A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material which is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent file or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.
The invention is generally related to light sources, and bioanalytics or bioanalysis, and is particularly related to a system and method for metered dosage illumination in a bioanalysis or other system.
Bioanalytics or bioanalysis is the analysis of biological samples. Bioanalysis systems often use light to excite fluorescence from molecular tags in a sample (referred to herein as fluorescent tags or fluors). Fluors may be exogenous, as in the case of fluorescently labeled immunochemical tags that recognize subcellular structure and bind to impose fluorescent labeling; or endogenous, as in the case of genetically modified cells in which fluorescent proteins for example are expressed in order to impart specific fluorescent signals within a living cell. Particularly in fields such as fluorescence imaging, gene expression analysis, various types of sequencing, high resolution fluorescence microscopy, fluorescence life time measurements, and high content screening, it is necessary to be able to measure the amount of fluorescence and compare that amount to other measurements. This means the excitation light flux must generally be measured for each illumination exposure or fluorescence excitation event. To monitor biological events, it is necessary to be able to measure specific biological activity with often sub-millisecond exposure times. Excitation and detection must occur rapidly, such that the illumination must be generally switched on and off within a time period that is at most one-tenth of the duration of the minimum exposure time. Additionally, fluors can be temporarily or permanently photo-bleached, and biological samples can be otherwise damaged by the illumination light—a process known as phototoxicity. In order to minimize perturbation of the fluors due to photo-bleaching, and photo-damage to the biological samples, it is generally desired to minimize the light flux or dosage within the constraints of the signal-to-noise (S/N) requirements of that particular bioanalysis system. These are the general areas that embodiments of the invention are intended to address.
Described herein is a system and method for metered dosage illumination in a bioanalysis or other system. In accordance with an embodiment, an illumination system or subsystem is described that can provide optimized amounts of excitation light within the short exposure times necessary to measure fast biological activity. The amount of light can be precisely measured to provide quantitative results. The light flux can also be precisely controlled to generate only a prescribed minimum amount of light, in order to reduce adverse lighting effects on both fluors and samples. Although the examples herein illustrate the providing of metered dosage illumination in the context of a bioanalysis system, the techniques can be similarly used to provide metered dosage illumination in the context of other types of system.
As described above, in the context of bioanalysis, it is often required that an excitation light flux be measured for each illumination exposure or fluorescence excitation event; or that the illumination be switched on and off within an appropriately brief time period; or that the light flux or dosage be minimized within the constraints of the signal-to-noise (S/N) requirements of the particular bioanalysis system.
To address this, described herein is a system and method for metered dosage illumination in a bioanalysis or other system. In accordance with an embodiment, an illumination system or subsystem is described that can provide optimized amounts of excitation light within the short exposure times necessary to measure fast biological activity. The amount of light can be precisely measured to provide quantitative results. The light flux can also be precisely controlled to generate only a prescribed minimum amount of light, in order to reduce adverse lighting effects on both fluors and samples.
A host computer 110 generates an analysis protocol, including providing a dosage for each of the plurality of colors, and receiving feedback data from a camera 112. In accordance with an embodiment, the dosage can be in the form of a reference count that represents the amount of light flux per exposure period for each color provided by the light engine.
The camera is configured to detect fluorescence from the sample.
A beamsplitter 114 directs a portion of the light engine output, from the light engine, to a photodiode detector 116. A light-to-frequency converter 118 converts the detector output to a pulse train 130, the frequency of which is proportional to the light flux. A microprocessor-based counter 120 counts the pulse train, for each color, and compares the ongoing count to the reference count or preset dosage for each color.
Depending on the particular implementation, the above components can be provided as part of a complete system; or alternatively some or all of the above components can be provided as part of an illumination subsystem. For example, in accordance with an embodiment, the multi-color light engine, beamsplitter, photodiode detector, light-to-frequency converter, and microprocessor-based counter components can be provided as an illumination subsystem intended for use with a separately-provided host computer and camera.
In accordance with an embodiment, during operation of the system, the host computer downloads a reference count 122 for each color to the microprocessor-based counter. For each exposure period, the computer triggers the camera to begin an exposure period 124. The camera then sends an enable message or otherwise enables 126 the light engine, to turn on the appropriate color, and begins integrating the fluorescence. A portion of the light engine output 128, as directed by the beamsplitter, is monitored by the photodiode detector. The detector's output is converted to the pulse train that is then counted by the counter. When the counter reaches the reference count, it disables 132 the color channel currently on or provided by the light engine. Simultaneously, another trigger 134 is sent to the camera, ending the current exposure period.
