System and methods for the measurement of drilling mud flow in real-time

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11867008
  • Patent Number
    11,867,008
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, November 5, 2020
    3 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 9, 2024
    4 months ago
Abstract
The present disclosure describes methods and systems, including computer-implemented methods, computer program products, and computer systems, for monitoring the flow of drilling mud from a wellbore by image processing. One method includes: capturing, using a digital imaging device, images of drilling mud at a surface of the wellbore as the drilling mud flows through one or more image capture zones of a circulation system that circulates drilling mud through the wellbore and a wellbore drilling assembly; receiving, by one or more processors of a computer system operatively coupled to the digital imaging device, the images captured by the digital imaging device; and processing, by the one or more processors, the images captured by the digital imaging device to determine a rate of flow of the drilling mud through the one or more image capture zones.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

This disclosure relates to wellbores, particularly, to drilling wellbores.


BACKGROUND

Hydrocarbons trapped in subsurface reservoirs can be raised to the surface of the Earth through wellbores formed from the surface to the subsurface reservoirs. Wellbore drilling systems are used to drill wellbores through a subterranean zone (for example, a formation, a portion of a formation, or multiple formations) to the subsurface reservoir. At a basic level, the wellbore drilling system includes a drill bit connected to an end of a drill string. The drill string is rotated and weight is applied to the drill bit to drill through the subterranean zone. Wellbore drilling fluid (also known as drilling mud) is flowed in a downhole direction through the drill string. The drilling mud exits the drill bit through ports defined in the drill bit and flows in an uphole direction through an annulus defined by an outer surface of the drill string and an inner wall of the wellbore. As the drilling mud flows towards the surface, it carries cuttings and debris released into the wellbore due to the drilling. The cuttings and debris are generally released from the subterranean zone as the drill bit breaks rock while penetrating the subterranean zone. When mixed with the drilling mud, the cuttings and debris form a solid slurry that can flow to the surface. At the surface, the cuttings and debris can be filtered from the solid slurry and the drilling mud can be recirculated into the wellbore to continue drilling.


SUMMARY

This specification describes technologies for monitoring the flow of drilling mud from a wellbore by image processing.


According to a first aspect, a method for monitoring the flow of drilling mud from a wellbore includes: capturing, using a digital imaging device, images of drilling mud at a surface of the wellbore as the drilling mud flows through one or more image capture zones of a circulation system that circulates drilling mud through the wellbore and a wellbore drilling assembly; receiving, by one or more processors of a computer system operatively coupled to the digital imaging device, the images captured by the digital imaging device; and processing, by the one or more processors, the images captured by the digital imaging device to determine a rate of flow of the drilling mud through the one or more image capture zones.


In some cases, the method also includes: receiving a mud flow-in rate from a flow rate sensor of the circulation system; calculating a delta flow based on a difference between the mud flow-in rate and the rate of flow of the drilling mud through the one or more image capture zones; and displaying, using a display device of the computer system, a mud flow status based on the delta flow. The method may also include identifying one or more recommended actions for operating the wellbore drilling assembly based on the delta flow or the mud flow status; and displaying the one or more recommended actions on the display device.


In some implementations of the method, the one or more image capture zones include a discharge zone where a flow-out line connects to a possum belly, the possum belly being configured to receive drilling mud from the flow-out line.


In some implementations, the circulation system includes one or more shaker assemblies, each including a splash zone configured to receive drilling mud from the possum belly, wherein the one or more image capture zones include the splash zone of each of the one or more shaker assemblies.


In some implementations, the method also includes determining a partial flow rate of drilling mud through the splash zone of each of a plurality of shaker assemblies; and combining the partial flow rates to obtain the rate of flow of the drilling mud.


In some implementations, implementing image processing techniques includes deploying a machine learning model to extract abstract features from the images captured by the digital imaging device. In some cases, the machine learning model includes a convolutional neural network (CNN) model, the method further including: receiving additional features that include one or more of drilling parameters of the wellbore drilling assembly, properties of the drilling mud, and the weight of drilling mud measured in the one or more image capture zones using one or more mass sensors; concatenating the abstract features extracted by the CNN and the additional features; and feeding the concatenated features as input to a regression model to determine the rate of flow of the drilling mud through the one or more image capture zones.


According to a second aspect, a system for monitoring the flow of drilling mud from a wellbore, includes: a digital imaging device configured to capture images of drilling mud at a surface of the wellbore as the drilling mud flows through one or more image capture zones of a circulation system configured to circulate drilling mud through the wellbore and a wellbore drilling assembly; a computer system operatively coupled to the digital imaging device, the computer system including one or more processors and a computer-readable medium storing instructions executable by the one or more processors to perform operations including: receiving the images captured by the digital imaging device; and processing, by the one or more processors, the images captured by the digital imaging device to determine a rate of flow of the drilling mud through the one or more image capture zones.


Some implementations of the system include a flow rate sensor configured to measure a mud flow-in rate of the drilling mud through the wellbore drilling assembly and into the wellbore, wherein the computer system includes a display device and is configured to perform operations including: receiving the mud flow-in rate from the flow rate sensor; calculating a delta flow based on a difference between the mud flow-in rate and the rate of flow of the drilling mud through the one or more image capture zones; identifying a mud flow status based on the delta flow; identifying one or more recommended actions for operating the wellbore drilling assembly based on the delta flow or the mud flow status; and displaying the mud flow status and the one or more recommended actions on the display device.


Some implementations of the system include a possum belly configured to receive drilling mud from a flow-out line of the circulation system, wherein the one or more image capture zones include a discharge zone where the flow-out line connects to the possum belly. In some cases, the digital imaging device includes a camera mounted to or adjacent to the possum belly and oriented to face the discharge zone of the possum belly.


Some implementations of the system include one or more shaker assemblies, wherein each of the one or more shaker assemblies includes a splash zone configured to receive drilling mud from the possum belly, wherein the one or more image capture zones include the splash zone of each of the one or more shaker assemblies. In some cases, each of the one or more shaker assemblies includes a flow pane with an adjustable opening through which drilling mud flows from the possum belly into the splash zone, wherein the one or more image capture zones include the flow pane of each of the one or more shaker assemblies. The digital imaging device may include a camera mounted to or adjacent to each of the one or more shaker assemblies, wherein each camera is oriented to face the splash zone and flow pane of the one or more shaker assemblies. The digital imaging device may also include a camera mounted above and oriented to face the possum belly and the one or more shaker assemblies, wherein the camera includes a field of view that includes the discharge zone of the possum belly and the splash zone of each of the one or more shaker assemblies.


In some implementations, the computer system is configured to perform operations including: deploying a convolutional neural network (CNN) model to extract abstract features from the images captured by the digital imaging device; receiving additional features that include one or more of drilling parameters of the wellbore drilling assembly, properties of the drilling mud, and the weight of drilling mud measured in the one or more image capture zones using one or more mass sensors; concatenating the abstract features extracted by the CNN and the additional features; and feeding the concatenated features as input to a regression model to determine the rate of flow of the drilling mud through the one or more image capture zones.


Other implementations include corresponding computer programs recorded on one or more computer storage devices, each configured to perform the actions of the methods.


The details of one or more embodiments of the subject matter described in this specification are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features, aspects, and advantages of the subject matter will become apparent from the description, the drawings, and the claims.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a wellbore drilling assembly for drilling a wellbore.



FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a system for monitoring the flow of drilling mud from the wellbore according to an implementation.



FIG. 3 is a flowchart of an example of a process for monitoring the flow of drilling mud from a wellbore.



FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of an example of how the computer system predicts mud flow at a shale shaker using image processing techniques.



FIG. 5 is an overview of an example process for training and testing a machine learning model, for example, the model shown in FIG. 4



FIG. 6A is a flowchart of an example of a process for evaluating the flow of drilling mud during wellbore drilling operations.



FIG. 6B is a schematic diagram of a mud flow recommendation system.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Wellbore drilling involves breaking rock in a subterranean zone to form and deepen a wellbore. The broken rock is carried to the wellbore surface by drilling mud that flows through the wellbore.


This disclosure relates to systems and techniques that can be implemented to monitor the flow of drilling mud at the wellbore surface. A digital imaging device along with data analytics models can be implemented to estimate, in real-time, the rate of mud flow that exits the wellbore at the wellbore surface. Potential hazards can be identified and assessed. The monitoring can reduce or eliminate the need for manual, visual inspection of mud flow. The monitoring system can alert the rig crew about possible drilling hazards in real-time and, in some implementations, predict, mitigate, or even prevent major challenges to wellbore operations.



FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a wellbore drilling assembly 10 and a system for monitoring the flow of drilling mud from the wellbore. The wellbore can extend from the surface through the Earth to one or more subterranean zones of interest. The wellbore drilling assembly 10 includes a drill floor 12 positioned above the surface, a wellhead assembly 14, a drill string assembly 16 supported by a rig structure, a fluid circulation system 18 to filter used drilling fluid or drilling mud from the wellbore and provide clean drilling mud to the drill string assembly 16. The wellhead assembly 14 can be used to support casing or other wellbore components or equipment into the wellbore.


