This invention pertains generally to methods and systems for providing power outage and restoration notifications within an Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) network.
A mesh network is a wireless network configured to route data between nodes within a network. It allows for continuous connections and reconfigurations around broken or blocked paths by retransmitting messages from node to node until a destination is reached. Mesh networks differ from other networks in that the component parts can all connect to each other via multiple hops. Thus, mesh networks are self-healing: the network remains operational when a node or a connection fails.
Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) or Advanced Metering Management (AMM) are systems that measure, collect and analyze utility usage, from advanced devices such as electricity meters, gas meters, and water meters, through a network on request or a pre-defined schedule. This infrastructure includes hardware, software, communications, customer associated systems and meter data management software. The infrastructure allows collection and distribution of information to customers, suppliers, utility companies and service providers. This enables these businesses to either participate in, or provide, demand response solutions, products and services. Customers may alter energy usage patterns from normal consumption patterns in response to demand pricing. This improves system load and reliability.
A meter may be installed on a power line, gas line, or water line and wired into a power grid for power. During an outage, the meter may cease to function. When power is restored, meter functionality may be restored.
A method and system provide power outage and restoration notifications within an AMI network. Mesh networks are used to connect meters of an AMI in a geographical area. Each meter may communicate with its neighbors via the mesh network. A mesh gate links the mesh network to a server over a wide area network (WAN). When a power outage occurs among the meters of a mesh network, leaf meters transmit outage messages first. Parent meters add a parent identifier before forwarding the outage messages. This reduces the number of transmitted outage messages within the mesh network. Similarly, restoration messages are transmitted from the leaf nodes first, while parent nodes piggy-back parent identifiers when forwarding the restoration messages from the leaf meters.
In one aspect, there is provided a system and method for power outage and restoration notification in an advanced metering infrastructure network.
In another aspect, there is provided a method of transmitting a meter power status, including: recognizing a power status change at a meter; if the meter is scheduled to transmit first, transmitting a notification message to at least one neighboring meter towards a mesh gate, wherein the notification message includes a power status indicator and a meter identifier; if the meter is not scheduled to transmit first, waiting a predetermined time period to receive a notification message from at least one neighboring meter; responsive to receiving a notification message, adding a meter identifier to the received notification message before retransmitting the modified notification message to at least one neighboring meter; and retransmitting the notification message.
In another aspect, there is provided a method of transmitting a network power status, including: receiving at least one notification message from a meter, wherein the notification message includes a power status indicator and at least one meter identifier; aggregating the received meter identifiers into a composite notification message, the composite notification message including a power status indicator and at least one meter identifier; transmitting the composite notification message to a server over a wide area network; and retransmitting the composite notification message.
In another aspect, there is provided a system for transmitting a network power status, including: (A) a mesh network; (B) a wide area network separate from the mesh network; (C) at least one meter in communication with the mesh network, the meter configured to: recognize a power status change at a meter, if the meter is scheduled to transmit first, transmit a notification message to at least one neighboring meter towards a mesh gate, wherein the notification message includes a power status indicator and a meter identifier, if the meter is not scheduled to transmit first, wait a predetermined time period to receive a notification message from at least one neighboring meter, responsive to receiving a notification message, adding a meter identifier to the received notification message before retransmitting the modified notification message to at least one neighboring meter, and retransmitting the notification message; (D) a mesh gate in communication with the meter over the mesh network and in communication with the wide area network, the mesh gate configured to: receive at least one notification message from a meter, wherein the notification messages include a power status indicator and at least one meter identifier, aggregate the received meter identifiers into a composite notification message, the composite notification message includes a power status indicator and at least one meter identifier, transmit the composite notification message to a server over a wide area network, and retransmitting the composite notification message; and (E) a server in communication with the mesh gate over the wide area network, the server configured to receive the composite notification message.
In another aspect, there is provided a system for transmitting a network power status, including: a mesh network; a wide area network separate from the mesh network; at least one meter in communication with the mesh network; a mesh gate in communication with the meter over the mesh network and in communication with the wide area network; and a server in communication with the mesh gate over the wide area network, the server configured to receive the composite notification message.
In another aspect, there is provided a computer program stored in a computer readable form for execution in a processor and a processor coupled memory to implement a method of transmitting a meter power status, the method including: recognizing a power status change at a meter; if the meter is scheduled to transmit first, transmitting a notification message to at least one neighboring meter towards a mesh gate, wherein the notification message includes a power status indicator and a meter identifier; if the meter is not scheduled to transmit first, waiting a predetermined time period to receive a notification message from at least one neighboring meter; responsive to receiving a notification message, adding a meter identifier to the received notification message before retransmitting the modified notification message to at least one neighboring meter; and retransmitting the notification message.
In another aspect, there is provided a computer program stored in a computer readable form for execution in a processor and a processor coupled memory to implement a method of transmitting a network power status, including: receiving at least one notification message from a meter, wherein the notification message includes a power status indicator and at least one meter identifier; aggregating the received meter identifiers into a composite notification message, the composite notification message including a power status indicator and at least one meter identifier; transmitting the composite notification message to a server over a wide area network; and retransmitting the composite notification message.
In another aspect, there is provided a method of transmitting a meter power status, including: recognizing a power status change at a meter; if the meter is scheduled to transmit first, transmitting a notification message from the meter to at least one neighboring meter towards a mesh gate, wherein the notification message includes a power status indicator and a meter identifier; if the meter is not scheduled to transmit first, waiting a predetermined time period to receive a notification message from at least one neighboring meter; responsive to receiving a notification message, adding a meter identifier to the received notification message before retransmitting the modified notification message to at least one neighboring meter, wherein the notification message includes a power status indicator and at least one meter identifier; aggregating the received meter identifiers into a composite notification message, the composite notification message including a power status indicator and at least one meter identifier; transmitting the composite notification message to a server over a wide area network; and retransmitting the composite notification message.
In another aspect, there is provided a computer program stored in a computer readable form for execution in a processor and a processor coupled memory to implement a method of transmitting a meter power status, the method including: recognizing a power status change at a meter; if the meter is scheduled to transmit first, transmitting a notification message from the meter to at least one neighboring meter towards a mesh gate, wherein the notification message includes a power status indicator and a meter identifier; if the meter is not scheduled to transmit first, waiting a predetermined time period to receive a notification message from at least one neighboring meter; responsive to receiving a notification message, adding a meter identifier to the received notification message before retransmitting the modified notification message to at least one neighboring meter, wherein the notification message includes a power status indicator and at least one meter identifier; aggregating the received meter identifiers into a composite notification message, the composite notification message including a power status indicator and at least one meter identifier; transmitting the composite notification message to a server over a wide area network; and retransmitting the composite notification message.
This Summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description. This Summary is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used to limit the scope of the claimed subject matter.
In one example embodiment, the server 118 is known as a “head end.” The mesh gate may also be known as a collector, a concentrator, or an access point.
It will be appreciated that a mesh device association can include a registration for application service at the mesh gate A 102 or the server 118. The mesh gate A 102 and the server 118 can maintain a table of available applications and services and requesting mesh devices.
The mesh network A 100 may include a plurality of mesh gates and meters which cover a geographical area. The meters may be part of an AMI system and communicate with the mesh gates over the mesh network. For example, the AMI system may monitor utilities usage, such as gas, water, or electricity usage and usage patterns.
The mesh gate A 102 may provide a gateway between the mesh network A 100 and a server, discussed below. The mesh gate A 102 may include a mesh radio to communicate with the mesh network A 100 and a WAN communication interface to communicate with a WAN.
The mesh gate A 102 may aggregate information from meters within the mesh network A 100 and transmit the information to the server. The mesh gate A 102 may be as depicted below. It will be appreciated that while only one mesh gate is depicted in the mesh network A 100, any number of mesh gates may be deployed within the mesh network A 100, for example, to improve transmission bandwidth to the server and provide redundancy. A typical system will include a plurality of mesh gates within the mesh network. In a non-limiting embodiment for an urban or metropolitan geographical area, there may be between 1 and 100 mesh gates, though this is not a limitation of the invention. In one embodiment, each mesh gate supports approximately 400 meters, depending on system requirements, wireless reception conditions, available bandwidth, and other considerations. It will be appreciated that it is preferable to limit meter usage of bandwidth to allow for future upgrades.
The meters A 104, B 106, C 108, D 110, E 112, and F 114 may each be a mesh device, such as a meter depicted below. The meters may be associated with the mesh network A 100 through direct or indirect communications with the mesh gate A 102. Each meter may forward or relay transmissions from other meters within the mesh network A 100 towards the mesh gate A. It will be appreciated that while only six meters are depicted in the mesh network A 100, any number of meters may be deployed to cover any number of utility lines or locations.
As depicted, only meters A 104 and D 110 are in direct communications with mesh gate A 102. However, meters B 106, E 112 and F 114 can all reach mesh gate A 102 through meter D 110. Similarly, meter C 108 can reach mesh gate A 102 through meter E 112 and meter D 110.
The wide area network (WAN) 116 may be any communication medium capable of transmitting digital information. For example, the WAN 116 may be the Internet, a cellular network, a private network, a phone line configured to carry a dial-up connection, or any other network.
The server 118 may be a computing device configured to receive information from a plurality of mesh networks and meters. The server 118 may also be configured to transmit instructions to the mesh networks, mesh gates, and meters.
It will be appreciated that while only one server is depicted, any number of servers may be used in the AMI system. For example, servers may be distributed by geographical location. Redundant servers may provide backup and failover capabilities in the AMI system.
The optional mesh gates B 120 and C 124 may be similar to mesh gate A 102, discussed above. Each mesh gate may be associated with a mesh network. For example, mesh gate B 120 may be associated with mesh network B 122 and mesh gate C 124 may be associated with mesh network C 126.
The mesh network B 122 and the mesh network C 126 may be similar to the mesh network A 102. Each mesh network may include a plurality of meters (not depicted).
