The present disclosure pertains to network analytics, and more specifically to systems that detect packet loss by analyzing packets processed by several different network environments and analyzing the various data to determine whether there is packet loss at the different environments.
Network architectures for observing and capturing information about network traffic in a datacenter are described herein. Network traffic processed in a compute environment is captured by entities called sensors or capturing agents. Sensors export data or metadata of the observed network activity to collection agents called “Collectors.” Collectors can be a group of processes running on a single machine or a cluster of machines. For sake of simplicity, collectors can be treated as one logical entity and referred to as one collector. In actual deployment of datacenter scale, there will be more than just one collector, each responsible for handling export data from a group of sensors. Collectors are capable of doing preprocessing and analysis of the data collected from sensors. The collector is capable of sending the processed or unprocessed data to a cluster of processes responsible for analysis of network data. The entities which receive the data from the collector can be a cluster of processes, and this logical group can be considered or referred to as a “pipeline.” Note that sensors and collectors are not limited to observing and processing just network data, but can also capturing other system information like currently active processes, active file handles, socket handles, status of I/O devices, memory, etc.
A network will often experience different amounts of packet loss at different points within the path of a packet flow. It is important to identify the amount of packet loss at each point to fine tune and improve the network. Current solutions implement a request/reply model when trying to identify packet loss at different points. In this approach, a system will send a request at each point and will identify packet loss if a reply is not received. However, this model cannot be implemented in a live environment. Moreover, this model is not as efficient or accurate as it can lead to additional network traffic and be subject to errors.
In order to describe the manner in which the above-recited and other advantages and features of the disclosure can be obtained, a more particular description of the principles briefly described above will be rendered by reference to specific embodiments thereof which are illustrated in the appended drawings. Understanding that these drawings depict only exemplary embodiments of the disclosure and are not therefore to be considered to be limiting of its scope, the principles herein are described and explained with additional specificity and detail through the use of the accompanying drawings in which:
Various embodiments of the disclosure are discussed in detail below. While specific implementations are discussed, it should be understood that this is done for illustration purposes only. A person skilled in the relevant art will recognize that other components and configurations may be used without parting from the spirit and scope of the disclosure.
It is advantageous to identify the amount of packet loss at each point in a network and to fine tune and improve the network. Prior art solutions noted above implement a request/reply model when trying to identify packet loss at different points. However, unlike the concepts disclosed herein, the prior model cannot be implemented in a live environment. Moreover, the model is not as efficient or accurate as the concepts disclosed herein.
Additional features and advantages of the disclosure will be set forth in the description which follows, and in part will be obvious from the description, or can be learned by practice of the herein disclosed principles. The features and advantages of the disclosure can be realized and obtained by means of the instruments and combinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims. These and other features of the disclosure will become more fully apparent from the following description and appended claims, or can be learned by the practice of the principles set forth herein.
Disclosed are systems, methods, and computer-readable storage media for determining a packet loss in a network environment. The method can include analyzing, via a first capturing agent, packets coming into and out of or processed by a first environment associated with a first computing device or host to yield first data. The method includes analyzing, via a second capturing agent, packets coming into and out of or processed by a second environment associated with a second computing device or host to yield second data, collecting the first data and the second data at a collector to yield aggregated data, transmitting the aggregated data to an analysis engine which analyzes the aggregated data to yield an analysis, and based on the analysis, identifying first packet loss at the first environment and second packet loss at the second environment.
The identifying of the first packet loss at the first environment and the second packet loss at the second environment can be performed by comparing packets captured and reported by the first capturing agent and the second capturing agent. The comparing of the packets captured and reported by the first capturing agent and the second capturing agent can also be performed on one of a per flow, per link and per host basis. The comparing of the packets captured and reported by the first capturing agent and the second capturing agent can also be performed during a specific time window. In one example, the packet flow occurs through the first environment and the second environment.
The disclosed technology addresses the need in the art for identifying packet loss within a network. A description of an example network environment, as illustrated in
Leaf routers 104 can be responsible for routing and/or bridging tenant or endpoint packets and applying network policies. Spine routers 102 can perform switching and routing within fabric 112. Thus, network connectivity in fabric 112 can flow from spine routers 102 to leaf routers 104, and vice versa.
Leaf routers 104 can provide servers (106A-D) (collectively “106”), hypervisors (108A-108C) (collectively “108”), virtual machines (VMs) 1-4 (110A-110D) (collectively “110”), collectors 118, engines 120, and the Layer 2 (L2) network access to fabric 112. For example, leaf routers 104 can encapsulate and decapsulate packets to and from servers 106 in order to enable communications throughout environment 100. Leaf routers 104 can also connect other network-capable device(s) or network(s), such as a firewall, a database, a server, etc., to the fabric 112. Leaf routers 104 can also provide any other servers, resources, endpoints, external networks, VMs, services, tenants, or workloads with access to fabric 112.
VMs 110 can be virtual machines hosted by hypervisors 108 running on servers 106. VMs 110 can include-workloads running on a guest operating system on a respective server. Hypervisors 108 can provide a layer of software, firmware, and/or hardware that creates and runs the VMs 110. Hypervisors 108 can allow VMs 110 to share hardware resources on servers 106, and the hardware resources on servers 106 to appear as multiple, separate hardware platforms. Moreover, hypervisors 108 and servers 106 can host one or more VMs 110. For example, server 106A and hypervisor 108A can host VMs 110A-B.
In some cases, VMs 110 and/or hypervisors 108 can be migrated to other servers 106. For example, VM 110A can be migrated to server 106C and hypervisor 108B. Servers 106 can similarly be migrated to other locations in network environment 100. For example, a server connected to a specific leaf router can be changed to connect to a different or additional leaf router. In some cases, some or all of servers 106, hypervisors 108, and/or VMs 110 can represent tenant space. Tenant space can include workloads, services, applications, devices, and/or resources that are associated with one or more clients or subscribers. Accordingly, traffic in network environment 100 can be routed based on specific tenant policies, spaces, agreements, configurations, etc. Moreover, addressing can vary between one or more tenants. In some configurations, tenant spaces can be divided into logical segments and/or networks and separated from logical segments and/or networks associated with other tenants.
Any of leaf routers 104, servers 106, hypervisors 108, and VMs 110 can include capturing agent 116 (also referred to as a “sensor” or a “capturing agent”) configured to capture network data, and report any portion of the captured data to collector 118. Capturing agents 116 can be processes, agents, modules, drivers, or components deployed on a respective system or system layer (e.g., a server, VM, virtual container, hypervisor, leaf router, etc.), configured to capture network data for the respective system (e.g., data received or transmitted by the respective system), and report some or all of the captured data and statistics to collector 118.
For example, a VM capturing agent can run as a process, kernel module, software element, or kernel driver on the guest operating system installed in a VM and configured to capture and report data (e.g., network and/or system data) processed (e.g., sent, received, generated, etc.) by the VM.
A hypervisor capturing agent can run as a process, kernel module, software element, or kernel driver on the host operating system installed at the hypervisor layer and configured to capture and report data (e.g., network and/or system data) processed (e.g., sent, received, generated, etc.) by the hypervisor.
A container capturing agent can run as a process, kernel module, software element, or kernel driver on the operating system of a device, such as a switch or server, which can be configured to capture and report data processed by the container.
A server capturing agent can run as a process, kernel module, software element, or kernel driver on the host operating system of a server and configured to capture and report data (e.g., network and/or system data) processed (e.g., sent, received, generated, etc.) by the server.
A network device capturing agent can run as a process, software element, or component in a network device, such as leaf routers 104, and configured to capture and report data (e.g., network and/or system data) processed (e.g., sent, received, generated, etc.) by the network device.
Capturing agents 116 can be configured to report observed data, statistics, and/or metadata about one or more packets, flows, communications, processes, events, and/or activities to collector 118. For example, capturing agents 116 can capture network data and statistics processed (e.g., sent, received, generated, dropped, forwarded, etc.) by the system or host (e.g., server, hypervisor, VM, container, switch, etc.) of the capturing agents 116 (e.g., where the capturing agents 116 are deployed). The capturing agents 116 can also report the network data and statistics to one or more devices, such as collectors 118 and/or engines 120. For example, the capturing agents 116 can report an amount of traffic processed by their host, a frequency of the traffic processed by their host, a type of traffic processed (e.g., sent, received, generated, etc.) by their host, a source or destination of the traffic processed by their host, a pattern in the traffic, an amount of traffic dropped or blocked by their host, types of requests or data in the traffic received, discrepancies in traffic (e.g., spoofed addresses, invalid addresses, hidden sender, etc.), protocols used in communications, type or characteristics of responses to traffic by the hosts of the capturing agents 116, what processes have triggered specific packets, etc.
Capturing agents 116 can also capture and report information about the system or host of the capturing agents 116 (e.g., type of host, type of environment, status of host, conditions of the host, etc.). Such information can include, for example, data or metadata of active or previously active processes of the system, operating system user identifiers, kernel modules loaded or used, network software characteristics (e.g., software switch, virtual network card, etc.), metadata of files on the system, system alerts, number and/or identity of applications at the host, domain information, networking information (e.g., address, topology, settings, connectivity, etc.), session information (e.g., session identifier), faults or errors, memory or CPU usage, threads, filename and/or path, services, security information or settings, and so forth.
Capturing agents 116 may also analyze the processes running on the respective VMs, hypervisors, servers, or network devices to determine specifically which process is responsible for a particular flow of network traffic. Similarly, capturing agents 116 may determine which operating system user (e.g., root, system, John Doe, Admin, etc.) is responsible for a given flow. Reported data from capturing agents 116 can provide details or statistics particular to one or more tenants or customers. For example, reported data from a subset of capturing agents 116 deployed throughout devices or elements in a tenant space can provide information about the performance, use, quality, events, processes, security status, characteristics, statistics, patterns, conditions, configurations, topology, and/or any other information for the particular tenant space.
Collectors 118 can be one or more devices, modules, workloads, VMs, containers, and/or processes capable of receiving data from capturing agents 116. Collectors 118 can thus collect reports and data from capturing agents 116. Collectors 118 can be deployed anywhere in network environment 100 and/or even on remote networks capable of communicating with network environment 100. For example, one or more collectors can be deployed within fabric 112, on the L2 network, or on one or more of the servers 106, VMs 110, hypervisors. Collectors 118 can be hosted on a server or a cluster of servers, for example. In some cases, collectors 118 can be implemented in one or more servers in a distributed fashion.
As previously noted, collectors 118 can include one or more collectors. Moreover, a collector can be configured to receive reported data from all capturing agents 116 or a subset of capturing agents 116. For example, a collector can be assigned to a subset of capturing agents 116 so the data received by that specific collector is limited to data from the subset of capturing agents 116. Collectors 118 can be configured to aggregate data from all capturing agents 116 and/or a subset of capturing agents 116. Further, collectors 118 can be configured to analyze some or all of the data reported by capturing agents 116.
Environment 100 can include one or more analytics engines 120 configured to analyze the data reported to collectors 118. For example, engines 120 can be configured to receive collected data from collectors 118, aggregate the data, analyze the data (individually and/or aggregated), generate reports, identify conditions, compute statistics, visualize reported data, troubleshoot conditions, visualize the network and/or portions of the network (e.g., a tenant space), generate alerts, identify patterns, calculate misconfigurations, identify errors, generate suggestions, generate testing, detect compromised elements (e.g., capturing agents 116, devices, servers, switches, etc.), and/or perform any other analytics functions.
Engines 120 can include one or more modules or software programs for performing such analytics. Further, engines 120 can reside on one or more servers, devices, VMs, nodes, etc. For example, engines 120 can be separate VMs or servers, an individual VM or server, or a cluster of servers or applications. Engines 120 can reside within the fabric 112, within the L2 network, outside of the environment 100 (e.g., WAN 114), in one or more segments or networks coupled with the fabric 112 (e.g., overlay network coupled with the fabric 112), etc. Engines 120 can be coupled with the fabric 112 via the leaf switches 104, for example.
While collectors 118 and engines 120 are shown as separate entities, this is simply a non-limiting example for illustration purposes, as other configurations are also contemplated herein. For example, any of collectors 118 and engines 120 can be part of a same or separate entity. Moreover, any of the collector, aggregation, and analytics functions can be implemented by one entity (e.g., a collector 118 or engine 120) or separately implemented by multiple entities (e.g., engines 120 and/or collectors 118).
Each of the capturing agents 116 can use a respective address (e.g., internet protocol (IP) address, port number, etc.) of their host to send information to collectors 118 and/or any other destination. Collectors 118 may also be associated with their respective addresses such as IP addresses. Moreover, capturing agents 116 can periodically send information about flows they observe to collectors 118. Capturing agents 116 can be configured to report each and every flow they observe or a subset of flows they observe. For example, capturing agents 116 can report every flow always, every flow within a period of time, every flow at one or more intervals, or a subset of flows during a period of time or at one or more intervals.
Capturing agents 116 can report a list of flows that were active during a period of time (e.g., between the current time and the time of the last report). The consecutive periods of time of observance can be represented as pre-defined or adjustable time series. The series can be adjusted to a specific level of granularity. Thus, the time periods can be adjusted to control the level of details in statistics and can be customized based on specific requirements or conditions, such as security, scalability, bandwidth, storage, etc. The time series information can also be implemented to focus on more important flows or components (e.g., VMs) by varying the time intervals. The communication channel between a capturing agent and collector 118 can also create a flow in every reporting interval. Thus, the information transmitted or reported by capturing agents 116 can also include information about the flow created by the communication channel.
When referring to a capturing agent's host herein, the host can refer to the physical device or component hosting the capturing agent (e.g., server, networking device, ASIC, etc.), the virtualized environment hosting the capturing agent (e.g., hypervisor, virtual machine, etc.), the operating system hosting the capturing agent (e.g., guest operating system, host operating system, etc.), and/or system layer hosting the capturing agent (e.g., hardware layer, operating system layer, hypervisor layer, virtual machine layer, etc.).
Hypervisor 108A (otherwise known as a virtual machine manager or monitor) can be a layer of software, firmware, and/or hardware that creates and runs VMs 110. Guest operating systems 204 running on VMs 110 can share virtualized hardware resources created by hypervisor 108A. The virtualized hardware resources can provide the illusion of separate hardware components. Moreover, the virtualized hardware resources can perform as physical hardware components (e.g., memory, storage, processor, network interface, peripherals, etc.), and can be driven by hardware resources 210 on server 106A. Hypervisor 108A can have one or more network addresses, such as an internet protocol (IP) address, to communicate with other devices, components, or networks. For example, hypervisor 108A can have a dedicated IP address which it can use to communicate with VMs 110, server 106A, and/or any remote devices or networks.
