Symmetric non-intrusive and covert technique to render a transistor permanently non-operable

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8049281
  • Patent Number
    8,049,281
  • Date Filed
    Friday, December 3, 2010
    14 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 1, 2011
    13 years ago
Abstract
A technique for and structures for camouflaging an integrated circuit structure. The technique including forming active areas of a first conductivity type and LDD regions of a second conductivity type resulting in a transistor that is always non-operational when standard voltages are applied to the device.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to integrated circuits (ICs) and semiconductor devices in general and their methods of manufacture wherein the integrated circuits and semiconductor devices employ camouflaging techniques which make it difficult for the reverse engineer to discern how the semiconductor device functions by rendering devices, which appear to be normally functioning devices, non-operable (i.e. OFF).


RELATED ART

The present invention is related to the following US patents and patent applications by some of the same inventors as the present inventors:

    • (1) U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,866,933; 5,783,375 and 6,294,816 teach transistors in a CMOS circuit that are connected by implanted (and therefore hidden and buried) lines between the transistors by modifying the p+ and n+ source/drain masks. These implanted interconnections form 3-input AND or OR circuits that look substantially identical to the reverse engineer. Also, buried interconnects force the reverse engineer to examine the IC in greater depth to try to figure out the connectivity between transistors and hence their function.
    • (2) U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,783,846; 5,930,663 and 6,064,110 teach a further modification in the implant masks so that the implanted connecting lines between transistors have a gap inserted, with approximately the length of the minimum feature size of the CMOS technology being used. If this gap is “filled” with one kind of implant, the line conducts; but if it is “filled” with another kind of implant, the line does not conduct. The intentional gaps are called “channel blocks.” The reverse engineer is forced to determine connectivity on the basis of resolving the implant type at the minimum feature size of the CMOS process being used.
    • (3) U.S. Pat. No. 6,117,762 teaches a method and apparatus for protecting semiconductor integrated circuits from reverse engineering. Semiconductor active areas are formed on a substrate and a silicide layer is formed both over at least one active area of the semiconductor active areas and over a selected substrate area for interconnecting the at least one active area with another area through the silicide area formed on the selected substrate area. This connection, as affected by the silicide layer, is substantially invisible to the reverse engineer unless imaged via cross-sectional techniques which are prohibitively costly and time consuming.
    • (4) U.S. Pat. No. 7,217,977 noted above teaches forming semiconductor active areas on a substrate of a first conductivity type and placing a lightly doped density active area of a second conductivity type on one side of the gate. The size of the lightly doped density active is slightly larger than the standard lightly doped density active to prevent punch through.
    • (5) Co-pending U.S. Patent Application No. 60/414,216 filed on Sep. 27, 2002 discloses modifying a silicide layer mask such that an artifact edge of the silicide layer a reverse engineer would see when reverse engineering devices manufactured with other reverse engineering detection prevention techniques does not indicate the camouflaging technique being used.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The creation of complex integrated circuits and semiconductor devices can be a very expensive undertaking given the large number of hours of sophisticated engineering talent involved in designing such devices. Additionally, integrated circuits can include read only memories and/or EEPROMs into which software, in the form of firmware, is encoded. Additionally, integrated circuits are often used in applications involving the encryption of information. Therefore in order to keep such information confidential (i.e. design, critical information and encryption), it is desirable to keep such devices from being reverse engineered. Thus, there are a variety of reasons for protecting integrated circuits and other semiconductor devices from being reversed engineered.


In order to keep the reverse engineer at bay, different techniques are known in the art to make integrated circuits more difficult to reverse engineer. One technique is to alter the composition or structures of the transistors in the circuit in such a way that the alteration is not easily apparent, forcing the reverse engineer to carefully analyze each transistor (in particular, each CMOS transistor pair for CMOS devices), and thwarting attempts to use automatic circuit and pattern recognition techniques in order to reverse engineer an integrated circuit. Since integrated circuits can have hundreds of thousands or even millions of transistors, forcing the reverse engineer to carefully analyze each transistor in a device can effectively frustrate the reverse engineer's ability to reverse engineer the device successfully.


A conductive layer, such as silicide, is often used during the manufacturing of semiconductor devices. In modern CMOS processing, especially with a feature size below 0.5 μm, a silicide layer is utilized to improve the conductivity of gate, source and drain contacts. In accordance with general design rules, any active region providing a source or drain is silicided. This silicide layer is very thin and difficult for the reverse engineer to see. Hence, if there are ways to modify the transistor through the modification of the silicide layer so as to change the transistor functionality then the modification would be difficult to determine.



