Embodiments of the present invention relate generally to the processing of unit dose packages and, more particularly, to systems and methods for determining the orientation of a unit dose package.
Medications may be packaged in various forms including in bottles, jars and other packages. A unit dose package is one common form in which medication is packaged. In this regard, a unit dose package refers to a unit dose of medication for one or more oral solids of the same or different strength, form or type that has been sealed in the package. One example of a unit dose package is a unit dose blister in which the medication may be disposed in a vinyl and foil package in which the vinyl defines a cavity that generally conforms to the shape of the medication. The vinyl may be sealed to the foil which offers a relatively flat support panel on which information relating to the medication may be printed, for example, on the opposite side from the vinyl cavity that houses the medication.
When unit dose medications are packaged as unit dose blisters, they are typically packaged with several unit dose blisters per blister card. Each unit dose blister is connected to the other unit dose blisters of the blister card, but perforations are generally defined between the unit dose blisters to permit each unit dose blister to be separated from the remainder of the blister card. A singulated blister is one that has been separated from a blister card, generally along a perforation.
As described above and as depicted in
One application in which it would be desirable to determine the orientation of a unit dose blister relates to the handling of a unit dose blister by a robotic system. In this regard, robotic systems have been developed to facilitate medication retrieval and distribution. One example of such a robotic system is the ROBOT-Rx® system provided by McKesson Automation Inc. and described by U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,468,110, 5,593,267 and 5,880,443, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference. The ROBOT-Rx® system is a stationary robotic system that automates the drug storing, dispensing, returning, restocking and crediting process. Unit dose blisters are generally repackaged in bags to be able to be handled by a robotic system, such as the ROBOT-Rx® system, although other robotic systems may be developed to handle unit dose blisters in their raw form. Typically, a robotic system works with single doses of medications, such as unit dose packages including, for example, unit dose blisters.
With respect to unit dose blisters, the unit dose blisters are generally singulated, that is, the unit dose blisters are generally separated from other unit dose blisters of a blister card, and then stored in trays or other containers dedicated to a particular dosage of a predetermined medication for subsequent access by the robotic system. The tray or other container for a respective medication may be stored in a predefined location such that the robotic system is thereafter able to access the tray or other container and obtain a prescribed number of unit dose blisters of the respective medication in response to instructions dictating the dispensation of the medication.
In some instances, the medication that is dispensed for a patient, such as in a hospital, nursing home or other health care facility, is not consumed and is, instead, returned to the pharmacy. In some settings, for example, up to about 20% of the medication that is dispensed for patients in a health care facility is eventually returned. Upon receiving the returned medication, the medication is generally restocked, such as by placing the unit dose blisters in the respective trays or other containers that house the respective medication.
From at least an efficiency and a cost-effectiveness standpoint, it would be desirable for the medication that is returned to be restocked in an automated fashion. For example, it would be desirable for a robotic system to individually engage a unit dose blister that has been returned, to identify the contents, such as by reading the associated text or barcode, and to then load the unit dose blister in the tray or other container that houses the respective medication. However, because of the two distinct orientations of a unit dose blister, that is, with the cavity facing either upwards or downwards, it would be useful to be able to determine the orientation of the unit dose blister since a robotic system may be able to more efficiently or reliably pick unit dose blisters in only one of the two orientations. Indeed, in the absence of being able to determine the orientation of a unit dose blister, singulated unit dose blisters may need to be picked and placed into the trays or other containers by technicians, thereby potentially increasing the associated costs.
A method and system are therefore provided according to one embodiment of the present invention for determining an orientation of a unit dose package, such as by determining whether the cavity that houses the medication is facing upwards or downwards. As a result of the determination of the orientation of the unit dose package, a method and system are also provided according to another embodiment of the present invention for selectively picking a unit dose package, thereby enabling automated restocking of singulated unit dose packages in an efficient manner by taking into account the orientation of the unit dose packages.
In one embodiment, a system and method for determining the orientation of a unit dose package are provided. In this regard, a unit dose package may be supported upon a support surface. Light may then be directed, such as from a light source, e.g., an optical fiber or a light emitting diode (LED), at the unit dose package upon the support surface. In this regard, light may be directed along a path that defines an acute angle that is less than a predefined threshold with respect to the support surface. Light may then be detected, such as by a camera, following redirection by the unit dose package. As such, the orientation of the unit dose package may be determined based upon a pattern created by the light following redirection by the unit dose package.
