This disclosure describes an electronic device that facilitates concurrent parallel signal processing and learning in its circuit with high speed and energy efficiency, and more particularly to a synaptic resistor (hereafter also referred as “synstor”) that can emulate the synapse with signal processing, learning, and memory functions in a single device.
Over decades, modern electronics has evolved through a series of major developments (e.g., transistors, integrated circuits, memories, microprocessors) leading to the programmable electronic circuits that are ubiquitous today. The computing and learning processes in transistor-based computers and neuromorphic circuits are implemented sequentially on logic and memory transistors based on the Turing model. Signals are processed by logic transistors with their states programmed sequentially by the signals from memory transistors, and the program stored in the memory is sequentially modified in turn by the signals from logic transistors for learning.
Neuromorphic devices such as synaptic transistor, phase change memory (PCM), and memory resistors (memristors) have been developed to emulate the synapses to process signals in parallel mode. (See, e.g., WO2016/069334, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.) Correlative learning algorithms such as spiking-time-dependent plasticity (STDP) are executed on individual devices by applying voltage signals on the devices. However, the writing voltage signals for learning (whereas device conductance changes) have different magnitudes, polarities, and/or dynamic profiles from the reading voltage signals for signal processing (whereas device conductance does not change). To avoid the interference between the voltage signals for processing and learning, when the signal processing is executed in the circuits, the learning is interrupted; when the learning is executed in the circuits, the signal processing algorithm is interrupted. The learning and processing cannot be executed concurrently. Moreover, the modification of the device conductance in the learning process is not only determined by the voltage signals applied on the device, but also by other factors, such as the current flowing through the device, which prevent the device conductance to be modified accurately. In order to modify device conductances accurately in a circuit, learning algorithms are executed in external digital computing circuits to obtain targeted conductances, then devices are modified to the targeted conductances by applying different writing voltages on different devices sequentially in iterative writing and reading processes. The devices still need to be modified in serial learning processes by the signals from peripheral memory, signal processing, and/or control circuits. Accordingly, an electronic device that can emulate a synapse to facilitate the concurrent parallel signal processing and learning in the brain has not been realized,
Many embodiments of the disclosure are directed to electronic devices that facilitate concurrent parallel signal processing and learning in their circuits with high speed and energy efficiency.
Many other embodiments of the disclosure are directed to a synstor that can emulate the synapse with analog signal processing, learning, and memory functions in a single device.
Still many other embodiments of the disclosure are directed to a synstor circuit that can emulate the brain to create circuits with concurrent parallel signal processing and learning capabilities with speed, power efficiency, and learning capabilities significantly superior to computers.
Some embodiments of the disclosure are directed to a synstor, capable of providing analog signal processing, memory and learning functions of synapse, including:
In still some embodiments, the voltage signals applied to the input and output electrodes can be voltage pulses with fixed amplitudes and temporal durations for signal processing and learning.
In yet some embodiments, the set of the input voltage signals induces a dynamic output current for signal processing, and the dynamic output current is the convolution of a kernel function and the product of the set of input voltage signals and the synstor conductance.
In still yet some embodiments, the change rate of the conductance of the synstor is equal to the product of the conductance modification coefficient, the input voltage signal, and the output voltage signal.
In still yet some embodiments, the input and output electrodes and the semiconducting channel form a contact with a contact resistance, which is comparable with or larger than the resistance of the channel.
In still yet some embodiments, wherein the semiconducting channel forms Schottky barriers with the input and output electrodes, and wherein the input and output electrodes and the channel form a contact with a contact resistance which is comparable with or larger than the resistance of the channel.
In still yet some embodiments, the channel is dimensioned to have a length between the input and output electrodes longer than the length of the reference electrode.
In still yet some embodiments, the reference electrode extends beyond the edges of the portion of the dielectric layer containing the charge storage material.
In still yet some embodiments, the thickness of the dielectric layer between the charge storage material and the channel is less than the thickness of the dielectric layer between the charge storage material and the reference electrode.
In still yet some embodiments, the semiconducting channel comprises a semiconducting material selected from the group consisting of carbon nanotube, Si, graphene, Ge, SiC, ZnO, InO, InP, TiO2, Cu2O, GaN, GaAs, MoS2, MoSe2, WS2, WSe2, GaSe, GaTe, FeTe, polymers, molecules, and combinations thereof.
In still yet some embodiments, the semiconducting channel has a channel length between about 5-106 nm, a channel width between about 5-106 nm, and a channel thickness between about 0.1-105 nm.
In still yet some embodiments, the input, output and reference electrodes comprise a conducting or semiconducting material selected from the group consisting of Ti, Al, Au, Ni, Pt, Cu, carbon nanotube, Si, graphene, Ge, SiC, ZnO, InO, InP, TiO2, Cu2O, GaN, GaAs, MoS2, MoSe2, WS2, WSe2, GaSe, GaTe, FeTe, polymers, and combinations thereof.
In still yet some embodiments, the dielectric layers comprises an insulative material selected from the group consisting of HfO2, Al2O3, SiO2, Si3N4, Si, C, Ge, SiC, ZnO, InO, InP, TiO2, Cu2O, GaN, GaAs, polymers, molecules, and combinations thereof.
In still yet some embodiments, the dielectric layers have a dielectric length between about 5-106 nm, a dielectric width between about 5-106 nm, and a dielectric thickness between about 0.2-103 nm.
In still yet some embodiments, the charge storage material is selected from the group consisting of molecules, nanoparticles, semiconductor quantum dots, dopants, implanted ions, defects, vacancies, impurities, semiconducting materials, dielectric materials, and metals.
In still yet some embodiments, the charge storage material is within a volume with a length between about 5-106 nm, a width between about 5-106 nm, and a thickness between about 0.1-103 nm.
In still yet some embodiments, the semiconducting channel extends laterally beyond the edges of the portion of the first dielectric layer containing the charge storage material; the semiconducting channel extends laterally beyond the edges of the reference electrode; and the reference electrode extends laterally beyond the edges of the portion of the first dielectric layer containing the charge storage material; and the thickness of the dielectric layer between the charge storage material and the channel is less than the thickness of the dielectric layer between the charge storage material and the reference electrode.
