System and method for determining location of extrusion in interconnect

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6768323
  • Patent Number
    6,768,323
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, October 30, 2002
    22 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 27, 2004
    20 years ago
Abstract
For locating an extrusion from an interconnect, an extrusion monitor structure is formed to surround the interconnect and is separated from the interconnect by a dielectric material. A first via is coupled to the interconnect, and a second via is coupled to the extrusion monitor structure and separated from the first via by a via distance (Lv). The extrusion is located at an extrusion site distance (Lextrusion) from the first via and between the first and second vias to short-circuit the interconnect to the extrusion monitor structure. A resistance (Rtotal) between the first and second vias is measured, and the Lextrusion is determined from a relationship with Rtotal, Lv, and resistivities and dimensions of the interconnect and the extrusion monitor structure.
Description




TECHNICAL FIELD




The present invention relates generally to interconnect technology in integrated circuit fabrication, and more particularly, to a system and method for electrically determining the location of an extrusion site along a length of an interconnect.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Referring to

FIG. 1

, common components of a monolithic IC (integrated circuit) include interconnect structures such as a first metal line


102


and a second metal line


104


.

FIG. 2

shows a cross-sectional view of the first and second metal lines


102


and


104


along line I—I of

FIG. 1

formed to be surrounded by dielectric material


106


on a semiconductor substrate


108


. Interconnect structures are formed to electrically connect integrated circuit devices formed on the semiconductor substrate


108


as known to one of ordinary skill in the art of integrated circuit fabrication.




A long-recognized important objective in the constant advancement of monolithic IC (Integrated Circuit) technology is the scaling-down of IC dimensions. Such scaling-down of IC dimensions reduces area capacitance and is critical to obtaining higher speed performance of integrated circuits. Moreover, reducing the area of an IC die leads to higher yield in IC fabrication. Such advantages are a driving force to constantly scale down IC dimensions.




As IC dimensions are scaled down, the width of the metal lines


102


and


104


are scaled down, and the distance between the metal lines


102


and


104


is decreased as the density of the locations of the interconnect structures is increased for connecting the IC devices having scaled down dimensions. Referring to

FIG. 3

, as the width of the metal lines


102


and


104


is scaled down, the current density through the metal lines


102


and


104


is increased. With higher current density, the metal lines


102


and


104


exhibit a higher rate of electromigration failure from flux divergence, as known to one of ordinary skill in the art of integrated circuit fabrication. For example, an extrusion


110


of metal material from the first metal line


102


may reach the second metal line


104


to undesirably short-circuit the two metal lines


102


and


104


.




Occurrence of such an extrusion


110


is even more probable in current interconnect technology where the metal lines


102


and


104


are comprised of copper surrounded by material


106


that is a low-K dielectric (i.e., a dielectric material having a dielectric constant lower than that of silicon dioxide S


102


). The low-K dielectric material


106


is advantageous for lower capacitance between the interconnect structures as the distance between the metal lines


102


and


104


is decreased. Such lower capacitance results in higher speed performance of the integrated circuit and also in lower power dissipation.




In addition, such lower capacitance results in lower cross-talk between the interconnect structures. Lower cross-talk between interconnect structures is especially advantageous when the interconnect structures are disposed closer together as device density continually increases. However, the dielectric material


106


with low-K typically is softer (i.e., has lower density) and may even be porous. Thus, the undesired extrusion


110


is especially more likely to occur with such low-K dielectric material


106


.




In addition, as device dimensions are further scaled down, a diffusion barrier layer material is formed to be thinner when surrounding interconnect having scaled down dimensions for minimizing resistance of the interconnect. However, a thinner diffusion barrier layer material surrounding the interconnect results in a higher probability of the occurrence of an extrusion from such interconnect.




During characterization of an integrated circuit fabrication process, the location of the extrusion


110


along the length of any of the metal lines


102


or


104


is desired to be determined. Referring to

FIGS. 4 and 5

, in the prior art, when the extrusion


110


is disposed below the top surface of the surrounding dielectric material


106


, the top surface of the materials on the semiconductor substrate


108


is polished down until the extrusion


110


is exposed. Then, the polished top surface is inspected using microscopy tools to visually locate the extrusion


110


.




