System and method for profiling users interest based on multimedia content analysis

Abstract
A method and system for profiling interests of users based on multimedia content analysis and creating users' profiles respective thereof is provided. The method comprises receiving a tracking information gathered with respect to an interaction of a user with at least one multimedia element displayed on a user node; determining a user impression respective of at least one multimedia content element using the received tracking information; generating at least one signature for the at least one multimedia element; determining at least a concept of the at least one multimedia element using the at least one generated signature, wherein an interest of the user is determined respective of the concept; creating a user profile to include at least the user interest; and storing the user profile in a data warehouse.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates generally to the analysis of multimedia content, and more specifically to a system for profiling users' preferences based on their interaction with the multimedia content


BACKGROUND

With the abundance of data made available through various means in general and the Internet and world-wide web (WWW) in particular, a need to understand likes and dislikes of users has become essential for on-line businesses.


Prior art solutions provide several tools to identify users' preferences. Some prior art solutions actively require an input from the users to specify their interests. However, profiles generated for users based on their inputs may be inaccurate as the users tend to provide only their current interests, or only partial information due to their privacy concerns.


Other prior art solutions passively track the users' activity through particular web sites such as social networks. The disadvantage with such solutions is that typically limited information regarding the users is revealed, as users tend to provide only partial information due to privacy concerns. For example, users creating an account on Facebook® provide in most cases only the mandatory information required for the creation of the account.


It would be therefore advantageous to provide a solution that overcomes the deficiencies of the prior art by efficiently identifying preferences of users, and generating profiles thereof.


SUMMARY

Certain embodiments disclosed herein include a method for profiling interests of users based on multimedia content analysis and creating users' profiles respective thereof is provided. The method comprises receiving a tracking information gathered with respect to an interaction of a user with at least one multimedia element displayed on a user node; determining a user impression respective of at least one multimedia content element using the received tracking information; generating at least one signature for the at least one multimedia element; determining at least a concept of the at least one multimedia element using the at least one generated signature, wherein an interest of the user is determined respective of the concept; creating a user profile to include at least the user interest; and storing the user profile in a data warehouse.


Certain embodiments disclosed herein also include a method for profiling interests of users based on multimedia content analysis and creating users' profiles respective thereof. The method comprises receiving a tracking information gathered with respect to an upload of at least one multimedia element to at least one information source; generating at least one signature for the at least one multimedia element identified in the tracking information; determining at least a concept of the at least one multimedia element using the at least one generated signature, wherein an interest of the user is determined respective of the concept; creating a user profile to include at least the user interest; and storing the user profile in a data warehouse.


Certain embodiments disclosed herein also include a system for profiling interests of users based on multimedia content analysis and creating users' profiles respective thereof. The system comprises an interface to a network for receiving at least tracking information gathered with respect to an interaction of a user with at least one multimedia element displayed on a user node; a profiler for determining a user impression respective of at least one multimedia content element using the received tracking information, wherein the profiler is further configured to determine at least a concept of the at least one multimedia element using at least one signature generated for the at least one multimedia element and creating a user profile to include at least the user interest, wherein the interest of the user is determined respective of the concept; and a data warehouse for saving at least the user profile.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The subject matter that is regarded as the invention is particularly pointed out and distinctly claimed in the claims at the conclusion of the specification. The foregoing and other objects, features, and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.



FIG. 1 is a schematic block diagram of a system for analyzing multimedia content displayed on a web-page according to one embodiment.



FIG. 2 is a flowchart describing a method for profiling a user's interest and creating a user profile based on an analysis of multimedia content according to one embodiment.



FIG. 3 is a flowchart describing a method for profiling a user's interest and creating a user profile based on an analysis of multimedia content according to another embodiment.



FIG. 4 is a block diagram depicting the basic flow of information in the signature generator system.



FIG. 5 is a diagram showing the flow of patches generation, response vector generation, and signature generation in a large-scale speech-to-text system.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

It is important to note that the embodiments disclosed herein are only examples of the many advantageous uses of the innovative teachings herein. In general, statements made in the specification of the present application do not necessarily limit any of the various claimed inventions. Moreover, some statements may apply to some inventive features but not to others. In general, unless otherwise indicated, singular elements may be in plural and vice versa with no loss of generality. In the drawings, like numerals refer to like parts through several views.


Certain exemplary embodiments disclosed herein enable the creation of a database of users' profiles based on their impression of multimedia content and the respective signatures. The user impression indicates the user's attention to a certain multimedia content or element. The multimedia content viewed by the user is analyzed and one or more matching signatures is generated respective thereto. Based on the signatures the concept of the multimedia content is determined. Thereafter, based on the concept or concepts, the user preferences are determined, and user's profile respective thereto is created. The profile and impressions for each user is saved in a data warehouse or a database.


As a non-limiting example, if a user views and interacts with images of pets and the generated user's impression respective of all these images is positive, the user's profile may be determined as an “animal lover”. The profile of the user is then stored in the data warehouse for further use. An example for such further use may be to provide advertisements related to animal supplies to the user's device.


A user impression is determined by the period of time the user viewed or interacted with the multimedia content, a gesture received by the user device such as, a mouse click, a mouse scroll, a tap, and any other gesture on a device having touch screen display or a pointing device. According to another embodiment, a user impression may be determined based on matching between a plurality of multimedia content elements viewed by a user and their respective impression. According to yet another embodiment, a user impression may be generated based on multimedia content that the user uploads or shares on the web, such as social network websites. It should be noted that the user impression may be determined based on one or more of the above identified techniques.



FIG. 1 shows an exemplary and non-limiting schematic diagram of a system 100 utilized to describe the various embodiments disclosed herein. As illustrated in FIG. 1, a network 110 enables the communication between different parts of the system. The network 110 may be the Internet, the world-wide-web (WWW), a local area network (LAN), a wide area network (WAN), a metro area network (MAN), and other networks capable of enabling communication between the elements of the system 100.


Further connected to the network 110 are client applications, such as web browsers (WB) 120-1 through 120-n (collectively referred to hereinafter as web browsers 120 or individually as a web browser 120). A web browser 120 is executed over a computing device which may be, for example, a personal computer (PC), a personal digital assistant (PDA), a mobile phone, a tablet computer, and the like. The computing device is configured to at least provide multimedia elements to servers connected to the network 110. According to one embodiment, each web browser 120 is installed with an add-on or is configured to embed an executable script (e.g., Java script) in a web page rendered on the browser 120. The executable script is downloaded from the server 130 or any of the web sources 150. The add-on and the script are collectively referred to as a “tracking agent”, which is configured to track the user's impression with respect to multimedia content viewed by the user on a browser 120 or uploaded by the user through a browser 120.


The content displayed on the web browser is downloaded from a web source 150 and may be embedded in a web-page. The uploaded multimedia content can be locally saved in the computing device or can be captured by the device. For example, the multimedia content may be an image captured by a camera installed in the client device, a video clip saved in the device, and so on. A multimedia content may be, for example, an image, a graphic, a video stream, a video clip, an audio stream, an audio clip, a video frame, a photograph, and an image of signals (e.g., spectrograms, phasograms, scalograms, etc.), and/or combinations thereof and portions thereof.


The system 100 also includes a plurality of web sources 150-1 through 150-m (collectively referred to hereinafter as web sources 150 or individually as a web sources 150) being connected to the network 110. Each of the web sources 150 may be, for example, a web server, an application server, a data repository, a database, and the like.


The various embodiments disclosed herein are realized using the profiling server 130 and a signature generator system (SGS) 140. The profiling server 130 generates a profile for each user of a web browser 120 as will be discussed below.


The SGS 140 is configured to generate a signature respective of the multimedia elements or content fed by the profiling server 130. The process for generating the signatures is explained in more detail herein below with respect to FIGS. 4 and 5. Each of the profiling server 130 and the SGS 140 typically is comprised of a processing unit, such as processor (not shown) that is coupled to a memory. The memory contains instructions that can be executed by the processing unit. The profiling server 130 also includes an interface (not shown) to the network 110.


According to the disclosed embodiment, the tracking agent provides the profiling server 130 with tracking information related to the multimedia element viewed or uploaded by the user and the interaction of the user with the multimedia element. The information may include, but is not limited to, the multimedia element (or a URL referencing the element), the amount of time the user viewed the multimedia element, the user's gesture with respect to the multimedia element, a URL of a webpage that the element was viewed or uploaded to, and so on. The tracking information is provided for each multimedia element displayed on a user's web browser 120.


The server 130 then determines the user impression with respect to the received tracking information. The user impression may be determined per each multimedia element or group of elements. As noted above, the user impression indicates the user attention with respect a multimedia element. In one embodiment, the server 130 first filters the tracking information to remove details that cannot help in the determination of the user impression. For example, if the user hovered the element using his mouse for a very short time (e.g., less than 0.5 seconds), then such a measure is ignored. The server 130 then computes a quantitative measure for the impression. In one embodiment, for each input measure that is tracked by the tracking agent a predefined number is assigned. For example, a dwell time over the multimedia element of 2 seconds or less may be assigned with a ‘5’; whereas a dwell time of over 2 seconds may be assigned with the number ‘10’. A click on the element may increase the value of the quantitative measure. Then, the numbers related to the measures provided in the tracking information are accumulated. The total number is the quantitative measure of the impression. Thereafter, the server compares the quantitative measure to a predefined threshold, and if the number exceeds the threshold the impression is determined to positive.


The multimedia element or elements that are determined as having a positive user impression are sent to the SGS 140. The SGS 140 generates at least one signature for each multimedia element or each portion thereof. The generated signature(s) may be robust to noise and distortions as discussed below.


