The disclosure relates generally to computer networks. More specifically, certain embodiments of the technology relate to a method and system for mapping application dependency information.
Network infrastructure management is important for business and organizations. To track application dependencies, IT management has relied on conventional techniques such as spreadsheets. But the proliferation of virtualized data centers and cloud services has made it increasingly difficult to track dependencies using traditional methods.
For example, traditional IT management technologies are unable to map individual application and specifically unable to discover which computing component supports each application. As businesses have attempted to utilize IT management systems for more complex business and application management, they have discovered that this is a very manual process, involving constant maintenance and complex programming.
In order to describe the manner in which the above-recited and other advantages and features of the disclosure can be obtained, a more particular description of the principles briefly described above will be rendered by reference to specific examples thereof which are illustrated in the appended drawings. Understanding that these drawings depict only examples of the disclosure and are not therefore to be considered to be limiting of its scope, the principles herein are described and explained with additional specificity and detail through the use of the accompanying drawings in which:
Various embodiments of the present technology are discussed in detail below. While specific implementations are discussed, it should be understood that this is done for illustration purposes only. A person skilled in the relevant art will recognize that other components and configurations may be used without departing from the spirit and scope of the present technology.
Overview
Aspects of the present technology relate to techniques that enable user-adjustable application dependency mapping of a network system. By collecting internal network data using various sensors in conjunction with external user inputs, the present technology can provide user optimized application dependency mapping.
In accordance with one aspect of the present disclosure, a computer-implemented method is provided. The method includes receiving network data using a plurality of sensors associated with a plurality of nodes of a network, generating, based at least in part on the network data, a first application dependency map of an application executing in the network, the first dependency map representing an application network topology, receiving, via a user interface, an adjustment to an input parameter of the network, generating a second application dependency map of the application, the second dependency map representing an updated network topology, and displaying at least a portion of the second application dependency map.
According to some embodiments, the present technology can enable a system comprising: one or more processors, and memory including instructions that, upon being executed by the one or more processors, cause the system to receive network data using a plurality of sensors associated with a plurality of nodes of a network, the plurality of sensors including at least a first sensor of a physical switch, a second sensor of a hypervisor associated with the physical switch, and a third sensor of a virtual machine associated with the hypervisor, generate, based at least in part on the network data, a first clustering of the plurality of nodes, receive, via a user interface, an adjustment to an input parameter of the network, generate a second clustering of the plurality of nodes based at least in part on the adjustment, and display at least a portion of data related to the second clustering.
In accordance with another aspect of the present disclosure, a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing instructions is provided, the instructions which, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to perform operations including, receive network data using a plurality of sensors associated with a plurality of nodes of a network, generate, based at least in part on the network data, a first application dependency map of an application executing in the network, the first dependency map representing an application network topology, receive, via a user interface, an adjustment to an input parameter of the network, generate a second application dependency map of the application, the second dependency map representing an updated network topology, and display at least a portion of the second application dependency map.
Although many of the examples herein are described with reference to the application dependency mapping and discovery, it should be understood that these are only examples and the present technology is not limited in this regard. Rather, any other network information applications may be realized. Additionally, even though the present disclosure uses a sensor as a data-collecting device, the present technology is applicable to other controller or device that is capable of review, record and report network communication data between various end groups.
Additional features and advantages of the disclosure will be set forth in the description which follows, and, in part, will be obvious from the description, or can be learned by practice of the herein disclosed principles. The features and advantages of the disclosure can be realized and obtained by means of the instruments and combinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims. These and other features of the disclosure will become more fully apparent from the following description and appended claims, or can be learned by the practice of the principles set forth herein.
Configuration/image manager 102 can configure and manage sensors 104. For example, when a new virtual machine is instantiated or when an existing virtual machine is migrated, configuration/image manager 102 can provision and configure a new sensor on the virtual machine. According to some embodiments, configuration/image manager 102 can monitor the physical status or healthy of sensors 104. For example, configuration/image manager 102 might request status updates or initiate tests. According to some embodiments, configuration/image manager 102 also manages and provisions virtual machines.
According to some embodiments, configuration/image manager 102 can verify and validate sensors 104. For example, sensors 104 can be provisioned with a unique ID that is generated using a one-way hash function of its basic input/output system (BIOS) universally unique identifier (UUID) and a secret key stored on configuration and image manager 102. This unique ID can be a large number that is difficult for an imposter sensor to guess. According to some embodiments, configuration/image manager 102 can keep sensors 104 up to date by installing new versions of their software and applying patches. Configuration/image manager 102 can get these updates from a local source or automatically from a remote source via internet.
Sensors 104 can be associated with each node and component of a data center (e.g., virtual machine, hypervisor, slice, blade, switch, router, gateway, etc.). Sensors 104 can monitor communications to and from the component, report on environmental data related to the component (e.g., component IDs, statuses, etc.), and perform actions related to the component (e.g., shut down a process, block ports, redirect traffic, etc.). Sensors 104 can send their records over a high-bandwidth connection to the collectors 122 for storage.
Sensors 104 can comprise software codes (e.g., running on virtual machine 106, container 112, or hypervisor 108), an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC 110, e.g., a component of a switch, gateway, router, or standalone packet monitor), or an independent unit (e.g., a device connected to a switch's monitoring port or a device connected in series along a main trunk of a datacenter). For clarity and simplicity in this description, the term “component” is used to denote a component of the network (i.e., a process, module, slice, blade, hypervisor, machine, switch, router, gateway, etc.). It should be understood that various software and hardware configurations can be used as sensors 104. Sensors 104 can be lightweight, minimally impeding normal traffic and compute resources in a datacenter. Software sensors 104 can “sniff” packets being sent over its host network interface card (NIC) or individual processes can be configured to report traffic to sensors 104.
According to some embodiments, sensors 104 reside on every virtual machine, hypervisor, switch, etc. This layered sensor structure allows for granular packet statistics and data collection at each hop of data transmission. In some embodiments, sensors 104 are not installed in certain places. For example, in a shared hosting environment, customers may have exclusive control of VMs, thus preventing network administrators from installing a sensor on those client-specific VMs.
As sensors 104 capture communications, they can continuously send network flow data to collectors 122. The network flow data can relate to a packet, collection of packets, flow, group of flows, open ports, port knocks, etc. The network flow data can also include other details such as the VM bios ID, sensor ID, associated process ID, associated process name, process user name, sensor private key, geo-location of sensor, environmental details, etc. The network flow data can comprise data describing the communication on all layers of the OSI model. For example, the network flow data can include Ethernet signal strength, source/destination MAC address, source/destination IP address, protocol, port number, encryption data, requesting process, a sample packet, etc.
Sensors 104 can preprocess network flow data before sending. For example, sensors 104 can remove extraneous or duplicative data or create a summary of the data (e.g., latency, packets and bytes sent per traffic flow, flagging abnormal activity, etc.). According to some embodiments, sensors 104 are configured to selectively capture certain types of connection information while disregarding the rest. Further, as it can be overwhelming for a system to capture every packet, sensors can be configured to capture only a representative sample of packets (for example, every 1,000th packet). According to some embodiments, sensors 104 can generate aggregate network flow data that has been subjected to processing, rendering it light-weighted for subsequent transmitting and processing.
According to some embodiments, sensors 104 can perform various actions with regard to the associated network component. For example, a sensor installed on a VM can close, quarantine, restart, or throttle a process executing on the VM. Sensors 104 can create and enforce policies (e.g., block access to ports, protocols, or addresses). According to some embodiments, sensors 104 receive instructions to perform such actions; alternatively, sensors 104 can act autonomously without external direction.
Sensors 104 can send network flow data to one or more collectors 122. Sensors 104 can be assigned to send network flow data to a primary collector and a secondary collector. In some embodiments, sensors 104 are not assigned a collector, but determine an optimal collector through a discovery process. Sensors 104 can change a destination for the report if its environment changes. For example, if a certain collector experiences failure or if a sensor is migrated to a new location that is close to a different collector. According to some embodiments, sensors 104 send different network flow data to different collectors. For example, sensors 104 can send a first report related to one type of process to a first collector, and send a second report related to another type of process to a second collector.
Collectors 122 can be any type of storage medium that can serve as a repository for the data recorded by the sensors. According to some embodiments, collectors 122 are directly connected to the top of rack (TOR) switch; alternatively, collectors 122 can be located near the end of row or elsewhere on or off premises. The placement of collectors 122 can be optimized according to various priorities such as network capacity, cost, and system responsiveness. According to some embodiments, data storage of collectors 122 is located in an in-memory database such as dash DB by IBM. This approach benefits from rapid random access speeds that typically are required for analytics software. Alternatively, collectors 122 can utilize solid state drives, disk drives, magnetic tape drives, or a combination of the foregoing according to cost, responsiveness, and size requirements. Collectors 122 can utilize various database structures such as a normalized relational database or NoSQL database.
