Embodiments of the present disclosure relate generally to systems, methods and devices for molecule sensing, and more particularly to systems, methods and devices for detecting target molecules, and in some embodiments, single molecule detection. Moreover, other embodiments are directed to methods of manufacture of such systems and devices.
In a series of earlier disclosures: WO2009/17522A2, WO2010/042514A1, WO2009/117517, WO2008/124706A2, US2010/0084276A1, and US2012/0288948, each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, a system is shown where nucleic acid bases are read using the electron tunneling current signals generated as nucleobases pass through a tunnel gap functionalized with adaptor molecules. See also Huang et al.1 This method is referred to as “Recognition Tunneling”.2
U.S. non-provisional patent application Ser. No. 13/838,727, filed Mar. 15, 2013, is understood to disclose a readout device constructed from a planar sandwich of a Pd electrode, a layer of dielectric and a top Pd electrode, where a nano sized opening (or nanopore) is drilled by means of an electron beam. However, drilling through a sandwich of materials sometimes presents challenges. For example, sometimes such drilling may damaging the Pd electrodes, which could lead to electrical shorting.
Accordingly, it is an object of some of the embodiments of the present disclosure to provide a target molecule recognition tunneling device (e.g., single molecule detection) that, during manufacturing, damage caused by drilling a nano-sized opening (i.e., nanopore) through metal electrodes, is minimized (in some embodiments, such manufacturing eliminates the nano-sized opening altogether). It is another object of some of the embodiments of the present disclosure to provide a device that can be manufactured without one and/or another critical alignment steps for various components and processing, and therefore, easier and, in some embodiments, more economical to mass produce.
It is still another object of some of the embodiments of the present disclosure to cut, etch or otherwise create an opening to and/or through metal electrodes in a tunnel gap in a manner that minimize damage to the tunnel gap.
In some embodiments, a method for manufacturing a device for detecting one or more target molecules is provided and may comprise one or more (and in some embodiments several, and in some embodiments, all of the following steps: depositing a first bottom electrode onto a solid supporting layer wherein the first electrode including a first area, depositing a dielectric layer over the first electrode, depositing a second top electrode over the dielectric layer, wherein the second electrode includes a second area which is substantially less than the first area, and cutting, etching or otherwise creating at least one trench through at least the second electrode and the dielectric layer, such that the bottom of the trench exposes the first electrode and exposes a tunnel junction between the electrodes.
Some embodiments may comprise, and/or otherwise include (e.g., with respect to the above noted embodiments, or other embodiments disclosed herein) one and/or another of the following features and/or steps:
In some embodiments, a method for manufacturing a device for identifying one or more target molecules is provided which may comprise one or more of (and in some embodiments, several of, and in still some embodiments, all of): depositing a first bottom electrode onto a solid supporting layer, wherein the first electrode including a first area, depositing a dielectric layer over the first electrode, depositing a second top electrode over the dielectric layer, wherein the second electrode includes a second area which is substantially less than the first area, establishing at least one trench through at least the second electrode and the dielectric layer, such that the bottom of the trench exposes a tunnel junction between the first and second electrodes, substantially covering the device with a first passivating layer, and establishing an opening in the passivating layer adjacent the at least one trench.
Some embodiments may comprise, and/or otherwise include (e.g., with respect to the above noted embodiments, or other embodiments disclosed herein) one and/or another of the following features and/or steps:
In some embodiments, a device for detecting one or more target molecules is provided and may comprise a first bottom electrode having a first thickness, the first electrode deposited on onto a solid supporting layer, a dielectric layer substantially covering the first electrode, a second top electrode having a second thickness, the second electrode being separated from the first electrode by the dielectric layer, where the surface area of the second electrode is less than the surface area of the first electrode, at least one trench is cut, etched or otherwise created through at least the second electrode and dielectric layer such that at least the bottom of the opening exposes the first electrode. In some embodiments, the trench is configured to expose a tunnel junction between the electrodes to facilitate communication of one or more target molecules with the first and second electrodes.
