The present application claims priority of European Patent Application No. 16177307.2, filed Jun. 30, 2016, the content of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
In exemplary government engagement management systems, web client or web-based interaction and engagement systems are unable to accommodate the use of external knowledge searching capabilities. In other words, current systems are unable to use external, third-party systems seamlessly through the engagement management system in order to collect relevant knowledge content for the interaction with a client.
In the field of government engagement management, for users of an employee desktop web client, it is now possible, within the web client application, to search and read articles and/or knowledge content that has been authored to external locations. Due to this integration to external, third-party applications, content and/or articles can be displayed to an agent on the employee desktop web client graphical user interface. Agents can enter free text into a specific search field and review the results in summary form, and then select an article in HTML format to progress the current interaction with the client. An additional feature extending from this capability is to add an amount of coding to external knowledge content websites that are owned and/or operated by the owner of the system such that when the website is viewed through the third-party integration module, a button or icon appears within the website that when selected takes the agent to an appropriate form. This button or icon does not appear when the website is viewed outside of the system. This functionality adds value to the agent experience and enables the agent to provide an improved service to the end client. Results may be filtered by the search engine as well. Moreover, this system and method improves the operation of the computer in that the computer running such a system in the past was not able to integrate in such a fashion in a web client format. This system and method also enables an agent to handle calls with the web client more efficiently, and allows agents on the web client to automatically classify.
In one embodiment of the present application, a method of embedding and launching a form with an external application for an agent in a web client application, the method comprises starting an interaction with a client with the web client application by the agent, searching for relevant knowledge content through a third-party integration module using a graphical user interface, launching a knowledge content form from a knowledge content website with an embedded knowledge content button and completing the knowledge content form, and completing the interaction with the client with enhanced input from the search step.
In an additional embodiment of the present application, a non-transitory computer readable medium programmed with computer readable code that upon execution by a computer processor causes the computer processor to start an interaction with a client with the web client application by the agent, search for relevant knowledge content through a third-party integration module using a graphical user interface, launch a knowledge content form from a knowledge content website with an embedded knowledge content button and completing the knowledge content form, and complete the interaction with the client with enhanced input from the search step.
As set out above, the embodiments allow integration of a plurality of system parts into a web client application. This makes the overall system more user-friendly because a user does not need to switch between different system parts that are running in separate user interfaces, but instead is able to interact with multiple system parts through a single user interface, such as a web client application. This simplifies the way in which the user interacts with the overall system and therefore makes it easier for the user to use.
In the present description, certain terms have been used for brevity, clearness and understanding. No unnecessary limitations are to be applied therefrom beyond the requirement of the prior art because such terms are used for descriptive purposes only and are intended to be broadly construed. The different systems and methods described herein may be used alone or in combination with other systems and methods. Various equivalents, alternatives and modifications are possible within the scope of the appended claims. Each limitation in the appended claims is intended to invoke interpretation under 35 U.S.C. § 112, sixth paragraph, only if the terms “means for” or “step for” are explicitly recited in the respective limitation.
In the field of government engagement management systems, human agents in web client systems may wish to run specific scripts that allow the agent to be more efficient in handling interactions with a human customer more efficiently by improving the operation of the system and computer generally. In such cases, the user logs on to an employee desktop web client as an interaction handling human agent and starts an interaction with the human user, by clicking on a VOICE IN button or another activation button on an interaction bar, thus allowing a script-flow to launch and display to the agent. The human agent will then speak the text shown on the graphical user interface to the human client and select the menu based on the response of the client. The human agent may then be shown different screens in the content panel based on the nature of the call, and the interaction with the human client is ended when the human client has no more queries for the human agent, and/or when the script-flow is completed. It should be understood that all subsequent instances of the terms user and agent are humans.
Although the computing system 200 as depicted in
The processing system 206 can comprise a microprocessor and other circuitry that retrieves and executes software 202 from storage system 204. Processing system 206 can be implemented within a single processing device but can also be distributed across multiple processing devices or sub-systems that cooperate in existing program instructions. Examples of processing system 206 include general purpose central processing units, application specific processors, and logic devices, as well as any other type of processing device, combinations of processing devices, or variations thereof.
The storage system 204 can comprise any storage media readable by processing system 206, and capable of storing software 202. The storage system 204 can include volatile and non-volatile, removable and non-removable media implemented in any method or technology for storage of information, such as computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules, or other data. Storage system 204 can be implemented as a single storage device but may also be implemented across multiple storage devices or sub-systems. Storage system 204 can further include additional elements, such a controller capable, of communicating with the processing system 206.
Examples of storage media include random access memory, read only memory, magnetic discs, optical discs, flash memory, virtual memory, and non-virtual memory, magnetic sets, magnetic tape, magnetic disc storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to store the desired information and that may be accessed by an instruction execution system, as well as any combination or variation thereof, or any other type of storage medium. In some implementations, the storage media can be a non-transitory storage media. In some implementations, at least a portion of the storage media may be transitory.
User interface 210 can include a mouse, a keyboard, a voice input device, a touch input device for receiving a gesture from a user, a motion input device for detecting non-touch gestures and other motions by a user, and other comparable input devices and associated processing elements capable of receiving user input from a user. Output devices such as a video display or graphical display can display an interface further associated with embodiments of the system and method as disclosed herein. Speakers, printers, haptic devices and other types of output devices may also be included in the user interface 210. An agent 250 communicates with the computing system 200 through the user interface 210 in order to enter client input 220, to manage an interaction, or any number of other tasks the agent 250 may want to complete with the computing system 200 as well be described in greater detail below.
