Patent Application
20130006913
In business and in personal life, humans often fail to consistently keep in touch with important individuals. Even with the best of intentions, remembering each person and the last time you contacted them can be challenging. The result of a lack of communication is often that relationships fail and sales and customer satisfaction suffer. In the past, a person might have kept an address book containing lists of people and their contact information. More recently, most electronic mail (e-mail) applications include a version of the traditional address book that is often referred to as a contacts list. Simply having the contact information for friends, family, and business clients available does not ensure any consistent communication gets made.
In one embodiment of the present invention, by providing an automated tool for initiating communication with contacts on a contact list, users are able to not only be reminded that a communication with a person is over due, but also have the communication automatically placed for them. In addition to organizing contact information and initiating communication with them, another important aspect is the optimization and continual refinement in when the communication is made. In one embodiment, based on actual success rate statistics from attempted communications as well as user-defined preferences, the automated tool is able to optimize which methods of communication is most successful, as well as the time and day of the week that is best to attempt the communication.
In one embodiment of the present invention, a system and method may be provided for automating proactive communication. The information for the desired contacts may be accepted from a user. A selection of contact communication frequency preferences may be received from a user. An automatic communication to one of the desired contacts may be initiated. The user may be allowed to cancel the automatic communication, in response to receiving a notification that the communication is about to begin. A response indicative of the communication status may be received. Rules and preferences may be optimized based upon the received response.
Illustrative embodiments of the present invention are described in detail below with reference to the attached drawing figures, which are incorporated by reference herein and wherein:
In one embodiment, in the situation where the user does not cancel the automatic communication to the contact, the data packet 113 may be delivered through the communications network 106 to one of the contact's communications devices. A contact's communications device may include a landline telephone 111, a computing device 112, or a wireless communications device 114. In other embodiments, any number of devices operable to communicate with the automatic proactive communicator 102 via the communications network 106 may also be included. A return data packet 115 may be communicated from one of the contact's communications devices via the communications network 106 to the automatic proactive communicator 102 in order to alert the automatic proactive communicator 102 as to whether or not the contact accepted the call or other message, or whether the user did not receive the communication.
The automatic proactive communicator 102 may be a standalone device such as a personal computer, laptop, server, network node, or any other computing device operable to perform the principals of the present invention. The software modules 104 may be located within the automatic proactive communicator 102, or they may be located anywhere connected to the communications network 106 that is in communication with the automatic proactive communicator 102. The software modules 104 will be described in greater detail below in reference to
Data packets 105, 107, 113, and 115 may be any type of data packet that may be communicated over the communications network 106. In one embodiment, if the network is a LAN or the Internet, the data packets may be internet protocol (IP) packets. In another embodiment, the communications network 106 may be the public-switched telephone network (PSTN), in which case the data packets 105 may consist of analog signals, as is commonly known in the art. In other words, depending on the particular type of communications network 106 different types of data packets 105, 107, 113 and 115 may be used. The communications network 106 may be the Internet, a LAN, WAN, PSTN, wireless networks such as GSM or CDMA, or any other communications network operable to communicate between the automatic proactive communicator 102 and the user's and contact's communications devices.
In one embodiment, the user's communications devices may include a wireless communications device 108, a landline telephone 109, or a computing device 110. The wireless communications device 108 may be a cellular telephone, a PDA, or any other wireless communications device 108 operable to communicate over the communications network 106. A landline telephone 109 may be a traditional telephone operable to communicate over the PSTN, or may be an IP based phone operable to communicate over data networks, such as the Internet. The computing device 110 may be a laptop, PC, desktop, netbook, or any other computing device operable to communicate via the communications network 106 with the automatic proactive communicator 102. It should be understood that any other similar devices that are able to communicate messages with the automatic proactive communicator 102 may also be used in the present invention. In one embodiment, the contact's communications devices 111, 112, and 114 are similar to user's communications devices 108, 109, and 110. The difference between devices lies in whom the communications devices belong. Therefore, no separate description of the landline telephone 111, computing device 112, or wireless communications device 114 is provided.
