This disclosure relates to wellbores, particularly, to drilling wellbores.
Hydrocarbons trapped in subsurface reservoirs can be raised to the surface of the Earth through wellbores formed from the surface to the subsurface reservoirs. Wellbore drilling systems are used to drill wellbores through a subterranean zone (for example, a formation, a portion of a formation, or multiple formations) to the subsurface reservoir. At a basic level, the wellbore drilling system includes a drill bit connected to an end of a drill string. The drill string is rotated and weight is applied to the drill bit to drill through the subterranean zone. Wellbore drilling fluid (also known as drilling mud) is flowed in a downhole direction through the drill string. The drilling mud exits the drill bit through ports defined in the drill bit and flows in an uphole direction through an annulus defined by an outer surface of the drill string and an inner wall of the wellbore. As the drilling mud flows towards the surface, it carries cuttings and debris released into the wellbore due to the drilling. The cuttings and debris are generally released from the subterranean zone as the drill bit breaks rock while penetrating the subterranean zone. When mixed with the drilling mud, the cuttings and debris form a solid slurry that can flow to the surface. At the surface, the cuttings and debris can be filtered from the solid slurry and the drilling mud can be recirculated into the wellbore to continue drilling.
This specification describes technologies for monitoring the flow of drilling mud from a wellbore by image processing.
According to a first aspect, a method for monitoring the flow of drilling mud from a wellbore includes: capturing, using a digital imaging device, images of drilling mud at a surface of the wellbore as the drilling mud flows through one or more image capture zones of a circulation system that circulates drilling mud through the wellbore and a wellbore drilling assembly; receiving, by one or more processors of a computer system operatively coupled to the digital imaging device, the images captured by the digital imaging device; and processing, by the one or more processors, the images captured by the digital imaging device to determine a rate of flow of the drilling mud through the one or more image capture zones.
In some cases, the method also includes: receiving a mud flow-in rate from a flow rate sensor of the circulation system; calculating a delta flow based on a difference between the mud flow-in rate and the rate of flow of the drilling mud through the one or more image capture zones; and displaying, using a display device of the computer system, a mud flow status based on the delta flow. The method may also include identifying one or more recommended actions for operating the wellbore drilling assembly based on the delta flow or the mud flow status; and displaying the one or more recommended actions on the display device.
In some implementations of the method, the one or more image capture zones include a discharge zone where a flow-out line connects to a possum belly, the possum belly being configured to receive drilling mud from the flow-out line.
In some implementations, the circulation system includes one or more shaker assemblies, each including a splash zone configured to receive drilling mud from the possum belly, wherein the one or more image capture zones include the splash zone of each of the one or more shaker assemblies.
In some implementations, the method also includes determining a partial flow rate of drilling mud through the splash zone of each of a plurality of shaker assemblies; and combining the partial flow rates to obtain the rate of flow of the drilling mud.
In some implementations, implementing image processing techniques includes deploying a machine learning model to extract abstract features from the images captured by the digital imaging device. In some cases, the machine learning model includes a convolutional neural network (CNN) model, the method further including: receiving additional features that include one or more of drilling parameters of the wellbore drilling assembly, properties of the drilling mud, and the weight of drilling mud measured in the one or more image capture zones using one or more mass sensors; concatenating the abstract features extracted by the CNN and the additional features; and feeding the concatenated features as input to a regression model to determine the rate of flow of the drilling mud through the one or more image capture zones.
According to a second aspect, a system for monitoring the flow of drilling mud from a wellbore, includes: a digital imaging device configured to capture images of drilling mud at a surface of the wellbore as the drilling mud flows through one or more image capture zones of a circulation system configured to circulate drilling mud through the wellbore and a wellbore drilling assembly; a computer system operatively coupled to the digital imaging device, the computer system including one or more processors and a computer-readable medium storing instructions executable by the one or more processors to perform operations including: receiving the images captured by the digital imaging device; and processing, by the one or more processors, the images captured by the digital imaging device to determine a rate of flow of the drilling mud through the one or more image capture zones.
Some implementations of the system include a flow rate sensor configured to measure a mud flow-in rate of the drilling mud through the wellbore drilling assembly and into the wellbore, wherein the computer system includes a display device and is configured to perform operations including: receiving the mud flow-in rate from the flow rate sensor; calculating a delta flow based on a difference between the mud flow-in rate and the rate of flow of the drilling mud through the one or more image capture zones; identifying a mud flow status based on the delta flow; identifying one or more recommended actions for operating the wellbore drilling assembly based on the delta flow or the mud flow status; and displaying the mud flow status and the one or more recommended actions on the display device.
Some implementations of the system include a possum belly configured to receive drilling mud from a flow-out line of the circulation system, wherein the one or more image capture zones include a discharge zone where the flow-out line connects to the possum belly. In some cases, the digital imaging device includes a camera mounted to or adjacent to the possum belly and oriented to face the discharge zone of the possum belly.
Some implementations of the system include one or more shaker assemblies, wherein each of the one or more shaker assemblies includes a splash zone configured to receive drilling mud from the possum belly, wherein the one or more image capture zones include the splash zone of each of the one or more shaker assemblies. In some cases, each of the one or more shaker assemblies includes a flow pane with an adjustable opening through which drilling mud flows from the possum belly into the splash zone, wherein the one or more image capture zones include the flow pane of each of the one or more shaker assemblies. The digital imaging device may include a camera mounted to or adjacent to each of the one or more shaker assemblies, wherein each camera is oriented to face the splash zone and flow pane of the one or more shaker assemblies. The digital imaging device may also include a camera mounted above and oriented to face the possum belly and the one or more shaker assemblies, wherein the camera includes a field of view that includes the discharge zone of the possum belly and the splash zone of each of the one or more shaker assemblies.
In some implementations, the computer system is configured to perform operations including: deploying a convolutional neural network (CNN) model to extract abstract features from the images captured by the digital imaging device; receiving additional features that include one or more of drilling parameters of the wellbore drilling assembly, properties of the drilling mud, and the weight of drilling mud measured in the one or more image capture zones using one or more mass sensors; concatenating the abstract features extracted by the CNN and the additional features; and feeding the concatenated features as input to a regression model to determine the rate of flow of the drilling mud through the one or more image capture zones.
Other implementations include corresponding computer programs recorded on one or more computer storage devices, each configured to perform the actions of the methods.
The details of one or more embodiments of the subject matter described in this specification are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features, aspects, and advantages of the subject matter will become apparent from the description, the drawings, and the claims.
Wellbore drilling involves breaking rock in a subterranean zone to form and deepen a wellbore. The broken rock is carried to the wellbore surface by drilling mud that flows through the wellbore.