It should be appreciated that using signatures for profiling the user's interests, because signatures allow the accurate reorganization of multimedia elements in comparison, for example, to utilization of metadata. The signatures generated by the SGS 140 for the multimedia elements allow for recognition and classification of multimedia elements, such as, content-tracking, video filtering, multimedia taxonomy generation, video fingerprinting, speech-to-text, audio classification, element recognition, video/image search and any other application requiring content-based signatures generation and matching for large content volumes such as, web and other large-scale databases. For example, a signature generated by the SGS 140 for a picture showing a car, enables accurate recognition of the model of the car from any angle from which the picture was taken.


In one embodiment, the generated signatures are matched against a database of concepts 170 to identify a concept that can be associated with the signature, and hence the multimedia element. For example, an image of tulip would be associated with a concept structure of flowers. The techniques for generating concepts, concept structure, and a concept-based database are disclosed in a co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/766,463, filed on Feb. 13, 2013, assigned to common assignee, is hereby incorporated by reference for all the useful information it contains.


The profiling server 130 using the identified concepts creates the user profile. That is, for each user, when a number of similar or identical concepts for multiple multimedia elements have been identified over time, the user's preference or interest can be established. The interest is saved to a user profile created for the user. For example, a concept of flowers may be determined as a user interest in ‘flowers’ or ‘gardening’. In one embodiment, the user interest may simply be the identified concept. In another embodiment the interest may be determined using an association table which associates one or more identified concepts with a user interest. For example, the concept of ‘flowers’ and ‘spring’ may be associated with the interest of ‘gardening’. Such an association table is maintained in the profiling server 130 or the data warehouse 160.



FIG. 2 depicts an exemplary and non-limiting flowchart 200 describing the process of creating users' profiles based on an analysis of multimedia content according to one embodiment. In S210, the tracking information collected by one of the web-browsers (e.g., web-browser 120-1) is received at the profiling server 130. As noted above, the tracking information is collected with respect to multimedia elements displayed over the web browser.


In S215, a user impression is determined based on the received tracking information. One embodiment for determining the user impression is described above. The user impression is determined for one or more multimedia elements identified in the tracking information. In S220, it is checked if the user impression is positive, and if so execution continues with S230; otherwise, execution proceeds with S270.


In S230, at least one signature to each of the multimedia elements identified in the tracking information is generated. As noted above, the tracking information may include the actual multimedia element(s) or a link thereto. In the latter case, each of the multimedia element(s) is first retrieved from its location. The at least one signature for each multimedia element is generated by the SGS 140 as described below. In S240, the concept respective of the signature generated for the multimedia element is determined. In one embodiment, S240 includes querying a concept-based database using the generated signatures. In S250, the user interest is determined by the server 130 respective of the concept or concepts associated with the identified elements.


One embodiment for determining the user interest is described below. As a non-limiting example, the user views a web-page that contains an image of a car. The image is then analyzed and a signature is generated respective thereto. As it appears that the user spent time above a certain threshold viewing the image of the car, the user's impression is determined as positive. It is therefore determined that the user's interest is cars.


In S260, a user profile is created in the data warehouse 150 and the determined user interest is saved therein. It should be noted that if a user profile already exists in the data warehouse 160, the receptive user profile is only updated to include the user interest determined in S250. It should be noted that a unique profile is created for each user of a web browser. The user can be identified by a unique identification number assigned, for example, by the tracking agent. The unique identification number does not reveal the user's identity. The user profile can be updated over time as additional tracking information is gathered and analyzed by the profiling server. In one embodiment, the server 130 analyzes the tracking information only when a sufficient amount of information has been collected. In S270, it is checked whether additional tracking information is received, and if so, execution continues with S210; otherwise, execution terminates.



FIG. 3 depicts an exemplary and non-limiting flowchart 300 describing the process for profiling a user interest and creating a user profile based on an analysis of multimedia content according to another embodiment. In S310, tracking information gathered by the tracking agent is received at the server 130. According to this embodiment, the tracking information identifies multimedia elements (e.g., pictures, video clips, etc.) uploaded by the user from a web-browser 120 to one or more information sources. The information sources may include, but are not limited to, social networks, web blogs, news feeds, and the like. The social networks may include, for example, Google+®, Facebook®, Twitter®, Instagram, and so on. The tracking information includes the actual uploaded content or a reference thereto. This information may also contain the name of each of the information sources, text entered by the user with the uploaded image, and a unique identification code assigned to a user of the web browser.


In S320, at least one signature for each multimedia element identified in the tracking is generated. The signatures for the multimedia content elements are generated by a SGS 140 as described hereinabove. In S330, the concept respective of the at least one signature generated for each multimedia element is determined. In one embodiment, S330 includes querying a concept-based database using the generated signatures. In S340, the user interest is determined by the server 130 respective of the concept or concepts associated with the identified elements. According to one embodiment, if text is entered by the user and if such text is included in the tracking information, the input text is also processed by the server 130 to provide an indication if the element described a favorable interest.


In S350, a user profile is created in the data warehouse 150 and the determined user interest is saved therein. It should be noted that if a user profile already exists in the data warehouse 160, the receptive user profile is only updated to include the user interest determined in S340. In S360, it is checked whether there are additional requests, and if so, execution continues with S310; otherwise, execution terminates.


As a non-limiting example for the process described in FIG. 3, a picture of a user riding a bicycle is uploaded to the user's profile page in Facebook®. The image is then analyzed and a signature is generated respective thereto. A comment made by the user stating: “I love those field trips” is identified. Based on the concept of the uploaded picture and the user's comment, the user profile is determined as positive for field trips. The user profile is then stored in a data warehouse for further uses.


According to one embodiment, in such cases where several elements are identified in the tracking information, a signature is generated for each of these elements and the context of the multimedia content (i.e., collection of elements) is determined respective thereto. An exemplary technique for determining a context of multimedia elements based on signatures is described in detail in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/770,603, filed on Feb. 19, 2013, assigned to common assignee, which is hereby incorporated by reference for all the useful information it contains.



FIGS. 4 and 5 illustrate the generation of signatures for the multimedia elements by the SGS 140 according to one embodiment. An exemplary high-level description of the process for large scale matching is depicted in FIG. 4. In this example, the matching is for a video content.


Video content segments 2 from a Master database (DB) 6 and a Target DB 1 are processed in parallel by a large number of independent computational Cores 3 that constitute an architecture for generating the Signatures (hereinafter the “Architecture”). Further details on the computational Cores generation are provided below. The independent Cores 3 generate a database of Robust Signatures and Signatures 4 for Target content-segments 5 and a database of Robust Signatures and Signatures 7 for Master content-segments 8. An exemplary and non-limiting process of signature generation for an audio component is shown in detail in FIG. 5. Finally, Target Robust Signatures and/or Signatures are effectively matched, by a matching algorithm 9, to Master Robust Signatures and/or Signatures database to find all matches between the two databases.


To demonstrate an example of signature generation process, it is assumed, merely for the sake of simplicity and without limitation on the generality of the disclosed embodiments, that the signatures are based on a single frame, leading to certain simplification of the computational cores generation. The Matching System is extensible for signatures generation capturing the dynamics in-between the frames.


The Signatures' generation process is now described with reference to FIG. 5. The first step in the process of signatures generation from a given speech-segment is to break down the speech-segment to K patches 14 of random length P and random position within the speech segment 12. The breakdown is performed by the patch generator component 21. The value of the number of patches K, random length P and random position parameters is determined based on optimization, considering the tradeoff between accuracy rate and the number of fast matches required in the flow process of the profiling server 130 and SGS 140. Thereafter, all the K patches are injected in parallel into all computational Cores 3 to generate K response vectors 22, which are fed into a signature generator system 23 to produce a database of Robust Signatures and Signatures 4.


In order to generate Robust Signatures, i.e., Signatures that are robust to additive noise L (where L is an integer equal to or greater than 1) by the Computational Cores 3, a frame ‘i’ is injected into all the Cores 3. Then, Cores 3 generate two binary response vectors: {right arrow over (S)} which is a Signature vector, and {right arrow over (RS)} which is a Robust Signature vector.


For generation of signatures robust to additive noise, such as White-Gaussian-Noise, scratch, etc., but not robust to distortions, such as crop, shift and rotation, etc., a core Ci={ni} (1≤i≤L) may consist of a single leaky integrate-to-threshold unit (LTU) node or more nodes. The node ni equations are:







V
i

=



j




w
ij



k
j










n
i

=




(

Vi
-

Th
x


)






where, □ is a Heaviside step function; wij is a coupling node unit (CNU) between node i and image component j (for example, grayscale value of a certain pixel j); kj is an image component ‘j’ (for example, grayscale value of a certain pixel j); Thx is a constant Threshold value, where x is ‘S’ for Signature and ‘RS’ for Robust Signature; and Vi is a Coupling Node Value.


The Threshold values ThX are set differently for Signature generation and for Robust Signature generation. For example, for a certain distribution of values (for the set of nodes), the thresholds for Signature (ThS) and Robust Signature (ThRS) are set apart, after optimization, according to at least one or more of the following criteria:

    • 1: For: Vi>ThRS
      1−p(V>ThS)−1−(1−ε)l<<1


i.e., given that l nodes (cores) constitute a Robust Signature of a certain image I, the probability that not all of these l nodes will belong to the Signature of a same, but noisy image, custom character is sufficiently low (according to a system's specified accuracy).

    • 2: p(Vi>ThRS)≈l/L


      i.e., approximately l out of the total L nodes can be found to generate a Robust Signature according to the above definition.
    • 3: Both Robust Signature and Signature are generated for certain frame i.


