This invention relates generally to the telephony field, and more specifically to a new and useful system and method for managing media in a distributed communication network.
In recent years, innovations in the web application and Voice over Internet Protocol (VOIP) have brought about considerable changes to the capabilities offered through traditional phone and communication services. In some distributed or cloud-based telephony systems, the routing of audio, video, or other media files can be determined or limited by the location and/or availability of the appropriate computing resources. In some instances, some or all of the callers reside in the same region, country, or continent as the bulk of the computing resources, thereby promoting increased call quality. However, if one or more of the parties to the call is located in a different region, country, or continent, then it is not readily apparent which computing resources should be utilized. Similarly, if the platform infrastructure is based in one region, communication outside of that region will be poor quality. For example, if the two callers reside in different countries, it might be unclear which of many computing resources should be allocated to the particular session. Furthermore, as more communication platforms are supported by cloud computing services located in distinct areas, core-computing infrastructure may be limited to particular locations. Accordingly, there is a need in the art for determining the shortest, highest quality, and/or optimized route for session traffic in a globally distributed telephony system. This invention provides such a new and useful system and method, described in detail below with reference to the appended figures.
The following description of preferred embodiments of the invention is not intended to limit the invention to these preferred embodiments, but rather to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use this invention.
Preferred System
As shown in
As shown in
The provider services (P1, P2, P3) preferably receive or initiate communication to an endpoint such as a caller, a mobile or browser client. The provider service is preferably an interface between the communication platform of the system 10 and communication providers. Communication providers preferably include telephony carrier networks, client applications using IP based communication protocols, or any suitable outside network. The system 10 may include a plurality of regions in addition to the first and second regions 12, 14. The provider services are preferably specific to each region as they are determined by the communication service providers, networks, and established contracts with various communication entities. Communication to an endpoint may alternatively be initiated from the platform. For example, an API call may specify that at least one endpoint should be contacted.
Incoming communications to a destination endpoint are preferably routed to the provider services in response to the destination endpoint being registered with the system 10. For example, a user dialing a PSTN number belonging to the system 10 will preferably have the communication directed to a provider service (P1, P2, or P3). Another example, a user dialing a SIP based endpoint that specifies a domain registered in DNS to the system 10 will preferably have the communication directed to a provider service (P1, P2, or P3). The provider additionally creates invite requests and responses that are preferably sent to a regional address (e.g., europe.twilio.com) and resolved to a communication gateway. In some variations, communication may be directly connected to a communication gateway to achieve a lower latency audio/video. This may be particularly advantageous to mobile and browser clients. The Domain Name System (DNS), anycast, or any suitable addressing and routing methodology may be used to forward to the closest communication gateway of a particular zone. The provider services preferably use SIP protocol for communication within the system, but the outside connected communication devices may use any suitable communication protocol. The signaling portion of the communication preferably contributes control directives and a mechanism to communicate various aspects concerning a communication session. The media portion of the communication is preferably the channel through which media is transferred. The medium of the communication can preferably include any suitable combination of possible media mediums such as audio, video, screen-sharing, virtual environment data, or other suitable synchronous media mediums. The media portion can be particularly susceptible to latency issues caused by the routing path. The signaling route and the media route can diverge in their network topology.
The communication gateways (X1, X2) are preferably configured for both media and signaling. A communication gateway preferably mediates Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) signaling between at least one endpoint of a communication, from call establishment to termination. SIP is a signaling protocol widely used for controlling communication sessions such as voice and/or video calls over Internet Protocol. Any suitable communication protocol such as RTP or combination of protocols may alternatively be used. As a SIP mediator, the communication gateway preferably creates SIP invites, issues other SIP signaling messages, and facilitates transfer of media (e.g., audio, video) between various end-points. The communication gateways (X1, X2, XN) are preferably logical network elements of a SIP application, and more preferably configured as back-to-back user agents (b2bua) for one or both of media and signaling control. A b2bua, as would be readily understood by a person of ordinary skill in the art, preferably operates between endpoints involved in a communication session (e.g., a phone call, video chat session, or screen-sharing session). The b2bua also divides a communication channel into at least two communication legs and mediates signaling between the involved endpoints from call establishment to termination. As such, the communication gateway can facilitate switching the communication flow from flowing through a remote region (to use remote resources) to flowing just within the local region (e.g., when establishing a call with another endpoint in the local region). The communication gateway may additionally include media processing components/resources such as Dual-tone Multi-frequency (DTMF) detector, media recorder, text-to-speech (TTS), and/or any suitable processor or service. The media processing and signaling components of a communication gateway may alternatively be divided into any suitable number of components or services in cooperative communication. In one variation, the communication gateway is implemented by two distinct components—a signaling gateway that handles the signaling and a media gateway that handles media processing and media communication. In an alternative embodiment, the communication gateways may be configured as a control channel that functions to allow devices to directly communicate peer-to-peer. Browser clients, mobile clients, or any suitable combination of clients may have direct media communication in this variation. This alternative embodiment is preferably used with low-latency media. As an additional security precaution, communication gateways may be configured to allow traffic from only a distinct set of providers. Other providers are preferably firewalled off to protect infrastructure from the public Internet. The communication gateways will preferably respond to communications and/or propagate the communication messages to a communication-processing server. The communication-processing server may be in a different remote region. Load balancers may additionally facilitate a communication propagating from a communication gateway to an optimal communication-processing server. For example, there may be multiple remote regions with available communication-processing servers that can service a communication. A load balancer or alternatively a routing policy engine may direct the communication to an appropriate the region and/or communication-processing server.
The communication-processing servers (H1, H2, H3) function to process communication from a communication gateway. A communication-processing server preferably provides value-added features or services to a communication. A preferred communication-processing server is preferably a call router or telephony application processing component as described in patent application Ser. No. 12/417,630 referenced and incorporated above. A communication-processing server (or more specifically a call router) will preferably retrieve an addressable application resource (e.g., HTTP URI address document) associated with the phone number or communication indicator. In a preferred embodiment, the resource is a telephony application that indicates sequential telephony commands for the communication session of the client(s). The telephony commands may include instructions to call another communication endpoint, to start a conference call, to play audio, to record audio or video, to convert text to speech, to transcribe audio, to perform answering machine detection, to send text or media messages (e.g., SMS or MMS messages), to collect DTMF key entry, to end a call, or perform any suitable action. The telephony instructions are preferably communicated in a telephony instruction markup language such as TwiML. The addressable resource is preferably hosted at the HTTP Server 16. The servers (H1, H2, H3) and HTTP server 16 communications are preferably RESTful in nature in both/all directions. RESTful is understood in this document to describe a Representational State Transfer architecture as is known in the art. The RESTful HTTP requests are preferably stateless, thus each message communicated from any component in the system 10 preferably contains all necessary information for operation and/or performance of the specified function. Signaling will preferably be transferred through the server, but media may not be transferred through the server.
The communication-processing server is preferably part of a telephony application platform and may cooperatively use several other resources in operation. The communication-processing server may be a central component to the service provided by a platform and as such may be associated with considerable stateful data generated in use of the server. The stateful data may be used in internal logic and operation of the platform and/or for providing API accessible data and information. The system 10 is preferably implemented in a multi-tenant environment where multiple accounts share/operate with the same resources. As such, there may be benefits in keeping the communication-processing servers centrally located in a limited number of regions. Since the communication-processing server may not be located in each local region, a local region may call out, bridge or otherwise communicate with a remote region that does hold a communication-processing server. As mentioned above, the communication-processing server may provide any suitable processing services in addition to or as an alternative to the call router variation described above.
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
The SIP API 30 can include one or more additional headers and/or configurations for use in the preferred system 10, including a regional header, an action header, a features header, a support header, and/or a required header. In this example implementation, the regional header can indicate a zone from which the request is originating, including for example a regional or sub-regional zone of Europe, Asia, North America, and/or South America. The example action header can include instructions for the receiver to perform one or more designated actions, such as a “hang up” action. The example features header can include one or more system 10 specific features, such as an instruction to hang up if the user presses the star key on his or her terminal, whether the hardware supports call recording, and the like. The example support/required headers can include information that identify any features, protocols, functions, and/or other features that are desirable, optional, or necessary for properly routing the session through any particular set of communication gateways 20 and servers 40.
The system preferably can be configured to perform one or more of the foregoing functions in a computer-readable medium storing computer-readable instructions. The instructions are preferably executed by computer-executable components preferably integrated with the one or more communication gateways (X1, X2, XN) in the first region 12, the one or more communication-processing servers (H1, H2, H3, HN) in the second region 14, the HTTP server 16, the SIP API 30, and/or the routing policy server 50. The computer-readable medium can be stored on any suitable computer readable media such as RAMs, ROMs, flash memory, EEPROMs, optical devices (CD or DVD), hard drives, floppy drives, or any suitable device. The computer-executable component is preferably a processor but the instructions can alternatively or additionally be executed by any suitable dedicated hardware device.
