System and method for multisensory psychomotor skill training

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11749137
  • Patent Number
    11,749,137
  • Date Filed
    Friday, January 15, 2021
    3 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 5, 2023
    9 months ago
Abstract
A system and method for delivering psychomotor skill training, providing didactic instruction using an internet portal, tracking performance, and providing user feedback within a multisensory environment, serving as an integration for existing multimodal ultrasound training systems. This multisensory psychomotor skill training environment of the present invention would extend the existing described patented technologies by further adding realism through representation of virtual (digital) characters into a training scenario (e.g., pregnant patient), superimposing virtual (digital) guides or prompts onto actual real physical objects (e.g., anatomical landmarks or guides onto a mannequin or patient) embedding the training instruments within a broader virtual (digital) scenario (e.g., operating room). The ability to create these virtual, augmented, and mixed reality scenarios enables cost-effective, realistic, and improved training capabilities that mirror real-life training scenarios.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

This invention relates generally to systems and methods for providing medical training, and more specifically to medical training systems and methods that at least partly involve simulations of medical procedures and operations, particularly ultrasonography.


BACKGROUND

Paradigm shifts are taking place in the world of medicine and technology. Point-of-care ultrasonography is redefining the very essence of the physical examination and the way clinicians practice medicine. Point-of-care ultrasound refers to the use of portable ultrasonography at a patient's bedside for diagnostic (e.g., symptom or sign-based examination) and therapeutic (e.g., image-guidance) purposes. The principal barrier to use of this life-saving technology is lack of ultrasound training. User adoption is limited by the psychomotor skills required to manipulate an ultrasound probe coupled with the ability to interpret the resulting ultrasound images. Concurrent with improving psychomotor skills, training must also reflect the psychosocial stressors associated with performing procedures. It is clear that medical education must catch up with the expanded use of ultrasonography if tomorrow's practitioners are to provide superior healthcare for their patients.


Developing competence on performing ultrasonography in a clinical setting requires integrated cognitive (image interpretation) and psychomotor (optimal image window acquisition) skills and developing the ability to perform these procedures under stress. Once an optimal image window is acquired and correctly interpreted, the information needs to be correctly applied to patient care. The opportunity cost of training healthcare providers on ultrasonography is extremely high. Optimal training requires: (1) a qualified instructor; (2) trainees; (3) an ultrasound machine; (4) a patient with a pathologic condition; and (5) an environment that accurately recreates the psychosocial challenges of performing procedures. All of these elements must come together in the same place and at the same time.


Currently available training methods all have significant limitations. These include clinical bedside teaching, attending hands-on training courses, use of phantom models, and high-fidelity yet very expensive ultrasound simulator workstations. They may involve bulky training platforms that require multiple users to visit a simulation center (e.g., UltraSim®, CAE Healthcare) or require the presence of an actual ultrasound machine (e.g., Blue Phantom™). These ultrasound-training solutions employ high-priced dedicated computer hardware and software that does not deploy over the Internet. Alternative training products provide a limited library of purely didactic training solutions that are not accompanied with any hands-on training experience (e.g., EMSONO). None of the above solutions recreate the psychosocial stressors of performing procedures in a real-life clinical setting.


Conversely, within the fields of virtual reality, augmented reality, and mixed reality technologies there exists the ability to create virtual (digital) characters, environments, and guides that can be superimposed on actual physical objects. However, none of these technologies offer the ability to develop and train individuals on highly refined psychomotor skills, such as performing an ultrasound-guided procedure.


For the foregoing reasons there is a need for a system and method to develop psychomotor skills of individuals on a wide variety of tasks, such as ultrasound-guided procedures, in a context (or clinical setting) that accurately imposes the psychosocial stressors of performing these stated procedures in a real clinical setting. Individuals skilled in these arts and technologies have not been able to devise a solution to the described limitations of existing training solutions. The lack of existing products and/or technology solutions to this problem, at the time of this filing, speaks to the lack of a clear and/or obvious solution to this problem.


SUMMARY

The present invention is directed to creating the perception of presence in a multisensory psychomotor skill training environment that would extend the existing described patented technologies by further adding realism through representation of virtual (digital) characters into a training scenario (e.g., pregnant patient), superimposing virtual (digital) guides or prompts onto actual real physical objects (e.g., anatomical landmarks or guides onto a mannequin or patient), or embedding the training instruments within a broader virtual (digital) scenario (e.g., operating room).





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 shows a schematic flow diagram illustrating how the various components of the system of the present invention may interact.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The detailed description set forth below in connection with the appended drawings is intended as a description of presently-preferred embodiments of the invention and is not intended to represent the only forms in which the present invention may be constructed or utilized. The description sets forth the functions and the sequence of steps for constructing and operating the invention in connection with the illustrated embodiments. It is to be understood, however, that the same or equivalent functions and sequences may be accomplished by different embodiments that are also intended to be encompassed within the spirit and scope of the invention.


The present invention is a system and method for delivering psychomotor skill training to provide didactic instruction for performing a skill in at least a partially virtual environment. In some embodiments, using an internet portal, tracking performance, and providing user feedback within a multisensory environment integrates existing multimodal ultrasound training systems with the psychomotor skill training system. The feedback may be in the form of an auditory feedback, visual feedback, or tactile feedback to alert or instruct the user regarding his or her performance.


The existing multimodal ultrasound training systems comprise a wide variety of immersive and non-immersive visualization technologies that have been described as virtual reality, augmented reality, and mixed reality. U.S. Pat. No. 8,480,404 to Savitsky (the '404 patent) and U.S. Pat. No. 8,297,983 to Savitsky et al. (the '983 patent) describe multimodal ultrasound training systems in greater detail. The '404 and '983 patents are incorporated in their entirety here by this reference.


