This application generally relates to surgical robot systems, and specifically to systems, devices, and methods for restarting a surgical robotic system without comprising sterility.
In robotically-assisted or tele-manipulated surgical robotic systems, a surgeon operates a master console to remotely control one or more slave devices or surgical instruments at a surgical site. During the operation of the surgical robotic system, there may be events or factors that cause unexpected movement and/or operation of one or more components of the system. In these instances, a surgical robotic system may transition into a safe operating mode, whereby one or more functions of the surgical robotic system may be disabled. To restart the surgical robotic device, a surgeon or other user within an operating room may need to perform one or more actions that may compromise a sterile field. In some cases, the surgeon or other user may also need to release one or more surgical instruments from a patient before initiating a restart. If the sterile field is compromised either during an instrument release or restart of the surgical robotic system, then significant delays may result in a surgical procedure. As such, it may be desirable to have a way to restart a surgical robotic system without comprising the sterile field.
The present disclosure overcomes the drawbacks of previously-known surgical robotic systems by providing systems, devices, and methods for restarting a surgical robotic system without comprising sterility of a surgical site.
In some embodiments, an apparatus can include: a restart of a surgical robotic system that is configured to be activated by a sterile user from within a sterile field without compromising the sterile field; and a controller operatively coupled to the restart, the controller configured to: detect that the restart has been activated; and in response to detecting that the restart has been activated, restart the surgical robotic system.
In some embodiments, an apparatus can include: a restart of a surgical robotic system that is configured to be activated by a user from within a sterile field without compromising the sterile field; and a controller operatively coupled to the restart, the controller configured to: detect that the restart has been activated; in response to detecting that the restart has been activated, determine whether an instrument is coupled to a slave manipulator of the surgical robotic system; and in response to determining that the instrument is in the active state, enabling telemanipulation of the instrument in a predefined set of degrees-of-freedom (DOFs) that allows the instrument to engage further with or disengage from tissue or other components within a body of a patient without compromising the sterile field.
In some embodiments, a system can include: at least one slave manipulator isolated from a sterile field by a first sterile barrier, the at least one slave manipulator including a plurality of slave links and a plurality of drive units; at least one instrument configured to be removably coupled to the at least one slave manipulator, the at least one sterile instrument configured to be positioned via movement of the plurality of slave links and to be manipulated in a plurality of degrees-of-freedom (DOFs) via activation of the plurality of drive units; and a master console disposed separately from the slave manipulator and isolated from the sterile field by a second sterile barrier, the master console including a plurality of master links being operatively coupled to the plurality of slave links such that movement of the plurality of master links causes corresponding movement in the plurality of slave links; at least one sterile handle grip configured to be removably coupled to the master console, the at least one sterile handle grip when coupled to the master console being configured to control the activation of the plurality of drive units to manipulate the at least one instrument in the plurality of DOFs; a restart that is configured to be activated by a user from within the sterile field without compromising the sterile field; and at least one controller operatively coupled to the at least one slave manipulator and the master console, the controller configured to: deactivate controlled movement of the plurality of slave links and the manipulation of at least one instrument during a surgical procedure in response to detecting an abnormal event; detect that the restart has been activated; and after detecting that the restart has been activated, restart the surgical robotic system.
In some embodiments, a method for maintaining sterility of a surgical robotic system while restarting during a surgical procedure can include: after the interruption and with a slave manipulator of the surgical robotic system being deactivated from movement, detecting that a restart of the surgical robotic system that is configured to be activated from within a sterile field and without compromising sterility has been activated; and after detecting that the restart has been activated, restarting the surgical robotic system.
The present disclosure relates to surgical robotic systems having a master console and slave manipulators, with components and features for enabling a restart without comprising the sterility of the surgical robotic system. Systems, devices, and methods described herein allow a surgical robotic system to be restarted as well as an instrument to be released (or to perform other functions) after a temporary interruption, while maintaining a sterile environment.
During a surgical operation, a surgical robotic system may be used to perform certain minimally invasive procedures. In some embodiments, the surgical robotic system may include one or more patient-side carts and a surgeon or master console. The patient-side carts may include manipulators (e.g., robotic arms) that support one or more sterile instruments, which may be used during the surgical operation to engage with the patient anatomy. At times, it may become necessary to restart the surgical robotic system. For example, the surgical robotic system may experience a temporary interruption if certain events and/or conditions arise (e.g., unexpected movement, collisions, component failure). When there is a temporary interruption, the surgical robotic system may disable certain functions (e.g., deactivate movement of the slave manipulators and/or sterile instruments). To then resume the surgical robotic operation, the surgical robotic system may need to be restarted and/or any instruments coupled to the surgical robotic system may need to be released from the patient anatomy.
The master console 110 can be operatively coupled to the slave console(s) 120. For example, the master console 110 can be coupled to the slave console(s) 120 via wired and/or wireless connections. The master console 110 can include one or more master manipulator(s) 112 and one or more master controller(s) 114. The master manipulator(s) 112 can include a plurality of master links that are interconnected by a plurality of joints. Movement can be applied to the master manipulator(s) 112 by a sterile handle, which can be actuated by a sterile user (e.g., a surgeon). The movement of the master manipulator(s) 112 and one or more actuators of the handle can be sensed, e.g., using a plurality of sensors, and transmitted to the master controller(s) 114. In operation, the master controller(s) 114 can send instructions to one or more slave console(s) 120 to cause one or more drive units and/or actuators at the slave console(s) 120 to move based on the movements applied at the master console 110.
Each slave console 120 can include a slave manipulator 122 and/or an instrument 128 that is coupled to the slave manipulator 122. The slave manipulator 122 can include a plurality of links that are interconnected by a plurality of joints, and the instrument 128 can include one or more components that can be actuated in a plurality of degrees of freedom (DOFs). The slave console(s) 120 can include one or more drive units and/or actuators that control movement of the plurality of links and joints of the slave manipulator 122 and the component(s) of the instrument 128. In accordance with aspects of the present disclosures, the slave manipulator 112 and the instrument 128 of the slave console(s) 120 can be configured to move in a manner responsive to movements applied at the handle of the master console 110, such that the slave manipulator 112 and the instrument 128 reproduces the movement applied at the handle of the master console 110. In particular, the master console 110 can generate instructions or commands based on movements applied at the handle and transmit those instructions or commands to the slave console(s) 120 to cause movement of the slave manipulator 112 and/or the instrument 128. The slave console(s) 120 can include a slave controller 124 that can be configured to interpret the instructions or other signals from the master console 110 and to control the movement of the slave manipulator 112 and/or the instrument 128.
