This application claims priority from U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/659,005, filed 25 Jul. 2017, which is incorporated herein in its entirety.
This disclosure relates generally to quantum and classical circuit systems, and specifically to a superconducting bidirectional current driver.
Superconducting digital technology has provided computing and/or communications resources that benefit from unprecedented high speed, low power dissipation, and low operating temperature. Superconducting digital technology has been developed as an alternative to CMOS technology, and typically comprises superconductor based single flux quantum superconducting circuitry, utilizing superconducting Josephson junctions, and can exhibit typical signal power of around 4 nW (nanowatts) at a typical data rate of 20 Gb/s (gigabytes/second) or greater, and can operate at temperatures of around 4 Kelvin. Superconducting circuits in a variety of applications, such as memory and quantum processors, can require a current to be applied to certain load devices (e.g., an inductor) in the circuit for a certain amount of time. For example, in a memory circuit, the current can be applied as a “write” signal applied to a bit or word write line, in quantum information the current can be a flux bias signal to a qubit, or in other superconducting applications, the current may be a programming or enable line. In some such applications, the applied current may be required to be bidirectional.
One example includes a superconducting bidirectional current driver. The current driver includes a first direction superconducting latch that is activated in response to a first activation signal to provide a first current path of an input current through a bidirectional current load in a first direction. The current driver also includes a second direction superconducting latch that is activated in response to a second activation signal to provide a second current path of the input current through the bidirectional current load in a second direction opposite the first direction.
Another example includes a method for providing a superconducting current through a bidirectional current load in a first direction or a second direction. The method includes generating an input current via a current source. The method also includes providing a first activation signal to a respective first direction superconducting latch to activate the first direction superconducting latch to provide a current path for the input current from the current source through the bidirectional current load in the first direction. The method further includes providing a second activation signal to the respective second direction superconducting latch to activate the second direction superconducting latch to provide a current path for the input current from the current source through the bidirectional current load in the second direction.
Another example includes a bidirectional memory write current driver. The memory write current driver includes a current source configured to generate an input current and a write line associated with at least one of a row or a column of a memory array. The write line can be configured to write a first memory state of at least one memory cell of the respective at least one of the row or the column based on the input current being provided through the write line in a first direction and to write a second memory state of the at least one memory cell of the respective at least one of the row or the column based on the input current being provided through the write line in a second direction opposite the first direction. The memory write current driver also includes a superconducting bidirectional current driver. The current driver includes a first direction superconducting latch that is activated in response to a first activation signal to provide a first current path of an input current through a bidirectional current load in a first direction. The current driver also includes a second direction superconducting latch that is activated in response to a second activation signal to provide a second current path of the input current through the bidirectional current load in a second direction opposite the first direction.
This disclosure relates generally to quantum and classical circuit systems, and specifically to a superconducting bidirectional current driver. The superconducting bidirectional current driver is configured to provide current in one of a first direction and a second direction through a bidirectional current load. As an example, the bidirectional current load can be configured as an inductive load, such that the inductive load can be inductively coupled to or can correspond to a write-current line in a memory system to write a first logic state in a memory cell based on the current flowing in a first direction through the inductive load and to write a second logic state in the memory cell based on the current flowing in a second direction through the inductive load. The superconducting bidirectional current driver includes a plurality of superconducting latches that are selectively activated to provide a current path for an input current that is provided from a current source through non-activated superconducting latches and through the bidirectional current load in one of the first and second directions.
As an example, each of the superconducting latches can be configured as a quantum flux device (e.g., a superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) or a Josephson junction device) that is activated to switch to a voltage state. The activation of the superconducting latches can be performed via activation signals provided from an activation controller. Thus, in response to being switched to the voltage state, the superconducting latch acts as a resistive element by diverting current from flowing through it. Therefore, the superconducting bidirectional current driver steers current through the bidirectional current load based on the selective activation of the superconducting latches. For example, the superconducting bidirectional current driver can be configured as an H-bridge circuit that includes complementary pairs of the superconducting latches that are activated to provide the input current through the bidirectional current load in the respective first and second directions. As another example, the superconducting bidirectional current driver can be configured as an A-bridge circuit that includes a pair of superconducting latches that are selectively activated to provide the input current through the bidirectional current load in the respective first and second directions and through a pair of inductors.