Hypervisor 108A can be assigned a network address, such as an IP, with a global scope. For example, hypervisor 108A can have an IP that can be reached or seen by VMs 110A-N as well any other devices in the network environment 100 illustrated in
Hardware resources 210 of server 106A can provide the underlying physical hardware that drive operations and functionalities provided by server 106A, hypervisor 108A, and VMs 110. Hardware resources 210 can include, for example, one or more memory resources, one or more storage resources, one or more communication interfaces, one or more processors, one or more circuit boards, one or more buses, one or more extension cards, one or more power supplies, one or more antennas, one or more peripheral components, etc.
Server 106A can also include one or more host operating systems (not shown). The number of host operating systems can vary by configuration. For example, some configurations can include a dual boot configuration that allows server 106A to boot into one of multiple host operating systems. In other configurations, server 106A may run a single host operating system. Host operating systems can run on hardware resources 210. In some cases, hypervisor 108A can run on, or utilize, a host operating system on server 106A. Each of the host operating systems can execute one or more processes, which may be programs, applications, modules, drivers, services, widgets, etc.
Server 106A can also have one or more network addresses, such as an IP address, to communicate with other devices, components, or networks. For example, server 106A can have an IP address assigned to a communications interface from hardware resources 210, which it can use to communicate with VMs 110, hypervisor 108A, leaf router 104A in
VM capturing agents 202A-N (collectively “202”) can be deployed on one or more of VMs 110. VM capturing agents 202 can be data and packet inspection agents or sensors deployed on VMs 110 to capture packets, flows, processes, events, traffic, and/or any data flowing into, out of, or through VMs 110. VM capturing agents 202 can be configured to export or report any data collected or captured by the capturing agents 202 to a remote entity, such as collectors 118, for example. VM capturing agents 202 can communicate or report such data using a network address of the respective VMs 110 e.g., VM IP address).
VM capturing agents 202 can capture and report any traffic (e.g., packets, flows, etc.) sent, received, generated, and/or processed by VMs 110. For example, capturing agents 202 can report every packet or flow of communication sent and received by VMs 110. Such communication channel between capturing agents 202 and collectors 108 creates a flow in every monitoring period or interval and the flow generated by capturing agents 202 may be denoted as a control flow. Moreover, any communication sent or received by VMs 110, including data reported from capturing agents 202, can create a network flow. VM capturing agents 202 can report such flows in the form of a control flow to a remote device, such as collectors 118 illustrated in
VM capturing agents 202 can report each flow separately or aggregated with other flows. When reporting a flow via a control flow, VM capturing agents 202 can include a capturing agent identifier that identifies capturing agents 202 as reporting the associated flow. VM capturing agents 202 can also include in the control flow a flow identifier, an IP address, a timestamp, metadata, a process ID, an OS username associated with the process ID, a host or environment descriptor (e.g., type of software bridge or virtual network card, type of host such as a hypervisor VM, etc.), and any other information, as further described below. In addition, capturing agents 202 can append the process and user information which process and/or user is associated with a particular flow) to the control flow. The additional information as identified above can be applied to the control flow as labels. Alternatively, the additional information can be included as part of a header, a trailer, or a payload.
VM capturing agents 202 can also report multiple flows as a set of flows. When reporting a set of flows, VM capturing agents 202 can include a flow identifier for the set of flows and/or a flow identifier for each flow in the set of flows. VM capturing agents 202 can also include one or more timestamps and other information as previously explained.
VM capturing agents 202 can run as a process, kernel module, or kernel driver on guest operating systems 204 of VMs 110. VM capturing agents 202 can thus monitor any traffic sent, received, or processed by VMs 110, any processes running on guest operating systems 204, any users and user activities on guest operating system 204, any workloads on VMs 110, etc.
Hypervisor capturing agent 206 can be deployed on hypervisor 108A. Hypervisor capturing agent 206 can be a data inspection agent, capturing agent or sensor deployed on hypervisor 108A to capture traffic (e.g., packets, flows, etc.) and/or data flowing through hypervisor 108A. Hypervisor capturing agent 206 can be configured to export or report any data collected or captured by hypervisor capturing agent 206 to a remote entity, such as collectors 118, for example. Hypervisor capturing agent 206 can communicate or report such data using a network address of hypervisor 108A, such as an IP address of hypervisor 108A.
Because hypervisor 108A can see traffic and data originating from VMs 110, hypervisor capturing agent 206 can also capture and report any data (e.g., traffic data) associated with VMs 110. For example, hypervisor capturing agent 206 can report every packet or flow of communication sent or received by VMs 110 and/or VM capturing agents 202. Moreover, any communication sent or received by hypervisor 108A, including data reported from hypervisor capturing agent 206, can create a network flow. Hypervisor capturing agent 206 can report such flows in the form of a control flow to a remote device, such as collectors 118 illustrated in
When reporting a flow, hypervisor capturing agent 206 can include a capturing agent identifier that identifies hypervisor capturing agent 206 as reporting the flow. Hypervisor capturing agent 206 can also include in the control flow a flow identifier, an IP address, a timestamp, metadata, a process ID, and any other information, as explained below. In addition, capturing agents 206 can append the process and user information (i.e., which process and/or user is associated with a particular flow) to the control flow. The additional information as identified above can be applied to the control flow as labels. Alternatively, the additional information can be included as part of a header, a trailer, or a payload.
Hypervisor capturing agent 206 can also report multiple flows as a set of flows. When reporting a set of flows, hypervisor capturing agent 206 can include a flow identifier for the set of flows and/or a flow identifier for each flow in the set of flows. Hypervisor capturing agent 206 can also include one or more timestamps and other information as previously explained, such as process and user information.
As previously explained, any communication captured or reported by VM capturing agents 202 can flow through hypervisor 108A. Thus, hypervisor capturing agent 206 can observe and capture any flows or packets reported by VM capturing agents 202, including any control flows. Accordingly, hypervisor capturing agent 206 can also report any packets or flows reported by VM capturing agents 202 and any control flows generated by VM capturing agents 202. For example, VM capturing agent 202A on VM 1 (110A) captures flow 1 (“F1”) and reports F1 to collector 118 on
When reporting F1, hypervisor capturing agent 206 can report F1 as a message or report that is separate from the message or report of F1 transmitted by VM capturing agent 202A on VM 1 (110A). However, hypervisor capturing agent 206 can also, or otherwise, report F1 as a message or report that includes or appends the message or report of F1 transmitted by VM capturing agent 202A on VM 1 (110A). In other words, hypervisor capturing agent 206 can report F1 as a separate message or report from VM capturing agent 202A's message or report of F1, and/or a same message or report that includes both a report of F1 by hypervisor capturing agent 206 and the report of F1 by VM capturing agent 202A at VM 1 (110A). In this way, VM capturing agents 202 at VMs 110 can report packets or flows received or sent by VMs 110, and hypervisor capturing agent 206 at hypervisor 108A can report packets or flows received or sent by hypervisor 108A, including any flows or packets received or sent by VMs 110 and/or reported by VM capturing agents 202.
Hypervisor capturing agent 206 can run as a process, kernel module, or kernel driver on the host operating system associated with hypervisor 108A. Hypervisor capturing agent 206 can thus monitor any traffic sent and received by hypervisor 108A, any processes associated with hypervisor 108A, etc.
Server 106A can also have server capturing agent 208 running on it. Server capturing agent 208 can be a data inspection agent or sensor deployed on server 106A to capture data (e.g., packets, flows, traffic data, etc.) on server 106A. Server capturing agent 208 can be configured to export or report any data collected or captured by server capturing agent 206 to a remote entity, such as collector 118, for example. Server capturing agent 208 can communicate or report such data using a network address of server 106A, such as an IP address of server 106A.
Server capturing agent 208 can capture and report any packet or flow of communication associated with server 106A. For example, capturing agent 208 can report every packet or flow of communication sent or received by one or more communication interfaces of server 106A. Moreover, any communication sent or received by server 106A, including data reported from capturing agents 202 and 206, can create a network flow associated with server 106A. Server capturing agent 208 can report such flows in the form of a control flow to a remote device, such as collector 118 illustrated in
Server capturing agent 208 can also report multiple flows as a set of flows. When reporting a set of flows, server capturing agent 208 can include a flow identifier for the set of flows and/or a flow identifier for each flow in the set of flows. Server capturing agent 208 can also include one or more timestamps and other information as previously explained.
Any communications captured or reported by capturing agents 202 and 206 can flow through server 106A. Thus, server capturing agent 208 can observe or capture any flows or packets reported by capturing agents 202 and 206. In other words, network data observed by capturing agents 202 and 206 inside VMs 110 and hypervisor 108A can be a subset of the data observed by server capturing agent 208 on server 106A. Accordingly, server capturing agent 208 can report any packets or flows reported by capturing agents 202 and 206 and any control flows generated by capturing agents 202 and 206. For example, capturing agent 202A on VM 1 (110A) captures flow 1 (F1) and reports F1 to collector 118 as illustrated on
When reporting F1, server capturing agent 208 can report F1 as a message or report that is separate from any messages or reports of F1 transmitted by capturing agent 202A on VM 1 (110A) or capturing agent 206 on hypervisor 108A. However, server capturing agent 208 can also, or otherwise, report F1 as a message or report that includes or appends the messages or reports or metadata of F1 transmitted by capturing agent 202A on VM 1 (110A) and capturing agent 206 on hypervisor 108A. In other words, server capturing agent 208 can report F1 as a separate message or report from the messages or reports of F1 from capturing agent 202, and capturing agent 206, and/or a same message or report that includes a report of F1 by capturing agent 202A, capturing agent 206, and capturing agent 208. In this way, capturing agents 202 at VMs 110 can report packets or flows received or sent by VMs 110, capturing agent 206 at hypervisor 108A can report packets or flows received or sent by hypervisor 108A, including any flows or packets received or sent by VMs 110 and reported by capturing agents 202, and capturing agent 208 at server 106A can report packets or flows received or sent by server 106A, including any flows or packets received or sent by VMs 110 and reported by capturing agents 202, and any flows or packets received or sent by hypervisor 108A and reported by capturing agent 206.
Server capturing agent 208 can run as a process, kernel module, or kernel driver on the host operating system or a hardware component of server 106A. Server capturing agent 208 can thus monitor any traffic sent and received by server 106A, any processes associated with server 106A, etc.
In addition to network data, capturing agents 202, 206, and 208 can capture additional information about the system or environment in which they reside. For example, capturing agents 202, 206, and 208 can capture data or metadata of active or previously active processes of their respective system or environment, operating system user identifiers, metadata of files on their respective system or environment, timestamps, network addressing information, flow identifiers, capturing agent identifiers, etc. Capturing agents 202, 206, and 208
Moreover, capturing agents 202, 206, 208 are not specific to any operating system environment, hypervisor environment, network environment, or hardware environment. Thus, capturing agents 202, 206, and 208 can operate in any environment.
As previously explained, capturing agents 202, 206, and 208 can send information about the network traffic they observe. This information can be sent to one or more remote devices, such as one or more servers, collectors, engines, etc. Each capturing agent can be configured to send respective information using a network address, such as an IP address, and any other communication details, such as port number, to one or more destination addresses or locations. Capturing agents 202, 206, and 208 can send metadata about one or more flows, packets, communications, processes, events, etc.
Capturing agents 202, 206, and 208 can periodically report information about each flow or packet they observe. The information reported can contain a list of flows or packets that were active during a period of time (e.g., between the current time and the time at which the last information was reported). The communication channel between the capturing agent and the destination can create a flow in every interval. For example, the communication channel between capturing agent 208 and collector 118 can create a control flow. Thus, the information reported by a capturing agent can also contain information about this control flow. For example, the information reported by capturing agent 208 to collector 118 can include a list of flows or packets that were active at hypervisor 108A during a period of time, as well as information about the communication channel between capturing agent 206 and collector 118 used to report the information by capturing agent 206.
In this example, leaf router 104A can include network resources 222, such as memory, storage, communication, processing, input, output, and other types of resources. Leaf router 104A can also include operating system environment 224. The operating system environment 224 can include any operating system, such as a network operating system, embedded operating system, etc. Operating system environment 224 can include processes, functions, and applications for performing networking, routing, switching, forwarding, policy implementation, messaging, monitoring, and other types of operations.
Leaf router 104A can also include capturing agent 226. Capturing agent 226 can be an agent or sensor configured to capture network data, such as flows or packets, sent received, or processed by leaf router 104A. Capturing agent 226 can also be configured to capture other information, such as processes, statistics, users, alerts, status information, device information, etc. Moreover, capturing agent 226 can be configured to report captured data to a remote device or network, such as collector 118 shown in
Leaf router 104A can be configured to route traffic to and from other devices or networks, such as server 106A. Accordingly, capturing agent 226 can also report data reported by other capturing agents on other devices. For example, leaf router 104A can be configured to route traffic sent and received by server 106A to other devices. Thus, data reported from capturing agents deployed on server 106A, such as VM and hypervisor capturing agents on server 106A, would also be observed by capturing agent 226 and can thus be reported by capturing agent 226 as data observed at leaf router 104A. Such report can be a control flow generated by capturing agent 226. Data reported by the VM and hypervisor capturing agents on server 106A can therefore be a subset of the data reported by capturing agent 226.
Capturing agent 226 can run as a process or component (e.g., firmware, module, hardware device, etc.) in leaf router 104A. Moreover, capturing agent 226 can be installed on leaf router 104A as a software or firmware agent. In some configurations, leaf router 104A itself can act as capturing agent 226. Moreover, capturing agent 226 can run within operating system 224 and/or separate from operating system 224.
Leaf router 104A can route packets or traffic 242 between fabric 112 and server 106A, hypervisor 108A, and VM 110A. Packets or traffic 242 between VM 110A and leaf router 104A can flow through hypervisor 108A and server 106A. Packets or traffic 242 between hypervisor 108A and leaf router 104A can flow through server 106A. Finally, packets or traffic 242 between server 106A and leaf router 104A can flow directly to leaf router 104A. However, in some cases, packets or traffic 242 between server 106A and leaf router 104A can flow through one or more intervening devices or networks, such as a switch or a firewall.