FIG. 1 depicts a prior art modern CMOS device. The substrate 20 is a p-type substrate. Referring to the NMOS device, active areas 4, 6 disposed in the substrate 20 have n-type conductivity. The lightly doped density (LDD) active regions 14 have the same conductivity type as active areas 4, 6, but with a much lower dose than active areas 4, 6. The gate comprises a gate oxide layer 8, and a self-aligned polysilicon gate 10. Oxide sidewall spacers 16 form the differentiation between the active areas 4,6 and the LDD regions 14. Field oxide 2 provides separation between transistors. Referring to the PMOS device, a well 21 of n-type conductivity is disposed in the substrate 20. Active areas 23, 25 having p-type conductivity are disposed within n-type well 21. LDD regions 15 have the same conductivity type as active areas 23,25, but with a much lower dose than active areas 23, 25. The gate comprises a gate oxide layer 8 and a selfaligned polysilicon gate structure 10. Oxide sidewall spacers 16 form the differentiation between the active areas 23,25 and the LDD regions 15. The silicide layer 12 is deposited and sintered over the active areas 4, 6, 23, 25 to make better contact. The silicide layer 12 is optionally deposited over the poly gates 10 as well. For the prior art CMOS device of FIG. 1, the NMOS or PMOS transistors normally turn “ON” when a voltage is applied to V1 51 or V2 50, respectively.


Many other prior art techniques for discouraging or preventing reverse engineering of a circuit cause the IC to look different from a standard IC. What is needed are techniques in which the transistors, and thus the circuits, are constructed to look essentially the same as conventional circuits, but where the functionality of selected transistors is varied. The minor differences between the conventional circuit and the modified circuit should be difficult to detect by reverse engineering processes. In addition, the techniques should strive to modify only a vendor's library design instead of forming a completely new and differently appearing library. Requiring only modification to an existing library results in a simpler path to implementation.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

It is an object of this invention to make reverse engineering even more difficult and, in particular, to use LDD regions of opposite type from the active areas resulting in a transistor that is always off when standard voltages are applied to the device. It is believed that this will make the reverse engineer's efforts all the more difficult in terms of making it very time consuming and perhaps exceedingly impractical, if not impossible, to reverse engineer a chip employing the present invention.


The Inventors named herein have previously filed Patent Applications and have received Patents in this general area of technology, that is, relating to the camouflage of integrated circuit devices in order to make it more difficult to reverse engineer them. The present invention can be used harmoniously with the techniques disclosed above in the prior United States Patents to further confuse the reverse engineer.


Note that the present invention might only be used in one in a thousand instances on the chip in question, but the reverse engineer will have to look very carefully at each transistor or connection knowing full well that for each transistor or connection that he or she sees, there is a very low likelihood that it has been modified by the present invention. The reverse engineer will be faced with having to find the proverbial needle in a haystack.


The present invention comprises a method of manufacturing a semiconductor device in which some selected non-operable transistors look the same as the operable transistors, but which have modified LDD implants. The modified LDD implants are of an opposite conductivity type than the conductivity of the transistor, and hence these implants will result in a transistor that will not turn on when biased.


In another aspect, depending on the design rules of the fabrication process, the present invention will offset the active areas of the transistor so as to increase the dimensions of the oppositely charged LDD regions to keep the transistor OFF.


In another aspect, depending upon the other camouflage techniques being used, the silicide layer may be placed on the device in a manner such that the silicide layer placed on a transistor having sidewall spacers is in the same position as the silicide layer placed on a transistor not having sidewall spacers.





DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 depicts a prior art cross-section of a CMOS device with conventional LDD regions;



FIGS. 2
a through 2f depict various steps in the manufacturing of a camouflaged integrated circuit structure having oppositely doped LDD regions in accordance with the present invention;



FIG. 3 depicts a cross-section of a CMOS device manufactured in accordance with the present invention wherein the silicide layer is pulled back from the sidewall spacer;



FIGS. 4
a-4c depict various steps in the manufacturing of another camouflaged integrated circuit structure in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention wherein the LDD regions are slightly larger, and the active regions are slightly smaller than the standard circuit structure; and



FIG. 5 depicts another embodiment of the present invention, wherein the silicide layer is placed over both the active regions and the LDD regions.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Semiconductor device manufacturing employs many techniques, process steps, and technologies that are well known. These techniques, process steps and technologies vary with feature size, material composition and other specific device attributes. The following discussions are general discussions regarding modifications that may be made to the masks used in manufacturing a CMOS device. The discussions below are provided as examples only of possible embodiments of the presently disclosed technology.



FIG. 2
a depicts a substrate 20, for purposes of this discussion the substrate 20 is a p-type substrate; however the substrate could alternatively be a n-type substrate. A mask layer 27 is disposed over substrate 20 and photolithographically patterned to act as a mask for subsequent implantation. The substrate 20 is then exposed to ions 31. Ions 31 are chosen such that the ions 31 will result is a well of opposite conductivity type to that of substrate 20 (e.g. a n-type well 21 for the case of a p-type substrate 20). The mask layer 27 is removed and another mask (not shown) is disposed over substrate 20 and photolithographically patterned to act as a mask for subsequent thermal oxide growth. The substrate 20 is heated and field oxide 2 is grown as shown in FIG. 2b. The second mask is then removed.