This disclosure relates to systems and techniques that can be implemented to monitor the flow of drilling mud at the wellbore surface. A digital imaging device along with data analytics models can be implemented to estimate, in real-time, the rate of mud flow that exits the wellbore at the wellbore surface. Potential hazards can be identified and assessed. The monitoring can reduce or eliminate the need for manual, visual inspection of mud flow. The monitoring system can alert the rig crew about possible drilling hazards in real-time and, in some implementations, predict, mitigate, or even prevent major challenges to wellbore operations.
A derrick or mast is a support framework mounted on the drill floor 12 and positioned over the wellbore to support the components of the drill string assembly 16 during drilling operations. A crown block 20 forms a longitudinally-fixed top of the derrick and connects to a travelling block 22 with a drilling line that includes a set of wire ropes or cables. The crown block 20 and the travelling block 22 support the drill string assembly 16 via a swivel 24, a kelly 26. Longitudinal movement of the travelling block 22 relative to the crown block 20 of the drill string assembly 16 moves the drill string assembly 16 longitudinally upward and downward. The swivel 24, connected to and hung by the travelling block 22 and a rotary hook, allows free rotation of the drill string assembly 16 and provides a connection to a kelly hose 28. The kelly hose 28 flows drilling mud from a drilling mud supply of the circulation system 18 to the drill string assembly 16. A standpipe 30 mounted on the drill floor 12 guides at least a portion of the kelly hose 28 to a location proximate to the drill string assembly 16. The kelly 26 is generally a device with a hexagonal cross-section suspended from the swivel 24 and connected to a longitudinal top of the drill string assembly 16. Kelly 26 turns with the drill string assembly 16 as a rotary table 32 of the drill string assembly turns. The techniques described in this disclosure can be implemented with a top drive system instead of the kelly 26.
In the wellbore drilling assembly 10 of
The illustrated wellhead assembly 14 also includes a blowout preventer 40 positioned at the surface of the wellbore and below (but often connected to) the drill floor 12. The blowout preventer 40 prevents wellbore blowouts caused by formation fluid entering the wellbore, displacing drilling mud, and flowing to the surface at a pressure greater than atmospheric pressure. The blowout preventer 40 can close around (and in some instances, through) the drill string assembly 16 and seal off the space between the drill string and the wellbore wall. Wellhead assemblies can take a variety of forms and include a number of different components.
During a drilling operation, the circulation system 18 circulates drilling mud from the wellbore to the drill string assembly 16, filters used drilling mud from the wellbore, and provides clean drilling mud to the drill string assembly 16. The illustrated circulation system 18 includes a fluid pump 42 that fluidly connects to and provides drilling mud to drill string assembly 16 via the kelly hose 28 and the standpipe 30. The circulation system 18 also includes a flow-out line 44, a possum belly or header box 46, two shale shakers 48, a settling pit 50, and a suction pit 52. In a drilling operation, the circulation system 18 pumps drilling mud from the surface, through the drill string assembly 16, out the drill bit and back up the annulus of the wellbore, where the annulus is the space between the drill pipe and the formation or casing. The hydrostatic pressure from the drilling mud is intended to be greater than the formation pressures to prevent formation fluids from entering the annulus and flowing to the surface, but less than the mechanical strength of the formation since a higher pressure may fracture the formation and create a path for the drilling muds to enter the formation. Apart from wellbore control, drilling mud can also cool the drill bit and lift rock cuttings from the drilled formation up the annulus and to the surface to be filtered out and treated. The drilling mud returns from the annulus with rock cuttings and flows out to the flow-out line 44, which connects to and provides the fluid to the shaker header box or possum belly 46. The flow-out line 44 is an inclined pipe that directs the drilling mud from the annulus to the possum belly 46. The possum belly 46 is connected to and distributes drilling mud to the shale shakers 48. Each shale shaker 48 includes a mesh-like surface to separate the coarse rock cuttings from the drilling mud. Finer rock cuttings and drilling mud then go through the settling pit 50 to the suction pit 50. The circulation system 18 includes a mud hopper 54 into which materials (for example, to provide dispersion, rapid hydration, and uniform mixing) can be introduced to the circulation system 18. The fluid pump 42 cycles the drilling mud up the standpipe 30 through the swivel 24 and back into the drill string assembly 16 to return to the wellbore.
A system for monitoring the flow of drilling mud from the wellbore includes a digital image capturing device 102 and an onsite computer system 104 to monitor the drilling mud that flows from within the wellbore to the surface in real time. The digital imaging device 102 and the computer system 104 together form a monitoring system that can track the flow of drilling mud as it emerges from the wellbore and passes through the possum belly 46 and the shale shakers 48. In some implementations, the digital imaging device 102 (for example, a smart camera, an image sensor, vision sensor network or similar digital imaging device) can capture digital images of the mud flow. The computer system 104 can receive the images, process the images using image processing techniques to analyze the received images, and determine a volumetric rate of flow of the drilling mud at the wellbore surface. For example, the digital imaging device 102 can be configured to capture images of drilling mud as it flows through one or more image capture zones of the circulation system 18. The image capture zones can include regions of the possum belly 46, the shale shakers 48, or both. The computer system 104 can use image processing techniques based, e.g., semantic and instance segmentation, or based on machine learning (ML) or deep learning (DL) to extract abstract features from the images and estimate the flow rate of mud through each of the image capture zones, as described in more detail later. Such an estimation of the drilling mud flow rate has several applications including, for example, the identification of an influx of drilling mud, a loss of drilling mud circulation, and the identification and analysis of chemical treatments, such as sweep pills, to name a few.
Downstream from the discharge zone and the flow-out line 44, the possum belly 46 is connected to two shale shakers 48 that filter solids dispersed in the drilling mud before the drilling mud is pumped back into the drilling assembly. A flow pane 56 with an adjustable opening 58 is arranged between each shale shaker 48 and the possum belly 46. In a system that includes multiple shale shakers 48, the size of the respective flow pane openings 58 can be adjusted to distribute the drilling mud according to a specific ratio. For example, in
The drilling mud lands on a shaking screen and is carried downstream of the shale shaker 48 when the shaking screen is vibrated by shaker basket motors (not shown).
As illustrated, the digital imaging device 102 can include a plurality of cameras 102a, 102b, 102c that are oriented such that the view finder or screen of each device 102a-102c faces the drilling mud. In particular, a first camera 102a is oriented such that the field of view of the camera captures a plan view of the opening of the flow-out line 44 into the possum belly. The second and third cameras 102b, 102c are each oriented such that their fields of view capture a plan view of the flow pane opening 58 and the very wet or splash zone 62 of the shaker screen, respectively. Thus, the discharge zone in the possum belly 46, the flow pane openings 58, and splash zones 62 form image capture zones in which images of the flowing drilling mud are captured by the cameras 102a-102c of the digital imaging device 102. Each camera 102a-102c can have a field of view 106a-106c that spans an entire width of the shaking screen or possum belly so as to image an entirety of the drilling mud carried by the shaking screen and possum belly, respectively. The cameras 102a-102c can include smart, waterproof, high resolution, wireless cameras or any other image or vision sensor such as infrared sensors, gamma ray sensors, computerized tomography (CT) scanners, thermal sensors, or X-ray sensors, to name a few. The fields of view of cameras 102a-102c can be illuminated with lights to account for low light conditions. Alternatively, cameras 102a-102c can include night vision capabilities.