Such a prior art technique for locating the extrusion


110


is disadvantageous because the top surface of the materials on the semiconductor substrate


108


may not be polished down enough (as illustrated in

FIG. 6

) or may be polished down too much (as illustrated in FIG.


7


). In those cases, the extrusion


110


would not be detected visually. In addition, it is difficult to polish down the proper amount of material until the extrusion is exposed to be detected visually since the location of the extrusion is not known a priori. Furthermore, visually determining the location of the extrusion


110


by scanning the entire top surface of materials on the semiconductor substrate


106


using microscopy tools is tedious and time-consuming.




Nevertheless, during characterization of an integrated circuit fabrication process, the location of the extrusion


110


along the length of any of the metal lines


102


or


104


is desired to be determined. Thus, a mechanism is desired for determining the location of an extrusion along the length of a metal line in an easy and accurate manner.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




Accordingly, in a general aspect of the present invention, a system and method determines the location of an extrusion site along a length of an interconnect electrically in an easy and accurate manner.




In one embodiment of the present invention, in a system and method for determining a location of an extrusion site along a length of an interconnect having a width (w


i


), a resistivity (ρ


i


), and a height (h


i


), an extrusion monitor structure having a width (w


m


), a resistivity (ρ


m


), and a height (h


m


), surrounds the sides of the interconnect along the length of the interconnect. The width (w


m


) of the extrusion monitor structure is larger than the width (w


i


) of the interconnect. The interconnect and the surrounding extrusion monitor structure are separated by a dielectric material. A first via is coupled to the interconnect at a first via location, and a second via is coupled to the extrusion monitor structure at a second via location. The first via and the second via are separated by a via distance (L


v


), and the extrusion site is located along the length of the interconnect at an extrusion site distance (L


extrusion


) from the first via and between the first via and the second via. An extrusion of the interconnect at the extrusion site short-circuits the interconnect to the extrusion monitor structure. A resistance meter is coupled between the first via and the second via for measuring a resistance (R


total


) between the first via and the second via. The extrusion site distance (L


extrusion


) is then determined from the following relationship:








R




total


=(ρ


i




/h




i


)*(


L




extrusion




/w




i


)+(ρ


m




/h




m


)*((


L




v




−L




extrusion


)/


w




m


).






In another embodiment of the invention, the interconnect and the extrusion monitor structure are comprised of a same material such that the resistivity (ρ


i


) of the interconnect is substantially same as the resistivity (ρ


m


) of the extrusion monitor structure. In addition, the height (h


i


) of the interconnect is substantially same as the height (h


m


) of the extrusion monitor structure. In that case, the extrusion site distance (L


extrusion


) is determined as follows:








L




extrusion


=(


w




i


/(


w




m




−w




i


))*(R


total




*h




i




w




m





i




−L




v


).






In this manner, the location of the extrusion site along the length of the interconnect is determined electrically by measuring the resistance between the first via and the second via for an easy and accurate technique of determining the location of the extrusion site. Thus, the time-consuming hit-or-miss technique of polishing down to the extrusion site for locating the extrusion visually in the prior art is avoided.




These and other features and advantages of the present invention will be better understood by considering the following detailed description of the invention which is presented with the attached drawings.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

shows a top view of two metal lines surrounded by dielectric material on a semiconductor substrate, according to the prior art;





FIG. 2

shows a cross-sectional view of the two metal lines of

FIG. 1

across line I—I, according to the prior art;





FIG. 3

shows an extrusion of metal from a first metal line short-circuiting to a second metal line in

FIG. 1

, according to the prior art;





FIG. 4

shows a cross-sectional view across the extrusion of

FIG. 3

, according to the prior art;





FIG. 5

shows a cross-sectional view across the extrusion of

FIG. 3

with polishing down of materials until the extrusion is exposed for visually determining the location of the extrusion, according to the prior art;





FIG. 6

shows the cross-sectional view of

FIG. 5

when the materials on the semiconductor substrate are not polished down enough such that the location of the extrusion cannot be visually determined, according to the prior art;