In FIG. 2b, the field oxide 2 acts to separate the transistors. The left side of the substrate will become the NMOS device, while the right side of the substrate will become the PMOS device. Next, a gate oxide layer 8 and a polysilicon layer 10 are disposed over the substrate 20 using standard semiconductor processing techniques. The polysilicon layer 10 and gate oxide layer 8 are etched on the left side of the substrate to form the poly gate for the NMOS device. The polysilicon layer 10 and gate oxide layer 8 are not etched on the right side, thus providing a mask over the PMOS device. The substrate 20 is then exposed to ions 32. This results in lightly doped density (LDD) active regions 14a, 14b, as shown in FIG. 2c. In this example, the ions 32 are chosen such that the LDD regions 14a, 14b are of the same conductivity type as substrate 20 (e.g. p-type in the case of a p-type substrate 20).


In FIG. 2c, the polysilicon layer 10 and gate oxide layer 8 are etched on the right side of the device to form the poly gate for the PMOS device. A mask 28 is disposed over the substrate 20 and photolithographically patterned to cover the NMOS device. The substrate 20 is then exposed to ions 33. This results in LDD regions 15a, 15b, as shown in FIG. 2d. In this example, the ions 33 are chosen such that the LDD regions 15a, 15b are of the same conductivity type as well 21 (e.g. n-type for this embodiment).


In FIG. 2d, a layer of oxide 29 is disposed on the substrate 20 and photolithographically patterned. On the NMOS side of the CMOS device, the oxide layer 29 is etched, through a suitable mask (not shown) to form sidewall spacers 29a, 29b. The sidewall spacers 29a, 29b are preferably of the same size as sidewall spacers that would be present on a standard NMOS device. The oxide layer 29 disposed over the PMOS device is not etched at this time. The substrate 20 is exposed to ions 34. This exposure results in active areas 4 and 6, as shown in FIG. 2e. The ions 34 are chosen such that the active areas 4, 6 are of opposite conductivity type to that of the LDD regions 14a, 14b (e.g. n-type in this embodiment). Therefore, the active areas 4, 6 have a first conductivity type, and the LDD regions 14a, 14b have a second conductivity type. Thus, active areas 4, 6 and LDD regions 14a, 14b are oppositely doped.


In FIG. 2e, the oxide layer 29 is etched to form sidewall spacers 29c, 29d adjacent to the poly gate of the PMOS device. The sidewall spacers 29c, 29d are preferably of the same size as sidewall spacers that would be present on a standard PMOS device. An oxide layer 30 is disposed over the substrate 20 and photolithographically patterned to cover the NMOS device. The substrate 20 is then exposed to ions 35. This results in the creation of active areas 23 and 25, as shown in FIG. 2f. The ions 35 are chosen such that the active areas 23, 25 are of opposite conductivity type to that of LDD regions 15a, 15b (e.g. p-type in this embodiment). Therefore, the active areas 23,25 have a second conductivity type and LDD regions 15a, 15b have a first conductivity type. Thus, active areas 23, 25 and LDD regions 15a, 15b are oppositely doped.


In FIG. 2f, the oxide layer 30 is preferably etched leaving portions 30a and 30b, herein referred to as sidewall spacers. The sidewall spacers 30a, 30b, 29c and 29d are the same dimensions as the sidewall spacers for a standard CMOS device. Thus, the reverse engineer would have no information about the functionality of the device from the sizes of the sidewall spacers 30a, 30b, 29c, 29d.


As shown in FIG. 2f, an optional silicide layer 12 may be disposed and patterned over the NMOS and PMOS devices. For the NMOS device, the silicide layer 12 may allow for an electrical conductive path from V1 51 to substrate 20 through LDD region 14a, while the oppositely doped LDD regions 14a, 14b prevent an electrical path from active area 4 to active area 6. Thus, the NMOS device formed will be OFF for any standard voltage applied to V1 51.


One skilled in the art will appreciate that the electrical path between V1 51 and the substrate 20 through LDD region 14a is dependent upon the tolerances of the process. If the silicide layer 12 overlaps a portion of the LDD region 14a, then the electrical path is formed. If instead, the silicide layer 12 does not overlap a portion of the LDD region 14a, as shown in FIG. 3, then there is no electrical path from V1 51 to substrate 20. However, if there is or is not an electrical path from V1 51 to substrate 20, the device formed will be OFF for any standard voltage applied to Vi 51 due to the presence of LDD regions 14a, 14b, which prevent an electrical path from active region 4 to active region 6.


For the PMOS device, the silicide layer 12 may allow an electrical conductive path from V2 50 to n-well 21 through LDD region 15b, while the oppositely doped LDD regions 15a, 15b prevent an electrical path from active area 25 to active area 23. Thus, the device formed will be OFF for any standard voltage applied to V2 50. One skilled in the art will appreciate that the electrical path between V2 50 and n-well 21 through LDD region 15b is dependent upon the tolerances of the process. If the silicide layer 12 overlaps a portion of the LDD region 15b, then the electrical path is formed. If instead, the silicide layer 12 does not overlap a portion of the LDD region 15b, as shown in FIG. 3, then there is no electrical path from V2 50 to n-well 21. However, if there is or is not an electrical path from V2 50 to n-well 21, the device formed will be OFF for any standard voltage applied to V2 50 due to the presence of LDD regions 15a, 15b, which prevent an electrical path from active region 25 to active region 23.


