Diamonds and cubic boron nitride (CBN) have been widely used as superabrasives on saws, drills, and other tools which utilize the superabrasive to cut, form or polish other hard materials. In 1996, the total value of superabrasive tools consumed was over 5 billion dollars (U.S.). It has been estimated that more than half of the superabrasive tools were consumed in sawing applications such as cutting stones, concretes, asphalts, etc.
Diamond tools are particularly indispensable for applications where other tools lack the strength and durability to be practical substitutes. For example, in the stone industry where rocks are cut, or sawed, diamond saws are the type that are sufficiently hard and durable to do the cutting. If superabrasives were not used, many such industries would be economically infeasible. Likewise, in the precision grinding industry, superabrasive tools, due to their superior wear resistance, are uniquely capable of developing the tight tolerances required, while simultaneously withstanding wear sufficiently to be practical.
Despite the tremendous improvements which diamond and cubic boron nitride have provided for cutting, drilling and grinding tools, there are still several disadvantages which, if overcome, would greatly improve performance of the tools, and/or reduce their cost. For example, the abrasive diamond or cubic boron nitride particles are not distributed uniformly in the matrix that holds them in place. As a result, the abrasive particles are not positioned to maximize efficiency for cutting, drilling, etc.
The distance between diamond or CBN abrasive particles determines the work load each particle will perform. Improper spacing of the diamond or CBN abrasive particles typically leads to premature failure of the abrasive surface or structure. Thus, if the diamond/CBN abrasive particles are too close to one another, some of the particles are redundant and provide little or no assistance in cutting or grinding. In addition, excess particles add to the expense of production due the high cost of diamond and cubic boron nitride. Moreover, these non-performing diamond or CBN particles can block the passage of debris, thereby reducing the cutting efficiency. Thus, having abrasive particles disposed too close to one another adds to the cost, while decreasing the useful life of the tool.
On the other hand, if abrasive particles are separated too far, the work load (e.g., the impact force exerted by the work piece) for each particle becomes excessive. The sparsely distributed diamond or CBN abrasive particles may be crushed, or even dislodged from the matrix into which they are disposed. The damaged or missing abrasive particles are unable to fully assist in the work load. Thus, the work load is transferred to the surviving abrasive particles. The failure of each abrasive particle causes a chain reaction which soon renders the tool ineffective to cut, drill, grind, etc.
A typical superabrasive tool, such as a diamond saw blade, is manufactured by mixing diamond particles (e.g., 40/50 U.S. mesh saw grit) with a suitable matrix (bond) powder (e.g., cobalt powder of 1.5 micrometer in size). The mixture is then compressed in a mold to form the right shape (e.g., a saw segment). The “green” form is then consolidated by sintering at a temperature between 700-1200° C. to form a single body with a plurality of superabrasive particles disposed therein. Finally, the consolidated body is attached (e.g., by brazing) to a tool body; such as the round blade of a saw, to form the final product.
Different applications, however, require different combinations of diamond (or cubic boron nitride) and matrix powder. For example, for drilling and sawing applications, a large sized (20 to 60 U.S. mesh) diamond grit is mixed with a metal powder. The metal powder is typically selected from cobalt, nickel, iron, copper, bronze, alloys thereof, and/or mixtures thereof. For grinding applications, a small sized (60/400 U.S. mesh) diamond grit (or cubic boron nitride) is mixed with either metal (typically bronze), ceramic/glass (typically a mixture of oxides of sodium, potassium, silicon, and aluminum) or resin (typically phenolic, or polyemide).
Because diamond or cubic boron nitride is much larger than the matrix powder (300 times in the above example for making saw segments), and it is much lighter than the latter (about ⅓ in density for making saw segments), it is very difficult to mix the two to achieve uniformity. Moreover, even when the mixing is thorough, diamond particles can still segregate from metal powder in the subsequent treatments such as pouring the mixture into a mold, or when the mixture is subjected to vibration. The distribution problem is particularly troublesome for making diamond tools when diamond is mixed in the metal matrix. Thus, finding a method for increasing the performance of the diamond or CBN superabrasive material, and/or decreasing the amount of the abrasive which is needed, is highly desirable. Such has been accomplished by the invention set forth herein. The invention is particularly effective and useful for diamond saws, the largest value category of all superabrasive tools, although it is applicable to all abrasive tools.
Over the decades, there have been numerous attempts to solve the diamond or CBN distribution problems. Unfortunately, none of the attempted methods have proven effective and, as of today, the distribution of diamond or CBN particles in superabrasive tools is still random and irregular, except for some special cases such as for drillers or dressers, where large diamond particles are individually set by hand in the surface to provide a single layer.
One method used in an attempt to make the diamond distribution uniform is to wrap diamond particles with a thick coating of matrix powder. The concentration of diamond particles in each diamond tool is tailored for a particular application. The concentration determines the average distance between diamond particles. For example, the concentration of a typical saw segment is 25 (100 means 25% by volume) or 6.25% by volume. Such a concentration makes the average diamond to diamond distance 2.5 times the particle size. Thus, if one coats the diamond and mixes the coated particles together, the distribution of diamond would be controlled by the thickness of coating and may become relatively uniform. Additional metal powder may be added as an interstitial filler between these coated particles to increase the packing efficiency so the consolidation of the matrix powder in subsequent sintering would be easier. Although the above-described coating metal has certain merit, in practice, uniformity of coating is very difficult to achieve.
There is yet another limitation associated with the current methods of coating diamond grits. Many times a metal bond diamond tool requires different sizes of diamond grits and/or different diamond concentrations to be disposed at different parts of the same diamond tool. For example, saw segments tend to wear faster on the edge or front than the middle. Therefore, higher concentrations are preferred in these locations to prevent uneven wear and thus premature failure of the saw segment. These higher concentration (known as “sandwich” segments) are difficult to fabricate by mixing coated diamond with metal powder to achieve a controlled distribution of the diamond particles in the segment. Thus, despite the known advantages of having varied diamond grit sizes and concentration levels, such configurations are seldom used because of the lack of a practical method of making thereof.
In summary, current arts are incapable of efficiently controlling the uniformity of diamond or CBN distribution in cutting tools. Likewise, the current methods are inadequate to provide effective control of size variations and/or concentration variations on different parts of the same tool. Moreover, even when the distribution is made relatively uniform, current arts cannot tailor the pattern of the distribution to overcome or compensate for typical wear patterns for the abrasive material, when used for a particular purpose. By resolving these problems, the performance of a diamond and other superabrasive tools can be effectively optimized.
This invention provides significant improvements to overcome the deficiencies. discussed above by eliminating random distribution of superabrasive particles. This invention provides a superabrasive in which every diamond or CBN particle is positively planted at desired positions to achieve the maximum utility of the superabrasive particles. Hence, the performance of the superabrasive tool can be optimized.
By making the distribution of diamond or CBN particles, uniform or in a predetermined pattern and tailored to the particular applications of the tool, the work load can be evenly distributed to each particle. As a result, the superabrasive tool will cut faster and its working life will be extended for a considerable amount of time. Moreover, by eliminating the redundancy, less superabrasive may be needed, thereby reducing the cost of the tool manufacture. Additionally, if the distribution can be controlled, superabrasive tools utilizing diamond or cubic boron nitride can be configured to provide the most efficient tool possible.