The '404 patent teaches a medical procedure training system based on a computer platform that provides multimodal education within a virtual environment. The system integrates digital video, three-dimensional modeling, and force-feedback devices for the purpose of training medical professionals on the skills required to perform medical procedures. It can be used to teach a variety of medical procedures and interventions, including ultrasound. The '983 patent describes an ultrasound training system having a data capture module, a digital asset management module, a validation module, didactic content, a media asset production module, an integration layer, an internet-based portal, a software client, and a peripheral probe. The combination of the disclosed elements creates a system that enables the creation and delivery of high-quality ultrasound education and training in a low-cost, widely deployable, and scalable manner, with a facilitated method for processing orders and financial transactions between customers and content providers.


The multisensory psychomotor skill training environment of the present invention would extend the existing described patented technologies by further adding realism through representation of virtual (digital) characters into a training scenario (e.g., pregnant patient), superimposing virtual (digital) guides or prompts onto actual real physical objects (e.g., anatomical landmarks or guides onto a mannequin or patient), or embedding the training instruments within a broader virtual (digital) scenario (e.g., operating room). The ability to create these virtual, augmented, and mixed reality scenarios enables cost-effective, realistic, and improved training capabilities that mirror real-life training scenarios.


Importantly, the present invention would eliminate the need for physical structures (e.g., hospital beds, manikins, etc.) within the training scenario, as these elements can be virtually represented—making training scalable, cost-effective, and efficient. Combining the virtual, augmented, and mixed reality scenarios with the multimodal ultrasound training system enables effective ultrasound training for performance of fine psychomotor skill-dependent skills with the added psychosocial stressors associated with performing these procedures in real clinical settings. This proposed system and method for providing multisensory psychomotor skill training will address the unmet need for a method to develop the psychomotor skills of individuals on a wide variety of tasks, such as ultrasound-guided procedures, in in a realistic clinical scenario with proportionate psychosocial stressors.


The present invention hinges on emerging technologies capable of creating the perception of presence to enhance the psychological impact and the effectiveness of medical training simulators. The notion of presence for our purpose has two fundamental meanings:


(1) the cognitive illusion of being truly transported into an alternate world recreated by computer simulations; or


(2) the cognitive illusion that an object, a person, or other interactive medium generated by computer simulations is truly present in the surrounding world perceived by the user.


The notion of presence is fundamentally important in its ability to instill a powerful emotional response in users—an essential requisite for our invention. Collectively, these technologies are defined as projector of presence (“POP”) devices. The POP devices address the problem associated with recreating the visual and auditory stimuli that play a primary role in creating the perception of presence and synchronizing those stimuli with the reality that surrounds the user. A practitioner skilled in the art will recognize that several commercially available POP devices exist already. POP devices are grouped in several broad categories:


(1) Virtual Reality (VR), wherein the sight of the real world is entirely blocked by an opaque medium and the user's field of view is completely replaced by a rendering of a simulated reality (virtual world) in which solutions generally rely on sophisticated motion sensing technologies to synchronize the rendering of the virtual world with the user's head motion and in some cases his or her position in the real world;


(2) Augmented Reality (AR), wherein the content is overlaid on the user's field of view of the real world and enhanced with audio that responds to the surrounding real world in which true AR solutions are generally restricted to showing notifications or graphical user interfaces superimposed on real objects; or


(3) Mixed Reality (MR), wherein solutions extend the basic notion of AR by synchronizing the content overlaid onto the user's field of view with the surrounding real world, thus recreating a convincing perception that the simulated objects are really present in front of the user.


While the present invention can be realized with any of these categories of POP devices, the preferred embodiment utilizes VR and MR for their enhanced ability in creating the perception of presence. Further, it has been shown that for many applications, tactile feedback is also very important in establishing a strong perception of presence, especially in situations where a simulated real world task does in fact require interaction with a physical object. The present invention conveys the strongest perception of presence and succeeds in recreating psychological stressors that occur in real-world clinical scenarios.


Unless otherwise stated, the following terms as used herein have the following definitions.


“Projector of Presence” of “POP” devices refers to any VR, AR, or MR device capable of measuring key aspect of the user's head position, body placement, and gaze direction using a first set of sensors to measure position, orientation, and/or motion in order to project realistic renditions of individual objects or entire settings into the user's field of view. These types of technologies exist already and are rapidly evolving.


“Tracked probe” refers to a device preferably in the shape of a medical instrument with a second set of sensors to measure its position, orientation and/or motion, and with communication hardware to transmit sensor information to the computer.


“Scanning surface” refers to a planar or curvilinear solid surface on which the user can place and move the tracked probe on top of, such as a medical manikin. Preferably the geometry of the scanning surface is known by the simulation software so that the tactile feedback of the tracked probe moving on the scanning surface can be reproduced accurately in the virtual environment projected by the POP device. The scanning surface may contain a third set of sensors so that its position, orientation, and/or motion can be measured and detected.


The sensors for detecting position, orientation, and/or motion can be realized using MEMS sensors, such as accelerometers, gyroscopes, and magnetometers for self-contained solutions, or the can be built using external optical or electromagnetic trackers that act as position and orientation references. Other sensing solutions capable of measuring position, orientation and/or motion fall within the spirit of this invention.


