The present invention relates to integrated circuits (ICs) and semiconductor devices in general and their methods of manufacture wherein the integrated circuits and semiconductor devices employ camouflaging techniques which make it difficult for the reverse engineer to discern how the semiconductor device functions by rendering devices, which appear to be normally functioning devices, non-operable (i.e. OFF).
The present invention is related to the following US patents and patent applications by some of the same inventors as the present inventors:
The creation of complex integrated circuits and semiconductor devices can be a very expensive undertaking given the large number of hours of sophisticated engineering talent involved in designing such devices. Additionally, integrated circuits can include read only memories and/or EEPROMs into which software, in the form of firmware, is encoded. Additionally, integrated circuits are often used in applications involving the encryption of information. Therefore in order to keep such information confidential (i.e. design, critical information and encryption), it is desirable to keep such devices from being reverse engineered. Thus, there are a variety of reasons for protecting integrated circuits and other semiconductor devices from being reversed engineered.
In order to keep the reverse engineer at bay, different techniques are known in the art to make integrated circuits more difficult to reverse engineer. One technique is to alter the composition or structures of the transistors in the circuit in such a way that the alteration is not easily apparent, forcing the reverse engineer to carefully analyze each transistor (in particular, each CMOS transistor pair for CMOS devices), and thwarting attempts to use automatic circuit and pattern recognition techniques in order to reverse engineer an integrated circuit. Since integrated circuits can have hundreds of thousands or even millions of transistors, forcing the reverse engineer to carefully analyze each transistor in a device can effectively frustrate the reverse engineer's ability to reverse engineer the device successfully.
A conductive layer, such as silicide, is often used during the manufacturing of semiconductor devices. In modern CMOS processing, especially with a feature size below 0.5 μm, a silicide layer is utilized to improve the conductivity of gate, source and drain contacts. In accordance with general design rules, any active region providing a source or drain is silicided. This silicide layer is very thin and difficult for the reverse engineer to see. Hence, if there are ways to modify the transistor through the modification of the silicide layer so as to change the transistor functionality then the modification would be difficult to determine.
Many other prior art techniques for discouraging or preventing reverse engineering of a circuit cause the IC to look different from a standard IC. What is needed are techniques in which the transistors, and thus the circuits, are constructed to look essentially the same as conventional circuits, but where the functionality of selected transistors is varied. The minor differences between the conventional circuit and the modified circuit should be difficult to detect by reverse engineering processes. In addition, the techniques should strive to modify only a vendor's library design instead of forming a completely new and differently appearing library. Requiring only modification to an existing library results in a simpler path to implementation.
It is an object of this invention to make reverse engineering even more difficult and, in particular, to use LDD regions of opposite type from the active areas resulting in a transistor that is always off when standard voltages are applied to the device. It is believed that this will make the reverse engineer's efforts all the more difficult in terms of making it very time consuming and perhaps exceedingly impractical, if not impossible, to reverse engineer a chip employing the present invention.
The Inventors named herein have previously filed Patent Applications and have received Patents in this general area of technology, that is, relating to the camouflage of integrated circuit devices in order to make it more difficult to reverse engineer them. The present invention can be used harmoniously with the techniques disclosed above in the prior United States Patents to further confuse the reverse engineer.
Note that the present invention might only be used in one in a thousand instances on the chip in question, but the reverse engineer will have to look very carefully at each transistor or connection knowing full well that for each transistor or connection that he or she sees, there is a very low likelihood that it has been modified by the present invention. The reverse engineer will be faced with having to find the proverbial needle in a haystack.
The present invention comprises a method of manufacturing a semiconductor device in which some selected non-operable transistors look the same as the operable transistors, but which have modified LDD implants. The modified LDD implants are of an opposite conductivity type than the conductivity of the transistor, and hence these implants will result in a transistor that will not turn on when biased.
In another aspect, depending on the design rules of the fabrication process, the present invention will offset the active areas of the transistor so as to increase the dimensions of the oppositely charged LDD regions to keep the transistor OFF.
In another aspect, depending upon the other camouflage techniques being used, the silicide layer may be placed on the device in a manner such that the silicide layer placed on a transistor having sidewall spacers is in the same position as the silicide layer placed on a transistor not having sidewall spacers.
a through 2f depict various steps in the manufacturing of a camouflaged integrated circuit structure having oppositely doped LDD regions in accordance with the present invention;
a-4c depict various steps in the manufacturing of another camouflaged integrated circuit structure in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention wherein the LDD regions are slightly larger, and the active regions are slightly smaller than the standard circuit structure; and
Semiconductor device manufacturing employs many techniques, process steps, and technologies that are well known. These techniques, process steps and technologies vary with feature size, material composition and other specific device attributes. The following discussions are general discussions regarding modifications that may be made to the masks used in manufacturing a CMOS device. The discussions below are provided as examples only of possible embodiments of the presently disclosed technology.
