Contained herein is material that is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction of the patent disclosure by any person as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent files or records, but otherwise reserves all rights to the copyright whatsoever.
This invention relates generally to the field of network data services. More particularly, the invention relates to an apparatus and method for synchronizing a wireless data processing device with a wireless messaging service.
A variety of wireless data processing devices have been introduced over the past several years. These include wireless personal digital assistants (“PDAs”) such as the Palm® VIIx handheld, cellular phones equipped with data processing capabilities (e.g., those which include wireless application protocol (“WAP”) support), and, more recently, wireless messaging devices such as the Blackberry™ wireless pager developed by Research In Motion (“RIM”).™
Personal digital assistants such as the Palm devices typically provide only limited wireless messaging capabilities (e.g., instant messaging and basic Internet access). For example, these devices typically require a user to manually establish a connection to the Internet via an Internet Service Provider (“ISP”) or to a corporate server to check e-mail messages.
Although corporate messaging systems such as the RIM Blackberry provide more comprehensive messaging capabilities, there are significant limitations to these systems. Specifically, these systems employ e-mail “redirection” or “forwarding” techniques in which messages are redirected to the wireless device only if certain conditions are met. These conditions, referred to as “redirection events,” may include, for example, an indication that the user is not working at his corporate desktop (e.g., removal of the wireless device from the desktop cradle, a screen saver firing on the desktop, . . . etc) or a manual redirection command initiated by the user (e.g., via the wireless device or the corporate desktop). One such message redirection system is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,219,694 (“System and Method for Pushing Information From a Host System to a Mobile Data Communication Device Having a Shared Electronic Address”).
As a result, these systems are (as a practical matter) incapable of providing complete synchronization between the wireless device and the corporate e-mail database. For example, because messages are only redirected to the wireless device under certain conditions (e.g., following a redirection event), at any given point in time, the wireless device may contain an incomplete set of e-mail data. Moreover, even when messages are actively being forwarded to the wireless device, the e-mail data stored at the wireless device and the e-mail database are not truly synchronized. For example, certain types of transactions performed on the wireless device, such as an indication that a message has been viewed by the user, message deletions, movement of messages from one folder to another, . . . etc., are not updated at the e-mail service wirelessly.
Moreover, only basic e-mail functions such as sending and receiving messages may be controlled at the wireless device. More advanced e-mail management functions must be set at the user's desktop (e.g., configuring e-mail filters, outgoing e-mail signatures, security settings such as passwords, . . . etc).
In addition, prior messaging systems require a corporate desktop to which the device must be attached when the user is in the office. The problem with this is not merely that a corporate desktop is required, but also that the corporate desktop must be configured with software and a proprietary “cradle” that allows it to communicate directly to the wireless device.
Accordingly, what is needed is a system and method for providing complete synchronization and management between a wireless device and a messaging service (e.g., a corporate e-mail account). What is also needed is a wireless apparatus for receiving and sending e-mail messages, which does not require a corporate desktop or any software to be installed and executed on the corporate desktop.
According to one embodiment, a system is described. The system includes a wireless data processing device, and a server implementing a messaging service communicatively coupled to the wireless device. The server maintains synchronization of data objects with the wireless device over a wireless network. In addition, the server transmits message updates originating at the messaging service to the wireless device and receives message updates originating at the wireless device. The message updates indicate a modification to an electronic mail (e-mail) file folder hierarchy.
A better understanding of the present invention can be obtained from the following detailed description in conjunction with the following drawings, in which:
In the following description, for the purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. It will be apparent, however, to one skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced without some of these specific details. In other instances, well-known structures and devices are shown in block diagram form to avoid obscuring the underlying principles of the present invention.
Reference in the specification to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the invention. The appearances of the phrase “in one embodiment” in various places in the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment.
Servers 103 may be configured to provide a variety of different messaging and groupware services 102 to network users (e.g., e-mail, instant messaging, calendaring, . . . etc). In one embodiment, these services are provided by Microsoft Exchange.™ However, the underlying principles of the invention are not limited to any particular messaging/groupware platform.