Preferred Method
As shown in
Block S210, which includes receiving a communication invitation of a first endpoint from a communication provider, functions to initiate a communication session. Preferably a “call” will be directed to the system through a provider service of the first region. The called destination is preferably registered with the system. For example, the telephony endpoint (the phone number, phone number prefix, SIP address, the domain of the SIP address, and the like) is used to route communication to the system in any suitable manner. The provider services preferably ports or provides a network access interface through which outside communication networks connect to the system (and/or conversely, how the system connects to the outside communication networks). A communication will preferably include a call from an endpoint being directed through outside networking to a provider service interface. The provider service will preferably use SIP signaling or any suitable protocol to direct a communication stream to a communication gateway of the first region. A SIP communication invite is preferably received at the communication gateway or more specifically a SIP signaling gateway acting as a b2bua. Herein, “calls” may refer to PSTN phone calls, IP based video calls, screen-sharing sessions, multimedia sessions, and/or any suitable synchronous media communication. Calls can additionally be mixed medium/protocols. For example, a call (i.e., communication session) may have one leg connect to a PSTN telephony device while a second leg connects to a SIP based client application. Calls may alternatively be initiated from within the system such as in response to an API request or any suitable event.
The communication session preferably includes a signaling and media communication to an endpoint through a provider service connector in the region of the endpoint (i.e., a local region). In one variation, only one endpoint may include in the communication session, such as where the platform provides media interactions with the endpoint. In another variation, the endpoint communication with one or more endpoints. The other endpoint(s) can be in the same local region, a central remote region, and/or a remote region that serves a local area. Block S210 preferably includes establishing a media communication to at least one endpoint and a signaling communication. As described below, the communication session will preferably additionally include establishing, at least at one point, a signaling communication to the remote region where control logic can facilitate directing the media communication.
Block S220, which includes signaling the communication invitation to a communication-processing server in a second region, functions to direct the communication to a communication-processing server in another region. The other region (the second region) is preferably spatially separate and remotely located from the first region. The distance of separation is preferably a globally significant distance. Within the US, the distance may be greater than 2000 miles (across country). Across the globe, the distance may be greater than 5000 miles. The communication gateway preferably directs the communication signaling. As shown in
The communication-processing server can provide any suitable communication processing service. The communication-processing server and/or any suitable component can trigger modification of the media communication wherein at least one media resource in the media communication route is changed. The change preferably includes adding a media resource, but the change may additionally or alternatively include removing a media resource. Preferably, the communication-processing server acts as a call router that manages execution of a communication session application. Processing a communication application can include operations such as connecting to endpoints, recording media, processing media (converting text-to-speech, transcribing audio to text, transcoding between media codecs), retrieving device inputs (e.g., DTMF capture), sending messages or emails, ending calls, providing answering machine detection, or providing any suitable service. In one preferred variation, the method may additionally include, within the second region, a communication-processing server retrieving application instructions from an internet accessible server at a URI that is associated with a destination endpoint of the communication invitation. In this variation, the communication-processing server is preferably a call router as described in the incorporated patent application Ser. No. 12/417,630. The application instructions are preferably formatted as markup instructions within a document retrieved over HTTP using a web request-response model.
Block S230, which includes dynamically directing signaling and media of the communication according to communication processing instructions and the resources available in at least the first and second regions functions to redirect communication to appropriate regions. The directing of signaling and media is preferably dynamically responsive to the active state of the communication. Preferably, the signal and media direction is responsive to application state of a communication. Application state may include streaming media between two outside endpoints, playing media from the system to an endpoint, processing or recording media of a communication, or any suitable application state. The communication routing is preferably changed to increase the communication performance of the current state of a communication. For example, if a first endpoint is connected to a second endpoint, and the first and second endpoints are in the same region, the communication media stream is preferably kept within the first region. This can preferably reduce the amount of communication latency that might be involved in routing through a second region. In a contrasting situation, if the communication of a first endpoint necessitates particular media processing not available in the first region, a communication flow may be established with a second region. Additionally, an application can be configured with any suitable logic. For example, a call may be responsive to a new connection to an endpoint, to one of two endpoints hanging up, to initiating media processing (e.g., audio recording, transcription, or DTMF detection), or to sending an out of stream communication (e.g., SMS or MMS) and the like. The media and the signaling channels may be routed independently according to particular requirements. Depending on the state of the communication and the media services acting on the communication, various components may be maintained in the signaling channel. For example, the communication-processing server may be maintained in the signaling route while the media route does not pass through the remote region, which can enable the communication-processing server to respond to events and redirect media as required.
Dynamically directing the signaling and media of the communication can include selecting the media, which functions to determine the network path. Generally, the selected media path includes the media resources required to fulfill the functionality requirements. The determination and selection of the media can additionally be made according to the communication quality impact of routing through that media resource. Communication quality can depend on latency, but other factors such as resource capacity, resource operational cost, and other suitable factors may be considered. In many cases, media resources closer in geographical and/or in network topology are preferred over media resources more remote. Accordingly, if a media resource is available in a region local to the endpoint(s) involved in the communication, then that media resource is selected. If a media resource is not available, then the media resource used is outside of the local region. In one variation, a core media resource in a core remote region may be used. In another variation, a second local region (serving a different area) may be used.
Block S232, which includes selectively routing media communication exclusively through communication resources of the first region if media resources to execute the processing instructions are available in the first region, functions to route communication within a region. The resources of the region are preferably sufficient to support the current state of the communication session. In a preferred variation, the media communication is exclusively routed through the communication resources of the first region for calls to other endpoints in the region. In one variation, a media resource in the platform actively manipulates the media communication. In this variation, a single endpoint may connect such as when an endpoint has a text-to-speech media server or a media player plays audio for the connected endpoint. In another variation, the media resource is an ancillary media resource that transparently monitors and operates on the media. In both variations, multiple endpoints may be part of the communication session
In the variation with multiple endpoints, Block S232 preferably includes a communication-processing server inviting a second gateway, the second communication gateway inviting a second endpoint accessible through a provider service of the first region, and the communication-processing server re-inviting the first and second communication gateways to establish media communication flow between the first and second endpoints. The communication is also directed away from the communication-processing server of the second region. As a slight variation, the media communication flow may even be established to flow directly between the first and second endpoints without passing through a gateway of the first region. The first and second endpoints can be PSTN-based endpoints, SIP based endpoints, RTP based endpoints, endpoints accessible through a proprietary IP protocol (e.g., 3rd party communication app), or any suitable endpoint. An endpoint is preferably any addressable communication destination, which may be a phone, a client application (e.g., desktop or mobile application), an IP based device or any suitable communication device. The endpoints can use any suitable protocol and the first and second endpoints may additionally use different communication protocols or mediums.
Additionally or alternatively, routing media communication exclusively through communication resources of the first region may include selecting a media resource of the first region to facilitate the media communication flow. In some cases, select media resources may be deployed/implemented in the first region. When the current communication media stream transitions to a state where it requires only the media resources of the first region, the media communication flow will preferably utilize the media resources of the first region, rather than those of the remotely located resources in the second region. For example, an application may initiate a media recording instruction. If a recording resource is in the first region, the communication gateway may direct communication flow to go to the local recording server as opposed to a recording server in a different region. In another example, a media transcoding server may be accessed to transcode media for two endpoints. Two endpoints may use different media codecs that are not compatible. The transcoding service will preferably be added as an intermediary in the communication flow so that the media can be transcoded with low latency.
The method may include querying a routing policy service for a selected communication route, which functions to dynamically select a communication route. The routing policy server can use the current state of the system, individual regions, individual resources/services/components of a region, application state, or any suitable parameter as an input. In one variation, the routing policy service is substantially statically defined. A set of rules and/or architecture configuration may be used to select the routes. In another variation, the routing policy service performs an analysis and selects a route that has statistical indications to be an optimal route based on the analysis. In the case of rerouting to augment the included media resources, the routing policy service preferably selects a route according to functionality requirements and the availability. The functionality condition preferably determines what media resource or resources are capable and required for the communication session (e.g., recording media, text to speech, transcoding, etc.). Availability preferably evaluates what regions have the media resources, the quality of service they can provide, and what is the capacity/availability of those media resources. The routing policy server is preferably queried by the communication-processing server to select communication gateways. The routing policy server may additionally or alternatively be used by the communication gateway to select a communication-processing server in block S220. There may be one canonical routing policy server or multiple routing policy server instances may be established in multiple regions.
Block S234, which includes selectively routing media communication through at least the communication-processing server if media resources are not in the first region, functions to route communication between the first and second regions. This selective option is preferably taken when the resource needed or preferred for handling the communication session is not within the local region (i.e., the first region). As with the initiation of a call, the communication gateway preferably initially connects to a communication-processing server. As was mentioned above, this default behavior may not be taken if the next state of the communication is known without accessing the communication-processing server. Additional resources within the second region may additionally or alternatively be used with the communication-processing server. For example, media resources such as recording service, text-to-speech servers, transcoding servers, transcription/speech recognition servers, and/or any suitable media resource may be implemented in the second region and may act on the media communication flow.