Moreover, VM capturing agent 202A at VM 110A, hypervisor capturing agent 206A at hypervisor 108A, network device capturing agent 226 at leaf router 104A, and any server capturing agent at server 106A (e.g., capturing agent running on host environment of server 106A) can send reports 244 (also referred to as control flows) to collector 118 based on the packets or traffic 242 captured at each respective capturing agent. Reports 244 from VM capturing agent 202A to collector 118 can flow through VM 110A, hypervisor 108A, server 106A, and leaf router 104A. Reports 244 from hypervisor capturing agent 206A to collector 118 can flow through hypervisor 108A, server 106A, and leaf router 104A. Reports 244 from any other server capturing agent at server 106A to collector 118 can flow through server 106A and leaf router 104A. Finally, reports 244 from network device capturing agent 226 to collector 118 can flow through leaf router 104A. Although reports 244 are depicted as being routed separately from traffic 242 in
Reports 244 can include any portion of packets or traffic 242 captured at the respective capturing agents. Reports 244 can also include other information, such as timestamps, process information, capturing agent identifiers, flow identifiers, flow statistics, notifications, logs, user information, system information, etc. Some or all of this information can be appended to reports 244 as one or more labels, metadata, or as part of the packet(s)' header, trailer, or payload. For example, if a user opens a browser on VM 110A and navigates to examplewebsite.com, VM capturing agent 202A of VM 110A can determine which user (i.e., operating system user) of VM 110A (e.g., username “johndoe85”) and which process being executed on the operating system of VM 110A (e.g., “chrome.exe”) were responsible for the particular network flow to and from examplewebsite.com. Once such information is determined, the information can be included in report 244 as labels for example, and report 244 can be transmitted from VM capturing agent 202A to collector 118. Such additional information can help system 240 to gain insight into flow information at the process and user level, for instance. This information can be used for security, optimization, and determining structures and dependencies within system 240.
In some examples, the reports 244 can include various statistics and/or usage information reported by the respective capturing agents. For example, the reports 244 can indicate an amount of traffic captured by the respective capturing agent, which can include the amount of traffic sent, received, and generated by the capturing agent's host; a type of traffic captured, such as video, audio, Web (e.g., HTTP or HTTPS), database queries, application traffic, etc.; a source and/or destination of the traffic, such as a destination server or application, a source network or device, a source or destination address or name (e.g., IP address, DNS name, FQDN, packet label, MAC address, WAN, VNID, VxLAN, source or destination domain, etc.); a source and/or destination port (e.g., port 25, port 80, port 443, port 8080, port 22); a traffic protocol; traffic metadata; etc. The reports 244 can also include indications of traffic or usage patterns and information, such as frequency of communications, intervals, type of requests, type of responses, triggering processes or events (e.g., causality), resource usage, etc.
Each of the capturing agents 202A, 206A, 226 can include a respective unique capturing agent identifier on each of reports 244 it sends to collector 118, to allow collector 118 to determine which capturing agent sent the report. Capturing agent identifiers in reports 244 can also be used to determine which capturing agents reported what flows. This information can then be used to determine capturing agent placement and topology, as further described below, as well as mapping individual flows to processes and users. Such additional insights gained can be useful for analyzing the data in reports 244, as well as troubleshooting, security, visualization, configuration, planning, and management, and so forth.
As previously noted, the topology of the capturing agents can be ascertained from the reports 244. To illustrate, a packet received by VM 110A from fabric 112 can be captured and reported by VM capturing agent 202A. Since the packet received by VM 110A will also flow through leaf router 104A and hypervisor 108A, it can also be captured and reported by hypervisor capturing agent 206A and network device capturing agent 226. Thus, for a packet received by VM 110A from fabric 112, collector 118 can receive a report of the packet from VM capturing agent 202A, hypervisor capturing agent 206A, and network device capturing agent 226.
Similarly, a packet sent by VM 110A to fabric 112 can be captured and reported by VM capturing agent 202A. Since the packet sent by VM 110A will also flow through leaf router 104A and hypervisor 108A, it can also be captured and reported by hypervisor capturing agent 206A and network device capturing agent 226. Thus, for a packet sent by VM 110A to fabric 112, collector 118 can receive a report of the packet from VM capturing agent 202A, hypervisor capturing agent 206A, and network device capturing agent 226.
On the other hand, a packet originating at, or destined to, hypervisor 108A, can be captured and reported by hypervisor capturing agent 206A and network device capturing agent 226, but not VM capturing agent 202A, as such packet may not flow through VM 110A. Moreover, a packet originating at, or destined to, leaf router 104A, will be captured and reported by network device capturing agent 226, but not VM capturing agent 202A, hypervisor capturing agent 206A, or any other capturing agent on server 106A, as such packet may not flow through VM 110A, hypervisor 108A, or server 106A.
Information ascertained or inferred about the topology of the capturing agents can also be used with the reports 244 to detect problems. For example, the inferred topology of the capturing agents can be used with the current and/or historical statistics included in the reports 244 to infer or detect various conditions. To illustrate, traffic to and from fabric 112 captured by VM capturing agent 202 should also be captured by hypervisor capturing agent 206 and network device capturing agent 226. Thus, if VM capturing agent 202 reports 200 packets to or from fabric 112 during a period of time and network device capturing agent 226 only reports 20 packets to or from fabric 112 during that same period of time, then one can infer from this discrepancy that VM capturing agent 202 has reported and/or captured an abnormal or unexpected number of packets during that period of time. This abnormal activity can be determined to indicate a faulty state of the VM capturing agent 202, such as an error, a bug, malware, a virus, or a compromised condition.
Other statistics and usage details determined from reports 244 can also be considered for determining problems or faults with capturing agents and/or hosts. For example, if hypervisor capturing agent 206 has typically reported in the past an average of 10K server hits (e.g., Web, email, database, etc.) every 7 days, and reports 244 indicate a spike of 50K server hits over the last 2 days, then one can infer that this abnormal levels of activity indicate a problem with the hypervisor capturing agent 206 and/or its host (i.e., hypervisor 108 or server 106). The abnormal levels of activity can be a result of malware or a virus affecting the hypervisor capturing agent 206.
In another example, if the reports 244 indicate that the VM capturing agent 202 has been generating unexpected, improper, or excessive traffic, such as sending packets or commands to a new or different device other than collector 118—or other than any other system with which VM capturing agent 202 is expected or configured to communicate with—or sending the wrong types of packets (e.g., other than reports 244) or sending traffic at unexpected times or events (e.g., without being triggered by a predefined setting or event such as the capturing of a packet processed by the host), then one can assume that VM capturing agent 202 has been compromised or is being manipulated by an unauthorized user or device.
Reports 244 can be transmitted to collector 118 periodically as new packets or traffic 242 are captured by a capturing agent, or otherwise based on a schedule, interval, or event, for example. Further, each capturing agent can send a single report or multiple reports to collector 118. For example, each of the capturing agents can be configured to send a report to collector 118 for every flow, packet, message, communication, or network data received, transmitted, and/or generated by its respective host (e.g., VM 110A, hypervisor 108A, server 106A, and leaf router 104A). As such, collector 118 can receive a report of a same packet from multiple capturing agents. In other examples, one or more capturing agents can be configured to send a report to collector 118 for one or more flows, packets, messages, communications, network data, or subset(s) thereof, received, transmitted, and/or generated by the respective host during a period of time or interval.
VM capturing agent 202A can be configured to report to collector 118 traffic sent, received, or processed by VM 110A. Hypervisor capturing agent 210 can be configured to report to collector 118 traffic sent, received, or processed by hypervisor 108A. Finally, network device capturing agent 226 can be configured to report to collector 118 traffic sent, received, or processed by leaf router 104A.
Collector 118 can thus receive flows 302 from VM capturing agent 202A, flows 304 from hypervisor capturing agent 206A, and flows 306 from network device capturing agent 226. Flows 302, 304, and 306 can include control flows. Flows 302 can include flows captured by VM capturing agent 202A at VM 110A.
Flows 304 can include flows captured by hypervisor capturing agent 206A at hypervisor 108A. Flows captured by hypervisor capturing agent 206A can also include flows 302 captured by VM capturing agent 202A, as traffic sent and received by VM 110A will be received and observed by hypervisor 108A and captured by hypervisor capturing agent 206A.
Flows 306 can include flows captured by network device capturing agent 226 at leaf router 104A. Flows captured by network device capturing agent 226 can also include flows 302 captured by VM capturing agent 202A and flows 304 captured by hypervisor capturing agent 206A, as traffic sent and received by VM 110A and hypervisor 108A is routed through leaf router 104A and can thus be captured by network device capturing agent 226.
Collector 118 can collect flows 302, 304, and 306, and store the reported data. Collector 118 can also forward some or all of flows 302, 304, and 306, and/or any respective portion thereof, to engine 120. Engine 120 can process the information, including any information about the capturing agents (e.g., agent placement, agent environment, etc.) and/or the captured traffic (e.g., statistics), received from collector 118 to identify patterns, conditions, network or device characteristics; log statistics or history details; aggregate and/or process the data; generate reports, timelines, alerts, graphical user interfaces; detect errors, events, inconsistencies; troubleshoot networks or devices; configure networks or devices; deploy services or devices; reconfigure services, applications, devices, or networks; etc.
Collector 118 and/or engine 120 can map individual flows that traverse VM 110A, hypervisor 108A, and/or leaf router 104A to the specific capturing agents at VM 110A, hypervisor 108A, and/or leaf router 104A. For example, collector 118 or engine 120 can determine that a particular flow that originated from VM 110A and destined for fabric 112 was sent by VM 110A and such flow was reported by VM capturing agent 202. It may be determined that, the same flow was received by a process named Z on hypervisor 108A and forwarded to a process named W on leaf router 104A and also reported by hypervisor capturing agent 206.
While engine 120 is illustrated as a separate entity, other configurations are also contemplated herein. For example, engine 120 can be part of collector 118 and/or a separate entity. Indeed, engine 120 can include one or more devices, applications, modules, databases, processing components, elements, etc. Moreover, collector 118 can represent one or more collectors. For example, in some configurations, collector 118 can include multiple collection systems or entities, which can reside in one or more networks.
Having disclosed some basic system components and concepts, the disclosure now turns to the exemplary method embodiment shown in
The current disclosure implements capturing agents or sensors within VMs, hypervisors, servers, and hardware switches which capture data sent and received at each of these points and report the data to a collector which can aggregate and maintain the reported, sensed data. The collector can transmit the collected data from each capturing agent to the pipeline (e.g., particular engine), which can analyze the aggregated data and identify precise amounts of packet loss at each point. The pipeline can identify packet loss at each point by comparing data or packets captured and reported by capturing agents at each point. This comparison can be performed per flow, per link, or on a host basis.
Moreover, the pipeline can perform the comparison for data captured within a specific time window. For example, the pipeline can compare data from each point within a 30 minute time window. The pipeline can then identify packet loss at each point and determine if there is a problem at a specific point within the link, path, or flow. For example, the pipeline can analyze an aggregate of data captured for a 30 minute window of communications from S1 to H1 to S2. Based on the aggregated data, the pipeline can determine that S1 reported 100% of the packets, H1 reported 90% of the packets, and S2 reported 80% of the packets. Here, the pipeline can thus determine that there is a 10% packet loss at each of H1 and S2. In another aspect, the time window can be more flexible and dynamic. For example, the time window might be for a particular communication session (or any task) between two hosts plus 60 seconds following the conclusion of the session. The extended time of the time window beyond the communication session can depend on whether packet loss is reported. Thus, if over a threshold amount of packet loss is experienced, the time window can be extended by a period of time like 1 minute. The amount of time added or used for the window may be dependent on how much over or under a threshold the packet loss is.
The concepts disclosed herein allow a centralized system to collect and aggregate data captured from sensors at each point within a communication path over a specific period of time and compare the information reported at each point to identify packet loss at each point. This mechanism can be implemented in a live environment and can accurately and efficiently ascertain packet loss at each point within a network.
The identifying of the first packet loss at the first environment and the second packet loss at the second environment can be performed by comparing packets captured and reported by the first capturing agent and the second capturing agent. The comparing of the packets captured and reported by the first capturing agent and the second capturing agent can also be performed on one of a per flow, per link and per host basis. In one example, the packet flow occurs through the first environment and the second environment.
Moreover, the identifying can take into account an inferred topology associated with the capturing agents. For example, the number of packets reported by a first capturing agent can be compared with the number of packets reported by a second capturing agent. The delta can suggest a difference in packets processed at the respective hosts of the two capturing agents. In some cases, the delta can indicate the number of packets lost or an amount of packet loss between the two hops associated with the capturing agents. However, in some cases, the delta can be adjusted based on a topology of the capturing agents when ascertaining the packet loss. Moreover, the topology can be used to determine whether the delta indicates a packet loss or whether the delta is simply a result of the network topology. For example, if capturing agent A resides in a hypervisor and capturing agent B resides in a VM hosted by the hypervisor, then this topology can suggest that capturing agent A is expected to detect more packets than capturing agent B, as all packets to and from the VM must traverse the hypervisor while all of the packets to and from the hypervisor may not necessarily traverse the VM. Thus, if the delta indicates that capturing agent A has captured more packets than capturing agent B, then the delta can be ignored or attributed to the topology of components associated with the reported communications. On the other hand, if the delta indicates that capturing agent B has reported more traffic than capturing agent A, then the topology information can be used to infer that this delta suggests a packet loss at the hypervisor layer.
Furthermore, specific characteristics of the reported traffic can be extracted from the reported data and used to infer packet loss conditions and estimates. For example, the data reported by the capturing agents can be reviewed to determine the type(s) of traffic or activity captured by the respective capturing agents. The type of traffic or activity can then be used to adjust packet loss calculations or estimates. For example, capturing agent A may report an increased number of packets than capturing agent B. In one non-limiting example, upon further review, the extra packets may be identified as packets that can only be processed by the host of capturing agent A and not the host of capturing agent B due to reasons other than a packet loss, for example, protocol or network requirements.
To illustrate, assume that capturing agent A resides on a switch in an overlay fabric (e.g., 112). Further assume that capturing agent B resides on a host in a L2 network connected to the fabric via a virtual tunneling endpoint switch, for example (e.g., leaf 104). Also assume that spanning tree protocol (STP) is running and configured on the L2 network. Thus, in this scenario, such topology may suggest, in some cases, that capturing agent A is expected to report more traffic than capturing agent B because the traffic sent and received by capturing agent B's host would also be captured by capturing agent A's host. However, in some cases when STP is running on the L2 network, it may be possible for capturing agent B to capture significantly more packets than capturing agent A. Upon further review of the type of traffic captured by capturing agent B, one may determine that the extra packets are STP packets (e.g., BPDUs). Moreover, since STP packets (e.g., BPDUs) are propagated in the L2 network but cannot be propagated on overlay fabrics, this difference in reported packets may be normal. Thus, where such difference in the number of reported packets may otherwise indicate a packet loss because capturing agent A is expected to capture all of the packets captured by capturing agent B plus additional packets, upon further review of the type of traffic which accounts for such additional traffic, it may be determined that such difference is not attributed to packet loss but rather the specific configuration, topology, and protocols of the associated hosts.
