System for testing devices inside of carriers

Abstract

An example test system includes a test carrier to receive a device to test. The test carrier includes test components to perform at least a structural test on the device. The example test system also includes a slot to receive the test carrier. The slot includes an interface to which the test carrier connects to enable the test carrier to communicate with a system that is part of the test system or external to the test system.

Description

TECHNICAL FIELD

This specification relates generally to a test system having test carriers that include electronics for testing devices inside the test carriers.

BACKGROUND

Test systems are configured to test the operation of electronic devices, such as microprocessors and memory chips. Testing may include sending signals to a device and determining how the device reacted to those signals based on its response. The device's reaction will dictate whether the device has passed or failed testing.

SUMMARY

An example test system includes a test carrier to receive a device to test. The test carrier includes test components to perform at least a structural test on the device. The example test system also includes a slot to receive the test carrier. The slot includes an interface to which the test carrier connects to enable the test carrier to communicate with a system that is part of the test system or external to the test system. The example test system may include one or more of the following features, either alone or in combination.

The structural test may be for performing component-level testing on the device. The structural test may include a parametric test. The structural test may include a scan test. The test components may be configured to perform a functional test on the device. The functional test may be for performing system-level testing on the device. The functional test may include providing an input to the device, obtaining an output based on the input, and determining whether the device has passed the functional test based on the output.

The example test system may include a printed circuit board (PCB) having the test components to perform at least a structural test on the device. The example test system may include robotics to move the test carrier into, and out of, the slot.

The example test system may include one or more additional test carriers. Each of the one or more additional test carriers may be configured to receive a different device to test. Each additional test carrier may include test components to perform at least a structural test on a different device. The example test system may include one or more additional slots. Each of the one or more additional slots may be configured to receive a target test carrier among the one or more additional test carriers. Each slot may include an interface to which the individual test carrier connects to enable the target test carrier to communicate with the system that is part of the test system or external to the test system.

Each test carrier may include a same type of test components. At least some of the additional test carriers may include different types of test components configured to perform different types of tests.

The device may be a first device. The test carrier may include a first receptacle to receive the first device and a second receptacle to receive a second device to test. The test components may be configured also to test the second device. The test components may be configured may be perform a same type of test on the first device and the second device. The test components may be configured to perform different types of tests on the first device and the second device. The different types of test may be performed asynchronously.

The test components may include memory storing data representing test stimulus vectors for use in the structural test. The test components may include one or more processing devices configured to execute instructions to perform to the structural test. The test components may include memory storing test results based on performance of the structural test. The test components may include an interface to enable exchange of communications with the system. The system may include a computing system. The communications may include instructions for performing testing originating at the computing system. The test results may originate at the test carrier.

The test components may include memory storing instructions comprising one or more test programs, and one or more processing devices to execute the instructions to perform the structural test on the device. The instructions define a test flow.

The system may include a computing system. The test carrier may be configured to receive, from the computing system, commands to change the test flow.

An example method includes receiving a device to test in a test carrier. The test carrier includes test components that perform at least a structural test on the device. The example method also includes receiving the test carrier in a slot. The slot includes an interface to which the test carrier connects to communicate with a system that is part of a test system or external to the test system. The test carrier communicates with the system based on the structural test. The example method may include one or more of the following features, alone or in combination.

The structural test may perform component-level testing on the device. The structural test may include a parametric test. The structural test may include a scan test. The test components may perform a functional test on the device. The functional test may perform system-level testing on the device. The functional test may provide an input to the device, obtain an output based on the input, and determine whether the device has passed the functional test based on the output.

An example test system includes means for receiving a device to test, where the means for receiving the device includes test components to perform at least a structural test on the device; means for receiving the test carrier, where the means for receiving the test carrier includes an interface to which the test carrier connects to enable the test carrier to communicate with a system that is part of the test system or external to the test system; and means for moving the test carrier into, and out of, the slot. The example test system may include one or more of following features, alone or in combination.

The example test system may include means for moving the device into, and out of, the means for receiving the device. The test components may be configured also to perform a functional test on the device.

Any two or more of the features described in this specification, including in this summary section, can be combined to form implementations not specifically described herein.

The systems and processes described herein, or portions thereof, can be implemented as/controlled by a computer program product that includes instructions that are stored on one or more non-transitory machine-readable storage media, and that are executable on one or more processing devices to control (e.g., coordinate) the operations described herein. The systems and processes described herein, or portions thereof, can be implemented as an apparatus, method, or electronic system that can include one or more processing devices and memory to store executable instructions to implement various operations.

