The present invention relates generally to electronic mail and, more particularly, to a system and method to control sending of unsolicited electronic mail over a network.
There is no question that the explosive growth of the Internet in recent years has changed classic business and economic models. One area in which this change has been noteworthy is in the use of mass marketing by electronic mail (“e-mail”). This form of marketing has become an attractive advertising medium for businesses and other organizations because it allows them to reach large numbers of consumers at minimal cost.
Nevertheless, the use of e-mail in this manner is often problematic for the recipients of these messages. On the Internet, SPAM is the term used to describe useless or unsolicited e-mail messages. Typically, the SPAM is of narrow interest. The aspiration of the “spammer” is to make a profit, even if only a small number of recipients respond. The sending and receiving of SPAM is especially onerous for online service providers because it reduces user satisfaction in their services. SPAM also wastes network resources and people's time.
Various methods exist to filter or otherwise counter unsolicited e-mail messages. For example, filtering techniques exist to block e-mail messages received from addresses that are sources of unsolicited e-mail. One problem associated with filtering techniques, however, is that the source of the unsolicited e-mail can easily change their address to bypass the system. Another problem associated with filtering techniques is that they often filter legitimate bulk e-mail messages that could be of interest to the user. Moreover, filtering techniques are often ineffective against robotic delivery programs that send out thousands of junk e-mail messages and create non-existent source addresses to prevent detection. The cost of monitoring robotic delivery programs is usually high.
Although functionality exists in the prior art to allow recipients to complain about unsolicited e-mail, the process can be burdensome and time-consuming for the user. In addition, to date there has been little functionality to monitor complaints against particular sources and to effectively curtail the sending of unsolicited e-mails from these sources based on this monitoring function.
According to one aspect of the present invention, there is provided a system and method to control sending of unsolicited communications over a network. The system may define a SPAM inhibiting tool for users engaged in transactions over a network such as the Internet. Users of an on-line service, for example an on-line commerce service, who are interested in a non-transactional communication (e.g., a communication wherein the sending user is not engaged in a bidding transaction with a recipient user) with another user are provided with a proprietary contact form that allows them to contact other users without the sender viewing the e-mail address of the would-be recipient. This form appears only in cases where a user is contacting another and where the intended recipient is not involved in an active transaction (e.g., already bid on an item listed by the intended recipient) or a closed-successful transaction with the sender. In cases where an active transaction is involved, a seller may view all bidder e-mail addresses and bidders may view the seller's e-mail address.
In another aspect of the present invention, a network link is provided that allows recipients of forwarded messages to tag an incident as SPAM and to provide senders with feedback. For instance, users who click on the link receive a confirmation prompt advising them of the SPAM policy, what reporting of the incident means to the recipient and the sender, and the ability to classify the reason for the complaint. In a further aspect of the present invention, the system monitors the number of SPAM complaints received by a user and triggers events (e.g., inability to use the on-line services, warning flags, suspension flags, etc.) based on thresholds and displays for a user complaint level.
The present invention is illustrated by way of example, and not limitation, in the figures of the accompanying drawings in which like reference numerals refer to similar elements and which:
Described herein is a system and method to control sending of unsolicited communications over a network. The system and method may thus define a SPAM prevention tool. Although well-suited for use in on-line commerce services, the SPAM prevention tool described below may also be utilized for other types of applications, such as simple on-line transactions (e.g., purchasing goods and services from a Web site). As such, throughout the following description specific details are set forth in order to provide a more thorough understanding of the invention. However, the invention may be practiced without these particulars. In other instances, well known elements have not been shown or described in detail to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the present invention. Accordingly, the specification and drawings are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.
SPAM concerns are a major complaint received by on-line service providers. Typically, hundreds of requests by users to be unregistered from these services are received each month as a result of SPAM. These complaints are especially problematic for on-line commerce services, where individual buyers and sellers register on a Web site to buy and sell or to simply communicate with one another regarding topics of mutual interest or to petition one another for information. Bulletin boards or public forums encourage open communication between users. The cornerstone of these communities is the ability to communicate online (i.e., via e-mail). Therefore, on-line service providers are in the uncertain position of both trying to facilitate communication among users while simultaneously trying to prevent users from sending junk e-mail to one another.
