Surgical instrument

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10405874
  • Patent Number
    10,405,874
  • Date Filed
    Friday, May 2, 2014
    10 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 10, 2019
    4 years ago
Abstract
A surgical instrument is provided. The surgical instrument includes a housing. A movable handle is coupled to the housing and is configured to approximate a pair of jaw members toward and away from one another. A latch mechanism operably couples to the movable handle and includes one or more mechanical interfaces configured to selectively engage a corresponding mechanical interface disposed within the housing to lock and unlock the jaw members in an approximated configuration. When the movable handle is in a jammed position, the mechanical interface(s) of the latch mechanism is/are configured to deform and separate from the corresponding mechanical interface disposed within the housing when the movable handle is moved from the jammed position.
Description
BACKGROUND

1. Technical Field


The present disclosure relates to surgical instruments. In particular, the present disclosure relates to a surgical instrument that includes a fail safe latch mechanism.


2. Background of Related Art


Instruments such as electrosurgical forceps are commonly used in open and endoscopic surgical procedures to coagulate, cauterize and seal tissue. Such forceps typically include a pair of jaws that can be controlled by a surgeon to grasp targeted tissue, such as, e.g., a blood vessel. Utilizing a movable handle of the forceps the jaws may be approximated toward one another to apply a mechanical clamping force to the tissue. The jaws are associated with at least one electrode to permit the delivery of electrosurgical energy to the tissue. The combination of the mechanical clamping force and the electrosurgical energy has been demonstrated to join adjacent layers of tissue captured between the jaws.


A latching or locking mechanism may be a component of the forceps and utilized to temporarily lock the movable handle in a proximal position against the bias of a spring (or the like) to clamp the jaws on the tissue. As can be appreciated, if the latch mechanism were to fail during use (e.g., get jammed, trapped or stuck into a locked configuration), for example, while the jaws were clamped on tissue, it could prove difficult to remove the jaws and/or the forceps safely from the surgical site.


SUMMARY

A surgical instrument that includes a fail safe latch mechanism may prove useful in the surgical arena.


Aspects of the present disclosure are described in detail with reference to the drawing figures wherein like reference numerals identify similar or identical elements. As used herein, the term “distal” refers to the portion that is being described which is further from a user, while the term “proximal” refers to the portion that is being described which is closer to a user.


An aspect of the instant disclosure provides a surgical instrument including a housing and a movable handle coupled to the housing. The movable handle is configured to approximate a pair of jaw members toward and away from one another. A latch mechanism operably couples to the movable handle and includes one or more mechanical interfaces configured to releasably engage a corresponding mechanical interface disposed within the housing for locking and unlocking the jaw members in and from an approximated configuration. When the movable handle is in a jammed position, the mechanical interface(s) of latch mechanism is/are configured deform and separate from the corresponding mechanical interface disposed within the housing when the movable handle is moved distally from the jammed position. The latch mechanism may be formed from metal.


The latch mechanism may include a distal end that couples to the movable handle, a generally elongated medial portion, and a proximal end that supports the mechanical interface(s) of the latch mechanism. The mechanical interface(s) of the latch mechanism may be a latch pin that extends perpendicularly with respect to the generally elongated medial portion of the latch mechanism and the corresponding mechanical interface disposed within the housing may be in the form of a railway. The latch pin may extend from a left or right side of the generally elongated medial portion. Alternatively, the latch pin may extend from left and right sides of the generally elongated medial portion.


The generally elongated medial portion may be tapered at the proximal end of the latch mechanism to facilitate deformation thereof. The generally elongated medial portion may include a notch at the proximal end of the latch mechanism to facilitate deformation thereof. The mechanical interface(s) of the latch mechanism may remain coupled to the proximal end of the latch mechanism when the mechanical interface(s) is/are deformed to un-latch the corresponding mechanical interface disposed within the housing. The mechanical interface(s) of the latch mechanism may be configured to deform and separate from the corresponding mechanical interface disposed within the housing when the movable handle is moved distally from the jammed position with a predetermined force ranging from about 29 ft·lb to about 31 ft·lb.


An aspect of the instant disclosure provides a surgical instrument. The surgical instrument includes a housing. A movable handle is coupled to the housing and is configured to approximate a pair of jaw members of the surgical instrument toward one another when the movable handle is moved proximally. A latch mechanism includes a distal end that couples to the movable handle and a proximal end that supports one or more mechanical interfaces configured to releasably engage a corresponding mechanical interface disposed within a stationary handle of the housing. The latch mechanism includes a generally elongated medial portion that extends from the distal end thereof. The mechanical interface of the latch mechanism engages the mechanical interface disposed within the stationary handle to lock and unlock the jaw members in and from an approximated configuration when the movable handle is moved. The at least one mechanical interface of the latch mechanism is configured to deform and separate from the corresponding mechanical interface disposed within the stationary handle when the movable handle is moved from a jammed position within the stationary handle with a predetermined force to release the jaw members from the approximated configuration. The latch mechanism may be formed from metal.


