This invention relates to a system and method for removing dissolved contaminants, particulate contaminants and oil contaminants from industrial waste water.
The oil industry produces large amounts of waste water during exploration and production of petroleum. It has been estimated that approximately 800 gallons of water are used for the production of a barrel of oil of which approximately 80% is used for cooling in the refinery process. Oil wastes are classified depending on their origin, e.g., from oil production or from oil refining. Waste water from oil production is generally a mixture of drilling muds, salt water, free and emulsified oil and natural gas. Waste water from oil refineries includes, inter alia, free and emulsified oils from leaks, spills, and other sources. The combined refinery wastes or spills may contain crude oil and various fractions thereof, dissolved or suspended mineral and organic compounds discharged in liquors and sludges in various stages of processing.
Cleaning of industrial waste water from oil production and oil refining is important for both environmental and industry purposes. There are many conventional processes for cleaning oil industrial waste water which include, for example, gravity separation, floatation, filtration, chemical treatments, electrochemical treatments, biochemical treatments, and the like. These systems are typically large, inefficient, and expensive to operate. The only known process which can achieve a final effluent with less than 5 p.p.m. oil contaminants is membrane filtration. However, membrane filtration is expensive and difficult to operate because the membranes quickly foul.
It is therefore an object of this invention to provide a system and method for removing dissolved contaminants, particulate contaminants, and oil contaminants from industrial waste water.
It is a further object of this invention to provide such a system and method which removes dissolved contaminants, particulate contaminants, and oil contaminants from industrial waste water generated by oil production and oil refining processes.
It is a further object of this invention to provide such a system and method which removes dissolved contaminants, particulate contaminants, and oil contaminants from industrial waste water to an acceptable level required by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
It is a further object of this invention to provide such a system and method which produces a final effluent which can be reused by oil production and oil refining processes.
It is a further object of this invention to provide such a system and method which provides a final effluent with less than 5 p.p.m. of oil contaminants.
It is a further object of this invention to provide such a system and method which provides a final effluent with less than 5 p.p.m. of particulate contaminants.
It is a further object of this invention to provide such a system and method which utilizes less space.
It is a further object of this invention to provide such a system and method which eliminates the problems associated with using membranes.
It is a further object of this invention to provide such a system and method which reduces costs.
It is a further object of this invention to provide such a system and method which recycles weighting agents.
It is a further object of this invention to provide such a system and method which is more effective.
The subject invention, however, in other embodiments, need not achieve all these objectives and the claims hereof should not be limited to structures or methods capable of achieving these objectives.
This invention features a system for removing dissolved contaminants, particulate contaminants, and oil contaminants from industrial waste water, the system including a gas floatation and primary oil contaminant removal subsystem including a tank for receiving a flow of the industrial waste water and a flow of gaseous microspheres, wherein the gaseous microspheres combine with oil droplets in the waste water to form flocs which float to the surface and are removed to provide processed waste water with the majority of the oil contaminants removed, and a contaminant removal subsystem for removing dissolved contaminants, particulate contaminants, and any remaining oil contaminants from the processed waste water.
In a preferred embodiment, the gas floatation and primary oil contaminant removal subsystem may further include a floc removal subsystem for removing the flocs from the surface of the waste water. The subsystem may include a skimmer. The system may include a cooling subsystem for reducing the temperature of the waste water to an appropriate temperature for use with a desired flocculant. The system may further include a buffer tank for regulating the flow of waste water and removing coarse particulates in the waste water. The contaminant removal subsystem may include a coagulation mixing tank for receiving the processed waste water and introducing and mixing a coagulant with the processed waste water to precipitate the dissolved contaminants and form flocs of the precipitated dissolved contaminants and of the particulate contaminants. The system may further include a weighting agent mixing tank for receiving the processed waste water from the coagulation mixing tank and introducing and mixing a weighting agent with the processed waste water. The system may further include a flocculation subsystem for receiving the processed waste water from the weighting agent mixing tank and introducing and mixing a flocculant to form large flocs of the weighting agent and the microflocs of the particulate contaminants and/or large flocs of the weighting agent and the precipitated dissolved contaminants and/or large flocs of the weighting agent and any remaining oil particulates and/or large flocs of the weighting agent and any other particulates present in the waste water. The system may further include a separation subsystem for separating the large flocs from the processed waste water to form a clear effluent. The system may further include an oxidation subsystem for introducing an oxidation agent to the processed waste water for changing the electrical charges on one or more of the particulate contaminants and/or the oil contaminants. Oxidation agent may include hydrogen peroxide. The weighting agent may include magnetite. The weighting agent may include coal fines. The separation subsystem may include a clarifier. The separation subsystem may include a rapid settler. The separation subsystem may include hydrocyclone. The system may further include a weighting agent recovery subsystem for recovering the weighting agent. The weighting agent recovery system may include a high shear mixer subsystem. The weighting agent recovery subsystem may include a high gradient magnetic filter for removing fine magnetized weighting agents from the clear effluent. The weighting agent recovery subsystem may include a wet drum magnetic separator. The system may further include a recycling subsystem for recycling the weighting agent to the weighting agent mixing tank. The system may further include a re-circulation system for re-circulating sludge formed from large flocs of the weighting agent and the microflocs of the particulate contaminants and/or large flocs of the weighting agent and the precipitated dissolved contaminants and/or large flocs of the weighting agent and any remaining oil particulates and/or large flocs of the weighting agent and any other particulates present in the waste water. The flocculation subsystem may include a static mixer and/or a mixing tank. The oxidation subsystem may include a static mixer. The separation subsystem may include a skimmer disposed inside the clarifier for coalescing the oil contained in the processed waste water and driving the coalesced oil particulates to the surface of the clarifier. The clear effluent may have less than about 5 p.p.m. of oil contaminants, dissolved contaminants, and particulate contaminants.
