System and method for depth-selectable x-ray analysis

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11056308
  • Patent Number
    11,056,308
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, September 4, 2019
    4 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 6, 2021
    2 years ago
Abstract
A system for x-ray analysis includes at least one x-ray source configured to emit x-rays. The at least one x-ray source includes at least one silicon carbide sub-source on or embedded in at least one thermally conductive substrate and configured to generate the x-rays in response to electron bombardment of the at least one silicon carbide sub-source. At least some of the x-rays emitted from the at least one x-ray source includes Si x-ray emission line x-rays. The system further includes at least one x-ray optical train configured to receive the Si x-ray emission line x-rays and to irradiate a sample with at least some of the Si x-ray emission line x-rays.
Description
BACKGROUND
Field

This application relates generally to systems and methods for analyzing samples using x-rays, and more particularly, to x-ray sources configured to provide soft and/or tender x-rays selectable across an x-ray energy range.


Description of the Related Art

Conventional laboratory-based x-ray sources generate x-rays by bombarding a target material (e.g., solid anode; liquid metal jet) with an electron beam. The generated x-rays include emission (e.g., fluorescence) x-rays generated by the electron beam creating holes in the inner core electron orbitals of the target atoms, which are then filled by electrons of the target with binding energies that are lower than the inner core electron orbitals, with concomitant generation of emission x-rays. The emission x-rays have discrete energies that are characteristic of the target atoms and that are less than the kinetic energy of the electron beam. In addition, the generated x-rays include Bremsstrahlung x-rays generated by the deceleration of the electron beam within the target material, the Bremsstrahlung x-rays having a continuum of energies from zero to the kinetic energy of the electron beam. Generally, in x-ray analysis applications (e.g., x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy) in which x-rays having a predetermined energy irradiate the sample, the target material of the x-ray source is selected based on the characteristic discrete energies of the emission x-rays.


For example, FIG. 1 shows the x-ray photoelectron cross sections for the is, 2p, 3d, and 4s core levels of titanium and the is, 2s, and 2p core levels of oxygen. In addition, FIG. 1 shows the energy of the Al Kα emission x-ray line (1.49 keV) (e.g., as can be obtained from conventional Al-based x-ray sources) and the energy of the Ga Kα emission x-ray line (9.25 keV) (e.g., as can be obtained from conventional Ga-based liquid jet x-ray sources). In the range of x-ray photon energies between these two example conventional x-ray sources, the one-electron cross-sections of the Ti 2p, Ti 3d, O 1s, and O 2s core levels change by between 2 and 3 orders of magnitude, and the one-electron cross-sections of the Ti 4s and O 2p core levels change by about 4 orders of magnitude.


SUMMARY

In one aspect disclosed herein, a system for x-ray analysis comprises at least one x-ray source configured to emit x-rays. The at least one x-ray source comprises at least one silicon carbide sub-source on or embedded in at least one thermally conductive substrate and configured to generate the x-rays in response to electron bombardment of the at least one silicon carbide sub-source. At least some of the x-rays emitted from the at least one x-ray source comprises Si x-ray emission line x-rays. The system further comprises at least one x-ray optical train configured to receive the Si x-ray emission line x-rays and to irradiate a sample with at least some of the Si x-ray emission line x-rays.


In another aspect disclosed herein, an x-ray source comprises at least one electron source configured to generate at least one electron beam and at least one target. The at least one target comprises at least one thermally conductive substrate and a plurality of sub-sources on or embedded in at least a portion of the at least one thermally conductive substrate. The sub-sources are separate from one another and in thermal communication with the at least one thermally conductive substrate. At least one sub-source of the plurality of the sub-sources comprises silicon carbide and is configured to emit Si x-ray emission line x-rays in response to bombardment by the at least one electron beam.


In another aspect disclosed herein, a method of x-ray analysis comprises bombarding a target material comprising silicon carbide with electrons. The method further comprises emitting Si x-ray emission line x-rays from the target material. The method further comprises irradiating a sample with at least some of the Si x-ray emission line x-rays. The method further comprises detecting x-rays and/or electrons emitted from the sample.


In another aspect disclosed herein, an x-ray illumination system comprises at least one x-ray source comprising at least a first x-ray sub-source and a second x-ray sub-source. The first and second x-ray sub-sources are on or embedded in at least one thermally conductive substrate. The first x-ray sub-source comprises a first material configured to generate first x-rays in response to electron bombardment of the first x-ray sub-source. The second x-ray sub-source comprises a second material different from the first material, the second material configured to generate second x-rays in response to electron bombardment of the second x-ray sub-source. The system further comprises a plurality of x-ray optical trains comprising a first optical train and a second optical train. The first optical train comprises at least one first collimating x-ray mirror, at least one first energy-selective x-ray monochromator or multilayer, and at least one first focusing x-ray mirror. The first optical train is configured to be positioned to direct at least some of the first x-rays emitted from the first x-ray sub-source to irradiate a sample. The second optical train comprises at least one second collimating x-ray mirror, at least one second energy-selective x-ray monochromator or multilayer, and at least one second focusing x-ray mirror. The second optical train is configured to be positioned to direct at least some of the second x-rays emitted from the second x-ray sub-source to irradiate the sample.


In another aspect disclosed herein, an x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy system comprises at least one x-ray source comprising a plurality of x-ray sub-sources on or embedded in at least one thermally conductive substrate. The x-ray sub-sources comprise a plurality of materials configured to generate x-rays in response to electron bombardment. The system further comprises a plurality of x-ray optical trains, each optical train comprising at least one collimating x-ray optical element, at least one energy-selective optical element, and at least one focusing x-ray optical element. The plurality of x-ray optical trains is configured to be positioned to direct at least some of the x-rays emitted from a selected one of the plurality of x-ray sub-sources to irradiate a sample. The system further comprises a sample chamber configured to contain the sample at a sample pressure. The system further comprises a first chamber and a first electrostatic lens contained in the first chamber at a first pressure less than the sample pressure. The sample chamber and the first chamber are separated from one another by a first wall having a first aperture configured to allow at least some photoelectrons from the sample to propagate from the sample chamber to the first chamber. The system further comprises a second chamber and a second electrostatic lens contained in the second chamber at a second pressure less than the first pressure. The first chamber and the second chamber are separated from one another by a second wall having a second aperture configured to allow at least some of the photoelectrons in the first chamber to propagate to the second chamber.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 shows the photoemission cross sections for the is, 2p, 3d, and 4s core levels of titanium and the is, 2s, and 2p core levels of oxygen with the energy of the Al Kα x-ray line (1.49 keV) and the energy of the Ga Kα x-ray line (9.25 keV).



FIGS. 2A-2C schematically illustrate various examples of a system for x-ray analysis in accordance with certain embodiments described herein.



FIG. 3 schematically illustrates an example x-ray source configured to emit x-rays in accordance with certain embodiments described herein.



FIG. 4A shows the attenuation length of photons incident on a silicon surface as a function of photon energy in accordance with certain embodiments described herein.



FIG. 4B shows the attenuation length of photons incident on a hafnium surface as a function of photon energy in accordance with certain embodiments described herein.



FIG. 5A shows a plot of the parametric inelastic mean free path of electrons as a function of electron kinetic energy in accordance with certain embodiments described herein.



FIG. 5B shows the plot of the parametric inelastic mean free path of electrons as a function of electron kinetic energy with arrows denoting the energies of the Hf M5 (3d5/2) photoelectrons generated by three x-ray lines (Si Kα1; Rh Kα; Cr Kα1) and a corresponding table of values in accordance with certain embodiments described herein.



FIG. 5C shows the plot of the parametric inelastic mean free path of electrons as a function of electron kinetic energy with arrows denoting the energies of the Al K (is) photoelectrons and the Al L (2p) photoelectrons generated by three x-ray lines (Si Kα1; Rh Kα; Cr Kα1) and a corresponding table of values in accordance with certain embodiments described herein.



FIG. 5D shows the plot of the parametric inelastic mean free path of electrons as a function of electron kinetic energy with arrows denoting the energies of the Ti K (is) photoelectrons and the Ti L (2p) photoelectrons generated by three x-ray lines (Si Kα1; Rh Kα; Cr Kα1) and a corresponding table of values in accordance with certain embodiments described herein.



FIG. 6 shows a plot of the relative photoelectron intensity as a function of depth for Si 2p photoelectrons generated using various x-ray energies in accordance with certain embodiments described herein.



FIG. 7 shows a plot of the inelastic mean free path of electrons in liquid water as a function of electron kinetic energy in accordance with certain embodiments described herein.



FIG. 8A schematically illustrate the Fe 2p photoemission peak intensity as a function of x-ray energy from a silicon substrate with a 1-nm-thick Fe layer and a carbon overlayer having three thicknesses of 10 nm, 20 nm, and 30 nm in accordance with certain embodiments described herein.



FIG. 8B shows a simulation from the “NIST Database for the Simulation of Electron Spectra for Surface Analysis (SESSA).”



FIG. 9A schematically illustrates a portion of an example system utilizing small focus enabling atmospheric pressure XPS in accordance with certain embodiments described herein.



FIGS. 9B and 9C show an example electrostatic lens assembly and an example APXPS system (located at the Advanced Light Source), respectively, in accordance with certain embodiments described herein.



FIG. 10 shows example advantages of ambient pressure XPS in accordance with certain embodiments described herein.



FIG. 11 shows the equilibrium vapor pressure of water as a function of temperature.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Certain embodiments described herein advantageously provide emission x-rays with energies within the range between the Al Kα x-ray line (1.49 keV) and the Ga Kα x-ray line (9.25 keV). In certain embodiments, these emission x-rays are used to advantageously provide valuable information regarding samples under analysis (e.g., by selecting the emission x-ray energy to optimize the photoelectron cross sections).


Certain embodiments described herein provide a source of soft and/or tender x-rays (e.g., soft x-rays with energies in a range of 0.5 keV to about 1.8 keV; tender x-rays with energies in a range of about 1.8 keV to 6 keV) selectable across a broad energy range for tuning depth sensitivity as well as studying interfaces (e.g., gas/solid; gas/liquid; liquid/solid). The system in certain embodiments is optimized to provide a high flux of monochromatic and focused x-rays. The x-ray source of certain embodiments described herein is mountable on a 4.5″ ConFlat® flange, includes a replaceable window (e.g., Be), and includes a mechanism with sufficient travel (e.g., 50 mm) to move and position the x-ray source relative to the x-ray optical elements without breaking vacuum and without requiring re-alignment.


Certain embodiments described herein provide selectable (e.g., tunable) x-ray energies (e.g., selectable among 1.74 keV, 2.7 keV, and 5.4 keV), thereby advantageously providing selectable probing depths (e.g., from 1 nm to 15 nm) for surface, interface, and bulk analysis, and with optimized sensitivity to selected elements (e.g., Hf; Al; Ti). Certain embodiments described herein provide high x-ray energy resolution (e.g., better than 0.7 eV for all energies), small x-ray focus spot sizes (e.g., in a range from 10 μm to 200 μm; 15 μm or less; 20 μm or less; 100 μm or less) for small spot analysis and imaging, and high flux of monochromatic x-rays (e.g., greater than 2×109 photons/second at 100 μm spot size and 200 W or 300 W electron beam power; up to 5×109 photons/second) for high-speed analysis). Certain embodiments described herein provide in situ, in vitro, and/or in operando analysis in combination with small focus spot sizes and high excitation energies, thereby advantageously enabling near-ambient pressure operation. For example, by using an x-ray spot size of 100 μm, certain embodiments described herein can include electron energy analyzer slit sizes of 100 μm, thereby allowing a pressure in the sample region of about 20 mbar, which is comparable to the vapor pressure of water (e.g., about 17 mbar at 15 degrees Celsius). For another example, by using an x-ray spot size of 10 μm, certain embodiments described herein can include electron energy analyzer slit sizes of 10 μm, thereby allowing a pressure in the sample region of about 100 mbar or even higher (e.g., 1 bar), with concomitant reduced signal strength, which can be advantageously used for the study of catalysis. Certain embodiments described herein provide fully automated selection of excitation energy and/or focus spot size, with no cross-contamination of different x-rays.



FIGS. 2A-2C schematically illustrate various examples of a system 10 for x-ray analysis in accordance with certain embodiments described herein. The system 10 comprises at least one x-ray source 20 configured to emit x-rays 22. In certain embodiments, the at least one x-ray source 20 comprises at least one silicon carbide sub-source on (e.g., adhered to; affixed to; sputtered onto) or embedded in at least one thermally conductive substrate (e.g., diamond) and configured to generate the x-rays 22 in response to electron bombardment of the at least one silicon carbide sub-source. For example, the at least one silicon carbide sub-source can be in thermal communication with the at least one thermally conductive substrate, thereby providing a heat flow path away from the at least one silicon carbide sub-source. At least some of the x-rays 22 emitted from the at least one silicon carbide sub-source of the at least one x-ray source 20 comprise Si characteristic x-rays (e.g., Si x-ray emission line x-rays; Si Kα1 x-ray emission line x-rays; Si x-ray emission line x-rays that have an energy approximately equal to 1.74 keV).


While prior systems have included x-ray sources with anodes having a heat dissipation layer comprising silicon carbide, these the x-ray sources have not been configured to emit Si characteristic x-rays (e.g., the Si Kα1 line) generated in the silicon carbide (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. Appl. Publ. No. 2014/0185778). The x-ray source 20 of certain embodiments described herein is optimized to emit the Si characteristic x-rays (e.g., the Si Kα1 line) generated in the silicon carbide sub-source (e.g., to provide the Si characteristic x-rays for use by the system 10).



FIG. 3 schematically illustrates an example x-ray source 20 configured to emit x-rays 22 in accordance with certain embodiments described herein. The x-ray source 20 comprises at least one electron source 21 (e.g., at least one electron gun column having an electron emitter cathode and associated grids, lenses, and power supplies) configured to generate at least one electron beam 23. The x-ray source 20 further comprises at least one target 24 comprising at least one thermally conductive substrate 25 and a plurality of sub-sources 26 on (e.g., adhered to; affixed to; sputtered onto) or embedded in at least a portion of the at least one thermally conductive substrate 25 (e.g., diamond). The sub-sources 26 (e.g., microstructured, sub-micron-sized, or micron-sized) are separate from one another and in thermal communication with the at least one thermally conductive substrate 25. In certain embodiments, at least one sub-source 26a of the plurality of the sub-sources 26 comprises silicon carbide (SiC) and is configured to emit Si x-ray emission line x-rays 22a in response to bombardment by the at least one electron beam 23. For example, the x-rays 22a emitted from the at least one SiC sub-source 26a have energies corresponding to the Si KcL line (1.74 keV). SiC is electrically conductive and has a high melting point, and certain embodiments described herein advantageously use SiC as a target material to generate the x-rays 22a with energies and high fluxes that have previously been unavailable from laboratory-based x-ray sources.


In certain embodiments, the at least one x-ray source 20 is configured to bombard a selected sub-source 26 with the at least one electron beam 23 (e.g., by moving, relative to one another, one or both of the at least one electron beam 23 and the at least one target 24). For example, the at least one electron source 21 of certain embodiments can be configured to direct the at least one electron beam 23 (e.g., via electric and/or magnetic fields) to bombard at least one selected sub-source 26 of the plurality of sub-sources 26 (e.g., as denoted in FIG. 3 by the dashed double-headed arrow). For another example, the at least one target 24 can be mounted on a stage (not shown) to move the at least one target 24 laterally relative to the electron beam 23 (e.g., as denoted in FIG. 3 by the solid double-headed arrow).


As schematically illustrated by FIG. 3, the at least one silicon carbide sub-source 26a of certain embodiments comprises a substrate portion 25a (e.g., diamond) on or embedded in another substrate portion 25b and at least one layer 27a on the substrate portion 25a, the at least one layer 27a comprising silicon carbide. In certain embodiments, the at least one layer 27a comprising silicon carbide is formed (e.g., via chemical vapor deposition, sputtering, sol-gel coating, plasma spraying, and/or reactant spraying) onto the thermally conductive substrate portion 25a. For example, RF or DC magnetron sputtering can be used with a silicon carbide sputtering target (e.g., available from Saint-Gobain Ceramic Material of Courbevoie France or American Elements of Los Angeles Calif.) to form a silicon carbide film (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,944,963) on a thermally conductive substrate (e.g., diamond). In certain embodiments, the at least one layer 27a comprising silicon carbide comprises single-crystal silicon carbide (e.g., 4H A-grade, N-type silicon carbide crystal available from MSE Supplies of Tucson Ariz.). In certain embodiments, the silicon carbide is doped to be electrically conductive (e.g., with an electrical conductivity sufficient to prevent charging of the silicon carbide film due to the electron bombardment), while in certain other embodiments, the silicon carbide has an electrically-conductive surface coating (e.g., with nanometer-scale thickness).


In certain embodiments, the at least one layer 27a comprises at least one intermediate layer (e.g., W) between the substrate portion 25a and the silicon carbide, the at least one intermediate layer configured to facilitate adhesion of the silicon carbide to the substrate portion 25a and/or to provide a diffusion barrier between the silicon carbide and the substrate portion 25a. While pure, stoichiometric silicon carbide is a semiconductor, in certain embodiments, the silicon carbide can be non-stoichiometric (e.g., containing excess carbon; a molar ratio of carbon to silicon in a range between 1 and 1.45), can be doped, and/or can be coated with a thin metal layer to provide a predetermined electrical conductivity so that the sub-source 26a is configured to be used in the anode of the x-ray source 20.


In certain embodiments, the plurality of sub-sources 26 comprises at least one first sub-source 26a comprising SiC and at least one second sub-source 26b comprising at least one target material different from SiC (e.g., Al, Ag, Rh, Cr, Au, Ti, Fe, and/or Mo). In certain other embodiments, the plurality of sub-sources 26 comprises a plurality of target materials (e.g., 3, 4, or more) selected from the group consisting of: Al, Ag, Rh, Cr, Au, Ti, Fe, and Mo. The at least one target material can be on (e.g., adhered to; affixed to; sputtered onto) or embedded in a single thermally conductive substrate (e.g., diamond) or a plurality of thermally conductive substrates. For example, the at least one target material can be in thermal communication with the at least one thermally conductive substrate 26, thereby providing a heat flow path away from the at least one target material. The emitted x-rays 22 have energies corresponding to one or more characteristic x-ray lines (e.g., x-ray emission lines) of the at least one target material and ultrahigh source brightness. For example, the emitted x-rays 22 can comprise at least one of: Al Kα x-ray emission line x-rays (about 1.49 keV); Ag Lα x-ray emission line x-rays (about 2.98 keV); Rh Lα x-ray emission line x-rays (about 2.70 keV); Cr Kα1 x-ray emission line x-rays (about 5.42 keV); Au Lα x-ray emission line x-rays (about 9.70 keV); Ti Kα x-ray emission line x-rays (about 4.51 keV); Fe Kα x-ray emission line x-rays (about 6.40 keV); Mo Lα x-ray emission line x-rays (about 2.29 keV); Mo Lβ1 and Mo Lβ2 x-ray emission line x-rays (about 2.39 keV and 2.52 keV, respectively).


In certain embodiments, the at least one x-ray source 20 further comprises an x-ray window 28 (e.g., Be) configured to allow at least some of the Si x-ray emission line x-rays 22a to propagate from a first region within the x-ray source 20 and containing the at least one sub-source 27a, through the x-ray window 28, to a second region outside the x-ray source 20.


In certain embodiments, the at least one target 24 comprises an anode disk configured to be rapidly rotated while under vacuum with different regions of the anode disk along a circular track being sequentially irradiated by the electron beam 23, thereby distributing the heat load from the electron beam 23 over the circular track of the anode disk. In certain such embodiments, the anode disk is cooled by coolant (e.g., water) flowing through cooling channels within the anode disk. In certain other embodiments, the at least one target 24 is radiatively cooled. For example, a rotating anode disk of the at least one target 24 can comprise silicon carbide (which can withstand operating temperatures of about 2000 degrees Celsius), and at least one heat sink can be positioned in close proximity to a surface portion of the rotating anode disk in a region of the rotating anode disk that is separate from the region of the rotating anode disk being irradiated by the electron beam 23. While conventional rotating source anodes with cooling channels can be operated with an electron beam 23 having a power of 1000 W in a spot size of about 80 μm×80 μm, certain embodiments described herein (utilizing a rotating anode disk comprising silicon carbide) can be operated with an electron beam 23 having a power of 200 W or 300 W in a spot size of about 5 μm×5 μm, resulting in at least about a 50× improvement in x-ray brightness (80 μm/5 μm×80 μm/5 μm×200 W/1000 W).