It should be understood that the generation of a signature is unidirectional, and typically yields lossless compression, where the characteristics of the compressed data are maintained but the uncompressed data cannot be reconstructed. Therefore, a signature can be used for the purpose of comparison to another signature without the need of comparison to the original data. The detailed description of the Signature generation can be found U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,326,775 and 8,312,031, assigned to common assignee, and are hereby incorporated by reference for all the useful information they contain.


A Computational Core generation is a process of definition, selection, and tuning of the parameters of the cores for a certain realization in a specific system and application. The process is based on several design considerations, such as:

    • (a) The Cores should be designed so as to obtain maximal independence, i.e., the projection from a signal space should generate a maximal pair-wise distance between any two cores' projections into a high-dimensional space.
    • (b) The Cores should be optimally designed for the type of signals, i.e., the Cores should be maximally sensitive to the spatio-temporal structure of the injected signal, for example, and in particular, sensitive to local correlations in time and space. Thus, in some cases a core represents a dynamic system, such as in state space, phase space, edge of chaos, etc., which is uniquely used herein to exploit their maximal computational power.
    • (c) The Cores should be optimally designed with regard to invariance to a set of signal distortions, of interest in relevant applications.


Detailed description of the Computational Core generation and the process for configuring such cores is discussed in more detail in the co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/084,150 referenced above.


The various embodiments disclosed herein can be implemented as hardware, firmware, software, or any combination thereof. Moreover, the software is preferably implemented as an application program tangibly embodied on a program storage unit or computer readable medium consisting of parts, or of certain devices and/or a combination of devices. The application program may be uploaded to, and executed by, a machine comprising any suitable architecture. Preferably, the machine is implemented on a computer platform having hardware such as one or more central processing units (“CPUs”), a memory, and input/output interfaces. The computer platform may also include an operating system and microinstruction code. The various processes and functions described herein may be either part of the microinstruction code or part of the application program, or any combination thereof, which may be executed by a CPU, whether or not such a computer or processor is explicitly shown. In addition, various other peripheral units may be connected to the computer platform such as an additional data storage unit and a printing unit. Furthermore, a non-transitory computer readable medium is any computer readable medium except for a transitory propagating signal.


All examples and conditional language recited herein are intended for pedagogical purposes to aid the reader in understanding the principles of the invention and the concepts contributed by the inventor to furthering the art, and are to be construed as being without limitation to such specifically recited examples and conditions. Moreover, all statements herein reciting principles, aspects, and embodiments of the invention, as well as specific examples thereof, are intended to encompass both structural and functional equivalents thereof. Additionally, it is intended that such equivalents include both currently known equivalents as well as equivalents developed in the future, i.e., any elements developed that perform the same function, regardless of structure.

Claims
  • 1. A method for profiling interests of users based on multimedia content analysis and creating users' profiles respective thereof, comprising: receiving tracking information gathered with respect to at least one multimedia element viewed on a user node for display to the user and the interaction of the user with the at least one multimedia element displayed on the user node;determining at least one user impression indicative of the user's attention with respect to at least one multimedia content element based on the received tracking information;generating at least one signature for the at least one multimedia element responsive to the at least one multimedia element being determined to be associated with at least one positive user impression;preventing from generating a signature for the at least one multimedia element responsive to the at least one multimedia element being determined to be not associated with at least one positive user impression;determining at least a concept structure representative of a thematic feature of the at least one multimedia element using the at least one generated signature, wherein an interest of the user is determined with respect to a subject of the concept structure;creating a user profile including the user interest; andstoring the user profile in a data warehouse.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the tracking information includes any one of: the at least one multimedia element and a reference to the at least one multimedia element.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the tracking information further includes at least one of: a measure of a period of time the user viewed the multimedia element, an indication of a user's gesture detected over the multimedia element, an indication of whether the at least one multimedia element was uploaded to an information source, an identification of the information source, and a unique identification code identifying the user.
  • 4. The method of claim 3, wherein the user gesture is any one of: a scroll over the at least one multimedia element, a click on the at least one multimedia element, a tap on the at least one multimedia element, and a response to the at least one multimedia element.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the concept structure comprises one or more signature reduced clusters and metadata associated with the one or more signature reduced clusters; wherein the one or more signature reduced clusters comprise multiple signatures.
  • 6. The method of claim 1 wherein the determination of the user interest respective of the subject of the concept structure is performed using an association table that maps one or more subjects of identified concept structures to a user interest.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the concept structure is determined by querying a concept-based database using the at least one signature.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein the at least one signature is robust to noise and distortion.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the multimedia element is at least one of: an image, graphics, a video stream, a video clip, an audio stream, an audio clip, a video frame, a photograph, images of signals, and portions thereof.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, further comprising: providing an advertisement to the user node respective of the user profile.
  • 11. A non-transitory computer readable medium having stored thereon instructions for causing one or more processing units to execute the method according to claim 1.
  • 12. The method according to claim 1 wherein generating of the at least one signature for the at least one multimedia element is executed by independent computational cores.
  • 13. The method according to claim 1, wherein the at least one signature of the at least one multimedia element is at least one response of one or more neural networks to the at least one multimedia element.
  • 14. A method for profiling interests of users based on multimedia content analysis and creating users' profiles respective thereof, comprising: receiving tracking information with respect to an uploading to at least one information source of at least one multimedia element displayed on a user node and the interaction of the user with the uploaded at least one multimedia element;generating at least one signature for the at least one multimedia element identified in the tracking information responsive to the at least one multimedia element being associated with a positive user impression;preventing from generating a signature for the at least one multimedia element responsive to the at least one multimedia element being determined to be not associated with at least one positive user impression;determining at least a concept structure representative of a thematic feature of the at least one multimedia element using the at least one generated signature, wherein an interest of the user is determined with respect to a subject of the concept structure;creating a user profile to include at least the user interest; andstoring the user profile in a data warehouse.
  • 15. The method of claim 14, wherein the tracking information includes an identification of the at least one multimedia element and an identification of the at least one information source, wherein the identification of the at least one multimedia element includes any one of: a reference to the at least one multimedia element and the actual multimedia element.
  • 16. The method of claim 15, wherein the determination of the user interest respective of the subject of the concept structure is performed using an association table that maps one or more subjects of identified concept structures to a user interest.
  • 17. A non-transitory computer readable medium having stored thereon instructions for causing one or more processing units to execute the method according to claim 14.
  • 18. A system for profiling interests of users based on multimedia content analysis and creating users' profiles respective thereof, comprising: an interface to a network for receiving at least tracking information gathered with respect to an interaction of a user with at least one multimedia element displayed on a user node;a profiler for determining a user impression respective of at least one multimedia content element using the received tracking information,wherein the profiler is further configured to:generate at least one signature for the at least one multimedia element responsive to the at least one multimedia element being determined to be associated with at least one positive user impression;determine at least a concept structure representative of a thematic feature of the at least one multimedia element using the at least one generated signature, wherein an interest of the user is determined with respect to a subject of the concept structure;prevent from generating a signature for the at least one multimedia element responsive to the at least one multimedia element being determined to be not associated with at least one positive user impression;create a user profile including the user interest; andstore the user profile in a data warehouse.
  • 19. The system of claim 18, further comprising: a signature generator system (SGS) for generating the at least one signature for the at least one multimedia element, wherein the at least one signature is robust to noise and distortion.
  • 20. The system of claim 19, wherein the signature generator system further comprises: a plurality of computational cores configured to receive the at least one multimedia element, each computational core of the plurality of computational cores having properties that are at least partly statistically independent from other of the plurality of computational cores, the properties are set independently of each other core.
  • 21. The system of claim 18, wherein the tracking information further includes at least one of: a measure of a period of time the user viewed the multimedia element, an indication of a user's gesture detected over the multimedia element, an indication of whether the at least one multimedia element was uploaded to an information source, an identification of the information source, and a unique identification code identifying the user.
  • 22. The system according to claim 18 wherein the concept structure comprises one or more signature reduced clusters and metadata associated with the one or more signature reduced clusters; wherein the one or more signature reduced clusters comprise multiple signatures.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority from Provisional Application No. 61/766,016 filed on Feb. 18, 2013. This application is also a continuation-in-part (CIP) of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/624,397 filed on Sep. 21, 2012, now pending. The Ser. No. 13/624,397 Application is a continuation-in-part of: (a) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/344,400 filed on Jan. 5, 2012, now pending, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/434,221, filed May 1, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,112,376; (b) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/195,863, filed Aug. 21, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,326,775, which claims priority under 35 USC 119 from Israeli Application No. 185414, filed on Aug. 21, 2007, and which is also a continuation-in-part of the below-referenced U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/084,150; and, (c) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/084,150 with a filing date of Apr. 7, 2009, now pending, which is the National Stage of International Application No. PCT/IL2006/001235, filed on Oct. 26, 2006, which claims foreign priority from Israeli Application No. 171577 filed on Oct. 26, 2005 and Israeli Application No. 173409 filed on 29 Jan. 2006. All of the applications referenced above are herein incorporated by reference for all that they contain.

