This invention relates to systems and methods for geographically locating a cellular phone; and in particular to the use of such systems and methods for locating vehicles in a traffic information system
Determining the geographical location of a cellular phone is useful in a variety of applications, including applications in the field of location-based services. In traffic information systems, for example, the locations of vehicles may be determined based on the locations of drivers' cellular phones, in order to form an image of traffic conditions. The location of a cellular phone can be determined based on data acquired from the cellular network itself. In particular, the location can be specified in terms of the network cell in which the cellular phone is located, as defined by a cell-identifier, possibly in addition to other data such as a time-advance.
There is an ongoing need, however, for accurate techniques of determining the geographical location of cellular phones, in many applications.
According to an aspect of the present invention there is provided a method for geographically locating a cellular phone, the method comprising determining an effective cell area for each of a first cell and a second cell in a cellular network and determining a handover area within which the cellular phone is likely to be located when control of the cellular phone is transferred from the first cell to the second cell. The determination of the handover area and the effective cell-area for each of the first cell and the second cell are made based on a topological relationship between the first cell and the second cell.
According to another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method for geographically locating a cellular phone in a cellular network comprising a first antenna for a first cell and a second antenna for a second cell, the method comprising (i) determining an effective radius Ri for each of a set of i different topological relationships between the first cell and the second cell, (ii) determining an angle a for which, when the first antenna is contained within the second cell, and when an angle β formed by a line between the first antenna and the second antenna and a sector limit line of the second cell is less than the angle α; the second cell will be extended beyond the sector limit line, (iii) determining a first extension width E1 of a first rectangular extension added to a sector limit line of the second cell when the angle β is less than the angle α; (iv) determining a second extension width E2 of a second rectangular extension added to a sector limit line of the second cell when the first antenna is outside the second cell, and when an inner angle formed between a sector limit line of the second cell and a line between the first antenna and the second antenna, is greater than 180 degrees, (v) determining a first penumbra width W1 of a first rectangular strip between a line of equal intensity of signal reception from the first antenna and the second antenna, and a first strip limit proximal to a cell into which the cellular phone is moving, (vi) determining a second penumbra width W2 of a second rectangular strip between the line of equal intensity and a second strip limit proximal to a cell out of which the cellular phone is moving, and (vii) determining a handover area within which the cellular phone is likely to be located when control of the cellular phone is transferred from the first cell to the second cell, the determination of the handover area being based on at least a subset of the effective radii Ri, the angle α; the first extension width E1, the second extension width E2, the first penumbra width W1, and the second penumbra width W2.
According to another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method of geographically locating a cellular phone by determining the area in which handover from a first cell to a second cell occurs, the method comprising modeling at least a portion of a cell reception area of said first cell and said second cell and defining a handover area comprising overlapping portions of said first and second cell areas.
According to another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method of monitoring traffic flow by determining successive locations of a plurality of cellular phones located in a plurality of vehicles, the method comprising repeat determination of the location of at least some of the plurality of cellular phones. This determination is preferably by means of sampling the locations of the at least some of the cellular phones to determine a present picture of traffic flow. The step of determining the location of a cellular phone of the plurality comprises determining the area in which handover from a first cell to a second cell occurs, the handover determination being based on modeling at least a portion of a cell reception area of said first cell and said second cell and defining the handover area to comprise overlapping portions of said first and second cell areas.
According to another aspect of the present invention, there is provided apparatus for geographically locating a cellular phone, the apparatus comprising an effective cell-area module for determining an effective cell-area for each of a first cell and a second cell in a cellular network and a handover area module for determining a handover area within which the cellular phone is likely to be located when control of the cellular phone is transferred from the first cell to the second cell. The determination of the handover area and the effective cell-area for each of the first cell and the second cell are made based on a topological relationship between the first cell and the second cell.
According to another aspect of the present invention, there is provided apparatus for geographically locating a cellular phone by determining the area in which handover from a first cell to a second cell occurs, the apparatus comprising an effective cell-area module for modeling at least a portion of a cell reception area of said first cell and said second cell, and a handover area module for defining a handover area comprising overlapping portions of said first and second cell areas.
According to another aspect of the present invention, there is provided apparatus for monitoring traffic flow by determining successive locations of a plurality of cellular phones located in a plurality of vehicles. The apparatus comprises (i) a handover area module for defining a handover area comprising overlapping portions of a modeled cell reception area of at least a portion of each of a first cell and a second cell of a cellular network, and (ii) a sampler module for sampling a set of repeated location determinations of at least some of the plurality of cellular phones, to determine a present picture of traffic flow, wherein each such location determination is based at least in part on the handover area defined by the handover area module for a given cellular phone moving between a given first cell and second cell of the cellular network.