One skilled in the art will appreciate that the shorting of the NMOS device to the substrate would not be preferred if the voltage applied to the substrate 20 was not the same as the voltage applied to V1 51. Many NMOS devices are connected such that the substrate 20 and V1 51 are connected to Vss. However, if the voltage applied to substrate 20 was not the same as the voltage applied to V1 51, then a silicide block mask may be used to provide a silicide gap 31 that ensures that silicide layer 12 will not extend over LDD region area 14a, as shown in FIG. 3. Therefore, the silicide layer would be unable to provide an electrical path from V1 51 to substrate 20 through LDD region 14a. However, the presence of the LDD regions 14a, 14b being oppositely doped from active areas 4, 6 would prevent the transistor from turning ON when standard voltages are applied to V1 51. A silicide block mask may also be used to prevent the silicide from extending over LDD implant 15b by forming a gap 32 in the silicide layer 12.



FIGS. 4
a-4c depict another embodiment in accordance with the present invention. FIG. 4a is similar to FIG. 2d. The process steps described above in relation to FIGS. 2a-2c are utilized to reach a point where a change in the processing will now be described. As in the case of FIG. 2d, a layer of oxide 29 is disposed on the substrate 20 and photolithographically patterned. On the NMOS side of the CMOS device, the oxide layer 29 is etched, through a suitable mask (not shown) to form sidewall spacers 29a′, 29b′ shown in FIG. 4a, which spacers are larger (comparatively wider) than are the sidewall spacers 29a, 29b shown in FIG. 2d. The oxide layer 29 disposed over the PMOS device is not etched. The substrate 20 is exposed to ions 34. The exposure results in active areas 4′ and 6′, as shown in FIG. 4b. One skilled in the art will appreciate that the active regions 4′ and 6′ in this embodiment are smaller (comparatively less wide) than are the active regions 4,6 of the prior embodiment (see FIG. 2e). Thus, the remaining LDD regions 14a′, 14b′ in FIG. 4b are larger (comparatively wider) than the LDD regions 14a, 14b shown in the prior embodiment (see FIG. 2e). The oxide sidewall spacers 29a′, 29b′ are used to offset the active areas 4′, 6′ away from the gate 10 further than is normal. The ions 34 are chosen such that the active areas 4′, 6′ are of opposite conductivity type to that of the LDD regions 14a′, 14b′ (e.g. n-type in this embodiment). Therefore, the active areas 4′, 6′ have an opposite conductivity type than the LDD regions 14a′, 14b′.


In FIG. 4b, the field oxide layer 29 is etched to form sidewall spacers 29c′, 29d′ which are larger (comparatively wider) than are the sidewall spacers 29c, 29d shown in the prior embodiment (see FIG. 2t). An oxide layer 30 is disposed over the NMOS device. The substrate 20 is exposed to ions 35. This results in active areas 23′ and 25′, as shown in FIG. 4c. One skilled in the art will appreciate that the active regions 23′ and 25′ are smaller (comparatively less wide) than active regions 23, 25 shown in FIG. 2f. Thus, the remaining LDD regions 15a′, 15b′ of FIG. 4c are larger than the LDD regions 15a, 15b shown in FIG. 2f. The field oxide sidewall spacers 29c′, 29d′ are used to offset the active areas 23′, 25′ away from the gate 10 further than is normal. The ions 35 are chosen such that the active areas 23′, 25′ are of opposite conductivity type to that of LDD regions 15a′, 15b′ (e.g. p-type in this embodiment). Therefore, the active areas 23′, 25′ have an opposite conductivity type than the LDD regions 15a′, 15b′.


In FIG. 4c, the oxide layer 30 is preferably etched leaving portions 30a and 30b, herein referred to as conventionally sized sidewall spacers. Further, the sidewall spacers 29c′ and 29d′ are also preferably etched to form conventionally sized sidewall spacers 29c and 29d as shown in FIG. 4c. The sidewall spacers 30a, 30b, 29c and 29d are preferably of the same dimensions as conventional sidewall spacers. Thus, the reverse engineer would have no indication about the functionality of the device by the widths of the sidewall spacers 30a, 30b, 29c, 29d.


In one embodiment as shown in FIG. 4c, an optional silicide layer 12 is disposed over the NMOS and PMOS devices. The silicide layer 12 is placed such that the silicide layer 12 does not extend over LDD regions 14a′, 14b′, 15a′, 15b′, Thus, when a voltage V1 is applied at point 51 or a voltage V2 (which may be the same as voltage VI) is applied to point 50, the current will pass through the silicide layer 12 and into active areas 4′ and 25′ respectively, but the current will not pass any further due to the oppositely doped LDD regions 14a′, 14b′, 15a′, 15b′. Thus, the device will be off for any reasonable applied voltage. The purpose of the slightly smaller active regions 4′, 6′, 23′, 25′ shown in FIG. 4c is to allow larger LDD regions 14a′, 14b′, 15a′, 15b′. The larger LDD regions 14a′, 14b′, 15a′, 15b′ may be desirable in some applications to prevent punch through.



