System for implanting a replacement valve

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8721713
  • Patent Number
    8,721,713
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, April 23, 2002
    22 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 13, 2014
    10 years ago
Abstract
A system for percutaneously inserting a prosthesis containing a biological replacement for a defective valve into an implantation site through a body lumen. The system contains a balloon catheter upon which a collapsable stent containing a venous valvular replacement is mounted. A protective shield is slidably mounted upon the catheter that is movable between a closed position over the balloon and an open position wherein the balloon can be inflated to expand the stent. A central lumen runs through the catheter that is formed of stainless steel. The central lumen provides a one to one torque ratio between the proximal end of the catheter and the distal end to enhance the steerability of the catheter. The vein of the replacement is reduced in thickness between 50% and 90% of its original size thereby considerably reducing the size of the replacement package when the stem is collapsed upon the balloon of the catheter.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to a system for the percutaneous implantation of a biological venous valvular replacement for a human valve.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

There exists a need in the medical field for an improved system for carrying out the percutaneous implantation of biological venous valvular replacements for human valves and in particular cardiac valves. Up until recently, many valves such as heart valves had to be replaced surgically. Accordingly, the patients were exposed to all the potential dangers of major surgery.


Recently, procedures have been devised for implanting biological valves harvested from animals percutaneously into humans to replace damaged or malfunctioning valves. Andersen et al. in U.S. Pat. No. 5,840,081 describes a system for carrying out such a procedure. In Andersen et al., a biological cardiac valve is mounted upon the expandable stent of a catheter. The assembly is crimped onto the balloon section of the catheter and a protective cap is placed over the package. The catheter is then passed through a body lumen into a predetermined site within the heart. The package is then moved out of the cap and is positioned in the implantation site using well known positioning techniques. The balloon is inflated causing the stent with the replacement valve attached thereto to expand thus implanting the valve within the desire site.


The Andersen et al. type system works well in practice in that it can be carried out in a relatively short period of time when compared to surgical procedures and the risk to the patient is considerably reduced. However, the biological prosthesis that include the venous valvular replacement and the stent tends to be relatively bulky and thick even when tightly compressed against the deflated balloon and thus sometimes difficult to move through the body lumen into the implantation site. Most catheters in present day use can not deliver the necessary torque to guide the prosthesis through the body lumen, particularly where there is a relatively tight bend in the path of travel. In addition, most of the catheters that are equipped with protective caps do not possess the rigidity needed to hold the prosthesis in the desired location as the balloon is cleared for inflation.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

It is therefore an object of the present invention to improve percutaneous delivery systems for placing a biological venous valvular replacement for a defective valve within an implantation site.


A further object of the present invention is to improve the steerability of a balloon catheter used to implant a biological valve percutaneously in a patient.


A still further object of the present invention is to more accurately place a biological valve prosthesis with a desired implantation site.


Another object of the present invention is to provide a more compact system for percutaneously inserting a biological replacement valve into an implantation site.


These and other objects of the present invention are attained by a system for percutaneously inserting a biological venous valvular replacement for a defective valve within a patient through a body lumen. The system includes a balloon catheter upon which a collapsable stent containing a venous valvular replacement is mounted in a collapsed condition upon the deflated balloon. A protective shield is placed over the balloon and the replacement valve unit. The shield is movable from a closed position over the balloon to a fully opened position without having to axially displace the balloon so that the balloon can be inflated to expand the stent and accurately implant the replacement valve. A central lumen formed of a stainless steel tube passes through the catheter to provide a one to one torque ratio between the proximal end of the catheter and its distal end. The wall thickness of the venous valvular replacement is reduced from its original size by between 50% and 90% to provide for a more compact replacement package when the package is collapsed upon the uninflated balloon.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING

For a better understanding of these and other objects of the invention, reference will be made to the following detailed description of the invention which is to be read in association with the accompanying drawing, wherein:



FIG. 1 is a perspective view illustrating a delivery system embodying the teachings of the present invention for the percutaneous insertion and implantation of a biological replacement valve within a patient;



FIG. 2. is a partial perspective view illustrating the distal end of the system shown in FIG. 1 with its protective shield moved back away from the balloon section of the system;



FIG. 3 is an enlarged side elevation of an expanded stent used in the practice of the present invention;



FIG. 4 is a perspective view of the stent with a biological replacement valve unit mounted inside the stent;



FIG. 5 is an enlarged section taken along lines 4-4 in FIG. 2; and



FIG. 6 is a side elevation illustrating a biological replacement valve suitable for use in the present invention as the wall thickness of the vein which supports the valve is being reduced.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION


FIGS. 1 and 2 illustrate a system, generally referenced 10, for percutaneous insertion and implantation of a biological venous valvular replacement for a defective or malfunctioning valve. The system includes an elongated balloon catheter 12 having an inflatable balloon 13 joined to the distal end of the catheter. The balloon is connected in fluid flow communication with a lumen 15 through which the balloon is inflated or deflated in a manner well known in the art. Preferably the balloon is inflated using a radio-opaque fluid. Although a single balloon is shown in the present embodiment of the invention, it should be obvious to one skilled in the art that a plurality of balloons in various configurations may be employed in the practice of the present invention.