According to some embodiments, collectors 122 serve as network storage for application dependency mapping system 100. Additionally, collectors 122 can organize, summarize, and preprocess the collected data. For example, collectors 122 can tabulate how often packets of certain sizes or types are transmitted from different virtual machines. Collectors 122 can also characterize the traffic flows going to and from various network components. According to some embodiments, collectors 122 can match packets based on sequence numbers, thus identifying traffic flows as well as connection links.
According to some embodiments, collectors 122 flag anomalous data. Because it would be inefficient to retain all data indefinitely, collectors 122 can routinely replace detailed network flow data with consolidated summaries. In this manner, collectors 122 can retain a complete dataset describing one period (e.g., the past minute), with a smaller report of another period (e.g., the previous), and progressively consolidated network flow data of other times (day, week, month, year, etc.). By organizing, summarizing, and preprocessing the data, collectors 122 can help application dependency mapping system 100 scale efficiently. Although collectors 122 are generally herein referred to as a plural noun, a single machine or cluster of machines are contemplated to be sufficient, especially for smaller datacenters. In some embodiments, collectors 122 serve as sensors 104 as well.
According to some embodiments, in addition to data from sensors 104, collectors 122 can receive other types of data. For example, collectors 122 can receive out-of-band data 114 that includes, for example, geolocation data 116, IP watch lists 118, and WhoIs data 120. Additional out-of-band data can include power status, temperature data, etc.
Configuration/image manager 102 can configure and manage sensors 104. When a new virtual machine is instantiated or when an existing one is migrated, configuration and image manager 102 can provision and configure a new sensor on the machine. In some embodiments configuration and image manager 102 can monitor the health of sensors 104. For example, configuration and image manager 102 might request status updates or initiate tests. In some embodiments, configuration and image manager 102 also manages and provisions virtual machines.
Analytics module 124 can accomplish various tasks in its analysis, some of which are herein disclosed. By processing data stored in various collectors 122, analytics module 124 can automatically generate an application dependency map, which depicts the physical and logical dependencies of the application components, as well as the dependencies of the components on the underlying infrastructure resources. The application dependency map can identify, for example, communication paths between the nodes, the ports used for communication (e.g., TCP ports), as well as the processes executing on the nodes. This map can be instructive when analytics module 124 attempts to determine the root cause of a failure (because failure of one component can cascade and cause failure of its dependent components) or when analytics module 124 attempts to predict what will happen if a component is taken offline. Additionally, analytics module 124 can associate edges of an application dependency map with expected latency, bandwidth, etc. for that individual edge.
For example, if component A routinely sends data to component B, but component B never sends data to component A, then analytics module 124 can determine that component B is dependent on component A, but A is likely not dependent on component B. If, however, component B also sends data to component A, then they are likely interdependent. These components can be processes, virtual machines, hypervisors, VLANs, etc. Once analytics module 124 has determined component dependencies, it can then form an application dependency map that represents the application network topology.
Similarly, using data provided from sensors 104, analytics module 124 can determine relationships between interdependent applications, analytics module 124 can determine what type of devices exist on the network (brand and model of switches, gateways, machines, etc.), where they are physically located (e.g., latitude and longitude, building, datacenter, room, row, rack, machine, etc.), how they are interconnected (10 Gb Ethernet, fiber-optic, etc.), and what the strength of each connection is (bandwidth, latency, etc.). Automatically determining the network topology can facilitate integrating of application dependency mapping system 100 within an established datacenter. Furthermore, analytics module 124 can detect changes of network topology without the needed of further configuration.
Analytics module 124 can establish patterns and norms for component behavior. Analytics module 124 can determine that certain processes (when functioning normally) will only send a certain amount of traffic to a certain VM using a small set of ports. Analytics module 124 can establish these norms by analyzing individual components or by analyzing data coming from similar components (e.g., VMs with similar configurations). Similarly, analytics module 124 can determine expectations for network operations. For example, it can determine the expected latency between two components, the expected throughput of a component, response time of a component, typical packet sizes, traffic flow signatures, etc. In some embodiments, analytics module 124 can combine its dependency map with pattern analysis to create reaction expectations. For example, if traffic increases with one component, other components may predictably increase traffic in response (or latency, compute time, etc.).
According to some embodiments, analytics module 124 uses machine learning techniques to identify which patterns are policy-compliant or unwanted or harmful. For example, a network administrator can indicate network states corresponding to an attack and network states corresponding to normal operation. Analytics module 124 can then analyze the data to determine which patterns most correlate with the network being in a complaint or non-compliant state. According to some embodiments, the network can operate within a trusted environment for a time so that analytics module 124 can establish baseline normalcy. According to some embodiments, analytics module 124 contains a database of norms and expectations for various components. This database can incorporate data from sources external to the network. Analytics module 124 can then create network security policies for how components can interact. According to some embodiments, when policies are determined external to system 100, analytics module 124 can detect the policies and incorporate them into this framework. A network administrator can manually tweak the network security policies. For example, network security policies can be dynamically changed and be conditional on events. These policies can be enforced on the components. ADM policy engine 126 can maintain these network security policies and receive user input to change the policies.
ADM policy engine 126 can configure analytics module 124 to establish what network security policies exist or should be maintained. For example, ADM policy engine 126 may specify that certain machines should not intercommunicate or that certain ports are restricted. A network policy controller can set the parameters of ADM policy engine 126. According to some embodiments, ADM policy engine 126 is accessible via presentation module 128.
According to some embodiments, analytics module 124 can determine similarity scores for the nodes, which indicate similarity levels among the plurality of nodes. Presentation module 128 can display the similarity scores on a user interface. Further, the system can generate node clusters based on the similarity levels of the node, e.g. nodes sharing a high similarity score (e.g., higher than a selected threshold) are associated with one node cluster.
Presentation module 128 can comprise serving layer 129 and user interface (UI) 130 that is operable to display, for example, information related to the application dependency map. As analytics module 124 analyzes the aggregate network flow data, they may not be in a human-readable form or they may be too large for an administrator to navigate. Presentation module 128 can take the network flow data generated by analytics module 124 and further summarize, filter, and organize the network flow data as well as create intuitive presentations of the network flow data.
Serving layer 129 can be the interface between presentation module 128 and analytics module 124. As analytics module 124 generates node attributes, serving layer 129 can summarize, filter, and organize the attributes that comes from analytics module 124. According to some embodiments, serving layer 129 can request raw data from a sensor, collector, or analytics module 124.
UI 130 can connect with serving layer 129 to present the data in a page for human presentation. For example, UI 130 can present the data in bar charts, core charts, tree maps, acyclic dependency maps, line graphs, tables, etc. UI 130 can be configured to allow a user to “drill down” on information sets to get a filtered data representation specific to the item the user wishes to “drill down” to. For example, individual traffic flows, components, etc. UI 130 can also be configured to allow a user to filter by search. This search filter can use natural language processing to determine analyze the network administrator's input. There can be options to view data relative to the current second, minute, hour, day, etc. UI 130 can allow a network administrator to view traffic flows, application dependency maps, network topology, etc.
According to some embodiments, UI 130 can receive inputs from a network administrator to adjust configurations in application dependency mapping system 100 or components of the datacenter. These instructions can be passed through serving layer 129, sent to configuration/image manager 102, or sent to analytics module 124.
After receiving an adjustment to an input parameter, analytics module 124 can generated an updated application dependency map using the adjusted parameters. For example, the user can remove or add a node from a selected node cluster and rerun the node clustering, or an application dependency mapping (ADM) pipeline. The user can define a period of time for generating the updated application dependency map, for example, Aug. 1, 2012-Aug. 14, 2012. The user can also create/name a new workspace, select nodes for generating the updated map, and upload side information, e.g., routs/subnets, load balancer information, for generating the map. Additionally, the user can, while adjusting part of the cluster parameters, approve or preserver certain cluster so that they are not subjected to re-runs.
Further, the user can adjust the clustering granularity, for example, via a knob or a selectable element on UI 130. The clustering granularity can generated a preferred number of node clusters. For example, a coarse-grained system with a low granularity comprises fewer clusters of nodes, whereas a fine-grained system with a higher granularity comprises more clusters of nodes.
With the updated application dependency mapping completed, the user can view network information on UI 130. For example, such information includes statistics of the network, number/name of the node clusters, port information related to nodes, comparison summary between the last ADM to the recent ADM.
Additionally, the various elements of application dependency mapping system 100 can exist in various configurations. For example, collectors 122 can be a component of sensors 104. In some embodiments, additional elements can share certain portion of computation to ease the load of analytics module 124.
Spine switches 202 can support various capabilities, such as 40 or 10 Gbps Ethernet speeds. Spine switches 202 can include one or more 40 Gigabit Ethernet ports, each of which can also be split to support other speeds. For example, a 40 Gigabit Ethernet port can be split into four 10 Gigabit Ethernet ports.
Leaf switches 204 can reside at the edge of network fabric 201, thus representing the physical network edge. According to some embodiments, the leaf switches 204 can be top-of-rack switches configured according to a top-of-rack architecture. According to some embodiments, the leaf switches 204 can be aggregation switches in any particular topology, such as end-of-row or middle-of-row topologies. The leaf switches 204 can also represent aggregation switches.
