Patent Grant
9076607
Embodiments of the invention relate generally to electrical circuitry, and, more particularly, to micro-electromechanical system (MEMS) based switching devices, and, even more particularly, to system with circuitry for suppressing arc formation during a switching event, such as during a turn on and/or a turn off of the MEMS switching device.
A circuit breaker is an electrical device designed to protect electrical equipment from damage caused by faults in the circuit. Traditionally, most conventional circuit breakers include bulky electromechanical switches. Unfortunately, these conventional circuit breakers are large in size thereby necessitating use of a large force to activate the switching mechanism. Additionally, the switches of these circuit breakers generally operate at relatively slow speeds. Furthermore, these circuit breakers are disadvantageously complex to build and thus expensive to fabricate. In addition, when contacts of the switching mechanism in conventional circuit breakers are physically separated, an arc is typically formed there between which continues to carry current until the current in the circuit ceases. Moreover, energy associated with the arc may seriously damage the contacts and/or present a burn hazard to personnel.
As an alternative to slow electromechanical switches, it is known to use relatively fast solid-state switches in high speed switching applications. As will be appreciated, these solid-state switches switch between a conducting state and a non-conducting state through controlled application of a voltage or bias. For example, by reverse biasing a solid-state switch, the switch may be transitioned into a non-conducting state. However, since solid-state switches do not create a physical gap between contacts when they are switched into a non-conducting state, they experience leakage current. Furthermore, due to internal resistances, when solid-state switches operate in a conducting state, they experience a voltage drop. Both the voltage drop and leakage current contribute to the generation of excess heat under normal operating circumstances, which may be detrimental to switch performance and life.
Generally, aspects of the present invention provide a system that includes micro-electromechanical system switching circuitry. A first over-current protection circuitry is connected in a parallel circuit with the micro-electromechanical system switching circuitry. The first over-current protection circuitry is configured to momentarily form an electrically conductive path in response to a first switching event of the micro-electromechanical system switching circuitry. This electrically conductive path forms a parallel circuit with the micro-electromechanical system switching circuitry for suppressing a voltage level across contacts of the micro-electromechanical system switching circuitry during the first switching event. A second over-current protection circuitry is connected in a parallel circuit with the micro-electromechanical system switching circuitry and the first over-current protection circuitry. The second over-current protection circuitry is configured to momentarily form an electrically conductive path in response to a second switching event of the micro-electromechanical system switching circuitry. The electrically conductive path forms a parallel circuit with the micro-electromechanical system switching circuitry for suppressing a current flow through the contacts of the micro-electromechanical system switching circuitry during the second switching event.
Further aspects of the present invention provide a system including a micro-electromechanical system switching circuitry. At least a first over-current protection circuitry may be connected in a parallel circuit with the micro-electromechanical system switching circuitry. The first over-current protection circuitry may be configured to momentarily form an electrically conductive path in response to a first switching event of the micro-electromechanical system switching circuitry. The electrically conductive path forms a parallel circuit with the micro-electromechanical system switching circuitry for suppressing a voltage across contacts of the micro-electromechanical system switching circuitry during the first switching event.
These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention will become better understood when the following detailed description is read with reference to the accompanying drawings in which like characters represent like parts throughout the drawings, wherein:
In accordance with one or more embodiments of the present invention, a system including micro-electromechanical system (MEMS) switching circuitry will be described herein. In the following detailed description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of various embodiments of the present invention. However, those skilled in the art will understand that embodiments of the present invention may be practiced without these specific details, that the present invention is not limited to the depicted embodiments, and that the present invention may be practiced in a variety of alternative embodiments. In other instances, well known methods, procedures, and components have not been described in detail.
Furthermore, various operations may be described as multiple discrete steps performed in a manner that is helpful for understanding embodiments of the present invention. However, the order of description should not be construed as to imply neither that these operations need to be performed in the order they are presented, nor that they are even order dependent. Moreover, repeated usage of the phrase “in one embodiment” does not necessarily refer to the same embodiment, although it may. Lastly, the terms “comprising”, “including”, “having”, and the like, as used in the present application, are intended to be synonymous unless otherwise indicated.
As illustrated in
In a presently contemplated configuration as will be described in greater detail with reference to
For readers desirous of background information in connection with suppression of arc formation reference is made to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/314,336 filed on Dec. 20, 2005, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety herein. The foregoing application describes high-speed micro-electromechanical system (MEMS) based switching devices including circuitry and pulsing techniques adapted to suppress arc formation between contacts of the micro-electromechanical system. In such an application, arc formation suppression is accomplished by effectively shunting a current flowing through such contacts.
Turning now to
In accordance with further aspects of the present technique, a load circuit 40, such an electromotive machine or electric motor, may be coupled in series with the first MEMS switch 20. The load circuit 40 may be connected to a suitable voltage source VBUS, such as an alternating voltage (AC) or a direct voltage (DC) 44. In addition, the load circuit 40 may comprise a load inductance 46 LLOAD, where the load inductance LLOAD 46 is representative of a combined load inductance and a bus inductance viewed by the load circuit 40. The load circuit 40 may also include a load resistance RLOAD 48 representative of a combined load resistance viewed by the load circuit 40. Reference numeral 50 is representative of a load circuit current ILOAD that may flow through the load circuit 40 and the first MEMS switch 20.
Further, as noted with reference to
In one embodiment, the first MEMS switch 20 may be coupled in parallel across midpoints of the balanced diode bridge 28. The midpoints of the balanced diode bridge may include a first midpoint located between the first and second diodes 30, 32 and a second midpoint located between the third and fourth diodes 34, 36. Furthermore, the first MEMS switch 20 and the balanced diode bridge 28 may be tightly packaged to facilitate minimization of parasitic inductance caused by the balanced diode bridge 28 and in particular, the connections to the MEMS switch 20. It may be noted that, in accordance with exemplary aspects of the present technique, the first MEMS switch 20 and the balanced diode bridge 28 are positioned relative to one another such that the inherent inductance between the first MEMS switch 20 and the balanced diode bridge 28 produces a L*di/dt voltage, where L represents the parasitic inductance. The voltage produced may be less than a few percent of the voltage across the drain 22 and source 24 of the MEMS switch 20 when carrying a transfer of the load current to the diode bridge 28 during the MEMS switch 20 turn-off which will be described in greater detail hereinafter. In one embodiment, the first MEMS switch 20 may be integrated with the balanced diode bridge 28 in a single package 38 or optionally, the same die with the intention of minimizing the inductance interconnecting the MEMS switch 20 and the diode bridge 28.
Additionally, the over current protection circuitry 14 may include a pulse circuit 52 coupled in operative association with the balanced diode bridge 28. The pulse circuit 52 may be configured to detect a switch condition and initiate opening of the MEMS switch 20 responsive to the switch condition. As used herein, the term “switch condition” refers to a condition that triggers changing a present operating state of the MEMS switch 20. For example, the switch condition may result in changing a first closed state of the MEMS switch 20 to a second open state or a first open state of the MEMS switch 20 to a second closed state. A switch condition may occur in response to a number of actions including but not limited to a circuit fault, circuit overload, or switch ON/OFF request.