FIG. 7

shows the cross-sectional view of

FIG. 5

when the materials on the semiconductor substrate are polished down too much such that the location of the extrusion cannot be visually determined, according to the prior art;





FIG. 8

shows a system for electrically determining the location of the extrusion site along a length of an interconnect, including a top view of an extrusion monitor structure formed to surround the interconnect and including first and second vias formed to the interconnect and the extrusion monitor structure, according to an embodiment of the present invention;





FIG. 9

shows a cross-sectional view of the interconnect and the extrusion monitor structure of

FIG. 8

across line II—II, according to an embodiment of the present invention;





FIG. 10

shows a current source for providing current through the interconnect for causing an extrusion to occur from the interconnect, according to an embodiment of the present invention;





FIG. 11

shows the top view of the interconnect and the extrusion monitor structure of

FIG. 8

with formation of an extrusion that short-circuits the interconnect to the extrusion monitor structure;





FIG. 12

shows a resistance monitor for measuring a resistance between the first and second vias after formation of the extrusion of

FIG. 11

, according to an embodiment of the present invention; and





FIG. 13

shows the cross-sectional view of the interconnect and the extrusion monitor structure of

FIG. 8

across line II—II when the interconnect is surrounded by a diffusion barrier material, according to another embodiment of the present invention.




The figures referred to herein are drawn for clarity of illustration and are not necessarily drawn to scale. Elements having the same reference number in

FIGS. 1

,


2


,


3


,


4


,


5


,


6


,


7


,


8


,


9


,


10


,


11


,


12


, and


13


refer to elements having similar structure and function.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION




Referring to

FIG. 8

, a system


200


of the present invention is used to electrically determine a location of an extrusion site along a length of an interconnect


202


.

FIG. 8

shows a top view of the system


200


that includes an extrusion monitor structure


204


that surrounds the sides the interconnect


202


along the length of the interconnect.

FIG. 9

shows a cross-sectional view of the interconnect


202


and the extrusion monitor structure


204


of

FIG. 8

along line II—II. Referring to

FIG. 9

, the interconnect


202


has a width (w


i


)


206


and a height (h


i


)


208


, and the extrusion monitor structure


204


has a width (w


m


)


210


and a height (h


m


)


212


.




In one embodiment of the present invention, the height (h


i


)


208


of the interconnect


202


is substantially same as the height (h


m


)


212


of the extrusion monitor structure


204


. On the other hand, the width (w


m


)


210


of the extrusion monitor structure


204


is substantially larger such as at least ten times larger than the width (w


i


)


206


of the interconnect


202


. Such a substantially larger width (w


m


)


210


of the extrusion monitor structure


204


ensures that the current density through the extrusion monitor structure


204


is limited such that an extrusion is not likely to occur from the extrusion monitor structure


204


. Thus, the extrusion that occurs from the interconnect


202


and not the extrusion monitor structure


204


is characterized in this manner.




In addition, the material comprising the interconnect


202


determines a resistivity (ρ


i


) of the interconnect


202


, and the material comprising the extrusion monitor structure


204


determines a resistivity (ρ


m


) of the extrusion monitor structure


204


. In one embodiment of the present invention, the interconnect


202


and the extrusion monitor structure


204


are comprised of the same material such as copper for example such that the resistivity (ρ


i


) of the interconnect


202


is substantially same as the resistivity (ρ


m


) of the extrusion monitor structure


204


.




Further referring to

FIG. 9

, the interconnect


202


and the extrusion monitor structure


204


are formed to be surrounded by a dielectric material


214


on a semiconductor substrate


216


. Thus, the dielectric material


214


separates the interconnect


202


from the extrusion monitor structure


204


. The semiconductor substrate


216


is comprised of silicon, and the dielectric material


214


is comprised of a low-K dielectric material, according to one embodiment of the present invention.




The low-K dielectric material


214


is advantageous for lower capacitance between the interconnect structures as the distance between the interconnect structures is decreased. Such lower capacitance results in higher speed performance of the integrated circuit and also in lower power dissipation. In addition, such lower capacitance results in lower cross-talk between the interconnect structures. Lower cross-talk between interconnect structures is especially advantageous when the interconnect structures are disposed closer together as device density continually increases. However, the dielectric material


214


with low-K typically is softer (i.e., has lower density) and may even be porous. Thus, an extrusion is more likely to form through such low-K dielectric material


214


that may be characterized with the system


200


of FIG.