As mentioned above, the directing of the communication can dynamically change. The method may additionally include re-establishing communication with the communication-processing server upon a second endpoint terminating the media communication flow S236 as shown in
As shown in
As shown in
In block S302, the first communication gateway preferably performs any necessary authentications, security checks, verifications, and/or credential checks for one or both of the caller and the recipient. Block S302 can additionally include looking up and/or identifying a target uniform resource identifier (URI) for the invitation, which designates the next destination for the transmission, i.e., the suitable regional communication-processing server H1 for the request. As shown in
In block S306, the server H1 downloads and/or retrieves the TwiML based on the URI associated with the dialed number (which corresponds to an address in one variation of the preferred system and method). Preferably, block S306 can further include determining if there is any media associated with the session. Preferably, the existence or requirement of a particular media can be determined with reference to the TwiML, which can contain predefined actions or verbs. Suitable actions or verbs can include dialing a number, saying text to the caller, sending an SMS message, playing an audio or video file, getting input from the keypad, recording audio or video, connecting the call to another browser client or device, or any other suitable type or media of communication. In the example implementation, the TwiML would contain the “dial” verb, which requires media. Following a series of mutual acknowledgements, the transmission of media is opened up between the POP and the server H1 in block S306.
As shown in
As shown in
Preferably, the server H1 is not involved in the media flow of block S314. Accordingly, another example implementation can include detecting, at each of the first and second communication gateways X1 and X2, whether each respective side of the session has timed out for some reason. In response to a timeout at the first communication gateway X1, the first communication gateway X1 will alert the server H1, which in turn will hang up both the caller side and the callee side of the session. Alternatively, if it is the second communication gateway X2 that times out, then the server H1 can be configured to only terminate or hang up on the callee side in the event that there are more actions or verbs to execute on the caller side.
The foregoing example implementation illustrates one aspect of the preferred system and method using a single dial verb between two PSTN users in a telephony system. However, the preferred system and method can be readily configured for any suitable combination of verbs, user types, and media types found in a cloud-based communication network system. Some example alternative implementations can include usage of the say verb, the hang up verb, the gather verb, either alone or in combination with the dial verb described above.
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in FIG. ii, a fifth exemplary implementation of the system and/or method of the preferred embodiment can accommodate hanging up a call on a detected input. In this example, the detected input will be the DTMF input of a star (*). A user presses star when they are ready to end a call. An RTP event is sent to the provider service, which is then delivered to X1. X1 will initiate a hang up of the other party. To hang up, a re-invite signal is sent to the H1 with an action header that asks the communication processing service to hang up the other side. The H1 then issues a BYE sequence to the second endpoint through the X2 and continues executing any remaining application instructions. In an alternative implementation shown in
A sixth exemplary implementation of the system and/or method of the preferred embodiment can accommodate timeout scenarios on the caller or callee side. Each communication gateway is preferably responsible for detecting timeouts for their respective leg of the communication. As shown in
One or more aspects of the example embodiment can be configured partially or entirely in a computer-readable medium storing computer-readable instructions. The instructions are preferably executed by computer-executable components preferably integrated with one or more APIs, servers, routing policy servers, POP servers, and/or communication gateways. The computer-readable medium can be stored on any suitable computer readable media such as RAMs, ROMs, flash memory, EEPROMs, optical devices (CD or DVD), hard drives, floppy drives, or any suitable device. The computer-executable component is preferably a processor but the instructions can alternatively or additionally be executed by any suitable dedicated hardware device.
System of Global Media Resources
As shown in
The system and method can be used with any suitable media resource or resources that may benefit from being deployed to local regions. The media resources are preferably configured as a media services. A media service can be easily deployed in a local region and operate independently and consistently integrate with other regions, such as the remote region where API resources and state is maintained. A media service preferably has a defined interface and manages its own high availability load balancing, scalability, redundancy, and other service oriented orchestration considerations. Storage and state can preferably be maintained internally within the media service. For example, a database used to manage the service orchestration of the media service can be kept internally and may, at least in part, not be shared outside of the service. Information, records, and data that is to be shared outside of a media service, is preferably distributed across regions for other services to consume. The media service may include a media service API to facilitate access and integration of the media service with other services and components of a communication platform. Media services are preferably composed of components or computing resources. The components can be software libraries or other services (e.g., a mini-service). The components preferably perform a specific task. Some of these components, which facilitate a particular feature of a service, may or may not be activated or included in a locally deployed media service. For example, for a recording service, transcription may or may not be an included component. Multiple media services may be implemented within a local region, and the media services may target a variety of communication functions. A media service may be a recording service, a text-to-speech (TTS) service, a speech recognition service, a transcoding service, an input detection service, answering machine detection service, a conferencing service, a communication queuing service, and/or any suitable media service.
Two preferred varieties of media services include passive media services and active media services. A passive media service is a media service that acts on the media asynchronously to the media communication path connected to an endpoint, and more specifically, the passive media service immutably operates on the media of the communication session—the media of the communication session is immutable to the operations of the passive media service. Duplicated copies of the media, stored versions of the media, or other secondary instances of the media may be reasonably mutable by a passive media service, wherein secondary instances of the media (e.g., a branch or tunnel) can be processed or augmented in any suitable manner asynchronous to the primary media communication route of the communication session. In other words, the media service preferably does not substantially impact the latency of communication of the media communication with an endpoint. A passive media service may process the media after or independent of media communication routing; the passive media service may asynchronously relay a branch of the media to another resource; or the media service may otherwise operate on the media in an immutable and asynchronously manner. A recording service preferably temporarily stores media and then tunnels the media asynchronously (i.e., independent of the media path through the recording service). The media communication routed through the media service is preferably not mutable by the recording service. Some passive media services may contribute some latency to the communication stream, but this is preferably independent of the latency caused from tunneling the media. A speech to text transcription service may generate text from spoken text asynchronous to media passed through the service. An active media service preferably acts and may modify the media in the media communication with an endpoint. An active media service may generate media (e.g., a ITS service), mix media (e.g., conferencing service), and translate/transcode media (e.g. transcode between media codecs and/or mediums). The media communication is preferably mutable. In other words, an active media service mutably operates on the media by altering or augmenting the state of the media communication of the communication session (e.g., the media or representation of the media can be altered). A media service may additionally provide passive and active functionality as a single media service, such as a ITS service with recording capabilities.
Recording services preferably enable recording of calls or communication sessions that are routed through communication gateways within the local region. This avoids routing media communication flow through a remote region to access a recording resource. Recording is preferably for audio recording, but may additionally or alternatively include video recording, screen-sharing recording, multimedia recording, or any suitable recording service. The recording service may have additional features that may or may not be integrated into the recording service of the local service. Transcription is one preferred feature of the recording service. Transcription may use algorithmic speech recognition techniques, automated manual transcription, semi-automated techniques, and/or any suitable approach. The audio recording files, the meta data of the recording (e.g., timestamp, time duration, audio quality and format), and/or the recording transcripts are preferably synchronized with a remote region. As shown in
The recording component is preferably responsible for taking a stream (audio, video, etc.), manipulating the stream (e.g., trimming off silence, transcoding it to a different format/codec, etc.,) and writing the recording to a file. Inputs for the recording component may include the audio stream, the file name, and/or arguments for trimming, file format, recording quality, volume adjustment, and/or any suitable parameter of the recording. Outputs of the recording component preferably include an audio stream saved as a file, meta data such as the duration of the saved audio file, and size of the file. The transcription component can include inputs such as the audio stream, transcription arguments, an HTTP callback to call when transcription is complete, and/or any suitable parameter. The transcription arguments may include the accuracy level of the transcription (e.g., level of service), language of transcription, and/or any suitable variable of the transcription process. The transcription component preferably outputs the text of the stream. An interface of the recording service preferably abstracts away the inner-workings of the components of the recording service. The interface of the recording service uses inputs of a recording ID, an audio stream to record, and/or a HTTP callback to call after complete. In one variation the HTTP callback is called after transcoding of the recorded file is complete. Other inputs and parameters may additionally or alternatively be exposed of the recording service. Additional inputs may include transcription inputs such as if a recording should use transcription and the parameters of the transcription. The recording service interface preferably outputs a URI or alternative resources address of a recording, parameters of the recording (e.g., duration of the recording, timestamp), and/or file parameters such as file size.
A Text-to speech service preferably generates, plays, and/or converts text into audible speech. The audible speech is then played within a communication stream. For example, a phone call may connect to a telephony application that specifies a script that should be read to the caller. The script is preferably directed to the TTS service to be played during the phone call. The text-to-speech services are preferably for audio communication. However, a computer generated video simulation or rendering of a speaker may additionally be created for video communication. The text-to-speech service preferably takes text as an input and outputs an audio stream and/or an audio file as an output. The audio file may be cached internally within a local region implementation of a media service. The audio file of a TTS request may additionally be synchronized with a TTS cache of a remote region.