In
Although
In any case, the digital imaging device 102 is mounted to a component that does not vibrate extensively during operation so that the digital imaging device 102 can capture relatively vibration-free images. In some implementations, vibration dampeners can be mounted to a component and the digital imaging device 102 can be mounted to any component whose vibrations have been dampened. In some implementations, the digital imaging device 102 can implement vibration control or shake reduction features to capture nearly vibration-free or shake-free images even if mounted on a vibrating structure of a wellbore drilling assembly component. In some implementations, vibration dampeners can be mounted to a component and shake reduction features can be implemented in the digital imaging device 102. In some implementations, image distortions due to vibration or shaking can be removed during image processing.
The digital imaging device 102 is operatively coupled to the computer system 104, for example, by wired or wireless operative coupling techniques. The computer system 104 includes a computer-readable medium (for example, a transitory or a non-transitory computer-readable medium) and one or more processors coupled to the computer-readable medium. The computer-readable medium stores computer instructions executable by the one or more processors to perform operations described in this disclosure. In some implementations, the computer system 104 can implement edge or fog computing hardware and software based on artificial intelligence models including ML and DL for image or video processing. Together, the digital imaging device 102 and the computer system 104 can form an Internet of Things (IoT) platform to be used on a drilling rig and configured to implement a set of artificial intelligence models including ML and DL that serve as the foundation for enabling analysis of new sensors and data streams in real-time to provide advanced solutions for optimization of drilling operations.
In some implementations, a machine learning model extracts at 306 abstract features from the images captured by the digital imaging device. For example, the machine learning model can include a convolutional neural network (CNN) model. The image processing techniques can include receiving additional features besides the captured images; extracting abstract features from the images captured by the digital imaging device using the CNN; concatenating the abstract features extracted by the CNN and the additional features; and feeding the concatenated features as input to a regression model to determine the rate of flow of the drilling mud through the one or more image capture zones. In some implementations, these additional features can include drilling parameters of the wellbore drilling assembly, properties of the drilling mud, and the weight of drilling mud measured in the one or more image capture zones using one or more mass sensors, to name a few examples.
A generic CNN model 410 implemented by the computer system is also shown. A CNN is a suitable DL model for pattern recognition and image classification and can exploit spatial correlation/dependencies in the data. The size and number of filter and pooling layers in different CNNs can be tailored to automatically extract features from the images obtained at the shale shaker 402. The computer system flattens the features extracted from the images as a vector. In the illustrated implementation, the abstract features extracted from each frame 408 are concatenated with additional features. Table 1 lists examples of additional features that can be used as input for the models executed by the computer system:
The vector for each frame 408 is provided as input to a sequence model 412. The sequence model 412 includes an output layer that predicts a single value, i.e., the estimated flow of mud in the frame 408. In some implementations, the sequence model 412 is a supervised learning model such as a recurrent neural network (RNN), long short-term memory (LSTM) network, or other regression model. One aspect of the present disclosure uses time series analysis to understand the trends of the flow with respect to time. For this, regression models based on RNN and LSTM are described. They are capable of interpreting the context of a video frame relative to the frames that came before it. However, other implementations can include simple regression models without considering trends (i.e., support vector regression, ridge regression, logistic regression, lasso regression, to name a few).
As previously described, the solids control system of a wellbore drilling assembly 10 can include several shale shakers coupled to a possum belly (see, for example,
In implementations that use supervised learning models such as RNN/LSTM to estimate the flow of mud, the model must initially learn the relationships between the image frames 408, drilling parameters, and the mud flow rate at a given time step tn. In order to train the models, a set of N vectors that contain the abstract features extracted from the frames 408, drilling parameters, and other sensor data, represents a sample Stn, such that Stn={x1, x2, . . . , xn}:ytn where xi represent the abstract and additional features (shown in
At 502, operating parameters that include drilling parameters, the mud weight, or both are received. In some implementations, the drilling parameters include one or more of the parameters listed in Table 1. In some implementations, the mud weight is measured by a mass sensor arranged, for example, below a discharge zone of the possum belly 46. At 504, digital images of mud flow captured at the discharge zone of the possum belly, the splash zones of one or more shale shakers, or both are received. The images can be cropped, enhanced, or augmented in preparation for image processing. The images are processed, for example, using the techniques described above. The feature vectors that result from image processing can be labeled with an input flow rate measured by the surface flow-in rate sensor at the time the image was captured. In some implementations, the data is processed before being labeled. For example, data collected from different wells can include sensors with different ranges of data that arise from different hardware and calibrations. In some implementations, processing and labeling the data can include the use of z-score normalization, mean subtraction, or ranges.
At 506, the labeled data are used to train and validate a machine learning model, for example, a supervised learning model. In some implementations, a data split technique, such as the nested stratified cross-validation technique, is used to train and tune the model parameters of a DL model. In such implementations, the labeled and processed data is split into training data and validation data. In nested cross-validation, inner k-fold cross-validation is used to tune the parameters of the model and is only performed on the training data, while the outer k-fold cross-validation is used to validate the final performance of the model. At 508, the trained and validated machine learning model is deployed to predict the flow rate of mud in an image frame as described previously in reference to
The trained and validated model can be tested on new wells, as described in 510-514 of
At 606, a display device of the on-site computer system is used to display a mud flow status based on the delta flow. In some cases, a mud flow status is determined by comparing the delta flow to a pre-determined threshold value. An estimated mud flow greater than the measured mud flow-in rate can indicate an increased likelihood of kicks or a blowout. An estimated mud flow less than the measured mud flow-in rate can indicate a loss of circulation. When the estimated and measured mud flows substantially differ, a severity of the discrepancy can also be estimated and displayed. For example, if the estimated mud flow out is less than the measured mud flow in, a difference or a ratio of the estimated flow and the measured flow in can be calculated and compared to empirical values or threshold values to indicate a low, severe, or total loss of mud circulation. Alternatively, if the estimated mud flow out is greater than the measured mud flow in, a difference can be calculated to determine the total amount of gain mud (e.g., in gallons per minute).
