Patent Grant
8204174
The subject matter disclosed herein relates to X-ray imaging. More particularly, the subject matter disclosed herein relates to systems and methods for detecting an image of an object by use of X-ray beams generated by a plurality of small area sources, and by use of facing sides of adjacent monochromator crystals.
X-ray imaging has been used in a variety of fields for imaging objects. For example, X-ray imaging has been used extensively in the medical field for non-destructive testing and X-ray computed tomography (CT). Various other types of technology are also being used for medical imaging. For example, diffraction enhanced imaging (DEI) is an X-ray imaging technique that dramatically extends the capability of conventional X-ray imaging.
The DEI technique is an X-ray imaging modality capable of generating contrast from X-ray absorption, X-ray refraction, and ultra-small angle scatter rejection (extinction). In contrast, conventional X-ray imaging techniques measure only X-ray attenuation. The DEI absorption image and peak image show similar information to a conventional radiograph, except that it is virtually free of scatter degradation. DEI utilizes perfect crystal diffraction from to convert small angular changes in a transmitted x-ray beam into large intensity changes in an image. Thus, DEI is well suited to soft-tissue imaging, and very promising for mammography.
The use of a silicon analyzer crystal in the path of the X-ray beam generates two additional forms of image contrast, X-ray refraction, and extinction (ultra small angle scatter rejection). DEI utilizes highly collimated X-rays prepared by X-ray diffraction from perfect single-crystal silicon. These collimated X-rays are of single X-ray energy, practically monochromatic, and are used as the beam to image an object.
Objects that have very little absorption contrast may have considerable refraction and extinction contrast, thus improving visualization and extending the utility of X-ray imaging. Applications of DEI techniques to biology and materials science have generated significant gains in both contrast and resolution, indicating the potential for use in mainstream medical imaging. An area of medicine where DEI may be particularly effective is in breast imaging for cancer diagnosis, where the diagnostic structures of interest often have low absorption contrast, making them difficult to see. Structures with low absorption contrast, such as the spiculations extending from a malignant mass, have high refraction and ultra-small angle scatter contrast. It is desirable to provide a DEI system with the capability to increase both the sensitivity and specificity of X-ray-based breast imaging.
Multiple studies have demonstrated improved image contrast in both medical and industrial applications of DEI. Advantages of DEI systems over conventional X-ray imaging systems in the medical field include a dramatic reduction in patient radiation dose and improved image quality. The dose reduction is due to the ability of DEI systems to function at higher X-ray energies. X-ray absorption is governed by the photoelectric effect, Z2/E3, where Z is the atomic number and E is the photon energy.
A monoenergetic radiograph contains several components that can affect image contrast and resolution: a coherently scattered component Ic, an incoherently scattered component Ii, and a transmitted component. X-rays passing through an object or medium where there are variations in density can be refracted, resulting in an angular deviation. Specifically, deviations in the X-ray range result from variations in ρt along the path of the beam, where ρ is the density and t is the thickness. A fraction of the incident photons may also be diffracted by structures within an object, which are generally on the order of milliradians and referred to as small angle scattering. The sum total of these interactions contributed to the recorded intensity in a radiograph IN, which can be represented by the following equation:
IN=IR+ID+IC+II
System spatial resolution and contrast will be degraded by the contributions of both coherent and incoherent scatter. Anti-scatter grids are often used in medical imaging to reduce the contribution of scatter, but their performance is limited and use of a grid often requires a higher dose to compensate for the loss in intensity.
The DEI technique utilizes a silicon analyzer crystal in the path of the post-object X-ray beam to virtually eliminate the effects of both coherent and incoherent scatter. The narrow angular acceptance window of the silicon analyzer crystal is referred to as its rocking curve, and is on the order of microradians for the X-ray energies used in DEI. The analyzer acts as an exquisitely sensitive angular filter, which can be used to measure both refraction and extinction contrast. Extinction contrast is defined as the loss of intensity from the incident beam due to scattering, which can produce substantial improvements in both contrast and resolution.