Additional advantages and novel features of the invention will be set forth in part in the description which follows, and in part will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon examination of the following and the accompanying drawings; or may be learned by practice of the invention.
For a better understanding of the present invention, and to show how the same may be carried into effect, reference will now be made, by way of example only, to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Although techniques are known for determining the location of a cellular phone based on the network cell in which the phone is located, the accuracy of such techniques is limited by the large geographical area covered by each cell. Other techniques are known in which a specific machine is used to actively monitor the location of given handsets by request. However, such techniques load the network, and are therefore costly and limited in capacity.
Cellular networks operate using a network of antennas, each of which communicates messages to and from cellular phones located in a given area, called a cell. Cell areas from different antennas overlap, so that the domain of operation of the cellular network is completely covered. At any given time, a cellular phone is under the control of a single cell of the network. The controlling cell is usually the one whose reception intensity is the strongest at the location of the cellular phone. When a cellular phone is in motion, it traverses from cell to cell, and its control is “handed over” from one cell to another. The event of control transfer from cell to cell is called “handover.”
Theoretically, a handover event from cell A to cell B occurs when a cellular phone moves from an area where the intensity of the signal from the cell A antenna is higher than that of the cell B antenna, to an area where the intensity of the signal from the cell B antenna is higher than that of the cell A antenna. Thus, the handover event should theoretically occur when the cellular phone crosses a line of equal-intensity signals from both cells. However, in reality, the handover does not occur exactly on the equal-intensity line, but rather within a certain penumbra area around the equal-intensity line. The form and dimension of the penumbra area depends on various parameters, including the relative positioning of the cells involved, which is determined by the location and orientation of the antennas.
In an embodiment according to the invention, there is disclosed a technique for geographically locating a cellular phone with high confidence at the moment that handover occurs, by determining the “handover area,” which is the area in which handover from cell A to cell B might occur at high probability. Because the handover areas are found to be smaller than cell areas, on average, this technique offers better accuracy than techniques that use only the cell area to locate a phone. Additionally, handover events are recorded by the cellular network management system, and are therefore available at no additional cost, so that the technique is relatively inexpensive.
In order to implement an embodiment according to the invention, a polygon must be constructed to represent the handover area. In order to do so, four simplifying assumptions are made.
First, the simplifying assumption is made that the control area of an antenna (a cell area) is a sector, generally of 120 degrees, whose center is the antenna; see, for example, sector 101, centered around antenna 100 of the embodiment of
Second, the simplifying assumption is made that the reception intensity of signals from the antenna grows in inverse relation to the distance from the antenna, while the cellular phone is located within the sector. Other factors that influence the reception intensity of signals from the antenna are ignored, such as the exact azimuth of the antenna, the effect of reflections, and the effect of multi-pathing; because the influence of such factors is limited, and the factors often statistically offset one another.
Third, the simplifying assumption is made that the reception intensity from the antenna outside the sector is significantly lower than the reception intensity within the sector.
Fourth, the simplifying assumption is made that the handover from one cell to another occurs within a reasonable distance from a point where the cellular phone receives a signal from both antennas at equal intensity.
Based on these assumptions, an embodiment according to the invention initially models a cell's reception area as a sector with a final radius. Beyond that radius, reception does occur, but it is significantly weaker than reception within the radius. Also, there are regions of weak reception beyond the limiting lines of the sector; and in the area behind the antenna, in the opposite direction from the sector. In some cases, control over a cellular phone can be handed over within these weak reception areas. An embodiment according to the invention therefore extends the cell reception area, initially modeled as a sector, into these weak reception areas, in certain circumstances. Once the effect of such circumstances has been considered, and the cell sector area possibly extended (or not), the resulting model of the cell's reception is here termed the effective cell area. As will be seen further below, whether to extend a cell sector area can be determined based on the relative positions and orientations of the two antennas between which a phone is moving. For example, extensions can be made when one cell's antenna is situated within the other cell's sector, but very close to the sector's limit (as in the embodiment of
By taking such effects into consideration, an embodiment according to the invention constructs a polygon representing the handover area out of a combination of two areas: 1) the overlap part of the effective cell-areas of the two cells between which the cellular phone is moving; and 2) the penumbra area around the equal-intensity line between the antennas of the two cells. As will be seen below, the relative positioning of the two cells plays a significant role in the determination of these two areas; and there are cases in which the penumbra area is impossible to define, and therefore only the effective cell area is used.