Optionally, at 608, one or more recommended actions for operating the wellbore drilling assembly based on the delta flow or the mud flow status are identified. For example, the severity can be compared to historical data and logs from offset wells. In some cases, the total amount of gain mud can be used to look up a recommended mud weight to kill the well. The amount of gain mud can also be used to look up recommended actions, such as stopping circulation, closing the blowout preventer (BOP) annulus or ram to prevent a blowout. In the event of mud losses or lost circulation, the calculated severity can be used to infer whether the cause of the lost circulation is natural or induced. In some implementations, a lost circulation material can be recommended based on the historical data from the offset wells. Such data can include the depth of the wellbore and the lithology in the open hole, to name a few examples, and the type of lost circulation material and amount used for successfully stopping losses. Optionally, at 610, the one or more recommended actions are displayed on the display device alongside the mud flow status, as shown in
Generally, the implementations in this disclosure include image processing of image data that has been captured in continuous recording. Continuous recording can capture trends of the mud flow over time. However, image can also be processed in snapshot mode, for example, 10 frames per minute. The timing can be adapted to the speed of the processers and the transport time of the mud and solids across the image capturing zone to avoid double counting. Further, the image processing techniques of the present disclosure can also be used to detect characteristics of the drilling mud such as its color or temperature. Applications of such an implementation can be used to determine a circulation time necessary to clean a wellbore, i.e., the number of bottom ups. In such cases, high viscosity or sweep pills are pumped into the well to carry out the drill cuttings. The system and techniques described in this disclosure can also be used to derive a model able to recognize a dye or consistency contained in the sweep/high viscosity pill in order to automatically detect the pill at the shale shakers or possum belly.
The above description is presented to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the disclosed subject matter, and is provided in the context of one or more particular implementations. Various modifications to the disclosed implementations will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the general principles defined in this disclosure may be applied to other implementations and applications without departing from scope of the disclosure. Thus, the present disclosure is not intended to be limited to the described or illustrated implementations, but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and features disclosed in this disclosure.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
891957 | Schubert | Jun 1908 | A |
2043225 | Armentrout et al. | Jun 1936 | A |
2110913 | Lowrey | Mar 1938 | A |
2227729 | Lynes | Jan 1941 | A |
2286673 | Douglas | Jun 1942 | A |
2305062 | Church et al. | Dec 1942 | A |
2344120 | Baker | Mar 1944 | A |
2757738 | Ritchey | Sep 1948 | A |
2509608 | Penfield | May 1950 | A |
2688369 | Broyles | Sep 1954 | A |
2690897 | Clark | Oct 1954 | A |
2719363 | Richard et al. | Oct 1955 | A |
2795279 | Erich | Jun 1957 | A |
2799641 | Gordon | Jul 1957 | A |
2805045 | Goodwin | Sep 1957 | A |
2822150 | Muse et al. | Feb 1958 | A |
2841226 | Conrad et al. | Jul 1958 | A |
2899000 | Medders et al. | Aug 1959 | A |
2927775 | Hildebrandt | Mar 1960 | A |
2950724 | Roederer, Jr. | Aug 1960 | A |
3016244 | Friedrich et al. | Jan 1962 | A |
3028915 | Jennings | Apr 1962 | A |
3087552 | Graham | Apr 1963 | A |
3102599 | Hillburn | Sep 1963 | A |
3103975 | Hanson | Sep 1963 | A |
3104711 | Haagensen | Sep 1963 | A |
3114875 | Haagensen | Dec 1963 | A |
3133592 | Tomberlin | May 1964 | A |
3137347 | Parker | Jun 1964 | A |
3149672 | Joseph et al. | Sep 1964 | A |
3169577 | Erich | Feb 1965 | A |
3170519 | Haagensen | Feb 1965 | A |
3211220 | Erich | Oct 1965 | A |
3220478 | Kinzbach | Nov 1965 | A |
3236307 | Brown | Feb 1966 | A |
3253336 | Brown | May 1966 | A |
3268003 | Essary | Aug 1966 | A |
3331439 | Lawrence | Jul 1967 | A |
3428125 | Parker | Feb 1969 | A |
3468373 | Smith | Sep 1969 | A |
3522848 | New | Aug 1970 | A |
3547192 | Claridge et al. | Dec 1970 | A |
3547193 | Gill | Dec 1970 | A |
3642066 | Gill | Feb 1972 | A |
3656564 | Brown | Apr 1972 | A |
3696866 | Dryden | Oct 1972 | A |
3839791 | Feamster | Oct 1974 | A |
3862662 | Kern | Jan 1975 | A |
3874450 | Kern | Apr 1975 | A |
3931856 | Barnes | Jan 1976 | A |
3946809 | Hagedorn | Mar 1976 | A |
3948319 | Pritchett | Apr 1976 | A |
4008762 | Fisher et al. | Feb 1977 | A |
4010799 | Kern et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
4064211 | Wood | Dec 1977 | A |
4084637 | Todd | Apr 1978 | A |
4135579 | Rowland et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
4140179 | Kasevich et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
4140180 | Bridges et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
4144935 | Bridges et al. | Mar 1979 | A |
4191493 | Hansson et al. | Mar 1980 | A |
4193448 | Jearnbey | Mar 1980 | A |
4193451 | Dauphine | Mar 1980 | A |
4196329 | Rowland et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4199025 | Carpenter | Apr 1980 | A |
4265307 | Elkins | May 1981 | A |
RE30738 | Bridges et al. | Sep 1981 | E |
4301865 | Kasevich et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
4320801 | Rowland et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4334928 | Hara | Jun 1982 | A |
4337653 | Chauffe | Jul 1982 | A |
4343651 | Yazu et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4354559 | Johnson | Oct 1982 | A |
4373581 | Toellner | Feb 1983 | A |
4394170 | Sawaoka et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4396062 | Iskander | Aug 1983 | A |
4412585 | Bouck | Nov 1983 | A |
4413642 | Smith et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4449585 | Bridges et al. | May 1984 | A |
4457365 | Kasevich et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4470459 | Copland | Sep 1984 | A |
4476926 | Bridges et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4484627 | Perkins | Nov 1984 | A |
4485868 | Sresty et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4485869 | Sresty et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4487257 | Dauphine | Dec 1984 | A |
4495990 | Titus et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4498535 | Bridges | Feb 1985 | A |
4499948 | Perkins | Feb 1985 | A |
4508168 | Heeren | Apr 1985 | A |
4513815 | Rundell et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4524826 | Savage | Jun 1985 | A |
4524827 | Bridges et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4545435 | Bridges et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4553592 | Looney et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4557327 | Kinley et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4576231 | Dowling et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4583589 | Kasevich | Apr 1986 | A |
4592423 | Savage et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4610161 | Gehrig | Sep 1986 | A |
4612988 | Segalman | Sep 1986 | A |
4620593 | Haagensen | Nov 1986 | A |
4636934 | Schwendemann | Jan 1987 | A |
RE32345 | Wood | Mar 1987 | E |
4660636 | Rundell et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4705108 | Little et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4708212 | McAuley | Nov 1987 | A |
4817711 | Jearnbey | Apr 1989 | A |
5012863 | Springer | May 1991 | A |
5018580 | Skipper | May 1991 | A |
5037704 | Nakai et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5055180 | Klaila | Oct 1991 | A |
5068819 | Misra et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5070952 | Neff | Dec 1991 | A |
5074355 | Lennon | Dec 1991 | A |
5082054 | Kiamanesh | Jan 1992 | A |
5092056 | Deaton | Mar 1992 | A |
5107705 | Wraight et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5107931 | Valka et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5228518 | Wilson et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5236039 | Edelstein et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5278550 | Rhein-Knudsen et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5388648 | Jordan, Jr. | Feb 1995 | A |
5490598 | Adams | Feb 1996 | A |
5501248 | Kiest, Jr. | Mar 1996 | A |
5690826 | Cravello | Nov 1997 | A |
5803186 | Berger et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5803666 | Keller | Sep 1998 | A |
