The invention relates generally to workflow management, and more particularly to a workflow management system and method of approving workflow changes that includes taking a snapshot of an original workflow.
Workflow management systems are extremely useful tools in managing tasks for different projects. Such tools allow the user to plan, view, and track tasks that are required to complete a given project. In more complex business scenarios, such tools may be required to simultaneously manage hundreds or even thousands of projects. In such cases, there may be hundreds of users that need to interact with the tool.
An example of such a scenario may involve a financial institution having thousands of different sites, e.g., data centers, offices, branches, automatic teller machines (ATMs), etc., that is undergoing a technology migration. In order to complete the migration, each site must undergo some transformation that can be tracked as a unique project. Each project has an associated set of tasks that must be completed, e.g., installing hardware, configuring databases, testing, etc. In such a scenario, there would typically be a relatively small number of different workflows that would be shared among each of the different projects based on the configuration or “tier type” of the site. For example, some of the offices may have T1 data lines, while others have fiber optics. Based on the configuration, a workflow would be assigned to the site.
One of the challenges in managing such a migration project is that it may not always be evident to a user what the configuration or tier type of the site is. For instance, an office may use a mix of technologies, e.g., fiber and T1, so the user may simply take their best guess. In this case, the organization may later find it necessary to change the tier type, and thus the workflow, in mid-stream. However, such changes could have far reaching implications in terms of overall schedule and workflow. Moreover, if a user changes the tier type, all of the workflow information about the original workflow would be lost. Accordingly, controls are required to ensure that such changes are correct.
The present invention addresses the above-mentioned problems, as well as others, by a workflow management system that includes an approval process for changing workflows. As part of the approval process, a snapshot of the original workflow is maintained in the event that a proposed workflow change is rejected.
In a first aspect, the invention provides workflow management system, comprising: a mapping system for mapping tier types to workflows; a modification system for changing tier types, wherein a tier type change causes a new workflow to replace an original workflow; a workflow snapshot system for taking a snapshot of the original workflow when the tier type change occurs; and an approval system for approving tier type changes.
In a second aspect, the invention provides a computer program product stored on a computer readable medium, which when executed provides a workflow management tool and includes: program code configured for mapping tier types to workflows; program code configured for allowing a user to change tier types, wherein a tier type change causes a new workflow to replace an original workflow; program code configured for taking a snapshot of the original workflow when the tier type change occurs; and program code configured for approving tier type changes.
In a third aspect, the invention provides a method of providing workflow management, comprising: assigning a tier type to a project; mapping the tier type to a workflow; changing the tier type, wherein a tier type change causes a new workflow to replace an original workflow; taking a snapshot of the original workflow when the tier type change occurs; and approving or rejecting the tier type change.
In a fourth aspect, the invention provides a method for deploying a workflow management system, comprising: providing a computer infrastructure being operable to: map tier types to workflows; allow a user to change tier types, wherein a tier type change causes a new workflow to replace an original workflow; take a snapshot of the original workflow when the tier type change occurs; and approve tier type changes.
These and other features of this invention will be more readily understood from the following detailed description of the various aspects of the invention taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
Referring now to drawings,
As noted above, there may be instances where a user 30 believes that a particular project may have been assigned the wrong tier type. To address this, workflow management system 18 includes a modification system 22 for changing tier types (
Note that while the user 30 is able to change the tier type to create a new workflow 29, the tier type change must be approved via approval system 26, e.g., by a manager 32, before it is officially accepted (
If the change it is not approved, the original workflow 27 must be reinstated. In order to allow for reinstatement, a snapshot of the original workflow 27 is saved by workflow snapshot system 24 in the workflow database 28.
Referring again to
I/O 14 may comprise any system for exchanging information to/from an external resource. External devices/resources may comprise any known type of external device, including a monitor/display, speakers, storage, another computer system, a hand-held device, keyboard, mouse, voice recognition system, speech output system, printer, facsimile, pager, etc. Bus 17 provides a communication link between each of the components in the computer system 10 and likewise may comprise any known type of transmission link, including electrical, optical, wireless, etc. Although not shown, additional components, such as cache memory, communication systems, system software, etc., may be incorporated into computer system 10.