The details of one or more implementations are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features, objects, and advantages will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.

DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a perspective view of an example carrier for a test system.

FIG. 2 is a perspective view of an example test system.

FIGS. 3 and 4 are perspective views showing examples of internal components of the test system of FIG. 2 at different configurations during operation.

Like reference numerals in different figures indicate like elements.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Described herein are example implementations of a carrier-based test system (“test system”). An example of such a test system includes a test carrier to receive a device to test. The test carrier includes electronics that comprise test components to perform at least a structural test on the device. A structural test includes testing individual components of the device. The test carrier may also include electronics comprising test components to perform a functional test on the device. A functional test includes testing an overall operation of the device. The test system includes a test slot (“slot”) to receive the test carrier. The slot includes an interface to which the test carrier connects to enable the test carrier to communicate with a system that is part of the test system or external to the test system. Robotics may be configured and controlled to move the test carrier into, and out of, the slot during a testing process.

FIG. 1 shows an example of a test carrier 1. In some implementations, test carrier 1 is self-contained, portable, and movable into, and out of, a slot. Test carrier 1 includes electronics 2 comprising test components configured to perform structural tests, functional tests, or both structural and functional tests on a device held in the test carrier. In this regard, test carrier 1 includes receptacles for holding devices to test. The receptacles contain one or more interfaces that are configured to connect devices to the test carrier both mechanically and electrically. In test carrier 1, the receptacles include two test sockets 3 and 4 arranged along the test carrier's longitudinal dimension. Although two test sockets are shown, other implementations of the test carrier may contain more than, or fewer than, two test sockets. The test sockets may also be arranged differently than as shown in FIG. 1. For example, the test sockets may be arranged along the lateral dimension.

As noted, example electronics 2 may be incorporated into the test carrier itself to perform one or more tests on a device in a test socket. Electronics 2 are internal to the test carrier, and are shown in block form in FIG. 1. Electronics 2 may be included on a printed circuit board (PCB) that is part of the test carrier.

Electronics 2 may include memory 5 storing data representing test stimulus vectors for use in a structural test, a functional test, or both a structural test and a functional test. Circuitry, such as that described below, may retrieve all or some of the data from memory and generate stimulus signals or test data based on the retrieved data.

Electronics 2 may include scan test circuitry 6. Generally, an example scan test includes gaining access to internal nodes of device under test (DUT), shifting bits into registers in those internal nodes, and monitoring the response of those internal nodes to the bits in the registers. In an example scan testing system, memory elements, such as latches or flip-flops, are connected to form a shift register, called a scan register. The internal state of a DUT may be controlled by shifting, into the scan register, test data for application to individual components of the DUT. The states of the individual components may be obtained by shifting-out data stored in the scan register.

An example of a scan test system that may be implemented using scan test circuitry 6 includes a level sensitive scan design system (LSSD). In an example LSSD, shift register latches operate as basic building blocks in a logic organization. Clock trains control groups of the shift register latches to shift data into, and out of, the shift register latches. Independent accessing and controls are also provided for these latches for independent scan-in/scan-out functions to be performed.

Electronics 2 may include a parametric measurement unit (PMU) 7 for performing parametric tests on a device in a socket. An example type of PMU that may be used includes a per-pin PMU (PPMU). Example parametric tests may include DC (direct current) parametric tests, AC (alternating current) parametric tests, or both AC and DC parametric tests. In a parametric test, the parametric measurement unit forces a current or voltage stimulus signal to a pin on the DUT, measures a response to the stimulus signal, and compares the measurement to an expected metric.

In this regard, the response to the stimulus signal may include electrical signals. An electrical signal includes informational content—data transmitted, for example. Electrical signals also include associated parametric information, such as signal-to-noise ratio, modulation amplitude, extinction ratio, wavelength, rise time, fall time, slew rate, or any other characteristic relating to a wave or the wave's shape. The PMU may obtain the parametric information from the electrical signals sent in response to stimulus signals, and compare the parametric information to one or more expected metrics. If the parametric information is deemed to be acceptable, components of the DUT associated with the pin that receives the input signals may pass testing. Otherwise, those components may fail testing. The PMU may also determine whether the information content of the electrical signals sent in response to the stimulus signals is as expected. For example, the voltage or current of the electrical signal may be compared to reference voltages or currents. If the informational content is deemed to be acceptable, components of the DUT associated with the pin that receives the input signals may pass testing. Otherwise, those components may fail testing.