Some embodiments may comprise, and/or otherwise include (e.g., with respect to the above noted embodiments, or other embodiments disclosed herein) one and/or another of the following features:
In some embodiments, a method for identifying one or more target molecules is provided, and may comprise one or more of (and in some embodiments, several of, and in some embodiments, all of) the following steps: providing a device according to any of the disclosed embodiments, functionalizing at least a portion of at least one of the electrodes with first molecules, the first molecules configured for forming non-covalent bonds with one or more target molecules, flowing a solution containing one or more target molecules past the electrodes, and detecting the one or more target molecules upon the one or more target molecules forming a non-covalent bond with the first molecules.
In some embodiments, a top electrode (30) may then be deposited over the dielectric layer. In some embodiments, this may also be about a 9 nm evaporated layer of Pd on top of about a 0.5 nm Ti adhesion layer. The second electrode may be made much smaller, relatively, than the lower, first electrode, for example, a wire of between about 10 and about 100 nm in width (in some embodiments, this may be a wire of about 40 to about 80 nm). In some embodiments, such dimensions allows minimization of background, direct tunneling through the dielectric, and may also minimize the probability of encountering a pinhole in the dielectric.
In some embodiments, in order to gain access to a tunnel junction between the electrodes for target molecules (e.g., analyte) in solution, a trench (40) may be cut through portions of the device (and in some embodiments, the entire device). Such a trench may be made with a focused ion beam, or FIB, (for example), though reactive ion etching may also be used. In some embodiments, the depth of the trench may be between about 30 to about 100 nm. An advantage of some of such embodiments is that the trench need only intersect the top wire and dielectric, exposing the bottom electrode at some point for a junction to be made/accessible. Thus, according to such embodiments, critical alignment may not be required.
In some embodiments, tunnel currents through the dielectric layer may be notably small when 80 micron wide wires are utilized (for example, several picoamps at 0.8V).
In some embodiments, the electrodes may be functionalized with 4(5)-(2-mercaptoethyl)-1H imideazole-2-carboxamide. This may be accomplished, according to some embodiments, by soaking the devices in a 0.5 mM solution of the molecule in ethanol for 24 h (for example). After treatment, tests on devices with a 1 mM phosphate buffer solution (pH=7.0) yield the current vs. time graph illustrated in
In some embodiments, when a 1 mM solution of deoxyguanosine monophosphate (in 1 mM phosphate buffer) is placed in the well, the background current increases in a substantial manner (to 2.6 nA). Superimposed on this current may be three-level switching behavior (to 3.4 and 3.9 nA) characteristic of signals from just one or two molecules as illustrated in
In order to make sequential reads of the composition of a polymer, such as (for example) the base sequence of DNA or an amino acid sequence of a protein (or the sugar sequence of a polysaccharide), the molecule may be passed through a nano sized opening (nanopore) adjacent to the electrodes. An exemplary configuration for accomplishing this is shown in
In some embodiments, the cutting of an electrode gap using a Ga beam FIB may include a disadvantage in that considerable energy is transferred into the tunnel junction by the heavy Ga ions, which may cause damage to one and/or another of the metal electrodes. Furthermore, implantation of Ga ions in the region of the junction, in some instances, may lead to unpredictable electrical characteristics for the device. For these reasons, devices based on cuts with a Ga FIB may provide low yields. To that end, in some embodiments, the dielectric layer (e.g., Al2O3) may be made thicker than required such that damaged devices in which the electrodes are brought closer together can operate. In some instances, a consequence of this may be that the signals (see
In some embodiments, the Ni (or Ta) layer may be covered with PMMA (202) and optical lithography may be used to expose an opening or window in the PMMA (203), as shown in panel 1 of
In some embodiments, the assembly may then be placed in a reactive ion etcher (RIE). For example, it may be first exposed to chlorine ions which etch the top palladium electrode (see (206) of Panel 4 of
Using this technique, cuts may be made reliably into devices with, for example, a 2 nm (or thereabout) Al2O3 layer, which corresponds to significant improvement on etching using the Ga FIB where the starting thickness of the dielectric may be required to be thicker than 2 nm (e.g., between about 3 to about 5 nm).