While the slave console 120 is described as having a slave manipulator 122 and an instrument 128, it can be appreciated that a single slave console 120 can include more than one slave manipulator 122 and/or more than one instrument 128. For example, a slave console 120 can include two slave manipulators 122 that each support one or more instruments 128.
The master controller(s) 114 and the slave controller(s) 124, as described herein, can include one or more of a memory, a processor, a communications interface, and/or an input/output device. The memory can include any type of suitable non-transitory compute readable media that can store instructions that can be executed by one or more processors. The memory can be, for example, a random access memory (RAM), a memory buffer, a hard drive, a database, an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM), an electrically erasable read-only memory (EEPROM), a read-only memory (ROM), and/or so forth. The processor can be any suitable processing device configured to run and/or execute functions associated with the surgical robotic system 100. The processor can be a general purpose processor, a Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA), an Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC), a Digital Signal Processor (DSP), and/or the like. The communications interface can include wired and/or wireless interfaces for receiving information and/or sending information to other devices. The input/output device can include one or more displays, audio devices, touchscreens, keyboards, or other input or output devices for presenting information to and/or receiving information from a user.
Further examples of surgical robotic systems are described in PCT Patent Application No. PCT/IB2020/050039, filed Jan. 4, 2020, titled “Surgical Robot Systems Comprising Robotic Telemanipulators and Integrated Laparoscopy,” and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/269,383, filed Feb. 6, 2019, titled “Surgical Robot Systems Comprising Robotic Telemanipulators and Integrated Laparoscopy,” the disclosures of each of which are incorporated by reference herein.
As depicted, the master console 110 can be located within the operating room 104. The master console 110 can include a portion that covered by one or more sterile drape(s) 111, which allows that portion of the master console 110 to remain sterile during a surgical operation. In some embodiments, the master manipulator(s) 112 and the master controller(s) 114 can be covered by one or more sterile drape(s) 111, while certain sterile components (e.g., handles) can be removably coupled to the master manipulator at sterile coupling interfaces.
The slave console(s) 120 can be located within the operating room 104 and distributed around a patient P. Each slave console 120 can include a portion that is covered by one or more sterile drapes 121, which allows that portion of the respective slave console 120 to remain sterile during the surgical operation. The slave console(s) 120 can be configured to support and manipulate one or more surgical instruments. The surgical instruments can be sterile, and can be removably coupled to the slave console(s) 120 via sterile coupling interfaces.
If the system 100 includes an imaging device 130, then the imaging device 130 can also include a portion that is covered by one or more sterile drapes 131, which allows that portion of the imaging device 130 to remain sterile during a surgical operation.
While one or more controllers are described with reference to
In operation, movement of the first slave manipulator 212a (and handle coupled thereto) can be sensed and transmitted to the master controller 214, which can then send instructions to a first slave console 220a to control the movement of the first slave console 220a. Similarly, movement of the second slave manipulator 212b (and handle coupled thereto) can be sensed and transmitted to the master controller 214, which can then send instructions to a second slave console 220b to control the movement of the second slave console 220b. In some embodiments, the master console 210 can also include one or more foot pedal(s) or other actuator(s), which can be depressed to engage or release a clutch. When the clutch is engaged (e.g., by depressing the one or more foot pedal(s)), the master controller 214 can be configured to send instructions that cause the slave consoles 220a, 220b to replicate movements of the master manipulators 212a, 212b. And when the clutch is not engaged, the master controller 214 may pause sending instruction to the slave consoles 220a, 220b, such that the slave consoles 220a, 220b do not replicate the movements of the master manipulators 212a, 212b and/or deactivate the movement of the slave console(s) 220a, 220b in some other manner.
A first slave console 220a (e.g., a left slave console) may include a sterile zone 221a (e.g., a fourth sterile zone). A sterile instrument 228a can be removably couplable to the first slave console 220a (and specifically, a slave manipulator of the first slave console 220a) at a sterile coupling interface 223a. The sterile coupling interface 223a can allow the sterile instrument 228a to be coupled to and decoupled from the first slave console 220a without compromising the sterile zone 221a of the first slave console 220a. A second slave console 220b (e.g., a right slave console) may include a sterile zone 220b (e.g., a fifth sterile zone). A sterile instrument 228b can be removably couplable to the second slave console 220b (and specifically, a slave manipulator of the second slave console 220b) at a sterile coupling interface 223b. The sterile coupling interface 228b can allow the sterile instrument 228b to be coupled to and decoupled from the second slave console 220b without compromising the sterile zone 221b of the second slave console 220b. The first and second slave consoles 220a, 220b can also include components or surfaces 229a, 229b, respectively, that are disposed outside of the sterile zones 221a, 221b. For example, the slave consoles 220a, 220b can include one or more transport elements 229a, 229b (e.g., wheels) that are disposed outside of the sterile zones 221a, 221b.
The endoscopic device 230 can include a sterile zone 231 (e.g., a sixth sterile zone) and one or more non-sterile components or surfaces 239.
As shown in
The instrument 328 can include a head 327 at a proximal region of the instrument 328, an end effector 329 at a distal region of the instrument, and a shaft 326 extending therebetween. The head 327 and/or shaft 326 can define one or more lumens, e.g., for receiving one or more other components such as, for example, electrical cables for coupling an electrosurgical generator with the end effector 329 and/or cables for actuating the end effector 329. The instrument 328 can be sized and shaped to be inserted through the lumen or opening of the sterile coupling interface 323. Further examples of instruments and coupling interfaces are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/976,812, filed May 10, 2018, titled “Translational Instrument Interface for Surgical Robot and Surgical Robot Systems Comprising the Same,” the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
During a surgical operation, the one or more drive units and/or actuators of the slave console may drive movement of the end effector 329 of the instrument 328 to perform a surgical task, such as, for example, grasping tissue and/or gripping a needle, suture or other object. When the surgical operation is interrupted, e.g., due to a non-critical temporary interruption, the surgical robotic system may not be easily restarted if the instrument 328 (or other instruments coupled to the surgical robotic system) is blocked inside of the patient (e.g., grasped onto patient tissue and/or gripped onto a needle, suture, or other object). In these instances, the instrument 328 may need to be released first (e.g., released from the tissue, needle, or suture) under controlled conditions before surgical robotic system can be restarted. If the instrument 328 is blocked inside of the patient while tissue is grasped, uncontrolled motion to release the instrument may cause damages to the patient.