The Darwin Width (DW) is used to describe reflectivity curves, and is approximately the Full Width at Half Maximum (FWHM) of the reflectivity curve. Points at −½ DW and +½ DW are points on the curve with a steep slope, producing the greatest change in photon intensity per microradian for a particular analyzer reflection and beam energy. Contrast at the peak of the analyzer crystal rocking curve is dominated by X-ray absorption and extinction, resulting in near scatter-free radiographs. Refraction contrast is highest where the slope of the rocking curve is greatest, at the −½ and +½ DW positions. One DEI based image processing technique uses these points to extract the contrast components of refraction and apparent absorption from these image pairs.
The following paragraph describes of this technique for extracting the contrast components of refraction and apparent absorption from an image pair. When the analyzer crystal is set to an angle representing +/−½ DW for a given reflection and beam energy, the slope of the rocking curve is relatively consistent and can be represented as a two-term Taylor series approximation as represented by the following equation:
If the analyzer crystal is set to the low-angle side of the rocking curve (−½ DW), the resulting image intensity can be represented by the following equation:
The recorded intensity for images acquired with the analyzer crystal set to the high-angle position (+½ DW) can be represented by the following equation:
These equations can be solved for the changes in intensity due to apparent absorption (IR) and the refraction in angle observed in the z direction (ΔθZ) represented by the following equation:
These equations can be applied to the high and low angle images on a pixel-by-pixel basis to separate the two contrast elements into what is known as a DEI apparent absorption and refraction image. However, it is important to note that each of the single point rocking curve images used to generate DEI apparent absorption and refraction images is useful.
Development of a clinical DEI imager may have significance for women's health and medical imaging in general for the following reasons: (1) DEI has been shown to produce very high contrast for the features that are most important to detection and characterization of breast cancer; (2) the physics of DEI allows for imaging at higher x-ray energies than used with absorption alone; and (3) the ability of DEI to generate contrast without the need of photons to be absorbed dramatically reduces ionization, and thus reduces the absorbed dose.
Further, screen-film mammography has been studied extensively for the last 40 years, and because of many large randomized screening trials, it is known to reduce breast cancer mortality by approximately 18-30%. The rate of breast cancer death in the last few years has begun to decline, likely due in part to the widespread use of this imaging test. However, standard screen-film mammography is neither perfectly sensitive nor highly specific. Dense breast tissue and diffuse involvement of the breast with tumor tends to reduce the sensitivity of screening mammography. For women with dense breasts, lesions that develop are difficult to see because their ability to absorb photons is not much greater than the surrounding adipose tissue, generating little contrast for visualization. Approximately 10-20% of breast cancers that are detected by self-examination or physical examination are not visible by screen-film mammography. In addition, when lesions are detected by mammography and biopsy, only 5-40% of lesions prove to be malignant. Furthermore, approximately 30% of breast cancers are visible in retrospect on prior mammograms.
Current DEI and DEI imaging processing techniques are based heavily on conventional imaging theory and rely, at least in part, on X-ray absorption for image generation. Thus, objects imaged using these techniques absorb radiation. Such radiation exposure is undesirable in applications for medical imaging given concerns of dose, and this reasoning places considerable engineering limitations that make clinical and industrial translation challenging. Thus, it is desirable to provide DEI and DEI techniques that produce high quality images and that rely less on absorption but produce images with equivalent diagnostic quality and feature visualization. In addition, it is desirable to reduce DEI imaging time, which can be affected by the significant reduction of beam flux in DEI monochromators.
Systems and methods for detecting an image of an object by use of X-ray beams generated by multiple small area sources are disclosed herein. According to an aspect of the disclosed subject matter, a system can include small area sources having dimensions between 0.2 and 2 mm in the vertical, horizontal directions, and/or any other direction. In an example embodiment, a method may include providing a plurality of small area sources. A plurality of first X-ray beams may be generated by using the small area sources. A plurality of monochromator crystals may be positioned to intercept the plurality of first X-ray beams such that a plurality of second X-ray beams each having predetermined energy levels is produced. Further, an object to be imaged may be positioned in paths of the second x-ray beams for transmission of the second X-ray beams through the object and emitting from the object a plurality of transmission X-ray beams. The X-ray beams may be directed at angles of incidence upon a plurality of analyzer crystals. Further, an image of the object may be detected based upon beams diffracted from the analyzer crystals.
