Patent Grant
9303636
The present invention relates to a system for controlling a hydraulic pump included in a construction machine. More particularly, the present invention relates to a hydraulic pump control system for a construction machine such as an excavator or the like, in which the flow rate of a fluid discharged from a variable displacement hydraulic pump (hereinafter, referred to as“hydraulic pump”) can be variably controlled in response to a load pressure generated in the hydraulic pump.
In general, a main relief valve is included in a hydraulic system of a hydraulic construction machine such as an excavator or the like, so that when a load pressure of a hydraulic pump exceeds a predetermined pressure, the main relief valve allows a hydraulic fluid discharged from a hydraulic pump to be drained to a hydraulic tank, thereby preventing a damage of hydraulic components. In addition, the hydraulic system employs a hydraulic control method in which the load pressure is restricted so as not to exceed a preset specific horsepower or torque value to reduce the discharge flow rate of the hydraulic pump.
The main relief valve applied to such a hydraulic system allows the hydraulic fluid to be drained to the hydraulic tank before the discharge pressure of the hydraulic pump reaches a preset value of the relief valve as shown in
Conventionally, the hydraulic system is constructed such that when the discharge pressure of the hydraulic pump is more than the preset value of the relief valve, the relief valve is turned on or off in order to reduce a loss of the flow rate of the hydraulic fluid as mentioned above. In other words, when discharge pressure of the hydraulic pump is more than the preset value of the relief valve, the discharge flow rate of the hydraulic pump is abruptly reduced, and thus a shock occurs in the hydraulic system. This results in a deterioration of a manipulation feeling felt by an operator when a work apparatus such as a boom or the like is driven by the operator.
Accordingly, the present invention was made to solve the aforementioned problem occurring in the prior art, and it is an object of the present invention to provide a hydraulic pump control system for a construction machine, in which when a load pressure of a hydraulic pump is more than a preset value, a maximum dischargeable flow rate of the hydraulic pump can be restricted to reduce a loss of the flow rate.
Another aspect of the present invention is to provide a hydraulic pump control system for a construction machine, in which a discharge flow rate of a hydraulic pump can be reduced proportionally in response to a load pressure of the hydraulic pump to improve manipulability of an operator.
To accomplish the above object, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a hydraulic pump control system for a construction machine, including a variable displacement hydraulic pump, at least one hydraulic actuator connected to the hydraulic pump, a spool configured to control hydraulic fluid supplied to the actuator when the spool is shifted by a signal pressure that is supplied to the spool in proportion to an manipulation amount of the manipulation lever, a discharge pressure detection sensor installed in a discharge flow path of the hydraulic pump and configured to detect discharge pressure of the hydraulic pump, a signal pressure detection sensor configured to detect the signal pressure based on the manipulation amount of the manipulation lever, and a control unit configured to control a discharge flow rate of the hydraulic pump in response to the detection signals from the detection sensors, the hydraulic pump control system including:
According to a more preferable embodiment, the control unit controls a function of reducing the discharge flow rate of the hydraulic pump to be released if a system pressure boost-up function is selected by a user.
The control unit controls, if the detected discharge pressure is more than the preset pressure even in the case where the discharge flow rate required by the hydraulic pump 2 does not reach the maximum dischargeable flow rate in the above sixth step, the discharge flow rate required by the hydraulic pump 2 to be proportionally reduced based on a difference between the detected discharge pressure and the preset pressure value in such a manner that the degree of reduction is proportionally controlled based on the size of the discharge flow rate so that the reduction rate of the discharge flow rate is controlled to be equal to or to approximate the size of the discharge flow rate required by the hydraulic pump 2.
The hydraulic pump control system for a construction machine according to an embodiment of the present invention as constructed above has the following advantages.