The invention may also feature a system for removing dissolved contaminants, particulate contaminants, and oil contaminants from industrial waste water, the system including a gas floatation and primary oil contaminate removal subsystem including a tank for receiving a flow of the industrial waste water and a flow of gaseous microspheres, wherein the gaseous microspheres combine with oil droplets in the waste water to form flocs which float to the surface and are removed to provide processed waste water with the majority of the oil contaminants removed, a cooling subsystem for reducing the temperature of the waste water to an appropriate temperature for use with a desired flocculent, and a contaminant removal subsystem for receiving the waste water from the gas floatation subsystem for removing dissolved contaminants, particulate contaminants, and any remaining oil contaminants from the processed waste water.
The invention further features a system for removing dissolved contaminants, particulate contaminants, and oil contaminants from industrial waste water, the system including a gas floatation and primary oil removal subsystem including a tank for receiving a flow of industrial waste water and a flow of gaseous microspheres, wherein the gaseous microspheres combine with oil droplets in the waste water to form flocs which float to the surface and are removed to provide processed waste water with the majority of the oil contaminants removed, a buffer tank for regulating the flow of oily waste water and removing coarse particulates in the waste water, and a contaminant removal subsystem for receiving the waste water from the gas floatation subsystem for removing dissolved contaminants, particulate contaminants, and any remaining oil contaminants from the processed waste water.
The invention further features a system for removing dissolved contaminants, particulate contaminants, and oil contaminants from industrial waste water, the system including a gas floatation and primary oil removal subsystem including a tank for receiving a flow of the industrial waste water and a flow of gaseous microspheres, wherein the gaseous microspheres combine with oil droplets in the waste water to form flocs which float to the surface and are removed to provide processed waste water with the majority of the oil contaminants removed, a cooling subsystem for reducing the temperature of the waste water to an appropriate temperature for use with a desired flocculant, a buffer tank for regulating the flow of waste water and removing coarse particulates in the oily waste water, and a contaminant removal subsystem for receiving the waste water from the gas floatation subsystem for removing dissolved contaminants, particulate contaminants, and any remaining oil contaminants from the processed waste water.
This invention further features a system for removing dissolved contaminants, particulate contaminants, and oil contaminants from industrial waste water, the system including a gas floatation and primary oil removal subsystem including a tank for receiving a flow of the industrial waste water and a flow of gaseous microspheres, wherein the gaseous microspheres combine with oil droplets in the waste water to form flocs which float to the surface and are removed to provide processed waste water with the majority of the oil contaminants removed, a cooling tank for reducing the temperature of the waste water to an appropriate temperature for use with a desired flocculant, a buffer tank for regulating the flow of waste water and removing coarse particulates in the oily waste water, and a contaminant removal subsystem for removing dissolved contaminants, particulate contaminants, and any remaining oil contaminants from the processed waste water. The contaminant removal subsystem includes a coagulation mixing tank for receiving the processed waste water and introducing and mixing a coagulant with the waste water to form microflocs of the particulate contaminants and to precipitate the dissolved contaminants. A weighting agent mixing tank receives the processed waste water from the coagulation mixing tank and introduces and mixing a weighting agent with the processed waste water, a flocculation mixing tank receives the processed waste water from the weighting agent mixing tank and introduces and mixes a flocculant to form large flocs of the weighting agent and the microflocs of the particulate contaminants and/or large flocs of the weighting agent and the precipitated dissolved contaminants and/or large flocs of the weighting agent and remaining oil particulates and/or large flocs of the weighting agent and any other particulates present in the waste water. A separation subsystem separates the large flocs from the processed waste water to form a clear effluent.