The pulse circuit 52 may include a pulse switch 54 and a pulse capacitor CPULSE 56 series coupled to the pulse switch 54. Further, the pulse circuit may also include a pulse inductance LPULSE 58 and a first diode DP 60 coupled in series with the pulse switch 54. The pulse inductance LPULSE 58, the diode DP 60, the pulse switch 54 and the pulse capacitor CPULSE 56 may be coupled in series to form a first branch of the pulse circuit 52, where the components of the first branch may be configured to facilitate pulse current shaping and timing. Also, reference numeral 62 is representative of a pulse circuit current IPULSE that may flow through the pulse circuit 52.
In accordance with aspects of the present invention as will be described in further detail hereinafter, the MEMS switch 20 may be rapidly switched (e.g., on the order of picoseconds or nanoseconds) from a first closed state to a second open state while carrying no current or a near zero current. This may be achieved through the combined operation of the load circuit 40, and pulse circuit 52 including the balanced diode bridge 28 coupled in parallel across contacts of the MEMS switch 20.
Moreover, for discussion of this example operation of the MEMS based switching system 18, it may be presumed that a resistance associated with the MEMS switch 20 is sufficiently small such that the voltage produced by the load current through the resistance of MEMS switch 20 has only a negligible effect on the near-zero voltage difference between the mid-points of the diode bridge 28 when pulsed. For example, the resistance associated with the MEMS switch 20 may be presumed to be sufficiently small so as to produce a voltage drop of less than a few millivolts due to the maximum anticipated load current.
It may be noted that in this initial condition of the MEMS based switching system 18, the pulse switch 54 is in a first open state. Additionally, there is no pulse circuit current in the pulse circuit 52. Also, in the pulse circuit 52, the capacitor CPULSE 56 may be pre-charged to a voltage VPULSE, where VPULSE is a voltage that can produce a half sinusoid of pulse current having a peak magnitude significantly greater (e.g., 10×) the anticipated load current ILOAD 50 during the transfer interval of the load current. It may be noted that CPULSE 56 and LPULSE 58 comprise a series resonant circuit.
The pulse circuit 52 may be configured to detect the switch condition to facilitate switching the present closed state of the MEMS switch 20 to a second open state. In one embodiment, the switch condition may be a fault condition generated due to a voltage level or load current in the load circuit 40 exceeding a predetermined threshold level. However, as will be appreciated, the switch condition may also include monitoring a ramp voltage to achieve a given system-dependent ON time for the MEMS switch 20.
In one embodiment, the pulse switch 54 may generate a sinusoidal pulse responsive to receiving a trigger signal as a result of a detected switching condition. The triggering of the pulse switch 54 may initiate a resonant sinusoidal current in the pulse circuit 52. The current direction of the pulse circuit current may be represented by reference numerals 66 and 68. Furthermore, the current direction and relative magnitude of the pulse circuit current through the first diode 30 and the second diode 32 of the first branch 29 of the balanced diode bridge 28 may be represented by current vectors 72 and 70 respectively. Similarly, current vectors 76 and 74 are representative of a current direction and relative magnitude of the pulse circuit current through the third diode 34 and the fourth diode 36 respectively.
The value of the peak sinusoidal bridge pulse current may be determined by the initial voltage on the pulse capacitor CPULSE 56, value of the pulse capacitor CPULSE 56 and the value of the pulse inductance LPULSE 58. The values for the pulse inductance LPULSE 58 and the pulse capacitor CPULSE 56 also determine the pulse width of the half sinusoid of pulse current. The bridge current pulse width may be adjusted to meet the system load current turn-off requirement predicated upon the rate of change of the load current (VBUS/LLOAD) and the desired peak let-through current during a load fault condition. According to aspects of the present invention, the pulse switch 54 may be configured to be in a conducting state prior to opening the MEMS switch 20.
It may be noted that triggering of the pulse switch 54 may include controlling a timing of the pulse circuit current IPULSE 62 through the balanced diode bridge 28 to facilitate creating a lower impedance path as compared to the impedance of a path through the contacts of the MEMS switch 20 during an opening interval. In addition, the pulse switch 54 may be triggered such that a desired voltage drop is presented across the contacts of the MEMS switch 20.
In one embodiment, the pulse switch 54 may be a solid-state switch that may be configured to have switching speeds in the range of nanoseconds to microseconds, for example. The switching speed of the pulse switch 54 should be relatively fast compared to the anticipated rise time of the load current in a fault condition. The current rating required of the MEMS switch 20 may be dependent on the rate of rise of the load current, which in turn is dependent on the inductance LLOAD 46 and the bus supply voltage VBUS 44 in the load circuit 40 as previously noted. The MEMS switch 20 may be appropriately rated to handle a larger load current ILOAD 50 if the load current ILOAD 50 may rise rapidly compared to the speed capability of the bridge pulse circuit.
The pulse circuit current IPULSE 62 increases from a value of zero and divides equally between the first and second branches 29, 31 of the balanced diode bridge 28. In accordance with one embodiment, the difference in voltage drops across the branches 29, 31 of the balanced diode bridge 28 may be designed to be negligible, as previously described. Further, as previously described, the diode bridge 28 is balanced such that the voltage drop across the first and second branches of the diode bridge 28 are substantially equal. Moreover, as the resistance of the MEMS switch 20 in a present closed state is relatively low, there is a relatively small voltage drop across the MEMS switch 20. However, if the voltage drop across the MEMS switch 20 happened to be larger (e.g., due to an inherent design of the MEMS switch), the balancing of the diode bridge 28 may be affected as the diode bridge 28 is operatively coupled in parallel with the MEMS switch 20. In accordance with aspects of the present invention, if the resistance of the MEMS switch 20 causes a significant voltage drop across the MEMS switch 20 then the diode bridge 28 may accommodate the resulting imbalance of the pulse bridge by increasing the magnitude of the peak bridge pulse current.
Referring now to
Once the amplitude of the pulse circuit current IPULSE 62 becomes greater than the amplitude of the load circuit current ILOAD 50 (e.g., due to the resonant action of the pulse circuit 52), a voltage applied to the gate contact 26 of the MEMS switch 20 may be appropriately biased to switch the present operating state of the MEMS switch 20 from the first closed and conducting state to an increasing resistance condition in which the MEMS switch 20 starts to turn off (e.g., where the contacts are still closed but contact pressure diminishing due the switch opening process) which causes the switch resistance to increase which in turn causes the load current to start to divert from the MEMS switch 20 into the diode bridge 28.
In this present condition, the balanced diode bridge 28 presents a path of relatively low impedance to the load circuit current ILOAD 50 as compared to a path through the MEMS switch 20, which now exhibits an increasing contact resistance. It may be noted that this diversion of load circuit current ILOAD 50 through the MEMS switch 20 is an extremely fast process compared to the rate of change of the load circuit current ILOAD 50. As previously noted, it may be desirable that the values of inductances L1 84 and L2 88 associated with connections between the MEMS switch 20 and the balanced diode bridge 28 be very small to avoid inhibition of the fast current diversion.