In detecting the light, an image may be captured, such as by means of a camera. It may then be determined if the image includes a predefined pattern indicative the unit dose package having a predetermined orientation. For example, the predefined pattern may be an at least partially annular pattern indicative of the unit dose package being oriented with the cavity housing the medication facing upwards in a direction away from the support surface.
In one embodiment, the support surface may be at least partially translucent. As such, the unit dose package may be backlit through the support surface, such as by means of a back light. As such, the general location of a unit dose package may be determined along with the orientation of the unit dose package.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, a system and method are provided for selectively picking a unit dose package based upon the determined orientation of the unit dose package. In this regard, a unit dose package is supported, such as upon a support surface. Light may then be directed at the unit dose package upon the support surface, such as by means of a light source, e.g., an optical fiber or an LED. In directing the light at the unit dose package, the light may be directed along a path that has a component that extends parallel to the support surface. An image formed by the light following redirection by the unit dose package may then be captured, such as by means of a camera. The resulting image permits the orientation of the unit dose package to be determined based upon the pattern, if any, created by the light following redirection by the unit dose package. When the unit dose package is determined to have a predetermined orientation, the unit dose package may then be selectively engaged, such as by means of a picking system, so as to remove the unit dose package from the support surface. As such, the picking system may then identify and place the unit dose package in the tray or other container associated with the respective medication. In instances in which the unit dose package does not have the predetermined orientation, the unit dose package may be re-circulated prior to returning to the support surface for reconsideration of its orientation.
By determining the orientation of a unit dose package, the unit dose package may therefore be handled in an automated fashion. For example, the unit dose package may be stocked and restocked in an automated fashion in order to increase the efficiency with which a robotic system handles singulated unit dose packages.
Having thus described the invention in general terms, reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings, which are not necessarily drawn to scale, and wherein:
The present inventions now will be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which some, but not all embodiments of the inventions are shown. Indeed, these inventions may be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein; rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will satisfy applicable legal requirements. Like numbers refer to like elements throughout. Moreover, the term “exemplary”, as used herein, is not provided to convey any qualitative assessment, but instead merely to convey an illustration of an example. Thus, use of any such terms should not be taken to limit the spirit and scope of embodiments of the present invention.
A system and method for determining the orientation of a unit dose package, such as a unit dose blister, is provided according to embodiments of the present invention. As described below, the system and method of embodiments of the present invention may be employed in conjunction with robotic systems to facilitate the automated handling and processing of various medications. However, the system and method of other embodiments of the present invention may be employed in other applications, which need not include a robotic system.
As described below, one or more unit dose packages are supported upon a support surface. The support surface may have various configurations and, in one embodiment, may be a conveyer for supporting the unit dose packages. Regardless of its configuration, in instances in which the unit dose packages are to be automatically picked from the support surface, such as by means of a picking system as described below, the support surface of one embodiment is positioned in a predefined location to facilitate access to the unit dose packages.
As also described below, it is desirable to determine the location of each unit dose package upon the support surface. While the location of the unit dose packages may be established in various manners, referring now to operation 20 of
In addition to determining the location of each unit dose package upon the support surface 50, it may be desirable to determine the orientation of each unit dose package upon the support surface, as also described below. In order to determine the orientation of the unit dose packages, the unit dose packages may also be illuminated by light directed along a path that defines an acute angle of less than a predefined threshold with respect to the support surface, as shown, for example, by operation 22 of
Various light sources 58 may be employed in order to illuminate the unit dose package. In one embodiment, however, the light source has a relatively small divergence angle. For example, the light source may be a light emitting diode (LED) or a line or other array of LEDs. In another embodiment, the light source may include a remote light source, such as a laser diode, that delivers light proximate to the support surface 50 by means of one or more optical fibers. The light source, such as the LED(s) or the output facet of the optical fiber(s), may be positioned proximate one side of the support surface as shown in
Referring now to operation 24 of
Once one or more unit dose packages are supported by the support surface 50 and in response to both backlighting of the support surface and illumination of the support surface with light having an acute angle as indicated by operations 20 and 22 of
As depicted in
The unit dose packages may have various orientations upon the support surface 50. With respect to unit dose blisters, for example, the unit dose blisters may have a first orientation in which the cavity housing the medication faces upward, that is, away from the support surface, and a second configuration in which the support member faces upwards with the cavity that houses the medication facing downward toward the support surface.