What is needed is a system and method that allows users of on-line services to communicate with one another without viewing contact information (e.g., e-mail addresses) and functionality that allows recipients of unsolicited communications (e.g., e-mail) efficiently to complain about the incident. It would also be helpful if functionality existed to monitor the number of SPAM complaints received by a user and for the system to trigger events, such as the inability to use the system for a predetermined time period or to issue warning flags to a user based on thresholds.
Referring now to
The auction facility has a system 10 including one or more of a number of types of front-end servers, namely page servers 12 that deliver web pages (e.g., markup language documents), picture servers 14 that dynamically deliver images to be displayed within Web pages, listing servers 16, ISAPI/CGI servers 18 that provide an intelligent interface to the back-end of the system 10, and search servers 20 that handle search requests to the system 10. A communication server arrangement in the form of e-mail servers 21 provide, inter alia, automated e-mail communications to users of the system 10.
The back-end servers include a database engine server 22, a search index server 24 and a credit card database server 26, each of which maintains and facilitates access to a respective database. The back-end servers are also shown to include a number of administrative applications or functions 28 that are described in further detail below.
The network-based auction system 10 may be accessed by a client program 30, such as a browser (e.g., the Internet Explorer distributed by Microsoft Corp. of Redmond, Wash.) that executes on a client machine 32 and accesses the system 10 via a network such as, for example, the Internet 34. According to the embodiment illustrated by
A number of other tables are also shown to be linked to the user table 40, namely a user past aliases table 50, a feedback table 52, a bids table 54, an accounts table 56, and an account balances table 58.
Referring now to
Referring now to
A non-transactional communication is any communication between users of an on-line service that does not relate to an active transaction (e.g., a bid has been placed by the sending user on an item listed by the recipient user) for the purchase or sale of goods and/or services and in which both the sending user and the recipient user are parties to the transaction. The display of e-mail addresses on the site will be prevented to all users not involved in an active transaction. It should be noted that in an active transaction, a seller may view all bidder e-mail addresses and the bidder(s) may view the seller's e-mail address. However, the bidder(s) are not able to view other bidder e-mail addresses. In a closed successful transaction (up to 60 days, in one embodiment) the seller may view the winning bidder's e-mail address and the winning bidder may view the seller's e-mail address.
Using the form of
According to the embodiment illustrated by
Referring now to
Referring now to
Additional functionality is provided by the system 10 in that it monitors the number of SPAM complaints received against a user and triggers events (e.g., inability to use the feature, warning flags, suspension flags, etc.) based on thresholds, and displays the number of complaints against the user (their complaint level). The system 10 captures and stores the SPAM complaint frequency and associates these with the user account to allow for enforcement/policing processes as will be discussed in greater detail with reference to the embodiment illustrated by
Referring now to
According to the embodiment illustrated by
A user who has been blocked from using the feature that allows forwarding of non-transactional e-mails (see block 311), and that has been reinstated (e.g., 30 days have elapsed as shown in block 312), is allowed to use the feature again. The system 10 re-starts the complaint counter (block 313) and the user will be able to resume use of the feature (block 314). The same triggers, actions, and impacts (blocks 315, 316, 317, etc.) apply to the reinstated user (block 311) (i.e., one who has previously been suspended from the system 10 for SPAM) as to the new user (block 301) of the system 10. Of course, it should be appreciated that the triggers, actions, and impacts described in the embodiment illustrated by
Referring now to
Referring now to
It should be appreciated, of course, that the instructions represented by the blocks in
As the sending user may not be provided with direct contact information, but merely a user 10 of the recipient, the sending user may be inhibited from contacting the recipient user directly. The system 10 may use the user ID to obtain direct contact information wherafter the sending user's message 110 may be forwarded in an automated fashion to the recipient user.
Referring now to
Referring now to
The computer system 500 includes a processor 502, a main memory 504 and a static memory 506, which communicate with each other via a bus 508. The computer system 500 may further include a video display unit 510 (e.g., a liquid crystal display (LCD) or cathode ray tube (CRT). The computer system 500 also includes an alpha-numeric input device 512 (e.g. a keyword), a cursor control device 514 (e.g. a mouse) a disk drive unit 516, a signal generation device 518 (e.g. a speaker) and a network interface device 520.