US Referenced Citations (523)
Number Name Date Kind
4733353 Jaswa Mar 1988 A
4932645 Schorey et al. Jun 1990 A
4972363 Nguyen et al. Nov 1990 A
5214746 Fogel et al. May 1993 A
5307451 Clark Apr 1994 A
5412564 Ecer May 1995 A
5436653 Ellis et al. Jul 1995 A
5568181 Greenwood et al. Oct 1996 A
5638425 Meador et al. Jun 1997 A
5745678 Herzberg et al. Apr 1998 A
5763069 Jordan Jun 1998 A
5806061 Chaudhuri et al. Sep 1998 A
5852435 Vigneaux et al. Dec 1998 A
5870754 Dimitrova et al. Feb 1999 A
5873080 Coden et al. Feb 1999 A
5887193 Takahashi et al. Mar 1999 A
5978754 Kumano Nov 1999 A
5991306 Burns et al. Nov 1999 A
6052481 Grajski et al. Apr 2000 A
6070167 Qian et al. May 2000 A
6076088 Paik et al. Jun 2000 A
6122628 Castelli et al. Sep 2000 A
6128651 Cezar Oct 2000 A
6137911 Zhilyaev Oct 2000 A
6144767 Bottou et al. Nov 2000 A
6147636 Gershenson Nov 2000 A
6163510 Lee et al. Dec 2000 A
6243375 Speicher Jun 2001 B1
6243713 Nelson et al. Jun 2001 B1
6275599 Adler et al. Aug 2001 B1
6329986 Cheng Dec 2001 B1
6381656 Shankman Apr 2002 B1
6411229 Kobayashi Jun 2002 B2
6422617 Fukumoto et al. Jul 2002 B1
6507672 Watkins et al. Jan 2003 B1
6523046 Liu et al. Feb 2003 B2
6524861 Anderson Feb 2003 B1
6550018 Abonamah et al. Apr 2003 B1
6557042 He et al. Apr 2003 B1
6594699 Sahai et al. Jul 2003 B1
6601026 Appelt et al. Jul 2003 B2
6611628 Sekiguchi et al. Aug 2003 B1
6618711 Ananth Sep 2003 B1
6640015 Lafruit Oct 2003 B1
6643620 Contolini et al. Nov 2003 B1
6643643 Lee et al. Nov 2003 B1
6665657 Dibachi Dec 2003 B1
6681032 Bortolussi et al. Jan 2004 B2
6704725 Lee Mar 2004 B1
6732149 Kephart May 2004 B1
6742094 Igari May 2004 B2
6751363 Natsev et al. Jun 2004 B1
6751613 Lee et al. Jun 2004 B1
6754435 Kim Jun 2004 B2
6763069 Divakaran et al. Jul 2004 B1
6763519 McColl et al. Jul 2004 B1
6774917 Foote et al. Aug 2004 B1
6795818 Lee Sep 2004 B1
6804356 Krishnamachari Oct 2004 B1
6813395 Kinjo Nov 2004 B1
6819797 Smith et al. Nov 2004 B1
6845374 Oliver et al. Jan 2005 B1
6877134 Fuller et al. Apr 2005 B1
6901207 Watkins May 2005 B1
6938025 Lulich et al. Aug 2005 B1
6985172 Rigney et al. Jan 2006 B1
7006689 Kasutani Feb 2006 B2
7013051 Sekiguchi et al. Mar 2006 B2
7020654 Najmi Mar 2006 B1
7023979 Wu et al. Apr 2006 B1
7043473 Rassool et al. May 2006 B1
7047033 Wyler May 2006 B2
7158681 Persiantsev Jan 2007 B2
7199798 Echigo et al. Apr 2007 B1
7215828 Luo May 2007 B2
7260564 Lynn et al. Aug 2007 B1
7277928 Lennon Oct 2007 B2
7299261 Oliver et al. Nov 2007 B1
7302117 Sekiguchi et al. Nov 2007 B2
7313805 Rosin et al. Dec 2007 B1
7340358 Yoneyama Mar 2008 B2
7340458 Vaithilingam et al. Mar 2008 B2
7353224 Chen et al. Apr 2008 B2
7376672 Weare May 2008 B2
7376722 Sim et al. May 2008 B1
7433895 Li et al. Oct 2008 B2
7464086 Black et al. Dec 2008 B2
7526607 Singh et al. Apr 2009 B1
7529659 Wold May 2009 B2
7536417 Walsh et al. May 2009 B2
7574668 Nunez et al. Aug 2009 B2
7577656 Kawai et al. Aug 2009 B2
7657100 Gokturk et al. Feb 2010 B2
7660468 Gokturk et al. Feb 2010 B2
7660737 Lim et al. Feb 2010 B1
7694318 Eldering et al. Apr 2010 B2
7697791 Chan Apr 2010 B1
7769221 Shakes et al. Aug 2010 B1
7788132 Desikan et al. Aug 2010 B2
7801893 Gulli Sep 2010 B2
7836054 Kawai et al. Nov 2010 B2
7860895 Scofield Dec 2010 B1
7904503 Van De Sluis Mar 2011 B2
7920894 Wyler Apr 2011 B2
7921107 Chang et al. Apr 2011 B2
7933407 Keidar et al. Apr 2011 B2
7974994 Li et al. Jul 2011 B2
7987194 Walker et al. Jul 2011 B1
7987217 Long et al. Jul 2011 B2
7991715 Schiff et al. Aug 2011 B2
8000655 Wang et al. Aug 2011 B2
8023739 Hohimer et al. Sep 2011 B2
8036893 Reich Oct 2011 B2
8098934 Vincent Jan 2012 B2
8112376 Raichelgauz et al. Feb 2012 B2
8266185 Raichelgauz et al. Sep 2012 B2
8275764 Jeon Sep 2012 B2
8312031 Raichelgauz et al. Nov 2012 B2
8315442 Gokturk et al. Nov 2012 B2
8316005 Moore Nov 2012 B2
8326775 Raichelgauz et al. Dec 2012 B2
8345982 Gokturk et al. Jan 2013 B2
RE44225 Aviv May 2013 E
8457827 Ferguson et al. Jun 2013 B1
8495489 Everingham Jul 2013 B1
8527978 Sallam Sep 2013 B1
8548828 Longmire Oct 2013 B1
8634980 Urmson Jan 2014 B1
8635531 Graham et al. Jan 2014 B2
8655801 Raichelgauz et al. Feb 2014 B2
8655878 Kulkarni et al. Feb 2014 B1
8677377 Cheyer et al. Mar 2014 B2
8682667 Haughay Mar 2014 B2
8688446 Yanagihara Apr 2014 B2
8706503 Cheyer et al. Apr 2014 B2
8775442 Moore et al. Jul 2014 B2
8781152 Momeyer Jul 2014 B2
8782077 Rowley Jul 2014 B1
8799195 Raichelgauz et al. Aug 2014 B2
8799196 Raichelquaz et al. Aug 2014 B2
8818916 Raichelgauz et al. Aug 2014 B2
8868619 Raichelgauz et al. Oct 2014 B2
8868861 Shimizu et al. Oct 2014 B2
8880539 Raichelgauz et al. Nov 2014 B2
8880566 Raichelgauz et al. Nov 2014 B2
8886222 Rodriguez Nov 2014 B1
8886648 Procopio et al. Nov 2014 B1
8898568 Bull et al. Nov 2014 B2
8922414 Raichelgauz et al. Dec 2014 B2
8959037 Raichelgauz et al. Feb 2015 B2
8990125 Raichelgauz et al. Mar 2015 B2
8990199 Ramesh et al. Mar 2015 B1
9009086 Raichelgauz et al. Apr 2015 B2
9031999 Raichelgauz et al. May 2015 B2
9087049 Raichelgauz et al. Jul 2015 B2
9104747 Raichelgauz et al. Aug 2015 B2
9165406 Gray et al. Oct 2015 B1
9191626 Raichelgauz et al. Nov 2015 B2
9197244 Raichelgauz et al. Nov 2015 B2
9218606 Raichelgauz et al. Dec 2015 B2
9235557 Ichelgauz et al. Jan 2016 B2
9256668 Ichelgauz et al. Feb 2016 B2
9298763 Zack Mar 2016 B1
9323754 Ramanathan et al. Apr 2016 B2
9330189 Raichelgauz et al. May 2016 B2
9438270 Raichelgauz et al. Sep 2016 B2
9440647 Sucan Sep 2016 B1
9466068 Raichelgauz et al. Oct 2016 B2
9646006 Raichelgauz et al. May 2017 B2
9679062 Schillings et al. Jun 2017 B2
9734533 Givot Aug 2017 B1
9807442 Bhatia et al. Oct 2017 B2
9875445 Amer et al. Jan 2018 B2
9984369 Li et al. May 2018 B2
10133947 Yang Nov 2018 B2
10347122 Takenaka Jul 2019 B2
10491885 Hicks Nov 2019 B1
20010019633 Tenze Sep 2001 A1
20010038876 Anderson Nov 2001 A1
20010056427 Yoon et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020010682 Johnson Jan 2002 A1
20020010715 Chinn et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020019881 Bokhari et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020019882 Soejima Feb 2002 A1
20020032677 Morgenthaler et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020037010 Yamauchi Mar 2002 A1
20020038299 Zernik et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020042914 Walker et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020059580 Kalker et al. May 2002 A1
20020072935 Rowse et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020087530 Smith et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020099870 Miller et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020107827 Benitez-Jimenez et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020113812 Walker et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020123928 Eldering et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020126872 Brunk et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020129140 Peled et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020129296 Kwiat et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020143976 Barker et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020147637 Kraft et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020152267 Lennon Oct 2002 A1
20020157116 Jasinschi Oct 2002 A1
20020159640 Vaithilingam et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020161739 Oh Oct 2002 A1
20020163532 Thomas Nov 2002 A1
20020174095 Lulich et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020178410 Haitsma et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020184505 Mihcak et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030005432 Ellis et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030028660 Igawa et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030037010 Schmelzer Feb 2003 A1
20030041047 Chang et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030050815 Seigel et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030078766 Appelt et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030086627 Berriss et al. May 2003 A1
20030089216 Birmingham et al. May 2003 A1
20030093790 Logan et al. May 2003 A1
20030101150 Agnihotri May 2003 A1
20030105739 Essafi et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030115191 Copperman et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030126147 Essafi et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030182567 Barton et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030184598 Graham Oct 2003 A1
20030191764 Richards Oct 2003 A1
20030200217 Ackerman Oct 2003 A1
20030217335 Chung et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030229531 Beckerman et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040003394 Ramaswamy Jan 2004 A1
20040025180 Begeja et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040059736 Willse Mar 2004 A1
20040068510 Hayes et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040091111 Levy May 2004 A1
20040095376 Graham et al. May 2004 A1
20040098671 Graham et al. May 2004 A1
20040107181 Rodden Jun 2004 A1
20040111432 Adams et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040111465 Chuang et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040117367 Smith et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040117638 Monroe Jun 2004 A1
20040128142 Whitham Jul 2004 A1
20040128511 Sun et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040133927 Sternberg et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040153426 Nugent Aug 2004 A1
20040215663 Liu et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040230572 Omoigui Nov 2004 A1
20040249779 Nauck et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040260688 Gross Dec 2004 A1
20040267774 Lin et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050021394 Miedema et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050114198 Koningstein et al. May 2005 A1