A speech recognition service is preferably a service used in collecting spoken input and converting it into a format for transcription, natural language processing, or interpretation of responses. The speech recognition may use the transcription component described above, but may alternatively use an alternative approach. The input to the speech recognition is preferably an audio stream and parameters of speech recognition. Parameters of speech recognition may include expected language of speech. In one variation, the speech recognition service is used to detect or identify categories of responses. For example, the speech recognition may be used to identify a number with a set number of digits, to identify particular key words, or classes of responses. In one example, classes of responses may include a confirmation class and a cancel/deny response. The output may be the interpretation of the speech. In one variation, an HTTP callback may be specified where the output may be posted after speech recognition is completed. In another variation, the speech recognition service may work in cooperation with the recording service. Alternatively, a speech recognition component may be integrated into the recording service, an input detection service, and/or any suitable service.
A transcoding service functions to convert between formats. The transcoding may convert an active media stream to another format. For example, a call with two endpoints may natively use two different codecs. The transcoding service may convert one or two of the legs of the communication to a common or compatible media stream format. Additionally, the transcoding service may work to convert accessed media resources that are or will be used in a communication session. For example, an MP3 file accessed from a URI may be converted to a wave file for playback during a phone call. The transcoding service preferably accepts a media stream in a first format and outputs a media stream in a second format. The transcoding preferably is used on communication that flows within the local region. The transcoding service may additionally be used if communication flows between two different local regions (as opposed to including a third remote region just for the transcoding service).
An input detection service functions to gather inputs of a communication device. Preferably the input detection service collects DTMF inputs from a user. In the DTMF input detection variation, an audio stream and parameters of detection are preferably an input to the service. Parameters of DTMF detection can include timeout, a key to finish detection on, number of digits, a callback URI to call after input is captured, and/or any suitable input. As an additional service, an answering machine detection service may be used to identify an answering machine. The components of an answering machine detection service may alternatively be integrated into the input detection service or any suitable service.
Conferencing services preferably facilitate calls with more than two endpoints connected. Various features of conference calls may be enabled through components of conferencing services. Additionally, a conferencing service may generate accessible API resources that can be used by applications to programmatically query and modify aspects of in-progress or past conference calls. The API resources are preferably streamed or transmitted to a remote region where consistent representations of API resources are managed for a platform. This preferably functions to make API resources to be regionally/globally consistent despite media services handling communication processing within a local region. For example, a conference call may be in progress in Europe. The communication is preferably routed between multiple European endpoints, possible communication gateways facilitating the signaling, and a conferencing service in the European region. Data for conference call API resources is preferably communicated back to a remote region that is used in managing the API resources. Now if an application anywhere in the world queries for the in-progress conferencing resource and modifies the resource, that occurs on a platform consistent version of the API resource. The synchronous communication preferably avoids increased latency that may occur if the communication was routed to a remote region to a conferencing service, but the API resources used to programmatically interact with the conference call are maintained consistent in the platform.
A communication queuing service functions manage phone queues or, in other words, communication holding lines. Similar to the conference call above, API resources for querying and managing a call queue may be accessible within the platform. The data to support such API resources is preferably synchronized with the platform services and components in a remote region.
A core media service functions to provide functionality of the media service in a central or core region. The core media service may be a super-set of media processing features than those of a local region, but may alternatively provide substantially identical media processing functionality. A core media service can preferably coordinate with a local media service in synchronizing API media resources. For example, a recording media service may locally temporarily store a copy of the media in the local region in case a failure occurs in communication with the remote region. Then the media communication is streamed or otherwise communicated to the core media service to synchronize with the API sub-system. The API sub-system preferably includes the API services to support processing API calls. The API sub-system additionally includes media storage systems. In the recording example, a copy of the recording is preferably stored in some media storage solution such as a cloud hosted simple storage solution.
As mentioned above any suitable services may be implemented within a local region. The media services used within a local region depend on the use-case of the communication platform. While any of the above media services or suitable alternative media services may used, the below method primarily uses a recording service as an exemplary media service but any suitable media service may additionally or alternatively be used.
Method of Global Media Resources
As shown in
As discussed herein, establishing a media communication can include establishing a media communication and a signaling communication. Furthermore, at the communication session includes at least one connection to an endpoint, but may support multiple endpoints, which may be associated with the same or different regions.
Additionally, dynamically directing signaling and media of the communication preferably includes routing media communication outside of the first region if the selected media resource is outside the first region, and routing media communication through the media resource of the first region if the media resource is available in the first region. The method preferably selects media resources according to communication quality. Communication quality preferably includes communication latency (which may be impacted according to regional association of media resources), post dial delay, jitter, cost to platform, cost to customer, and/or any suitable quality metric.
The method can preferably establish regional communication routing according to various modes of communication network topologies. The use of active media resources can preferably include any suitable mode of communication network topology (e.g., routing media within a single region, accessing an active media resource external to the region associated with the connected endpoints, routing through multiple regions when endpoints connect in different regions, and other suitable scenarios). In the case of passive media resources, branches of the media communication can be transmitted or tunneled to media resources of other regions. Additionally, various combinations and variations of the communication topologies can be dynamically generated in response to different passive and/or active media resource requirements.
As shown in
Block S510, which includes providing a communication processing platform with components of at least two regions, functions to dynamically direct communication traffic between two regions. The provided communication processing platform is preferably substantially similar to the system and methods described above. Communication can preferably be routed within a local region if resources are available in that region or communication can be routed between at least a local and remote region to use the resources used during a communication session. Providing communication processing platform may include initializing signaling and media communication flow as described above. The subsequent steps below are preferably used in the context where the media communication flow is established within a local region. In other words, media communication flow is from at least one endpoint through a provider service of a first region and to at least a communication gateway. A one legged variation where only one outside endpoint is connected preferably uses at least one media resource to act as the other endpoint (e.g., play audio and/or collect input). Other variations, preferably involve a communication session having at least two outside endpoints connected. The communication route preferably is from a first endpoint through a provider service to a first communication gateway to a second communication gateway and then through a provider service to the second endpoint. Any suitable number of endpoints may additionally be connected. Additionally, communication is additionally routed to a media service as described below in Block S520.
Block S520, which includes routing communication to at least one media service of the local region, functions to incorporate a media service with active communication. The media service may also be provided by a remote service as well as a local region. A benefit of using the media service of the local region is that latency issues, quality of service, and other issues may be avoided by containing communication flow within a local region. A media service is preferably activated by a communication-processing server (e.g., a call router) of a remote region deciding that a media process should be used. The communication-processing server preferably signals to the communication gateway of the local region to inform the communication gateway that it should use, activate, or enable the media service. Preferably the signal is sent through a SIP control channel using SIP INFO. Additionally, some record within the remote region may initially be created by the communication-processing server. The record may be used in creation of an API resource or for internal logic of the remote region. The record is preferably stored in a database or some other suitable storage mechanism. In initializing the record, some information such as a resource ID or secure ID may be automatically generated before a media service is notified. Record information such as account information, media resource ID, and other instructions may be included in the signal communication to the communication gateway in the local region. For example, if a call router encounters an instruction to record audio. The call router preferably creates a recording resource in the remote region; transmits a SIP INFO signal to a communication gateway managing the endpoint in a remote region, wherein the SIP INFO also includes recording instructions, the resource ID and account information.
The communication gateway preferably activates the media resource by connecting the communication stream to the media service. Depending on the type and use-case of the media service, the media service may be an intermediary service, a side service or an endpoint service. As an intermediary service, the media communication flow passes through the media service. This may include a transformation of the media stream between different legs of the communication. For example, a transcoding service may convert the communication stream to a common compatible media format. A side service is preferably an passive or ancillary service that has a communication stream pushed to the media service. The communication stream maybe transmitted asynchronous to the media communication connected to the endpoint. As being transmitted asynchronously, any latency or delays in the media transmission is preferably independent of such issues with the communication quality experienced by connected endpoints. The media service may be passively observing the communication stream such as in the case of a recording service. The media service may alternatively actively interact with the communication stream such as if an input service signals the communication gateway that an input event was detected. The media service may additionally be a communicating endpoint of the communication session. For example, a media service for playing audio files and/or performing speech recognition may act as one leg of a phone call. In the case of a recording service, the two streams of a media communication are preferably merged and pushed to the recording resource over HTTP. The stream is additionally stored in local disc of the local region. The local disc storage functions as a backup in case of failure. In one variation, the media service of the local region is implemented as a static proxy of the media service and the media stream is tunneled from the static proxy to a service proxy and media service of a remote region as shown in
Block S530, which includes tunneling a media stream to the remote region, functions to transfer data for persistent storage in the remote region. Tunneling to the remote region is preferably used to update records in the remote region. There may be several ways to accomplish this. A first variation include tunneling of a media stream may include establishing VPN proxies that function to get around firewalls. A firewall for HTTP is preferably opened to enable servers of the local region push media streams to media services of the remote region. As described above, service proxy servers may be implemented within the remote region to receive incoming SSL-encrypted connections from local regions, terminate the SSL, and forward requests to an appropriate media service of the remote region. Another variation may include cutting database dependence of a media service and promoting a resource of the remote region to update the database. Data generated in the media service is preferably streamed from the local region to the remote region. In one variation, an existing SIP channel may be used as the signaling and media channel for streaming media to the remote region. Special handling of SIP failures or media processing failures may used to ensure updating of the database. Another variation would be to open up firewalls for the databases with records used by a media service. Measures are preferably with the communication link between the regions to avoid a security risk of opening up firewalls for the databases.