The mechanical interface(s) of the latch mechanism may be a latch pin that extends perpendicularly with respect to the generally elongated medial portion of the latch mechanism and the corresponding mechanical interface disposed within the stationary handle may be in the form of a railway. The latch pin may extend from a left or right side of the generally elongated medial portion. Alternatively, the latch pin may extend from left and right sides of the generally elongated medial portion.


The generally elongated medial portion may be tapered at the proximal end of the latch mechanism to facilitate deformation thereof. The generally elongated medial portion may include a notch at the proximal end of the latch mechanism to facilitate deformation thereof. The mechanical interface(s) of the latch mechanism may remain coupled to the proximal end of the latch mechanism when the mechanical interface(s) is/are deformed to un-latch the corresponding mechanical interface disposed within the stationary handle. The predetermined force may range from about 29 ft·lb to about 31 ft·lb.


An aspect of the instant disclosure provides a surgical instrument. The surgical instrument includes a housing. A movable handle is coupled to the housing and is configured to approximate a pair of jaw members of the surgical instrument toward one another. The movable handle is movable to a locked configuration for maintaining the pair of jaw members in an approximated configuration. A latch mechanism includes a distal end that couples to the movable handle and a proximal end that supports at least one mechanical interface configured to releasably engage a corresponding mechanical interface disposed within a stationary handle of the housing. The latch mechanism includes a generally elongated medial portion that extends from the distal end thereof. The at least one mechanical interface of the latch mechanism engages the mechanical interface disposed within the stationary handle to lock and unlock the jaw members in and from the approximated configuration when the movable handle is moved. The at least one mechanical interface being configured to deform and separate from the corresponding mechanical interface disposed within the stationary handle when the movable handle is moved from a jammed position within the stationary handle with a predetermined force to release the movable handle from the locked positioned and the jaw members from the approximated configuration.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the present disclosure and, together with the detailed description of the embodiments given below, serve to explain the principles of the disclosure.



FIG. 1 is a perspective view of an electrosurgical forceps including a latch mechanism according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;



FIG. 2 is a side cut-away view of a proximal end of the electrosurgical forceps shown in FIG. 1;



FIG. 3 is a partial, cut-away view of the proximal end of the electrosurgical forceps shown in FIG. 1 with parts removed to illustrate a latch mechanism of a movable handle of the electrosurgical forceps;



FIGS. 4A and 4B are perspective views of the latch mechanism shown in FIG. 3 with a pin of the latch shown in pre-deformed and deformed configurations, respectively;



FIG. 5 is a perspective view of a latch mechanism according to another embodiment of the instant disclosure; and



FIG. 6 is a perspective view of a latch mechanism according to yet another embodiment of the instant disclosure.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Detailed embodiments of the present disclosure are disclosed herein; however, the disclosed embodiments are merely examples of the disclosure, which may be embodied in various forms. Therefore, specific structural and functional details disclosed herein are not to be interpreted as limiting, but merely as a basis for the claims and as a representative basis for teaching one skilled in the art to variously employ the present disclosure in virtually any appropriately detailed structure.


Referring initially to FIG. 1, an embodiment of an electrosurgical forceps 10 generally includes a housing 12 that supports various actuators for remotely controlling an end effector 14 through an elongated shaft 16. Although this configuration is typically associated with instruments for use in laparoscopic or endoscopic surgical procedures, various aspects of the present disclosure may be practiced with traditional open instruments and in connection with endoluminal procedures as well.


To mechanically control the end effector 14, the housing 12 supports a stationary handle 18, a movable handle 20, a trigger 22 and a rotation knob 24. The movable handle 20 is operable to move the end effector 14 between an open configuration (FIG. 1) wherein a pair of opposed jaw members 15, 17 are disposed in spaced relation relative to one another, and a closed or clamping configuration (not explicitly shown) wherein the jaw members 15, 17 are closer together. Approximation of the movable handle 20 towards the stationary handle 18 serves to move the end effector 14 to the closed configuration and separation of the movable handle 20 from the stationary handle 18 serves to move the end effector 14 to the open configuration. The movable handle 22 may be moved from the distal position to an intermediate position to move the jaw members 15, 17 to the closed configuration. The movable handle 20 may be moved from the intermediate position to a fully actuated or proximal position to increase the pressure applied by the jaw members 15, 17. When the movable handle 20 is in a fully actuated or proximal position, electrosurgical energy may be selectively supplied to the end effector 14 to effect tissue, e.g., seal tissue.


The trigger 22 is operable to extend and retract a knife blade (not explicitly shown) through the end effector 14 when the end effector 14 is in the closed configuration. The rotation knob 24 serves to rotate the elongated shaft 16 and the end effector 14 about a longitudinal axis A-A extending through the forceps 10. For a more detailed description of the forceps 10, reference is made to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/461,355 filed on May 1, 2012 by Allen I V et al.


With reference to FIGS. 2-4B, a latch mechanism 26 according to an embodiment of the instant disclosure is illustrated. The latch mechanism 26 may be formed from any suitable material including without limitation to metal, plastic, etc. In the illustrated embodiment, the latch mechanism 26 is formed from metal.