In some embodiments, a possible disadvantage of RIE may be that the size of the cut through the junction may be limited by the lithography used to cut the Ni or Ta mask. An alternative to Ga ion FIB is to use He ion FIB. The He ion FIB generally does not cause the electronic modifications produced by Ga ions (when they implant into the sample). He ions also deposit less energy into the target (because of their smaller mass) and are thus less destructive.
In some embodiments, low-energy (e.g., 60 eV) argon ions may be used. The speed of etching using the low-energy argon ions is such that a hard mask is not needed. To protect the tunnel junctions from the ions, a PMMA resist of about 600 to about 800 nm thickness may be used. For example, a Kauffman gridded ion source was operated at a beam current of 15 to 20 mA with an accelerating voltage of 60V. Molecule detection devices according to some embodiments which were exposed to the beam for times that varied between about 5 and 15 minutes produced chemical tunnel signals corresponding to those shown in
Any and all references to publications or other documents, including but not limited to, patents, patent applications, articles, webpages, books, etc., presented in the present application, are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Example embodiments of devices, systems, and methods have been described herein. As noted elsewhere, these embodiments have been described for illustrative purposes only and are not limiting. Other embodiments are possible and are covered by the disclosure, which will be apparent from the teachings contained herein. Thus, the breadth and scope of the disclosure should not be limited by any of the above-described embodiments but should be defined only in accordance with claims supported by the present disclosure and their equivalents. Moreover, embodiments of the subject disclosure may include methods, systems and devices, which may further include any and all elements from any other disclosed methods, systems, and devices. In other words, elements from one and/or another disclosed embodiments may be interchangeable with elements from other disclosed embodiments. In addition, one or more features/elements of disclosed embodiments may be removed and still result in patentable subject matter (and thus, resulting in yet more embodiments of the subject disclosure).
The present application claims benefit under 35 USC §119(e) of U.S. provisional patent application No. 61/711,981, filed Oct. 10, 2012, the entire disclosure of which is herein incorporated by references.
This invention was made with government support under HG006323 awarded by the National Institute of Health. The government has certain rights in the disclosed embodiments.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3619206 | Irons et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
4804707 | Okamoto et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
5066716 | Robey et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5879436 | Kramer et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6215798 | Carneheim et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6537755 | Drmanac | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6627067 | Branton et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6821730 | Hannah | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6824974 | Pisharody et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6905586 | Lee et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7001792 | Sauer et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7033476 | Lee et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7282130 | Flory | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7638034 | Sansinena et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7700306 | Thompson et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
8003319 | Polonsky et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8278055 | Su et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8628649 | Lindsay et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
20020033345 | Meade | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020117659 | Lieber et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030089605 | Timperman | May 2003 | A1 |