In some embodiments, the surgical robotic system may include one or more emergency release features 351. The emergency release features 351 may be cavities that can receive an emergency release tool, such as the tool 350 shown in
After an unexpected interruption, it may also be necessary to restart the various components of the surgical robotic system before resuming the surgical operation. For example, each of the slave consoles that are in use may need to be restarted before the surgical operation can resume. In some embodiments, a slave console can include a switch or other actuator for restarting. For example, as depicted in
Systems, devices, and methods described herein provide mechanisms for restarting a surgical robotic system and/or releasing one or more surgical instruments without compromising sterility. The restart procedure can be initiated or performed from a sterile area of a surgical robotic system. If any instruments are blocked within a patient, then the restart procedure can include or be followed by an instrument release procedure, whereby an instrument can be actuated to release from patient tissue and/or other objects within a patient without compromising the sterility of the surgical robotic system and/or components and accessories thereof or the sterility of users within the operating room.
Importantly, the restart can be activated or actuated by a sterile user within the sterile field without comprising sterility. In the example depicted in
In some embodiments, the sets of buttons 516, 517 may need to be pressed according to a predefined combination or sequence before activating a restart. For example, one or more buttons may need to be pressed concurrently or sequentially for a predefined period of time (e.g., between about 2 seconds and about 10 seconds, inclusive of all sub-ranges and values) to activate the restart. In some embodiments, a single button may need to be pressed for a predefined period of time (e.g., between about 2 seconds and about 10 seconds, inclusive of all sub-ranges and values) to activate the restart. Having a specific combination or sequence can avoid an accidental restart. In some embodiments, activation of the restart may not initiate a restart process until certain conditions are present. For example, activation of the restart (e.g., pressing the button(s) 516, 517) may not initiate the restart process when the surgical robotic system is not in an interrupted state (e.g., when the surgical robotic system is operating normally, or when the surgical robotic system is powered off).
In some embodiments, activation of the restart can restart the entire surgical robotic system, e.g., including the master console 510, one or more slave consoles, and/or an endoscopic device. In other words, the restart of the entire surgical robotic system can be activated using one centralized command. Alternatively, or additionally, one or more components of the surgical robotic system can be selectively restarted, e.g., based on actuation of different combinations or sequences of one or more restart elements. For example, pressing on a button 517 located at or near master manipulator 512a may activate a restart of a left slave console, while pressing on a button 516a or 516b located at or near master manipulator 512b may activate a restart of a right slave console. Such selectively may be useful in instances where a first slave console may have been temporarily interrupted while a second slave console has not been temporarily interrupted.
While the restart is shown as being located on the master console 510 in the example embodiment depicted in
In some embodiments, a surgeon or other operator within the operating room may control which procedure is implemented by the surgical robotic system. When the surgical robotic system is unexpectedly or temporarily interrupted, the surgical robotic system can be in one of three states of operation. In a first state, the surgical robotic system may not have any instruments present (i.e., no instruments are coupled to the slave manipulators of the surgical robotic system). In such instances, the user can activate a restart, and the surgical robotic system can proceed with restarting according to method 700. In a second state, the surgical robotic system may have one or more instruments present (i.e., one or more instruments are coupled to one or more slave manipulators of the surgical robotic system), but the one or more instruments may not be active or blocked within a patient. In such cases, the instruments do not need to be released and therefore the user may choose to remove the instruments before activating the restart. If the restart is activated without any instruments, then the surgical robotic system can proceed with restarting according to method 700. If there are still instruments present, then the surgical robotic system can proceed with restarting according to method 600. In a third state, the surgical robotic system may have one or more instruments present, and at least one of those instruments may be active or blocked within a patient. In such cases, the user can remove any inactive instruments first and then activate the restart. When the restart is activated, then surgical robotic system can proceed with restarting according to method 600 to release the one or more active instruments.
Referring now to
At 603, the surgical robotic system may optionally, in response to detecting that the restart has been activated, determine whether restarting is allowed. For example, the surgical robotic system may determine whether certain conditions are present that necessitate a restart. In some embodiments, a restart may only be allowed when one or more components of the surgical robotic system have experienced a temporary interruption. A temporary interruption can be caused by one or more abnormal events or conditions, including, for example, (1) an unexpected movement of a slave manipulator (e.g., a joint or link of a slave manipulator), (2) an unexpected movement of the master console (e.g., the master manipulator or another portion of the master console), (3) an input anomaly associated with the master console (e.g., too fast of a movement of the master manipulator, too high acceleration of the master manipulator, lost of integrity, sensor failure), (4) a collision between a portion of the surgical robotic system (e.g., one or more links of the slave manipulator and/or the instrument) and an external object, or (5) a failure of a sensor, actuator, or controller of the surgical robotic system. When the surgical robotic system is interrupted, it may enter into a safe mode, whereby controlled movement of the slave manipulators by the master console (i.e., telemanipulation of the slave manipulators) may be deactivated. Therefore, in some embodiments, the surgical robotic system may determine whether it is operating in a safe mode, at 603. If the surgical robotic system determines that at least a portion of the surgical robotic system has been temporarily interrupted (e.g., is operating in a safe mode), then the method 600 continues to 604. Alternatively, if the surgical robotic system determines that it is operating normally or has not been interrupted, then the surgical robotic system may continue its normal operation, at 614.