Block S540, which includes storing the data of the media service, functions to store the data of the media service in a consistent and accessible manner. The data is preferably stored within a remote region that is used at least in part as a core, central, or main sub-system of the platform. The remote region will preferably be a region where at least part of state data of the platform is kept. There may need to be numerous local regions deployed to service different geographic regions. However, replicating and making the data consistent across each region increases complexity and cost of the platform. A subset of the regions, possibly even one or two regions, is preferably used as the central region where persistent data is stored. The persistent data may be used within logic of the platform or alternatively used as accessible resources available through an API, user interface, or other suitable interface. Once the data from the media service of the local region has completed, the communication-processing server will preferably signal back to the local region over the signaling control channel to stop the recording. Alternatively, a media service in may signal to the communication gateway, which may contact a component of the remote region to indicate that the storing of the persistent data is complete. While storing of persistent data is used for some media services, some media services may not generate persistent data that requires storing outside of the local region.
As shown in
Method for Managing Communication in a Distributed Communication Network
As shown in
Block S610, which includes providing a communication platform with resources in at least two regions, functions to have a communication platform with at least two regions of resources. The different regions are preferably substantially similar to the regions described above. The regional centers are preferably hosted within distributed computing systems based in particular geographic regions. The regions of the communication platform are preferably at least partially co-dependent, in that at least one or more resources are shared between the two regions. In a preferred implementation, a central core region, will maintain core resources such as communication-processing servers. There may be a single core region, which in one implementation maintains the official state information within the platform (e.g., maintains the consistent source of API resource information for various accounts). There can additionally be multiple core regions. Synchronizing resources can be used to keep data and state of the core regions in synchronization. Local regions are preferably deployed to serve communication requirements in particular geographic regions. The local regions may not include a full set of resources to handle all communication capabilities of the platform. Additionally, different local regions may have different levels of communication capabilities. As described above, the local regions may additionally include local instances of a resource that operate in cooperation with core regional instances of the resource. For example, a local recording resource may facilitate recording in the local region (avoiding latency issues), while tunneling the media to a core recording resource to store as an API resource. The regions can include different sets of media processing resources, signaling resources, storage/state information, platform services (e.g., API servers, etc.), and/or any suitable type of resource.
Block S620, which includes initializing a communication session with a connection to at least one endpoint, functions to establish a communication with at least one outside initiator or receiver of the communication. The initiated transaction may be transacted (e.g., originated, terminated, or otherwise connected) with a PSTN provider, a SIP provider, a IP communication provider, client application, a WebRTC communication source, or any suitable communication provider.
In one preferred variation, the communication session is initiated from an incoming communication request. The incoming request may be received from a PSTN provider, a SIP provider, an OTT IP communication provider, a client application, a WebRTC provider or service, and/or any suitable communication provider. In the case of a client application, the incoming request from the client application may be an API request from a client endpoint (e.g., a mobile app used as a communication device). In the case of an incoming request, the calling endpoint is connected to at least one media endpoint (e.g., a TTS server) within the communication platform or alternatively to at least a second external endpoint. The first, second, and/or optionally other endpoints may be the same type of endpoint or may be different endpoints. A subset of the endpoints may be endpoints associated with the same region or, alternatively, different regions.
In other instances, the communication session may be initiated in response to an outgoing communication request. In this variation, the communication is established from the communication session, and will preferably include calling out or inviting at least one external communication endpoint. As with the inbound communication, the outbound communication may be between one endpoint and an internal media service or between at least two external communication endpoints. The outbound communication session may be initialized in response to an API request. For example, an account may make a REST API request to setup a call between two endpoints. The outbound communication session may alternatively be in response to application processing, part of a scheduled event, or in response to any suitable trigger. In many cases, the communication session will be modified such that the involved endpoints change during the session, preferably through merging incoming and/or outgoing communications. For example, an inbound call may be redirected to connect to another external endpoint; two inbound calls may be merged in a conference; or outbound calls may be merged in a conference.
Block S630, which includes associating the first endpoint with a first region, functions to establish or determine a regional relationship of involved endpoints. The endpoint is preferably associated with a region according to regional information encoded in the endpoint (e.g., country code, area code, etc.) or otherwise associated with the endpoint. An endpoint will preferably have a geographic proximity (or alternatively a network-based proximity) to at least one region. The endpoint is preferably associated with the geographically closest region. In some cases, where the distance different between a local region and core regional is negligible (e.g., less than 500 miles), then the association may be biased towards the region that better meets the communication resource requirements. For inbound communications in particular, the regional association is preferably based on the provider resource through which the inbound communication is received. For example, a PSTN provider that serves a particular region is preferably configured to bridge communications to the communication platform in a designated region. Similarly, when making outbound calls, the area code or country code of an endpoint may be used to determine which region will be used as a connection point to the endpoint. For example, all outgoing calls for endpoints with addressing information associated with a particular region may go through that particular region. Multiple endpoints may participate in a communication session, and each endpoint can be individually associated with a region.
A communication session can include one or more connected endpoints. Each endpoint is preferably associated with a region wherein block S630 may be performed for multiple endpoints. Such region associations can be determined based on acquired metadata stored in association with the endpoint address. Additionally or alternatively, regional information may conveyed through the endpoint address such as in the country code and area code of a phone number, or the domain name used in a SIP address. Such endpoint associations are preferably account for and impact the determination of a communication route topology.
Block S640, which includes determining a communication route topology, functions to query, select, or otherwise determine how at least media is routed within the communication platform. As the communication platform spans multiple regions, the media and/or signaling can be routed in different topologies depending on the communication requirements, regional association of the connected endpoints, and the regional capabilities. The communication route topologies preferably include which resource instances and which regions are used and how the communication is networked between them to connect the endpoints. Block S640 preferably includes determining a communication route topology based on the required resource requirements and the availability of media resources in the regions. As discussed above, communication resources may have different availability depending on the associated regions. Preferably the communication route topology includes the media communication route (i.e., how a real-time media stream is routed). The communication route topology can additionally include a signaling communication route. The signaling and media communication can be facilitated by SIP, but may use any suitable communication protocol. The signaling route and the media route can be independent such that the route of media can be different from the signaling route (even including different regions.
Determining a communication route topology preferably includes determining a route that provides improved communication quality. Preferably the communication quality minimizes communication latency. The communication quality preferably depends on media latency between connected endpoints, but may additionally include other factors such as post-dial delay, jitter, codec quality, platform cost, user cost, and/or any suitable parameter. In one variation, a network graph search algorithm is used to determine the route. In particular, a provider-weighted network search approach can balance a set of different communication quality properties such as the method described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/209,152, filed 13 Mar. 2014, which is incorporated in its entirety by this reference. In an alternative variation, various heuristics based on regional availability of resources is used to default to the nearest resource.
Block S650, which includes establishing the communication route topology, functions to register, negotiate, or otherwise setup the determined communication route topology. Establishing the communication route topology can include negotiating the setup of a media route through a path of the determined path. In a SIP variation, various elements may resources may be invited or subscribe to the media stream. Additionally, media and/or signaling resources may be directed to perform various tasks in association with the communication session. The path will preferably connect the connected endpoint(s) and at least one resource of the communication platform. Other instances may route through multiple resources, establish multiple media “branches”, and include various resources.
The communication route topologies can specify different modes of operation that are established in block S650. In a local mode, the topology is maintained in the first region. The local mode is preferably used when the resources are available within the region associated with the endpoint(s) as shown in
In a remote mode, the topology is through a region outside of the first region. In the remote mode, at least one resource is used outside of the region local to an endpoint. This can include any suitable multi-regional topology. The routing of media through different regions is preferably to access resources not available in the local regions of connected endpoints. In one instance of a remote mode, the topology includes a communication route topology connecting a segment of the route in a first region connected to a first endpoint, a segment through a second region, and a segment in the first region connected to a second endpoint as shown in
In hybrid mode, may include substantially serving the communication session with resources in a local region while creating a media branch to a remote region as with the recording example above and shown in
Communication signal route topology can be similarly be established in any of the suitable variations described above. In one variation, signaling and media are coupled. In another variation, signaling and media are distinct and can have different or identical paths as shown in
Additionally, the method may include detecting a new resource requirement and updating the communication route topology S660, which functions to transition the communication route topology according to resource requirements. In a communication platform, a communication session may have different resource requirements over the duration of a single session. The communication route may be updated to use different resources, which may result in the media and/or signaling route to have a different path through regions. In other words, the set of resources and the set of regions from one communication topology may be distinct from that of a second instance of the communication topology. For example, a first segment of a session may be simple bridging of multiple endpoints, another segment may require processing application logic of the communication session, and another segment may require the use of a particular media resource (e.g., recording service). Each of these segments can have different resource requirements. The change of resource requirements is preferably identified through the signaling and/or processing of application logic. When a new resource is required, the resource(s) are preferably identified, and then blocks S630, S640, and S650 are preferably substantially repeated to transition the media and/or signaling. Even if a resource was included in the previous route, a new instance of that resource in a different region may be used. Similarly, if resources are no longer needed, they may be removed from the route.