A “computer” refers to any type of desktop, laptop, tablet, mobile computer, or any other computational device capable of running the simulation software and/or communicating through a wired or wireless connection with the POP device and tracked probe.


A “simulation software,” runs on the computer and provides a realistic representation of a clinical scenario to train students on the use of medical imaging and how to perform certain types of procedures. Several types of simulation solutions exist on the market and demonstrate the importance of this type of technology. However, current solutions are not capable of instilling the same types of psychosocial stressors that a medical practitioner encounters in real life or emulating interactions with other medical professionals involved in a clinical scenario (e.g. nurses and radiologists).


The simulation software augmented with a POP device renders and animates a clinical scene and provides a convincing rendition of a patient in pain that emotes vigorously during a procedure. The simulation software also renders and animates other medical professionals interacting and talking to the user to help him or her understand the team effort required to diagnose and treat a patient in real life and to emulate the psychological pressure of being surrounded by other individuals that must coordinates their efforts to achieve a desired clinical goal. The computer monitors the position, orientation, and movement of the tracked probe to determine whether the user has performed the proper procedure with a predetermined level of proficiency by determining whether the tracked probe was in the correct position and orientation and moved in a predetermined manner within a specified tolerance level for a given scenario.


As illustrated in FIG. 1, the present invention, in the preferred embodiment, comprises a POP device, a tracked probe emulating a medical implement whose orientation and/or position can be tracked in 3D space, an optional scanning surface that emulates the physicality of a human body or a section of it, a computer capable of running the simulation, and software running on the computer that gathers data from the various devices comprising this invention and actuates them based on the state of the simulation.


In use, a user wears and activates a POP device. A computer in communication with the POP device generates a simulation in the user's field of view. The simulation may be all the user sees in the user's field of view or the simulation may be integrated with the real world environment in the user's field of view. The user holds a tracked probe in the user's hand, and when brought into the user's field of view, the tracked probe enters the simulation. As the tracked probe interacts with the simulation, the tracked probe provides tactile feedback that contributes to a perception of the user.


In some embodiments, the tracked probe may be used with a scanning surface. The tracked probe interacts with the scanning surface and the combined interaction provides a tactile feedback that contributes to the perception of the user.


In some embodiments, the computer in communication with the POP device and the tracked probe determines the position and orientation of the tracked probe and the POP device and projects a simulated environment on the POP device based on the position and orientation of the POP device and the tracked probe. The POP device uses the sensors to measure information, such as the orientation and/or position of the user's head and gaze direction, and reports the information to the computer.


The computer may be integrated with the POP device or may be a separate system that communicates with the POP device and supports the processing requirements of the POP device. The computational system uses the information to generate a rendering of a simulated scene in the POP device for display in the user's field of view. The simulated scene may represent a clinical scenario or individual objects in a way that matches the user's viewpoint and the current state of the tracked probe.


The POP device renders an image, and optionally auditory feedback, to convince the user that the simulated scene generated by the computer simulation is truly present in the user's field of view. By way of example only, in an ultrasound training application, the POP device may present a simulated hospital scene in which the tracked probe is represented as an ultrasound probe. The scanning surface may be presented as a patient. As the user looks around the room, the POP device generates a simulated monitor when the user looks in a specific location. The specific location may be predetermined, or the user may select a particular location to generate the simulated monitor. The user can then begin his or her ultrasound examination on the scanning surface. If the user's gaze is directed towards the tracked probe and scanning surface, then the user will see the ultrasound probe and patient. If the user turn's his or her head in the particular location where the monitor was established, then the user sees on the simulated monitor, an ultrasound image. As the user manipulates the ultrasound image along the scanning surface, the ultrasound image changes accordingly giving the user the perception of actually conducting an ultrasound scan.


The simulation software can create a scene in which the user must perform the proper procedure to pass the test. Whether the user passes the test will be determined by the position, orientation, and/or movement of the tracked probe. Timing can also be integrated into the scene by allowing the user to perform a particular procedure at a specified time that the user must recognize. Distractions can also be incorporated into the scene to determine whether the user is able to maintain focus.


A database of scenes may be stored on the computer or other storage device for the user to select to test various skills and knowledge.


The system can take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment or an embodiment containing both hardware and software elements. In one embodiment, the system is implemented in software, which includes but is not limited to firmware, resident software, microcode, etc.


Furthermore, the system can take the form of a computer program product accessible from a computer-usable or computer-readable medium providing program code for use by or in connection with a computer or any instruction execution system. For the purposes of this description, a computer-usable or computer readable medium can be any apparatus that can contain, store, communicate, propagate, or transport the program for use by or in connection with the instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.


The medium can be an electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system (or apparatus or device) or a propagation medium. Examples of a computer-readable medium comprise a semiconductor or solid-state memory, magnetic tape, a removable computer diskette, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), a rigid magnetic disk and an optical disk. Current examples of optical disks comprise compact disk-read only memory (CD-ROM), compact disk-read/write (CD-R/W) and DVD.


A data processing system suitable for storing and/or executing program code comprises at least one processor coupled directly or indirectly to memory elements through a system bus. The memory elements can include local memory employed during actual execution of the program code, bulk storage, and cache memories that provide temporary storage of at least some program code in order to reduce the number of times code is retrieved from bulk storage during execution.


Input/output or I/O devices (including but not limited to keyboards, displays, pointing devices, etc.) can be coupled to the system either directly or through intervening I/O controllers.


Network adapters may also be coupled to the system to enable the data processing system to become coupled to other data processing systems or remote printers or storage devices through intervening private or public networks. Modems, cable modem and Ethernet cards are just a few of the currently available types of network adapters.