The process of current transfer from the MEMS switch 20 to the pulse bridge continues to increase the current in the first diode 30 and the fourth diode 36 while simultaneously the current in the second diode 32 and the third diode 34 diminish. The transfer process is completed when the mechanical contacts 22, 24 of the MEMS switch 20 are separated to form a physical gap and all of the load current is carried by the first diode 30 and the fourth diode 36.
Consequent to the load circuit current ILOAD being diverted from the MEMS switch 20 to the diode bridge 28 in direction 86, an imbalance forms across the first and second branches 29, 31 of the diode bridge 28. Furthermore, as the pulse circuit current decays, voltage across the pulse capacitor CPULSE 56 continues to reverse (e.g., acting as a “back electromotive force”) which causes the eventual reduction of the load circuit current ILOAD to zero. The second diode 32 and the third diode 34 in the diode bridge 28 become reverse biased which results in the load circuit now including the pulse inductor LPULSE 58 and the bridge pulse capacitor CPULSE 56 and to become a series resonant circuit.
Turning now to
Additionally, a significant switch contact voltage difference from the drain 24 to the source 26 of the MEMS switch 20 may now rise to a maximum of approximately twice the VBUS voltage at a rate determined by the net resonant circuit which includes the pulse inductor LPULSE 58, the pulse capacitor CPULSE 56, the load circuit inductor LLOAD 46, and damping due to the load resistor RLOAD 48 and circuit losses. Moreover, the pulse circuit current IPULSE 62, that at some point was equal to the load circuit current ILOAD 50, may decrease to a zero value due to resonance and such a zero value may be maintained due to the reverse blocking action of the diode bridge 28 and the diode DP 60. The voltage across the pulse capacitor CPULSE 56 due to resonance would reverse polarity to a negative peak and such a negative peak would be maintained until the pulse capacitor CPULSE 56 is recharged.
The diode bridge 28 may be configured to maintain a near-zero voltage across the contacts of the MEMS switch 20 until the contacts separate to open the MEMS switch 20, thereby preventing damage by suppressing any arc that would tend to form between the contacts of the MEMS switch 20 during opening. Additionally, the contacts of the MEMS switch 20 approach the opened state at a much reduced contact current through the MEMS switch 20. Also, any stored energy in the circuit inductance, the load inductance and the source may be transferred to the pulse circuit capacitor CPULSE 56 and may be absorbed via voltage dissipation circuitry (not shown). The voltage snubber circuit 33 may be configured to limit voltage overshoot during the fast contact separation due to the inductive energy remaining in the interface inductance between the bridge and the MEMS switch. Furthermore, the rate of increase of voltage that may be reapplied across the contacts of the MEMS switch 20 during opening may be controlled via use of the snubber circuit (not shown).
It may also be noted that although a gap is created between the contacts of the MEMS switch 20 when in an open state, a leakage current may nonetheless exist between the load circuit 40 and the diode bridge circuit 28 around the MEMS switch 20. (A path could also form through the MOV and/or R/C snubber circuits). This leakage current may be suppressed via introduction of a secondary mechanical switch (not shown) series connected in the load circuit 40 to generate a physical gap. In certain embodiments, the mechanical switch may include a second MEMS switch.
Referring now to
As indicated by block 114, a current level in a load circuit, such as the load circuit 40 (see
If the sensed current level or sensed voltage level varies or departs from an expected value, a switch condition may be generated as indicated by block 118. As previously noted, the term “switch condition” refers to a condition that triggers changing a present operating state of the MEMS switch. In certain embodiments, the switch condition may be generated responsive to a fault signal and may be employed to facilitate initiating opening of the MEMS switch. It may be noted that blocks 114-118 are representative of one example of generating a switch condition. However as will be appreciated, other methods of generating the switch condition are also envisioned in accordance with aspects of the present invention.
As indicated by block 120, the pulse circuit may be triggered to initiate a pulse circuit current responsive to the switch condition. Due to the resonant action of the pulse circuit, the pulse circuit current level may continue to increase. Due at least in part to the diode bridge 28, a near-zero voltage drop may be maintained across the contacts of the MEMS switch if the instantaneous amplitude of the pulse circuit current is significantly greater than the instantaneous amplitude of the load circuit current. Additionally, the load circuit current through the MEMS switch may be diverted from the MEMS switch to the pulse circuit as indicated by block 122. As previously noted, the diode bridge presents a path of relatively low impedance as opposed to a path through the MEMS switch, where a relatively high impedance increases as the contacts of the MEMS switch start to part. The MEMS switch may then be opened in an arc-less manner as indicated by block 124.
As previously described, a near-zero voltage drop across contacts of the MEMS switch may be maintained as long as the instantaneous amplitude of the pulse circuit current is significantly greater than the instantaneous amplitude of the load circuit current, thereby facilitating opening of the MEMS switch and suppressing formation of any arc across the contacts of the MEMS switch. Thus, as described hereinabove, the MEMS switch may be opened at a near-zero voltage condition across the contacts of the MEMS switch and with a greatly reduced current through the MEMS switch.
Response curve 142 represents a variation of amplitude of the load circuit current as a function of time. A variation of amplitude of the pulse circuit current as a function of time is represented in response curve 144. In a similar fashion, a variation of amplitude of gate voltage as a function of time is embodied in response curve 146. Response curve 148 represents a zero gate voltage reference, while response curve 150 is the reference level for the load current prior to turn-off.
Additionally, reference numeral 152 represents region on the response curve 142 where the process of switch opening occurs. Similarly, reference numeral 154 represents a region on the response curve 142 where the contacts of the MEMS switch have parted and the switch is in an open state. Also, as can be seen from the second section 138 of the graphical representation 130, the gate voltage is pulled low to facilitate initiating opening of the MEMS switch. Furthermore, as can be seen from the third section 140 of the graphical representation 130, the load circuit current 142 and the pulse circuit current 144 in the conducting half of the balanced diode bridge are decaying.
Response curve 406 represents a variation of amplitude of the load circuit current as a function of time. A variation of amplitude of the pulse circuit current as a function of time is represented in response curve 408. In a similar fashion, a variation of amplitude of gate voltage as a function of time is embodied in response curve 410. The reader is cautioned to note the different amplitude scales in connection with the respective plots.
Below are described circuitry and/or techniques that reliably and cost-effectively allow a switching system to withstand a surge current (e.g., during a start up event or a transient condition) with solid state (e.g., semiconductor-based) switching circuitry while able to, for example, utilize MEMS-based switching circuitry for steady state operation and for addressing fault conditions that may arise.
The surge current may arise when starting up an electrical load, such as a motor or some other type of electrical equipment, or may arise during a transient condition. The value of the surge current during a start up event often comprises multiple times (e.g., six times or more) the value of the steady state load current and can last for several seconds, such as in the order of ten seconds.