A derrick or mast is a support framework mounted on the drill floor 12 and positioned over the wellbore to support the components of the drill string assembly 16 during drilling operations. A crown block 20 forms a longitudinally-fixed top of the derrick and connects to a travelling block 22 with a drilling line that includes a set of wire ropes or cables. The crown block 20 and the travelling block 22 support the drill string assembly 16 via a swivel 24, a kelly 26. Longitudinal movement of the travelling block 22 relative to the crown block 20 of the drill string assembly 16 moves the drill string assembly 16 longitudinally upward and downward. The swivel 24, connected to and hung by the travelling block 22 and a rotary hook, allows free rotation of the drill string assembly 16 and provides a connection to a kelly hose 28. The kelly hose 28 flows drilling mud from a drilling mud supply of the circulation system 18 to the drill string assembly 16. A standpipe 30 mounted on the drill floor 12 guides at least a portion of the kelly hose 28 to a location proximate to the drill string assembly 16. The kelly 26 is generally a device with a hexagonal cross-section suspended from the swivel 24 and connected to a longitudinal top of the drill string assembly 16. Kelly 26 turns with the drill string assembly 16 as a rotary table 32 of the drill string assembly turns. The techniques described in this disclosure can be implemented with a top drive system instead of the kelly 26.


In the wellbore drilling assembly 10 of FIG. 1, the drill string assembly 16 is made up of drill pipes with a drill bit (not shown) at a longitudinally bottom end of the drill string. The drill pipe can include hollow steel piping, and the drill bit can include cutting tools, such as blades, discs, rollers, cutters, or a combination of these, to cut into the formation and form the wellbore. The drill bit rotates and penetrates through rock formations below the surface under the combined effect of axial load and rotation of the drill string assembly 16. In some implementations, the kelly 26 and swivel 24 can be replaced by a top drive that allows the drill string assembly 16 to spin and drill. The wellhead assembly 14 can also include a drawworks 34 and a deadline anchor 36. A drawworks 34 includes a winch that acts as a hoisting system to reel the drilling line in and out to raise and lower the drill string assembly 16 by a fast line. A deadline anchor 36 fixes the drilling line opposite the drawworks 34 by a deadline 38 and can measure the suspended load (or hook load) on the rotary hook. The weight on bit (WOB) can be measured when the drill bit is at the bottom the wellbore.


The illustrated wellhead assembly 14 also includes a blowout preventer 40 positioned at the surface of the wellbore and below (but often connected to) the drill floor 12. The blowout preventer 40 prevents wellbore blowouts caused by formation fluid entering the wellbore, displacing drilling mud, and flowing to the surface at a pressure greater than atmospheric pressure. The blowout preventer 40 can close around (and in some instances, through) the drill string assembly 16 and seal off the space between the drill string and the wellbore wall. Wellhead assemblies can take a variety of forms and include a number of different components.


During a drilling operation, the circulation system 18 circulates drilling mud from the wellbore to the drill string assembly 16, filters used drilling mud from the wellbore, and provides clean drilling mud to the drill string assembly 16. The illustrated circulation system 18 includes a fluid pump 42 that fluidly connects to and provides drilling mud to drill string assembly 16 via the kelly hose 28 and the standpipe 30. The circulation system 18 also includes a flow-out line 44, a possum belly or header box 46, two shale shakers 48, a settling pit 50, and a suction pit 52. In a drilling operation, the circulation system 18 pumps drilling mud from the surface, through the drill string assembly 16, out the drill bit and back up the annulus of the wellbore, where the annulus is the space between the drill pipe and the formation or casing. The hydrostatic pressure from the drilling mud is intended to be greater than the formation pressures to prevent formation fluids from entering the annulus and flowing to the surface, but less than the mechanical strength of the formation since a higher pressure may fracture the formation and create a path for the drilling muds to enter the formation. Apart from wellbore control, drilling mud can also cool the drill bit and lift rock cuttings from the drilled formation up the annulus and to the surface to be filtered out and treated. The drilling mud returns from the annulus with rock cuttings and flows out to the flow-out line 44, which connects to and provides the fluid to the shaker header box or possum belly 46. The flow-out line 44 is an inclined pipe that directs the drilling mud from the annulus to the possum belly 46. The possum belly 46 is connected to and distributes drilling mud to the shale shakers 48. Each shale shaker 48 includes a mesh-like surface to separate the coarse rock cuttings from the drilling mud. Finer rock cuttings and drilling mud then go through the settling pit 50 to the suction pit 50. The circulation system 18 includes a mud hopper 54 into which materials (for example, to provide dispersion, rapid hydration, and uniform mixing) can be introduced to the circulation system 18. The fluid pump 42 cycles the drilling mud up the standpipe 30 through the swivel 24 and back into the drill string assembly 16 to return to the wellbore.


A system for monitoring the flow of drilling mud from the wellbore includes a digital image capturing device 102 and an onsite computer system 104 to monitor the drilling mud that flows from within the wellbore to the surface in real time. The digital imaging device 102 and the computer system 104 together form a monitoring system that can track the flow of drilling mud as it emerges from the wellbore and passes through the possum belly 46 and the shale shakers 48. In some implementations, the digital imaging device 102 (for example, a smart camera, an image sensor, vision sensor network or similar digital imaging device) can capture digital images of the mud flow. The computer system 104 can receive the images, process the images using image processing techniques to analyze the received images, and determine a volumetric rate of flow of the drilling mud at the wellbore surface. For example, the digital imaging device 102 can be configured to capture images of drilling mud as it flows through one or more image capture zones of the circulation system 18. The image capture zones can include regions of the possum belly 46, the shale shakers 48, or both. The computer system 104 can use image processing techniques based, e.g., semantic and instance segmentation, or based on machine learning (ML) or deep learning (DL) to extract abstract features from the images and estimate the flow rate of mud through each of the image capture zones, as described in more detail later. Such an estimation of the drilling mud flow rate has several applications including, for example, the identification of an influx of drilling mud, a loss of drilling mud circulation, and the identification and analysis of chemical treatments, such as sweep pills, to name a few.



FIG. 2 is an enlarged schematic view of the possum belly 46, the shale shakers 48, the digital imaging device 102, and the computer system 104. The possum belly 46 is connected to the flow-out line 44 and receives drilling mud from the wellbore. During drilling operation, the drilling mud can include drill cuttings and other solids S dispersed in the liquid phase. Flow-out line 44 opens into the possum belly 46 at a discharge zone for the drilling mud (and any drilling solids). For example, the drilling mud can gain momentum as it flows along the inclined flow-out line 44 and slows as it flows into the discharge zone and the possum belly. In FIG. 2, the flow of drilling mud is represented by droplets. Possum belly 46 can also be referred to as a “header box,” a “distribution box,” or a “flow line trap.” In some implementations, the possum belly 46 includes a mass sensor (not shown) that measures the weight of the drilling mud that flows into the possum belly 46.


Downstream from the discharge zone and the flow-out line 44, the possum belly 46 is connected to two shale shakers 48 that filter solids dispersed in the drilling mud before the drilling mud is pumped back into the drilling assembly. A flow pane 56 with an adjustable opening 58 is arranged between each shale shaker 48 and the possum belly 46. In a system that includes multiple shale shakers 48, the size of the respective flow pane openings 58 can be adjusted to distribute the drilling mud according to a specific ratio. For example, in FIG. 2, the flow pane openings 58 are configured so that 75% of the drilling mud from the possum belly 46 flows to the shale shaker 48 on the left and 25% of the drilling mud flows to the shale shaker 48 on the right. Although the implementation of FIG. 2 includes two shale shakers 48, some implementations may include only a single shale shaker 48 or more than two shale shakers 48, e.g., three to eight shale shakers. Further, although the shale shakers 48 in FIG. 2 are each connected to the possum belly 46 by a flow pane 56, other implementations do not necessarily include a flow pane 56. For example, the shale shaker 48 can be positioned below the possum belly 46 so that drilling mud flows over the edge of the possum belly 46 and into the shale shaker 48 below.


The drilling mud lands on a shaking screen and is carried downstream of the shale shaker 48 when the shaking screen is vibrated by shaker basket motors (not shown). FIG. 2 shows different length segments of the moving tray 60 or the mesh or sieve of the shale shaker 48. In particular, the length segment nearest the possum belly 46 and the flow pane 56 can be a very wet or splash zone 62 in which the drilling mud is wettest, that is, it has the highest concentration of drilling mud among all the length segments. In some implementations, the shale shaker 48 includes a mass sensor (not shown) that is arranged below the splash zone 62 and weighs the drilling mud and solids that flow onto the screen. Arrow 64 represents a direction of movement of the drilling mud as the shaking screen vibrates. The length segment downstream of the very wet or splash zone 62 is an intermediate zone 66 that is drier compared to the very wet or splash zone 62 because at least some but not all of the drilling mud has been drained from the drilling mud. The length segment downstream of the intermediate zone 66 is the dry zone 68 in which the drilling mud is most dry, that is, has the lowest concentration of drilling mud among all the length segments. The dry zone 68 can be the length segment that is immediately upstream of a downstream edge 70 of the tray 60. In the dry zone 68, most, if not all, of the drilling mud liquid has been drained from the slurry leaving only solid objects or mostly solid objects with very little drilling mud. The solid objects from which the drilling mud has been separated are discarded in a solids discard zone (not shown) downstream of the shale shaker's edge 70. The drilling mud and any fine solids, depending on the mesh size of the shale shaker screen, are gathered into a sump tank for further treatment and recycling for reuse in the wellbore drilling operation. In some implementations, the relative sizes of the splash zone 62, the intermediate zone 66, and the dry zone 68 can differ from what is shown in FIG. 2.