5813480 | Zaleski, Jr. et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5853049 | Keller | Dec 1998 | A |
5890540 | Pia et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5899274 | Frauenfeld et al. | May 1999 | A |
5947213 | Angle | Sep 1999 | A |
5955666 | Mullins | Sep 1999 | A |
5958236 | Bakula | Sep 1999 | A |
RE36362 | Jackson | Nov 1999 | E |
5987385 | Varsamis et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6012526 | Jennings et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6032742 | Tomlin et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6041860 | Nazzal et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6047239 | Berger et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6096436 | Inspektor | Aug 2000 | A |
6170531 | Jung et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6173795 | McGarian et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6189611 | Kasevich | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6254844 | Takeuchi et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6268726 | Prammer | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6269953 | Seyffert et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6290068 | Adams et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6305471 | Milloy | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6325216 | Seyffert et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6328111 | Bearden et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6330913 | Langseth et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6354371 | O'Blanc | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6371302 | Adams et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6413399 | Kasevich | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6443228 | Aronstam | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6454099 | Adams et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6510947 | Schulte et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6534980 | Toufaily et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6544411 | Varandaraj | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6561269 | Brown et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6571877 | Van Bilderbeek | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6607080 | Winkler et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6612384 | Singh et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6622554 | Manke et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6623850 | Kukino et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6629610 | Adams et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6637092 | Menzel | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6678616 | Winkler et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6722504 | Schulte et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6741000 | Newcomb | May 2004 | B2 |
6761230 | Cross et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6814141 | Huh et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6827145 | Fotland et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6845818 | Tutuncu et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6850068 | Chernali et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6895678 | Ash et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6912177 | Smith | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6971265 | Sheppard et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6993432 | Jenkins et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7000777 | Adams et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7013992 | Tessari et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7048051 | McQueen | May 2006 | B2 |
7063155 | Ruttley | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7086463 | Ringgenberg et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7091460 | Kinzer | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7109457 | Kinzer | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7115847 | Kinzer | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7124819 | Ciglenec et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7216767 | Schulte et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7255582 | Liao | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7312428 | Kinzer | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7322776 | Webb et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7331385 | Symington | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7376514 | Habashy et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7387174 | Lurie | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7445041 | O'Brien | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7455117 | Hall et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7461693 | Considine et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7484561 | Bridges | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7539548 | Dhawan | May 2009 | B2 |
7562708 | Cogliandro et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7629497 | Pringle | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7631691 | Symington et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7647980 | Corre et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7650269 | Rodney | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7677673 | Tranquilla et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7730625 | Blake | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7779903 | Bailey et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7951482 | Ichinose et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7980392 | Varco | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8067865 | Savant | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8237444 | Simon | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8245792 | Trinh et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8275549 | Sabag et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8286734 | Hannegan et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8484858 | Brannigan et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8511404 | Rasheed | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8526171 | Wu et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8528668 | Rasheed | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8567491 | Lurie | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8636063 | Ravi et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8683859 | Godager | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8776609 | Dria et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8794062 | DiFoggio et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8884624 | Homan et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8925213 | Sallwasser | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8960215 | Cui et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8973680 | MacKenzie | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9051810 | Cuffe et al. | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9109429 | Xu et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9217323 | Clark | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9222350 | Vaughn et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9238953 | Fleming et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9238961 | Bedouet | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9250339 | Ramirez | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9353589 | Hekelaar | May 2016 | B2 |
9394782 | DiGiovanni et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9435159 | Scott | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9464487 | Zurn | Oct 2016 | B1 |
9470059 | Zhou | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9494010 | Flores | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9494032 | Roberson et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9528366 | Selman et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9562987 | Guner et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9617815 | Schwartze et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9664011 | Kruspe et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9702211 | Tinnen | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9731471 | Schaedler et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9739141 | Zeng et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9757796 | Sherman et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9845653 | Hannegan et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9903010 | Doud et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9976381 | Martin et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