Although it is not shown, in one embodiment, the user's communications device and the automatic proactive communicator 102 may be the same device. For example, if the automatic proactive communicator 102 also functions as a personal computer for the user, the user may not only set up contact information and other necessary inputs into the automatic proactive communicator 102, but may also use the automatic proactive communicator 102 for traditional personal computer computing uses. Therefore, at least in one embodiment, the automatic proactive communicator 102 and a computing device belonging to the user may be the same physical device. The method in which the automatic proactive communicator 102 decides which user communications device to use as well as which contact communication device to communicate with, will be described in greater detail below in reference to
Memory 206 may also be located within the automatic proactive communicator 200 for storing data being processed by the processing unit 202. The automatic proactive communicator 200 may include an input/output (I/O) unit 208 for receiving and communicating data between communications devices, such as user's communications devices and contact's communications devices, and the automatic proactive communicator 200, over a communications network. A data storage unit 210 may be included in, or be in communication with the automatic proactive communicator 200. The data storage unit 210 may be a hard drive or any other type of volatile or non-volatile memory capable of storing data. Within the data storage unit 210 may be one or more data repositories 212a-212n (212), such as a database or multiple databases, capable of storing and organizing data. Some example data may include contact information, user preferences, and predefined rules, but any information may be stored within the data repositories 212. In one embodiment, rather than including the data storage unit 210, the automatic proactive communicator 200 may use a memory 206 that is large enough to store any necessary data.
The automatic proactive communicator may communicate in a variety of ways with the contacts that are entered in by the user. In one embodiment, one way to communicate with the user's contact is through the use of a telephone. In step 308, the automatic proactive communicator places a call to the user's telephone number. In step 310, the user answering the telephone is notified by the automatic proactive communicator which contact is about to be called. In one embodiment, the user may be notified by an automated recording generated by the automatic proactive communicator 102. In an alterative embodiment, the user may be notified via a display screen located on the user's telephone, similar to a caller ID display, or any other manner in which the telephone is able to alert the user as to the identity of the contact that is to receive the communication. In step 312, a determination may be made whether or not the user would like to abort the call. For example, the user may choose to hang up and not allow the call to continue on to the contact, the user may not answer the phone at all, which would also be seen as the user refusing the call, or the user may answer the call and choose not to hang up, in which case in step 314, the contact's number is dialed.
In step 316, a determination may be made as to whether or not the contact answered the phone call. If the contact does not answer the phone call, or if the user aborted the call previously, in step 320 the automatic proactive communicator may be notified of a failure to communicate with a contact. Alternatively, in step 318, if the contact did answer the telephone call, the proactive communicator is notified of the success. Although it will be described below in greater detail, in one embodiment, notifying the automatic proactive communicator of failure or success each time an attempt to communicate with a contact is one useful metric for optimizing the proactive communications process. For example, using the contact's information, as well as the time of day and the day of the week if the call or other communication is successful, the automatic proactive communicator is likely to determine that that contact has a greater possibility of being reached at that particular time or day of the week for future communications. On the other hand, if the communication is unsuccessful, the automatic proactive communicator may likely use this information to determine not to attempt to try to communicate with the contact at that particular time or day, in the future.
Although the automatic proactive communicator may be operable to communicate many different types of messages to the user's communications devices, for simplicity, only one other example is given in
In an alternative embodiment, the automatic communicator may initiate the e-mail program, even if a user is not currently operating within, or have running, the e-mail program. This allows for contacts that are most likely to be available by e-mail to be contacted without user intervention or without respect to what programs are running.
In step 326, a determination is made as to whether or not the user chose to abort the sending of the e-mail. If the user does not cancel the e-mail, in step 328 the e-mail message is automatically sent to the contact and the automatic proactive communicator may be notified of the successful sending of the message. However, if the user cancels the e-mail, the automatic proactive communicator may be notified of the failure. Once again, the automatic proactive communicator may use the data regarding the success or failure of the message to be communicated in order to provide data to the various algorithms located within the software modules that enable the automatic proactive communicator to optimize communications with the user's contacts.