The data for identifying packet loss can be derived from one or more of an external source or sources, such as malware trackers or whois databases, and/or data obtained from the various layers of a network including a physical layer, a hypervisor layer and a virtual layer. The identification of packet loss can be based, at least in part, on capturing agents configured in a device hardware layer 104A, a hypervisor layer 108A, and/or a virtual machine layer 110A. The data obtained from these capturing agents can also be coordinated with external data or other data to arrive at conclusions about packet loss.
With the information at the various levels, increased fine tuning can occur with respect to identifying where packet loss might be occurring. For example, detecting traffic flow information between different layers such as at a hypervisor as well as one of its virtual machine, can help to tailor a targeted response or solution.
The hypervisors will each have a virtual switch and each virtual machine can also have a virtual network interface. With the disclosure, one can analyze the behavior of these virtual switches and/or virtual network interfaces and use that data in establishing packet loss data.
Flow identifier (e.g., unique identifier associated with the flow).
Capturing agent identifier (e.g., data uniquely identifying reporting capturing agent).
Timestamp (e.g., time of event, report, etc.).
Interval (e.g., time between current report and previous report, interval between flows or packets, interval between events, etc.).
Duration (e.g., duration of event,duration of communication, duration of flow, duration of report, etc.).
Flow direction (e.g., egress flow, ingress flow,etc.).
Application identifier (e.g., identifier of application associated with flow, process, event, or data).
Port (e.g., source port,destination port, layer 4 port, etc.).
Destination address (e.g., interface address associated with destination, IP address, domain name, network address, hardware address, virtual address, physical address, etc.).
Source address (e.g., interface address associated with source, IP address, domain name, network address, hardware address, virtual address, physical address, etc.).
Interface (e.g., interface address, interface information, etc.).
Protocol (e.g., layer 4 protocol, layer 3 protocol, etc.).
Event (e.g., description of event, event identifier, etc.).
Flag (e.g., layer 3 flag, flag options, etc.).
Tag (e.g., virtual local area network tag, etc.).
Process (e.g., process identifier, etc.).
User (e.g., OS username, etc.).
Bytes (e.g., flow size, packet size, transmission size, etc.).
Sensor Type (e.g., the type of virtualized environment hosting the capturing agent, such as hypervisor or VM; the type of virtual network device, such as VNIC, LINUX bridge, OVS, software switch, etc.).
The listing 500 includes a non-limiting example of fields in a report. Other fields and data items are also contemplated herein, such as handshake information, system information, network address associated with capturing agent or host, operating system environment information, network data or statistics, process statistics, system statistics, etc. The order in which these fields are illustrated is also exemplary and can be rearranged in any other way. One or more of these fields can be part of a header, a trailer, or a payload of in one or more packets. Moreover, one or more of these fields can be applied to the one or more packets as labels. Each of the fields can include data, metadata, and/or any other information relevant to the fields.
The disclosure now turns o the example network device and system illustrated in
The interfaces 668 are typically provided as interface cards (sometimes referred to as “line cards”). Generally, they control the sending and receiving of data packets over the network and sometimes support other peripherals used with the router 610. Among the interfaces that may be provided are Ethernet interfaces, frame relay interfaces, cable interfaces, DSL interfaces, token ring interfaces, and the like. In addition, various very high-speed interfaces may be provided such as fast token ring interfaces, wireless interfaces, Ethernet interfaces, Gigabit Ethernet interfaces, ATM interfaces, HSSI interfaces, POS interfaces, FDDI interfaces and the like. Generally, these interfaces may include ports appropriate for communication with the appropriate media. In some cases, they may also include an independent processor and, in some instances, volatile RAM. The independent processors may control such communications intensive tasks as packet switching, media control and management. By providing separate processors for the communications intensive tasks, these interfaces allow the master microprocessor 662 to efficiently perform routing computations, network diagnostics, security functions, etc.
Although the system shown in
Regardless of the network device's configuration, it may employ one or more memories or memory modules (including memory 661) configured to store program instructions for the general-purpose network operations and mechanisms for roaming, route optimization and routing functions described herein. The program instructions may control the operation of an operating system and/or one or more applications, for example. The memory or memories may also be configured to store tables such as mobility binding, registration, and association tables, etc.
To enable user interaction with the computing device 700, an input device 745 can represent any number of input mechanisms, such as a microphone for speech, a touch-sensitive screen for gesture or graphical input, keyboard, mouse, motion input, speech and so forth. An output device 735 can also be one or more of a number of output mechanisms known to those of skill in the art. In some instances, multimodal systems can enable a user to provide multiple types of input to communicate with the computing device 700. The communications interface 740 can generally govern and manage the user input and system output. There is no restriction on operating on any particular hardware arrangement and therefore the basic features here may easily be substituted for improved hardware or firmware arrangements as they are developed.
Storage device 730 is a non-volatile memory and can be a hard disk or other types of computer readable media which can store data that are accessible by a computer, such as magnetic cassettes, flash memory cards, solid state memory devices, digital versatile disks, cartridges, random access memories (RAMS) 725, read only memory (ROM) 720, and hybrids thereof.
The storage device 730 can include software modules 732, 734, 736 for controlling the processor 710. Other hardware or software modules are contemplated. The storage device 730 can be connected to the system bus 705. In one aspect, a hardware module that performs a particular function can include the software component stored in a computer-readable medium in connection with the necessary hardware components, such as the processor 710, bus 705, display 735, and so forth, to carry out the function.
Chipset 760 can also interface with one or more communication interfaces 790 that can have different physical interfaces. Such communication interfaces can include interfaces for wired and wireless local area networks, for broadband wireless networks, as well as personal area networks. Some applications of the methods for generating, displaying, and using the GUI disclosed herein can include receiving ordered datasets over the physical interface or be generated by the machine itself by processor 755 analyzing data stored in storage 770 or 775. Further, the machine can receive inputs from a user via user interface components 785 and execute appropriate functions, such as browsing functions by interpreting these inputs using processor 755.
It can be appreciated that example systems 700 and 750 can have more than one processor 710/755 or be part of a group or cluster of computing devices networked together to provide greater processing capability. In one aspect, reference to a “processor” can mean a group of processors of the same or different types. For example, the “processor” can include a central processing unit and a graphical processing unit. The “processor” can include one or multiple virtual and/or hardware processors.
For clarity of explanation, in some instances the present technology may be presented as including individual functional blocks including functional blocks comprising devices, device components, steps or routines in a method embodied in software, or combinations of hardware and software.
In some embodiments the computer-readable storage devices, mediums, and memories can include a cable or wireless signal containing a bit stream and the like. However, when mentioned, non-transitory computer-readable storage media expressly exclude media such as energy, carrier signals, electromagnetic waves, and signals per se.
Methods according to the above-described examples can be implemented using computer-executable instructions that are stored or otherwise available from computer readable media. Such instructions can comprise, for example, instructions and data which cause or otherwise configure a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, or special purpose processing device to perform a certain function or group of functions. Portions of computer resources used can be accessible over a network. The computer executable instructions may be, for example, binaries, intermediate format instructions such as assembly language, firmware, or source code. Examples of computer-readable media that may be used to store instructions, information used, and/or information created during methods according to described examples include magnetic or optical disks, flash memory, USB devices provided with non-volatile memory, networked storage devices, and so on.
Devices implementing methods according to these disclosures can comprise hardware, firmware and/or software, and can take any of a variety of form factors. Typical examples of such form factors include laptops, smart phones, small form factor personal computers, personal digital assistants, rackmount devices, standalone devices, and so on. Functionality described herein also can be embodied in peripherals or add-in cards. Such functionality can also be implemented on a circuit board among different chips or different processes executing in a single device, by way of further example.
The instructions, media for conveying such instructions, computing resources for executing them, and other structures for supporting such computing resources are means for providing the functions described in these disclosures.
Although a variety of examples and other information was used to explain aspects within the scope of the appended claims, no limitation of the claims should be implied based on particular features or arrangements in such examples, as one of ordinary skill would be able to use these examples to derive a wide variety of implementations. Further and although some subject matter may have been described in language specific to examples of structural features and/or method steps, it is to be understood that the subject matter defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to these described features or acts. For example, such functionality can be distributed differently or performed in components other than those identified herein. Rather, the described features and steps are disclosed as examples of components of systems and methods within the scope of the appended claims. Moreover, claim language reciting “at least one of” a set indicates that one member of the set or multiple members of the set satisfy the claim.
It should be understood that features or configurations herein with reference to one embodiment or example can be implemented in, or combined with, other embodiments or examples herein. That is, terms such as “embodiment”, “variation”, “aspect”, “example”, “configuration”, “implementation”, “case”, and any other terms which may connote an embodiment, as used herein to describe specific features or configurations, are not intended to limit any of the associated features or configurations to a specific or separate embodiment or embodiments, and should not be interpreted to suggest that such features or configurations cannot be combined with features or configurations described with reference to other embodiments, variations, aspects, examples, configurations, implementations, cases, and so forth. In other words, features described herein with reference to a specific example (e.g., embodiment, variation, aspect, configuration, implementation, case, etc.) can be combined with features described with reference to another example. Precisely, one of ordinary skill in the art will readily recognize that the various embodiments or examples described herein, and their associated features, can be combined with each other.
A phrase such as an “aspect” does not imply that such aspect is essential to the subject technology or that such aspect applies to all configurations of the subject technology. A disclosure relating to an aspect may apply to all configurations, or one or more configurations. A phrase such as an aspect may refer to one or more aspects and vice versa. A phrase such as a “configuration” does not imply that such configuration is essential to the subject technology or that such configuration applies to all configurations of the subject technology. A disclosure relating to a configuration may apply to all configurations, or one or more configurations. A phrase such as a configuration may refer to one or more configurations and vice versa. The word “exemplary” is used herein to mean “serving as an example or illustration.” Any aspect or design described herein as “exemplary” is not necessarily to be construed as preferred or advantageous over other aspects or designs.