Described above, aspects of the present application are embodied in a World Wide Web (“WWW”) or (“Web”) site accessible via the Internet. As is well known to those skilled in the art, the term “Internet” refers to the collection of networks and routers that use the Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol (“TCP/IP”) to communicate with one another. The internet can include a plurality of local area networks (“LANs”) and a wide area network (“WAN”) that are interconnected by routers. The routers are special purpose computers used to interface one LAN or WAN to another. Communication links within the LANs may be wireless, twisted wire pair, coaxial cable, or optical fiber, while communication links between networks may utilize analog telephone lines, digital T-1 lines, T-3 lines or other communications links known to those skilled in the art.


Furthermore, computers and other related electronic devices can be remotely connected to either the LANs or the WAN via a digital communications device, modem and temporary telephone, or a wireless link. It will be appreciated that the internet comprises a vast number of such interconnected networks, computers, and routers.


The foregoing description of the preferred embodiment of the invention has been presented for the purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. It is intended that the scope of the invention not be limited by this detailed description, but by the claims and the equivalents to the claims appended hereto.

Claims
  • 1. A system for medical training, comprising: a) a POP device configured to register a position and orientation of the POP device with a computer using a first set of sensors;b) a probe configured to register a position and orientation of the probe with the computer using a second set of sensors;c) a scanning surface configured to register a position and orientation of the scanning surface with the computer using a third set of sensors; andd) the computer configured to monitor the position and orientation of the POP device, the position and orientation of the probe, and the position and orientation of the scanning surface;e) the computer programmed with a simulation software that when executed: i) generates a simulated environment in the POP device representing a clinical scenario in a manner that corresponds with a user's gaze direction;ii) generates a virtual medical instrument based on the position and orientation of the probe; andiii) generates a virtual patient based on the position and orientation of the scanning surface.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the computer is configured to provide feedback to the user.
  • 3. The system of claim 2, wherein the feedback is audio feedback through the POP device.
  • 4. The system of claim 2, wherein the feedback is visual feedback through the POP device.
  • 5. The system of claim 1, wherein the probe is configured to generate tactile feedback corresponding with a scene in the simulated environment.
  • 6. The system of claim 1, wherein the simulation software is configured to animate a clinical scene and the computer is configured to determine a level of proficiency of the user by determining whether the probe was in a correct position and orientation, and moved in a predetermined manner within a specified tolerance level.
  • 7. The system of claim 1, wherein the computer is configured to track a performance of the user.
  • 8. The system of claim 1, wherein the POP device is selected from the group consisting of a virtual reality device, an augmented reality device, and a mixed reality device.
  • 9. A method for medical training, comprising the steps of: a) a POP device registering a position and orientation of the POP device with a computer;b) a probe registering a position and orientation of the probe with the computer;c) a scanning surface registering a position and orientation of the scanning surface with the computer;d) the computer monitoring the position and orientation of the POP device, the position and orientation of the probe, and the position and orientation of the scanning surface;e) the computer programmed with simulation software that when executed: i) generates a simulated environment in the POP device representing a clinical scenario in a manner that corresponds with the position and orientation of the POP device;ii) generates a virtual medical instrument based on the position and orientation of the probe; andiii) generates a virtual patient based on the position and orientation of the scanning surface.
  • 10. The method of claim 9, wherein the computer provides feedback to the user.
  • 11. The method of claim 10, wherein the feedback is audio feedback through the POP device.
  • 12. The method of claim 10, wherein the feedback is visual feedback through the POP device.
  • 13. The method of claim 10, wherein the probe generates tactile feedback corresponding with a scene in the simulated environment.
  • 14. The method of claim 13, wherein the simulation software animates a clinical scene and the computer determines a level of proficiency of the user by determining whether the probe was in a correct position and orientation, and moved in a predetermined manner within a specified tolerance level.
  • 15. The method of claim 14, wherein the computer tracks a performance of the user.
  • 16. The method of claim 15, wherein the POP device is selected from the group consisting of a virtual reality device, an augmented reality device, and a mixed reality device.
  • 17. A method for medical training, comprising the steps of: a) displaying at least a partially simulated environment in a POP device based on a position and orientation of the POP device;b) displaying a virtual medical instrument in the at least partially simulated environment based on a position and orientation of a probe when the POP device is directed towards the probe;c) displaying a virtual patient in the at least partially simulated environment based on a position and orientation of a scanning surface when the POP device is directed towards the scanning surface; andd) displaying a simulated monitor in the at least partially simulated environment when the POP device is directed towards a predetermined location.
  • 18. The method of claim 17, further comprising generating tactile feedback to the probe while the probe is moved along the scanning surface.
  • 19. The method of claim 18, displaying an ultrasound image in the simulated monitor corresponding to the position and orientation of the probe relative to the position and orientation of the scanning surface when the POP device is directed towards the predetermined location.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/880,290, filed Jan. 25, 2018, titled “System and Method for Multisensory Psychomotor Skill Training,” which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/450,975, filed Jan. 26, 2017, which applications are incorporated here in their entirety by this reference.