Latch mechanism 26 includes a distal end 28 (FIG. 4B) that couples to the movable handle 20 and is movable therewith as the movable handle 20 is moved to and from the distal, proximal, and intermediate positions. The distal end 28 may be bent to one or more configurations to function as a latch spring 27 that is configured to bias the movable handle 20 to the distal configuration, see FIG. 4B for example.


A generally elongated medial portion 30 extends from the distal end 28 of the latch mechanism 26. In the embodiment illustrated in FIGS. 1-4B, the elongated medial portion 30 tapers toward the end of the latch mechanism 26 to form the proximal end 32 with a reduced width; the significance of which is described in detail below.


A mechanical interface in the form of a latching pin 34 is supported by the proximal end 32 of the latch mechanism 26 and is configured to releasably engage a corresponding mechanical interface, e.g., a railway 25 (FIGS. 2-3), supported within the stationary handle 18. The railway 25 and latching pin 34 serve to temporarily lock the movable handle 20 in the proximal position against the bias of a compression spring 13 (see FIG. 2 for example). Thus, the railway 25 maintains pressure at the end effector 14 without actively maintaining pressure on the movable handle 20. The latching pin 34 may be released from the railway 25 by pivoting the movable handle 20 proximally and releasing the movable handle 20 to move under the influence of the spring 13. Operation of the railway 25 is described in greater detail in commonly-owned U.S. Pat. No. 7,766,910 to Hixson et al.


Unlike conventional latch mechanisms, the latching pin 34 of the latch mechanism 26 is deformable to separate from the railway 25 disposed within the stationary handle 18 when a predetermined force is exerted on the movable handle 20. In essence, the latching pin 34 serves as a mechanical fuse that is configured to predictably “fail” when a surgeon attempts to force the latch mechanism 26 open after the movable handle 20 has been moved to the locked configuration. Specifically, as a result of the reduced width of the proximal end 32 of the latch mechanism 26, the latching pin 34 deforms, e.g., bends, (FIG. 4B) against the bias of the latch spring 27 at the distal end 28 of the latch mechanism 26 when the surgeon moves the movable handle 20 distally with a predetermined force. As the movable handle 20 is being moved distally with the predetermined force, the latching pin 34 continues to deform until the latching pin 34 separates from the railway 25. Accordingly, if the latching pin 34 were to get jammed, stuck or trapped in the locked configuration, the surgeon could “force” or un-latch the latching pin 34 from the railway 25 to open the jaw members 15, 17 and remove the forceps 10 from the surgical site. As defined herein, the terms jammed, stuck or trapped mean “caught or held in a position so as not being able to move as intended.”


In embodiments, such as the illustrated embodiment, the latching pin 34 of the latch mechanism 26 remains coupled to the proximal end 32 of the latch mechanism 26 when the latching pin 34 is deformed to separate from the railway 25 (see FIGS. 4A and 4B for example). Alternatively, in embodiments, the latching pin 34 of the latch mechanism 26 may be configured to uncouple from the proximal end 32 of the latch mechanism 26 when the latching pin 34 is deformed to separate from the railway 25.


Through empirical testing, it has been found that a suitable predetermined force that may be exerted by a user on the movable handle 20 to deform the latching pin 34 (having a diameter that ranges from about 0.145 inches to about 0.155 inches) of the latch mechanism 26 may range from about 29 ft·lb to about 31 ft·lb. In an embodiment, such as the illustrated embodiment, the force exerted by a user on the movable handle 20 to deform the latching pin 34 (having a diameter that is approximately 0.150 inches) of the latch mechanism 26 is approximately equal to 30 ft·lb.


Latching pin 34 extends perpendicularly with respect to the elongated medial portion 30 of the latch mechanism 26 to engage the railway 25 and deforms when the aforementioned forces are exerted by a user to move the movable handle 20 distally. In embodiments, the latching pin 34 may extend from left and right sides of the elongated medial portion 30 (FIGS. 4A and 4B). Alternatively, as shown in FIG. 5, the latching pin 34 may extend from one of the left and right sides of the elongated medial portion 30.


In use, movable handle 20 may be moved to the proximal position to move the latching pin 34 into engagement with the railway 25 which locks the jaw members 15, 17 in the approximated configuration. In the event the latching pin 34 gets trapped, jammed or stuck within the railway 25, the unique configuration of the latch mechanism 26 that includes the latching pin 34 allows a user to move the movable handle 20 distally with the aforementioned predetermined forces to separate the latching pin 34 from the railway 25, which, in turn, releases the jaw members 15, 17 from the approximated configuration.


From the foregoing and with reference to the various figure drawings, those skilled in the art will appreciate that certain modifications can also be made to the present disclosure without departing from the scope of the same. For example, in embodiments, the proximal end 32 may be configured to facilitate deformation of the latching pin 34 as shown in the tapered configurations depicted in FIGS. 4A-5. FIG. 6 illustrates a proximal end 132 of a latch mechanism 126 having a notch 136 defined therein that reduces the structural integrity of the proximal end 132 such that the latching pin 134 deforms when the aforementioned forces are exerted on the movable handle 20.