When a load pressure of a hydraulic pump is more than a preset value, a maximum dischargeable flow rate of the hydraulic pump can be restricted to reduce a loss of the flow rate being relieved, thereby improving fuel efficiency. In addition, a discharge flow rate of a hydraulic pump can be reduced proportionally in response to a load pressure of the hydraulic pump to improve manipulability of an operator.
The above objects, other features and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent by describing the preferred embodiments thereof with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Hereinafter, preferred embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings. The matters defined in the description, such as the detailed construction and elements, are nothing but specific details provided to assist those of ordinary skill in the art in a comprehensive understanding of the invention, and thus the present invention is not limited to the embodiments disclosed hereinafter.
As shown in
The hydraulic pump control system comprises:
In the drawings, a non-explained reference numeral 10 denotes a proportional control valve that converts a pilot signal pressure applied to the spool 5 via the manipulation lever 4 to be proportion to a control signal from the control unit 9 so as to control the discharge flow rate of the hydraulic pump 2.
Hereinafter, an example of the hydraulic pump control system for a construction machine according to an embodiment of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.
As shown in
At step S200, a discharge flow rate Q1 required by the hydraulic pump 2 is calculated based on the manipulation amount of the manipulation lever 4. That is, the flow rate Q1 required by the hydraulic pump 2 relative to the manipulation amount of the manipulation lever 4 is calculated based on a relationship equation or a table (a graph or chart not shown as an example can be used).
At step S300, the control unit 9 compares the sizes of the discharge pressure of the hydraulic pump 2 detected by the detection sensor 7 with a preset pressure value, and determines a comparison result. In this case, the preset pressure value means a value obtained by subtracting a given value from a set pressure of the main relief value (i.e., preset pressure value=preset pressure of the main relief valve−given value, which varies depending on a hydraulic system of the construction equipment).
If it is determined at step S300 that if the detected discharge pressure value of the hydraulic pump 2 is more than the preset pressure value, the program proceeds to step S400. On the contrary, if it is determined at step S300 that if the detected discharge pressure value of the hydraulic pump 2 is less than the preset pressure value, the program proceeds to step S500.
In other words, at step S300, if the detected discharge pressure value of the hydraulic pump 2 is more than the preset pressure value, the program proceeds to step S400 where the control unit 9 controls a maximum dischargeable flow rate Q of the hydraulic pump 2 to be proportionally reduced based on a difference between the detected discharge pressure and the preset pressure value (shown in
In this case, the proportionally reduced maximum dischargeable flow rate Q′ of the hydraulic pump 2 is written as follows:
Q′=Q×[(P−100)/(hydraulic system pressure−preset pressure value)×(currently detected pressure−preset pressure value)+100]/100
wherein P means a percentage to be reduced in the system pressure.
Meanwhile, the control unit controls a function of reducing the discharge flow rate of the hydraulic pump 2 to be released if a system pressure boost-up function is selected by a user (i.e., referring to the case where the operator selects the system pressure boost-up function intentionally to prevent the drive speed of a work apparatus or the like from being lowered).
Subsequently, the program proceeds to step S500 where the control unit 9 compares a currently detected torque (pressure×flow rate) value of the hydraulic pump 2 with the maximum dischargeable flow rate of the hydraulic pump 2 and determines a comparison result. If it is determined at step S500 that the currently detected torque value of the hydraulic pump 2 is more than the maximum dischargeable flow rate of the hydraulic pump 2, the program proceeds to step S600A. On the contrary, if it is determined at step S500 that if the currently detected torque value of the hydraulic pump 2 is less than the maximum dischargeable flow rate of the hydraulic pump 2, the program proceeds to step S600B.
That is, at step S500, if the currently detected torque value of the hydraulic pump 2 is more than the maximum dischargeable flow rate of the hydraulic pump 2, the program proceeds to step S600A where the control unit 9 controls the discharge flow rate (i.e., volume) to be the maximum dischargeable flow rate.