The above approach avoids the latency inherent in any non-real-time operating systems. In accordance with an embodiment, additional circuitry can be provided to determine which color should be activated, and eliminate any delay inherent in the light engine turning on a color channel. An alternative approach is for the computer to turn on each color directly in conjunction with starting the camera's exposure period. In yet other embodiments, the procedure described above can be modified to suit the particular needs of the system (such as its use in quantitative analyses, or temporally fast analyses, as described below).
Quantitative Analysis
In accordance with an embodiment of particular use in quantitivate analysis, the system can comprise a collection of color channels, wherein each color channel is used to provide the specific wavelength band needed to excite a specific fluorescence molecule as defined by the fluorescence absorption of the tag. In accordance with an embodiment, each color channel can comprise a solid state light source (e.g. an LED, laser, light pipe or other light source), a single band pass filter, and an electronic circuit to power the light source. Within the system, the channels can be combined using, e.g. dichroic mirrors, so that the light from each source travels the same optical path, which is required, e.g. in epifluorescence measurements.
In accordance with an embodiment, the control circuitry can use a photodiode to measure the excitation light flux from each channel during each exposure period. An example of such a photodiode can be the TAOS light-to-frequency converter (part number TSL230RD), which can be used to quantify the light flux or dosage for each illumination pulse. The converter circuit generates pulses at a rate that is proportional to the light flux. Counting the pulses yields a measure of the dosage during each exposure time. Since dosage measurements can be made for each color channel independently, the user can optimize the amount of light, using a GUI such as that described above, to irradiate any given fluor uniquely. This allows for differences in efficiencies of all the processes involved in fluorescent signal generation to be taken into account for each color channel, (e.g. efficiency of light generation, fluorescence generation, or various differences in biological sample condition and fluor concentration).
In accordance with an embodiment, quantitative fluorescent measurements can be obtained ratiometrically by measuring the fluorescent signal, and dividing that signal by the dosage. In this manner, the fluorescent measurements can be normalized and rendered independent of the illumination intensity. This approach can be further automated by using dosage measurements to control the timing of the illumination and detection events. For example in accordance with an embodiment, a desired dosage count for each color channel can be entered into a reference counter. During a measurement, the control electronics monitor the dosage and gate off the excitation source for each color when the dosage count equals the amount in the reference counter. Light is metered independently of the exposure time period, rather as a function of the total light delivery prescribed by the reference counter. The precise dosage is delivered during each exposure, leading to quantitation as precise as the light flux measurement.
In this way, quantitative analysis can be performed using metered dosage with or without constant exposure times. In the former case, the light flux is maintained at the same level, and the flux is delivered within the exposure period. After the metered light dosage has been delivered, the excitation light is gated off leaving a time period when the camera can still detect fluorescent signals. In the latter case, the light flux is held constant, and the exposure time will vary as the intensity fluctuates.
In accordance with an embodiment, a range of light levels can be monitored and measured using conventional counters and logic circuitry. In some instances, the dosage levels may be so small as to generate insufficient statistical counts or too large and can overflow the counters. In these instances, a programmable gain can be used to dynamically adjust the count rate from the dosimeter circuitry.
Temporally Fast Analysis
In accordance with an embodiment of particular use in temporally fast analysis, the sources and circuitry can be implemented for fast switching, as is common with LEDs, lasers and light pipes. For example, in accordance with these embodiments, all switching can be performed electronically, with no mechanical motion. This allows modulation in the range of 10 ns to 1 ms to be readily achieved. In addition, significant speed increases can be achieved by directly connecting the camera and the illumination subsystem. In accordance with this embodiment, the host computer can trigger the camera to begin the analysis. The camera in turn can send a trigger to the illumination subsystem to turn on the excitation light. When the dosage count equals the reference count, the light is gated off, and a signal is sent to the camera to end the exposure. This configuration eliminates the variability in timing associated with non-real-time operating systems.
