The application generally relates to collecting and processing agricultural field data. The application relates more specifically to a system and method for remotely overseeing or controlling the organizing, monitoring, analyzing and collecting of agricultural field data by equipment, people and other assets.
Previously, when a user wanted samples from a particular job site, the user had to create a workorder that provided information on the samples to be taken and then make arrangements for the workorder to be provided to the job site. The user could directly provide the workorder to the equipment operator assigned to the job site, which would require the user and operator to be at the same location. If the user was not at the same location as the operator, the user would have to transmit the information to the operator by phone or other communication technique, which transmission process could be time consuming and lead to errors being introduced into the workorder. Further, once the workorder was completed and the samples were taken, information regarding the samples and the completion of the workorder had to be sent back to the user using the same time consuming and error prone techniques.
Further, after the samples were taken, the operator had to make arrangements to provide the collected samples to a laboratory for analysis. The operator would have to manually prepare associated documentation for the samples as required by the laboratory and include the documentation with the physical samples, which would delay the laboratory's start in processing the samples. Then, once the laboratory completed the analysis of the samples, the laboratory would send a paper report detailing the analysis results. If a user wanted to correlate the analysis results with the information associated with the taking of the samples, the user would have to manually correlate the information, which correlation process can be time consuming and error prone.
Therefore, what is needed is a system and method that can manage the collecting and processing of agricultural field data from a single location including the sending of workorders to collect samples, the providing of samples and associated information to a laboratory for analysis, and the receipt of information from the laboratory regarding analyzed samples.
The present application is directed to a method for collecting and processing agricultural field data. The method includes collecting a plurality of samples at a predetermined location, storing log data associated with the collected plurality of samples and transmitting the stored log data on the collected plurality of samples to a computer. The method further includes analyzing the collected plurality of samples and transmitting analysis information on the collected plurality of samples to the computer. The method also includes combining the analysis information with the stored log data for the collected plurality of samples with the computer and preparing a prescription plan for the predetermined location using the combined information for the collected plurality of samples.
The present application is additionally directed to a system having a first computer, a second computer associated with a piece of equipment at a remote location from the first computer, a third computer associated with a laboratory, and a field data management system. The field data management system including a first computer algorithm executable by a microprocessor from the first computer, a second computer algorithm executable by a microprocessor from the second computer, and a third computer algorithm executable by a microprocessor from the third computer. The first computer algorithm operates to permit a user to create a sampling workorder for a predetermined location and transmit the sampling workorder to the second computer. The second computer algorithm operates to store log data associated with a collection of samples from the sampling workorder and transmit log data associated with the collection of samples to the first computer and the third computer. The third computer algorithm operates to transmit analysis information relating to the collection of samples to the first computer. The first computer algorithm operates to combine the log data and the analysis information for the collection of samples with respect to the predetermined location.
One advantage of the present application is the ability to determine and save specific information on the location of where a sample is taken.
Another advantage of the present application is significant cost savings in time and resources from more efficient collecting and processing of agricultural field data.
Still another advantage of the present application is the use of mobile communications and web services to enable communication of information to a central system and subsequent access of information from the central system.
An additional advantage of the present application is the ability for users in multiple locations to collaborate on the same document, i.e., a peer-sharing document that is accessible from the beginning of the process to the end of the process.
Another advantage of the present application is more efficient and accurate collection of agricultural field data.
Yet another advantage of the present application is better and more accurate reporting capabilities regarding agricultural field data to comply with governmental requirements.
A further advantage of the present application is a reduction in the misapplication of materials or misuse of machines or equipment and the corresponding liability associated with such misapplication or misuse.
Other features and advantages of the present application will be apparent from the following more detailed description of the preferred embodiment, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings which illustrate, by way of example, the principles of the application.
Wherever possible, the same reference numbers are used throughout the drawings to refer to the same or like parts.
