The present application relates to system and method to control a hydraulic pump of a vehicle to provide for both steering and braking assist function.
Motor vehicles may use a single power steering pump to provide both steering and braking assist, where the pump regulates hydraulic flow and limits pressure to ensure that steering and braking systems can meet peak demand requirements. Such systems, however, can use large amounts of excess energy during non-demand situations. Thus, when the system does not provide assist to the brake system and/or steering system, it is common to reduce pump output during low demand conditions. However, when the system is required to provide brake assist and/or steering assist, it operates at a higher output level to assure availability of adequate braking assist.
One known approach for controlling such a system in a vehicle having stop-start engine capability uses detailed driver braking demand information to control the hydraulic pump. Specifically, the known system includes a brake-by-wire system, and uses brake sensor inputs that provide detailed information as to the level of brake actuation requested by the driver, such as the degree of driver depression.
However, the inventors herein have recognized several disadvantages of the above system. As one example, it relies on detailed brake information that may only be available on systems utilizing complex brake-by-wire systems, such as in hybrid vehicles having stop-start functionality. As another example, detailed brake information may be unavailable in some systems which may otherwise benefit from adjustable pump control to provide both braking and steering assist functions. As still another example, adding complex braking control or detailed sensor systems may undesirably increase system cost.
Thus, in one approach, at least some of the above issues may be addressed by a method to control a hydraulic pump of a vehicle, the pump coupled to at least a power steering system and a power braking system, the method comprising: measuring steering and braking information using a brake sensor and a steering sensor; and adjusting output of said hydraulic pump based on measured information from said sensors. For example, the method may use predicted pump demand to control a hydraulic pump and adjust output of said hydraulic pump based predicted pump demand using measured information from sensors.
In this way, it is possible to advantageously control the pump to generate appropriate flow rate to handle both steering and braking maneuvers, while also reducing parasitic losses without the need for additional sensors.
In another approach, a system for a vehicle having a power steering and a power brake system may be used. The system comprises: a pump coupled to at least the power steering and the power brake system; a brake switch sensor configured to indicate whether or not a brake pedal of the brake system is actuated by a vehicle operator; a hydraulic brake booster hydraulically coupled to the pump and mechanically coupled to the operator actuated brake pedal; a steering sensor coupled to the steering system; and a control system configured to adjust output of the pump in response to said brake switch sensor and said steering sensor.
In this way, it is possible to advantageously utilize a lower resolution brake sensor system having lower cost components, such as a hydraulic brake booster, while still providing appropriate control of a hydraulic pump that provides both steering and braking assist. For example, by utilizing both steering and brake sensor information, sufficient assist operation may be provided to the steering and braking systems when needed, while also reducing parasitic system losses when such assistance is not needed.
Note that various types of steering sensors may be used, such as steering angle, steering rate, steering torque, combinations thereof, and others. Further, various types of brake sensors may be used, such as a brake switch, a brake light switch, a brake pressure switch, combinations thereof, and others. The pump may be driven by an electric motor, driven by the engine (e.g., via the front end accessory drive, FEAD), combinations thereof, or others.
Continuing with
Referring to the exemplary embodiment depicted in
Continuing with
It should be appreciated that the example hydraulic circuit for the example steering and braking systems are for illustration purposes. Various other hydraulic circuits, steering systems, or braking systems may be used, if desired.
Referring now specifically to
To determine a braking assist demands, a brake sensor may be used. The brake sensor may be the brake pedal sensor 22 to detect the brake pedal activation, such as a brake pedal switch or a brake light switch coupled to a brake light. Alternatively, a brake pressure switch or brake position may be used to sense braking assist demands.
Additionally, a vehicle speed sensor 32 may be used as an input to further determine the hydraulic pump demand, or adjust a steering or braking demand determined via steering and/or braking sensors. In this way, a more accurate indication of hydraulic pump demand can be achieved. For example, as noted herein, during some vehicle speed conditions, increased hydraulic flow may be needed, whereas under other vehicle speed conditions, decreased hydraulic pressure may be needed. Vehicle speed sensor 32 may be any variety used to sense vehicle speed, such as a sensor not subject to wheel slip. For example, vehicle speed as determined from a non-driven wheel may be used. As another example, a signal generator driven by the powertrain of the vehicle may be used. Further still, vehicle speed as determined via a radar unit may also be used.