Each mesh network may cover a geographical area, such as a premise, a residential building, an apartment building, or a residential block. Alternatively, the mesh network may include a utilities network and be configured to measure utilities flow at each sensor. Each mesh gate communicates with the server over the WAN, and thus the server may receive information from and control a large number of meters or mesh devices. Mesh devices may be located wherever they are needed, without the necessity of providing wired communications with the server.
A mesh device can be any device configured to participate as a node within a mesh network. An example mesh device is a mesh repeater, which can be a wired device configured to retransmit received mesh transmissions. This extends a range of a mesh network and provides mesh network functionality to mesh devices that enter sleep cycles.
The meter 200 may be a mesh device communicating with a mesh gate and other mesh devices over a mesh network. For example, the meter 200 may be a gas, water or electricity meter installed in a residential building or other location to monitor utilities usage. The meter 200 may also control access to utilities on server instructions, for example, by reducing the flow of gas, water or electricity.
The radio 202 may be a mesh radio configured to communicate with a mesh network. The radio 202 may transmit, receive, and forward messages to the mesh network. Any meter within the mesh network may thus communicate with any other meter or mesh gate by communicating with its neighbor and requesting a message be forwarded.
The communication card 204 may interface between the radio 202 and the sensor 206. Sensor readings may be converted to radio signals for transmission over the radio 202. The communication card 204 may include encryption/decryption or other security functions to protect the transmission. In addition, the communication card 204 may decode instructions received from the server.
The metering sensor 206 may be a gas, water, or electricity meter sensor, or another sensor. For example, digital flow sensors may be used to measure a quantity of utilities consumed within a residence or building. Alternatively, the sensor 206 may be an electricity meter configured to measure a quantity of electricity flowing over a power line.
The battery 208 may be configured to independently power the meter 200 during a power outage. For example, the battery 208 may be a large capacitor storing electricity to power the meter 200 for at least five minutes after a power outage. Small compact but high capacity capacitors known as super capacitors are known in the art and may advantageously be used. One exemplary super capacitor is the SESSCAP 50f 2.7v 18×30 mm capacitor. Alternative battery technologies may be used, for example, galvanic cells, electrolytic cells, fuel cells, flow cells, and voltaic cells.
It will be appreciated that the radio 202, communication card 204, metering sensor 206 and battery 208 may be modular and configured for easy removal and replacement. This facilitates component upgrading over a lifetime of the meter 200.
The memory 210 of the radio 202 may store instructions and run-time variables of the radio 202. For example, the memory 210 may include both volatile and non-volatile memory.
The memory 210 may also store a history of sensor readings from the metering sensor 206 and an incoming queue of server instructions.
The processor 212 of the radio 202 may execute instructions, for example, stored in memory 210. Instructions stored in memory 210 may be ordinary instructions, for example, provided at time of meter installation, or special instructions received from the server during run time.
The transceiver 214 of the radio 202 may transmit and receive wireless signals to a mesh network. The transceiver 214 may be configured to transmit sensor readings and status updates under control of the processor 212. The transceiver 214 may receive server instructions from a server, which are communicated to the memory 210 and the processor 212.
In the example of
In one embodiment, any number of MCUs can exist in the meter 200. For example, two MCUs can be installed, a first MCU for executing firmware handling communication protocols, and a second MCU for handling applications.
It will be appreciated that a mesh device and a mesh gate can share the architecture of meter 200. The radio 202 and the MCU 216 provide the necessary hardware, and the MCU 216 executes any necessary firmware or software.
Meters may be located in geographically dispersed locations within an AMI system. For example, a meter may be located near a gas line, an electric line, or a water line entering a building or premise to monitor a quantity of gas, electricity, or water. The meter may communicate with other meters and mesh gates through a mesh network. The meter may transmit meter readings and receive instructions via the mesh network.
The mesh gate 230 may interface between mesh devices (for example, meters) in a mesh network and a server. For example, meters may be as discussed above. The mesh gate 230 may be installed in a central location relative to the meters and also communicate with a server over a WAN.
The mesh radio 232 may be a mesh radio configured to communicate with meters over a mesh network. The radio 232 may transmit, receive, and forward messages to the mesh network.
The WAN interface 234 may communicate with a server over a WAN. For example, the WAN may be a cellular network, a private network, a dial up connection, or any other network. The WAN interface 234 may include encryption/decryption or other security functions to protect data being transmitted to and from the server.
The battery 236 may be configured to independently power the mesh gate 230 during a power outage. For example, the battery 236 may be a large capacitor storing electricity to power the mesh gate 230 for at least five minutes after a power outage. A power outage notification process may be activated during a power outage.
The processor 238 may control the mesh radio 232 and the WAN interface 234. Meter information received from the meters over the mesh radio 232 may be compiled into composite messages for forwarding to the server. Server instructions may be received from the WAN interface 234 and forwarded to meters in the mesh network.
It will be appreciated that the mesh radio 232, WAN interface 234, battery 236, and processor 238 may be modular and configured for easy removal and replacement. This facilitates component upgrading over a lifetime of the mesh gate 230.
The memory 242 of the mesh radio 232 may store instructions and run-time variables of the mesh radio 232. For example, the memory 242 may include both volatile and non-volatile memory. The memory 242 may also store a history of meter communications and a queue of incoming server instructions. For example, meter communications may include past sensor readings and status updates.
The processor 244 of the mesh radio 232 may execute instructions, for example, stored in memory 242. Instructions stored in memory 242 may be ordinary instructions, for example, provided at time of mesh gate installation, or special instructions received from the server during run-time.
The transceiver 246 of the mesh radio 232 may transmit and receive wireless signals to a mesh network. The transceiver 246 may be configured to receive sensor readings and status updates from a plurality of meters in the mesh network. The transceiver 246 may also receive server instructions, which are communicated to the memory 242 and the processor 244.
A mesh gate may interface between a mesh network and a server. The mesh gate may communicate with meters in the mesh network and communicate with the server over a WAN network. By acting as a gateway, the mesh gate forwards information and instructions between the meters in its mesh network and the server.
The radio 300 may be a mesh radio as discussed above. For example, the radio 300 may be a component in a meter, a mesh gate, or any other mesh device configured to participate in a mesh network. The radio 300 may be configured to transmit wireless signals over a predetermined frequency to other radios.
The application process 302 may be an executing application that requires information to be communicated over the network stack. For example, the application process 302 may be software supporting an AMI system.
The application layer 304 interfaces directly with and performs common application services for application processes. Functionality includes semantic conversion between associated application processes. For example, the application layer 304 may be implemented as ANSI C12.12/22.
The transport layer 306 responds to service requests from the application layer 304 and issues service requests to the network layer 308. It delivers data to the appropriate application on the host computers. For example, the layer 306 may be implemented as TCP (Transmission Control Protocol), and UDP (User Datagram Protocol).
The network layer 308 is responsible for end to end (source to destination) packet delivery. The functionality of the layer 308 includes transferring variable length data sequences from a source to a destination via one or more networks while maintaining the quality of service, and error control functions. Data will be transmitted from its source to its destination, even if the transmission path involves multiple hops.
The data link layer 310 transfers data between adjacent network nodes in a network, wherein the data is in the form of packets. The layer 310 provides functionality including transferring data between network entities and error correction/detection. For example, the layer 310 may be implemented as IEEE 802.15.4.
The physical layer 312 may be the most basic network layer, transmitting bits over a data link connecting network nodes. No packet headers or trailers are included. The bit stream may be grouped into code words or symbols and converted to a physical signal, which is transmitted over a transmission medium, such as radio waves. The physical layer 312 provides an electrical, mechanical, and procedural interface to the transmission medium. For example, the layer 312 may be implemented as IEEE 802.15.4.
The network stack provides different levels of abstraction for programmers within an AMI system. Abstraction reduces a concept to only information which is relevant for a particular purpose. Thus, each level of the network stack may assume the functionality below it on the stack is implemented. This facilitates programming features and functionality for the AMI system.
In 400, the meter may detect a power status change. For example, the meter may include an electric sensor sensing a power, current, or voltage of an electric line powering the meter from a power grid. When the sensor senses a cut-off in electricity, the meter may wait a predetermined recognition period before determining that a power outage has occurred.
When a meter's power is restored after an outage, the meter may also wait a predetermined recognition period before determining that the power outage has ended and power has been restored. Using a recognition period before an outage or a restoration has occurred prevents the meter from trigging the notification procedure for brief outages and restorations.
In 402, the meter tests whether it is the first to transmit. For example, the meter may look up a neighborhood table to determine whether it is a leaf meter. A leaf meter may have no children meters, and is thus the last meter on its associated branch. For example,
A one-hop device, which can be a device in direct communications with the mesh gate, may transmit immediately.
Alternatively, the meter may look up the neighborhood table to determine a number of hops to the mesh gate. If it is farthest from the mesh gate on its branch, it will transmit first. If the meter determines yes, the meter proceeds to 404. If no, the meter proceeds to 410. The neighborhood table can be built during association requests and subsequent neighbor exchanges.
In 404, the meter may transmit a notification message. The notification message may include a nature of the notification (whether a power outage or restoration has occurred, as determined in 400) and a meter identifier. The meter identifier may be a globally unique identifier assigned to the meter at manufacture or installation that identifies the meter to the mesh gate and the server.
If the notification message has previously been transmitted, the meter may attempt a retry transmission. Retries may be attempted until an acknowledgement is received or a predetermined number of retry attempts has been exceeded.
Information transmitted in the transmission may include a device identifier, a time of outage, and any other necessary information. In one embodiment, a number of transmitted neighbor information may be restricted. For example, only a predetermined maximum number of parents, siblings, and children node information can be transmitted to limit message size. Neighbors can be selected based on a preferred route ratio. Neighbors that are on a preferred route of a meter's path to the mesh gate may be prioritized. The preferred route ratio can be used to select routes with a minimum of hops over a best minimum signal quality link to the mesh gate.
In 406, the meter may test whether it has exceeded a predetermined retry attempts. The meter may increment a counter for a number of retries after every attempt to transmit a notification message in 404. The predetermined retry attempts may be set to limit network congestion, both within the mesh network and over a WAN from a mesh gate to the server during a power outage and restoration.