8


.




Further referring to

FIG. 8

, a first end via


222


is formed to be coupled to a first end of the interconnect


202


, and a second end via


224


is formed to be coupled to a second end of the interconnect


202


. In addition, a first via


226


is formed to be coupled to the interconnect at a first via location between the ends of the interconnect, and a second via


228


is formed to be coupled to the extrusion monitor structure


204


at a second via location. Techniques for forming a via to be coupled to an interconnect structure in general are known to one of ordinary skill in the art of integrated circuit fabrication.




Referring to

FIG. 10

, a first test pad


232


is coupled to the first end via


222


, and a second test pad


234


is coupled to the second end via


224


. A current source


236


is coupled between the first and second test pads


232


and


234


and thus to the first and second end vias


222


and


224


. The current source


236


provides a current flowing through the interconnect


202


. Such a current source


236


individually is known to one of ordinary skill in the art of electronics. When electrons from such current flow from the first end via


222


toward the second end via


224


, the first end via


222


acts as a cathode end, and the second end via


224


acts as an anode end for the interconnect


202


.




Referring to

FIGS. 10 and 11

, when the current density through the interconnect


202


is sufficiently high, an extrusion


240


occurs from flux divergence of material of the interconnect


202


at an extrusion site along the length of the interconnect


202


. The extrusion


240


short-circuits the interconnect


202


to the extrusion monitor structure


204


that surrounds the sides of the interconnect


202


along the length of the interconnect


202


. The extrusion site of the extrusion


240


is located between the first via


226


on the interconnect


202


and the second via


228


on the extrusion monitor structure


204


.




Further referring to

FIG. 1

, the extrusion site of the extrusion


240


is located along the length of the interconnect


202


at an extrusion site distance (L


extrusion


)


242


from the first via


226


. In addition, the first via


226


on the interconnect


202


and the second via


228


on the extrusion monitor structure


204


are separated by a via distance (L


v


)


244


.




Referring to

FIG. 12

, the system


200


further comprises a resistance meter


256


coupled between a first test pad


252


and a second test pad


254


. The first test pad


252


is coupled to the first via


226


on the interconnect


226


, and the second test pad


254


is coupled to the second via


228


on the extrusion monitor structure


204


. Thus, the resistance meter


256


is coupled between and measures the resistance (R


total


) between the first via


226


on the interconnect


226


and the second via


228


on the extrusion monitor structure


204


. Such a resistance meter


256


individually is known to one of ordinary skill in the art of electronics.




With such a measurement of the resistance (R


total


) between the first via


226


on the interconnect


226


and the second via


228


on the extrusion monitor structure


204


, the extrusion site distance (L


extrusion


)


242


for the extrusion


240


from the first via


226


is then determined from the following relationship:







R




total


=(ρ


i




/h




i


)*(


L




extrusion




/w




i


)+(ρ


m




/h




m


)*((


L




v




−L




extrusion


)/


w




m


),




with the variables, ρ


i


, h


i


, L


extrusion


, w


i


, ρ


m


, h


m


, L


v


, and w


m


being already described herein.




Note that in one embodiment of the present invention, the width (w


m


) of the extrusion monitor structure


204


is significantly larger (such as at least ten times larger for example) than the width (w


i


) of the interconnect


202


. When the width (w


m


) of the extrusion monitor structure


204


is significantly larger than the width (w


i


) of the interconnect


202


, the contribution of resistance from the extrusion monitor structure


204


to the value of the measured resistance (R


total


) between the first via


226


and the second via


228


is significantly less than the contribution of resistance from the relevant portion of the interconnect


202


between the first via


226


and the site of the extrusion


240


. Thus, with such a structural condition, the measured resistance (R


total


) is more sensitive to the site of the extrusion


240


such that the resistance (R


total


) is more indicative of the site of the extrusion


240


.