US Referenced Citations (268)
Number Name Date Kind
1488233 Diehl Mar 1924 A
1762937 Staud Jun 1930 A
2019121 De Rewal Oct 1935 A
2112019 Gyger Mar 1938 A
2127610 Moore Aug 1938 A
2705049 Brooks Mar 1955 A
2705307 Nyswander Mar 1955 A
2722947 Sragal Nov 1955 A
2886316 Ayala May 1959 A
4040171 Cline et al. Aug 1977 A
4838863 Allard et al. Jun 1989 A
4838869 Allard Jun 1989 A
4994034 Botich et al. Feb 1991 A
5231381 Duwaer Jul 1993 A
5513992 Refait May 1996 A
5609485 Bergman et al. Mar 1997 A
5678565 Sarvazyan Oct 1997 A
5689443 Ramanathan Nov 1997 A
5701900 Shehada et al. Dec 1997 A
5704791 Gillio Jan 1998 A
5755577 Gillio May 1998 A
5767839 Rosenberg Jun 1998 A
5776062 Nieids Jul 1998 A
5791908 Gillio Aug 1998 A
5800177 Gillio Sep 1998 A
5800178 Gillio Sep 1998 A
5800179 Bailey Sep 1998 A
5800350 Coppleson et al. Sep 1998 A
5827942 Madsen et al. Oct 1998 A
5882206 Gillio Mar 1999 A
5889237 Makinwa Mar 1999 A
5934288 Avila et al. Aug 1999 A
6001472 Ikeda et al. Dec 1999 A
6048312 Ishrak et al. Apr 2000 A
6063030 Vara et al. May 2000 A
6068597 Lin May 2000 A
6074213 Hon Jun 2000 A
6113395 Hon Sep 2000 A
6117078 Lysyansky et al. Sep 2000 A
6122538 Sliwa, Jr. et al. Sep 2000 A
6156213 Dudley et al. Dec 2000 A
6193657 Drapkin Feb 2001 B1
6267599 Bailey Jul 2001 B1
6468212 Scott et al. Oct 2002 B1
6502756 Fåhraeus Jan 2003 B1
6511427 Sliwa, Jr. et al. Jan 2003 B1
6548768 Pettersson et al. Apr 2003 B1
6570104 Ericson et al. May 2003 B1
6654000 Rosenberg Nov 2003 B2
6663008 Pettersson et al. Dec 2003 B1
6665554 Charles et al. Dec 2003 B1
6666376 Ericson Dec 2003 B1
6667695 Pettersson et al. Dec 2003 B2
6674427 Pettersson et al. Jan 2004 B1
6689966 Wiebe Feb 2004 B2
6693626 Rosenberg Feb 2004 B1
6694163 Vining Feb 2004 B1
6698660 Fåhraeus et al. Mar 2004 B2
6714213 Lithicum et al. Mar 2004 B1
6714901 Cotin et al. Mar 2004 B1
6719470 Berhin Apr 2004 B2
6722574 Skantze et al. Apr 2004 B2
6732927 Olsson et al. May 2004 B2
6750877 Rosenberg et al. Jun 2004 B2
6780016 Toly Aug 2004 B1
6816148 Mallett et al. Nov 2004 B2
6836555 Ericson et al. Dec 2004 B2
6854821 Ericson et al. Feb 2005 B2
6864880 Hugosson et al. Mar 2005 B2
6878062 Bjorklund et al. Apr 2005 B2
6896650 Tracey et al. May 2005 B2
6916283 Tracey et al. Jul 2005 B2
6927916 Craven-Bartle Aug 2005 B2
6929183 Pettersson Aug 2005 B2
6929481 Alexander et al. Aug 2005 B1
6947033 Fåhraeus et al. Sep 2005 B2
6958747 Sahlberg et al. Oct 2005 B2
6966495 Lynggaard et al. Nov 2005 B2
6992655 Ericson et al. Jan 2006 B2
7002559 Ericson Feb 2006 B2
7035429 Andreasson Apr 2006 B2
7037258 Chatenever et al. May 2006 B2
7050653 Edso et al. May 2006 B2
7054487 Ericson et al. May 2006 B2
7072529 Hugosson et al. Jul 2006 B2
7089308 Fransson et al. Aug 2006 B2
7094977 Ericson et al. Aug 2006 B2
7110604 Olsson Sep 2006 B2
7120320 Petterson et al. Oct 2006 B2
7121465 Rignell Oct 2006 B2
7127682 Sandstrom et al. Oct 2006 B2
7143952 Ericson Dec 2006 B2
7145556 Pettersson Dec 2006 B2
7154056 Bergqvist et al. Dec 2006 B2
7162087 Bryborn Jan 2007 B2
7167164 Ericson et al. Jan 2007 B2
7172131 Pettersson et al. Feb 2007 B2
7175095 Pettersson et al. Feb 2007 B2
7176896 Fahraeus et al. Feb 2007 B1
7180509 Fermgard et al. Feb 2007 B2
7195166 Olsson et al. Mar 2007 B2
7202861 Lynggaard Apr 2007 B2
7202963 Wiebe et al. Apr 2007 B2
7239306 Fahraeus et al. Jul 2007 B2
7246321 Bryborn et al. Jul 2007 B2
7248250 Pettersson et al. Jul 2007 B2
7249256 Hansen et al. Jul 2007 B2
7249716 Bryborn Jul 2007 B2
7254839 Fahraeus et al. Aug 2007 B2
7278017 Skantze Oct 2007 B2
7281668 Pettersson et al. Oct 2007 B2
7283676 Olsson Oct 2007 B2
7293697 Wiebe et al. Nov 2007 B2
7295193 Fahraeus Nov 2007 B2
7296075 Lynggaard Nov 2007 B2
7321692 Bryborn et al. Jan 2008 B2
7333947 Wiebe et al. Feb 2008 B2
7345673 Ericson et al. Mar 2008 B2
7353393 Hansen et al. Apr 2008 B2
7356012 Wiebe et al. Apr 2008 B2
7371068 Lloyd et al. May 2008 B2
7382361 Burstrom et al. Jun 2008 B2
7385595 Bryborn et al. Jun 2008 B2
7408536 Hugosson et al. Aug 2008 B2
7415501 Burstrom Aug 2008 B2
7418160 Lynggaard Aug 2008 B2
7422154 Ericson Sep 2008 B2
7441183 Burstrom et al. Oct 2008 B2
7457413 Thuveshoimen et al. Nov 2008 B2
7457476 Olsson Nov 2008 B2
7543753 Pettersson Jun 2009 B2
7588191 Pettersson et al. Sep 2009 B2
7600693 Pettersson Oct 2009 B2
7649637 Wiebe et al. Jan 2010 B2
7670070 Craven-Bartle Mar 2010 B2
7672513 Bjorklund et al. Mar 2010 B2
7701446 Sahlberg et al. Apr 2010 B2
7710408 Ericson May 2010 B2
7751089 Fahraeus et al. Jul 2010 B2
7753283 Lynggaard Jul 2010 B2
7777777 Bowman et al. Aug 2010 B2
7788315 Johansson Aug 2010 B2
7794388 Draxinger et al. Sep 2010 B2
7806696 Alexander et al. Oct 2010 B2
7833018 Alexander et al. Nov 2010 B2
7850454 Toly Dec 2010 B2
7857626 Toly Dec 2010 B2
7871850 Park Jan 2011 B2
7931470 Alexander et al. Apr 2011 B2
8244506 Butsev et al. Aug 2012 B2
8294972 Chung Oct 2012 B2
8428326 Falk et al. Apr 2013 B2
8480404 Savitsky Jul 2013 B2
8480406 Alexander et al. Jul 2013 B2
8556635 Siassi Oct 2013 B2
8721344 Marmaropoulos et al. May 2014 B2