Example parameters of the at least one x-ray source 20 include, but are not limited to: variable anode voltage in a range of 5 keV to 30 keV; electron power of up to 300 W, an electron beam footprint on at least one selected sub-source having a user-selectable size (e.g., full-width-at-half-maximum) with a first lateral dimension within a range of 5 μm to 50 μm (e.g., 5 μm to 25 μm; 10 μm to 50 μm; 10 μm to 25 μm; 25 μm to 50 μm) and a second lateral dimension perpendicular to the first lateral dimension, the second lateral dimension within a range of 30 μm to 200 μm (e.g., 30 μm to 150 μm, 30 μm to 100 μm). Examples of the at least one x-ray source 20 comprising a plurality of sub-sources 26 compatible with certain embodiments described herein are disclosed by U.S. Pat. Nos. 9,874,531, 9,823,203, 9,719,947, 9,594,036, 9,570,265, 9,543,109, 9,449,781, 9,448,190, and 9,390,881, each of which is incorporated in its entirety by reference herein.


In certain embodiments, the system 10 comprises one or more of: an x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) system, a photoemission electron microscopy (PEEM) system, an angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) system, an ambient-pressure x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (APXPS) system, an x-ray fluorescence (XRF) system, an x-ray emission (XES) system, an x-ray phase contrast imaging system, and a computed tomography imaging system. Other types of systems and/or applications of the system are also compatible with certain embodiments described herein. The samples under analysis can comprise one or more biological samples (e.g., tissue samples), one or more semiconductor samples, one or more geological samples, and/or other types of samples.


For trace element analysis of semiconductor and geological samples, the use of the Si Kα1 x-ray emission line x-rays can advantageously reduce the background contribution from the silicon in the samples. Since the energy of the Si Kα1 x-ray emission line x-rays (about 1.74 keV) is lower than the Si K absorption edge energy, the Si Kα1 x-ray emission line x-rays do not generate the background photoelectron and/or fluorescence contributions from Si that would be seen if x-rays above the Si K absorption edge energy were used.


In certain embodiments, as schematically illustrated by FIGS. 2A-2C, the system 10 further comprises at least one first x-ray optical element 30 configured to receive at least some of the x-rays 22 emitted from the at least one x-ray source 20 and to generate a collimated first x-ray beam 32. The system 10 further comprises at least one second x-ray optical element 40 configured to receive at least a portion of the collimated first x-ray beam 32 and to emit a monochromatic second x-ray beam 42. The system 10 further comprises at least one third x-ray optical element 50 configured to receive at least a portion of the monochromatic second x-ray beam 42 and to focus a third x-ray beam 52 at a sample 60 to be analyzed.



FIG. 2B schematically illustrates an example system 10 comprising in accordance with certain embodiments described herein. The at least one first x-ray optical element 30 of FIG. 2B comprises at least one x-ray collimating optical element 34 (e.g., mirror; mirror lens) configured to receive at least some of the x-rays 22 emitted from the at least one x-ray source 20 (e.g., including at least some of the Si x-ray emission line x-rays) and to generate the collimated first x-ray beam 32. The surface 36 can be concave and curved in at least one cross-sectional plane parallel to a longitudinal axis 38 of the at least one x-ray collimating optical element 34 (e.g., in a cross-sectional plane that includes the longitudinal axis 38). The at least one x-ray collimating optical element 34 can comprise an axially symmetric x-ray collimating optic (e.g., a paraboloidal mirror lens; a Wolter optic) having a surface 36 configured to collect and to efficiently direct (e.g., reflect; diffract) at least some x-rays 22 from the at least one x-ray source 20 into the collimated first x-ray beam 32. For example, the at least one x-ray sub-source being bombarded by the at least one electron beam can be positioned at or near a focus of the at least one x-ray collimating optical element 30 such that at least some of the emitted x-rays 22 impinge the surface 36 at an incident grazing angle that is smaller than the critical angle and are reflected into the collimated first x-ray beam 32. In certain embodiments, the at least one collimating optical element 34 comprises at least one layer (e.g., a depth-graded multilayer coating; a mosaic crystal layer) at the surface 36, the at least one layer configured to efficiently collect and direct (e.g., reflect; diffract) the x-rays 22 with specific x-ray energies. Examples of x-ray collimating optical elements 34 compatible with certain embodiments described herein are disclosed by U.S. Pat. Nos. 9,874,531, 9,823,203, 9,719,947, 9,594,036, 9,570,265, 9,543,109, 9,449,781, 9,448,190, and 9,390,881, each of which is incorporated in its entirety by reference herein.


In certain embodiments, the at least one x-ray collimating optical element 34 comprises at least one substrate (e.g., comprising glass or silicon oxide). For example, the at least one substrate can be a single, unitary, hollow, axially symmetric structure (e.g., an axially symmetric tube) comprising an inner surface 36 that extends fully around the longitudinal axis 38 (e.g., encircles the longitudinal axis 38; extends 360 degrees around the longitudinal axis 38). In certain other embodiments, the at least one substrate can comprise a portion of a hollow, axially symmetric structure (e.g., a portion of an axially symmetric tube) extending along the longitudinal axis 38 with a surface 36 that extends only partially around the longitudinal axis 38 (e.g., less than 360 degrees; in a range of 45 degrees to 315 degrees; in a range of 45 degrees to 360 degrees; in a range of 180 degrees to 360 degrees; in a range of 90 degrees to 270 degrees). In certain other embodiments, the at least one substrate comprises multiple portions (e.g., 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, or more) separate from one another (e.g., with spaces between the portions) and distributed around the longitudinal axis 38, with the surface 36 of each portion extending at least partially around and along the longitudinal axis 38. For example, the surfaces 36 of the multiple portions can each extend around the longitudinal axis 38 by an angle in a range of 15 degrees to 175 degrees, in a range of 30 degrees to 115 degrees, and/or in a range of 45 degrees to 85 degrees.


In certain embodiments, at least a portion of the surface 36 has a profile that comprises a portion of a quadric profile in a cross-sectional plane that comprises the longitudinal axis 38. In certain embodiments, the surface 36 comprises multiple portions having cross-sectional profiles (e.g., in a cross-sectional plane that comprises the longitudinal axis 38) comprising corresponding quadric profiles. Examples of quadric profiles compatible with certain embodiments described herein include, but are not limited to: at least one ellipsoid; at least one paraboloid; at least one hyperboloid; or a combination of two or more thereof. In certain embodiments, the surface 36 has a first linear dimension (e.g., length) parallel to the longitudinal axis 38 in a range of 3 mm to 150 mm, a second linear dimension (e.g., width) perpendicular to the first linear dimension in a range of 1 mm to 50 mm, and a maximum linear dimension (e.g., an inner diameter; a maximum length of a straight line segment joining two points on the surface 36) in a range of 1 mm to 50 mm in a plane perpendicular to the longitudinal axis 38, a surface roughness in a range of 0.1 nm to 1 nm, and/or a plurality of surface tangent planes having a range of angles relative to the longitudinal axis 38 in a range of 0.002 radian to 0.5 radian (e.g., in a range of 0.002 radian to 0.4 radian; in a range of 0.002 radian to 0.3 radian; in a range of 0.002 radian to 0.2 radian).


The at least one second x-ray optical element 40 of FIG. 2B comprises at least one energy-selective component (e.g., x-ray monochromator; multilayer; multilayer-coated optical substrate) configured to receive at least a portion of the collimated first x-ray beam 32 and to emit the monochromatic second x-ray beam 42 (e.g., including at least some of the Si x-ray emission line x-rays). In certain embodiments, the at least one second x-ray optical element 40 has an energy resolution better than 2 eV. For example, the at least one second x-ray optical element 40 can comprise at least one x-ray crystal monochromator (e.g., a single-crystal monochromator; a double-crystal monochromator; a quartz monochromator; an InSb(111) monochromator; a Ge(111) monochromator; a Ge(220) monochromator; a Si(111) monochromator) having a resolution of at least 1×10−4. For another example, the at least one second x-ray optical element 40 can comprise at least one multilayer-coated optical substrate having a resolution of at least 1×10−3. While FIG. 2B schematically illustrate the at least one second x-ray optical element 40 as being separate from the at least one first x-ray optical element 30 and from the at least one third x-ray optical element 50, in certain other embodiments, the at least one second x-ray optical element 40 comprises an energy-selective coating (e.g., a multilayer coating configured to substantially reflect x-rays within a predetermined energy range) at a reflecting surface of the at least one first x-ray optical element 30 and/or at a reflecting surface of the at least one third x-ray optical element 50. Examples of an energy-selective component compatible with certain embodiments described herein are disclosed by U.S. Pat. Nos. 9,874,531, 9,823,203, 9,719,947, 9,594,036, 9,570,265, 9,543,109, 9,449,781, 9,448,190, and 9,390,881, each of which is incorporated in its entirety by reference herein.


The at least one third x-ray optical element 50 of FIG. 2B comprises at least one x-ray focusing optical element 54 (e.g., mirror; mirror lens) configured to receive at least a portion of the monochromatic second x-ray beam 42 and to focus the third x-ray beam 52 (e.g., including at least some of the Si x-ray emission line x-rays) at the sample 60 (e.g., focused at a surface region of the sample 60). The surface 56 can be concave and curved in at least one cross-sectional plane parallel to a longitudinal axis 58 of the at least one x-ray focusing optical element 54 (e.g., in a cross-sectional plane that includes the longitudinal axis 58). The at least one x-ray focusing optical element 54 can comprise an axially symmetric x-ray focusing optic (e.g., a paraboloidal mirror lens; a Wolter optic) having a surface 56 configured to collect and to efficiently direct (e.g., reflect; diffract) and focus at least some of the monochromatic second x-ray beam 42 at the sample 60 to be analyzed. For example, the at least one x-ray focusing optical element 50 can be positioned relative to the at least one second x-ray optical element 40 such that the monochromatic second x-ray beam 42 impinges the surface 56 at an incident grazing angle that is smaller than the critical angle and focused by the at least one x-ray focusing optical element 50 into the third x-ray beam 52 with a focus at the sample 60 to be analyzed. In certain embodiments, the at least one x-ray focusing optical element 54 comprises at least one layer (e.g., a depth-graded multilayer coating; a mosaic crystal layer) at the surface 56, the at least one layer configured to efficiently collect the second x-ray beam 42 and to focus the third x-ray beam 52 at the sample 60. Examples of x-ray focusing optical elements 54 compatible with certain embodiments described herein are disclosed by U.S. Pat. Nos. 9,874,531, 9,823,203, 9,719,947, 9,594,036, 9,570,265, 9,543,109, 9,449,781, 9,448,190, and 9,390,881, each of which is incorporated in its entirety by reference herein.


In certain embodiments, the at least one x-ray focusing optical element 54 comprises at least one substrate (e.g., comprising glass or silicon oxide). For example, the at least one substrate can be a single, unitary, hollow, axially symmetric structure (e.g., an axially symmetric tube) comprising an inner surface 56 that extends fully around the longitudinal axis 58 (e.g., encircles the longitudinal axis 58; extends 360 degrees around the longitudinal axis 58). In certain other embodiments, the at least one substrate can comprise a portion of a hollow, axially symmetric structure (e.g., a portion of an axially symmetric tube) extending along the longitudinal axis 58 with a surface 56 that extends only partially around the longitudinal axis 58 (e.g., less than 360 degrees; in a range of 45 degrees to 315 degrees; in a range of 45 degrees to 360 degrees; in a range of 180 degrees to 360 degrees; in a range of 90 degrees to 270 degrees). In certain other embodiments, the at least one substrate comprises multiple portions (e.g., 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, or more) separate from one another (e.g., with spaces between the portions) and distributed around the longitudinal axis 58, with the surface 56 of each portion extending at least partially around and along the longitudinal axis 58. For example, the surfaces 56 of the multiple portions can each extend around the longitudinal axis 58 by an angle in a range of 15 degrees to 175 degrees, in a range of 30 degrees to 115 degrees, and/or in a range of 45 degrees to 85 degrees.


In certain embodiments, at least a portion of the surface 56 has a profile that comprises a portion of a quadric profile in a cross-sectional plane that comprises the longitudinal axis 58. In certain embodiments, the surface 56 comprises multiple portions having cross-sectional profiles (e.g., in a cross-sectional plane that comprises the longitudinal axis 58) comprising corresponding quadric profiles. Examples of quadric profiles compatible with certain embodiments described herein include, but are not limited to: at least one ellipsoid; at least one paraboloid; at least one hyperboloid; or a combination of two or more thereof. In certain embodiments, the surface 56 has a first linear dimension (e.g., length) parallel to the longitudinal axis 58 in a range of 3 mm to 150 mm, a second linear dimension (e.g., width) perpendicular to the first linear dimension in a range of 1 mm to 50 mm, and a maximum linear dimension (e.g., an inner diameter; a maximum length of a straight line segment joining two points on the surface 56) in a range of 1 mm to 50 mm in a plane perpendicular to the longitudinal axis 58, a surface roughness in a range of 0.1 nm to 1 nm, and/or a plurality of surface tangent planes having a range of angles relative to the longitudinal axis 58 in a range of 0.002 radian to 0.5 radian (e.g., in a range of 0.002 radian to 0.4 radian; in a range of 0.002 radian to 0.3 radian; in a range of 0.002 radian to 0.2 radian).


In certain embodiments, the system 10 further comprises at least one beam stop 80 configured to prevent a non-reflected portion of the x-rays 22 from impinging the at least one second x-ray optical element 40. As schematically illustrated by FIG. 2B, the at least one beam stop 80 can be positioned on a longitudinal axis 38 of the at least one first x-ray optical element 30 (e.g., at or near an upstream end of the at least one first x-ray optical element 30; at or near a downstream end of the at least one first x-ray optical element 30; upstream from the at least one first x-ray optical element 30; downstream from the at least one first x-ray optical element 30). Example beam stops 80 compatible with certain embodiments described herein are disclosed by U.S. Pat. Nos. 9,874,531, 9,823,203, 9,719,947, 9,594,036, 9,570,265, 9,543,109, 9,449,781, 9,448,190, and 9,390,881, each of which is incorporated in its entirety by reference herein.


In certain embodiments, the system 10 further comprises at least one detector subsystem 70 (e.g., comprising an energy dispersive x-ray energy analyzer and/or an energy dispersive electron energy analyzer) configured to detect x-rays 62 and/or electrons 64 emitted from the sample 60 (e.g., in response to the sample 60 being irradiated by the third x-ray beam 52). For example, for a system 10 selected from the group consisting of an x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) system, a photoemission electron microscopy (PEEM) system, and an ambient-pressure x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (APXPS) system, the at least one detector subsystem 70 can be configured to detect photoelectrons 62 (e.g., with electron energy resolution) emitted from the sample 60 in response to at least a portion of the third x-ray beam 52. For another example, for a system 10 selected from the group consisting of an x-ray fluorescence (XRF) system and an x-ray emission (XES) system, the at least one detector subsystem 70 can be configured to detect emission (e.g., fluorescence) x-rays 64 (e.g., with x-ray energy resolution) emitted from the sample 60 in response to at least a portion of the third x-ray beam 52. In certain embodiments, the at least one detector subsystem 70 comprises a pixel array 72 configured to generate images indicative of a spatial distribution of the elemental distribution of portions of the sample 60 from which the detected electrons 62 and/or detected x-rays 64 are emitted. In certain embodiments, the focused third x-ray beam 52 irradiates a portion of a first surface of the sample 60, and the at least one detector subsystem 70 can be positioned to detect x-rays 62 and/or electrons 64 emitted from at least one of: the same portion of the first surface, a different portion of the first surface, and a second surface of the sample 60 different from the first surface (e.g., the second surface opposite to the first surface). Example detector subsystems 70 compatible with certain embodiments described herein are disclosed by U.S. Pat. Nos. 9,874,531, 9,823,203, 9,719,947, 9,594,036, 9,570,265, 9,543,109, 9,449,781, 9,448,190, and 9,390,881, each of which is incorporated in its entirety by reference herein.



FIG. 2C schematically illustrates an example system 10 comprising a plurality of x-ray optical trains 90 (e.g., beamlines) in accordance with certain embodiments described herein. The plurality of x-ray optical trains 90 of FIG. 2C are configured to be moved relative to the at least one x-ray source 20, the sample 60, and/or the at least one detector subsystem 70 such that a selected x-ray optical train 90 is positioned to receive x-rays 22 from the at least one x-ray source 20 and to irradiate the sample 60 with the third x-ray beam 52. Example x-ray optical trains compatible with certain embodiments described herein are disclosed by U.S. Pat. Nos. 9,823,203 and 9,594,036, each of which is incorporated in its entirety by reference herein.


In certain embodiments, each of the x-ray optical trains 90 is mounted to a controllably movable stage 92 (e.g., motorized translation and/or rotation stage) configured to controllably position and select an x-ray optical train 90 for use. For example, as schematically illustrated by FIG. 2C, the system 10 comprises first, second, and third x-ray optical trains 90a-90c each comprising a corresponding first x-ray optical element 30a-30c (e.g., an x-ray collimating optical element), a corresponding second x-ray optical element 40a-40c (e.g., an x-ray monochromator; multilayer; multilayer-coated optical substrate), and a corresponding third x-ray optical element 50a-50c (e.g., an x-ray focusing optical element). Each of the x-ray optical trains 90a-90c is configured for conversion (e.g., optimized for efficient conversion) of x-rays 22a-22c from a corresponding target sub-source material of the x-ray source 20 into a third x-ray beam 52a-52c having a corresponding energy for irradiating the sample 60. While FIG. 2C schematically illustrates an example system 10 in which the multiple components of the plurality of x-ray optical trains 90 are fixed relative to one another on a single controllably movable stage 92 and are moved together (indicated in FIG. 2C by arrows 94), in certain other embodiments, the plurality of first x-ray optical elements 30 are fixed relative to one another on a first controllably movable stage, the plurality of second x-ray optical elements 40 are fixed relative to one another on a second controllably movable stage, and the plurality of third x-ray optical elements 50 are fixed relative to one another on a third controllably movable stage, such that the first, second, and third stages can be controllably moved independently from one another to form an x-ray optical train comprising selected combinations of one x-ray optical element from each of the first, second, and third pluralities of x-ray optical elements 30, 40, 50.


In certain embodiments, a first x-ray optical train 90a is configured to be positioned to receive the x-rays 22 from the x-ray source 20 while a first target material of the x-ray source 20 comprising SiC is emitting x-rays 22a (e.g., including at least some of the Si x-ray emission line x-rays) and a second x-ray optical train 90b is configured to be positioned to receive the x-rays 22 from the x-ray source 20 while a second target material (e.g., Cr) of the x-ray source 20 is emitting x-rays 22b (e.g., including at least some of the x-ray emission line x-rays of the second target material). In certain embodiments further comprising a third x-ray optical train 90c, the third x-ray optical train 90c is configured to be positioned to receive the x-rays 22 from the x-ray source 20 while a third target material (e.g., Rh) of the x-ray source 20 is emitting x-rays 22c (e.g., including at least some of the x-ray emission line x-rays of the third target material).


In certain embodiments, the system 10 is configured to generate a Si Kα (1.74 keV) monochromatic focused third x-ray beam 52 and comprises (i) an x-ray source 20 comprising an anode comprising microstructured SiC; (ii) a first x-ray optical element 30 comprising a collimating parabolic mirror having a silver coating; (iii) a second x-ray optical element 40 comprising a channel-cut quartz or InSb (111) double-crystal monochromator, and (iv) a third x-ray optical element 50 comprising a focusing parabolic mirror having a silver coating. The monochromatic third x-ray beam 52 can have a line width with a full-width-at-half-maximum in a range of 0.5 eV to 0.7 eV, a focused x-ray spot size selectable in a range of 10 μm to 200 μm (e.g., by selecting an electron spot size on the anode; fully automated), and can be optimized for high flux (e.g., at least 2×109 photons/second for a 100 μm spot size at 200 W or 300 W of electron beam power).