The illumination subsystem can also be used as a direct connection to drive the camera to activate or advance. Color channels can be programmed, e.g. via a ring buffer, to engage camera operation uniquely for each fluor of interest, each excitation source in a preprogrammed series of exposures of the various color channels. The timing of such camera and/or illuminator pulses can be optimized to interrogate specialized fluor characteristics, such as for fluorophor lifetime measurements, photoactivation and photolysis measurements as examples.
Photo-Bleaching and Phototoxicity
In accordance with another embodiment, the ability to precisely meter the light dosage and precisely turn on and off the illumination can minimize overall the exposure of the biological sample to the illuminator's excitation light. In so doing, photo-bleaching and phototoxicity effects are reduced, sample viability for live cell analyses is prolonged, and artifacts imposed by the lighting on the measurement are reduced. The combined benefit of such dosage optimization is enhanced accuracy and longer duration quantitative fluorescent analyses.
Modulation Techniques
As described above, in accordance with an embodiment, a metered dosage technique can be used to obtain pulse-to-pulse repeatability and increase dynamic range. This technique involves gating the light on and off for the required dosage during each camera exposure period. Other modulation techniques can be used. For example, a modulation technique commonly employed is fluorescence lifetime imaging (FLIM), wherein the illumination is modulated, and the fluorescence lifetime is determined by the phase shift and modulation depth of the fluorescence signal relative to the illumination signal.
Analog Measurement Techniques
As described above, in accordance with an embodiment, a host computer can be used to generate an analysis protocol, including providing a dosage for each of the plurality of colors, and receiving feedback data from a camera, while a microprocessor-based counter counts the pulse train, and compares the ongoing count to the reference count or preset dosage for each color. in accordance with other embodiments, alternative measurement techniques, such as analog measurement techniques can be used.
The present invention may be conveniently implemented using one or more conventional general purpose or specialized digital computers or microprocessors programmed according to the teachings of the present disclosure. Appropriate software coding can readily be prepared by skilled programmers based on the teachings of the present disclosure, as will be apparent to those skilled in the software art.
In some embodiments, the present invention includes a computer program product which is a storage medium (media) having instructions stored thereon/in which can be used to program a computer to perform any of the processes of the present invention. The storage medium can include, but is not limited to, any type of disk including floppy disks, optical discs, DVD, CD-ROMs, microdrive, and magneto-optical disks, ROMs, RAMs, EPROMs, EEPROMs, DRAMs, VRAMs, flash memory devices, magnetic or optical cards, nanosystems (including molecular memory ICs), or any type of media or device suitable for storing instructions and/or data.
The foregoing description of the present invention has been provided for the purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed. In particular, although most of the examples above illustrate the providing of metered dosage illumination in the context of a bioanalysis system, the techniques can be similarly used to provide metered dosage illumination in the context of other types of systems. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical application, thereby enabling others skilled in the art to understand the invention for various embodiments and with various modifications that are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the following claims and their equivalence.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1998054 | McBurney | Apr 1935 | A |
3313337 | Bernat | Apr 1967 | A |
3637285 | Stewart | Jan 1972 | A |
3759604 | Thelen | Sep 1973 | A |
3881800 | Friesem | May 1975 | A |
3982151 | Ludovici | Sep 1976 | A |
4003080 | Maiman | Jan 1977 | A |
4298820 | Bongers | Nov 1981 | A |
4371897 | Kramer | Feb 1983 | A |
4510555 | Mori | Apr 1985 | A |
4539687 | Gordon | Sep 1985 | A |
4626068 | Caldwell | Dec 1986 | A |
4642695 | Iwasaki | Feb 1987 | A |
4644141 | Hagen | Feb 1987 | A |
4695332 | Gordon | Sep 1987 | A |
4695732 | Ward | Sep 1987 | A |
4695762 | Berkstresser | Sep 1987 | A |
4713577 | Gualtieri | Dec 1987 | A |
4724356 | Daehler | Feb 1988 | A |
4798994 | Rijpers | Jan 1989 | A |
4804850 | Norrish et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4852985 | Fujihara et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4937661 | Van der Voort | Jun 1990 | A |
4995043 | Kuwata | Feb 1991 | A |
5052016 | Mahbobzadeh | Sep 1991 | A |
5089860 | Deppe | Feb 1992 | A |
5109463 | Lee | Apr 1992 | A |
5126626 | Iwasaki | Jun 1992 | A |
5128846 | Mills et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5137598 | Thomas | Aug 1992 | A |
5193015 | Shanks | Mar 1993 | A |
5200861 | Moskovich | Apr 1993 | A |
5226053 | Cho | Jul 1993 | A |
5231533 | Gonokami | Jul 1993 | A |
5233372 | Matsumoto | Aug 1993 | A |
5249195 | Feldman | Sep 1993 | A |
5285131 | Muller | Feb 1994 | A |
5289018 | Okuda | Feb 1994 | A |
5312535 | Waska | May 1994 | A |
