The present invention relates to a surgical robot/instrument system as well as to a surgical instrument adapted for being connected to a robot.
In modern surgery, an increasing number of surgical interventions are carried out preferably in the form of minimally invasive operations by means of or with the aid of surgery robots which are able to move surgical instruments to their destination in a precise manner and so as to be largely free of any vibrations and initiate corresponding movements of the surgical instrument at this place. As sterility is of top priority in a surgical intervention, the robot/instrument system is subdivided so to speak in a non-sterile and a sterile zone/portion, which are separated from each other by a sterility barrier in the form of a plastic foil, for example. In such arrangement, the major part of the robotic system and the drives are situated in the non-sterile zone, whereas at least the surgical instrument as well as its mounting are arranged in the sterile zone. For moving and actuating the surgical instrument, power transmission trains such as gear units, cable pulls/chain hoists or pressure lines usually extend from the respective drives in the non-sterile zone through the barrier to the surgical instrument and/or its mounting in the sterile zone; for this purpose, suitable ports are provided in the barrier.
In particular in the minimally invasive surgery, the drives for the robotic system have the task to drive and move the surgical instruments or also optical endoscopes in all their motion-related degrees of freedom which are required for the respective operation. This is effected today primarily via a guiding arm (e.g. kinetic system with parallel organs) at whose free end the surgical instrument is firmly mounted but so as to be changeable. Said arm transfers all movements which are required for the instrument fastened to it via a corresponding interface which is mounted or can be mounted on the instrument support. This interface has to have a suitable design, so that the sterility of the instrument is ensured.
Further, the guiding arm moves the instrument e.g. in circular paths around a pivot point which is ideally congruent with an invariant point which is determined by a trocar in the abdominal wall. As a standard, also the movement of the instrument in the axial direction parallel to the trocar is effected by the guiding arm of the robotic system.
According to a specific prior art which is known internally but has not been accessible to the public so far, provision is made to arrange a sort of mechanical interface for the mechanical, electrical and/or hydraulic-pneumatic coupling of a mounting of a surgical instrument on a free, distal end of a robot arm, said interface being configured such that a sterility barrier in the form of a foil can be placed between the interface and the instrument support. To this end, the foil-like barrier is equipped with a mechanism which is formed such that—upon placing the mounting on the interface—the respective power transmission trains on the part of the mounting can reach through the foil-like barrier in order to connect to corresponding connectors on the part of the interface and in this way couple the robotic system-internal power transmission trains to the mounting-internal power transmission trains.
During use of a robot/instrument system with such a design, any movements of the robotic system, of the instrument mount and also of the instrument itself are carried out or effected by means of corresponding drives on the part of the robotic system whose drive outputs are partially in operative connection with the respective actuators on the instrument mount as well as the movement functions on the surgical instrument via the respective power transmission trains.
The previously described concept basically allows to implement the surgical instrument as a so-called “disposable” instrument, i.e. an instrument for one-time use. However, it has turned out that especially the instrument mount is required to have a comparably complicated inner structure, so that it is usually realized as a reusable component whose cleaning and sterilization is elaborate and hence costly.
In view of the problems described above, it is the object of the present invention to provide a surgical robot/instrument system or apparatus which facilitates the provision of a sterility barrier. Advantageously, the novel surgical robot/instrument system or apparatus is also supposed to improve the guarantee of sterility.
The above object is achieved by a robot/instrument system or apparatus comprising the features of claim 1. Advantageous configurations of the invention are subject-matter of the sub-claims.
In the following description, in particular the following terms are used which are defined in advance:
The gist of the present invention according to claim 1 consists essentially in that the drives required for moving/actuating and/or positioning a surgical instrument—which can be coupled to a robotic system in an exchangeable manner—in the degrees of freedom provided for it (as a rule 6 degrees of freedom+1 instrument-internal actuation movement) are divided to different units of the robot/instrument system or apparatus, which are already constituent parts of a conventional operation setup.
As a consequence, according to an aspect of the present invention which may be claimed independently, the drives of the surgical instrument or of the functions thereof (preferably a rotation of the effector, an inclination of the instrument tip supporting the effector, a rotation of the shaft, an actuation of jaw part/effector)—corresponding preferably to 3 degrees of freedom+1 actuation—are provided in/on the changeable instrument itself, so that it is an “actively driven” surgical instrument, so to speak.