9128116 Welch et al. Sep 2015 B2
9251721 Lampotang Feb 2016 B2
9436993 Stolka et al. Sep 2016 B1
9870721 Savitsky et al. Jan 2018 B2
9911365 Toly Mar 2018 B2
10052010 Feddema Aug 2018 B2
10132015 Woodruff et al. Nov 2018 B2
11011077 Garcia Kilroy May 2021 B2
20010031920 Kaufman et al. Oct 2001 A1
20020076581 McCoy Jun 2002 A1
20020076681 Leight et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020088926 Prasser Jul 2002 A1
20020099310 Kimchy et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020168618 Anderson et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020173721 Grunwald et al. Nov 2002 A1
20040043368 Hsieh et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040087850 Okerlund et al. May 2004 A1
20050119569 Ohtake Jun 2005 A1
20050181342 Toly Aug 2005 A1
20050214726 Feygin et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050228617 Kerwin et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050283075 Ma et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060020204 Serra et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060098010 Dwyer et al. May 2006 A1
20070088213 Poland Apr 2007 A1
20070161904 Urbano Jul 2007 A1
20070232907 Pelissier et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070233085 Colvin et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070236514 Augusanto Oct 2007 A1
20080009743 Hayasaka Jan 2008 A1
20080137071 Chow Jun 2008 A1
20080187896 Savitsky Aug 2008 A1
20080200807 Wright et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080204004 Anderson Aug 2008 A1
20080269606 Matsumura Oct 2008 A1
20080294096 Uber et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080312884 Hostettler et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090006419 Savitsky et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090043195 Poland Feb 2009 A1
20090046912 Hostettler Feb 2009 A1
20090130642 Tada et al. May 2009 A1
20090209859 Tsujita et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090266957 Cermak Oct 2009 A1
20090305213 Burgkart et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090311655 Karkanias et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100055657 Goble et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100104162 Falk et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100179428 Pedersen et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100268067 Razzaque et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100277422 Muresianu et al. Nov 2010 A1
20110010023 Kunzig et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110306025 Sheehan et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120021993 Kim et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120058457 Savitsky Mar 2012 A1
20120143142 Klein Jun 2012 A1
20120150797 Landy et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120179039 Pelissier et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120200977 Nestler Aug 2012 A1
20120219937 Hughes et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120237102 Savitsky et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120237913 Savitsky et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120238875 Savitsky et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120251991 Savitsky Oct 2012 A1
20130046523 Van Dinther Feb 2013 A1
20130064036 Lee et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130065211 Amso et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130137989 Chen May 2013 A1
20130158411 Miyasaka Jun 2013 A1
20130179306 Want et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130236872 Laurusonis et al. Sep 2013 A1
20140000448 Tepper Jan 2014 A1
20140087347 Tracy Mar 2014 A1
20140114194 Kanayama et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140119645 Zimet May 2014 A1
20140120505 Rios et al. May 2014 A1
20140170620 Savitsky et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140228685 Eelbode Aug 2014 A1
20140272878 Shim et al. Sep 2014 A1
20150056591 Tepper et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150073639 Hausotte Mar 2015 A1
20150084897 Nataneli et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150086956 Savitsky et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150140538 Savitsky et al. May 2015 A1
20150154890 Savitsky Jun 2015 A1
20150213731 Sato Jul 2015 A1
20160104393 Savitsky et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160259424 Nataneli et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160314715 Savitsky et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160314716 Grubbs Oct 2016 A1
20160328998 Pedersen Nov 2016 A1
20170018204 Savitsky et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170028141 Fiedler et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170035517 Geri Feb 2017 A1
20170046985 Hendrickson et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170110032 O'Brien Apr 2017 A1
20170270829 Bauss Sep 2017 A1
20170352294 Nataneli et al. Dec 2017 A1
20180137784 Savitsky May 2018 A1
20180197441 Rios Jul 2018 A1