The present application is directed to a system and method for coordinating the collecting and processing of agricultural field data from a single location. In an exemplary embodiment, the agricultural field data system can be an “online system” that is accessed by users over the Internet or other similar type of computer network. The use of the Internet or other type of computer network permits the transfer, i.e., the sending and/or receiving, of information between users and/or the pieces of equipment without the users and/or pieces of equipment having to be in close proximity to each other. In addition, since the agricultural field data system uses the Internet to transfer information, users can access the agricultural field data system with any device that includes Internet connection functionality, e.g., network cards, wireless modems, transceivers, etc., and display software, e.g., a web browser. Some examples of devices a user can use to access the agricultural field data system are desktop computers, laptop computers, tablet computers, net books, handheld devices, e.g., “smart” phones, and other similar devices. The user may be required to enter personally identifiable information, e.g., a user name and password, to permit the agricultural field data system to identify the user. Once the user is identified by the agricultural field data system, the agricultural field data system can retrieve a user profile for the user that can include information on particular fields and/or locations for evaluation and treatment, available sampling type(s), available sampling method(s), analytical labs to be used, a window of activity and user preference information. After gaining access to the agricultural field data system, a user is provided with a web page or other similar type of file that provides information on a particular field and/or location selected by a user.
In one exemplary embodiment, the agricultural field data system is used in the agricultural industry to permit a user to monitor and coordinate the collection and processing of agricultural field data. The agricultural field data system can be included in or be a part of a larger agricultural management system. However, in other embodiments, the agricultural field data system can be a stand-alone application that operates separate from other agricultural management systems. If the agricultural field data system is separate from other agricultural management systems, the agricultural field data system can be in communication with the other agricultural management systems to exchange data as required.
In one embodiment, the agricultural field data system can be computer programs, algorithms or software stored in the non-volatile memory of corresponding computers or computing devices accessible by the user or operator or associated with the pieces of equipment or machinery. The computer programs, algorithms or software can have a series of instructions executable by a corresponding microprocessor of the computer or computing device. While the agricultural field data system can be embodied in a computer program(s) and executed by a microprocessor, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the agricultural field data system may have some functions implemented and executed using digital and/or analog hardware, especially on the computer or computing device associate with the pieces of equipment or machinery. The agricultural field data system also includes user interfaces accessible by the user and the machinery or equipment operators.
As the corresponding sampling workorders are completed, the corresponding sampling information can be transmitted back to the user 102 by the equipment computer #1 and the equipment computer #2 for review by the user 102. In addition, the equipment computer #1 and the equipment computer #2 wirelessly transmit sampling information to a laboratory 108 along with providing the corresponding physical samples to the laboratory 108 for analysis. In an alternate embodiment, after reviewing the sampling information from the equipment computer #1 and the equipment computer #2, the user 102 can send the sampling information over the Internet to a computer associated with the laboratory 108 for the laboratory's use in analyzing and processing the samples. Once the laboratory 108 has completed the analysis of the samples, the laboratory computer can transmit the results back to the user computer for review by the user 102. In another embodiment, the user computer can send other information, e.g., a prescription plan for a particular field or location, to the equipment computer #1 and the equipment computer #2 and receive corresponding information back from the equipment computer #1 and the equipment computer #2 regarding the execution of the prescription plan.
Referring back to
Once the sampling workorder is received by the corresponding equipment and/or operator, the workorder is stored or saved in a computer included in or with the equipment or operator. In one embodiment, if the sampling workorder is sent to the operator, the operator may have to transfer the sampling workorder to the computer included with the equipment. In another embodiment, if the sampling workorder is sent directly to the computer included with the equipment, the operator may receive a notification, e.g., an email, text message, etc., informing the operator that the equipment computer has received a new sampling workorder.
After the sampling workorder is stored on the equipment computer, the necessary actions from the sampling workorder, e.g., the taking of samples, are performed by the equipment and/or operator (step 206). To facilitate more accurate processing of the sampling workorder, the equipment can include a global positioning system (GPS) device. The GPS device can provide an accurate location of where certain actions identified in the sampling workorder, e.g., the taking of a sample, were taken by the equipment and/or operator.