According to another aspect of the present invention which may be claimed independently, a further degree of freedom is preferably realized by the trocar, further preferred in the form of an “actively driven trocar” comprising a trocar-internal drive (1 degree of freedom). As an alternative, the trocar may also represent a sort of passive instrument unit which is mounted to the robotic system in an exchangeable manner via a suitable interface and whose drive is arranged on the part of the robotic system and coupled to the trocar/its mounting via a force transmission train.
A trocar is an auxiliary device which is used in minimally invasive surgeries in order to provide an access through the abdominal wall of a patient, as well as to seal off the operation site from the operation environment in a gas-tight manner. The sleeve-shaped design provides the access for the rod-shaped surgical instruments which are inserted into the body in this way.
In the context of this invention of an overall system for the robotic surgery, a trocar of this type having the known attributes is expanded such that it fulfils the task of a drive (translation of the instrument shaft parallel to the axis of the trocar) in addition to its existing tasks of providing an access to a patient with a predefined access width.
Preferably, the gear train/the drive for moving the instrument/instrument shaft is to be arranged in the trocar and delivered in a sterile condition; more preferably, it is not the motor itself which delivers the energy for the movement. It is preferred that the drive or motor for the mentioned additional trocar function is in the holding arm/cantilever of the robotic system.
According to another preferred aspect of the present invention which may be claimed independently, the remaining further 2 degrees of freedom relate to the swiveling of the surgical instrument/trocar by the “actively driven holding arm” of the robotic system preferably around an invariant point (i.e. the translatory movement of the interface in the X- and Y-direction of a preferably horizontal plane), said point being determined by the trocar or the surgical instrument in the abdominal wall of a patient.
To be more precise, the “active” holding arm/cantilever exclusively performs the movement (pivoting) of the surgical instrument/trocar, by the correspondingly driven holding arm/cantilever traveling along a circle segment so to speak, whereas with prior robotic solutions of this type the entire instrument movement has been effected by a robotic kinematic system fastened to the surgical instrument via an adapter.
With a trocar assembly, the interface is provided on the robotic system/holding arm and designed to not hold and guide the surgical instrument itself, but to hold and guide the trocar (for instance an actively driven trocar or one whose drive is arranged on the part of the robotic system e.g. in the holding arm of the robotic system) into which the surgical instrument is inserted and retained therein.
Here, the holding arm fulfils exclusively the pivoting movement of the trocar around the natural support point, preferably the abdominal wall. Accordingly, also the natural invariant point is used, which results from the placement of the trocar in the abdominal wall.
The active instrument is thus put freely in the (active) trocar, so to speak, which for its part moves the instrument back and forth in relation to the instrument's axis. This is preferably possible if the implemented drives in the active instrument have a compact construction and a low weight, so that the reaction forces acting on the abdominal wall can be neglected in the zone of the support site.
As an alternative or in addition, the holding arm may be configured such that an additional arm supports the trocar in the vicinity of the entry point, for example by a membrane support, in this way quasi simulating the abutment so far defined by the abdominal wall for the definition of the invariant point. As a further alternative, however, it is also conceivable to move the trocar/the surgical instrument in a robotic fashion not only on a circular path (and to effect the pivoting movement by the abdominal wall/the membrane support), but to rotate the gripper simultaneously to the holding arm's movement in order to actively produce the pivoting movement of the trocar/surgical instrument (without the abdominal wall/membrane as an abutment).
In the prior art, the structure of a commonly known surgical instrument for a robot-assisted surgery is characterized in that the drive of such an instrument has to go through the initially mentioned sterile barrier (passive instrument), where there are various solutions. By way of example, it is known to transmit rotational movements via an adapter plate to the surgical instrument, said plate as a transmitter being fastened to a sterile protective foil and hence separating the non-sterile robotic arm from the sterile instrument. This is necessary as the instrument might have to be changed during the operation.
Other systems make use of a so-called port system (as already mentioned at the outset) for providing a connection to the instrument drives, or the elasticity of a membrane situated between the drives or even a simple sterile foil is made use of in a known manner.