In an embodiment according to the invention, a method for geographically locating a cellular phone includes three steps: first, determining the effective cell-area of each cell; second, determining the penumbra area around the equal-intensity line; and third, combining the areas determined in the first and second steps to determine the handover area.
A first step of an embodiment according to the invention comprises determining the effective cell-area of each cell. In order to do so, there is first determined an effective radius of the cell-sector. The existence of such a radius is premised on the second simplifying assumption above, i.e. that the reception intensity of the antenna within the sector grows in inverse relation to the distance from the antenna. Determining the effective radius depends on the topological case involved: in the topology of the embodiment of
Next, after determining the effective radius of the cell-sector, the effective cell-area is determined by extending the cell sector beyond the edges of the sector, in certain cases. This determines the sidelines of the effective cell-area. The extension of the cell-area beyond the edges of the sector is required in two cases: 1) when one antenna is contained in the sector of the other cell, very near one of its limiting lines, as will be illustrated with reference to the embodiment of
In the first extension case, shown in the embodiment of
In the second extension case, described first with reference to the embodiment of
The embodiment of
Having determined the effective cell-area (by determining an effective radius and, in some cases, extending the edges of the sector), the second step of an embodiment according to the invention is to determine the penumbra area around the line of equal intensity between the two antennas, as illustrated with reference to the embodiments of
In determining the penumbra area around the equal intensity line, according to an embodiment of the invention, it is first necessary to determine the location of the equal intensity line, which varies depending on the topological case. In the first topological case of the embodiment of
Having determined the effective cell-area and the penumbra area around the line of equal intensity, a third step of an embodiment according to the invention is to determine the handover area. For each of the topological cases except that of the embodiment of
As can be seen from the embodiment of
An embodiment according to the invention also improves accuracy, on average, when the cellular network specifies the location of a cellular phone using time advance data, in addition to cell identifier data.
Those of skill in the art will appreciate that the generalized parameters mentioned above (such as parameters R1, R2, R3, R4, α, E1, E2, W1, and W2), may be determined empirically and calibrated by field trials. For example, tests may be performed in which actual locations of test cellular phones are known, so that the actual locations can be empirically matched against the cell map to determine proper values for the parameters. The parameters may be estimated statistically based on the empirical results, and may be improved as test results and other data are accumulated over time.
In accordance with an embodiment of the invention, a system and method for location of cellular phones may be used as part of a traffic information system, such as that described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,587,781 of Feldman et al., a summary block diagram of which is shown in the embodiment of
In accordance with an embodiment of the invention, an apparatus for implementing the technique of locating cellular phones, described herein, can be used to generate traffic data using cellular phone locations from phones in vehicles. For example, when a handover area is determined for given cellular phone, a traffic system can use the geographical area corresponding to the handover area that has been determined, as an estimate of the location of a vehicle in which that cellular phone was located at the time that handover event occurred. Based on the resulting position and time data for a large number of such vehicles, and traffic data from other sources, a normalized travel time calculator 2, or other traffic system component, can generate a picture of traffic conditions for a variety of uses, including for predicting upcoming traffic conditions. In one embodiment, a technique in accordance with those described herein for geographically locating a cellular phone is implemented by the sampler module 1 of the embodiment of
Also, an apparatus according to an embodiment of the invention need not be implemented in the form of the embodiment of
A skilled reader will appreciate that, while the foregoing has described what is considered to be the best mode and where appropriate other modes of performing the invention, the invention should not be limited to specific apparatus configurations or method steps disclosed in this description of the preferred embodiment. For example, while various embodiments herein refer to geographically locating a “cellular phone,” it will be appreciated that this term should be construed broadly to refer not only to mobile cellular handsets, but also, for example, to other modules in communication with a cellular network, such as vehicle-bound probes which communicate with a cellular network. Those skilled in the art will also recognize that the invention has a broad range of applications. For example, embodiments according to the invention for geographically locating a cellular phone may be used in a wide variety of applications; including (but not limited to): location-based services, generally; traffic information systems; for emergency purposes, such as in locating a cellular phone that was used to call an emergency number; for escape planning; and for security, intelligence, and national defense applications. It will also be appreciated that the embodiments admit of a wide range of modifications without departing from the inventive concepts.