Electronics 2 may include one or more processing devices, such as microprocessor 8. Microprocessor 8 may be configured—for example, programmed—with instructions to implement structural tests, functional tests, or both structural and functional tests on a DUT in a test carrier socket. As noted, a structural test includes performing component-level testing on the device. A functional test includes performing system-level testing on the device. An example functional test includes providing an input—such as a stimulus signal—to the DUT, obtaining an output from the DUT based on the input, and determining whether the device has passed the functional test based on the output. For example, the output may be compared to one or more metrics by the microprocessor. If the comparison indicates that the DUT's output is within an acceptable range, the DUT passes testing. Otherwise, the DUT fails. In a functional test, multiple outputs may be obtained from the same DUT and compared to one or more metrics as part of the testing process.

As described below, a test system may include multiple test carriers, such as the test carrier shown in FIG. 1. In some implementations, two or more different test carriers in the same test system may include different types or numbers of test components to perform structural tests, functional tests, or both structural and functional tests on a device held in the test carrier. In some implementations, two or more different test carriers in the same test system may include the same types or numbers of test components to perform structural tests, functional tests, or both structural and functional tests on a device held in the test carrier. In some implementations, all test carriers in the same test system may include the same types or numbers of test components to perform structural tests, functional tests, or both structural and functional tests on a device held in the test carrier.

As noted, the example test carrier of FIG. 1 includes two test sockets, each for housing a different DUT. The testing performed on the two DUTs may be the same type of testing or different types of testing. For example, parametric tests may be performed on one DUT while scan tests are performed on a different DUT. For example, functional tests may be performed on one DUT while structural tests are performed on a different DUT. The two DUTs may be tested synchronously or asynchronously. The preceding is also true for test carriers that are configured to hold and to test, more than two DUTs. For example, testing performed on all DUTs in the test carrier may be the same type of testing or different types of testing. For example, parametric tests may be performed on one or more DUTs while scan tests are performed on one or more different DUTs. For example, functional tests may be performed on one or more DUTs while structural tests are performed on one or more different DUTs. The multiple DUTs may be tested synchronously or asynchronously. In some implementations, structural testing and functional testing may be performed simultaneously or contemporaneously on the same DUT. For example, structural and functional testing may be performed on the same DUT at the same time, or parts of the structural and functional testing may overlap in time.

In some implementations, testing performed on the test carriers may be initiated by, or controlled by, a computing system that is external to the test carrier but that is in communication with the test carrier. Example implementations of such a computing system are described herein. In some implementations, testing performed on the test carriers may be initiated by, or controlled by, electronics that is external to the test carrier but that is in communication with the test carrier. Example implementations of such electronics include components in a rack that holds the test carrier

The testing performed by the test carriers may be independent of, or may complement, other testing performed by the test system. For example, as described below, the test system may perform tests on DUTs in a test carrier while the test carrier is inside a slot of the test system. The testing may be conducted by electronics contained in the slot or in a test rack holding the slot. The tests may include structural tests, functional tests, or both structural test and functional tests.

As noted, the testing performed on the test carriers may complement other testing performed by the test system. For example, outputs from the testing performed on the test carriers may be provided to the electronics contained in the slot, electronics contained in the test rack holding the slot, or the computing system. The electronics contained in the slot, electronics contained in the test rack holding the slot, or the computing system may analyze those outputs or integrate those outputs into test results generated separately by the electronics contained in the slot, electronics contained in the test rack holding the slot, or the computing system. Likewise, the electronics contained in the slot, electronics contained in the test rack holding the slot, or the computing system may output test results to components (electronics 2) on the test carrier. The components may use those external test results when performing on-carrier tests of a DUT.

FIGS. 2 to 4 show components of an example test system 10 in which the test carrier described above and with respect to FIG. 1 may be used. In some implementations, the example test system is modular, enabling the test system to accommodate various testing requirements. Each unit of the test system is referred to as a slice. Two or more slices may be combined and controlled to operate in concert (e.g., dependently) or independently to perform testing operations.