As illustrated, the digital imaging device 102 can include a plurality of cameras 102a, 102b, 102c that are oriented such that the view finder or screen of each device 102a-102c faces the drilling mud. In particular, a first camera 102a is oriented such that the field of view of the camera captures a plan view of the opening of the flow-out line 44 into the possum belly. The second and third cameras 102b, 102c are each oriented such that their fields of view capture a plan view of the flow pane opening 58 and the very wet or splash zone 62 of the shaker screen, respectively. Thus, the discharge zone in the possum belly 46, the flow pane openings 58, and splash zones 62 form image capture zones in which images of the flowing drilling mud are captured by the cameras 102a-102c of the digital imaging device 102. Each camera 102a-102c can have a field of view 106a-106c that spans an entire width of the shaking screen or possum belly so as to image an entirety of the drilling mud carried by the shaking screen and possum belly, respectively. The cameras 102a-102c can include smart, waterproof, high resolution, wireless cameras or any other image or vision sensor such as infrared sensors, gamma ray sensors, computerized tomography (CT) scanners, thermal sensors, or X-ray sensors, to name a few. The fields of view of cameras 102a-102c can be illuminated with lights to account for low light conditions. Alternatively, cameras 102a-102c can include night vision capabilities.


In FIG. 2, each camera 102a-102c is mounted to a stand (not shown) that is positioned adjacent to the possum belly 46 or the downstream edge 70 of the shale shakers 48. However, the cameras 102a-102c can also be mounted to the possum belly 46 or the shale shakers 48 themselves. For example, the shale shakers 48 include a static motor cable support member (for example, a swing arm or other static, non-vibrating member) that spans a width of the shaking screen and that carries cabling or wiring to power the motors. In some implementations, the cameras 102b, 102c are mounted on and directly attached to the support member. Alternatively or in addition, the digital imaging device 102 can be mounted on other components of the circulation system 18, for example, a centrifuge, de-sander, or de-silter.


Although FIG. 2 illustrates an implementation in which the digital imaging device 102 includes a camera for each image capture zone, this is not necessarily the case. For example, the digital imaging device 102 can include a single device or camera mounted elsewhere on the drilling rig site, for example, on a pole installed onto the drilling rig structure or onto or into the ground around the rig structure that effectively hoists the digital imaging device 102 to a bird's eye view above the solids control equipment. In such implementations, the camera's field of view can cover multiple or even all image capture zones (e.g. the discharge zone and numerous splash zones). The images captured by the single device can be cropped to obtain individual frames for each zone prior to image processing. In yet another implementation, the digital imaging device 102 can include devices that are provided for a single image capture zone and other devices that capture more than one image capture zone.


In any case, the digital imaging device 102 is mounted to a component that does not vibrate extensively during operation so that the digital imaging device 102 can capture relatively vibration-free images. In some implementations, vibration dampeners can be mounted to a component and the digital imaging device 102 can be mounted to any component whose vibrations have been dampened. In some implementations, the digital imaging device 102 can implement vibration control or shake reduction features to capture nearly vibration-free or shake-free images even if mounted on a vibrating structure of a wellbore drilling assembly component. In some implementations, vibration dampeners can be mounted to a component and shake reduction features can be implemented in the digital imaging device 102. In some implementations, image distortions due to vibration or shaking can be removed during image processing.


The digital imaging device 102 is operatively coupled to the computer system 104, for example, by wired or wireless operative coupling techniques. The computer system 104 includes a computer-readable medium (for example, a transitory or a non-transitory computer-readable medium) and one or more processors coupled to the computer-readable medium. The computer-readable medium stores computer instructions executable by the one or more processors to perform operations described in this disclosure. In some implementations, the computer system 104 can implement edge or fog computing hardware and software based on artificial intelligence models including ML and DL for image or video processing. Together, the digital imaging device 102 and the computer system 104 can form an Internet of Things (IoT) platform to be used on a drilling rig and configured to implement a set of artificial intelligence models including ML and DL that serve as the foundation for enabling analysis of new sensors and data streams in real-time to provide advanced solutions for optimization of drilling operations.



FIG. 3 is a flowchart of an example of a process 300 for monitoring the flow of drilling mud from a wellbore. At 302, images of drilling mud at a surface of the wellbore are captured using a digital imaging device 102 as the drilling mud flows through one or more image capture zones of a circulation system that circulates drilling mud through the wellbore and a wellbore drilling assembly. At 304, the images captured by the digital imaging device are received by one or more processors of a computer system operatively coupled to the digital imaging device. At 306, image processing techniques are implemented on the captured images by the one or more processors of the computer system to determine a rate of flow of the drilling mud through the one or more image capture zones. As described previously, the one or more image capture zones can include the discharge zone of the possum belly 46. Additionally or alternatively, the one or more image capture zones can include the splash zone 62 of one or more shale shakers 48. If the shale shakers 48 are connected to the possum belly 46 by a flow pane 56, the image capture zones can also include the flow pane opening 58 for each shale shaker 48.


In some implementations, a machine learning model extracts at 306 abstract features from the images captured by the digital imaging device. For example, the machine learning model can include a convolutional neural network (CNN) model. The image processing techniques can include receiving additional features besides the captured images; extracting abstract features from the images captured by the digital imaging device using the CNN; concatenating the abstract features extracted by the CNN and the additional features; and feeding the concatenated features as input to a regression model to determine the rate of flow of the drilling mud through the one or more image capture zones. In some implementations, these additional features can include drilling parameters of the wellbore drilling assembly, properties of the drilling mud, and the weight of drilling mud measured in the one or more image capture zones using one or more mass sensors, to name a few examples.



FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of how the mud flow at a shale shaker 402 is predicted using image processing techniques according to one implementation. The shale shaker 402 may be similar to the shale shakers 48 shown in FIG. 2. As in other implementations, the shale shaker 402 includes a flow pane 404 that regulates the flow of drilling mud from the possum belly (not shown) onto the screen of the shale shaker 402. As described earlier, a digital imaging device 406 (for example a camera) captures multiple images of the shale shaker 402 and the flow pane 404 as drilling mud (represented by black droplets) flows through the flow pane opening and along the splash zone of the shale shaker 402 and transmits the images to the computer system. In some cases, the series of images may be individual frames of a video. In other cases, the images may captured in snapshot mode.


A generic CNN model 410 implemented by the computer system is also shown. A CNN is a suitable DL model for pattern recognition and image classification and can exploit spatial correlation/dependencies in the data. The size and number of filter and pooling layers in different CNNs can be tailored to automatically extract features from the images obtained at the shale shaker 402. The computer system flattens the features extracted from the images as a vector. In the illustrated implementation, the abstract features extracted from each frame 408 are concatenated with additional features. Table 1 lists examples of additional features that can be used as input for the models executed by the computer system:










TABLE 1





Type
Parameter [units]







Real-time surface
Stand pipe pressure (SPP) [psi]


drilling parameters
Flow rate in, calculated [gpm]



Flow rate out (sensor) [%]



Pump stroke count (STKC) [—]



Pump stroke rates (SPMT) [—]



Rate of penetration (ROP), calculated [ft/h]



Revolutions per minute (rpm)



True vertical depth (TVD) [ft]


Static data
Mud rheology and properties



Section diameter, formation tops



(expected, observed), etc.


Additional sensors
Mass sensors, temperature, etc.









The vector for each frame 408 is provided as input to a sequence model 412. The sequence model 412 includes an output layer that predicts a single value, i.e., the estimated flow of mud in the frame 408. In some implementations, the sequence model 412 is a supervised learning model such as a recurrent neural network (RNN), long short-term memory (LSTM) network, or other regression model. One aspect of the present disclosure uses time series analysis to understand the trends of the flow with respect to time. For this, regression models based on RNN and LSTM are described. They are capable of interpreting the context of a video frame relative to the frames that came before it. However, other implementations can include simple regression models without considering trends (i.e., support vector regression, ridge regression, logistic regression, lasso regression, to name a few).


As previously described, the solids control system of a wellbore drilling assembly 10 can include several shale shakers coupled to a possum belly (see, for example, FIGS. 1 and 2). Since the flow of drilling mud at each shale shaker may be different, for example, due to the opening size of a flow pane, the computer system can implement a model such as the one shown in FIG. 4 for each shale shaker. After calculating the mud flow for each shale shaker, these partial flows are added to determine the total mud flow from the wellbore. In other cases, the model described in reference to FIG. 4 can be implemented only for the discharge zone of the possum belly (in other words without the shale shakers), since the possum belly receives the entirety of the drilling mud that exits the wellbore. Other implementations can include separate models for the possum belly and each of the shale shakers, and the aggregate mud flow at the splash zones of the shale shakers should be equal to the mud flow estimated for the discharge zone of the possum belly.


In implementations that use supervised learning models such as RNN/LSTM to estimate the flow of mud, the model must initially learn the relationships between the image frames 408, drilling parameters, and the mud flow rate at a given time step tn. In order to train the models, a set of N vectors that contain the abstract features extracted from the frames 408, drilling parameters, and other sensor data, represents a sample Stn, such that Stn={x1, x2, . . . , xn}:ytn where xi represent the abstract and additional features (shown in FIG. 4) and is assigned to the input flow rate that indicates the label y, i.e., the mud flow measured by a surface flow-in rate sensor.



FIG. 5 is an overview of an example process 500 for training and testing a machine learning model, for example, the model shown in FIG. 4. More specifically, a training phase is described in reference to 502-508 of FIG. 5.


At 502, operating parameters that include drilling parameters, the mud weight, or both are received. In some implementations, the drilling parameters include one or more of the parameters listed in Table 1. In some implementations, the mud weight is measured by a mass sensor arranged, for example, below a discharge zone of the possum belly 46. At 504, digital images of mud flow captured at the discharge zone of the possum belly, the splash zones of one or more shale shakers, or both are received. The images can be cropped, enhanced, or augmented in preparation for image processing. The images are processed, for example, using the techniques described above. The feature vectors that result from image processing can be labeled with an input flow rate measured by the surface flow-in rate sensor at the time the image was captured. In some implementations, the data is processed before being labeled. For example, data collected from different wells can include sensors with different ranges of data that arise from different hardware and calibrations. In some implementations, processing and labeling the data can include the use of z-score normalization, mean subtraction, or ranges.