In one embodiment, an interface 100 forwards data objects maintained by service 102 (e.g., e-mail messages, instant messages, calendar data, . . . etc) to a plurality of wireless data processing devices (represented in
Alternatively, or in addition, the service 102 may provide the e-mail to the user's local computer (e.g., client 110) upon request (i.e., so that the user will receive the e-mail on his/her wireless device 130 when out of the office and on his/her personal computer 110 when in the office). Conversely, e-mail messages sent from the user's wireless data processing device 130 are transmitted to the service 102 via the interface 100.
In one embodiment, the interface 100 is a software module adapted to work with the particular service 120. It should be noted, however, that interface 100 may be implemented in hardware or any combination of hardware and software while still complying with the underlying principles of the invention.
In one embodiment, external data network 170 is comprised of a plurality of databases, servers/clients (not shown) and other networking hardware (e.g., routers, hubs, . . . etc) for transmitting data between the interface 100 and the wireless devices 130. In a further embodiment, interface 100 encapsulates data in one or more packets containing an address identifying the wireless devices 130 (e.g., such as a 24-bit Mobitex Access Number (“MAN#”)).
The external data network 170 transmits the packets to a wireless service provider network 171, which in turn, transmits the packets (or the data contained therein) over a wireless communication link to the wireless device 130. In one embodiment, the wireless service provider network is a 2-way paging network. However, various other network types may be employed (e.g., CDMA 2000, GPRS, PCS, . . . etc) while still complying with the underlying principles of the invention.
It should be noted that the network service provider network 171 and the external data network 170 (and associated interface 100) may be owned/operated by the same organization or, alternatively, the owner/operator of the external data network 170 may lease wireless services from the wireless service provider network. The underlying principles of the invention are not limited to any particular service arrangement.
In one embodiment, service 102 (e.g., the e-mail database) is fully synchronized with wireless data processing device 130. Thus, any actions performed on wireless device 130 are automatically updated on service 102 and any transactions occurring at service 102 are automatically reflected on device 130. In one embodiment, these individual message transactions are transmitted from the interface 100 as they occur at the service 102.
In a further embodiment, synchronization updates of this type may include, but are not limited to, device configuration modifications, calendar updates, e-mail message updates, instant messages, to-do list updates and/or any other type of personal information management transactions or corporate data management transactions (hereinafter “message transactions”).
As one example, when a user views an e-mail message using device 130, a message transaction indicating that the user viewed the message is transmitted to service 102 (via the interface 100). Accordingly, if the user subsequently connects to e-mail via a client 110, the e-mail will appear as having already been viewed.
Other actions such as message deletions, filing activities (e.g., moving a message to a particular folder), message responses, meeting confirmations/additions . . . etc, will automatically be reflected in the service 102, thereby providing complete synchronization between the service 102, the device 130 and/or the client 110 (if one is being used).
Current messaging systems do not offer complete wireless device synchronization. As such, these systems require that the user have a desktop computer with a “cradle” to which the device is attached to received certain types of synchronization updates. One reason for this is that prior systems process message transactions in a relatively inefficient manner and employ only limited compression techniques, thereby making complete synchronization impractical. As such, in order to realize complete wireless synchronization, embodiments of the invention employ one or more of the following compression and/or message processing techniques.
According to one embodiment, synchronization updates are also used to implement wireless folders. Consequently, a replication of an e-mail file folder hierarchy on server 103 at customer site 120 is maintained at wireless device 130. According to another embodiment, all changes made to the folder hierarchy at wireless device 130 are automatically changed at server 103, and vice versa. Therefore, message transactions are transmitted between wireless device 130 and server 103 for actions such as the creation of new folders, the deletion of old folders, filing of messages to folders, arrival of new messages, and copying of messages to a folder,
In one embodiment, “move” events are detected and processed in an efficient manner. Move events may indicate that one or more new folders have been created, folders have been deleted, or folders have been reorganized. In addition, move events may indicate that messages have been moved between folders.
As indicated in
Alternatively, the message may initially be deleted from the source folder and then re-created in the destination folder. Transmitting a delete command followed or preceded by a copy of the underlying message to the wireless device 130 is an inefficient way to perform move transactions.