The superconducting bidirectional current driver system 10 also includes a current source 14 configured to generate an input current IS. As an example, the current source 14 can be configured as a flux shuttle or flux pump that is configured to generate the input current IS based on the sequential triggering of a sequence of Josephson junctions about a loop, with each triggering of a Josephson junction generating a current increment that is stored in a storage inductor. The superconducting bidirectional current driver system 10 also includes a superconducting bidirectional current driver 16 that receives the input current IS and is configured to provide the input current IS through the bidirectional current load 12 as a load current IL in one of a first direction or a second direction. In the example of
In the example of
In the example of
The diagram 100 demonstrates a first current state of the input current IS through the inductor 62. In the example of
Particularly, in the example of
The diagram 150 demonstrates a second current state of the input current IS through the inductor 62. In the example of
Particularly, in the example of
In the example of
Therefore, the superconducting bidirectional current driver 200 can be configured similar to the superconducting bidirectional current driver 50 in the example of
As an example, in a non-activated state, the reset superconducting latch 214 is superconducting to provide a zero resistance current path for the load current IL in either the first or the second current state. In response to receiving the activation signal ACTR, the reset superconducting latch 214 can be configured to switch to the voltage state to cease current flow (e.g., provide resistance) in the current path of the load current IL through the inductor 212. Accordingly, based on the balanced arrangement of the superconducting bidirectional current driver 200, the load current IL is diverted from the current path through the inductor 212 and the reset superconducting latch 214, and thus the input current IS becomes divided at the input node 202. As a result, the input current IS flows substantially equally as the currents IL1 through the respective current paths of the superconducting latches 204 and 208 and the superconducting latches 206 and 210. Therefore, the superconducting bidirectional current driver 200 is set to the idle state from one of the first current state and the second current state.
In the example of
Therefore, the superconducting bidirectional current driver 250 can be configured similar to the superconducting bidirectional current driver 50 in the example of
In the example of
In the example of
Similar to as described previously, the superconducting latches 308 and 310 are configured to switch to a voltage state in response to the respective activation signals ACT3 and ACT4. However, in the example of
Accordingly, the superconducting bidirectional current driver 300 can be configured to mitigate timing problems that can occur with respect to activation of the superconducting latches 304, 306, 308, and 310. For example, depending on the location of inputs of the superconducting latches 304, 306, 308, and 310 relative to each other, and/or depending on timing associated with generating the activation signals ACT1, ACT2, ACT3, and ACT4, the complementary pairs of the superconducting latches 304 and 310 and the superconducting latches 306 and 308 could be activated sequentially, as opposed to concurrently, which could cause problems with controlling the direction of the load current IL through the inductor 312. Therefore, by implementing only a pair of activation signals ACT3 and ACT4 that are mutually exclusively activated, and by implementing the nodes 314 and 316 as respective activation signals of the superconducting latches 304 and 306, the concurrent activation of the complementary pairs of the superconducting latches 304 and 310 and the superconducting latches 306 and 308 can be ensured. Accordingly, timing problems associated with activation of the complementary pairs of the superconducting latches 304 and 310 and the superconducting latches 306 and 308 can be mitigated.
In the example of
In the example of
Similarly, in response to activation of the superconducting latch 356 via the activation signal ACT2, the current IL1 flowing through the inductor L2 (or the full load current IL) is diverted from flowing through the superconducting latch 356. Thus, similar to as described previously, based on the large inductance of the inductors L1 and L2 relative to the inductor 358, the current IL1 that flows through the inductor L1 ceases to flow through the inductor 358, and instead continues to flow through the superconducting latch 354. The current IL1 that flows through the inductor L2, however, ceases to flow through the superconducting latch 356 and begins to flow through the inductor 358 in the second direction in the second current state. The current IL1 that flows through the inductor L1 combines with the current IL1 that flows through the inductor 358 in the second direction, such that the full load current IL flows through the superconducting latch 354 to the low-voltage rail in the second current state.