As a person skilled in the art will recognize from the previous detailed description and from the figures and claims, modifications and changes can be made to the preferred embodiments of the invention without departing from the scope of this invention defined in the following claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/278,952, filed 15 May 2014, which is a continuation-in-part of prior U.S. application Ser. No. 14/176,458, filed on 10 Feb. 2014, which is a continuation of prior U.S. application Ser. No. 13/891,111, filed on 9 May 2013, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/644,886, filed on 9 May 2012, all of which are incorporated in their entirety by this reference. This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/278,952, filed 15 May 2014, which also claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/823,837, filed on 15 May 2013, both of which are incorporated in their entirety by this reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5274700 | Gechter et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5526416 | Dezonno et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5581608 | Jreij et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5598457 | Foladare et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5867495 | Elliott et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5934181 | Adamczewski | Aug 1999 | A |
5978465 | Corduroy et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6026440 | Shrader et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6034946 | Roginsky et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6094681 | Shaffer et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6138143 | Gigliotti et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6185565 | Meubus et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192123 | Grunsted et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6206564 | Adamczewski | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6223287 | Douglas et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6232979 | Shochet | May 2001 | B1 |
6269336 | Ladd et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6317137 | Rosasco | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6363065 | Thornton et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6373836 | Deryugin et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6425012 | Trovato et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6426995 | Kim et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430175 | Echols et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6434528 | Sanders | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6445694 | Swartz | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6445776 | Shank et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6459913 | Cloutier | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6463414 | Su et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6493558 | Bernhart et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6496500 | Johnson et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6501739 | Cohen | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6501832 | Saylor et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6507875 | Mellen-Garnett et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6571245 | Huang et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6574216 | Farris et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6577721 | Vainio et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6600736 | Ball et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6606596 | Zirngibl et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6614783 | Sonesh et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6625258 | Ram et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6625576 | Kochanski et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6636504 | Albers et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6662231 | Drosset et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6704785 | Koo et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6707889 | Saylor et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6711129 | Bauer et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6711249 | Weissman et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6738738 | Henton | May 2004 | B2 |
6757365 | Bogard | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6765997 | Zirngibl et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6768788 | Langseth et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6771955 | Imura et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6778653 | Kallas et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6785266 | Swartz | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6788768 | Saylor et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6792086 | Saylor et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6792093 | Barak et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6798867 | Zirngibl et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6807529 | Johnson et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6807574 | Partovi et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6819667 | Brusilovsky et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6820260 | Flockhart et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6829334 | Zirngibl et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6831966 | Tegan et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6834265 | Balasuriya | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6836537 | Zirngibl et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6842767 | Partovi et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6850603 | Eberle et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6870830 | Schuster et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6873952 | Bailey et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6885737 | Gao et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6874084 | Dobner et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6888929 | Saylor et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6895084 | Saylor et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6898567 | Balasuriya | May 2005 | B2 |
6912581 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6922411 | Taylor | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6928469 | Duursma et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6931405 | El-Shimi et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6937699 | Schuster et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6940953 | Eberle et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6941268 | Porter et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6947417 | Laursen et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6947988 | Saleh | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6961330 | Cattan et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6964012 | Zirngibl et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6970915 | Partovi et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6977992 | Zirngibl et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6981041 | Araujo et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6985862 | Stroem et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6999576 | Sacra | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7003464 | Ferrans et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7006606 | Cohen et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7010586 | Allavarpu et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7020685 | Chen et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7039165 | Saylor et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7058042 | Bontempi et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7058181 | Wright et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7062709 | Cheung | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7065637 | Nanja | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7076037 | Gonen et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7076428 | Anastasakos et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7089310 | Ellerman et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7099442 | Da Palma et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7103003 | Brueckheimer et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7103171 | Annadata et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7106844 | Holland | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7111163 | Haney | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7136932 | Schneider | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7140004 | Kunins et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7143039 | Stifelman et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7197331 | Anastasakos et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7197461 | Eberle et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7197462 | Takagi et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7197544 | Wang et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7225232 | Elberse | May 2007 | B2 |
7227849 | Rasanen | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7245611 | Narasimhan et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7260208 | Cavalcanti | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7266181 | Zirngibl et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7269557 | Bailey et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7272212 | Eberle et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7272564 | Phillips et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7277851 | Henton | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7283515 | Fowler | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7283519 | Girard | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7286521 | Jackson et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7287248 | Adeeb | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7289453 | Riedel et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7296739 | Mo et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7298732 | Cho | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7298834 | Homeier et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7308085 | Weissman | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7308408 | Stifelman et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7324633 | Gao et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7324942 | Mahowald et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7328263 | Sadjadi | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7330463 | Bradd et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7330890 | Partovi et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7340040 | Saylor et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7349714 | Lee et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7369865 | Gabriel et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7370329 | Kumar et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7373660 | Guichard et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7376223 | Taylor et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7376586 | Partovi et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7376733 | Connelly et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7376740 | Porter et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7412525 | Cafarella et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7418090 | Reding et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7428302 | Zirngibl et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7440898 | Eberle et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7447299 | Partovi et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7454459 | Kapoor et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7457249 | Baldwin et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7457397 | Saylor et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7473872 | Takimoto | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7486780 | Zirngibl et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7496054 | Taylor | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7496188 | Saha et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7496651 | Joshi | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7500249 | Kampe et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7505951 | Thompson et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7519359 | Chiarulli et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7522711 | Stein et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7536454 | Balasuriya | May 2009 | B2 |
7542761 | Sarkar | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7552054 | Stifelman et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7571226 | Partovi et al. | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7606868 | Le et al. | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7613287 | Stifelman et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7623648 | Oppenheim et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7630900 | Strom | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7631310 | Henzinger | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7644000 | Strom | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7657433 | Chang | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7657434 | Thompson et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7668157 | Weintraub et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7672275 | Yajnik et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7672295 | Andhare et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7675857 | Chesson | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7676221 | Roundtree et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7685280 | Berry et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7685298 | Day et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7715547 | Ibbotson et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7716293 | Kasuga et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7742499 | Erskine et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7779065 | Gupta et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7809125 | Brunson et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7809791 | Schwartz et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7875836 | Imura et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7882253 | Pardo-Castellote et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7920866 | Bosch et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7926099 | Chakravarty et al. | Apr 2011 | B1 |
7929562 | Petrovykh | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7936867 | Hill et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
7949111 | Harlow et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7962644 | Ezerzer et al. | Jun 2011 | B1 |
7979555 | Rothstein et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7992120 | Wang et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8023425 | Raleigh | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8024785 | Andress et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8045689 | Provenzale et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8046378 | Zhuge et al. | Oct 2011 | B1 |
8046823 | Begen et al. | Oct 2011 | B1 |
8069096 | Ballaro et al. | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8078483 | Hirose et al. | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8081744 | Sylvain | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8081958 | Soederstroem et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8103725 | Gupta et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8126128 | Hicks, Iii et al. | Feb 2012 | B1 |
8126129 | McGuire | Feb 2012 | B1 |
8130750 | Hester | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8130917 | Helbling et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8139730 | Palma et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8145212 | Lopresti et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8149716 | Ramanathan et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8150918 | Edelman et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8156213 | Deng et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8165116 | Ku et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8166185 | Samuel et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8169936 | Koren et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8175007 | Jain et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8185619 | Maiocco et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
8196133 | Kakumani et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8204479 | Vendrow et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8214868 | Hamilton et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8218457 | Malhotra et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8233611 | Zettner | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8238533 | Blackwell et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8243889 | Taylor et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8249552 | Gailloux et al. | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8266327 | Kumar et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8295272 | Boni et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8301117 | Keast et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8306021 | Lawson et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8315198 | Corneille et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8315369 | Lawson et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8315620 | Williamson et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8319816 | Swanson et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8326805 | Arous et al. | Dec 2012 | B1 |
8335852 | Hokimoto | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8346630 | McKeown | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8355394 | Taylor et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8411669 | Chen et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8413247 | Hudis et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8417817 | Jacobs | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8429827 | Wetzel | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8438315 | Tao et al. | May 2013 | B1 |
8462670 | Chien et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8467502 | Sureka et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8477926 | Jasper et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8503639 | Reding et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8503650 | Reding et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8504818 | Rao et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8509068 | Begall et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8532686 | Schmidt et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8533857 | Tuchman et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8542805 | Agranovsky et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8543665 | Ansari et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8547962 | Ramachandran et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8549047 | Beechuk et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8565117 | Hilt et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8572391 | Golan et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8576712 | Sabat et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8577803 | Chatterjee et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8582450 | Robesky | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8582737 | Lawson et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8594626 | Woodson et al. | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8601136 | Fahlgren et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8611338 | Lawson et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8613102 | Nath | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8621598 | Lai et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8649268 | Lawson et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8656452 | Li et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8667056 | Proulx et al. | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8675493 | Buddhikot et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8688147 | Nguyen et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8695077 | Gerhard et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8713693 | Shanabrook et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8728656 | Takahashi et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8751801 | Harris et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8755376 | Lawson et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8767925 | Sureka et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8781975 | Bennett et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8797920 | Parreira | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8806024 | Francis et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8819133 | Wang | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8825746 | Ravichandran et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8837465 | Lawson et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8838707 | Lawson et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8843596 | Goel et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8855271 | Brock et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8861510 | Fritz | Oct 2014 | B1 |