The present invention resolves these problems and provides the advantages set forth above by providing a method for forming such metal bond diamond or CBN tools wherein the superabrasive grit distribution can be controlled to provide either uniform grit placement, or to provide a grit placement pattern which is tailored to the particular wear characteristics of the tool. Because the distribution of the diamond/CBN grits is controlled, the diamond/CBN grits can be disposed in patterns which provide for relatively even wear of the abrasive surface, rather than having portions of the surface wear prematurely. As each superabrasive grit is more fully utilized, there is no need for redundant superabrasive grits as a backup. Therefore, the cost of making the metal bond diamond or CBN tools can be reduced by reducing the overall amount of superabrasives.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a method for forming metal bond superabrasive tools, wherein the distribution of the superabrasive grit is monitored to provide improved cutting, sawing, or grinding, characteristics without requiring an increase in the amount of superabrasive grit used to form the tool.
It is another object of the invention to provide such a method wherein the distribution of the superabrasive grit is controlled to promote more even wear of the tool surface, and thereby lengthen the useful life of the tool.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide tools with the minimal amount of superabrasive required to perform the task for which the tool is designed, thereby reducing the cost of making the tool.
The above and other objects of the invention are achieved by providing metal bond superabrasive tools wherein the superabrasives, such as diamond or CBN grits, are distributed in a metal matrix in a uniform or a predetermined pattern. While the process of distributing diamond or cubic boron nitride grits in a metal matrix has always been viewed as a complex one and needs to be improved, the present invention provides such an improved process that is easy to manipulate and control, and which can be repeated with a high degree of accuracy. More specifically, the desire distribution of superabrasive particles in a metal matrix body is achieved by assembling layers of metal matrix material that contain a controlled, predetermined pattern of superabrasive particles. Each layer is formed by distributing the superabrasive grit into a layer of bonding metal matrix in a predetermined pattern. Each layer, which is assembled to form a superabrasive impregnated segment, can be of the same distribution pattern and concentration, or the distribution pattern and/or concentration may vary from layer to layer.
In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, each layer is assembled by disposing a layer of metal matrix so that it may be used as a precursor. The superabrasive grit is then disposed in the metal matrix layer in a desired pattern. After the diamond particles are planted into the metal matrix layer in a predetermined pattern, the process is repeated until a desired number of layers have been formed. These layers are then assembled to form the desired three-dimensional body. Subsequently the diamond tool is consolidated (e.g., by sintering or infiltration as described above) to form the final product.
By assembling layers of metal matrix impregnated with superabrasives in a predetermined pattern and concentration into a three dimensional body, the present invention not only provides the desirable diamond/CBN distribution pattern in the tool body, but also provides the flexibility for possible manipulation of diamond concentration at different parts of the same tool body. Thus, for example, diamond particles can be disposed in denser concentrations in some layers than others, and the layers with the greater diamond/CBN concentrations can be disposed within the three-dimensional structure created in such a manner as to prevent the uneven wear patterns that are typical in many prior art diamond tools.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention each metal matrix layer impregnated with superabrasives is created by first forming a thin layer of metal bonding matrix. A template is then disposed on the metal bonding matrix. The template has a plurality of apertures formed therein which are sized to receive a superabrasive grit of a particular size, with one particle being disposed in each aperture. As the superabrasive grit fills the apertures, the grits may be subjected to pressure or otherwise moved into the metal bonding matrix. Because of the template, the superabrasive which enters the metal bonding matrix is disposed in a predetermined pattern. A plurality of such metal matrix layers impregnated with superabrasives can then be bonded together and attached to the tool by brazing, or some other process, to provide a three-dimensional superabrasive cutting or sawing member on the tool.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, the pattern in which the superabrasive grit is disposed may be uniform, or may be calculated to provide superabrasive members with particular cutting or sawing abilities. For example, the superabrasive particles may be disposed in varied concentrations to compensate for uneven wear patterns. Thus, the diamond or CBN distribution for the cutting edge of a saw may have a greater distribution of diamond or CBN particles in the lead edge and sides than in the middle portion which is generally subjected to less wear. Likewise, the sizes of the superabrasive particles can be controlled to provide a cutting, grinding, etc., surface which is tailored to the particular uses and wear patterns for the tool.
Yet another aspect of the present invention is to mix diamond/CBN grits with a metal powder in a conventional manner. However, instead of pressing the mixture to form a body, the metal powder is glued with a binder and rolled to form a sheet or layer. In this case, although diamond/CBN grits distribution does not form a predetermined pattern, the grit distribution is much more uniform than mixing metal powder with diamond grits to form thick body by a conventional mixing process. The layers thus formed can then be stacked up to form the final body. In this case, powders are already locked in layers so they cannot segregate.
The above and other objects, features and advantages of the invention will become apparent from a consideration of the following detailed description presented in connection with the accompanying drawings in which:
Before the present invention comprising metal bond diamond tools that contain uniform distribution of diamond grits and the method for the manufacture thereof is disclosed and described, it is to be understood that this invention is not limited to the particular process steps and materials. In disclosing and claiming the present invention, the following terminology will be used in accordance with the definitions set out below.
As used herein, the terms set herein as such process steps and materials may vary somewhat. It is also to be understood that the terminology employed herein is used for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting since the scope of the present invention will be limited only by the appended claims and equivalents thereof.
It must be noted that, as used in this specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to a metal bond diamond containing “a diamond grit” includes a mixture of two or more diamond grits, reference to “a superabrasive” includes reference to one or more of such superabrasives, and reference to “a metal” includes reference to a mixture of two or more of such metals.
“Diamond grit” and “superabrasive grit” are used interchangeably in this application, and include diamond, CBN, or other superabrasive grits.
“Grit” and “particle” are used interchangeably in this application, referring to particles which is significant larger than a powder, usually with a size of at least 400 U.S. mesh (40 micrometer).
“Metal bond diamond tools” refers to superabrasive tools wherein the superabrasives are diamond or other superabrasives such as CBN grits of a size larger than 400 U.S. mesh, and the grits are bonded by a metal material. Metal bond diamond tools usually include diamond saws, diamond drill bits, diamond dressers, and diamond grinding wheels. Metal bond diamond saws with uniform or patterned distributed diamond grits of the present invention include wire saws with diamond beads, circular saws with diamond segments, chain saws with diamond segments, and frame (reciprocating) saws with diamond segments. Except for the diamond grinding wheels, polishing, and lapping tools that contain diamond grits smaller than 60 mesh, all other metal bond diamond tools contain diamond grits larger than 60 mesh.
References will now be made to the drawings in which the various elements of the present invention will be given numeral designations and in which the invention will be discussed so as to enable one skilled in the art to make and use the invention. It is also understood that the following description is only exemplary of the principles of the present invention, and should not be viewed as narrowing the pending claims.