A controller 208 may be coupled to MEMS-based switching circuitry 202, solid-state switching circuitry 204, and over-current protection circuitry 206. Controller 208 may be configured to selectively transfer current back and forth between the MEMS-based switching circuitry and the solid state switching circuitry by performing a control strategy configured to determine when to actuate over-current protection circuitry 206, and also when to open and close each respective switching circuitry, such as may be performed in response to load current conditions appropriate to the current-carrying capabilities of a respective one of the switching circuitries and/or during fault conditions that may affect the switching system. It is noted that in such a control strategy it is desirable to be prepared to perform fault current limiting while transferring current back and forth between the respective switching circuitries 202 and 204, as well as performing current limiting and load de-energization whenever the load current approaches the maximum current handling capacity of either switching circuitry.
A system embodying the foregoing example circuitry may be controlled such that the surge current is not carried by MEMS based switching circuitry 202 and such a current is instead carried by solid-state switching circuitry 204. The steady-state current would be carried by MEMS based switching circuitry 202, and over-current and/or fault protection would be available during system operation through over-current protection circuit 206. It will be appreciated that in its broad aspects the proposed concepts need not be limited to MEMS-based switching circuitry. For example, a system comprising one or more standard electromechanical switches (i.e., not MEMS-based electromechanical switching circuitry) in parallel with one or more solid state switches and a suitable controller may similarly benefit from the advantages afforded by aspects of the present invention.
Below is an example sequence of switching states as well as example current values in the switching system upon occurrence of a motor starting event, presuming the load connected to the system is a motor. The letter X next to a number indicates an example current value corresponding to a number of times the value of a typical current under steady state conditions. Thus, 6× denotes a current value corresponding to six times the value of a typical current under steady state conditions.
MEMS based switching circuitry—Open
Current 0
MEMS based switching circuitry—Open
Current—6×
MEMS based switching circuitry—Closed
Current—1×
MEMS based switching circuitry—Closed
Current—1×
It is noted that the voltage drop across an inverse-series connected pair of MOSFETs is just the IR drop based on the Rdson (on state resistance) value for the two switches, in lieu of the IR drop based on the Rdson value for one switch plus the relatively larger voltage drop of a diode, as would be the case in an inverse-parallel arrangement. Thus, in one example embodiment an inverse-series configuration of MOSFETs may be desirable since it has the capability of providing a relatively lower voltage drop, hence lower power dissipation, heat, and energy loss.
It will be further appreciated that in one example embodiment wherein solid state switching circuitry 204 comprises a bidirectional thyristor (or an inverse-parallel pair of thyristors), while this arrangement may incur relatively higher losses at lower currents, such an arrangement would have the advantage of being able to withstand a relatively higher short-term current surge because of the relatively lower voltage drop at high currents, and the transient thermal response characteristics.
It is contemplated that in one example embodiment solid state switching circuitry 204 may be used to perform soft-starting (or stopping) of a load, such as motor, by controlling current pulses. By switching the solid state circuitry in correspondence with a variable phase angle of an alternating source voltage or alternating load current, one can adjust the electrical energy resulting from a stream of current pulses applied to the motor. For example, when the motor is first energized, solid state switching circuitry 204 can be turned on close to voltage zero as the voltage is approaching zero. This will produce only a small pulse of current. The current will rise, reach a peak at approximately the time the voltage reaches zero, and then will fall to zero as the voltage reverses. The firing (phase) angle is gradually advanced to produce larger current pulses, until the current reaches a desired value, such as three times rated load. Eventually, as the motor starts up and the current amplitude continues to decay, the firing angle is further advanced until eventually full line voltage is continuously applied to the motor. For readers desirous of general background information regarding an example soft starting technique with solid state switching circuitry, reference is made to U.S. Pat. No. 5,341,080, titled “Apparatus and Three Phase Induction Motor Starting and Stopping Control Method”, assigned in common to the same assignee of the present invention.
After the initial start-up current has subsided to a suitable level, MEMS-based switching circuitry 202 may be turned on using a suitable MEMS-compatible switching technique, or by closing into the voltage that is dropped across the solid-state switching circuitry provided such voltage drop comprises a relatively small voltage. At this point, FET switches 210 and 219 can be turned off.
It is noted that MEMS-based switching circuitry should not be closed to a conductive switching state in the presence of a voltage across its switching contacts nor should such circuitry be opened into a non-conductive switching state while passing current through such contacts. One example of a MEMS-compatible switching technique may be a pulse-forming technique as described and/or illustrated in the context of
Another example of a MEMS-compatible switching technique may be achieved by configuring the switching system to perform soft or point-on-wave switching whereby one or more MEMS switches in the switching circuitry 202 may be closed at a time when the voltage across the switching circuitry 202 is at or very close to zero, and opened at a time when the current through the switching circuitry 202 is at or close to zero. For readers desirous of background information regarding such a technique reference is made to patent application titled “Micro-Electromechanical System Based Soft Switching”, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/314,879 filed Dec. 20, 2005.
By closing the switches at a time when the voltage across the switching circuitry 202 is at or very close to zero, pre-strike arcing can be avoided by keeping the electric field low between the contacts of the one or more MEMS switches as they close, even if multiple switches do not all close at the same time. As alluded to above, control circuitry may be configured to synchronize the opening and closing of the one or more MEMS switches of the switching circuitry 202 with the occurrence of a zero crossing of an alternating source voltage or an alternating load circuit current. Should a fault occur during a start up event, over-current protection circuitry 206 is configured to protect the down stream load as well as the respective switching circuitries. As illustrated in
It is noted that although electromechanical and solid-state switching circuitry when viewed at a top level may in concept appear to behave substantially similar to one another, in practice, however, such switching circuitry may exhibit respective distinct operational characteristics since they operate based on substantially different physical principles and thus the over-current protection circuitry may have to be appropriately configured to account for such characteristics and still appropriately actuate the switching circuitry. For instance, a MEMS switch may involve a mechanical movement of a cantilever beam to break contact, whereas a field-effect solid-state switch generally involves movement of charge carriers in a voltage-induced channel, and a bi-polar solid state switch involves injection of charge carriers in a reverse-biased junction. The time it takes to clear the carriers is called the recovery time, and this recovery time can range from a time of <1 μs to a time >100 μs. For instance, if the solid-state switch is closed into a fault, then over-current protection circuitry 206 should be able to absorb the fault current and protect the solid-state switch and the down stream load until the switch's channel is fully cleared and the switch is fully open. In the event over-current protection circuitry 206 comprises a pulse circuit 52 and a balanced diode bridge 31, it can be shown that the pulse characteristics (such as the width and/or height of a pulse formed by the pulse circuit) could affect the quality of down stream protection. For example, over-current protection circuitry 206 should be able to generate a pulse having sufficient width and/or height to accommodate the recovery time of the parallel solid-state switching circuitry as well as accommodate the fault protection for the MEMS based switching circuitry.
It is noted that there are two general categories of solid state switching circuitry, with regard to fault current interruption. Some solid state switches (such as FETs) can inherently force a zero current condition when turned off. Others (such as SCRs) cannot force such a zero current condition. Solid state switching circuitry that can force a zero current condition may not need the aid of over-current protection circuitry 206 to perform current limiting during a fault. Solid state switching circuitry that cannot force a zero current condition will generally require an over-current protection circuitry 206.