At 506, the labeled data are used to train and validate a machine learning model, for example, a supervised learning model. In some implementations, a data split technique, such as the nested stratified cross-validation technique, is used to train and tune the model parameters of a DL model. In such implementations, the labeled and processed data is split into training data and validation data. In nested cross-validation, inner k-fold cross-validation is used to tune the parameters of the model and is only performed on the training data, while the outer k-fold cross-validation is used to validate the final performance of the model. At 508, the trained and validated machine learning model is deployed to predict the flow rate of mud in an image frame as described previously in reference to FIG. 4.


The trained and validated model can be tested on new wells, as described in 510-514 of FIG. 5. At 510, digital images captured at one or more image capture zones of the new well are collected in the ways previously described. Data from additional sources, such as sensors, can also be received. At 512, the data is processed and labeled. In some implementations, image frames can be enhanced, cropped, or both prior to labeling. In some implementations, processing and labeling the data can include the use of z-score normalization, mean subtraction, or ranges obtained from the training data at 504 to normalize the additional data. In contrast to other implementations, the processed data is not assigned a mud flow-in rate, since the mud flow is the target value that is estimated by the model. At 514, the processed image frames that contain the splash and discharge zones as well as the additional data for the new well or section are fed to a machine learning model to estimate the mud flow observed at the possum belly and one or more shale shakers.



FIG. 6A is a flowchart of an example of a process 600 for evaluating the flow of drilling mud during wellbore drilling operations that follows process 300 described in FIG. 3. At 602, a mud flow-in rate is received from a flow rate sensor of the circulation system. The mud flow-in rate indicates, for example, the flow of drilling mud into the wellbore drilling assembly in gallons per minute. In normal drilling operations, the mud flow-in rate should be substantially equal to the rate at which mud flows out of the wellbore. Thus, at 604, a delta flow that reflects a difference between the mud flow-in rate and the rate of flow of the drilling mud through the one or more image capture zones is calculated. In some implementations, delta flow is calculated in gallons per minute.


At 606, a display device of the on-site computer system is used to display a mud flow status based on the delta flow. In some cases, a mud flow status is determined by comparing the delta flow to a pre-determined threshold value. An estimated mud flow greater than the measured mud flow-in rate can indicate an increased likelihood of kicks or a blowout. An estimated mud flow less than the measured mud flow-in rate can indicate a loss of circulation. When the estimated and measured mud flows substantially differ, a severity of the discrepancy can also be estimated and displayed. For example, if the estimated mud flow out is less than the measured mud flow in, a difference or a ratio of the estimated flow and the measured flow in can be calculated and compared to empirical values or threshold values to indicate a low, severe, or total loss of mud circulation. Alternatively, if the estimated mud flow out is greater than the measured mud flow in, a difference can be calculated to determine the total amount of gain mud (e.g., in gallons per minute).


Optionally, at 608, one or more recommended actions for operating the wellbore drilling assembly based on the delta flow or the mud flow status are identified. For example, the severity can be compared to historical data and logs from offset wells. In some cases, the total amount of gain mud can be used to look up a recommended mud weight to kill the well. The amount of gain mud can also be used to look up recommended actions, such as stopping circulation, closing the blowout preventer (BOP) annulus or ram to prevent a blowout. In the event of mud losses or lost circulation, the calculated severity can be used to infer whether the cause of the lost circulation is natural or induced. In some implementations, a lost circulation material can be recommended based on the historical data from the offset wells. Such data can include the depth of the wellbore and the lithology in the open hole, to name a few examples, and the type of lost circulation material and amount used for successfully stopping losses. Optionally, at 610, the one or more recommended actions are displayed on the display device alongside the mud flow status, as shown in FIG. 6B. In some implementations, a value indicating delta flow can also be displayed. Thus, the process 600 can automatically identify the amount of mud losses or gains and provide recommendations to the crew in real-time, based on the historical data and logs from the offset wells.


Generally, the implementations in this disclosure include image processing of image data that has been captured in continuous recording. Continuous recording can capture trends of the mud flow over time. However, image can also be processed in snapshot mode, for example, 10 frames per minute. The timing can be adapted to the speed of the processers and the transport time of the mud and solids across the image capturing zone to avoid double counting. Further, the image processing techniques of the present disclosure can also be used to detect characteristics of the drilling mud such as its color or temperature. Applications of such an implementation can be used to determine a circulation time necessary to clean a wellbore, i.e., the number of bottom ups. In such cases, high viscosity or sweep pills are pumped into the well to carry out the drill cuttings. The system and techniques described in this disclosure can also be used to derive a model able to recognize a dye or consistency contained in the sweep/high viscosity pill in order to automatically detect the pill at the shale shakers or possum belly.


The above description is presented to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the disclosed subject matter, and is provided in the context of one or more particular implementations. Various modifications to the disclosed implementations will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the general principles defined in this disclosure may be applied to other implementations and applications without departing from scope of the disclosure. Thus, the present disclosure is not intended to be limited to the described or illustrated implementations, but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and features disclosed in this disclosure.