Various embodiments of the disclosure are directed to a synstor capable of providing analog signal processing, memory and learning functions of biological synapse, including:
In still various embodiments, the dynamic output current is a convolution of a kernel function and the product of the input voltage signals and the synstor conductance.
In yet various embodiments, the change rate of the conductance of the synstor is the product of the conductance modification coefficient, the input voltage signal, and the output voltage signal.
Many embodiments of the disclosure are directed to a synaptic circuit capable of providing analog signal processing, memory and learning functions including:
Additional embodiments and features are set forth in part in the description that follows, and in part will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon examination of the specification or may be learned by the practice of the disclosed subject matter. A further understanding of the nature and advantages of the present disclosure may be realized by reference to the remaining portions of the specification and the drawings, which forms a part of this disclosure.
These and other features and advantages of the present invention will be better understood by reference to the following detailed description when considered in conjunction with the accompanying data and figures, wherein:
The embodiments of the invention described herein are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to precise forms disclosed. Rather, the embodiments selected for description have been chosen to enable one skilled in the art to practice the invention. All structural and functional equivalents to the elements of the disclosed embodiments that are known to those of ordinary skill in the art are expressly incorporated herein by reference and are intended to be encompassed by the present claims. Furthermore, no element, component, or method step in the present disclosure is intended to be dedicated to the public regardless of whether the element, component, or method step is explicitly recited in the claims.
As previously discussed, a computer based on the Turing model has separate logic and memory units. As shown in
Digital transistors have been developed to compose circuits with parallel computing architectures and distributed memories, such as graphics processing units (GPUs) from Nvidia, tensor processing units (TPUs) from Google, field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) from Intel, and the TrueNorth neuromorphic circuit from IBM, to improve their speed and energy efficiencies to the range of 1010-1011 FLOPS/W (floating point operations per second per watt) by increasing parallelism and reducing global data transmission. However, their energy efficiencies are fundamentally limited by the energy consumptions on memory (˜10−15 J/bit) and signal transitions (˜10−11 J/bit) in digital computing circuits. When transistors approach the limitations of their minimal sizes near the end of Moore's law, the energy efficiencies of transistor-based computing circuits are asymptotically saturated.
By contrast, the brain circumvents these bottleneck problems by processing signals in parallel via trillions of synapses, and modifying the synapses concurrently in a parallel learning process. The analog signal processing, learning, and memory functions are integrated in each single synapse. For signal processing, when a set of input voltage pulse signals in a presynaptic neuron is processed by a synapse, wherein no voltage signal in the postsynaptic neuron, the input voltage signals induces a dynamic current via the synapse in the postsynaptic neuron. The postsynaptic current can be expressed as:
I(t)=κ{circle around (*)}(wVi) (EQ. 1)
where Vi(t) denotes the voltage pulse signals on the presynaptic neuron, w(t) denotes the synaptic conductance (weight), κ(t) represents a kernel dynamic function, and κ{circle around (*)}(wVi) represents the convolution of κ(t) and w(t) Vi(t). The synapse is also modified by the sets of voltage pulse signals triggered simultaneously in the presynaptic and postsynaptic neurons for learning. The modification rate of the synaptic conductance, w, can be expressed as
{dot over (w)}=αViVo (EQ. 2)
where Vi denotes the voltage signals in the presynaptic neuron, Vo denotes the voltage signals in the postsynaptic neuron, and a denotes the conductance modification coefficient. w is modified when the voltage pulse signals Vi(t)≈Vo(t) with the learning coefficient α>0 in Hebbian learning, and α<0 in anti-Hebbian learning. α is a function of the timing difference, Δt, between Vi(t) and Vo(t+Δt) voltage pulse signals in the learning based on synaptic spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP). EQ. 2 also represents a universal correlative learning algorithm in machine learning. When a set of voltage pulse signals is triggered in the presynaptic or postsynaptic neurons, and wherein no voltage pulse signals is triggered in the presynaptic or postsynaptic neurons, the synaptic conductance is not changed for learning. Based on EQ. 2, when Vi Vo>0 (i.e. Vi(t)≈Vo(t)), then {dot over (w)}≠0; when Vi Vo=0 (e.g. Vi≠0 and Vo=0; or Vo≠0 and Vi=0; or Vi=Vo=0), then {dot over (w)}=0, w remains unchanged as nonvolatile memory. By integrating the analog convolutional processing (EQ. 1), correlative learning (EQ. 2), a neural network in the brain can concurrently process and learn from signals. For signal processing, a set of voltage pulse signals, Vim(t), in the mth presynaptic neuron is processed by synapses connected with the mth presynaptic and nth postsynaptic neurons, and induces a collective current, In, in the nth postsynaptic neuron. The current induces voltage pulse signals, Von(t), in the nth postsynaptic neuron. When the voltage pulse signal is fired in the nth postsynaptic neuron (Von≠0), the output current In=0 in the nth postsynaptic neuron. In can be expressed as,
where wnm denotes the conductance of the synstor(s), κnm(t) denotes a temporal kernel function, and κnm ®{circle around (*)}(wnmVim) represents the temporal convolution between wnmVim and Vim(t). The conductance matrix of the synapses, [Wnm]N,M in the neuronal network is also modified concurrently by the sets of voltage signals in the input and output electrodes for learning,
{dot over (w)}nm=αVimVon (EQ. 4)
The brain processes (EQ. 3) and learns (EQ. 4) from “big data” concurrently in analog parallel mode with an estimated speed of ˜1016 FLOPS comparable to the fastest supercomputer, Summit (˜1017 FLOPS), but the brain consumes a power of ˜20 W, much less than the power of the supercomputer (˜107 W), and the brain is much more energy-efficient (˜1015 FLOPS/W) than the supercomputer (˜1010 FLOPS/W). In summary, by integrating the analog convolutional processing (EQ. 1), correlative learning (EQ. 2), and nonvolatile memory functions in a single synapse, the brain circumvents the fundamental limitations such as physically separated memory units, data transmission between memory and logic units in computers as shown in
The circuits of the existing electronic devices, such as transistors, memristors, and phase change memory (PCM) devices, cannot execute the signal processing (EQ. 1) and correlative learning (EQ. 2) algorithms concurrently in parallel mode, which limits their speeds and energy efficiencies for processing and learning from “big data”. The devices in their circuits still need to be modified in serial learning processes by the signals from peripheral memory, signal processing, and/or control circuits, which limits the speeds and energy efficiencies of their circuits for learning (≤1011 FLOPS/W).