a depicts a substrate 20, for purposes of this discussion the substrate 20 is a p-type substrate; however the substrate could alternatively be a n-type substrate. A mask layer 27 is disposed over substrate 20 and photolithographically patterned to act as a mask for subsequent implantation. The substrate 20 is then exposed to ions 31. Ions 31 are chosen such that the ions 31 will result is a well of opposite conductivity type to that of substrate 20 (e.g. a n-type well 21 for the case of a p-type substrate 20). The mask layer 27 is removed and another mask (not shown) is disposed over substrate 20 and photolithographically patterned to act as a mask for subsequent thermal oxide growth. The substrate 20 is heated and field oxide 2 is grown as shown in
In
In
In
In
In
As shown in
One skilled in the art will appreciate that the electrical path between V1 51 and the substrate 20 through LDD region 14a is dependent upon the tolerances of the process. If the silicide layer 12 overlaps a portion of the LDD region 14a, then the electrical path is formed. If instead, the silicide layer 12 does not overlap a portion of the LDD region 14a, as shown in
For the PMOS device, the silicide layer 12 may allow an electrical conductive path from V2 50 to n-well 21 through LDD region 15b, while the oppositely doped LDD regions 15a, 15b prevent an electrical path from active area 25 to active area 23. Thus, the device formed will be OFF for any standard voltage applied to V2 50. One skilled in the art will appreciate that the electrical path between V2 50 and n-well 21 through LDD region 15b is dependent upon the tolerances of the process. If the silicide layer 12 overlaps a portion of the LDD region 15b, then the electrical path is formed. If instead, the silicide layer 12 does not overlap a portion of the LDD region 15b, as shown in
One skilled in the art will appreciate that the shorting of the NMOS device to the substrate would not be preferred if the voltage applied to the substrate 20 was not the same as the voltage applied to V1 51. Many NMOS devices are connected such that the substrate 20 and V1 51 are connected to Vss. However, if the voltage applied to substrate 20 was not the same as the voltage applied to V1 51, then a silicide block mask may be used to provide a silicide gap 31 that ensures that silicide layer 12 will not extend over LDD region area 14a, as shown in
a-4c depict another embodiment in accordance with the present invention.
In
In
In one embodiment as shown in
One skilled in the art will appreciate that there are many different types of CMOS manufacturing processes with different feature sizes. The present invention may be applied to any CMOS manufacturing process. For purposes of further clarification, typical dimensions will be supplied for a 0.35 μm process.
For both the PMOS and NMOS device, the dimensions of the oxide sidewall portions 29a, 29b, 29c, 29d, determine the size of the LDD regions 14a, 14b, 15a and 15b of
In
For the CMOS device in
For the CMOS device in
The present invention provides an IC that is difficult to reverse engineer given that the conductivity type of the LDD region implants is very difficult to determine given the small dosage levels used in forming LDD regions. Additionally, the silicide layer is difficult to detect. As a result, the false transistor formed in accordance with the present invention will look operational to the reverse engineer. In a sea of millions of other transistors, these features will be difficult to detect easily, thus forcing the reverse engineer to examine every transistor closely. Such a task makes reverse engineering semiconductor chips using the present invention much less desirable and much more expensive due to the need to closely examine each and every transistor formed on a device.
Additionally, the invention is preferably not used to completely disable a multiple transistor circuit, but rather to cause the circuit to function in an unexpected or non-intuitive manner. For example, what appears to be an OR gate to the reverse engineer might really function as an AND gate with the non-functioning transistor(s). Or, what appears as an inverting input might really be non-inverting. The possibilities are almost endless and are almost sure to cause the reverse engineer so much grief that he or she gives up as opposed to pressing forward to discover how to reverse engineer the integrated circuit device on which these techniques are utilized.
Having described the invention in connection with certain preferred embodiments thereof, modification will now certainly suggest itself to those skilled in the art. As such, the invention is not to be limited to the disclosed embodiments, except as is specifically required by the appended claims.