According to another aspect of the disclosed subject matter, a system can comprise an X-ray generation device configured to generate a plurality of first X-ray beams. The system can include monochromator crystals including first and second sides. The first sides of the monochromator crystals are positioned in predetermined positions to directly intercept the plurality of first X-ray beams for generating a plurality of second X-ray beams. The second sides of the monochromator crystals are positioned to intercept the plurality of second X-ray beams such that a plurality of third X-ray beams is produced for transmission through an object. A plurality of analyzer crystals are positioned to intercept transmitted X-ray beams at angles of incidence of the analyzer crystals. An image detector is configured to detect an image of the object from beams diffracted from the analyzer crystals.
Further, systems and methods for detecting an image of an object by use of X-ray beams generated by utilizing facing sides of adjacent monochromator crystals are also disclosed. According to an aspect, a system using facing sides of adjacent monochromator crystals can include an X-ray generation device configured to generate a plurality of first X-ray beams. The system can include monochromator crystals including first and second sides. The first sides of the monochromator crystals are positioned in predetermined positions to directly intercept the plurality of first X-ray beams for generating a plurality of second X-ray beams. The second sides of the monochromator crystals are positioned to intercept the plurality of second X-ray beams such that a plurality of third X-ray beams is produced for transmission through an object. A plurality of analyzer crystals are positioned to intercept transmitted X-ray beams at angles of incidence of the analyzer crystals. An image detector is configured to detect an image of the object from beams diffracted from the analyzer crystals.
This Summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description. This Summary is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used to limit the scope of the claimed subject matter. Furthermore, the claimed subject matter is not limited to implementations that solve any or all disadvantages noted in any part of this disclosure.
The foregoing summary, as well as the following detailed description of preferred embodiments, is better understood when read in conjunction with the appended drawings. For the purposes of illustration, there is shown in the drawings exemplary embodiments; however, the disclosed subject matter is not limited to the specific methods and instrumentalities disclosed. In the drawings:
The presently disclosed subject matter is described with specificity to meet statutory requirements. However, the description itself is not intended to limit the scope of this patent. Rather, the inventors have contemplated that the claimed subject matter might also be embodied in other ways, to include different steps or elements similar to the ones described in this document, in conjunction with other present or future technologies. Moreover, although the term “step” may be used herein to connote different aspects of methods employed, the term should not be interpreted as implying any particular order among or between various steps herein disclosed unless and except when the order of individual steps is explicitly described.
The subject matter described herein discloses improved DEI and DEI systems and related methods for detecting an image of an object. In particular, the subject matter described herein includes systems and methods for detecting an image of an object using X-rays generated by multiple small area sources. According to one aspect, the subject matter described herein can include a method for detecting an image of an object by providing a plurality of small area sources. A plurality of first X-ray beams can be generated by using the small area sources. A plurality of monochromator crystals can be positioned to intercept the plurality of first X-ray beams such that a plurality of second X-ray beams each having predetermined energy levels is produced. Further, an object to be imaged can be positioned in paths of the second x-ray beams for transmission of the second X-ray beams through the object and emitting from the object a plurality of transmission X-ray beams. The X-ray beams may be directed at angles of incidence upon a plurality of analyzer crystals. Further, an image of the object can be detected based upon beams diffracted from the analyzer crystals. These systems and methods can be advantageous, for example, because they can provide extremely low dose in medical applications, fast scan times, high resolution, and relatively low operation and build costs. Further, for example, these systems can be constructed into a compact unit and be readily usable in clinical and industrial applications. Additional description about these systems and related methods are described in further detail herein.
According to another aspect, the subject matter described herein can include a system comprising an X-ray generation device configured to generate a plurality of first X-ray beams. The system can include monochromator crystals including first and second sides. The first sides of the monochromator crystals are positioned in predetermined positions to directly intercept the plurality of first X-ray beams for generating a plurality of second X-ray beams. The second sides of the monochromator crystals are positioned to intercept the plurality of second X-ray beams such that a plurality of third X-ray beams is produced for transmission through an object. A plurality of analyzer crystals are positioned to intercept transmitted X-ray beams at angles of incidence of the analyzer crystals. An image detector is configured to detect an image of the object from beams diffracted from the analyzer crystals. An image of the object may be detected based upon beams diffracted from the analyzer crystals. These systems and methods can be advantageous, for example, because they can provide extremely low dose in medical applications, fast scan times, high resolution, and relatively low operation and build costs. Further, for example, these systems can be constructed into a compact unit and be readily usable in clinical and industrial applications. Additional description about these systems and related methods are described in further detail herein.
