1. Field of the Disclosure
The present disclosure relates generally to industrial facilities and, more particularly, to monitoring of machine parameters in industrial facilities.
2. Description of the Related Art
Industrial facilities, such as manufacturing facilities, laboratories, research facilities, refineries, other structures, and the like, often use sensors to monitor machine parameters. For example sensors may be used to measure machine parameters such as vibration, acceleration, velocity, sound, electric field, speed, torque, displacement, and the like. Each sensor produces an analog output voltage, current, or digital representation of the machine parameter being measured. In many cases, a field unit samples the signal output by the sensor and transmits data representing the sampled signal over a wireless network to a base unit. Often times the field units are battery powered and have limited bandwidth for transmitting the signals produced by the sensors monitoring the machine parameters. Consequently, transmission of the data representing the sampled sensor signals often taxes the wireless network and limits the operational time of the field units on a given battery charge, resulting in delays, transmission errors, field unit failures, frequent battery replacement, inefficiencies, greater expense, and safety concerns.
The present disclosure may be better understood, and its numerous features and advantages made apparent to those skilled in the art by referencing the accompanying drawings. The use of the same reference symbols in different drawings indicates similar or identical items.
As used herein, the term “machine” refers to a structure or combination of structures subject to environmental changes or mechanical forces, either self-generated or externally applied. Structures with self-generated mechanical forces include, for example boilers, compressors, generators, transformers, industrial robots, rotating bearings, mills, lathes, grinders, saws, welders, ovens, mining equipment, and the like. Structures with externally applied mechanical forces include, for example, bridges and other spans, buildings, cranes, boat hulls, highways, and the like. Moreover, it will be appreciated that some machines may comprise structures subject to both self-generated mechanical forces and externally-applied mechanical forces.
Conventionally, a field unit receives a quasi-periodic signal representing the quasi-periodic machine parameter, samples the quasi-periodic signal to create a sample waveform, and wirelessly transmits data representing the entirety of the sample waveform to a base station. However, transmitting this amount of data over a wireless network often taxes the wireless network and limits the operational time of battery-powered field units on a given battery charge, resulting in delays, transmission errors, field unit failures, frequent battery replacement, inefficiencies, greater expense, and safety concerns.
In contrast, in the illustrated embodiments, a field unit 102 of the sampling system 100 takes advantage of the duplicate information between cycles of the quasi-periodic signal by creating a reference waveform 110 out of one cycle, a portion of one cycle, or more than one cycle of the quasi-periodic signal. The field unit 102 phase-aligns and compares the reference waveform 110 with subsequent sample waveforms sampled from the quasi-periodic signal, to produce delta data sets representing the difference between the reference waveform 110 and each sample waveform. Due to the quasi-periodic nature of the sensed signal, there typically is substantial duplication or overlap between the reference waveform and the sample waveform, resulting in a small differential, and thus a delta data set that is smaller than the data set representing the sample waveform. Moreover, filtering and compression techniques can be applied, thereby further reducing the size of the delta data set. As such, wirelessly transmitting compressed delta data sets 114, 115 often requires fewer resources than would be required to transmit the sample waveform itself.
The field unit 102 transmits a representation of the reference waveform 110 and the compressed delta data set 114 to the base station 106 over a wireless network via a wireless transmitter 108, so that the base station can use the reference waveform 110 and the compressed delta data set 114 to reconstruct the sample waveform. In the illustrated embodiment, the field unit 102 is depicted as transmitting the reference waveform 110 in a separate transmission from the compressed delta data set 114 to decrease the load of a single transmission, but in some embodiments any combination of reference waveforms and compressed delta data sets may be sent in a single transmission.
The base station 106 stores the reference waveform 110 and the compressed delta data set 114 in a data store 118 when received over the wireless network via wireless receiver 109. The data store 118 may be configured to maintain the reference waveform 110 and the compressed delta data set 114 for any given period of time according to any conditions. The data store 118 may store the compressed delta data set 114 or may store the delta data set after it has been decompressed by a decompressor.