5315128 | Hunt | May 1994 | A |
5332892 | Li et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5345333 | Greenberg | Sep 1994 | A |
5363398 | Glass | Nov 1994 | A |
5416342 | Edmond et al. | May 1995 | A |
5416617 | Loiseaux | May 1995 | A |
5418584 | Larson | May 1995 | A |
5428476 | Jensen | Jun 1995 | A |
5469018 | Jacobsen | Nov 1995 | A |
5475281 | Heijboer | Dec 1995 | A |
5478658 | Dodabalapur | Dec 1995 | A |
5489771 | Beach et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5493177 | Muller | Feb 1996 | A |
5500569 | Blomberg | Mar 1996 | A |
5542016 | Kaschke | Jul 1996 | A |
5616986 | Jacobsen | Apr 1997 | A |
5644676 | Blomberg | Jul 1997 | A |
5658976 | Carpenter | Aug 1997 | A |
5669692 | Thorgersen | Sep 1997 | A |
5671050 | De Groot | Sep 1997 | A |
5674698 | Zarling | Oct 1997 | A |
5690417 | Polidor et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5715083 | Takayama | Feb 1998 | A |
5719391 | Kain | Feb 1998 | A |
5757014 | Bruno | May 1998 | A |
5781338 | Kapitza | Jul 1998 | A |
5803579 | Turnbull et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5804919 | Jacobsen | Sep 1998 | A |
5808759 | Okamori | Sep 1998 | A |
5827438 | Blomberg | Oct 1998 | A |
5833827 | Anazawa | Nov 1998 | A |
5858562 | Utsugi | Jan 1999 | A |
5864426 | Songer | Jan 1999 | A |
5942319 | Oyama | Aug 1999 | A |
5955839 | Jaffe | Sep 1999 | A |
5984861 | Crowley | Nov 1999 | A |
6110106 | MacKinnon et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6154282 | Lilge et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6198211 | Jaffe | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6204971 | Morris | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6222673 | Austin | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6293911 | Imaizumi et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6299338 | Levinson | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6304584 | Krupke | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6366383 | Roeder | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6392341 | Jacobsen | May 2002 | B2 |
6404127 | Jacobsen | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6404495 | Melman | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6422994 | Kaneko et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6444476 | Morgan | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6513962 | Mayshack et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6517213 | Fujita et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6529322 | Jones | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6542231 | Garrett | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6544734 | Briscoe | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6594075 | Kanao et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6608332 | Shimizu et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6614161 | Jacobsen | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6614179 | Shimizu et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6637905 | Ng | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6642652 | Collins | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6649432 | Eilers | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6674575 | Tandler et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6680569 | Mueller-Mach et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6685341 | Ouderkirk et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6690467 | Reel | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6717353 | Mueller | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6747710 | Hall | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6791259 | Stokes et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6791629 | Moskovich | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6795239 | Tandler | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6843590 | Jones | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6869206 | Zimmerman et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6870165 | Amirkhanian | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6926848 | Le Mercier | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6958245 | Seul et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6960872 | Beeson et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6981970 | Karni | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6991358 | Kokogawa | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6995355 | Rains, Jr. et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7009211 | Eilers | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7011421 | Hulse et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7035017 | Tadic-Galeb | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7083610 | Murray et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7153015 | Brukilacchio | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7192161 | Cleaver et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7205048 | Naasani | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7208007 | Nightingale et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7211833 | Slater, Jr. et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7239449 | Leitel et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7300175 | Brukilacchio | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7316497 | Rutherford et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7384797 | Blair | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7416313 | Westphal et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7422356 | Hama et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7427146 | Conner | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7445340 | Conner | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7467885 | Grotsch et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7488088 | Brukilacchio | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7488101 | Brukilacchio | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7498734 | Suehiro et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7540616 | Conner | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7633093 | Blonder et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7709811 | Conner | May 2010 | B2 |