Alternatively, the meter may continually attempt to transmit until its battery is drained during a power outage notification procedure. This may be used in an AMI system where it is important to receive as many accurate outage notifications as possible, or where network bandwidth is of lesser concern. If the predetermined retry attempts have been exceed, the procedure ends. If no, the meter procedures to 408.
In 408, the meter optionally delays a random time period. For example, the delay may allow other meters in the mesh network to transmit and reduce collisions. Further, the delay may improve battery life after a power outage.
The random time period may be associated with a predetermined floor value, below which it cannot be set. This may be an exclusion period during which no retransmission may be attempted by the meter.
In 410, the meter tests whether a child message has been received. For example, a non-leaf meter will not transmit during a first attempt, and may receive notification messages from child meters. If yes, the meter proceeds to 412. If no, the meter proceeds to 404. In one embodiment, if the meter determines it has missed the child messages, it may immediately transmit its message.
In 412, the meter may insert a meter identifier in the notification message. The notification message received from the child meter in 410 may include a status (whether the notification is for a power outage or restoration) and at least one meter identifier associated with children meters. The meter may insert its own identifier into the message before forwarding the message in 404.
By executing the procedure above, leaf meters transmit notification messages first. Each meter waits to receive a notification message from children meters before adding its identifier and forwarding the notification to its parent meter. This reduces message congestion in the mesh network during a notification procedure.
In an alternative example, each parent meter may determine how many children meters it has, and wait for notification messages from all children meters before compiling the messages into one message to be forwarded. Alternatively, the parent meter may wait for a predetermined period of time, because only some children meters may be affected by a power outage.
It will be appreciated that if a meter has not suffered a power outage, it would simply forward any received notification messages to its parent without adding its identifier into the message. Similarly, if a parent meter has not had a power restoration; it will remain off and be unable to forward notification messages. In this example, children meters may attempt alternative routes to transmit notification messages, as discussed below.
In 450, the mesh gate may receive a notification message from a meter within its mesh network. For example, the notification message may include a status indicating whether it is an outage or restoration notification and at least one meter identifier. The notification message may be as discussed above.
In 452, the mesh gate may test whether it has finished receiving notification messages from the mesh network. For example, the mesh gate may continually receive notification messages until its battery drops to a critical level during an outage. The critical level may be set to where enough power remains in the battery to allow the mesh gate to transmit its composite notification message to the server, as discussed below, along with a predetermined number of retries.
Alternatively, the mesh gate may wait for a predetermined time period after receiving a first notification message. For example, the predetermined time period may be determined, in part, based on the size of the mesh network, the maximum number of hops to reach a leaf meter, the link quality of the mesh network, etc.
Alternatively, the mesh gate may proceed as soon as message notifications from all children meters within the mesh network have been received. If all children meters are accounted for, the mesh gate does not need to wait for further notification messages.
If the mesh gate has finished receiving notification messages, it may proceed to 454. If no, it may proceed to 450 to await more notification messages.
In 454, the mesh gate may select a power reporting configuration. For example, two power reporting configurations may be available: one used for minor outage, such as one affecting only a few meters, and one used for major outages, such as one affecting many meters. The power reporting configuration may affect the retry attempts and delay periods discussed below.
For example, it may be very important to inform the server of a major outage. Thus, a high number of retry attempts may be set. It may be likely that a major outage has affected other mesh networks. Thus, a longer delay period may be used to reduce transmission collisions over the WAN. In addition, a longer window may be set to wait for notification messages from meters.
In 456, the mesh gate may aggregate all the notification messages into a composite notification message. For example, the mesh gate may create the composite notification message containing a status indicating whether an outage or restoration has occurred in the mesh network and a list of meter identifiers associated with the notification. For example, the list of meter identifiers may be received in 452 from one or more meters.
In one example, the mesh gate may receive both an outage and a restoration notification message. The mesh gate may aggregate a first notification message, for example, all received outage notification messages, for transmission. Then, the mesh gate may aggregate a second notification message, for example, the restoration notification message for transmission.
In 458, the mesh gate may transmit the composite notification message to the server over a WAN. For example, the WAN may be a cellular network, a wired network, or another network configured to carry information. In one example, the WAN used to transmit the composite notification message may be a secondary communications medium. A primary wired network may fail during a power outage, and therefore a backup network may be used. For example, the backup network may be a battery-powered network, cellular network, a battery-powered wired network, or another network configured to operate during an outage.
If the composite notification message has previously been transmitted, the mesh gate may attempt a retry transmission. Retries may be attempted until an acknowledgement is received or a predetermined number of retry attempts has been exceeded.
In 460, the mesh gate may test whether a predetermined number of retry attempts has been exceeded. The mesh gate may increment a counter for a number of retries after every attempt to transmit a notification message in 458. The predetermined retry attempts may be set to limit network congestion over the WAN to the server during a power outage and restoration.
Alternatively, the mesh gate may continually attempt to transmit until its battery is drained during a power outage notification procedure. This may be used in an AMI system where it is important to receive as many accurate outage notifications as possible, or where network bandwidth is of lesser concern.
For example, the predetermined number of retry attempts may be set in part based on the power reporting configuration selected in 454. If the predetermined number of retry attempts has been exceeded, the mesh gate may end the procedure. If no, the mesh gate may proceed to 462.
In 462, the mesh gate may optionally delay a random time period. For example, the delay may allow other mesh gates in the WAN to transmit and reduce collisions. Further, the delay may improve battery life after a power outage.
For example, the delay period may be set in part based on the power reporting configuration selected in 454. The random time period may be associated with a floor value, below which it cannot be set. This may be an exclusion period during which no retransmission may be attempted.
The mesh gate may aggregate all notification messages sent to it by meters over the mesh network. The composite notification message consists of a power status and a list of meter identifiers identifying the meters affected by the power status. The composite notification message may be transmitted over an outage-resistant communications link to a server.
A recognition period (e.g., RECOGNITION_PERIOD) may elapse between an occurrence of a power outage and time T1, when the power outage is recognized by the meter. The recognition period may prevent minor power fluctuations or outages from triggering the outage notification procedure.
The meter may wait for a retry random period before a retry attempt at time T3. A retry wait period (e.g., PO_RETRY_RND_PERIOD) may represent a maximum random delay in seconds used for each retry. This random delay starts after time T2, when a first transmission attempt occurs.
Using a random delay before the first and retry attempts prevents colliding transmission from multiple meters and reduces network congestion. If a meter attempts to transmit but a transmission is already in progress, the meter may wait for the transmission in progress to end before attempting to transmit.
If a meter receives a notification from a child meter, its transmission includes the child's notification plus the meter's identifier. By piggy-backing the meter's identifier in a child's notification and forwarding the notification, the number of individual notifications and messages are reduced in the mesh network.
The meter may continually retry to transmit an outage notification until the meter's battery is drained. In addition, there may be a predetermined maximum number retries. In addition, there may be a minimum period for the first delay and the subsequent retry delays. The minimum delay periods may eliminate the possibility of immediate retransmissions and guarantee a minimum delay between attempts.
The mesh gate may receive all the power outage notification messages and compile the information into a message for transmission to a server over a WAN. The mesh gate may also retransmit the compiled notification as necessary, until its battery is drained.
Child meters in a mesh network transmit outage notifications first, and parent meters piggy-back meter identifiers into the child notifications before forwarding the child notifications. A number of messages and notifications transmitted in the mesh network during an outage are thereby reduced.
When power is restored at a meter, the meter may first wait for a recognition period before deciding the power has been restored. The recognition period may prevent triggering restoration notifications when power returns for a brief moment before the outage continues.
A first random period, PR_RND_PERIOD, may represent a maximum random delay used before a first attempt is made to send a power restoration notification. This first random period may begin after the power restored recognition period, PR_RECOGNITION_PERIOD. A first notification may be transmitted. Only leaf meters transmit during the first attempt.
A retry random period, PR_RETRY_RND_PERIOD, may represent a maximum random delay before a retry to send a power restoration notification. The retry random period begins after the first random period.
Using a random delay before the first and retry attempts reduces colliding transmission from multiple meters. If a meter attempts to transmit but a transmission is already in progress, the meter may wait for the transmission to end before attempting to transmit.
After the first attempt to transmit has been made, the mesh gate may wait a minimum delay (e.g., MIN_DELAY) to time T4 and an additional random period (e.g., RAND_PERIOD) to time T5 before retrying transmission. Each retry attempt may be preceded by a retry random period (e.g., RETRY_RND_PERIOD) to time T6, and a maximum number of retry attempts may be set at maximum retries (e.g., MAX_RETRIES). The procedure may stop at time T7, after all retry attempts have been made.
If a meter receives a notification from a child meter, its transmission includes the child's notification plus the meter's identifier. By piggy-backing the meter's identifier in a child's notification and forwarding the notification, the number of individual notifications and messages are reduced in the mesh network.
The mesh gate may receive all power restoration notification messages and compile the information into a composite message for transmission to a server over a WAN. Similarly, the mesh gate may also repeatedly attempt to transmit the composite restoration message until a maximum number of retries have been made or the server acknowledges the transmission.
Child meters in a mesh network transmit restoration notifications first, and parent meters piggy-back meter identifiers into the child notifications before forwarding the child notifications. A number of messages and notifications transmitted in the mesh network during a restoration are thereby reduced.
If a child meter attempts to forward a message to a parent meter that is not functional (for example, the parent meter's power has not been restored); the child meter may wait a predetermined period of time. If the parent meter remains non-functional, the child meter may attempt to send its notification via an alternative path through the mesh network stored in its memory. If that fails, the child meter may attempt to discover a new route through the mesh network to the mesh gate. If that fails, the child meter may attempt to associate with a new mesh network in order to transmit its restoration notification message.