An image processing technique using DEI in accordance with the subject matter described herein can use images acquired at symmetric points of the rocking curve to generate apparent absorption and refraction images of an object. A DEI apparent absorption image is similar to a conventional radiograph image, but exhibits much greater contrast owing to scatter rejection. DEI refraction images can depict the magnitude of small beam deflections caused by large-scale refractive-index features (features of a size at or greater than the system resolution). A DEI extinction image is generated at points on the rocking curve where the primary mechanism of contrast is due to photons that have been scattered by an object on the order of microradians. Another DEI based imaging processing technique is referred to as Multiple Image Radiography (MIR) which uses multiple points on the rocking curve to generate quantitative images representing an object's X-ray absorption, refraction, and ultra-small angle scatter. Systems and methods can generate images at any point on the analyzer rocking curve, and can thus be used to generate: (1) single image DEI at any analyzer position; (2) DEI apparent absorption and refraction images; and (3) mass density images. The ability to generate the raw image data required for these processes and any other DEI based processing technique are useful for all DEI based processing techniques. In addition, systems and methods described herein are amenable for use in computed tomography, and can provide the raw data for use in any DEI-based computed tomography algorithm.
As understood, a small area source may refer to any source capable of generating X-ray beams from a small area in space. For example, an X-ray tube may include multiple small area sources for emitting X-ray beams from multiple points. The small area sources may be within the same X-ray tube source. Alternatively or in addition to being a part of a system as disclosed herein, multiple X-ray tube sources may each provide one or more small area sources and be used together for generating multiple X-ray beams.
The subject matter disclosed herein provides an additional advantage of providing spacing between individual DEI crystal optics arrays and improved heat dissipation with the source anode due the power load being delivered to several, separated points, both advancements over a single-source, multiple-beam design. This applies to one beam per small area source (wherein the number of beams equals the number of small area sources) as well as multiple beams per source point (if each source generates n beams, then the beams will number n times the number of small area sources).
The subject matter disclosed herein is advantageous over previous DEI systems and methods, because it allows for greater mechanical separation between the individual optical elements, thereby solving the problem of potential mechanical interference between monochromator crystals. By using multiple small area sources as described herein, rather than having a single, very high power source location, the power load can be divided amongst several source locations, thus the heat load to the anode may be distributed over a larger area, which can allow for longer operating times for the tube sources. By spacing out the small area sources, the monochromator crystal sizes, as well as the size of the electromechanical control systems, can be larger as compared to previous systems. In addition, the subject matter disclosed herein can allow for greater distribution of the heating load to the anode for decreasing time between imaging sessions.
Approaches to DEI or analyzer-based imaging as described herein can use large X-ray beams at a sample or object location to image the object without the need to scan the X-ray beam. These large area X-ray beams can be generated through the use of asymmetric crystals, an X-ray line source, or a combination of the two. As with the techniques and systems presented herein, the other techniques may require a high-power X-ray tube source operating at a peak voltage well above the Kα1 emission energy of their respective source in order to generate sufficient Kα1 flux for a small imaging time. The high energy X-rays generated by the high peak voltage will be readily scattered by the monochromator crystals, and this scattered radiation dose delivered to the object to be imaged. Stated in another way, there will be a “line-of-sight” between the scatter locations on the monochromator crystals and the object to be imaged over which there cannot be significant radiation shielding to stop the scattered radiation from reaching the object to be imaged. This contribution of scattered radiation to the radiation dose delivered to the object to be imaged can be overcome through the use of a multiple small-vertical height X-ray beam system, which can be created through the use of an array of small area X-ray beams. Any radiation that does not propagate along the narrow beam path can be filtered out by high-Z shielding, and therefore only a minimal amount of scattered radiation will reach the object to be imaged.
A DEI system according to one embodiment of the subject matter described herein can include multiple monochromator crystals for rejecting particular X-rays emitted by multiple X-ray small area sources.