7746560 | Yamazaki | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7832878 | Brukilacchio | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7837348 | Narendran et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7854514 | Conner | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7857457 | Rutherford et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
8029142 | Conner | Oct 2011 | B2 |
20010055208 | Kimura | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020109844 | Christel et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020127224 | Chen | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030044160 | Jones et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030095401 | Hanson et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030127609 | El-Hage | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030160151 | Zarate | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030230728 | Dai | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233138 | Spooner | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040090600 | Blei | May 2004 | A1 |
20040247861 | Naasani | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050062404 | Jones et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050116635 | Walson et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050146652 | Yokoyama et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050152029 | Endo | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050184651 | Cheng | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050201899 | Weisbuch | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050248839 | Yamaguchi | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050260676 | Chandler | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050263679 | Fan | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060002131 | Schultz et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060030026 | Garcia | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060060872 | Edmond | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060060879 | Edmond | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060114960 | Snee | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060170931 | Guo | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060237658 | Waluszko | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060282137 | Nightingale et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070053184 | Brukilacchio | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070053200 | Brukilacchio | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070058389 | Brukilacchio | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070064202 | Moffat et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070086006 | Ebersole et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070126017 | Krames et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070211460 | Ravkin | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070253733 | Fey | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070262731 | Jaffar et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070279914 | Rutherford et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070279915 | Rutherford et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070280622 | Rutherford et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070281322 | Jaffe et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070284513 | Fan | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070297049 | Schadwinkel et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080079910 | Rutherford et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080224024 | Ashdown | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080291446 | Smith | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090122533 | Brukilacchio | May 2009 | A1 |
20090196046 | Rutherford et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090268461 | Deak et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100188017 | Brukilacchio | Jul 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 280 398 | Apr 2000 | CA |
1 426 807 | Dec 2003 | EP |
0943756 | Dec 1963 | GB |
2005-195485 | Jul 2005 | JP |
2005-243973 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2006-049814 | Feb 2006 | JP |
2007-133435 | May 2007 | JP |
2008139796 | Jun 2008 | JP |
10-2006-0055934 | May 2006 | KR |
WO 02080577 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO 2004114053 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO 2006067885 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO 2006120586 | Nov 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Deck, L., et al., “Two color light-emitting-diode source for high precision phase-shifting interferometry”, Optics Letters, vol. 18, No. 22, Nov. 15, 1993, pp. 1899-1901. |