As previously mentioned, a suitable control technique should be implemented to selectively transfer current back and forth between the MEMS-based switching circuitry and the solid state switching circuitry. In one example embodiment, such a control technique may be based on a respective electrical loss model for each switching circuitry. For instance, electrical losses (and concomitant temperature rise) in MEMS-based switching circuitry are generally proportional to the square of the load current, while losses (and concomitant temperature rise) in solid state switching circuitry are generally proportional to the absolute value of load current. Also, the thermal capacity of solid state devices is generally greater than that of MEMS-based switching circuitry. Accordingly, for normal values of load current, it is contemplated that the MEMS-based switching circuitry will carry the current, while, for temporary overload currents, it is contemplated for the solid state switching circuitry to carry the current. Thus, it is contemplated to transfer current back and forth during transient overload situations.
We will discuss below, three example techniques for selectively transferring load current back and forth between the MEMS-based switching circuitry and the solid state switching circuitry. One example technique contemplates use of dual over-current protection circuitry, such as shown in
It is noted that if the switching system uses just a single over-current protection circuitry 206, then such a single over-current protection circuitry would be activated upon a switching event in connection with the MEMS-based switching circuitry. However, if shortly thereafter a fault were to occur, then the single over-current protection circuitry 206 may not be ready to be reactivated to protect the switching circuitry. As described above, over-current protection circuitry 206 operates based on pulsing techniques, and thus such circuitry would not be instantaneously ready to operate shortly upon a pulse firing. For example, one would have to wait some period of time to recharge the pulse capacitor in pulse circuit 52.
The technique involving redundant over-current protection circuitry ensures leaving one over-current protection circuitry (e.g., circuitry 2062) free and ready to assist current limiting in the event of a fault, even when the other over-current protection circuitry 2061 has just performed a pulse-assisted switching in connection with a normal switching event (non-fault driven switching event). This technique is believed to provide substantial design flexibility with a relatively simpler control, but requires dual over-current protection circuitry instead of a single over-current protection circuitry. It is noted that this technique is compatible with any type of solid state switching circuitry.
It will be appreciated that in an example embodiment that comprises redundant over-current protection circuitry, such circuitry should include dual pulse circuits 52 but need not include dual balanced diode bridges 31. For example, if the first over-current protection circuitry comprises a respective pulse circuit 52 and a respective balanced diode bridge 31, the second over-current protection circuitry may just comprise a respective pulse circuit 52 configured to apply a suitable pulse current (when needed) to the balanced diode bridge 31 of the first over protection circuit. Conversely, if the second over-current protection circuitry comprises a respective pulse circuit 52 and a respective balanced diode bridge 31, then the first over-current protection circuitry may just comprise a respective pulse circuit 52 configured to apply a suitable pulse current (when needed) to the balanced diode bridge 31 of the second over protection circuit.
A second example technique is to time the execution of the transfer to coincide with a current zero. This eliminates the need for a second over-current protection circuitry, and is also compatible with any type of solid state switching circuitry. However, this technique may involve relatively more elaborate control and could require a complete shut-off of the system in some cases. A third example technique is to perform the current transfer by coordinating the opening and closing of the MEMS switching circuitry and the solid state switching circuitry. As will be appreciated, this technique can be used provided the solid state switching circuitry has a relatively small voltage drop.
In any case, it should be appreciated that the control strategy may be configured to determine when to operate the over-current protection circuitry (either single or dual over-current protection circuitry) and to determine when to open and close the respective switching circuitries, such as in response to load current conditions appropriate to the current-carrying capabilities of a respective one of the switching circuitries. The general concept is to be prepared to perform fault current limiting while transferring current back and forth between alternate current paths, as well as performing current limiting and circuit de-energization when the load current approaches the maximum capacity of either load current carrying path. One example control strategy may be as follows:
Use the solid state switching circuitry to energize the load, on the expectation that there will be a large initial current. Transfer the load over to the MEMS-based switching circuitry after the current falls within the rating of the MEMS-based switching circuitry.
When it is desired to de-energize the load under normal conditions, do so with whatever switching circuitry is carrying the current at that time. If it is the MEMS-based switching circuitry, use point-on-wave switching to turn off at current zero.
Based on simulated or sensed temperatures, determined the respective temperature of both the MEMS-based switching circuitry and the solid state switching circuitry. If any of such temperature is determined to be approaching a respective thermal ratings limit, or if the load current is approaching a respective maximum current carrying capability, (such as under fault conditions or a severe overload) perform an instantaneous current interruption (assisted with the over-current protection circuitry) and open both the MEMS-based switching circuitry and the solid state switching circuitry. This action would pre-empt any other control action. Wait for a reset before allowing a re-close switching action.
Under normal operation, the respective thermal conditions of each respective switching circuitry may be used to determine whether to pass current through the MEMS-based switching circuitry or through the solid state switching circuitry. If one switching circuitry is approaching its thermal or current limit while the other switching circuitry still has thermal margin, a transfer may be automatically made. The precise timing would depend on the switching transfer technique. For instance, in a pulse-assisted transfer, the transfer can take place essentially instantaneously as soon as the transfer is needed. In a transfer based on point-on-wave switching, such a transfer would be performed (e.g., deferred) until a next available zero crossing of the current occurs. For a deferred transfer, there should be some margin provided in the setting for the decision to transfer in order to make it likely that the transfer can be successfully deferred until the next current zero.
In this example embodiment, second pulse switch 229 is coupled to respective pulse inductor 230 and pulse capacitor 234, which in operation constitute a tuned resonant circuit, and may be configured to apply a pulse to bridge diode 28 in connection with a turn-off event of MEMS-based switching circuitry. That is, to form a pulse at a time appropriately chosen to ensure that the current through the MEMS-based switching circuitry is equal to zero (or substantially close to zero) when the MEMS-based switching circuitry is to open. Essentially, the pulse signal is generated in connection with a turn-off of the micro-electromechanical system switching circuitry to a non-conductive state. This may be accomplished in combination with the alluded point-on-wave (POW) technique, thereby providing an incremental level of robustness to the switching system design. For example, it is envisioned that this pulse-assisted turn-on technique may allow a switching system embodying aspects of the present invention to be deployed in applications where the quality of the supply voltage may not be suitable for consistently reliable operation with POW switching alone. It is noted that a third pulse circuit (e.g., 206n of
In one example embodiment, inter-module controls can relay the primary input commands, e.g., providing galvanically isolated control signals for an array of voltage-scalable MEMS switching circuitry modules.
With a voltage grading network and over-current protection circuitry in parallel with MEMS-based switching circuitry, there may be some leakage current in an off state. Accordingly, for applications requiring zero leakage in a tripped state, an isolation contactor may be added. It will be appreciated that such isolation contactor need not be designed to interrupt a large level of load current and thus may just be designed to carry rated current and withstand the applicable dielectric voltages, greatly reducing its size.