This is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/807,896, filed on May 29, 2007, which is incorporated herein as though set forth in full. This application is a divisional application of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/881,286, filed on Jun. 29, 2004, which has been allowed. This application is also related to U.S. Pat. No. 7,217,977 entitled “Covert Transformation of Transistor Properties as a Circuit Protection Method,” the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3673471 | Klein et al. | Jun 1972 | A |
3946426 | Sanders | Mar 1976 | A |
3983620 | Spadea | Oct 1976 | A |
4017888 | Christie et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4101344 | Kooi et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4139864 | Schulman | Feb 1979 | A |
4143854 | Vetter | Mar 1979 | A |
4145701 | Kawagoe | Mar 1979 | A |
4164461 | Schilling | Aug 1979 | A |
4196443 | Dingwall | Apr 1980 | A |
4267578 | Vetter | May 1981 | A |
4291391 | Chatterjee et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
4295897 | Tubbs et al. | Oct 1981 | A |
4314268 | Yoshioka et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4317273 | Guterman et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4322736 | Sasaki et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4374454 | Jochems | Feb 1983 | A |
4393575 | Dunkley et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4409434 | Basset et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4435895 | Parillo | Mar 1984 | A |
4471376 | Morcom et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4493740 | Komeda | Jan 1985 | A |
4530150 | Shirato | Jul 1985 | A |
4581628 | Miyauchi et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4583011 | Pechar | Apr 1986 | A |
4603381 | Guttag et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4623255 | Suszko | Nov 1986 | A |
4636822 | Codella et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4727038 | Watabe | Feb 1988 | A |
4727493 | Taylor, Sr. | Feb 1988 | A |
4729001 | Haskell | Mar 1988 | A |
4753897 | Lund et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4766516 | Ozdemir et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4771012 | Yabu et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4799096 | Koeppe | Jan 1989 | A |
4814854 | Tigelaar et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4821085 | Haken et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4829356 | Arndt | May 1989 | A |
4830974 | Chang et al. | May 1989 | A |
4860084 | Shibata | Aug 1989 | A |
4912053 | Schrantz | Mar 1990 | A |
4927777 | Hsu et al. | May 1990 | A |
4931411 | Tigelaar et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4939567 | Kenney | Jul 1990 | A |
4962484 | Takeshima et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4975756 | Haken et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4998151 | Korman et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5015596 | Toyoda et al. | May 1991 | A |
5030796 | Swanson et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5050123 | Castro | Sep 1991 | A |
5061978 | Mizutani et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5065208 | Shah et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5068697 | Noda et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5070378 | Yamagata | Dec 1991 | A |
5073812 | Shimura | Dec 1991 | A |
5101121 | Sourgen | Mar 1992 | A |
5117276 | Thomas et al. | May 1992 | A |
5120669 | Schrantz | Jun 1992 | A |
5121089 | Larson et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5121186 | Wong et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5132571 | McCollum et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5138197 | Kuwana | Aug 1992 | A |
5146117 | Larson et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5168340 | Nishimura | Dec 1992 | A |
5177589 | Kobayashi et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5202591 | Walden | Apr 1993 | A |
5210437 | Sawada et al. | May 1993 | A |
5225699 | Nakamura | Jul 1993 | A |
5227649 | Chapman | Jul 1993 | A |
5231299 | Ning et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5302539 | Haken et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5308682 | Morikawa | May 1994 | A |
5309015 | Kuwata et al. | May 1994 | A |
5317197 | Roberts | May 1994 | A |
5336624 | Walden | Aug 1994 | A |
5341013 | Koyanagi et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5345105 | Sun et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5354704 | Yang et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5369299 | Byrne et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5371390 | Mohsen | Dec 1994 | A |
5371443 | Sun et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5376577 | Roberts et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5378641 | Cheffings | Jan 1995 | A |
5384472 | Yin | Jan 1995 | A |
5384475 | Yahata | Jan 1995 | A |
5399441 | Bearinger et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5404040 | Hshieh et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5412237 | Komori et al. | May 1995 | A |
5441902 | Hsieh et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5453635 | Hsu | Sep 1995 | A |
5468990 | Daum | Nov 1995 | A |
5475251 | Kuo et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5506806 | Fukushima | Apr 1996 | A |
5510279 | Chien et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5531018 | Saia et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5539224 | Ema | Jul 1996 | A |
5541614 | Lam et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5571735 | Mogami et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5576988 | Kuo et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5580804 | Joh | Dec 1996 | A |
5585658 | Mukai et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5611940 | Zettler | Mar 1997 | A |
5635749 | Hong | Jun 1997 | A |
5638946 | Zavracky | Jun 1997 | A |
5650340 | Burr et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5675172 | Miyamoto et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5677557 | Wuu et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5679595 | Chen et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5702972 | Tsai et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5719422 | Burr et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5719430 | Goto | Feb 1998 | A |
5721150 | Pasch | Feb 1998 | A |
5744372 | Bulucea | Apr 1998 | A |
5763916 | Gonzalez et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5783375 | Twist | Jul 1998 | A |
5783846 | Baukus et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5789298 | Gardner et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5811340 | Park | Sep 1998 | A |