The catheter further includes a centrally located lumen 17 that passes through the entire length of the catheter from its proximal end to its distal end. The central lumen, unlike other catheter lumens employed in the prior art, is formed from a length of stainless steel tubing. A pointed nose cone 20 is affixed to the distal end of the tubing and the rear section 21 of the nose cone is secured to the front part of the balloon. The distal end of the central lumen 17 opens to the surrounding ambient at one end through the front of the nose cone and at the other end through the rear section of the catheter as illustrated in FIG. 1.


A thin guide wire 24 passes through the central lumen which is used in a conventional manner to guide the catheter into the implantation site.


It has been found that when a stent containing a biological valve is mounted upon the balloon of a catheter, the package tends to become overly large and clumsy to maneuver. Accordingly, maneuvering of the catheter through a vein or artery to the implantation site becomes difficult, particularly where the catheter has to be conducted through a number of bends along the intended path of travel. Conventional catheters and the lumens running there-through are fabricated from plastic materials that tend to twist when a torque is applied to the proximal or steering end of the device. This twisting adversely effects the steering control at the distal end of the catheter making it difficult to direct the catheter around any bends in the intended path of travel and accurately place the replacement package in the implantation region. The stainless steel tube running down the center of the present catheter is designed to provide the catheter with a 1 to 1 torque ratio between the proximal end of the catheter and its distal end. This in turn, enhances the steerability of the catheter as well as providing the user with the ability to more easily push the catheter along the desired path of travel. It has been found that a stainless steel tube having an inside diameter of about 0.039″ will provide the above noted desired properties while at the same time providing the catheter with sufficient flexibility to pass readily through bent regions along the path of travel. This, along with the contoured nose cone, enables the user to rapidly guide the catheter into a desired implantation site and thus considerably shorten the implantation procedure when compared to similar systems used in the art.


An elongated sheath 30 is placed over the catheter. A close running fit is provided between the sheath and the catheter so that the sheath can slide easily over the body of the catheter. A protective shield 31 is attached to the distal end of the sheath so that the shield can be repositioned by simply moving the sheath over the catheter. In assembly, the shield is movable between a fully closed position as illustrated in FIG. 1 wherein the balloon and the replacement package are protectively enclosed and a fully opened position as illustrated in FIG. 2 wherein the balloon is cleared for inflation. An annular stop 33 is mounted on the catheter adjacent to the back edge of the balloon section. The stop is arranged to arrest the forward motion of the sheath once the shield reaches a fully closed position insuring that the shield will not ride over the nose cone.


The proximal end of the sheath contains a cylindrical flange 34 by which aids the operator to manually slide the sheath over the catheter body to open or close the protective shield. The distal end 35 of the catheter passes out of the sheath through the flange and extend back a distance that is greater than the axial length of the shield. Indicator marks 36 and 37 are placed on the extended length of the catheter for informing the operator when the shield is located in either the open or the closed position.


A cylindrical fluid barrier 40 is slidably mounted upon the proximal end of the sheath. The barrier includes a tubular body section 41 and a radially extended end flange 42. The outside diameter of the body section is about equal to that of the protective shield. In practice, once the balloon shield has passed into the body lumen through the physician's incision, the body of the fluid barrier is passed into the body lumen through the incision and the flange is placed in contact against the incision opening. Once inserted, the barrier restricts the flow of body fluid through the incision opening while, at the same time, allowing the sheath and the catheter to be advanced and maneuvered within the body lumen into the implantation site.


As will be further explained below, the prosthetic device made up of an expandable stent and a biological venous valvular replacement is mounted in a collapsed state upon the balloon section of the catheter. The replacement is preferably has been harvested from the jugular vein of an animal, such as a cow, and is secured to the inside of the stent. Initially, the sheath is pulled back along the catheter to expose the collapsed balloon and the prosthetic device is passed over the balloon and crimped tightly onto the balloon to establish a compact low profile package. The sheath is then moved forward along the catheter to place the shield over the package to protect it during insertion. Once the package is positioned within the insertion site the shield again is moved back over the stationary body of the catheter as explained above and the balloon is inflated to implant the biological replacement within the site.