At 604, the surgical robotic system may determine whether an instrument is active. In some embodiments, the surgical robotic system may determine whether an instrument is active by determining whether an instrument is coupled to any one of the slave manipulators of the surgical robotic system. For example, when an instrument is coupled to one of the slave manipulators, then the surgical robotic system may assume that the instrument is active and can proceed to implementing an instrument release procedure, at 606. Alternatively, if no instrument is coupled to a slave manipulator, then the surgical robotic system can proceed to restarting the surgical robotic system, at 612. In some embodiments, the surgical robotic system may determine whether an instrument is active by determining whether an instrument is disposed within a patient. For example, the surgical robotic system may use one or more sensors to determine that an instrument is located within a patient. When an instrument is disposed within a patient, the surgical robotic system may then proceed to implementing an instrument release procedure, at 606. When no instrument is disposed within the patient, then the surgical robotic system may proceed, optionally, to unlocking the instruments, at 610, or to restarting the surgical robotic system, at 612.
At 606, when there is at least one active instrument, the surgical robotic system can implement an instrument release. The surgical robotic system can implement an instrument release by allowing for controlled movement by the master console or telemanipulation of the instrument in a limited or reduced set of DOFs. In embodiments where the instrument includes a set of jaws, the surgical robotic system may enable controlled movement of the instrument in one or two DOFs, including, for example, a first DOF that allows a first jaw to move (e.g., pivot or translate) relative to a second jaw and/or a second DOF that allows the second jaw to move relative to the first jaw. In embodiments where the instrument includes a hook, a scalpel, a spatula, a needle holder, a dissector, a scissor, or a grasper, the surgical robotic system may enable controlled movement of the instrument in one or two DOFs that allows the hook, scalpel, spatula, needle holder, dissector, scissor, or grasper to engage in translational and/or rotational movement. Further details of an example instrument release procedure are described below with reference to
In some embodiments, the surgical robotic system can implement further engagement of an instrument with patient tissue or other components within a patient. For example, the surgical robotic system may allow for controlled movement by the master console or telemanipulation of the instrument in a limited or reduced set of DOFs that allows the instrument to increase its engagement with patient tissue and/or other components. This can be desirable when a patient is bleeding or when other emergency action may need to be taken within a patient before an instrument is to be released. For example, the instrument can be engaged further with patient tissue to apply pressure to stop bleeding.
Where there are multiple instruments that are coupled to the surgical robotic system (e.g., coupled to one or more slave manipulators of the surgical robotic system), the surgical robotic system may enable instrument release and/or further engagement of the multiple instruments concurrently and/or sequentially. When all instruments have been released, at 608, the method 600 can continue, optionally, to 610 or continue to 612.
In some embodiments, the one or more instruments coupled to the surgical robotic system may be locked in engagement with the slave manipulators, e.g., by one or more locking mechanism(s). In such embodiments, the one or more instruments may need to be released (e.g., the locking mechanism(s) may need to be released) so that the instruments can be removed from the slave manipulators. In some embodiments, the surgical robotic system may optionally unlock the instruments, at 610, such that a sterile user can remove the instruments from the slave manipulators. Alternatively, or additionally, the instruments can be manually unlocked by a user and removed from the slave manipulators.
At 612, the surgical robotic system can automatically restart. In some embodiments, restarting the surgical robotic system can include powering off and on (i.e., power cycling) each component of the surgical robotic system. For example, the master console, each of the slave consoles, and/or the endoscopic device can be powered off and then back on. Optionally, in some embodiments, after powering off and on the surgical robotic system, one or more components of the surgical robotic system may be placed back in a starting or home position. For example, one or more slave manipulators of the surgical robotic system may be placed back in a home position.
At 614, the surgical robotic system may then continue its operation. For example, one or more instruments may be inserted back into the slave manipulators and then the surgical procedure can resume.
In some embodiments, the surgical robotic system may prevent the user from applying an unintended force on grabbed tissue when taking control of the instrument actuation. In such embodiments, the user may need to first close a handle at the master console and then open the handle until the handle position (or command associated therewith) matches or corresponds to the current position of the instrument (i.e., the position of the instrument when it was interrupted). In response to the handle position matching the current position of the instrument, the actuation of the instrument may then activate and the movement of the handle can be replicated at the instrument. Therefore, in such embodiments, only an opening movement can be the first movement that is replicated. Subsequent movements following the opening of the instrument can then include closing of the instrument (e.g., under visual guidance). Alternatively, in some embodiments (e.g., such as those involving dissention or anastomosis where a vessel may be held open with one or more jaws), the surgical robotic system may require the first movement to be a closing movement.
While various inventive embodiments have been described and illustrated herein, those of ordinary skill in the art will readily envision a variety of other means and/or structures for performing the function and/or obtaining the results and/or one or more of the advantages described herein, and each of such variations and/or modifications is deemed to be within the scope of the inventive embodiments described herein. More generally, those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that all parameters, dimensions, materials, and configurations described herein are meant to be exemplary and that the actual parameters, dimensions, materials, and/or configurations will depend upon the specific application or applications for which the inventive teachings is/are used. Those skilled in the art will recognize, or be able to ascertain using no more than routine experimentation, many equivalents to the specific inventive embodiments described herein. It is, therefore, to be understood that the foregoing embodiments are presented by way of example only and that, within the scope of the appended claims and equivalents thereto; inventive embodiments may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described and claimed. Inventive embodiments of the present disclosure are directed to each individual feature, system, article, material, and/or method described herein. In addition, any combination of two or more such features, systems, articles, materials, and/or methods, if such features, systems, articles, materials, and/or methods are not mutually inconsistent, is included within the inventive scope of the present disclosure.
Also, various inventive concepts may be embodied as one or more methods, of which an example has been provided. The acts performed as part of the method may be ordered in any suitable way. Accordingly, embodiments may be constructed in which acts are performed in an order different than illustrated, which may include performing some acts simultaneously, even though shown as sequential acts in illustrative embodiments.
As used herein, the terms “about” and/or “approximately” when used in conjunction with numerical values and/or ranges generally refer to those numerical values and/or ranges near to a recited numerical value and/or range. In some instances, the terms “about” and “approximately” may mean within ±10% of the recited value. For example, in some instances, “about 100 [units]” may mean within ±10% of 100 (e.g., from 90 to 110). The terms “about” and “approximately” may be used interchangeably.
The indefinite articles “a” and “an,” as used herein in the specification and in the claims, unless clearly indicated to the contrary, should be understood to mean “at least one.”