20050131884 Gross et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050144455 Haitsma Jun 2005 A1
20050163375 Grady Jul 2005 A1
20050172130 Roberts Aug 2005 A1
20050177372 Wang et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050193015 Logston Sep 2005 A1
20050238198 Brown et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050238238 Xu et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050245241 Durand et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050249398 Khamene et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050256820 Dugan et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050262428 Little et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050281439 Lange Dec 2005 A1
20050289163 Gordon et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050289590 Cheok et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060004745 Kuhn et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060013451 Haitsma Jan 2006 A1
20060020860 Tardif et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060020958 Allamanche et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060026203 Tan et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060031216 Semple et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060033163 Chen Feb 2006 A1
20060041596 Stirbu et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060048191 Xiong Mar 2006 A1
20060064037 Shalon et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060100987 Leurs May 2006 A1
20060112035 Cecchi et al. May 2006 A1
20060120626 Perlmutter Jun 2006 A1
20060129822 Snijder et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060143674 Jones et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060153296 Deng Jul 2006 A1
20060159442 Kim et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060173688 Whitham Aug 2006 A1
20060184638 Chua et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060204035 Guo et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060217818 Fujiwara Sep 2006 A1
20060217828 Hicken Sep 2006 A1
20060218191 Gopalakrishnan Sep 2006 A1
20060224529 Kermani Oct 2006 A1
20060236343 Chang Oct 2006 A1
20060242130 Sadri Oct 2006 A1
20060242139 Butterfield et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060242554 Gerace et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060247983 Dalli Nov 2006 A1
20060248558 Barton Nov 2006 A1
20060251339 Gokturk Nov 2006 A1
20060253423 McLane et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060288002 Epstein et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070019864 Koyama et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070022374 Huang et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070033163 Epstein et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070038614 Guha Feb 2007 A1
20070042757 Jung et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070061302 Ramer et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070067304 Ives Mar 2007 A1
20070067682 Fang Mar 2007 A1
20070071330 Oostveen et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070074147 Wold Mar 2007 A1
20070083611 Farago et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070091106 Moroney Apr 2007 A1
20070130159 Gulli et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070156720 Maren Jul 2007 A1
20070168413 Barletta et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070195987 Rhoads Aug 2007 A1
20070196013 Li Aug 2007 A1
20070220573 Chiussi et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070244902 Seide et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070253594 Lu et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070255785 Hayashi et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070294295 Finkelstein et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070298152 Baets Dec 2007 A1
20080040277 Dewitt Feb 2008 A1
20080046406 Seide et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080049629 Morrill Feb 2008 A1
20080049789 Vedantham et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080072256 Boicey et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080079729 Brailovsky Apr 2008 A1
20080091527 Silverbrook et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080109433 Rose May 2008 A1
20080152231 Gokturk Jun 2008 A1
20080159622 Agnihotri et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080163288 Ghosal et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080165861 Wen Jul 2008 A1
20080166020 Kosaka Jul 2008 A1
20080201299 Lehikoinen et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080201314 Smith et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080201361 Castro et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080204706 Magne et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080228995 Tan et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080237359 Silverbrook et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080253737 Kimura Oct 2008 A1
20080263579 Mears et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080270373 Oostveen et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080270569 McBride Oct 2008 A1
20080294278 Borgeson Nov 2008 A1
20080307454 Ahanger et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080313140 Pereira et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090013414 Washington et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090022472 Bronstein Jan 2009 A1
20090024641 Quigley et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090034791 Doretto Feb 2009 A1
20090043637 Eder Feb 2009 A1
20090043818 Raichelgauz Feb 2009 A1
20090080759 Bhaskar Mar 2009 A1
20090089587 Brunk et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090119157 Dulepet May 2009 A1
20090125529 Vydiswaran et al. May 2009 A1
20090125544 Brindley May 2009 A1
20090148045 Lee et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090157575 Schobben et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090172030 Schiff et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090175538 Bronstein et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090204511 Tsang Aug 2009 A1
20090208106 Dunlop et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090216639 Kapczynski et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090216761 Raichelgauz Aug 2009 A1
20090220138 Zhang et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090245573 Saptharishi et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090245603 Koruga et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090253583 Yoganathan Oct 2009 A1
20090254572 Redlich et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090277322 Cai et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090278934 Ecker Nov 2009 A1
20090282218 Raichelgauz et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090297048 Slotine Dec 2009 A1
20100023400 Dewitt Jan 2010 A1
20100042646 Raichelqauz Feb 2010 A1
20100082684 Churchill et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100088321 Soloman et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100104184 Bronstein Apr 2010 A1
20100106857 Wyler Apr 2010 A1
20100111408 Matsuhira May 2010 A1
20100125569 Nair May 2010 A1
20100162405 Cook Jun 2010 A1
20100173269 Puri et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100191567 Lee et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100198626 Cho et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100268524 Nath et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100284604 Chrysanthakopoulos Nov 2010 A1
20100306193 Pereira Dec 2010 A1
20100312736 Kello Dec 2010 A1
20100318493 Wesseling Dec 2010 A1
20100322522 Wang et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100325138 Lee et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100325581 Finkelstein et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110029620 Bonforte Feb 2011 A1
20110035289 King et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110038545 Bober Feb 2011 A1
20110052063 McAuley et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110055585 Lee Mar 2011 A1
20110106782 Ke et al. May 2011 A1
20110119287 Chen May 2011 A1
20110145068 King et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110164180 Lee Jul 2011 A1
20110164810 Zang et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110202848 Ismalon Aug 2011 A1
20110208822 Rathod Aug 2011 A1
20110218946 Stern Sep 2011 A1
20110246566 Kashef Oct 2011 A1
20110251896 Impollonia et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110276680 Rimon Nov 2011 A1
20110296315 Lin et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110313856 Cohen et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120082362 Diem et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120131454 Shah May 2012 A1
20120133497 Sasaki May 2012 A1
20120150890 Jeong et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120167133 Carroll et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120179642 Sweeney et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120179751 Ahn Jul 2012 A1
20120185445 Borden et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120197857 Huang Aug 2012 A1
20120221470 Lyon Aug 2012 A1
20120227074 Hill et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120239690 Asikainen et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120239694 Avner et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120299961 Ramkumar et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120301105 Rehg et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120330869 Durham Dec 2012 A1
20120331011 Raichelgauz et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130031489 Gubin Jan 2013 A1