Leaf switches 204 can be responsible for routing and/or bridging the tenant packets and applying network policies. According to some embodiments, a leaf switch can perform one or more additional functions, such as implementing a mapping cache, sending packets to the proxy function when there is a miss in the cache, encapsulate packets, enforce ingress or egress policies, etc.
Network connectivity in network fabric 201 can flow through the leaf switches 204. For example, leaf switches 204 can provide servers, resources, endpoints, external networks, or VMs network access to network fabric 201. According to some embodiments, leaf switches 204 can connect one or more end point groups to network fabric 201 or any external networks. Each end point group can connect to network fabric 201 via one of leaf switches 204.
Endpoints 218a-218d (collectively “218”) can connect to network fabric 201 via leaf switches 204. For example, endpoints 218a and 218b can connect directly to leaf switch 204A. On the other hand, endpoints 218 and 218d can connect to leaf switch 204b via L1 network 208. Similarly, wide area network (WAN) 220 can connect to leaf switches 204n via L2 network 210.
Endpoints 218 can include any communication device or component, such as a node, computer, server, blade, hypervisor, virtual machine, container, process (e.g., running on a virtual machine), switch, router, gateway, etc. According to some embodiments, endpoints 218 can include a server, hypervisor, process, or switch configured with a VTEP functionality which connects an overlay network with network fabric 201. The overlay network can host physical devices, such as servers, applications, EPGs, virtual segments, virtual workloads, etc. In addition, endpoints 218 can host virtual workload(s), clusters, and applications or services, which can connect with network fabric 201 or any other device or network, including an external network. For example, one or more endpoints 218 can host, or connect to, a cluster of load balancers or an end point group of various applications.
Sensors 206a-206h (collectively “206) can be associated with each node and component of a data center (e.g., virtual machine, hypervisor, slice, blade, switch, router, gateway, etc.). As illustrated in
Sensors 206 can preprocess network flow data before sending. For example, sensors 206 can remove extraneous or duplicative data or create a summary of the data (e.g., latency, packets and bytes sent per traffic flow, flagging abnormal activity, etc.). According to some embodiments, sensors 206 are configured to selectively capture certain types of connection information while disregarding the rest. Further, as it can be overwhelming for a system to capture every packet, sensors can be configured to capture only a representative sample of packets (for example, every 1,000th packet).
According to some embodiments, sensors 206 can perform various actions with regard to the associated network component. For example, a sensor installed on a VM can close, quarantine, restart, or throttle a process executing on the VM. Sensors 206 can create and enforce security policies (e.g., block access to ports, protocols, or addresses). According to some embodiments, sensors 206 receive instructions to perform such actions; alternatively, sensors 104 can act autonomously without external direction.
Sensors 206 can send network flow data to one or more collectors 212. Sensors 206 can be assigned to send network flow data to a primary collector and a secondary collector. In some embodiments, sensors 206 are not assigned a collector, but determine an optimal collector through a discovery process. Sensors 206 can change a destination for the report if its environment changes. For example, if a certain collector experiences failure or if a sensor is migrated to a new location that is close to a different collector. According to some embodiments, sensors 206 send different network flow data to different collectors. For example, sensors 206 can send a first report related to one type of process to a first collector, and send a second report related to another type of process to a second collector.
Collectors 212 can be any type of storage medium that can serve as a repository for the data recorded by the sensors. Collectors 212 can be connected to network fabric 201 via one or more network interfaces. Collectors 212 can be located near the end of row or elsewhere on or off premises. The placement of collectors 212 can be optimized according to various priorities such as network capacity, cost, and system responsiveness. Although collectors 122 are generally herein referred to as a plural noun, a single machine or cluster of machines are contemplated to be sufficient, especially for smaller datacenters. In some embodiments, collectors 122 serve as sensors 202 as well.
According to some embodiments, collectors 212 serve as network storage for network flow data. Additionally, collectors 212 can organize, summarize, and preprocess the collected data. For example, collectors 212 can tabulate how often packets of certain sizes or types are transmitted from different virtual machines. Collectors 212 can also characterize the traffic flows going to and from various network components. According to some embodiments, collectors 212 can match packets based on sequence numbers, thus identifying traffic flows as well as connection links.
Analytics module 214 can automatically generate an application dependency map, which depicts the physical and logical dependencies of the application components, as well as the dependencies of the components on the underlying infrastructure resources. The application dependency map can identify, for example, communication paths between the nodes, the ports used for communication, as well as the processes executing on the nodes. This map can be instructive when analytics module 214 attempts to determine the root cause of a failure (because failure of one component can cascade and cause failure of its dependent components) or when analytics module 214 attempts to predict what will happen if a component is taken offline. Additionally, analytics module 214 can associate edges of an application dependency map with expected latency, bandwidth, etc. for that individual edge.
Similarly, using data provided from sensors 206, analytics module 214 can determine relationships between interdependent applications, analytics module 214 can determine what type of devices exist on the network (brand and model of switches, gateways, machines, etc.), where they are physically located (e.g., latitude and longitude, building, datacenter, room, row, rack, machine, etc.), how they are interconnected (10 Gb Ethernet, fiber-optic, etc.), and what the strength of each connection is (bandwidth, latency, etc.). Automatically determining the network topology can facilitate integrating of application dependency mapping system 200 within an established datacenter. Furthermore, analytics module 214 can detect changes of network topology without the needed of further configuration.
According to some embodiments, analytics module 214 can determine similarity scores for the nodes, which indicate similarity levels among the plurality of nodes. Presentation module 222 can display the similarity scores on a user interface. Further, the system can generate node clusters based on the similarity levels of the node, e.g. nodes sharing a high similarity score (e.g., higher than a selected threshold) are associated with one node cluster.
According to some embodiments, the application dependency mapping system can enable re-runs of application dependent mapping to implement various adjustments to the system. For example, a system administrator can make one or more adjustments, e.g. editing the size of the clusters, changing data-capturing time, to optimize the system performance. Analytics module 214 can compare the re-run data with the original data to summarize the recent adjustments, e.g. by matching the clusters with a matching algorithm. Additionally, presentation module 222 can display the summary of the changes on a user interface. This feature can help the administrator or user to track the implemented changes, make necessary adjustments, and improve system performance.
Application dependent mapping 300 illustrates 1 zone 302 that include a number of nodes with 0 applications (304) executing on them. These nodes are divided to 12 clusters (306) having 43 conversations (308). There are 24 endpoints (310) having 21 policies (312).
As shown in
As shown in
Source cluster 326 can include a search tab 320 to allow an administrator to “drill down” on information sets to get a filtered data representation. This search filter can use natural language processing to determine analyze the administrator's input. There can be options to view data relative to the current second, minute, hour, day, etc. Similarly, target cluster 318 can include a search tab 334 to perform similar functions.
When selecting Pascal data nodes 328, the user can modify network parameters related to this node cluster. For example, the user can modify the cluster's name via selecting modify cluster name tab 346, which enables the user to change the cluster name. The user can also modify node cluster description via selecting modify description tab 348, e.g. to define selected nodes for executing processes. Further, the user can edit parameters related to endpoints (2) 350 neighbors (3) 352 and subnets (0) 354.
The user can define a period of time for generating the updated application dependency map, for example, from a first time 416 to a second time 418 (e.g., Aug. 1, 2012-Aug. 8, 2012). The user can adjust the clustering granularity, for example, via a knob 420 or a selectable element, which can generate a preferred number of node clusters. For example, a coarse-grained system with a low granularity comprises fewer clusters of nodes, whereas a fine-grained system with a higher granularity comprises more clusters of nodes. Additionally, the user can also create/name a new workspace, select nodes for generating the updated map, and upload side information, e.g., routs/subnets, load balancer information, for generating the map. The user can, while adjusting part of the cluster parameters, approve or preserver certain cluster so that they are not subjected to re-runs.
After completing the adjustments, the user can select submit ADM run tab 422 for implementing the adjustments. With the ADM rerun completed, the user can view information including statistics of the network, number/name of the node clusters, port information related to nodes, comparison summary between the last ADM to the recent ADM. For example, to compare two ADMs, cluster statistics can be calculated to show 1) the number of clusters that is added, 2) the number of clusters that is removed, 3) the number of existing clusters that are modified, and 4) the number of clusters remain unchanged, etc.
At step 502, an application dependency mapping system can receive receiving network data using a plurality of sensors associated with a plurality of nodes of a network. The plurality of sensors includes at least a first sensor of a physical switch of the network, a second sensor of a hypervisor associated with the physical switch, a third sensor of a virtual machine associated with the hypervisor. For example, as illustrated in
At step 504, the application dependency mapping system can generate, based at least in part on the network data, a first application dependency map of an application executing in the network, the first dependency map representing an application network topology. For example, by analyzing aggregate network flow data, analytics module 214 can automatically generate an application dependency map, which can identify, for example, communication paths between the nodes, the ports used for communication, as well as the processes executing on the nodes. This map can be instructive when analytics module 214 attempts to determine the root cause of a failure (because failure of one component can cascade and cause failure of its dependent components) or when analytics module 214 attempts to predict what will happen if a component is taken offline. Additionally, analytics module 214 can associate edges of an application dependency map with expected latency, bandwidth, etc. for that individual edge.