To address the said limitations and inefficiencies of the circuits of existing electronic devices, embodiments are directed to circuits of synstors that capable of facilitating concurrent parallel signal processing and learning with high speed and energy efficiency, as shown schematically in
As illustrated in
Such a synstor has analog signal processing, memory and learning functions of biological synapse. The synstor is configured to apply a zero or a constant voltage to the reference electrode (4). When no voltage signals are applied on the input (2) and output (3) electrodes, a standby zero voltage or a standby constant voltage is applied on the input and output electrodes. Sets of voltage signals are applied on the input and output electrodes with respect to the standby voltage. The voltage signals can be voltage pulses with fixed amplitudes and temporal durations for signal processing and learning.
According to embodiments a synstor is configured for signal processing when a set of input voltage signals is applied on the input electrode (2), wherein no voltage signal is applied on the output electrode (3), the set of the input voltage signals induces a dynamic output current on the output electrode (3). The output current can be expressed as,
I(t)=K{circle around (*)}(wVi) (EQ. 1)
where Vi denotes the voltage signals on the input electrode, w(t) denotes the synstor conductance, κ(t) represents a kernel function, and κ{circle around (*)}(wVi) represents the convolution of κ(t) and w(t) Vi(t).
When a set of voltage signals is applied to the input electrode (2), wherein a set of voltage signals with the same or similar amplitudes as the voltage signals is applied to the output electrode (3) simultaneously, the conductance of the synstor is changed in analog mode for learning; when a set of voltage signals is applied to one of either the input (2) or the output electrode (3), and wherein no voltage signals or a set of voltage signals with different polarities is applied to the other of either the input or output electrode simultaneously, or when no voltage signals is applied to either the input (2) or the output electrode (3), the conductance of the synstor is not changed for learning. The change rate of the conductance of the synstor, w, can be expressed as,
{dot over (w)}=αViVo (EQ. 2)
where Vi denotes the voltage signals on the input electrode, Vo denotes the voltage signals on the output electrode, and α denotes the conductance modification coefficient. When Vi Vo>0, then α≠0 and {dot over (w)}≠0; when Vi Vo≤0, then α=0 and {dot over (w)}=0.
When a set of voltage signals is applied to one of either the input (2) or the output electrode (3), and wherein no voltage signals or a set of voltage signals with different polarities is applied to the other of either the input or output electrode simultaneously, or when no voltage signals is applied to either the input (2) or the output electrode (3), or when no external voltages are applied to either the input or the output or the reference electrode the conductance of the synstor remains unchanged as memory, i.e. {dot over (w)}=0, under Vi Vo≤0.
According to many embodiments, such synstor devices may have a structure as illustrated in
Although
In many embodiments, at least a portion of the dielectric layer (18) is disposed between the charge storage material (20) and the reference electrode (24) such that the dielectric layer (18) ensures that the voltage differences between the charge storage material (20) and the reference electrode (24) are insufficient to drive charge through the dielectric layer (18). For the same reason, in various embodiments, as shown in
The combination of the input electrode (14), the semiconducting channel (12), and the output electrode (16) form a resistor. The combination of the semiconducting channel (12), the dielectric layer (18), the charge storage material (20) forms a capacitor. The charge storage material (20), the dielectric layer (18), and the reference electrode (24) form a capacitor. The two capacitors are connected in series to form a capacitor between the semiconducting channel (12) and the reference electrode (24).
The synstor is configured to apply a zero or a constant voltage to the reference electrode (24). When no voltage signals are applied on the input (14) and output (16) electrodes, a standby zero voltage or a standby constant voltage is applied on the input and output electrodes. Sets of voltage signals are applied on the input and output electrodes with respect to the standby voltage. The voltage signals can be voltage pulses with fixed amplitudes and temporal durations for signal processing and learning.
According to embodiments a synstor is configured such that during signal processing when a set of input voltage signals is applied on the input electrode (14), wherein no voltage signal is applied on the output electrode (16), a synstor processes a set of voltage signals on its input electrode (14) by inducing an output current on the output electrode through the resistors, and charging the capacitor between the semiconducting channel (12) and the reference electrode (24) during the voltage signals, and discharging the capacitor after the voltage signals, and triggering a dynamic current on the output electrode (16). The output current can be expressed as
I(t)=κ{circle around (*)}(wVi) (EQ. 1)
where Vi denotes the voltage signals on the input electrode, w(t) denotes the synstor conductance, κ(t) represents a kernel function, and κ{circle around (*)}(wVi) represents the convolution of κ(t) and w(t) Vi(t).
According to embodiments a synstor is configured such that during learning when a set of voltage signals is applied to the input electrode (14), wherein a set of voltage signals with the same or similar amplitudes as the voltage signals is applied to the output electrode (16) simultaneously, the sets of the voltage signals generates a voltage difference between the channel (12) and the charge storage material (20) across the dielectric layer (18), which has an magnitude larger than the threshold value and is sufficient to drive charge through the dielectric layer (18) to modify the charge storage material (20), such that the net charge within the charge storage material (18) is changed. In such embodiments, the change of the net charge within the charge storage material (18) induces the change of the carrier concentration in the semiconducting channel, such that the conductance of the synstor is changed in analog mode for learning. When a set of voltage signals is applied to one of either the input or the output electrode and wherein no voltage signal or a set of voltage signals with the opposite polarity is applied to the other of either the input or output electrode simultaneously, or when no voltage signals is applied to either the input or the output electrode, the set of the voltage signals only generates a voltage difference between the channel (12) and the charge storage material (20) across the dielectric layer (18), which has an magnitude smaller than the threshold value and is insufficient to drive charge through the dielectric layer (18) to modify the charge storage material (20). In such embodiments, the net charge within the charge storage material (18) remains unchanged, and the conductance of the synstor is not changed for learning. When no voltage signals is applied to either the input (14) or the output electrode (16), the voltage difference between the channel (12) and the charge storage material (20) across the dielectric layer (18) has an magnitude smaller than the threshold value and is insufficient to drive charge through the dielectric layer (18) to modify the charge storage material (20). In such embodiments, the net charge within the charge storage material (18) remains unchanged, and the conductance of the synstor is not changed for learning. The change rate of the conductance of the synstor, w, can be expressed as
{dot over (w)}=αViVo (EQ. 2)
where Vi denotes the voltage signals on the input electrode, Vo denotes the voltage signals on the output electrode, and α denotes the conductance modification coefficient. When Vi Vo>0, then α≠0 and {dot over (w)}≠0; when Vi Vo≤0, then α=0 and {dot over (w)}=0.