In one embodiment of the present invention, the height (h


i


)


208


of the interconnect


202


is substantially same as the height (h


m


)


212


of the extrusion monitor structure


204


, and the interconnect


202


and the extrusion monitor structure


204


are comprised of the same material such as copper for example such that the resistivity (ρ


i


) of the interconnect


202


is substantially same as the resistivity (ρ


m


) of the extrusion monitor structure


204


. In that case, the extrusion site distance (L


extrusion


) for the extrusion


240


from the first via


226


is determined as follows:








L




extrusion


=(


w




i


/(


w




m




−w




i


))*(


R




total




*h




i




*w




m





i




−L




v


).






In this manner, the location of the extrusion site along the length of the interconnect


202


is determined electrically by measuring the resistance (R


total


) between the first via


226


on the interconnect


226


and the second via


228


on the extrusion monitor structure


204


for an easy and accurate technique of determining the location of the extrusion site. Thus, the time-consuming hit-or-miss technique of polishing down to the extrusion for locating the extrusion visually in the prior art is avoided. Such a technique of electrically determining the location of the extrusion site along the length of the interconnect


202


may advantageously be used for characterizing a process for integrated circuit fabrication such as for various types of material for the interconnect


202


or for the low-K dielectric material


214


.




In addition, referring to

FIG. 13

, the interconnect


202


may be formed to be surrounded by a diffusion barrier material


260


, especially when the interconnect


202


is comprised of copper for preventing diffusion of copper from the interconnect


202


into the surrounding dielectric material


214


. As device dimensions are further scaled down, the thickness of the diffusion barrier material


260


is decreased to maximize the volume of the interconnect


202


and in turn to minimize the resistance of the interconnect


202


. However, as the diffusion barrier material


260


becomes thinner, extrusion of material of the interconnect


202


is more probable. Thus, the system


200


of

FIG. 2

may advantageously be used for characterizing such extrusion of the interconnect


202


for various types and thicknesses of the diffusion barrier material


260


surrounding the interconnect


202


.




The foregoing is by way of example only and is not intended to be limiting. Any specified material or any specified dimension of any structure described herein is by way of example only. For example, the present invention may be practiced when the interconnect


202


and the extrusion monitor structure


204


are comprised of various types of conductive material and are comprised of same or different conductive materials from each-other, as would be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art of integrated circuit fabrication from the description herein. In addition, the present invention may be practiced when the interconnect


202


and the extrusion monitor structure


204


have same or different heights, as would be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art of integrated circuit fabrication from the description herein.




In addition, as will be understood by those skilled in the art, the structures described herein may be made or used in the same way regardless of their position and orientation. Accordingly, it is to be understood that terms and phrases such as “top,” “side,” and “on” as used herein refer to relative location and orientation of various portions of the structures with respect to one another, and are not intended to suggest that any particular absolute orientation with respect to external objects is necessary or required.




The present invention is limited only as defined in the following claims and equivalents thereof.