The base station 106 further comprises a waveform reconstruction module 120 for reconstructing or otherwise generating a representation of each sample waveform corresponding to each delta data set. The waveform reconstruction module 120 is communicatively coupled to the data store 118, such that after the reference waveform 110 and the delta data set 114 have been received by the base station 106 and stored in the data store 118, the waveform reconstruction module 120 may retrieve the delta data set 114 and the corresponding reference waveform 110 from the data store 118. Since the reference waveform 110 is the same reference waveform that the field unit 102 used to create the delta data set 114, the waveform reconstruction module 120 combines the decompressed delta data set 114 and the reference waveform 110 to generate a reconstructed waveform 126, which is a representation of the sample waveform that the field unit 102 used to generate the delta data set 114. The waveform reconstruction module 120 may then send the reconstructed waveform 126 to a processing module 128 to analyze or otherwise make use of the reconstructed waveform 126.
In some embodiments, the field unit 102 may identify multiple reference waveforms 110, 111 and transmit the multiple reference waveforms 110, 111 to the base station 106 concurrently, sequentially, at pre-determined intervals, randomly, or otherwise. Further, in some embodiments the field unit 102 may update the reference waveform periodically to increase the likelihood of duplicate information between the reference waveform and the sampled waveforms. For example, as a machine 104 operates, one or more components of the machine may wear such that the measured machine parameter may have changed, and the current reference waveform 110 may no longer be as relevant to the current or subsequent sample waveforms. In such a case, the field unit 102 identifies a new reference waveform 111 and transmits the new reference waveform 111 over the wireless network to the base station 106, which then uses this revised reference for subsequent delta data sets 116. In some embodiments, the field unit 102 updates the reference waveform 110 at a fixed time, a random time, based on statistics of one or more of the compressed delta data sets 114, 115, a combination of these, and the like.
One example of a trigger to initiate an update to the reference waveform is a predetermined temporal increment, (i.e., days, hours, minutes, seconds, and the like), while another example is based on the quasi-periodic signal (i.e., number of cycles processed, number of sample waveforms sampled, number of delta data sets generated, and the like). In an embodiment using statistics of one or more of the compressed delta data sets 114, 115 to determine when to update the reference waveform 110 the field unit 102 maintains statistics related to the size of the compressed delta data sets 114, 115 as well as information related to a threshold, such that if the size of a predetermined number of the compressed delta data sets 114, 115 exceeds the threshold, the field unit identifies an updated reference waveform 111.
In the depicted example, the field unit wirelessly transmits reference waveform 110, then compressed delta data set 114, then compressed delta data set 115, but then determines that the size of compressed delta data set 115 (or alternatively in some embodiments, compressed delta data set 116) exceeds the threshold. As such, the field unit 102 identifies an updated reference waveform 111 and transmits the updated reference waveform 111 to the base station 106 before transmitting compressed delta data set 116 that represents the difference between the reference waveform 111 and a corresponding sample waveform. In other embodiments, the field unit 102 does not transmit a compressed delta data set 116 that exceeds the threshold unless a predetermined number of updated reference waveforms 111 fail to generate a compressed delta data set 116 of a size within the threshold. Alternatively, in some embodiments, the reference waveform 110 may be updated based on statistics of the delta data set before compression. For example, the field unit 102 may update a reference waveform when a delta data set exceeds a predetermined level of differences measured, for example, using root mean square (RMS) values.
In some embodiments, the base station 106 uses the most recently reconstructed waveform 126 as the reference waveform. This may occur at regular intervals, in response to an update indication from the field unit 102, in response to the size of the compressed delta data set 114, 115, 116 exceeding the threshold, randomly (in which case the base unit 106 would indicate to the field unit 102 to use the most recent sample waveform as the reference waveform), a combination of these, and the like.
In some embodiments, the base station 106 may store more than one reference waveform in the data store 118 concurrently. In such cases, the field unit 102 may assign a unique identifier to each reference waveform, and indicate to the base station 106 which reference waveform should be used in reconstructing a corresponding sample waveform by referencing the corresponding identifier in the wireless transmission of the delta data set, in a separate transmission, or otherwise. For example, in some embodiments, the field unit 102 may transmit a first identifier associated with the reference waveform 110 already stored in the data store 118, then transmit compressed delta data sets 114, 115 for the base station 106 to use with the first identifier, then transmit a second identifier associated with a second reference waveform 111 already stored in the data store 118 to indicate to the base station that all subsequent compressed delta data sets 116 should be used with the second reference waveform 111 until the field unit 102 transmits a subsequent identifier (which may be the first identifier associated with the first reference waveform or a third identifier associated with a third reference waveform). In the case that the field unit 102 identifies a reference waveform that is not available to the base station 106 via data store 118 or otherwise, the base station 106 may request that the field unit 102 send the identified reference waveform or an updated reference waveform.