10000983 | Jackson et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10113408 | Pobedinski et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10174577 | Leuchtenberg et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10233372 | Ramasamy et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10329877 | Simpson et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10352125 | Frazier | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10392910 | Walton et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10394193 | Li et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10544640 | Hekelaar | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10551800 | Li et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10673238 | Boone et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
20020066563 | Langseth et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020074269 | Hensley | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020120401 | Macdonald | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030159776 | Graham | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030230526 | Okabayshi et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040182574 | Sarmad et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040256103 | Batarseh | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050022987 | Green et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050092523 | McCaskill et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050259512 | Mandal | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060011520 | Schulte | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060016592 | Wu | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060106541 | Hassan et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060144620 | Cooper | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060185843 | Smith | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060248949 | Gregory et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060249307 | Ritter | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070131591 | Pringle | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070137852 | Considine et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070175633 | Kosmala | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070187089 | Bridges | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070204994 | Wimmersperg | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070289736 | Kearl et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080007421 | Liu et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080047337 | Chemali et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080053652 | Corre et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080173480 | Annaiyappa et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080190822 | Young | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080308282 | Standridge et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090153354 | Daussin | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090164125 | Bordakov et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090178809 | Jeffryes et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090259446 | Zhang et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100006339 | Desai | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100089583 | Xu et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100276209 | Yong et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100282511 | Maranuk | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110011576 | Cavender et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110120732 | Lurie | May 2011 | A1 |
20110155368 | El-Khazindar | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120012319 | Dennis | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120111578 | Tverlid | May 2012 | A1 |
20120132418 | McClung | May 2012 | A1 |
20120152543 | Davis | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120173196 | Miszewski | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120186817 | Gibson et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120222854 | McClung, III | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120227983 | Lymberopoulous et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120273187 | Hall | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120325564 | Vaughn et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130008653 | Schultz et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130008671 | Booth | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130025943 | Kumar | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130068525 | Digiovanni | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130076525 | Vu et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130125642 | Parfitt | May 2013 | A1 |
20130126164 | Sweatman et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130146359 | Koederitz | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130213637 | Kearl | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130255936 | Statoilydro et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130269945 | Mulholland et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130308424 | Kumar | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140083771 | Clark | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140132468 | Scott et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140183143 | Cady et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140231075 | Springett et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140231147 | Bozso et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140238658 | Wilson et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140246235 | Yao | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140251894 | Larson et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140265337 | Harding et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140278111 | Gerrie et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140291023 | Edbury | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140300895 | Pope et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140326506 | Difoggio | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140333754 | Graves et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140360778 | Batarseh | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140375468 | Wilkinson et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150020908 | Warren | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150021240 | Wardell et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150027724 | Symms | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150083422 | Pritchard | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150091737 | Richardson et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150101864 | May | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150129306 | Coffman et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150159467 | Hartman et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150211362 | Rogers | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150267500 | Van Dongen | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150290878 | Houben et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150300151 | Mohaghegh | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160053572 | Snoswell | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160053604 | Abbassian | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160076357 | Hbaieb | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160115783 | Zeng et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160130928 | Torrione et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160153240 | Braga et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160160106 | Jamison et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160237810 | Beaman et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160247316 | Whalley et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160356125 | Bello et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170051785 | Cooper | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170056929 | Torrione | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170077705 | Kuttel et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170161885 | Parmeshwar et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170234104 | James | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170292376 | Kumar et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170314335 | Kosonde et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170328196 | Shi et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170328197 | Shi