20180211563 Savitsky Jul 2018 A1
20180330635 Savitsky Nov 2018 A1
20180366034 Casals Gelpi Dec 2018 A1
20190057620 Eggert Feb 2019 A1
20190231436 Panse Aug 2019 A1
20190321657 Hale Oct 2019 A1
20190371204 Savitsky Dec 2019 A1
20200126449 Horst Apr 2020 A1
20200138518 Lang May 2020 A1
20200242971 Wang Jul 2020 A1
20200242972 Petrinec Jul 2020 A1
20210128125 Sitti et al. May 2021 A1
20210186311 Levy et al. Jun 2021 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (6)
Number Date Country
1103223 May 2001 EP
2801966 Nov 2014 EP
2011097238 Dec 2014 JP
2127610 Nov 2014 RU
1994040171 Nov 2014 RU
2006060406 Jun 2006 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (50)
Entry
Simsuite, “Are you ready for your first carotid stent procedure/begin preparing now,” www.simsuites.com/readarticie.asp?articleId=598, 1 pg, obtained from website Nov. 25, 2004.
NewRuleFX Brand 5ml Retractable Hypo Syringe Prop—Retractable Needle and Plunger—No Liquids. (Feb. 9, 2014), from https://www.newrulefx.com/products/newrulefx-brand-5ml-retractable-hypo-syringe-prop-retractable-needle-and-plunger-no-liquids?_pos=4&_sid=71f351469&_ss=r (Year: 2014).
Chung, Gregory, “Effects of Simulation-Based Practice on Focused Assessment . . . ”, Military Medicine, Oct. 2013, vol. 178.
Aligned Management Associates, Inc., Corporate home page describing organizing committee, overview, Procedicus MIST[trademark]-suturing module 30.0, 6 pgs., obtained from website Sep. 6, 2004.
American Academy of Emergency Medicine, conference: 11th annual scientific assembly preconference ultrasound courts, http://www. aaem.org/education/scientificassembly/sa05/precon/ultrasound.shtml, 6 pgs, obtained from website Feb. 16, 2005.
Barbosa, J. et. al., “Computer education in emergency medicine residency programs,” http://www.med-ed-online.org/res00002.htm, 8 pgs, obtained from website Sep. 6, 2004.
Brannam, Let al, “Emergency nurses' utilization of ultrasound guidance for placement of peripheral intravenous lines in difficult-access patients,” Acad Emerg Med, 11(12):1361-1363, Dec. 2004.
Calvert, N et al., “The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of ultrasound locating devices for central venous access: a systematic review and economic evaluation/executive summary,” Health Tech Assess 2003, 7(12), 4 pgs.
Center for Human Simulation, corporate home page describing overview/people, http://www.uchsc.edu, 7 pgs, obtained from website Sep. 6, 2004.
CIMIT News, “The medical access program: new CIMIT initiative to benefit underserved patients/partners telemedicine and CIMIT launch new initiative: stay connected, be healthy/highlights: operating room of the future plug-and-play project,” http://www.cimit.org, Jan. 2005: vol. II(2), 2 pgs., obtained from website Mar. 1, 2005.
Colt, H. G. et. al., “Virtual reality bronchoscopy simulation: a revolution in procedural training,” Chest 2001; 120:1333-1339.
Computer Motion, “About computer motion: technology to enhance surgeons' capabilities, improve patient outcomes and reduce healthcare costs/corporate alliances/products & solutions for surgical innovation/training on the da Vinci[registered] surgical system-introd action,” 2002 Computer Motion, http://www.computermotion.com, 6 pgs.
Delp, Setal, “Surgical simulation—an emerging technology for training in emergency medicine,” Presence, 6(2):147-159, Apr. 1997 (abstract).
Dorner, R. et. al,, “Synergies between interactive training simulations and digital storytelling: a component-based framework,” Computer & Graphics, 26(1):45-55, Feb. 2002 (abstract).
Duque, D. and Kessler S., “Ultrasound guided vascular access,” Amer Coli Emerg Phy., http://www.nyacep.org/education/articles/ultrasound%20vascular%20access.htm, 2 pgs, obtained from website May 11, 2005.
Espinet, A. and Dunning J., “Does ultrasound-guided central line insertion reduce complications and time to placement in elective patients undergoing cardiac surgery,” Inter Cardiovascular Thoracic Surg, 3:523-527, 2004; http:/licvts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/full/3/3/523, 6 pgs, obtained from website May 11, 2005 (abstract).
Gallagher, A. G. et. al., “Virtual reality training for the operating room and cardiac catheterization laboratory,” Lancet, 364:1538-1540, Oct. 23, 2004.
Gallagher, A. G. et. al., “Psychomotor skills assessment in practicing surgeons experienced in performing advanced laparoscopic procedures,” AM Coll Surg, 197(3):479-488, Sep. 2003.
Gausche, M. et. al., “Effect on out-of-hospital pediatric endotracheal intubation on survival and neurological outcome: a controlled clinical trial,” JAMA, 283(6):783-790, Feb. 9, 2000.
Gore, D. C. and Gregory, S. R., “Historical perspective on medical errors: Richard Cabot and the Institute of Medicine,” J Amer Coll Surg, 197(4), 5 pgs, Oct. 2003.
Grantcharov, T. P. et. al., “Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training,” Br J Surg, 91(2):146-150, Feb. 1, 2004 (abstract).