Referring to
As will be discussed in additional detail below, forming the segment 10 in a plurality of thin layers provides remarkably improved control over the distribution of the superabrasive grits. By controlling the distribution of the superabrasive grits within each layer and then combining the layers, a three-dimensional segment can be formed in which the distribution of the superabrasive grits is controlled in each dimension. This, in return, enables the formation of segments which are particularly adapted to the intended use of the segment, such as cutting, sawing, grinding, etc. By tailoring the distribution and concentration of the superabrasive grits within the segment 10, more precise control is given over performance of the tool under actual working conditions.
For example, when using a diamond saw blade to cut rocks (e.g., granite), the two sides of the diamond saw segments are cutting more materials than the center. As the result of uneven wear, the cross section of the saw segment becomes convex in shape with the center bulging above both sides. This configuration typically slows the cutting rate of the saw blade. Moreover, the protruding profile may also cause the saw blade to deflect sideways in the cut slot. In order to maintain a straight cutting path, it is sometimes desirable to make a “sandwich diamond segment” to reinforce both sides of the segment with layers impregnated with more diamond or superabrasive grits. Such a “sandwich segment” is difficult to manufacture by mixing diamond grit with metal powder by conventional means, but it can be easily accomplished by methods of the present invention: first planting diamond grits with desirable patterns and concentrations in a metal matrix layer and then assembling these metal matrix layers with diamond grits impregnated in the predetermined patterns and concentrations together to form a sandwiched segment.
In accordance with the present invention, a cutting segment can be formed to resist premature wear to the sides of the segment, thereby extending the cutting segment's useful life. Referring specifically to
Another advantage to the use of multiple layers of metal matrix impregnated with diamond or cubic boron nitride particles is that the layers are easily formed into other desirable shapes. For example,
Each of the layers shown in the drawings is impregnated with a plurality of superabrasive particles 20, typically diamond or cubic boron nitride. Because each layer is a relatively thin layer of metal matrix, (i.e., the metal matrix is usually no more than two times the thickness of the diameter of the particles), superior control over placement of the superabrasive particles in the metal matrix layer can be easily achieved. As discussed above, the random placement of superabrasives in tools in the current art often lead to ineffective use of superabrasive particles. By controlling distribution of superabrasives the present invention enables either even distribution which prevents under or over spacing, or controlled distribution so that different portions of the segment have different sizes and concentrations which are matched to prevent traditional wear patterns.
Referring now to
Many cutting tools are configured such that the cutting segment is provided with a lead edge which performs a majority of the cutting and which receives most of the impact force when contacting the workpiece to be cut. For example, a circular saw blade will usually have a plurality of teeth (saw segments), each tooth having a leading edge which takes the force of the cutting. Because the leading edge performs a significant portion of the cutting, it is much more susceptible to wear than are the rotationally trailing portions of the tooth. When formed in accordance with the prior art, the teeth, however, often had similar concentrations of abrasive particles disposed therein. Over time the leading edge wears significantly, but the trailing layers remain with minimal wear. Eventually, the abrasive of the saw tooth is worn off the leading edge, while significant amounts remain on the tail end. Thus, a considerable amount of superabrasive is wasted when the blade is discarded.
The embodiment of
With routine experimentation and the teachings of the method of the present invention, those skilled in the art will be able to customize cutting, drilling, grinding, polishing and other types of abrasive segments which are specifically formed to maximize their performance (i.e, cutting, drilling, grinding, etc.) over an extended useful life, while simultaneously decreasing the amount of expensive superabrasive which is used to form the tool.
Referring now to
There are many ways that a metal matrix powder can be made into the sheets 100. For example, the powder can first be mixed with a suitable binder (typically organic) and a solvent that can dissolve the binder. This mixture is then blended to form a slurry having a desired viscosity. In order to prevent the powder from agglomerating during the processing, a suitable wetting agent (e.g., menhaden oil, phosphate ester) may also be added. The slurry can then be poured onto a plastic tape and pulled underneath a blade or leveling device. By adjusting the gap between the blade and the tape, the slurry can be cast into a sheet with the right thickness. The tape casting method is a well known method for making thin sheets out of powdered materials and it works well with the method of the present invention.
Alternatively, the metal powder can be mixed with a suitable binder and its solvent to form a deformable cake. The cake can then be extruded through a die with slit opening. The gap in the opening determines the thickness of the extruded plate. Alternatively, the material can also be drawn between two rollers with adjustable gap to form sheets with the right thickness.
It is desirable to make the sheets pliable for subsequent treatments (e.g., bending over a tool substrate which has a curvature). Therefore, a suitable organic plasticier may also be added to provide the desired characteristics.
The use of organic agents for powder (metal, plastics, or ceramics) processing is documented in many text books and it is well known by those skilled in the art. Typical binders include polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), polyvinyl butyral (PVB), polyethylene glycol (PEG), paraffin, phenolic resin, wax emulsions, and acrylic resins. Typical binder solvents include methanol, ethanol, acetone, trichlorethylene, toluene, etc. Typical plasticizers are polyethylene glycol, diethel oxalate, triethylene glycol, dihydroabietate, glycerine, octyl phthalate. The organic agents so introduced are used to facilitate the fabrication of metal layers. They must be removed before the consolidation of metal powders. The binder removal process (e.g., by heating in a furnace with atmospheric control) is also well known to those skilled in the art.
Once the sheet 100 of matrix material 104 is formed, a template 110 is laid on the top of the sheet. The template 110 contains apertures 114 that are larger than one abrasive particle 20, but smaller than two abrasive particles, thereby allowing a single particle so of the abrasive to be disposed at each specific location.
In this example, the thickness of the template is preferably between ⅓ to ⅔ of the diameter of the average abrasive particle 20. However, other thicknesses may be used if appropriate accommodations are made for seating the abrasive particles in the desire locations.
After the template 110 is properly positioned, a layer of abrasive particles 20 is then spread over the template so that each aperture 114 receives an abrasive particle. Those particles not falling into the apertures 114 in the template 110 are removed by tilting the substrate, sweeping the template with a brush, or some other similar method.
As shown in
After removing the template 110, the flat surface 120 is used again to press the abrasive particles 120 firmly into the sheet 100 of matrix material 104 as shown in
If desired, the process shown in
The abrasive impregnated sheets 100 are then cut to any desired size and shape. The sheets 100 are then assembled to form the tool segment or the entire tool body where appropriate. Typically, the assembly of the sheets 100 is accomplished by a known method such as cold compaction with a press. The “green” body so formed can then be consolidated to form a final tool product by conventional methods of sintering or infiltration as described by the following examples.
While the method described in
In the alternative,
The present invention is intended for making metal bond superabrasive tools containing superabrasives distributed in a predetermined three dimensional pattern, which provides a significant improvement over the prior art where the abrasives are typically random and non-uniformly distributed. The methods illustrated in
The performance may be further improved by having a braze layer of uniform thickness. This uniformity can allow a better diamond or CBN retention and easier debris removal. Moreover, by fully utilizing each diamond particle for cutting, the concentration of diamond can be reduced. As discussed, diamond cost often accounts for about half of the total manufacturing cost of a diamond tool. Hence, by practicing this invention, manufacturing cost can be reduced substantially.