Moreover, claim language reciting “at least one of” a set indicates that one member of the set or multiple members of the set satisfy the claim. For example, claim language reciting “at least one of A, B, and C” or “at least one of A, B, or C” means A alone, B alone, C alone, A and B together, A and C together, B and C together, or A, B and C together.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/171,899, entitled “SYSTEM FOR MONITORING AND MANAGING DATACENTERS,” filed on Jun. 5, 2015, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5086385 | Launey et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5319754 | Meinecke et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5400246 | Wilson et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5436909 | Dev et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5448724 | Hayashi | Sep 1995 | A |
5555416 | Owens et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5726644 | Jednacz et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5742803 | Igarashi et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5742829 | Davis et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5751914 | Coley et al. | May 1998 | A |
5794047 | Meier | Aug 1998 | A |
5822731 | Schultz | Oct 1998 | A |
5831848 | Rielly et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5903545 | Sabourin et al. | May 1999 | A |
5949974 | Ewing et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6012096 | Link et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6026362 | Kim et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6085243 | Fletcher et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6115462 | Servi et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6141595 | Gloudeman et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6144962 | Weinberg et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6192402 | Iwase | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6204850 | Green | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6215898 | Woodfill et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6226273 | Busuioc et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6230312 | Hunt | May 2001 | B1 |
6239699 | Ronnen | May 2001 | B1 |
6247058 | Miller et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6249241 | Jordan et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6279035 | Brown et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6295527 | McCormack et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6307837 | Ichikawa et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6330562 | Boden et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6338131 | Dillon | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6351843 | Berkley et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6353775 | Nichols | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6381735 | Hunt | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6499137 | Hunt | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6525658 | Streetman et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6546420 | Lemler et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6546553 | Hunt | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6597663 | Rekhter | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6611896 | Mason, Jr. et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6629123 | Hunt | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6633909 | Barrett et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6654750 | Adams et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6718414 | Doggett | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728779 | Griffin et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6751663 | Farrell et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6774899 | Ryall et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6801878 | Hintz et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6816461 | Scrandis et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6847993 | Novaes et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6848106 | Hipp | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6925490 | Novaes et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6958998 | Shorey | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6965861 | Dailey et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6983323 | Cantrell et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6996808 | Niewiadomski et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
6996817 | Birum et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
6999452 | Drummond-Murray et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7002464 | Bruemmer et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7024468 | Meyer et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7036049 | Ali et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7089583 | Mehra et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7096368 | Kouznetsov et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7111055 | Falkner | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7120934 | Ishikawa | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7133923 | MeLampy et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7162643 | Sankaran et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7167483 | Sharma et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7181769 | Keanini et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7185103 | Jain | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7194664 | Fung et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7203740 | Putzolu et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7213068 | Kohli et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7263689 | Edwards et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7296288 | Hill et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7302487 | Ylonen et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7327735 | Robotham et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7331060 | Ricciulli | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7337206 | Wen et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7349761 | Cruse | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7353507 | Gazdik et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7353511 | Ziese | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7356679 | Le et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7360072 | Soltis et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7370092 | Aderton et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7395195 | Suenbuel et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7444404 | Wetherall et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7453879 | Lo | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7454486 | Kaler et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7466681 | Ashwood-Smith et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7467205 | Dempster et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7469290 | Liubovich et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7496040 | Seo | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7496575 | Buccella et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7496661 | Morford et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7523178 | Reeves et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7523465 | Aamodt et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7523493 | Liang et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7530105 | Gilbert et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7539770 | Meier | May 2009 | B2 |
7568107 | Rathi et al. | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7571478 | Munson et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7606203 | Shabtay | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7610330 | Quinn et al. | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7633942 | Bearden et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7644438 | Dash et al. | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7676570 | Levy et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7681131 | Quarterman et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7693947 | Judge et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7742406 | Muppala | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7742413 | Bugenhagen | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7743242 | Oberhaus et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7752307 | Takara | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7774498 | Kraemer et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7783457 | Cunningham | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7787480 | Mehta et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7788477 | Huang et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7808897 | Mehta et al. | Oct 2010 | B1 |
7813822 | Hoffberg | Oct 2010 | B1 |
7840618 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7844696 | Labovitz et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7844744 | Abercrombie et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7864707 | Dimitropoulos et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7870204 | LeVasseur et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7873025 | Patel et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7873074 | Boland | Jan 2011 | B1 |
7874001 | Beck et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7885197 | Metzler | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7895649 | Brook et al. | Feb 2011 | B1 |
7904420 | Ianni | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7930752 | Hertzog et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7934248 | Yehuda et al. | Apr 2011 | B1 |
7957934 | Greifeneder | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7961637 | McBeath | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7970946 | Djabarov et al. | Jun 2011 | B1 |
7975035 | Popescu et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7990847 | Leroy et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8001610 | Chickering et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8005935 | Pradhan et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8040232 | Oh et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8040822 | Proulx et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8040832 | Nishio et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8056134 | Ogilvie | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8115617 | Thubert et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8135657 | Kapoor et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8135847 | Pujol et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8156430 | Newman | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8160063 | Maltz et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8179809 | Eppstein et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
8181248 | Oh et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8181253 | Zaitsev et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
8185343 | Fitzgerald et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
8185824 | Mitchell et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
8239365 | Salman | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8239915 | Satish et al. | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8250657 | Nachenberg et al. | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8255972 | Azagury et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8266697 | Coffman | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8272875 | Jurmain | Sep 2012 | B1 |
8280683 | Finkler | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8281397 | Vaidyanathan et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8291495 | Burns et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8296847 | Mendonca et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8311973 | Zadeh | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8312540 | Kahn et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8339959 | Moisand et al. | Dec 2012 | B1 |
8356007 | Arson et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8365005 | Bengtson et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8365286 | Poston | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8370407 | Devarajan et al. | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8381289 | Pereira et al. | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8391270 | Van Der Stok et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8407164 | Malik et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8407798 | Lotem et al. | Mar 2013 | B1 |
8413235 | Chen et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8442073 | Skubacz et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8451731 | Lee et al. | May 2013 | B1 |
8462212 | Kundu et al. | Jun 2013 | B1 |
8463860 | Guruswamy et al. | Jun 2013 | B1 |
8489765 | Vasseur et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8494985 | Keralapura et al. | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8499348 | Rubin | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8516590 | Ranadive et al. | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8527977 | Cheng et al. | Sep 2013 | B1 |
8549635 | Muttik et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8565109 | Poovendran et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8570861 | Brandwine et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8572600 | Chung et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8572734 | McConnell et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8572735 | Ghosh et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8572739 | Cruz et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8578491 | McNamee et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8588081 | Salam et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8595709 | Rao et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8600726 | Varshney et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8612530 | Sapovalovs et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8613084 | Dalcher | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8615803 | Dacier et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8624898 | Bugaj et al. | Jan 2014 | B1 |
8630316 | Haba | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8631464 | Belakhdar et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8640086 | Bonev et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8656493 | Capalik | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8661544 | Yen et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8677487 | Balupari et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8683389 | Bar-Yam et al. | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8689172 | Amaral et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8706914 | Duchesneau | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8713676 | Pandrangi et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8719452 | Ding et al. | May 2014 | B1 |
8719835 | Kanso et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8750287 | Bui et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8752042 | Ratica | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8752179 | Zaitsev | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8755396 | Sindhu et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8762951 | Kosche et al. | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8769084 | Westerfeld et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8775577 | Alford et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8776180 | Kumar et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8779921 | Curtiss | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8793255 | Bilinski et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8805946 | Glommen | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8812448 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8812725 | Kulkarni | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8813236 | Saha et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8825848 | Dotan et al. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8832013 | Adams et al. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8832103 | Isaacson et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8832461 | Saroiu et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8849926 | Marzencki et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8881258 | Paul et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8887238 | Howard et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8887285 | Jordan et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8904520 | Nachenberg et al. | Dec 2014 | B1 |
8908685 | Patel et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8914497 | Xiao et al. | Dec 2014 | B1 |
8924941 | Krajec et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8931043 | Cooper et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8954546 | Krajec | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8954610 | Berke et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8955124 | Kim et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8966021 | Allen | Feb 2015 | B1 |
8966625 | Zuk et al. | Feb 2015 | B1 |
8973147 | Pearcy et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8984331 | Quinn | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8990386 | He et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8996695 | Anderson et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8997063 | Krajec et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8997227 | Mhatre et al. | Mar 2015 | B1 |
9014047 | Alcala et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9015716 | Fletcher et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9043905 | Allen et al. | May 2015 | B1 |
9071575 | Lemaster et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9088598 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2015 | B1 |
9104543 | Cavanagh et al. | Aug 2015 | B1 |
9110905 | Polley et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9117075 | Yeh | Aug 2015 | B1 |
9122599 | Jaladanki et al. | Sep 2015 | B1 |
9130836 | Kapadia et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9135145 | Voccio et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9141912 | Shircliff et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9141914 | Viswanathan et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9146820 | Alfadhly et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9152789 | Natarajan et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9158720 | Shirlen et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9160764 | Stiansen et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9170917 | Kumar et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9178906 | Chen et al. | Nov 2015 | B1 |
9179058 | Zeira et al. | Nov 2015 | B1 |
9185127 | Neou et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9191042 | Dhayni | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9191400 | Ptasinski et al. | Nov 2015 | B1 |
9191402 | Yan | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9197654 | Ben-Shalom et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9225793 | Dutta et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9237111 | Banavalikar et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9246702 | Sharma et al. | Jan 2016 | B1 |
9246773 | Degioanni | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9252915 | Bakken | Feb 2016 | B1 |
9253042 | Lumezanu et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9253206 | Fleischman | Feb 2016 | B1 |
9258217 | Duffield et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9276829 | Castro et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9281940 | Matsuda et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9286047 | Avramov et al. | Mar 2016 | B1 |
9292415 | Seto et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9294486 | Chiang et al. | Mar 2016 | B1 |
9294498 | Yampolskiy et al. | Mar 2016 | B1 |
9300689 | Tsuchitoi | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9317574 | Brisebois et al. | Apr 2016 | B1 |
9319384 | Yan et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9369435 | Short et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9369479 | Lin | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9378068 | Anantharam et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9396327 | Shimomura et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9385917 | Khanna et al. | Jul 2016 | B1 |
9397902 | Dragon et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9405903 | Xie et al. | Aug 2016 | B1 |
9413615 | Singh et al. | Aug 2016 | B1 |
9417985 | Baars et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9418222 | Rivera et al. | Aug 2016 | B1 |
9426068 | Dunbar et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9454324 | Madhavapeddi | Sep 2016 | B1 |
9462013 | Boss et al. | Oct 2016 | B1 |
9465696 | McNeil et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9483334 | Walsh | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9487222 | Palmer et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9501744 | Brisebois et al. | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9531589 | Clemm et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9536084 | Lukacs et al. | Jan 2017 | B1 |
9552221 | Pora | Jan 2017 | B1 |
9563517 | Natanzon et al. | Feb 2017 | B1 |
9575869 | Pechanec et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9575874 | Gautallin et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9576240 | Jeong et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9582669 | Shen et al. | Feb 2017 | B1 |
9596196 | Hills | Mar 2017 | B1 |
9602536 | Brown, Jr. et al. | Mar 2017 | B1 |
9621413 | Lee | Apr 2017 | B1 |
9621575 | Jalan et al. | Apr 2017 | B1 |
9634915 | Bley | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9645892 | Patwardhan | May 2017 | B1 |
9658942 | Bhat et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9665474 | Li et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9678803 | Suit | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9684453 | Holt et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9686233 | Paxton | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9697033 | Koponen et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9727394 | Kun et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9729568 | Lefebvre et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9733973 | Prasad et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9736041 | Lumezanu et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9749145 | Banavalikar et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9800608 | Korsunsky et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9804830 | Raman et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9804951 | Liu et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9813307 | Walsh et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9813324 | Nampelly et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9813516 | Wang | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9825911 | Brandwine | Nov 2017 | B1 |
9836183 | Love et al. | Dec 2017 | B1 |
9857825 | Johnson et al. | Jan 2018 | B1 |
9858621 | Konrardy et al. | Jan 2018 | B1 |
9860208 | Ettema et al. | Jan 2018 | B1 |
9904584 | Konig et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9916232 | Voccio et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9916538 | Zadeh et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9935851 | Gandham et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9996529 | McCandless et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10002187 | McCandless et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10009240 | Rao et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10116531 | Alizadeh Attar et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10171319 | Yadav et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10243862 | Cafarelli et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10394692 | Liu et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10447551 | Zhang et al. | Oct 2019 | B1 |
10454793 | Deen et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10454999 | Eder | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10476982 | Tarre et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10652225 | Koved et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
10686804 | Yadav et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10749890 | Aloisio et al. | Aug 2020 | B1 |
10944683 | Roskind | Mar 2021 | B1 |
11368378 | Gandham et al. | Jun 2022 | B2 |
11516098 | Spadaro et al. | Nov 2022 | B2 |
11528283 | Yadav et al. | Dec 2022 | B2 |
11556808 | Kim et al. | Jan 2023 | B1 |