The response of the unit dose package to the illumination with light having an acute angle differs depending upon the orientation of the unit dose package. In this regard, in instances in which the planer support member faces upwards with the cavity housing the medication facing downwards toward the support surface 50, a small percentage of the light, if any, is reflected since the planer support member generally lies in the same plane or nearly the same plane as the support surface. In other words, because of the low angle of the incident light to the support surface, the incident light also defines a low angle, if not an angle of 0°, with respect to the planar support member such that little, if any, of the incident light reflects from the support member, as shown, for example, in the image of
However, in instances in which the cavity that houses the medication is facing upwards with the planer support member resting on the support surface 50, at least some of the light incident upon the cavity will be reflected and will define a distinctive pattern indicative of the orientation of the unit dose package. As described above, the cavity generally conforms to the shape of the medication and, as such, may have a rounded shape or at least a rounded upper surface (that is, the portion of the cavity surface furthest from the support member). As a result of the relatively low angle of the light source with respect to the support surface, the light is generally incident upon the side surfaces (which may or may not be tapered or rounded) and the rounded upper surface of the cavity. In response to the light incident thereupon, the cavity generally reflects one portion of the light, such as in an upward direction away from the support surface, while permitting another portion of the light to be refracted and to propagate through the wall of the cavity, that is, through the vinyl, plastic or other material forming the cavity. The light that propagates through the wall of the cavity may then propagate through the void within the cavity in which the medication is housed prior to contacting and propagating though another wall of the cavity with at least a portion of the light that propagates through the other wall of the cavity being refracted in an upward direction opposite the support surface. The light that is reflected and/or refracted by the cavity in an upward direction away from the support surface may form a predefined shape, such as a circular, elliptical or other annular shape, as shown in
The camera 54 of this embodiment is also configured to detect the light following its redirection, such as by reflection and/or refraction, by the unit dose package in the image captured by operation 26 of
The image may be reviewed and the predefined pattern(s) may be detected in various manners. For example, the image may be reviewed and the predefined pattern(s) may be recognized in a manual manner. Alternatively, the computing device 56 may analyze the image and identify any predefined pattern(s) present in the image in an automated manner, such as in accordance with image or pattern recognition techniques. See, for example, operation 30 of
Based upon the prior determination of the respective locations of the unit dose packages, such as provided by operation 28 in response to back lighting of the support surface 50, it may be determined, such as by the computing device 56, which ones, if any, of the unit dose packages are oriented with the cavity facing upwards away from the support surface, with the remainder of the unit dose packages being considered to be oppositely oriented with the cavity facing downwards toward the support surface. For example, in instances in which a predetermined pattern is recognized, the computing device 56 may determine which one of the unit dose packages is associated with, e.g., created, the pattern based upon a correspondence between the relative location of the predetermined pattern and the respective locations of the unit dose packages. This unit dose package will then be considered to be oriented with the cavity facing upwards, with the remainder of the unit dose packages being considered to be oriented with the cavity facing downwards. Similarly, if the image includes two or more of the predetermined pattern, the computing device may determine which one of the unit dose packages is associated with each of the predetermined patterns, again typically based upon a correspondence between the relative location of each predetermined pattern and the respective locations of the unit dose packages. The unit dose packages (equal in number to the number of predetermined patterns) that are associated with the predetermined patters will then be considered to be oriented with the cavity facing upwards with the remainder of the unit dose packages being considered to be oriented with the cavity facing downwards. Conversely, if the image does not include the predetermined pattern, it is determined, such as by the computing device, that any unit dose packages identified in response to the back lighting are oriented with the cavity facing downwards.