Other objects, features and advantages will occur to those skilled in the art from the following description of a preferred embodiment and the accompanying drawings, in which:
Aside from the preferred embodiment or embodiments disclosed below, this invention is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced or being carried out in various ways. Thus, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangements of components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the drawings. If only one embodiment is described herein, the claims hereof are not to be limited to that embodiment. Moreover, the claims hereof are not to be read restrictively unless there is clear and convincing evidence manifesting a certain exclusion, restriction, or disclaimer.
As discussed in the Background section above, conventional processes for cleaning oil industry waste water, such as gravity separation, floatation, filtration, chemical treatments, electrochemical treatments, biochemical treatments, and the like, are inefficient, large, expensive to operate, and typically incapable of producing a final effluent with less than 5 p.p.m. of oil and/or particulate contaminants. Although membrane filtration systems can produce a final effluent with less than 5 p.p.m. of oil contaminants, these systems are expensive and difficult to operate because the membrane filter quickly fouls.
In contrast, system 10,
When oil is in an emulsified state, it exists as a colloidal suspension. When oil is in a free state, it is present as micro-droplets. The micro-droplets, when suspended in waste water, possess negative charge surfaces which creates repulsive forces between the droplets. The gaseous microspheres from flow of gaseous microspheres 16 are positively charged and are attracted to the oil droplets. The interaction of gaseous microspheres 16 with the oil droplets in industrial waste water 14 forms flocs. The flocs of the oil micro-droplets and the gaseous microspheres float to the surface of the waste water and are removed as recovered oil 18, e.g., with a skimmer or similar type device. This removes the majority of oil contaminants from the industrial waste water and is output as processed waste water by line 22.
Contaminant removal subsystem 20 receives the processed waste water from subsystem 12 by line 22 and removes dissolved contaminants, particulate contaminants, and any remaining oil contaminants from the processed waste water by line 22 to provide a final clear effluent by line 50 which preferably has a concentration of oil contaminants, particulate contaminants, and dissolved contaminants which are less than about 5 p.p.m. each, as discussed in detail below.
In one embodiment, contaminant removal subsystem 20 includes coagulation mixing tank 24 with mixer 26 which receives the processed waste water from subsystem 12, by line 22 and introduces coagulant 28, e.g., aluminum, FeCl3, PAC (polyaluminum chloride), and the like, to tank 24. Mixer 26 mixes the coagulant and the processed waste water to precipitate the dissolved contaminants in the waste water and form microflocs of precipitated dissolved contaminants and particulates.
Contaminant removal subsystem 20 also preferably includes weighting agent mixing tank 30 with mixer 32 which receives the processed waste water from coagulation mixing tank 24 by line 34 and introduces weighting agent or magnetic ballast 34, e.g., magnetite or similar type weighting agents known to those skilled in the art. Mixer 32 mixes the weighting agent 34 with the processed waste water in tank 30. As known by those skilled in the art, the weighting agent provides for rapid settling of flocs, as discussed below.
Subsystem 20 preferably includes flocculation mixing tank 36 which receives the processed waste water from weighting agent mixing tank 30 by line 40 and introduces flocculant 42. Mixer 38 mixes flocculant 42 with the processed waste water in tank 36 to form large flocs of the weighting agent and the microflocs of the particulate contaminants and/or large flocs of the weighting agent and the precipitated dissolved contaminants and/or large flocs of the weighting agent and any remaining oil particulates and/or large flocs of any other particulates present in the processed waste water received by line 40. The flocculant, e.g., a polymer, has an electrical charge (anionic or cationic) which attracts the weighting agent, the microflocs of the particulate contaminants, the precipitated dissolved contaminants, any remaining oil particulates, and any other particulates present in the waste water to form the large flocs which are separated using separation subsystem 44. The weighting agent provides for rapid settling of the flocs separation subsystem 44.
Separation subsystem 44 separates the large flocs of the weighting agent and the microflocs of the particulate, large flocs of the weighting agent and the precipitated dissolved contaminants and/or large flocs of the weighting agent and any remaining oil particulates and/or large flocs of any other particulates present in the processed waste water to provide a clear effluent on line 50, e.g., a final effluent having less than 5 p.p.m. each of oil contaminants, and particulate contaminants. As known to those skilled in the art, separation subsystem 44 may include a clarifier, a rapid settler, or a hydrocyclone.