When a set of voltage signals is applied to one of either the input or the output electrode and wherein no voltage signal or a set of voltage signals with the opposite polarity is applied to the other of either the input or output electrode simultaneously, or when no voltage signals is applied to either the input or the output electrode, or when no external voltages is applied to either the input or the output or the reference electrode for the same reason, the conductance of the synstor remains unchanged as memory, i.e. {dot over (w)}=0, under Vi Vo<0.
In many embodiments, the input/output electrodes (14/16) and the channel (12) form a contact with a contact resistance which is comparable with or larger than the resistance of the channel (12) such that when a set of voltage signals is applied to one of either the input (14) or the output electrode (16), and wherein no voltage signals or a set of voltage signals with different polarities is applied to the other of either the input or output electrode simultaneously, or when no voltage signals is applied to either the input (14) or the output electrode (16), the voltage drops across the contact region(s) between the input/output electrode (14/16) and the channel (12), and the lateral spaces beyond the charge storage material (20). In such embodiments, the voltage difference between the channel (12) and the charge storage material (20) across the dielectric layers (18) induced by the voltage signal(s) has an magnitude smaller than the threshold value and is insufficient to drive charge through the dielectric layer (18) to modify the charge storage material (20), such that the net charge within the charge storage material (18) and the conductance of the synstor remains unchanged for memory and learning.
In many other embodiments, the input/output electrodes (14/16) form Schottky barriers with the channel (12) such that when a set of voltage signals is applied to one of either the input (14) or the output electrode (16), and wherein no voltage signals or a set of voltage signals with different polarities is applied to the other of either the input or output electrode simultaneously, or when no voltage signals is applied to either the input (14) or the output electrode (16), the voltage mainly drops across the contact region between the input/output electrode and the channel, and the lateral spaces beyond the charge storage material (20). Again, in such embodiments, the voltage difference between the channel (12) and the charge storage material (20) across the dielectric layers (18) induced by the voltage signal(s) has an magnitude smaller than the threshold value and is insufficient to drive charge through the dielectric layer (18) to modify the charge storage material (20), such that the net charge within the charge storage material (18) and the conductance of the synstor remains unchanged for memory and learning.
As shown in
Turning to the materials used in the construction of the various structures, various embodiments the channel (12) in the synstor device may comprise a semiconducting material selected from but not limited to carbon nanotube, Si, graphene, Ge, SiC, ZnO, InO, InP, TiO2, Cu2O, GaN, GaAs, MoS2, MoSe2, WS2, WSe2, GaSe, GaTe, FeTe, polymers, and molecules, etc. In many embodiments, the channel length (26) may range between about 5-106 nm, the channel width may range between about 5-106 nm, and the channel thickness may range between about 0.1-105 nm.
In various embodiments the input (14) and output (16) electrodes in the synstor device may comprise metals, such as, for example, Ti, Al, Au, Ni, Pt, Cu, etc. or semiconductor such as selected from but not limited to carbon nanotube, Si, graphene, Ge, SiC, ZnO, InO, InP, TiO2, Cu2O, GaN, GaAs, MoS2, MoSe2, WS2, WSe2, GaSe, GaTe, FeTe, and polymers, etc.
In various embodiments the dielectric layers (18) in the synstor device may comprise insulative materials selected from but not limited to HfO2, Al2O3, SiO2, Si3N4, Si, C, Ge, SiC, ZnO, InO, InP, TiO2, Cu2O, GaN, GaAs, etc. or polymers, and molecules. In many embodiments, the length of the dielectric layer may range between about 5-106 nm, the width of the first dielectric layer may range between about 5-106 nm. In many embodiments, the thickness (32) of the dielectric layer (18) between the charge storage material (20) and the semiconducting channel (12) may range between about 0.2-102 nm. In many embodiments, the thickness (34) of the dielectric layer (18) between the charge storage material (20) and the reference electrode (24) may range between about 0.5-103 nm.
In various embodiments, the charge storage material (22) may comprise continuous or distributed charge storage materials buried within the dielectric layer (18). In many embodiments the charge storage materials may comprise molecules such as C60, nanoparticles such as Au nanoparticles, semiconductor quantum dots, impurities such as, for example, dopants and implanted ions inside the material, and defects inside the material, such as, for example, vacancies, impurity, semiconducting films selected from but not limited to Si, C, Ge, SiC, ZnO, InO, InP, TiO2, Cu2O, GaN, GaAs, dielectric materials selected from but not limited to TiO2, SiO2, Si3N4, HfO2, Al2O3, or metals selected from but not limited to Ti, Al, Au, Ni, Pt, Cu, etc. In many embodiments, the dimensions of the charge storage material may range between about 0.2-102 nm.
In various embodiments the reference electrode (24) in the synstor device may comprise metals selected from but not limited to Ti, Al, Au, Ni, Pt, Cu, or semiconducting materials selected from but not limited to carbon nanotube, Si, graphene, Ge, SiC, ZnO, InO, InP, TiO2, Cu2O, GaN, GaAs, MoS2, MoSe2, WS2, WSe2, GaSe, GaTe, FeTe, and polymers, etc.
Although specific materials and combinations of materials are described above, it will be understood that any suitable combination of such materials may be used where appropriate such that the overall functions of the synstor device is preserved.