Although the above embodiments have been discussed with reference to specific example embodiments, it will be evident that the various modification, combinations and changes can be made to these embodiments. Accordingly, the specification and drawings are to be regarded in an illustrative sense rather than in a restrictive sense. The foregoing specification provides a description with reference to specific exemplary embodiments. It will be evident that various modifications may be made thereto without departing from the broader spirit and scope as set forth in the following claims. The specification and drawings are, accordingly, to be regarded in an illustrative sense rather than a restrictive sense.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/275,254, filed Nov. 21, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,171,364, and claims the benefit of priority to the following United States provisional patent applications which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety: Ser. No. 60/989,957 entitled “Point-to-Point Communication within a Mesh Network”, filed Nov. 25, 2007;Ser. No. 60/989,967 entitled “Efficient And Compact Transport Layer And Model For An Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) Network,” filed Nov. 25, 2007;Ser. No. 60/989,958 entitled “Creating And Managing A Mesh Network Including Network Association,” filed Nov. 25, 2007;Ser. No. 60/989,964 entitled “Route Optimization Within A Mesh Network,” filed Nov. 25, 2007;Ser. No. 60/989,950 entitled “Application Layer Device Agnostic Collector Utilizing ANSI C12.22,” filed Nov. 25, 2007;Ser. No. 60/989,953 entitled “System And Method For Real Time Event Report Generation Between Nodes And Head End Server In A Meter Reading Network Including From Smart And Dumb Meters,” filed Nov. 25, 2007;Ser. No. 60/989,956 entitled “System and Method for False Alert Filtering of Event Messages Within a Network”, filed Nov. 25, 2007;Ser. No. 60/989,975 entitled “System and Method for Network (Mesh) Layer And Application Layer Architecture And Processes,” filed Nov. 25, 2007;Ser. No. 60/989,959 entitled “Tree Routing Within a Mesh Network,” filed Nov. 25, 2007;Ser. No. 60/989,961 entitled “Source Routing Within a Mesh Network,” filed Nov. 25, 2007;Ser. No. 60/989,962 entitled “Creating and Managing a Mesh Network,” filed Nov. 25, 2007;Ser. No. 60/989,951 entitled “Network Node And Collector Architecture For Communicating Data And Method Of Communications,” filed Nov. 25, 2007;Ser. No. 60/989,955 entitled “System And Method For Recovering From Head End Data Loss And Data Collector Failure In An Automated Meter Reading Infrastructure,” filed Nov. 25, 2007;Ser. No. 60/989,952 entitled “System And Method For Assigning Checkpoints To A Plurality Of Network Nodes In Communication With A Device Agnostic Data Collector,” filed Nov. 25, 2007;Ser. No. 60/989,954 entitled “System And Method For Synchronizing Data In An Automated Meter Reading Infrastructure,” filed Nov. 25, 2007;Ser. No. 61/025,285 entitled “Outage and Restoration Notification within a Mesh Network”, filed Jan. 31, 2008;Ser. No. 60/992,312 entitled “Mesh Network Broadcast,” filed Dec. 4, 2007;Ser. No. 60/992,313 entitled “Multi Tree Mesh Networks”, filed Dec. 4, 2007;Ser. No. 60/992,315 entitled “Mesh Routing Within a Mesh Network,” filed Dec. 4, 2007;Ser. No. 61/025,279 entitled “Point-to-Point Communication within a Mesh Network”, filed Jan. 31, 2008, and which are incorporated by reference.Ser. No. 61/025,270 entitled “Application Layer Device Agnostic Collector Utilizing Standardized Utility Metering Protocol Such As ANSI C12.22,” filed Jan. 31, 2008;Ser. No. 61/025,276 entitled “System And Method For Real-Time Event Report Generation Between Nodes And Head End Server In A Meter Reading Network Including Form Smart And Dumb Meters,” filed Jan. 31, 2008;Ser. No. 61/025,282 entitled “Method And System for Creating And Managing Association And Balancing Of A Mesh Device In A Mesh Network,” filed Jan. 31, 2008;Ser. No. 61/025,271 entitled “Method And System for Creating And Managing Association And Balancing Of A Mesh Device In A Mesh Network,” filed Jan. 31, 2008;Ser. No. 61/025,287 entitled “System And Method For Operating Mesh Devices In Multi-Tree Overlapping Mesh Networks”, filed Jan. 31, 2008;Ser. No. 61/025,278 entitled “System And Method For Recovering From Head End Data Loss And Data Collector Failure In An Automated Meter Reading Infrastructure,” filed Jan. 31, 2008;Ser. No. 61/025,273 entitled “System And Method For Assigning Checkpoints to A Plurality Of Network Nodes In Communication With A Device-Agnostic Data Collector,” filed Jan. 31, 2008;Ser. No. 61/025,277 entitled “System And Method For Synchronizing Data In An Automated Meter Reading Infrastructure,” filed Jan. 31, 2008;Ser. No. 61/025,285 entitled “System and Method for Power Outage and Restoration Notification in An Automated Meter Reading Infrastructure,” filed Jan. 31, 2008; andSer. No. 61/094,116 entitled “Message Formats and Processes for Communication Across a Mesh Network,” filed Sep. 4, 2008. This application hereby references and incorporates by reference each of the following United States nonprovisional patent applications filed contemporaneously herewith: Ser. No. 12/275,236 entitled “Point-to-Point Communication within a Mesh Network”, filed Nov. 21, 2008;Ser. No. 12/275,305 entitled “Efficient And Compact Transport Layer And Model For An Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) Network,” filed Nov. 21, 2008;Ser. No. 12/275,238 entitled “Communication and Message Route Optimization and Messaging in a Mesh Network,” filed Nov. 21, 2008;Ser. No. 12/275,242 entitled “Collector Device and System Utilizing Standardized Utility Metering Protocol,” filed Nov. 21, 2008;Ser. No. 12/275,245 entitled “System and Method for False Alert Filtering of Event Messages Within a Network,” filed Nov. 21, 2008;Ser. No. 12/275,252 entitled “Method and System for Creating and Managing Association and Balancing of a Mesh Device in a Mesh Network,” filed Nov. 21, 2008; andSer. No. 12/275,257 entitled “System And Method For Operating Mesh Devices In Multi-Tree Overlapping Mesh Networks”, filed Nov. 21, 2008.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4132981 | White | Jan 1979 | A |
4190800 | Kelly, Jr. et al. | Feb 1980 | A |
4204195 | Bogacki | May 1980 | A |
4254472 | Juengel et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4322842 | Martinez | Mar 1982 | A |
4396915 | Farnsworth et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4425628 | Bedard et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4638314 | Keller | Jan 1987 | A |
4644320 | Carr et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4749992 | Fitzemeyer et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4792946 | Mayo | Dec 1988 | A |
4939726 | Flammer et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
5007052 | Flammer | Apr 1991 | A |
5056107 | Johnson et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5077753 | Grau, Jr. et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5079768 | Flammer | Jan 1992 | A |
5115433 | Baran et al. | May 1992 | A |
5117422 | Hauptschein et al. | May 1992 | A |
5130987 | Flammer | Jul 1992 | A |
5138615 | Lamport et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5159592 | Perkins | Oct 1992 | A |
5216623 | Barrett et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5276680 | Messenger | Jan 1994 | A |
5311581 | Merriam et al. | May 1994 | A |
5400338 | Flammer, III et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5430729 | Rahnema | Jul 1995 | A |
5432507 | Mussino et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5453977 | Flammer, III et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5459727 | Vannucci | Oct 1995 | A |
5463777 | Bialkowski et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5465398 | Flammer | Nov 1995 | A |
5467345 | Cutter, Jr. et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5471469 | Flammer, III et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5479400 | Dilworth et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5488608 | Flammer, III | Jan 1996 | A |
5515369 | Flammer, III et al. | May 1996 | A |
5515509 | Rom | May 1996 | A |
5528507 | McNamara et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5544036 | Brown, Jr. et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5553094 | Johnson et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5570084 | Retter et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5572438 | Ehlers et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5572528 | Shuen | Nov 1996 | A |
5596722 | Rahnema | Jan 1997 | A |
5608721 | Natarajan et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5608780 | Gerszberg et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5623495 | Eng et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5659300 | Dresselhuys et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5673252 | Johnson et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5684710 | Ehlers et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5696501 | Ouellette et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5696695 | Ehlers et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5717718 | Rowsell et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5719564 | Sears | Feb 1998 | A |
5726644 | Jednacz et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5727057 | Emery et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5737318 | Melnik | Apr 1998 | A |
5740366 | Mahany et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5748104 | Argyroudis et al. | May 1998 | A |
5757783 | Eng et al. | May 1998 | A |
5758331 | Johnson | May 1998 | A |
5761083 | Brown, Jr. et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5767790 | Jovellana | Jun 1998 | A |
5774660 | Brendel et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5812531 | Cheung et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5822309 | Ayanoglu et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5844893 | Gollnick et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5874903 | Shuey et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5880677 | Lestician | Mar 1999 | A |
5892758 | Argyroudis | Apr 1999 | A |
5894422 | Chasek | Apr 1999 | A |
5896097 | Cardozo | Apr 1999 | A |
5896566 | Averbuch et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5898387 | Davis et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5898826 | Pierce et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5901067 | Kao et al. | May 1999 | A |
5903566 | Flammer, III | May 1999 | A |
5914672 | Glorioso et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5914673 | Jennings et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5919247 | Van Hoff et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5920697 | Masters et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5926531 | Petite | Jul 1999 | A |
5933092 | Ouellette et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5953371 | Rowsell et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5963146 | Johnson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5963457 | Kanoi et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5974236 | Sherman | Oct 1999 | A |
5986574 | Colton | Nov 1999 | A |
5987011 | Toh | Nov 1999 | A |
5991806 | McHann, Jr. | Nov 1999 | A |
6014089 | Tracy et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6018659 | Ayyagari et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6026133 | Sokoler | Feb 2000 | A |
6028522 | Petite | Feb 2000 | A |
6044062 | Brownrigg et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6058355 | Ahmed et al. | May 2000 | A |
6061609 | Kanoi et al. | May 2000 | A |
6073169 | Shuey et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6075777 | Agrawal et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6078785 | Bush | Jun 2000 | A |
6084867 | Meier | Jul 2000 | A |
6088659 | Kelley et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6097703 | Larsen et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108699 | Moiin | Aug 2000 | A |
6118269 | Davis | Sep 2000 | A |
6122603 | Budike, Jr. | Sep 2000 | A |
6124806 | Cunningham et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6134587 | Okanoue | Oct 2000 | A |
6137423 | Glorioso et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6150955 | Tracy et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6169979 | Johnson | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6172616 | Johnson et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6195018 | Ragle et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6218953 | Petite | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6233327 | Petite | May 2001 | B1 |