Contrarily, at step S500, if the currently detected torque value of the hydraulic pump 2 is less than the maximum dischargeable flow rate of the hydraulic pump 2, the program proceeds to step S600B where the control unit 9 controls the discharge flow rate (i.e., volume) to be the flow rate required by the hydraulic pump 2, which is calculated based on the manipulation amount at step S200.
As shown in
In addition, when the operator manipulates the manipulation lever (RCV) to drive the work apparatus, the operator's manipulation feeling can be prevented from deteriorated due to an abrupt reduction in the flow rate.
In the meantime, as shown in
In other words, if the discharge flow rate required by the hydraulic pump 2 is Q1, the control unit 9 controls the discharge flow rate to be proportionally reduced by an a portion “a” indicated by oblique lines, and if the discharge flow rate required by the hydraulic pump 2 is Q2 (Q1>Q2), the control unit 9 controls the discharge flow rate to be proportionally reduced by an a portion “b” indicated by oblique lines (i.e., controls the discharge flow rate to be reduced by “b” relative to “a” based on a difference between the discharge flow rates Q1 and Q2. If the discharge flow rate required by the hydraulic pump 2 is Q3 (Q1>Q3), the control unit 9 controls the discharge flow rate to be proportionally reduced by an a portion “c” indicated by oblique lines (i.e., controls the discharge flow rate to be reduced by “c” relative to “a” based on a difference between the discharge flow rates Q1 and Q3.
In this case, the control unit controls a function of reducing the discharge flow rate of the hydraulic pump 2 to be released if the system pressure boost-up function is selected by a user (i.e., referring to the case where the operator selects the system pressure boost-up function intentionally to prevent the drive speed of a work apparatus or the like from being lowered).
In the hydraulic pump control system for a construction machine according to an embodiment of the present invention as constructed above when a load pressure of the hydraulic pump is more than a preset value, a maximum dischargeable flow rate of the hydraulic pump can be restricted proportionally to reduce a loss of the flow rate being relieved, thereby improving fuel efficiency and manipulability of an operator.
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/KR2010/004692 | 7/19/2010 | WO | 00 | 1/17/2013 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2012/011615 | 1/26/2012 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4967557 | Izumi et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
| 5083430 | Hirata et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5134853 | Hirata et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5177964 | Tanaka et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5186000 | Hirata et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5267440 | Nakamura et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5289679 | Yasuda | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5295795 | Yasuda et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5447027 | Ishikawa et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5630317 | Takamura et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5638677 | Hosono et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5839279 | Moriya et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5996341 | Tohji | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6308516 | Kamada | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 7155909 | Toji | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7431101 | Hacker | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7487609 | Nakamura et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7779630 | Sakamoto | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 8327638 | Ohtsukasa | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8818651 | Joung et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 20030019209 | Tsuruga et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20060229787 | Kurup et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20070012039 | Takebe | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070125078 | Tanaka et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20090151346 | Kim | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090248259 | Lee | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090293468 | Kim | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100170239 | Sora | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20130098021 | Shin et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130263583 | Shin | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130318971 | Sora | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20140000252 | Sora | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 61-054503 | Oct 1987 | JP |
| 10-246204 | Sep 1998 | JP |
| 11-044291 | Feb 1999 | JP |
| 10-1997-0001723 | Feb 1997 | KR |
| 10-0337091 | Dec 2002 | KR |
| 20030087247 | Nov 2003 | KR |
| 10-0974275 | Aug 2010 | KR |
| 10-0974279 | Aug 2010 | KR |
| WO 2012002586 | Jan 2012 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| International Search Report (in Korean and English) and Written Opinion (in Korean) for PCT/KR2010/004692, mailed Apr. 21, 2011; ISA/KR. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability (Chapter II of the Patent Cooperation Treaty) (in Korean) for PCT/KR2010/004692, dated Nov. 23, 2012; IPEA/KR. |
| Japanese Office Action for Japan Application No. 2013-520626 mailed May 7, 2014. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20130121852 A1 | May 2013 | US |