In the illustrated embodiment, the digital quasi-periodic signal 200 is depicted as comprising three full cycles 210, 211, 212 and the beginning of a fourth cycle 213. While each cycle 210, 211, 212, 213 may comprise different values for any given sample value within the cycles 210, 211, 212, 213, all of the cycles 210, 211, 212, 213 share similar characteristics. For example, each cycle 210, 211, 212, 213 begins with a significant dip 214, 215, 216, 217, followed by a first significant peak 218, 219, 220, 221, and the three full cycles 210, 211, 212 comprise a second significant peak 222, 223, 224. While the depicted cycles 210, 211, 212 are depicted as twenty-six (“26”) samples long, in other embodiments the cycles may comprise any size. Further, in some embodiments the field unit 102 determines the periodicity (or other information related to the cycles 210, 211, 212, 213) of the digital quasi-periodic signal 200 based on a correlation, such as an autocorrelation. In at least one embodiment, the reference waveform 202 is selected from the digital quasi-periodic signal 200 without regard to periodicity.
The field unit 102 samples the digital quasi-periodic signal 200 to generate the reference waveform 202. While the illustrated embodiment depicts the reference waveform 202 as comprising exactly one cycle 210, in other embodiments the reference waveform 202 may comprise less than a full cycle, or more than a full cycle (e.g., one and a half cycles, three cycles, and the like). The field unit 102 then samples the digital quasi-periodic signal 200 again to generate the sample waveform 204.
The field unit 102 then compares the reference waveform 202 and the sample waveform 204 to generate the delta data set 206, representing a difference between the reference waveform 202 and the sample waveform 204. While the illustrated embodiment depicts the sample waveform 204 as the same size as the reference waveform 202 for ease of illustration, in other embodiments the sample waveform may be of a different size than the reference waveform 202, and the reference waveform 202 may be phase-aligned or repeatedly compared to sections of the sample waveform 204 as necessary. To generate the delta data set 206, the field unit 102 compares each sample value of the reference waveform 202 with a corresponding sample value of the sample waveform 204, to determine a delta data value representing the difference between the two sample values.
For example, in the illustrated embodiment, sample value 214 of the reference waveform 202 has a value of six (“6”), while sample value 216 of the sample waveform 204 has a value of seven (“7”), meaning that the sample waveform 204 increases by one value at sample value 216 relative to the reference waveform 202, resulting in a delta value 226 of one (“1”) for the delta data set 206. Similarly, both sample value 218 of the reference waveform 202 and sample value 220 of the sample waveform 204 have values of eighteen (“18”), meaning that the sample waveform neither increases nor decreases at sample value 220 relative to the reference waveform 202, resulting in a delta data value 230 of zero (“0”) for the delta data set 206. Further, sample value 222 of the reference waveform 202 has a value of sixteen (“16”), while sample value 224 of the sample waveform 204 has a value of fifteen (“15”), meaning that the sample waveform 204 decreases by one value at sample value 224 relative to the reference waveform 202, resulting in a delta data value 234 of negative one (“−1”) for the delta data set 206.
The duplicate values between sample values of cycles 210, 211, 212 of the digital quasi-periodic signal 200 in the illustrated example results in multiple delta data values of zero (“0”) allowing the field unit 102 to compress the delta data set 206 or otherwise reduced the size of the delta data set 206 relative to the sample waveform 204. Moreover, filtering may be applied to further reduce the data size of the delta data set. To illustrate, a filter may be applied such that all delta data values in the delta data set 206 that are between negative one (“−1”) and one (“1”) are replaced with zeros, thereby allowing the filtered delta data set to be further compressed. The reduced data required to represent the sampled quasi-periodic signal 200 reduces the transmit time and power needed to wirelessly transmit this data, which permits the field unit 102 to operate longer on a given battery charge.
While in the above example the field unit 102 subtracts each sample value of the reference waveform 202 from the corresponding sample value of the sample waveform 204, in other embodiments the field unit 102 may subtract each sample value of the sample waveform 204 from the corresponding sample value of the reference waveform 202. However, in these embodiments, the base unit 106 will then need to subtract the delta data set 206 from the reference waveform 202 in order for the reconstructed waveform 126 to match the sample waveform 204.