FIG. 5 depicts another embodiment of the present invention. The process steps used to achieve the device in FIG. 5 are almost identical to the steps for the embodiment of FIGS. 4a-4c as discussed above. However, in FIG. 5, the silicide layer 12 is placed over both the active regions 4′, 6′, 23′, 25′ as well as the LDD regions 14a′, 14b′, 15a′, 15b′. In this embodiment, the NMOS device is always ON due to the electrical path created from the voltage V1 51 to the silicide layer 12, to the LDD region 14a′, to the substrate 20, and then to the LDD region 14b′. The PMOS device is also always ON due to the electrical path from V2 50 to the silicide layer 12, to the LDD region 15b′, to the well 21, and then to the LDD region 15a′


One skilled in the art will appreciate that there are many different types of CMOS manufacturing processes with different feature sizes. The present invention may be applied to any CMOS manufacturing process. For purposes of further clarification, typical dimensions will be supplied for a 0.35 μm process.


For both the PMOS and NMOS device, the dimensions of the oxide sidewall portions 29a, 29b, 29c, 29d, determine the size of the LDD regions 14a, 14b, 15a and 15b of FIGS. 2a-2f and FIG. 3. The LDD regions 14a, 14b, 15a and 15b, and thus the field oxide portions 29a, 29b, 29c and 29d, are preferably chosen to be sufficiently large to avoid punch through for standard voltages applied to V2 50, or V1 51 and as small as possible in order to avoid detection. In an embodiment utilizing a 0.35 μm process the LDD regions 14a, 14b, 15a, 15b are approximately 0.1 micrometers wide and a voltage of approximately 3.5 Volts is applied to V1 50 or V2 51.


In FIGS. 4a-4c and FIG. 5, the LDD regions 14a′, 14b′, 15a′, 15b′ are approximately 50% larger than a standard side wall spacer width, but the actual width of these LDD regions will depend on a number of factors, including the implant depth and doses.


For the CMOS device in FIG. 3, the dimensions of the optional silicide gap are preferably chosen such that the optional silicide gap is ensured to be over at least the LDD region 14a or 15b, taking into account the alignment tolerances for the process, thus preventing V1 51 from shorting to the substrate 20 or V2 50 from shorting to n-well 21. The dimensions of the optional silicide gap 31, 32 is dependent upon the mask alignment error for the process used. Typically, the optional silicide gap is less than 0.1 micrometers.


For the CMOS device in FIG. 4c, the dimensions of the optional silicide gap are preferably chosen such that the optional silicide gap will occur over at least the LDD regions 14a′, 14b′, 15a′, 15b′, taking into account the alignment tolerances for the processes used, thus preventing V1 51 from shorting to the substrate 20 or V2 50 from shorting to n-well 21.


The present invention provides an IC that is difficult to reverse engineer given that the conductivity type of the LDD region implants is very difficult to determine given the small dosage levels used in forming LDD regions. Additionally, the silicide layer is difficult to detect. As a result, the false transistor formed in accordance with the present invention will look operational to the reverse engineer. In a sea of millions of other transistors, these features will be difficult to detect easily, thus forcing the reverse engineer to examine every transistor closely. Such a task makes reverse engineering semiconductor chips using the present invention much less desirable and much more expensive due to the need to closely examine each and every transistor formed on a device.


Additionally, the invention is preferably not used to completely disable a multiple transistor circuit, but rather to cause the circuit to function in an unexpected or non-intuitive manner. For example, what appears to be an OR gate to the reverse engineer might really function as an AND gate with the non-functioning transistor(s). Or, what appears as an inverting input might really be non-inverting. The possibilities are almost endless and are almost sure to cause the reverse engineer so much grief that he or she gives up as opposed to pressing forward to discover how to reverse engineer the integrated circuit device on which these techniques are utilized.