Referring again to
The monochromator crystals MC-1-MC-n can be configured to select a predetermined energy of a portion of X-ray beams XB1 incident thereon. In one example, a monochromator crystal is a silicon [333] monochromator crystal adapted to reject the majority of photons of its respective X-ray beams that do not have a desired energy. For the case of a tungsten X-ray tube, there can be a range of beam energies that are reflected by the silicon monochromator crystal. In this case, the characteristic emission lines of the X-ray beams are 59.13 keV (Kα1) and 57.983 (Kα2), and the Bremsstrahlung radiation that falls within the narrow angular acceptance window of the monochromator crystal. The brightness of the bremsstrahlung radiation is several orders of magnitude less than the two Kα emission lines.
An X-ray beam may be scattered by its respective monochromator crystal in several different directions. Another array of collimators (not shown) may be positioned between the monochromator crystals MC-1-MC-n and the object O for blocking a portion of the X-ray beam that falls outside an angular acceptance window of its corresponding analyzer crystal, one of analyzer crystals AC-1-AC-n. Each collimator can define a slit or hole through which a portion of one of the X-ray beams can pass towards its analyzer crystal for interception by the analyzer crystal.
The analyzer crystals AC-1-AC-n can be rotated for measuring the amount of radiation traveling in a particular direction. The angular reflectivity function of the crystal system is called the intrinsic rocking curve, and this property is used to generate image refraction contrast. If an X-ray photon is deviated towards the peak of the rocking curve, its reflectivity, and thus intensity will increase. If an object feature causes a photon to be deflected down the rocking curve, or away from the peak reflectivity position, it will cause a reduction in intensity.
A sample or object O can be imaged in air or immersed in a coupling medium, such as water. The use of a coupling medium can be used to reduce the index gradient between the air and the object O to be imaged, thus allowing the incident X-rays to pass into the object without experiencing significant refraction at the air-object interface. This is not necessary for most objects, but it is an application of the DEI method and can be used to improve the internal contrast of an object.
In one example, a monochromator crystal is a symmetric crystal which is narrow in one dimension. A symmetric crystal's lattice planes (the atomic layers that contribute to diffracting the X-ray beam) are parallel to the surface of the crystal. A symmetric crystal preserves the vertical height of the corresponding X-ray source in the incoming beam. In comparison, an asymmetric crystal modifies the divergence and size of the incoming beam. In this example of a monochromator crystal being a symmetric crystal, two-dimensional imaging of large imaging fields (e.g., imaging fields of about 25 cm by 20 cm) can be achieved by scanning a sample object and a detector using a symmetric crystal. One exemplary advantage of a symmetric crystal over an asymmetric crystal is that the asymmetric crystal requires a large monochromator crystal to prepare the imaging beam (e.g., selecting and collimating X-rays), imposing a severe limitation on the perfection of the large crystal. Further, the size of an asymmetric crystal increases with increasing X-ray beam energy, thus making it impractical for X-rays of about 59.13 keV. In contrast, for example, a symmetric monochromator crystal used in accordance with the subject matter described herein can utilize 59.13 keV X-rays with a modest sized crystal of about 30 mm in length. An advantage, over single-beam DEI, of the system and methods proposed disclosed herein, with multiple sources, is that this scan range can be greatly reduced, because of much better spatial coverage of the beams (i.e. if you have a required 25 cm scan range, and 10 beams, then the object will only have to be scanned through a range of 2.5 cm).
Referring again to
The electrical signals can be communicated to a computer C for image analysis and display to an operator. The computer C can be configured to generate an absorption image, an image showing refraction effects, and an image depicting ultra-small-angle scattering, the types of which are described in more detail below.
The monochromator crystals can propagate their respective x-ray beams as a horizontally-divergent (
Referring now to
Collimator C2 is positioned in a path of emission lines Kα1 K1 and Kα2 K2. Collimator C2 defines an adjustable slit through which emission lines can be selectively passed towards analyzer crystal AC. In the first operational mode shown in
Referring now to
Further, in one embodiment of using the second mode, the Bremsstrahlung radiation at x-ray energies that are different from the K alpha lines can be captured. Thus, in this embodiment, the system is tunable in x-ray energy and is not limited to the characteristic emission energies. This functionality can be achieved by changing the incident angle of the monochromator crystal and the analyzer crystal. In one example, this functionality can be achieved by changing the incident angle to 11.4 degrees, following the Bragg's law, and replacing the Copper filter with an Aluminum filter. In this example, imaging can occur at 30 keV x-ray energy. X-ray energies lower than the Tungsten emission line energies can be utilized for relatively thin objects.