Further, while the digital quasi-periodic signal 200, the reference waveform 202, and the sample waveform 204 in the above example are described in the context of a temporal domain, other embodiments may use a fast Fourier transform (FFT) to convert the waveforms to a frequency domain. In some embodiments, the FFT data is rotated in phase to phase align the FFT bins with the reference waveform 202. Once phase-aligned, the delta data set 206 may be calculated based on a function of the magnitude and phase of the reference waveform 202 and the sample waveform 204.
The machine sensor 302 provides the quasi-periodic signal 301 to an analog-to-digital converter (ADC) 304 for conversion to the digital quasi-periodic signal 200 as shown in
The ADC 304 sends the digital quasi-periodic signal 200 to a processor 306, for example, a Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) or a Digital Signal Processor (DSP). In at least one embodiment, the processor 306 sends the digital quasi-periodic signal 200 to an autocorrelator 307 to determine the periodicity of the digital quasi-periodic signal 200 based on a correlation, for example, an autocorrelation. Given the nature of the digital quasi-periodic signal 200, repetitive information may be found in the cycles of the digital quasi-periodic signal 200, and the autocorrelator 307 uses this repetitive information to identify the periodicity of the digital quasi-periodic signal 200. In the illustrated embodiment, the periodicity is represented by peaks 308, but other embodiments may use any of a variety of mechanisms to indicate the periodicity of the digital quasi-periodic signal 200. In some embodiments the autocorrelator 307 provides information related to the periodicity to a reference generator 310, to generate the reference waveform 202 based on the periodicity of the digital quasi-periodic signal 200, while in other embodiments the reference generator 310 generates the reference waveform 202 without regard to the periodicity of the digital quasi-periodic signal 200. The reference generator 310 then sends the reference waveform 202 to a data store 312 to maintain the reference waveform 202 until needed by another component of the field unit 102. The data store 312 of various embodiments may also maintain data related to the digital quasi-periodic signal 200, the sample waveform 204, the delta data set 206, or other information used or produced by the processor 306. Further, while the data store 312 is depicted at the processor 306, other embodiments may comprise an off-chip data store, or a combination of on-chip and off-chip data stores.
A peak alignment module 314 uses the peaks 308 or other periodicity information provided by the autocorrelator 307 to align the sample waveform 204 to the corresponding reference waveform 202 and indicate to a delta calculator 316 at what point or points of the sample waveform 204 the delta calculator 316 is to begin comparing the reference waveform 202 with the sample waveform 204. In some embodiments, the peak alignment module 314 may further identify and send to the data store 312 a peak offset to indicate that the delta calculator 316 is to begin comparing the reference waveform 202 to the sample waveform 204 at a certain offset relative to a given peak 308. The peak alignment module 314 helps to increase the likelihood of overlapping data points between the reference waveform 202 and the sample waveform 204, thereby increasing the chances of the delta calculator 316 generating a delta data set 206 that may be compressed by a compressor 318 to generate a compressed delta data set 320 that is of reduced size relative to the sample waveform 204. The wireless transmitter 108 may then transmit the compressed delta data set 320 to the base station 106, and given the reduced size of the compressed delta data set relative to the sample waveform 204, the transmit time and power needed to wirelessly transmit this data is also decreased, which extends the life of the battery 300, and permits the field unit 102 to operate longer on a given battery charge.
In some embodiments, a filter 324 identifies and removes noise or other small values from the delta data set 206 before the compressor 318 generates the compressed delta data set 320. The filter 324 identifies an average noise floor for the delta data set 320, and forces the values within the boundaries of the noise floor to zero (“0”), so as highlight the significant data values and allow for a more effective compression of the delta data set 206. In many instances, the filter 324 allows for a compressed delta data set 320 of reduced size relative to a compressed delta data set 320 that was not filtered prior to compression.
Contemporaneously or in parallel, at block 404, the field unit 102 samples the digital quasi-periodic signal 200 to generate a reference waveform, such as the reference waveform 202 of
At block 406, the autocorrelator 307 of the field unit 102 correlates the data to identify the periodicity using as series of peaks 308. The peak alignment module 314 then uses the peaks 308 to align the sample waveform 204, or otherwise indicate to the delta calculator 316 how to align the reference waveform 202 with the sample waveform 204.