Turning more specifically to FIGS. 2-5, there is illustrated a stent 50 that is particularly well suited for use in the present system. A biological venous valvular replacement 51 for a defective valve is carried inside of the stent. Although the present valve replacement is ideally suited for percutaneous implantation of a pulmonary valve, it should clear that the present system can be used in a number of similar applications without departing from the teachings of the invention. As illustrated in FIG. 3, the biological replacement unit 51 includes a section of vein 55 that contain a valve 56. As will be explained below in further detail the venous valvular replacement is attached to the stent by means of sutures 58.


The present expandable stent includes a series of fine wire ribbon sections, each designated 60 that are joined together to create a tubular or cylindrical member. The wire stand 59 of each section is fabricated of a soft, highly malleable metal alloy that has been fully annealed to remove as much of its spring memory as possible. Preferably the wire material is fabricated of an alloy consisting of about 90% platinum and 10% iridium that has a tensile strength of between 150,000 psi and 175,000 psi. Although a platinum iridium wire is preferred for use in the present stent, other alloys having similar properties such as a gold nickel alloy may also be employed. Prior to winding the wire ribbon sections into a cylindrical shape, each section is formed so that it contains a series of alternating sinusoidal bends 61. The sections are formed by winding the strand of wire between rows of vertical pins projecting from the surface of a flat substrate. The strand is then wound about the pins in alternate rows to create a sinusoidal shaped ribbon section having a desired number of bends and a free length of wire is located at each end of the ribbon section.


Each ribbon section is next wound into a cylinder and the cylinders are then placed in axial alignment so that the apex of each bend section is located in close proximity with the apex of a bend section on an adjacent ribbon section. The adjacent bends are then welded together to cojoin the ribbon section in assembly. Although not shown, the free ends of the adjacent cylindrical ribbon sections, in turn, are bent into parallel overlapping alignment and are cojoined using similar welds.


Referring to FIG. 5, there is illustrated a typical weld joint 64 used in the practice of the present invention. Each weld is formed so that it lies inside the boundaries of the cylindrical stent as described by the inside diameter and outside diameter of the stent. Accordingly, the welds do not protrude beyond the boundaries of the wire cylinder into regions where rough edges of the welds might come in contact with the tissue of the biological valve replacement thereby preventing the tissue from becoming damaged during insertion and implantation.


A stent of the construction and configuration as herein described has extremely good flexibility, dimensional stability, very smooth surfaces, a low profile when collapsed and an immunity to fatigue and corrosion. As should be evident the length of the stent can be varied by varying the number of ribbon sections that are utilized. By the same token, the working range of the stent between its fully collapsed condition and it fully expanded condition can also be varied by varying the number of bends in each of the ribbon sections. As can be seen each stent can be tailored for insertion into a particular body site to provide for the most effective implantation of the biological valve which is attached to the stent.


Because of the stent construction there is very little or no axial deformation of the stent as it is radially expanded or collapsed. Another feature of the present stent is its ability to be reconfigured even after implantation without adversely effecting the stents performance. This feature is important in cases where a valve has been implanted in a growing child. Rather than replacing a valve periodically during the growth period, the supporting stent can be simply reconfigured to accommodate for growth using a percutaneously introduced balloon catheter for re-engaging the stent to reconfigure the stent so that it will conform to the changes in the implantation site produced by growth.


As illustrated in FIG. 4, the stent is initially expanded to a desired diameter which generally conforms to the body vessel configuration at the implantation site. Next, as illustrated in FIG. 6, the vein section of the valve is trimmed to a desired length conforming to the length of the stent with the valve 56 being located in about the mid-region of the stent. In addition, the wall of the vein 56 is reduced in thickness to between 50% to 90% of its original thickness to considerably reduce the size of the valve package when the stent is collapsed over the balloon prior to insertion. It has been found that the jugular vein of a bovine animal is formed by layers of tissue that can be readily peeled back using a sharp instrument 75. The layers can be removed without destroying the integrity of the vein structure or its ability to function in a replacement prosthesis. The wall of the vein is trimmed so that its outside diameter about matches the inside diameter of the expanded stent. The vein is then passed into the expanded stent and the vein sutured to the stent as illustrated in FIG. 3. The sutures are arranged to support the vein in a fully opened circular configuration within the expanded stent.


Once the prosthesis has been sutured in place, it is passed over the balloon section of the catheter and the stent is collapsed tightly against the balloon to provide a more compact than normal package that can more easily be delivered through a body lumen into an implantation site when compared to similar devices employing bovine or eqvine biological valves replacements.