Accordingly, as indicated in
In order to provide a move command to the wireless device 130 in this manner, the system (e.g., the interface 100) first identifies the folder and/or message that is to be moved. In one embodiment, interface 100 identifies the message using the methods set forth in
Referring initially to
If interface 100 finds the same message in a particular folder, e.g., Folder B, it transmits a move command to the wireless device 130 at 330 indicating that Message X should be moved from Folder A to Folder B. If, however, it does not locate Message X in another folder, it transmits a delete command to the wireless device indicating that Message X should be deleted from Folder A. In addition, one of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the method above may also be used to delete a Folder X that may or may not be filed under Folder A.
Referring now to
If, however, interface 100 does not locate an identification code match, interface 100 transmits a delete command to the wireless device indicating that Message X should be deleted from Folder A. Further, one of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the method above may also be used to move a Folder X that may or may not be filed under Folder B.
In one embodiment, messages received at server 102 may be automatically forwarded to a reserve folder specified by the user. In such an embodiment, the reserve folder is set up to receive public e-mails that a user may not wish to read until a later time. In a further embodiment, only the message header (e.g., subject line and to/from information) of e-mails forwarded to the reserve box are transmitted as message updates to wireless device 130 in order.
Upon receiving the header information, the user may choose whether or not to retrieve the full message. If the user decides to retrieve the full message, wireless device 130 transmits a message to server 103 requesting the full e-mail. Subsequently, server 103 transmits the full text of the e-mail to wireless device 130.
Computer system 500 further comprises a random access memory (RAM) or other dynamic storage device 525 (referred to herein as main memory), coupled to bus 520 for storing information and instructions to be executed by processor 510. Main memory 525 also may be used for storing temporary variables or other intermediate information during execution of instructions by processor 510. Computer system 500 also may include a read only memory (ROM) and/or other static storage device 526 coupled to bus 520 for storing static information and instructions used by processor 510.
A data storage device 525 such as a magnetic disk or optical disc and its corresponding drive may also be coupled to computer system 500 for storing information and instructions. Computer system 500 can also be coupled to a second I/O bus 750 via an I/O interface 530. A plurality of I/O devices may be coupled to I/O bus 550, including a display device 524, an input device (e.g., an alphanumeric input device 523 and/or a cursor control device 522).
The communication device 521 is for accessing other computers (servers or clients) via network 170. The communication device 521 may comprise a modem, a network interface card, or other well-known interface device, such as those used for coupling to Ethernet, token ring, or other types of networks.
Embodiments of the invention may include various steps as set forth above. The steps may be embodied in machine-executable instructions. The instructions can be used to cause a general-purpose or special-purpose processor to perform certain steps. Alternatively, these steps may be performed by specific hardware components that contain hardwired logic for performing the steps, or by any combination of programmed computer components and custom hardware components.
Elements of the present invention may also be provided as a machine-readable medium for storing the machine-executable instructions. The machine-readable medium may include, but is not limited to, floppy diskettes, optical disks, CD-ROMs, and magneto-optical disks, ROMs, RAMs, EPROMs, EEPROMs, magnetic or optical cards, propagation media or other type of media/machine-readable medium suitable for storing electronic instructions. For example, the present invention may be downloaded as a computer program which may be transferred from a remote computer (e.g., a server) to a requesting computer (e.g., a client) by way of data signals embodied in a carrier wave or other propagation medium via a communication link (e.g., a modem or network connection).
Throughout the foregoing description, for the purposes of explanation, numerous specific details were set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the invention. It will be apparent, however, to one skilled in the art that the invention may be practiced without some of these specific details. For example, while illustrated as an interface 100 to a service 102 executed on a server 103 (see
Moreover, although described in the context of a wireless data processing device, the underlying principles of the invention may be implemented to compress data in virtually any networking environment, both wired and wireless. Accordingly, the scope and spirit of the invention should be judged in terms of the claims which follow.