In one design, system 10 may include recycling and re-circulating subsystem 46 which recovers and recycles weighting agent or magnetic ballast 34 from the processed waste water in separation subsystem 40 by line 48 and also re-circulates the sludge of the large flocs of the weighting agent and contaminants by line 48 (discussed below).
In one embodiment, system 10 includes an oxidation subsystem 29 for introducing an oxidation agent, e.g., hydrogen peroxide or similar oxidation agent known to those skilled in the art, to the processed water in coagulation mixing tank 24 in order to change the electrical charges of one or more of the particulate contaminants and/or the oil contaminants in the waste water and to improve the formation of flocs. Additional examples of contaminant removal subsystem 20 are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,099,738 by the inventors hereof, incorporated by reference herein.
The result is system 10 for removing dissolved contaminants, particulate contaminants, and oil contaminants from industrial waste water of this invention effectively and efficiently removes dissolved contaminants, particulate contaminants, and oil contaminants from industrial waste water. e.g., generated from oil production and/or oil refining processes. System 10 provides a final clean effluent, preferably having a level of oil contaminants and particulate contaminants less than about 5 p.p.m. each. Such a level is an acceptable level required by the EPA and can be reused by oil production and/or oil refining processes. Moreover, system 10 does not require the use of any membranes or filters, thus the problems associated therewith are eliminated. System 10 is less expensive and utilizes less space than conventional industrial waste water cleaning systems. The ability to recycle the weight agents further decreases processing costs.
In one embodiment, system 10′,
In one design, weighting agent 34′,
In another design, system 10′″,
In one design, contaminant removal subsystem 20′ receives the cooled and regulated waste water from cooling subsystem 52 and buffer tank 56 by line 57. Static mixers 60 introduce and mix the coagulant via coagulant feed R1-92 by line 83 and/or the oxidation agent via oxidation feed R2-84 by line 85. The coagulant and/or oxidation agent interacts with plates 62 of static mixers 60 to effectively mix of the coagulant and/or the oxidizing agent with the processed waste water in line 57. The statically mixed coagulant and/or oxidizing agent with the processed waste water from subsystem 12 are fed into mixing tanks T-1 and T-2 by line 89. Tanks T-1 to T-2, e.g., weighting agent tank 30 with mixer 32 and flocculant mixing tank 36 with mixer 38 introduce and mix the waste water from static mixers 60 with weighting agents and flocculant to form large flocs of the weighting agent and the microflocs of particulate contaminants and/or large flocs of the weighting agent and the precipitated dissolved contaminants and/or large flocs of the weighting agent and any remaining oil particulates and/or large flocs of any other particulates present in the waste processed, similar as discussed above with reference to
In one design, contaminant removal subsystem 20′ includes weighting agent recovery subsystem 46′ for removing fine magnetized weighting agents from the clear effluent on line 50′. In one example, magnetic filter subsystem 72 and/or high shear subsystem 74 and/or magnetic wet drum separator 76 is used to remove and recover the weighting agent from the clear effluent in line 50′. Weighting agent recovery subsystem 70 recovers the weighting agent which is then recycled back to weighting agent mixing tanks, e.g., any of tank T-1 to T-2, by line 78. See, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 6,099,738 cited supra.
Although, as discussed above with reference to
Although specific features of the invention are shown in some drawings and not in others, this is for convenience only as each feature may be combined with any or all of the other features in accordance with the invention. The words “including”, “comprising”, “having”, and “with” as used herein are to be interpreted broadly and comprehensively and are not limited to any physical interconnection. Moreover, any embodiments disclosed in the subject application are not to be taken as the only possible embodiments. Other embodiments will occur to those skilled in the art and are within the following claims.
In addition, any amendment presented during the prosecution of the patent application for this patent is not a disclaimer of any claim element presented in the application as filed: those skilled in the art cannot reasonably be expected to draft a claim that would literally encompass all possible equivalents, many equivalents will be unforeseeable at the time of the amendment and are beyond a fair interpretation of what is to be surrendered (if anything), the rationale underlying the amendment may bear no more than a tangential relation to many equivalents, and/or there are many other reasons the applicant can not be expected to describe certain insubstantial substitutes for any claim element amended.