20010028646 | Arts et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020023210 | Tuomenoksa et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020053033 | Cooper et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020083175 | Afek et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020097687 | Meiri et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020103793 | Koller et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020107857 | Teraslinna | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020107875 | Seliger et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020141343 | Bays | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020169739 | Carr et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020184393 | Leddy et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020196292 | Toh et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030005145 | Bullard | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030016627 | MeLampy et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023600 | Nagamura et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023601 | Fortier, Jr. et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030035140 | Tomita et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030046388 | Milliken | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030065986 | Fraenkel et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030069953 | Bottom et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030072269 | Teruhi et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030084158 | Saito et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097439 | Strayer et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030105976 | Copeland, III | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030126242 | Chang | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030133443 | Klinker et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030145232 | Poletto et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030149888 | Yadav | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030151513 | Herrmann et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030154399 | Zuk et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030177208 | Harvey, IV | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030206205 | Kawahara et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040019676 | Iwatsuki et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040030776 | Cantrell et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040036478 | Logvinov et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040046787 | Henry et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040049698 | Ott et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040054680 | Kelley et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040111679 | Subasic et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040133640 | Yeager et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040133690 | Chauffour et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040137908 | Sinivaara et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040167921 | Carson et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040205536 | Newman et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040213221 | Civanlar et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040218532 | Khirman | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040220984 | Dudfield et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040243533 | Dempster et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040255050 | Takehiro et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040268149 | Aaron | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050028154 | Smith et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050039104 | Shah et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050060403 | Bernstein et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050063377 | Bryant et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050068907 | Garg | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050083933 | Fine et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050104885 | Jager et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050108331 | Osterman | May 2005 | A1 |
20050122325 | Twait | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050138157 | Jung et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050154625 | Chua et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050166066 | Ahuja et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050177829 | Vishwanath | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050177871 | Roesch et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050182681 | Bruskotter et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050185621 | Sivakumar et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050198247 | Perry et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050198371 | Smith et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050198629 | Vishwanath | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050207376 | Ashwood-Smith et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050210331 | Connelly et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050210533 | Copeland et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050228885 | Winfield et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050237948 | Wan et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050257244 | Joly et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050289244 | Sahu et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060004758 | Teng et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060026669 | Zakas | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060048218 | Lingafelt et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060058218 | Syud et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060075396 | Surasinghe | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060077909 | Saleh et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060080733 | Khosmood et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060089985 | Poletto | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060095968 | Portolani et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060098625 | King et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060101516 | Sudaharan et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060106550 | Morin et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060143432 | Rothman et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060156408 | Himberger et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060158266 | Yonekawa et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060158354 | Aberg et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060159032 | Ukrainetz et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060173912 | Lindvall et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195448 | Newport | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060212556 | Yacoby et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060224398 | Lakshman et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060253566 | Stassinopoulos | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060265713 | Depro et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060272018 | Fouant | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060274659 | Ouderkirk | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060280179 | Meier | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060294219 | Ogawa et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070010898 | Hosek et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070014275 | Bettink et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070019618 | Shaffer et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070025306 | Cox et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070044147 | Choi et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070067756 | Garza | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070074288 | Chang et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070097976 | Wood et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118654 | Jamkhedkar et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070124376 | Greenwell | May 2007 | A1 |
20070127491 | Verzijp et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070150568 | Ruiz | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070162420 | Ou et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070169179 | Narad | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070177626 | Kotelba | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070180526 | Copeland, III | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070195729 | Li et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070195794 | Fujita et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070195797 | Patel et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070199060 | Touboul | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070201474 | Isobe | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070209074 | Coffman | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070211637 | Mitchell | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070214348 | Danielsen | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070220159 | Choi et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070223388 | Arad et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070230415 | Malik | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070232265 | Park et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250640 | Wells | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250930 | Aziz et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070280108 | Sakurai | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070300061 | Kim et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080002697 | Anantharamaiah et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080013532 | Garner et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080017619 | Yamakawa et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080022385 | Crowell et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080028389 | Genty et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080040088 | Vankov et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080046708 | Fitzgerald et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080049633 | Edwards et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080052387 | Heinz et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080056124 | Nanda et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080066009 | Gardner et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080082662 | Danliker et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080101234 | Nakil et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080120350 | Grabowski et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080126534 | Mueller et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080141246 | Kuck et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080155245 | Lipscombe et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080181100 | Yang et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080185621 | Yi et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080201109 | Zill et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080208367 | Koehler et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080222352 | Booth et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080232358 | Baker et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080247539 | Huang et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080250122 | Zsigmond et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080250128 | Sargent | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080262990 | Kapoor et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080270199 | Chess et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080282347 | Dadhia et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080295163 | Kang | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080298271 | Morinaga | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080301755 | Sinha et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080301765 | Nicol et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080320592 | Suit et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090019026 | Valdes-Perez et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090059934 | Aggarwal et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090064332 | Porras et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090077097 | Lacapra et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090077543 | Siskind et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090077666 | Chen et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090106646 | Mollicone et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090109849 | Wood et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090133126 | Jang et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090138590 | Lee et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090158432 | Zheng et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090161658 | Danner et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090164565 | Underhill | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090177484 | Davis et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090180393 | Nakamura | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090192847 | Lipkin et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090193495 | McAfee et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090241170 | Kumar et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090249302 | Xu et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090252181 | Desanti | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090260083 | Szeto et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090271412 | Lacapra et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090271504 | Ginter et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090292795 | Ford et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090296593 | Prescott | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090300180 | Dehaan et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090307753 | Dupont et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090310485 | Averi | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090313373 | Hanna et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090313698 | Wahl | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090319912 | Serr et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090323543 | Shimakura | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090328219 | Narayanaswamy | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100005288 | Rao et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100005478 | Helfman et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100042716 | Farajidana et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100049839 | Parker et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100054241 | Shah et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100070647 | Irino et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100077445 | Schneider et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100095293 | O'Neill et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100095367 | Narayanaswamy | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100095377 | Krywaniuk | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100128598 | Gandhewar et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100138526 | DeHaan et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100138810 | Komatsu et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100148940 | Gelvin et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100153316 | Duffield et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100153696 | Beachem et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100157809 | Duffield et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100161817 | Xiao et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100174813 | Hildreth et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100180016 | Bugwadia et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100185901 | Hirsch | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100188989 | Wing et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100188995 | Raleigh | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100194741 | Finocchio | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100220584 | DeHaan et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100226373 | Rowell et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100235514 | Beachem | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100235879 | Burnside et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100235915 | Memon et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100246432 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100287266 | Asati et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100303240 | Beachem | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100306180 | Johnson et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100317420 | Hoffberg | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100319060 | Aiken et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110004935 | Moffie et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110010585 | Bugenhagen et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110022641 | Werth et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110055381 | Narasimhan et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110055382 | Narasimhan | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110055388 | Yumerefendi et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110060704 | Rubin et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110066719 | Miryanov et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110069685 | Tofighbakhsh | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110072119 | Bronstein et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110083124 | Moskal et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110083125 | Komatsu et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110085556 | Breslin et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110103259 | Aybay et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110107074 | Chan et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110107331 | Evans et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110125894 | Anderson et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110126136 | Abella et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110126275 | Anderson et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110145885 | Rivers et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110153039 | Gvelesiani et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110153811 | Jeong et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110158088 | Lofstrand et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110158112 | Finn et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110158410 | Falk et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110167435 | Fang | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110170860 | Smith et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110173490 | Narayanaswamy et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110185423 | Sallam | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110191465 | Hofstaedter et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110196957 | Ayachitula et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110202655 | Sharma et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110202761 | Sarela et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110214174 | Herzog et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110225207 | Subramanian et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110228696 | Agarwal et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110238793 | Bedare et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110239058 | Umezuki | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110239194 | Braude | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110246663 | Melsen et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110267952 | Ko et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110276951 | Jain | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110277034 | Hanson | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110283266 | Gallagher et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110283277 | Castillo et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110289122 | Grube et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110289301 | Allen et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110302652 | Westerfeld | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110310892 | DiMambro | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110314148 | Petersen et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110317982 | Xu et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120005542 | Petersen et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120011153 | Buchanan et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120016972 | Tamura | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120047394 | Jain et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120075999 | Ko et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120079592 | Pandrangi | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120089664 | Igelka | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120096394 | Balko et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120102361 | Sass et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120102543 | Kohli et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120102545 | Carter, III et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120110188 | Van Biljon et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120117226 | Tanaka et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120117642 | Lin et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120136996 | Seo et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120137278 | Draper et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120137361 | Yi et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120140626 | Anand et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120144030 | Narasimhan | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120167057 | Schmich et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120195198 | Regan | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120197856 | Banka et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120198541 | Reeves | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120216271 | Cooper et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120216282 | Pappu et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120218989 | Tanabe et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120219004 | Balus et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120233348 | Winters | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120233473 | Vasseur et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120240185 | Kapoor et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120240232 | Azuma | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120246303 | Petersen et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120254109 | Shukla et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120255875 | Vicente et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120260135 | Beck et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120260227 | Shukla et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120260236 | Basak et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120268405 | Ferren et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120278021 | Lin et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120281700 | Koganti et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120287815 | Attar | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120300628 | Prescott et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130003538 | Greenburg et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130003733 | Venkatesan et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130006935 | Grisby | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130007435 | Bayani | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130019008 | Jorgenson et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130038358 | Cook et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130041934 | Annamalaisami et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130054682 | Malik et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130055145 | Antony et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130055373 | Beacham et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130064096 | Degioanni et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130080375 | Viswanathan et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130085889 | Fitting et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130086272 | Chen et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130094372 | Boot | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130094376 | Reeves | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130097706 | Titonis et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130103827 | Dunlap et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130107709 | Campbell et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130114598 | Schrum et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130117748 | Cooper et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130117847 | Friedman | May 2013 | A1 |