Also shown in
In addition to being able to improve the performance of the tool and to reduce the cost of manufacturing, this invention also provides an easier method for making thin bladed tools. For example, the electronic industry requires using larger and larger silicon wafers (now 12 inches in diameter). Hence, thinner saw blades for slicing silicon crystals, and thinner dicing wheels for grooving silicon chips with tighter partitions have been in great demand.
Prior to the present invention, it has been extremely difficult to make very thin tools that contain evenly distributed diamond particles. The present invention provides an alternative method for making such tools. For example, it has been discovered that by mixing micron powders of diamond, a blend of metal powders (e.g., bronze and cobalt) and a suitable binder, the material can be rolled to a thickness thinner than 0.1 mm—a thickness which is thinner than most dicing wheels. By firing this thin sheet and mounting it on a tool holder, a thin dicing wheel can be made.
In the alternative to the above, it has been found in accordance with the present invention that some of the advantages of the controlled distribution, multilayered superabrasive configurations described above can be achieved without the use of a template. More specifically, the superabrasive particles can also be mixed in with the matrix powder and made as an ingredient of the layered sheet. In this case, the distribution of abrasive particles are still somewhat random. Even so, their distribution is typically more uniform than that in a conventional abrasive body. The segregation of superabrasive particles and matrix powders discussed in the background section is less extensive in a substantially two-dimensional sheet than in a three-dimensional body. This is particularly true for sheets made by a deforming process (e.g., by rolling). In this case, superabrasive particles are further spread out in the matrix by the shearing action of the rollers.
This invention may also be applicable to other applications not related to making abrasive tools. For example, graphite or metal sheets planted with diamond particles may be used as seeds for diamond growth under high pressure and temperature. Industrial diamonds are typically produced by compressing alternative layers of graphite and metal catalyst (e.g., Fe, Co, or Ni alloy) to high pressure and heating above the melting point of the catalyst. Diamond will then nucleate randomly on the interface of these layers. The quality of the diamond crystal formed often suffers by the impingement of growing crystals that are distributed unevenly. Hence, the yield and cost of diamond synthesis can be substantially improved by making the nuclei uniformly distributed. This invention can provide layers of either graphite or metal catalyst with a pre-determined pattern of diamond seeds. If organic binders are introduced during the fabrication of these layers, they can be removed by heating in a furnace before loading into the press.
The following are examples that illustrate preferred embodiments of the invention but are intended as being representatively only.
40/50 mesh diamond grit (SDA-85+ made by De Beers Company) were mixed with metal powder to form a mixture with a diamond concentration of 20 (5% of total volume). Five different proportions of cobalt (about 1.5 micrometer in size) and bronze (about 20 micrometers in size) were used for the matrix powder. An acrylic binder was added (8% by weight) to the mixture and the charge was blended to form a cake. The cake was then rolled between two stainless steel rollers to form sheets with a thickness of 1 mm. These sheets were cut in the shape of saw segments with a length of 40 mm and width of 15 mm. Three each of such segments were assembled and placed into a typical graphite mold for making conventional diamond saw segments. The assembled segments were pressed and heated by passing electric current through the graphite mold. After sintering for three minutes, the segments were consolidated to a height of 9 mm with less then 1% porosity. Twenty-four segments for each composition were fabricated. They were brazed onto a circular saw of 14 inches in diameter. These blades were used for cutting granites and found to perform equal or better than those with higher diamond concentrations (e.g. 23) made by conventional methods. Microscopic examination of the worn segment indicated that, although diamond particles were not planted into the layered matrix, they were distributed more evenly than segments prepared by the traditional method. The segregation of particles in a layered matrix was considerably less than that in the thick body of conventional segments.
The same procedures were followed as Example 1, but with 8 thinner layers (0.4 mm) being used to form each segment. The diamond concentration was reduced to 15 and particles were planted according to the illustration as shown in
Iron powders of about 100 mesh were mixed with an S-binder made by Wall Colmonoy Company to form a cake. The cake was then rolled to form sheets of 0.4 mm in thickness. 40/50 mesh SDA-100 diamond grit was planted into these sheets to attain a concentration of 15. These diamond containing sheets were cut in the shape of saw segments with a length of 40 mm and width of 9 mm. Eight of such segments were assembled as a group and placed in a graphite mold. Twenty-four groups were placed horizontally, and another twenty-four groups were placed vertically in the graphite mold. Nicrobraz LM powder (−140 mesh) (made by Wall Colmonoy Company) was added on the top of these segments. These samples were heated in a vacuum furnace (10−5 torr) to 1050° C. for 20 minutes for horizontally placed segments, and 30 minutes for vertically placed segments. The melted LM alloy (Ni—C—B—Si with a liquidus point at 1000° C.) infiltrated into these segments and filled the porosity. The excess LM braze on these segments were ground by electrode discharge (EDG). Each of the 24 segments so fabricated were brazed onto a 14 inch (diameter) circular saw blade. These blades were used to cut granite and showed marked improvement over conventional saw blades.
Nicrobraz LM powder was mixed with an acrylic binder and rolled to form layers of about 0.25 mm. 40/50 mesh MBS-960 diamond grit manufactured by General Electric Company was planted into these metal layers according to the method as illustrated in
The same method as described by Example 4, but applied to other products, e.g., circular saws, thin-wall core bits, and curvature grounder. Each of these products shows superior performance over conventional electro-plated diamond tools having similar superabrasive concentrations.
Mixture of metal powders that contain 87 wt % of −140 mesh Nichrobraz LM (made by Wall Comonoy, U.S.), 8 wt % of iron of −125 mesh, and 5 wt % of copper of −60 mesh were mixed with 3 wt % of an acrylic binder to form a dough. The dough is rolled between two rollers to form sheets of 0.6 mm thick. Each sheet is cut to shape and covered with a template. 30/40 mesh (0.420 to 0.595 mm) diamond grits of SDA-100+ grade (made by De Beers, South Africa) were planted into the metal layers in a predetermined pattern with a diamond-to-diamond distance of about 2 mm. Three layers were stacked together and wrapped around a steel sleeve to form a diamond bead of 10 mm in diameter and 10 mm in length. These beads were heated in a vacuum furnace to consolidate the metal that also braze the diamond in place and onto the steel sleeve. 1,000 of such diamond beads were fitted over 5 mm steel cable that contained 7×19 wires and are spaced by plastic coating formed by injection molding. The wire was 25 meters long and was joined end-to-end to form a loop. This wire saw was used to cut granite blocks (3.5 meter long by 1.8 meter high) of all grades. The life achieved was 0.5 square meter cut surface per diamond bead consumed (0.5 carat). This area cut is twice of that cut by conventional diamond beads made by a powder metallurgical method.
This is the same as Example 6, except many diamond impregnated layers were assembled to form a block 20 mm long by 5 mm thick by 7 mm high. These blocks were consolidated in a vacuum furnace to form diamond segments. Each segment contained about 8 volume percent diamond. 30 of such segments were brazed onto a 4 meter long steel frame and the fame was mounted on a reciprocating sawing machine. The saw was used to cut marble blocks and had a life more than twice as long as than conventional diamond segments produced by powder metallurgical methods.