Referring to FIGS. 2 and 3, example test system 10 includes five stages (or zones) per slice; however, any appropriate number of stages may be included in the test system. In an example implementation, the five stages include an input/output (I/O) stage 14 a transport stage 17, a loading stage 18, an insertion stage 19, and a test stage 20. The definitions of the various stages are not meant to be limiting, and one or more components may perform functions in two or more of the stages. In some implementations, different stages are configured to operate with different levels of precision. For example, higher levels of precision (e.g., down to the micron level) may be used in the loading stage, whereas lower levels of precision may be used in some or all other stages. System components, such as mechanical components, may be configured for operation within tolerances that enable lower levels of precision in some stages. By relegating higher precision to stages that may require it, the cost and complexity of the test system can be controlled in some cases.

Computing system 45 communicates with test system 10 to control, and to coordinate operations of, test system 10. Computing system 45 may include one or more processing devices, examples of which are described herein. Communications between test system 10 and computing system 45 are represented by dashed arrow 46.

The different stages of the test system may operate independently and contemporaneously. In the example of FIG. 3, each stage includes two parallel paths 21 and 22. Each of the parallel paths includes automation, such as robotics, to pass test carriers, devices, or both between adjacent stages. Operation of the different stages independently, contemporaneously, and in the parallel paths may support higher testing throughput and speed than some comparable test systems

In the example of FIG. 2, I/O stage 14 includes, but is not limited to, feeders for receiving trays of tested devices, and for providing trays of untested devices to the test system. In the example of FIG. 2, there are three feeders 23, 24, 25 per slice; however, the system is not limited to use with three feeders. A first feeder 23 is for trays containing untested devices; a second feeder 24 is for trays containing tested devices that have not passed testing, and a third feeder 25 is for trays containing devices that have passed testing. In this example, feeder 23 is loaded manually with trays of untested devices. A tray among a stack of trays containing untested devices is fed from feeder 23 to the transport stage 17. After all devices on that tray have been forwarded for testing, and the tray is empty, the tray is retracted into the feeder and a new tray containing untested devices is fed to the transport stage. After devices have been loaded onto that tray following testing, and the tray is full (in some implementations), the tray is retracted into the feeder and a new, empty tray is fed from the I/O stage to the transport stage from either feeder 24 or 25. In this example, operations of feeders 24 and 25 are the same for trays containing devices that have passed testing and trays containing devices that have not passed testing.

In this example, transport stage 17 includes, but is not limited to, a transport robot 30 (e.g., FIG. 3) and two device shuttles 31, 32 (e.g., FIG. 4). The two device shuttles provide parallel transport paths, both into, and out of, the loading stage 18 described below, and support testing throughput and redundant reliability in some examples. Transport robot 30 is controllable to pick untested devices from a tray 34 (e.g., FIG. 3) and to place the untested devices onto device shuttles 31 and/or 32 (e.g., FIG. 4). Transport robot 30 is controllable to pick tested devices from device shuttles 31 and 32, and to place the tested devices into an appropriate one of trays 35 or 36, depending upon whether a particular device has passed testing or has not passed testing. In some implementations, transport robot 30 may pick and hold the device through air suction or using mechanical grips or other mechanical mechanisms.

In some implementations, the two devices shuttles may be configured and controlled to operate in parallel, independently, contemporaneously, and/or concurrently. For example, the transport robot may provide one device shuttle with devices to be tested, while removing devices that have been tested from another device shuttle. The two devices shuttles may be configured to move between the loading stage and the transport stage independently, in parallel, contemporaneously, and/or concurrently. For example, one device shuttle may transport devices to be tested from the transport stage towards, and to, the loading stage, while the other device shuttle transports devices that have been tested away from the loading stage and to the transport stage. In addition, one device shuttle may be stationary while the other device shuttle is moving. For example, one device shuttle may receive devices to be tested while the other device shuttle transports devices to or from the loading stage.

In some implementations, loading stage 18 includes, but is not limited to, loading robots 48, 49 and an area for loading devices into, and unloading devices from, test carriers, such as 50 and 51. In this example, there are two loading robots per slice; however, the test system may include any appropriate number of loading robots. In this example, loading robots 48, 49 are configured to move in the X dimension and also in the Z dimension to perform pick-and-place operations on devices. For example, untested devices are picked-up from a shuttle and moved into a test carrier for testing, and tested devices are picked-up from a test carrier and moved to a shuttle.

In the example of FIGS. 3 and 4, two test arms 77, 78 are shown per slice; however, the test system may include any appropriate number of test arms. The test arms are movable in all three dimensions—X, Y and Z, including rotations and flipping, in order to insert test carriers containing untested device into test slots in the test rack, and to extract, or to remove, test carriers containing tested devices from the test slots in the test rack. Test carriers containing tested devices are moved back to the loading stage, where the devices are unloaded onto shuttles by the loading robots.