In one embodiment in which the unit dose packages are processed in an automated fashion, such as by a robotic system, and it has been determined that a unit dose package is present upon the support surface and has a predetermined orientation, such as an orientation in which the cavity is facing downwards toward the support surface 50, the computing device 56 may determine both the location and the orientation of the unit dose package based upon the image captured at operation 26 including, for example, the location of the centroid or center of the unit dose package as shown by operation 32. A picking system 60, such as a pick-and-place device, may be responsive to directions from the computing device which instruct the picking system to engage the unit dose package with the predetermined orientation as shown in operation 34 of
In order to facilitate movement of the end effector of the picking system 60 to a position proximate the unit dose package, the location of the unit dose package upon the support surface 50 may be determined. In this regard, the computing device 56 of one embodiment is configured to determine the location of the unit dose packages, such as in response to back lighting of the support surface and illumination of the unit dose packages with light having an acute angle, as depicted by operations 28, 30 and 32 of
One the picking system 60 has engaged a unit dose package, but prior to the placement of the unit dose package within a respective tray, the picking system may position the unit dose package proximate a reader 62, such as a bar code reader, an RFID reader or the like. In particular, the picking system may position a unit dose package such that the identification code, typically carried by the planer support member, faces or is otherwise readable by the reader. The reader can therefore obtain the identification code from the support member and can provide the identification code to the computing device 56. Based upon the identification code, the computing device can determine the medication carried by the unit dose package, such as by accessing a look up table associating identification codes with respective medications. See operation 36 of
This process of engaging a unit dose package that is oriented in a predetermined manner, such as with the cavity facing downward, determining the medication housed by the unit dose package and then appropriately depositing the unit dose package within the respective tray or other container may be repeated for each unit dose package upon the support surface 50 that is oriented in the same predetermined manner. See operation 40 of
By determining the orientation of a unit dose package, such as in an automated fashion, the system and method of embodiments of the present invention facilitate the efficient handling of unit dose packages by permitting the unit dose packages that are properly oriented to be processed while re-circulating and potentially reorienting the unit dose packages that were previously improperly oriented. As such, a restocking or other unit dose package handling process may be performed in a more fully automated fashion and, therefore, more efficiently. While an embodiment has been described above in which the unit dose packages oriented with the cavity facing downward were determined to have the desired orientation and to be engaged by the picking system 60, other embodiments may be configured such that unit dose packages oriented with the cavity facing upward are determined to have the desired orientation and to be engaged and further processed by the picking system.
Many modifications and other embodiments of the inventions set forth herein will come to mind to one skilled in the art to which these inventions pertain having the benefit of the teachings presented in the foregoing descriptions and the associated drawings. Therefore, it is to be understood that the inventions are not to be limited to the specific embodiments disclosed and that modifications and other embodiments are intended to be included within the scope of the appended claims. Although specific terms are employed herein, they are used in a generic and descriptive sense only and not for purposes of limitation.
This application is a continuation of, and claims the benefit of, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/405,716 filed Mar. 17, 2009, the contents of which are incorporated herein in its entirety by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4147930 | Browne | Apr 1979 | A |
4691100 | Kizu et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4717042 | McLaughlin | Jan 1988 | A |
4785969 | McLaughlin | Nov 1988 | A |
4847764 | Halvorson | Jul 1989 | A |
4857716 | Gombrich et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4967928 | Carter | Nov 1990 | A |
5014875 | McLaughlin et al. | May 1991 | A |
5155343 | Chandler et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5190185 | Blechl | Mar 1993 | A |
5259668 | Teufel et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5314243 | McDonald et al. | May 1994 | A |
5317652 | Chatterjee | May 1994 | A |
5346297 | Colson, Jr. et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5377864 | Blechl et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5396054 | Krichever et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5405048 | Rogers et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5431299 | Brewer et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5460294 | Williams | Oct 1995 | A |
5468110 | McDonald et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5480062 | Rogers et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5502944 | Kraft et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5504319 | Li et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5515159 | Sites et al. | May 1996 | A |
5520450 | Colson, Jr. et al. | May 1996 | A |
5523552 | Shellhammer et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5525788 | Bridgelall et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5536084 | Curtis et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5564593 | East, Sr. | Oct 1996 | A |
5564803 | McDonald et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5591952 | Krichever et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5593267 | McDonald et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5635697 | Shellhammer et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5635699 | Cherry et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5642442 | Morton et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5661978 | Holmes et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
D384578 | Wangu et al. | Oct 1997 | S |
5673983 | Carlson et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5692518 | Baker et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5713485 | Liff et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5716114 | Holmes et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5742037 | Scola et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5745366 | Higham et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5761877 | Quandt | Jun 1998 | A |