20130066856 Ong et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130067035 Amanat et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130067364 Berntson et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130086499 Dyor et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130089248 Remiszewski Apr 2013 A1
20130103814 Carrasco Apr 2013 A1
20130104251 Moore et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130159298 Mason Jun 2013 A1
20130173635 Sanjeev Jul 2013 A1
20130212493 Krishnamurthy Aug 2013 A1
20130226820 Sedota, Jr. Aug 2013 A1
20130226930 Amgren et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130283401 Pabla et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130325550 Varghese et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130332951 Gharaat et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140019264 Wachman et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140025692 Pappas Jan 2014 A1
20140059443 Tabe Feb 2014 A1
20140095425 Sipple Apr 2014 A1
20140111647 Atsmon Apr 2014 A1
20140125703 Roveta May 2014 A1
20140147829 Jerauld May 2014 A1
20140152698 Kim et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140169681 Drake Jun 2014 A1
20140176604 Venkitaraman et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140188786 Raichelgauz et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140193077 Shiiyama et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140201330 Lozano Lopez Jul 2014 A1
20140250032 Huang et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140282655 Roberts Sep 2014 A1
20140300722 Garcia Oct 2014 A1
20140310825 Raichelgauz et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140330830 Raichelgauz et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140341476 Kulick et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140379477 Sheinfeld Dec 2014 A1
20150033150 Lee Jan 2015 A1
20150100562 Kohlmeier et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150117784 Lin Apr 2015 A1
20150120627 Hunzinger et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150134688 Jing May 2015 A1
20150254344 Kulkarni Sep 2015 A1
20150286742 Zhang et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150289022 Gross Oct 2015 A1
20150324356 Gutierrez et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150363644 Wnuk Dec 2015 A1
20160007083 Gurha Jan 2016 A1
20160026707 Ong et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160210525 Yang Jul 2016 A1
20160221592 Puttagunta Aug 2016 A1
20160306798 Guo et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160342683 Kwon Nov 2016 A1
20160357188 Ansari Dec 2016 A1
20170017638 Satyavarta et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170032257 Sharifi Feb 2017 A1
20170041254 Agara Venkatesha Rao Feb 2017 A1
20170109602 Kim Apr 2017 A1
20170154241 Shambik et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170255620 Raichelgauz Sep 2017 A1
20170262437 Raichelgauz Sep 2017 A1
20170323568 Inoue Nov 2017 A1
20180081368 Watanabe Mar 2018 A1
20180101177 Cohen Apr 2018 A1
20180157916 Doumbouya Jun 2018 A1
20180158323 Takenaka Jun 2018 A1
20180204111 Zadeh Jul 2018 A1
20190005726 Nakano Jan 2019 A1
20190039627 Yamamoto Feb 2019 A1
20190043274 Hayakawa Feb 2019 A1
20190045244 Balakrishnan Feb 2019 A1
20190056718 Satou Feb 2019 A1
20190065951 Luo Feb 2019 A1
20190188501 Ryu Jun 2019 A1
20190220011 Della Penna Jul 2019 A1
20190317513 Zhang Oct 2019 A1
20190364492 Azizi Nov 2019 A1
20190384303 Muller Dec 2019 A1
20190384312 Herbach Dec 2019 A1
20190385460 Magzimof Dec 2019 A1
20190389459 Berntorp Dec 2019 A1
20200004248 Healey Jan 2020 A1
20200004251 Zhu Jan 2020 A1
20200004265 Zhu Jan 2020 A1
20200005631 Visintainer Jan 2020 A1
20200018606 Wolcott Jan 2020 A1
20200018618 Ozog Jan 2020 A1
20200020212 Song Jan 2020 A1
20200050973 Stenneth Feb 2020 A1
20200073977 Montemerlo Mar 2020 A1
20200090484 Chen Mar 2020 A1
20200097756 Hashimoto Mar 2020 A1
20200133307 Kelkar Apr 2020 A1
20200043326 Tao Jun 2020 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (13)
Number Date Country
1085464 Jan 2007 EP
0231764 Apr 2002 WO
0231764 Apr 2002 WO
2003005242 Jan 2003 WO
2003067467 Aug 2003 WO
2004019527 Mar 2004 WO
2005027457 Mar 2005 WO
20070049282 May 2007 WO
2007049282 May 2007 WO
2014076002 May 2014 WO
2014137337 Sep 2014 WO
2016040376 Mar 2016 WO
2016070193 May 2016 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (138)
Entry
Vallet, David, et al. “Personalized content retrieval in context using ontological knowledge.” IEEE Transactions on circuits and systems for video technology 17.3 (2007): 336-346.
Foote, Jonathan, et al. “Content-Based Retrieval of Music and Audio”, 1997 Institute of Systems Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore (Abstract).
Raichelgauz, I., et al., “Natural Signal Classification by Neural Cliques and Phase-Locked Attractors”, pp. 6693-6697, Proceedings of the 28th IEEE, EMBS Annual International Conference, New York City, USA, Aug. 30-Sep. 3, 2006, downloaded on Mar. 12, 2009.
Ribert et al. “An Incremental Hierarchical Clustering”, Visicon Interface 1999, pp. 586-591.
Boari et al, “Adaptive Routing for Dynamic Applications in Massively Parallel Architectures”, 1995 IEEE, Spring 1995.
Cococcioni, et al, “Automatic Diagnosis of Defects of Rolling Element Bearings Based on Computational Intelligence Techniques”, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy, 2009.
Emami, et al, “Role of Spatiotemporal Oriented Energy Features for Robust Visual Tracking in Video Surveillance, University of Queensland”, St. Lucia, Australia, 2012.
Mandhaoui, et al, “Emotional Speech Characterization Based on Multi-Features Fusion for Face-to-Face Interaction”, Universite Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France, 2009.
Marti, et al, “Real Time Speaker Localization and Detection System for Camera Steering in Multiparticipant Videoconferencing Environments”, Universidad Politecnica de Valencia, Spain, 2011.
Nagy et al, “A Transputer, Based, Flexible, Real-Time Control System for Robotic Manipulators”, UKACC International Conference on CONTROL '96, Sep. 2-5, 1996, Conference 1996, Conference Publication No. 427, IEE 1996.
Scheper, et al. “Nonlinear dynamics in neural computation”, ESANN'2006 proceedings—European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks, Bruges (Belgium), Apr. 26-28, 2006, d-side publi, ISBN 2-930307-06-4.
Theodoropoulos et al, “Simulating Asynchronous Architectures on Transputer Networks”, Proceedings of the Fourth Euromicro Workshop on Parallel and Distributed Processing, 1996. PDP '96.
Verstraeten et al., “Isolated word recognition with the Liquid State Machine: a case study”; Department of Electronics and Information Systems, Ghent University, Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 41, 9000 Gent, Belgium, Available online Jul. 14, 2005.
Zhou et al., “Medical Diagnosis With C4.5 Rule Preceded by Artificial Neural Network Ensemble”; IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, vol. 7, Issue: 1, pp. 37-42, Date of Publication: Mar. 2003.
Cernansky et al., “Feed-forward Echo State Networks”; Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Montreal, Canada, Jul. 31-Aug. 4, 2005.
Lyon, Richard F.; “Computational Models of Neural Auditory Processing”; IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, ICASSP '84, Date of Conference: Mar. 1984, vol. 9, pp. 41-44.
Zhou et al., “Ensembling neural networks: Many could be better than all”; National Laboratory for Novel Software Technology, Nanjing Unviersirty, Hankou Road 22, Nanjing 210093, PR China; Received Nov. 16, 2001, Available online Mar. 12, 2002.
Fathy et al., “A Parallel Design and Implementation for Backpropagation Neural Network Using NIMD Architecture”, 8th Mediterranean Electrotechnical Corsfe rersce, 19'96. MELECON '96, Date of Conference: May 13-16, 1996, vol. 3, pp. 1472-1475.
Howlett et al., “A Multi-Computer Neural Network Architecture in a Virtual Sensor System Application”, International Journal of Knowledge-based Intelligent Engineering Systems, 4 (2). pp. 86-93, 133N 1327-2314; first submitted Nov. 30, 1999; revised version submitted Mar. 10, 2000.
Ortiz-Boyer et al., “CIXL2: A Crossover Operator for Evolutionary Algorithms Based on Population Features”, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 24 (2005) 1-48 Submitted Nov. 2004; published Jul. 2005.
IPO Examination Report under Section 18(3) for corresponding UK application No. GB1001219.3, dated May 30, 2012.
IPO Examination Report under Section 18(3) for corresponding UK application No: GB1001219.3, dated Sep. 12, 2011.
Lin, C.; Chang, S.: “Generating Robust Digital Signature for Image/Video Authentication”, Multimedia and Security Workshop at ACM Mutlimedia '98; Bristol, U.K., Sep. 1998; pp. 49-54.
Iwamoto, K.; Kasutani, E.; Yamada, A.: “Image Signature Robust to Caption Superimposition for Video Sequence Identification”; 2006 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing; pp. 3185-3188, Oct. 8-11, 2006; doi: 10.1109/ICIP.2006.313046.
Maass, W. et al.: “Computational Models for Generic Cortical Microcircuits”, Institute for Theoretical Computer Science, Technische Universitaet Graz, Graz, Austria, published Jun. 10, 2003.
International Search Report for the corresponding International Patent Application PCT/IL2006/001235; dated Nov. 2, 2008.
Raichelgauz, I. et al.: “Co-evolutionary Learning in Liquid Architectures”, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, [Online] vol. 3512, Jun. 21, 2005 (Jun. 21, 2005), pp. 241-248, XP019010280 Springer Berlin / Heidelberg ISSN: 1611-3349 ISBN: 978-3-540-26208-4.
Jaeger, H.: “The “echo state” approach to analysing and training recurrent neural networks”, GMD Report, No. 148, 2001, pp. 1-43, XP002466251. German National Research Center for Information Technology.