As described in further detail herein, the computing system 200 receives and transmits data through communication interface 208. In embodiments, the communication interface 208 operates to send and/or receive data to/from other devices to which the computing system 200 is communicatively connected, and to received and process client input 220, as will be described in greater detail below. The client input 220 will include details about a request, work order or other set of information that will necessitate an interaction between the client and the agent. Client input 220 may also be made directly to the agent 250, as will be described in further detail below.
The client GUI 102 is therefore the point of interface for the client 101 as well as the agent 103, 105 in the system 100, and is in communication with the remainder of the system through a network 111. The network is preferably the internet, or another LAN, but generally the system 100 described here in the present application is directed toward the employee web desktop application 106, that utilizes a client GUI 102 separated by the remainder of the system 100 through the internet.
The server-side services 112 include a number of service applications 114 utilized by the employee web desktop 106. The service applications shown in
Still referring to
The databases 124 include an online transactional process database (OLTP) 126 that stores all configuration and interaction data, as well as providing a secure and resilient way of holding information and enables data extraction using standard database reporting tools. The databases 124 may be held on a physically separate machine from the server-side services 112 or on the same physical location. The OLTP database 126 stores all of the data needed for interaction case manipulation and/or execution. The data mart (DM) database 127 is a reporting database configured so that reporting does not have to be done from the OLTP database 126. The knowledge database 129 is utilized for the owner of the engagement management system 100 to store its own website or other information. The configuration module 128 includes a number of configuration applications 130 that are utilized to set-up, maintain and configure the system 100.
As described above, the system and method of the present application also includes additional functionality related to this graphical user interface 300, as depicted in
The functional block diagrams, operational sequences, and flow diagrams provided in the Figures are representative of exemplary architectures, environments, and methodologies for performing novel aspects of the disclosure. While, for purposes of simplicity of explanation, the methodologies included herein may be in the form of a functional diagram, operational sequence, or flow diagram, and may be described as a series of acts, it is to be understood and appreciated that the methodologies are not limited by the order of acts, as some acts may, in accordance therewith, occur in a different order and/or concurrently with other acts from that shown and described herein. For example, those skilled in the art will understand and appreciate that a methodology can alternatively be represented as a series of interrelated states or events, such as in a state diagram. Moreover, not all acts illustrated in a methodology may be required for a novel implementation.
This written description uses examples to disclose the invention, including the best mode, and also to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the invention. The patentable scope of the invention is defined by the claims, and may include other examples that occur to those skilled in the art. Such other examples are intended to be within the scope of the claims if they have structural elements that do not differ from the literal language of the claims, or if they include equivalent structural elements with insubstantial differences from the literal languages of the claims.
In the foregoing description, certain terms have been used for brevity, clearness, and understanding. No unnecessary limitations are to be inferred therefrom beyond the requirement of the prior art because such terms are used for descriptive purposes and are intended to be broadly construed. The different configurations, systems, and method steps described herein may be used alone or in combination with other configurations, systems and method steps. It is to be expected that various equivalents, alternatives and modifications are possible within the scope of the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
16177307 | Jun 2016 | EP | regional |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6012083 | Savitzky et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6337858 | Petty | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6338056 | Dessloch | Jan 2002 | B1 |
7593522 | Parker-Stephen | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7720833 | Wen | May 2010 | B1 |
7724890 | Conrad | May 2010 | B1 |
9178994 | Tuchman et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9641680 | Wold | May 2017 | B1 |
9699315 | Waalkes | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9747621 | Kuruvila | Aug 2017 | B1 |
20010029483 | Schultz | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20050053224 | Pennington et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050193055 | Angel | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060100788 | Carrino | May 2006 | A1 |
20070038499 | Margulies | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20080172598 | Jacobsen | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090285392 | Leitheiser | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090293007 | Duarte | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20110208660 | Erbey | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110211687 | Bethea | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110264677 | Hermitage | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120109882 | Bouse et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120203757 | Ravindran | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120290614 | Nandakumar | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130035995 | Patterson | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130097172 | McIntosh | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130104088 | Santos-Gomez | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130117289 | Fischer | May 2013 | A1 |
20130230154 | Wilson | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140119531 | Tuchman | May 2014 | A1 |
20140359462 | Khalil | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150089345 | Marimuthu | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150095753 | Gajera | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150227276 | Batti | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150195406 | Dwyer | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150363765 | Alimi et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150379995 | Sims, III | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160021179 | James | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160044497 | Soini | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160063897 | Rusin | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160119788 | Mandyam | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160180257 | Rees | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160239848 | Chang | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160267422 | Kothadiya | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20170060856 | Turtle | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170068976 | Wawrzynowicz | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170178145 | Adrian | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170337207 | Ravindran | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180165375 | Silkey | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20190294640 | Chuah | Sep 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
03094490 | Nov 2003 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 14, 2018, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/217,240. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/217,188 dated Apr. 4, 2018. |
Examination Report for EP16177307.2 dated Nov. 16, 2016. |
Examination Report for EP16177307.2 dated Feb. 22, 2019. |
NAQC Issue Paper, Call Center Metrics: Fundamentals of Call Center Staffing and Technologies, North American Quitline Consortium, 2010. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180004842 A1 | Jan 2018 | US |