In certain embodiments, in addition to being configured to generate a Si Kα (1.74 keV) monochromatic focused third x-ray beam 52 as described above, the system 10 is further configured to generate a Cr Kα (5.42 keV) monochromatic focused third x-ray beam 52 and comprises (i) an x-ray source 20 comprising an anode comprising microstructured chromium imbedded in diamond; (ii) a first x-ray optical element 30 comprising a collimating parabolic mirror having a platinum coating; (iii) a second x-ray optical element 40 comprising a channel-cut Ge (111) or Ge (220) double-crystal monochromator, and (iv) a third x-ray optical element 50 comprising a focusing parabolic mirror having a platinum coating. The monochromatic third x-ray beam 52 can have a line width with a full-width-at-half-maximum of 0.5 eV, a focused x-ray spot size selectable in a range of 10 μm to 200 μm (e.g., by selecting an electron spot size on the anode; fully automated), and can be optimized for high flux (e.g., at least 2×109 photons/second for a 100 μm spot size at 200 W or 300 W of electron beam power).


In certain embodiments, in addition to being configured to generate a Si Kα (1.74 keV) monochromatic focused third x-ray beam 52 as described above, the system 10 is further configured to generate a Rh Lα (2.70 keV) monochromatic focused third x-ray beam 52 and comprises (i) an x-ray source 20 comprising an anode comprising microstructured rhodium imbedded in diamond; (ii) a first x-ray optical element 30 comprising a collimating parabolic mirror having a silver coating; (iii) a second x-ray optical element 40 comprising a channel-cut Ge (111) or Si (111) double-crystal monochromator, and (iv) a third x-ray optical element 50 comprising a focusing parabolic mirror having a silver coating. The monochromatic third x-ray beam 52 can have a line width with a full-width-at-half-maximum of 0.5 eV, a focused x-ray spot size selectable in a range of 10 μm to 200 μm (e.g., by selecting an electron spot size on the anode; fully automated), and can be optimized for high flux (e.g., at least 2×109 photons/second for a 100 μm spot size at 200 W or 300 W of electron beam power).


Depth Selectivity


In certain embodiments, the system 10 is configured to provide depth selectivity by virtue of one or more of the following: the attenuation length within the sample 60 of the excitation third x-ray beam 52 (e.g., the distance that the third x-ray beam 52 propagates within the sample 60 where the intensity of the third x-ray beam 52 has dropped by a factor of 1/e; Iattenuation length/Iincident=1/e); the attenuation length within the sample 60 of the emission (e.g., fluorescence) x-rays 62 (e.g., the distance that the emission x-rays 62 propagate within the sample 60 where the intensity of the emission x-rays 62 has dropped by a factor of 1/e), and/or the inelastic mean free path within the sample 60 of the photoelectrons 64 (e.g., the distance, on average, that the photoelectrons 64 propagate, without loss of kinetic energy, within the sample 60 where the intensity of the photoelectrons 64 has dropped by a factor of 1/e). These attenuation lengths of the x-rays 52, 62 and the inelastic mean free path of the photoelectrons 64 are dependent on the material of the sample 60 and the energies of the excitation x-rays 52, 62 and the kinetic energies of the photoelectrons 64, respectively.


For example, FIGS. 4A and 4B show the attenuation lengths for photons within silicon and hafnium, respectively, in accordance with certain embodiments described herein. FIG. 4A shows the attenuation length of photons incident on a silicon surface as a function of photon energy in accordance with certain embodiments described herein. The arrows indicate that Si Kα1 (1.74 keV) x-rays (which are above the L edge of Si and below the K edge of Si) have an attenuation length in Si of about 10 μm, Rh Lα (2.70 keV) x-rays (which are above the K edge of Si) have an attenuation length in Si of about 3 μm, and Cr Kα1 (5.42 keV) x-rays (which are above the K edge of Si) have an attenuation length in Si of about 21 μm. Therefore, x-rays with these three photon energies can be used in certain embodiments described herein to analyze different depths of a Si sample.



FIG. 4B shows the attenuation length of photons incident on a hafnium surface as a function of photon energy in accordance with certain embodiments described herein. The arrows indicate that Si Kα1 (1.74 keV) x-rays (which are above the Mα edge of Hf) have an attenuation length in Hf of about 0.15 μm, Rh Lα (2.70 keV) x-rays (which are above the Mα edge of Hf) have an attenuation length in Hf of about 0.3 μm, and Cr Kα1 (5.42 keV) x-rays (which are above the Mα edge of Hf) have an attenuation length in Hf of about 1.7 μm. Therefore, x-rays with these three photon energies can be used in certain embodiments described herein to analyze different depths of a Hf sample.



FIGS. 5A-5D, 6, 7, 8A, and 8B relate to selecting probe depth by selecting at least one optimal x-ray energy in accordance with certain embodiments described herein.



FIG. 5A shows a plot of a parametric (and conservative) estimate of the inelastic mean free path (IMFP) of electrons as a function of electron kinetic energy in accordance with certain embodiments described herein. The curve and parametric equation of FIG. 5A has been referred to as a “universal curve” since it generally applies to electrons propagating many materials. This same parametric estimate of the inelastic mean free path of electrons as a function of electron kinetic energy is also included in FIGS. 5B-5D with regard to various photoelectrons.



FIG. 5B illustrates the selectable probing depth from Hf of certain embodiments described herein by showing the parametric inelastic mean free path (IMFP) of electrons as a function of electron kinetic energy with arrows denoting the energies of the Hf M5 (3d5/2) photoelectrons generated by three x-ray lines (Si Kα1; Rh Kα; Cr Kα1) and a corresponding table of values. As seen in FIG. 4B, Si Kα1 (1.74 keV) x-rays generate 78 eV photoelectrons which have an IMFP of about 0.5 nm and a “5% penetration depth” (e.g., depth at which only 5% of the photoelectrons escape from the sample surface without an inelastic loss of energy) of 1.5 nm. FIG. 5B also shows that Rh Lα (2.67 keV) x-rays generate 1035 eV photoelectrons which have an IMFP of about 1.5 nm and a “5% penetration depth” of 4.5 nm. FIG. 5B also shows that Cr Kα1 (5.42 keV) x-rays generate 3753 eV photoelectrons which have an IMFP of about 3.1 nm and a “5% penetration depth” of 9.3 nm. Therefore, x-rays with these three photon energies can be used in certain embodiments described herein to analyze different depths of a Hf sample.



FIG. 5C illustrates the selectable probing depth from Al of certain embodiments described herein by showing the parametric inelastic mean free path of electrons as a function of electron kinetic energy with arrows denoting the energies of the Al K (is) photoelectrons and the Al L (2p) photoelectrons generated by three x-ray lines (Si Kα1; Rh Kα; Cr Kα1) and a corresponding table of values. As seen in FIG. 5C, Si Kα1 (1.74 keV) x-rays generate 180 eV photoelectrons which have an IMFP of about 0.8 nm and a “5% penetration depth” of 2.4 nm and generate 1622 eV photoelectrons which have an IMFP of about 2 nm and a “5% penetration depth” of 6 nm. FIG. 5C also shows that Rh Lα (2.70 keV) x-rays generate 1137 eV photoelectrons which have an IMFP of about 1.5 nm and a “5% penetration depth” of 4.5 nm, and generate 2579 eV photoelectrons which have an IMFP of about 2.8 nm and a “5% penetration depth” of 8.4 nm. FIG. 5C also shows that Cr Kα1 (5.42 keV) x-rays generate 3855 eV photoelectrons which have an IMFP of about 3.1 nm and a “5% penetration depth” of 9.3 nm, and generate 5297 eV photoelectrons which have an IMFP of about 3.7 nm and a “5% penetration depth” of 11.1 nm. Therefore, x-rays with these three photon energies can be used in certain embodiments described herein to analyze different depths of an Al sample.



FIG. 5D illustrates the selectable probing depth from Ti of certain embodiments described herein by showing the parametric inelastic mean free path of electrons as a function of electron kinetic energy with arrows denoting the energies of the Ti K (is) photoelectrons and the Ti L (2p) photoelectrons generated by three x-ray lines (Si Kα1; Rh Kα; Cr Kα1) and a corresponding table of values. As seen in FIG. 5D, Si Kα1 (1.74 keV) x-rays and Rh Lα (2.70 keV) x-rays do not generate photoelectrons since its energy (4.97 keV) is higher than that of the Si Kα1 and Rh Lα x-rays. FIG. 5D also shows that Si Kα1 (1.74 keV) x-rays generate 1286 eV photoelectrons which have an IMFP of about 1.6 nm and a “5% penetration depth” of 4.8 nm. FIG. 5D also shows that Rh Lα (2.70 keV) x-rays generate 2243 eV photoelectrons which have an IMFP of about 2.6 nm and a “5% penetration depth” of 7.8 nm. FIG. 5D also shows that Cr Kα1 (5.42 keV) x-rays generate 449 eV photoelectrons which have an IMFP of about 1 nm and a “5% penetration depth” of 3 nm, and generate 4961 eV photoelectrons which have an IMFP of about 3.5 nm and a “5% penetration depth” of 10.5 nm. Therefore, x-rays with these three photon energies can be used in certain embodiments described herein to analyze different depths of a Ti sample.



FIG. 6 shows a plot of the relative photoelectron intensity as a function of depth for Si 2p photoelectrons generated using various x-ray energies in accordance with certain embodiments described herein. For example, Si 2p photoelectrons excited by Mg Kα x-rays have a penetration depth (e.g., depth at which the x-rays have an intensity that equals 1/10 the incident intensity; denoted by the horizontal dotted line of FIG. 6) of 6 nm, Si 2p photoelectrons excited by Al Kα x-rays have a penetration depth of 7 nm, Si 2p photoelectrons excited by Ag Lα x-rays have a penetration depth of 13 nm, Si 2p photoelectrons excited by Cr Kα x-rays have a penetration depth of 22 nm, and Si 2p photoelectrons excited by Ga Kα x-rays have a penetration depth of 34 nm. While FIG. 6 shows that the photoelectrons have differing penetration depths depending on their energy, the probing depth shown in FIG. 6 is at least two times larger than the calculated values from the parametric inelastic mean free path of electrons as a function of electron energy shown in FIGS. 5A-5D.



FIG. 7 shows a plot of the inelastic mean free path of electrons in liquid water as a function of electron kinetic energy (from Emfietzoglou & Nikjoo, Rad. Res. 2007) in accordance with certain embodiments described herein. As seen in FIG. 7, in certain embodiments described herein, photoelectrons having various energies can provide depth-sensitive information from an interface comprising water.



FIG. 8A schematically illustrate the Fe 2p photoemission peak intensity as a function of x-ray energy from a silicon substrate with a 1-nm-thick Fe layer and a carbon overlayer having three thicknesses of 10 nm, 20 nm, and 30 nm (from Stafanos et al., Nature Scientific Report, 2013). The Fe 2p photoemission peak intensity is reduced for larger thicknesses of the carbon overlayer. FIG. 8B shows a simulation from the “NIST Database for the Simulation of Electron Spectra for Surface Analysis (SESSA).” The electron inelastic mean free path is proportional to E0.8, and the proportionality of the photoelectron cross section as a function of the photon energy hv is in a range of about (hv)−2 to (hv)−3.


Example Configurations



FIGS. 9-11 relate to advantages of small focus spot sizes in accordance with certain embodiments described herein. Certain embodiments described herein provide small focus spot sizes which can provide one or more of the following advantages: small spot analysis with simple sample preparation; imaging/mapping; atmospheric pressure XPS; in situ, in vitro, and/or in operando analysis.



FIG. 9A schematically illustrates a portion of an example system 10 utilizing small focus enabling atmospheric pressure XPS in accordance with certain embodiments described herein. For example, the system 10 of FIG. 9A can be used to perform XPS at 20 Torr water vapor pressure (e.g., about equilibrium water vapor pressure at 20 degrees Celsius). In certain embodiments, the example system 10 comprises at least one x-ray source 20 comprising a plurality of x-ray sub-sources 26 on or embedded in at least one thermally conductive substrate 25, the x-ray sub-sources comprising a plurality of materials configured to generate x-rays in response to electron bombardment. The example system 10 further comprises a plurality of x-ray optical trains 90, each optical train 90 comprising at least one collimating x-ray optical element 30 (e.g., mirror; mirror lens), at least one energy-selective optical element 40 (e.g., x-ray monochromator; multilayer; multilayer-coated optical substrate), and at least one focusing x-ray optical element 50 (e.g., mirror; mirror lens). As described herein, the plurality of x-ray optical trains 90 is configured to be positioned to direct at least some of the x-rays emitted from a selected one of the plurality of x-ray sub-sources 26 to irradiate a sample 60.


As schematically illustrated by FIG. 9A, the example system 10 further comprises a sample chamber 100 configured to contain a sample 60 at a sample pressure, a first chamber 110 and a first electrostatic lens 111 contained in the first chamber 110 at a first pressure, and a second chamber 120 and a second electrostatic lens 121 contained in the second chamber 120 at a second pressure. The sample chamber 100 and the first chamber 110 are separated from one another by a first wall 104 having a first aperture 102 configured to allow at least some photoelectrons from the sample 60 to propagate from the sample chamber 100 to the first chamber 110. The first chamber 110 and the second chamber 120 are separated from one another by a second wall 114 having a second aperture 112 configured to allow at least some of the photoelectrons in the first chamber to propagate to the second chamber 120. The second chamber 120 is separated from an energy dispersive electron energy analyzer (e.g., a hemispherical analyzer; not shown) by a third wall 124 having a third aperture 122 configured to allow at least some of the photoelectrons in the second chamber to propagate to the energy dispersive electron energy analyzer.


As schematically illustrated by FIG. 9A, the at least one x-ray source 20 and the plurality of x-ray optical trains 90 are configured to irradiate the sample 60 with a small focus x-ray spot impinging the sample 60 (e.g., a third x-ray beam 52 having a spot size or largest dimension in a surface plane of the sample 60 in a range from 10 μm to 200 μm; 15 μm or less; 20 μm or less; 100 μm or less). The sample pressure P0 within the sample chamber 100 can be in a range of 20 mbar to 1 bar (e.g., in a range of 100 mbar to 1 bar). The first chamber 110 containing the first electrostatic lens 111 can be pumped (e.g., differentially pumped) to a pressure P1 less than P0, and the second chamber 120 containing the second electrostatic lens 121 can be pumped (e.g., differentially pumped) to a pressure P2 less than P1. In certain embodiments, each of the first aperture 102, the second aperture 112, and the third aperture 122 has a size (e.g., a largest lateral dimension parallel to the respective wall 104, 114, 124) configured to allow at least some of the photoelectrons to propagate therethrough while preventing unwanted pressure increases in the first and second chambers 110, 120 due to gas from the sample chamber 100 entering the first chamber 110 and gas from the first chamber 110 entering the second chamber 120 (e.g., sizes in a range from m to 200 μm; 15 μm or less; 20 μm or less; 100 μm or less). The first electrostatic lens 111 is configured to receive photoelectrons from the first aperture 102 and to focus at least some of the photoelectrons through the second aperture 112, and the second electrostatic lens 121 is configured to receive photoelectrons from the second aperture 112 and to focus at least some of the photoelectrons through the third aperture 122. In this way, certain embodiments described herein can provide a 1000X increase in detection efficiency. FIGS. 9B and 9C show an example electrostatic lens assembly and an example APXPS system (located at the Advanced Light Source), respectively, which can be configured to be used by the system 10 of certain embodiments described herein.



FIG. 10 shows example advantages of ambient pressure XPS in accordance with certain embodiments described herein. FIG. 11 shows the equilibrium vapor pressure of water as a function of temperature. The inelastic mean free path of electrons with 100 eV kinetic energy in 1 Torr water vapor is about 1 mm, so ambient pressure XPS can be performed in accordance with certain embodiments described herein.


Example Configuration


Table 1 lists various components of an example configuration of an APXPS system in accordance with certain embodiments described herein. The example configuration can be used in studying various processes and/or phenomena at liquid-solid interfaces (e.g., corrosion of metallic biomaterials, such as medical implants and medical devices; surface chemistry under realistic, ambient pressure environments).










TABLE 1







X-ray source
Target (sub-sources): X-ray target comprising a plurality of x-ray sub-



sources (e.g., micro-sized) comprising (i) at least one Rh sub-source



embedded in a diamond substrate, (ii) at least one Cr sub-source



embedded in the diamond substrate, and (iii) single crystal SiC sub-



source in thermal contact with the diamond substrate (e.g., positioned



next to the other sub-sources.



Source size: 10 microns in the dispersive direction of the x-ray crystal



monochromator achieved with 6-degree take-off angle of an electron



beam footprint of 100 microns and 300 microns in the orthogonal



direction (e.g., corresponding to the nondispersive direction of the x-ray



crystal monochromator).



X-ray source power and electron acceleration voltage: 300 W and 10-20



kVp.



X-ray spectral change: software control of motorized translation of the



target.


Paraboloidal
Surface figure: Three sets of two each axially symmetric paraboloidal


Mirror Lenses
surfaces with parameters optimized for the three x-ray energies from the



Rh, Cr, and SiC sub-sources.



Surface figure error: better than 20 μrad.



Mirror surface coating: Pt for Cr Kα1 and for Si Kα1; Pd for Rh Lα1.


Resolution (X-
Less than 0.7 eV, which is comparable to natural line widths (e.g., life


ray line width)
time broadening) of core levels.


Photon flux
4 × 109 photons/second for a spot of 100 micron diameter.


Focus spot size
20 microns to 200 microns.


at sample


Detector
HIPPIII electron energy analyzer available from Scienta-Omicron GmbH



of Taunusstein Germany.



Kinetic energies of up to 6 keV; Analyzer allows ambient pressure up to



100 mbar with 100 micron diameter entrance aperture.









The example configuration compatible with certain embodiments described herein can be characterized by a figure of merit (e.g., for comparison to other APXPS systems. For example, the figure of merit for comparing different APXPS systems for studying solid-liquid interfaces of biomaterials with depth profiling can be expressed as the intensity of the photoelectron peak (Ii) for an element of interest i at a depth (z) from the surface from where photoelectrons are emitted. The intensity Ii is dependent on the photon flux (F) incident on the interface, the average atomic concentration of element i (Ni), the photoelectron cross-section of element i related to the mentioned peak (σi), the inelastic mean free path (Λi) of photoelectrons from element i related to the mentioned peak, and the solid angle of the acceptance (Ω(hv)) of the analyzer (approximately inversely proportional to hv). In the simplest form, Ii=F*Ni*σi*exp(−z/Λi)*Ω(hv) Khv, where Khv corresponds to all other factors (which can be assumed to remain constant for a specific photon energy during the measurement).


In certain embodiments described herein, the example configuration provides five times more flux at the sample than currently marketed APXPS systems. For example, a laboratory-based APXPS system marketed by SPECS Surface Nano Analysis GMBH of Berlin Germany uses Al Kα x-rays at 1.487 keV, which are not suitable for studying solid-liquid interfaces of in-vitro biomaterials (e.g., medical implants) due to the limited IMFP of the photoelectrons. For another example, a Ga Kα (9.3 keV) x-ray source using a Ga liquid jet anode, marketed by Scienta-Omicron GmbH of Taunusstein Germany), suffers from lower cross sections and thus lower detection efficiencies (e.g., by a factor of 6, as compared to using Cr Kα x-rays). In addition, the accepted solid angle of the analyzer for 9.3 keV photoelectrons, as compared to 5.4 keV photoelectrons is about 60% less due to larger retardation used by the analyzer which reduces the solid angle. For still another example, a dual Al Kα and Cr Kα x-ray source marketed as “Phi Quantes” by Ulvac-Phi, Inc. of Kanagawa Japan, utilizes Rowland circle geometry Bragg crystals for monochromatization, which provides high resolution at the expense of lower flux and larger divergence angle.


In certain embodiments described herein, the example configuration provide three different x-ray energies, thereby allowing systematic study of depth profiling and optimizing the performance for signal strength, with a figure of merit about 50 times larger than currently marketed APXPS systems (e.g., equal to about 5 (flux)×6 (cross-section)×1.6 (acceptance solid angle)). As a result, the example configuration can provide higher flux (e.g., by a factor of five) with significantly higher cross sections and the ability for optimization depending on the element of interest and various thicknesses of the liquid and passivation layer of the sample.


Conditional language, such as “can,” “could,” “might,” or “may,” unless specifically stated otherwise, or otherwise understood within the context as used, is generally intended to convey that certain embodiments include, while other embodiments do not include, certain features, elements, and/or steps. Thus, such conditional language is not generally intended to imply that features, elements, and/or steps are in any way required for one or more embodiments.