The communication frequency button 406 may include options such as daily, weekly, bi-weekly, monthly, semiannually, or a user defined period of time in which a user may select how often to communicate with a particular contact. Upon entry of a contact's information into the automatic proactive communicator, as well as other necessary input used in setting up the automatic proactive communicator, such as the frequency in which the user wishes to communicate with a contact, a user will no longer have to be concerned about letting relationships go without some form of regular communication. By including an interval chosen by the user, the user is able to best decide what scope of communication is appropriate on an individual basis. After entry of all the applicable fields with the contact's information, a user may select the submit button 408 in order to submit the contact's information to the automatic proactive communicator.
In alternative embodiments, the proactive communicator contact setup screen 400 may additionally include other input fields such as a preferred contact means, (e.g., e-mail), predetermined rules, such as no attempt to communicate with business contacts should be made on a weekend day, or any other number of set rules that the user chooses to set up from the beginning. In one embodiment, the automatic proactive communicator will, however, learn preferences of both the user and the contacts, individually and/or as a group, based on the received feedback such as being notified of success or failure of a communication at a particular time and on a particular day, and over time will learn to automatically make communication attempts that the user is more likely to accept.
In another embodiment, although not depicted in a separate figure, a user may receive a telephone call, and upon answering the telephone call, a recorded voicemail or other message may alert the user of the identity of the contact that is about to be called, and give the user an opportunity to either stay on the line and have the call connected, or to hang up and cancel the call. By automatically initiating a telephone call to the user, the automatic proactive communicator allows the user to effortlessly keep in touch with the contacts without any additional effort on the user's part. If the user has time and wishes to talk to the contact, the user simply has to wait and will be connected to the contact. On the other hand, if the user is in a meeting or otherwise is occupied and cannot complete the communication at that time, the automatic proactive communicator will note the particular time and day and factor that into future determinations of when to attempt to contact that person, or any other person, in the future.
A preferences and rules module 604 may additionally be included that would allow a user, either during the contact setup that occurs initially or during subsequent edits to a contact's information, to enter in preferences, or other rules. The preferences or rules may be related to the automatic proactive communications systems in general, all of the contacts in general, or to a particular contact. For example, if the user knows that he or she never wants to attempt a business contact communication on the weekends, contacts identified as a business contact may additionally include a rule within a record associated with that particular contact, or type of contacts, alerting the automatic proactive communicator not to select certain contacts during weekend attempts at communications. Many other different types of preferences or rules, such as time of day preferences, may also be entered using the preferences and rules module 604. In one embodiment, the preferences and rules module 604 may include references to the user's schedule, or calendar, with a preference being set automatically to not attempt communications during times indicated as busy or unavailable by the user within their calendar.
A logic module 606 may additionally be included, in one embodiment, to interpret statistics received over the communications network from the user's device as well as the contact's device, indicating success or failure of particular communication. Calculations made by the logic module may provide additional information to the preferences and rules module. To optimize the automatic proactive communication with the contacts, the logic module 606 may alternatively operate independent of the preferences and rules module 604. Some examples of various algorithms or other methods which may be used by the logic module to optimize the communications include parameter optimization, Bayes theorems of probability, heuristics, and other mathematical techniques. By using the algorithms, the automatic proactive communicator is able to increase the percentage of completed calls or other communication with contacts, as effectively as possible.
In one embodiment, the automatic proactive communicator includes an algorithm that executes Bayes theorems of probability to help determine the best time or day to call a particular contact. Bayes theorems, at least in the Bayesian interpretation, say that probabilities are rationally coherent degrees of belief, or a proposition's likelihood given a body of well-specified information. Additionally, Bayes theorem can be seen as a way of understanding how the probability that a theory is true is affected by a new piece of evidence. Related to the present invention, using a body of data of past calls, the likelihood of a person being available at particular time may be updated based on information received from future attempts at contacting a particular contact. For example, if a contact has only been available before 9 a.m. once, each additional attempt at communication with the contact prior to 9 a.m. would diminish the chances of the contact being available before 9 a.m. The automatic proactive communicator would eventually have enough data to determine that the contact should not be called before 9 a.m., to allow for the most efficient use of the user's time. Data may be compiled not only on the contact, but also on the availability of the user, as well. For example, if the user frequently aborts communication attempts between a set period of time (for example between 4 and 6pm), the algorithms may determine that it would be best to not attempt communications during these times. Each aborted attempt that is made during that time would be factored in to the calculation, ultimately leading to the decision by the automatic proactive communicator to not make calls during that period of time.