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2764301 | Goertz et al. | Sep 1956 | A |
2771199 | Jelatis | Nov 1956 | A |
2774488 | Goertz et al. | Dec 1956 | A |
2846084 | Goertz et al. | Aug 1958 | A |
3065863 | Saunders, Jr. | Nov 1962 | A |
3095096 | Chesley | Jun 1963 | A |
3212651 | Specht et al. | Oct 1965 | A |
3261480 | Haaker et al. | Jul 1966 | A |
3297172 | Haaker et al. | Jan 1967 | A |
3391801 | Haaker | Jul 1968 | A |
3425569 | Haaker | Feb 1969 | A |
4221516 | Haaker et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4522196 | Cunningham et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4756655 | Jameson | Jul 1988 | A |
5147357 | Rose et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5176352 | Braun | Jan 1993 | A |
5207114 | Salisbury, Jr. et al. | May 1993 | A |
5209747 | Knoepfler | May 1993 | A |
5304203 | El-Mallawany et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5308358 | Bond et al. | May 1994 | A |
5330502 | Hassler et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5368606 | Marlow et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5383888 | Zvenyatsky et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5484435 | Fleenor et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5591119 | Adair | Jan 1997 | A |
5599151 | Daum et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5603723 | Aranyi et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5631973 | Green | May 1997 | A |
5649955 | Hashimoto et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5649956 | Jensen et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5710870 | Ohm et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5716352 | Viola et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5735874 | Measamer et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5779727 | Orejola | Jul 1998 | A |
5784542 | Ohm | Jul 1998 | A |
5792045 | Adair | Aug 1998 | A |
5797900 | Madhani et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5810716 | Mukherjee et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5810805 | Sutcu et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5828813 | Ohm | Oct 1998 | A |
5908436 | Cuschieri et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5931832 | Jensen | Aug 1999 | A |
5951587 | Qureshi et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5976122 | Madhani et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6026701 | Reboulet | Feb 2000 | A |
6063095 | Wang | May 2000 | A |
6132368 | Cooper | Oct 2000 | A |
6197017 | Brock et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206903 | Ramans | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6233504 | Das | May 2001 | B1 |
6281651 | Haanpaa et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6312435 | Wallace et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6331181 | Tierney et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6358249 | Chen et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6361534 | Chen et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6364879 | Chen et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6371952 | Madhani et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6375610 | Verschuur | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6385509 | Das | May 2002 | B2 |
6394998 | Wallace et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6435794 | Springer | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6436107 | Wang | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6459926 | Nowlin et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6491701 | Tierney et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6504456 | Iio et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6554844 | Lee et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6587750 | Gerbi et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6594552 | Nowlin et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6659939 | Moll et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6671581 | Niemeyer et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6699177 | Wang et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6786896 | Madhani et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6788999 | Green | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6799065 | Niemeyer | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6840938 | Morley et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6850817 | Green | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6852107 | Wang et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6879880 | Nowlin et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6902560 | Morley et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6913613 | Schwarz et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6951535 | Ghodoussi et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6991627 | Madhani et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6994708 | Manzo | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7025064 | Wang et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7048745 | Tierney et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7083571 | Wang et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7090637 | Danitz et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7101363 | Nishizawa et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7122032 | Shinmura et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7204836 | Wagner et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7232440 | Dumbauld et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7241289 | Braun | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7306597 | Manzo | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7316681 | Madhani et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7338513 | Lee et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7364582 | Lee | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7373219 | Nowlin et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7398707 | Morley et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7481824 | Boudreaux et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7549998 | Braun | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7594912 | Cooper et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7608039 | Todd | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7615002 | Rothweiler et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7615067 | Lee et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7674255 | Braun | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7695481 | Wang | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7699855 | Anderson et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7756036 | Druke et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7819894 | Mitsuishi et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7824401 | Manzo et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7828798 | Buysse et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7833156 | Williams et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7890211 | Green | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7914521 | Wang et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7976458 | Stefanchik et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8048084 | Schneid | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8105320 | Manzo | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8114017 | Bacher | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8137263 | Marescaux et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8142447 | Cooper et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8224485 | Unsworth | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8246617 | Welt et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8267958 | Braun | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8287469 | Stefanchik et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8292889 | Cunningham et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8306656 | Schaible et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8308738 | Nobis et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8332072 | Schaible et al. | Dec 2012 | B1 |
8336751 | Scirica | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8353898 | Lutze et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8357161 | Mueller | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8382742 | Hermann et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8388516 | Sholev | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8403832 | Cunningham et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8414475 | Sholev | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8418904 | Wenchell et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8423186 | Itkowitz et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8433389 | Geiger et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8435171 | Sholev | May 2013 | B2 |
8437754 | Kubota et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8496152 | Viola | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8518024 | Williams et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8523900 | Jinno et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8540748 | Murphy et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8560118 | Greer | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8562592 | Conlon et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8568444 | Cunningham | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8579176 | Smith et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8591397 | Berkelman et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8597280 | Cooper et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8602287 | Yates et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8603077 | Cooper et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8616431 | Timm et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8617203 | Stefanchik et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8663270 | Donnigan et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8668689 | Dumbauld et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8668702 | Awtar et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8690755 | Sholev | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8696666 | Sanai et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8709000 | Madhani et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8738181 | Greer | May 2014 | B2 |