According to some embodiments, analytics module 214 can determine similarity scores for the nodes, which indicate similarity levels among the plurality of nodes. Further, the system can generate node clusters based on the similarity levels of the node, e.g. nodes sharing a high similarity score (e.g., higher than a selected threshold) are associated with one node cluster.
Analytics module 214 can create network security policies for how components can interact. A network administrator can manually tweak the network security policies. For example, network security policies can be dynamically changed and be conditional on events. These policies can be enforced on the components. ADM policy engine can maintain these network security policies and receive user input to change the policies.
At step 506, the application dependency mapping system can receive, via a user interface, an adjustment to an input parameter of the network. For example, the user can remove or add a node from a selected node cluster and rerun the node clustering, or an application dependency mapping pipeline. The user can define a period of time for generating the updated application dependency map. The user can also create/name a new workspace, select nodes for generating the updated map, and upload side information, e.g., routs/subnets, load balancer information, for generating the map. The user can also approve or preserve certain cluster so that they are not subjected to re-runs and consume system resources. For example, the system can receive a user approval for a clustering of nodes and prevent changes to the cluster of nodes in terms of node membership statuses.
At step 508, the application dependency mapping system can generate a second application dependency map of the application, the second dependency map representing an updated network topology. According to some embodiments, the application dependency mapping system can enable re-runs or revision of an application dependent mapping to implement various adjustments to the system.
At step 510, the application dependency mapping system can display at least a portion of the second application dependency map. For example, with the ADM rerun completed, the user can view information including statistics of the network, number/name of the node clusters, port information related to nodes, comparison summary between the last ADM to the recent ADM. Cluster statistics can include 1) the number of clusters that is added, 2) the number of clusters that is removed, 3) the number of existing clusters that are modified, and 4) the number of clusters remain unchanged, etc.
To enable user interaction with the computing device 600, an input device 645 can represent any number of input mechanisms, such as a microphone for speech, a touch-sensitive screen for gesture or graphical input, keyboard, mouse, motion input, speech and so forth. An output device 635 can also be one or more of a number of output mechanisms known to those of skill in the art. In some instances, multimodal systems can enable a user to provide multiple types of input to communicate with the computing device 600. The communications interface 640 can generally govern and manage the user input and system output. There is no restriction on operating on any particular hardware arrangement and therefore the basic features here may easily be substituted for improved hardware or firmware arrangements as they are developed.
Storage device 630 is a non-volatile memory and can be a hard disk or other types of computer readable media which can store data that are accessible by a computer, such as magnetic cassettes, flash memory cards, solid state memory devices, digital versatile disks, cartridges, random access memories (RAMs) 625, read only memory (ROM) 620, and hybrids thereof.
The storage device 630 can include software modules 632, 634, 636 for controlling the processor 610. Other hardware or software modules are contemplated. The storage device 630 can be connected to the system bus 605. In one aspect, a hardware module that performs a particular function can include the software component stored in a computer-readable medium in connection with the necessary hardware components, such as the processor 610, bus 605, output device 635, and so forth, to carry out the function.
Chipset 660 can also interface with one or more communication interfaces 690 that can have different physical interfaces. Such communication interfaces can include interfaces for wired and wireless local area networks, for broadband wireless networks, as well as personal area networks. Some applications of the methods for generating, displaying, and using the GUI disclosed herein can include receiving ordered datasets over the physical interface or be generated by the machine itself by processor 655 analyzing data stored in storage 670 or 675. Further, the machine can receive inputs from a user via user interface components 685 and execute appropriate functions, such as browsing functions by interpreting these inputs using processor 655.
It can be appreciated that example systems 600 and 650 can have more than one processor 610 or be part of a group or cluster of computing devices networked together to provide greater processing capability.
For clarity of explanation, in some instances the present technology may be presented as including individual functional blocks including functional blocks comprising devices, device components, steps or routines in a method embodied in software, or combinations of hardware and software.
In some embodiments the computer-readable storage devices, mediums, and memories can include a cable or wireless signal containing a bit stream and the like. However, when mentioned, non-transitory computer-readable storage media expressly exclude media such as energy, carrier signals, electromagnetic waves, and signals per se.
Methods according to the above-described examples can be implemented using computer-executable instructions that are stored or otherwise available from computer readable media. Such instructions can comprise, for example, instructions and data which cause or otherwise configure a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, or special purpose processing device to perform a certain function or group of functions. Portions of computer resources used can be accessible over a network. The computer executable instructions may be, for example, binaries, intermediate format instructions such as assembly language, firmware, or source code. Examples of computer-readable media that may be used to store instructions, information used, and/or information created during methods according to described examples include magnetic or optical disks, flash memory, USB devices provided with non-volatile memory, networked storage devices, and so on.
Devices implementing methods according to these disclosures can comprise hardware, firmware and/or software, and can take any of a variety of form factors. Typical examples of such form factors include laptops, smart phones, small form factor personal computers, personal digital assistants, rackmount devices, standalone devices, and so on. Functionality described herein also can be embodied in peripherals or add-in cards. Such functionality can also be implemented on a circuit board among different chips or different processes executing in a single device, by way of further example.
The instructions, media for conveying such instructions, computing resources for executing them, and other structures for supporting such computing resources are means for providing the functions described in these disclosures.
Although a variety of examples and other information was used to explain aspects within the scope of the appended claims, no limitation of the claims should be implied based on particular features or arrangements in such examples, as one of ordinary skill would be able to use these examples to derive a wide variety of implementations. Further and although some subject matter may have been described in language specific to examples of structural features and/or method steps, it is to be understood that the subject matter defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to these described features or acts. For example, such functionality can be distributed differently or performed in components other than those identified herein. Rather, the described features and steps are disclosed as examples of components of systems and methods within the scope of the appended claims. Moreover, claim language reciting “at least one of” a set indicates that one member of the set or multiple members of the set satisfy the claim.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application 62/171,899, titled “System for Monitoring and Managing Datacenters” and filed at Jun. 5, 2015, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5086385 | Launey et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5319754 | Meinecke et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5400246 | Wilson et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5436909 | Dev et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5555416 | Owens et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5726644 | Jednacz et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5742829 | Davis et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5822731 | Schultz | Oct 1998 | A |
5831848 | Rielly et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5903545 | Sabourin et al. | May 1999 | A |
6012096 | Link et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6141595 | Gloudeman et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6144962 | Weinberg et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6239699 | Ronnen | May 2001 | B1 |
6247058 | Miller et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6249241 | Jordan et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6330562 | Boden et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6353775 | Nichols | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6525658 | Streetman et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6546420 | Lemler et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6597663 | Rekhter | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6611896 | Mason, Jr. et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6654750 | Adams et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6728779 | Griffin et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6801878 | Hintz et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6816461 | Scrandis et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6847993 | Novaes et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6848106 | Hipp | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6925490 | Novaes et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6958998 | Shorey | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6983323 | Cantrell et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6996817 | Birum et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
6999452 | Drummond-Murray et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7002464 | Bruemmer et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7024468 | Meyer et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7096368 | Kouznetsov et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7111055 | Falkner | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7120934 | Ishikawa | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7133923 | MeLampy et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7162643 | Sankaran et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7181769 | Keanini et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7185103 | Jain | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7203740 | Putzolu et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7302487 | Ylonen et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7337206 | Wen et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7349761 | Cruse | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7353511 | Ziese | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7356679 | Le et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7360072 | Soltis et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7370092 | Aderton et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7395195 | Suenbuel et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7444404 | Wetherall et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7466681 | Ashwood-Smith et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7467205 | Dempster et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7496040 | Seo | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7496575 | Buccella et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7530105 | Gilbert et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7539770 | Meier | May 2009 | B2 |
7568107 | Rathi et al. | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7610330 | Quinn et al. | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7633942 | Bearden et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7644438 | Dash et al. | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7676570 | Levy et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7681131 | Quarterman et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7693947 | Judge et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7743242 | Oberhaus et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7752307 | Takara | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7774498 | Kraemer et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7783457 | Cunningham | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7787480 | Mehta et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7788477 | Huang et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7808897 | Mehta et al. | Oct 2010 | B1 |
7813822 | Hoffberg | Oct 2010 | B1 |
7844696 | Labovitz et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7844744 | Abercrombie et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7864707 | Dimitropoulos et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7873025 | Patel et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7873074 | Boland | Jan 2011 | B1 |
7874001 | Beck et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7885197 | Metzler | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7895649 | Brook et al. | Feb 2011 | B1 |
