The application pertains to systems and methods for establishing locations of mobile wireless devices, such as gas detectors, radiation detectors or the like, in a region being monitored. More particularly, the application pertains to such systems and methods wherein the mobile devices obtain location indicating information from fixed location anchors and forward that information to a location establishing engine.
Portable gas detectors which can be used to monitor one or more conditions in a region of interest can wirelessly communicate with a Wi-Fi based network of access points. Each of the access points of the network can provide IEEE 802.11 access service. The members of the network can forward detector generated information as to gas concentrations and detector location indicating information to a location manager which can incorporate a location determining engine.
Systems of the type described above have been disclosed in US Patent Application Publication 2011/0161885 published Jun. 30, 2011, application Ser. No. 12/695,736 filed Jan. 28, 2010, entitled “WIRELESS LOCATION-BASED SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETECTING HAZARDOUS AND NON-HAZARDOUS CONDITIONS, and US Patent Application Publication 2011/0161044 published Jun. 30, 2011, application Ser. No. 12/959,250 filed Dec. 2, 2010, entitled “WIRELESS LOCATION-BASED SYSTEM FOR DETECTING HAZARDOUS CONDITIONS. The above two published applications, 0161885 and 0161044 are both assigned to the Assignee hereof and are hereby incorporated by reference.
Wi-Fi based wireless location system accuracy is known to exhibit a probability distribution of location error when attempting to estimate the location of a mobile device. For example, the empirical data suggests the average location estimate may be accurate to within 35% of the average wireless local area network (WLAN) access point (AP) spacing when estimated using received signal strength indication (RSSI) information. However some applications may require more accuracy than would be provided by the WLAN infrastructure. Thus in order to provide adequate location system accuracy in a typical WLAN system, it may be necessary to deploy additional access points beyond those necessary for WLAN coverage. Installation of these additional access points may be expensive in terms of material cost of additional APs and also either installation cost of backhaul communications wiring e.g. for Ethernet or material cost of additional radios in the APs to provide equivalent wireless back haul communications. A lower cost solution to improve location accuracy would be desirable.
While disclosed embodiments can take many different forms, specific embodiments hereof are shown in the drawings and will be described herein in detail with the understanding that the present disclosure is to be considered as an exemplification of the principles hereof, as well as the best mode of practicing same, and is not intended to limit the claims hereof to the specific embodiment illustrated.
In embodiments hereof, the mobile devices, also interchangeably referred to herein as detectors, transmit probes into portions of a region being monitored. Location anchors distributed in the region which receive the probes can each transmit at least a location indicating address that can be read by the receiving mobile device. The mobile device can then make signal strength measurements of responses from members of a plurality of location anchors L distributed in a region being monitored. Alternately, round trip time-of-flight measurements can be made of an interval between the time of the request and time of the response. The address and signal strength (RSSI), or, time-of-flight information can be transmitted from the mobile device to a location manager which can then estimate the location of the device in the region.
Because it is the mobile devices that communicate with the location manager, and not the location anchors, the location anchors advantageously each have a lower total installed cost, that is lower cost inclusive of installation cost and materials cost, than a corresponding access point would have since they need not provide back-haul communications. The elimination of back-haul communications equipment offers an opportunity to save (installed) cost at each anchor location. Hence more location anchors can be provided, at the same or lesser cost, for improved location accuracy.
For example, in the location anchors, there is no need for Ethernet port electronics or Ethernet wire installation (for back haul communications). Alternatively to avoid having to install Ethernet wiring the access points may utilize an additional back haul radio. The location anchors in the present embodiments do not need back haul radios. So the relative total installed cost for a location anchor can be reduced as compared to an access point
The detectors Di, upon receiving the responses R to the probes P from the anchors L, can read the address of the responding location anchor and can measure the associated RSSI or time-of-flight of the response R. The results of such measurements, along with address information for the respective location anchor, can then be forwarded via one of the APs to the Location Manager which makes estimates of the position of the respective devices, such as detectors D. The dotted line 26 indicates the relay of this measurement information from the detector D via one of the APs to the location manager 24. Advantageously, the location anchors L exhibit a lower total installed cost than the APs as the location anchors need not support Ethernet electronics or connectors and need not be wired for Ethernet backhaul communications nor contain additional backhaul radios.