6239722 | Colten et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6240080 | Okanoue et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6246677 | Nap et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6246689 | Shavitt | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6249516 | Brownrigg et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6298053 | Flammer, III et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6300881 | Yee et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6304556 | Haas | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6311105 | Budike, Jr. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6338087 | Okanoue | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6362745 | Davis | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6363057 | Ardalan et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6366217 | Cunningham et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6369719 | Tracy et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6369769 | Nap et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6373399 | Johnson et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6396839 | Ardalan et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6400949 | Bielefeld et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6407991 | Meier | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6415330 | Okanoue | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430268 | Petite | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6437692 | Petite et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6457054 | Bakshi | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6480497 | Flammer, III et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6480505 | Johansson et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6492910 | Ragle et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6509841 | Colton et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6522974 | Sitton | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6535498 | Larsson et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6538577 | Ehrke et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6553355 | Arnoux et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6556830 | Lenzo | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6577671 | Vimpari | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6606708 | Devine et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6618578 | Petite | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6618772 | Kao et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6628764 | Petite | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6633823 | Bartone et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6636894 | Short et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6650249 | Meyer et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6653945 | Johnson et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6657552 | Belski et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6665620 | Burns et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6671635 | Forth et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6681110 | Crookham et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6681154 | Nierlich et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6684245 | Shuey et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6687901 | Imamatsu | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6691173 | Morris et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6697331 | Riihinen et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6710721 | Holowick | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6711166 | Amir et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6711409 | Zavgren, Jr. et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6711512 | Noh | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6714787 | Reed et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6718137 | Chin | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6725281 | Zintel et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728514 | Bandeira et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6747557 | Petite et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6747981 | Ardalan et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6751445 | Kasperkovitz et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6751455 | Acampora | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6751672 | Khalil et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6772052 | Amundsen et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6775258 | van Valkenburg et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6778099 | Mayer et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6785592 | Smith et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6798352 | Holowick | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6801865 | Gilgenbach et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6826620 | Mawhinney et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6829216 | Nakata | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6829347 | Odiaka | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6831921 | Higgins | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6836737 | Petite et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6839775 | Kao et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6842706 | Baraty | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6845091 | Ogier et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6859186 | Lizalek et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6865185 | Patel et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6882635 | Eitan et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6885309 | Van Heteren | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6891838 | Petite et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6900738 | Crichlow | May 2005 | B2 |
6904025 | Madour et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6904385 | Budike, Jr. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6909705 | Lee et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6914533 | Petite | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6914893 | Petite | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6946972 | Mueller et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6954814 | Leach | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6963285 | Fischer et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6967452 | Aiso et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6970434 | Mahany et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6970771 | Preiss et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6975613 | Johansson | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6980973 | Karpenko | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6982651 | Fischer | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6985087 | Soliman | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6995666 | Luttrell | Feb 2006 | B1 |
6999441 | Flammer, III et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7009379 | Ramirez | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7009493 | Howard et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7010363 | Donnelly et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7016336 | Sorensen | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7020701 | Gelvin et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7042368 | Patterson et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7046682 | Carpenter et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7053767 | Petite et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7053853 | Merenda et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7054271 | Brownrigg et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7062361 | Lane | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7064679 | Ehrke et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7072945 | Nieminen et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7079810 | Petite et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7089089 | Cumming et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7102533 | Kim | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7103086 | Steed et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7103511 | Petite | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7106044 | Lee, Jr. et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7119713 | Shuey et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7126494 | Ardalan et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7135850 | Ramirez | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7135956 | Bartone et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7137550 | Petite | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7143204 | Kao et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7145474 | Shuey et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7170425 | Christopher et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7174260 | Tuff et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7185131 | Leach | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7188003 | Ransom et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7197046 | Hariharasubrahmanian | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7200633 | Sekiguchi et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7209840 | Petite et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7215926 | Corbett et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7222111 | Budike, Jr. | May 2007 | B1 |
7230544 | Van Heteren | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7230931 | Struhsaker | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7231482 | Leach | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7245938 | Sobczak et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7248181 | Patterson et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7248861 | Lazaridis et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7250874 | Mueller et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7251570 | Hancock et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7263073 | Petite et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7271735 | Rogai | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7274305 | Luttrell | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7274975 | Miller | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7277027 | Ehrke et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7277967 | Kao et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7289887 | Rodgers | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7295128 | Petite | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7301476 | Shuey et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7304587 | Boaz | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7308370 | Mason, Jr. et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7312721 | Mason, Jr. et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7315257 | Patterson et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7317404 | Cumeralto et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7321316 | Hancock et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7324453 | Wu et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7327998 | Kumar et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7346463 | Petite et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7348769 | Ramirez | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7349766 | Rodgers | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7362709 | Hui et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7366113 | Chandra et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7366191 | Higashiyama | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7379981 | Elliott et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7397907 | Petite | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7406298 | Luglio et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7411964 | Suemura | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7427927 | Borleske et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7451019 | Rodgers | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7457273 | Nakanishi et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7468661 | Petite et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7487282 | Leach | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7495578 | Borleske | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7498873 | Opshaug et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7505453 | Carpenter et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7512234 | McDonnell et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7515571 | Kwon et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7516106 | Ehlers et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7522540 | Maufer | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7522639 | Katz | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7539151 | Demirhan et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7545285 | Shuey et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7546595 | Wickham et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7548826 | Witter et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7548907 | Wall et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7554941 | Ratiu et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7562024 | Brooks et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7571865 | Nicodem et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7586420 | Fischer et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7599665 | Sinivaara | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7602747 | Maksymczuk et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7609673 | Bergenlid et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7613147 | Bergenlid et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7623043 | Mizra et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7626967 | Yarvis et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7650425 | Davis et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7676231 | Demirhan et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7680041 | Johansen | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7729496 | Hacigumus | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7733224 | Tran | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7743224 | Wang | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7756538 | Bonta et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7788491 | Dawson | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7802245 | Sonnier et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7814322 | Gurevich et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7818758 | de Bonet et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7847706 | Ross et al. | Dec 2010 | B1 |
8051415 | Suzuki | Nov 2011 | B2 |