As discussed above, the synstor device according to embodiments is configured to provide analog signal processing, memory, and learning functions in a single device. Additional advantages may include, but are not limited to, the following:
Although the above discussion has focused on the architecture, materials and function of synstor devices according to certain embodiments, various other embodiments are directed to the integration of synstors in circuits. In many embodiments, as illustrated in
Using a circuit in accordance with such embodiments circumvents the bottleneck problems of conventional computers by processing voltage signals in parallel, and modifying the conductances of the synstors concurrently in a parallel learning process. As shown in
The synstor conductance matrix, [wnm]N,M is also modified concurrently by the spatiotemporal sets of voltage signals in the input and output electrodes for learning,
{dot over (w)}nm=αVimVon (EQ. 4)
where α denotes the conductance modification coefficient. By integrating the analog convolutional processing (EQ. 1), correlative learning (EQ. 2), and nonvolatile memory functions in a single synstor, the synstor circuit in accordance with embodiments concurrently executes the signal processing (EQ. 3) and correlative learning (EQ. 4) algorithms in a circuit in analog parallel mode.
Synstor circuits in accordance with embodiments may be advantageous in various ways, which include but are not limited to the following:
Although the description herein contains many details, these should not be construed as limiting the scope of the disclosure but as merely providing illustrations of some of the presently preferred embodiments. Therefore, it will be appreciated that the scope of the disclosure fully encompasses other embodiments, which may become obvious to those skilled in the art.
Exemplary Synstor
An exemplary carbon nanotube (CNT) synstor is shown in
Methods of Fabrication
In various exemplary embodiments of methods to fabricate CNT synstors, as shown In
Operation and Testing Methods
The reference electrodes of the exemplary CNT synstors were always electrically grounded during the tests. When no voltage signals are applied on the input and output electrodes of the synstors, the input and output electrodes are also electrically grounded. Current-voltage (I-V) characteristics were measured by a Keithley 4200 semiconductor parameter analyzer. The electrical voltage signals (Vi and Vo) applied to the input and output electrodes of the devices and circuits were generated by a field programmable gate array (FPGA), computer-controlled modules (National Instruments), and a Tektronix AFG3152C waveform/function generator. Currents flowing through synstors were measured by a semiconductor parameter analyzer, computer-controlled circuit modules (National Instruments), and oscilloscope (Tektronix). The DC conductance of the devices was derived from the currents measured by applying negative voltage signals with a duration of 5 ms and a magnitude equal to the voltages applied for learning. Testing protocols were programmed (NI LabVIEW) and implemented in an embedded field-programmable gate array (FPGA, Xilinx), a microcontroller, and a reconfigurable I/O interface (NI CompactRIO).
The exemplary devices and circuits were simulated by Technology Computer-Aided Design (TCAD) simulator (Sentaurus Device, Synopsys). The simulator performed numerical simulations of device physics based on partial differential equations of electrostatics, quantum mechanics, and carrier transport under a set of boundary conditions defined by device structures, and electronic properties and band diagrams were extracted from the simulations. Transient and quasi-stationary simulations were conducted under different voltage biases on the Al input/output electrodes with respect to the grounded reference electrodes. The electric properties and power consumptions of the circuits were also analyzed by the simulations.
Exemplary Physical Models and Testing Results of Signal Processing in Synstor Embodiments
In exemplary embodiments a voltage pulse with an amplitude of Va and a duration of td applied on the input electrode of a synstor at the moment t=tn charges the capacitor between the CNT network and Al reference electrode, CCNT/Al, and induces a change of the current through the CNT network toward the grounded output electrode of the synstor, ΔI(t)≈w Vp[1−e−β
In some exemplary embodiments, the currents triggered by periodic voltage pulses with an amplitude Va=−1.75 V, a period of 30 ns, and different durations (8-20 ns) were measured versus time (as discussed below in relation to
Exemplary Physical Models and Testing Results of Learning and Memory in Synstor Embodiments
In various exemplary embodiments, as shown in the simulated electronic band structures in
In various exemplary embodiments, as shown in the simulated electronic band structures in
In various exemplary embodiments, Vi and Vo voltages with an amplitude Vi=Vo applied on the input and output electrodes of a synstor induce a voltage, VCNT/TiO2, on the capacitor between the CNT network and TiO2 charge-storage layer, which in turn modify the charge density, ρs, in the charge storage layer by electronic hopping through the HfO2 layer (as discussed below in relation to
where q denotes the charge of an electron, kB denotes the Boltzmann constant, T denotes temperature, ϕB denotes the potential barrier for electrons to diffuse in the HfO2 barrier layer, θ denotes a parameter related to the thickness of the HfO2 layer, and represents a parameter equal to current density under |VCNT/TiO2|=(ϕB/θ)2. In exemplary CNT synstors, CNT/HfO2/TiO2/HfO2/Al layers in the synstor are composed of two capacitors connected in series with the CNT/HfO2/TiO2 and TiO2/HfO2/Al sandwich structures and corresponding capacitance cCNT/TiO2 and cTiO2/Al, and VCNT/TiO2=Vi/ν−ρs/(νcTiO2/Al) with ν=(CCNT/TiO2+cTiO2/Al)/cTiO2/Al. After substituting VCNT/TiO2 in dρs/dt,
under Vi=Vo> Vt+>0;
under Vi=Vo<Vat−<0, where Vt+=ν(ϕB/θ)2+ρs0/cTiO2/Al>0, Vt−=−ν(ϕB/θ)2+ρs0/CTiO2/Al<0, and ρs0 as ρs before the voltage Va is applied. When Vt−<Vi=Vo<Vt+, the external voltage Vi drives an insignificant amount of electrons to overcome the potential barrier in the HfO2 layer, and |dρs/dt|<||≈0. When Vi=Vo> Vt+ or <Vt−, the external voltage drives electrons through the potential barrier to modify ρs, and ρs also gradually builds up an internal potential against the external potential. When ρs is modified to balance the external potential with Vi−ρs/cTiO2/Al≈Vt+−ρs0/cTiO2/Al or Vi−ρs/CTiO2/Al≈Vt−−ρs0/cTiO2/Al, dρs/dt=≈0 and ρs reaches its saturation values with ρs≈ρs0+CTiO2/Al[Vi−Vt+] or ρs≈ρs0+CTiO2/Al[Vi−Vt−]. In the capacitance-voltage test, after a synstor experiences multiple voltage pulses with Vi=Vo on its input and output electrodes, the modification of the charge densities in the synstor,
where Δρs=ρs−ρs0. The experimental observed Δρs data (