Claims
  • 1. A method for monitoring the flow of drilling mud from a wellbore, comprising: capturing, using a digital imaging device, images of drilling mud at a surface of the wellbore as the drilling mud flows through one or more image capture zones of a circulation system that circulates drilling mud through the wellbore and a wellbore drilling assembly;receiving, by one or more processors of a computer system operatively coupled to the digital imaging device, the images captured by the digital imaging device; andprocessing, by the one or more processors, the images captured by the digital imaging device to determine a rate of flow of the drilling mud through the one or more image capture zones, wherein processing the images comprises: deploying a machine learning model to extract abstract features from the images captured by the digital imaging device, wherein the machine learning model comprises a convolutional neural network (CNN) model, anddetermining the rate of flow of the drilling mud through the one or more image capture zones by processing, using the CNN, the abstract features and additional features that comprise one or more of drilling parameters of the wellbore drilling assembly, properties of the drilling mud, and the weight of drilling mud measured in the one or more image capture zones using one or more mass sensors.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising: receiving a mud flow-in rate from a flow rate sensor of the circulation system;calculating a delta flow based on a difference between the mud flow-in rate and the rate of flow of the drilling mud through the one or more image capture zones; anddisplaying, using a display device of the computer system, a mud flow status based on the delta flow.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, further comprising: identifying one or more recommended actions for operating the wellbore drilling assembly based on the delta flow or the mud flow status; anddisplaying the one or more recommended actions on the display device.
  • 4. The method of claim 2, wherein the one or more image capture zones comprise a discharge zone where a flow-out line connects to a possum belly, the possum belly being configured to receive drilling mud from the flow-out line.
  • 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the circulation system comprises one or more shaker assemblies, each comprising a splash zone configured to receive drilling mud from the possum belly, wherein the one or more image capture zones comprise the splash zone of each of the one or more shaker assemblies.
  • 6. The method of claim 5, wherein the one or more shaker assemblies comprises a plurality of shaker assemblies, wherein the method further comprises: determining a partial flow rate of drilling mud through the splash zone of each of the plurality of shaker assemblies; andcombining the partial flow rates to obtain the rate of flow of the drilling mud.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein determining the rate of flow of the drilling mud through the one or more image capture zones by processing, using the CNN comprises: receiving the additional features;concatenating the abstract features extracted by the CNN and the additional features; andfeeding the concatenated features as input to a regression model to determine the rate of flow of the drilling mud through the one or more image capture zones.
  • 8. A system for monitoring the flow of drilling mud from a wellbore, comprising: a digital imaging device configured to capture images of drilling mud at a surface of the wellbore as the drilling mud flows through one or more image capture zones of a circulation system configured to circulate drilling mud through the wellbore and a wellbore drilling assembly;a computer system operatively coupled to the digital imaging device, the computer system comprising one or more processors and a computer-readable medium storing instructions executable by the one or more processors to perform operations comprising: receiving the images captured by the digital imaging device; andprocessing, by the one or more processors, the images captured by the digital imaging device to determine a rate of flow of the drilling mud through the one or more image capture zones, wherein processing the images comprises deploying a convolutional neural network (CNN) model that determines the rate of flow of the drilling mud through the one or more image capture zones using abstract features extracted from the images captured by the digital imaging device and additional features that comprise one or more of drilling parameters of the wellbore drilling assembly, properties of the drilling mud, and the weight of drilling mud measured in the one or more image capture zones.
  • 9. The system of claim 8, further comprising a flow rate sensor configured to measure a mud flow-in rate of the drilling mud through the wellbore drilling assembly and into the wellbore, wherein the computer system comprises a display device and is configured to perform operations comprising: receiving the mud flow-in rate from the flow rate sensor;calculating a delta flow based on a difference between the mud flow-in rate and the rate of flow of the drilling mud through the one or more image capture zones;identifying a mud flow status based on the delta flow;identifying one or more recommended actions for operating the wellbore drilling assembly based on the delta flow or the mud flow status; anddisplaying the mud flow status and the one or more recommended actions on the display device.
  • 10. The system of claim 8, further comprising a possum belly configured to receive drilling mud from a flow-out line of the circulation system, wherein the one or more image capture zones comprise a discharge zone where the flow-out line connects to the possum belly.
  • 11. The system of claim 10, wherein the digital imaging device comprises a camera mounted to or adjacent to the possum belly and oriented to face the discharge zone of the possum belly.
  • 12. The system of claim 10, further comprising one or more shaker assemblies, wherein each of the one or more shaker assemblies comprises a splash zone configured to receive drilling mud from the possum belly, wherein the one or more image capture zones comprise the splash zone of each of the one or more shaker assemblies.
  • 13. The system of claim 12, wherein each of the one or more shaker assemblies comprises a flow pane with an adjustable opening through which drilling mud flows from the possum belly into the splash zone, wherein the one or more image capture zones comprise the flow pane of each of the one or more shaker assemblies.
  • 14. The system of claim 13, wherein the digital imaging device comprises a camera mounted to or adjacent to each of the one or more shaker assemblies, wherein each camera is oriented to face the splash zone and flow pane of the one or more shaker assemblies.
  • 15. The system of claim 12, wherein the digital imaging device comprises a camera mounted above and oriented to face the possum belly and the one or more shaker assemblies, wherein the camera comprises a field of view that comprises the discharge zone of the possum belly and the splash zone of each of the one or more shaker assemblies.
  • 16. The system of claim 8, wherein deploying the CNN model comprises: deploying the CNN model to extract the abstract features from the images captured by the digital imaging device;receiving the additional features that comprise the one or more of drilling parameters of the wellbore drilling assembly, the properties of the drilling mud, and the weight of drilling mud measured in the one or more image capture zones from one or more mass sensors;concatenating the abstract features extracted by the CNN and the additional features; andfeeding the concatenated features as input to a regression model to determine the rate of flow of the drilling mud through the one or more image capture zones.
  • 17. A non-transitory computer-readable medium storing instructions executable by one or more processors to perform operations comprising: receiving images of drilling mud at a surface of a wellbore captured by a digital imaging device as the drilling mud flows through one or more image capture zones of a circulation system configured to circulate drilling mud through the wellbore and a wellbore drilling assembly;deploying a convolutional neural network (CNN) model to extract abstract features from the images captured by the digital imaging device;receiving additional features that comprise one or more of drilling parameters of the wellbore drilling assembly, properties of the drilling mud, and the weight of drilling mud measured in the one or more image capture zones using one or more mass sensors;concatenating the abstract features extracted by the CNN and the additional features; andfeeding the concatenated features as input to a regression model to determine the rate of flow of the drilling mud through the one or more image capture zones; andprocessing the images captured by the digital imaging device to determine a rate of flow of the drilling mud through the one or more image capture zones.
  • 18. The medium of claim 17, the operations further comprising: receiving a mud flow-in rate from a flow rate sensor of the circulation system;calculating a delta flow based on a difference between the mud flow-in rate and the rate of flow of the drilling mud through the one or more image capture zones;identifying a mud flow status based on the delta flow;identifying one or more recommended actions for operating the wellbore drilling assembly based on the delta flow or the mud flow status; anddisplaying the mud flow status and the one or more recommended actions on the display device.