In yet another aspect, the detectors, such as detector Di can communicate directly with the location manager 24 provided it supports an internal AP or e.g. Wi-Fi Direct functionality. It will also be understood that other forms of communications between the detectors, such as detector Di, and the Location Manager 24 come within the spirit and scope of the invention.
Control circuits 32, carried by housing 30, are coupled to the one or more sensors Si, and to a transceiver 34. Transceiver 34 can be implemented as an RF transceiver, for example, and without limitation. The control circuits can be implemented, at least in part, by a programmable processor 32a which executes pre-stored instructions in a storage unit 32b. Housing 30 can also carry an audio/visual output device 36 with operator controls 36a.
It will be understood that the detector Di can communicate via transceiver 34 with the location anchors L in the region R1. Based on responses from the location anchors L, detector Di can in turn communicate wirelessly with the location manager 24, directly or via access points AP, without limitation, as discussed above.
It is an important aspect of the embodiment 10 disclosed in
In summary, location anchors may respond to probes from respective mobile devices such that the mobile devices may measure the RSSI of the respective response, or time-of-flight from transmission of the probe to receipt of a response from a respective anchor. The mobile devices may then report the measured RSSI from location anchors, or time-of-flight to a location manager where estimated positions of the respective mobile devices may be determined. The location anchors can also identify themselves, by providing address information, which the mobile devices can forward to the location manager.
In embodiments hereof, total installed cost for the additional location anchors may be reduced as compared to the equivalent total installed cost of the same number of access points. This reduction is due to eliminating the back-haul communications equipment required by an access point.
From the foregoing, it will be observed that numerous variations and modifications may be effected without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. It is to be understood that no limitation with respect to the specific apparatus illustrated herein is intended or should be inferred. It is, of course, intended to cover by the appended claims all such modifications as fall within the scope of the claims.
Further, logic flows depicted in the figures do not require the particular order shown, or sequential order, to achieve desirable results. Other steps may be provided, or steps may be eliminated, from the described flows, and other components may be added to, or removed from the described embodiments.
This application claims the benefit of the filing date of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/683,056 filed Aug. 14, 2012, entitled, “System and Method for Improved Location System Accuracy”. The '056 application is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5767390 | Chapman, IV | Jun 1998 | A |
5771004 | Suppelsa et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5922943 | Chapman, IV | Jul 1999 | A |
6138512 | Roberts et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6182497 | Krajci | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6252510 | Dungan | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6772071 | Gilbert et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
7019637 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7345582 | Gould | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7522043 | English et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7609159 | Benson et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7904244 | Sugla | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7994926 | Longman et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8099130 | Halla et al. | Jan 2012 | B1 |
20030146835 | Carter | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040061646 | Andrews et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040149918 | Craig et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040204915 | Steinthal et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215532 | Boman et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050057370 | Warrior et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20060082462 | Crook | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20080168826 | Saidi et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090139299 | Prince | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090188302 | Rolff et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090212995 | Wu et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100103844 | Kim | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20110161044 | Gonia et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110161885 | Gonia et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120083289 | Li et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20130185000 | Fabes et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 2010142139 | Dec 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Junjie Chen et al., A Weighted Compensated Localization Algorithm of Nodes in Wireless Sensor Networks, Third International Workshop on Advanced Computational Intelligence, Aug. 26-27, 2010, pp. 379-384, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China. |
Elisabetta Farella et al., Aware and Smart Environments: The Casattenta Project, Microelectronics Journal 41 (2010) pp. 697-702. |
Search Report for corresponding EP application 13178424.1, dated Oct. 27, 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140051459 A1 | Feb 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61683056 | Aug 2012 | US |