This the same as Example 7, except the diamond planted layers were assembled to form segments of about 24 mm long by 3.5 mm thick for core bits 150 mm in diameter. The diamond content in these segments was about 4 volume percent. Ten of such core bits were used to drill concrete. The drilling speed and the life of these core bits were much higher than conventional diamond segment bits made by powder metallurgical methods.
This is the same as Example 8, except the shape of segments is for circular saws. These segments were brazed to make circular saws of 230 mm (with 18 segments of 40 mm by 8.5 mm by 2.4 mm), 300 mm (with 21 segments of 50 mm by 8.5 mm by 2.8 mm), and 350 mm (with 24 segments of 50 mm by 8.5 mm by 3.2 mm) in diameter. These saws were used to cut granite, asphalt, and concrete with superior performance.
This is the same as Example 7, except the segments are used as dressers for conditioning grinding wheels.
A single layer of 14/16 mesh (1.4 mm to 1.2 mm in size) diamond grits (natural diamond EMB-S made by De Beers) planted sheet is covered over a pellet of 20 mm diameter by 8 mm thickness. Many of these pellets were brazed in a vacuum furnace. More than 3000 of such pellets were mounted on floor grinding machines to grind stone and wood floors. The results indicate that the grinding speed could be three times faster than conventional diamond grinders.
A single layer that contained planted diamond grits of 40/50 mesh (0.420-0.297 mm size) ISD 1700 grade (made by Iljin Diamond of Korea) was laid over the curved surface of a profile wheel and brazed to form a rigid tool in a vacuum furnace. More than 100 of such profile wheels of various diameters were used to form the edges of granite and marble slabs. These profile wheels were capable to cut more than 3 times faster than conventional diamond tools made by either electroplating or sintering method.
This is the same as Example 12, except that the diamond planted layer is wrapped around a steel sleeve to form single layered diamond beads. More than 100,000 of such beads were manufactured. They were used to cut granite or marble with superior performance.
This is the same as Example 11, except the diamond grits were 80/100 mesh, and the diamond planted layer was used to cover the surface of a flat disk 4 inches in diameter. Four such disks were produced and used as conditioner to dress the CMP (chemical and mechanical polishing) pad that polished silicon wafers. The result indicated that the CMP efficiency was much improved and the conditioner outlasted conventional conditioners made by either electroplating or brazing.
The above description and examples are intended only to illustrate certain potential uses of this invention. It will be readily understood by those persons skilled in the art that the present invention is suitable for a broad utility and applications. Many embodiments and adaptations of the present invention other than those herein described, as well as many variations, modifications and equivalent arrangements will be apparent from or reasonably suggested by the present invention and the forgoing description thereof without departing from the substance for scope of the invention. Accordingly, while the present invention has been described herein in detail in relation to its preferred embodiment, it is to be understood that this disclosure is only illustrative and exemplary of the present invention and is made merely for the purpose of providing a full and enabling disclosure of the invention. The forgoing disclosure is not intended to be construed to limit the present invention or otherwise to exclude any such other embodiments, adaptations, variations, modifications and equivalent arrangements, the present invention being limited only by the claims appended hereto and the equivalents thereof.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/463,897, filed on May 11, 2009, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,104,464, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/818,894, filed on Jun. 14, 2007, now abandoned, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/791,300, filed Mar. 1, 2004, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,323,049, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/259,168, filed Sep. 27, 2002, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,124,753, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/935,204, filed Aug. 22, 2001, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,679,243, and of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/109,531, filed Mar. 27, 2002, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,884,155. U.S. Pat. No. 6,679,243 is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/835,117, filed on Apr. 4, 1997, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,039,641 and a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/399,573, filed Sep. 20, 1999, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,286,498, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/832,852, filed Apr. 4, 1997, now abandoned. U.S. Pat. No. 6,884,155 is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/558,582, filed Apr. 26, 2000, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,368,198, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/447,620, filed Nov. 22, 1999, now abandoned, all of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
187593 | Brown et al. | Feb 1877 | A |
238946 | McKitrick | Mar 1881 | A |
296756 | Kirkpatrick | Apr 1884 | A |
1854071 | Schacht | Apr 1932 | A |
1988065 | Wooddell | Jan 1935 | A |
2027087 | Buckner | Jan 1936 | A |
2027307 | Schacht | Jan 1936 | A |
2033991 | Melton | Mar 1936 | A |
2035521 | Benner | Mar 1936 | A |
2075354 | Monier | Mar 1937 | A |
RE20660 | Schacht | Feb 1938 | E |
2184348 | Kirchner | Dec 1939 | A |
2187624 | Melton | Jan 1940 | A |
2194253 | Benner | Mar 1940 | A |
2268663 | Kuzmick | Jan 1942 | A |
2281558 | Cross | May 1942 | A |
2307461 | Ogden | Jan 1943 | A |
2318570 | Carlton | May 1943 | A |
2334572 | Melton | Nov 1943 | A |
2612348 | Catallo | Sep 1952 | A |
2725693 | Smith | Dec 1955 | A |
2811960 | Fessel | Nov 1957 | A |
2867086 | Haley | Jan 1959 | A |
2876086 | Raymond | Mar 1959 | A |
2947608 | Hall | Aug 1960 | A |
2652951 | Simpson | Sep 1960 | A |
2952951 | Simpson | Sep 1960 | A |
3067551 | Maginnis | Dec 1962 | A |
3121981 | Hurst | Feb 1964 | A |
3127715 | Christensen | Apr 1964 | A |
3146560 | Hurst | Sep 1964 | A |
3276852 | Lemelson | Oct 1966 | A |
3293012 | Smiley | Dec 1966 | A |
3372010 | Parsons | Mar 1968 | A |
3377411 | Charvat | Apr 1968 | A |
3416560 | Bruno | Dec 1968 | A |
3440774 | Curn | Apr 1969 | A |
3593382 | Miller | Jul 1971 | A |
3608134 | Cook | Sep 1971 | A |
3625666 | James | Dec 1971 | A |
3630699 | Caitlin | Dec 1971 | A |
3631638 | Yoshikawa et al. | Jan 1972 | A |
3664662 | Linz | May 1972 | A |
3706650 | Eisner | Dec 1972 | A |
2078354 | Webster | Apr 1973 | A |
3743489 | Wentorf et al. | Jul 1973 | A |
3767371 | Wentorf et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
3802130 | Lindenbeck | Apr 1974 | A |
3819814 | Pope | Jun 1974 | A |
3852078 | Wakatsuki et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
3894673 | Lowder et al. | Jul 1975 | A |
3905571 | Lombardo | Sep 1975 | A |
3982358 | Fukuda | Sep 1976 | A |
4018576 | Lowder et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4028576 | Wofsey | Jun 1977 | A |
4078906 | Green | Mar 1978 | A |
4149881 | D'Silva | Apr 1979 | A |
4151154 | Berger | Apr 1979 | A |
4155721 | Fletcher | May 1979 | A |
4182628 | D'Silva | Jan 1980 | A |
4188194 | Gorrigan | Feb 1980 | A |
4201601 | D'Silva | May 1980 | A |
4211294 | Multakh | Jul 1980 | A |
4211924 | Muller et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4224380 | Bovenkerek et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4228214 | Steigleman et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4229186 | Wilson | Oct 1980 | A |
4273561 | Villalobos | Jun 1981 | A |
4287168 | Wentorf et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
4289503 | Corrigan | Sep 1981 | A |
4341532 | Oide | Jul 1982 | A |
4355489 | Heyer et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4405411 | Inoue et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4481016 | Campbell et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4525179 | Gigl | Jun 1985 | A |
4547257 | Iizuka et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4551195 | Iizuka et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4565034 | Sekiya | Jan 1986 | A |
4610699 | Yazu et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4617181 | Yazu et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4629373 | Hall | Dec 1986 | A |
4632817 | Yazu et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4662896 | Dennis | May 1987 | A |
4669522 | Griffin | Jun 1987 | A |
4680199 | Vontell et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4712552 | Pangburn | Dec 1987 | A |
4737162 | Grazen | Apr 1988 | A |
4749514 | Murakami et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4770907 | Kimura | Sep 1988 | A |
4776861 | Frushour | Oct 1988 | A |
4780274 | Barr | Oct 1988 | A |
4797241 | Peterson et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4828582 | Frushour | May 1989 | A |
4849602 | Gardner | Jul 1989 | A |
4863573 | Moore et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4866888 | Murai et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4883500 | Deakins et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4908046 | Wiand | Mar 1990 | A |
4916869 | Oliver | Apr 1990 | A |
4923490 | Johnson et al. | May 1990 | A |
4925457 | deKok et al. | May 1990 | A |
4927619 | Tsuji | May 1990 | A |
4943488 | Sung et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4945686 | Wiand | Aug 1990 | A |
4949511 | Endo et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4954139 | Cerutti | Sep 1990 | A |
4968326 | Wiand | Nov 1990 | A |
5000273 | Horton et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5011513 | Zador et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5022895 | Wiand | Jun 1991 | A |
5024680 | Chen et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5030276 | Sung et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5037451 | Burnand et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5043120 | Corrigan | Aug 1991 | A |