Access to computer system 10 may be provided over a network such as the Internet, a local area network (LAN), a wide area network (WAN), a virtual private network (VPN), etc. Communication could occur via a direct hardwired connection (e.g., serial port), or via an addressable connection that may utilize any combination of wireline and/or wireless transmission methods. Moreover, conventional network connectivity, such as Token Ring, Ethernet, WiFi or other conventional communications standards could be used. Still yet, connectivity could be provided by conventional TCP/IP sockets-based protocol. In this instance, an Internet service provider could be used to establish interconnectivity. Further, as indicated above, communication could occur in a client-server or server-server environment.
It should be appreciated that the teachings of the present invention could be offered as a business method on a subscription or fee basis. For example, a computer system 10 comprising a workflow management system 18 could be created, maintained and/or deployed by a service provider that offers the functions described herein for customers. That is, a service provider could offer to provide workflow management having a tier modification approval process as described above.
It is understood that the systems, functions, mechanisms, methods, engines and modules described herein can be implemented in hardware, software, or a combination of hardware and software. They may be implemented by any type of computer system or other apparatus adapted for carrying out the methods described herein. A typical combination of hardware and software could be a general-purpose computer system with a computer program that, when loaded and executed, controls the computer system such that it carries out the methods described herein. Alternatively, a specific use computer, containing specialized hardware for carrying out one or more of the functional tasks of the invention could be utilized. In a further embodiment, part or all of the invention could be implemented in a distributed manner, e.g., over a network such as the Internet.
The present invention can also be embedded in a computer program product, which comprises all the features enabling the implementation of the methods and functions described herein, and which—when loaded in a computer system—is able to carry out these methods and functions. Terms such as computer program, software program, program, program product, software, etc., in the present context mean any expression, in any language, code or notation, of a set of instructions intended to cause a system having an information processing capability to perform a particular function either directly or after either or both of the following: (a) conversion to another language, code or notation; and/or (b) reproduction in a different material form.
The foregoing description of the invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed, and obviously, many modifications and variations are possible. Such modifications and variations that may be apparent to a person skilled in the art are intended to be included within the scope of this invention as defined by the accompanying claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5088058 | Salsburg | Feb 1992 | A |
5197120 | Saxton et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5630069 | Flores et al. | May 1997 | A |
5734837 | Flores et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5768506 | Randell | Jun 1998 | A |
5835953 | Ohran | Nov 1998 | A |
5999911 | Berg et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6003011 | Sarin et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6058413 | Flores et al. | May 2000 | A |
6073109 | Flores et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6151583 | Ohmura et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6189016 | Cabrera et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6338149 | Ciccone et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6381610 | Gundewar et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6574675 | Swenson | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6826579 | Leymann et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6968343 | Charisius et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6993761 | Czajkowski et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7184966 | Parsonnet et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7225208 | Midgley et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7310653 | Coyle et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7386532 | Kiessig et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7440979 | Strahl et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7447644 | Brandt et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7467371 | Meredith et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7493591 | Charisius et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7581011 | Teng | Aug 2009 | B2 |
20020065798 | Bostleman et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020075293 | Charisius et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020077842 | Charisius et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020078432 | Charisius et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020129024 | Lee | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020129078 | Plaxton et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138543 | Teng et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138577 | Teng et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020188597 | Kern et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030061266 | Ouchi | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030105654 | MacLeod et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030195963 | Song et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030233374 | Spinola et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040083448 | Schulz et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040172445 | Singh et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040177226 | Chen | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040243640 | Bostleman et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267595 | Woodings et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267835 | Zwilling et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040268338 | Gurpinar et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050027386 | Weigand et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050027582 | Chereau et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050033777 | Moraes et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050119911 | Ayan et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060047555 | Kang et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060070068 | Chandel | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060143270 | Wodtke et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060206352 | Pulianda | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060218366 | Fukuda et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060248371 | Chen et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070013943 | Sawayanagi et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070016432 | Piggott et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070156486 | Sanabria et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070261018 | Sanghvi et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080034017 | Giampaolo et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080077466 A1 | Mar 2008 | US |