8761930 | Nixon | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8768509 | Unsworth | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8792688 | Unsworth | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8801752 | Fortier et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8816628 | Nowlin et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8818560 | Kishi | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8821480 | Burbank | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8827135 | Amid et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8828046 | Stefanchik et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8845517 | Russo | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8845622 | Paik et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8870049 | Amid et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8870867 | Walberg et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8887979 | Mastri et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8894674 | Balanev et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8919348 | Williams et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8930027 | Schaible et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8945098 | Seibold et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8961499 | Paik et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8961514 | Garrison | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8968187 | Kleyman et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8989844 | Cinquin et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8992564 | Jaspers | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9023015 | Penna | May 2015 | B2 |
9033998 | Schaible et al. | May 2015 | B1 |
9044238 | Orszulak | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9052710 | Farwell | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9084606 | Greep | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9113860 | Viola et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9113861 | Martin et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9131986 | Greer | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9149339 | Unsworth | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9204939 | Frimer et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9216013 | Scirica et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9244523 | Ogawa | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9295379 | Sholev | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9307894 | Von Grünberg et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9333040 | Shellenberger et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9345545 | Shellenberger et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9360934 | Ruiz Morales et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9421003 | Williams et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9474580 | Hannaford et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9480531 | Von Grünberg | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9492240 | Itkowitz et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9603672 | Shellenberger et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9669542 | Karguth et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9696700 | Beira et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9730717 | Katsuki | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9757204 | Frimer et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9757206 | Frimer et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9763741 | Alvarez et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9795282 | Sholev et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9795454 | Seeber et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9825455 | Sandhu et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9877794 | Csiky | Jan 2018 | B2 |
D816243 | Barber | Apr 2018 | S |
9937013 | Frimer et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9943372 | Sholev et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
10028792 | Frimer et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10039609 | Frimer et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10039820 | Coller et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10052157 | Frimer et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10064691 | Frimer et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10071488 | Robinson et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10085811 | Weir | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10092164 | Sholev et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10092359 | Beira et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10092365 | Seeber | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10136956 | Seeber | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10201392 | Frimer et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10265129 | Beira | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10325072 | Beira et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10357320 | Beira | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10357324 | Flatt et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10363055 | Beira et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10413374 | Chassot et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10500005 | Weir | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10510447 | Beira et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10548680 | Beira | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10568709 | Beira | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10646291 | Turner | May 2020 | B2 |
10646294 | Beira | May 2020 | B2 |
10786272 | Beira | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10864049 | Beira | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10864052 | Beira | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10959792 | Huang | Mar 2021 | B1 |
11039820 | Beira | Jun 2021 | B2 |
11058503 | Chassot et al. | Jul 2021 | B2 |
11337716 | Beira | May 2022 | B2 |
11478315 | Beira | Oct 2022 | B2 |
11510745 | Chassot et al. | Nov 2022 | B2 |
11571195 | Beira | Feb 2023 | B2 |
20010020200 | Das | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020040217 | Jinno | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020049367 | Irion et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020072736 | Tierney et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020082612 | Moll et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030013949 | Moll et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030155747 | Bridges | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030208186 | Moreyra | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040049205 | Lee et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040116906 | Lipow | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040236316 | Danitz et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040253079 | Sanchez | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050096502 | Khalili | May 2005 | A1 |
20050204851 | Morley et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050240078 | Kwon et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060043698 | Bridges | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060079884 | Manzo et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060178559 | Kumar et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060183975 | Saadat et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060219065 | Jinno et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060235436 | Anderson et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060253109 | Chu | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070088340 | Brock et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070137371 | Devengenzo et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070156123 | Moll et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070208375 | Nishizawa et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070299387 | Williams et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080039255 | Jinno et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080046122 | Manzo et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080058776 | Jo et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071208 | Voegele et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080103492 | Morley et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080177285 | Brock et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080215065 | Wang | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080243106 | Coe et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080287926 | Abou El Kheir | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080314181 | Schena | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090030449 | Kawai et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090036902 | DiMaio et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090192522 | Blumenkranz | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090198253 | Omori | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090216248 | Uenohara et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090216249 | Jinno et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090247821 | Rogers | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090248039 | Cooper et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090275994 | Phan et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090326552 | Diolaiti | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100004508 | Naito et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100011900 | Burbank | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100023025 | Zeiner et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100082041 | Prisco | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100094130 | Ninomiya et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100121347 | Jaspers | May 2010 | A1 |