Therefore, the superconducting bidirectional current driver 350 operates substantially similar to the superconducting bidirectional current drivers 50, 200, 250, and 300 in the respective examples of
The superconducting bidirectional current driver system 400 includes a superconducting bidirectional current driver 404 that receives an input current IS, such as from a current source (e.g., the current source 14 in the example of
In the example of
In view of the foregoing structural and functional features described above, a methodology in accordance with various aspects of the present invention will be better appreciated with reference to
What have been described above are examples of the present invention. It is, of course, not possible to describe every conceivable combination of components or methodologies for purposes of describing the present invention, but one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that many further combinations and permutations of the present invention are possible. Accordingly, the present invention is intended to embrace all such alterations, modifications and variations that fall within the spirit and scope of the appended claims. Additionally, where the disclosure or claims recite “a,” “an,” “a first,” or “another” element, or the equivalent thereof, it should be interpreted to include one or more than one such element, neither requiring nor excluding two or more such elements. As used herein, the term “includes” means includes but not limited to, and the term “including” means including but not limited to. The term “based on” means based at least in part on.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3341380 | Mets et al. | Sep 1967 | A |
4117354 | Geewala | Sep 1978 | A |
4132956 | Russer | Jan 1979 | A |
4149097 | Faris | Apr 1979 | A |
4274015 | Faris | Jun 1981 | A |
4360898 | Faris | Nov 1982 | A |
4916335 | Goto | Apr 1990 | A |
5051627 | Schneier | Sep 1991 | A |
5099152 | Suzuki | Mar 1992 | A |
5309038 | Harada | May 1994 | A |
5942950 | Merenda | Aug 1999 | A |
6184477 | Tanahashi | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6188236 | Wikborg | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6486756 | Tarutani | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6507234 | Johnson | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6518786 | Herr | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6549059 | Johnson | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6617643 | Goodwin-Johansson | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6724216 | Suzuki | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6750794 | Durand | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6865639 | Herr | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6897468 | Blais | May 2005 | B2 |
6960780 | Blais | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6960929 | Bedard | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7129870 | Hirano | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7212070 | Westwick | May 2007 | B2 |
7498832 | Baumgardner | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7613765 | Hilton | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7714605 | Baumgardner | May 2010 | B2 |
7724020 | Herr | May 2010 | B2 |
7772871 | Herr | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7772872 | Lewis | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7782077 | Herr | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7977964 | Herr | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8022722 | Pesetski | Sep 2011 | B1 |
8111083 | Pesetski | Feb 2012 | B1 |
8508280 | Naaman | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8654578 | Lewis et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8975912 | Chow | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9000621 | Ichikawa | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9208861 | Herr | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9281057 | Herr | Mar 2016 | B1 |
9735776 | Abdo | Aug 2017 | B1 |
10122352 | Miller | Nov 2018 | B1 |
20020063643 | Smith | May 2002 | A1 |
20020190381 | Herr | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030011398 | Herr | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030016069 | Furuta | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030039138 | Herr | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030040440 | Wire | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030115401 | Herr | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030183935 | Herr | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030207766 | Esteve et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040120444 | Herr | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040201099 | Herr | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040201400 | Herr | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040266209 | Hinode et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050001209 | Hilton et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050023518 | Herr | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050078022 | Hirano et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050098773 | Vion et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050110106 | Goto | May 2005 | A1 |
20050117244 | Ranmuthu | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050224784 | Amin | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050231196 | Tarutani | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060091490 | Chen | May 2006 | A1 |
20070052441 | Taguchi | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20090082209 | Bunyk | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090084991 | Ichimura | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090153180 | Herr | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090289638 | Farinelli | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090322374 | Przybysz | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20110175062 | Farinelli | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120094838 | Bunyk | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20130015885 | Naaman | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130043945 | McDermott | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20150092465 | Herr | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150254571 | Miller et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20170141769 | Miller et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0467104 | Jan 1992 | EP |
3217336 | Sep 2017 | EP |