Verstraeten et al.: “Isolated word recognition with the Liquid State Machine: a case study”, Information Processing Letters, Amsterdam, NL, vol. 95, No. 6, Sep. 30, 2005 (Sep. 30, 2005), pp. 521-528, XP005028093 ISSN: 0020-0190.
Zeevi, Y. et al.: “Natural Signal Classification by Neural Cliques and Phase-Locked Attractors”, IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence, IJCNN2006, Vancouver, Canada, Jul. 2006 (Jul. 2006), XP002466252.
Natsclager, T. et al.: “The “liquid computer”: A novel strategy for real-time computing on time series”, Special Issue on Foundations of Information Processing of Telematik, vol. 8, No. 1, 2002, pp. 39-43, XP002466253.
Morad, T.Y. et al.: “Performance, Power Efficiency and Scalability of Asymmetric Cluster Chip Multiprocessors”, Computer Architecture Letters, vol. 4, Jul. 4, 2005 (Jul. 4, 2005), pp. 1-4, XP002466254.
International Search Authority: “Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority” (PCT Rule 43bis.1) including International Search Report for International Patent Application No. PCT/US20081073852; dated Jan. 28, 2009.
Xian-Sheng Hua et al.: “Robust Video Signature Based on Ordinal Measure” In: 2004 International Conference on Image Processing, ICIP '04; Microsoft Research Asia, Beijing, China; published Oct. 24-27, 2004, pp. 685-688.
International Search Authority: International Preliminary Report on Patentability (Chapter I of the Patent Cooperation Treaty) including “Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority” (PCT Rule 43bis. 1) for the corresponding International Patent Application No. PCT/IL2006/001235; dated Jul. 28, 2009.
Guo et al, “AdOn: An Intelligent Overlay Video Advertising System”, SIGIR, Boston, Massachusetts, Jul. 19-23, 2009.
Mei, et al., “Contextual In-Image Advertising”, Microsoft Research Asia, pp. 439-448, 2008.
Mei, et al., “VideoSense—Towards Effective Online Video Advertising”, Microsoft Research Asia, pp. 1075-1084, 2007.
Semizarov et al. “Specificity of Short Interfering RNA Determined through Gene Expression Signatures”, PNAS, 2003, pp. 6347-6352.
Liu, et al., “Instant Mobile Video Search With Layered Audio-Video Indexing and Progressive Transmission”, Multimedia, IEEE Transactions on Year: 2014, vol. 16, Issue: 8, pp. 2242-2255, DOI: 10.1109/TMM.2014.2359332 IEEE Journals & Magazines.
Mladenovic, et al., “Electronic Tour Guide for Android Mobile Platform with Multimedia Travel Book”, Telecommunications Forum (TELFOR), 2012 20th Year: 2012, pp. 1460-1463, DOI: 10.1109/TELFOR.2012.6419494 IEEE Conference Publications.
Park, et al., “Compact Video Signatures for Near-Duplicate Detection on Mobile Devices”, Consumer Electronics (ISCE 2014), the 18th IEEE International Symposium on Year: 2014, pp. 1-2, DOI: 10.1109/ISCE.2014.6884293 IEEE Conference Publications.
Wang et al. “A Signature for Content-based Image Retrieval Using a Geometrical Transform”, ACM 1998, pp. 229-234.
Zang, et al., “A New Multimedia Message Customizing Framework for Mobile Devices”, Multimedia and Expo, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Year: 2007, pp. 1043-1046, DOI: 10.1109/ICME.2007.4284832 IEEE Conference Publications.
Clement, et al. “Speaker Diarization of Heterogeneous Web Video Files: A Preliminary Study”, Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2011, IEEE International Conference on Year: 2011, pp. 4432-4435, DOI: 10.1109/ICASSP.2011.5947337 IEEE Conference Publications, France.
Gong, et al., “A Knowledge-based Mediator for Dynamic Integration of Heterogeneous Multimedia Information Sources”, Video and Speech Processing, 2004, Proceedings of 2004 International Symposium on Year: 2004, pp. 467-470, DOI: 10.1109/ISIMP.2004.1434102 IEEE Conference Publications, Hong Kong.
Lin, et al., “Robust Digital Signature for Multimedia Authentication: A Summary”, IEEE Circuits and Systems Magazine, 4th Quarter 2003, pp. 23-26.
Lin, et al., “Summarization of Large Scale Social Network Activity”, Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 2009, ICASSP 2009, IEEE International Conference on Year 2009, pp. 3481-3484, DOI: 10.1109/ICASSP.2009.4960375, IEEE Conference Publications, Arizona.
Nouza, et al., “Large-scale Processing, Indexing and Search System for Czech Audio-Visual Heritage Archives”, Multimedia Signal Processing (MMSP), 2012, pp. 337-342, IEEE 14th Intl. Workshop, DOI: 10.1109/MMSP.2012.6343465, Czech Republic.
Li, et al., “Matching Commercial Clips from TV Streams Using a Unique, Robust and Compact Signature,” Proceedings of the Digital Imaging Computing: Techniques and Applications, Feb. 2005, vol. 0-7695-2467, Australia.
May et al., “The Transputer”, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 1989, teaches multiprocessing system.
Vailaya, et al., “Content-Based Hierarchical Classification of Vacation Images,” I.E.E.E.: Multimedia Computing and Systems, vol. 1, 1999, East Lansing, MI, pp. 518-523.
Vallet, et al., “Personalized Content Retrieval in Context Using Ontological Knowledge,” IEEE Transactions on circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 17, No. 3, Mar. 2007, pp. 336-346.
Whitby-Strevens, “The Transputer”, 1985 IEEE, Bristol, UK.
Yanai, “Generic Image Classification Using Visual Knowledge on the Web,” MM'03, Nov. 2-8, 2003, Tokyo, Japan, pp. 167-176.
Chuan-Yu Cho, et al., “Efficient Motion-Vector-Based Video Search Using Query by Clip”, 2004, IEEE, Taiwan, pp. 1-4.
Gomes et al., “Audio Watermaking and Fingerprinting: For Which Applications?” University of Rene Descartes, Paris, France, 2003.
Ihab Al Kabary, et al., “SportSense: Using Motion Queries to Find Scenes in Sports Videos”, Oct. 2013, ACM, Switzerland, pp. 1-3.
Jianping Fan et al., “Concept-Oriented Indexing of Video Databases: Towards Semantic Sensitive Retrieval and Browsing”, IEEE, vol. 13, No. 7, Jul. 2004, pp. 1-19.
Nam, et al., “Audio Visual Content-Based Violent Scene Characterization”, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Minneapolis, MN, 1998, pp. 353-357.
Shih-Fu Chang, et al., “VideoQ: A Fully Automated Video Retrieval System Using Motion Sketches”, 1998, IEEE New York, pp. 1-2.
Wei-Te Li et al., “Exploring Visual and Motion Saliency for Automatic Video Object Extraction”, IEEE, vol. 22, No. 7, Jul. 2013, pp. 1-11.
Zhu et al., Technology-Assisted Dietary Assessment. Computational Imaging VI, edited by Charles A. Bouman, Eric L. Miller, Ilya Pollak, Proc. of SPIE-IS&T Electronic Imaging, SPIE vol. 6814, 681411, Copyright 2008 SPIE-IS&T. pp. 1-10.
Lau, et al., “Semantic Web Service Adaptation Model for a Pervasive Learning Scenario”, 2008 IEEE Conference on Innovative Technologies in Intelligent Systems and Industrial Applications Year: 2008, pp. 98-103, DOI: 10.1109/CITISIA.2008.4607342 IEEE Conference Publications.
McNamara, et al., “Diversity Decay in Opportunistic Content Sharing Systems”, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks Year: 2011, pp. 1-3, DOI: 10.1109/WoWMoM.2011.5986211 IEEE Conference Publications.
Odinaev, et al., “Cliques in Neural Ensembles as Perception Carriers”, Technion—Israel Institute of Technology, 2006 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Canada, 2006, pp. 285-292.
Santos, et al., “SCORM-MPEG: an Ontology of Interoperable Metadata for Multimedia and e-Leaming”, 2015 23rd International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks (SoftCOM) Year: 2015, pp. 224-228, DOI: 10.1109/SOFTCOM.2015.7314122 IEEE Conference Publications.
Wilk, et al., “The Potential of Social-Aware Multimedia Prefetching on Mobile Devices”, 2015 International Conference and Workshops on Networked Systems (NetSys) Year: 2015, pp. 1-5, DOI: 10.1109/NetSys.2015.7089081 IEEE Conference Publications.
Brecheisen, et al., “Hierarchical Genre Classification for Large Music Collections”, ICME 2006, pp. 1385-1388.
Queluz, “Content-Based Integrity Protection of Digital Images”, SPIE Conf. on Security and Watermarking of Multimedia Contents, San Jose, Jan. 1999, pp. 85-93, downloaded from http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/ on Aug. 2, 2017.
Schneider, et. al., “A Robust Content Based Digital Signature for Image Authentication”, Proc. ICIP 1996, Laussane, Switzerland, Oct. 1996, pp. 227-230.
Yanagawa, et al., “Columbia University's Baseline Detectors for 374 LSCOM Semantic Visual Concepts.” Columbia University Advent technical report, 2007, pp. 222-2006-8.
Johnson, John L., “Pulse-Coupled Neural Nets: Translation, Rotation, Scale, Distortion, and Intensity Signal Invariance for Images.” Applied Optics, vol. 33, No. 26, 1994, pp. 6239-6253.
The International Search Report and the Written Opinion for PCT/US2016/050471, ISA/RU, Moscow, RU, dated May 4, 2017.
The International Search Report and the Written Opinion for PCT/US2016/054634 dated Mar. 16, 2017, ISA/RU, Moscow, RU.
The International Search Report and the Written Opinion for PCT/US2017/015831, ISA/RU, Moscow, Russia, dated Apr. 20, 2017.
Lau et al., “Semantic Web Service Adaptation Model for a Pervasive Learning Scenario”, 2008 IEEE Conference on nnovative Technologies in Intelligent Systems and Industrial Applications, 2008, pp. 98-103.
Ma et el. (“Semantics modeling based image retrieval system using neural networks” 2005 (Year: 2005).
Big Bang Theory Series 04 Episode 12, aired Jan. 6, 2011; [retrieved from Internet: ].
Boari et al, “Adaptive Routing for Dynamic Applications in Massively Parallel Architectures”, 1995 IEEE, Spring 1995, pp. 1-14.
Burgsteiner et al., “Movement Prediction from Real-World Images Using a Liquid State machine”, Innovations in Applied Artificial Intelligence Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, LNCS, Springer-Verlag, BE, vol. 3533, Jun. 2005, pp. 121-130.