While the present invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to the preferred mode as illustrated in the drawing, it will be understood by one skilled in the art that various changes in detail may be effected therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the claims.

Claims
  • 1. A delivery system for percutaneously implanting a heart valve assembly at an implantation site within a patient, the delivery system comprising: an elongated catheter;a stop on the elongated catheter;a tip at a distal end of the elongated catheter;a sheath configured to slidably receive the elongated catheter; anda protective shield at a distal end of the sheath;wherein the sheath and protective shield are moveable relative to the elongated catheter and the stop between a first dosed position with a distal end portion of the protective shield being engaged with a proximal end portion of the tip and the heart valve assembly being positioned between the protective shield and the elongated catheter, and a second open position with the protective shield being sufficiently spaced from the heart valve assembly to permit expansion of the heart valve assembly; andwherein the stop is positioned on the elongated catheter and sized such that at the first dosed position the stop abuts a distal end of the sheath to stop motion of the sheath and the protective shield relative to the elongated catheter and to prevent the protective shield from overlapping the tip.
  • 2. The delivery system of claim 1, wherein the stop is an annular shoulder extending radially outward from the elongated catheter.
  • 3. The delivery system of claim 1, further comprising an inflatable balloon coupled to the elongated catheter and expandable between a collapsed position at which the heart valve assembly is crimped on the inflatable balloon and capable of being transported by the catheter to an implantation site, and an expanded position for implanting the heart valve assembly at the implantation site.
  • 4. The delivery system of claim 3, wherein the stop abuts a proximal edge portion of the inflatable balloon.
  • 5. The delivery system of claim 3, wherein the balloon and protective shield are sized and shaped to afford crimping of the heart valve assembly onto the balloon so that the heart valve assembly may be positioned between the balloon and the shield.
  • 6. The delivery system of claim 1, wherein the tip is a contoured nose cone configured to slide along an internal surface of a blood vessel.
  • 7. The delivery system of claim 6, wherein the contoured nose cone comprises a leading tip portion having a diameter that increases in a proximal direction.
  • 8. The delivery system of claim 7, wherein the leading tip portion is substantially frusto-conical.
  • 9. The delivery system of claim 1, wherein the tip has a profile that radially extends beyond the heart valve assembly crimped on an inflatable balloon coupled to the elongated catheter.
  • 10. The delivery system of claim 1, wherein the elongated catheter and the tip collectively define a passageway for slidably receiving a guide wire.
US Referenced Citations (195)
Number Name Date Kind
3409013 Berry Nov 1968 A
3587115 Shiley Jun 1971 A
3714671 Edwards et al. Feb 1973 A
3755823 Hancock Sep 1973 A
4035849 Angell et al. Jul 1977 A
4222126 Boretos et al. Sep 1980 A
4297749 Davis et al. Nov 1981 A
4339831 Johnson Jul 1982 A
4343048 Ross et al. Aug 1982 A
4345340 Rosen Aug 1982 A
4470157 Love Sep 1984 A
4574803 Storz Mar 1986 A
4592340 Boyles Jun 1986 A
4612011 Kautzky Sep 1986 A
4681110 Wiktor Jul 1987 A
4777951 Cribier et al. Oct 1988 A
4787899 Lazarus Nov 1988 A
4787901 Baykut Nov 1988 A
4796629 Grayzel Jan 1989 A
4878495 Grayzel Nov 1989 A
4878906 Lindemann et al. Nov 1989 A
4883458 Shiber Nov 1989 A
4922905 Strecker May 1990 A
4966604 Reiss Oct 1990 A
4967743 Lambert Nov 1990 A
4979939 Shiber Dec 1990 A
4986830 Owens et al. Jan 1991 A
5007896 Shiber Apr 1991 A
5026366 Leckrone Jun 1991 A
5047041 Samuels Sep 1991 A