20010005368 | Rune | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010010032 | Ehlers et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010038342 | Foote | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010046879 | Schramm et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020012358 | Sato | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020013679 | Petite | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020031101 | Petite et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020051269 | Margalit et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020066095 | Yu | May 2002 | A1 |
20020110118 | Foley | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020114303 | Crosbie et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120569 | Day | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020174354 | Bel et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020186619 | Reeves et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030001640 | Lao et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030001754 | Johnson et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030014633 | Gruber | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030033394 | Stine | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030037268 | Kistler | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030050737 | Osann | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030112822 | Hong et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030117966 | Chen | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030122686 | Ehrke et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030123481 | Neale et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030156715 | Reeds, III et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030207697 | Shpak | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030229900 | Reisman | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233201 | Horst et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040008663 | Srikrishna et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040031030 | Kidder et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040034773 | Balabine et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040039817 | Lee et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040056775 | Crookham et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040066310 | Ehrke et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040077341 | Chandranmenon et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040081086 | Hippelainen et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040082203 | Logvinov et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040100953 | Chen et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040113810 | Mason, Jr. et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040117788 | Karaoguz et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040125776 | Haugli et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040138787 | Ransom et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040140908 | Gladwin et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040157613 | Steer et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040183687 | Petite et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040185845 | Abhishek et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193329 | Ransom et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040210544 | Shuey et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040268142 | Karjala et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050026569 | Lim et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050027859 | Alvisi et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050030968 | Rich et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050033967 | Morino et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050055432 | Rodgers | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050058144 | Ayyagari et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050065742 | Rodgers | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050122944 | Kwon et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050136972 | Smith et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050172024 | Cheifot et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050187928 | Byers | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050193390 | Suzuki et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050195757 | Kidder et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050201397 | Petite | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050228874 | Edgett et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050243867 | Petite | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050249113 | Kobayashi et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050251403 | Shuey | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050257215 | Denby et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050270173 | Boaz | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050276243 | Sugaya et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050286440 | Strutt et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060028355 | Patterson et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060055432 | Shimokawa et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060056363 | Ratiu et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060056368 | Ratiu et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060077906 | Maegawa et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060087993 | Sengupta et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060098576 | Brownrigg et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060098604 | Flammer, III et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060111111 | Ovadia | May 2006 | A1 |
20060130053 | Buljore et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060140135 | Bonta et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060146717 | Conner et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060158347 | Roche et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161310 | Lal | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060167784 | Hoffberg | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060184288 | Rodgers | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060215583 | Castagnoli | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060215673 | Olvera-Hernandez | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060217936 | Mason et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060230276 | Nochta | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060271244 | Cumming et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271678 | Jessup et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070001868 | Boaz | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070013547 | Boaz | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070019598 | Prehofer | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070036353 | Reznik et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070057767 | Sun et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070060147 | Shin et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070063866 | Webb | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070063868 | Borleske | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070085700 | Walters et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070087756 | Hoffberg | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070089110 | Li | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070101442 | Bondurant | May 2007 | A1 |
20070103324 | Kosuge et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070109121 | Cohen | May 2007 | A1 |
20070110024 | Meier | May 2007 | A1 |
20070120705 | Kiiskila et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070136817 | Nguyen | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070139220 | Mirza et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070143046 | Budike, Jr. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070147268 | Kelley et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070169074 | Koo et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070169075 | Lill et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070169080 | Friedman | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070174467 | Ballou, Jr. et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070177538 | Christensen et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070177576 | Johansen et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070177613 | Shorty et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070189249 | Gurevich et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070200729 | Borleske et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070201504 | Christensen et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070204009 | Shorty et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070205915 | Shuey et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070206503 | Gong et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070206521 | Osaje | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070207811 | Das et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070210933 | Leach | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070211636 | Bellur et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070239477 | Budike, Jr. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070248047 | Shorty et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070257813 | Vaswani et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070258508 | Werb et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070263647 | Shorty et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070265947 | Schimpf et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070266429 | Ginter et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070271006 | Golden et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070276547 | Miller | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080011864 | Tessier et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080018492 | Ehrke et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080024320 | Ehrke et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080031145 | Ethier et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080032703 | Krumm et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080037569 | Werb et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080042874 | Rogai | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080046388 | Budike, Jr. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080048883 | Boaz | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080051036 | Vaswani et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080063205 | Braskich et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080068217 | Van Wyk et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080068994 | Garrison et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080068996 | Clave et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080086560 | Monier et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080089314 | Meyer et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080095221 | Picard | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080097782 | Budike, Jr. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080107034 | Jetcheva et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080117110 | Luglio et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080129538 | Vaswani et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080130535 | Shorty et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080130562 | Shorty et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080132185 | Elliott et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080136667 | Vaswani et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080151795 | Shorty et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080151824 | Shorty et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080151825 | Shorty et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080151826 | Shorty et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080151827 | Shorty et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080154396 | Shorty et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080159213 | Shorty et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080165712 | Shorty et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080170511 | Shorty et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080177678 | Di Martini et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080180274 | Cumeralto et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080181133 | Thubert et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183339 | Vaswani et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080186202 | Vaswani et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080186203 | Vaswani et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080187001 | Vaswani et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080187116 | Reeves et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080189415 | Vaswani et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080189436 | Vaswani et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080204272 | Ehrke et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080205355 | Liu et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080224891 | Ehrke et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080225737 | Gong et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080238714 | Ehrke et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080238716 | Ehrke et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080272934 | Wang et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080283620 | Knapp | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080310311 | Flammer et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080310377 | Flammer et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080317047 | Zeng et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080318547 | Ballou, Jr. et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090003214 | Vaswani et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090003232 | Vaswani et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090003243 | Vaswani et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090003356 | Vaswani et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090010178 | Tekippe | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090034418 | Flammer, III et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090034419 | Flammer, III et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090034432 | Bonta et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090043911 | Flammer et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090046732 | Pratt, Jr. et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090055032 | Rodgers | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090068947 | Petite | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090077405 | Johansen | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090079584 | Grady et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090082888 | Johansen | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090096605 | Petite et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090102737 | Birnbaum et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090115626 | Vaswani et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090129575 | Chakroaborty et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090132220 | Chakroborty et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090134969 | Veillette | May 2009 | A1 |