8879547 | Maes | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8903938 | Vermeulen et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8918848 | Sharma et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8924489 | Bleau et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8938053 | Cooke et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8948356 | Nowack et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8954591 | Ganesan | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8964726 | Lawson et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8990610 | Bostick et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9014664 | Kim et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9015702 | Bhat | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9031223 | Smith et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9071677 | Aggarwal et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9137127 | Nowack et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9141682 | Adoc, Jr. et al. | Sep 2015 | B1 |
9161296 | Parsons et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9177007 | Winters et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9204281 | Ramprasad et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9210275 | Lawson et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9306982 | Lawson et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9307094 | Nowack et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9325624 | Malatack et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9338190 | Eng et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9344573 | Wolthuis et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9350642 | Fahlgren et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9356916 | Kravitz et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9378337 | Kuhr | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9398622 | Lawson et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9456008 | Lawson et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9456339 | Hildner et al. | Sep 2016 | B1 |
9460169 | Hinton et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9596274 | Lawson et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9602586 | Tarricone et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9628624 | Wolthuis et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9632875 | Raichstein et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9634995 | Binder | Apr 2017 | B2 |
20010038624 | Greenberg et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010043684 | Guedalia et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010051996 | Cooper et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020006124 | Jimenez et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020006125 | Josse et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020006193 | Rodenbusch et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020025819 | Cetusic et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020057777 | Saito et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020064267 | Martin et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020067823 | Walker et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020077833 | Arons et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020126813 | Partovi et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020133587 | Ensel et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020136391 | Armstrong | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020165957 | Devoe et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020176378 | Hamilton et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020176404 | Girard | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020184361 | Eden | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020198941 | Gavrilescu et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030006137 | Wei et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030012356 | Zino et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030014665 | Anderson et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018830 | Chen et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023672 | Vaysman | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030026426 | Wright | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030046366 | Pardikar et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030051037 | Sundaram et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030058884 | Kallner et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030059020 | Meyerson et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060188 | Gidron et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030061317 | Brown et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030061404 | Atwal | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030088421 | Maes et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097330 | Hillmer et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097447 | Johnston | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097639 | Niyogi et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030103620 | Brown et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030123640 | Roelle et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030149721 | Alfonso-Nogueiro et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030162506 | Toshimitsu et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030195950 | Huang et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030195990 | Greenblat | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030196076 | Zabarski et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204616 | Billhartz et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030211842 | Kempf et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030231647 | Petrovykh | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233276 | Pearlman et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040008635 | Nelson et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040011690 | Marfino et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040044953 | Watkins et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040052349 | Creamer et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040071275 | Bowater et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040101122 | Da Palma | May 2004 | A1 |
20040102182 | Reith et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040117788 | Karaoguz et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040136324 | Steinberg et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040165569 | Sweatman et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040172482 | Weissman et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040199572 | Hunt et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040205101 | Radhakrishnan | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040205689 | Ellens et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040213400 | Golitsin et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040216058 | Chavers et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040218748 | Fisher | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040228469 | Andrews et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040236696 | Aoki et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040240649 | Goel | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050005109 | Castaldi et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050005200 | Matena et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050015505 | Kruis et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021626 | Prajapat et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050025303 | Hostetler | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050038772 | Colrain | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050043952 | Sharma et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050047579 | Salame | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050060411 | Coulombe et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050083907 | Fishler | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050091336 | DeHamer et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050091572 | Gavrilescu et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050108770 | Karaoguz et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050125251 | Berger et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050125739 | Thompson et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050128961 | Miloslaysky et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050135578 | Ress et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050141500 | Bhandari et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050147088 | Bao et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050177635 | Schmidt et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050181835 | Lau et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050198292 | Duursma et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050228680 | Malik | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050238153 | Chevalier | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050240659 | Taylor | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050243977 | Creamer et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050246176 | Creamer et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050286496 | Malhotra | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050289222 | Sahim | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060008065 | Longman et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060008073 | Yoshizawa et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060008256 | Khedouri et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060015467 | Morken et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060021004 | Moran et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060023676 | Whitmore et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060047666 | Bedi et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060067506 | Flockhart et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060080415 | Tu | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060098624 | Morgan et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060129638 | Deakin | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060143007 | Koh et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060146792 | Ramachandran et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060146802 | Baldwin et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060168334 | Potti et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060203979 | Jennings | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060209695 | Archer et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060212865 | Vincent et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060215824 | Mitby et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060217823 | Hussey | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060217978 | Mitby et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060222166 | Ramakrishna et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060235715 | Abrams | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060256816 | Yarlagadda et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060262915 | Marascio et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060270386 | Yu et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060285489 | Francisco et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070002744 | Mewhinney et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070036143 | Alt et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070038499 | Margulies et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043681 | Morgan et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070050306 | McQueen | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070064672 | Raghav et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070070906 | Thakur | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070070980 | Phelps | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070071223 | Lee et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070074174 | Thornton | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070088836 | Tai et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070091907 | Seshadri et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070107048 | Halls et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070112574 | Greene | May 2007 | A1 |
20070116191 | Bermudez et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070121651 | Casey et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070127691 | Lert | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070127703 | Siminoff | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070130260 | Weintraub et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070133771 | Stifelman et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070147351 | Dietrich et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070149166 | Turcotte et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070153711 | Dykas et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070167170 | Fitchett et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070192629 | Saito | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070201448 | Baird et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070208862 | Fox et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070232284 | Mason et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070239761 | Baio et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070242626 | Altberg et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070255828 | Paradise | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070265073 | Novi et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070286180 | Marquette et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070291734 | Bhatia et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070291905 | Halliday et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070293200 | Roundtree et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070295803 | Levine et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080005275 | Overton et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080025320 | Bangalore et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080037715 | Prozeniuk et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080037746 | Dufrene et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080040484 | Yardley | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080049617 | Grice et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080052395 | Wright et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080091843 | Kulkarni | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080101571 | Harlow et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080104348 | Kabzinski et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080120702 | Holimoto | May 2008 | A1 |
20080123559 | Haviv et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080134049 | Gupta et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080139166 | Agarwal et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080146268 | Gandhi et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080152101 | Griggs | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080154601 | Stifelman et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080155029 | Helbling | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080162482 | Ahern et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080165708 | Moore et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080172404 | Cohen | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080177883 | Hanai et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080192736 | Jabri et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080201426 | Darcie | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080209050 | Li | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080212945 | Khedouri et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080222656 | Lyman | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080229421 | Hudis et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080232574 | Baluja et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080235230 | Maes | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080256224 | Kaji et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080275741 | Loeffen | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080307436 | Hamilton | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080310599 | Purnadi et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080313318 | Vermeulen | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080316931 | Qiu et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080317222 | Griggs et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080317232 | Couse et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080317233 | Rey et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090046838 | Andreasson | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090052437 | Taylor et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090052641 | Taylor et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090059894 | Jackson et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090063502 | Coimbatore et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090074159 | Goldfarb et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090075684 | Cheng et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090083155 | Tudor et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090089165 | Sweeney | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090089352 | Davis et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090089699 | Saha et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090092674 | Schwartz | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090093250 | Jackson et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090094674 | Swartz | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090125608 | Werth et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090129573 | Gavan et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090136011 | Goel | May 2009 | A1 |