Claims
  • 1. A system for locating an extrusion from an interconnect, comprising:an extrusion monitor structure surrounding the interconnect and being separated from the interconnect by a dielectric material; a first via coupled to the interconnect, and a second via coupled to the extrusion monitor structure and separated from the first via by a via distance (Lv), wherein the extrusion is located at an extrusion site distance (Lextrusion) from the first via and between the first and second vias to short-circuit the interconnect to the extrusion monitor structure; and a resistance meter for measuring a resistance (Rtotal) between the first and second vias, wherein the Lextrusion is determined from a relationship with Rtotal, Lv, and resistivities and dimensions of the interconnect and the extrusion monitor structure, and wherein a width (wm) of the extrusion monitor structure portion running aside a length of the interconnect is larger than a width (wi) of the interconnect such that the resistance (Rtotal) varies depending on the extrusion site distance (Lextrusion).
  • 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the interconnect has the width (wi), a resistivity (ρi), and a height (hi), and wherein the extrusion monitor structure has the width (wm), a resistivity (ρm), and a height (hm), and wherein the Lextrusion is determined from the following relationship:Rtotal=(ρi/hi)*(Lextrusion/wi)+(ρm/hm)*((Lv−Lextrusion)/wm).
  • 3. The system of claim 2, wherein the interconnect and the extrusion monitor structure have a substantially same resistivity (ρi) and a substantially same height (hi), and wherein the extrusion site distance (Lextrusion) is determined as follows:Lextrusion=(wi/(wm−wi))*(Rtotal*hi*wm/ρi−Lv).
  • 4. The system of claim 1, further comprising:a current source for providing a current through the interconnect that causes the extrusion to occur at the extrusion site.
  • 5. The system of claim 1, wherein the interconnect and the extrusion monitor structure are comprised of a same material and have a substantially same resistivity.
  • 6. The system of claim 1, wherein the interconnect and the extrusion monitor structure are comprised of copper.
  • 7. The system of claim 1, wherein the interconnect and the extrusion monitor structure have a substantially same height.
  • 8. The system of claim 1, wherein the width (wm) of the extrusion monitor structure running aside the length of the interconnect is at least ten times larger than the width (wi) of the interconnect.
  • 9. The system of claim 1, wherein the dielectric material between the interconnect and the extrusion monitor structure is a low-K dielectric material.
  • 10. The system of claim 1, wherein the interconnect is surrounded by a diffusion barrier material.
  • 11. A method for locating an extrusion from an interconnect, comprising:forming an extrusion monitor structure that surrounds the interconnect and that is separated from the interconnect by a dielectric material; forming a first via coupled to the interconnect, and a second via coupled to the extrusion monitor structure and separated from the first via by a via distance (Lv), wherein the extrusion is located at an extrusion site distance (Lextrusion) from the first via and between the first and second vias to short-circuit the interconnect to the extrusion monitor structure; and measuring a resistance (Rtotal) between the first and second vias, wherein the Lextrusion is determined from a relationship with Rtotal, Lv, and resistivities and dimensions of the interconnect and the extrusion monitor structure, and wherein a width (wm) of the extrusion monitor structure portion running aside a length of the interconnect is larger than a width (wi) of the interconnect such that the resistance (Rtotal) varies depending on the extrusion site distance (Lextrusion).
  • 12. The method of claim 11, wherein the interconnect has the width (wi), a resistivity (ρi), and a height (hi), and wherein the extrusion monitor structure has the width (wm), a resistivity (ρm), and a height (hm), and wherein the Lextrusion is determined from the following relationship:Rtotal=(ρi/hi)*(Lextrusion/wi)+(ρm/hm)*((Lv−Lextrusion)/wm).
  • 13. The method of claim 12, wherein the interconnect and the extrusion monitor structure have a substantially same resistivity (ρi) and a substantially same height (hi), and wherein the extrusion site distance (Lextrusion) is determined as follows:Lextrusion=(wi/(wm−wi))*(Rtotal*hi*wm/ρi−Lv).
  • 14. The method of claim 11, further including the step of:conducting a current through ends of the interconnect to cause the extrusion to occur at the extrusion site.
  • 15. The method of claim 11, wherein the interconnect and the extrusion monitor structure are comprised of a same material and have a substantially same resistivity.
  • 16. The method of claim 11, wherein the interconnect and the extrusion monitor structure are comprised of copper.
  • 17. The method of claim 11, wherein the interconnect and the extrusion monitor structure are formed to have a substantially same height.
  • 18. The method of claim 11, wherein the extrusion monitor structure running aside the length of the interconnect is formed to have the width (wm) that is at least ten times larger than the width (wi) of the interconnect.
  • 19. The method of claim 11, further including the step of:forming a low-K dielectric material between the interconnect and the extrusion monitor structure.
  • 20. The method of claim 11, further including the step of:forming a diffusion barrier material that surrounds the interconnect.
US Referenced Citations (3)
Number Name Date Kind
5264377 Chesire et al. Nov 1993 A
6320391 Bui Nov 2001 B1
6686273 Hsu et al. Feb 2004 B2
Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)
Entry
Hess et al. “Modeling of test structures for efficient online defect monitoring using a digital tester” (Proc. IEEE 1994, Intl Conference on Microelectronic Test Structure, vol. 7, Mar. 1994).