5778133 | Plesko | Jul 1998 | A |
5797515 | Liff et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5805051 | Herrmann et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5805456 | Higham et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5834749 | Durbin | Nov 1998 | A |
5842976 | Williamson | Dec 1998 | A |
5878885 | Wangu et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5880443 | McDonald et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5880451 | Smith et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5883806 | Meador et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5893697 | Zini et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5905653 | Higham et al. | May 1999 | A |
5912818 | McGrady et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5927540 | Godlewski | Jul 1999 | A |
5940306 | Gardner et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5945651 | Chorosinski et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5971593 | McGrady | Oct 1999 | A |
6003006 | Colella et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6003992 | Bergeron Dunn et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6011999 | Holmes | Jan 2000 | A |
6021392 | Lester et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6022124 | Bourn | Feb 2000 | A |
6039467 | Holmes | Mar 2000 | A |
6064759 | Buckley et al. | May 2000 | A |
6065819 | Holmes et al. | May 2000 | A |
6068156 | Liff et al. | May 2000 | A |
6109774 | Holmes et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6112502 | Frederick et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6116461 | Broadfield et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6142376 | Cherry et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6151536 | Arnold et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6163737 | Fedor et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6170230 | Chudy et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6170929 | Wilson et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6175779 | Barrett | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6176392 | William et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6189727 | Shoenfeld | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6219587 | Ahlin et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6223934 | Shoenfeld | May 2001 | B1 |
6256967 | Hebron et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6283322 | Liff et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6289656 | Wangu et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6338007 | Broadfield et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6339732 | Phoon et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6354783 | Stoy et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6361263 | Dewey et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6366696 | Hertz et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6370841 | Chudy et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6435370 | Wilson | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6449927 | Hebron et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6471089 | Liff et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6497342 | Zhang et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6499270 | Peroni et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6499665 | Meunier et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6532399 | Mase | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6564121 | Wallace et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6581798 | Liff et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6585163 | Meunier et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6604019 | Ahlin et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6609047 | Lipps | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6611733 | De La Huerga | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6625952 | Chudy et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6640159 | Holmes et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6650964 | Spano, Jr. et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6671579 | Spano, Jr. et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6681149 | William et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6742671 | Hebron et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6749120 | Hung et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6755931 | Vollm et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6760643 | Lipps | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6776304 | Liff et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6785589 | Eggenberger et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6790198 | White et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6805259 | Stevens et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6814254 | Liff et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6814255 | Liff et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6847861 | Lunak et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6874684 | Denenberg et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6892780 | Vollm et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6895304 | Spano, Jr. et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6948662 | Dvorkis | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6975922 | Duncan et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6985797 | Spano, Jr. et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6996455 | Eggenberger et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7007846 | Shellhammer | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7010389 | Lunak et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7014063 | Shows et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7016766 | William et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7040504 | Broadfield et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7052097 | Meek, Jr. et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7072737 | Lunak et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7072855 | Godlewski et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7077286 | Shows et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7085621 | Spano, Jr. et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7092796 | Vanderveen | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7093755 | Jordan et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7100792 | Hunter et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7103419 | Engleson et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7111780 | Broussard et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7139639 | Broussard et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7150724 | Morris et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7171277 | Engleson et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7218231 | Higham | May 2007 | B2 |