3378162 | Sep 2018 | EP |
S6192036 | May 1986 | JP |
2001345488 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2004080129 | Mar 2004 | JP |
2013058998 | Mar 2013 | JP |
199808307 | Feb 1998 | WO |
2003090162 | Oct 2003 | WO |
2005093649 | Oct 2005 | WO |
2008050864 | May 2008 | WO |
2009157532 | Dec 2009 | WO |
2010028183 | Mar 2010 | WO |
2016127021 | Aug 2016 | WO |
2017087070 | May 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Canadian Office Action corresponding to Canadian Patent Application No. 2973060, dated Dec. 18, 2018. |
Berns et al., “Coherent Quasiclassical Dynamics of a Persistent Current Qubit”, Physical Review Letters APS USA, vol. 97, No. 15, pp. 150502, Oct. 13, 2006. |
Garanin et al., Effects of nonlinear sweep in the Landau-Zener-Stueckelberg effect, Physical Review B, vol. 66, No. 17, pp. 174438-1-174438-11, Nov. 1, 2002. |
Koch, et al.: “A NRZ—Output Amplifier for RSFQ Circuits”, IEEE Transaction on Applied Superconductivity, vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 3549-3552, Jun. 1999. |
Wulf et al., Dressed States of Josephson Phase Qubit Coupled to an LC Circuit, IEEE Transaction on Applied Superconductivity IEEE USA, vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 856-859, Jun. 2, 2005. |
Schuenemann C. et al. “Interleaved Josephson junction tree decoder,” IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, International Business Machines Corp. (Thorwood), US, vol. 18, No. 12, Apr. 30, 1976, pp. 4168, line 1-p. 4170, line 29; figures I, II. |
International Search Report & Written Opinion corresponding to International Application No. PCT/US2018/051076 dated Jan. 2, 2019. |
International Search Report & Written Opinion corresponding to International Application No. PCT/US2018/0042466 dated Dec. 12, 2018. |
International Search Report & Written Opinion corresponding to International Application No. PCT/US2008/050864 dated Sep. 6, 2008. |
Ortlepp et al.; “Experimental Analysis of a new Generation of compact Josephson-inductance-based RSFQ Circuits”: Authors are with the Institute of Information Technology, University of Technology Germany. |
Internation Search Report & Written Opinion corresponding to International Application No. PCT/US2008/072017 dated Feb. 23, 2009. |
Gopalakrishnan, R. et al.: “Novel Very High IE Structures Based on the Directed BBHE Mechanism for Ultralow-Power Flash Memories”, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 26, No. 3, Mar. 2005. |
Choi, W. Y. et al.: “80nm Self-Aligned Complementary I-MOS Using Double Sidewall Spacer and Elevated Drain Structure and Its Applicability to Amplifiers with High Linearity”, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 8, No. 5, dated 2004. |
Choi, W. Y. et al.: “Novel Tunneling Devices with Multi-Functionality”, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 16, No. 1B, dated 2007; pp. 2622-2625. |
International Search Report corresponding to International Application No. PCT/US2009/045167, dated Feb. 5, 2010. |
Semenov, et. al, “SFQ Control Circuits for Josephson Junction Qubits”, IEEE Trans. on Applied Superconductivity, vol. 13, No. 2, Jun. 2003, pp. 960-965. |
Canadian Office Action corresponding to Canadian Patent Application No. 2882109 dated Mar. 11, 2016. |
Polonsky, et. al., Transmission of Single-Flux-Quantum Pulses along Superconducting Microstrip Lines, IEEE Trans. on Applied Superconductivity, vol. 3, No. 1, Mar. 1993, pp. 2598-2600. |
Ohki et. al., “Low-Jc Rapid Single Flux Quantum (RSFQ) Qubit Control Circuit”, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, vol. 17, No. 2, Jun. 2007. |
Allman, et al: “rt-SQUID-Mediated Coherent Tunable Coupling Between a Superconducting Phase Qubit and a Lumped-Element Resonator”; Physical Review Letters, 201O The American Physical Society, PRL 104, week endinq Apr. 30, 201 O, pp. 177004-1 thru 177004-4. |
Johnson, et al.: “A Scalable Control System for a Superconducting Adiabatic Quantum Optimization Processor”; arXiv:0907.3757v2 fquant-phl Mar. 24, 2010, pp. 1-14. |
Saira, et al.: “Entanglement genesis by anciila-based parity measurement in 20 circuit QED” Physical review letters 1 i 2.7 ( 201 4): 070502. |
Galiautdinov, et al.: “Resonator-zero-qubit architecture for superconducting qubits” Physical Review A 85.4 (201 2): 042321, Department of Electrical Engineering and Physics, University of California. pp. 1-11. |
Bourassa, et al.: “Ultra.strong coupling regime of cavity QED with phase-biased flux qubits” Physical Review A 80.3 (2009): 032109. |
International Search Report corresponding to International Application No. PCT/US2015/052666 dated Jan. 3, 2016. |
RSFQubit , RSFQ Control of Josephson Junctions Qubits, D7: Report on the Evaluation of the RSFQ Circuitry for Qubit Control, Sep. 1, 2005, pp. 1-16. |
Herr, et al: “Ultra-Low-Power Superconductor Logic”, Journal of Applied Physics, American Institute of Physics, US, vol. 109, No. 10, May 17, 2011, pp. 103903-103903, XP012146891, ISSN: 0021-8979, 001: 10.1063/1.3585849, p. 2, left-hand column, paragraph 4—right-hand column, paragraph 1; Fig. 1. |
Gui-Long, et al., “A Simple Scheme to Generate X-type Four-charge Entangled States in Circuit QED”, Chinese Physics B, Chinese Physics B, Bristol GB, vol. 21, No. 4, Apr. 5, 2012 (Apr. 5, 2012), pp. 44209/1-5. XP020221550, ISSN: 1674-1056, DOI: 10.1088/1674-1056/21/4/044209. |
International Search Report corresponding to International Application No. PCT/US2016/053412, dated Dec. 21, 2016. |
International Search Report corresponding to International Application No. PCT/US2013/054161, dated Feb. 25, 2014. |
Canadian Office Action corresponding to Canadian Patent Application No. 3003272 dated Feb. 12, 2019. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2019/030036 dated Jul. 19, 2019. |
Korean Office Action corresponding to Korean Application No. 10-2018-7013489 dated Mar. 28, 2019. |
European Office Action for Application 09 752 537.2-1221 dated Oct. 24, 2019. |
Non Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/915,976 dated Dec. 6, 2019. |
Takeuchi N et al., “On-chip RSFQ microwave pulse generator using a multi-flux-quantum driver for controlling superconducting qubits”, Physica C, vol. 470, No. 20, doi: 10.1016/J.PHYSC.2010.05.159, ISSN 0921-4534, (May 15, 2010), pp. 1550-1554, (May 15, 2010). |
Australian Examination Report for Application No. 2017360505 dated Dec. 24, 2019. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190036515 A1 | Jan 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15659005 | Jul 2017 | US |
Child | 16150045 | US |