20100160929 | Rogers et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100160940 | Lutze et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100170519 | Romo et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100174410 | Greer | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100225209 | Goldberg | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100228249 | Mohr | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100234857 | Itkowitz et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100286712 | Won et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100305595 | Hermann | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100318099 | Itkowitz et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100318101 | Choi | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100324551 | Gerhardt | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331859 | Omori | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110087236 | Stokes et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110087238 | Wang et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110213346 | Morley et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110230867 | Hirschfeld et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110275901 | Shelton, IV | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110290854 | Timm et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110301419 | Craft et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120010628 | Cooper et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120027762 | Schofield | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120031114 | Mueller et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120049623 | Nakayama | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120095298 | Stefanchik et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120116163 | Lutze et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120132018 | Tang et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120143173 | Steege et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120158014 | Stefanchik et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120191245 | Fudaba et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120203269 | Katsuki | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120209292 | Devengenzo et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120232339 | Csiky | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120253326 | Kleyman | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120277762 | Lathrop et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120283745 | Goldberg et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120283747 | Popovic | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120289973 | Prisco et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120289974 | Rogers et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120296341 | Seibold et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130024024 | Namiki | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130123805 | Park et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130144274 | Stefanchik et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130172713 | Kirschenman | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130172906 | Olson et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130245643 | Woodard, Jr. et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130245647 | Martin et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130282027 | Woodard, Jr. et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130303408 | Indermuhle | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130304083 | Kaercher et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130304084 | Beira et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140005681 | Gee et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140018447 | McGovern et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140018780 | Hirscheld | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140018960 | Itkowitz | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140052152 | Au et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140076088 | Berkelman et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140114481 | Ogawa et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140121834 | Ogawa | May 2014 | A1 |
20140135794 | Cau | May 2014 | A1 |
20140142595 | Awtar et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140148950 | Ogawa | May 2014 | A1 |
20140166023 | Kishi | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140180308 | Von Grünberg | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140188091 | Vidal et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140188159 | Steege | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140195010 | Beira et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140200561 | Ingmanson et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140207150 | Rosa et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140229007 | Kishi | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140230595 | Butt et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140249546 | Shvartsberg et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140263541 | Leimbach et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140263553 | Leimbach et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140275961 | Kassab et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276950 | Smaby et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276956 | Crainich et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140277017 | Leimbach et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140350570 | Lee | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150057499 | Erden et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150057702 | Edmondson et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150060517 | Williams | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150066018 | Doll et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150105821 | Ward et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150113933 | Markt | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150142018 | Sniffin et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150150575 | Hartoumbekis et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150173840 | Lohmeier | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150230869 | Shim et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150250547 | Fukushima et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150265355 | Prestel et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150272575 | Leimbach | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160022365 | Jensen et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160051274 | Howell et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160151115 | Karguth et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160220314 | Huelman et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160256155 | Shelton, IV | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160302876 | Teichtmann | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160346053 | Beira | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160374766 | Schuh | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170020615 | Koenig et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170020617 | Weir | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170245954 | Beira | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170252096 | Felder et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170265951 | Grover et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170273749 | Grover et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170308667 | Beira et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170360522 | Beira | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20170367778 | Beira | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180000472 | Beira | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180000544 | Beira | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180000550 | Beira | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180008358 | Kostrzewski et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180028269 | Morel et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180055583 | Schuh et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180078439 | Cagle et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180110576 | Kopp | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180125519 | Beira et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180125592 | Beira | May 2018 | A1 |
20180242991 | Beira | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180353252 | Chassot et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180360548 | Marshall et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190060012 | Weir | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190133698 | Beira et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190239968 | Beira | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190239972 | Chassot et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190328473 | Chassot et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20200105412 | Beira et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200275985 | Thompson | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200390510 | Thompson | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20210093397 | Huang | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210307737 | Beira | Oct 2021 | A1 |