This application claims priority of and benefit to provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/879,429, filed Jan. 9, 2007, incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
438579 | Faunce et al. | Oct 1890 | A |
531183 | Harris | Dec 1894 | A |
653010 | Koyl | Jul 1900 | A |
728062 | Wilson | May 1903 | A |
1064807 | Yost | Jun 1913 | A |
1310461 | Williams | Jul 1919 | A |
1383287 | Campbell | Jul 1921 | A |
1401288 | Sodeau | Dec 1921 | A |
1948080 | Thomas | Feb 1934 | A |
2065123 | Downes | Dec 1936 | A |
2129267 | Fischer | Sep 1938 | A |
2232294 | Urbain et al. | Feb 1941 | A |
2232296 | Urbain et al. | Feb 1941 | A |
2268461 | Nichols | Dec 1941 | A |
2326575 | Stearns | Aug 1943 | A |
2359748 | Clemens | Oct 1944 | A |
2391494 | Walker | Dec 1945 | A |
2401924 | Goetz | Jun 1946 | A |
2564515 | Vogel | Aug 1951 | A |
2597561 | Blind | May 1952 | A |
2652925 | Vermeiren | Sep 1953 | A |
2713028 | Jenks | Jul 1955 | A |
2758715 | Fowler | Aug 1956 | A |
2825464 | Mack | Mar 1958 | A |
2945590 | Stearns | Jul 1960 | A |
3066095 | Hronas | Nov 1962 | A |
3080264 | Zimmie | Mar 1963 | A |
3142638 | Blaisdell et al. | Jul 1964 | A |
3228878 | Moody | Jan 1966 | A |
3350302 | Demeter et al. | Oct 1967 | A |
3575852 | Hughes | Apr 1971 | A |
3617561 | Fanselow | Nov 1971 | A |
3622461 | Wagner et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
3627678 | Marston et al. | Dec 1971 | A |
3676337 | Kolm | Jul 1972 | A |
3690454 | Bekhtle et al. | Sep 1972 | A |
3693795 | Robinson et al. | Sep 1972 | A |
3697420 | Blaisdell et al. | Oct 1972 | A |
3767351 | Blaser | Oct 1973 | A |
3819589 | Fauke et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
3856666 | Yashima et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
3886064 | Kosonen | May 1975 | A |
3887457 | Marston et al. | Jun 1975 | A |
3920543 | Marston et al. | Nov 1975 | A |
3929632 | Buriks et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
3929635 | Buriks et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
3950319 | Schmidt et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
3951807 | Sanderson | Apr 1976 | A |
3959133 | Fulton | May 1976 | A |
3983033 | de Latour | Sep 1976 | A |
4024040 | Phalangas et al. | May 1977 | A |
4025432 | Nolan et al. | May 1977 | A |
4033864 | Nolan et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
4046681 | Marston et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
4066991 | Marston et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4089779 | Neal | May 1978 | A |
4110208 | Neal | Aug 1978 | A |
4139456 | Yabuuchi et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
4142970 | von Hagel et al. | Mar 1979 | A |
4151090 | Brigante | Apr 1979 | A |
4153559 | Sanderson | May 1979 | A |
4167480 | Mach | Sep 1979 | A |
4176042 | Fahlstrom | Nov 1979 | A |
4190539 | Besik | Feb 1980 | A |
4193866 | Slusarczuk et al. | Mar 1980 | A |
4204948 | Wechsler et al. | May 1980 | A |
4274968 | Grutsch et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4290898 | von Hagel et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
4297484 | Quinlan | Oct 1981 | A |
4320012 | Palm et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4339347 | Quinlan | Jul 1982 | A |
4341657 | Quinlan | Jul 1982 | A |
4343730 | Becker et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4357237 | Sanderson | Nov 1982 | A |
4358382 | Quinlan | Nov 1982 | A |
4359382 | Morgan | Nov 1982 | A |
4377483 | Yamashita et al. | Mar 1983 | A |
4388195 | von Hagel et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4402833 | Bennett et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4454047 | Becker et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4465597 | Herman et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4482459 | Shiver | Nov 1984 | A |
4502958 | Sasaki | Mar 1985 | A |
4522643 | Quinlan | Jun 1985 | A |
4563286 | Johnson et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4579655 | Louboutin et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4588508 | Allenson et al. | May 1986 | A |
4595506 | Kneer | Jun 1986 | A |
4626354 | Hoffman et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4654139 | Baba et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4655933 | Johnson et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4686035 | Estabrook | Aug 1987 | A |
4689154 | Zimberg | Aug 1987 | A |
4699951 | Allenson et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4735725 | Reischl et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4752401 | Bodenstein | Jun 1988 | A |
4765900 | Schwoyer et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4765908 | Monick et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4783265 | Timmons | Nov 1988 | A |
4795557 | Bourbigot et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4827890 | Pociask et al. | May 1989 | A |
4843105 | Reischl et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4849128 | Timmons et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4851123 | Mishra | Jul 1989 | A |
4864075 | Thompson et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4872993 | Harrison | Oct 1989 | A |
4874508 | Fritz | Oct 1989 | A |
4882064 | Dixon et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4921597 | Lurie | May 1990 | A |
4921613 | Nordberg et al. | May 1990 | A |
4927543 | Bablon et al. | May 1990 | A |
4938876 | Ohsol | Jul 1990 | A |
4940550 | Watson | Jul 1990 | A |
4944278 | Woodard | Jul 1990 | A |
4944279 | Woodard | Jul 1990 | A |
4956099 | Thompson et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4981593 | Priestley et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5009791 | Lin et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5013451 | Thompson et al. | May 1991 | A |
5019274 | Thompson et al. | May 1991 | A |
5023012 | Buchan et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5026483 | Thompson et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5055194 | Goetz et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5064531 | Wang et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5069783 | Wang et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5084733 | Katoh et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5089120 | Eberhardt | Feb 1992 | A |
5089227 | Thompson et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5089619 | Thompson et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5112494 | Yan | May 1992 | A |
5112499 | Murray et al. | May 1992 | A |
5149438 | Hebert | Sep 1992 | A |
5187326 | Shirai | Feb 1993 | A |
5234603 | Potts | Aug 1993 | A |
5266200 | Reid | Nov 1993 | A |
5298168 | Guess | Mar 1994 | A |
5310642 | Vargas et al. | May 1994 | A |