Conjunctive language such as the phrase “at least one of X, Y, and Z,” unless specifically stated otherwise, is to be understood within the context used in general to convey that an item, term, etc. may be either X, Y, or Z. Thus, such conjunctive language is not generally intended to imply that certain embodiments require the presence of at least one of X, at least one of Y, and at least one of Z.


Language of degree, as used herein, such as the terms “approximately,” “about,” “generally,” and “substantially,” represent a value, amount, or characteristic close to the stated value, amount, or characteristic that still performs a desired function or achieves a desired result. For example, the terms “approximately,” “about,” “generally,” and “substantially” may refer to an amount that is within ±10% of, within ±5% of, within ±2% of, within ±1% of, or within ±0.1% of the stated amount. As another example, the terms “generally parallel” and “substantially parallel” refer to a value, amount, or characteristic that departs from exactly parallel by ±10 degrees, by ±5 degrees, by ±2 degrees, by ±1 degree, or by ±0.1 degree, and the terms “generally perpendicular” and “substantially perpendicular” refer to a value, amount, or characteristic that departs from exactly perpendicular by ±10 degrees, by ±5 degrees, by ±2 degrees, by ±1 degree, or by ±0.1 degree.


Various configurations have been described above. Although this invention has been described with reference to these specific configurations, the descriptions are intended to be illustrative of the invention and are not intended to be limiting. Various modifications and applications may occur to those skilled in the art without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention. Thus, for example, in any method or process disclosed herein, the acts or operations making up the method/process may be performed in any suitable sequence and are not necessarily limited to any particular disclosed sequence. Features or elements from various embodiments and examples discussed above may be combined with one another to produce alternative configurations compatible with embodiments disclosed herein. Various aspects and advantages of the embodiments have been described where appropriate. It is to be understood that not necessarily all such aspects or advantages may be achieved in accordance with any particular embodiment. Thus, for example, it should be recognized that the various embodiments may be carried out in a manner that achieves or optimizes one advantage or group of advantages as taught herein without necessarily achieving other aspects or advantages as may be taught or suggested herein.

Claims
  • 1. A system for x-ray analysis, the system comprising: at least one x-ray source configured to emit x-rays, the at least one x-ray source comprising at least one silicon carbide sub-source on or embedded in at least one thermally conductive substrate and configured to generate the x-rays in response to electron bombardment of the at least one silicon carbide sub-source, at least some of the x-rays emitted from the at least one x-ray source comprising Si x-ray emission line x-rays;an electron beam source configured to bombard the at least one silicon carbide sub-source with an electron beam having an electron energy in a range of 5 keV to 30 keV; andat least one x-ray optical train configured to receive the Si x-ray emission line x-rays and to irradiate a sample with at least some of the Si x-ray emission line x-rays.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the Si x-ray emission line x-rays comprise Si Kai x-ray emission line x-rays.
  • 3. The system of claim 1, wherein the at least one x-ray source further comprises at least one second sub-source on or embedded in the at least one thermally conductive substrate, the at least one second sub-source configured to generate x-rays in response to electron bombardment of the at least one second sub-source, the at least one second sub-source comprising at least one material different from silicon carbide, at least some of the x-rays emitted from the at least one x-ray source comprising x-ray emission line x-rays of the at least one material.
  • 4. The system of claim 3, wherein the at least one material is selected from the group consisting of: Al, Ag, Rh, Cr, Au, Ti, Fe, and Mo and the x-ray emission line x-rays of the at least one material comprise at least one of: Al Kα x-ray emission line x-rays; Ag Lα x-ray emission line x-rays; Rh Lα x-ray emission line x-rays; Cr Kα1 x-ray emission line x-rays; Au Lα x-ray emission line x-rays; Ti Kα x-ray emission line x-rays; Fe Kα x-ray emission line x-rays; Mo Lα x-ray emission line x-rays; Mo Lβ1 x-ray emission line x-rays, and Mo Lβ2 x-ray emission line x-rays.
  • 5. The system of claim 3, wherein the at least one x-ray optical train comprises a plurality of x-ray optical trains configured to be moved relative to the at least one x-ray source and/or the sample such that a selected x-ray optical train of the plurality of x-ray optical trains is positioned to receive the x-rays emitted from the at least one x-ray source and to irradiate the sample with an x-ray beam comprising at least some of the received x-rays emitted from the at least one x-ray source.
  • 6. The system of claim 5, wherein a first x-ray optical train of the plurality of x-ray optical trains is configured for conversion of the Si x-ray emission line x-rays into the x-ray beam and a second x-ray optical train of the plurality of x-ray optical trains is configured for conversion of the x-ray emission line x-rays of the at least one material into the x-ray beam.
  • 7. The system of claim 1, wherein the at least one optical train is configured to focus at least some of the Si x-ray emission line x-rays at the sample.
  • 8. The system of claim 7, wherein the at least one optical train comprises: at least one first x-ray optical element configured to receive at least some of the x-rays emitted from the at least one x-ray source and to generate a collimated first x-ray beam;at least one second x-ray optical element configured to receive at least a portion of the collimated first x-ray beam and to emit a monochromatic second x-ray beam comprising the Si x-ray emission line x-rays; andat least one third x-ray optical element configured to receive at least a portion of the monochromatic second x-ray beam and to focus a third x-ray beam at the sample.
  • 9. The system of claim 8, wherein the at least one first x-ray optical element comprises at least one axially symmetric x-ray collimating optic.
  • 10. The system of claim 8, wherein the at least one second x-ray optical element comprises at least one x-ray crystal monochromator.
  • 11. The system of claim 8, wherein the at least one third x-ray optical element comprises at least one axially symmetric x-ray focusing optic.
  • 12. The system of claim 8, wherein the system further comprises at least one detector subsystem configured to detect x-rays and/or electrons emitted from the sample in response to the sample being irradiated by the third x-ray beam.
  • 13. The system of claim 1, wherein the system comprises one or more of: an x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) system, a photoemission electron microscopy (PEEM) system, an angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) system, an ambient-pressure x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (APXPS) system, an x-ray fluorescence (XRF) system, an x-ray emission (XES) system, an x-ray phase contrast imaging system, and a computed tomography imaging system.
  • 14. An x-ray source comprising: at least one electron source configured to generate at least one electron beam having an electron energy in a range of 5 keV to 30 keV; andat least one target comprising: at least one thermally conductive substrate; anda plurality of sub-sources on or embedded in at least a portion of the at least one thermally conductive substrate, the sub-sources separate from one another and in thermal communication with the at least one thermally conductive substrate, at least one sub-source of the plurality of the sub-sources comprising silicon carbide and configured to emit Si x-ray emission line x-rays in response to bombardment by the at least one electron beam.
  • 15. The x-ray source of claim 14, further comprising an x-ray window configured to allow at least some of the Si x-ray emission line x-rays to propagate from a first region within the x-ray source and containing the at least one target, through the x-ray window, to a second region outside the x-ray source.
  • 16. The x-ray source of claim 14, wherein the at least one electron source comprises at least one electron gun column configured to generate and direct the at least one electron beam to bombard at least one selected sub-source of the plurality of sub-sources.
  • 17. The x-ray source of claim 14, wherein the at least one thermally conductive substrate comprises diamond and the at least last one sub-source comprises a silicon carbide layer sputtered onto the at least one thermally conductive substrate.
  • 18. The x-ray source of claim 14, wherein the plurality of sub-sources further comprises at least one second sub-source comprising at least one target material different from silicon carbide and configured to emit x-ray emission line x-rays of the at least one target material in response to bombardment by the at least one electron beam.
  • 19. The x-ray source of claim 18, wherein the at least one target material is selected from the group consisting of: Al, Ag, Rh, Cr, Au, Ti, Fe, and Mo.
  • 20. A method of x-ray analysis, the method comprising: bombarding a target material comprising silicon carbide with electrons with kinetic energy in a range of 5 keV to 30 keV;emitting Si x-ray emission line x-rays from the target material;irradiating a sample with at least some of the Si x-ray emission line x-rays; anddetecting x-rays and/or electrons emitted from the sample.
  • 21. The method of claim 20, wherein irradiating the sample with at least some of the Si x-ray emission line x-rays comprises using at least one x-ray optical train to receive the Si x-ray emission line x-rays and to direct the at least some of the Si x-ray emission line x-rays to irradiate the sample.
  • 22. The method of claim 20, further comprising: bombarding at least one second target material different from silicon carbide with electrons;emitting x-ray emission line x-rays from the at least one second target material; andirradiating the sample with at least some of the x-ray emission line x-rays from the at least one second target material.
  • 23. The method of claim 22, wherein irradiating the sample with at least some of the x-ray emission line x-rays from the at least one second target material comprises using at least one x-ray optical train to receive the x-ray emission line x-rays from the at least one second target material and to direct the at least some of the x-ray emission line x-rays from the at least one second target material to irradiate the sample.
  • 24. An x-ray illumination system comprising: at least one x-ray source comprising at least a first x-ray sub-source and a second x-ray sub-source, the first and second x-ray sub-sources on or embedded in at least one thermally conductive substrate, the first x-ray sub-source comprising a first material configured to generate first x-rays in response to electron bombardment of the first x-ray sub-source, the second x-ray sub-source comprising a second material different from the first material, the second material configured to generate second x-rays in response to electron bombardment of the second x-ray sub-source; anda plurality of x-ray optical trains comprising: a first optical train comprising at least one first collimating x-ray mirror, at least one first energy-selective x-ray monochromator or multilayer, and at least one first focusing x-ray mirror, the first optical train configured to be positioned to direct at least some of the first x-rays emitted from the first x-ray sub-source to irradiate a sample; anda second optical train comprising at least one second collimating x-ray mirror, at least one second energy-selective x-ray monochromator or multilayer, and at least one second focusing x-ray mirror, the second optical train configured to be positioned to direct at least some of the second x-rays emitted from the second x-ray sub-source to irradiate the sample.
  • 25. The system of claim 24, wherein the at least one x-ray source is configured to bombard a selected sub-source of the first and second x-ray sub-sources with at least one electron beam by moving, relative to one another, one or both of the at least one electron beam and the at least one substrate.
  • 26. The system of claim 24, wherein the at least one x-ray sub-source comprises a third x-ray sub-source on or embedded in the at least one thermally conductive substrate, the third x-ray sub-source comprising a third material different from the first material and the second material, the third material configured to generate third x-rays in response to electron bombardment of the third x-ray sub-source, the plurality of x-ray optical trains further comprising a third optical train comprising at least one third collimating x-ray mirror, at least one third energy-selective x-ray monochromator or multilayer, and at least one third focusing x-ray mirror, the third optical train configured to be positioned to direct at least some of the third x-rays emitted from the third x-ray sub-source to irradiate the sample.
  • 27. The system of claim 24, further comprising at least one controllably movable stage mechanically coupled to the plurality of x-ray optical trains, the at least one stage configured to controllably position the plurality of x-ray optical trains such that a selected one x-ray optical train of the plurality of x-ray optical trains is positioned to receive x-rays from the at least one x-ray source and to direct at least some of the received x-rays to irradiate the sample.
  • 28. The system of claim 27, wherein the at least one controllably movable stage consists essentially of a single controllably movable stage.
  • 29. The system of claim 27, wherein the at least one controllably movable stage comprises a first stage, a second stage, and a third stage, the first stage mechanically coupled to the first and second collimating x-ray mirrors, the second stage mechanically coupled to the first and second energy-selective x-ray monochromators or multilayers, and the third stage mechanically coupled to the first and second focusing x-ray mirrors, the first, second, and third stages configured to be controlled independently from one another.
  • 30. An x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy system comprising: at least one x-ray source comprising a plurality of x-ray sub-sources on or embedded in at least one thermally conductive substrate, the x-ray sub-sources comprising a plurality of materials configured to generate x-rays in response to electron bombardment;a plurality of x-ray optical trains, each optical train comprising at least one collimating x-ray optical element, at least one energy-selective optical element, and at least one focusing x-ray optical element, the plurality of x-ray optical trains configured to be positioned to direct at least some of the x-rays emitted from a selected one of the plurality of x-ray sub-sources to irradiate a sample;a sample chamber configured to contain the sample at a sample pressure;a first chamber and a first electrostatic lens contained in the first chamber at a first pressure less than the sample pressure, the sample chamber and the first chamber separated from one another by a first wall having a first aperture configured to allow at least some photoelectrons from the sample to propagate from the sample chamber to the first chamber; anda second chamber and a second electrostatic lens contained in the second chamber at a second pressure less than the first pressure, the first chamber and the second chamber separated from one another by a second wall having a second aperture configured to allow at least some of the photoelectrons in the first chamber to propagate to the second chamber.
  • 31. The system of claim 30, wherein the sample pressure is in a range of 20 mbar to 1 bar.
  • 32. The system of claim 30, wherein the first electrostatic lens is configured to receive photoelectrons from the first aperture and to focus at least some of the photoelectrons from the first aperture through the second aperture.
  • 33. The system of claim 30, further comprising an energy dispersive electron energy analyzer separated from the second chamber by a third wall having a third aperture configured to allow at least some of the photoelectrons in the second chamber to propagate to the energy dispersive electron energy analyzer.
  • 34. The system of claim 33, wherein the second electrostatic lens is configured to receive photoelectrons from the second aperture and to focus at least some of the photoelectrons from the second aperture through the third aperture.
CLAIM OF PRIORITY

This application claims the benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Appl. No. 62/728,574 filed on Sep. 7, 2018 and incorporated in its entirety by reference herein.