At block 408, the delta calculator of the field unit 102 compares the reference waveform 202 with the sample waveform 204 to calculate a delta data set, such as delta data set 206 of
At block 410, the filter 324 reduces or removes noise from the delta data set 206 by identifying an average noise floor and forcing delta data values within the boundaries of the noise floor to zero (“0”). In some embodiments, the delta data set 206 is not filtered for noise. Further at block 410, the compressor 318 compresses the delta data set 206 to generate a compressed delta data set 320 using any of a variety of compression techniques or algorithms, for example, Lempel-Ziv (LZ), probabilistic modeling, run-length encoding, block-sorting compression, a combination of these, and the like. In many instances, the compressed delta data set 320 will be of a data size that is less than the data size of the sample waveform 204.
In some embodiments, in an effort to avoid taxing the wireless network with large delta data sets 206, a threshold is designated for the data size of the compressed delta data set 320. In these embodiments, at block 412, the field unit 102 assesses whether the compressed delta data set 320 exceeds the threshold. If the size of the delta data set 206 exceeds the threshold, the field unit 102 generates a new reference waveform 202 (returning to block 404) in an effort to identify a reference waveform 202 with more duplicate data relative to the sample waveform 204, resulting in a reduced compressed delta data set 320.
If the field unit 102 determines that the size of the compressed delta data set 320 does not exceed the threshold, the method proceeds to block 414, whereby the field unit 102 wirelessly transmits the compressed delta data set 320 to the base station 106 via the wireless transmitter 108. The method 400 then returns to block 406, whereby the field unit 102 uses a new sample waveform 204 and repeats the steps to generate a new delta data set 206 representative of the new sample waveform 204. When the base station 106 receives both the reference waveform 202 and the compressed delta data set 320 from the field unit 102, the base station 106 may proceed to reconstruct a representation of the sample waveform 104. For example, in some embodiments, the base station 106 decompresses the compressed delta data set 320 to generate a representation of the delta data set 206. The base station 106 then combines the delta data set 206 and the reference waveform 202 to generate a representation of the sample waveform 204.
By using this correlative sampling and compression method 400, the base station 106 is able to receive the same information regarding the sample waveform 204 of the digital quasi-periodic signal 200 as conventional methods while reducing the amount of data transmitted over the wireless network to represent the sample waveform 204. Thus, the methods and systems described above reduce the transmit time and power needed to wirelessly transmit the digital quasi-periodic signal 200 representing machine parameter data, which permits the field unit 102 to operate longer on a given battery charge and consume less radio transmit time.
Note that not all of the activities or elements described above in the general description are required, that a portion of a specific activity or device may not be required, and that one or more further activities may be performed, or elements included, in addition to those described. Still further, the order in which activities are listed are not necessarily the order in which they are performed. Also, the concepts have been described with reference to specific embodiments. However, one of ordinary skill in the art appreciates that various modifications and changes can be made without departing from the scope of the present disclosure as set forth in the claims below. Accordingly, the specification and figures are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense, and all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of the present disclosure.
Benefits, other advantages, and solutions to problems have been described above with regard to specific embodiments. However, the benefits, advantages, solutions to problems, and any feature(s) that may cause any benefit, advantage, or solution to occur or become more pronounced are not to be construed as a critical, required, or essential feature of any or all the claims. Moreover, the particular embodiments disclosed above are illustrative only, as the disclosed subject matter may be modified and practiced in different but equivalent manners apparent to those skilled in the art having the benefit of the teachings herein. No limitations are intended to the details of construction or design herein shown, other than as described in the claims below. It is therefore evident that the particular embodiments disclosed above may be altered or modified and all such variations are considered within the scope of the disclosed subject matter. Accordingly, the protection sought herein is as set forth in the claims below.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5720066 | Kim | Feb 1998 | A |
6370957 | Filippenko et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6789422 | Ward, Jr. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6801877 | Schiltz | Oct 2004 | B2 |
7283914 | Poorman et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7409261 | Jalluri et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
8100009 | Dyer | Jan 2012 | B2 |
20060209927 | Khandekar | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070220561 | Girardeau | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20090213968 | Tormalehto | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20110108181 | Cai et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
9905486 | Feb 1999 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“What Are Accelerometers?”, <http://www.omega.com/prodinfo/accelerometers.html>, Accessed May 30, 2014, 3 pages. |
“Autocorrelation”, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autocorrelation>, Accessed May 30, 2014, 9 pages. |
“Cross-correlation”, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/cross-correlation>, Accessed May 30, 2014, 5 pages. |
“TS-1X Wireless Data Collector”, <http://uptime-solutions.us/?page id=12>, Accessed May 30, 2014, 2 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150264586 A1 | Sep 2015 | US |