20090170496 | Bourque | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090171659 | Pearce et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090171669 | Engelsma et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090171752 | Galvin et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090182896 | Patterson et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090193433 | Maes | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090216835 | Jain et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090217293 | Wolber et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090220057 | Waters | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090221310 | Chen et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090222341 | Belwadi et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090225748 | Taylor | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090225763 | Forsberg et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090228868 | Drukman et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090232289 | Drucker et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090234965 | Viveganandhan et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090235349 | Lai et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090241135 | Wong et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090252159 | Lawson et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090262725 | Chen | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090276771 | Nickolov et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090288012 | Udo et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090288165 | Qiu et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090300194 | Ogasawara | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090316687 | Kruppa | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090318112 | Vasten | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100027531 | Kurashima | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100037204 | Lin et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100054142 | Moiso et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100070424 | Monk | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100071053 | Ansari et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100082513 | Liu | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100087215 | Gu et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100088187 | Courtney et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100088698 | Krishnamurthy | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100094758 | Chamberlain et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100103845 | Ulupinar et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100107222 | Glasser | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100115041 | Hawkins et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100138501 | Clinton et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100142516 | Lawson et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100150139 | Lawson | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100167689 | Sepehri-Nik et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100188979 | Thubert et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100191915 | Spencer | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100208881 | Kawamura | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100217837 | Ansari | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100217982 | Brown et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100232594 | Lawson | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100235539 | Carter et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100250946 | Korte et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100251329 | Wei | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100251340 | Martin et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100265825 | Blair et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100281108 | Cohen | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100291910 | Sanding et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100299437 | Moore | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100312919 | Lee et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100332852 | Vembu et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110026516 | Roberts et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110029882 | Jaisinghani | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110029981 | Jaisinghani | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110053555 | Cai et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110078278 | Cui et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110081008 | Lawson et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110083069 | Paul et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110083179 | Lawson et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110093516 | Geng et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110096673 | Stevenson et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110110366 | Moore et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110131293 | Mori | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110138453 | Verma | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110143714 | Keast | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110145049 | Udo et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110149810 | Koren et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110149950 | Petit-Huguenin et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110151884 | Zhao | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110158235 | Senga | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110167172 | Roach et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110170505 | Rajasekar et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110176537 | Lawson et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110179126 | Wetherell et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110211679 | Mezhibovsky et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110251921 | Kassaei et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110253693 | Lyons et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110255675 | Jasper et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110258432 | Rao | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110265168 | Lucovsky et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110265172 | Sharma | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110267985 | Wilkinson et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110274111 | Narasappa et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110276892 | Jensen-Horne et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110276951 | Jain | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110280390 | Lawson et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110283259 | Lawson et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110289126 | Aikas et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110289162 | Furlong et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110299672 | Chiu et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110310902 | Xu | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110313950 | Nuggehalli et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110320449 | Gudlavenkatasiva | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110320550 | Lawson et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120000903 | Baarman et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120011274 | Moreman | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120017222 | May | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120023531 | Meuninck et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120023544 | Li et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120027228 | Rijken et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120028602 | Lisi et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120036574 | Heithcock et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120039202 | Song | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120059709 | Lieberman et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120079066 | Li et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120083266 | VanSwol et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120089572 | Raichstein et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120094637 | Jeyaseelan et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120101952 | Raleigh et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120110564 | Ran et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120114112 | Rauschenberger et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120149404 | Beattie et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120166488 | Kaushik et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120170726 | Schwartz | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120173610 | Bleau | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120174095 | Natchadalingam et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120179646 | Hinton | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120180021 | Byrd et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120180029 | Hill et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120185561 | Klein | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120198004 | Watte | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120201238 | Lawson et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120208495 | Lawson et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120221603 | Kothule et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120226579 | Ha et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120239757 | Firstenberg et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120240226 | Li | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120246273 | Bornstein et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120254828 | Aiylam et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120266258 | Tuchman | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120281536 | Gell et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120288082 | Segall | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120290706 | Lin et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120304245 | Lawson | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120304275 | Ji et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120316809 | Egolf et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120321058 | Eng et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120321070 | Smith et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130029629 | Lindholm et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130031158 | Salsburg | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130031613 | Shanabrook | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130036476 | Roever et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130047232 | Tuchman et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130054517 | Beechuk | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130054684 | Brazier et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130058262 | Parreira | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130067232 | Cheung et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130067448 | Sannidhanam et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130097298 | Ting et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130110658 | Lyman et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130132573 | Lindblom | May 2013 | A1 |
20130139148 | Berg et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130156024 | Burg | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130166580 | Maharajh et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130179942 | Caplis et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130201909 | Bosch et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130204786 | Mattes et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130212603 | Cooke et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130244632 | Spence et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130268676 | Martins et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130304928 | Fahlgren et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130325934 | Fausak et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130328997 | Desai | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130336472 | Fahlgren et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140013400 | Warshavsky | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140025503 | Meyer et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140058806 | Guenette et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140064467 | Lawson | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140072115 | Makagon et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140073291 | Hildner et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140095627 | Romagnino | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140101058 | Castel et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140101149 | Winters | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140105372 | Nowack et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140106704 | Cooke et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140122600 | Kim et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140123187 | Reisman | May 2014 | A1 |
20140126715 | Lum et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140129363 | Lorah et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140153565 | Lawson et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140153566 | Fahlgren et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140185490 | Holm et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140254600 | Shibata et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140258481 | Lundell | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140269333 | Boerjesson | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140274086 | Boerjesson et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140282473 | Saraf et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140289303 | Tarricone et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140289391 | Balaji et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140304054 | Orun et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140317640 | Harm | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140355600 | Lawson | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140372508 | Fausak et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140372509 | Fausak et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140372510 | Fausak et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140373098 | Fausak et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140379670 | Kuhr | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150004932 | Kim et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150004933 | Kim et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150023251 | Giakoumelis et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150026477 | Malatack et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150066865 | Yara et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150081918 | Nowack et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150082378 | Collison | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150100634 | He et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150119050 | Liao et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150181631 | Lee et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150236905 | Bellan et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150281294 | Nur et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150365480 | Soto et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150370788 | Bareket et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150381580 | Graham, II | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160011758 | Dornbush et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160028695 | Binder | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160077693 | Meyer et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160112475 | Lawson et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160112521 | Lawson et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160119291 | Zollinger et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160127254 | Kumar et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160149956 | Birnbaum et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160162172 | Rathod | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160205519 | Patel et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160226937 | Patel et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160226979 | Lancaster et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160234391 | Wolthuis et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160239770 | Batabyal et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20170339283 | Chaudhary et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1684587 | Mar 1971 | DE |
0282126 | Sep 1988 | EP |
1464418 | Oct 2004 | EP |
1522922 | Apr 2005 | EP |
1770586 | Apr 2007 | EP |
2053869 | Apr 2009 | EP |
2134107 | Sep 1999 | ES |
10294788 | Apr 1998 | JP |
2004166000 | Jun 2004 | JP |
2004220118 | Aug 2004 | JP |
2006319914 | Nov 2006 | JP |
9732448 | Sep 1997 | WO |
2002087804 | Nov 2002 | WO |
2006037492 | Apr 2006 | WO |
018489 | Feb 2009 | WO |
2009124223 | Oct 2009 | WO |
2010037064 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2010040010 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2010101935 | Sep 2010 | WO |
2011091085 | Jul 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Ethernet to Token ring Bridge”—Black Box Corporation, Oct. 1999 http://blackboxcanada.com/resource/files/productdetails/17044.pdf. |
Abu-Lebdeh et al. “A 3GPP Evolved Packet Core-Based Architecture for QoS-Enabled Mobile Video Surveillance Applications”. 2012 Third International Conference on the Network of the Future (NOF). Nov. 21-23, 2012. pp. 1-6. |
Archive Microsoft Office 365 Email | Retain Unified Archiving, 2015, Gwava, Inc., Montreal, Canada. |
Complaint for Patent Infringement, Telinit Technologies, LLC v. Twilio Inc., dated Oct. 12, 2012. |
Kim et al. “In-service Feedback QoE Framework” 2010 Third International Conference on Communication Theory. Reliability and Quality of Service. pp. 135-138. 2010. |
Matos et al. “Quality of Experience-based Routing in Multi-Service Wireless Mesh Networks” Realizing Advanced Video Optimized Wireless Networks. IEEE pp. 7060-7065. 2012. |
NPL, “API Monetization Platform”, 2013. |
RFC 3986: Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax; T. Berners-Lee, R. Fielding, L. Masinter; Jan. 2005; The Internet Society. |
S. barakovic and L. Skorin-Kapov. “Survey and Challenges of QoE Management Issues in Wireless Networks”. 2012, pp. 1-29. |
Subramanya, et al. “Digital Signatures”, IEEE Potentials, Mar./Apr. 2006, pp. 5-8. |
Tran et al. “User to User adaptive routing based on QoE” ICNS 2011: The Seventh International Conference on Networking and Services. pp. 170-177. 2011. |
Twilio Cloud Communications—APIs for Voice, VoIP, and Text Messaging, Twilio. |
Wu et al. “Quality Evaluation in Peer-to-Peer IPTV Services” Data Traffic and Monitoring Analysis, LNCS 7754. pp. 302-319. 2013. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/891,111, Non Final Office Action dated Oct. 10, 2013”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/176,458, Examiner Interview Summary dated Dec. 21, 2015”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/176,458, Non Final Office Action dated Sep. 15, 2015”, 16 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/176,458, Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 21, 2016”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/176,458, Preliminary Amendment filed May 6, 2014”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/176,458, Response filed Dec. 6, 2015 to Non Final Office Action dated Sep. 15, 2015”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/176,458, Supplemental Notice of Allowability dated Apr. 25, 2016”, 4 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/278,952, Examiner Interview Summary dated Sep. 23, 2016”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/278,952, Non Final Office Action dated Jul. 28, 2016”, 16 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/278,952, Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 7, 2016”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/278,952, Preliminary Amendment filed May 15, 2014”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/278,952, Response filed Oct. 5, 2016 to Non Final Office Action dated Jul. 28, 2016”, 13 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170149869 A1 | May 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61644886 | May 2012 | US | |
61823837 | May 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14278952 | May 2014 | US |
Child | 15426474 | US | |
Parent | 13891111 | May 2013 | US |
Child | 14176458 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14176458 | Feb 2014 | US |
Child | 14278952 | US |