The various embodiments disclosed herein may also be configured to work with robotic surgical systems and what is commonly referred to as “Telesurgery”. Such systems employ various robotic elements to assist the surgeon in the operating theatre and allow remote operation (or partial remote operation) of surgical instrumentation. Various robotic arms, gears, cams, pulleys, electric and mechanical motors, etc. may be employed for this purpose and may be designed with a robotic surgical system to assist the surgeon during the course of an operation or treatment. Such robotic systems may include, remotely steerable systems, automatically flexible surgical systems, remotely flexible surgical systems, remotely articulating surgical systems, wireless surgical systems, modular or selectively configurable remotely operated surgical systems, etc.


The robotic surgical systems may be employed with one or more consoles that are next to the operating theater or located in a remote location. In this instance, one team of surgeons or nurses may prep the patient for surgery and configure the robotic surgical system with one or more of the instruments disclosed herein while another surgeon (or group of surgeons) remotely control the instruments via the robotic surgical system. As can be appreciated, a highly skilled surgeon may perform multiple operations in multiple locations without leaving his/her remote console which can be both economically advantageous and a benefit to the patient or a series of patients.


The robotic arms of the surgical system are typically coupled to a pair of master handles by a controller. The handles can be moved by the surgeon to produce a corresponding movement of the working ends of any type of surgical instrument (e.g., end effectors, graspers, knifes, scissors, etc.) which may complement the use of one or more of the embodiments described herein. The movement of the master handles may be scaled so that the working ends have a corresponding movement that is different, smaller or larger, than the movement performed by the operating hands of the surgeon. The scale factor or gearing ratio may be adjustable so that the operator can control the resolution of the working ends of the surgical instrument(s).


The master handles may include various sensors to provide feedback to the surgeon relating to various tissue parameters or conditions, e.g., tissue resistance due to manipulation, cutting or otherwise treating, pressure by the instrument onto the tissue, tissue temperature, tissue impedance, etc. As can be appreciated, such sensors provide the surgeon with enhanced tactile feedback simulating actual operating conditions. The master handles may also include a variety of different actuators for delicate tissue manipulation or treatment further enhancing the surgeon's ability to mimic actual operating conditions.


While several embodiments of the disclosure have been shown in the drawings, it is not intended that the disclosure be limited thereto, as it is intended that the disclosure be as broad in scope as the art will allow and that the specification be read likewise. Therefore, the above description should not be construed as limiting, but merely as examples of particular embodiments. Those skilled in the art will envision other modifications within the scope and spirit of the claims appended hereto.