Information from vehicle speed sensor, steering sensor, and brake sensor are input into the electro-hydraulic power assisted steering (EHPAS) control unit 40 where the input data are processed. For example, the EHPAS control unit may include a table for steering angle, steering rate, and/or vehicle speed, and a brake calibration table. Parameters indicating the hydraulic pump conditions such as pump speed and pump current may be read into the EHPAS control unit. The command for pump speed determined by a control routine is then sent to the pump motor control 15 to regulate the hydraulic flow to the steering and braking system. One example of a control routine is illustrated in
Continuing with
In some embodiments, an anti-lock brake system (ABS) 48 may be coupled to the braking system. A separate ABS controller 46 may be employed in the system to communicate with PCM 42 and EHPAS control unit 40. Alternatively, ABS controller 46 may be integrated/incorporated into PCM and/or EHPAS control unit. Brake sensor 22 may be electrically linked to ABS controller 46. Optionally, CAN may link hard wired sensors to controllers. For example, steering sensor 26 or vehicle speed sensor 32 may be linked to ABS controller 46 via CAN. In another example, steering angle sensor 26 or vehicle speed sensor may be linked to PCM via CAN.
Referring now to
In one particular embodiment, the brake sensor is a two position switch type sensor that only indicates whether or not the brakes are activated by the operator. Thus, the degree of braking may increase or decrease, yet the sensor output remains substantially unchanged. On the other hand, the sensor indicates whether or not the brake pedal is substantially released by the operator. Next, the routine, in 54, validates and filters signals, calculates steering angle rate, and calculates pump conditions. Pump conditions may include a pump pressure or pump flow. The pump pressure may be inferred from its relationship with pump speed and pump current using predetermined pump characteristics. Similarly, the pump flow may be inferred from pump speed and pump current using predetermined pump characteristics. Next, the routine, in 56, determines whether a brake input is on, or activated. If so, the routine sets a brake boost fraction to 1.0 in 58. Otherwise, the routine, in 60, filters the braking signal by determining the relationship between the brake boost fraction with time after the brake is off. In one embodiment, the new brake boost fraction equals the old brake boost fraction times exp(−dT/tauCAL), where T is time and tau is a time constant. In this way, the fraction can be filtered to provide a desired response to various excitation inputs. Next, in 62, predicted brake pressure is set to be a function of the brake boost fraction, and the brake leakage is set to be a function of inferred pump pressure. Various functions may be used, including either linear or non-linear relationships.
Next, the routine, in 64, determines the steering demand based on steering input information. For example, in one embodiment, predicted steering pressure may be a function of steering rate and vehicle speed. Similarly, desired steering flow from the hydraulic pump may be scheduled as a function of steering rate and vehicle speed.
Continuing with
Next, the routine, in 70, determines the required pump speed by modifying and adopting changes over time. For example, the minimum pump speed may be selected to be the maximum of two values: (1) (pump speed commanded minus calibrated decreased rate multiplied by an interval of time), and (2) a minimum calibrated speed. The maximum pump speed may be the minimum of two values: (1) (commanded pump speed plus calibrated increased rate multiplied by an interval of time), and (2) the maximum calibrated speed. Then, the commanded pump speed may be determined by clipping the following values: the minimum pump speed, (desired pump speed FF plus desired pump speed PID), and the maximum pump speed.
According to the above operation, it is possible to appropriately control the pump to provide sufficient hydraulic operation under varying steering and braking condition, while also reducing parasitic losses. Further, it is possible to provide such operation even with lower resolution brake sensor information.