In one example, the copper filter can be configured to remove about 19 keV bremsstrahlung radiation for reducing or eliminating unwanted crystal reflections and harmonics. Images have the potential to be degraded without this filtering.
The DEI system 100 can include right and left post-analyzer crystal sodium iodide detectors D1 and D2, respectively, and right and left post-monochromator crystal sodium iodide detectors D3 and D4, respectively. Detectors D3 and D4 are used to ensure alignment of the monochromator crystals (MC) and detectors D1 and D2 are used to ensure analyzer crystal (AC) alignment. These detectors are used to measure the intensity of the diffracted X-ray beam being emitted from the monochromator crystal MC, or the analyzer crystal AC. For system alignment, detectors D1 and D2 are placed in the post analyzer crystal AC X-ray beam XB. If the analyzer crystal is not tuned to the desired angle, the intensity measured by the detectors D1 and D2 will show this and the system can be adjusted. The same is true for the detectors D3 and D4 in the post-monochromator crystal MC X-ray beam XB. In addition, detectors D1-D4 can be used to measure X-ray beam XB in real time and adjust the analyzer crystal, D1 and D2, chi (angle as measured about the axis along the X-ray beam path) or monochromator crystal chi, D3 and D4. The use of these detectors to set, measure, and adjust the analyzer crystal AC and monochromator crystal MC can be important for successful DEI image acquisition.
Referring now to
Referring now to
The DEI system 600 shown in
Referring now to
Referring now to
System 800 includes a plurality of digital detectors DD-1-DD-n each configured to receive respective, diffracted X-ray beams DXB-1-DXB-n from the analyzer crystal sets AC-1-AC-n. Computer C is operable to receive electrical signals from the digital detectors DD-1-DD-n for generating an image of the object O.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
In step 1202, a plurality of first X-ray beams may be generated using the small area sources. For example, the small area sources S of the X-ray tubes XT-1-XT-N shown in
A plurality of monochromator crystals, such as the monochromator crystals MC-1-MC-n shown in
In step 1206, an object can be positioned in the paths of the second X-ray beams for transmission of the second X-ray beams through the object and emission from the object a plurality of transmission X-ray beams. For example, the object O shown in
In step 1208, the transmitted X-ray beam can be directed at angles of incidence upon analyzer crystals. For example, analyzer crystals AC-1-AC-n shown in
In step 1210, an image of object O can be detected from the beams diffracted from the analyzer crystal AC-1-AC-n. For example, detector DD can detect the diffracted beam from the analyzer crystals. The diffracted beams can be detected by one of the following exemplary detectors: a detector configured to digitize a detected image; a radiograph film; and an image plate. In one example, the image of an object can be detected from beam diffracted from analyzer crystals at a peak of a rocking curve of the analyzer crystals and/or near a peak of a rocking curve of the analyzer crystals. The detected image can be processed and presented to a user via a display of a computer.
It is noted that a DEI system, such as the system shown in
In step 1404, the second sides S2 of the monochromator crystals MC-2-MC-n are positioned to intercept the second X-ray beams XB2 for producing the third X-ray beams, generally designated XB3. An object O can be positioned in the paths of the third X-ray beams XB3 for transmission of the third X-ray beams XB3 through the object and emission from the object transmission X-ray beams (step 1406).
In step 1408, the transmitted X-ray beams can be directed at angles of incidence upon the analyzer crystals AC-1-AC-n. Further, in step 1410, an image of the object can be detected from the diffracted X-ray beams DXB.
In another example of detecting the image of the object, a first angle image of object can be detected from first diffracted beams emitted from analyzer crystals positioned at a first angular position. The first angle image of the object can be detected at a low rocking curve angle setting of the analyzer crystals. Further, a second angle image of the object can be detected from a second diffracted beam emitted from analyzer crystals positioned at a second angular position. The second angle image of the object can be detected at a high rocking curve angle setting of the analyzer crystals. The first and second angle images can be combined by a computer to derive a refraction image and apparent absorption image. Further, the computer can derive a mass density image of the object from the refraction image. The mass density image can be presented to a user via a display of the computer.