Claims
  • 1. A surgical instrument, comprising: a housing;a mechanical housing interface disposed within the housing;a movable handle coupled to the housing and configured to approximate a pair of jaw members toward and away from one another; anda latch mechanism operably coupled to the movable handle, the latch mechanism including at least one mechanical interface configured to selectively engage the mechanical housing interface to lock and unlock the jaw members in and from an approximated configuration,wherein, when the movable handle is in a jammed position, the at least one mechanical interface of the latch mechanism is configured to deform beyond a structural integrity thereof and separate from the mechanical housing interface when the movable handle is moved from the jammed position.
  • 2. The surgical instrument according to claim 1, wherein the latch mechanism includes a distal end that couples to the movable handle, a generally elongated medial portion and a proximal end that supports the at least one mechanical interface of the latch mechanism.
  • 3. The surgical instrument according to claim 2, wherein the at least one mechanical interface of the latch mechanism is a latch pin that extends perpendicularly with respect to the generally elongated medial portion of the latch mechanism, and the mechanical housing interface is in the form of a railway.
  • 4. The surgical instrument according to claim 2, wherein the latch mechanism includes a latch pin that extends from at least one of a left or a right side of the generally elongated medial portion.
  • 5. The surgical instrument according to claim 2, wherein the latch mechanism includes a latch pin that extends from left and right sides of the generally elongated medial portion.
  • 6. The surgical instrument according to claim 2, wherein the generally elongated medial portion is tapered at the proximal end of the latch mechanism to facilitate deformation thereof.
  • 7. The surgical instrument according to claim 2, wherein the generally elongated medial portion includes a notch at the proximal end of the latch mechanism to facilitate deformation thereof.
  • 8. The surgical instrument according to claim 2, wherein the at least one mechanical interface of the latch mechanism remains coupled to the proximal end of the latch mechanism when the at least one mechanical interface is deformed to separate from the mechanical housing interface.
  • 9. The surgical instrument according to claim 1, wherein the at least one mechanical interface of the latch mechanism is configured to deform and separate from the mechanical housing interface when the movable handle is moved distally from the jammed position with a predetermined force ranging from about 29 ft·lb to about 31 ft·lb.
  • 10. The surgical instrument according to claim 1, wherein the latch mechanism is formed from metal.
  • 11. A surgical instrument, comprising: a housing having a stationary handle;a mechanical housing interface disposed within the stationary handle;a movable handle coupled to the housing and configured to approximate a pair of jaw members toward one another when the movable handle is moved proximally; anda latch mechanism including a distal end that couples to the movable handle and a proximal end that supports at least one mechanical interface configured to releasably engage the mechanical housing interface, the latch mechanism including a generally elongated medial portion that extends from the distal end thereof,wherein the at least one mechanical interface of the latch mechanism engages the mechanical housing interface to lock and unlock the jaw members in and from an approximated configuration when the movable handle is moved, the at least one mechanical interface being configured to deform beyond a structural integrity thereof and separate from the mechanical housing interface when the movable handle is moved from a jammed position within the stationary handle with a predetermined force to release the jaw members from the approximated configuration.
  • 12. The surgical instrument according to claim 11, wherein the at least one mechanical interface of the latch mechanism is a latch pin that extends perpendicularly with respect to the generally elongated medial portion of the latch mechanism, and wherein the mechanical housing interface is in the form of a railway.
  • 13. The surgical instrument according to claim 12, wherein the latch pin extends from at least one of a left and right side of the generally elongated medial portion.
  • 14. The surgical instrument according to claim 12, wherein the latch pin extends from left and right sides of the generally elongated medial portion.
  • 15. The surgical instrument according to claim 11, wherein the generally elongated medial portion is tapered at the proximal end of the latch mechanism to facilitate deformation thereof.
  • 16. The surgical instrument according to claim 11, wherein the generally elongated medial portion includes a notch at the proximal end of the latch mechanism to facilitate deformation thereof.
  • 17. The surgical instrument according to claim 11, wherein the at least one mechanical interface of the latch mechanism remains coupled to the proximal end of the latch mechanism when the at least one mechanical interface of the latch mechanism is deformed to un-latch the mechanical housing interface.
  • 18. The surgical instrument according to claim 11, wherein the predetermined force ranges from about 29 ft·lb to about 31 ft·lb.
  • 19. The surgical instrument according to claim 11, wherein the latch mechanism is formed from metal.
  • 20. A surgical instrument, comprising: a housing having a stationary handle;a mechanical housing interface disposed within the stationary handle;a movable handle coupled to the housing and configured to approximate a pair of jaw members toward one another, the movable handle movable to a locked configuration for maintaining the pair of jaw members in an approximated configuration; anda latch mechanism including a distal end that couples to the movable handle and a proximal end that supports at least one mechanical interface configured to releasably engage the mechanical housing interface, the latch mechanism including a generally elongated medial portion that extends from the distal end thereof,wherein the at least one mechanical interface of the latch mechanism engages the mechanical housing interface to lock and unlock the jaw members in and from the approximated configuration when the movable handle is moved, the at least one mechanical interface of the latch mechanism being configured to deform beyond a structural integrity thereof and separate from the mechanical housing interface when the movable handle is moved from a jammed position within the stationary handle with a predetermined force to release the movable handle from the locked positioned and the jaw members from the approximated configuration.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