et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170332482 | Hauslmann | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170342776 | Bullock et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170350201 | Shi et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20170350241 | Shi | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180010030 | Ramasamy et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180010419 | Livescu et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180171772 | Rodney | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180171774 | Ringer et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180177064 | Van Pol et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180187498 | Soto et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180265416 | Ishida et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180326679 | Weisenberg et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180334883 | Williamson | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180363404 | Faugstad | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190049054 | Gunnarsson et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190101872 | Li | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190227499 | Li et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190257180 | Kriesels et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190267805 | Kothuru et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20200032638 | Ezzeddine | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200125040 | Li et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200248546 | Torrione et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200370381 | Al-Rubaii et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200371495 | Al-Rubaii et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2011282638 | Jul 2015 | AU |
1226325 | Sep 1987 | CA |
2249432 | Sep 2005 | CA |
2537585 | Aug 2006 | CA |
2669721 | Jul 2011 | CA |
2594042 | Aug 2012 | CA |
200989202 | Dec 2007 | CN |
203232293 | Oct 2013 | CN |
204627586 | Sep 2015 | CN |
107462222 | Dec 2017 | CN |
110571475 | Dec 2019 | CN |
102008001607 | Nov 2009 | DE |
102012022453 | May 2014 | DE |
102013200450 | Jul 2014 | DE |
102012205757 | Aug 2014 | DE |
2317068 | May 2011 | EP |
2574722 | Apr 2013 | EP |
2737173 | Jun 2014 | EP |
3279430 | Feb 2018 | EP |
2124855 | Feb 1984 | GB |
2357305 | Jun 2001 | GB |
2399515 | Sep 2004 | GB |
2422125 | Jul 2006 | GB |
2532967 | Jun 2016 | GB |
2009067609 | Apr 2009 | JP |
4275896 | Jun 2009 | JP |
5013156 | Aug 2012 | JP |
2013110910 | Jun 2013 | JP |
343139 | Nov 2018 | NO |
20161842 | May 2019 | NO |
2282708 | Aug 2006 | RU |
122531 | Nov 2012 | RU |
WO 1995035429 | Dec 1995 | WO |
WO 1997021904 | Jun 1997 | WO |
WO 2000025942 | May 2000 | WO |
WO 2000031374 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 2001042622 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO 2002020944 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO 2002068793 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO 2004042185 | May 2004 | WO |
WO 2007049026 | May 2007 | WO |
WO 2007070305 | Jun 2007 | WO |
WO 2008146017 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO 2009020889 | Feb 2009 | WO |
WO 2009113895 | Sep 2009 | WO |
WO 2010054353 | May 2010 | WO |
WO 2010105177 | Sep 2010 | WO |
WO 2011038170 | Mar 2011 | WO |
WO 2011042622 | Jun 2011 | WO |
WO 2011130159 | Oct 2011 | WO |
WO 2011139697 | Nov 2011 | WO |
WO 2012007407 | Jan 2012 | WO |
WO 2013016095 | Jan 2013 | WO |
WO 2013148510 | Oct 2013 | WO |
WO 2014127035 | Aug 2014 | WO |
WO 2015072971 | May 2015 | WO |
WO 2015095155 | Jun 2015 | WO |
WO 2016007139 | Jan 2016 | WO |
WO 2016077521 | May 2016 | WO |
WO 2016178005 | Nov 2016 | WO |
WO 2017011078 | Jan 2017 | WO |
WO 2017027105 | Feb 2017 | WO |
WO 2017132297 | Aug 2017 | WO |
WO 2017196303 | Nov 2017 | WO |
WO 2018022198 | Feb 2018 | WO |
WO 2018169991 | Sep 2018 | WO |
WO 2019040091 | Feb 2019 | WO |
WO 2019055240 | Mar 2019 | WO |
WO 2019089926 | May 2019 | WO |
WO 2019108931 | Jun 2019 | WO |
WO 2019169067 | Sep 2019 | WO |
WO 2019236288 | Dec 2019 | WO |
WO 2019246263 | Dec 2019 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“IADC Dull Grading for PDC Drill Bits,” Beste Bit, SPE/IADC 23939, 1992, 52 pages. |
AkerSolutions, “Aker MH CCTC Improving Safety,” AkerSolutions, Jan. 2008, 12 pages. |
Anwar et al., “Fog computing: an overview of big IoT data analytics,” ID 7157192, Wiley, Hindawi, Wireless communications and mobile computing, May 2018, 2018: 1-22, 23 pages. |
Artymiuk et al., “The new drilling control and monitoring system,” Acta Montanistica Slovaca, Sep. 2004, 9:3 (145-151), 7 pages. |
Ashby et al., “Coiled Tubing Conveyed Video Camera and Multi-Arm Caliper Liner Damage Diagnostics Post Plug and Perf Frac,” SPE-172622-MS, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the SPE Middle East Oil & Gas Show and Conference, Mar. 8-11, 2015, 12 pages. |
Bilal et al., “Potentials, trends, and prospects in edge technologies: Fog, cloudlet, mobile edge, and micro data centers,” Computer Networks, Elsevier, Oct. 2017, 130: 94-120, 27 pages. |
Carpenter, “Advancing Deepwater Kick Detection,” JPT, 68:5, May 2016, 2 pages. |
Commer et al., “New advances in three-dimensional controlled-source electromagnetic inversion,” Geophys. J. Int., 2008, 172: 513-535, 23 pages. |
Corona et al., “Novel Washpipe-Free ICD Completion With Dissolvable Material,” OTC-28863-MS, presented at the Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, TX, Apr. 30-May 3, 2018, 2018, OTC, 10 pages. |
Dickens et al., “An LED array-based light induced fluorescence sensor for real-time process and field monitoring,” Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, Elsevier, Apr. 2011, 158:1 (35-42), 8 pages. |
Dong et al., “Dual Substitution and Spark Plasma Sintering to Improve Ionic Conductivity of Garnet Li7La3Zr2O12,” Nanomaterials, 9:721, 2019, 10 pages. |
downholediagnostic.com [online] “Acoustic Fluid Level Surveys,” retrieved from URL <https://www.downholediagnostic.com/fluid-level> retrieved on Mar. 27, 2020, available on or before 2018, 13 pages. |
edition.cnn.com [online], “Revolutionary gel is five times stronger than steel,” retrieved from URL <https://edition.cnn.com/style/article/hydrogel-steel-japan/index.html>, retrieved on Apr. 2, 2020, available on or before Jul. 16, 2017, 6 pages. |
Fjetland et al., “Kick Detection and Influx Size Estimation during Offshore Drilling Operations using Deep Learning,” INSPEC 18992956, IEEE, presented at the 2019 14th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA), Jun. 19-21, 2019, 6 pages. |
Gemmeke and Ruiter, “3D ultrasound computer tomography for medical imagining,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A:580 (1057-1065), Oct. 1, 2007, 9 pages. |
gryphonoilfield.com [online], “Gryphon Oilfield Services, Echo Dissolvable Fracturing Plug,” available on or before Jun. 17, 2020, retrieved on Aug. 20, 2020, retrieved from URL <https://www.gryphonoilfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Echo-Series-Dissolvable-Fracturing-Plugs-8-23-2018-1.pdf>, 1 page. |
Halliburton, “Drill Bits and Services Solutions Catalogs,” retrieved from URL: <https://www.halliburton.com/content/dam/ps/public/sdbs/sdbs_contents/Books_and_Catalogs/web/DBS-Solution.pdf> on Sep. 26, 2019, 2014, 64 pages. |
Hopkin, “Factor Affecting Cuttings Removal during Rotary Drilling,” Journal of Petroleum Technology 19.06, Jun. 1967, 8 pages. |
Ji et al., “Submicron Sized Nb Doped Lithium Garnet for High Ionic Conductivity Solid Electrolyte and Performance of All Solid-State Lithium Battery,” doi:10.20944/preprints201912.0307.v1, Dec. 2019, 10 pages. |
Johnson et al., “Advanced Deepwater Kick Detection,” IADC/SPE 167990, presented at the 2014 IADC/SPE Drilling Conference and Exhibition, Mar. 4-6, 2014, 10 pages. |
Johnson, “Design and Testing of a Laboratory Ultrasonic Data Acquisition System for Tomography” Thesis for the degree of Master of Science in Mining and Minerals Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Dec. 2, 2004, 108 pages. |
King et al., “Atomic layer deposition of TiO2 films on particles in a fluidized bed reactor,” Power Technology, 183:3, Apr. 2008, 8 pages. |
Lafond et al., “Automated Influx and Loss Detection System Based on Advanced Mud Flow Modeling,” SPE-195835-MS, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Sep. 30-Oct. 2, 2019, 11 pages. |
Li et al., 3D Printed Hybrid Electrodes for Lithium-ion Batteries, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Washington State University; ECS Transactions, 77 (11) 1209-1218 (2017), 11 pages. |