In another embodiment, a DEI system in accordance with the subject matter described herein can include a mismatch crystal design for rejecting particular X-rays emitted by an X-ray tube. In this design, the Kα2 emission line of the X-ray beam can be eliminated at the monochromator. A collimator can be positioned for blocking a portion of an X-ray beam that fall outside an angular acceptance window of a first set of monochromator crystals, such as, for example, one of monochromator crystals MC1-1-MC1-n shown in
The monochromator crystals of the first and second sets can be configured in a mismatch crystal design for rejecting particular X-ray beams emitted by source points, such as small area sources of an X-ray tube. The monochromator crystals can be used to eliminate the Kα2 emission line of the X-ray beam, which can be achieved by utilizing the angular acceptance versus energy for different crystals. In one example, the monochromator crystals can be germanium [333] and silicon [333] monochromator crystals, respectively.
In another example of detecting the image of the object, first angle image of an object can be detected from first diffracted beams emitted from analyzer crystals positioned at first angular positions. The first angle image of an object can be detected at a low rocking curve angle setting of the analyzer crystals. Further, a second angle image of the object can be detected from second diffracted beams emitted from analyzer crystals positioned at second angular positions. The second angle images of the object can be detected at a high rocking curve angle setting of the analyzer crystals. The first and second angle images can be combined by a computer to derive a refraction image. Further, the computer can derive a mass density image of the object from the refraction image. The mass density image can be presented to a user via a display of the computer.
The systems and methods in accordance with the subject matter described herein can be applied to a variety of medical applications. As set forth above, the systems and methods described herein can be applied for breast imaging. Further, for example, the systems and methods described herein can be applied to cartilage imaging, neuroimaging, cardiac imaging, vascular imaging (with and without contrast), pulmonary (lung) imaging, bone imaging, genitourinary imaging, gastrointestinal imaging, soft tissue imaging in general, hematopoietic system imaging, and endocrine system imaging. In addition to image time and dose, a major advancement of using higher energy X-rays is the thickness of the object that can be imaged. For applications such as breast imaging, the system described allows for imaging full thickness breast tissue with a clinically realistic imaging time. The same can be said for other regions of the body, such as the head, neck, extremities, abdomen, and pelvis. Without the limitations of X-ray absorption, utilization of DEI with higher energy X-rays dramatically increases the penetration ability of X-rays. For soft tissue, only a small portion of the X-ray photons incident on the object are absorbed, which greatly increases efficiency of emitted photons from the X-ray tube reaching the detector.
With respect to pulmonary imaging, DEI techniques as described herein can produce excellent contrast in the lungs and can be used heavily for diagnosing pulmonary conditions such as pneumonia. Fluid collections in the lungs generate a marked density gradient that could be detected easily with DEI. The density gradient, characteristics of the surrounding tissue, and geometric differences between normal lung tissue and tissue with a tumor can be large, producing good contrast. Further, DEI techniques described herein can be applied to lung cancer screening and diagnosis.
With respect to bone imaging, DEI techniques as described herein can produce an excellent image of bone in general. High refraction and extinction contrast of DEI can be especially useful for visualizing fractures and lesions within the bone.
Further, the systems and methods in accordance with the subject matter described herein can be applied to a variety of inspection and industrial applications. For example, the systems and methods can be applied for meat inspection, such as poultry inspection. For example, the systems and methods can be used for viewing sharp bones, feathers, and other low contrast objects in meats that required screening and/or removal. The systems and methods described herein can be applied for such screening.
The systems and methods described herein can also be applied for manufacture inspection. For example, the systems and methods can be used for inspecting welds, such as in aircraft production. DEI techniques as described herein can be used to inspect key structural parts that undergo heavy wear and tear, such as jet turbine blades. Further, for example, the systems and methods described herein can be used for inspecting circuit boards and other electronics. In another example, the systems and methods described herein can be used for tire inspection, such as the inspection of steel belts and tread integrity.
Further, the systems and methods in accordance with the subject matter described herein can be used for security screening purposes. For example, the systems and methods can be used for screening at airports and seaports. DEI techniques as described herein can be used for screening for plastic and low absorption contrast objects, such as plastic knives, composite guns difficult to detect with conventional X-ray, and plastic explosives. For imaging larger objects, such is for airport baggage inspection, the distance between the X-ray tube and detector can be increased to allow beam divergence. A larger analyzer crystal would be necessary to accommodate a larger fan beam.