Similarly, in one embodiment, the automatic proactive communicator may include an algorithm that uses heuristics to determine which contact to attempt communication with at a particular time. A heuristic algorithm uses experience-based techniques that help in problem solving, learning and discovery. A heuristic method is particularly used to rapidly come to a solution that is hoped to be close to the best possible answer, or “optimal solution.” Using more of a trial and error type approach, the automatic proactive communicator would maintain records of each contact and the date and time the contact was used in a communication attempt. While never being able to be certain that a contact is available, using heuristics, a determination may be made by the automatic proactive communication as to which contacts are more likely to be available at any given time. Other techniques, such as parameter optimization, which are commonly known in the art for determining probabilities or helping in decision making may also be used, although not specifically described herein.
Several initiation modules, such as an initiate call module 608, initiate e-mail module 610, and initiate IM module 612, may also be included within the automatic proactive communicator. When the automatic proactive communicator determines that, based upon the preferences and rules generated from past experience or the information available, a communication attempt for particular contact should occur, the automatic proactive communicator will execute either the initiate call module 608, initiate e-mail module 610, or initiate IM module 612, to initiate their respective communication method. For example, if a particular contact only had an e-mail address, the initiate e-mail module 610 would be the only module that would make sense to the automatic proactive communicator to call. Alternatively, if information for the contact is known for the telephone number, e-mail address or instant messenger, based upon learned experience as determined by the logic module or other means, one of the initiate modules 608-612 may be called to initiate the communication.
A verification module 614 may be included in one embodiment to receive results from both the user devices and the contact device. The verification module, in one embodiment, verifies whether or not the communication was successful as well as collect experimental results and data such as the time and day of the week and then updates the preferences and rules module 604 based upon the results of the received information. In other embodiments, the logic module 606 may receive the data from the verification module 614 to either separately, or additionally, process the information before sending it to the preferences and rules module 604. It is to be noted that any of the individual modules in an embodiment may be combined or otherwise not present, and similar functionality may be performed by other modules located within the automatic proactive communicator.
In step 706, in one embodiment, an automatic communication may be initiated to one of the desired contacts. The automatic communication may be an e-mail, text message, instant message, phone call, voicemail, or any other type of communication in which both the automatic proactive communicator is operable to generate, as well as the contact is operable to receive from the user. In step 708, in response to receiving a notification that the communication is about to begin, the user may be allowed to abort the automatic communication. For example, if the automatic proactive communicator is attempting to connect a telephone call between the user and their contact, upon hearing or seeing which contact is about to be communicated with, the user may simply hang up and cancel the communication from occurring.
In step 710, a response indicative of a communication status may be received. The automatic proactive communicator may use various modules located within the software to evaluate the responses received from both the user's communications devices, as well as the contact's communications devices. In step 712, based upon the received responses, rules and preferences may be optimized by the automatic proactive communicator to ensure that future communications with a particular contact, or with the contacts in general, are more likely to be successful. There are many different optimization techniques, such as the ones described previously, which may be implemented. However, any information received that goes towards causing a greater probability for a communication to be successful, advances the chances of the user being a more effective proactive communicator.
The previous detailed description is of a small number of embodiments for implementing the invention and is not intended to be limiting in scope. One of skill in this art will immediately envisage the methods and variations used to implement this invention in other areas than those described in detail. The following claims set forth a number of the embodiments of the invention disclosed with greater particularity
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 12483523 | Jun 2009 | US |
| Child | 13611348 | US |