5369072 | Benjamin et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5377845 | Hamen et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5383539 | Bair et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5395527 | Desjardins | Mar 1995 | A |
5397476 | Bradbury et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5462670 | Guess | Oct 1995 | A |
5545330 | Ehrlich | Aug 1996 | A |
5560493 | Perry | Oct 1996 | A |
5593590 | Steyskal | Jan 1997 | A |
5595666 | Kochen et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5596392 | Danzuka | Jan 1997 | A |
5597479 | Johnson | Jan 1997 | A |
5616241 | Khudenko | Apr 1997 | A |
5616250 | Johnson et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5637221 | Coyne | Jun 1997 | A |
5693461 | Bagchi et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5702809 | Tixier et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5730864 | Delsalle et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5731134 | Honan et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5770091 | Binot et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5779908 | Anderson et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5800717 | Ramsay et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5805965 | Tsuda et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5840185 | Hughes et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5840195 | Delsalle et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5856072 | Leone et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5893355 | Glover et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5925290 | Hills | Jul 1999 | A |
5976375 | Dorica et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5976771 | Kosugi et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6010631 | Delsalle et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6030761 | Taguchi et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6093318 | Saho et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6099738 | Wechsler et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6149014 | Mankosa et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6151467 | Yamaguchi | Nov 2000 | A |
6160976 | Karakama et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6185393 | Karakama et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6210587 | Vion | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6210588 | Vion | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6221253 | Fukase et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6221262 | MacDonald et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6228269 | Cort | May 2001 | B1 |
6228565 | Ohzeki et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6251576 | Taguchi et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6277285 | Vion | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6290849 | Rykaer et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6379549 | LePoder et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6383370 | Keever et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6386781 | Gueret | May 2002 | B1 |
6406624 | DeVos | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6423485 | Yamada et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6432303 | Chesner et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6447686 | Choi et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6472132 | Yamada et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6485652 | Le Poder et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6517714 | Streat | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6613232 | Chesner et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6645386 | Moreau et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6689277 | Streat | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6692173 | Gueret | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6706467 | Howe et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6740245 | Johnson | May 2004 | B2 |
6759018 | Arno et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6783679 | Rozich | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6811885 | Andriessen et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6824692 | Binot et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6832691 | Miles et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6875351 | Arnaud | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6896815 | Cort | May 2005 | B2 |
6902678 | Tipton | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6919031 | Blumenschein et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6923901 | Leffler et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6960294 | Arnaud | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6966993 | Binot | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6968138 | Akutsu | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7001525 | Binot et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7083715 | Binot | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7153431 | Daugherty | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7160448 | Johnson | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7210581 | Robinson et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7244362 | Binot | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7255793 | Cort | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7276165 | Morgoun | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7309435 | Rozich | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7311841 | Binot et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7323108 | Garbett et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7407582 | Sun | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7407593 | Frederick, Jr. et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7438817 | Nagghappan et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7449105 | Hastings | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7476324 | Ciampi et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7494592 | Deskins | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7563366 | Sun | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7601261 | Palacios Donaque | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7608190 | Banerjee et al. | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7625490 | Cort | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7648637 | Sauvignet et al. | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7648638 | Essemiani et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7651620 | Vion | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7678278 | Binot et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7686079 | Gamache et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7686960 | Cort | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7691261 | Deskins | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7691269 | Cort | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7695623 | Woodard et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7695630 | de Guevara | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7704390 | Leffler et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7704399 | Condit | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7722843 | Srinivasachar | May 2010 | B1 |