7904420 | Ianni | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7930752 | Hertzog et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7934248 | Yehuda et al. | Apr 2011 | B1 |
7957934 | Greifeneder | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7961637 | McBeath | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7970946 | Djabarov et al. | Jun 2011 | B1 |
7975035 | Popescu et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8001610 | Chickering et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8005935 | Pradhan et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8040232 | Oh et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8040822 | Proulx et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8056134 | Ogilvie | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8115617 | Thubert et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8135657 | Kapoor et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8156430 | Newman | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8160063 | Maltz et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8179809 | Eppstein et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
8181248 | Oh et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8185824 | Mitchell et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
8239365 | Salman | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8239915 | Satish et al. | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8250657 | Nachenberg et al. | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8255972 | Azagury et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8266697 | Coffman | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8272875 | Jurmain | Sep 2012 | B1 |
8281397 | Vaidyanathan et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8291495 | Burns et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8296847 | Mendonca et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8311973 | Zadeh | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8365286 | Poston | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8370407 | Devarajan et al. | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8381289 | Pereira et al. | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8391270 | Van Der Stok et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8407164 | Malik et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8407798 | Lotem et al. | Mar 2013 | B1 |
8413235 | Chen et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8442073 | Skubacz et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8451731 | Lee et al. | May 2013 | B1 |
8462212 | Kundu et al. | Jun 2013 | B1 |
8489765 | Vasseur et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8499348 | Rubin | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8516590 | Ranadive et al. | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8527977 | Cheng et al. | Sep 2013 | B1 |
8549635 | Muttik et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8570861 | Brandwine et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8572600 | Chung et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8572734 | McConnell et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8572735 | Ghosh et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8572739 | Cruz et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8588081 | Salam et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8600726 | Varshney et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8613084 | Dalcher | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8615803 | Dacier et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8630316 | Haba | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8631464 | Belakhdar et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8640086 | Bonev et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8656493 | Capalik | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8661544 | Yen et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8677487 | Balupari et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8683389 | Bar-Yam et al. | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8706914 | Duchesneau | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8713676 | Pandrangi et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8719452 | Ding et al. | May 2014 | B1 |
8719835 | Kanso et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8750287 | Bui et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8752042 | Ratica | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8752179 | Zaitsev | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8755396 | Sindhu et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8762951 | Kosche et al. | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8769084 | Westerfeld et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8775577 | Alford et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8776180 | Kumar et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8812448 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8812725 | Kulkarni | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8813236 | Saha et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8825848 | Dotan et al. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8832013 | Adams et al. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8832461 | Saroiu et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8849926 | Marzencki et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8881258 | Paul et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8887238 | Howard et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8904520 | Nachenberg et al. | Dec 2014 | B1 |
8908685 | Patel et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8914497 | Xiao et al. | Dec 2014 | B1 |
8931043 | Cooper et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8954610 | Berke et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8955124 | Kim et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8966021 | Allen | Feb 2015 | B1 |
8966625 | Zuk et al. | Feb 2015 | B1 |
8973147 | Pearcy et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8984331 | Quinn | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8990386 | He et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8996695 | Anderson et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8997227 | Mhatre et al. | Mar 2015 | B1 |
9014047 | Alcala et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9015716 | Fletcher et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9071575 | Lemaster et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9088598 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2015 | B1 |
9110905 | Polley et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9117075 | Yeh | Aug 2015 | B1 |
9130836 | Kapadia et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9152789 | Natarajan et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9160764 | Stiansen et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9170917 | Kumar et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9178906 | Chen et al. | Nov 2015 | B1 |
9185127 | Neou et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9191400 | Ptasinski et al. | Nov 2015 | B1 |
9191402 | Yan | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9197654 | Ben-Shalom et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9225793 | Dutta et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9237111 | Banavalikar et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9246702 | Sharma et al. | Jan 2016 | B1 |
9246773 | Degioanni | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9253042 | Lumezanu et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9253206 | Fleischman | Feb 2016 | B1 |
9258217 | Duffield et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9281940 | Matsuda et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9286047 | Avramov et al. | Mar 2016 | B1 |
9294486 | Chiang et al. | Mar 2016 | B1 |
9317574 | Brisebois et al. | Apr 2016 | B1 |
9319384 | Yan et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9369435 | Short et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9369479 | Lin | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9378068 | Anantharam et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9396327 | Shimomura et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9405903 | Xie et al. | Aug 2016 | B1 |
9417985 | Baars et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9418222 | Rivera et al. | Aug 2016 | B1 |
9426068 | Dunbar et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9454324 | Madhavapeddi | Sep 2016 | B1 |
9462013 | Boss et al. | Oct 2016 | B1 |
9465696 | McNeil et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9501744 | Brisebois et al. | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9531589 | Clemm et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9563517 | Natanzon et al. | Feb 2017 | B1 |
9621413 | Lee | Apr 2017 | B1 |
9634915 | Bley | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9645892 | Patwardhan | May 2017 | B1 |
9684453 | Holt et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9697033 | Koponen et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9733973 | Prasad et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9749145 | Banavalikar et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9800608 | Korsunsky et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9904584 | Konig et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9916538 | Zadeh et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9935851 | Gandham et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
10009240 | Rao et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
20010028646 | Arts et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020053033 | Cooper et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020097687 | Meiri et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020103793 | Koller et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020107857 | Teraslinna | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020141343 | Bays | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020184393 | Leddy et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030023601 | Fortier, Jr. et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030065986 | Fraenkel et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030097439 | Strayer et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030126242 | Chang | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030145232 | Poletto et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030151513 | Herrmann et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030154399 | Zuk et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030177208 | Harvey, IV | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040019676 | Iwatsuki et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040030776 | Cantrell et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040213221 | Civanlar et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040220984 | Dudfield | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040243533 | Dempster et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040255050 | Takehiro et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040268149 | Aaron | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050028154 | Smith et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050039104 | Shah et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050063377 | Bryant et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050083933 | Fine et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050108331 | Osterman | May 2005 | A1 |
20050122325 | Twait | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050138157 | Jung et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050166066 | Ahuja et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050177829 | Vishwanath | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050182681 | Bruskotter et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050185621 | Sivakumar et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050198247 | Perry et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050198371 | Smith et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050198629 | Vishwanath | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050207376 | Ashwood-Smith et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050257244 | Joly et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050289244 | Sahu et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060048218 | Lingafelt et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060077909 | Saleh et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060080733 | Khosmood et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060089985 | Poletto | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060095968 | Portolani et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060143432 | Rothman et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060156408 | Himberger et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060159032 | Ukrainetz et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060173912 | Lindvall et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195448 | Newport | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060272018 | Fouant | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060274659 | Ouderkirk | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060280179 | Meier | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060294219 | Ogawa et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070014275 | Bettink et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070025306 | Cox et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070044147 | Choi et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070097976 | Wood et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118654 | Jamkhedkar et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070127491 | Verzijp et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070162420 | Ou et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070169179 | Narad | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070195729 | Li et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070195794 | Fujita et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070195797 | Patel et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070201474 | Isobe | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070211637 | Mitchell | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070214348 | Danielsen | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070230415 | Malik | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070232265 | Park et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250930 | Aziz et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070300061 | Kim et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080002697 | Anantharamaiah et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080022385 | Crowell et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080028389 | Genty et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080046708 | Fitzgerald et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080049633 | Edwards et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080056124 | Nanda et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080082662 | Danliker et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080101234 | Nakil et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080120350 | Grabowski et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080126534 | Mueller et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080141246 | Kuck et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080155245 | Lipscombe et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080250122 | Zsigmond et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080270199 | Chess et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080282347 | Dadhia et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080295163 | Kang | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080301765 | Nicol et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090059934 | Aggarwal et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090064332 | Porras et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090109849 | Wood et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090133126 | Jang et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090138590 | Lee et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090180393 | Nakamura | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090241170 | Kumar et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090292795 | Ford et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090296593 | Prescott | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090300180 | Dehaan et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090307753 | Dupont et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090313373 | Hanna et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090313698 | Wahl | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090319912 | Serr et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090323543 | Shimakura | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090328219 | Narayanaswamy | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100005288 | Rao et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100049839 | Parker et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100054241 | Shah | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100077445 | Schneider et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100095293 | O'Neill et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100095367 | Narayanaswamy | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100095377 | Krywaniuk | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100138526 | DeHaan et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100138810 | Komatsu et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100148940 | Gelvin et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100153316 | Duffield et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100153696 | Beachem et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100180016 | Bugwadia et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100194741 | Finocchio | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100220584 | DeHaan et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100235514 | Beachem | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100235879 | Burnside et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100235915 | Memon et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100287266 | Asati et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100303240 | Beachem | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100306180 | Johnson et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100317420 | Hoffberg | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100319060 | Aiken et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110004935 | Moffie et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110010585 | Bugenhagen et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110022641 | Werth et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110055381 | Narasimhan et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110055388 | Yumerefendi et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110066719 | Miryanov et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110069685 | Tofighbakhsh | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110072119 | Bronstein et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110083125 | Komatsu et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110085556 | Breslin et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110103259 | Aybay et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110107074 | Chan et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110107331 | Evans et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110126136 | Abella et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110126275 | Anderson et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110145885 | Rivers et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110153039 | Gvelesiani | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110153811 | Jeong et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110158088 | Lofstrand et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110170860 | Smith et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110173490 | Narayanaswamy et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110185423 | Sallam | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110196957 | Ayachitula et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110202655 | Sharma et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110214174 | Herzog et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110225207 | Subramanian et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110228696 | Agarwal et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110238793 | Bedare et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110246663 | Meisen et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110277034 | Hanson | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110283277 | Castillo et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110302652 | Westerfeld | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110314148 | Petersen et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110317982 | Xu et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120005542 | Petersen et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120079592 | Pandrangi | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120089664 | Igelka | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120102361 | Sass et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120102543 | Kohli et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120110188 | Van Biljon | May 2012 | A1 |
20120117226 | Tanaka et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120117642 | Lin et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120136996 | Seo et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120137278 | Draper et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120137361 | Yi et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120140626 | Anand et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120195198 | Regan | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120197856 | Banka et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120198541 | Reeves | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120216271 | Cooper et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120218989 | Tanabe et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120219004 | Balus et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120233348 | Winters | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120233473 | Vasseur et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120240232 | Azuma | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120246303 | Petersen et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120254109 | Shukla et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120260227 | Shukla et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120278021 | Lin et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120281700 | Koganti et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120300628 | Prescott et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130003538 | Greenburg et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130003733 | Venkatesan et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130006935 | Grisby | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130007435 | Bayani | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130038358 | Cook et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130041934 | Annamalaisami et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130054682 | Malik et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130085889 | Fitting et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130086272 | Chen et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130103827 | Dunlap et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130107709 | Campbell et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130124807 | Nielsen et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130125107 | Bandakka et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130145099 | Liu et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130148663 | Xiong | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130159999 | Chiueh et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130173784 | Wang et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130174256 | Powers | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130179487 | Lubetzky et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130179879 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130198517 | Mazzarella | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130198839 | Wei et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130201986 | Sajassi et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130205293 | Levijarvi et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130219161 | Fontignie et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130219500 | Lukas et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130232498 | Mangtani et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130242999 | Kamble et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130246925 | Ahuja et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130247201 | Alperovitch et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130254879 | Chesla et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130268994 | Cooper et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130275579 | Hernandez et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130283374 | Zisapel et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130290521 | Labovitz | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130297771 | Osterloh et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130301472 | Allan | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130304900 | Trabelsi et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130305369 | Karta et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130318357 | Abraham et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130326623 | Kruglick | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130333029 | Chesla et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130335219 | Malkowski | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130336164 | Yang et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130346736 | Cook et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130347103 | Veteikis et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140006610 | Formby et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140006871 | Lakshmanan et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140012814 | Bercovici et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140019972 | Yahalom et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140031005 | Sumcad et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140033193 | Palaniappan | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140036688 | Stassinopoulos et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140040343 | Nickolov et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140047185 | Peterson et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140047372 | Gnezdov et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140056318 | Hansson et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140059200 | Nguyen et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140074946 | Dirstine et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140089494 | Dasari et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140092884 | Murphy et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140096058 | Molesky et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140105029 | Jain et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140115219 | Ajanovic et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140129942 | Rathod | May 2014 | A1 |