20130122854 | Agarwal et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130124807 | Nielsen et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130125107 | Bandakka et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130145099 | Liu et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130148663 | Xiong | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130159999 | Chiueh et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130160128 | Dolan-Gavitt et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130166730 | Wilkinson | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130173784 | Wang et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130173787 | Tateishi et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130174256 | Powers | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130179487 | Lubetzky et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130179879 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130198509 | Buruganahalli et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130198517 | Mazzarella | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130198839 | Wei et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130201986 | Sajassi et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130205137 | Farrugia et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130205293 | Levijarvi et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130219161 | Fontignie et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130219263 | Abrahami | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130219500 | Lukas et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130232498 | Mangtani et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130238665 | Sequin | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130242999 | Kamble et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130246925 | Ahuja et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130247201 | Alperovitch et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130254879 | Chesla et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130268994 | Cooper et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130275579 | Hernandez et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130283240 | Krajec et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130283281 | Krajec et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130283374 | Zisapel et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130290521 | Labovitz | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130297771 | Osterloh et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130298244 | Kumar et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130301472 | Allan | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130304900 | Trabelsi et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130305369 | Karta et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130308468 | Cowie | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130312097 | Turnbull | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130318357 | Abraham et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130322441 | Anumala | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130326623 | Kruglick | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130326625 | Anderson et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130332773 | Yuan et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130333029 | Chesla et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130335219 | Malkowski | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130336164 | Yang et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130343207 | Cook et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130346054 | Mumtaz | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130346736 | Cook et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130347103 | Veteikis et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140006610 | Formby et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140006871 | Lakshmanan et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140009338 | Lin et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140012562 | Chang | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140012814 | Bercovici et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140019972 | Yahalom et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140020099 | Vaidyanathan et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140031005 | Sumcad et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140033193 | Palaniappan | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140036688 | Stassinopoulos et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140040343 | Nickolov et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140047185 | Peterson et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140047274 | Lumezanu et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140047372 | Gnezdov et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140050222 | Lynar et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140053226 | Fadida et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140056318 | Hansson et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140059200 | Nguyen et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140074946 | Dirstine et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140075048 | Yuksel et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140075336 | Curtis et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140081596 | Agrawal et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140089494 | Dasari et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140092884 | Murphy et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140096058 | Molesky et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140105029 | Jain et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140108665 | Arora et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140115219 | Ajanovic et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140115403 | Rhee et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140115654 | Rogers et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140122656 | Baldwin et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140129942 | Rathod | May 2014 | A1 |
20140130039 | Chaplik et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140136680 | Joshi et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140137109 | Sharma et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140137180 | Lukacs et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140140213 | Raleigh et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140140244 | Kapadia et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140141524 | Keith | May 2014 | A1 |
20140143825 | Behrendt et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140149490 | Luxenberg et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140156814 | Barabash et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140156861 | Cruz-Aguilar et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140164607 | Bai et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140165200 | Singla | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140165207 | Engel et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140173623 | Chang et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140173723 | Singla et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140192639 | Smirnov | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140201717 | Mascaro et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140201838 | Varsanyi et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140208296 | Dang et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140210616 | Ramachandran | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140215573 | Cepuran | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140215621 | Xaypanya et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140224784 | Kohler | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140225603 | Auguste et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140230062 | Kumaran | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140233387 | Zheng et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140247206 | Grokop et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140258310 | Wong et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140269777 | Rothstein et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140280499 | Basavaiah et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140280892 | Reynolds | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140280908 | Rothstein et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140281030 | Cui et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140286174 | Iizuka et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140286354 | Van De Poel et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140289418 | Cohen et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140289854 | Mahvi | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140297357 | Zeng et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140298461 | Hohndel et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140301213 | Khanal et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140307686 | Su et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140317278 | Kersch et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140317737 | Shin et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140321290 | Jin et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140330616 | Lyras | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140331048 | Casas-Sanchez et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140331276 | Frascadore et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140331280 | Porras et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140331304 | Wong | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140344438 | Chen et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140348182 | Chandra et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140351203 | Kunnatur et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140351415 | Harrigan et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140359695 | Chari et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140363076 | Han et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140376379 | Fredette et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150006689 | Szilagyi et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150006714 | Jain | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150007317 | Jain | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150009840 | Pruthi et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150019140 | Downey | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150019569 | Parker et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150023170 | Kakadia et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150026794 | Zuk et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150026809 | Altman et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150033305 | Shear et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150036480 | Huang et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150036533 | Sodhi | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150039751 | Harrigan et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150039757 | Petersen et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150043351 | Ohkawa et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150046882 | Menyhart et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150047032 | Hannis et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150052441 | Degioanni | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150058976 | Carney et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150067143 | Babakhan et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150067786 | Fiske | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150082151 | Liang et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150082430 | Sridhara et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150085665 | Kompella et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150089614 | Mathew et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150095332 | Beisiegel et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150112933 | Satapathy | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150113063 | Liu | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150113133 | Srinivas et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150117624 | Rosenshine | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150124608 | Agarwal et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150124652 | Dhamapurikar et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150128133 | Pohlmann | May 2015 | A1 |
20150128205 | Mahaffey et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150128246 | Feghali et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150134801 | Walley et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150138993 | Forster et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150142962 | Srinivas et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150147973 | Williams et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150156118 | Madani et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150170213 | O'Malley | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150195291 | Zuk et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150199254 | Vesepogu et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150215334 | Bingham et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150222516 | Deval et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150222939 | Gallant et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150227396 | Nimmagadda et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150227598 | Hahn | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150244617 | Nakil et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150244739 | Ben-Shalom et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150245248 | Shudark et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150249622 | Phillips et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150254330 | Chan et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150256413 | Du et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150256555 | Choi et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150256587 | Walker et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150261842 | Huang et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150261886 | Wu et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150261887 | Joukov | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150271008 | Jain et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150271255 | Mackay et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150278273 | Wigington et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150281116 | Ko et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150281277 | May et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150281407 | Raju et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150294212 | Fein | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150295945 | Canzanese, Jr. et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150304346 | Kim | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150312233 | Graham, III et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150356297 | Yang et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150336016 | Chaturvedi | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150341376 | Nandy et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150341379 | Lefebvre et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150341383 | Reddy et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150347554 | Vasantham et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150358287 | Caputo et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150358352 | Chasin et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150379278 | Thota et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150381409 | Margalit et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160006753 | McDaid et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160019030 | Shukla et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160020959 | Rahaman | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160021131 | Heilig | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160026552 | Holden et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160028605 | Gil et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160030683 | Taylor et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160034560 | Setayesh et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160035787 | Matsuda | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160036636 | Erickson et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160036833 | Ardeli et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160036837 | Jain et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160036838 | Jain et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160050128 | Schaible et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160050132 | Zhang et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160072638 | Amer et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160072815 | Rieke et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160080414 | Kolton et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160087861 | Kuan et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160094394 | Sharma et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160094529 | Mityagin | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160094657 | Meira et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160094994 | Kirkby et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160103692 | Guntaka et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160105333 | Lenglet | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160105350 | Greifeneder et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160112269 | Singh et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160112270 | Danait et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160112284 | Pon et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160119234 | Valencia Lopez et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160127395 | Underwood et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160147585 | Konig et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160148251 | Thomas et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160150060 | Meng et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160156531 | Cartwright | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160162308 | Chen et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160162312 | Doherty et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160173446 | Nantel | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160173535 | Barabash et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160183093 | Vaughn et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160191362 | Hwang et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160191466 | Pernicha | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160191469 | Zatko et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160191476 | Schutz et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160196374 | Bar et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160205002 | Rieke et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160216994 | Sefidcon et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160217022 | Velipasaoglu et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160218933 | Porras et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160234083 | Ahn et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160248794 | Cam | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160248813 | Byrnes | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160255082 | Rathod | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160269424 | Chandola et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160269442 | Shieh | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160269482 | Jamjoom et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160277272 | Peach et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160277435 | Salajegheh et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160283307 | Takeshima et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160285730 | Ohkawa et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160292065 | Thangamani et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160294691 | Joshi | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160306550 | Liu et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160308908 | Kirby et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160321452 | Richardson et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160321455 | Deng et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160330097 | Kim et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160337204 | Dubey et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160357424 | Pang et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160357546 | Chang et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160357587 | Yadav et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160357957 | Deen et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359592 | Kulshreshtha et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359628 | Singh et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359658 | Yadav et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359673 | Gupta et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359677 | Kulshreshtha et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359678 | Madani et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359679 | Parasdehgheibi et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359680 | Parasdehgheibi et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359686 | Parasdehgheibi et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359695 | Yadav et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359696 | Yadav et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359697 | Scheib et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359699 | Gandham et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359700 | Pang et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359701 | Pang et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359703 | Gandham et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359704 | Gandham et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359705 | Parasdehgheibi et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359708 | Gandham et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359709 | Deen et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359711 | Deen et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359712 | Alizadeh Attar et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359740 | Parasdehgheibi et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359759 | Singh et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359872 | Yadav et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359877 | Kulshreshtha et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359878 | Prasad et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359879 | Deen et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359880 | Pang et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359881 | Yadav et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359888 | Gupta et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359889 | Yadav et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359890 | Deen et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359891 | Pang et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359897 | Yadav et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359905 | Touboul et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359912 | Gupta et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359913 | Gupta et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359914 | Deen et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359915 | Gupta et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359917 | Rao et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160373481 | Sultan et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160378978 | Singla et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160380865 | Dubai et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160380869 | Shen et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170006141 | Bhadra | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170024453 | Raja et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170032310 | Mimnaugh | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170034018 | Parasdehgheibi et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170048121 | Hobbs et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170054643 | Fraser | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170059353 | Madine et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170070582 | Desai et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170085483 | Mihaly et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170091204 | Minwalla et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170093910 | Gukal et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170118244 | Bai et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170163502 | Macneil et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170187733 | Ahn et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170201448 | Deval et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170208487 | Ratakonda et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170214708 | Gukal et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170222909 | Sadana et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170223052 | Stutz | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170250880 | Akens et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170250951 | Wang et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170257424 | Neogi et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170284839 | Ojala | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170289067 | Lu et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170295141 | Thubert et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170302691 | Singh et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170324518 | Meng et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170331747 | Singh et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170346736 | Chander et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170364380 | Frye, Jr. et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180005427 | Marvie et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180006911 | Dickey | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180007115 | Nedeltchev et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180013670 | Kapadia et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180032905 | Abercrombie | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180098123 | Larson | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180145906 | Yadav et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180191617 | Caulfield et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20200225110 | Knauss et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200273040 | Novick et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200279055 | Nambiar et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200396129 | Tedaldi et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20220141103 | Gandham et al. | May 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1486555 | Mar 2004 | CN |