This application is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/614,538 filed on Nov. 9, 2009, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/888,631 filed 9 Jul. 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,620,402, the entire contents of each of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4361202 | Minovitch | Nov 1982 | A |
4985705 | Stammler | Jan 1991 | A |
5122959 | Nathanson et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5131020 | Liebesny et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5182555 | Sumner | Jan 1993 | A |
5187810 | Yoneyama et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5272638 | Martin et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5327144 | Stilp et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5343906 | Tibbals, III | Sep 1994 | A |
5428545 | Maegawa et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5432842 | Kinoshita et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5438517 | Sennott | Aug 1995 | A |
5465088 | Braegas | Nov 1995 | A |
5465289 | Kennedy, Jr. | Nov 1995 | A |
5523950 | Peterson | Jun 1996 | A |
5539645 | Mandhyan et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5543789 | Behr et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5543802 | Villevieille et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5559864 | Kennedy, Jr. | Sep 1996 | A |
5613205 | Dufour | Mar 1997 | A |
5689252 | Ayanoglu et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5724243 | Westerlage | Mar 1998 | A |
5732383 | Foladare et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5740166 | Ekemark et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5745865 | Rostoker et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5751245 | Janky et al. | May 1998 | A |
5774827 | Smith et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5801943 | Nasburg | Sep 1998 | A |
5839086 | Hirano | Nov 1998 | A |
5845227 | Peterson | Dec 1998 | A |
5880958 | Helms et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5933100 | Golding | Aug 1999 | A |
5948042 | Heimann et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5959568 | Woolley | Sep 1999 | A |
6012012 | Fleck et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6038444 | Schipper et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6098016 | Ishihara | Aug 2000 | A |
6128571 | Ito et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6161071 | Shuman et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6178374 | Mohlenkamp et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6219793 | Li et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6230011 | Guenther et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6236932 | Fastenrath | May 2001 | B1 |
6236933 | Lang | May 2001 | B1 |
6240364 | Kerner et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6256577 | Graunke | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6263205 | Yamaura et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6288676 | Maloney | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6314360 | Becker | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6317686 | Ran | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6341255 | Lapidot | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6401027 | Xu et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6401037 | Muller et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411897 | Gaspard, II | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6424838 | Stobbe et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430496 | Smith et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6438561 | Israni et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6466862 | DeKock et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6480783 | Myr | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6490519 | Lapidot et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6532414 | Mintz | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6545637 | Krull | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6587781 | Feldman et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6594577 | Nakajima et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6606494 | Arpee et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6618650 | Nakai et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6708036 | Proctor et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6711404 | Arpee et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6718425 | Pajakowski et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6792263 | Kite | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6799046 | Tang | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6842620 | Smith et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6911918 | Chen | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6922629 | Yoshikawa et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6947833 | Kita et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6952643 | Matsuoka et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6989765 | Gueziec | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7031983 | Israni et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7062379 | Videtich | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7107038 | Fitch et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7155376 | Yang et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7620402 | Feldman et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7986954 | Steer | Jul 2011 | B1 |
20010018628 | Jenkins et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010029425 | Myr | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010034577 | Grounds et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010037174 | Dickerson | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020009184 | Shnier | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020026278 | Feldman et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020030698 | Baur et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020049630 | Furuta et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020055818 | Gaspard | May 2002 | A1 |