It will now be apparent that circuitry embodying aspects of the present invention, as disclosed in the foregoing description, is able to realize in a reliable and cost effective manner each element and/or operational functionality that may be required from a circuit breaker: For example, the inverse time relationship useful for characterizing circuit breakers, e.g., —overcurrent curves defined by (I^2*t=K, wherein the allowable duration of an overload is such that the product of time (t) and the square of the current (I) is a constant K)—may be customarily divided into three segments based on current magnitude: For example, long-time (e.g., larger K), short-time (e.g., smaller K), and instantaneous. It is noted that both the long-time and short-time segments generally involve times much longer than a half cycle, hence are amenable to point-on-wave switching. It is also noted, however, that the instantaneous segment will generally require substantially fast sub-half-cycle switching, as may be provided by MEMS-based switching circuitry, since this could be the result of a short circuit that could reach a potential current of kilo-amperes in less than a millisecond with explosive results. Accordingly, in operation, circuitry embodying aspects of the present invention, innovatively meets each element and/or operational functionality, as may be required in a circuit breaker to meet its operational requirements over each of the foregoing operational segments, for example.
Appendixes 1 and 2 describe some experimental results and analytical underpinnings regarding practical considerations in connection with over current protection circuitry embodying aspects of the present invention.
While only certain features of the invention have been illustrated and described herein, many modifications and changes will occur to those skilled in the art. It is, therefore, to be understood that the appended claims are intended to cover all such modifications and changes as fall within the true spirit of the invention.
Over current protection circuitry embodying aspects of the present invention affords protection to the associated MEMS based switching circuitry during power switching operations, both during opening and closing. Without the use of the diode bridge, the MEMS based switching circuitry, such as an array of MEMS microswitches, could experience damage if the microswitches were closed into a voltage or opened under a load current.
Conceptually, the first microswitch to close during a closing event and the last microswitch to open during an opening event would have to carry the entire burden of the switching operation, something that no individual microswitch may be capable of sustaining. The diode bridge provides a low resistance parallel path to protect the microswitches during switching events. During closing, a first over current protection circuitry is configured to collapse the voltage across the array of switches before they close. During opening, a second over current protection circuitry shunts the current away from the array of switches while they open.
Under idealized conditions, the two branches of the diode bridge that shunt the switch array should behave as a perfect short, establishing a zero voltage drop between the two branches, regardless of how much current is being diverted. Ideally, the switches would switch cold, with no current flowing through them when they open. However, in a practical circuit, the diodes will have some voltage drop, and because the diodes may not necessarily be exactly matched, there may be some residual voltage across the switches when they open, thereby constituting a warm switching. If the voltage is large enough, there may be contact erosion and/or welding under hot switching conditions. In fact, the level of residual voltage across the branches of the diode bridge would essentially define the limits of operation.
Similarly, when the last switch in the array opens, there may be a relatively small amount of current flowing through it that is nearly instantaneously diverted into the second diode bridge, generating a corresponding small inductive voltage kick. This appendix 1 discusses effects of the residual bridge voltage and gives equations that can be used for analysis and design of the diode bridge and snubber circuit. Results are summarized in this appendix 1.
This analysis focuses on turn-off operation because it generally stresses the switches more than turn-on operation. During turn-off operation, an example sequence of events that may be of interest comprise the following:
As suggested above, the warm switching and the inductive voltage kick during the last step in the sequence of events could lead to contact sticking, welding, melting, and/or arcing. Even if there is not any gross contact damage, there could be subtle contact erosion that could eventually limit the useful life of the contacts.
It is also possible to damage the contacts during turn-on. It is noted that many of the steps applicable during turn-on are the same as that during turn-off, except that such steps may be in a reverse order. Therefore, much of the following analysis applies in either situation. Some notable differences may be as follows:
During turn-off operation, the last switch to divert current into the diode bridge may conduct extra current for a short period of time, on the order of a few hundred nanoseconds, and will be expected to perform warm switching of that current. The amount of current is approximately equal to a residual voltage produced by the diode bridge, divided by the resistance of the switch(es). During switching, an inductive kick may create a short duration, high voltage pulse at the switch, that rises faster than the rate at which the electrical breakdown voltage of the contact gap grows, which could cause arcing for a very short amount of time.
Ideally, while the diode bridge is conducting, we would like the voltage across the array of MEMS switches to be zero. That would create a cold switching condition for the MEMS switches. However, there will be a residual voltage that will result in a “warm switching” condition, and possibly even a “hot switching” condition. There are two effects that can lead to this voltage:
The theoretical underpinnings of these two effects are analyzed in the circuit analysis contained in the attached appendix 2. The results are summarized below. An example equivalent circuit during a final stage of the current transfer is shown in illustration E1. The voltage ΔV is the residual voltage across the branches of the diode bridge due to the nominal diode voltages as well as unbalance variations. ΔV establishes the current though the last switch based on voltage divided by the switch resistance, and also establishes a small voltage on the snubber capacitor. The pulse-forming inductor (LHALT) and snubber inductor (CSNUB) represent respective inductances involved in the transfer. The inductance of the pulse-forming inductor represents the inductance of the loop current required to complete the transfer of current from the switch to the over current protection circuitry, and may be on the order of several tens of nanohenries. The snubber inductance represents stray inductance of the connection of the snubber capacitor to the switch array. The connection should be as tight as feasible to reduce the value of this inductance. It should be possible to limit the stray inductance of the snubber connection to a few nanohenries. The snubber resistance is a resistor that may be connected in series with the snubber capacitor.
The last switch to open is modeled as a contact resistance in series with an idealized switch. It will be appreciated that depending on how fast a switch actually opens, it may be appropriate to model such a switch as a time-varying resistance that starts from the closed contact resistance, and climbs to infinity over a time interval that it takes for the contact pressure to go to zero, such as over a period on the order of magnitude of 0.01 to 10 nanoseconds.
Effects of Residual Bridge Voltage
The voltage across the last switch to open, ΔV, is equal to the sum of the voltages produced by two effects, and the current is equal to that voltage divided by the contact resistance of one set of contacts, according to equation (1).
It will be appreciated that the use of the absolute operator is to emphasize that we do not care about the sign of the voltages, and that we cannot count on the two effects producing voltages with opposite signs. We are concerned just with the magnitudes of the effects, and the magnitude of the totals.
An example model of the voltage-current characteristics of the type of semiconductor diodes that one may use in the diode bridge circuit, during forward conduction, is given by equation (2):
Starting from the model in equation (2), one may obtain a closed form expression for the voltage across the last switch to open in terms of the turn-off pulse current, the load current, and the diode model parameters, due to the first effect. See appendix 2 for details. An accurate approximation for the residual voltage due to the nominal diode voltage is given by equation (3), where the diode parameters are from equation (2):
It is noted that it is not the peak of the turn-off pulse current that goes into equation (3), rather it is the pulse current that is flowing at the instant that the last switch opens. Equation (3) can also be viewed as expressing the possible nominal residual voltage as a function of time in terms of the turn-off pulse current and load current, as functions of time.
It is instructive to look at a typical situation. First, let us use example diode parameters. As explained in appendix 2, the voltage current characteristics for one of the types of diodes used in our experimental testing, such as diode type PDU540, has model parameters at 25 degrees centigrade given by equation (4).