Multiple Vi and Vo voltage pulses with an amplitude Vi=Vo=Va applied on the input and output electrodes of an exemplary synstor also can modify ρs, and the change of ρs, Δρs induces the change of the Fermi level of the CNT network, which in turn causes the change of device conductance (as discussed in reference to
where w0 denotes the initial device DC conductance before the charge modification, and qΔVCNTf denotes the change of the CNT Fermi level induced by Δρs. ΔVCNTf increases monotonically with −Δρs in the p-type CNTs, and its linear approximation gives ΔVCNTf≈−ερ+Δρs when Δρs>0 and ΔVCNTf≈−ερ−Δρs when Δρs<0, where ερ+ and ερ− denote constants related to the device structure, capacitance, CNT doping concentration. After substituting ΔVCNTf in Δw by Δρs in EQ. 6,
where βv+=qερ+cTiO2/Al/kBT and βv−=qερ−cTiO2/Al/kBT. The experimental data, Δw/w0, (
When a series of Vi and Vo voltage pulses with Vi=Vo are applied, ρs is modified by the pulses as a function of the number of the applied pulses, n (as discussed below in relation to
with td as the pulse duration. The solution of the differential equation gives
with
induces the shift of the CNT Fermi energy qΔVCNTf(n), which in turn induces
Therefore,
where
The experimental data, Δw(n)/w0, (
Synstors were modified to its high and low conductance values, wH and wL, by applying 50 pairs of 5 ms-wide Vi and Vo pulses with Vi=Vo=−1.75 V and Vi=Vo=1.75 V alternatively in 2930 modification cycles, and no deterioration of device conductance modification was observed (
108 synstors on a chip were modified to wH and wL respectively, and the distributions of wH and wL values are shown in
After synstors were modified to different analog conductances, w0, the nonvolatile memory of the synstors was examined by measuring their conductances versus time over 1.75×105 s at room temperature. Within the test period, the average percentage changes of the conductances
Simulations of Nanoscale Synstors
Nanoscale synstors have been simulated by Technology Computer-Aided Design (TCAD) simulator (Sentaurus Device, Synopsys). The cross-sectional structure of a simulated synstor composed of a 200 nm-wide p-type semiconducting CNT network channel formed contacts with an Al input and an Al output electrodes is shown in
When a pair of negative Vi and Vo pulses with Vi=Vo=−1.75 V are applied on the input and output electrodes of the 200 nm CNT synstor simultaneously, the negative voltage on the CNT network with respect to the Al reference electrode inverts the p-type CNTs above the Al reference electrode to n-type CNTs, and moves the edge of the CNT conduction band close to the Fermi level of the Al input/output electrodes (
Electronic band diagrams were also simulated by TCAD when a pair of Vi and Vo pulses are applied on the input and output electrodes of the synstor with the 200 nm-wide CNT network under the different conditions: (1) Vi=−1.75 V and Vo=1.75 V (
The cross-sectional structure of a simulated synstor composed of a 40 nm-wide p-type semiconducting CNT network channel formed contacts with an Al input and an Al output electrode is shown in
The simulated electronic band diagrams along the Al input electrode/CNT/AI output electrode under various Vi, the voltage on the input electrode, and Vo, the voltage on the output electrode of the 40 nm CNT synstor are shown in
Electronic band diagrams were also simulated by TCAD when a pair of Vi and Vo pulses are applied on the input and output electrodes of the 40-nm synstor under different conditions: (1) Vi=−0.5 V and Vo=0.5 V (
In summary, in this exemplary embodiment, the CNT synstor is composed of a p-type semiconducting CNT network which formed Schottky contacts with Al input and output electrodes as a resistor, and a recessed TiO2 charge storage layer embedded in a HfO2 dielectric layer sandwiched between an Al reference electrode and the CNT network as a capacitor. For signal processing, a synstor processes a set of voltage pulses, Vi(t), on its input electrode by charging the capacitor during the pulses, and discharging the capacitor after the pulses, and triggering a current via the CNT resistor, I(t)=κ{circle around (*)}(wVl) (EQ. 1) on its grounded output electrode (Vo=0). When a set of paired Vi and Vo voltage pulses with the same amplitude (i.e. Vi=Vo) are applied on the CNT synstor simultaneously, w is modified by following {dot over (w)}=αVi Vo (EQ. 2). The paired negative (positive) voltage pulses generate a potential difference between the CNT network and TiO2 layer to increase (decrease) the electronic charge stored in the TiO2 layer, which in turn attracts (repels) the holes in the p-type semiconducting CNT network to increase (decrease) its conductance with α>0 (α<0). Otherwise, when a synstor experiences Vi and Vo pulses under the condition Vi·Vo≤0, the Vi or Vo potential mainly drops beyond the TiO2 charge storage layer/Al reference electrode, and the magnitudes of the potential differences between the CNT network and the recessed TiO2 layer are below the threshold values to modify the charge stored in the TiO2 layer, thus {dot over (w)}=0 (EQ. 2) for learning and nonvolatile memory. Based on simulation of nanoscale devices, microscale synstors in this exemplary embodiment can potentially be miniaturized to nanoscale (˜40 nm).
Exemplary Synstor Circuits
The concurrent signal processing and learning of synstors according to embodiments were demonstrated in an exemplary 4×2 crossbar circuit, as shown schematically in
Original speech signals consisted of unlabeled “yes” and “no” utterances were pre-processed to generate the set of voltage pulses, Vim(t), input to the crossbar synstor circuit (
with
The 4×2 crossbar synstor circuit in this exemplary embodiment was demonstrated for concurrent signal processing and learning from “yes” and “no” speech signals. The speech signals were converted to a set of input voltage pulses, {right arrow over (V)}i, processed by the synstor circuit in parallel to generate output currents (EQ. 3), which in turn triggered sets of forward-propagating output voltage pulses, {right arrow over (V)}f, from the connected integrate-and-fire “neuron” circuits for signal processing, and back-propagating voltage pulses, {right arrow over (V)}o, on the output electrodes of the synstor circuit. During the signal processing, the conductance matrix [wnm]N,M of the synstor circuit was concurrently modified by following the correlative learning algorithm (EQ. 4) in a parallel learning process, leading to the orthogonal sets of output {right arrow over (V)}f voltage pulses to distinguish “yes” and “no” speech signals. As demonstrated in this exemplary embodiment, a synstor circuit can execute spatiotemporal signal processing (EQ. 3) and correlative learning (EQ. 4) algorithms concurrently with high energy efficiency by circumventing the fundamental computing limitations in existing electronic circuits such as physically separated logic and memory units, data transmission between memory and logic, the execution of the signal processing and learning algorithms in serial mode in different circuits, and the signal transmissions between the circuits.