Each test arm is configured to hold two test carriers at the same time—one on each face or side of the test arm. In some implementations, each side of a test arm (e.g., 77 or 78) includes a test carrier-holding receptacle, such as a gripper, for receiving, for holding, and for releasing a test carrier. In an example, the gripper is spring-loaded to accept a test carrier containing untested devices from a test carrier shuttle, and to release a test carrier containing tested to device to the (same or different) test carrier shuttle. The test carrier shuttle may be configured to control opening and closing of each gripper. A test carrier shuttle 82 may move the test carrier between the test arm and loading position.

Test rack 80 includes multiple test slots. Test carriers 81 are shown inside corresponding slots of the test rack. Each test slot may be configured and controllable to test devices in the test sockets on a test carrier, and to report the test results back to the computing system controlling the test system. The computing system keeps track of which devices passed testing and which devices failed testing, sorts the devices accordingly, and reports the test results. A test slot in the test rack is serviced by a test arm. In some implementations, during testing, a test slot always remains occupied except for the short time during which test carriers are exchanged in the test slot. For example, a test arm 77 or 78 may arrive at a test slot while holding a test carrier containing untested devices, extract a test carrier containing tested devices from the test slot, and insert the test carrier containing untested devices into that same test slot from which the other test carrier was extracted. Thus, except for the time between the removal and insertion of the test carriers, the test slot remains occupied. Each test slot in the test rack may be serviced in this manner to enhance testing throughput. Examples of how test carriers are inserted and extracted are provided below.

In operation, a test arm 77 or 78 moves—e.g., flips and rotates—to position itself to pick-up a test carrier containing untested devices from a test carrier shuttle such as test carrier shuttle 50, and to deposit the test carrier containing tested devices onto the (same or different) test carrier shuttle. In this example, the test carrier rotates (e.g., about 180°) and flips. The rotation is about a longitudinal axis of the test arm and the flipping includes a rotation in the Y dimension. As a result of this movement, an empty, first gripper on the test arm is in position to pick-up a test carrier containing untested devices from the test carrier shuttle. Accordingly, the first gripper is controlled to pick-up the test carrier containing untested devices from the test carrier shuttle. The test arm then rotates along its longitudinal axis at a point above, or proximate to, the test carrier shuttle to position a test carrier containing tested devices for deposit onto the test carrier shuttle. A second gripper on the test arm that is holding the test carrier is opened, resulting in the test carrier containing the tested devices being deposited on the test carrier shuttle. Thereafter, the test carrier shuttle transports the test carrier containing the tested devices to the loading stage.

At this time, therefore, the second gripper is empty and the first gripper holds a test carrier containing untested devices. Accordingly, the test arm rotates and flips to position the test arm to service a test slot. The test arm may also move vertically to position itself in front of a target test slot to be serviced. This rotation and flipping is opposite to the rotation and flipping performed to position the test arm above the test carrier shuttle. Thus, the test arm is positioned to extract, or to receive, from the target test slot, a test carrier containing devices that have been tested. The test carrier containing devices that have been tested is received into the theretofore empty second gripper. Following receipt of the test carrier containing devices that have been tested, the test arm rotates to position the test carrier in the first gripper, which contains devices that have not been tested, into position for insertion into the same test slot. Thereafter, the test carrier containing devices that have not been tested is pushed into that test slot, and the foregoing operations are repeated, slot-by-slot.

Example implementations of a system like that of FIGS. 2 to 4 are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/688,112, which was filed on Aug. 28, 2017 and which is titled “Calibration Process For An Automated Test System”. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/688,112 is incorporated herein by reference. For example, the robotics and other components of input/output (I/O) stage 14, transport stage 17, loading stage 18, insertion stage 19, and test stage 20 are incorporated by reference into this application from U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/688,112.

As noted, FIG. 4 shows an example of a test carrier 51. As also noted, test sockets and electronics are included in the test carrier. In some implementations, a test socket is device-specific. For example, the test socket may contain electrical contacts that are complementary to corresponding electrical contacts on a device under test (DUT). Among other things, the loading robots may be configured to place untested devices into test sockets, and to remove tested devices from test sockets. The test sockets are included in the test carrier, and contain walls that may guide devices under test into position so that electrical contacts in the test carrier test socket and electrical contacts on the device under test align. In some implementations, for example, where the electrical contacts are relatively large, the loading robots may not require a high level of precision, and the test socket walls may play a prominent role in guiding devices under test into position so that electrical contacts in the test carrier test socket and electrical contacts on the device under test align.