20090135677 | Veillette | May 2009 | A1 |
20090135716 | Veillette | May 2009 | A1 |
20090135843 | Veillette | May 2009 | A1 |
20090136042 | Veillette | May 2009 | A1 |
20090138777 | Veillette | May 2009 | A1 |
20090161594 | Zhu et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090167547 | Gilbert | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090168846 | Filippo, III et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090175238 | Jetcheva et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090179771 | Seal et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090201936 | Dumet et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090235246 | Seal et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090243840 | Petite et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090245270 | van Greunen et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090262642 | van Greunen et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090267792 | Crichlow | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090285124 | Aguirre et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090303972 | Flammer, III et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090310593 | Sheynblat et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090315699 | Satish et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090319672 | Reisman | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090320073 | Reisman | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100037069 | Deierling et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100037293 | St. Johns et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100040042 | van Greunen et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100060259 | Vaswani et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100061272 | Veillette | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100061350 | Flammer, III | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100073193 | Flammer, III | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100074176 | Flammer, III et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100074304 | Flammer, III | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100138660 | Haynes et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100238917 | Silverman et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110066297 | Saberi et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 578 041 | Nov 1999 | EP |
0 663 746 | Jan 2003 | EP |
0 812 502 | Aug 2004 | EP |
0 740 873 | Dec 2005 | EP |
10-070774 | Mar 1998 | JP |
10-135965 | May 1998 | JP |
WO 9512942 | May 1995 | WO |
WO 9610307 | Apr 1996 | WO |
WO 9610307 | Apr 1996 | WO |
WO 0054237 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO 0126334 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO 0155865 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 03015452 | Feb 2003 | WO |
WO 2005091303 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO 2006059195 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO 2007015822 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO 2007132473 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO 2008027457 | Mar 2008 | WO |
WO 2008033287 | Mar 2008 | WO |
WO 2008033514 | Mar 2008 | WO |
WO 2008038072 | Apr 2008 | WO |
WO 2008092268 | Aug 2008 | WO |
WO 2009067251 | May 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US09/05008, dated Oct. 22, 2009, 8 pp. |
Nachum Shacham, Edwin B. Brownrigg, & Clifford A. Lynch, A Packet Radio Network for Library Automation, 1987 IEEE Military Communications Conference, vol. 2 at 21.3.1, (Oct. 1987). |
Nachum Shacham & Janet D. Tornow, Future Directions in Packet Radio Technology, Proc. of the IEEE Infocom 1985 at 93 (Mar. 1985), 17 pp. |
John Jubin & Janet D. Tornow, The DARPA Packet Radio Network Protocols, Proc. of the IEEE, vol. 75, No. 1 at 21 (Jan. 1987). |
John Jubin, Current Packet Radio Network Protocols, Proc. of the IEEE Infocom1985 at 86 (Mar. 1985), 9 pp. |
David B. Johnson & David A. Maltz, Dynamic Source Routing in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks, reprinted in Mobile Computing, 153, Kluwer Academic Publishers (Tomasz Imielinski & Henry F. Korth eds., 1996), 18 pp. |
David B. Johnson, Mobile Host Internetworking Using IP Loose Source Routing, Carnegie Mellon University CMU-CS-93-128, DARPA Order No. 7330 (Feb. 1993), 18 pp. |
Daniel M. Frank, Transmission of IP Datagrams Over NET/ROM Networks, Proc. of the ARRL 7th Computer Networking Conference 1988 at 65 (Oct. 1988), 6 pp. |
Robert E. Kahn, et al., Advances in Packet Radio Technology, Proc. of the IEEE, vol. 66, No. 11, pp. 1468-1496 (Nov. 1978). |
Clifford A. Lynch & Edwin B. Brownrigg, Packet Radio Networks, Bergamon Press, 259-74 (1987). |
Charles E. Perkins & Pravin Bhagwat, Highly Dynamic Destination-Sequenced Distance-Vector Routing (DSDV) for Mobile Computers, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, vol. 24, Issue 4 at 234 (Oct. 1994), 11 pp. |
William MacGregor, Jil Westcott, & Michael Beeler, Multiple Control Stations in Packet Radio Networks, 1982 IEEE Military Communications Conference, vol. 3 at 10.3-1 (Oct. 1982), 6 pp. |
Nachum Shacham & Jil Westcott, Future Directions in Packet Radio Architectures and Protocols, Proc. of the IEEE, vol. 75, No. 1 at 83 (Jan. 1987) 17 pp. |
David B. Johnson and David A. Maltz, Protocols for Adaptive Wireless and Mobile Networking, IEEE Personal Communications, Feb. 1996, p. 34-42. |
Arek J. Dadej and Daniel Floreani, Interconnected Mobile Radio Networks—A step Towards Integrated Multimedia Military Communications, Communications and Networks for the Year 2000, IEEE Singapore International Conference on Networks/International Conference on Information Engineering '93, vol. 1, p. 152-156. |
David A. Beyer, Accomplishments of the DARPA SURAN Program, IEEE MILCOM 1990, p. 39.6.1-8. |
William S. Hortos, Application of Neural Networks to the Dynamic Spatial Distribution of Nodes within an Urban Wireless Network, SPIE, vol. 2492, p. 58-70, 1995. |
Nachum Shacham and Richard G. Ogier, Network Control and Data Transport for C3I Applications, IEEE 1987, p. 30.5.1-6. |
John E. Rustad, Reidar Skaug, and Andreas Aasen, New Radio Networks for Tactical Communication, IEEE Jornal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 8, No. 5, p. 713-27, Jun. 1990. |
Barry M. Leiner, Donald L. Nielson, and Fouad A. Tobagi, Issues in Packet Radio Network Design, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 75, No. 1, p. 6-20, Jan. 1987. |
Janet Tornow, Functional Summary of the DARPA SURAP1 Network, DARPA, Sep. 1986, 17 pp. |
John F. Shoch and Lawrence Stewart, Interconnecting Local Networks via the Packet Radio Network, Sixth Data Communications Symposium, Nov. 1979, pp. 153-158. |
J.R. Cleveland, Performance and Design Considerations for Mobile Mesh Networks, IEEE MILCOM 96, vol. 1, p. 245-49. |
Cmdr. R. E. Bruninga, USN, A Worldwide Packet Radio Network, Signal, vol. 42, No. 10, p. 221-230, Jun. 1988. |
Nachum Shacham and Janet Tornow, Packet Radio Networking, Telecommunications, vol. 20, No. 9, p. 42-48, 64, 82, Sep. 1986. |
Spencer T. Carlisle, Edison's NetComm Project, IEEE 1989, Paper No. 89CH2709-4-B5, p. B5-1-B5-4. |
Brian H. Davies and T.R. Davies, The Application of Packet Switching Techniques to Combat Net Radio, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 75, No. 1, p. 43-55, Jan. 1987. |
Fouad A. Tobagi, Richard Binder, and Barry Leiner, Packet Radio and Satellite Networks, IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 22, No. 11, p. 24-40, Nov. 1984. |
M. Scott Corson, Joseph Macker, and Stephen G. Batsell, Architectural Considerations for Mobile Mesh Networking, IEEE MILCOM 96, vol. 1, p. 225-9. |
K.Y. Eng, et. al., Bahama: A Broadband Ad-Hoc Wireless ATM Local-Area Network, 1995 IEEE International Conference on Communications, vol. 2, p. 1216-23, Jun. 18-22, 1995. |
J. Jonquin Garcia-Luna-Aceves, A Fail-Safe Routing Algorithm for Multihop Packet-Radio Networks, IEEE INFOCOM '86, p. 434-43, Apr. 8-10, 1986. |
Johanes P. Tamtomo, A Prototype of TCP/IP-Based Internet-PRNET for Land Information Networks and Services, Department of Surveying Engineering, University of New Brunswick, Jan. 25, 1993, 118 pp. |
A. Alwan, et al., Adaptive Mobile Multimedia Networks, IEEE Personal Communications, p. 34-51, Apr. 1996. |
Michael Ball, et al., Reliability of Packet Switching Broadcast Radio Networks, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems, vol. Cas-23, No. 12, p. 806-13 ,Dec. 1976. |
Kenneth Brayer, Implementation and Performance of Survivable Computer Communication with Autonomous Decentralized Control, IEEE Communications Magazine, p. 34-41, Jul. 1983. |
Weidong Chen and Eric Lin, Route Optimization and Locations Updates for Mobile Hosts, Proceedings of the 16th ICDCS, p. 319-326, 1996. |
Daniel Cohen, Jonathan B. Postel, and Raphael Rom, Addressing and Routing in a Local Wireless Network,IEEE INFOCOM 1992, p. 5A.3.1-7. |
Charles Perkins and David B. Johnson, Mobility Support in IPv6, Sep. 22, 1994, http//www.monarch.cs.rice.edu/internet-drafts/draft-perkins-ipv6-mobility-sup-00.txt (last visited Sep. 26, 2009. |
Jonathan J. Hahn and David M. Stolle, Packet Radio Network Routing Algorithms: A Survey, IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 22, No. 11, p. 41-7, Nov. 1984. |
David A. Hall, Tactical Internet System Architecture for the Task Force XXI, IEEE 1996, p. 219-30. |
Robert Hinden and Alan Sheltzer, The DARPA Internet Gateway, DARPA RFC 823, Sep. 1982, 45 pp. |
Manuel Jimenez-Cedeno and Ramon Vasquez-Espinosa, Centralized Packet Radio Network: A Communication Approach Suited for Data Collection in a Real-Time Flash Flood Prediction System, Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Puerto Rico—Mayaguez, ACM 0-89791-568-2/93, p. 709-13, 1993. |
David B. Johnson, Routing in Ad Hoc Networks of Mobile Hosts, Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, Dec. 8-9, 1994, Santa Cruz, California, IEEE 1995, p. 158-63. |
David B. Johnson, Route Optimization in Mobile IP, Nov. 28, 1994, http://www.monarch.cs.rice.edu/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mobileip-optim-00.txt (last visited Sep. 26, 2009), 32 pp. |
Mark G. Lewis and J.J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves, Packet-Switching Applique for Tactical VHF Radios, 1987 IEEE MILCOM Communciations Conference, Oct. 19-22, 1987, Washington, D.C., p. 21.2.1-7. |
Sioe Mak and Denny Radford, Design Considerations for Implementation of Large Scale Automatic Meter Reading Systems, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 10, No. 1, p. 97-103, Jan. 1995. |
Charles E. Perkins and Pravin Bhagwat, A Mobile Networking System Based on Internet Protocol, IEEE Personal Communications, First Quarter 1994, IEEE 1994, p. 32-41. |
Richard Schulman, Richard Snyder, and Larry J. Williams, SINCGARS Internet Controller—Heart of the Digitized Battlefield, Proceedings of the 1996 Tactical Communications Conference, Apr. 30-May 2, 1996, Fort Wayne, Indiana, p. 417-21. |
Nachum Shacham and Earl J. Craighill, Dynamic Routing for Real-Time Data Transport in Packet Radio Networks, Proceedings of INFOCOM 1982, IEEE 1982, p. 152-58. |
R. Lee Hamilton, Jr. and Hsien-Chuen Yu, Optimal Routing in Multihop Packet Radio Networks, IEEE 1990, p. 389-96. |
Carl A. Sunshine, Addressing Problems in Multi-Network Systems, Proceedings of INFOCOM 1982, IEEE 1982, p. 12-18. |
J.J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves, Routing Management in Very Large-Scale Networks, North-Holland, Future Generations Computer Systems 4, 1988, pp. 81-93. |
J.J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves, A Minimum-hop Routing Algorithm Based on Distributed Information, North-Holland, Computer Networks and ISDN Systems 16, 1988/89, p. 367-382. |
D. Hubner, J. Kassubek, F. Reichert, A Distributed Multihop Protocol for Mobile Stations to Contact a Stationary Infrastructure, Third IEE Conference on Telecommunications, Conference Publication No. 331, p. 204-7. |
Jens Zander and Robert Forchheimer, The SOFTNET Project: A Retrospect, IEEE EUROCON, Jun. 13-17, 1988, p. 343-5. |
Mario Gerla and Jack Tzu-Chich Tsai, Multicluster, Mobile, Multimedia Radio Network, Wireless Networks 1, J.C. Baltzer AG, Science Publishers, 1995, p. 255-265. |
F. G. Harrison, Microwave Radio in the British TeleCom Access Network, Second IEE National Conference on Telecommunications, Conference Publication No. 300, Apr. 2-5, 1989, p. 208-13. |