20030099951 | Akeson et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030148289 | Sundararajan et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030203394 | Eichen et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030215376 | Chopra | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040128081 | Rabitz et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040144658 | Flory | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040262636 | Yang et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050032053 | Sampson | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050095599 | Pittaro et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050136408 | Tom-Moy et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050202444 | Zhu | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050217990 | Sibbett et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060073489 | Li et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060194228 | Rakitin et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060211016 | Kayyem et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060263255 | Han et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070009379 | Bau et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070138132 | Barth | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070154890 | Isobe | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070292855 | Dubin et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080050752 | Sun et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080121534 | White et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080171316 | Golovchenko et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090198117 | Cooper et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090298072 | Ju et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090308741 | Frey et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090309614 | Goodman et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090326238 | Burn et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100084276 | Lindsay | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100145626 | Ecker et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100292101 | So | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100294659 | Green | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100310421 | Oliver et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110065164 | Santoyo Gonzalez et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110070735 | Shi | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110120868 | Lindsay et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110124118 | Park et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110168562 | Nuckolls et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110285409 | Maleki et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120052258 | Op De Beeck et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120097539 | Qian et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120288935 | Mirkin et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120288948 | Lindsay et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120329741 | Oyelere et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120330001 | Darzins et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130186757 | Reinhart et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130302901 | Lindsay et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130316912 | Bjornson et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140005509 | Bhavaraju et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 9957550 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO 2007084163 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO 2008071982 | Jun 2008 | WO |
WO-2008124706 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO-2009117517 | Sep 2009 | WO |
WO-2009117522 | Sep 2009 | WO |
WO-2010042514 | Apr 2010 | WO |
WO 2011097171 | Aug 2011 | WO |
WO 2013116509 | Aug 2013 | WO |
WO 2013123379 | Aug 2013 | WO |
WO 2013148344 | Oct 2013 | WO |
WO 2013180819 | Dec 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Aksimentiev, A et al. “Microscopic Kinetics of DNA Translocation through Synthetic Nanopores.” Biophys. J. (2004), 87.3: 2086-2097. |
Ashkenasy et al. “Recognizing a Single Base in an Individual DNA Strand: A Step Toward DNA Sequencing in Nanopores.” Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. (2005), 44.9: 1401-1404. |
Astier et al. “Toward Single Molecule DNA Sequencing: Direct Identification of Ribonucleoside and Deoxyribonucleoside 5′-Monophosphates by Using an Engineered Protein Nanopore Equipped with a Molecular Adapter.” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128 (2006): 1705-1710. |
Bacri, L. et al. “Discrimination of neutral ollgosaccharides through a nanopore.” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications (2011), 412(4): 561-564. |
Boersma et al. “Real-Time Stochastic Detection of Multiple Neurotransmitters with a Protein Nanopore.” ACSnano (2012), 6(6): 5304-5308. |
Boersma et al. “Continuous Stochastic Detection of Amino Acid Enantiomers with a Protein Nanopore.” Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. (2012), 51: 9606-9609. |
Branton et al. “The Potential and Challenges of Nanopore Sequencing.” Nat. Biotechnol. (2008), 26.10: 1146-1153. |
Bustamante, C. et al. Grabbing the cat by the tail: Manipulating molecules one by one., Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology (2000), 1: 130-136. |