Referring back to
In addition, the equipment and/or operator also wirelessly sends or transmits information relating to the collected samples to the corresponding laboratory that is to process the samples to enable the laboratory to “check in” the samples and the operator provides or sends the actual samples to the laboratory for analysis (step 210). The laboratory analyzes the samples and provides the results of the analysis to the system for access by the user (step 212). The system then incorporates the results of the sample analysis from the laboratory with the original sample data sent to the system by the equipment and/or the operator.
After the prescription plan workorder is stored on the equipment computer, the necessary actions from the prescription plan workorder are performed by the equipment and operator (step 218). The system can also track the progress of the piece of equipment with respect to the particular prescription.
In
In
The piece of equipment can include a GPS device to determine the location of the piece of equipment relative to the predefined field or location 702. An equipment indicator 706 can be shown to indicate the position of the piece of equipment relative to the predefined field or location 702. Further, the area 708 of the predefined field or location 702 where the transmitted prescription or recommendation plan has already been applied, i.e., the required action or task from the prescription or recommendation plan that has been completed, can be shown. When the piece of equipment has finished with the transmitted prescription or recommendation plan, the piece of equipment can send information to the agricultural field data system with the amount of material actually applied (using measured data from corresponding sensors) for particular locations (using information from the GPS device). The agricultural field data system can then provide the actual applied amount information to the user.
In one exemplary embodiment, agricultural field data can include one or more of soil samples, tissue samples from crops and nematode samples. It is to be understood that the collection of a particular sample is performed with the appropriate equipment necessary to obtain a viable sample for subsequent analysis.
In one exemplary embodiment, the agricultural field data system can communicate with the user, the operator, the piece of equipment or the laboratory by any suitable wireless communication technique. For example, the system can communicate through cellular communication technology or satellite communication technology. It is to be understood that the pieces of equipment incorporate the appropriate hardware, e.g., transmitters, receivers, amplifiers, etc., and/or software to enable effective communication for the wireless technology implemented in the piece of equipment.
In one exemplary embodiment, the user computer, operator computer, laboratory computer and equipment computers can include the appropriate user interfaces, monitors, displays or other associated equipment or software to enable a user or operator to interact with the equipment monitoring system.
Embodiments within the scope of the present application include program products having machine-readable media for carrying or having machine-executable instructions or data structures stored thereon. Machine-readable media can be any available non-transitory media that can be accessed by a general purpose or special purpose computer or other machine with a processor. By way of example, machine-readable media can comprise RAM, ROM, EPROM, EEPROM, CD-ROM or other optical disk storage, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to carry or store desired program code in the form of machine-executable instructions or data structures and which can be accessed by a general purpose or special purpose computer or other machine with a processor. When information is transferred or provided over a network or another communication connection (either hardwired, wireless, or a combination of hardwired or wireless) to a machine, the machine properly views the connection as a machine-readable medium. Combinations of the above are also included within the scope of machine-readable media. Machine-executable instructions comprise, for example, instructions and data which cause a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, or special purpose processing machines to perform a certain function or group of functions.
Although the figures herein may show a specific order of method steps, the order of the steps may differ from what is depicted. Also, two or more steps may be performed concurrently or with partial concurrence. Variations in step performance can depend on the software and hardware systems chosen and on designer choice. All such variations are within the scope of the application. Likewise, software implementations could be accomplished with standard programming techniques with rule based logic and other logic to accomplish the various connection steps, processing steps, comparison steps and decision steps.
While the exemplary embodiments illustrated in the figures and described herein are presently preferred, it should be understood that these embodiments are offered by way of example only. Other substitutions, modifications, changes and omissions may be made in the design, operating conditions and arrangement of the exemplary embodiments without departing from the scope of the present application. Accordingly, the present application is not limited to a particular embodiment, but extends to various modifications that nevertheless fall within the scope of the appended claims. It should also be understood that the phraseology and terminology employed herein is for the purpose of description only and should not be regarded as limiting.