20140137109 | Sharma et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140140244 | Kapadia et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140143825 | Behrendt et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140149490 | Luxenberg et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140156814 | Barabash et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140156861 | Cruz-Aguilar et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140164607 | Bai et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140165200 | Singla | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140165207 | Engel et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140173623 | Chang et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140192639 | Smirnov | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140201717 | Mascaro et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140215573 | Cepuran | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140215621 | Xaypanya et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140224784 | Kohler | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140225603 | Auguste et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140233387 | Zheng et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140258310 | Wong | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140269777 | Rothstein et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140280499 | Basavaiah et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140281030 | Cui et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140286354 | Van De Poel et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140289854 | Mahvi | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140297357 | Zeng | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140298461 | Hohndel et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140307686 | Su et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140317278 | Kersch et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140317737 | Shin et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140330616 | Lyras | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140331048 | Casas-Sanchez et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140331276 | Frascadore et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140331280 | Porras et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140331304 | Wong | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140348182 | Chandra et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140351203 | Kunnatur et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140351415 | Harrigan et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140359695 | Chari et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150006689 | Szilagyi et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150006714 | Jain | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150009840 | Pruthi et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150026809 | Altman et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150033305 | Shear et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150036480 | Huang et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150036533 | Sodhi et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150039751 | Harrigan et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150046882 | Menyhart et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150052441 | Degioanni | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150058976 | Carney et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150067143 | Babakhan et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150067786 | Fiske | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150082151 | Liang et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150082430 | Sridhara et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150085665 | Kompella et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150095332 | Beisiegel et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150112933 | Satapathy | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150113133 | Srinivas et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150124608 | Agarwal et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150124652 | Dhamapurikar et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150128133 | Pohlmann | May 2015 | A1 |
20150128205 | Mahaffey et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150138993 | Forster et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150142962 | Srinivas et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150195291 | Zuk et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150222939 | Gallant et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150249622 | Phillips et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150256555 | Choi et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150261842 | Huang et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150261886 | Wu et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150271008 | Jain et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150271255 | Mackay et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150295945 | Canzanese, Jr. et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150312233 | Graham, III et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150356297 | Yang et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150347554 | Vasantham et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150358352 | Chasin et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160006753 | McDaid et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160019030 | Shukla et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160020959 | Rahaman | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160021131 | Heilig | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160026552 | Holden et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160036636 | Erickson et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160036837 | Jain et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160050132 | Zhang et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160072815 | Rieke et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160080414 | Kolton et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160087861 | Kuan et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160094394 | Sharma et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160094529 | Mityagin | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160103692 | Guntaka et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160105350 | Greifeneder et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160112270 | Danait et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160112284 | Pon et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160119234 | Valencia Lopez et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160127395 | Underwood et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160147585 | Konig et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160162308 | Chen et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160162312 | Doherty et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160173446 | Nantel | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160173535 | Barabash et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160183093 | Vaughn et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160191476 | Schutz et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160205002 | Rieke et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160216994 | Sefidcon et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160217022 | Velipasaoglu et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160255082 | Rathod | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160269424 | Chandola et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160269442 | Shieh | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160269482 | Jamjoom et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160294691 | Joshi | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160308908 | Kirby et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160337204 | Dubey et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160357424 | Pang et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160357546 | Chang et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160357587 | Yadav et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160357957 | Deen et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359592 | Kulshreshtha et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359628 | Singh et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359658 | Yadav et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359673 | Gupta et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359677 | Kulshreshtha et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359679 | Parasdehgheibi et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359680 | Parasdehgheibi et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359686 | Parasdehgheibi et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359695 | Yadav et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359696 | Yadav et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359697 | Scheib et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359698 | Deen et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359699 | Gandham et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359700 | Pang et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359701 | Pang et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359703 | Gandham et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359704 | Gandham et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359705 | Parasdehgheibi et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359708 | Gandham et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359709 | Deen et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359711 | Deen et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359712 | Alizadeh Attar et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359740 | Parasdehgheibi et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359759 | Singh et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359872 | Yadav et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359877 | Kulshreshtha et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359878 | Prasad et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359879 | Deen et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359880 | Pang et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359881 | Yadav et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359888 | Gupta et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359889 | Yadav et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359890 | Deen et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359891 | Pang et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359897 | Yadav et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359905 | Touboul et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359912 | Gupta et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359913 | Gupta et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359914 | Deen et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359915 | Gupta et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359917 | Rao et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160373481 | Sultan et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160380865 | Dubai et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170006141 | Bhadra | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170024453 | Raja et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170032310 | Mimnaugh | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170034018 | Parasdehgheibi et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170048121 | Hobbs et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170070582 | Desai et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170085483 | Mihaly et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170208487 | Ratakonda et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170250880 | Akens et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170250951 | Wang et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170289067 | Lu et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170295141 | Thubert et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170302691 | Singh et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170331747 | Singh et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170346736 | Chander et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170364380 | Frye, Jr. et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180006911 | Dickey | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180007115 | Nedeltchev et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180013670 | Kapadia et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180145906 | Yadav et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101093452 | Dec 2007 | CN |
101770551 | Jul 2010 | CN |
102521537 | Jun 2012 | CN |
103023970 | Apr 2013 | CN |
103716137 | Apr 2014 | CN |
104065518 | Sep 2014 | CN |
107196807 | Sep 2017 | CN |
0811942 | Dec 1997 | EP |
1076848 | Jul 2002 | EP |
1383261 | Jan 2004 | EP |
1450511 | Aug 2004 | EP |
2045974 | Apr 2008 | EP |
2043320 | Apr 2009 | EP |
2860912 | Apr 2015 | EP |
2887595 | Jun 2015 | EP |
2009-016906 | Jan 2009 | JP |
1394338 | May 2014 | KR |
WO 2007014314 | Feb 2007 | WO |
WO 2007070711 | Jun 2007 | WO |
WO 2008069439 | Jun 2008 | WO |
WO 2013030830 | Mar 2013 | WO |
WO 2015042171 | Mar 2015 | WO |
WO 2015099778 | Jul 2015 | WO |
WO 2016004075 | Jan 2016 | WO |
WO 2016019523 | Feb 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Australian Government Department of Defence, Intelligence and Security, “Top 4 Strategies to Mitigate Targeted Cyber Intrusions,” Cyber Security Operations Centre Jul. 2013, http://www.asd.gov.au/infosec/top-mitigations/top-4-strategies-explained.htm. |
Author Unknown, “Blacklists & Dynamic Reputation: Understanding Why the Evolving Threat Eludes Blacklists,” www.dambala.com, 9 pages, Dambala, Atlanta, GA, USA. |
Aydin, Galip, et al., “Architecture and Implementation of a Scalable Sensor Data Storage and Analysis Using Cloud Computing and Big Data Technologies,” Journal of Sensors, vol. 2015, Article ID 834217, Feb. 2015, 11 pages. |
Backes, Michael, et al., “Data Lineage in Malicious Environments,” IEEE 2015, pp. 1-13. |
Bayati, Mohsen, et al., “Message-Passing Algorithms for Sparse Network Alignment,” Mar. 2013, 31 pages. |