The present application claims the benefit of and priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/865,443, filed on Aug. 13, 2013, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (80)
Number Name Date Kind
2652832 Castroviejo Sep 1953 A
D249549 Pike Sep 1978 S
D263020 Rau, III Feb 1982 S
D295893 Sharkany et al. May 1988 S
D295894 Sharkany et al. May 1988 S
4753235 Hasson Jun 1988 A
D298353 Manno Nov 1988 S
D299413 DeCarolis Jan 1989 S
4823792 Dulebohn Apr 1989 A
5026370 Lottick Jun 1991 A
5104397 Vasconcelos Apr 1992 A
5176702 Bales Jan 1993 A
D343453 Noda Jan 1994 S
D348930 Olson Jul 1994 S
D349341 Lichtman et al. Aug 1994 S
D354564 Medema Jan 1995 S
D358887 Feinberg May 1995 S
5425743 Nicholas Jun 1995 A
D384413 Zlock et al. Sep 1997 S
5730740 Wales Mar 1998 A
H1745 Paraschac Apr 1998 H
D402028 Grimm et al. Dec 1998 S
D408018 McNaughton Apr 1999 S
D416089 Barton et al. Nov 1999 S
D424694 Tetzlaff et al. May 2000 S
D425201 Tetzlaff et al. May 2000 S
H1904 Yates et al. Oct 2000 H
D449886 Tetzlaff et al. Oct 2001 S
D453923 Olson Feb 2002 S
D454951 Bon Mar 2002 S
D457958 Dycus et al. May 2002 S
D457959 Tetzlaff et al. May 2002 S
H2037 Yates et al. Jul 2002 H
D465281 Lang Nov 2002 S
D466209 Bon Nov 2002 S
D493888 Reschke Aug 2004 S
D496997 Dycus et al. Oct 2004 S
D499181 Dycus et al. Nov 2004 S
D502994 Blake, III Mar 2005 S
D509297 Wells Sep 2005 S
D525361 Hushka Jul 2006 S
D531311 Guerra et al. Oct 2006 S
D533274 Visconti et al. Dec 2006 S
D533942 Kerr et al. Dec 2006 S
D535027 James et al. Jan 2007 S
7160299 Baily Jan 2007 B2
D538932 Malik Mar 2007 S
D541418 Schechter et al. Apr 2007 S
D541611 Aglassinger May 2007 S
D541938 Kerr et al. May 2007 S
D545432 Watanabe Jun 2007 S
D547154 Lee Jul 2007 S
D564662 Moses et al. Mar 2008 S
D567943 Moses et al. Apr 2008 S
D575395 Hushka Aug 2008 S
D575401 Hixson et al. Aug 2008 S
D582038 Swoyer et al. Dec 2008 S
D617900 Kingsley et al. Jun 2010 S
D617901 Unger et al. Jun 2010 S
D617902 Twomey et al. Jun 2010 S
D617903 Unger et al. Jun 2010 S
D618798 Olson et al. Jun 2010 S
D621503 Otten et al. Aug 2010 S
7766910 Hixson et al. Aug 2010 B2
D627462 Kingsley Nov 2010 S
D628289 Romero Nov 2010 S
D628290 Romero Nov 2010 S
D630324 Reschke Jan 2011 S
D649249 Guerra Nov 2011 S
D649643 Allen, IV et al. Nov 2011 S
D661394 Romero et al. Jun 2012 S
D670808 Moua et al. Nov 2012 S
D680220 Rachlin Apr 2013 S
20030018331 Dycus et al. Jan 2003 A1
20040167569 Dicesare et al. Aug 2004 A1
20070043352 Garrison et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070175952 Shelton, IV Aug 2007 A1
20100228235 Lee et al. Sep 2010 A1
20120215134 Hunter-Jones et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120283727 Twomey Nov 2012 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (91)
Number Date Country
201299462 Sep 2009 CN
2415263 Oct 1975 DE
02514501 Oct 1976 DE
2627679 Jan 1977 DE
03423356 Jun 1986 DE
03612646 Apr 1987 DE
3627221 Feb 1988 DE
8712328 Feb 1988 DE
04303882 Feb 1995 DE
04403252 Aug 1995 DE
19515914 Jul 1996 DE
19506363 Aug 1996 DE
29616210 Nov 1996 DE
19608716 Apr 1997 DE
19751106 May 1998 DE
19751108 May 1999 DE
19946527 Jul 2001 DE
20121161 Apr 2002 DE
10045375 Oct 2002 DE
202007009165 Aug 2007 DE
202007009317 Aug 2007 DE
202007009318 Aug 2007 DE
10031773 Nov 2007 DE
202007016233 Jan 2008 DE
19738457 Jan 2009 DE
102004026179 Jan 2009 DE
102008018406 Jul 2009 DE
1281878 Feb 2003 EP
1159926 Mar 2003 EP
61-501068 Sep 1984 JP
10-24051 Jan 1989 JP
11-47150 Jun 1989 JP
6-502328 Mar 1992 JP
5-5106 Jan 1993 JP
05-40112 Feb 1993 JP
0006030945 Feb 1994 JP
6-121797 May 1994 JP
6-285078 Oct 1994 JP
6-511401 Dec 1994 JP
06343644 Dec 1994 JP
07265328 Oct 1995 JP
8-56955 May 1996 JP
08252263 Oct 1996 JP
8-289895 Nov 1996 JP
8-317934 Dec 1996 JP
8-317936 Dec 1996 JP
9-10223 Jan 1997 JP
09000538 Jan 1997 JP
9-122138 May 1997 JP
0010000195 Jan 1998 JP
10-155798 Jun 1998 JP
11-47149 Feb 1999 JP
11-070124 Mar 1999 JP
11-169381 Jun 1999 JP
11-192238 Jul 1999 JP
11244298 Sep 1999 JP
2000-102545 Apr 2000 JP
2000-135222 May 2000 JP
2000342599 Dec 2000 JP
2000350732 Dec 2000 JP
2001008944 Jan 2001 JP
2001-29355 Feb 2001 JP
2001029356 Feb 2001 JP
2001-03400 Apr 2001 JP
2001128990 May 2001 JP
2001-190564 Jul 2001 JP
2002-136525 May 2002 JP
2002-528166 Sep 2002 JP
2003-116871 Apr 2003 JP
2003-175052 Jun 2003 JP
2003245285 Sep 2003 JP
2004-517668 Jun 2004 JP
2004-528869 Sep 2004 JP
2005-152663 Jun 2005 JP
2005-253789 Sep 2005 JP
2005312807 Nov 2005 JP
2006-015078 Jan 2006 JP
2006-501939 Jan 2006 JP
2006-095316 Apr 2006 JP
2008-054926 Mar 2008 JP
2011125195 Jun 2011 JP
401367 Nov 1974 SU
0036986 Jun 2000 WO
0059392 Oct 2000 WO
0115614 Mar 2001 WO
0154604 Aug 2001 WO
0245589 Sep 2002 WO
06021269 Mar 2006 WO
05110264 Apr 2006 WO
08040483 Apr 2008 WO
2011018154 Feb 2011 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (89)
Entry