US Referenced Citations (634)
Number Name Date Kind
1203495 Coolidge Oct 1916 A
1211092 Coolidge Jan 1917 A
1215116 Coolidge Feb 1917 A
1328495 Coolidge Jan 1920 A
1355126 Coolidge Oct 1920 A
1790073 Pohl Jan 1931 A
1917099 Coolidge Jul 1933 A
1946312 Coolidge Feb 1934 A
2926270 Zunick Feb 1960 A
3795832 Holland Mar 1974 A
4165472 Wittry Aug 1979 A
4192994 Kastner Mar 1980 A
4227112 Waugh et al. Oct 1980 A
4266138 Nelson et al. May 1981 A
4426718 Hayashi Jan 1984 A
4523327 Eversole Jun 1985 A
4573186 Reinhold Feb 1986 A
4642811 Georgopoulos Feb 1987 A
4727000 Ovshinsky Feb 1988 A
4798446 Hettrick Jan 1989 A
4807268 Wittry Feb 1989 A
4940319 Ueda et al. Jul 1990 A
4945552 Ueda Jul 1990 A
4951304 Piestrup et al. Aug 1990 A
4972449 Upadhya et al. Nov 1990 A
5001737 Lewis et al. Mar 1991 A
5008918 Lee et al. Apr 1991 A
5119408 Little Jun 1992 A
5132997 Kojima Jul 1992 A
5148462 Spitsyn et al. Sep 1992 A
5173928 Momose et al. Dec 1992 A
5204887 Hayashida et al. Apr 1993 A
5249216 Ohsugi et al. Sep 1993 A
5276724 Kumasaka et al. Jan 1994 A
5371774 Cerrina Dec 1994 A
5452142 Hall Sep 1995 A
5461657 Hayashida Oct 1995 A
5513237 Nobuta et al. Apr 1996 A
5602899 Larson Feb 1997 A
5604782 Cash, Jr. Feb 1997 A
5629969 Koshishiba May 1997 A
5657365 Yamamoto et al. Aug 1997 A
5682415 O'Hara Oct 1997 A
5715291 Momose Feb 1998 A
5729583 Tang et al. Mar 1998 A
5737387 Smither Apr 1998 A
5768339 O'Hara Jun 1998 A
5772903 Hirsch Jun 1998 A
5778039 Hossain Jul 1998 A
5799056 Gulman Aug 1998 A
5812629 Clauser Sep 1998 A
5825848 Virshup et al. Oct 1998 A
5832052 Hirose et al. Nov 1998 A
5857008 Reinhold Jan 1999 A
5878110 Yamamoto et al. Mar 1999 A
5881126 Momose Mar 1999 A
5912940 O'Hara Jun 1999 A
5930325 Momose Jul 1999 A
6108397 Cash, Jr. Aug 2000 A
6108398 Mazor et al. Aug 2000 A
6118853 Hansen et al. Sep 2000 A
6125167 Morgan Sep 2000 A
6181773 Lee et al. Jan 2001 B1
6195410 Cash, Jr. Feb 2001 B1
6226347 Golenhofen May 2001 B1
6278764 Barbee, Jr. et al. Aug 2001 B1
6307916 Rogers et al. Oct 2001 B1
6359964 Kogan Mar 2002 B1
6377660 Ukita et al. Apr 2002 B1
6381303 Vu et al. Apr 2002 B1
6389100 Verman et al. May 2002 B1
6430254 Wilkins Aug 2002 B2
6430260 Snyder Aug 2002 B1
6442231 O'Hara Aug 2002 B1
6456688 Taguchi et al. Sep 2002 B1
6463123 Korenev Oct 2002 B1
6487272 Kutsuzawa Nov 2002 B1
6504901 Loxley et al. Jan 2003 B1
6504902 Iwasaki et al. Jan 2003 B2
6507388 Burghoorn Jan 2003 B2
6553096 Zhou et al. Apr 2003 B1
6560313 Harding et al. May 2003 B1
6560315 Price et al. May 2003 B1
6707883 Tiearney et al. Mar 2004 B1
6711234 Loxley et al. Mar 2004 B1
6763086 Platonov Jul 2004 B2
6811612 Gruen et al. Nov 2004 B2
6815363 Yun et al. Nov 2004 B2
6829327 Chen Dec 2004 B1
6847699 Rigali et al. Jan 2005 B2
6850598 Fryda et al. Feb 2005 B1
6870172 Mankos et al. Mar 2005 B1
6885503 Yun et al. Apr 2005 B2
6891627 Levy et al. May 2005 B1
6914723 Yun et al. Jul 2005 B2
6917472 Yun et al. Jul 2005 B1
6934359 Chen Aug 2005 B2
6947522 Wilson et al. Sep 2005 B2
6975703 Wilson et al. Dec 2005 B2
7003077 Jen et al. Feb 2006 B2
7006596 Janik Feb 2006 B1
7015467 Maldonado et al. Mar 2006 B2
7023950 Annis Apr 2006 B1
7023955 Chen et al. Apr 2006 B2
7057187 Yun et al. Jun 2006 B1
7076026 Verman et al. Jun 2006 B2
7079625 Lenz Jul 2006 B2
7095822 Yun Aug 2006 B1
7103138 Pelc et al. Sep 2006 B2
7110503 Kumakhov Sep 2006 B1
7119953 Yun et al. Oct 2006 B2
7120228 Yokhin et al. Oct 2006 B2
7130375 Yun et al. Oct 2006 B1
7149283 Hoheisel et al. Dec 2006 B2
7170969 Yun et al. Jan 2007 B1
7180979 Momose Feb 2007 B2
7180981 Wang Feb 2007 B2
7183547 Yun et al. Feb 2007 B2
7187751 Kawahara et al. Mar 2007 B2
7215736 Wang et al. May 2007 B1
7215741 Ukita et al. May 2007 B2
7218700 Huber et al. May 2007 B2
7218703 Yada et al. May 2007 B2
7221731 Yada et al. May 2007 B2
7245696 Yun et al. Jul 2007 B2
7264397 Ritter Sep 2007 B2
7268945 Yun et al. Sep 2007 B2
7286640 Yun et al. Oct 2007 B2
7297959 Yun et al. Nov 2007 B2
7298826 Inazuru Nov 2007 B2
7330533 Sampayon Feb 2008 B2
7346148 Ukita Mar 2008 B2
7346204 Ito Mar 2008 B2
7349525 Morton Mar 2008 B2
7359487 Newcome Apr 2008 B1
7365909 Yun et al. Apr 2008 B2
7365918 Yun et al. Apr 2008 B1
7382864 Hebert et al. Jun 2008 B2
7388942 Wang et al. Jun 2008 B2
7394890 Wang et al. Jul 2008 B1
7400704 Yun et al. Jul 2008 B1
7406151 Yun Jul 2008 B1
7412024 Yun et al. Aug 2008 B1
7412030 O'Hara Aug 2008 B1
7412131 Lee et al. Aug 2008 B2
7414787 Yun et al. Aug 2008 B2
7433444 Baumann Oct 2008 B2
7440542 Baumann Oct 2008 B2
7443953 Yun et al. Oct 2008 B1
7443958 Harding Oct 2008 B2
7453981 Baumann Nov 2008 B2
7463712 Zhu et al. Dec 2008 B2
7474735 Spahn Jan 2009 B2
7486770 Baumann Feb 2009 B2
7492871 Popescu Feb 2009 B2
7499521 Wang et al. Mar 2009 B2
7515684 Gibson et al. Apr 2009 B2
7522698 Popescu Apr 2009 B2
7522707 Steinlage et al. Apr 2009 B2
7522708 Heismann Apr 2009 B2
7529343 Safai et al. May 2009 B2
7532704 Hempel May 2009 B2
7551719 Yokhin et al. Jun 2009 B2
7551722 Ohshima et al. Jun 2009 B2
7561662 Wang et al. Jul 2009 B2
7564941 Baumann Jul 2009 B2
7583789 Macdonald et al. Sep 2009 B1
7601399 Barnola et al. Oct 2009 B2
7605371 Yasui et al. Oct 2009 B2
7639786 Baumann Dec 2009 B2
7646843 Popescu et al. Jan 2010 B2
7653177 Baumann et al. Jan 2010 B2
7672433 Zhong et al. Mar 2010 B2
7680243 Yokhin et al. Mar 2010 B2
7738629 Chen Jun 2010 B2
7787588 Yun et al. Aug 2010 B1
7796725 Yun et al. Sep 2010 B1
7796726 Gendreau et al. Sep 2010 B1
7800072 Yun et al. Sep 2010 B2
7809113 Aoki et al. Oct 2010 B2
7813475 Wu et al. Oct 2010 B1
7817777 Baumann et al. Oct 2010 B2
7848483 Platonov Dec 2010 B2
7864426 Yun et al. Jan 2011 B2
7864922 Kawabe Jan 2011 B2
7873146 Okunuki et al. Jan 2011 B2
7876883 O'Hara Jan 2011 B2
7889838 David et al. Feb 2011 B2
7889844 Okunuki et al. Feb 2011 B2
7899154 Chen et al. Mar 2011 B2
7902528 Hera et al. Mar 2011 B2
7914693 Jeong et al. Mar 2011 B2
7920673 Lanza et al. Apr 2011 B2
7920676 Yun et al. Apr 2011 B2
7924973 Kottler et al. Apr 2011 B2
7929667 Zhuang et al. Apr 2011 B1
7945018 Heismann May 2011 B2
7949092 Brons May 2011 B2
7949095 Ning May 2011 B2
7974379 Case et al. Jul 2011 B1
7983381 David et al. Jul 2011 B2
7991120 Okunuki et al. Aug 2011 B2
8005185 Popescu Aug 2011 B2
8009796 Popescu Aug 2011 B2
8009797 Ouchi Aug 2011 B2
8041004 David Oct 2011 B2
8036341 Lee Nov 2011 B2
8058621 Kommareddy Nov 2011 B2
8068579 Yun et al. Nov 2011 B1
8073099 Niu et al. Dec 2011 B2
8094784 Morton Jan 2012 B2
8139711 Takahashi Mar 2012 B2
8139716 Okunuki et al. Mar 2012 B2
8165270 David et al. Apr 2012 B2
8184771 Murakoshi May 2012 B2
8208602 Lee Jun 2012 B2
8208603 Sato Jun 2012 B2
8233587 Sato Jul 2012 B2
8243879 Itoh et al. Aug 2012 B2
8243884 Rödhammer et al. Aug 2012 B2
8249220 Verman et al. Aug 2012 B2
8280000 Takahashi Oct 2012 B2
8306183 Koehler Nov 2012 B2
8306184 Chang et al. Nov 2012 B2
8331534 Silver Dec 2012 B2
8351569 Baker Jan 2013 B2
8351570 Nakamura Jan 2013 B2
8353628 Yun et al. Jan 2013 B1
8357894 Toth et al. Jan 2013 B2
8360640 Reinhold Jan 2013 B2
8374309 Donath Feb 2013 B2
8406378 Wang et al. Mar 2013 B2
8416920 Okumura et al. Apr 2013 B2
8422633 Lantz et al. Apr 2013 B2
8423127 Mahmood et al. Apr 2013 B2
8451975 Tada May 2013 B2
8422637 Okunuki et al. Jun 2013 B2
8488743 Verman Jul 2013 B2
8509386 Lee et al. Aug 2013 B2
8520803 Behling Aug 2013 B2
8526575 Yun et al. Sep 2013 B1
8532257 Mukaide et al. Sep 2013 B2
8553843 Drory Oct 2013 B2
8559594 Ouchi Oct 2013 B2
8559597 Chen et al. Oct 2013 B2
8565371 Bredno Oct 2013 B2
8576983 Baeumer Nov 2013 B2
8588372 Zou et al. Nov 2013 B2
8591108 Tada Nov 2013 B2
8602648 Jacobsen et al. Dec 2013 B1
8632247 Ishii Jan 2014 B2
8644451 Aoki et al. Feb 2014 B2
8666024 Okunuki et al. Mar 2014 B2
8666025 Klausz Mar 2014 B2
8699667 Steinlage et al. Apr 2014 B2
8735844 Khaykovich et al. May 2014 B1
8737565 Lyon et al. May 2014 B1
8744048 Lee et al. Jun 2014 B2
8755487 Kaneko Jun 2014 B2
8767915 Stutman Jul 2014 B2
8767916 Hashimoto Jul 2014 B2
8781069 Murakoshi Jul 2014 B2
8824629 Ishii Sep 2014 B2
8831174 Kohara Sep 2014 B2
8831175 Silver et al. Sep 2014 B2
8831179 Adler et al. Sep 2014 B2
8837680 Tsujii Sep 2014 B2
8855265 Engel Oct 2014 B2
8859977 Kondoh Oct 2014 B2
8861682 Okunuki et al. Oct 2014 B2
8903042 Ishii Dec 2014 B2
8908824 Kondoh Dec 2014 B2
8972191 Stampanoni et al. Mar 2015 B2
8989351 Vogtmeier et al. Mar 2015 B2
8989474 Kido et al. Mar 2015 B2
8995622 Adler et al. Mar 2015 B2
9001967 Baturin Apr 2015 B2
9001968 Kugland et al. Apr 2015 B2
9007562 Marconi et al. Apr 2015 B2
9008278 Lee et al. Apr 2015 B2
9016943 Jacobsen et al. Apr 2015 B2
9020101 Omote et al. Apr 2015 B2
9025725 Kiyohara et al. May 2015 B2
9029795 Sando May 2015 B2
9031201 Sato May 2015 B2
9036773 David et al. May 2015 B2
9063055 Ouchi Jun 2015 B2
9086536 Pang et al. Jul 2015 B2
9129715 Adler et al. Sep 2015 B2
9222899 Yamaguchi Dec 2015 B2
9230703 Mohr et al. Jan 2016 B2
9234856 Mukaide Jan 2016 B2
9251995 Ogura Feb 2016 B2
9257254 Ogura et al. Feb 2016 B2
9263225 Morton Feb 2016 B2
9280056 Clube et al. Mar 2016 B2
9281158 Ogura Mar 2016 B2
9291578 Adler Mar 2016 B2
9329141 Stutman May 2016 B2
9336917 Ozawa et al. May 2016 B2
9357975 Baturin Jun 2016 B2
9362081 Bleuet Jun 2016 B2
9370084 Sprong et al. Jun 2016 B2
9390881 Yun et al. Jul 2016 B2
9412552 Aoki et al. Aug 2016 B2
9430832 Koehler et al. Aug 2016 B2
9439613 Stutman Sep 2016 B2
9445775 Das Sep 2016 B2
9448190 Yun et al. Sep 2016 B2
9449780 Chen Sep 2016 B2
9449781 Yun et al. Sep 2016 B2
9453803 Radicke Sep 2016 B2
9480447 Mohr et al. Nov 2016 B2
9486175 Fredenberg et al. Nov 2016 B2
9494534 Baturin Nov 2016 B2
9502204 Ikarashi Nov 2016 B2
9520260 Hesselink et al. Dec 2016 B2
9524846 Sato et al. Dec 2016 B2
9532760 Anton et al. Jan 2017 B2
9543109 Yun et al. Jan 2017 B2
9551677 Mazor et al. Jan 2017 B2
9557280 Pfeiffer et al. Jan 2017 B2
9564284 Gerzoskovitz Feb 2017 B2
9570264 Ogura et al. Feb 2017 B2
9570265 Yun et al. Feb 2017 B1
9588066 Pois et al. Mar 2017 B2
9594036 Yun et al. Mar 2017 B2
9595415 Ogura Mar 2017 B2
9632040 Stutman Apr 2017 B2
9658174 Omote May 2017 B2
9700267 Baturin et al. Jul 2017 B2
9715989 Dalakos Jul 2017 B2
9719947 Yun et al. Aug 2017 B2
9748012 Yokoyama Aug 2017 B2
9757081 Proksa Sep 2017 B2
9761021 Koehler Sep 2017 B2
9770215 Souchay et al. Sep 2017 B2
9778213 Bakeman et al. Oct 2017 B2
9823203 Yun et al. Nov 2017 B2
9826949 Ning Nov 2017 B2
9837178 Nagai Dec 2017 B2
9842414 Koehler Dec 2017 B2
9861330 Rossl Jan 2018 B2
9874531 Yun et al. Jan 2018 B2
9881710 Roessl Jan 2018 B2
9916655 Sampanoni Mar 2018 B2
9934930 Parker et al. Apr 2018 B2
9939392 Wen Apr 2018 B2
9970119 Yokoyama May 2018 B2
10014148 Tang et al. Jul 2018 B2
10020158 Yamada Jul 2018 B2
10028716 Rossl Jul 2018 B2
10045753 Teshima Aug 2018 B2
10068740 Gupta Sep 2018 B2
10074451 Kottler et al. Sep 2018 B2
10076297 Bauer Sep 2018 B2
10085701 Hoshino Oct 2018 B2
10105112 Utsumi Oct 2018 B2
10115557 Ishii Oct 2018 B2
10141081 Preusche Nov 2018 B2
10151713 Wu et al. Dec 2018 B2
10153061 Yokoyama Dec 2018 B2
10153062 Gall et al. Dec 2018 B2
10182194 Karim et al. Jan 2019 B2
10217596 Liang et al. Feb 2019 B2
10231687 Kahn et al. Mar 2019 B2
10247683 Yun et al. Apr 2019 B2
10256001 Yokoyama Apr 2019 B2
10264659 Miller et al. Apr 2019 B1
10267752 Zhang et al. Apr 2019 B2
10267753 Zhang et al. Apr 2019 B2
10269528 Yun et al. Apr 2019 B2
10295485 Yun et al. May 2019 B2
10295486 Yun et al. May 2019 B2
10297359 Yun et al. May 2019 B2
10304580 Yun et al. May 2019 B2
10349908 Yun et al. Jul 2019 B2
10352695 Dziura et al. Jul 2019 B2
10352880 Yun et al. Jul 2019 B2
10393683 Hegeman et al. Aug 2019 B2
10401309 Yun et al. Sep 2019 B2
10416099 Yun et al. Sep 2019 B2
10429325 Ito et al. Oct 2019 B2
10466185 Yun et al. Nov 2019 B2
10473598 Ogata et al. Nov 2019 B2
10485492 Koehler et al. Nov 2019 B2
10514345 Ogata et al. Dec 2019 B2
10514346 Sako Dec 2019 B2
10568588 Koehler et al. Feb 2020 B2
10578566 Yun et al. Mar 2020 B2
10634628 Kasper et al. Apr 2020 B2
10653376 Yun et al. May 2020 B2
10697902 Sharma et al. Jun 2020 B2
10743396 Kawase Aug 2020 B1
10782252 Gateshki et al. Sep 2020 B2
10794845 Filsinger Oct 2020 B2
10841515 Tsujino Nov 2020 B1
20010006413 Burghoorn Jul 2001 A1
20020080916 Jiang Jun 2002 A1
20020085676 Snyder Jul 2002 A1
20030142790 Zhou et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030054133 Wadley et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030112923 Lange Jun 2003 A1
20030142781 Kawahara Jul 2003 A1
20030223536 Yun et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040047446 Platonov Mar 2004 A1
20040076260 Charles, Jr. Apr 2004 A1
20040120463 Wilson et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040140432 Maldonado et al. Jul 2004 A1
20050025281 Verman et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050074094 Jen et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050123097 Wang Jun 2005 A1
20050163284 Inazuru Jul 2005 A1
20050201520 Smith et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050282300 Yun et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060045234 Pelc Mar 2006 A1
20060062350 Yokhin Mar 2006 A1
20060182322 Bernhardt et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060233309 Kutzner et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060239405 Verman Oct 2006 A1
20070030959 Ritter Feb 2007 A1
20070071174 Hebert et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070108387 Yun et al. May 2007 A1
20070110217 Ukita May 2007 A1
20070183563 Baumann Aug 2007 A1
20070183579 Baumann et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070189449 Baumann Aug 2007 A1
20070248215 Ohshima et al. Oct 2007 A1
20080084966 Aoki et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080089484 Reinhold Apr 2008 A1
20080094694 Yun et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080099935 Egle May 2008 A1
20080116398 Hara May 2008 A1
20080117511 Chen May 2008 A1
20080159475 Mazor et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080159707 Lee et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080165355 Yasui et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080170662 Reinhold Jul 2008 A1
20080170668 Kruit et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080181363 Fenter et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080240344 Reinhold Oct 2008 A1
20080273662 Yun Nov 2008 A1
20090052619 Endoh Feb 2009 A1
20090092227 David Apr 2009 A1
20090154640 Baumann et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090316857 David et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090316860 Okunuki et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100012845 Baeumer et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100027739 Lantz et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100040202 Lee Feb 2010 A1
20100046702 Chen et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100061508 Takahashi Mar 2010 A1
20100091947 Niu Apr 2010 A1
20100141151 Reinhold Jun 2010 A1
20100246765 Murakoshi Sep 2010 A1
20100260315 Sato et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100272239 Lantz et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100284513 Kawabe Nov 2010 A1
20110026680 Sato Feb 2011 A1
20110038455 Silver et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110058655 Okumura et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110064191 Toth et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110064202 Thran et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110085644 Verman Apr 2011 A1
20110135066 Behling Jun 2011 A1
20110142204 Zou et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110235781 Aoki et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110243302 Murakoshi Oct 2011 A1
20110268252 Ozawa et al. Nov 2011 A1
20120041679 Stampanoni Feb 2012 A1
20120057669 Vogtmeier et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120163547 Lee et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120163554 Tada Jun 2012 A1
20120224670 Kiyohara et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120228475 Pang et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120269323 Adler et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120269324 Adler Oct 2012 A1
20120269325 Adler et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120269326 Adler et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120294420 Nagai Nov 2012 A1
20130011040 Kido et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130032727 Kondoe Feb 2013 A1
20130039460 Levy Feb 2013 A1
20130108012 Sato May 2013 A1
20130108022 Kugland et al. May 2013 A1
20130195246 Tamura et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130223594 Sprong et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130235976 Jeong et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130251100 Sasaki et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130259207 Omote et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130279651 Yokoyama Oct 2013 A1
20130308112 Clube et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130308754 Yamazaki et al. Nov 2013 A1
20140023973 Marconi et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140029729 Kucharczyk Jan 2014 A1
20140037052 Adler Feb 2014 A1
20140064445 Adler Mar 2014 A1
20140072104 Jacobsen et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140079188 Hesselink et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140105363 Chen et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140146945 Fredenberg et al. May 2014 A1
20140153692 Larkin et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140177800 Sato et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140185778 Lee et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140205057 Koehler et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140211919 Ogura et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140226785 Stutman et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140241493 Yokoyama Aug 2014 A1
20140270060 Date et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140369469 Ogura et al. Dec 2014 A1
20140369471 Ogura et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150030126 Radicke Jan 2015 A1
20150030127 Aoki et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150043713 Chen Feb 2015 A1
20150049860 Das Feb 2015 A1
20150051877 Bakeman et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150055743 Vedantham et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150055745 Holzner et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150071402 Handa Mar 2015 A1
20150092924 Yun et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150110252 Yun et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150117599 Yun et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150194287 Yun et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150243397 Yun et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150247811 Yun Sep 2015 A1
20150260663 Yun et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150323478 Stutman Nov 2015 A1
20150357069 Yun et al. Dec 2015 A1
20160064175 Yun et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160066870 Yun et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160106387 Kahn Apr 2016 A1
20160178540 Yun et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160178541 Hwang et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160206259 Auclair et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160268094 Yun et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160320320 Yun et al. Nov 2016 A1