The present invention, however, makes provision to essentially do without a motorized or transmission-based connection to the robotic arm for the purpose of driving the surgical (exchangeable) instrument, because the motors (drives) required for driving the surgical instrument are already integrated or installed in the instrument realized as a one-way product. This offers the possibility to basically do without a sterile port for the drives, because the surgical (exchangeable) instrument taken by itself is already sterilized before use, with this condition remaining unchanged even if a corresponding instrument is exchanged.
The drives are controlled preferably in a pneumatic or hydraulic manner. These are, for instance, the drives for those movements which can be directly associated to the instrument, preferably
Consequently, all the movements mentioned above are preferably two translatory movement transfers and two rotary movement transfers.
The pneumatic/hydraulic system allows to achieve high forces in small installation spaces in conjunction with low weight. The low weight increases the safety due to a smaller moving load, smaller working spaces of the kinematic holding system and hence follows the philosophy “safety by design”. The risk of injury of a user/patient due to a collision between the moved arms and the staff, as known from medical robotics or also industrial robotics, is significantly smaller owing to the claimed invention. What is more, pneumatic or hydraulic drives have a simple structure and thus can result in a product which is intended for a one-time use, if applicable. As an alternative, however, it is also possible to provide electric actuators such as electric motors or piezo elements.
It would be advantageous to place the drives (directly) associated to the surgical instrument on the sterile side in such a manner on/in the surgical instrument that its manipulation on/in the patient is not impaired. To this end, provision is made to arrange the drives on a proximal end of the surgical instrument, preferably with respect to an articulation point for the instrument mount. In this case, the actively driven instrument remains essentially unchanged in its distal zone, preferably in the instrument portion between the articulation point for the instrument mount and the distal instrument end, compared to a conventional, passively driven instrument. Thus, the manipulation of the actively driven instrument is not affected as compared to a passively driven instrument and the sight on the surgery or intervention site of the actively driven instrument on the patient body remains unobstructed.
Further advantageous configurations of the invention are, among other things, subject-matter of the sub-claims.
The invention will be explained in more detail below on the basis of a preferred exemplary embodiment with reference to the attached drawings.
The surgical instrument shown in
In the present example, the surgical instrument having a minimally invasive design comprises an instrument shaft 10 (flexible or rigid) at whose distal end an instrument tip 12 is articulated in such a manner that the instrument tip 12 can bend like a hinge with respect to the shaft axis 10. In the following, this bending function forms according to
As shown in
Further, provision may be made that the distal shaft portion, in addition to or as an alternative to the previously described rotational support, is supported in/around/on the proximal shaft portion even so as to be movable in the longitudinal direction (in a telescopic manner).
Furthermore, the instrument shaft 10 can be inclined/tilted in an X-plane as well as in a Y-plane (perpendicular to the X-plane), in the following corresponding to the 3rd and 4th degree of freedom of the surgical instrument. Finally, the instrument tip 12 forms or comprises an effector of the surgical instrument, in the present case consisting of a jaw part comprising preferably two branches 16, 18 from which at least one branch 16 is pivotally supported on the effector in order to enlarge or reduce a gripping/clamping gap between the branches. This pivoting movement of the at least one branch 16 represents in the following the 6th degree of freedom of the surgical instrument.
Here, it is referred to the fact that in the case of a surgical instrument realized in some other design, such as a mechanical cutting knife, for example, the 6th degree of freedom would relate to extending or retracting the knife from or into the instrument tip, or in the case of a drill/milling cutter would relate to the rotation of the milling/drilling head, etc. It would also be conceivable to move an HF electrode or similar tool with respect to the effector.
The 5th and 6th degrees of freedom or movement possibilities defined in this way are achieved in the present exemplary embodiment preferably by mechanical ways and means, in fact preferably by means of independent power transmission trains (not shown in further detail) which may be arranged as instrument-internal trains within the instrument shaft 10.
As illustrated in
Here, it is referred to the fact that the stand 26 may be immovably mounted or in turn may be arranged on the distal end of a further, preceding movement mechanism (and hence in a movable manner). In the latter case, the stand 26 may simply be a swivel pin where the holding arm 24 is pivotally or immovably supported/held.