5821590 | Lee et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5831306 | Gardner et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5834356 | Bothra et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5834809 | Kato et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5838047 | Yamauchi et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5854510 | Sur, Jr. et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5858843 | Doyle et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5866933 | Baukus et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5874328 | Liu et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5877050 | Gardner et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5880503 | Matsumoto et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5888887 | Li et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5891782 | Hsu et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5895241 | Lu et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5909622 | Kadosh et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5920097 | Horne | Jul 1999 | A |
5925914 | Jiang | Jul 1999 | A |
5930663 | Baukus et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5930667 | Oda | Jul 1999 | A |
5933737 | Goto | Aug 1999 | A |
5960291 | Krivokapic | Sep 1999 | A |
5973375 | Baukus et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5977593 | Hara | Nov 1999 | A |
5998257 | Lane et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
5998272 | Ishida et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6010929 | Chapman | Jan 2000 | A |
6020227 | Bulucea | Feb 2000 | A |
6030869 | Odake et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6031272 | Hiroki et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6037627 | Kitamura et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6044011 | Marr | Mar 2000 | A |
6046659 | Loo et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6054659 | Lee et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6057520 | Goodwin-Johansson | May 2000 | A |
6064110 | Baukus et al. | May 2000 | A |
6078080 | Kadosh et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6080614 | Neilson et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6084248 | Inoue | Jul 2000 | A |
6090692 | Song | Jul 2000 | A |
6093609 | Chuang | Jul 2000 | A |
6103563 | Lukanc et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6117762 | Baukus et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6137318 | Takaaki | Oct 2000 | A |
6146952 | Nariman et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6153484 | Donaton et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154388 | Oh | Nov 2000 | A |
6215158 | Choi | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6242329 | Huster et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6255174 | Yu | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6261912 | Hsiao et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6294816 | Baukus et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6316303 | Lin et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6326675 | Scott et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6337249 | Yamane et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6365453 | Deboer et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6373106 | Maki et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6380041 | Yeap et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6384457 | Tyagi et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6399452 | Krishnan et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6410413 | Scott et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6455388 | Lai et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6465315 | Yu | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6466489 | Ieong et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6479350 | Ling et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6503787 | Choi | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6534787 | Hsu | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6566204 | Wang et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6613661 | Baukus | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6740942 | Baukus et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6746924 | Lee et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6815816 | Clark, Jr. et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6825530 | Brown et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6833307 | Wristers et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6833589 | Matsuhashi et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6911694 | Negoro et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6919600 | Baukus | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6921690 | Church | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6930361 | Inaba | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6933560 | Lee et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7012273 | Chen | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7091114 | Ito | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7179712 | Hoefler | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7195266 | Ricke et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7208383 | Weintraub et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7217977 | Chow et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7242063 | Chow et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
20010042892 | Okada | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020043689 | Matsuoka et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020058368 | Tseng | May 2002 | A1 |
20020096776 | Chow | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020173131 | Clark, Jr. et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030057476 | Morita et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030127709 | Lippmann | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030173622 | Porter et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030205816 | Janke | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040061186 | Chow et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040075147 | Ueda et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040099912 | Chow et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040144998 | Chow et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040164361 | Baukus et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050082625 | Kim | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050230787 | Chow et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060105489 | Rhodes | May 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 186 855 | Jul 1986 | EP |
0 364 769 | Apr 1990 | EP |
0 463 373 | Jan 1992 | EP |
0 528 302 | Feb 1993 | EP |
0 585 601 | Mar 1994 | EP |
0 764 985 | Mar 1997 | EP |
0 883 184 | Dec 1998 | EP |
0 920 057 | Jun 1999 | EP |
1 193 758 | Apr 2002 | EP |
1 202 353 | May 2002 | EP |
2 486 717 | Jan 1982 | FR |
S58-016565 | Jul 1982 | JP |
58-190064 | Nov 1983 | JP |
S59-035465 | Feb 1984 | JP |
61-147551 | Jul 1986 | JP |
61-201472 | Sep 1986 | JP |
63-129647 | Jun 1988 | JP |
H01-213350 | Aug 1989 | JP |
02-046762 | Feb 1990 | JP |
H02-062118 | Mar 1990 | JP |
02-188944 | Jul 1990 | JP |
02-237038 | Sep 1990 | JP |
H02-237038 | Sep 1990 | JP |
04-028092 | Jan 1992 | JP |
H04-267553 | Sep 1992 | JP |
05-218849 | Aug 1993 | JP |
H05-218849 | Aug 1993 | JP |
H08-274041 | Oct 1996 | JP |
10-256398 | Sep 1998 | JP |
2000-040809 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2000-040810 | Feb 2000 | JP |
9821734 | May 1998 | WO |
9857373 | Dec 1998 | WO |
0044012 | Jul 2000 | WO |
0055889 | Sep 2000 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11807896 | May 2007 | US |
Child | 12960126 | US |