Having described the invention in connection with certain preferred embodiments thereof, modification will now certainly suggest itself to those skilled in the art. As such, the invention is not to be limited to the disclosed embodiments, except as is specifically required by the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A camouflaged circuit, comprising: a gate structure in a substrate;a first active region in the substrate;a first lightly doped density active region adjacent the first active region, said first lightly doped density active region having a first conductivity type and said adjacent first active region having a second conductivity type;a second active region in the substrate;a second lightly doped density active region adjacent the second active region, said second lightly doped density active region having a first conductivity type and said adjacent second active region having a second conductivity type;a conductive layer disposed over at least a portion of said first active regions; anda gap in the conductive layer such that the gap prevents an electrical path from the conductive layer to the first lightly doped density active region for a nominal voltage applied to the conductive layer;wherein the circuit is non-operational when the nominal voltage is applied.
  • 2. The camouflaged circuit of claim 1, further comprising: an integrated circuit having a plurality of operable transistors;wherein at least one camouflaged circuit is connected to one or more of the operable transistors to cause the integrated circuit to function in an unexpected or non-intuitive way; andwherein said camouflaged circuit is non-operational when the nominal voltage is applied.
  • 3. The camouflaged circuit of claim 1, wherein said conductive layer is a silicide layer.
  • 4. The camouflaged circuit of claim 3, further comprising: a gap in the silicide layer to prevent the silicide layer from contacting said first lightly doped density active regions such that the gap prevents an electrical path of a nominal voltage from said silicide layer to the first lightly doped density active region.
  • 5. The camouflaged circuit of claim 1, further comprising: a sidewall spacer disposed on the substrate on each side of the gate structure.
  • 6. The camouflaged circuit of claim 5, wherein said first and second lightly doped density regions each have a width greater than the width of a sidewall spacer.
  • 7. The camouflaged circuit of claim 5, wherein the sidewall spacers have the same dimensions as conventional sidewall spacers.
  • 8. A camouflaged circuit, comprising: a substrate;source and drain structures in said substrate on either side of a gate structure, the source and drain structures being of a first conductivity type:first lightly doped region in said substrate disposed in contact with said source structure and adjacent said gate structure, said first lightly doped region being of a second conductivity type;a second lightly doped region in said substrate disposed in contact with said drain structure, said second lightly doped region being of the second conductivity type;a first conductive layer disposed over and in contact with at least a portion of said source region; anda second conductive layer disposed over and in contact with at least a portion of said drain region;the first and second conductive layers having a mask selectable width for controlling whether said first and second conductive layers make contact with said first and said second lightly doped regions to thereby selectively control whether the circuit is permanently ON or permanently OFF;an integrated circuit having a plurality of operable transistors;wherein at least one camouflaged circuit is connected to one or more of the operable transistors to cause the integrated circuit to function in an unexpected or non-intuitive way.
  • 9. The camouflaged circuit of claim 8, wherein the first and second conductive layers are in contact with said first and said second lightly doped regions whereby the circuit is always ON.
  • 10. The camouflaged circuit of claim 8, wherein the first and second conductive layers are not in contact with said first and said second lightly doped regions whereby the circuit is always OFF.
  • 11. The camouflaged circuit of claim 8, further comprising: a sidewall spacer disposed on the substrate on each side of the gate structure.
  • 12. The camouflaged circuit of claim 11, wherein said first and second lightly doped density regions each have a width greater than the width of a sidewall spacer.
  • 13. The camouflaged circuit of claim 12, wherein the sidewall spacers have the same dimensions as conventional sidewall spacers.