VD=0.027 volts
RD=0.024 ohms
ID=1.0E−10 amps Equation (4)
In one of our tests we attempted to divert a 10 amp load current with a 40 amp pulse current through a diode bridge built with four PDU540 diodes. Substituting those values and the diode parameters into equation (3), we find that the voltage across the last switch to open and the current to be hot switched, with a 1 ohm contact resistance, is given by:
Equation (3) is valid for a single array of parallel switches, a single diode bridge comprising four diodes, and a single turn-off pulse circuit. The equation can be readily extended to other configurations. For example, suppose that everything stays the same, except that at each of the 4 sides of the bridge, there are N diodes in parallel. In that case, the residual voltage is given by:
Equation (6) reveals, as one may expect, that placing diodes in parallel reduces the effect of the diode resistance. Perhaps less intuitive, but supported by analysis, is the result that the contribution to residual voltage due to the diode semiconductor junction is unchanged. Note that paralleling diodes will also reduce the current though each diode.
Placing diodes in series increases both terms of equation (3), and is not recommended. The voltage for an arrangement with N diodes in series at each side of the bridge is given by:
Another example configuration is a series-parallel switch array protected by a single diode bridge. Equation (3) is still valid for determining the nominal residual turn-off voltage, but equation (1) should be modified to determine the maximum amount of “hot switched” current. There will come a time during the opening of a series-parallel array of switches when the last switch in one of the parallel modules opens. This switch receives that highest “hot switching” stress, because when it opens, it diverts all of the remaining current though the series-parallel array out of the array and into the diode bridge. At that time there will be a few switches still closed in the other modules, so that the current through the worst-stressed switch will be equal to the residual voltage of the diode bridge, divided by the equivalent resistance of the series-parallel connection of the remaining switches that are still closed. In a worst case scenario, one module could open substantially sooner than all of the other series modules. In that case, the hot-switching current for the last switch will be equal to the residual voltage divided by the resistance of one switch. In the best case, all of the modules open at about the same time in such a way that there is exactly one switch still closed in each of the other series modules. In that case, the hot-switching current for the last switch to open is equal to the residual voltage divided by the resistance of several switches in series.
Another example configuration is to provide a separate turn-off circuit and bridge for each series module. In that case the series modules become decoupled, and equations (1) and (3) can still be applied directly.
Equations (1) and (3) suggest how over current protection circuitry configured for turn-off and MEMS switch arrays may be scaled for current and voltage. Generally, there will always be a last switch to open, no matter how many switches are in parallel. When the last switch opens, the amount of current it will hot switch is equal to the residual voltage, divided by the resistance of one contact. Therefore, to achieve scalability, once we develop a configuration that works at a certain level of load current, to achieve a higher level of load current we must produce the same nominal residual voltage as given by equation (3). This means that one should scale the turn-off pulse current by essentially the same factor as the load current, and we must reduce the diode resistance by the reciprocal of that factor. One way to do that with a given diode type is to use as many diodes in parallel as the scale factor. For example, to go from a first design applicable for switching 10 amps load, with a 40 amp turn-off pulse current, and a single diode of a certain type at each side of the bridge, to a second design applicable for switching a 100 amps load, may require a 400 amp turn-off pulse current and ten diodes in parallel. It is noted that the resistance parameter in equations (2) and (3) includes both the diode resistance as well as the resistance of the electrically conductive traces that carry the turn-off and load currents in the circuit board, so that in practice the thickness of the traces should also be scaled up by the same factor as the load current.
Equation (3) also suggests that one example way to scale for voltage is to provide a separate over current protection circuitry (configured for turn-off) including a respective diode bridge for each series module. That is, each module should be self-contained with respect to all parts and circuits. Higher voltage may then be achieved by stacking such self-contained modules. It is believed that placing diodes in series in a single diode bridge for an entire system would penalize scalability.
We now proceed to analyze the second effect. That is, residual voltage contribution due to variations in diode parameters. One of the assumptions used to derive equation (3) is that the diodes are identical. In fact, in a practical circuit they are not. For example, in the case of PD540 diodes, the voltage-current characteristic is a strong function of temperature. There are several example ways for the diodes to be at different temperatures. For example, they could be near a heat source, such as the switches themselves. They could experience uneven heating during operation of the turn-off circuit. Therefore, one should consider that the four diodes in the bridge may not be at the same temperature, and will cause additional residual voltage. In addition to the voltage given by equation (3), there may be an additional voltage contribution due to an unbalance internal to the diode bridge, given in terms of small shifts in diode parameters. The following equation, derived in the Exhibit, computes a worst case scenario regarding additional residual voltage due to variations in diode parameters. The voltage is expressed in terms of variations in parameters from nominal values:
For a numerical example, suppose that there is a variation in diode parameters of 5% from nominal values for the PDU540 diode for the example in the previous section. In that case, the extra residual voltage is computed as:
It is noted that one is not suggesting that one will encounter a 5% variation in diode parameters, we are just showing what the effect would be. Note that the largest sensitivity, percentage wise, is due to variations in the diode voltage parameter, which is a strong function of temperature. It is suggested that it will be useful to get an accurate estimate of what the actual parameter variations can be expected, with close scrutiny of temperature effects, and then use equation (8) to estimate the residual voltage. In this example, the total residual voltage is equal to 0.38 volts due to diode nominal voltage plus 0.156 volts due to diode unbalance voltage, for a total of 0.536 volts, which probably exceeds the capability of a single set of contacts.
Combining equations (3) and (8) produces an expression for the total residual voltage at the moment of final transfer of current into the diode bridge, where IH and IL are the values of the turn-off pulse current and the load current at the time of the transfer:
Equation (10) can be used to estimate the total residual voltage across the last switch that transfers current into the diode bridge. Equation (10) shows explicitly some example design tradeoffs. For example, one should note how the turn-off pulse current impacts the residual voltage. Although the first term in equation (10) continues to decrease as the turn-off pulse current is increased, the last term in the equation is proportional to the turn-off current. A plot of equation (10) versus turn-off current would reveal a broad maximum whose location depends on all of the other parameters, including the load current. Equation (10) can be used as a basis for designing a diode bridge that meets the requirements of a given application, MEMS switch characteristics, MEMS array configuration, and other turn-off parameters.
The circuit schematic in illustration A1 can be analyzed to determine the residual bridge voltage due to nominal diode voltages plus parameter variations.
Focus of the analysis is in determining ΔV, the residual bridge voltage resulting from the voltage-current characteristics of the diodes. The current IL is the load current being shunted away from the MEMS microswitch array. The current IH is the turn-off pulse current being used to maintain a forward bias on all of the diodes.
A three-parameter diode model that has a sound theoretical basis and which closely fits the forward biased voltage-current characteristics of the diodes is given by equation (A1).