20210330407 | Chassot | Oct 2021 | A1 |
20210402603 | Murphy | Dec 2021 | A1 |
20230129956 | Lyons | Apr 2023 | A1 |
20230142404 | Ariki | May 2023 | A1 |
20230149002 | Beira | May 2023 | A1 |
20230190396 | Taheri | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230200629 | Yang | Jun 2023 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101027010 | Aug 2007 | CN |
101584594 | Nov 2009 | CN |
101637402 | Feb 2010 | CN |
101732093 | Jun 2010 | CN |
103717355 | Apr 2014 | CN |
4303311 | Aug 1994 | DE |
19652792 | May 1999 | DE |
10314827 | Apr 2004 | DE |
10314828 | Jul 2004 | DE |
102012222755 | Jun 2014 | DE |
102014205036 | Sep 2015 | DE |
102014205159 | Sep 2015 | DE |
0595291 | May 1994 | EP |
0621009 | Oct 1994 | EP |
0677275 | Oct 1995 | EP |
0776739 | Jun 1997 | EP |
1254642 | Nov 2002 | EP |
1279371 | Dec 2004 | EP |
1886630 | Feb 2008 | EP |
1889579 | Feb 2008 | EP |
1889583 | Feb 2008 | EP |
2058090 | May 2009 | EP |
1977677 | Aug 2009 | EP |
2095778 | Sep 2009 | EP |
1889583 | Apr 2011 | EP |
2377477 | May 2012 | EP |
2473119 | Jul 2012 | EP |
2305144 | Oct 2012 | EP |
2044893 | Jul 2013 | EP |
2653110 | Oct 2013 | EP |
2679192 | Jan 2014 | EP |
2736680 | Jun 2014 | EP |
2777561 | Sep 2014 | EP |
2783643 | Oct 2014 | EP |
2837340 | Feb 2015 | EP |
2837354 | Feb 2015 | EP |
2554131 | Aug 2015 | EP |
2777561 | Oct 2015 | EP |
2979657 | Feb 2016 | EP |
2837340 | Oct 2016 | EP |
2783643 | Jan 2019 | EP |
834244 | May 1960 | GB |
969899 | Sep 1964 | GB |
2004041580 | Feb 2004 | JP |
2007290096 | Nov 2007 | JP |
2008104620 | May 2008 | JP |
2009018027 | Jan 2009 | JP |
20110032444 | Mar 2011 | KR |
20130031403 | Mar 2013 | KR |
722754 | Mar 1980 | SU |
WO-8200611 | Mar 1982 | WO |
WO-9743942 | Nov 1997 | WO |
WO-9825666 | Jun 1998 | WO |
WO-03067341 | Aug 2003 | WO |
WO-03086219 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO-2004052171 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO-2005009482 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO-2005046500 | May 2005 | WO |
WO-2006086663 | Aug 2006 | WO |
WO-2007133065 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO-2008130235 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO-2009091497 | Jul 2009 | WO |
WO-2009095893 | Aug 2009 | WO |
WO-2009145572 | Dec 2009 | WO |
WO-2009157719 | Dec 2009 | WO |
WO-2010019001 | Feb 2010 | WO |
WO-2010030114 | Mar 2010 | WO |
WO-2010050771 | May 2010 | WO |
WO-2010083480 | Jul 2010 | WO |
WO-2010096580 | Aug 2010 | WO |
WO-2010130817 | Nov 2010 | WO |
WO-2011025818 | Mar 2011 | WO |
WO-2011027183 | Mar 2011 | WO |
WO-2011123669 | Oct 2011 | WO |
WO-2012020386 | Feb 2012 | WO |
WO-2012049623 | Apr 2012 | WO |
WO-2013007784 | Jan 2013 | WO |
WO-2013014621 | Jan 2013 | WO |
WO-2014012780 | Jan 2014 | WO |
WO-2014018447 | Jan 2014 | WO |
WO-2014067804 | May 2014 | WO |
WO-2014094716 | Jun 2014 | WO |
WO-2014094717 | Jun 2014 | WO |
WO-2014094718 | Jun 2014 | WO |
WO-2014094719 | Jun 2014 | WO |
WO-2014139023 | Sep 2014 | WO |
WO-2014145148 | Sep 2014 | WO |
WO-2014156221 | Oct 2014 | WO |
WO-2014201010 | Dec 2014 | WO |
WO-2014201538 | Dec 2014 | WO |
WO-2015081946 | Jun 2015 | WO |
WO-2015081947 | Jun 2015 | WO |
WO-2015088647 | Jun 2015 | WO |
WO-2015088655 | Jun 2015 | WO |
WO-2015111475 | Jul 2015 | WO |
WO-2015113933 | Aug 2015 | WO |
WO-2015129383 | Sep 2015 | WO |
WO-2015139674 | Sep 2015 | WO |
WO-2015175200 | Nov 2015 | WO |
WO-2016030767 | Mar 2016 | WO |
WO-2016083189 | Jun 2016 | WO |
WO-2016097861 | Jun 2016 | WO |
WO-2016097864 | Jun 2016 | WO |
WO-2016097868 | Jun 2016 | WO |
WO-2016097871 | Jun 2016 | WO |
WO-2016097873 | Jun 2016 | WO |
WO-2016154173 | Sep 2016 | WO |
WO-2016162751 | Oct 2016 | WO |
WO-2016162752 | Oct 2016 | WO |
WO-2016183054 | Nov 2016 | WO |
WO-2016189284 | Dec 2016 | WO |
WO-2016209891 | Dec 2016 | WO |
WO-2017015599 | Jan 2017 | WO |
WO-2017037532 | Mar 2017 | WO |
WO-2017064301 | Apr 2017 | WO |
WO-2017064303 | Apr 2017 | WO |
WO-2017064305 | Apr 2017 | WO |
WO-2017064306 | Apr 2017 | WO |
WO-2017134077 | Aug 2017 | WO |
WO-2017220978 | Dec 2017 | WO |
WO-2018142112 | Aug 2018 | WO |
WO-2018162921 | Sep 2018 | WO |
WO-2019099346 | May 2019 | WO |
WO-2019155383 | Aug 2019 | WO |
WO-2020131304 | Jun 2020 | WO |
WO-2020141487 | Jul 2020 | WO |
WO-2020263870 | Dec 2020 | WO |
Entry |
---|
US 9,232,978 B2, 01/2016, Shellenberger (withdrawn) |
Abbott, et al., Design of an Endoluminal Notes Robotic System, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2007, San Diego, CA (pp. 410-416). |
Aesculap Surgical Technologies, Aesculap.RTM. Caiman ™, Advanced Bipolar Seal and Cut Technology Brochure, 6 pages (retrieved Aug. 31, 2015). |
Arata, et al., Development of a dexterous minimally-invasive surgical system with augmented force feedback capability, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2005 (pp. 3207-3212). |
Cavusoglu, et al., Laparoscopic Telesurgical Workstation, IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, (15)4:728-739 (1999). |
Charles, et al., Dexterity-enhanced Telerobotic Microsurgery, 8th International Conference Advanced Robotics, pp. 5-10 (1997). |
Dachs, et al., Novel Surgical Robot Design: Minimizing the Operating Envelope With in the Sterile Field, 28th International Conference, IEEE Engineering in Medicine Biology Society, 2006, New York (pp. 1505-1508). |
Dario, et al., “Novel Mechatronic Tool for Computer-Assisted Arthroscopy,” IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, 4(1 ):15-29 (Mar. 2000). |
Focacci, et al., Lightweight Hand-held Robot for Laparoscopic Surgery, IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, Rome, Italy, pp. 599-604 (2007). |
Guthart, et al., The Intuitive™. Telesurgery System: Overview and Application, IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, San Francisco, CA, 2000 (pp. 618-621 ). |
Ikuta, et al., Development of Remote Microsurgery Robot and New Surgical Procedure for Deep and Narrow Space, IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, Taipei, Taiwan, 2003 (pp. 1103-1108). |
Ikuta, et al., Hyper Redundant Miniature Manipulator ‘Hyper Finger’ for Remote Minimally Invasive Surgery in Deep Area, IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, Taipei, Taiwan, 2003 (pp. 1098-1102). |
Ishii, et al., Development of a New Bending Mechanism and Its Application to Robotic Forceps Manipulator, IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, Rome, Italy, 2007 (pp. 238-243). |
Kobayashi, et al., Small Occupancy Robotic Mechanisms for Endoscopic Surgery, International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer assisted Interventions, 2002, (pp. 75-82). |
Lang, et al., Intra-operative robotics: NeuroArm., Acta Neurochir Suppl, 109:231-236 (2011 ). |
Mayer, et al., The Endo[PA]R System for Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Sendai, Japan, 2004 (pp. 3637-3642). |
Mitsuishi, et al., Development of a Remote Minimally Invasive Surgical System with Operational Environment Transmission Capability, IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, Taipei, Taiwan, 2003, (pp. 2663-2670). |
Mitsuishi, et al., Master-Slave Robotic Platform and its Feasibility Study for Micro-Neurosurgery, Int. J. Med. Robot., 9(2):180-9 (2013). |
Morita, et al., Microsurgical Robotic System for the Deep Surgical Field: development of a Prototype and Feasibility Studies in Animal and Cadaveric Models, J. Neurosurg., 103(2):320-7 (2005). |
Nakamura, et al., Multi-DOF Forceps Manipulator System for Laparoscopic Surgery-Mechanism miniaturized & Evaluation of New Interface, 4th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer assisted Interventions (MICCAI2001 ), 2001 (pp. 606-613). |
Peirs, et al., “Design of an Advanced Tool Guiding System for Robotic Surgery,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, Taipei, Taiwan, 2003, (pp. 2651-2656). |
Salle, et al., Optimal Design of High Dexterity Modular MIS Instrument for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting, IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, New Orleans, LA, 2004, (pp. 1276-1281 ). |
Seibold, et al., Prototype of Instrument for Minimally Invasive Surgery with 6-Axis Force Sensing Capability, IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, Barcelona, Spain, 2005, (pp. 496-501 ). |
Simaan, et al., Dexterous System for Laryngeal Surgery: Multi-Backbone Bending Snake-like Slaves for Teleoperated Dexterous Surgical Tool Manipulation, IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, New Orleans, LA, 2004 (pp. 351-357). |
Stryker™, Endoscopy, Take a Look Around, Ideal Eyes. TM. FFD122 HD, Articulating Laparoscope Brochure, 2 pages (2009). |
Tavakoli, et al., Force Reflective Master-Slave System for Minimally Invasive Surgery, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Las Vegas, NV, 2003, (pp. 3077-3082). |
Taylor, et al., Steady-Hand Robotic System for Microsurgical Augmentation, The International Journal of Robotics Research, 18(12):1201-1210 (1999). |
www.cttc.co/technologies/maestro-non-robotic-dexterous-laproscopic-instrum-ent-writsproviding-seven-degrees, Maestro: Non-Robotic Dexterous Laproscopic Instrument With a Wrist Providing Seven Degrees of Freedom, accessed Nov. 12, 2015, 4 pages. |
Yamashita, et al., Development of Endoscopic Forceps Manipulator Using Multi-Slider Linkage Mechanisms, The 1st Asian Symposium on Computer Aided Surgery-Robotic and Image-Guided Surgery, Ibaraki, Japan, 4 pages (2005). |
Zeus, Robotic Surgical System, available at http://allaboutroboticsurgery.com/zeusrobot.html (2017) 4 pages. |