  • 14. A camouflaged circuit, comprising: a gate structure in a substrate;a first active region in the substrate;a first lightly doped density active region adjacent the first active region, said first lightly doped density active region having a first conductivity type and said adjacent first active region having a second conductivity type;a second active region in the substrate;a second lightly doped density active region adjacent the second active region, said second lightly doped density active region having a first conductivity type and said adjacent second active region having a second conductivity type; anda conductive layer disposed over said first active region and said first lightly doped density active region such that said conductive layer provides an electrical path for a nominal voltage from said conductive layer to the first lightly doped density active region;wherein the circuit is non-operational when the nominal voltage is applied to said conductive layer.
  • 15. The camouflaged circuit of claim 14, wherein said conductive layer is a silicide layer.
  • 16. The camouflaged circuit of claim 14, further comprising: an integrated circuit having a plurality of operable transistors;wherein at least one camouflaged circuit is connected to one or more of the operable transistors to cause the integrated circuit to function in an unexpected or non-intuitive way; andwherein said camouflaged circuit is non-operational when the nominal voltage is applied.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/807,896, filed on May 29, 2007, which is incorporated herein as though set forth in full. This application is a divisional application of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/881,286, filed on Jun. 29, 2004, which has been allowed. This application is also related to U.S. Pat. No. 7,217,977 entitled “Covert Transformation of Transistor Properties as a Circuit Protection Method,” the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (221)
Number Name Date Kind
3673471 Klein et al. Jun 1972 A
3946426 Sanders Mar 1976 A
3983620 Spadea Oct 1976 A
4017888 Christie et al. Apr 1977 A
4101344 Kooi et al. Jul 1978 A
4139864 Schulman Feb 1979 A
4143854 Vetter Mar 1979 A
4145701 Kawagoe Mar 1979 A
4164461 Schilling Aug 1979 A
4196443 Dingwall Apr 1980 A
4267578 Vetter May 1981 A
4291391 Chatterjee et al. Sep 1981 A
4295897 Tubbs et al. Oct 1981 A
4314268 Yoshioka et al. Feb 1982 A
4317273 Guterman et al. Mar 1982 A
4322736 Sasaki et al. Mar 1982 A
4374454 Jochems Feb 1983 A
4393575 Dunkley et al. Jul 1983 A
4409434 Basset et al. Oct 1983 A
4435895 Parillo Mar 1984 A
4471376 Morcom et al. Sep 1984 A
4493740 Komeda Jan 1985 A
4530150 Shirato Jul 1985 A
4581628 Miyauchi et al. Apr 1986 A
4583011 Pechar Apr 1986 A
4603381 Guttag et al. Jul 1986 A
4623255 Suszko Nov 1986 A
4636822 Codella et al. Jan 1987 A
4727038 Watabe Feb 1988 A
4727493 Taylor, Sr. Feb 1988 A
4729001 Haskell Mar 1988 A
4753897 Lund et al. Jun 1988 A
4766516 Ozdemir et al. Aug 1988 A
4771012 Yabu et al. Sep 1988 A
4799096 Koeppe Jan 1989 A
4814854 Tigelaar et al. Mar 1989 A
4821085 Haken et al. Apr 1989 A
4829356 Arndt May 1989 A
4830974 Chang et al. May 1989 A
4860084 Shibata Aug 1989 A
4912053 Schrantz Mar 1990 A
4927777 Hsu et al. May 1990 A
4931411 Tigelaar et al. Jun 1990 A
4939567 Kenney Jul 1990 A
4962484 Takeshima et al. Oct 1990 A
4975756 Haken et al. Dec 1990 A
4998151 Korman et al. Mar 1991 A
5015596 Toyoda et al. May 1991 A
5030796 Swanson et al. Jul 1991 A
5050123 Castro Sep 1991 A
5061978 Mizutani et al. Oct 1991 A
5065208 Shah et al. Nov 1991 A
5068697 Noda et al. Nov 1991 A
5070378 Yamagata Dec 1991 A
5073812 Shimura Dec 1991 A
5101121 Sourgen Mar 1992 A
5117276 Thomas et al. May 1992 A
5120669 Schrantz Jun 1992 A
5121089 Larson et al. Jun 1992 A
5121186 Wong et al. Jun 1992 A
5132571 McCollum et al. Jul 1992 A
5138197 Kuwana Aug 1992 A
5146117 Larson et al. Sep 1992 A
5168340 Nishimura Dec 1992 A
5177589 Kobayashi et al. Jan 1993 A
5202591 Walden Apr 1993 A
5210437 Sawada et al. May 1993 A
5225699 Nakamura Jul 1993 A
5227649 Chapman Jul 1993 A
5231299 Ning et al. Jul 1993 A
5302539 Haken et al. Apr 1994 A
5308682 Morikawa May 1994 A
5309015 Kuwata et al. May 1994 A
5317197 Roberts May 1994 A
5336624 Walden Aug 1994 A
5341013 Koyanagi et al. Aug 1994 A
5345105 Sun et al. Sep 1994 A
5354704 Yang et al. Oct 1994 A
5369299 Byrne et al. Nov 1994 A
5371390 Mohsen Dec 1994 A
5371443 Sun et al. Dec 1994 A
5376577 Roberts et al. Dec 1994 A
5378641 Cheffings Jan 1995 A
5384472 Yin Jan 1995 A
5384475 Yahata Jan 1995 A
5399441 Bearinger et al. Mar 1995 A
5404040 Hshieh et al. Apr 1995 A
5412237 Komori et al. May 1995 A
5441902 Hsieh et al. Aug 1995 A
5453635 Hsu Sep 1995 A
5468990 Daum Nov 1995 A
5475251 Kuo et al. Dec 1995 A
5506806 Fukushima Apr 1996 A
5510279 Chien et al. Apr 1996 A
5531018 Saia et al. Jul 1996 A
5539224 Ema Jul 1996 A
5541614 Lam et al. Jul 1996 A
5571735 Mogami et al. Nov 1996 A
5576988 Kuo et al. Nov 1996 A
5580804 Joh Dec 1996 A
5585658 Mukai et al. Dec 1996 A