The parameters for the model in equation (A1) can be estimated from published voltage-current curves, which are commonly plotted as the log of the current versus the voltage, at various temperatures. For small values of current and voltage, the first term of equation (A1) dominates so that VD can be estimated from the slope of the plot and ID can then be determined by fitting one of the points on the straight line. RD can then be estimated by the difference between the plotted voltage and the straight line approximation at higher currents. For the PDU540 diode, the following table provides the parameter values at various temperatures:
We will start the analysis by assuming that all 4 diodes in illustration A1 have identical models given by equation A1. Denote the forward voltages across each of the diodes as V1, V2, V3 and V4. Denote the forward currents through them as I1, I2, I3 and I4. We wish to determine ΔV, subject to the constraints of the electrical network given by equations (A2):
ΔVnominal=V1−V2=V4−V3
I1+I2=I3+I4=IH
I1−I3=I4−I2=IL Equation (A2)
The currents can be found by substituting equation (A1) into equations (A2) and solving the resulting system of nonlinear equations. The result is given by equations (A3) and (A4) which can be verified by direct substitution:
Substituting equations (A4) into the voltage equations in (A2) produces equation (A5):
In practice, ID is relatively small compared to IH and IL. For example, for the PDU540 diode, ID is never exceeds a fraction of a microamp over the entire rated temperature range of the diode, while IH and IL are 10s of amps. Therefore ID can be ignored in equation (A5), producing the approximation given by equation (A6).
Equation (A6) is based on the ideal assumption that all 4 diodes have identical current-voltage characteristics and is simply the starting point for a more complete analysis. It is likely that there will be small variations in the electrical model parameters of the diodes that will produce a slight unbalance in the diode bridge, producing additional residual bridge voltage, which can be analyzed as follows:
First, it is possible to simplify the analysis by using an approximate diode model given by equation (A7). The approximation is justified by the fact that the diode currents will be many orders of magnitude larger than ID.
The Taylor's expansion that expresses the change in diode voltage in terms of small shifts in model parameters, the model parameters, and the diode current is given by:
Equation (A8) is to be applied separately to each diode. It can be broken into two parts, one part that represents a voltage shift due to parameter shifts, and the other term represents a voltage shift due to a current shift:
Note that the parameter shifts can be either up or down, so the minus sign in front of the second term in equation (A9) is really irrelevant. What we are interested in is the magnitude of the voltage shift when the parameter shifts are in directions to create the worst situation:
The current shifts for the diodes are related because they should add to zero at each node of the network in FIG. A1. The total current in each diode can be expressed in terms of a current shift and the HALT and load currents according to equations (A11).
The voltage shifts at each diode are expressed by equations (A12).
The sum of the voltage shifts around the diode loop should be zero:
ΔV1+ΔV2+ΔV3ΔV4=0 Equation (A13)
Combining (A13) with (A12) produces:
Substituting equation (A3) into equation (A14) and solving leads to the following expression for the loop current shift:
As far as the residual voltage at the switches is concerned, we are interested in the difference in the variation between pairs of diodes as expressed in equation (A16).
Substituting equations (A15) and (A3) into equation (A16) produces a rather interesting, intuitive, and simple result:
There is an intuitive explanation for equation (A17). The terms in the numerator are the diode voltage shifts due to parameter shifts that would occur if the diode bridge were not a closed loop. Only half of each term appears as a residual voltage, because the four diodes in the loop form a voltage divider that divides each contribution virtually in half at the branches of the bridge. The incremental resistance of the series connection of diodes D1 and D2 is exactly the same as the incremental resistance of the series connection of diodes D3 and D4, from symmetry arguments. An increase in the forward drops of diodes D1 or D4 increases the residual voltage in the positive direction while an increase in the forward drops of diodes D2 or D3 increases the residual voltage in the negative direction.
Equations (A10) and (A17) can be used together to estimate the extra residual voltage due to any particular configuration of diode parameter shifts. Equation (A10) is applied to each diode to compute its contribution due the shift of its parameters away from the nominal value. Equation (A17) is then used to compute the overall effect at the switches.
Equations (A10) and (A17) can also be used to estimate the effect due to a worst case scenario. In the worst case the signs of the individual terms could be such that they all reinforce each other, leading to the following approximate expression for the worst case additional residual voltage due to diode variations:
The present application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/621,623 filed on Jan. 10, 2007, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,542,250, titled “Micro-Electromechanical System Based Motor Starter”, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3496409 | Connell | Feb 1970 | A |
| 3809959 | Pucher | May 1974 | A |
| 4420784 | Chen et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
| 4500934 | Kinsinger | Feb 1985 | A |
| 4658227 | Howell et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4698607 | Howell | Oct 1987 | A |
| 4700256 | Howell | Oct 1987 | A |
| 4705923 | Howell | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4717796 | Howell | Jan 1988 | A |
| 4717798 | Howell | Jan 1988 | A |
| 4723187 | Howell | Feb 1988 | A |
| 4725701 | Howell | Feb 1988 | A |
| 5164872 | Howell | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5341080 | Agut Sanz | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5374792 | Ghezzo et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5430597 | Bagepalli et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 6054659 | Lee et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6563683 | Strumpler | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6738246 | Stumpler | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6760202 | Meyer et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6884950 | Nicholson et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
| 7130204 | Tsuruya | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7612971 | Premerlani et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7633725 | Premerlani et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7643256 | Wright et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7876538 | Wright et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7885043 | Kumfer et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 8144445 | Caggiano et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8358488 | Premerlani et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8667325 | Schock | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8687325 | Premerlani et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 20030179527 | Chea, Jr. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030183838 | Huang et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20040150936 | Chea, Jr. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20050146404 | Yeatman | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050146814 | Sellier et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20060187688 | Tsuruya | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060202933 | Pasch et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20070139829 | Arthur et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070139830 | Premerlani et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070139831 | Wright et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20080137238 | Wright et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080164961 | Premerlani et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080165457 | Premerlani et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080309438 | Caggiano et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080310062 | Kumfer et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080315980 | Premerlani et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080316664 | Premerlani et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090107813 | O'Brien et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1930922 | Jun 2008 | EP |
| 1944779 | Jul 2008 | EP |
| 44006303 | Mar 1969 | JP |
| 49006437 | Jan 1974 | JP |
| 61259416 | Nov 1986 | JP |
| 63002214 | Jan 1988 | JP |
| 63131411 | Jun 1988 | JP |
| 5199091 | Aug 1993 | JP |
| 5336774 | Dec 1993 | JP |
| 2000031397 | Jan 2000 | JP |
| 2002539606 | Nov 2002 | JP |
| 2005160217 | Jun 2005 | JP |
| 2006086121 | Mar 2006 | JP |
| 2006173002 | Jun 2006 | JP |
| 2008211755 | Sep 2008 | JP |
| 2010530119 | Sep 2010 | JP |
| Entry |
|---|
| State Intellectual Property Office, P.R. China, English Translation of First Office Action issued on Dec. 2, 2010, 6 pages. |
| Search Report and Written Opinion from corresponding EP Application No. 08164432.0-2214 dated Nov. 20, 2012. |
| European Search Report and Written Opinion EP 08 100272, issued in connection with corresponding EP Application No. 08100272.7-2214 dated Nov. 24, 2009. |
| Unofficial English translation of Office Action issued in connection with corresponding CN Application No. 200810161963.4 on Apr. 13, 2012. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in connection with corresponding JP Application No. 2008-191824 dated Jul. 9, 2013. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20080164961 A1 | Jul 2008 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 11621623 | Jan 2007 | US |
| Child | 11866849 | US |