5059177 Towne et al. Oct 1991 A
5061273 Yock Oct 1991 A
5085635 Cragg Feb 1992 A
5089015 Ross Feb 1992 A
5152771 Sabbaghian et al. Oct 1992 A
5167628 Boyles Dec 1992 A
5232445 Bonzel Aug 1993 A
5257979 Jagpal Nov 1993 A
5272909 Nguyen et al. Dec 1993 A
5295958 Shturman Mar 1994 A
5327774 Nguyen et al. Jul 1994 A
5338313 Mollenauer et al. Aug 1994 A
5429597 DeMello et al. Jul 1995 A
5443446 Shturman Aug 1995 A
5449372 Schmaltz et al. Sep 1995 A
5480424 Cox Jan 1996 A
5496346 Horzewski et al. Mar 1996 A
5500014 Quijano et al. Mar 1996 A
5514109 Mollenauer et al. May 1996 A
5545209 Roberts et al. Aug 1996 A
5556387 Mollenauer et al. Sep 1996 A
5580922 Park et al. Dec 1996 A
5591195 Taheri et al. Jan 1997 A
5597378 Jervis Jan 1997 A
5609626 Quijano et al. Mar 1997 A
5643278 Wijay Jul 1997 A
5683451 Lenker et al. Nov 1997 A
5702368 Stevens et al. Dec 1997 A
5749890 Shaknovich May 1998 A
5749921 Lenker et al. May 1998 A
5782809 Umeno et al. Jul 1998 A
5824041 Lenker et al. Oct 1998 A
5824061 Quijano et al. Oct 1998 A
5840081 Andersen et al. Nov 1998 A
5855601 Bessler et al. Jan 1999 A
5906606 Chee et al. May 1999 A
5906619 Olson et al. May 1999 A
5957949 Leonhardt et al. Sep 1999 A
5968068 Dehdashtian et al. Oct 1999 A
5997573 Quijano et al. Dec 1999 A
6022370 Tower Feb 2000 A
6042589 Marianne Mar 2000 A
6059809 Amor et al. May 2000 A
6110201 Quijano et al. Aug 2000 A
6117166 Winston et al. Sep 2000 A
6123723 Konya et al. Sep 2000 A
6162208 Hipps Dec 2000 A
6171335 Wheatley et al. Jan 2001 B1
6203550 Olson Mar 2001 B1
6245102 Jayaraman Jun 2001 B1
6254564 Wilk et al. Jul 2001 B1
6287315 Wijeratne et al. Sep 2001 B1
6299637 Shaolia et al. Oct 2001 B1
6302906 Goicoechea et al. Oct 2001 B1
6319281 Patel Nov 2001 B1
6338725 Hermann et al. Jan 2002 B1
6350278 Lenker et al. Feb 2002 B1
6355027 Le et al. Mar 2002 B1
6355060 Lenker et al. Mar 2002 B1
6380457 Yurek et al. Apr 2002 B1
6454799 Schreck Sep 2002 B1
6461382 Cao Oct 2002 B1
6569196 Vesely May 2003 B1
6572645 Leonhardt Jun 2003 B2
6605112 Moll et al. Aug 2003 B1
6656213 Solem Dec 2003 B2
6786925 Schoon Sep 2004 B1
6790229 Berreklouw Sep 2004 B1
6797002 Spence Sep 2004 B2
6821297 Snyders Nov 2004 B2
6830584 Seguin Dec 2004 B1
6830585 Artof Dec 2004 B1
6852116 Leonhardt et al. Feb 2005 B2
6866650 Stevens Mar 2005 B2
6872223 Roberts Mar 2005 B2
6878161 Lenker Apr 2005 B2
6893460 Spenser et al. May 2005 B2
6908481 Cribier Jun 2005 B2
6911039 Shiu et al. Jun 2005 B2
6945990 Greenan Sep 2005 B2
6951571 Srivastava Oct 2005 B1
6974474 Pavcnik et al. Dec 2005 B2
6986774 Middleman et al. Jan 2006 B2
6989028 Lashinski et al. Jan 2006 B2
7060038 Letort et al. Jun 2006 B2
7105016 Shiu et al. Sep 2006 B2
7115141 Menz et al. Oct 2006 B2
7128759 Osborne et al. Oct 2006 B2
7147663 Berg et al. Dec 2006 B1
7153324 Case et al. Dec 2006 B2
7163552 Diaz Jan 2007 B2
7264632 Wright et al. Sep 2007 B2
20010002445 Vesely May 2001 A1
20010007956 Letac et al. Jul 2001 A1
20020029014 Jayaraman Mar 2002 A1
20020032481 Gabbay Mar 2002 A1
20020072789 Hackett et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020138138 Yang Sep 2002 A1
20030036791 Philipp et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030050694 Yang et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030065386 Weadock Apr 2003 A1
20030069492 Abrams et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030199963 Tower et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030199971 Tower et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030212410 Stenzel et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040093005 Durcan May 2004 A1
20040093060 Sequin et al. May 2004 A1
20040097788 Mourles et al. May 2004 A1
20040111096 Tu Jun 2004 A1
20040122516 Fogarty Jun 2004 A1
20040148008 Goodson, IV Jul 2004 A1
20040167573 Williamson Aug 2004 A1
20040167620 Ortiz Aug 2004 A1
20040193261 Berreklouw Sep 2004 A1
20040210304 Seguin et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040210307 Khairkhahan Oct 2004 A1
20040215333 Duran Oct 2004 A1