5049165 | Tselesin | Sep 1991 | A |
5092082 | Padberg | Mar 1992 | A |
5092910 | deKok et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5116568 | Sung | May 1992 | A |
5131924 | Wiand | Jul 1992 | A |
5133782 | Wiand | Jul 1992 | A |
5137543 | Heath et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5151107 | Cho et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5164247 | Solanki et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5176155 | Rudolph, Jr. | Jan 1993 | A |
5190568 | Tselesin | Mar 1993 | A |
5194070 | Sumiya et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5194071 | Corrigan et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5195403 | Sani et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5195404 | Notter et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5197249 | Wiand | Mar 1993 | A |
5203881 | Wiand | Apr 1993 | A |
5232320 | Tank et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5243790 | Gagne | Sep 1993 | A |
5246884 | Jaso | Sep 1993 | A |
5247765 | Quintana | Sep 1993 | A |
5248317 | Tank | Sep 1993 | A |
5264011 | Brown et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5266236 | Bovenkerk | Nov 1993 | A |
5271547 | Carlson | Dec 1993 | A |
5273730 | Yoshida et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5295402 | Bovenkerk | Mar 1994 | A |
5314513 | Miller | May 1994 | A |
5328548 | Tsuji et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5364423 | Bigelow et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5374293 | Takashita et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5380390 | Tselesin | Jan 1995 | A |
5443032 | Vichr et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5453106 | Roberts | Sep 1995 | A |
5454343 | Eun et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5458754 | Sathrum et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5486131 | Cesna et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5492771 | Lowder et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5492774 | Tateno et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5496386 | Broberg et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5500248 | Iacovangelo et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5505272 | Clark | Apr 1996 | A |
5518443 | Fisher | May 1996 | A |
5527424 | Mullins | Jun 1996 | A |
5536202 | Appel et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5547417 | Breivogel et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5551959 | Martin et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5560745 | Roberts | Oct 1996 | A |
5560754 | Johnson et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5609286 | Anthon | Mar 1997 | A |
5620489 | Tselesin | Apr 1997 | A |
5660894 | Chen et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5669943 | Horton et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5674572 | Sarin et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5725421 | Goers et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5746931 | Graebner | May 1998 | A |
RE35812 | Oliver | Jun 1998 | E |
5772756 | Davies et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5776214 | Wood | Jul 1998 | A |
5779743 | Wood | Jul 1998 | A |
5791975 | Cesna et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5801073 | Robbins et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5816891 | Woo | Oct 1998 | A |
5820450 | Calhoun | Oct 1998 | A |
5833519 | Moore | Nov 1998 | A |
5840090 | Ho et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5851138 | Hempel, Jr. | Dec 1998 | A |
5855314 | Shiue et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5868806 | Nishio et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5885137 | Ploessl | Mar 1999 | A |
5902173 | Tanaka | May 1999 | A |
5916011 | Kim | Jun 1999 | A |
5919084 | Powell et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5921856 | Zimmer | Jul 1999 | A |
5924917 | Benedict et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5961373 | Lai | Oct 1999 | A |
5975988 | Christianson | Nov 1999 | A |
5976001 | Powell et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5976205 | Andrews et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5980852 | Gurns et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5980982 | Degawa et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5985228 | Corrigan et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6001008 | Fujimori et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6001174 | Fang | Dec 1999 | A |
6024824 | Krech | Feb 2000 | A |
6027659 | Billet | Feb 2000 | A |
6030595 | Sumiya et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6039641 | Sung | Mar 2000 | A |
6054183 | Zimmer et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6093280 | Kirchner et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6106382 | Sakaguchi | Aug 2000 | A |
6123612 | Goers | Sep 2000 | A |
6125612 | Main | Oct 2000 | A |
6159087 | Briang et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6159286 | Sung | Dec 2000 | A |
6179886 | Gordeev et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6190240 | Kinoshita et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6193770 | Sung | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6196911 | Preston et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6200360 | Imai et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206942 | Wood et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6213856 | Cho et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6217413 | Christianson | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6224469 | Ohmori et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6258138 | DeVoe et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6258201 | Krech | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6258237 | Gal-Or et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6281129 | Easter et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6284556 | Wang et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6286498 | Sung | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6293854 | Kimura et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6299508 | Gagliardi et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6299521 | Morimura et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6312324 | Mitsui et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6319108 | Adefris et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6325709 | Nanda et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6346202 | Molnar | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6354918 | Togawa et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6354929 | Adefris et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6368198 | Sung et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6371838 | Holzapfel | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6371842 | Romero | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6372001 | Omar et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6394886 | Chen et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6409580 | Lougher et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6416878 | An | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6439986 | Myoung et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6446740 | Eyre | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6458018 | Goers et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6478831 | Tselesin | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6497853 | Davies et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6544599 | Brown et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6551176 | Garretson | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6605798 | Cullen | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6607423 | Areayan et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6616725 | Cho et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6616752 | Basura et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6626167 | Kim et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6627168 | Ohtsubo et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6629884 | Goers | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6646725 | Eichinger et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6672943 | Vogtmann | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6679243 | Sung | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6692547 | Kim | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6694847 | Hiroyasu et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6722952 | Goers et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6749485 | James et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6755720 | Ishizaki et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6769969 | Duescher | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6790126 | Wood et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6818029 | Myoung et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6824455 | Osterheld et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6835365 | Davies et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6837979 | Uzho et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6884155 | Sung et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6899592 | Kojima | May 2005 | B1 |
6905571 | Sakuma et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6935365 | Schuster et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6945857 | Doan et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6979357 | Fries et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7021995 | Toge et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7033408 | Fries et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7044990 | Ishizaki et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7066795 | Balagani et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7067903 | Tachibana et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7124753 | Sung | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7150677 | Yamashita et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7198553 | Goers | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7201645 | Sung | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7247577 | Palmgren et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7258708 | Sung | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7261621 | Moon et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7323049 | Sung | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7368013 | Sung | May 2008 | B2 |