US Referenced Citations (399)
Number Name Date Kind
891957 Schubert Jun 1908 A
2043225 Armentrout et al. Jun 1936 A
2110913 Lowrey Mar 1938 A
2227729 Lynes Jan 1941 A
2286673 Douglas Jun 1942 A
2305062 Church et al. Dec 1942 A
2344120 Baker Mar 1944 A
2757738 Ritchey Sep 1948 A
2509608 Penfield May 1950 A
2688369 Broyles Sep 1954 A
2690897 Clark Oct 1954 A
2719363 Richard et al. Oct 1955 A
2795279 Erich Jun 1957 A
2799641 Gordon Jul 1957 A
2805045 Goodwin Sep 1957 A
2822150 Muse et al. Feb 1958 A
2841226 Conrad et al. Jul 1958 A
2899000 Medders et al. Aug 1959 A
2927775 Hildebrandt Mar 1960 A
2950724 Roederer, Jr. Aug 1960 A
3016244 Friedrich et al. Jan 1962 A
3028915 Jennings Apr 1962 A
3087552 Graham Apr 1963 A
3102599 Hillburn Sep 1963 A
3103975 Hanson Sep 1963 A
3104711 Haagensen Sep 1963 A
3114875 Haagensen Dec 1963 A
3133592 Tomberlin May 1964 A
3137347 Parker Jun 1964 A
3149672 Joseph et al. Sep 1964 A
3169577 Erich Feb 1965 A
3170519 Haagensen Feb 1965 A
3211220 Erich Oct 1965 A
3220478 Kinzbach Nov 1965 A
3236307 Brown Feb 1966 A
3253336 Brown May 1966 A
3268003 Essary Aug 1966 A
3331439 Lawrence Jul 1967 A
3428125 Parker Feb 1969 A
3468373 Smith Sep 1969 A
3522848 New Aug 1970 A
3547192 Claridge et al. Dec 1970 A
3547193 Gill Dec 1970 A
3642066 Gill Feb 1972 A
3656564 Brown Apr 1972 A
3696866 Dryden Oct 1972 A
3839791 Feamster Oct 1974 A
3862662 Kern Jan 1975 A
3874450 Kern Apr 1975 A
3931856 Barnes Jan 1976 A
3946809 Hagedorn Mar 1976 A
3948319 Pritchett Apr 1976 A
4008762 Fisher et al. Feb 1977 A
4010799 Kern et al. Mar 1977 A
4064211 Wood Dec 1977 A
4084637 Todd Apr 1978 A
4135579 Rowland et al. Jan 1979 A
4140179 Kasevich et al. Feb 1979 A
4140180 Bridges et al. Feb 1979 A
4144935 Bridges et al. Mar 1979 A
4191493 Hansson et al. Mar 1980 A
4193448 Jearnbey Mar 1980 A
4193451 Dauphine Mar 1980 A
4196329 Rowland et al. Apr 1980 A
4199025 Carpenter Apr 1980 A
4265307 Elkins May 1981 A
RE30738 Bridges et al. Sep 1981 E
4301865 Kasevich et al. Nov 1981 A
4320801 Rowland et al. Mar 1982 A
4334928 Hara Jun 1982 A
4337653 Chauffe Jul 1982 A
4343651 Yazu et al. Aug 1982 A
4354559 Johnson Oct 1982 A
4373581 Toellner Feb 1983 A
4394170 Sawaoka et al. Jul 1983 A
4396062 Iskander Aug 1983 A
4412585 Bouck Nov 1983 A
4413642 Smith et al. Nov 1983 A
4449585 Bridges et al. May 1984 A
4457365 Kasevich et al. Jul 1984 A
4470459 Copland Sep 1984 A
4476926 Bridges et al. Oct 1984 A
4484627 Perkins Nov 1984 A
4485868 Sresty et al. Dec 1984 A
4485869 Sresty et al. Dec 1984 A
4487257 Dauphine Dec 1984 A
4495990 Titus et al. Jan 1985 A
4498535 Bridges Feb 1985 A
4499948 Perkins Feb 1985 A
4508168 Heeren Apr 1985 A
4513815 Rundell et al. Apr 1985 A
4524826 Savage Jun 1985 A
4524827 Bridges et al. Jun 1985 A
4545435 Bridges et al. Oct 1985 A
4553592 Looney et al. Nov 1985 A
4557327 Kinley et al. Dec 1985 A
4576231 Dowling et al. Mar 1986 A
4583589 Kasevich Apr 1986 A
4592423 Savage et al. Jun 1986 A
4610161 Gehrig Sep 1986 A
4612988 Segalman Sep 1986 A
4620593 Haagensen Nov 1986 A
4636934 Schwendemann Jan 1987 A
RE32345 Wood Mar 1987 E
4660636 Rundell et al. Apr 1987 A
4705108 Little et al. Nov 1987 A
4708212 McAuley Nov 1987 A
4817711 Jearnbey Apr 1989 A
5012863 Springer May 1991 A
5018580 Skipper May 1991 A
5037704 Nakai et al. Aug 1991 A
5055180 Klaila Oct 1991 A
5068819 Misra et al. Nov 1991 A
5070952 Neff Dec 1991 A
5074355 Lennon Dec 1991 A
5082054 Kiamanesh Jan 1992 A
5092056 Deaton Mar 1992 A
5107705 Wraight et al. Apr 1992 A
5107931 Valka et al. Apr 1992 A
5228518 Wilson et al. Jul 1993 A
5236039 Edelstein et al. Aug 1993 A
5278550 Rhein-Knudsen et al. Jan 1994 A
5388648 Jordan, Jr. Feb 1995 A
5490598 Adams Feb 1996 A
5501248 Kiest, Jr. Mar 1996 A
5690826 Cravello Nov 1997 A
5803186 Berger et al. Sep 1998 A
5803666 Keller Sep 1998 A
5813480 Zaleski, Jr. et al. Sep 1998 A
5853049 Keller Dec 1998 A
5890540 Pia et al. Apr 1999 A
5899274 Frauenfeld et al. May 1999 A
5947213 Angle Sep 1999 A
5955666 Mullins Sep 1999 A
5958236 Bakula Sep 1999 A
RE36362 Jackson Nov 1999 E
5987385 Varsamis et al. Nov 1999 A
6012526 Jennings et al. Jan 2000 A
6032742 Tomlin et al. Mar 2000 A
6041860 Nazzal et al. Mar 2000 A
6047239 Berger et al. Apr 2000 A
6096436 Inspektor Aug 2000 A
6170531 Jung et al. Jan 2001 B1
6173795 McGarian et al. Jan 2001 B1
6189611 Kasevich Feb 2001 B1
6254844 Takeuchi et al. Jul 2001 B1
6268726 Prammer Jul 2001 B1
6269953 Seyffert et al. Aug 2001 B1
6290068 Adams et al. Sep 2001 B1
6305471 Milloy Oct 2001 B1
6325216 Seyffert et al. Dec 2001 B1
6328111 Bearden et al. Dec 2001 B1
6330913 Langseth et al. Dec 2001 B1
6354371 O'Blanc Mar 2002 B1
6371302 Adams et al. Apr 2002 B1
6413399 Kasevich Jul 2002 B1
6443228 Aronstam Sep 2002 B1
6454099 Adams et al. Sep 2002 B1
6510947 Schulte et al. Jan 2003 B1
6534980 Toufaily et al. Feb 2003 B2
6544411 Varandaraj Apr 2003 B2
6561269 Brown et al. May 2003 B1
6571877 Van Bilderbeek Jun 2003 B1
6607080 Winkler et al. Aug 2003 B2
6612384 Singh et al. Sep 2003 B1
6622554 Manke et al. Sep 2003 B2
6623850 Kukino et al. Sep 2003 B2
6629610 Adams et al. Oct 2003 B1
6637092 Menzel Oct 2003 B1
6678616 Winkler et al. Jan 2004 B1
6722504 Schulte et al. Apr 2004 B2
6741000 Newcomb May 2004 B2
6761230 Cross et al. Jul 2004 B2
6814141 Huh et al. Nov 2004 B2
6827145 Fotland et al. Dec 2004 B2
6845818 Tutuncu et al. Jan 2005 B2
6850068 Chernali et al. Feb 2005 B2
6895678 Ash et al. May 2005 B2
6912177 Smith Jun 2005 B2
6971265 Sheppard et al. Dec 2005 B1
6993432 Jenkins et al. Jan 2006 B2
7000777 Adams et al. Feb 2006 B2
7013992 Tessari et al. Mar 2006 B2
7048051 McQueen May 2006 B2
7063155 Ruttley Jun 2006 B2
7086463 Ringgenberg et al. Aug 2006 B2
7091460 Kinzer Aug 2006 B2
7109457 Kinzer Sep 2006 B2
7115847 Kinzer Oct 2006 B2
7124819 Ciglenec et al. Oct 2006 B2
7216767 Schulte et al. May 2007 B2
7255582 Liao Aug 2007 B1
7312428 Kinzer Dec 2007 B2
7322776 Webb et al. Jan 2008 B2
7331385 Symington Feb 2008 B2
7376514 Habashy et al. May 2008 B2
7387174 Lurie Jun 2008 B2
7445041 O'Brien Nov 2008 B2
7455117 Hall et al. Nov 2008 B1
7461693 Considine et al. Dec 2008 B2
7484561 Bridges Feb 2009 B2
7539548 Dhawan May 2009 B2
7562708 Cogliandro et al. Jul 2009 B2
7629497 Pringle Dec 2009 B2
7631691 Symington et al. Dec 2009 B2
7647980 Corre et al. Jan 2010 B2
7650269 Rodney Jan 2010 B2
7677673 Tranquilla et al. Mar 2010 B2
7730625 Blake Jun 2010 B2
7779903 Bailey et al. Aug 2010 B2
7951482 Ichinose et al. May 2011 B2
7980392 Varco Jul 2011 B2
8067865 Savant Nov 2011 B2
8237444 Simon Aug 2012 B2
8245792 Trinh et al. Aug 2012 B2
8275549 Sabag et al. Sep 2012 B2
8286734 Hannegan et al. Oct 2012 B2
8484858 Brannigan et al. Jul 2013 B2
8511404 Rasheed Aug 2013 B2
8526171 Wu et al. Sep 2013 B2
8528668 Rasheed Sep 2013 B2
8567491 Lurie Oct 2013 B2
8636063 Ravi et al. Jan 2014 B2
8683859 Godager Apr 2014 B2
8776609 Dria et al. Jul 2014 B2
8794062 DiFoggio et al. Aug 2014 B2
8884624 Homan et al. Nov 2014 B2
8925213 Sallwasser Jan 2015 B2
8960215 Cui et al. Feb 2015 B2
8973680 MacKenzie Mar 2015 B2
9051810 Cuffe et al. Jun 2015 B1
9109429 Xu et al. Aug 2015 B2
9217323 Clark Dec 2015 B2
9222350 Vaughn et al. Dec 2015 B2
9238953 Fleming et al. Jan 2016 B2
9238961 Bedouet Jan 2016 B2
9250339 Ramirez Feb 2016 B2
9353589 Hekelaar May 2016 B2
9394782 DiGiovanni et al. Jul 2016 B2
9435159 Scott Sep 2016 B2
9464487 Zurn Oct 2016 B1
9470059 Zhou Oct 2016 B2
9494010 Flores Nov 2016 B2
9494032 Roberson et al. Nov 2016 B2
9528366 Selman et al. Dec 2016 B2
9562987 Guner et al. Feb 2017 B2
9617815 Schwartze et al. Apr 2017 B2
9664011 Kruspe et al. May 2017 B2
9702211 Tinnen Jul 2017 B2
9731471 Schaedler et al. Aug 2017 B2
9739141 Zeng et al. Aug 2017 B2
9757796 Sherman et al. Sep 2017 B2
9845653 Hannegan et al. Dec 2017 B2
9903010 Doud et al. Feb 2018 B2
9976381 Martin et al. May 2018 B2
10000983 Jackson et al. Jun 2018 B2
10113408 Pobedinski et al. Oct 2018 B2
10174577 Leuchtenberg et al. Jan 2019 B2
10233372 Ramasamy et al. Mar 2019 B2
10329877 Simpson et al. Jun 2019 B2
10352125 Frazier Jul 2019 B2
10392910 Walton et al. Aug 2019 B2
10394193 Li et al. Aug 2019 B2
10544640 Hekelaar Jan 2020 B2
10551800 Li et al. Feb 2020 B2
10673238 Boone et al. Jun 2020 B2
20020066563 Langseth et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020074269 Hensley Jun 2002 A1
20020120401 Macdonald Aug 2002 A1
20030159776 Graham Aug 2003 A1
20030230526 Okabayshi et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040182574 Sarmad et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040256103 Batarseh Dec 2004 A1
20050022987 Green et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050092523 McCaskill et al. May 2005 A1
20050259512 Mandal Nov 2005 A1
20060011520 Schulte Jan 2006 A1
20060016592 Wu Jan 2006 A1
20060106541 Hassan et al. May 2006 A1
20060144620 Cooper Jul 2006 A1
20060185843 Smith Aug 2006 A1
20060248949 Gregory et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060249307 Ritter Nov 2006 A1
20070131591 Pringle Jun 2007 A1
20070137852 Considine et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070175633 Kosmala Aug 2007 A1
20070187089 Bridges Aug 2007 A1
20070204994 Wimmersperg Sep 2007 A1
20070289736 Kearl et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080007421 Liu et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080047337 Chemali et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080053652 Corre et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080173480 Annaiyappa et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080190822 Young Aug 2008 A1
20080308282 Standridge et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090153354 Daussin Jun 2009 A1
20090164125 Bordakov et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090178809 Jeffryes et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090259446 Zhang et al. Oct 2009 A1