20020120390 | Bullock | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020198694 | Yang et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030003918 | Proctor et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030040944 | Hileman | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030069683 | Lapidot et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030096620 | Ozturk et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030135304 | Sroub et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030219024 | Purnadi et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030236818 | Bruner et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040076279 | Taschereau | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040082312 | O'Neill et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040111214 | Buecher et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040243285 | Grounder | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050026619 | Jha | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050065682 | Kapadia et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050192031 | Vare | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060009885 | Raines et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060025158 | Leblanc et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20070060108 | East et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070106465 | Adam et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20080214192 | Soliman | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090036148 | Yach | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20100010739 | Tsushima | Jan 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 434 707 | Mar 2004 | CA |
33 46 548 | Jul 1985 | DE |
40 05 803 | Aug 1990 | DE |
42 41 408 | Jun 1994 | DE |
195 25 291 | Dec 1996 | DE |
196 38 798 | Mar 1998 | DE |
196 51 146 | Jun 1998 | DE |
197 55 875 | Jun 1998 | DE |
199 17 154 | Oct 2000 | DE |
199 33 639 | Jan 2001 | DE |
199 48 416 | Apr 2001 | DE |
100 63 588 | Jul 2001 | DE |
100 37 827 | Feb 2002 | DE |
0 365 097 | Apr 1990 | EP |
0 372 840 | Jun 1990 | EP |
0 715 285 | Jun 1996 | EP |
0 715 286 | Jun 1996 | EP |
0 715 288 | Jun 1996 | EP |
0 715 291 | Jun 1996 | EP |
0 763 807 | Mar 1997 | EP |
0 834 840 | Apr 1998 | EP |
0 838 663 | Apr 1998 | EP |
0 838 797 | Apr 1998 | EP |
0879460 | Nov 1998 | EP |
0 921 509 | Jun 1999 | EP |
0 936 590 | Aug 1999 | EP |
0951187 | Oct 1999 | EP |
1 162 560 | Dec 2001 | EP |
1 320 075 | Jun 2003 | EP |
1 387 333 | Feb 2004 | EP |
1 515 122 | Mar 2005 | EP |
1-137778 | May 1989 | JP |
4-290098 | Oct 1992 | JP |
5-46086 | Feb 1993 | JP |
5-233996 | Sep 1993 | JP |
6-12593 | Jan 1994 | JP |
7-83685 | Mar 1995 | JP |
8-129697 | May 1996 | JP |
9-14986 | Jan 1997 | JP |
H09113290 | May 1997 | JP |
H10300495 | Nov 1998 | JP |
11-25389 | Jan 1999 | JP |
2001-124569 | May 2001 | JP |
2002122437 | Apr 2002 | JP |
2002-206395 | Jul 2002 | JP |
WO 9411839 | May 1994 | WO |
9502307 | Jan 1995 | WO |
WO 9514292 | May 1995 | WO |
WO 9610807 | Apr 1996 | WO |
WO 9625830 | Aug 1996 | WO |
WO 9629688 | Sep 1996 | WO |
9642179 | Dec 1996 | WO |
WO 9729470 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO 9729471 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO 9731241 | Aug 1997 | WO |
9737318 | Oct 1997 | WO |
WO 9736148 | Oct 1997 | WO |
WO 9740606 | Oct 1997 | WO |
WO 9815149 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO 9815935 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO 9823115 | May 1998 | WO |
WO 9826395 | Jun 1998 | WO |
WO 9829758 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO 9836397 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO 9842179 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO 9854682 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO 9963499 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 0101367 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 0123835 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO 0135370 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 0148725 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO 0201158 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO 0201532 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO 0203350 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO 0243026 | May 2002 | WO |
WO 03041030 | May 2003 | WO |
WO 03073048 | Sep 2003 | WO |
2004021305 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO 2004086799 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2008114369 | Sep 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
United States Office Action, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/020,427, dated Aug. 22, 2011. |
U.S. Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/614,538, dated Dec. 19, 2011. |
United States Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/020,427 dated Mar. 29, 2012. |
R. Sankar et al., “Intelligent Traffic Monitoring System Using Wireless Cellular Communications,” © 1997 IEEE. |
K. Abe et al., “A Planning Method Combining Rule-Bases and Optimization Algorithms for Transportation Network,” © 1992 IEEE. |
“Data Fusion for Dynamic Route Guidance Systems,” International Federation of Automatic Control (IFAC), 2361 Laxenburg, Schlossplatz 12, 1997. |
N. Shamanesh, “Getting Drivers Out of a Jam,” Automotive Engineer, Oct. 1999. |
Wang et al., “An Unified Vehicle Supervising and Traffic Information System,” © 1996 IEEE. |
Fastenrath, Floating Car Data on a Larger Scale, Oct. 24, 1997. |
J.J. Caffery et al., “Overview of Radiolocation in CDMA Cellular Systems,” published 1998; See Chapter “Accuracy Requirement” pp. 7-8, <http://sss-mag.com/pdf/radioloc.pdf>. |
International Search Report issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/GB2005/002637 dated Sep. 21, 2005. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/GB2005/002637 dated Sep. 21, 2005. |
M. Westerman et al., “Integration of Probe Vehicle and Induction Loop Data—Estimation of Travel Times and Automatic Incident Detection,” California PATH Research Report, Institute of Transportation Studies, Jan. 1, 1996. |
“Grubbs Test for Outliers,” Engineering Statistics Handbook, 2000. |
United States Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/020,427 dated Sep. 11, 2012. |
United States Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/020,427 dated Sep. 24, 2013. |
Kuhne, R.D. Data Fusion for dynamic route guidance systems. International Federation of Automatic Control Conference on Transportation Systems, vol. 3, Jun. 1997, p. 1386-90. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110171961 A1 | Jul 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12614538 | Nov 2009 | US |
Child | 13070982 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10888631 | Jul 2004 | US |
Child | 12614538 | US |