European Search Report dated Oct. 2, 2014 issued in European Appln No. 14180638.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/731,674, filed Dec. 31, 2012; inventor: Siebrecht.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/065,644, filed Oct. 29, 2013; inventor: Reschke.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/098,953, filed Dec. 6, 2013; inventor: Cunningham.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/100,237, filed Dec. 9, 2013; inventor: Reschke.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/103,971, filed Dec. 12, 2013; inventor: Roy.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/105,374, filed Dec. 13, 2013; inventor: Moua.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/152,618, filed Jan. 10, 2014; inventor: Artale.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/152,690. filed Jan. 10, 2014; inventor: Hart.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/169,358, filed Jan. 31, 2014; inventor: Reschke.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/173,391. filed Feb. 5, 2014; inventor: Kharin.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/176,341, filed Feb. 10, 2014; inventor: Hart.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/177,812, filed Feb. 11, 2014; inventor: Dycus.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/182,894, filed Feb. 18, 2014; inventor: Hart.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/182,967, filed Feb. 18, 2014; inventor: Latimer.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/183,090, filed Feb. 18, 2014; inventor: Arts.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/196,066, filed Mar. 4, 2014; inventor: McCullough.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/250,180, filed Apr. 10, 2014; inventor: Guerra.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/253,017, filed Apr. 15, 2014; inventor: Orszulak.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/260,905, filed Apr. 24, 2014; inventor: Jensen.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/268,051, filed May 2, 2014; inventor: Hart.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/268,140, filed May 2, 2014; inventor: Twomey.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/273,350, filed May 8, 2014; inventor: Gilbert.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/274,445, filed May 9, 2014; inventor: Hixson.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/276,465, filed May 13, 2014; inventor: Kappus.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/282,738, filed May 20, 2014; inventor: Rachlin.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/284,618, filed May 22, 2014; inventor: Hempstead.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/286,105, filed May 23, 2014; inventor: Johnson.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/294,316, filed Jun. 3, 2014; inventor: Johnson.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/295,049, filed Jun. 3, 2014; inventor: Couture.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/295,730, filed Jun. 4, 2014; inventor: Sartor.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/295,757, filed Jun. 4, 2014; inventor: McKenna.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/297,316, filed Jun. 5, 2014; inventor: Ackley.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/297,404, filed Jun. 5, 2014; inventor: Allen.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/299,740, filed Jun. 9, 2014; inventor: Larson.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/319,869, filed Jun. 30, 2014; inventor: Cunningham.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/322,513, filed Jul. 2, 2014; inventor: Duffin.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/335,303, filed Jul. 18, 2014; inventor: Lee.
Michael Choti, “Abdominoperineal Resection with the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System and LigaSure Atlas 20 cm Open Instrument” ; Innovations That Work, Jun. 2003.
Chung et al., “Clinical Experience of Sutureless Closed Hennorrhoidectomy with LigaSure” Diseases of the Colon & Rectum vol. 46, No. 1 Jan. 2003.
Tinkcler L.F., “Combined Diathermy and Suction Forceps” , Feb. 6, 1967 (Feb. 6, 1965), British Medical Journal Feb. 6, 1976, vol. 1, nr. 5431 p. 361, ISSN: 0007-1447.
Carbonell et al., “Comparison of theGyrus PlasmaKinetic Sealer and the Valleylab LigaSure Device in the Hemostasis of Small, Medium, and Large-Sized Arteries” Carolinas Laparoscopic and Advanced Surgery Program, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC; Date: Aug. 2003.
Peterson et al. “Comparison of Healing Process Following Ligation with Sutures and Bipolar Vessel Sealing” Surgical Technology International (2001).
“Electrosurgery: A Historical Overview” Innovations in Electrosurgery; Sales/Product Literature; Dec. 31, 2000.
Johnson et al. “Evaluation of a Bipolar Electrothermal Vessel Sealing Device in Hemorrhoidectomy” Sales/Product Literature; Jan. 2004.
E. David Crawford “Evaluation of a New Vessel Sealing Device in Urologic Cancer Surgery” Sales/Product Literature 2000.
Johnson et al. “Evaluation of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System in Hemorrhoidectormy” American College of Surgeons (ACS) Clinicla Congress Poster (2000).
Muller et al., “Extended Left Hemicolectomy Using the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System” Innovations That Work, Sep. 1999.
Kennedy et al. “High-burst-strength, feedback-controlled bipolar vessel sealing” Surgical Endoscopy (1998) 12: 876-878.
Burdette et al. “In Vivo Probe Measurement Technique for Determining Dielectric Properties At VHF Through Microwave Frequencies”, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. MTT-28, No. 4, Apr. 1980 pp. 414-427.
Carus et al., “Initial Experience With the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System in Abdominal Surgery” Innovations That Work, Jun. 2002.
Heniford et al. “Initial Research and Clinical Results with an Electrothermal Bipolar Vessel Sealer” Oct. 1999.