It may also be provided to support the holding arm on the stand only so as to be able to pivot, but not so as to be able to extend in telescopic manner, with the option that the holding arm can also be extended in a telescopic manner.
According to the present preferred exemplary embodiment, the holding arm 24 has its distal end portion provided with a gripper or coupling piece 28 which is connected to the holding arm 24 preferably by means of a joint or hinge 30. It is preferred that the gripper 28 can be exchanged depending on the surgical instrument to be used in each case or is designed as a universal gripper (and hence in a not exchangeable manner) which is adapted to be coupled to a freely selected surgical instrument.
The robotic structure is thus designed such that it is capable of moving the gripper 28 arranged on the distal end of the holding arm 24 according to the previously mentioned 3rd and 4th degree of freedom.
Stated in other words, in the case of application of the surgical robot/instrument system according to the invention it is understood that the surgical instrument is inserted directly or through a trocar 32 into a patient cavity, e.g. through the abdominal wall. In this case, the patient's tissue (e.g. abdominal wall) representing the penetration site serves as an abutment against any movements in the tissue plane. If the gripper 24 is moved in an X- and Y-direction transverse to the shaft axis, the instrument shaft 10 and/or the trocar 32 perform a corresponding pivoting movement around the penetration site as an imaginary pivot point. In this way, the instrument shaft/trocar may describe a sort of funnel in the course of its pivoting movement, with the penetration site as the tip of the funnel, as indicated in
As an alternative or in addition to this, the abdominal wall may also be supplemented or replaced by an elastic membrane defining the imaginary pivot point. Finally, it is also possible to give the gripper a corresponding rotation by a motorized unit in order to produce a funnel-shaped pivoting movement of the instrument/trocar in superposition with the circular movement of the holding arm; in this case, the abdominal wall and/or membrane serving as the abutment would not be required any more.
In this connection, the drive unit(s) 20 is/are located with respect to the gripper 24 on an end side of the surgical instrument remote from the penetration site, so that the view onto the penetration site remains unobstructed and is slightly limited merely by the preferably filigree gripper 24 (which is constructed as a framework).
In the present exemplary embodiment of the invention, it is not the surgical instrument itself which is mounted on the gripper 24, but a trocar 32 is exchangeably mounted.
A trocar is a surgical introduction aid at least comprising a tubular shaft having a distal front edge preferably realized as a blade and an insertion funnel on the proximal end of the tubular shaft for the insertion of a surgical instrument having the previously mentioned structure.
As a general rule, the trocar is realized so as to have a smooth surface at the inner side of the shaft, preferably with a sealing edge for preventing any uncontrolled outflow of blood or for preventing an air leak in the event of pressurizing the patient cavity with air for deploying it.
In the present exemplary embodiment, however, the trocar 32 is (optionally) provided with an internal drive/drive unit (not shown in further detail) by means of which the inserted surgical instrument can be (optionally) shifted in its longitudinal axis and, if applicable, can also be (optionally) rotated around its longitudinal axis. By way of example, the trocar-internal drive may consist of a number of friction wheels which act on the instrument shaft.
Further, the trocar-internal drive may also be designed such that it acts in one direction only, for instance in a direction toward the patient for advancing the surgical instrument into the patient body, whereas a movement of the surgical instrument in the opposite direction (out of the patient body) can be achieved for instance by a helical compression spring 34 which is supported on the trocar 32 as well as on the drive unit 20 of the surgical instrument, as is likewise shown in
The operating principle of the surgical robot/instrument system according to the invention can be explained preferably on the basis of
Here, a patient is illustrated symbolically, which is penetrated at at least two points spaced apart from each other by one trocar in each case. The two trocars are each held on one holding arm 24 (or gripper) in the previously mentioned sense, in fact in such a way that the two trocars are able to perform a pivoting movement (in a funnel shape) around the respective penetration site, as has been described above. In addition, a camera is inserted into the patient body at a third penetration site.
As can be seen in this case, the pivoting movement of each of the trocars is achieved in that the gripper 28 is swiveled back and forth around its joint to the holding arm 24 in a first plane (e.g. X-plane according to
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
102016105907.2 | Mar 2016 | DE | national |