20100006339 Desai Jan 2010 A1
20100089583 Xu et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100276209 Yong et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100282511 Maranuk Nov 2010 A1
20110011576 Cavender et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110120732 Lurie May 2011 A1
20110155368 El-Khazindar Jun 2011 A1
20120012319 Dennis Jan 2012 A1
20120111578 Tverlid May 2012 A1
20120132418 McClung May 2012 A1
20120152543 Davis Jun 2012 A1
20120173196 Miszewski Jul 2012 A1
20120186817 Gibson et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120222854 McClung, III Sep 2012 A1
20120227983 Lymberopoulous et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120273187 Hall Nov 2012 A1
20120325564 Vaughn et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130008653 Schultz et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130008671 Booth Jan 2013 A1
20130025943 Kumar Jan 2013 A1
20130068525 Digiovanni Mar 2013 A1
20130076525 Vu et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130125642 Parfitt May 2013 A1
20130126164 Sweatman et al. May 2013 A1
20130146359 Koederitz Jun 2013 A1
20130213637 Kearl Aug 2013 A1
20130255936 Statoilydro et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130269945 Mulholland et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130308424 Kumar Nov 2013 A1
20140083771 Clark Mar 2014 A1
20140132468 Scott et al. May 2014 A1
20140183143 Cady et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140231075 Springett et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140231147 Bozso et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140238658 Wilson et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140246235 Yao Sep 2014 A1
20140251894 Larson et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140265337 Harding et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140278111 Gerrie et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140291023 Edbury Oct 2014 A1
20140300895 Pope et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140326506 Difoggio Nov 2014 A1
20140333754 Graves et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140360778 Batarseh Dec 2014 A1
20140375468 Wilkinson et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150020908 Warren Jan 2015 A1
20150021240 Wardell et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150027724 Symms Jan 2015 A1
20150083422 Pritchard Mar 2015 A1
20150091737 Richardson et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150101864 May Apr 2015 A1
20150129306 Coffman et al. May 2015 A1
20150159467 Hartman et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150211362 Rogers Jul 2015 A1
20150267500 Van Dongen Sep 2015 A1
20150290878 Houben et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150300151 Mohaghegh Oct 2015 A1
20160053572 Snoswell Feb 2016 A1
20160053604 Abbassian Feb 2016 A1
20160076357 Hbaieb Mar 2016 A1
20160115783 Zeng et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160130928 Torrione et al. May 2016 A1
20160153240 Braga et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160160106 Jamison et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160237810 Beaman et al. Aug 2016 A1
20160247316 Whalley et al. Aug 2016 A1
20160356125 Bello et al. Dec 2016 A1
20170051785 Cooper Feb 2017 A1
20170056929 Torrione Mar 2017 A1
20170077705 Kuttel et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170161885 Parmeshwar et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170234104 James Aug 2017 A1
20170292376 Kumar et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170314335 Kosonde et al. Nov 2017 A1
20170328196 Shi et al. Nov 2017 A1
20170328197 Shi et al. Nov 2017 A1
20170332482 Hauslmann Nov 2017 A1
20170342776 Bullock et al. Nov 2017 A1
20170350201 Shi et al. Dec 2017 A1
20170350241 Shi Dec 2017 A1
20180010030 Ramasamy et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180010419 Livescu et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180171772 Rodney Jun 2018 A1
20180171774 Ringer et al. Jun 2018 A1
20180177064 Van Pol et al. Jun 2018 A1
20180187498 Soto et al. Jul 2018 A1
20180265416 Ishida et al. Sep 2018 A1
20180326679 Weisenberg et al. Nov 2018 A1
20180334883 Williamson Nov 2018 A1
20180363404 Faugstad Dec 2018 A1
20190049054 Gunnarsson et al. Feb 2019 A1
20190101872 Li Apr 2019 A1
20190227499 Li et al. Jul 2019 A1
20190257180 Kriesels et al. Aug 2019 A1
20190267805 Kothuru et al. Aug 2019 A1
20200032638 Ezzeddine Jan 2020 A1
20200125040 Li et al. Apr 2020 A1
20200248546 Torrione et al. Aug 2020 A1
20200370381 Al-Rubaii et al. Nov 2020 A1
20200371495 Al-Rubaii et al. Nov 2020 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (73)
Number Date Country
2011282638 Jul 2015 AU
1226325 Sep 1987 CA
2249432 Sep 2005 CA
2537585 Aug 2006 CA
2669721 Jul 2011 CA
2594042 Aug 2012 CA
200989202 Dec 2007 CN
203232293 Oct 2013 CN
204627586 Sep 2015 CN
107462222 Dec 2017 CN
110571475 Dec 2019 CN
102008001607 Nov 2009 DE
102012022453 May 2014 DE
102013200450 Jul 2014 DE
102012205757 Aug 2014 DE
2317068 May 2011 EP
2574722 Apr 2013 EP
2737173 Jun 2014 EP
3279430 Feb 2018 EP
2124855 Feb 1984 GB
2357305 Jun 2001 GB
2399515 Sep 2004 GB
2422125 Jul 2006 GB
2532967 Jun 2016 GB
2009067609 Apr 2009 JP
4275896 Jun 2009 JP
5013156 Aug 2012 JP
2013110910 Jun 2013 JP
343139 Nov 2018 NO
20161842 May 2019 NO
2282708 Aug 2006 RU
122531 Nov 2012 RU
WO 1995035429 Dec 1995 WO
WO 1997021904 Jun 1997 WO
WO 2000025942 May 2000 WO
WO 2000031374 Jun 2000 WO
WO 2001042622 Jun 2001 WO
WO 2002020944 Mar 2002 WO
WO 2002068793 Sep 2002 WO
WO 2004042185 May 2004 WO
WO 2007049026 May 2007 WO
WO 2007070305 Jun 2007 WO
WO 2008146017 Dec 2008 WO
WO 2009020889 Feb 2009 WO
WO 2009113895 Sep 2009 WO
WO 2010054353 May 2010 WO
WO 2010105177 Sep 2010 WO
WO 2011038170 Mar 2011 WO
WO 2011042622 Jun 2011 WO
WO 2011130159 Oct 2011 WO
WO 2011139697 Nov 2011 WO
WO 2012007407 Jan 2012 WO
WO 2013016095 Jan 2013 WO
WO 2013148510 Oct 2013 WO
WO 2014127035 Aug 2014 WO
WO 2015072971 May 2015 WO
WO 2015095155 Jun 2015 WO
WO 2016007139 Jan 2016 WO
WO 2016077521 May 2016 WO
WO 2016178005 Nov 2016 WO
WO 2017011078 Jan 2017 WO
WO 2017027105 Feb 2017 WO
WO 2017132297 Aug 2017 WO
WO 2017196303 Nov 2017 WO
WO 2018022198 Feb 2018 WO
WO 2018169991 Sep 2018 WO
WO 2019040091 Feb 2019 WO
WO 2019055240 Mar 2019 WO
WO 2019089926 May 2019 WO
WO 2019108931 Jun 2019 WO
WO 2019169067 Sep 2019 WO
WO 2019236288 Dec 2019 WO
WO 2019246263 Dec 2019 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (72)
Entry
“IADC Dull Grading for PDC Drill Bits,” Beste Bit, SPE/IADC 23939, 1992, 52 pages.
AkerSolutions, “Aker MH CCTC Improving Safety,” AkerSolutions, Jan. 2008, 12 pages.
Anwar et al., “Fog computing: an overview of big IoT data analytics,” ID 7157192, Wiley, Hindawi, Wireless communications and mobile computing, May 2018, 2018: 1-22, 23 pages.
Artymiuk et al., “The new drilling control and monitoring system,” Acta Montanistica Slovaca, Sep. 2004, 9:3 (145-151), 7 pages.
Ashby et al., “Coiled Tubing Conveyed Video Camera and Multi-Arm Caliper Liner Damage Diagnostics Post Plug and Perf Frac,” SPE-172622-MS, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the SPE Middle East Oil & Gas Show and Conference, Mar. 8-11, 2015, 12 pages.
Bilal et al., “Potentials, trends, and prospects in edge technologies: Fog, cloudlet, mobile edge, and micro data centers,” Computer Networks, Elsevier, Oct. 2017, 130: 94-120, 27 pages.
Carpenter, “Advancing Deepwater Kick Detection,” JPT, 68:5, May 2016, 2 pages.
Commer et al., “New advances in three-dimensional controlled-source electromagnetic inversion,” Geophys. J. Int., 2008, 172: 513-535, 23 pages.
Corona et al., “Novel Washpipe-Free ICD Completion With Dissolvable Material,” OTC-28863-MS, presented at the Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, TX, Apr. 30-May 3, 2018, 2018, OTC, 10 pages.
Dickens et al., “An LED array-based light induced fluorescence sensor for real-time process and field monitoring,” Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, Elsevier, Apr. 2011, 158:1 (35-42), 8 pages.
Dong et al., “Dual Substitution and Spark Plasma Sintering to Improve Ionic Conductivity of Garnet Li7La3Zr2O12,” Nanomaterials, 9:721, 2019, 10 pages.
downholediagnostic.com [online] “Acoustic Fluid Level Surveys,” retrieved from URL <https://www.downholediagnostic.com/fluid-level> retrieved on Mar. 27, 2020, available on or before 2018, 13 pages.
edition.cnn.com [online], “Revolutionary gel is five times stronger than steel,” retrieved from URL <https://edition.cnn.com/style/article/hydrogel-steel-japan/index.html>, retrieved on Apr. 2, 2020, available on or before Jul. 16, 2017, 6 pages.
Fjetland et al., “Kick Detection and Influx Size Estimation during Offshore Drilling Operations using Deep Learning,” INSPEC 18992956, IEEE, presented at the 2019 14th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA), Jun. 19-21, 2019, 6 pages.
Gemmeke and Ruiter, “3D ultrasound computer tomography for medical imagining,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A:580 (1057-1065), Oct. 1, 2007, 9 pages.
gryphonoilfield.com [online], “Gryphon Oilfield Services, Echo Dissolvable Fracturing Plug,” available on or before Jun. 17, 2020, retrieved on Aug. 20, 2020, retrieved from URL <https://www.gryphonoilfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Echo-Series-Dissolvable-Fracturing-Plugs-8-23-2018-1.pdf>, 1 page.
Halliburton, “Drill Bits and Services Solutions Catalogs,” retrieved from URL: <https://www.halliburton.com/content/dam/ps/public/sdbs/sdbs_contents/Books_and_Catalogs/web/DBS-Solution.pdf> on Sep. 26, 2019, 2014, 64 pages.
Hopkin, “Factor Affecting Cuttings Removal during Rotary Drilling,” Journal of Petroleum Technology 19.06, Jun. 1967, 8 pages.