Morgan, C. G., et al., << New Approaches to Lifetime-Resolved Luminescence Imaging, Journal of Fluorescence, vol. 7, No. 1, 1997, pp. 65-73. |
International Search Report dated Jun. 19, 2012 for Application No. PCT/US2011/063030, 11 pages. |
International Search Report dated Dec. 31, 2008, Application No. PCT/US2008/072394, 10 pages. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2010021843 dated Aug. 19, 2010, 9 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for PCT/US2008072394 dated Oct. 7, 2011, 9 pages. |
Mauch, R.H., et al., “Optical Behaviour of Electroluminescent Devices,” Springer Proceedings in Physics, vol. 38, Electroluminescence, © Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 291-295 (1989). |
Vlasenko, N.A., et al., “Interference of Luminescent Emission from an Evaporated Phosphor,” Opt. Spect., vol. 11, pp. 216-219 (1961). |
Vlasenko, N.A., et al., “Investigation of Interference Effects in Thin Electroluminescent ZnS-Mn Films,” Opt. Spect., vol. 28, pp. 68-71 (1970). |
Poelman, D., et al., “Spectral Shifts in Thin Film Electroluminescent Devices: An Interference Effect,” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., vol. 25, pp. 1010-1013 (1992). |
Tuenge, R.T., “Current Status of Color TFEL Phosphors,” Electroluminescence—Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Electroluminescence, El Paso, Tex., pp. 173-177, May 1992. |
Plasma Display Manufacturers of the American Display Consortium, “Recommended Research Topics on Plasma Display for the DARPA Sponsored Phosphor Center of Excellence,” pp. 1-2, Mar. 24, 1993. |
Yamamoto, Y., et al., “Optical Processes in Microcavities,” Physics Today, pp. 66-73, Jun. 1993. |
E.F. Schubert, E.F., et al., “Giant Enhancement of Luminescence Intensity in Er-doped Si/SiO2 Resonant Cavities,” Appl. Phys. Lett. vol. 61, No. 12, pp. 1381-1383, Sep. 21, 1992. |
Yokoyama, H., “Physics and Device Applications of Optical Microcavities,” Science, vol. 256, pp. 66-70, Apr. 3, 1992. |
Haroche, S., et al., “Cavity Quantum Electrodynamics,” Scientific American, pp. 54-62, Apr. 1993. |
Depp, S.W., et al., “Flat Panel Displays,” Scientific American, pp. 90-97, Mar. 1993. |
Huo, D.T.C., et al., “Reticulated Single-Crystal Luminescent Screen,” J. Electrochem. Soc., vol. 133, No. 7, pp. 1492-1497, Jul. 1986. |
Hinds, E.A., “Spectroscopy of Atoms in a Micron-Sized Cavity,” (date and periodical title unknown), pp. 18-19. |
Whitaker, Jerry C., “Electronic Displays: Technology, Design, and Applications,” McGraw-Hill, Inc., pp. 185-192 (1994). |
Hecht, Jeff, “Diverse fiberoptic systems require varied sources,” Laser Focus World, vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 155-161, Jan. 2000. |
Hamberg, I. and Granqvist, C.G., “Evaporated Sn-doped In2O3 films: Basic optical properties and applications to energy-efficient windows,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 60, No. 11, pp. R123-R159, Dec. 1, 1986. |
World Watch, Photonics Spectra, “IR Reflective Coating Boosts Bulb's Output, Recycling of IR Energy Saves Power, Cuts Costs” pp. 40-41, Jan. 1991. |
Jenmar Visual Systems, Sunnyvale, CA, 4 pages, no date, but at least as early as Oct. 15, 1998. |
DDS™ Rear Projection Screens, LORS™ Reflection Screens, © 1998 Physical Optics Corporation, Torrance, CA, 2 pages. |
Schott Glass Technologies, Inc., Schott Total Customer Care, Contrast Enhancement Filters, Duryea, PA, 6 pages, Jan. 1998. |
Handbook of Optics, vol. 1—Fundamentals, Techniques, and Design, Second Edition, Chapter 42: Optical Properties of Films and Coatings, J.A. Dobrowolski, pp. 42.3-42.25, McGraw-Hill, Inc., © 1995. |
Young, L., “Multilayer Interference Filters with Narrow Stop Bands,” Applied Optics, vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 297-312, Feb. 1967. |
Hemingway, D.J. and Lissberger, P.H., “Effective Refractive Indices of Metal-Dielectric Interference Filters,” Applied Optics, vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 471-476, Mar. 1967. |
Holloway, R.J. and Lissberger, P.H., “The Design and Preparation of Induced Transmission Filters,” Applied Optics, vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 653-660, Mar. 1969. |
Landau, B.V. and Lissberger, P.H., “Theory of Induced-Transmission Filters in Terms of the Concept of Equivalent Layers,” Journal of the Optical Society of America, vol. 62, No. 11, pp. 1258-1264, Nov. 1972. |
Lissberger, P.H., “Coatings with Induced Transmission,” Applied Optics, vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 95-103, Jan. 1, 1981. |
Pelletier, E. and MacLeod, H.A., “Interference Filters with Multiple Peaks,” Journal of the Optical Society of America, vol. 72, No. 6, pp. 683-687, Jun. 1982. |
Da-Lite Screen Company, Inc., www,da-lite,com, 46 pages website downloads as of Oct. 8, 1998. |
Stewart Filmscreen Corporation®, www.stewartfilm.com, 34 pages website downloads as of Oct. 8, 1998. |
Albrecht, M., et al., “Scintillators and Wavelength Shifters for the Detection of Ionizing Radiation,” Astroparticle, Particle and Space Physics, Detectors and Medical Physics Applications, ICATPP-8, M. Barone, et al., Eds, World Scientific, pp. 502-511 (2004). |
Flor-Henry, M., et al., “Use of a Highly Sensitive Two-Dimensional Luminescence Imaging System to Monitor Endogenous Bioluminescence in Plant Leaves,” BMC Plant Biology, vol. 4, No. 19, Nov. 2004. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120181936 A1 | Jul 2012 | US |