Chang, H. et al. “Fabrication and characterization of solid state nanopores using field emission scanning electron beam.” App. Phys. Lett. (2006), 88: 103109-103109-3. |
Chang, S. et al. “Chemical Recognition and Binding Kinetics in a Functionalized Tunnel Junction.” Nanotechnology (2012), 23(23): 235101. |
Chang, S. et al. “Gap Distance and Interactions in a Molecular Tunnel Junction.” Journal of the American Chemical Society (2011), 133: 14267-14269. dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja2067737. |
Chen et al. “Probing single DAN molecule transport using fabricated nanopores.” Nano Lett. (2004), 4: 2293-2298. |
Chen, P. et al. “Atomic layer deposition to fine-tune the surface properties and diameters of fabricated nanopores.” Nano Lett. (2004), 4: 1333. |
Chen et al. “Subfemtomole level protein sequencing by Edman degradation carried out in a microfluidic chip.” Chem. Commun. (2007), 24: 2488-2490. |
Clarke et al. “Continuous base identification for single-molecule nanopore DNA sequencing.” Nature Nanotechnology (2009), 4: 265-270. |
Deamer, D.W., et al. “Characterization of nucleic acids by nanopore analysis.” Acc. Chem. Res. (2002), 35: 817-825. |
Examination Report, dated Nov. 13, 2014, for EP Application No. 11740234.7. |
Examination Report, dated Jul. 8, 2014, for EP Application No. 11740234.7. |
Fologea, D., et al. “Detecting single stranded DNA with a solid state nanopore.” Nano Lett. (2005), 5(10): 1905-1909. |
Fologea, D., et al. “Slowing DNA translocation in a solid-state nanopore”, Nano Lett. (2005) 5(9): 1734-1737. |
Gao et al. “A Simple Method of Creating a Nanopore-Terminated Probe for Single-Molecule Enantiomer Discrimination.” Anal. Chem.(2009), 81: 80-86. |
Gracheva, M.E. et al. “Simulation of the electric response of DNA translocation through a semiconductor nanopore capacitor.” Nanotechnology (2006), 17: 622-633. |
He et al. “Functionalized Nanopore-Embedded Electrodes for Rapid DNA Sequencing.” The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters (2008), 112: 3456-3459 (published on Web Feb. 14, 2008). |
He, J. et al. “Identification of DNA Basepairing via Tunnel-Current Decay.” Nano Letters (2007), 7(12): 3854-3858. |
He, J. et al., “A hydrogen-bonded electron-tunneling circuit reads the base composition of unmodified DNA.” Nanotechnology (2009), 20(7): 075102. doi:10.1088/0957-4484/20/7/075102. |
Heng, J.B. et al. “The detection of DNA using a silicon nanopore. in Electron Devices Meeting, 2003.” IEDM '03 Technical Digest. 2003: IEEE International. |
Heng, J.B. et al. “Sizing DNA using a nanometer-diameter pore.” Biophys J. (2005), 87: 2905-2911. |
Heng, J.B. et al., “The electromechanics of DNA in a ysnthetic nanopore.” Biophysical Journal (2006), 90(3): 1098-1106. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, mailed Oct. 1, 2008 for International Application No. PCT/US2008/059602. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, issued Oct. 6, 2009 for International Application No. PCT/US2008/059602. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, mailed Jan. 25, 2010 for International Application No. PCT/US2009/037570. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, mailed Sep. 30, 2010 for International Application No. PCT/US2009/037570. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, mailed Nov. 2, 2009, for International Application No. PCT/US2009/037563. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, mailed Sep. 30, 2010 for International Application No. PCT/US2009/037563. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, mailed Dec. 17, 2009 for International Application No. PCT/US2009/059693. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, mailed Apr. 21, 2011 for International Application No. PCT/US2009/059693. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, mailed Apr. 8, 2011 for International Application No. PCT/US2011/023185. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, mailed Aug. 16, 2012, for International Application No. PCT/US2011/023185. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, mailed Jun. 12, 2013, for PCT/US2013/032240. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, mailed Oct. 16, 2014, for PCT/US2013/032240. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, mailed May 31, 2013, for PCT/US2013/032113. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, mailed Dec. 11, 2014, for PCT/US2013/032113. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, mailed Apr. 15, 2013 for PCT/US2013/024130, filed Jan. 31, 3013. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, mailed Aug. 14, 2014, for PCT/US2013/024130, filed Jan. 31, 3013. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, mailed May 30, 2013, for International Application No. PCT/US2013/032346. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, mailed Oct. 9, 2014, for International Application No. PCT/US2013/032346. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, mailed Mar. 11, 2014, for PCT/US2013/064337. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, mailed Apr. 23, 2015, for PCT/US2013/064337. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, mailed Aug. 22, 2014, for PCT/US2014/024630. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, mailed Aug. 1, 2014, for PCT/US2014/020789. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, mailed Dec. 9, 2014, for International Application No. PCT/US2014/039407. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, mailed Oct. 15, 2014, for International Application No. PCT/US2014/040323. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, mailed Mar. 10, 2015, for International Application No. PCT/US2014/062589. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, mailed May 29, 2015, for International Application No. PCT/US2015/017519. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, mailed May 20, 2015, for International Application No. PCT/US2015/018062. |
Kasianowicz et al. “Simultaneous multianalyte detection with a nanometer-scale pore.” Anal. Chem. (2001), 73: 2268-2272. |
Kim, M.J. et al. “Rapid Fabrication of Uniformly Sized Nanopores and Nanopore Arrays for Parallel DNA Analysis.” Advanced Materials (2006), 18: 3149-3153. |
Lee and Sankey et al. “Insights into electron tunneling across hydrogen-bonded base pairs in complete molecular circuits for single-stranded DNA sequencing.” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter (2009), 21(3): 35110. |
Lee and Sankey. “Theory of Tunneling Across Hydrogen-Bonded Base Pairs for DNA Recognition and Sequencing.” Phys. Rev. E. (2009), 79.5: 051911. |
Liang et al. “Synthesis, Physicochemical Properties, and Hydrogen Bonding of 4(5)-Substituted-1H-imidazole-2-carboxamide, A Potential Universal Reader for DNA Sequencing by Recognition Tunneling.” Chemistry—A European Journal (2012), 18(19): 5998-6007. |
Lindsay, S.M. Single Molecule Electronics and Tunneling in Molecules, Jap. J. Appl. Phys. (2002), 41: 4867-4870. |
Lindsay, S.M. “Single Molecule Electronics.” Interface (2004), 3: 26-30. |
Lindsay, S.M. “Molecular wires and devices: Advances and issues.” Faraday Discussions (2006), 131: 403-409. |
Lindsay and Ratner, “Molecular Transport Junctions: Clearing Mists.” Advanced Materials (2007), 19: 23-31. |
Liu, H. et al. “Translocation of Single-Stranded DNA Through Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes.” Science (2010), 327: 64-67. |
Meller et al. “Rapid Nanopore Discrimination Between Single Polynucleotide Molecules.” PNAS (2000), 97.3: 1079-1084. |
Meller et al. “Voltage-Driven DNA Translocations Through a Nanopore.” Phys. Rev. Lett. (2001), 86.15: 3435-3438. |
Meller et al. “Single molecule measurements of DNA transport through a nanopore.” Electrophoresis (2002), 23: 2583-2591. |
Mirkin, C.A. et al., Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. (1992), 43: 7389-7396. |
Nakane et al. “A nanosensor for transmembrane capture and Identification of single nucleic acid molecules.” Biophys J. (2004), 87: 615-621. |
Notice of Reasons for Rejection, mailed Jan. 19, 2015, for JP Application No. 2012-551372. |
Office Action, issued Dec. 19, 2014 for CN Application No. 201180004174.X. |
Office Action and Search Report, issued Feb. 24, 2014 for CN Application No. 201180004174.X. |
Peng et al. “Nanopore-based DNA sequencing and DNA motion control.” Nanopores: Sensing and Fundamental Biological Interactions (2011), 11: 255-286. |
Storm, A. et al. “Fabrication of solid-state nanopores with single-nanometre precision.” Nature Mat. (2003), 2: 537-540. |
Storm, A. et al. “Translocation of double-strand DNA through a silicon oxide nanopore.” Phys. Rev. E (2005), 71: 051903. |
Storm, A. et al. “Fast DNA translocation through a solid-state nanopore.” Nano Lett. (2005) 5: 1193. |
Strobel, S.A. et al. “The 2,6-Diaminopurine Riboside5- Methylisocytidine Wobble Base Pair: An Isoenergetic Substitution for the Study of GU Pairs in RNA.” Biochemistry (1994), 33(46): 13824-13835. |
Extended European Search Report and Search Opinion, dated Nov. 25, 2013, for EP Application No. 11740234.7. |
Venkatesan et al. “Nanopore sensors for nucleic acid analysis.” Nature Nanoteehnology (2011), 6: 615-624. |
Zwolak et al. “Colloquium: Physical Approaches to DNA Sequencing and Detection.” Rev. Mod. Physics. (2008), 80.1: 141-165. |
Huang, S., J. He, S. Chang, P. Zhang, F. Liang, S. Li, M. Tuchband, A. Fuhrman, R. Ros, and S.M. Lindsay, Identifying Single Bases in an DNA Oligomer With Electron Tunneling. Nature Nanotechnology, 2010. 5: p. 868-73. |
Lindsay, S., J. He, O. Sankey, P. Hapala, P. Jelinek, P. Zhang, S. Chang, and S. Huang, Recognition Tunneling. Nanotechnology, 2010. 21: p. 262001-262013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140113386 A1 | Apr 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61711981 | Oct 2012 | US |