After an untested device reaches a resting position within the test socket, a socket cap is placed over the test socket, among other things, to apply pressure to the device to cause the electrical contacts in the device under test to mate to the complementary electrical contacts in the test carrier. In some implementations, the socket cap may include memory storing executable instructions that are usable by the device or by a microprocessor on the carrier during test. For example, the executable instructions may include operational instructions, test routines, and so forth. Accordingly, the socket cap may also include electrical contacts that mate to complementary electrical contacts on the device and/or the test carrier. In some implementations, the socket cap exerts of force on the device in order to implement the various electrical connections; any appropriate amount of force may be applied to implement connections. In some implementations, as described herein, the socket cap may be, or include, a kinematic mount, that applies the force via a compression spring.

Other test systems in which the test carrier described above and with respect to FIG. 1 may be used include, but are not limited to, the disk drive test system described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,848,106, which issued on Dec. 7, 2010, and which is titled “Temperature Control Within Disk Drive Testing Systems”. U.S. Pat. No. 7,848,106 is incorporated herein by reference. For example, the robotics and test slots are incorporated by reference into this application from U.S. Pat. No. 7,848,106.

The example systems described herein may be implemented using, and/or controlled using, one or more computer systems comprising hardware or a combination of hardware and software. For example, a system like the ones described herein may include various controllers and/or processing devices located at various points in the system to control operation of the automated elements. A central computer may coordinate operation among the various controllers or processing devices. The central computer, controllers, and processing devices may execute various software routines to effect control and coordination of the various automated elements.

The example systems described herein can be controlled, at least in part, using one or more computer program products, e.g., one or more computer program tangibly embodied in one or more information test carriers, such as one or more non-transitory machine-readable media, for execution by, or to control the operation of, one or more data processing apparatus, e.g., a programmable processor, a computer, multiple computers, and/or programmable logic components.

A computer program can be written in any form of programming language, including compiled or interpreted languages, and it can be deployed in any form, including as a stand-alone program or as a module, component, subroutine, or other unit suitable for use in a computing environment. A computer program can be deployed to be executed on one computer or on multiple computers at one site or distributed across multiple sites and interconnected by a network.

Actions associated with implementing all or part of the testing can be performed by one or more programmable processors executing one or more computer programs to perform the functions described herein. All or part of the testing can be implemented using special purpose logic circuitry, e.g., an FPGA (field programmable gate array) and/or an ASIC (application-specific integrated circuit).

Processors suitable for the execution of a computer program include, by way of example, both general and special purpose microprocessors, and any one or more processors of any kind of digital computer. Generally, a processor will receive instructions and data from a read-only storage area or a random access storage area or both. Elements of a computer (including a server) include one or more processors for executing instructions and one or more storage area devices for storing instructions and data. Generally, a computer will also include, or be operatively coupled to receive data from, or transfer data to, or both, one or more machine-readable storage media, such as mass storage devices for storing data, e.g., magnetic, magneto-optical disks, or optical disks. Machine-readable storage media suitable for embodying computer program instructions and data include all forms of non-volatile storage area, including by way of example, semiconductor storage area devices, e.g., EPROM, EEPROM, and flash storage area devices; magnetic disks, e.g., internal hard disks or removable disks; magneto-optical disks; and CD-ROM and DVD-ROM disks.

Any “connection” as used herein may imply a direct physical connection or a wired or wireless connection that includes or does not include intervening components but that nevertheless allows signals to flow between connected components.

Elements of different implementations described herein may be combined to form other embodiments not specifically set forth above. Elements may be left out of the structures described herein without adversely affecting their operation. Furthermore, various separate elements may be combined into one or more individual elements to perform the functions described herein.

Claims

1. A test system comprising: a test carrier to receive a device to test, the test carrier comprising test components to perform, on the test carrier, at least a structural test on the device; anda slot in a test rack, the slot being configured to receive the test carrier, the slot being configured to connect to the test carrier to enable the test carrier to communicate with a system that is part of the test system or external to the test system;wherein at least the structural test is independent of testing performed on the device by components that are not on the test carrier when the test carrier is in the slot.