5611940 Zettler Mar 1997 A
5635749 Hong Jun 1997 A
5638946 Zavracky Jun 1997 A
5650340 Burr et al. Jul 1997 A
5675172 Miyamoto et al. Oct 1997 A
5677557 Wuu et al. Oct 1997 A
5679595 Chen et al. Oct 1997 A
5702972 Tsai et al. Dec 1997 A
5719422 Burr et al. Feb 1998 A
5719430 Goto Feb 1998 A
5721150 Pasch Feb 1998 A
5744372 Bulucea Apr 1998 A
5763916 Gonzalez et al. Jun 1998 A
5783375 Twist Jul 1998 A
5783846 Baukus et al. Jul 1998 A
5789298 Gardner et al. Aug 1998 A
5811340 Park Sep 1998 A
5821590 Lee et al. Oct 1998 A
5831306 Gardner et al. Nov 1998 A
5834356 Bothra et al. Nov 1998 A
5834809 Kato et al. Nov 1998 A
5838047 Yamauchi et al. Nov 1998 A
5854510 Sur, Jr. et al. Dec 1998 A
5858843 Doyle et al. Jan 1999 A
5866933 Baukus et al. Feb 1999 A
5874328 Liu et al. Feb 1999 A
5877050 Gardner et al. Mar 1999 A
5880503 Matsumoto et al. Mar 1999 A
5888887 Li et al. Mar 1999 A
5891782 Hsu et al. Apr 1999 A
5895241 Lu et al. Apr 1999 A
5909622 Kadosh et al. Jun 1999 A
5920097 Horne Jul 1999 A
5925914 Jiang Jul 1999 A
5930663 Baukus et al. Jul 1999 A
5930667 Oda Jul 1999 A
5933737 Goto Aug 1999 A
5960291 Krivokapic Sep 1999 A
5973375 Baukus et al. Oct 1999 A
5977593 Hara Nov 1999 A
5998257 Lane et al. Dec 1999 A
5998272 Ishida et al. Dec 1999 A
6010929 Chapman Jan 2000 A
6020227 Bulucea Feb 2000 A
6030869 Odake et al. Feb 2000 A
6031272 Hiroki et al. Feb 2000 A
6037627 Kitamura et al. Mar 2000 A
6044011 Marr Mar 2000 A
6046659 Loo et al. Apr 2000 A
6054659 Lee et al. Apr 2000 A
6057520 Goodwin-Johansson May 2000 A
6064110 Baukus et al. May 2000 A
6078080 Kadosh et al. Jun 2000 A
6080614 Neilson et al. Jun 2000 A
6084248 Inoue Jul 2000 A
6090692 Song Jul 2000 A
6093609 Chuang Jul 2000 A
6103563 Lukanc et al. Aug 2000 A
6117762 Baukus et al. Sep 2000 A
6137318 Takaaki Oct 2000 A
6146952 Nariman et al. Nov 2000 A
6153484 Donaton et al. Nov 2000 A
6154388 Oh Nov 2000 A
6215158 Choi Apr 2001 B1
6242329 Huster et al. Jun 2001 B1
6255174 Yu Jul 2001 B1
6261912 Hsiao et al. Jul 2001 B1
6294816 Baukus et al. Sep 2001 B1
6316303 Lin et al. Nov 2001 B1
6326675 Scott et al. Dec 2001 B1
6337249 Yamane et al. Jan 2002 B1
6365453 Deboer et al. Apr 2002 B1
6373106 Maki et al. Apr 2002 B2
6380041 Yeap et al. Apr 2002 B1
6384457 Tyagi et al. May 2002 B2
6399452 Krishnan et al. Jun 2002 B1
6410413 Scott et al. Jun 2002 B2
6455388 Lai et al. Sep 2002 B1
6465315 Yu Oct 2002 B1
6466489 Ieong et al. Oct 2002 B1
6479350 Ling et al. Nov 2002 B1
6503787 Choi Jan 2003 B1
6534787 Hsu Mar 2003 B1
6566204 Wang et al. May 2003 B1
6613661 Baukus Sep 2003 B1
6740942 Baukus et al. May 2004 B2
6746924 Lee et al. Jun 2004 B1
6815816 Clark, Jr. et al. Nov 2004 B1
6825530 Brown et al. Nov 2004 B1
6833307 Wristers et al. Dec 2004 B1
6833589 Matsuhashi et al. Dec 2004 B2
6911694 Negoro et al. Jun 2005 B2
6919600 Baukus Jul 2005 B2
6921690 Church Jul 2005 B2
6930361 Inaba Aug 2005 B2
6933560 Lee et al. Aug 2005 B2
7012273 Chen Mar 2006 B2
7091114 Ito Aug 2006 B2
7179712 Hoefler Feb 2007 B2
7195266 Ricke et al. Mar 2007 B2
7208383 Weintraub et al. Apr 2007 B1
7217977 Chow et al. May 2007 B2
7242063 Chow et al. Jul 2007 B1
20010042892 Okada Nov 2001 A1
20020043689 Matsuoka et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020058368 Tseng May 2002 A1
20020096776 Chow Jul 2002 A1
20020173131 Clark, Jr. et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030057476 Morita et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030127709 Lippmann Jul 2003 A1
20030173622 Porter et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030205816 Janke Nov 2003 A1
20040061186 Chow et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040075147 Ueda et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040099912 Chow et al. May 2004 A1
20040144998 Chow et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040164361 Baukus et al. Aug 2004 A1
20050082625 Kim Apr 2005 A1
20050230787 Chow et al. Oct 2005 A1
20060105489 Rhodes May 2006 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (35)
Number Date Country
0 186 855 Jul 1986 EP
0 364 769 Apr 1990 EP
0 463 373 Jan 1992 EP
0 528 302 Feb 1993 EP
0 585 601 Mar 1994 EP
0 764 985 Mar 1997 EP
0 883 184 Dec 1998 EP
0 920 057 Jun 1999 EP
1 193 758 Apr 2002 EP
1 202 353 May 2002 EP
2 486 717 Jan 1982 FR
S58-016565 Jul 1982 JP
58-190064 Nov 1983 JP
S59-035465 Feb 1984 JP
61-147551 Jul 1986 JP
61-201472 Sep 1986 JP
63-129647 Jun 1988 JP
H01-213350 Aug 1989 JP
02-046762 Feb 1990 JP
H02-062118 Mar 1990 JP
02-188944 Jul 1990 JP
02-237038 Sep 1990 JP
H02-237038 Sep 1990 JP
04-028092 Jan 1992 JP
H04-267553 Sep 1992 JP
05-218849 Aug 1993 JP
H05-218849 Aug 1993 JP
H08-274041 Oct 1996 JP
10-256398 Sep 1998 JP
2000-040809 Feb 2000 JP
2000-040810 Feb 2000 JP
9821734 May 1998 WO
9857373 Dec 1998 WO
0044012 Jul 2000 WO
0055889 Sep 2000 WO
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 11807896 May 2007 US
Child 12960126 US