Note that while
It should be noted that additional inputs such as vehicle operating conditions may be combined with the braking and steering inputs to accurately determine the braking and steering demands. The control routine 50 in
Continuing with
Continuing with
At the time period from t3 to t7, vehicle speed increases linearly and then decreases linearly to zero. In response to the changes, pump speed increases with increasing vehicle speed at lower vehicle speeds, but then decreases for increasing vehicle speeds at high vehicle speeds. This approach may provide the desired steering feel for the vehicle and provide enough flow to meet the demands of a sudden steering input. The pump speed verses vehicle speed curve may vary depending on the vehicle type and desired steering feel. From t8 to t9, steering angle rate or steering rate (degree per second) increases to a value and then decreases to zero as shown in
From t12 to t13, pump speed increases in response to the braking demand and then gradually decreases after the braking is off and then is kept at a constant value until t13. Since the vehicle is moving, more braking effort is needed to slow down the vehicle. Thus, the higher pump output is required to assist braking than when vehicle is stopped.
Continuing with
The control method described above has various advantages. For example, the method uses inputs from both braking and steering systems to control the output of a hydraulic pump to meet demands during peak usage and to reduce energy usage during non-peak time. As illustrated in
As will be appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art, the specific routines and block diagrams described above in the flowcharts may represent one or more of any number of processing strategies such as event-driven, interrupt-driven, multi-tasking, multi-threading, and the like. As such, various steps or functions illustrated may be performed in the sequence illustrated, in parallel, or in some cases omitted. Likewise, the order of processing is not necessarily required to achieve the features and advantages of the disclosure, but is provided for ease of illustration and description. Although not explicitly illustrated, one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that one or more of the illustrated steps or functions may be repeatedly performed depending on the particular strategy being used. Further, these Figures graphically represent code to be programmed into the computer readable storage medium in controllers.
It will be appreciated that the processes disclosed herein are exemplary in nature, and that these specific embodiments are not to be considered in a limiting sense, because numerous variations are possible. The subject matter of the present disclosure includes all novel and non-obvious combinations and subcombinations of the various steering and brake input sensors and pump plumbing and control methods, and other features, functions, and/or properties disclosed herein.
The following claims particularly point out certain combinations and subcombinations regarded as novel and nonobvious. These claims may refer to “an” element or “a first” element or the equivalent thereof. Such claims should be understood to include incorporation of one or more such elements, neither requiring nor excluding two or more such elements. Other combinations and subcombinations of pump control methods and system component configurations, processes, apparatuses, and/or other features, functions, elements, and/or properties may be claimed through amendment of the present claims or through presentation of new claims in this or a related application. Such claims, whether broader, narrower, equal, or different in scope to the original claims, also are regarded as included within the subject matter of the present disclosure.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3023639 | Weinrich et. al. | Mar 1962 | A |
3795423 | Shields et al. | Mar 1974 | A |
4074528 | Lourigan et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
4154262 | Blume et al. | May 1979 | A |
4199946 | Wilson et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4420290 | Drutchas | Dec 1983 | A |
4549566 | Fujiwara et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4557342 | Drutchas | Dec 1985 | A |
4586581 | Shibahata et al. | May 1986 | A |
4999776 | Soltis et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5067577 | Morishita | Nov 1991 | A |
5179835 | Casey et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5346289 | Cords et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5398184 | Yamaoka et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5505527 | Gray et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5540203 | Foulkes et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5549361 | Sorensen | Aug 1996 | A |
5713429 | Doolittle | Feb 1998 | A |
5836347 | Harries | Nov 1998 | A |
6101435 | Baughn et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6173223 | Liubakka et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6179389 | Freitag et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6276136 | Oishi et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6318817 | Martin et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6463378 | Nishio | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6498973 | Dix et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6588855 | Harris | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6595598 | Harris et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6955406 | Blue | Oct 2005 | B2 |
20020063469 | Nishio | May 2002 | A1 |
20020180258 | Davison et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030075975 | Fulks et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030234135 | Gaunt et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040098984 | Duell et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20060259221 | Murty et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1134133 | Oct 1996 | CN |
1451574 | Oct 2003 | CN |
19825204 | Mar 2000 | DE |
10147351 | Jun 2002 | DE |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070257550 A1 | Nov 2007 | US |