20040225353 McGuckin, Jr. Nov 2004 A1
20040225354 Allen Nov 2004 A1
20040254636 Flagle et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040260394 Douk et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050010287 Macoviak Jan 2005 A1
20050033398 Seguin Feb 2005 A1
20050043790 Seguin Feb 2005 A1
20050049692 Numamoto Mar 2005 A1
20050049696 Siess Mar 2005 A1
20050060029 Le Mar 2005 A1
20050075584 Cali Apr 2005 A1
20050075712 Biancucci Apr 2005 A1
20050075717 Nguyen Apr 2005 A1
20050075719 Bergheim Apr 2005 A1
20050075724 Svanidze Apr 2005 A1
20050075730 Myers Apr 2005 A1
20050075731 Artof Apr 2005 A1
20050096736 Osse et al. May 2005 A1
20050107871 Realyvasquez et al. May 2005 A1
20050113910 Paniagua May 2005 A1
20050131438 Cohn Jun 2005 A1
20050137686 Salahieh Jun 2005 A1
20050137692 Haug Jun 2005 A1
20050137695 Salahieh Jun 2005 A1
20050137701 Salahieh Jun 2005 A1
20050143809 Salahieh Jun 2005 A1
20050187616 Realyvasquez Aug 2005 A1
20050203549 Realyvasquez Sep 2005 A1
20050203618 Sharkawy Sep 2005 A1
20050222674 Paine Oct 2005 A1
20050228495 Macoviak Oct 2005 A1
20050234546 Nugent Oct 2005 A1
20050240200 Bergheim Oct 2005 A1
20060004439 Spenser et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060009841 McGuckin et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060020319 Kim et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060259134 Schwammenthal et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070005131 Taylor Jan 2007 A1
20070016286 Herrmann et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070043420 Lostetter Feb 2007 A1
20070088431 Bourang Apr 2007 A1
20080114442 Mitchell et al. May 2008 A1
20080228170 Murray Sep 2008 A1
20080228255 Rust et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080255652 Thomas et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080262590 Murray Oct 2008 A1
20080262596 Xiao Oct 2008 A1
20080262597 Xiao Oct 2008 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (62)
Number Date Country
36 40 745 Jun 1987 DE
195 32 846 Mar 1997 DE
195 46 692 Jun 1997 DE
195 46 692 Jun 1997 DE
198 57 887 Jul 2000 DE
199 07 646 Aug 2000 DE
100 49 812 Apr 2002 DE
100 49 813 Apr 2002 DE
100 49 814 Apr 2002 DE
100 49 815 Apr 2002 DE
0 597967 Dec 1994 EP
0850607 Jul 1998 EP
1057459 Jun 2000 EP
1057460 Jun 2000 EP
1088529 Apr 2001 EP
1472996 Nov 2004 EP
2788217 Dec 1999 FR
1 268 484 Mar 1972 GB
2056023 Mar 1981 GB
1271508 Nov 1986 SU
1371700 Feb 1988 SU
91-17720 Nov 1991 WO
92-17118 Oct 1992 WO
93-01768 Feb 1993 WO
9814137 Apr 1998 WO
98-29057 Jul 1998 WO
9912483 Mar 1999 WO
99-33414 Jul 1999 WO
99-40964 Aug 1999 WO
99-47075 Sep 1999 WO
00-41652 Jul 2000 WO
0047136 Aug 2000 WO
00-47139 Aug 2000 WO
01-49213 Jul 2001 WO
01-54625 Aug 2001 WO
01-62189 Aug 2001 WO
01-97115 Dec 2001 WO
0241789 May 2002 WO
02-43620 Jun 2002 WO
02-47575 Jun 2002 WO
02060352 Aug 2002 WO
02-036048 Oct 2002 WO
03-028592 Apr 2003 WO
03030776 Apr 2003 WO
03-0285952 Apr 2003 WO
03-037227 May 2003 WO
03-094793 Nov 2003 WO
2004019825 Mar 2004 WO
2004-058106 Jul 2004 WO
2004-089250 Oct 2004 WO
2004-089253 Oct 2004 WO
2004-093728 Nov 2004 WO
2004-105651 Dec 2004 WO
2005-002466 Jan 2005 WO
2005-004753 Jan 2005 WO
2005004753 Jan 2005 WO
2005-009285 Feb 2005 WO
2005-011534 Feb 2005 WO
2005-011535 Feb 2005 WO
2005-023155 Mar 2005 WO
2005-027790 Mar 2005 WO
2005-046528 May 2005 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (46)
Entry
Younes Boudjemline, et al, “Off-pump Replacement of the Pulmonary Valve in Large Right Ventricular Outflow Tracts: A Hybrid Approach,” Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (United States), Apr. 2005, pp. 831-837.
Louise Coats, et al, “The Potential Impact of Percutaneous Pulmonary Valve Stent Implantation on Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Re-Intervention,” European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (England), Apr. 2005, pp. 536-543.
Peter C. Block, et al, “Percutaneous Approaches to Valvular Heard Disease,” Current Cardiology Reports (United States), Mar. 2005, pp. 108-113.