7228198 | Vollm et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7249688 | Hunter et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7348884 | Higham | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7417729 | Greenwald | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7419133 | Clarke et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7426425 | Meek, Jr. et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7502666 | Siegel et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7541294 | Shirasaka | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7554449 | Higham | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7571024 | Duncan et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7588167 | Hunter et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7747066 | Mulligan | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7748628 | Greyshock | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7756248 | Beckers et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7990531 | Clements et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8009913 | Greyshock | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8036773 | Braun et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8483867 | Braun et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
20020162889 | Navon | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020196977 | Navon | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030228057 | Paquette | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040029362 | Liu | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040040975 | Hunter et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040249498 | William et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050096941 | Tong | May 2005 | A1 |
20050103848 | Zhu et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050226488 | Barry | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050240305 | Bogash et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060079996 | Benouali | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060122729 | Murphy et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070265730 | Greyshock | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070296963 | Parker et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20090084702 | Arnold et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20100239169 | Braun et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 2004039355 | May 2004 | WO |
WO 2005005266 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO 2005109119 | Nov 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Banctec LTD, BancTec Prescribes Solutions for the Pharmaceutical Industry, Retrieved from Internet Site www.banctec.com/wp-content/uploads/PPA—uk.pdf, earliest known Internet Archive Wayback Machine date Jun. 20, 2006, pp. 1-2, BancTec Ltd. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Examiner Requisition for Application No. 2,651,788, May 16, 2013, 3 pages, Canada. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Office Action for Application No. CA 2,651,788, dated Apr. 2, 2012, 3 pages. |
European Patent Office, Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC for Application No. 07776973.5, Jul. 3, 2013, 6 pages, The Netherlands. |
European Patent Office, Extended Search Report and European Search Opinion for European Application No. 08006591.5, dated May 4, 2012, 6 pages, The Netherlands. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/755,207 mailed Mar. 2, 2011. |
Final Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 11/754,689 dated Jan. 6, 2011. |
Hamilton, S. J. et al., “Hyperspectral techniques in analysis of oral dosage forms”, Journal of Biomedical Optics, Oct. 2002, pp. 561-570, vol. 7, No. 4. Retrieved from the Internet: http://biomedicaloptics.spiedigitallibrary.org/article.aspx?articleid=1101527. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2007/011352 mailed Dec. 31, 2008. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2007/011352 mailed Dec. 3, 2008. |
International Search Report for PCT/2007/011352, mailed Nov. 8, 2007. |
McKesson Automation, Robot-Rx®, Retrieved Jan. 5, 2006 from Internet Site http://www.mckessonautomation.com/wt/auto/tech—forpharmacy—robotrx, pp. 1-2, McKesson Automation. |
McKesson, CJW Medical Center Employs Pharmacy Robot to Improve Medication Orders, Pharmacy Week Supplement, Oct. 19, 2003, p. 1 of 1, Richmond Times Dispatch. |
McKesson, Robot-Rx™—Nothing is Faster or More Accurate at Dispensing Medications, pp. 1-2, McKesson Automation, 2005. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/754,689 mailed Aug. 12, 2010. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/755,207 mailed Sep. 17, 2010. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 11/382,605 mailed Jul. 19, 2010. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 11/611,956 mailed May 7, 2010. |
Notice of Allowance of U.S. Appl. No. 11/382,605 mailed Jun. 16, 2011. |
Notice of Allowance U.S. Appl. No. 11/754,689 dated Mar. 31, 2011. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/382,605 mailed Mar. 31, 2010. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/382,605 mailed Mar. 13, 2009. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/382,605 mailed Oct. 5, 2009. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/611,956 mailed Apr. 2, 2009. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/611,956 mailed Dec. 10, 2009. |
Tommiea P. Jackson, Robot Does the Work of a Pharmacist in Record Time, Nov. 21, 2003, p. 1 of 1, USA Today. |
Trialpack—Flexible Product Handling, http://fleximation.com/trialpack/vision.html (visited Mar. 16, 2009). |
Trialpack 640—Robot Blister Packaging System for Clinical Trials, http://www.fleximation.com/trialpack/tpac600.html (visited Mar. 16, 2009). |
Trialpack 640—Technical Data and Features, http://fleximation.com/trialpack/600—technical—data.html (visited Mar. 16, 2009). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) due for U.S. Appl. No. 12/405,716, Sep. 2, 2014, 21 pages, USA. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/906,398, Apr. 3, 2013, 9 pages, USA. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/906,398, dated Jun. 22, 2012, 22 pages, USA. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/906,398, Dec. 20, 2012, 11 pages, USA. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/405,716, May 2, 2014, 21 pages, USA. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/405,716, Sep. 26, 2013, 17 pages, USA. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/405,716, dated Oct. 25, 2012, 15 pages, USA. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/405,716, dated May 30, 2012, 30 pages, USA. |
Zhao et al., Tablets Vision Inspection Approach Using Fourier Descriptors and Support Vector Machines, The 9th International Conference for Young Computer Scientists, 2008 [on-line], Nov. 18-21, 2008, pp. 1743-1748. Retrieved from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs—all.jsp?arnumber=4709237&tag=1. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150085109 A1 | Mar 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12405716 | Mar 2009 | US |
Child | 14557098 | US |