7384436 | Sung | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7404857 | Sung | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7465217 | Kinoshita et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7494404 | Sung | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7507267 | Hall et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7585366 | Sung | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7641538 | Goers | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7651368 | Kendall et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7651386 | Sung | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7658666 | Sung | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7690971 | Sung | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7762872 | Sung | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7791188 | Sung | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7840305 | Behr et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7954483 | Kim et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8104464 | Sung | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8377158 | Palmgren et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8393934 | Sung | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8545583 | Duescher | Oct 2013 | B2 |
20010003884 | Wei et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010009844 | Cho et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010046835 | Wielonski et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020014041 | Baldonai et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020042200 | Fawcett | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020127962 | Cho et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020139680 | George | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020164928 | Tolles | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020173234 | Sung et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020182401 | Lawing | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030054746 | Nussbaumer | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030084894 | Sung | May 2003 | A1 |
20030092357 | Yoon et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030114094 | Myoung et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030207659 | Annen et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040009742 | Lin et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040023610 | Hu et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040060243 | Fries et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040079033 | Long | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040091627 | Ohara et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040107648 | Sung | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040180617 | Goers | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040203325 | Donohue | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040235406 | Duescher | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040238946 | Tachibana et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050032462 | Gagliardi et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050032469 | Duescher | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050060941 | Provow | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050095959 | Sung | May 2005 | A1 |
20050118939 | Duescher | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050215188 | Toge et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050227590 | Sung | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050260939 | Andrews et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060073774 | Sung | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060079160 | Balagani et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060079162 | Yamashita et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060128288 | An et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060135050 | Petersen et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060143991 | Sung | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060213128 | Sung | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060254154 | Haung et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060258276 | Sung | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070051354 | Sung | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070051355 | Sung | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070060026 | Sung | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070066194 | Wielonski et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070093181 | Lugg et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070128994 | Sung | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070155298 | Sung | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070232074 | Ravi et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070249270 | Sung | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070254566 | Sung | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070264918 | Sung | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070266639 | Sung | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070295267 | Sung | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080014845 | Yimaz et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080076338 | Andrews et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080096479 | Sung | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080153398 | Sung | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080171503 | Sung | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080271384 | Puthanangady et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080292869 | Sung | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080296756 | Koch et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090068937 | Sung | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090073774 | Horesh et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090093195 | Sung | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090094902 | Hou | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090123705 | Sung | May 2009 | A1 |
20090145045 | Sung | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090215363 | Sung | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090283089 | Sung | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100015898 | An et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100022174 | Chou et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100139174 | Sung | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100186479 | Borucki et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100203811 | Philipossian et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100221990 | Sung | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100248595 | Dinh-Ngoc | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100248596 | Sung | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100261419 | Sung | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110076925 | Sung | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110104989 | Boutaghou et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110192652 | Shen et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110212670 | Sung | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110252710 | Hall et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110275288 | Sung | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110293905 | Sung | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110296766 | Sung | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120192499 | Sung | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120241943 | Sung | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120244790 | Sung | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120260582 | Sung | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120302146 | Sung | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130225052 | Song et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1351922 | Jun 2002 | CN |
1494984 | May 2004 | CN |
0712941 | May 1966 | EP |
0238434 | Mar 1987 | EP |
0280657 | Aug 1988 | EP |
0331344 | Feb 1989 | EP |
0264674 | Sep 1995 | EP |
1075898 | Feb 2001 | EP |
2239011 | Jun 1991 | GB |
2366804 | Mar 2002 | GB |
06182184 | Apr 1994 | JP |
10128654 | May 1998 | JP |
10180618 | Jul 1998 | JP |
11048122 | Feb 1999 | JP |
11077536 | Mar 1999 | JP |
200167774 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2000343436 | Dec 2000 | JP |
2003071718 | Mar 2003 | JP |
20030717189 | Mar 2003 | JP |
2004025401 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2007-044823 | Feb 2007 | JP |
10-2002-0036138 | May 2002 | KR |
200339181 | Jan 2004 | KR |
10-2007-0063569 | Jun 2007 | KR |
WO9427883 | Dec 1994 | WO |
WO9527596 | Oct 1995 | WO |
WO 9531006 | Nov 1995 | WO |
WO9606732 | Mar 1996 | WO |
WO9810897 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO9845091 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO9851448 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO9845092 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO0231078 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO2004094106 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO2006039413 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO2006124792 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO2007032946 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO2008063599 | May 2008 | WO |
WO 2009043058 | Apr 2009 | WO |
WO 2009064677 | May 2009 | WO |
WO 2012040374 | Mar 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Colmonoy Technical Data Sheet; No. DSP-A; 1993. |
Endecott's Specifications; 2004. |
Kennametal Specification for DMHPM002 Hot Press Matrix N-50 Dec. 6, 2001. |
Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS), Wall Colmonoy Corporation; prepared Jul. 20, 1989. |
Material Safety Data Sheet MSDS); Kennametal; issued Jun. 11, 2004. |