Chai-Keong Toh, A Novel Distributed Routing Protocol to Support Ad-Hoc Mobile Computing, Conference Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE Fifteenth Annual International Phoenix Conference on Computers and Communications, Mar. 27-29, 1996, p. 480-6. |
Fadi F. Wahhab, Multi-Path Routing Protocol for Rapidly Deployable Radio Networks, Thesis submitted to the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science of the University of Kansas, 1994, 59 pp. |
Jil Westcott and Gregory Lauer, Hierarchical Routing for Very Large Networks, IEEE MILCOM 1984, Oct. 21-24, 1984, Conference Record vol. 2, p. 214-8. |
Leis, John, “TCP/IP Protocol Family,” pp. 1 and 42-43, Apr. 3, 2006. |
Supplementary European Search Report for Application No. EP 08 85 1869, dated Dec. 30, 2010, 7 pp. |
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US10/26956, dated May 19, 2010, 2 pp. |
Supplementary European Search Report for Application No. EP 08 85 1132, dated Dec. 6, 2010, 9 pp. |
Baumann, R., et al., “Routing Packets Into Wireless Mesh Networks,” Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications, 2007, WIMOB 2007, Third IEEE International Conference, Piscataway, NJ, Oct. 8, 2007, p. 38 (XP031338321). |
Levis Stanford University, J. P. Vasseur, Cisco Systems, et al., “Overview of Existing Routing Protocols for Low Power and Lossy Networks,” draft-levis-r12n-overview-protocols-02.txt, IETF Standard-Working-Draft, Internet Engineering Task Force, IETF, Ch, No. 2, Nov. 17, 2007 (XP015054252) (ISSN: 0000-0004). |
Culler Arch Rock, J.P. Vasseur, Cisco Systems, et al., “Routing Requirements for Low Power and Lossy Networks, draft-culler-r12n-routing-reqs-01.txt,” IETF Standard-Working-Draft, Internet Engineering Task Force, IETF, CH, No. 1, Jul. 7, 2007 (XP015050851) (ISSN: 000-0004). |
Perkins, C. E., et al., “Ad Hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing,” Network Working Group Internet Draft, XX, Nov. 9, 2001 (XP002950167). |
Postel, J., “RFC 793 Transmission Control Protocol,” Sep. 1981 [retrieved on Jan. 1, 2007], Retrieved From the Internet: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc0793.txt. |
Supplementary European Search Report for Application No. EP 08 85 1927, dated Dec. 22, 2010, 10 pp. |
Younis, M., et al., “Energy-Aware Routing in Cluster-Based Sensor Networks,” Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunications Systems, 10th IEEE Proceedings on Mascots, Oct. 11-16, 2002, Piscataway, NJ (XP010624424) (ISNB: 978-0-7695-1840-4). |
Supplementary European Search Report for Application No. EP 08 85 3052, dated Mar. 18, 2011, 10 pp. |
Supplementary European Search Report for Application No. EP 08 85 1560, dated Mar. 24, 2011, 9 pp. |
Supplementary European Search Report for Application No. EP 08 85 2992, dated Mar. 23, 2011, 6 pp. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US08/12161, dated Mar. 2, 2009, 13 pp. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US08/13017, dated Mar. 18, 2009, 11 pp. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US08/13032, dated May 12, 2009, 14 pp. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US08/13026, dated Feb. 24, 2009, 9 pp. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US08/13029, dated Feb. 2, 2009, 8 pp. |
Broch, Josh, et al., “A Performance Comparison of Multi-Hop Wireless Ad Hoc Network Routing Protocols,” Proceedings of the Fourth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference in Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom '98), Dallas, Texas, 13 pp., Oct. 25-30, 1998. |
Broch, Josh, et al., “The Dynamic Source Routing Protocol for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks” [online], Mar. 13, 1998 [retrieved on Feb. 24, 2009], 31 pp., Retrieved from the Internet: http://tools.ietf.org/draft-ietf-manet-dsr-00.txt. |
Katz, Randy H. and Brewer, Eric A., “The Case for Wireless Overlay Networks,” Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Department, University of California, Berkeley, 12 pp., 1996. |
Johnson, David B., “Routing in Ad Hoc Networks of Mobile Hosts,” IEEE, pp. 158-163, 1995. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US08/13027, dated Feb. 9, 2009, 6 pp. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US08/13023, dated Jan. 12, 2009, 10 pp. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US08/13019, dated Jan. 12, 2009, 13 pp. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US08/13025, dated Jan. 13, 2009, 7 pp. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US08/13018, dated Jan. 30, 2009, 9 pp. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US08/13020, dated Jan. 9, 2009, 8 pp. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US08/13028, dated Jan. 15, 2009, 9 pp. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US08/13021, dated Jan. 15, 2009, 11 pp. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US08/13016, dated Jan. 9, 2009, 7 pp. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US08/13024, dated Jan. 13, 2009, 9 pp. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US08/13022, dated Jan. 27, 2009, 10 pp. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US08/13030, dated Jan. 9, 2009, 7 pp. |
Reexamination Application No. 90/008,011, filed Jul. 24, 2006, 75 pp. |
“AMRON Technologies Successfully Deploys Advanced Metering Solution for C&I Customers Using Bluetooth” [online], Sep. 2, 2004 [retrieved on Jan. 2, 2009], 3 pp., Retrieved from the Internet: http://www.techweb.com/showpressrelease?articleID=X324101&CompanyId=3. |
Utility Intelligence, “Exclusive Distributors of Dynamic Virtual Metering” [online], Copyright 2004-2005 [retrieved on May 12, 2005], Retrieved from the Internet: http://www.empoweringutilities.com/hardware.html, 29 pp. |
“AMRON Meter Management System” [online], [retrieved on May 12, 2005], 41 pp., Retrieved from the Internet: http://www.amronm5.com/products/. |
Hydro One Networks, Inc., Request for Proposal for Smart Metering Services, 16 pp., Mar. 4, 2005. |
Trilliant Networks, “The Trilliant AMI Solution,” RFP SCP-07003, 50 pp., Mar. 22, 2007. |
“ZigBee Smart Energy Profile Specification,” ZigBee Profile 0x0109, Revision 14, Document 075356r14, 202 pp., May 29, 2008. |
Hubaux, J. P., et al. “Towards Mobile Ad-Hoc WANs: Terminodes,” 2000 IEEE, Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, WCNC, vol. 3, pp. 1052-1059, 2000. |
Miklos, G., et al., “Performance Aspects of Bluetooth Scatternet Formation,” First Annual Workshop on Mobile and Ad Hoc Networking and Computing, MobiHOC 2000, pp. 147-148, 2000. |
Eng, K. Y., et al. “BAHAMA: A Broadband Ad-Hoc Wireless ATM Local-Area Network,” 1995 IEEE International Conference on Communications, ICC '95 Seattle, ‘Gateway to Globalization’, vol. 2, pp. 1216-1223, Jun. 18-22, 1995. |
Lee, David J. Y., “Ricocheting Bluetooth,” 2nd International Conference on Microwave and Millimeter Wave Technology Proceedings, ICMMT 2000, pp. 432-435, 2000. |
Lilja, Tore, “Mobile Energy Supervision,” Twenty-second International Telecommunications Energy Conference, 2000 INTELEC, pp. 707-712, 2000. |
Parkka, Juha, et al., “A Wireless Wellness Monitor for Personal Weight Management,” Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE EMBS International Conference on Information Technology Applications in Biomedicine, pp. 83-88, 2000. |
Broch, J., et al., “Supporting Hierarchy and Heterogeneous Interfaces in Multi-Hop Wireless Ad Hoc Networks,” Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Parallel Architectures, Algorithms, and Networks (I-SPAN '99), pp. 370-375 (7 pp. with Abstract), Jun. 23-25, 1999. |
Privat, G., “A System-Architecture Viewpoint on Smart Networked Devices,” Microelectronic Engineering, vol. 54, Nos. 1-2, pp. 193-197, Dec. 2000. |
Jonsson, U., et al., “MIPMANET—Mobile IP for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks,” MobiHOC 2000, First Annual Workshop on Mobile and Ad Hoc Networking and Computing, pp. 75-85 (12 pp. with Abstract), 2000. |
Kapoor, R., et al., “Multimedia Support Over Bluetooth Piconets,” First Workshop on Wireless Mobile Internet, pp. 50-55, Jul. 2001. |
Sung-Yuan, K., “The Embedded Bluetooth CCD Camera,” TENCON, Proceedings of the IEEE Region 10 International Conference on Electrical and Electronic Technology, vol. 1, pp. 81-84 (5 pp. with Abstract), Aug. 19-22, 2001. |
Lim, A., “Distributed Services for Information Dissemination in Self-Organizing Sensor Networks,” Journal of the Franklin Institute, vol. 338, No. 6, pp. 707-727, Sep. 2001. |
Meguerdichian, S., et al., “Localized Algorithms in Wireless Ad-Hoc Networks: Location Discovery and Sensor Exposure,” ACM Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking & Computing, MobiHOC 2001, pp. 106-116, Oct. 2001. |
Lilakiatsakun, W., et al. “Wireless Home Networks Based on a Hierarchical Bluetooth Scatternet Architecture,” Proceedings of the Ninth IEEE International Conference on Networks, pp. 481-485 (6 pp. with Abstract), Oct. 2001. |
Jha, S., et al., “Universal Network of Small Wireless Operators (UNSWo),” Proceedings of the First IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster Computing and the Grid, pp. 626-631 (7 pp. with Abstract), 2001. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2011/060694, dated Apr. 9, 2012, 10 pp. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2011/049227, dated Jan. 31, 2012, 9 pp. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US12/22334, dated Apr. 9, 2012, 9 pp. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US11/56620, dated Mar. 13, 2012, 8 pp. |
Supplementary European Search Report for Application No. EP 08 84 2449, dated Nov. 29, 2011, 5 pp. |
Lin, Shen, et al., “A Wireless Network Based on the Combination of Zigbee and GPRS” [online], [retrieved on Feb. 16, 2012], IEEE International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control, Apr. 6-8, 2008, 4 pp., Retrieved From the Internet: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs—all.jsp?arnumber=4525223. |
Telegesis, “ZigBee Gateway Makes Your Meter Smart” [online], 2005 [retrieved on Feb. 16, 2012], 1 p., Retrieved From the Internet: http://www.telegesis.com/downloads/general/SSV%20IP%20gateway%20case%20study.pdf. |
Supplementary European Search Report for Application No. EP 09 81 1849, dated Dec. 13, 2011, 9 pp. |
Gerla, Mario, et al., Multicasting Protocols for High-Speed, Wormhole-Routing Local Area Networks, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, vol. 26, No. 4, Oct. 4, 1996, pp. 184-193. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2011/049277, dated Jan. 31, 2012, 9 pp. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US11/21167, dated Mar. 21, 2012, 8 pp. |
“UCAIug Home Area Network System Requirements Specification, A Work Product of the OpenHAN Task Force Formed by the SG Systems Working Group Under the Open Smart Grid (OpenSG) Technical Committee of the UCA® International Users Group, Version 2.0,” 157 pp., Aug. 30, 2010. |
“ZigBee Smart Energy Profile Specification,” ZigBee Profile: 0x0109, Revision 15, Dec. 1, 2008, Document 075345r15 (SEP Document), 244 pp. |
Edison Electric Institute (EEI), “Uniform Business Practices for Unbundled Electricity Metering, vol. Two,” Dec. 5, 2000, 196 pp., www.naesb.org/pdf/ubp120500.pdf. |
“ZigBee Smart Energy Profile Specification,” ZigBee Profile: 0x0109, Revision 16, Version 1.1, Document 075356r16ZB, 332 pp., Mar. 23, 2011. |
“ZigBee Over-the-Air Upgrading Cluster,” ZigBee Alliance, Document 095264r18, Revision 18, Version 1.0, 63 pp., Mar. 14, 2010. |
IEEE Standard for Information Technology—Telecommunications and Information Exchange Between Systems—Local and Metropolitan Area Networks—Specific Requirements, “Part 15.4: Wireless Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications for Low-Rate Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs),” IEEE Computer Society, 323 pp., Sep. 8, 2006. |
IEEE Standard for Information Technology—Telecommunications and Information Exchange Between Systems—Local and Metropolitan Area Networks—Specific Requirements, “Part 15.4: Wireless Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications for Low-Rate Wireless Personal Area Networks (LR-WPANs),” IEEE Computer Society, 679 pp., Oct. 1, 2003. |
“ZigBee Cluster Library Specification,” ZigBee Alliance, Document 075123r02ZB, 420 pp., May 29, 2008. |
Liu, Ryan, et al., “A Survey of PEV Impacts on Electric Utilities,” EEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference, Anaheim, California, 8 pp., Jan. 17-19, 2011. |
“Utility/Lab Workshop on PV Technology and Systems,” DTE Energy DER Technology Adoption, DEW Analysis of Renewable, PEV & Storage, Tempe, Arizona, 36 pp., Nov. 8-9, 2010. |
“Network Device: Gateway Specification,” ZigBee Alliance, ZigBee Document 075468r35, Revision 35, Version No. 1.0, 301 pp., Mar. 23, 2011. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120179941 A1 | Jul 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60989957 | Nov 2007 | US | |
60989967 | Nov 2007 | US | |
60989958 | Nov 2007 | US | |
60989964 | Nov 2007 | US | |
60989950 | Nov 2007 | US | |
60989953 | Nov 2007 | US | |
60989956 | Nov 2007 | US | |
60989975 | Nov 2007 | US | |
60989959 | Nov 2007 | US | |
60989961 | Nov 2007 | US | |
60989962 | Nov 2007 | US | |
60989951 | Nov 2007 | US | |
60989955 | Nov 2007 | US | |
60989952 | Nov 2007 | US | |
60989954 | Nov 2007 | US | |
61025285 | Jan 2008 | US | |
60992312 | Dec 2007 | US | |
60992313 | Dec 2007 | US | |
60992315 | Dec 2007 | US | |
61025279 | Jan 2008 | US | |
61025270 | Jan 2008 | US | |
61025276 | Jan 2008 | US | |
61025282 | Jan 2008 | US | |
61025271 | Jan 2008 | US | |
61025287 | Jan 2008 | US | |
61025278 | Jan 2008 | US | |
61025273 | Jan 2008 | US | |
61025277 | Jan 2008 | US | |
61025285 | Jan 2008 | US | |
61094116 | Sep 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12275254 | Nov 2008 | US |
Child | 13423160 | US |