20160351370 Yun et al. Dec 2016 A1
20170018392 Cheng Jan 2017 A1
20170047191 Yun Feb 2017 A1
20170052128 Yun et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170074809 Ito Mar 2017 A1
20170162288 Yun et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170162359 Tang et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170176356 Hoffman Jun 2017 A1
20170227476 Zhang et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170234811 Zhang et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170261442 Yun et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170336334 Yun et al. Nov 2017 A1
20180144901 Yun et al. May 2018 A1
20180182131 Koehler et al. Jun 2018 A1
20180202951 Yun et al. Jul 2018 A1
20180261352 Matsuyama et al. Sep 2018 A1
20180306734 Morimoto et al. Oct 2018 A1
20180323032 Strelec et al. Nov 2018 A1
20180344276 DeFreitas et al. Dec 2018 A1
20180348151 Kasper et al. Dec 2018 A1
20180356355 Momose et al. Dec 2018 A1
20190017942 Filevich Jan 2019 A1
20190017946 Wack et al. Jan 2019 A1
20190018824 Zarkadas Jan 2019 A1
20190019647 Lee et al. Jan 2019 A1
20190027265 Dey et al. Jan 2019 A1
20190043689 Camus Feb 2019 A1
20190057832 Durst et al. Feb 2019 A1
20190064084 Ullom et al. Feb 2019 A1
20190086342 Pois et al. Mar 2019 A1
20190088439 Honda Mar 2019 A1
20190113466 Karim et al. Apr 2019 A1
20190115184 Zalubovsky Apr 2019 A1
20190131103 Tuohimaa May 2019 A1
20190132936 Steck et al. May 2019 A1
20190154892 Moldovan May 2019 A1
20190172681 Owen et al. Jun 2019 A1
20190189385 Liang et al. Jun 2019 A1
20190204246 Hegeman et al. Jul 2019 A1
20190204757 Brussard et al. Jul 2019 A1
20190206652 Akinwande et al. Jul 2019 A1
20190212281 Shchegrov Jul 2019 A1
20190214216 Jeong et al. Jul 2019 A1
20190216416 Koehler et al. Jul 2019 A1
20190219713 Booker et al. Jul 2019 A1
20190261935 Kitamura Aug 2019 A1
20190272929 Omote et al. Sep 2019 A1
20190304735 Safai et al. Oct 2019 A1
20190311874 Tuohimma et al. Oct 2019 A1
20190317027 Tsuboi et al. Oct 2019 A1
20190331616 Schaff et al. Oct 2019 A1
20190341219 Zhang et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190341220 Parker et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190353802 Steinhauser et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190374182 Karim et al. Dec 2019 A1
20190380193 Matsuhana et al. Dec 2019 A1
20190387602 Woywode et al. Dec 2019 A1
20190391087 Matejka et al. Dec 2019 A1
20200003708 Kobayashi et al. Jan 2020 A1
20200003712 Kataoka et al. Jan 2020 A1
20200041429 Cho et al. Feb 2020 A1
20200058462 Suzuki Feb 2020 A1
20200088656 Pois et al. Mar 2020 A1
20200090826 Adler Mar 2020 A1
20200103358 Wiell et al. Apr 2020 A1
20200105492 Behling et al. Apr 2020 A1
20200154552 Suzuki et al. May 2020 A1
20200155088 Gruener et al. May 2020 A1
20200158662 Horiba et al. May 2020 A1
20200163195 Steck et al. May 2020 A1
20200168427 Krokhmal et al. May 2020 A1
20200182806 Kappler et al. Jun 2020 A1
20200187339 Freudenberger et al. Jun 2020 A1
20200191732 Taniguchi et al. Jun 2020 A1
20200194212 Dalakos et al. Jun 2020 A1
20200203113 Ponard Jun 2020 A1
20200225172 Sato et al. Jul 2020 A1
20200225173 Sato et al. Jul 2020 A1
20200225371 Greenberg et al. Jul 2020 A1
20200232937 Yaroshenko et al. Jul 2020 A1
20200234908 Fishman et al. Jul 2020 A1
20200279351 Ratner et al. Sep 2020 A1
20200292475 Cao et al. Sep 2020 A1
20200297297 Kok et al. Sep 2020 A1
20200300789 Osakabe et al. Sep 2020 A1
20200300790 Gellineau et al. Sep 2020 A1
20200303265 Gellineau et al. Sep 2020 A1
20200305809 Schwoebel et al. Oct 2020 A1
20200319120 Kitamura et al. Oct 2020 A1
20200321184 Parker et al. Oct 2020 A1
20200330059 Fredenberg et al. Oct 2020 A1
20200337659 Sano et al. Oct 2020 A1
20200378904 Albarqouni et al. Dec 2020 A1
20200378905 Safai Dec 2020 A1
20200378907 Morton Dec 2020 A1
20200378908 Fujimura et al. Dec 2020 A1
20200388461 Behling et al. Dec 2020 A1
20200398509 Sanli et al. Dec 2020 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (86)
Number Date Country
101257851 Sep 2008 CN
101532969 Sep 2009 CN
102124537 Jul 2011 CN
102325498 Jan 2012 CN
102551761 Jul 2012 CN
0432568 Jun 1991 EP
0751533 Jan 1997 EP
1028451 Aug 2000 EP
1169713 Jan 2006 EP
3093867 Nov 2016 EP
2548447 Jan 1985 FR
H06-188092 Jul 1994 JP
H07-056000 Mar 1995 JP
H07-194592 Aug 1995 JP
H08-128971 May 1996 JP
H08-184572 Jul 1996 JP
H11-304728 Nov 1999 JP
H11-352079 Dec 1999 JP
2000-306533 Nov 2000 JP
2001-021507 Jan 2001 JP
2003-149392 May 2003 JP
2003-288853 Oct 2003 JP
2004-089445 Mar 2004 JP
2004-518262 Jun 2004 JP
2007-218683 Aug 2007 JP
2007-265981 Oct 2007 JP
2007-311185 Nov 2007 JP
2008-200359 Apr 2008 JP
2008-145111 Jun 2008 JP
2008-197495 Aug 2008 JP
2009-195349 Mar 2009 JP
2009-212058 Sep 2009 JP
2010-236986 Oct 2010 JP
2011-029072 Feb 2011 JP
2011-033537 Feb 2011 JP
2011-218147 Nov 2011 JP
2012-032387 Feb 2012 JP
2012-187341 Oct 2012 JP
2012-254294 Dec 2012 JP
2013-508683 Mar 2013 JP
2015-529984 Jul 2013 JP
2013-157269 Aug 2013 JP
2013-160637 Aug 2013 JP
2013-181811 Sep 2013 JP
2013-239317 Nov 2013 JP
2015-002074 Jan 2015 JP
2015-047306 Mar 2015 JP
2015-072263 Apr 2015 JP
2015-077289 Apr 2015 JP
2017-040618 Feb 2017 JP
10-2012-0091591 Aug 2012 KR
10-2014-0059688 May 2014 KR
WO 1995006952 Mar 1995 WO
WO 1998011592 Mar 1998 WO
WO 2002039792 May 2002 WO
WO 2003081631 Oct 2003 WO
WO 2005109969 Nov 2005 WO
WO 2006096052 Sep 2006 WO
WO 2007125833 Nov 2007 WO
WO 2008068044 Jun 2008 WO
WO 2009098027 Aug 2009 WO
WO 20091104560 Aug 2009 WO
WO 2010109909 Sep 2010 WO
WO 2011032572 Mar 2011 WO
WO 2012032950 Mar 2012 WO
WO 2013004574 Jan 2013 WO
WO 2013111050 Aug 2013 WO
WO 2013118593 Aug 2013 WO
WO 2013160153 Oct 2013 WO
WO 2013168468 Nov 2013 WO
WO 2014054497 Apr 2014 WO
WO 2015016019 Feb 2015 WO
WO 2015034791 Mar 2015 WO
WO 2015066333 May 2015 WO
WO 2015084466 Jun 2015 WO
WO 2015152490 Oct 2015 WO
WO 2015168473 Nov 2015 WO
WO 2015176023 Nov 2015 WO
WO 2015187219 Dec 2015 WO
WO 2016187623 Nov 2016 WO
WO 2017031740 Mar 2017 WO
WO 2017204850 Nov 2017 WO
WO 2017-204850 Nov 2017 WO
WO 2017213996 Dec 2017 WO
WO 2018122213 Jul 2018 WO
WO 2018175570 Sep 2018 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (315)
Entry
“Diamond,” Section 10.4.2 of Zorman et al., “Material Aspects of Micro-Nanoelectromechanical Systems,” Chapter 10 of Springer Handbook of Nanotechnology, 2nd ed., Barat Bushan, ed. (Springer Science + Business Media, Inc., New York, 2007), pp. 312-314.
“Element Six CVD Diamond Handbook” (Element Six, Luxembourg, 2015).
“High performance benchtop EDXRF spectrometer with Windows® software,” published by: Rigaku Corp., Tokyo, Japan; 2017.
“Monochromatic Doubly Curved Crystal Optics,” published by: X-Ray Optical Systems, Inc. (XOS), East Greenbush, NY; 2017.
“Optics and Detectors,” Section 4 of X-Ray Data Booklet, 3rd Ed., A.C. Thompson ed. (Lawrence Berkeley Nat'l Lab, Berkeley, CA, 2009).
“Properties of Solids,” Ch. 12 of CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 90th ed., Devid R. Lide & W.M. “Mickey” Haynes, eds. (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2009), pp. 12-41-12-46; 12-203-12-212.
“Science and Technology of Future Light Sources”, Arthur L. Robinson (LBNL) and Brad Plummer (SLAG), eds. Report Nos. ANL-08/39 / BNL-81895-2008 / LBNL-1090E-2009 / SLAC-R-917 (Lawrence Berkeley Nat'l Lab, Berkeley, CA, Dec. 2008).
“Series 5000 Packaged X-ray Tubes,” Product Technical Data Sheet DS006 Rev. G, X-Ray Technologies Inc. (Oxford Instruments), Scotts Valley, CA (no date).
“Toward Control of Matter: Energy Science Needs for a New Class of X-Ray Light Sources” (Lawrence Berkeley Nat'l Lab, Berkeley, CA, Sep. 2008).
“X-ray Optics for BES Light Source Facilities,” Report of the Basic Energy Sciences Workshop on X-ray Optics for BES Light Source Facilities, D. Mills & H. Padmore, Co-Chairs, (U.S. Dept. of Energy, Office of Science, Potomac, MD, Mar. 2013).
Abullian et al., “Quantitative determination of the lateral density and intermolecular correlation between proteins anchored on the membrane surfaces using grazing incidence small-angle X-ray scattering and grazing incidence X-ray fluorescence,” Nov. 28, 2012, The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 137, pp. 204907-1 to 204907-8.
Adachi et al., “Development of the 17-inch Direct-Conversion Dynamic Flat-panel X-ray Detector (FPD),” Digital R/F (Shimadzu Corp., 2 pages (no date, published—2004 with product release).
Aharonovich et al., “Diamond Nanophotonics,” Adv. Op. Mat'ls vol. 2, Issue 10 (2014).
Als-Nielsen et al., “Phase contrast imaging” Sect. 9.3 of Ch. 9 of “Elements of Modern X-ray Physics, Second Edition” , (John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, West Sussex, UK, 2011), pp. 318-329.
Als-Nielsen et al., “Photoelectric Absorption,” Ch. 7 of “Elements of Modern X-ray Physics, Second Edition,” (John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, West Sussex, UK, 2011).
Als-Nielsen et al., “Refraction and reflection from interfaces,” Ch. 3 of “Elements of Modern X-ray Physics, Second Edition,” (John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester, West Sussex, UK, 2011), pp. 69-112.
Als-Nielsen et al., “X-rays and their interaction with matter”, and “Sources”, Ch. 1 & 2 of “Elements of Modern X-ray Physics, Second Edition” (John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, West Sussex, UK, 2011).
Altapova et al., “Phase contrast laminography based on Talbot interferometry,” Opt. Express, vol. 20, No. 6, (2012) pp. 6496-6508.
Ando et al., “Smooth and high-rate reactive ion etching of diamond,” Diamond and Related Materials, vol. 11, (2002) pp. 824-827.
Arfelli et al., “Mammography with Synchrotron Radiation: Phase-Detection Techniques,” Radiology vol. 215, (2000), pp. 286-293.
Arndt et al., Focusing Mirrors for Use with Microfocus X-ray Tubes, 1998, Journal of Applied Crystallography, vol. 31, pp. 733-741.
Bachucki et al., “Laboratory-based double X-ray spectrometer for simultaneous X-ray emission and X-ray absorption studies,” J. Anal. Atomic Spectr. DOI:10.1039/C9JA00159J (2019).
Balaic et al., “X-ray optics of tapered capillaries,” Appl. Opt. vol. 34 (Nov. 1995) pp. 7263-7272.
Baltes et al., “Coherent and incoherent grating reconstruction,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A vol. 3(8), (1986), pp. 1268-1275.
Barbee Jr., “Multilayers for x-ray optics,” Opt. Eng. vol. 25 (Aug. 1986) pp. 898-915.
Baron et al., “A compact optical design for Bragg reflections near backscattering,” J. Synchrotron Rad., vol. 8 (2001), pp. 1127-1130.
Bech, “In-vivo dark-field and phase-contrast x-ray imaging,” Scientific Reports 3, (2013), Article No. 03209.
Bech, “X-ray imaging with a grating interferometer,” University of Copenhagen PhD. Thesis, (May 1, 2009).
Bergamin et al., “Measuring small lattice distortions in Si-crystals by phase-contrast x-ray topography,” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. vol. 33 (Dec. 31, 2000) pp. 2678-2682.
Bernstorff, “Grazing Incidence Small Angle X-ray Scattering (GISAXS),” Presentation at Advanced School on Synchrotron and Free Electron Laser Sources and their Multidisciplinary Applications, Apr. 2008, Trieste, Italy.
Bilderback et al., “Single Capillaries,” Ch. 29 of “Handbook of Optics vol. III, 2nd Ed.” (McGraw Hill, New York, 2001).
Birkholz, “Chapter 4: Grazing Incidence Configurations,” Thin Film Analysis by X-ray Scattering (Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, Germany, 2006).
Bjeoumikhov et al., “A modular system for XRF and XRD applications consisting of a microfocus X-ray source and different capillary optics,” X-ray Spectrometry, vol. 33 (2004), pp. 312-316.
Bjeoumikhov et al., “Capillary Optics for X-Rays,” Ch. 18 of “Modern Developments in X-Ray and Neutron Optics,” A. Erko et al., eds. (Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2008), pp. 287-306.
Canberra Model S-5005 WinAxil X-Ray Analysis Software, published by: Canberra Eurisys Benelux N.V./S.A.,Zellik, Belgium; Jun. 2004.
Cerrina, “The Schwarzschild Objective,” Ch. 27 of “Handbook of Optics vol. III, 2nd Ed.” (McGraw Hill, New York, 2001).
Chen et al., “Advance in detection of low sulfur content by wavelength dispersive XRF,” Proceedings of the Annual ISA Analysis Division Symposium (2002).
Chen et al., “Doubly curved crystal (DCC) X-ray optics and applications,” Powder Diffraction, vol. 17(2) (2002), pp. 99-103.
Chen et al., “Guiding and focusing neutron beams using capillary optics,” Nature vol. 357 (Jun. 4, 1992), pp. 391-393.
Chervenak et al., “Experimental thick-target bremsstrahlung spectra from electrons in the range 10 to 30 keV”, Phys. Rev. A vol. 12 (1975), pp. 26-33.
Chon, “Measurement of Roundness for an X-Ray Mono-Capillary Optic by Using Computed Tomography,” J. Korean Phys. Soc. vol. 74, No. 9, pp. 901-906 (May 2019).
Coan et al., “In vivo x-ray phase contrast analyzer-based imaging for longitudinal osteoarthritis studies in guinea pigs,” Phys. Med. Biol. vol. 55(24) (2010), pp. 7649-7662.
Cockcroft et al., “Chapter 2: Experimental Setups,” Powder Diffraction: Theory and Practice, R.E. Dinnebier and S.J.L. Billinge, eds (Royal Society of Chemistry Publishing, London, UK, 2008).
Cohen et al., “Tunable laboratory extended x-ray absorption fine structure system,” Rev. Sci. Instr. vol. 51, No. 3, Mar. 1980, pp. 273-277.
Cong et al., “Fourier transform-based iterative method for differential phase-contrast computed tomography”, Opt. Lett. vol. 37 (2012), pp. 1784-1786.
Cornaby et al., “Advances in X-ray Microfocusing with Monocapillary Optics at CHESS,” CHESS News Magazine (2009), pp. 63-66.
Cornaby et al., “Design of Single-Bounce Monocapillary X-ray Optics,” Advances in X-ray Analysis: Proceedings of the 55th Annual Conference on Applications of X-ray Analysis, vol. 50, (International Centre for Diffraction Data (ICDD), 2007), pp. 194-200.
Cornaby, “The Handbook of X-ray Single Bounce Monocapillary Optics, Including Optical Design and Synchrotron Applications” (PhD Dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, May 2008).
David et al., “Fabrication of diffraction gratings for hard x-ray phase contrast imaging,” Microelectron. Eng. vol. 84, (2007), pp. 1172-1177.
David et al., “Hard X-ray phase imaging and tomography using a grating interferometer,” Spectrochimica Acta Part B vol. 62 (2007) pp. 626-630.
Davis et al., “Bridging the Micro-to-Macro Gap: A New Application for Micro X-Ray Fluorescence,” Microsc Microanal., vol. 17(3) (Jun. 2011), pp. 410-417.
Diaz et al., “Monte Carlo Simulation of Scatter Field for Calculation of Contrast of Discs in Synthetic CDMAM Images,” In: Digital Mammography, Proceedings 10th International Workshop IWDM 2010 (Springer Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg), (2010), pp. 628-635 (9 pages). Jun. 18, 2010.
Ding et al., “Reactive Ion Etching of CVD Diamond Films for MEMS Applications,” Micromachining and Microfabrication, Proc. SPIE vol. 4230 (2000), pp. 224-230.
Dobrovinskaya et al., “Thermal Properties,” Sect. 2.1.5 of “Sapphire: Material, Manufacturing,, Applications” (Springer Science + Business Media, New York, 2009).
Dong et al., “Improving Molecular Sensitivity in X-Ray Fluorescence Molecular Imaging (XFMI) of Iodine Distribution in Mouse-Sized Phantoms via Excitation Spectrum Optimization,” IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 56966-56976 (2018).
Erko et al., “X-ray Optics,” Ch. 3 of “Handbook of Practical X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis,” B. Beckhoff et al., eds. (Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2006), pp. 85-198.
Falcone et al., “New directions in X-ray microscopy,” Contemporary Physics, vol. 52, No. 4, (Jul.-Aug. 2010), pp. 293-318.
Fernández-Ruiz, “TXRF Spectrometry as a Powerful Tool for the Study of Metallic Traces in Biological Systems,” Development in Analytical Chemistry, vol. 1 (2014), pp. 1-14.
Freund, “Mirrors for Synchrotron Beamlines,” Ch. 26 of “Handbook of Optics vol. III, 2nd Ed.” (McGraw Hill, New York, 2001).
Ge et al., “Investigation of the partially coherent effects in a 2D Talbot interferometer,” Anal. Bioanal. Chem. vol. 401, (2011), pp. 865-870. Apr. 29, 2011 pub Jun. 14, 2011.
Gibson et al., “Polycapillary Optics: An Enabling Technology for New Applications,” Advances in X-ray Analysis, vol. 45 (2002), pp. 286-297.
Gonzales et al., “Angular Distribution of Bremsstrahlung Produced by 10-Kev and 20 Kev Electrons Incident on a Thick Au Target”, in Application of Accelerators in Research and Industry, AIP Conf. Proc. 1221 (2013), pp. 114-117.
Gonzales et al., “Angular distribution of thick-target bremsstrahlung produced by electrons with initial energies ranging from 10 to 20 keV incident on Ag”, Phys. Rev. A vol. 84 (2011): 052726.
Günther et al., “Full-field structured-illumination super-responution X-ray transmission microscopy,” Nature Comm. 10:2494 (2019) and supplementary information.
Guttmann et al., “Ellipsoidal capillary as condenser for the BESSY full-field x-ray microscope,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser. vol. 186 (2009): 012064.
Harasse et al., “Iterative reconstruction in x-ray computed laminography from differential phase measurements”, Opt. Express. vol. 19 (2011), pp. 16560-16573.
Harasse et al., “X-ray Phase Laminography with a Grating Interferometer using Iterative Reconstruction”, in International Workshop on X-ray and Neutron Phase Imaging with Gratings, AIP Conf. Proc. vol. 1466, (2012), pp. 163-168.
Harasse et al., “X-ray Phase Laminography with Talbot Interferometer”, in Developments in X-Ray Tomography VII, Proc. SPIE vol. 7804 (2010), 780411.
Hasse et al., “New developments in laboratory-based x-ray sources and optics,” Adv. In Laboratory-based X-Ray Sources, Optics, and Applications VI, ed. A.M, Khounsary, Proc. SPIE vol. 10387, 103870B-1 (2017).
Hemraj-Benny et al., “Near-Edge X-ray Absorption Fine Structure Spectroscopy as a Tool for Investigating Nanomaterials,” Small, vol. 2(1), (2006), pp. 26-35.
Henke et al., “X-ray interactions: photoabsorption, scattering, transmission, and reflection at E=50-30000 eV, Z=1-92,” Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables, vol. 54 (No. 2) (Jul. 1993), pp. 181-342.
Hennekam et al., “Trace metal analysis of sediment cores using a novel X-ray fluorescence core scanning method,” Quaternary Int'l, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2018.10.018 (2018).
Honma et al., Full-automatic XAFS Measurement System of the Engineering Science Research II beamline BL14B2 at Spring-8, 2011, AIP Conference Proceedings 1234, pp. 13-16.
Howard et al., “High-Definition X-ray Fluorescence Elemental Mapping of Paintings,” Anal. Chem., 2012, vol. 84(7), pp. 3278-3286.
Howells, “Gratings and Monochromators in the VUV and Soft X-RAY Spectral Region,” Ch. 21 of Handbook of Optics vol. III, 2nd Ed. (McGraw Hill, New York, 2001).
Howells, “Mirrors for Synchrotron-Radiation Beamlines,” Publication LBL-34750 (Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, Sep. 1993).
Hrdý et al, “Diffractive-Refractive Optics: X-ray Crystal Monochromators with Profiled Diffracting Surfaces,” Ch. 20 of “Modern Developments in X-Ray and Neutron Optics,” A. Erko et al., eds. (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 2008).
Hwang et al, “New etching process for device fabrication using diamond,” Diamond & Related Materials, vol. 13 (2004) pp. 2207-2210.