Berezinski, Przemyslaw, et al., “An Entropy-Based Network Anomaly Detection Method,” Entropy, 2015, vol. 17, www.mdpi.com/joumal/entropy, pp. 2367-2408. |
Berthier, Robin, et al. “Nfsight: Netflow-based Network Awareness Tool,” 2010, 16pages. |
Bhuyan, Dhiraj, “Fighting Bots and Botnets,” 2006, pp. 23-28. |
Blair, Dana, et al., U.S. Appl. No. 62/106,006, filed Jan. 21, 2015, entitled “Monitoring Network Policy Compliance.” |
Chandran, Midhun, et al., “Monitoring in a Virtualized Environment,” GSTF International Journal on Computing, vol. 1, No. 1, Aug. 2010. |
Chari, Suresh, et al., “Ensuring continuous compliance through reconciling policy with usage,” Proceedings of the 18th ACM symposium on Access control models and technologies (SACMAT '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 49-60. |
Chen, Xu, et al., “Automating network application dependency discovery: experiences, limitations, and new solutions,” 8th USENIX conference on Operating systems design and implementation (OSDI'08), USENIX Association, Berkeley, CA, USA, 117-130. |
Cisco Systems, “Cisco Network Analysis Modules (NAM) Tutorial,” Cisco Systems, Inc., Version 3.5. |
Cisco Systems, Inc., “Addressing Compliance from One Infrastructure: Cisco Unified Compliance Solution Framework,” 2014. |
Cisco Systems, Inc., “Cisco Application Dependency Mapping Service,” 2009. |
Cisco Systems, Inc., “White Paper—New Cisco Technologies Help Customers Achieve Regulatory Compliance,” 1992-2008. |
Cisco Systems, Inc., “A Cisco Guide to Defending Against Distributed Denial of Service Attacks,” May 3, 2016, 34 pages. |
Cisco Technology, Inc., “Cisco Lock-and-Key:Dynamic Access Lists,” http://www/cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security-vpn/lock-key/7604-13.html; Updated Jul. 12, 2006, 16 pages. |
Di Lorenzo, Guisy, et al., “EXSED: An Intelligent Tool for Exploration of Social Events Dynamics from Augmented Trajectories,” Mobile Data Management (MDM), pp. 323-330, Jun. 3-6, 2013. |
Feinstein, Laura, et al., “Statistical Approaches to DDoS Attack Detection and Response,” Proceedings of the DARPA Information Survivability Conference and Exposition (DISCEX '03), Apr. 2003, 12 pages. |
George, Ashley, et al., “NetPal: A Dynamic Network Administration Knowledge Base,” 2008, pp. 1-14. |
Goldsteen, Abigail, et al., “A Tool for Monitoring and Maintaining System Trustworthiness at Run Time,” REFSQ (2015), pp. 142-147. |
Hamadi, S., et al., “Fast Path Acceleration for Open vSwitch in Overlay Networks,” Global Information Infrastructure and Networking Symposium (GIIS), Montreal, QC, pp. 1-5, Sep. 15-19, 2014. |
Hewlett-Packard, “Effective use of reputation intelligence in a security operations center,” Jul. 2013, 6 pages. |
Hideshima, Yusuke, et al., “STARMINE: A Visualization System for Cyber Attacks,” https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221536306, Feb. 2006, 9 pages. |
InternetPerils, Inc., “Control Your Internet Business Risk,” 2003-2015, https://www.internetperils.com. |
Janoff, Christian, et al., “Cisco Compliance Solution for HIPAA Security Rule Design and Implementation Guide,” Cisco Systems, Inc., Updated Nov. 14, 2015, part 1 of 2, 350 pages. |
Janoff, Christian, et al., “Cisco Compliance Solution for HIPAA Security Rule Design and Implementation Guide,” Cisco Systems, Inc., Updated Nov. 14, 2015, part 2 of 2, 588 pages. |
Kerrison, Adam, et al., “Four Steps to Faster, Better Application Dependency Mapping—Laying the Foundation for Effective Business Service Models,” BMCSoftware, 2011. |
Kraemer, Brian, “Get to know your data center with CMDB,” TechTarget, Apr. 5, 2006, http://searchdatacenter.techtarget.com/news/118820/Get-to-know-your-data-center-with-CMDB. |
Lab SKU, “VMware Hands-on Labs—HOL-SDC-1301” Version: 20140321-160709, 2013; http://docs.hol.vmware.com/HOL-2013/holsdc-1301_html_en/ (part 1 of 2). |
Lab SKU, “VMware Hands-on Labs—HOL-SDC-1301” Version: 20140321-160709, 2013; http://docs.hol.vmware.com/HOL-2013/holsdc-1301_html_en/ (part 2 of 2). |
Lachance, Michael, “Dirty Little Secrets of Application Dependency Mapping,” Dec. 26, 2007. |
Landman, Yoav, et al., “Dependency Analyzer,” Feb. 14, 2008, http://jfrog.com/confluence/display/DA/Home. |
Lee, Sihyung, “Reducing Complexity of Large-Scale Network Configuration Management,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Carniege Mellon University, 2010. |
Li, Ang, et al., “Fast Anomaly Detection for Large Data Centers,” Global Telecommunications Conference (GLOBECOM 2010, Dec. 2010, 6 pages. |
Li, Bingbong, et al, “A Supervised Machine Learning Approach to Classify Host Roles on Line Using sFlow,” in Proceedings of the first edition workshop on High performance and programmable networking, 2013, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 53-60. |
Liu, Ting, et al., “Impala: A Middleware System for Managing Autonomic, Parallel Sensor Systems,” In Proceedings of the Ninth ACM SIGPLAN Symposium on Principles and Practice of Parallel Programming(PPoPP '03), ACM, New York, NY, USA, Jun. 11-13, 2003, pp. 107-118. |
Matteson, Ryan, “Depmap: Dependency Mapping of Applications Using Operating System Events: a Thesis,” Master's Thesis, California Polytechnic State University, Dec. 2010. |
Natarajan, Arun, et al., “NSDMiner: Automated Discovery of Network Service Dependencies,” Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers INFOCOM, Feb. 2012, 9 pages. |
Navaz, A.S. Syed, et al., “Entropy based Anomaly Detection System to Prevent DDoS Attacks in Cloud,” International Journal of computer Applications (0975-8887), vol. 62, No. 15, Jan. 2013, pp. 42-47. |
Neverfail, “Neverfail IT Continuity Architect,” 2015, https://web.archive.org/web/20150908090456/http://www.neverfailgroup.com/products/it-continuity-architect. |
Nilsson, Dennis K., et al., “Key Management and Secure Software Updates in Wireless Process Control Environments,” In Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Wireless Network Security (WiSec '08), ACM, New York, NY, USA, Mar. 31-Apr. 2, 2008, pp. 100-108. |
Nunnally, Troy, et al., “P3D: A Parallel 3D Coordinate Visualization for Advanced Network Scans,” IEEE 2013, Jun. 9-13, 2013, 6 pages. |
O'Donnell, Glenn, et al., “The CMDB Imperative: How to Realize the Dream and Avoid the Nightmares,” Prentice Hall, Feb. 19, 2009. |
Ohta, Kohei, et al., “Detection, Defense, and Tracking of Internet-Wide Illegal Access in a Distributed Manner,” 2000, pp. 1-16. |
Pathway Systems International Inc., “How Blueprints does Integration,” Apr. 15, 2014, 9 pages, http://pathwaysystems.com/company-blog/. |
Popa, Lucian, et al., “Macroscope: End-Point Approach to Networked Application Dependency Discovery,” CoNEXT'09, Dec. 1-4, 2009, Rome, Italy, 12 pages. |
Prasad, K. Munivara, et al., “An Efficient Detection of Flooding Attacks to Internet Threat Monitors (ITM) using Entropy Variations under Low Traffic,” Computing Communication & Networking Technologies (ICCCNT '12), Jul. 26-28, 2012, 11 pages. |
Sachan, Mrinmaya, et al., “Solving Electrical Networks to incorporate Supervision in Random Walks,” May 13-17, 2013, pp. 109-110. |
Sammarco, Matteo, et al., “Trace Selection for Improved WLAN Monitoring,” Aug. 16, 2013, pp. 9-14. |
Wang, Ru, et al., “Learning directed acyclic graphs via bootstarp aggregating,” 2014, 47 pages, http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.2098. |
Wang, Yongjun, et al., “A Network Gene-Based Framework for Detecting Advanced Persistent Threats,” Nov. 2014, 7 pages. |
Woodberg, Brad, “Snippet from Juniper SRX Series” Jun. 17, 2013, 1 page, O'Reilly Media, Inc. |
Zhang, Yue, et al., “CANTINA: A Content-Based Approach to Detecting Phishing Web Sites,” May 8-12, 2007, pp. 639-648. |
Pathway Systems International Inc., “What is Blueprints?” 2010-2016, http://pathwaysystems.com/blueprints-about/. |
Zhonghai Lu; Lei Xia; Jantsch, A., “Cluster-based Simulated Annealing for Mapping Cores onto 2D Mesh Networks on Chip,” Design and Diagnostics of Electronic Circuits and Systems, 2008. DDECS 2008. 11th IEEE Workshop on , vol., No., pp. 1,6, Apr. 16-18, 2008. |
Shneiderman, B.; Aris, A., “Network Visualization by Semantic Substrates,” Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on , vol. 12, No. 5, pp. 733,740, Sep.-Oct. 2006. |
Bosch, Greg, “Virtualization,” 2010, 33 pages. |
Breen, Christopher, “Mac 911, How to dismiss Mac App Store Notifications,” Macworld.com, Mar. 24, 2014, 3 pages. |
Chou, C.W., et al., “Optical Clocks and Relativity,” Science vol. 329, Sep. 24, 2010, pp. 1630-1633. |
Huang, Hing-Jie, et al., “Clock Skew Based Node Identification in Wireless Sensor Networks,” IEEE, 2008, 5 pages. |
Ives, Herbert, E., et al., “An Experimental Study of the Rate of a Moving Atomic Clock,” Journal of the Optical Society of America, vol. 28, No. 7, Jul. 1938, pp. 215-226. |
Witze, Alexandra, “Special relativity aces time trial, ‘Time dilation’ predicted by Einstein confirmed by lithium ion experiment,” Nature, Sep. 19, 2014, 3 pages. |
Zatrochova, Zuzana, “Analysis and Testing of Distributed NoSQL Datastore Riak,” Spring, 2015, 76 pages. |
Al-Fuqaha, Ala, et al., “Internet of Things: A Survey on Enabling Technologies, Protocols, and Applications,” IEEE Communication Surveys & Tutorials. vol. 17, No. 4, Nov. 18, 2015, pp. 2347-2376. |
Brocade Communications Systems, Inc., “Chapter 5—Configuring Virtual LANs (VLANs),” Jun. 2009, 38 pages. |
Cisco Systems, Inc. “Cisco, Nexus 3000 Series NX-OS Release Notes, Release 5.0(3)U3(1),” Feb. 29, 2012, Part No. OL-26631-01, 16 pages. |
Cisco Systems, Inc., “Cisco—VPN Client User Guide for Windows,” Release 4.6, Aug. 2004, 148 pages. |
Cisco Systems, Inc., “Cisco 4710 Application Control Engine Appliance Hardware Installation Guide,” Nov. 2007, 66 pages. |
Cisco Systems, Inc., “Cisco Data Center Network Architecture and Solutions Overview,” Feb. 2006, 19 pages. |
Cisco Systems, Inc., “Cisco IOS Configuration Fundamentals Configuration Guide: Using Autoinstall and Setup,” Release 12.2, first published Apr. 2001, last updated Sep. 2003, 32 pages. |
Cisco Systems, Inc., “Cisco VN-Link: Virtualization-Aware Networking,” White Paper, Mar. 2009, 10 pages. |
Cisco Systems, Inc., “Cisco, Nexus 5000 Series and Cisco Nexus 2000 Series Release Notes, Cisco NX-OS Release 5.1(3)N2(1b), NX-OS Release 5.1(3)N2(1a) and NX-OS Release 5.1(3)N2(1),” Sep. 5, 2012, Part No. OL-26652-03 CO, 24 pages. |
Cisco Systems, Inc., “Nexus 3000 Series NX-OS Fundamentals Configuration Guide, Release 5.0(3)U3(1): Using PowerOn Auto Provisioning,” Feb. 29, 2012, Part No. OL-26544-01, 10 pages. |
Cisco Systems, Inc., “Quick Start Guide, Cisco ACE 4700 Series Application Control Engine Appliance,” Software Ve740rsion A5(1.0), Sep. 2011, 138 pages. |
Cisco Systems, Inc., “Routing and Bridging Guide, Cisco ACE Application Control Engine,” Software Version A5(1.0), Sep. 2011, 248 pages. |
Cisco Systems, Inc., “VMWare and Cisco Virtualization Solution: Scale Virtual Machine Networking,” Jul. 2009, 4 pages. |
Cisco Systems, Inc., “Cisco Remote Integrated Service Engine for Citrix NetScaler Appliances and Cisco Nexus 7000 Series Switches Configuration Guide,” Last modified Apr. 29, 2014, 78 pages. |
Cisco Technology, Inc., “Cisco IOS Software Release 12.4T Features and Hardware Support,” Feb. 2009, 174 pages. |
Cisco Systems, Inc.,“Cisco Application Control Engine (ACE) Troubleshooting Guide—Understanding the ACE Module Architecture and Traffic Flow,” Mar. 11, 2011, 6 pages. |
Costa, Raul, et al., “An Intelligent Alarm Management System for Large-Scale Telecommunication Companies,” In Portuguese Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Oct. 2009, 14 pages. |
De Carvalho, Tiago Filipe Rodrigues, “Root Cause Analysis in Large and Complex Networks,” Dec. 2008, Repositorio.ul.pt, pp. 1-55. |
Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents, “FIPA Agent Message Transport Service Specification,” Dec. 3, 2002, http://www.fipa.org; 15 pages. |
Gia, Tuan Nguyen, et al., “Fog Computing in Healthcare Internet of Things: A Case Study on ECG Feature Extraction,” 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology; Ubiquitous Computing and Communications; Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing; Pervasive Intelligence and Computing, Oct. 26, 2015, pp. 356-363. |
Joseph, Dilip, et al., “Modeling Middleboxes,” IEEE Network, Sep./Oct. 2008, pp. 20-25. |
Kent, S., et al. “Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol,” Network Working Group, Nov. 1998, 67 pages. |
Online Collins English Dictionary, 1 page (Year: 2018). |
Voris, Jonathan, et al., “Bait and Snitch: Defending Computer Systems with Decoys,” Columbia University Libraries, Department of Computer Science, 2013, pp. 1-25. |
Arista Networks, Inc., “Application Visibility and Network Telemtry using Splunk,” Arista White Paper, Nov. 2013, 11 pages. |
Bauch, Petr, “Reader's Report of Master's Thesis, Analysis and Testing of Distributed NoSQL Datastore Riak,” May 28, 2015, Brno. 2 pages. |
Cisco Systems, Inc., “Cisco Application Visibility and Control,” Oct. 2011, 2 pages. |
Cisco Systems, Inc., “Cisco Tetration Platform Data Sheet”, Updated Mar. 5, 2018, 21 pages. |
Duan, Yiheng, et al., Detective: Automatically Identify and Analyze Malware Processes in Forensic Scenarios via DLLs, IEEE ICC 2015—Next Generation Networking Symposium, pp. 5691-5696. |
Heckman, Sarah, et al., “On Establishing a Benchmark for Evaluating Static Analysis Alert Prioritization and Classification Techniques,” IEEE, 2008; 10 pages. |
Kim, Myung-Sup, et al. “A Flow-based Method for Abnormal Network Traffic Detection,” IEEE, 2004, pp. 599-612. |
Thomas, R., “Bogon Dotted Decimal List,” Version 7.0, Team Cymru NOC, Apr. 27, 2012, 5 pages. |
Baek, Kwang-Hyun, et al., “Preventing Theft of Quality of Service on Open Platforms,” 2005 Workshop of the 1st International Conference on Security and Privacy for Emerging Areas in Communication Networks, 2005, 12 pages. |
Theodorakopoulos, George, et al., “On Trust Models and Trust Evaluation Metrics for Ad Hoc Networks,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications. vol. 24, Issue 2, Feb. 2006, pp. 318-328. |
Zeng, Sai, et al., “Managing Risk in Multi-node Automation of Endpoint Management,” 2014 IEEE Network Operations and Management Symposium (NOMS), 2014, 6 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160359678 A1 | Dec 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62171899 | Jun 2015 | US |