7729778 | Eggers et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7820025 | Ciampi et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7820053 | Cort | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7820054 | Hastings et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7828976 | Banerjee et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8012582 | Luo et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8470172 | Woodard et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8506800 | Woodard et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8540877 | Woodard | Sep 2013 | B2 |
20010030160 | Wechsler et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020003115 | Conaway et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020017483 | Chesner et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020030019 | Keever et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020054783 | Gueret | May 2002 | A1 |
20020088758 | Blumenschein et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020148780 | Tiemeyer | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020158025 | Streat | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020170816 | Leffler et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020185452 | Johnson | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020190004 | Wechsler et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030082084 | Cort | May 2003 | A1 |
20030089667 | Binot et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030132160 | Khudenko | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030150817 | Keever et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030222027 | Streat | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030224301 | Howe et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040055959 | Wechsler et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040055961 | Binot | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040060876 | Tipton | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040129642 | Binot | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040144730 | Binot et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040149653 | Johnson et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040206680 | Johnson | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040213721 | Arno et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050005471 | Pan | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050035030 | Oder et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050045534 | Kin et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050051488 | Nagghappan et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050101719 | Ishihara | May 2005 | A1 |
20050103719 | Binot et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050131266 | Carman et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050173354 | Binot et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050194311 | Rozich | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050218056 | Binot | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050230299 | Saho et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050258103 | Cort | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050271575 | Ciampi et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050277712 | Daly | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050282144 | Wechsler et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060006114 | Deskins | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060018273 | Yamada et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060108273 | Perri et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060108283 | Johnson et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060138047 | Morgoun | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060175252 | Upendrakumar et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060186056 | Ivan | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060213832 | Hudson et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060254770 | Hou | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060270888 | Carman et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060289357 | Wechsler et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070039894 | Cort | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070062883 | Frederick et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070108132 | de Guevara | May 2007 | A1 |
20070114184 | Essemiani et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070119776 | Isaka et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070138093 | Bossler et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070163955 | Sun | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080019780 | Hastings | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080073267 | Cort | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080073268 | Cort | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080073270 | Smith | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080073271 | Cort | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080073278 | Cort | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080073279 | Cort | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080073280 | Cort | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080073281 | Cort | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080073282 | Cort | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080073283 | Cort | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080073284 | Cort | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080078721 | Binot et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080135491 | Cort | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080156709 | Johnson | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080164183 | Marston et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080164184 | Marston et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080203015 | Marston et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080217244 | Gaid | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080257810 | Sun | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080272065 | Johnson | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080290030 | Nagghappan et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080296228 | Sauvignet et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080314820 | Prulhiere et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080314830 | Banerjee et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090047076 | Hastings | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090050570 | Sauvignet | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090065404 | Paspek, Jr. et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090084730 | Mabille et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090098262 | Mabille et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090127180 | Deskins | May 2009 | A1 |