Ide-Ektessabi et al., “The role of trace metallic elements in neurodegenerative disorders: quantitative analysis using XRF and XANES spectroscopy,” Anal. Sci., vol. 21(7) (Jul. 2005), pp. 885-892.
Ihsan et al., “A microfocus X-ray tube based on a microstructured X-ray target”, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B vol. 267 (2009) pp. 3566-3573.
Ishisaka et al., “A New Method of Analyzing Edge Effect in Phase Contrast Imaging with Incoherent X-rays,” Optical Review, vol. 7, No. 6, (2000), pp. 566-572.
Ito et al., “A Stable In-Laboratory EXAFS Measurement System,” Jap. J. Appl. Phys., vol. 22, No. 2, Feb. 1, 1983, pp. 357-360.
Itoh et al., “Two-dimensional grating-based X-ray phase-contrast imaging using Fourier transform phase retrieval,” Op. Express, vol. 19, No. 4 (2011) pp. 3339-3346.
Janssens et al, “Recent trends in quantitative aspects of microscopic X-ray fluorescence analysis,” TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 29.6 (Jun. 2010): 464-478.
Jahrman et al., “Vacuum formed temporary spherically and toroidally bent crystal analyzers for x-ray absorption and x-ray emission spectroscopy,” Rev. Sci. Inst. vol. 90, 013106 (2019).
Jiang et al., “X-Ray Phase-Contrast Imaging with Three 2D Gratings,” Int. J. Biomed. Imaging, (2008), 827152, 8 pages.
Jin et al., “Development of an X-ray tube with two selective targets modulated by a magnetic field,” Rev. Sci. Inst. vol. 90, 083105 (2019).
Joy, “Astronomical X-ray Optics,” Ch. 28 of “Handbook of Optics vol. III, 2nd Ed.,” (McGraw Hill, New York, 2001).
Kalasová et al., “Characterization of a laboratory-based X-ray computed nonotomography system for propagation-based method of phase contrast imaging,” IEEE Trans. On Instr. And Meas., DOI 10.1109/TIM.2019.2910338 (2019).
Keyrilainen et al., “Phase contrast X-ray imaging of breast,” Acta Radiologica, vol. 51 (8), (2010), pp. 866-884. Jan. 18, 2010 pub Jun. 15, 2010.
Kidalov et al., “Thermal Conductivity of Diamond Composites,” Materials, vol. 2 (2009) pp. 2467-2495.
Kido et al., “Bone Cartilage Imaging with X-ray Interferometry using a Practical X-ray Tube”, in Medical Imaging 2010: Physics of Medical Imaging, Proc. SPIE vol. 7622 (2010), 762240.
Kim, “Talbot images of wavelength-scale amplitude gratings,” Opt. Express vol. 20(5), (2012), pp. 4904-4920.
Kim et al., “Observation of the Talbot Effect at Beamline 6C Bio Medical Imaging of he Pohang Light Source—II,” J. Korean Phys. Soc., vol. 74, No. 10, pp. 935-940 (May 2019).
Kirkpatrick et al., “Formation of Optical Images by X-Rays”, J. Opt. Soc. Am. vol. 38(9) (1948), pp. 766-774.
Kirz, “Phase zone plates for x rays and the extreme uv,” J. Op. Soc. Am. vol. 64 (Mar. 1974), pp. 301-309.
Kirz et al., “The History and Future of X-ray Microscopy”, J. Physics: Conden. Series vol. 186 (2009): 012001.
Kiyohara et al., “Development of the Talbot-Lau Interferometry System Available for Clinical Use”, in International Workshop on X-ray and Neutron Phase Imaging with Gratings, AIP Cong. Proc. vol. 1466, (2012), pp. 97-102.
Klockenkämper et al., “7.1 Instrumental Developments” and “7.3 Future Prospects by Combinations,” from Chapter 7 of Total Reflection X-ray Fluorescence Analysis and Related Methods 2nd Ed. (J. Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2015).
Klockenkämper et al., “Chapter 3: Instrumentation for TXRF and GI-XRF,” Total Reflection X-ray Fluorescence Analysis and Related Methods 2nd Ed. (J. Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2015).
Kottler et al., “A two-directional approach for grating based differential phase contrast imaging using hard x-rays,” Opt. Express vol. 15(3), (2007), pp. 1175-1181.
Kottler et al., “Dual energy phase contrast x-ray imaging with Talbot-Lau interferometer,” J. Appl. Phys. vol. 108(11), (2010), 114906. Jul. 7, 2010 pub Dec. 7, 2010.
Kumakhov et al., “Multiple reflection from surface X-ray optics,” Physics Reports, vol. 191(5), (1990), pp. 289-350.
Kumakhov, “X-ray Capillary Optics. History of Development and Present Status” in Kumakhov Optics and Application, Proc. SPIE 4155 (2000), pp. 2-12.
Kuwabara et al., “Hard-X-ray Phase-Difference Microscopy with a Low-Brilliance Laboratory X-ray Source”, Appl. Phys. Express vol. 4 (2011) 062502.
Kuznetsov, “X-Ray Optics Calculator,” Institute of Microelectronics Technology and High Purity Materials, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMT RAS), Chernogolovka, Russia (6 pages submitted); 2016.
Lagomarsino et al., “Reflective Optical Arrays,” Ch. 19 of “Modern Developments in X-Ray and Neutron Optics,” A. Erko et al. eds. (Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2008), pp. 307-317.
Lai, “X-Ray Microfocusing Optics,” Slide Presentation from Argonne National Laboratory, 71 slides, Cheiron Summer School 2007.
Langhoff et al., “X-ray-Sources,” Ch. 2 of “Handbook of Practical X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis,” B. Beckhoff et al., eds. (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 2006), pp. 33-82.
Lechner et al., “Silicon drift detectors for high count rate X-ray spectroscopy at room temperature,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods, vol. 458A (2001), pp. 281-287.
Leenaers et al., “Application of Glancing Incidence X-ray Analysis,” 1997, X-ray Spectrometry, vol. 26, pp. 115-121.
Lengeler et al., “Refractive X-ray Optics,” Ch. 20 of “Handbook of Optics vol. III, 2nd Ed.” (McGraw Hill, New York, 2001.
Li et al., “Source-optic-crystal optimisation for compact monochromatic imaging,” Proc. SPIE 5537 (2004), pp. 105-114.
Li et al., “X-ray phase-contrast imaging using cascade Talbot-Lau interferometers,” Proc. SPIE 10964 (2018), pp. 1096469-1-1096469-6.
Li et al., “Study on High Thermal Conductivity of X-ray Anode with Composite Diamond Substrate,” J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., vol. 1300, 012115 (2019).
Lohmann et al., “An interferometer based on the Talbot effect,” Optics Communications vol. 2 (1971), pp. 413-415.
Lübcke et al., “Soft X-ray nanoscale imaging using a sub-pixel resolution charge coupled device (CCD) camera,” Ref. Sci. Instrum. vol. 90, 043111 (2019).
Lühl et al., “Scanning transmission X-ray microscopy with efficient X-ray fluorescence detection (STXM-XRF) for biomedical applications in the soft and tender energy range,” J. Synch. Rad. vol. 26, https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600577518016879, (2019).
Macdonald et al., “An Introduction to X-ray and Neutron Optics,” Ch. 19 of “Handbook of Optics vol. III, 2nd Ed.” (McGraw Hill, New York, 2001).
Macdonald et al., “Polycapillary and Multichannel Plate X-Ray Optics,” Ch. 30 of “Handbook of Optics vol. III, 2nd Ed.,” (McGraw Hill, New York, 2001).
Macdonald et al., “Polycapillary X-ray Optics for Microdiffraction,” J. Appl. Cryst., vol. 32 (1999) pp. 160-167.
Macdonald, “Focusing Polycapillary Optics and Their Applications,” X-Ray Optics and Instrumentation, vol. 2010, (Oct. 2010): 867049.
Maj et al., “Etching methods for improving surface imperfections of diamonds used for x-ray monochromators,” Adv. X-ray Anal., vol. 48 (2005), pp. 176-182.
Malgrange, “X-ray Optics for Synchrotron Radiation,” ACTA Physica Polonica A, vol. 82(1) (1992) pp. 13-32.
Malzer et al., “A laboratory spectrometer for high throughput X-ray emission spectroscopy in catalysis research,” Rev. Sci. Inst. 89, 113111 (2018).
Masuda et al., “Fabrication of Through-Hole Diamond Membranes by Plasma Etching Using Anodic Porous Alumina Mask,” Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters, vol. 4(11) (2001) pp. G101-G103.
Matsushita, “Mirrors and Multilayers,” Slide Presentation from Photon Factor, Tsukuba, Japan, 65 slides, (Cheiron School 2009, Sprint-8, Japan, Nov. 2009).
Matsushita, “X-ray monochromators,” Slide Presentation from Photon Factory, Tsukuba, Japan, 70 slides, (Cheiron School 2009, Spring-8, Japan, Nov. 2009).
Matsuyama et al., “Wavefront measurement for a hard-X-ray nanobeam using single-grating interferometry”, Opt Express vol. 20 (2012), pp. 24977-24986.
Miao et al., “Motionless phase stepping in X-ray phase contrast imaging with a compact source,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 110(48), (2013), pp. 19268-19272.
Michette, “Zone and Phase Plates, Bragg-Fresnel Optics,” Ch. 23 of “Handbook of Optics vol. III, 2nd Ed.,” (McGraw Hill, New York, 2001).
Mizutani et al., X-ray microscopy for neural circuit reconstruction in 9th International Conference on X-Ray Microscopy, J. Phys: Conf. Ser. 186 (2009) 012092.
Modregger et al., “Grating-Based X-ray Phase Contrast Imaging,” Ch. 3 of Emerging Imaging Technologies in Medicine, M. Anastasio & P. La Riviere, ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, (2012), pp. 43-56.
Momose et al., “Biomedical Imaging by Talbot-Type X-Ray Phase Tomography” in Developments in X-Ray Tomography V, Proc. SPIE vol. 6318 (2006) 63180T.
Momose et al., “Grating-Based X-ray Phase Imaging Using Multiline X-ray Source”, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. vol. 48 (2009), 076512.
Momose et al., “Phase Tomography by X-ray Talbot Interferometry for Biological Imaging” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. vol. 45 2006 pp. 5254-5262.
Momose et al., “Phase Tomography Using X-ray Talbot Interferometer”, in Synchrotron Radiation Instrumentation: Ninth International Conference, AIP Conf. Proc. vol. 879 (2007), pp. 1365-1368.
Momose et al., “Phase-Contrast X-Ray Imaging Using an X-Ray Interferometer for Biological Imaging”, Analytical Sciences vol. 17 Supplement (2001), pp. i527-i530.
Momose et al., “Sensitivity of X-ray Phase Imaging Based on Talbot Interferometry”, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. vol. 47 (2008), pp. 8077-8080.
Momose et al., “X-ray Phase Measurements with Talbot Interferometry and Its Applications”, in International Conference on Advanced Phase Measurement Methods in Optics and Imaging, AIP Conf. Proc. vol. 1236 (2010), pp. 195-199.
Momose et al., “X-ray Phase Imaging—From Static Observation to Dynamic Observation—”, in International Workshop on X-ray and Neutron Phase Imaging with Gratings AIP Conf. Proc. vol. 1466, (2012), pp. 67-77.
Momose et al., “X-ray Phase Imaging Using Lau Effect”, Appl. Phys. Express vol. 4 (2011) 066603.
Momose et al., “X-Ray Phase Imaging with Talbot Interferometry”, in “Biomedical Mathematics: Promising Directions in Imaging, Therapy Planning, and Inverse Problems”, Y. Censor, M. Jiang & G.Wang, eds, (Medical Physics Publishing, Madison, WI, USA, 2010), pp. 281-320.
Momose et al., “X-ray phase tomography with a Talbot interferometer in combination with an X-ray imaging microscope”, in 9th International Conference on X-Ray Microscopy, J. Phys: Conf. Ser. 186 (2009) 012044.
Momose et al., “X-ray Talbot Interferometry with Capillary Plates”, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. vol. 45 (2006), pp. 314-316.
Momose et al., “Four-dimensional X-ray phase tomography with Talbot interferometry and white synchrotron radiation: dynamic observation of a living worm”, Opt. Express vol. 19 (2011), pp. 8423-8432.
Momose et al., “High-speed X-ray phase imaging and X-ray phase tomography with Talbot interferometer and white synchrotron radiation”, Opt. Express vol. 17 (2009), pp. 12540-12545.
Momose et al., “Phase Imaging with an X-ray Talbot Interferometer”, Advances in X-ray Analysis vol. 49(3) (2006), pp. 21-30.
Momose et al.,“Demonstration of X-Ray Talbot Interferometry”, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. vol. 42 (2003), pp. L866-L868.
Momose et al.,“Phase Tomography Using an X-ray Talbot Interferometer”, in Developments in X-Ray Tomography IV, Proc. SPIE vol. 5535 (2004), pp. 352-360.
Momose, “Recent Advances in X-ray Phase Imaging”, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. vol. 44 (2005), pp. 6355-6367.
Montgomery, “Self Imaging Objects of Infinite Aperture,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. vol. 57(6), (1967), pp. 772-778.
Morimoto et al., “Development of multiline embedded X-ray targets for X-ray phase contrast imaging,” XTOP 2012 Book of Abstracts, (Ioffe Physical-Technical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia, 2012), pp. 74-75.
Morimoto et al., “X-ray phase contrast imaging by compact Talbot-Lau interferometer with a signal transmission grating,” 2014, Optics Letters, vol. 39, No. 15, pp. 4297-4300.
Morimoto et al., “Design and demonstration of phase gratings for 2D single grating interferometer,” Optics Express vol. 23, No. 23, 29399 (2015).
Munro et al., Design of a novel phase contrast imaging system for mammography, 2010, Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 55, No. 14, pp. 4169-4185.
Nango et al., “Talbot-defocus multiscan tomography using the synchrotron X-ray microscope to study the lacuno-canalicular network in mouse bone”, Biomed. Opt. Express vol. 4 (2013), pp. 917-923.
Neuhausler et al., “Non-destructive high-resolution X-ray imaging of ULSI micro-electronics using keV X-ray microscopy in Zernike phase contrast,” Microelectronic Engineering, Elsevier Publishers BV., Amsterdam, NO, vol. 83, No. 4-9 (Apr. 1, 2006) pp. 1043-1046.
Newville, “Fundamentals of XAFS,” (Univ. of Chicago, Chicago, IL, Jul. 23, 2004).
Noda et al., “Fabrication of Diffraction Grating with High Aspect Ratio Using X-ray Lithography Technique for X-ray Phase Imaging,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. vol. 46, (2007), pp. 849-851.
Noda et al., “Fabrication of High Aspect Ratio X-ray Grating Using X-ray Lithography” J. Solid Mech_ Mater. Eng. vol. 3 (2009), pp. 416-423.
Nojeh, “Carbon Nanotube Electron Sources: From Electron Beams to Energy Conversion and Optophononics”, ISRN Nanomaterials vol. 2014 (2014): 879827.
Nuhn, “From storage rings to free electron lasers for hard x-rays”, J.A37 Phys.: Condens. Matter vol. 16 (2004), pp. S3413-S34121.
Nykanen et al., “X-ray scattering in full-field digital mammography,” Med. Phys. vol. 30(7), (2003), pp. 1864-1873.
Oji et al., Automatic XAFS measurement system developed at BL14B2 in SPring-8, Available online Nov. 15, 2011, Journal of Synchrotron Radiation, vol. 19, pp. 54-59.
Olbinado et al., “Demonstration of Stroboscopic X-ray Talbot Interferometry Using Polychromatic Synchrotron and Laboratory X-ray Sources”, Appl. Phys. Express vol. 6 (2013), 096601.
Ortega et al., “Bio-metals imaging and speciation in cells using proton and synchrotron radiation X-ray microspectroscopy,” J. Royal Society Interface vol. 6 suppl. 5 (Oct. 6, 2009), pp. 6S649-6S658.
Otendal et al., A 9 keV electron-impact liquid-gallium-jet x-ray source, Rev. Sci. Instrum. vol. 79 (2008): 016102.
Oxford Instruments Inc., Series 5000 Model XTF5011 X-ray Tube information, Jun. 1998, 3 pages.
Parrill et al., “GISAXS—Glancing Incidence Small Angle X-ray Scattering,” Journal de Physique IV, vol. 3 (Dec. 1993), pp. 411-417.
Paxscan Flat Panel X-ray Imaging, Varian Sales Brochure, (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, Nov. 11, 2004).
Pfeiffer et al., “Hard-X-ray dark-field imaging using a grating interferometer,” Nature Materials vol. 7, (2008), pp. 134-137.
Pfeiffer et al., “Hard x-ray phase tomography with low brilliance x-ray sources,” Phys. Rev. Lett. vol. 98, (2007), 108105.
Pfeiffer et al., “Phase retrieval and differential phase-contrast imaging with low-brilliance X-ray sources,” Nature Physics vol. 2, (2006), pp. 258-261.
Pfeiffer, “Milestones and basic principles of grating-based x-ray and neutron phase-contrast imaging,” in International Workshop on X-ray and Neutron Phase Imaging with Gratings AIP Conf. Proc. vol. 1466, (2012), pp. 2-11.
Pianetta et al., “Application of synchrotron radiation to TXRF analysis of metal contamination on silicon wafer surfaces,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 373(1-2), 2000, pp. 222-226.
Potts, “Electron Probe Microanalysis”, Ch. 10 of “A Handbook of Silicate Rock Analysis” (Springer Science + Business Media, New York, 1987), pp. 326-382 (equation quoted from p. 336).
Prewitt et al., “FIB Repair of 5X Reticles and Effects on IC Quality,” Integrated Circuit Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control VII, Proc. SPIE vol. 1926 (1993), pp. 517-526.
Prewitt et al., “Focused ion beam repair: staining of photomasks and reticles,” J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. vol. 26 (1993), pp. 1135-1137.
Prewitt et al., “Gallium Staining in FIB Repair of Photomasks,” Microelectronic Engineering, vol. 21 (1993), pp. 191-196.
Pushie et al., “Elemental and Chemically Specific X-ray Fluorescence Imaging of Biological Systems,” Chem. Rev. 114:17, 8499-8541 (2014).
Pushie et al., “Prion protein expression level alters regional copper, iron and zinc content in the mouse brain,” Metallomics vol. 3, 206-214 (2011).
Qin et al., “Trace metal imaging with high spatial resolution: Applications in biomedicine,” Metallomics, vol. 3 (Jan. 2011), pp. 28-37.
Rayleigh, “On copying diffraction gratings and some phenomena connected therewith,” Philos. Mag. vol. 11 (1881), pp. 196-205.
Renaud et al., “Probing surface and interface morphology with Grazing Incidence Small Angle X-ray Scattering,” Surface Science Reports, vol. 64:8 (2009), pp. 255-380.
Riege, “Electron Emission from Ferroelectrics—A Review”, CERN Report CERN AT/93-18 (CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, Jul. 1993).
Rix et al., “Super-Resolution X-ray phase-contrast and dark-field imaging with a single 2D grating and electromagnetic source stepping,” Phys. Med. Biol. In press https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ab2ff5 (2019).
Röntgen, Ueber eine neue Art von Strahlen (Wurzburg Verlag, Wurzburg, Germany, 1896) also, in English, “On a New Kind of Rays,” Nature vol. 53 (Jan. 23, 1896). pp. 274-276.
Rovezzi, “Study of the local order around magnetic impurities in semiconductors for spintronics.” PhD Dissertation, Condensed Matter, Universite Joseph-Fourier—Grenoble I, 2009, English <tel-00442852>.
Rutishauser, “X-ray grating interferometry for imaging and metrology,” 2003, ETH Zurich, Diss. ETH No. 20939.
Sato et al., Two-dimensional gratings-based phase-contrast imaging using a conventional x-ray tube, 2011, Optics Letters, vol. 36, No. 18, pp. 3551-3553.
Scherer et al., “Bi-Directional X-Ray Phase-Contrast Mammography,” PLoS One, vol. 9, Issue 5 (May 2014) e93502.
Scholz, “X-ray Tubes and Monochromators,” Technical Workshop EPIC, Universität Würzburg (2007); 41 slides, 2007.
Scholze et al., “X-ray Detectors and XRF Detection Channels,” Ch. 4 of “Handbook of Practical X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis,” B. Beckhoff et al., eds. (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, Germany, 2006), pp. 85-198.
Scordo et al., “Pyrolitic Graphite Mosaic Drystal Thickness and Mosaicity Optimization for an Extended Source Von Hamos X-ray Spectrometer,” Condens. Matter Vo. 4, pp. 38-52 (2019).
Scott, “Hybrid Semiconductor Detectors for High Spatial Resolution Phase-contrast X-ray Imaging,” Thesis, University of Waterloo, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2019.
Sebert, “Flat-panel detectors:how much better are they?” Pediatr. Radial. vol. 36 (Suppl 2), (2006), pp. 173-181.
Seifert et al., “Talbot-Lau x-ray phase-contrast setup for fast scanning of large samples,” Sci. Rep. 9:4199, pp. 1-11 (2019).
Shen, “Polarizing Crystal Optics,” Ch. 25 of “Handbook of Optics vol. III, 2nd Ed.,” (McGraw Hill, New York, 2001).