2. The test system of claim 1, wherein the test components comprise test electronics, and wherein the structural test is for performing component-level testing on the device.

3. The test system of claim 1, wherein the structural test comprises a parametric test.

4. The test system of claim 1, wherein the structural test comprises a scan test.

5. The test system of claim 1, wherein the test components comprise test electronics, and wherein the test components are configured to perform a functional test on the device.

6. The test system of claim 5, wherein the functional test is for performing system-level testing on the device.

7. The test system of claim 5, wherein the functional test comprises providing an input to the device, obtaining an output based on the input, and determining whether the device has passed the functional test based on the output.

8. The test system of claim 1, wherein the test carrier comprises a printed circuit board (PCB) for holding test electronics comprising the test components to perform at least the structural test on the device.

9. The test system of claim 1, further comprising: robotics to move the test carrier into, and out of, the slot.

10. The test system of claim 1, wherein the test carrier is a first test carrier, the device is a first device, and the slot is a first slot; and wherein the test system further comprises: one or more additional test carriers, each of the one or more additional test carriers to receive a different device to test, each additional test carrier comprising test components to perform at least a structural test on a different device; andone or more additional slots, each of the one or more additional slots to receive a target test carrier among the one or more additional test carriers, each slot being configured to enable the target test carrier to communicate with the system that is part of the test system or external to the test system.

11. The test system of claim 10, wherein each test carrier comprises a same type of test components.

12. The test system of claim 10, wherein at least some of the additional test carriers comprise different types of test components configured to perform different types of tests.

13. The test system of claim 1, wherein the device is a first device; wherein the test carrier comprises a first receptacle to receive the first device and a second receptacle to receive a second device to test; andwherein the test components are configured also to test the second device.

14. The test system of claim 13, wherein the test components are configured to perform a same type of test on the first device and the second device.

15. The test system of claim 13, wherein the test components are configured to perform different types of tests on the first device and the second device.

16. The test system of claim 15, wherein the different types of test are performed asynchronously.

17. The test system of claim 1, wherein the test components comprise memory storing data representing test stimulus vectors for use in the structural test.

18. The test system of claim 1, wherein the test components comprise one or more processing devices configured to execute instructions to perform to the structural test.

19. The test system of claim 1, wherein the test components comprise memory storing test results based on performance of the structural test.

20. The test system of claim 19, wherein the test components comprise an interface to enable exchange of communications with the system, the system comprising a computing system, the communications comprising instructions for performing testing originating at the computing system, the test results originating at the test carrier.

21. The test system of claim 1, wherein the test components comprise: memory storing instructions comprising one or more test programs; andone or more processing devices to execute the instructions to perform the structural test on the device, the instructions defining a test flow.

22. The test system of claim 21, wherein the system comprises a computing system; and wherein the test carrier is configured to receive, from the computing system, commands to change the test flow.

23. A method comprising: receiving a device to test in a test carrier, the test carrier comprising test components to perform at least a structural test on the device;performing, in the test carrier, at least the structural test on the device;receiving the test carrier in a slot of a test rack, the slot being configured to enable the test carrier to communicate with a system that is part of a test system or external to the test system; andthe test carrier communicating with the system based on the structural test;wherein at least the structural test is independent of testing performed on the device by components that are not on the test carrier when the test carrier is in the slot.

24. The method of claim 23, wherein the structural test performs component-level testing on the device.

25. The method of claim 23, wherein the structural test is a parametric test.

26. The method of claim 23, wherein the structural test is a scan test.

27. The method of claim 23, wherein the test components comprise test electronics, and wherein the test components perform a functional test on the device.

28. The method of claim 27, wherein the functional test performs system-level testing on the device.

29. The method of claim 27 wherein the functional test provides an input to the device, obtains an output based on the input, and determines whether the device has passed the functional test based on the output.

30. A test system comprising: a test carrier for receiving a device to test, the test carrier comprising test components to perform, on the test carrier, at least a structural test on the device;means for receiving the test carrier, the means for receiving the test carrier being configured to enable the test carrier to communicate with a system that is part of the test system or external to the test system; andmeans for moving the test carrier into, and out of, the means for receiving;wherein at least the structural test is independent of testing performed on the device by components that are not on the test carrier when the test carrier is in the means for receiving.

31. The test system of claim 30, further comprising: means for moving the device into, and out of, the test carrier.

32. The test system of claim 30, wherein the test components are configured also to perform a functional test on the device.