It is important to note that the construction and arrangement of the present application as shown in the various exemplary embodiments is illustrative only. Only certain features and embodiments of the invention have been shown and described in the application and many modifications and changes may occur to those skilled in the art (e.g., variations in sizes, dimensions, structures, shapes and proportions of the various elements, values of parameters (e.g., temperatures, pressures, etc.), mounting arrangements, use of materials, orientations, etc.) without materially departing from the novel teachings and advantages of the subject matter recited in the claims. For example, elements shown as integrally formed may be constructed of multiple parts or elements, the position of elements may be reversed or otherwise varied, and the nature or number of discrete elements or positions may be altered or varied. The order or sequence of any process or method steps may be varied or re-sequenced according to alternative embodiments. It is, therefore, to be understood that the appended claims are intended to cover all such modifications and changes as fall within the true spirit of the invention. Furthermore, in an effort to provide a concise description of the exemplary embodiments, all features of an actual implementation may not have been described (i.e., those unrelated to the presently contemplated best mode of carrying out the invention, or those unrelated to enabling the claimed invention). It should be appreciated that in the development of any such actual implementation, as in any engineering or design project, numerous implementation specific decisions may be made. Such a development effort might be complex and time consuming, but would nevertheless be a routine undertaking of design, fabrication, and manufacture for those of ordinary skill having the benefit of this disclosure, without undue experimentation.
This application in a continuation of and claims the benefit of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/117,794, entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR COLLECTING AND PROCESSING AGRICULTURAL FIELD DATA,” filed May 27, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,521,372, issued Aug. 27, 2013, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/349,703, entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR COLLECTING AND PROCESSING AGRICULTURAL FIELD DATA,” filed May 28, 2010, U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/349,707, entitled “REMOTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR EQUIPMENT,” filed May 28, 2010, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/349,695, entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR WORKORDER MANAGEMENT,” filed May 28, 2010, which applications are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6016713 | Hale | Jan 2000 | A |
6044324 | Boerhave et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6141614 | Janzen et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6336066 | Pellenc et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6553300 | Ma et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6606542 | Hauwiller et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6937939 | Shibusawa et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6959245 | Rooney et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7059275 | Laitinen et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7110881 | Gray et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7184859 | Hood et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7254485 | Rooney et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7343867 | Fraisse et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7552654 | Burton | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7742862 | Anderson et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7908062 | Corcoran | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7930085 | Anderson et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8260485 | Meuth et al. | Sep 2012 | B1 |
20020035431 | Ell | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20030208319 | Ell et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040006426 | Armstrong et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20050150160 | Norgaard et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20070233533 | Xie et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20090005990 | Anderson et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090216594 | Verhey et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100036696 | Lang et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20110176523 | Huang et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110240730 | Covely | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120013498 | Hilliard et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120014220 | DePasqua | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120015566 | Salmon | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120015625 | Mendenhall et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120015670 | Boyer et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120015671 | Lada | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120016696 | Lee | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120019412 | Manzen et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120019641 | Reeder, III | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120021385 | Belenkii et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120021728 | Davis | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120023333 | Takada et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120024181 | Von Lengeling et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120027190 | Kim et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120028586 | Inaba | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120028599 | Hatton et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120029759 | Suh et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120029764 | Payne et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120029825 | Cho et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120029936 | Hanoun | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120032807 | Schumacher | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120033247 | Bernardo | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120033473 | Scharf | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120033580 | Rudolph et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120033720 | Brunel et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120256770 | Mitchell | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130124055 | Baurer et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130179204 | Sabarez, II | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130211660 | Mitchell | Aug 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO-0004341 | Jan 2000 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“International Search Report”, PCT/US2011/038378, (Nov. 29, 2011). |
“International Search Report”, PCT/US2011/038381, (Aug. 25, 2011). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130346129 A1 | Dec 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61349695 | May 2010 | US | |
61349707 | May 2010 | US | |
61349703 | May 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13117794 | May 2011 | US |
Child | 14011347 | US |