Georg Lutter, et al, “Percutaneous Valve Replacement: Current State and Future Prospects.” Annals of Thoracic Surgery (Netherlands), Dec. 2004, pp. 2199-2206.
Sachin Khambadkone, “Nonsurgical Pulmonary Valve Replacement: Why, When, and How?” Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions—Official Journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions (United States), Jul. 2004, pp. 401-408.
Younes Boudjemline, et al, “Percutaneous Pulmonary Valve Replacement in a Large Right Ventricular Outflow Tract: An Experimental Study,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology (United States), Mar. 17, 2004, pp. 1082-1087.
Younes Boudjemline, et al, “Images in Cardiovascular Medicine. Percutaneous Aortic Valve Replacement in Animals,” Circulation (United States), Mar. 16, 2004, 109, p. e161.
Younes Boudjemline, et al, “Is Percutaneous Implantation of a Bovine Venous Valve in the Inferior Vena Cava a Reliable Technique to Treat Chronic Venous Insufficiency Syndrome?” Medical Science Monitor—International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research (Poland), Mar. 2004, pp. BR61-BR66.
S. Khambadkone, et al, “Percutaneous Implantation of Pulmonary Valves,” Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy (England), Nov. 2003, pp. 541-548.
G. O. Yonga, et al, “Percutaneous Transvenous Mitral Commissurotomy in Juvenile Mitral Stenosis,” East African Medical Journal (Kenya), Apr. 2003, pp. 172-174.
Younes Boudjemline, et al, “Transcatheter Reconstruction of the Right Heart,” Cardiology in the Young (England), Jun. 2003, pp. 308-311.
Y. Boudjemline, et al, “Percutaneous Valve Insertion: A New Approach,” Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (United States), Mar. 2003, pp. 741-742.
Sachin Khambadkone, et al, “Percutaneous Pulmonary Valve Implantation: Early and Medium Term Results,” Circulation 108 (17 Supplement), Oct. 28, 2003, p. IV-375.
Sachin Khambadkone, et al, “Percutaneous Pulmonary Valve Implantation: Impact of Morphology on Case Selection,” Circulation 108 (17 Supplement), Oct. 28, 2003, p. IV-642-IV-643.
Y. Boudjemline, et al, “Percutaneous Implantation of a Valve in the Descending Aorta in Lambs,” European Heart Journal (England), Jul. 2002, pp. 1045-1049.
Y. Boudjemline, et al, “Percutaneous Closure of a Paravalvular Mitral Regurgitation with Amplatzer and Coil Prostheses,” Archives des Maladies du Coeur Et Des Vaisseaux (France), May 2002, pp. 483-486.
Philipp Bonhoeffer, et al, “Percutaneous Insertion of the Pulmonary Valve,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology (United States), May 15, 2002, pp. 1664-1669.
Younes Boudjemline, et al, “Percutaneous Implantation of a Biological Valve in the Aorta to Treat Aortic Valve Insufficiency—A Sheep Study,” Medical Science Monitor—International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research (Poland), Apr. 2002, pp. BR113-BR116.
Younes Boudjemline, et al, “Steps Toward Percutaneous Aortic Valve Replacement,” Circulation (United States), Feb. 12, 2002, pp. 775-778.
Y. Boudjemline, et al, “The Percutaneous Implantable Heart Valve,” Progress in Pediatric Cardiology (Ireland), 2001, pp. 89-93.
Y. Boudjemline, et al, “Percutaneous Aortic Valve Replacement: Will We Get There?” Heart (British Cardiac Society) (England), Dec. 2001, pp. 705-706.
Y. Boudjemline, et al, “Percutaneous Implantation of a Biological Valve in Aortic Position: Preliminary Results in a Sheep Study,” European Heart Journal 22, Sep. 2001, p. 630.
Y. Boudjemline, et al, “Stent Implantation Combined with a Valve Replacement to Treat Degenerated Right Ventricle to Pulmonary Artery Prosthetic Conduits,” European Heart Journal 22, Sep. 2001, p. 355.
P. Bonhoeffer, et al, “Technique and Results of Percutaneous Mitral Valvuloplasty With the Multi-Track System,” Journal of Interventional Cardiology (United States), 200, pp. 263-268.