Shields et al., “Overview of Polycapillary X-ray Optics,” Powder Diffraction, vol. 17(2) (Jun. 2002), pp. 70-80.
Shimura et al., “Hard x-ray phase contrast imaging using a tabletop Talbot-Lau interferometer with multiline embedded x-ray targets”, Opt. Lett. vol. 38(2) (2013), pp. 157-159.
Siddons, “Crystal Monochromators and Bent Crystals,” Ch. 22 of “Handbook of Optics vol. III, 2nd Ed.,” (McGraw Hill, New York, 2001).
Smith, “Fundamentals of Digital Mammography:Physics, Technology and Practical Considerations,” Publication R-BI-016 (Hologic, Inc., Bedford, MA, Mar. 2005).
Snigirev et al., “Hard X-Ray Microoptics,” Ch. 17 of “Modern Developments in X-Ray and Neutron Optics,” A. Erko et al., eds (Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2008), pp. 255-285.
Sparks Jr., “X-ray Fluorescence Microprobe for Chemical Analysis,” in Synchrotron Radiation Research, H. Winick & S. Doniach, eds. (Plenum Press, New York, NY 1980), pp. 459-512.
Spiller, “Multilayers,” Ch. 24 of “Handbook of Optics vol. III, 2nd Ed.,” (McGraw Hill, New York, 2001).
Stampanoni et al., “The First Analysis and Clinical Evaluation of Native Breast Tissue Using Differential Phase-Contrast Mammography,” Investigative Radiology, vol. 46, pp. 801-806. pub 2011-12-xx.
Strüder et al., “Silicon Drift Detectors for X-ray Imaging,” Presentation at Detector Workshop on Synchrotron Radiation Instrumentation, 54 slides, (Argonne Nat'l Lab, Argonne, IL Dec. 8, 2005), available at: <http://www.aps.anl.gov/News/Conferences/2005/Synchrotron_Radiation_Instrumentation/Presentations/Strueder.pdf>.
Strüder et al., “X-Ray Detectors,” Ch. 4 of “X-ray Spectrometry: Recent Technological Advances,” K. Tsuji et al. eds. (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Chichester, West Sussex, UK, 2004), pp. 63-131.
Stupple et al., “Modeling of Heat Transfer in an Aluminum X-Ray Anode Employing a Chemical Vapor Deposited Diamond Heat Spreader,” J. Heat Transfer, Vo. 140, 124501-1-5 (Dec. 2018).
Sun et al., “Combined optic system based on polycapillary X-ray optics and single-bounce monocapillary optics for focusing X-rays from a conventional laboratory X-ray source,” Nucl. Inst. and Methods in Phys. Res. A 802(2015) pp. 5-9.
Sun et al., “Numerical design of in-line X-ray phase-contrast imaging based on ellipsoidal single-bounce monocapillary,” Nucl. Inst. and Methods in Phys. Res. A746 (2014) pp. 33-38.
Sunday et al., “X-ray Metrology for the Semiconductor Industry Tutorial,” J. Res. Nat'l Inst. Stan. vol. 124: 124003 (2019); https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.124.003.
Suzuki et al., “Hard X-ray Imaging Microscopy using X-ray Guide Tube as Beam Condenser for Field Illumination,” J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. vol. 463 (2013): 012028.
Suzuki, “Development of the DIGITEX Safire Cardiac System Equipped with Direct conversion Flat Panel Detector,” Digital Angio Technical Report (Shimadzu Corp., Kyoto, Japan, no date, published—2004 with product release).
Takahama, “RADspeed safire Digital General Radiography System Equipped with New Direct-Conversion FPD,” Medical Now, No. 62 (2007).
Takeda et al., “Differential Phase X-ray Imaging Microscopy with X-ray Talbot Interferometer” Appl. Phys. Express vol. 1 (2008) 117002.
Takeda et al., “X-Ray Phase Imaging with Single Phase Grating”, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. vol. 46 (2007), pp. L89-L91.
Takeda et al., “In vivo physiological saline-infused hepatic vessel imaging using a two-crystal-interferometer-based phase-contrast X-ray technique”, J. Synchrotron Radiation vol. 19 (2012), pp. 252-256.
Talbot, “Facts relating to optical science No IV,” Philos. Mag. vol. 9 (1836), pp. 401-407.
Tanaka et al., “Cadaveric and in vivo human joint imaging based on differential phase contrast by X-ray Talbot-Lau interferometry”, Z. Med. Phys. vol. 23 (2013), pp. 222-227.
Tang et al., “Micro-computed tomography (Micro-CT): a novel approach for intraoperative breast cancer specimen imaging,” Breast Cancer Res. Treat. vol. 139, pp. 311-316 (2013).
Taniguchi et al., “Diamond nanoimprint lithography,” Nanotechnology, vol. 13 (2002) pp. 592-596.
Terzano et al., Recent advances in analysis of trace elements in environmental samples by X-ray based techniques (IUPAC Technical Report), Pure Appl. Chem. 2019.
Tkachuk et al., “High-resolution x-ray tomography using laboratory sources”, in Developments in X-Ray Tomography V, Proc. SPIE 6318 (2006): 631810.
Tkachuk et al., “Multi-length scale x-ray tomography using laboratory and synchrotron sources”, Microsc. Microanal. vol. 13 (Suppl. 2) (2007), pp. 1570-1571.
Töpperwien et al., “Multiscale x-ray phase-contrast tomography in a mouse model of transient focal cerebral ischemia,” Biomed. Op. Express, vol. 10, No. 1, Jan. 2019, pp. 92-103.
Touzelbaev et al., “Applications of micron-scale passive diamond layers for the integrated circuits and microelectromechanical systems industries,” Diamond and Rel. Mat'ls, vol. 7 (1998) pp. 1-14.
Tsuji et al., “X-Ray Spectrometry: Recent Technological Advances,” John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Chichester, West Susses, UK 2004), Chapters 1-7.
Udagawa, “An Introduction to In-House EXAFS Facilities,” The Rigaku Journal, vol. 6, (1) (1989), pp. 20-27.
Udagawa, “An Introduction to X-ray Absorption Fine Structure,” The Rigaku Journal, vol. 11(2)(1994), pp. 30-39.
Uehara et al., “Effectiveness of X-ray grating interferometry for non-destructive inspection of packaged devices”, J. Appl. Phys. vol. 114 (2013), 134901.
Viermetz et al., “High resolution laboratory grating-based X-ray phase-contrast CT,” Scientific Reports 8:15884 (2018).
Vogt, “X-ray Fluorescence Microscopy: A Tool for Biology, Life Science and Nanomedicine,” Presentation on May 16, 2012 at James Madison Univ., Harrisonburg, VA (31 slides), 2012.
Wan et al.,“Fabrication of Multiple Slit Using Stacked-Sliced Method for Hard X-ray Talbot-Lau Interferometer”, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. vol. 47 (2008), pp. 7412-7414.
Wang et al., “Advantages of intermediate X-ray energies in Zernike phase contrast X-ray microscopy,” Biotech. Adv., vol. 31 (2013) pp. 387-392.
Wang et al., “Non-invasive classification of microcalcifications with phase-contrast X-ray mammography,” Nature Comm. vol. 5:3797, pp. 1-9 (2014).
Wang, On the single-photon-counting (SPC) modes of imaging using an XFEL source, presented at IWORLD2015.
Wang et al., “Precise patterning of diamond films for MEMS application” Journal of Materials Processing Technology vol. 127 (2002), pp. 230-233.
Wang et al., “Measuring the average slope error of a single-bounce ellopsoidal glass monocapillary X-ray condenser based on an X-ray source with an adjustable source size,” Nucl. Inst. and Meth. A934, 36-40 (2019).
Wang et al., “High beam-current density of a 10-keV nano-focus X-ray source,” Nucl. Inst. and Meth. A940, 475-478 (2019).
Wansleben et al., “Photon flux determination of a liquid-metal jet x-ray source by means of photon scattering,” arXiv:1903.06024v1, Mar. 14, 2019.
Weitkamp et al., “Design aspects of X-ray grating interferometry,” in International Workshop on X-ray and Neutron Phase Imaging with Gratings AIP Conf. Proc. vol. 1466, (2012), pp. 84-89.
Weitkamp et al., “Hard X-ray phase imaging and tomography with a grating interferometer,” Proc. SPIE vol. 5535, (2004), pp. 137-142.
Weitkamp et al., “X-ray wavefront diagnostics with Talbot interferometers,” International Workshop on X-Ray Diagnostics and Scientific Application of the European XFEL, Ryn, Poland, (2010), 36 slides.
Wen et al., “Fourier X-ray Scattering Radiography Yields Bone Structural Information,” Radiology, vol. 251 (2009) pp. 910-918.
Wen et al., “Single-shot x-ray differential phase-contrast and diffraction imaging using two-dimensional transmission gratings,” Op. Lett. vol. 35, No. 12, (2010) pp. 1932-1934.
Wittry et al., “Properties of fixed-position Bragg diffractors for parallel detection of x-ray spectra,” Rev. Sci. Instr. vol. 64, pp. 2195-2200 (1993).
Wobrauschek et al., “Energy Dispersive, X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis,” Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry, R.A. Meyers, Ed. (Wiley 2010).
Wobrauschek et al., “Micro XRF of light elements using a polycapillary lens and an ultra-thin window Silicon Drift Detector inside a vacuum chamber,” 2005, International Centre for Diffraction Data 2005, Advances in X-ray Analysis, vol. 48, pp. 229-235.
Wolter, “Spiegelsysteme streifenden Einfalls als abbildende Optiken fur Rontgenstrahlen” [Grazing Incidence Reflector Systems as Imaging Optics for X-rays] Annalen der Physik vol. 445, Issue 1-2 (1952), pp. 94-114.
X-ray-Optics.de Website, http://www.x-ray-optics.de/, accessed Feb. 13, 2016.
Yakimchuk et al., “Ellipsoidal Concentrators for Laboratory X-ray Sources: Analytical approaches for optimization,” Mar. 22, 2013, Crystallography Reports, vol. 58, No. 2, pp. 355-364.
Yamamoto, “Fundamental physics of vacuum electron sources”, Reports on Progress in Physics vol. 69, (2006), pp. 181-232.
Yanagihara et al., “X-Ray Optics,” Ch. 3 of “X-ray Spectrometry: Recent Technological Advances,” K. Tsuji et al. eds. (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Chichester, West Sussex, UK, 2004), pp. 63-131.
Yang et al., “Analysis of Intrinsic Stress in Diamond Films by X-ray Diffraction,” Advances in X-ray Analysis, vol. 43 (2000), pp. 151-156.
Yashiro et al., “Distribution of unresolvable anisotropic microstructures revealed in visibility-contrast images using x-ray Talbot interferometry”, Phys. Rev. B vol. 84 (2011), 094106.
Yashiro et al., “Hard x-ray phase-imaging microscopy using the self-imaging phenomenon of a transmission grating”, Phys. Rev. A vol. 82 (2010), 043822.
Yashiro et al., “Theoretical Aspect of X-ray Phase Microscopy with Transmission Gratings” in International Workshop on X-ray and Neutron Phase Imaging with Gratings, AIP Conf. Proc. vol. 1466, (2012), pp. 144-149.
Yashiro et al., “X-ray Phase Imaging and Tomography Using a Fresnel Zone Plate and a Transmission Grating”, in “The 10th International Conference on X-ray Microscopy Radiation Instrumentation”, AIP Conf. Proc. vol. 1365 (2011) pp. 317-320.
Yashiro et al., “Efficiency of capturing a phase image using cone-beam x-ray Talbot interferometry”, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A vol. 25 (2008), pp. 2025-2039.
Yashiro et al., “On the origin of visibility contrast in x-ray Talbot interferometry”, Opt. Express (2010), pp. 16890-16901.
Yashiro et al., “Optimal Design of Transmission Grating for X-ray Talbot Interferometer”, Advances in X-ray Analysis vol. 49(3) (2006), pp. 375-379.
Yashiro et al., “X-ray Phase Imaging Microscopy using a Fresnel Zone Plate and a Transmission Grating”, in the 10th International Conference on Synchrotron Radiation Instrumentation, AIP Conf. Proc. vol. 1234 (2010), pp. 473-476.
Yashiro et. al., “Hard-X-Ray Phase-Difference Microscopy Using a Fresnel Zone Plate and a Transmission Grating”, Phys. Rev. Lett. vol. 103 (2009), 180801.
Yu et al., “Morphology and Microstructure of Tungsten Films by Magnetron Sputtering,” Mat. Sci. Forum, vol. 913, pp. 416-423 (2018).
Zanette et al., “Two-Dimensional X-Ray Grating interferometer,” Phys. Rev. Lett. vol. 105 (2010) pp. 248102-1 248102-4.
Zeeshan et al., “In-house setup for laboratory-based x-ray absorption fine structure spectroscopy measurements,” Rev. Sci. Inst. 90, 073105 (2019).
Zeng et al., “Ellipsoidal and parabolic glass capillaries as condensers for x-ray microscopes,” Appl. Opt. vol. 47 (May 2008), pp. 2376-2381.
Zeng et al., “Glass Monocapillary X-ray Optics and Their Applications in X-Ray Microscopy,” X-ray Optics and Microanalysis: Proceedings of the 20th International Congress, AIP Conf. Proc. vol. 1221, (2010), pp. 41-47.
Zhang et al., “Application of confocal X-ray fluorescence based on capillary X-ray optics in nondestructively measuring the inner diameter of monocapillary optics,” Optics Comm. (2018) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2018.11.064.
Zhang et al., “Fabrication of Diamond Microstructures by Using Dry and Wet Etching Methods”, Plasma Science and Technology vol. 15(6) (Jun. 2013), pp. 552-554.
Zhang et al., “Measurement of the inner diameter of monocapillary with confocal X-ray scattering technology based on capillary X-ray optics,” Appl. Opt. (Jan. 8, 2019), doc ID 351489, pp. 1-10.
Behling, “Medical X-ray sources Now and for the Future,” Nucl. Inst. and Methods in Physics Research A 873, pp. 43-50 (2017).
Chang et al., “Ultra-high aspect ratio high-resolution nanofabrication of hard X-ray diffractive optics,” Nature Comm. 5:4243, doi: 10.1038/ncomms5243 (2014).
Dittler et al., “A mail-in and user facility for X-ray absorption near-edge structure: the CEI-XANES laboratory X-ray spectrometer at University of Washington,” J. Synch. Rad. vol. 26, eight pages, (2019).
Huang et al., “Theoretical analysis and optimization of highly efficient multilayer-coated blazed gratings with high fix-focus constant for the tender X-ray region,” Op. Express Vo. 28, No. 2, pp. 821-845 (2020).
Kim et al., “A Simulation Study on the Transfer Characteristics of the Talbot Pattern Through Scintillation Screens in the Grating Interferometer,” J. Rad. Sci. and Tech. 42(1), pp. 67-75 (2019).
Kulow et al., “On the Way to Full-Field X-ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy Imaging with Coded Apertures,” J. Anal. At. Spectrom. Doi: 10.1039/C9JA00232D (2019).
Li et al., “Production and Heat Properties of an X-ray Reflective Anode Based on a Diamond Heat Buffer Layer,” Materials vol. 13, p. 241 (2020).
Weitkamp et al., Tomography with grating interferometers at low-brilliance sources, 2006, SPIE, vol. 6318, pp. 0S-1 to 0S-10.
Weitkamp et al., “X-ray phase imaging with a grating interferometer,” Opt. Express vol. 13(16), (2005), pp. 6296-6304.
Weitkamp et al., “X-ray wavefront analysis and optics characterization with a grating interferometer,” Appl. Phys. Lett. vol. 86, (2005), 054101.
Zhou et al., “Quasi-parallel X-ray microbeam obtained using a parabolic monocapillary X-ray lens with an embedded square-shaped lead occluder,” arXiv:2001.04667 (2020).
Akan et al., “Metal-Assisted Chemical Etching and Electroless Deposition for Fabrication of Hard X-ray Pd/Si Zone Plates,” Micromachines, vol. 11, 301; doi:10.3390/mi11030301 (2020).
Hashimoto et al., “Improved reconstruction method for phase stepping data with stepping errors and dose fluctuations,” Optics Express, vol. 28, No. 11, pp. 16363-16384 (2020).
Momose et al., “Recent Progress in X-ray and Neutron Phase Imaging with Gratings,” Quantum Beam Science, vol. 4, No. 9; doi:10.3390/qubs4010009 (2020).
Takeo et al., “Soft x-ray nanobeam formed by an ellipsoidal mirror,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 116, 121102 (2020).
Wang et al., “Double-spherically bent crystal high-resolution X-ray spectroscopy of spatially extended sources,” Chinese Optics Lett., vol. 18(6), 061101 (2020).
Yamada et al., “Compact full-field hard x-ray microscope based on advanced Kirkpatrick-Baez mirrors,” Optica, vol. 7, No. 4 pp. 367-370 (2020).
Yoshioka et al., “Imaging evaluation of the cartilage in rheumatoid arthritis patients with an x-ray phase imaging apparatus based on Talbot-Lau interferometry,” Scientific Reports, 10:6561, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63155-9 (2020).
International Search Report and Written Opinion, Application No. PCT/US2019/049553, dated Mar. 4, 2020, in 16 pages.
Datta et al., “A new generation of direct X-ray detectors for medical and synchrotron imaging applications,” Sci. Reports, vol. 10, p. 20097 (2020).
Graetz et al., “Lenseless C-ray Nano-Tomography down to 150 nm Resolution: on the Quantification of Modulation Transfer and Focal Spot of the Lab-based ntCT System,” arXiv:2009.11749v1 [physics.ins-det] Sep. 24, 2020, 10 pages.
Mijovilovich et al., “Analysis of trace metal distribution in plants with lab-based microscopic X-ray fluorescence imaging,” Plant Methods, vol. 16, No. 82, 21 pages (2020).
Pandeshwar et al., “Modeling of beam hardening effects in a dual-phase X-ray grading interferometer for quantitative dark-field imaging,” Optics Express, vol. 28, No. 13, Jun. 22, 2020, pp. 19187-19204 (2020).
Paunesku et al., “X-Ray Fluorescence Microprobe Imaging in Biology and Medicine,” J. Cell. Biochem. vol. 99, pp. 1489-1502 (2006).
Penkov et al., “X-Ray Calc: A software for the simulation of X-ray reflectivity,” SoftwareX, vol. 12, p. 100528 (2020).
Redus et al., “Spectrometer configuration and measurement uncertainty in X-ray spectroscopy,” X-Ray Spectrom., pp. 1-14 (2020).
Romano et al., “Microfabrication of X-ray Optics by Metal Assisted Chemical Etching: A Review,” Micromachines, vol. 11, No. 589, 23 pages (2020).
Salditt, “Nanoscale Photonic Imaging,” Topics in Applied Physics, vol. 134, T. Salditt et al., eds., Springer Open, 2020.
Schunck et al., “Soft x-ray imaging spectroscopy with micrometer resolution,” Optica vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 156-160 (2021).
Senba et al., “Stable sub-micrometre high-flux probe for soft X-ray ARPES using a monolithic Wolter mirror,” J. Synch. Rad., vol. 27, 5 pages, (2020).
Shi et al., “Towards the Fabrication of High-Aspect-Ratio Silicon Gratings by Deep Reactive Ion Etching,” Micromachines, vol. 11, p. 864, 13 pages (2020).
Takeo et al., “A highly efficient nanofocusing system for soft x rays,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 117, 151104 (2020).
Taphorn et al., “Grating-based spectral X-ray dark-field imaging for correlation with structural size measures,” Sci. Reports, vol. 10, 13195 (2020).
Tucker, “Design of X-Ray Source for Real-Time Computed Tomography,” Dissertation, Missouri Univ. of Sci. And Tech., Scholars' Mine, 104 pages (2020).
Vila-Comamala et al., “High sensitivity X-ray phase contrast imaging by laboratory grating-based interferometry at high Talbot order geometry,” Op. Express vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 2049-2064 (2021).
Wang et al., “Design and Fabrication of Soft X ray Supermirrors,” https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-139888/v1 (2021).
Wilde et al., “Modeling of an X-ray grating-based imaging interferometer using ray tracing,” Op. Express vol. 28, No. 17, p. 24657 (2020).
Withers et al., “X-ray computed tomography,” Nature Reviews | Methods Primers, vol. 1, No. 18, pp. 1-21 (2021).
Yang et al., “Comparative study of single-layer, bilayer, and trilayer mirrors with enhanced x-ray reflectance in 0.5- to 80keV energy region,” J. Astron. Telesc. Instrum. Syst., vol. 6(4) 044001, 12 pages (2020).
Zhou et al., “A study of new type electric field modulation multi-target X-ray source,” Nucl. Inst. and Methods in Physics Research A, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2020.164342 (2020).
Zhou et al., “X-ray wavefront characterization with grating interferometry using an x-ray microfocus laboratory source,” Proceedings, vol. 11492, Advances in Metrology for X-Ray and EUV Optics IX; 114920Q, https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2576152 (2020).
Buchanan et al., “Effective modelling of high-energy laboratory-based x-ray phase contrast imaging utilising absorption masks or gratings,” J. Appl. Physics (accepted) (2020).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20200098537 A1 Mar 2020 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62728574 Sep 2018 US