Heniford et al. “Initial Results with an Electrothermal Bipolar Vessel Sealer” Surgical Endoscopy (2000) 15:799-801.
Herman et al., “Laparoscopic Intestinal Resection With the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System: A Case Report”; Innovations That Work, Feb. 2002.
Koyle et al., “Laparoscopic Palomo Varicocele Ligation in Children and Adolescents” Pediatric Endosurgery & Innovative Techniques, vol. 6, No. 1, 2002.
W. Scott Helton, “LigaSure Vessel Sealing System: Revolutionary Hemostasis Product for General Surgery”; Sales/Product Literature 1999.
LigaSure Vessel Sealing System, the Seal of Confidence in General, Gynecologic, Urologic, and Laparaoscopic Surgery; Sales/Product Literature; Apr. 2002.
Joseph Ortenberg “LigaSure System Used in Laparoscopic 1st and 2nd Stage Orchiopexy” Innovations That Work, Nov. 2002.
Sigel et al. “The Mechanism of Blood Vessel Closure by High Frequency Electrocoagulation” Surgery Gynecology & Obstetrics, Oct. 1965 pp. 823-831.
Sampayan et al, “Multilayer Ultra-High Gradient Insulator Technology” Discharges and Electrical Insulation in Vacuum, 1998. Netherlands Aug. 17-21, 1998; vol. 2, pp. 740-743.
Paul G. Horgan, “A Novel Technique for Parenchymal Division During Hepatectomy” The American Journal of Surgery, vol. 181, No. 3, Apr. 2001 pp. 236-237.
Benaron et al., “Optical Time-Of-Flight and Absorbance Imaging of Biologic Media”, Science, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC, vol. 259, Mar. 5, 1993, pp. 1463-1466.
Olsson et al. “Radical Cystectomy in Females” Current Surgical Techniques in Urology, vol. 14, Issue 3, 2001.
Palazzo et al. “Randomized clinical trial of Ligasure versus open haemorrhoidectomy” British Journal of Surgery 2002, 89, 154-157.
Levy et al. “Randomized Trial of Suture Versus Electrosurgical Bipolar Vessel Sealing in Vaginal hysterectomy” Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 102, No. 1, Jul. 2003.
“Reducing Needlestick Injuries in the Operating Room” Sales/Product Literature 2001.
Bergdahl et al. “Studies on Coagulation and the Development of an Automatic Computerized Bipolar Coagulator” J. Neurosurg, vol. 75, July 1991, pp. 148-151.
Strasberg et al. “A Phase I Study of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System in Hepatic Surgery” Section of HPB Surger, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis MO, Presented at AHPBA, Feb. 2001.
Sayfan et al. “Sutureless Closed Hemorrhoidectomy: A New Technique” Annals of Surgery vol. 234 No. 1 Jul. 2001; pp. 21-24.
Levy et al., “Update on Hysterectomy—New Technologies and Techniques” OBG Management, Feb. 2003.
Dulemba et al. “Use of a Bipolar Electrothermal Vessel Sealer in Laparoscopically Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy” Sales/Product Literature; Jan. 2004.
Strasberg et al., “Use of a Bipolar Vessel-Sealing Device for Parenchymal Transection During Liver Surgery” Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, vol. 6, No. 4, Jul./Aug. 2002 pp. 569-574.
Sengupta et al., “Use of a Computer-Controlled Bipolar Diathermy System in Radical Prostatectomies and Other Open Urological Surgery” ANZ Journal of Surgery (2001) 71.9 pp. 538-540.
Rothenberg et al. “Use of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System in Minimally Invasive Surgery in Children” Int'l Pediatric Endosurgery Group (IPEG) 2000.
Crawford et al. “Use of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System in Urologic Cancer Surgery” Grand Rounds in Urology 1999 vol. 1 Issue 4 pp. 10-17.
Craig Johnson, “Use of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System in Bloodless Hemorrhoidectomy” Innovations That Work, Mar. 2000.
Levy et al. “Use of a New Energy-based Vessel Ligation Device During Vaginal Hysterectomy” Int'l Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) World Congress 1999.
Barbara Levy, “Use of a New Vessel Ligation Device During Vaginal Hysterectomy” FIGO 2000, Washington, D.C.
E. David Crawford “Use of a Novel Vessel Sealing Technology in Management of the Dorsal Veinous Complex” Sales/Product Literature 2000.
Jarrett et al., “Use of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System for Peri-Hilar Vessels in Laparoscopic Nephrectomy” Sales/ Product Literature 2000.
Crouch et al. “A Velocity-Dependent Model for Needle Insertion in Soft Tissue” MICCAI 2005; LNCS 3750 pp. 624-632, Dated: 2005.
McLellan et al. “Vessel Sealing for Hemostasis During Pelvic Surgery” Int'l Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics FIGO World Congress 2000, Washington, D.C.
McLellan et al. “Vessel Sealing for Hemostasis During Gynecologic Surgery” Sales/Product Literature 1999.
U.S. Appl. No. 08/926,869, filed Sep. 10, 1997; inventor: James G. Chandler.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/177,950, filed Oct. 23, 1998; inventor: Randel A. Frazier.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/387,883, filed Sep. 1, 1999; inventor: Dale F. Schmaltz.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/591,328, filed Jun. 9, 2000; inventor: Thomas P. Ryan.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/336,970, filed Dec. 17, 2008; inventor: Paul R. Sremeich.
European Office Action dated May 17, 2017 issued in EP Application No. 14 180 638.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20150051640 A1 Feb 2015 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61865443 Aug 2013 US