P. Bonhoeffer, et al, “Percutaneous Replacement of Pulmonary Valve in a Right-Ventricle to Pulmonary-Artery Prosthetic Conduit with Valve Dysfunction,” Lancet (England), Oct. 21, 2000, pp. 1403-1405.
P. Bonhoeffer, et al, “Transcatheter Implantation of a Bovine Valve in Pulmonary Position: A Lamb Study,” Circulation (United States), Aug. 15, 2000, pp. 813-816.
Z. Saliba, et al, “Treatment of Obstructions of Prosthetic Conduits by Percutaneous Implantation of Stents,” Archives des Maldies du Coeur et des Vaisseaux (France), 1999, pp. 591-596.
P. Bonhoeffer, et al, “Percutaneous Mitral Valve Dilatation with the Multi-Track System,” Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions—Official Journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions (United States), Oct. 1999, pp. 178-183.
G. O. Yonga, et al, “Effect of Percutaneous Balloon Mitral Valvotomy on Pulmonary Venous Flow in Severe Mitral Stenosis,” East African Medical Journal (Kenya), Jan. 1999, pp. 28-30.
G. O. Yonga, et al, “Percutaneous Balloon Mitral Valvotomy: Initial Experience in Nairobi Using a New Multi-Track Catheter System,” East African Medical Journal (Kenya), Feb. 1999, pp. 71-74.
G. O. Yonga, et al, “Percutaneous Transluminal Balloon Valvuloplasty for Pulmonary Valve Stenosis: Report on Six Cases,” East African Medical Journal (Kenya), Apr. 1994, pp. 232-235.
Georg Lutter, et al, “Percutaneous Aortic Valve Replacement: An Experimental Study. I. Studies on Implantation,” The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Apr. 2002, pp. 768-776.
Bailey, “Percutaneous expandable prosthetic valves,” In: Topol, EJ, ed. Textbook of Interventional Cardiology. vol. II. Second edition. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, 1994:1268-1276.
Babaliaros, et al., “State of the Art Percutaneous Intervention for the Treatment of Valvular Heart Disease: A Review of the Current Technologies and Ongoing Research in the Field of Percutaneous Valve Replacement and Repair,” Cardiology 2007;107:87-96.
Block, et al., “Percutaneous Approaches to Valvular Heart Disease,” Current Cardiology Reports, vol. 7, pp. 108-113 (2005).
Brodsky, “Percutaneous approaches to aortic valve replacement,” Applications in Imaging—Cardiac Interventions, Dec. 2004, pp. 4-9.
Cribier, et al., “Percutaneous Implantation of Aortic Valve Prosthesis in Patients with Calcific Aortic Stenosis: Technical Advances, Clinical Results and Future Strategies,” Journal of Interventional Cardiology, vol. 19, No. 5, Supplement 2006, pp. S87-S96.
Hanzel, et al., “Complications of percutaneous aortic valve replacement: experience with the Cribier-Edwards™ percutaneous heart valve,” EuroIntervention Supplements (2006), 1 (Supplement A) A3-A8.
Khambadkone, et al., “Pediatric and Congential Heart Disease,” Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 62:401-408 (2004).
Khambadkone, et al., “Percutaneous Pulmonary Valve Implantation in Humans Results in 59 Consecutive Patients,” Circulation, 2005;112:1189-1197.
“New Frontiers in Heart Valve Disease,” Medtech Insight, vol. 7, No. 8 (Aug. 2005).
Palacios, “Percutaneous Valve Replacement and Repair, Fiction or Reality?” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 44, No. 8, 2004 pp. 1662-1663.
Ruiz, “Transcathether Aortic Valve Implantation and Mitral Valve Repair: State of the Art,” Pediatric Cardiology, 26:289-294, 2005.
Huber, et al., “Do Valved Stents Compromise Coronary Flow?” Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2004;25:754-759.
Ruiz, et al., “Transcatheter placement of a low-profile biodegradable pulmonary valve made of small intestinal submucosa: A long-term study in a swine model,” J. of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 130, No. 2, Aug. 2005, 477.e1-477e9.
Chiam, et al., “Percutaneous Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Assessing Results, Judging Outcomes, and Planning Trials,” JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, vol. 1, No. 4, Aug. 2008:341-50.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20030199963 A1 Oct 2003 US