Ji et al., “Submicron Sized Nb Doped Lithium Garnet for High Ionic Conductivity Solid Electrolyte and Performance of All Solid-State Lithium Battery,” doi:10.20944/preprints201912.0307.v1, Dec. 2019, 10 pages.
Johnson et al., “Advanced Deepwater Kick Detection,” IADC/SPE 167990, presented at the 2014 IADC/SPE Drilling Conference and Exhibition, Mar. 4-6, 2014, 10 pages.
Johnson, “Design and Testing of a Laboratory Ultrasonic Data Acquisition System for Tomography” Thesis for the degree of Master of Science in Mining and Minerals Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Dec. 2, 2004, 108 pages.
King et al., “Atomic layer deposition of TiO2 films on particles in a fluidized bed reactor,” Power Technology, 183:3, Apr. 2008, 8 pages.
Lafond et al., “Automated Influx and Loss Detection System Based on Advanced Mud Flow Modeling,” SPE-195835-MS, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Sep. 30-Oct. 2, 2019, 11 pages.
Li et al., 3D Printed Hybrid Electrodes for Lithium-ion Batteries, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Washington State University; ECS Transactions, 77 (11) 1209-1218 (2017), 11 pages.
Liu et al., “Flow visualization and measurement in flow field of a torque converter,” Mechanic automation and control Engineering, Second International Conference on IEEE, Jul. 15, 2011, 1329-1331.
Liu et al., “Superstrong micro-grained polycrystalline diamond compact through work hardening under high pressure,” Appl. Phys. Lett. Feb. 2018, 112: 6 pages.
Luo et al., “Simple Charts to Determine Hole Cleaning Requirements in Deviated Wells,” IADC/SPE 27486, SPE/IADC Drilling Conference, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Feb. 15-18, 1994, 7 pages.
Maurer, “The Perfect Cleaning Theory of Rotary Drilling,” Journal of Petroleum Technology 14.11, 1962, 5 pages.
nature.com [online], “Mechanical Behavior of a Soft Hydrogel Reinforced with Three-Dimensional Printed Microfibre Scaffolds,” retrieved from URL <https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-19502-y>, retrieved on Apr. 2, 2020, available on or before Jan. 19, 2018, 47 pages.
Nuth, “Smart oil field distributed computing,” The Industrial Ethernet Book, Nov. 2014, 85:14 (1-3), 3 pages.
Olver, “Compact Antenna Test Ranges,” Seventh International Conference on Antennas and Propagation IEEE, Apr. 15-18, 1991, 10 pages.
Paiaman et al., “Effect of Drilling Fluid Properties on Rate Penetration,” Nafta 60:3, 2009, 6 pages.
Parini et al., “Chapter 3: Antenna measurements,” in Theory and Practice of Modern Antenna Range Measurements, IET editorial, 2014, 30 pages.
petrowiki.org [online], “Hole Cleaning,” retrieved from URL <http://petrowiki.org/Hole_cleaning#Annular-fluid_velocity>, retrieved on Jan. 25, 2019, 8 pages.
petrowiki.org [online], “Kicks,” Petrowiki, available on or before Jun. 26, 2015, retrieved on Jan. 24, 2018, retrieved from URL <https://petrowiki.org/Kicks>, 6 pages.
Ranjbar, “Cutting Transport in Inclined and Horizontal Wellbore,” University of Stavanger, Faculty of Science and Technology, Master's Thesis, Jul. 6, 2010, 137 pages.
Rasi, “Hole Cleaning in Large, High-Angle Wellbores,” IADC/SPE 27464, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the 1994 SPE/IADC Drilling Conference, Feb. 15-18, 1994, 12 pages.
rigzone.com [online], “How does Well Control Work?” Rigzone, available on or before 1999, retrieved on Jan. 24, 2019, retrieved from URL <https://www.rigzone.com/training/insight.asp?insight_id=304&c_id>, 5 pages.
Robinson and Morgan, “Effect of Hole Cleaning on Drilling Rate Performance,” Paper Aade-04-Df-Ho-42, AADE 2004 Drilling Fluids Conference, Houston, Texas, Apr. 6-7, 2004, 7 pages.
Robinson, “Economic Consequences of Poor Solids and Control,” AADE 2006 Fluids Conference and Houston, Texas, Apr. 11-12, 2006, 9 pages.
Rubaii et al., “A new robust approach for hole cleaning to improve rate of penetration,” SPE 192223-MS, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the SPE Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Annual Technical Symposium and Exhibition, Apr. 23-26, 2018, 40 pages.
Ruiter et al., “3D ultrasound computer tomography of the breast: A new era?” European Journal of Radiology 81S1, Sep. 2012, 2 pages.
sageoiltools.com [online] “Fluid Level & Dynamometer Instruments for Analysis due Optimization of Oil and Gas Wells,” retrieved from URL <http://www.sageoiltools.com/>, retrieved on Mar. 27, 2020, available on or before 2019, 3 pages.
Schlumberger, “CERTIS: Retrievable, single-trip, production-level isolation system,” www.slb.com/CERTIS, 2017, 2 pages.
Schlumberger, “First Rigless ESP Retrieval and Replacement with Slickline, Offshore Congo: Zeitecs Shuttle System Eliminates Need to Mobilize a Workover Rig,” slb.com/zeitecs, 2016, 1 page.
Schlumberger, “The Lifting Business,” Offshore Engineer, Mar. 2017, 1 page.
Schlumberger, “Zeitecs Shuttle System Decreases ESP Replacement Time by 87%: Customer ESP riglessly retrieved in less than 2 days on coiled tubing.” slb.com/zeitecs, 2015, 1 page.
Schlumberger, “Zeitecs Shuttle System Reduces Deferred Production Even Before ESP is Commissioned, Offshore Africa: Third Party ESP developed fault during installation and was retrieved on rods, enabling operator to continue running tubing without waiting on replacement,” slb.com/zeitecs, 2016, 2 pages.
Schlumberger, “Zeitecs Shuttle: Rigless ESP replacement system,” Schlumberger, 2017, 2 pages.
Sifferman et al., “Drilling cutting transport in full scale vertical annuli,” Journal of Petroleum Technology 26.11, 48th Annual Fall Meeting of the Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME, Las Vegas, Sep. 30-Oct. 3, 1973, 12 pages.
slb.com [online] “Technical Paper: ESP Retrievable Technology: A Solution to Enhance ESP Production While Minimizing Costs,” SPE 156189 presented in 2012, retrieved from URL <http://www.slb.com/resources/technical_papers/artificial_lift/156189.aspx>, retrieved on Nov. 2, 2018, 1 pages.
slb.com [online], “Zeitecs Shuttle Rigless ESP Replacement System,” retrieved from URL <http://www.slb.com/services/production/artificial_lift/submersible/zeitecs-shuttle.aspx?t=3>, available on or before May 31, 2017, retrieved on Nov. 2, 2018, 3 pages.
Sulzer Metco, “An Introduction to Thermal Spray,” 4, 2013, 24 pages.
Takahashi et al., “Degradation study on materials for dissolvable frac plugs,” URTeC 2901283, presented at the Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, Jul. 23-25, 2018, 9 pages.
tervesinc.com [online], “Tervalloy™ Degradable Magnesium Alloys,” available on or before Jun. 12, 2016, via Internet Archive: Wayback Machine URL <https://web.archive.org/web/20160612114602/http://tervesinc.com/media/Terves 8-Pg_Brochure.pd>, retrieved on Aug. 20, 2020, <http://tervesinc.com/media/Terves_8-Pg_Brochure.pdf>, 8 pages.
Tobenna, “Hole Cleaning Hydraulics,” Universitetet o Stavanger, Faculty of Science and Technology, Master's Thesis, Jun. 15, 2010, 75 pages.
Wastu et al., “The effect of drilling mud on hole cleaning in oil and gas industry,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Dec. 2019, 1402:2, 7 pages.
Weatherford, “RFID Advanced Reservoir Management System Optimizes Injection Well Design, Improves Reservoir Management,” Weatherford.com, 2013, 2 pages.
Wei et al., “The Fabrication of All-Solid-State Lithium-Ion Batteries via Spark Plasma Sintering,” Metals, 7: 372, 2017, 9 pages.
Wellbore Service Tools: Retrievable tools, “RTTS Packer,” Halliburton: Completion Tools, 2017, 4 pages.
wikipedia.org [online] “Optical Flowmeters,” retrieved from URL <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flow_measurement#Optical_flowmeters>, retrieved on Mar. 27, 2020, available on or before Jan. 2020, 1 page.
wikipedia.org [online] “Ultrasonic Flow Meter,” retrieved from URL <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultrasonic_flow_meter>, retrieved on Mar. 27, 2020, available on or before Sep. 2019, 3 pages.
wikipedia.org [online], “Surface roughness,” retrieved from URL <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surface_roughness>, retrieved on Apr. 2, 2020, available on or before Oct. 2017, 6 pages.
Williams and Bruce, “Carrying Capacity of Drilling Muds,” Journal of Petroleum Technology, 3.04, 192, 1951, 10 pages.
Xia et al., “A Cutting Concentration Model of a Vertical Wellbore Annulus in Deep-water Drilling Operation and its Application,” Applied Mechanics and Materials, 101-102, Sep. 27, 2011, 5 pages.
Xue et al., “Spark plasma sintering plus heat-treatment of Ta-doped Li7La3Zr2O12 solid electrolyte and its ionic conductivity,” Mater. Res. Express 7 (2020) 025518, 8 pages.
Zhan et al. “Effect of β-to-α Phase Transformation on the Microstructural Development and Mechanical Properties of Fine-Grained Silicon Carbide Ceramics,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society 84.5, May 2001, 6 pages.
Zhan et al. “Single-wall carbon nanotubes as attractive toughening agents in alumina-based nanocomposites,” Nature Materials 2.1, Jan. 2003, 6 pages.
Zhan et al., “Atomic Layer Deposition on Bulk Quantities of Surfactant Modified Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes,” Journal of American Ceramic Society, 91:3, Mar. 2008, 5 pages.
Zhang et al., “Increasing Polypropylene High Temperature Stability by Blending Polypropylene-Bonded Hindered Phenol Antioxidant,” Macromolecules, 51:5 (1927-1936), 2018, 10 pages.
Zhu et al., “Spark Plasma Sintering of Lithium Aluminum Germanium Phosphate Solid Electrolyte and its Electrochemical Properties,” University of British Columbia; Nanomaterials, 9, 1086, 2019, 10 pages.
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Appln. No. PCT/US2021/058034, dated Feb. 18, 2022, 13 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20220136344 A1 May 2022 US