This application is a continuation-in-part of co-pending U.S. application entitled System and Method for Full Wireless Synchronization of a Data Processing Apparatus with a Data Service, application Ser. No. 10/109,928, filed Mar. 29, 2002, which is a continuation-in-part of co-pending U.S. Application entitled Apparatus and Method for Conserving Bandwidth by Batch Processing Data Transactions, application Ser. No. 09/924,283, filed Aug. 7, 2001.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4682150 | Mathes et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
5049881 | Gibson et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5126739 | Whiting et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5159592 | Perkins | Oct 1992 | A |
5321840 | Ahlin et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5469161 | Bezek | Nov 1995 | A |
5553281 | Brown et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5559800 | Mousseau et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5563595 | Strohacker | Oct 1996 | A |
5666530 | Clark | Sep 1997 | A |
5715387 | Barnstijn et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5727159 | Kikinis | Mar 1998 | A |
5727202 | Kucala | Mar 1998 | A |
5760716 | Mathews et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5771010 | Masenas | Jun 1998 | A |
5790974 | Tognazzini | Aug 1998 | A |
5793970 | Fakes et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5802312 | Lazaridis et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5841376 | Hayashi | Nov 1998 | A |
5870610 | Beyda | Feb 1999 | A |
5903230 | Masenas | May 1999 | A |
5930471 | Milewski et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5961590 | Mendez et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5974238 | Chase, Jr. | Oct 1999 | A |
5987464 | Schneider | Nov 1999 | A |
6023708 | Mendez et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6034621 | Kaufman | Mar 2000 | A |
6052735 | Ulrich et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6065017 | Barker | May 2000 | A |
6085185 | Matsuzawa et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6104392 | Shaw et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6111707 | Buddecke et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6151606 | Mendez | Nov 2000 | A |
6182117 | Christie et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6216157 | Vishwanath et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6218970 | Jaquette | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6226618 | Downs et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6259891 | Allen | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6275848 | Arnold | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6279001 | DeBettencourt et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6304881 | Halim et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6310889 | Parsons et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6330618 | Hawkins et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6343299 | Huang et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6347340 | Coelho et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6360272 | Lincke et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6384850 | McNally et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6393434 | Huang et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6396482 | Griffin et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6401136 | Britton et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6430601 | Eldridge et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6449622 | LaRue et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6457062 | Pivowar et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6460055 | Midgley et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6463463 | Godrey et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6463464 | Lazaridis et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6477543 | Huang et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6505055 | Kahn et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6535892 | LaRue et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6571245 | Huang et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6604236 | Draper et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6625621 | Tan et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6654746 | Wong et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6658167 | Lee et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6694335 | Hopmann et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6697458 | Kunjibettu | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6701378 | Gilhuly et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6721787 | Hiscock | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6721871 | Piispanen et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6757698 | McBride et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6779019 | Mousseau et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6792085 | Rigaldies et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6874029 | Hutcheson et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6874037 | Abram et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6901415 | Thomas et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6931454 | Deshpande et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6941348 | Petry et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6973299 | Apfel | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6983308 | Oberhaus et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7003776 | Sutherland | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7085809 | Mori et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7092699 | Hefter | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7136934 | Carter et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7139555 | Apfel | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7149813 | Flanagin et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7155483 | Friend et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
20010004744 | Lazaridis et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010005864 | Mousseau et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010034654 | Vigil et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010054115 | Ferguson et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020016818 | Kirani et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020019225 | Miyashita | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020032722 | Baynes et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020046286 | Caldwell et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020119793 | Hronek et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120696 | Mousseau et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020146240 | Ogawa et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020160773 | Gresham et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030046434 | Flanagin et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030050046 | Conneely et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030081621 | Godfrey et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20040054739 | Friend et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040105423 | Koehler et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040109436 | Vargas et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20050148356 | Ferguson et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0666651 | Aug 1995 | EP |
0909037 | Apr 1999 | EP |
0917077 | May 1999 | EP |
1014629 | Jun 2000 | EP |
1014629 | Nov 2001 | EP |
03719504 | Aug 2006 | EP |
07-182263 | Jul 1995 | JP |
10-269125 | Oct 1998 | JP |
11-136365 | May 1999 | JP |
2001-053785 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2001-076040 | Mar 2001 | JP |
WO0067158 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO-0178342 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO 0178342 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO0219626 | Mar 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040054739 A1 | Mar 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10109928 | Mar 2002 | US |
Child | 10400979 | US | |
Parent | 09924283 | Aug 2001 | US |
Child | 10109928 | US |