The disk drive unit 516 includes a machine-readable medium 522 on which is stored a set of instructions (i.e., software) 524 embodying any one, or all, of the methodologies described above. The software 524 is also shown to reside, completely or at least partially, within the maim memory 504 and/or within the processor 502. The software 524 may further be transmitted or received via the network interface device 520. For the purposes of this specification, the term “machine-readable medium” shall be taken to include any medium which is capable of storing or encoding a sequence of instructions for execution by the machine and that cause the machine to perform any one of the methodologies of the present invention. The term “machine-readable medium” shall accordingly be taken to included, but not be limited to, solid-state memories, optical and magnetic disks, and carriers wave signals.
Thus, a method and a system to control sending of unsolicited communications over a network have been described. Although the present invention has been described with reference to specific exemplary embodiments, it will be evident that various modifications and changes may be made to these embodiments without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the specification and drawings are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.
The present patent application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/982,415 filed Oct. 17, 2001, entitled “System and Method to Control Sending of Unsolicited Communications Over a Network”, which has issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,748,422. U.S. application Ser. No. 09/982,415 is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3573747 | Adams et al. | Apr 1971 | A |
3581072 | Nymeyer | May 1971 | A |
4412287 | Braddock, III | Oct 1983 | A |
4674044 | Kalmus et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4677552 | Sibley, Jr. | Jun 1987 | A |
4789928 | Fujisaki | Dec 1988 | A |
4799156 | Shavit et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4823265 | Nelson | Apr 1989 | A |
4864516 | Gaither et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4903201 | Wagner | Feb 1990 | A |
5063507 | Lindsey et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5077665 | Silverman et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5101353 | Lupien et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5136501 | Silverman et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5168446 | Wiseman | Dec 1992 | A |
5205200 | Wright | Apr 1993 | A |
5243515 | Lee | Sep 1993 | A |
5258908 | Hartheimer et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5280422 | Moe et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5297031 | Gutterman et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5297032 | Trojan et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5305200 | Hartheimer et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5325297 | Bird et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5329589 | Fraser et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5375055 | Togher et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5394324 | Clearwater | Feb 1995 | A |
5426281 | Abecassis | Jun 1995 | A |
5485510 | Colbert | Jan 1996 | A |
5553145 | Micali | Sep 1996 | A |
5557728 | Garrett et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5596994 | Bro | Jan 1997 | A |
5598557 | Doner et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5640569 | Miller et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5657389 | Houvener | Aug 1997 | A |
5664115 | Fraser | Sep 1997 | A |
5689652 | Lupien et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5694546 | Reisman | Dec 1997 | A |
5706457 | Dwyer et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5710889 | Clark et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5715314 | Payne et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5715402 | Popolo | Feb 1998 | A |
5717989 | Tozzoli et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5722418 | Bro | Mar 1998 | A |
5727165 | Ordish et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5771291 | Newton et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5771380 | Tanaka et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5794219 | Brown | Aug 1998 | A |
5799285 | Klingman | Aug 1998 | A |
5803500 | Mossberg | Sep 1998 | A |
5818914 | Fujisaki | Oct 1998 | A |
5826244 | Huberman | Oct 1998 | A |
5835896 | Fisher et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5845265 | Woolston | Dec 1998 | A |
5845266 | Lupien et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5850442 | Muftic | Dec 1998 | A |
5872848 | Romney et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5873069 | Reuhl et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5884056 | Steele | Mar 1999 | A |
5890138 | Godin et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5905974 | Fraser et al. | May 1999 | A |
5905975 | Ausubel | May 1999 | A |
5922074 | Richard et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5924072 | Havens | Jul 1999 | A |
5926794 | Fethe | Jul 1999 | A |
5974412 | Hazlehurst et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5991739 | Cupps et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6035402 | Vaeth et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6044363 | Masakatsu et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6055518 | Franklin et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6058417 | Hess et al. | May 2000 | A |
6073117 | Oyanagi et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6085176 | Woolston | Jul 2000 | A |
6104815 | Alcorn et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6202051 | Woolston | Mar 2001 | B1 |
7188358 | Hisada et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
20080104664 | Morin et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2253543 | Mar 1997 | CA |
2658635 | Aug 1991 | FR |
9300266 | Feb 1993 | NL |
WO-9215174 | Sep 1992 | WO |
WO-9517711 | Jun 1995 | WO |
WO-9634356 | Oct 1996 | WO |
WO-9737315 | Oct 1997 | WO |
WO-9963461 | Dec 1999 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050144238 A1 | Jun 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09982415 | Oct 2001 | US |
Child | 10864763 | US |