20090178979 | Hastings et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090206040 | Berg et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090218281 | Sauvignet et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090261037 | Clifford, III et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090272693 | Mabille et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090299143 | Conlon et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090301948 | Essemiani et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090308815 | Sauvignet et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100038081 | Gamache et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100057085 | Holcomb et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100072142 | Lean et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100096335 | Sauvignet et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100101309 | Klyamkin et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100102006 | Quevillon | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100155327 | Woodard et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100213123 | Marston et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100219372 | Hook et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100251571 | Woodard | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100274209 | Roe et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110036771 | Woodard | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110147304 | Sauvignet et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120067824 | Berg et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20130020255 | Woodard | Jan 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1686862 | Oct 2005 | CN |
101186410 | May 2008 | CN |
101244884 | Aug 2008 | CN |
19600647 | Jul 1997 | DE |
12594 | Jun 1980 | EP |
0087223 | Aug 1983 | EP |
0139572 | May 1985 | EP |
266098 | May 1988 | EP |
392321 | Oct 1990 | EP |
392322 | Oct 1990 | EP |
1244601 | Oct 2002 | EP |
1785400 | May 2007 | EP |
2165980 | Mar 2010 | EP |
1411792 | Sep 1965 | FR |
2378550 | Aug 1978 | FR |
2719235 | Nov 1995 | FR |
07-299495 | Nov 1995 | JP |
08-257583 | Oct 1996 | JP |
11-169866 | Jun 1999 | JP |
2000-233198 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2001-170404 | Jun 2001 | JP |
2003-010874 | Jan 2003 | JP |
1136839 | Jan 1985 | SU |
9312041 | Jun 1993 | WO |
9735654 | Oct 1997 | WO |
9735655 | Oct 1997 | WO |
9803433 | Jan 1998 | WO |
9919261 | Apr 1999 | WO |
9931016 | Jun 1999 | WO |
0114260 | Mar 2001 | WO |
0128931 | Apr 2001 | WO |
0140121 | Jun 2001 | WO |
0200556 | Jan 2002 | WO |
0242223 | May 2002 | WO |
2005077835 | Aug 2005 | WO |
2005087381 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2006086384 | Aug 2006 | WO |
2006102362 | Sep 2006 | WO |
2007059141 | May 2007 | WO |
2007098298 | Aug 2007 | WO |
2008022192 | Feb 2008 | WO |
2008039711 | Apr 2008 | WO |
2008039936 | Apr 2008 | WO |
2008085196 | Jul 2008 | WO |
2008085197 | Jul 2008 | WO |
2008086009 | Jul 2008 | WO |
2008086010 | Jul 2008 | WO |
2009083346 | Jul 2009 | WO |
2010027895 | Mar 2010 | WO |
2010081903 | Jul 2010 | WO |
2010086249 | Aug 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Buchanan et al., “Aerobic Treatment of Wastewater and Aerobic Treatment Units,” University Curriculum Development for Decentralized Wastewater Management Aerobic Treatment of Wastewater and Aerobic Treatment Units Buchanan and Seabloom, p. i-v and 1-22, Nov. 2004, [Retrieved on Mar. 9, 2011]. |
Catlow et al. “Ballasted Biological Treatment Process Removes Nutrients and Doubles Plant Capacity”. WEFTEC Conference. Date Unkown. |
Kolm et al., “High Gradient Magnetic Separation,” Scientific American, Nov. 1975, vol. 233, No. 5, 10 pages (unnumbered). |
Lubenow et al. “Maximizing Nutrient Removal in an Existing SBR with a Full-Scale BioMag Demonstration”. WEFTEC Conference. Date Unknown. |
Moody et al. “Beyond Desktop Evaluation: Key Design Criteria for Mixing and Settling of Magnetite-Impregnated Mixed Liquor”. WEFTEC Conference 2011. |
Raskin et al., “Quantification of Methanogenic Groups in Anaerobic Biological Reactors by Oligonucleotide Probe Hybridization,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Apr. 1994, vol. 60, No. 4, pp. 1241-1248. |
Sakai et al., “A Sewage Treatment Process Using Highly Condensed Activated Sludge with an Apparatus for Magnetic Separation,” 1994, Journal of Fermentation and Bioengineering, vol. 78, No. 1, pp. 120-122. |
Sakai et al., “Magnetic Forced Sedimentation of Flocs in Activated Sludge Supplemented with Ferromagnetic Powder of Iron Oxide,” 1991, Journal of Fermentation and Bioengineering, vol. 71, No. 3, pp. 208-210. |
Sakai et al., “Recovery and Reuse of Ferromagnetic Powder Supplemented in Activated Sludge for Magnetic Separation,” Dept. of Applied Chemistry, Faculty of Engineering, Utsunomiya University, Japan, Submitted: Jun. 28, 1991; Accepted: Oct. 22, 1991, pp. 1-11. Japanese language original (pp. 52-56), and translated English language copy (pp. 1-11). |
Sakai et al., “Sewage Treatment under Conditions of Balancing Microbial Growth and Cell Decay with a High Concentration of Activated Sludge Supplemented with Ferromagnetic Powder,” 1992, Journal of Fermentation and Bioengineering, vol. 74, No. 6, pp. 413-315. |
Sakai et al., “Simultaneous Removal of Organic and Nitrogen Compounds in Intermittently Aerated Activated Sludge Process Using Magnetic Separation,” 1997, Technical Note Wat. Res., vol. 31, No. 8, pp. 2113-2116. |
http://www.envirosim.com/includes/weftec08.htm, downloaded Dec. 16, 2012. |
Tozer, “Study of Five Phosphorus Removal Processes,” The Georgia Operator, vol. 45, No. (Winter 2008). |
www.ingentaconnect.com/content/wef/wefproc/2009/00002009/00000004/art0020, downloaded Dec. 16, 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080210613 A1 | Sep 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60879429 | Jan 2007 | US |