In comparison with computers, the equivalent computing operations in a M×N synstor circuit shown in
vs=6MNfs (EQ. 9)
where fs denotes the circuit operation frequency. With fs=50 MHz, the 4×2 synstor circuit in this exemplary embodiment operated at a speed of 2.4×109 FLOPS (
The total power consumption of an M×N synstor circuit shown in
Ps≈MN
where
The energy efficiency of an M×N synstor circuit shown in
Fs=6fs/(
As shown in
In digital serial mode, transistors operate at high conductance (˜105 nS) in order to reduce computing latency (˜10−9 s) and enhance accuracy; in analog parallel mode, synstors (synapses) operate at low conductance (c 2 nS), and the computing latency and accuracy of an M×N synstor (synapse) circuit increase with increasing M and N, the numbers of parallel input/output electrodes (see, e.g.,
The speed of an M×N crossbar synstor circuit (
The microscale synstor circuit in this exemplary embodiment has a computing performance density of ˜1.3×1011 FLOPS/mm2, which is superior to that of nanoscale transistor circuits (˜109-1011 FLOPS/mm2) such as TPU from Google, Volta V100 GPU from Nvidia, and Stratrix 10 FPGA from Intel, and inferior to that of nanoscale memristor and PCM circuits (˜109-1012 FLOPS/mm2). Based on simulation of nanoscale devices, synstors can potentially be miniaturized to nanoscale (˜40 nm) with a projected performance density of ˜1017 FLOPS/mm2.
There is “plenty of room at the bottom” to miniaturize synstor size, scale up synstor circuits, improve their energy efficiency, speed, power consumption, and uniformity for concurrent signal processing and learning from “big data” in intelligent systems.
This description of the invention has been presented for the purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form described, and many modifications and variations are possible in light of the teaching above. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical applications. This description will enable others skilled in the art to best utilize and practice the invention in various embodiments and with various modifications as are suited to a particular use. The scope of the invention is defined by the following claims.
As used herein, the singular terms “a,” “an,” and “the” may include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Reference to an object in the singular is not intended to mean “one and only one” unless explicitly so stated, but rather “one or more.”
As used herein, the term “set” refers to a collection of one or more objects. Thus, for example, a set of objects can include a single object or multiple objects.
As used herein, the terms “substantially” and “about” are used to describe and account for small variations. When used in conjunction with an event or circumstance, the terms can refer to instances in which the event or circumstance occurs precisely as well as instances in which the event or circumstance occurs to a close approximation. When used in conjunction with a numerical value, the terms can refer to a range of variation of less than or equal to ±10% of that numerical value, such as less than or equal to ±5%, less than or equal to ±4%, less than or equal to ±3%, less than or equal to +2%, less than or equal to +1%, less than or equal to +0.5%, less than or equal to ±0.1%, or less than or equal to ±0.05%. For example, “substantially” aligned can refer to a range of angular variation of less than or equal to ±10°, such as less than or equal to 5°, less than or equal to ±4°, less than or equal to ±3°, less than or equal to 2°, less than or equal to ±1°, less than or equal to ±0.5°, less than or equal to 0.1°, or less than or equal to ±0.05°.
Additionally, amounts, ratios, and other numerical values may sometimes be presented herein in a range format. It is to be understood that such range format is used for convenience and brevity and should be understood flexibly to include numerical values explicitly specified as limits of a range, but also to include all individual numerical values or sub-ranges encompassed within that range as if each numerical value and sub-range is explicitly specified. For example, a ratio in the range of about 1 to about 200 should be understood to include the explicitly recited limits of about 1 and about 200, but also to include individual ratios such as about 2, about 3, and about 4, and sub-ranges such as about 10 to about 50, about 20 to about 100, and so forth.