Liu et al., “Flow visualization and measurement in flow field of a torque converter,” Mechanic automation and control Engineering, Second International Conference on IEEE, Jul. 15, 2011, 1329-1331. |
Liu et al., “Superstrong micro-grained polycrystalline diamond compact through work hardening under high pressure,” Appl. Phys. Lett. Feb. 2018, 112: 6 pages. |
Luo et al., “Simple Charts to Determine Hole Cleaning Requirements in Deviated Wells,” IADC/SPE 27486, SPE/IADC Drilling Conference, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Feb. 15-18, 1994, 7 pages. |
Maurer, “The Perfect Cleaning Theory of Rotary Drilling,” Journal of Petroleum Technology 14.11, 1962, 5 pages. |
nature.com [online], “Mechanical Behavior of a Soft Hydrogel Reinforced with Three-Dimensional Printed Microfibre Scaffolds,” retrieved from URL <https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-19502-y>, retrieved on Apr. 2, 2020, available on or before Jan. 19, 2018, 47 pages. |
Nuth, “Smart oil field distributed computing,” The Industrial Ethernet Book, Nov. 2014, 85:14 (1-3), 3 pages. |
Olver, “Compact Antenna Test Ranges,” Seventh International Conference on Antennas and Propagation IEEE, Apr. 15-18, 1991, 10 pages. |
Paiaman et al., “Effect of Drilling Fluid Properties on Rate Penetration,” Nafta 60:3, 2009, 6 pages. |
Parini et al., “Chapter 3: Antenna measurements,” in Theory and Practice of Modern Antenna Range Measurements, IET editorial, 2014, 30 pages. |
petrowiki.org [online], “Hole Cleaning,” retrieved from URL <http://petrowiki.org/Hole_cleaning#Annular-fluid_velocity>, retrieved on Jan. 25, 2019, 8 pages. |
petrowiki.org [online], “Kicks,” Petrowiki, available on or before Jun. 26, 2015, retrieved on Jan. 24, 2018, retrieved from URL <https://petrowiki.org/Kicks>, 6 pages. |
Ranjbar, “Cutting Transport in Inclined and Horizontal Wellbore,” University of Stavanger, Faculty of Science and Technology, Master's Thesis, Jul. 6, 2010, 137 pages. |
Rasi, “Hole Cleaning in Large, High-Angle Wellbores,” IADC/SPE 27464, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the 1994 SPE/IADC Drilling Conference, Feb. 15-18, 1994, 12 pages. |
rigzone.com [online], “How does Well Control Work?” Rigzone, available on or before 1999, retrieved on Jan. 24, 2019, retrieved from URL <https://www.rigzone.com/training/insight.asp?insight_id=304&c_id>, 5 pages. |
Robinson and Morgan, “Effect of Hole Cleaning on Drilling Rate Performance,” Paper Aade-04-Df-Ho-42, AADE 2004 Drilling Fluids Conference, Houston, Texas, Apr. 6-7, 2004, 7 pages. |
Robinson, “Economic Consequences of Poor Solids and Control,” AADE 2006 Fluids Conference and Houston, Texas, Apr. 11-12, 2006, 9 pages. |
Rubaii et al., “A new robust approach for hole cleaning to improve rate of penetration,” SPE 192223-MS, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the SPE Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Annual Technical Symposium and Exhibition, Apr. 23-26, 2018, 40 pages. |
Ruiter et al., “3D ultrasound computer tomography of the breast: A new era?” European Journal of Radiology 81S1, Sep. 2012, 2 pages. |
sageoiltools.com [online] “Fluid Level & Dynamometer Instruments for Analysis due Optimization of Oil and Gas Wells,” retrieved from URL <http://www.sageoiltools.com/>, retrieved on Mar. 27, 2020, available on or before 2019, 3 pages. |
Schlumberger, “CERTIS: Retrievable, single-trip, production-level isolation system,” www.slb.com/CERTIS, 2017, 2 pages. |
Schlumberger, “First Rigless ESP Retrieval and Replacement with Slickline, Offshore Congo: Zeitecs Shuttle System Eliminates Need to Mobilize a Workover Rig,” slb.com/zeitecs, 2016, 1 page. |
Schlumberger, “The Lifting Business,” Offshore Engineer, Mar. 2017, 1 page. |
Schlumberger, “Zeitecs Shuttle System Decreases ESP Replacement Time by 87%: Customer ESP riglessly retrieved in less than 2 days on coiled tubing.” slb.com/zeitecs, 2015, 1 page. |
Schlumberger, “Zeitecs Shuttle System Reduces Deferred Production Even Before ESP is Commissioned, Offshore Africa: Third Party ESP developed fault during installation and was retrieved on rods, enabling operator to continue running tubing without waiting on replacement,” slb.com/zeitecs, 2016, 2 pages. |
Schlumberger, “Zeitecs Shuttle: Rigless ESP replacement system,” Schlumberger, 2017, 2 pages. |
Sifferman et al., “Drilling cutting transport in full scale vertical annuli,” Journal of Petroleum Technology 26.11, 48th Annual Fall Meeting of the Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME, Las Vegas, Sep. 30-Oct. 3, 1973, 12 pages. |
slb.com [online] “Technical Paper: ESP Retrievable Technology: A Solution to Enhance ESP Production While Minimizing Costs,” SPE 156189 presented in 2012, retrieved from URL <http://www.slb.com/resources/technical_papers/artificial_lift/156189.aspx>, retrieved on Nov. 2, 2018, 1 pages. |
slb.com [online], “Zeitecs Shuttle Rigless ESP Replacement System,” retrieved from URL <http://www.slb.com/services/production/artificial_lift/submersible/zeitecs-shuttle.aspx?t=3>, available on or before May 31, 2017, retrieved on Nov. 2, 2018, 3 pages. |
Sulzer Metco, “An Introduction to Thermal Spray,” 4, 2013, 24 pages. |
Takahashi et al., “Degradation study on materials for dissolvable frac plugs,” URTeC 2901283, presented at the Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, Jul. 23-25, 2018, 9 pages. |
tervesinc.com [online], “Tervalloy™ Degradable Magnesium Alloys,” available on or before Jun. 12, 2016, via Internet Archive: Wayback Machine URL <https://web.archive.org/web/20160612114602/http://tervesinc.com/media/Terves 8-Pg_Brochure.pd>, retrieved on Aug. 20, 2020, <http://tervesinc.com/media/Terves_8-Pg_Brochure.pdf>, 8 pages. |
Tobenna, “Hole Cleaning Hydraulics,” Universitetet o Stavanger, Faculty of Science and Technology, Master's Thesis, Jun. 15, 2010, 75 pages. |
Wastu et al., “The effect of drilling mud on hole cleaning in oil and gas industry,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Dec. 2019, 1402:2, 7 pages. |
Weatherford, “RFID Advanced Reservoir Management System Optimizes Injection Well Design, Improves Reservoir Management,” Weatherford.com, 2013, 2 pages. |
Wei et al., “The Fabrication of All-Solid-State Lithium-Ion Batteries via Spark Plasma Sintering,” Metals, 7: 372, 2017, 9 pages. |
Wellbore Service Tools: Retrievable tools, “RTTS Packer,” Halliburton: Completion Tools, 2017, 4 pages. |
wikipedia.org [online] “Optical Flowmeters,” retrieved from URL <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flow_measurement#Optical_flowmeters>, retrieved on Mar. 27, 2020, available on or before Jan. 2020, 1 page. |
wikipedia.org [online] “Ultrasonic Flow Meter,” retrieved from URL <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultrasonic_flow_meter>, retrieved on Mar. 27, 2020, available on or before Sep. 2019, 3 pages. |
wikipedia.org [online], “Surface roughness,” retrieved from URL <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surface_roughness>, retrieved on Apr. 2, 2020, available on or before Oct. 2017, 6 pages. |
Williams and Bruce, “Carrying Capacity of Drilling Muds,” Journal of Petroleum Technology, 3.04, 192, 1951, 10 pages. |
Xia et al., “A Cutting Concentration Model of a Vertical Wellbore Annulus in Deep-water Drilling Operation and its Application,” Applied Mechanics and Materials, 101-102, Sep. 27, 2011, 5 pages. |
Xue et al., “Spark plasma sintering plus heat-treatment of Ta-doped Li7La3Zr2O12 solid electrolyte and its ionic conductivity,” Mater. Res. Express 7 (2020) 025518, 8 pages. |
Zhan et al. “Effect of β-to-α Phase Transformation on the Microstructural Development and Mechanical Properties of Fine-Grained Silicon Carbide Ceramics,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society 84.5, May 2001, 6 pages. |
Zhan et al. “Single-wall carbon nanotubes as attractive toughening agents in alumina-based nanocomposites,” Nature Materials 2.1, Jan. 2003, 6 pages. |
Zhan et al., “Atomic Layer Deposition on Bulk Quantities of Surfactant Modified Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes,” Journal of American Ceramic Society, 91:3, Mar. 2008, 5 pages. |
Zhang et al., “Increasing Polypropylene High Temperature Stability by Blending Polypropylene-Bonded Hindered Phenol Antioxidant,” Macromolecules, 51:5 (1927-1936), 2018, 10 pages. |
Zhu et al., “Spark Plasma Sintering of Lithium Aluminum Germanium Phosphate Solid Electrolyte and its Electrochemical Properties,” University of British Columbia; Nanomaterials, 9, 1086, 2019, 10 pages. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Appln. No. PCT/US2021/058034, dated Feb. 18, 2022, 13 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220136344 A1 | May 2022 | US |