101093452 | Dec 2007 | CN |
101465763 | Jun 2009 | CN |
101667935 | Mar 2010 | CN |
101770551 | Jul 2010 | CN |
102204170 | Sep 2011 | CN |
102521537 | Jun 2012 | CN |
103023970 | Apr 2013 | CN |
103699664 | Apr 2014 | CN |
103716137 | Apr 2014 | CN |
104065518 | Sep 2014 | CN |
107196807 | Sep 2017 | CN |
0811942 | Dec 1997 | EP |
1039690 | Sep 2000 | EP |
1069741 | Jan 2001 | EP |
1076848 | Jul 2002 | EP |
1383261 | Jan 2004 | EP |
1450511 | Aug 2004 | EP |
2045974 | Apr 2008 | EP |
2043320 | Apr 2009 | EP |
2427022 | Mar 2012 | EP |
2723034 | Apr 2014 | EP |
2860912 | Apr 2015 | EP |
2887595 | Jun 2015 | EP |
3069241 | Aug 2018 | EP |
3793166 | Mar 2021 | EP |
102142009 | Aug 2011 | IN |
2009016906 | Jan 2009 | JP |
1394338 | May 2014 | KR |
0145370 | Jun 2001 | WO |
2006045793 | May 2006 | WO |
WO 2007014314 | Feb 2007 | WO |
2007042171 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO 2007070711 | Jun 2007 | WO |
2007139842 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO 2008069439 | Jun 2008 | WO |
WO-2010048693 | May 2010 | WO |
WO-2010059972 | May 2010 | WO |
2012139288 | Oct 2012 | WO |
WO-2012162419 | Nov 2012 | WO |
WO 2013030830 | Mar 2013 | WO |
WO-2013055812 | Apr 2013 | WO |
2013126759 | Aug 2013 | WO |
WO-2014127008 | Aug 2014 | WO |
WO 2015042171 | Mar 2015 | WO |
WO 2015099778 | Jul 2015 | WO |
2015118454 | Aug 2015 | WO |
WO 2016004075 | Jan 2016 | WO |
2016019523 | Feb 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Approximation techniques for computing packet loss in finite-buffered voice multiplexers R. Nagarajan; J.F. Kurose;D. Towsley IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications (Year: 1991). |
A Simple Closed-Form Approximation for the Packet Loss Rate of a TCP Connection Over Wireless Links Jorge Mata-Díaz;Juanjo Alins;Jose L. Muñoz;Oscar Esparza IEEE Communications Letters (Year: 2014). |
Improving emergency messages transmission delay in road monitoring based WSNs Horiya Imane Brahmi; Soufiene Djahel; John Murphy 6th Joint IFIP Wireless and Mobile Networking Conference (WMNC) (Year: 2013). |
Packet Loss Measurement and Control for VPN based Services Dongli Zhang;D. Ionescu 2005 IEEE Instrumentationand Measurement Technology Conference Proceedings Year: 2005 | vol. 3 | Conference Paper | Publisher: IEEE (Year: 2005). |
Datacenter Applications in Virtualized Networks: A Cross-Layer Performance Study Daniel Crisan ⋅ Robert Birke ⋅ Katherine Barabash ⋅ Rami Cohen ⋅ Mitch Gusat , IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications (vol. 32, Issue: 1, pp. 77-87) Publication Date: Jan. 1, 2014 (Year: 2014). |
vNetTracer: Efficient and Programmable Packet Tracing in Virtualized Networks Kun Suo; Yong Zhao; Wei Chen; Jia Rao 2018 IEEE 38th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS) Year: 2018 | Conference Paper | Publisher: IEEE (Year: 2018). |
Australian Government Department of Defence, Intelligence and Security, “Top 4 Strategies to Mitigate Targeted Cyber Intrusions,” Cyber Security Operations Centre Jul. 2013, http://www.asd.gov.au/infosec/top-mitigations/top-4-strategies-explained.htm. |
Author Unknown, “Blacklists & Dynamic Reputation: Understanding Why the Evolving Threat Eludes Blacklists,” www.dambala.com, 9 pages, Dambala, Atlanta, GA, USA. |
Aydin, Galip, et al., “Architecture and Implementation of a Scalable Sensor Data Storage and Analysis Using Cloud Computing and Big Data Technologies,” Journal of Sensors, vol. 2015, Article ID 834217, Feb. 2015, 11 pages. |
Backes, Michael, et al., “Data Lineage in Malicious Environments,” IEEE 2015, pp. 1-13. |
Bayati, Mohsen, et al., “Message-Passing Algorithms for Sparse Network Alignment,” Mar. 2013, 31 pages. |
Berezinski, Przemyslaw, et al., “An Entropy-Based Network Anomaly Detection Method,” Entropy, 2015, vol. 17, www.mdpi.com/joumal/entropy, pp. 2367-2408. |
Berthier, Robin, et al. “Nfsight: Netflow-based Network Awareness Tool,” 2010, 16 pages. |
Bhuyan, Dhiraj, “Fighting Bots and Botnets,” 2006, pp. 23-28. |
Blair, Dana, et al., U.S. Appl. No. 62/106,006, filed Jan. 21, 2015, entitled “Monitoring Network Policy Compliance.” |
Chandran, Midhun, et al., “Monitoring in a Virtualized Environment,” GSTF International Journal on Computing, vol. 1, No. 1, Aug. 2010. |
Chari, Suresh, et al., “Ensuring continuous compliance through reconciling policy with usage,” Proceedings of the 18th ACM symposium on Access control models and technologies (SACMAT '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 49-60. |
Chen, Xu, et al., “Automating network application dependency discovery: experiences, limitations, and new solutions,” 8th USENIX conference on Operating systems design and implementation (OSDI'08), USENIX Association, Berkeley, CA, USA, 117-130. |
Cisco Systems, “Cisco Network Analysis Modules (NAM) Tutorial,” Cisco Systems, Inc., Version 3.5. |
Cisco Systems, Inc., “Addressing Compliance from One Infrastructure: Cisco Unified Compliance Solution Framework,” 2014. |
Cisco Systems, Inc., “Cisco Application Dependency Mapping Service,” 2009. |
Cisco Systems, Inc., “White Paper—New Cisco Technologies Help Customers Achieve Regulatory Compliance,” 1992-2008. |
Cisco Systems, Inc., “A Cisco Guide to Defending Against Distributed Denial of Service Attacks,” May 3, 2016, 34 pages. |
Cisco Technology, Inc., “Cisco Lock-and-Key:Dynamic Access Lists,” http://www/cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security-vpn/lock-key/7604-13.html; Updated Jul. 12, 2006, 16 pages. |
Di Lorenzo, Guisy, et al., “EXSED: An Intelligent Tool for Exploration of Social Events Dynamics from Augmented Trajectories,” Mobile Data Management (MDM), pp. 323-330, Jun. 3-6, 2013. |
Feinstein, Laura, et al., “Statistical Approaches to DDOS Attack Detection and Response,” Proceedings of the DARPA Information Survivability Conference and Exposition (DISCEX '03), Apr. 2003, 12 pages. |
George, Ashley, et al., “NetPal: A Dynamic Network Administration Knowledge Base,” 2008, pp. 1-14. |
Goldsteen, Abigail, et al., “A Tool for Monitoring and Maintaining System Trustworthiness at Run Time,” REFSQ (2015), pp. 142-147. |
Hamadi, S., et al., “Fast Path Acceleration for Open vSwitch in Overlay Networks,” Global Information Infrastructure and Networking Symposium (GIIS), Montreal, QC, pp. 1-5, Sep. 15-19, 2014. |
Hewlett-Packard, “Effective use of reputation intelligence in a security operations center,” Jul. 2013, 6 pages. |
Hideshima, Yusuke, et al., “Starmine: A Visualization System for Cyber Attacks,” https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221536306, Feb. 2006, 9 pages. |
InternetPerils, Inc., “Control Your Internet Business Risk,” 2003-2015, https://www.internetperils.com. |
Janoff, Christian, et al., “Cisco Compliance Solution for HIPAA Security Rule Design and Implementation Guide,” Cisco Systems, Inc., Updated Nov. 14, 2015, part 1 of 2, 350 pages. |
Janoff, Christian, et al., “Cisco Compliance Solution for HIPAA Security Rule Design and Implementation Guide,” Cisco Systems, Inc., Updated Nov. 14, 2015, part 2 of 2, 588 pages. |
Kerrison, Adam, et al., “Four Steps to Faster, Better Application Dependency Mapping—Laying the Foundation for Effective Business Service Models,” BMCSoftware, 2011. |
Kraemer, Brian, “Get to know your data center with CMDB,” TechTarget, Apr. 5, 2006, http://searchdatacenter.techtarget.com/news/118820/Get-to-know-your-data-center-with-CMDB. |
Lab SKU, “VMware Hands-on Labs—HOL-SDC-1301” Version: 20140321-160709, 2013; http://docs.hol.vmware.com/HOL-2013/hoisdo-1301_html_en/ (part 1 of 2). |
Lab SKU, “VMware Hands-on Labs—HOL-SDC-1301” Version: 20140321-160709, 2013; http://docs.hol.vmware.com/HOL-2013/holsdc-1301_html_en/ (part 2 of 2). |
Lachance, Michael, “Dirty Little Secrets of Application Dependency Mapping,” Dec. 26, 2007. |
Landman, Yoav, et al., “Dependency Analyzer,” Feb. 14, 2008, http://ifrog.com/confluence/display/DA/Home. |
Lee, Sihyung, “Reducing Complexity of Large-Scale Network Configuration Management,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Carniege Mellon University, 2010. |
Li, Ang, et al., “Fast Anomaly Detection for Large Data Centers,” Global Telecommunications Conference (GLOBECOM 2010, Dec. 2010, 6 pages. |
Li, Bingbong, et al., “A Supervised Machine Learning Approach to Classify Host Roles On Line Using sFlow,” in Proceedings of the first edition workshop on High performance and programmable networking, 2013, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 53-60. |
Liu, Ting, et al., “Impala: A Middleware System For Managing Autonomic, Parallel Sensor Systems,” In Proceedings of the Ninth ACM SIGPLAN Symposium On Principles And Practice Of Parallel Programming(PPoPP '03), ACM, New York, NY, USA, Jun. 11-13, 2003, pp. 107-118. |
Lu, Zhonghai, et al., “Cluster-based Simulated Annealing for Mapping Cores onto 2D Mesh Networks on Chip,” Design and Diagnostics of Electronic Circuits and Systems, pp. 1, 6, 16-18, Apr. 2008. |
Matteson, Ryan, “Depmap: Dependency Mapping of Applications Using Operating System Events: a Thesis,” Master's Thesis, California Polytechnic State University, Dec. 2010. |
Natarajan, Arun, et al., “NSDMiner: Automated Discovery of Network Service Dependencies,” Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers INFOCOM, Feb. 2012, 9 pages. |
Navaz, A.S. Syed, et al., “Entropy based Anomaly Detection System to Prevent DDOS Attacks in Cloud,” International Journal of computer Applications (0975-8887), vol. 62, No. 15, Jan. 2013, pp. 42-47. |
Neverfail, “Neverfail IT Continuity Architect,” 2015, https://web.archive.org/web/20150908090456/http://www.neverfailgroup.com/products/it-continuity-architect. |
Nilsson, Dennis K., et al., “Key Management And Secure Software Updates In Wireless Process Control Environments,” In Proceedings of the First ACM Conference On Wireless Network Security (WiSec '08), ACM, New York, NY, USA, Mar. 31-Apr. 2, 2008, pp. 100-108. |
Nunnally, Troy, et al., “P3D: A Parallel 3D Coordinate Visualization for Advanced Network Scans,” IEEE 2013, Jun. 9-13, 2013, 6 pages. |
O'Donnell, Glenn, et al., “The CMDB Imperative: How to Realize the Dream and Avoid the Nightmares,” Prentice Hall, Feb. 19, 2009. |
Ohta, Kohei, et al., “Detection, Defense, and Tracking of Internet-Wide Illegal Access in a Distributed Manner,” 2000, pp. 1-16. |
Pathway Systems International Inc., “How Blueprints does Integration,” Apr. 15, 2014, 9 pages, http://pathwaysystems.com/company-blog/. |
Pathway Systems International Inc., “What is Blueprints?” 2010-2016, http://pathwaysystems.com/blueprints-about/. |
Popa, Lucian, et al., “Macroscope: End-Point Approach to Networked Application Dependency Discovery,” CoNEXT'09, Dec. 1-4, 2009, Rome, Italy, 12 pages. |
Prasad, K. Munivara, et al., “An Efficient Detection of Flooding Attacks to Internet Threat Monitors (ITM) using Entropy Variations under Low Traffic,” Computing Communication & Networking Technologies (ICCCNT '12), Jul. 26-28, 2012, 11 pages. |
Sachan, Mrinmaya, et al., “Solving Electrical Networks to incorporate Supervision in Random Walks,” May 13-17, 2013, pp. 109-110. |
Sammarco, Matteo, et al., “Trace Selection for Improved WLAN Monitoring,” Aug. 16, 2013, pp. 9-14. |
Shneiderman, Ben, et al., “Network Visualization by Semantic Substrates,” Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 12, No. 5, pp. 733,740, Sep.-Oct. 2006. |
Wang, Ru, et al., “Learning directed acyclic graphs via bootstarp aggregating,” 2014, 47 pages, http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.2098. |
Wang, Yongjun, et al., “A Network Gene-Based Framework for Detecting Advanced Persistent Threats,” Nov. 2014, 7 pages. |
Woodberg, Brad, “Snippet from Juniper SRX Series” Jun. 17, 2013, 1 page, O'Reilly Media, Inc. |
Zhang, Yue, et al., “CANTINA: A Content-Based Approach to Detecting Phishing Web Sites,” May 8-12, 2007, pp. 639-648. |
Bosch, Greg, “Virtualization,” 2010, 33 pages. |
Breen, Christopher, “MAC 911, How to dismiss Mac App Store Notifications,” Macworld.com, Mar. 24, 2014, 3 pages. |
Chou, C.W., et al., “Optical Clocks and Relativity,” Science vol. 329, Sep. 24, 2010, pp. 1630-1633. |
Huang, Hing-Jie, et al., “Clock Skew Based Node Identification in Wireless Sensor Networks,” IEEE, 2008, 5 pages. |
Ives, Herbert, E., et al., “An Experimental Study of the Rate of a Moving Atomic Clock,” Journal of the Optical Society of America, vol. 28, No. 7, Jul. 1938, pp. 215-226. |
Witze, Alexandra, “Special relativity aces time trial, ‘Time dilation’ predicted by Einstein confirmed by lithium ion experiment,” Nature, Sep. 19, 2014, 3 pages. |
Zatrochova, Zuzana, “Analysis and Testing of Distributed NoSQL Datastore Riak,” Spring, 2015, 76 pages. |
Arista Networks, Inc., “Application Visibility and Network Telemtry using Splunk,” Arista White Paper, Nov. 2013, 11 pages. |
Bauch, Petr, “Reader's Report of Master's Thesis, Analysis and Testing of Distributed NoSQL Datastore Riak,” May 28, 2015, Brno. 2 pages. |
Cisco Systems, Inc., “Cisco Application Visibility and Control,” Oct. 2011, 2 pages. |
Cisco Systems, Inc., “Cisco Tetration Platform Data Sheet”, Updated Mar. 5, 2018, 21 pages. |
Duan, Yiheng, et al., Detective: Automatically Identify and Analyze Malware Processes in Forensic Scenarios via DLLs, IEEE ICC 2015—Next Generation Networking Symposium, pp. 5691-5696. |
Heckman, Sarah, et al., “On Establishing a Benchmark for Evaluating Static Analysis Alert Prioritization and Classification Techniques,” IEEE, 2008; 10 pages. |
Kim, Myung-Sup, et al. “A Flow-based Method for Abnormal Network Traffic Detection, ” IEEE, 2004, pp. 599-612. |
Thomas, R., “Bogon Dotted Decimal List,” Version 7.0, Team Cymru NOC, Apr. 27, 2012, 5 pages. |
Al-Fuqaha, Ala, et al., “Internet of Things: A Survey on Enabling Technologies, Protocols, and Applications,” IEEE Communication Surveys & Tutorials. vol. 17, No. 4, Nov. 18, 2015, pp. 2347-2376. |
Brocade Communications Systems, Inc., “Chapter 5—Configuring Virtual LANs (VLANs),” Jun. 2009, 38 pages. |
Cisco Systems, Inc. “Cisco, Nexus 3000 Series NX-OS Release Notes, Release 5.0(3)U3(1),” Feb. 29, 2012, Part No. OL-26631-01, 16 pages. |
Cisco Systems, Inc., “Cisco—VPN Client User Guide for Windows,” Release 4.6, Aug. 2004, 148 pages. |
Cisco Systems, Inc., “Cisco 4710 Application Control Engine Appliance Hardware Installation Guide,” Nov. 2007, 66 pages. |
Cisco Systems, Inc., “Cisco Data Center Network Architecture and Solutions Overview,” Feb. 2006, 19 pages. |
Cisco Systems, Inc., “Cisco IOS Configuration Fundamentals Configuration Guide: Using Autoinstall and Setup,” Release 12.2, first published Apr. 2001, last updated Sep. 2003, 32 pages. |
Cisco Systems, Inc., “Cisco VN-Link: Virtualization-Aware Networking,” White Paper, Mar. 2009, 10 pages. |
Cisco Systems, Inc., “Cisco, Nexus 5000 Series and Cisco Nexus 2000 Series Release Notes, Cisco NX-OS Release 5.1(3)N2(1b), NX-OS Release 5.1(3)N2(1a) and NX-OS Release 5.1(3)N2(1),” Sep. 5, 2012, Part No. OL-26652-03 CO, 24 pages. |
Cisco Systems, Inc., “Nexus 3000 Series NX-OS Fundamentals Configuration Guide, Release 5.0(3)U3(1): Using PowerOn Auto Provisioning,” Feb. 29, 2012, Part No. OL-26544-01, 10 pages. |
Cisco Systems, Inc., “Quick Start Guide, Cisco ACE 4700 Series Application Control Engine Appliance,” Software Ve740rsion A5(1.0), Sep. 2011, 138 pages. |
Cisco Systems, Inc., “Routing And Bridging Guide, Cisco ACE Application Control Engine,” Software Version A5(1.0), Sep. 2011, 248 pages. |
Cisco Systems, Inc., “VMWare and Cisco Virtualization Solution: Scale Virtual Machine Networking,” Jul. 2009, 4 pages. |
Cisco Systems, Inc., “Cisco Remote Integrated Service Engine for Citrix NetScaler Appliances and Cisco Nexus 7000 Series Switches Configuration Guide,” Last modified Apr. 29, 2014, 78 pages. |
Cisco Technology, Inc., “Cisco IOS Software Release 12.4T Features and Hardware Support,” Feb. 2009, 174 pages. |
Cisco Systems, Inc., “Cisco Application Control Engine (ACE) Troubleshooting Guide—Understanding the ACE Module Architecture and Traffic Flow,” Mar. 11, 2011, 6 pages. |
Costa, Raul, et al., “An Intelligent Alarm Management System for Large-Scale Telecommunication Companies,” In Portuguese Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Oct. 2009, 14 pages. |
De Carvalho, Tiago Filipe Rodrigues, “Root Cause Analysis in Large and Complex Networks,” Dec. 2008, Repositorio.ul.pt, pp. 1-55. |
Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents, “FIPA Agent Message Transport Service Specification,” Dec. 3, 2002, http://www.fipa.org; 15 pages. |
Gia, Tuan Nguyen, et al., “Fog Computing in Healthcare Internet of Things: A Case Study on ECG Feature Extraction,” 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology; Ubiquitous Computing and Communications; Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing; Pervasive Intelligence and Computing, Oct. 26, 2015, pp. 356-363. |
Joseph, Dilip, et al., “Modeling Middleboxes,” IEEE Network, Sep./Oct. 2008, pp. 20-25. |
Kent, S., et al. “Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol,” Network Working Group, Nov. 1998, 67 pages. |
Online Collins English Dictionary, 1 page (Year: 2018). |
Voris, Jonathan, et al., “Bait and Snitch: Defending Computer Systems with Decoys,” Columbia University Libraries, Department of Computer Science, 2013, pp. 1-25. |
Baek, Kwang-Hyun, et al., “Preventing Theft of Quality of Service on Open Platforms,” 2005 Workshop of the 1st International Conference on Security and Privacy for Emerging Areas in Communication Networks, 2005, 12 pages. |
Theodorakopoulos, George, et al., “On Trust Models and Trust Evaluation Metrics for Ad Hoc Networks,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications. vol. 24, Issue 2, Feb. 2006, pp. 318-328. |
Zeng, Sai, et al., “Managing Risk in Multi-node Automation of Endpoint Management,” 2014 IEEE Network Operations and Management Symposium (NOMS), 2014, 6 pages. |
Ananthanarayanan R., et al., “Photon: Fault-tolerant and Scalable Joining of Continuous Data Streams,” Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, New York, USA, Jun. 22-27, 2013, pp. 577-588. |
Aniszczyk C., “Distributed Systems Tracing with Zipkin,” Twitter Blog, Jun. 7, 2012, 3 Pages, [Retrieved on Jan. 26, 2021] Retrieved from URL: https://blog.twitter.com/engineering/en_us/a/2012/distributed-systems-tracing-with-zipkin.html. |
Ayers A., et al., “TraceBack: First Fault Diagnosis by Reconstruction of Distributed Control Flow,” Proceedings of the 2009 ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation-PLDI '09, Jun. 12-15, 2005, vol. 40, No. 6, 13 pages. |
Baah G.K., et al., “The Probabilistic Program Dependence Graph and Its Application to Fault Diagnosis,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, IEEE Service Center, Los Alamitos, CA, US, Jul./Aug. 2010, vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 528-545, ISSN 0098-5589, XP011299543. |
Choi C.H., et al., “CSMonitor: A Visual Client/Server Monitor for CORBA-based Distributed Applications,” Proceedings of 1998 Asia Pacific Software Engineering Conference, Taipei, Taiwan, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, Dec. 2-4, 1998, 8 Pages, DOI:10.1109/APSEC. 1998.733738, ISBN 978-0-8186-9183-6, XP010314829. |
Cisco Systems, Inc., “CCNA2 v3.1 Module 1 WANs and Routers,” 2004 Cisco.com, [retrieved on May 14, 2018], 26 pages. |
Cisco Systems, Inc., “CCNA2 v3.1 Module 2 Introduction to Routers,” 2004 Cisco.com, [retrieved on Jan. 18, 2018], 23 pages. |
Citirx, “AppFlow: Next-Generation Application Performance Monitoring,” Citirx.com, 2011, pp. 1-8. |
European Search Report in European Patent Application No. 23176492.9, dated Oct. 6, 2023, 5 Pages. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 19215055.5, mailed Jan. 17, 2020, 9 Pages. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 20165008.2, mailed May 25, 2020, 6 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 21150804.9, mailed May 6, 2021, 8 Pages. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 21156151.9, mailed May 25, 2021, 8 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 21190461.0, mailed Mar. 1, 2022, 10 Pages. |
Github, “OpenTracing,” 10 pages, Retrieved on Feb. 9, 2021, [URL: https://github.com/opentracing/specification/blob/master/specification.md.]. |
Goins A., et al., “Diving Deep into Kubernetes Networking,” Rancher, Jan. 2019, 42 pages. |
Grove D., et al., “Call Graph Construction in Object-Oriented Languages,” ACM Object-oriented Programming, Systems, Languages, and Applications—OOPSLA '97 Conference Proceedings, Oct. 1997, 18 pages. |
Henke C., et al., “Evaluation of Header Field Entropy forHash-Based Packet Selection,” based on Search String from Google: “entropy header fields,” Obtained on: Nov. 12, 2019, Passive and Active Network Measurement—PAM, 2008, vol. 4979, pp. 82-91. |
Hogg S., “Not your Father's Flow Export Protocol (Part 2), What is AppFlow and how does it Differ From Other Flow Analysis Protocols?,” Core Networking, Mar. 19, 2014, 6 pages. |
Ihler A., et al., “Learning to Detect Events With Markov-Modulated Poisson Processes,” ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery From Data, Dec. 2007, vol. 1, No. 3, Article 13, p. 13:1 to 13:23. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2016/035348, mailed Jul. 27, 2016, 8 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2016/035349, mailed Jul. 27, 2016, 8 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2016/035350, mailed Aug. 17, 2016, 13 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2016/035351, mailed Aug. 10, 2016, 15 pages. |
Juels A., “Rfid Security and Privacy: A Research Survey,” Feb. 2006, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 381-394. |
Kalyanasundaram B., et al., “Using Mobile Data Collectors to Federate Clusters of Disjoint Sensor Network Segments,” IEEE, International Conference on Communications, Department of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, University of Maryland Baltimore County, 2013, pp. 1496-1500. |
Kubernetes Blog, “Borg: The Predecessor to Kubernetes,” Apr. 23, 2015, 2 pages, Retrieved from URL: https://kubernetes.io/blog/2015/04/borg-predecessor-to-kubernetes/. |
Kubernetes IO, “Kubernetes Components,” Aug. 28, 2020, 4 pages, Retrieved from URL: https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/overview/components/. |
Kubernetes IO, “Nodes,” Jan. 12, 2021, 6 pages, Retrieved from URL: https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/architecture/nodes/. |
Kubernetes IO, “Pods,” Jan. 12, 2021, 5 pages, Retrieved from URL: https://kubernetes.io.docs/concepts/workloads/pods/pod/. |
Kubernetes IO, “What is Kubernetes?,” Oct. 22, 2020, 3 pages, Retrieved from URL: https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/overview/what-is-kubernetes/. |
Merriam-Webster, “Definition of Database,” Merriam-Webster Dictionary, 2018, 4 Pages. |
Miller N., et al., “Collecting Network Status Information for Network-Aware Applications,” International Conference on Computer Communications IEEE (INFOCOM), 2000, pp. 1-10. |
Moe J., et al., “Understanding Distributed Systems Via Execution Trace Data,” Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Program Comprehension, Toronto, Canada, May 12-13, 2001, 8 Pages. |
Notification Concerning Transmittal of Copy of International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2016/035348, mailed Dec. 14, 2017, 7 pages. |
Notification Concerning Transmittal of Copy of International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2016/035349, mailed Dec. 14, 2017, 7 pages. |
Notification Concerning Transmittal of International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2016/035350, mailed Dec. 14, 2017, 11 pages. |
Notification Concerning Transmittal of International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2016/035351, mailed Dec. 14, 2017, 11 pages. |
Opentracing IO, “The OpenTracing Semantic Specification,” 8 pages, Retrieved on Jul. 5, 2023, from URL: https://opentracing.io/docs/. |
Sandholm T., et al., “MapReduce Optimization Using Regulated Dynamic Prioritization,” ACM, Jun. 15-19, 2009, pp. 299-310. |
Sardella A., “Securing Service Provider Networks: Protecting Infrastructure and Managing Customer Security,” Juniper Networks, Inc., White Paper, Dec. 2006, pp. 1-19. |
Senel F., et al., “Optimized Interconnection of Disjoint Wireless Sensor Network Segments Using K Mobile Data Collectors,” IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), Jun. 2012, pp. 497-501. |
Sherri S., et al., “A Chipset Level Network Backdoor: Bypassing Host-Based Firewall & IDS,” ACM 2009, pp. 125-134. |
Sigelman B.H., et al., “Dapper, A Large-Scale Distributed Systems Tracing Infrastracture,” Google Technical Report dapper-2010-1, Apr. 2010, 14 Pages, Retrieved from the Internet: URL: https://research.google/pubs/pub36356/. |
Templeton S.J., et al., “Detecting Spoofed Packets,” IEEE, Proceedings of the DARPA Information Survivability Conference and Exposition (DISCEX'03), 2003, pp. 1-12. |
Wang J.Y., et al., “Continuous Data Collection in Wireless Sensor Networks through PNC and Distributed Storage”, 2007 International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, 2007, pp. 2568-2571. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160359698 A1 | Dec 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62171899 | Jun 2015 | US |