This application is a national stage of PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2019/015018, entitled “Synaptic Resistors for Concurrent Parallel Signal Processing, Memory and Learning with High Speed and Energy Efficiency” to Chen, filed Jan. 24, 2019, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/621,320, entitled “Synaptic Resistors and Circuits With Signal Processing, Memory, and Learning Functions” to Chen et al., filed Jan. 24, 2018, and claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/623,586, entitled “Synaptic Resistors and Circuits With Signal Processing, Memory, and Learning Functions” to Chen et al., filed Jan. 30, 2018, the disclosures of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
This invention was made with government support under Grant Number FA9550-15-1-0056, awarded by the U.S. Air Force, Office of Scientific Research. The government has certain rights in the invention.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2019/015018 | 1/24/2019 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2019/147859 | 8/1/2019 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
7412428 | Nugent | Aug 2008 | B2 |
8589320 | Breitwisch | Nov 2013 | B2 |
20140067743 | Park | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20150348667 | Bol | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20180012123 | Han | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20190065929 | Koelmans | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20200227635 | Yang | Jul 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
20160019682 | Feb 2016 | KR |
20180095977 | Aug 2018 | KR |
20180115995 | Oct 2018 | KR |
2016069334 | May 2016 | WO |
2019147859 | Aug 2019 | WO |
2019147859 | Sep 2019 | WO |
2019147859 | Mar 2022 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Tudor, Andrew William, “Synaptic Resistor Networks for Intelligent Systems with Real-Time Learning”, 2017 (Year: 2017). |
“Parker-A-biomimetic-fabricated-carbon-nanotube-synapse-for-prosthetic-applications”, 2011 (Year: 2011). |
“Analog Neuromorphic Module Based on Carbon Nanotube Synapses” (Year: 2013). |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2019/015018, Report dated Jul. 28, 2020, dated Aug. 6, 2020, 6 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2019/015018, Search completed Jun. 6, 2019, dated Jul. 15, 2019, 10 pgs. |
Backus, “Can Programming Be Liberated from Von Neumann Style—Functional Style and Its Algebra of Programs”, Communications of the ACM, Aug. 1978, vol. 21, No. 8, pp. 613-641, doi: 10.1145/359576.359579. |
Benjamin et al., “Neurogrid: A Mixed-Analog-Digital Multichip System for Large-Scale Neural Simulations”, Proceedings of the IEEE, May 2014, vol. 102, No. 5, pp. 699-716, doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2014.2313565. |
Brooks et al., “Is the brain a good model for machine intelligence?”, Nature, Feb. 23, 2012, vol. 482, pp. 462-463, doi: 10.1038/482462a. |
Chen et al., “Correlative Learning: A Basis for Brain and Adaptive Systems”, (Wiley, 2007), pp. 1-476, doi:10.1002/9780470171455 (presented in two parts). |
Chen et al., “The Role of Metal-Nanotube Contact in the Performance of Carbon Nanotube Field-Effect Transistors”, Nano Letters, Jun. 24, 2005, vol. 5 , No. 7, pp. 1497-1502, doi: 10.1021/nl0508624. |
Diorio et al., “A single-transistor silicon synapse”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, Nov. 1996, vol. 43, No. 11, pp. 1972-1980, doi: 10.1109/16.543035. |
Eryilmaz et al., “Brain-like associative learning using a nanoscale non-volatile phase change synaptic device array”, Frontiers in Neuroscience, Jul. 22, 2014, vol. 8, Article 205, pp. 1-11, doi: 10.3389/fnins.2014.00205. |
Feynman, “Simulating Physics with Computers”, International Journal of Theoretical Physics, Jun. 1982, vol. 21, No. 6-7, pp. 467-488, doi: 10.1007/BF02650179. |
Guez et al., “On the Stability, Storage Capacity, and Design of Nonlinear Continuous Neural Networks”, IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics, Feb. 1988, vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 80-87, doi: 10.1109/21.87056. |
Hebb, “The organization of behavior; a neuropsychological theory”, (Wiley, 1949), 365 pgs. |
Hodgkin et al., “A Quantitative Description of Membrane Current and Its Application to Conduction and Excitation in Nerve”, Journal of Physiology, Aug. 28, 1952, vol. 117, No. 4, pp. 500-544. |
Hopfield et al., “Neural Networks and Physical Systems with Emergent Collective Computational Abilities”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, Jan. 15, 1982, vol. 79, No. 8, pp. 2554-2558, doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.8.2554. |
Jo et al., “Nanoscale Memristor Device as Synapse in Neuromorphic Systems”, Nano Letters, Mar. 1, 2010, vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 1297-1301, doi: 10.1021/nl904092h. |
Kim et al., “Synaptic organic transistors with a vacuum-deposited charge-trapping nanosheet”, Scientific Reports, Sep. 20, 2016, 6:33355. |
Kumar et al., “Chaotic dynamics in nanoscale NbO2 Mott memristors for analogue computing”, Nature, Aug. 17, 2017, vol. 548, pp. 318-321, doi: 10.1038/nature23307. |
Lai et al., “Ionic/Electronic Hybrid Materials Integrated in a Synaptic Transistor with Signal Processing and Learning Functions.”, Advanced Materials, Jun. 2, 2010, vol. 22, pp. 2448-2453, doi: 10.1002/adma.201000282. |
Lee et al., “Electronic-band-structure mapping of nanotube transistors by scanning photocurrent microscopy”, Small, Dec. 4, 2007, vol. 3, No. 12, pp. 2038-2042, doi: 10.1002/smll.200700418. |
Merolla et al., “A million spiking-neuron integrated circuit with a scalable communication network and interface”, Science, Aug. 8, 2014, vol. 345, No. 6197, pp. 668-673, doi: 10.1126/science.1254642. |
Prezioso et al., “Training andoperation of an integrated neuromorphic network based on metal-oxide memristors”, Nature, May 7, 2015, vol. 521, pp. 61-64, doi: 10.1038/nature14441. |
Rinkio et al., “High-yield of memory elements from carbon nanotube field-effect transistors with atomic layer deposited gate dielectric”, New Journal of Physics, Oct. 16, 2008, vol. 10, 103019, 16 pgs., doi:10.188/1367-2630/10/10/103019. |
Sahidullah et al., “Design, analysis and experimental evaluation of block based transformation in MFCC computation for speaker recognition”, Speech Communication, May 2012, vol. 54, No. 4, pp. 543-565, doi: 10.1016/j.specom.2011.11.004. |
Silver et al., “Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search”, Nature, Jan. 28, 2016, vol. 529, pp. 484-489, doi: 10.1038/nature16961. |
Turing, “Computing machinery and intelligence”, Mind, Oct. 1, 1950, vol. 49, No. 28, pp. 433-460. |
Waldrop, “The semiconductor industry will soon abandon its pursuit of Moore's law. Now things could get a lot more interesting”, Nature, Feb. 9, 2016, vol. 530, No. 7589, pp. 144-147, doi: 10.1038/530144a. |
Wang et al., “A2-transistor/1-resistor artificial synapse capable of communication and stochastic learning in neuromorphic systems”, Frontiers in Neuroscience, Jan. 15, 2015, vol. 8, Article 438, p. 1-11, doi:10.3389/fnins.2014.00438. |
Yu et al., “Scaling-up Resistive Synaptic Arrays for Neuro-inspired Architecture Challenges and Prospect”, IEEE, 2015, 4 pgs. |
Zeki, “A massively asynchronous, parallel brain”, Philosophical Transactions B, Royal Society, May 19, 2015, vol. 370, No. 1668, pp. 1-14, doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0174. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 19743913.6, Search completed Sep. 17, 2021, dated Sep. 28, 2021, 12 Pgs. |
Tudor, Synaptic Resistor Networks for Intelligent Systems with Real-Time Learning, UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations, Jan. 1, 2017, pp. 88. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210406660 A1 | Dec 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62623586 | Jan 2018 | US | |
62621320 | Jan 2018 | US |