Cernansky et al, “Feed-forward Echo State Networks”, Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Montreal, Canada, Jul. 31-Aug. 4, 2005, pp. 1-4.
Chinchor, Nancy A. et al.; Multimedia Analysis + Visual Analytics = Multimedia Analytics; IEEE Computer Society; 2010; pp. 52-60. (Year: 2010).
Fathy et al, “A Parallel Design and Implementation for Backpropagation Neural Network Using MIMD Architecture”, 8th Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference, 19'96. MELECON '96, Date of Conference: May 13-16, 1996, vol. 3 pp. 1472-1475, vol. 3.
Freisleben et al, “Recognition of Fractal Images Using a Neural Network”, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1993, vol. 6861, 1993, pp. 631-637.
Garcia, “Solving the Weighted Region Least Cost Path Problem Using Transputers”, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California, Dec. 1989.
Hogue, “Tree Pattern Inference and Matching for Wrapper Induction on the World Wide Web”, Master's Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Jun. 2004, pp. 1-106.
Howlett et al, “A Multi-Computer Neural Network Architecture in a Virtual Sensor System Application”, International Journal of knowledge-based intelligent engineering systems, 4 (2). pp. 86-93, 133N 1327-2314.
Hua et al., “Robust Video Signature Based on Ordinal Measure”, Image Processing, 2004, 2004 International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), vol. 1, IEEE, pp. 685-688, 2004.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2016/050471, ISA/RU, Moscow, RU, dated May 4, 2017.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2016/054634, ISA/RU, Moscow, RU, dated Mar. 16, 2017.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2017/015831, ISA/RU, Moscow, RU, dated Apr. 20, 2017.
Johnson et al, “Pulse-Coupled Neural Nets: Translation, Rotation, Scale, Distortion, and Intensity Signal Invariance for Images”, Applied Optics, vol. 33, No. 26, 1994, pp. 6239-6253.
Lau et al., “Semantic Web Service Adaptation Model for a Pervasive Learning Scenario”, 2008 IEEE Conference on Innovative Technologies in Intelligent Systems and Industrial Applications, 2008, pp. 98-103.
Lin et al., “Generating robust digital signature for image/video authentication”, Multimedia and Security Workshop at ACM Multimedia '98, Bristol, U.K., Sep. 1998, pp. 245-251.
Lu et al, “Structural Digital Signature for Image Authentication: An Incidental Distortion Resistant Scheme”, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, vol. 5, No. 2, Jun. 2003, pp. 161-173.
Lyon, “Computational Models of Neural Auditory Processing”, IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, ICASSP '84, Date of Conference: Mar. 1984, vol. 9, pp. 41-44.
Marian Stewart B et al., “Independent component representations for face recognition”, Proceedings of the SPIE Symposium on Electronic Imaging: Science and Technology; Conference on Human Vision and Electronic Imaging III, San Jose, California, Jan. 1998, pp. 1-12.
May et al, “The Transputer”, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1989, vol. 41.
McNamara et al., “Diversity Decay in opportunistic Content Sharing Systems”, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks, pp. 1-3.
Morad et al., “Performance, Power Efficiency and Scalability of Asymmetric Cluster Chip Multiprocessors”, Computer Architecture Letters, vol. 4, Jul. 4, 2005, pp. 1-4, XP002466254.
Nagy et al, “A Transputer, Based, Flexible, Real-Time Control System for Robotic Manipulators”, UKACC International Conference on CONTROL '96, 2-5 Sep. 1996, Conference Publication No. 427, IEE 1996.
Natschlager et al., “The “Liquid Computer”: A novel strategy for real-time computing on time series”, Special Issue on Foundations of Information Processing of telematik, vol. 8, No. 1, 2002, pp. 39-43, XP002466253.
Odinaev et al, “Cliques in Neural Ensembles as Perception Carriers”, Technion—Institute of Technology, 2006 International Joint Conference on neural Networks, Canada, 2006, pp. 285-292.
Ortiz-Boyer et al, “CIXL2: A Crossover Operator for Evolutionary Algorithms Based on Population Features”, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 24 (2005) Submitted Nov. 2004; published Jul. 2005, pp. 1-48.
Pandya etal. A Survey on QR Codes: in context of Research and Application. International Journal of Emerging Technology and U Advanced Engineering. ISSN 2250-2459, ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal, vol. 4, Issue 3, Mar. 2014 (Year: 2014).
Queluz, “Content-Based Integrity Protection of Digital Images”, SPIE Conf. on Security and Watermarking of Multimedia Contents, San Jose, Jan. 1999, pp. 85-93.
Rui, Yong et al. “Relevance feedback: a power tool for interactive content-based image retrieval.” IEEE Transactions on circuits and systems for video technology 8.5 (1998): 644-655.
Santos et al., “SCORM-MPEG: an Ontology of Interoperable Metadata for multimediaand E-Learning”, 23rd International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks (SoftCom), 2015, pp. 224-228.
Scheper et al, “Nonlinear dynamics in neural computation”, ESANN'2006 proceedings—European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks, Bruges (Belgium), Apr. 26-28, 2006, d-side publication, ISBN 2-930307-06-4, pp. 1-12.
Schneider et al, “A Robust Content based Digital Signature for Image Authentication”, Proc. ICIP 1996, Lausane, Switzerland, Oct. 1996, pp. 227-230.
Srihari et al., “Intelligent Indexing and Semantic Retrieval of Multimodal Documents”, Kluwer Academic Publishers, May 2000, vol. 2, Issue 2-3, pp. 245-275.
Srihari, Rohini K. “Automatic indexing and content-based retrieval of captioned images” Computer 0 (1995): 49-56.
Stolberg et al, “Hibrid-Soc: A Mul Ti-Core Soc Architecture for Mul Timedia Signal Processing”, 2003 IEEE, pp. 189-194.
Theodoropoulos et al, “Simulating Asynchronous Architectures on Transputer Networks”, Proceedings of the Fourth Euromicro Workshop on Parallel and Distributed Processing, 1996. PDP '96, pp. 274-281.
Verstraeten et al, “Isolated word recognition with the Liquid State Machine: a case study”, Department of Electronics and Information Systems, Ghent University, Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 41, 9000 Gent, Belgium, Available onlline Jul. 14, 2005, pp. 521-528.
Wang et al., “Classifying Objectionable Websites Based onlmage Content”, Stanford University, pp. 1-12.
Ware et al, “Locating and Identifying Components in a Robot's Workspace using a Hybrid Computer Architecture” Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control, Aug. 27-29, 1995, pp. 139-144.
Whitby-Strevens, “The transputer”, 1985 IEEE, pp. 292-300.
Wilk et al., “The Potential of Social-Aware Multimedia Prefetching on Mobile Devices”, International Conference and Workshops on networked Systems (NetSys), 2015, pp. 1-5.
Yanagawa et al, “Columbia University's Baseline Detectors for 374 LSCOM Semantic Visual Concepts”, Columbia University Advent Technical Report # 222-2006-8, Mar. 20, 2007, pp. 1-17.
Yanagawa et al., “Columbia University's Baseline Detectors for 374 LSCOM Semantic Visual Concepts”, Columbia University ADVENT Technical Report #222, 2007, pp. 2006-2008.
Zhou et al, “Ensembling neural networks: Many could be better than all”, National Laboratory for Novel Software Technology, Nanjing University, Hankou Road 22, Nanjing 210093, PR China Received Nov. 16, 2001, Available inline Mar. 12, 2002, pp. 239-263.
Zhou et al, “Medical Diagnosis With C4.5 Rule Preceded by Artificial Neural Network Ensemble”, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, vol. 7, Issue: 1, Mar. 2003, pp. 37-42.
Zhu et al., “Technology-Assisted Dietary Assesment”, Proc SPIE. Mar. 20, 2008, pp. 1-15.
Zou et al., “A Content-Based Image Authentication System with Lossless Data Hiding”, ICME 2003, pp. 213-216.
“Computer Vision Demonstration Website”, Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, 2005, USA.
Guo et al, AdOn: An Intelligent Overlay Video Advertising System (Year: 2009).
Li et al (“Matching Commercial Clips from TV Streams Using a Unique, Robust and Compact Signature” 2005) (Year: 2005).
Stolberg et al (“Hibrid-Soc: a Multi-Core Soc Architecture for Multimedia Signal Processing” 2003).
Vallet et al (“Personalized Content Retrieval in Context Using Ontological Knowledge” Mar. 2007) (Year: 2007).
Jasinschi et al., “A Probabilistic Layered Framework for Integrating Multimedia Content and Context Information”, 2002, IEEE, p. 2057-2060. (Year: 2002).
Jones et al., “Contextual Dynamics of Group-Based Sharing Decisions”, 2011, University of Bath, p. 1777-1786. (Year: 2011).
Iwamoto, “Image Signature Robust to Caption Superimpostion for Video Sequence Identification”, IEEE, pp. 3185-3188 (Year: 2006).
Cooperative Multi-Scale Convolutional Neural, Networks for Person Detection, Markus Eisenbach, Daniel Seichter, Tim Wengefeld, and Horst-Michael Gross Ilmenau University of Technology, Neuroinformatics and Cognitive Robotics Lab (Year; 2016).
Chen, Yixin, James Ze Wang, and Robert Krovetz. “CLUE: cluster-based retrieval of images by unsupervised learning.” IEEE transactions on Image Processing 14.8 (2005); 1187-1201. (Year: 2005).
Wusk et al (Non-Invasive detection of Respiration and Heart Rate with a Vehicle Seat Sensor; www.mdpi.com/journal/sensors; Published: May 8, 2018). (Year: 2018).
Chen, Tiffany Yu-Han, et al. “Glimpse: Continuous, real-time object recognition on mobile devices.” Proceedings of the 13th ACM Confrecene on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. 2015. (Year: 2015).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20130227023 A1 Aug 2013 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61766016 Feb 2013 US
Continuation in Parts (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 13624397 Sep 2012 US
Child 13856201 US
Parent 13344400 Jan 2012 US
Child 13624397 US