Grantcharov, T. P. et. al., “Learning curves and impact of previous operative experience on performance on a virtual reality simulator to test laparoscopic surgical skills,” Am J Surg, 185(2):146-149, Feb. 1, 2004 (abstract).
Haluck, R. S., et. al., “Are surgery training programs ready for virtual reality? A survey of program directors in general surgery,” Arch Surg, 135(7):786-792, Jul. 1, 2000.
Helmreich, R. L., “On error management: lessons from aviation,” BMJ, 320:781-785, Mar. 2000.
Huckman, R. S. and Pisano, G. P., “Turf battles in coronary revascularization,” N Engl J Med, http://www.nejm.org, 4 pgs, 352(9):857-859, Mar. 3, 2005.
Immersion Corporation, URL: http://www.immersion.com/corporate/products/, corporate home page describing Immersion's surgical training simulators—“Wireless Data Giove: The CyberGlove[registered]II System,” 5 pgs, obtained from the website Nov. 17, 2005 and Jan. 24, 2008.
injuryboard.com, “Reducing complications associated with central vein catheterization,” URSL: http://www.injuryboard.com/view.cfm/Article=668, 5 pgs, obtained from website May 11, 2005.
Intersense, home page listing motion tracking products, http://www.isense.com/prodcuts.aspx?id=42&, 1 pg, obtained from website Jan. 24, 2008.
Jemmett, M. E., et. al., “Unrecognized misplacement of endotracheal tubes in a mixed urban to rural emergency medical services setting,” Acad Emerg Med, 10(9):961-964, Sep. 2003.
Katz, S. H. and Falk, J. L., “Misplaced endotrachial tubes by paramedics in an urban medical services system,” Annals Emerg Med, 37:32-37, Jan. 2001.
Lewis, R., “Educational research: time to reach the bar, not lower it,” Acad Emerg Med, 12(3):2478-248, Mar. 2005.
Liu, A. et. al., “A survey of surgical simulation: applications, technology, and education,” Presence, 12(6):1-45, Dec. 2003.
Manchester Visulations Centre, “Webset project-bringing 3D medical training tools to the WWW,” http://www.sve.man.ac.uklmvc/research/previous/website, 3 pgs, obtained from the website Sep. 8, 2004.
Medical Simulation Corporation, corporate home page describing management team/frequently asked questions, http://www.medsimulation.com/about_msc/key_employees.asp, 7 pgs, obtained from website Nov. 25, 2004.
Medtronic, “The StealthStation[registered] treatment, guidance system,” the corporate home page describing the company fact sheet and profile; http://www.medtronic.com/Newsroom, 4 pgs, obtained from website Mar. 5, 2005.
Mort, T. C., “Emergency tracheal intubation: complications associated with repeated laryngoscopic attempts,” Anesth Analg, 99(2):607-613, Aug. 2004, 1 pg, obtained from website Sep. 8, 2004 (abstract).
Nazeer, S. R., et. al., “Ultrasound-assisted paracentesis performed by emergency physicians v.s. the traditional technique: a prospective, randomized study,” Amer J of Emer Med, 23:363-367, 2005.
NCA Medical Simulation Center, Tutorial-simulation for medical training, http://Simcen.usuhs.millmiccaie, 4 pgs, 2003.
Next Dimension Imaging, “Products-Anatomy Analyzer 2,” http://www.nexted.com/anatomyanalyzer.asp, 2 pgs, obtained from website Dec. 7, 2004.
Norris, T. E. et. al., “Teaching procedural skills,” J General internal Med, 12(S2):S64-S70, Apr. 1997.
On the Net Resources-Education and Training, URL: http://www.hitl.washington.edu/projects/knowledge_base/education.html, corporate home page regarding internet sites regarding education and training, 16 pgs, obtained from website Jan. 8, 2005.
Osberg, K. M., “Virtual reality and education: a look at both sides of the sword,” http://www.hitl.washington.edu/publications/r-93-7/, 19 pgs, Dec. 14, 1992, obtained from website Jan. 21, 2008.
Osmon, S. et. al., “Clinical investigations: reporting of medical errors: an intensive care unit experience,” Grit Care Med, 32(3), 13 pgs, Mar. 2004.
Ponder, M., et al., “Immersive VR decision training: telling interactive stories featuring advanced human simulation technologies,” Eurographics Association 2003, 10 pgs.
Prystowsky, J. B. et. al., “A virtual reaiity moduie fer intravenous catheter placement,” Am J Surg 1999; 17(2):171-175 (abstract).
Reachin, “Medical Training Development Centre/Reachin technologies AB has entered into a corporation with Mentice AB,” Jan. 20, 2004, 4 pgs, obtained from website Nov. 9, 2004.
Rothschild, J. M., “Ultrasound guidance of central vein catheterization,” NCBI, Nat Lib Med, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/, HSTAT 21, 6 pgs, obtained from website May 11, 2005.
Rowe, R. and Cohen, R. A., “An evaluation of a virtual reality airway simulator,” Anesth Analg 2002, 95:62-66.
Sensable Technologies, “PHANTOM Omni Haptic Device,” 2 pgs, http://www.sensable.com/haptic-ohantom-omni.htm., obtained from website Jan. 24, 2008.
Shaffer, K., “Becoming a physician: teaching anatomy in a digital age,” NEJM, Sep. 23, 2004; 351(13):1279-81 (extract of first 100 words—no abstract).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20210134186 A1 May 2021 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62450975 Jan 2017 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 15880290 Jan 2018 US
Child 17150719 US