Sung et al.; The Eastern Wind of Diamond Synthesis; New Diamond and Frontier Carpon Technology; 2003; pp. 47-61; vol. 13, No. 1. |
Sung et al; Mechanism of the Solvent-Assisted Graphite to Diamond Transition Under High Pressure: Implications for the Selection of Catalysts, High Temperatures-High Pressure; 1995/1996; pp. 523-546; vol. 27/28. |
Syndite, CTM302; Announcement, Elementsix Advancing Diamond; Jan. 14, 2003; http://www.e6.com/en/resourches/announcementsheets/CTM302.pdf; as accessed on Dec. 16, 2008. |
Syndite, Elementsix Advancing Diamond; 2 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 08/832,852; filed Apr. 4, 1997; Chien-Min Sung. |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/447,620; filed Nov. 22, 1999; Chien-Min Sung. |
Yasinaga et al; Advances in Abrasive Technology, III; Soc. of Grinding Engineers (SGE) in Japan; 2000. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/512,755, filed Aug. 29, 2006; Chien-Min Sung. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/239,189, filed Sep. 21, 2011; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Dec. 21, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/255,823, filed Oct. 22, 2008; Chien-Min Sung; notice of allowance dated Dec. 26, 2012. |
PCT/US2012/039199; filed May 23, 2012; Chien-Min Sung; International Search Report dated Dec. 18, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/362,917; filed Jan. 13, 2012; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Dec. 31, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/168,110; filed Jul. 5, 2008; Chien-Min Sung; notice of allowance dated Jan. 18, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/059,422; filed Mar. 31, 2008; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Jan. 24, 2013. |
PCT Application PCT/US2011/052627; filed Sep. 21, 2011; Chien-Min Sung; International Search Report mailed May 11, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/362,917, filed Jan. 31, 2012; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Jun. 14, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/168,110, filed Jul. 5, 2008; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated May 14, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/059,422, filed Mar. 30, 2008; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Aug. 22, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/255,823, filed Oct. 21, 2008; Chien-Min Sung; notice of allowance dated Sep. 21, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/168,110, filed Jul. 5, 2008; Chien-Min Sung; notice of allowance dated Sep. 28, 2012. |
Implications for the Selection of Catalysts, High Temperatures-High Pressure; 1995/1996; pp. 523-546; vol. 27/28. |
Syndire; Elementssix Advancing Diamond; 2 pages; www.c6.com. |
PCT Application PCT/US2007/024165; filed Nov. 16, 2007; Chien-Min Sung; International Search report mailed May 23, 2011. |
PCT Application PCT/US2011/052626; filing date Sep. 21, 2011; Chien-Min Sung; International Search Report mailed May 2, 2012. |
PCT Application PCT/US2013/042538; filing date May 23, 2013; Chien-Min Sung; International Search Report mailed Aug. 27, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/168,110, filed Jul. 5, 2008; Chien-Min Sung; office action issued May 14, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/255,823, filed Oct. 22, 2005; Chien-Min Sung; office action issued Mar. 7, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. 12/267,172, filed Nov. 7, 2008; Chien-Min Sung; office action issued Jan. 3, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/267,172, filed Jan. 31, 2012; Chien-Min Sung; office action issued Jul. 9, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/715,583, filed Mar. 2, 2010; Chien-Min Sung; office action issued Mar. 21, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/362,917, filed Jan. 31, 2012; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Apr. 10, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/715,583, filed Mar. 2, 2010; Chien-Min Sung; office action issued Aug. 9, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/715,583, filed Mar. 2, 2010; Chien-Min Sung; office action issued Oct. 25, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/726,786, filed Mar. 18, 2010; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Mar. 19, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/328,338, filed Dec. 4, 2008; Chien-Min Sung; Office action issued May 10, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/021,350, filed Feb. 4, 2011; Chien-Min Sung; office action issued Aug. 31, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/021,350, filed Feb. 4, 2011; Chien-Min Sung; office action issued Feb. 7, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/021,350, filed Feb. 4, 2011; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Mar. 20, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. 13/113,779, filed May 23, 2011; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Nov. 12, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/239,198, filed Sep. 21, 2011; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Jul. 23, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/362,917, filed Jan. 31, 2012; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Apr. 10, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/153,176, filed Jun. 3, 2011; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Dec. 6, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/479,148, filed May 23, 2012; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated May 15, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/715,583, filed Mar. 2, 2010; Chien-Min Sung; notice of allowance dated Dec. 7, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/267,172, filed Nov. 7, 2008; Chien-Min Sung; notice of allowance dated Jan. 7, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/726, 786, filed Mar. 18, 2010; Chien-Min Sung; notice of allowance mailed Sep. 4, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. 13/239,189, filed Sep. 21, 2011; Chien-Min Sung; notice of allowance dated May 3, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/239,198, filed Sep. 21, 2011; Chien-Min Sung; notice of allowance mailed Mar. 4, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/794,164, filed Mar. 11, 2013; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Jul. 16, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/407,634, filed Feb. 28, 2012; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Jun. 13, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/644,790, filed Oct. 4, 2012; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Jun. 17, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/416,201, filed Mar. 9, 2012; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Jun. 18, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. 13/153,176, filed Jun. 3, 2011; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Jul. 1, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,112, filed Mar. 13, 2013; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Nov. 6, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/479,148, filed May 23, 2012; Chien-Min Sung; Notice of Allowance mailed Dec. 9, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/644,790, filed Oct. 4, 2012; Chien-Min Sung office action dated Dec. 24, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/153,176, filed Jun. 3, 2011; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Oct. 10, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. 13/407,634, filed Feb. 28, 2012; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Oct. 29, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/479,148, filed May 23, 2012; Chien-Min Sung; Notice of Allowance mailed Jan. 12, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/416,201, filed Mar. 9, 2012; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Jan. 22, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/153,176, filed Jun. 3, 2011; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Feb. 10, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/794,164, filed Mar. 11, 2013; Chiem-Min Sung; Notice of Allowance mailed Feb. 13, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/633,082, Filed date Oct. 1, 2012; Chien-Min Sung; Office Action dated Feb. 26, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/407,634, Filed date Feb. 28, 2012; Chien-Min Sung; Office Action dated Mar. 5, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,112, filed Mar. 13, 2013; Chien-Min Sung; Notice of Allowance mailed May 15, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/416,201, filed Mar. 9, 2012; Chien-Min Sung; Office Action dated May 15, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/644,790, filed Oct. 4, 2012; Chien-Min Sung; Notice of Allowance mailed Jun. 8, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/223,810, filed Mar. 24, 2014; Chien-Min Sung; Office Action dated Oct. 8, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/120,976, filed Jul. 15, 2014; Chien-Min Sung; Office Action dated Oct. 15, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/153,176, filed Jun. 3, 2011; Chien-Min Sung; Office Action dated Aug. 13, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/633,082, filed Oct. 1, 2012; Chien-Min Sung; Notice of Allowance mailed Aug. 19, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/407,634, filed Feb. 28, 2012; Chien-Min Sung; Notice of Allowance mailed Sep. 3, 2015. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110293905 A1 | Dec 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12463897 | May 2009 | US |
Child | 13113779 | US | |
Parent | 11818894 | Jun 2007 | US |
Child | 12463897 | US | |
Parent | 10791300 | Mar 2004 | US |
Child | 11818894 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10259168 | Sep 2002 | US |
Child | 10791300 | US | |
Parent | 09935204 | Aug 2001 | US |
Child | 10259168 | US | |
Parent | 10109531 | Mar 2002 | US |
Child | 09935204 | US | |
Parent | 08835117 | Apr 1997 | US |
Child | 09935204 | US | |
Parent | 09399573 | Sep 1999 | US |
Child | 08835117 | US | |
Parent | 08832852 | Apr 1997 | US |
Child | 09399573 | US | |
Parent | 09558582 | Apr 2000 | US |
Child | 10109531 | Mar 2002 | US |