The device described provides a mechanism that can be translated into a computed tomography imaging system, or DEI-CT. A DEI-CT system, resembling a third generation conventional computed tomography system, would use the same apparatus but modified for rotation around a central point. Alternatively, the system could remain stationary and the object, sample, or patient could be rotated in the beam. A DEI-CT system of this design would produce images representing X-ray absorption, refraction, and ultra-small angle scatter rejection (extinction), but they would be resolved in three dimensions.
The various techniques described herein may be implemented with hardware or software or, where appropriate, with a combination of both. Thus, the methods and apparatus of the disclosed embodiments, or certain aspects or portions thereof, may take the form of program code (i.e., instructions) embodied in tangible media, such as floppy diskettes, CD-ROMs, hard drives, or any other machine-readable storage medium, wherein, when the program code is loaded into and executed by a machine, such as a computer, the machine becomes an apparatus for practicing the subject matter disclosed herein. In the case of program code execution on programmable computers, the computer will generally include a processor, a storage medium readable by the processor (including volatile and non-volatile memory and/or storage elements), at least one input device and at least one output device. One or more programs are preferably implemented in a high level procedural or object oriented programming language to communicate with a computer system. However, the program(s) can be implemented in assembly or machine language, if desired. In any case, the language may be a compiled or interpreted language, and combined with hardware implementations.
The described methods and apparatus may also be embodied in the form of program code that is transmitted over some transmission medium, such as over electrical wiring or cabling, through fiber optics, or via any other form of transmission, wherein, when the program code is received and loaded into and executed by a machine, such as an EPROM, a gate array, a programmable logic device (PLD), a client computer, a video recorder or the like, the machine becomes an apparatus for practicing the subject matter disclosed herein. When implemented on a general-purpose processor, the program code combines with the processor to provide a unique apparatus that operates to perform the processing of the presently disclosed subject matter.
While the embodiments have been described in connection with the preferred embodiments of the various figures, it is to be understood that other similar embodiments may be used or modifications and additions may be made to the described embodiment for performing the same function without deviating therefrom. Therefore, the disclosed embodiments should not be limited to any single embodiment, but rather should be construed in breadth and scope in accordance with the appended claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. provisional patent application No. 61/183,988, filed Jun. 4, 2009, and U.S. provisional patent application No. 61/183,989, filed Jun. 4, 2009, the contents of which are incorporated herein in their entireties.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3598471 | Baldwin et al. | Aug 1971 | A |
| 3639039 | Rhodes, Jr. | Feb 1972 | A |
| 3801785 | Barrett | Apr 1974 | A |
| 3882310 | Barrett | May 1975 | A |
| 3925660 | Albert | Dec 1975 | A |
| 3993398 | Noguchi et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
| 4007375 | Albert | Feb 1977 | A |
| 4284844 | Belles | Aug 1981 | A |
| 4310227 | Zinchuk | Jan 1982 | A |
| 4517599 | Zwirn et al. | May 1985 | A |
| 4532548 | Zwirn et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
| 4647154 | Birhbach et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4718075 | Horn | Jan 1988 | A |
| 4882619 | Hasegawn et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
| 5008908 | Jach et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5123036 | Uno et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5127028 | Wittry | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5164975 | Steinmeyer | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5173930 | Hoover | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5195115 | Schiller et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5237598 | Albert | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5245648 | Kinney et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5259013 | Kuriyama et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5319694 | Ingal et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5339305 | Curtis et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5347400 | Hunter | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5406609 | Arai et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5428657 | Papanicolopoulos et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5430807 | Gravely | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5457726 | Miyazaki | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5457727 | Frijlink | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5532814 | Cha | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5535291 | Spencer et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5541026 | Matsumoto | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5579363 | Ingal et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5596620 | Canistraro et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5634669 | Colgate, Jr. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5635720 | Mooney et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5667736 | Chien | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5682412 | Skillicorn et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5715291 | Momose | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5717733 | Kurbatov et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5787146 | Giebeler | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5801889 | Meyers et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5802137 | Wilkins | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5805342 | Gravely | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5805662 | Kurbatov et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5835561 | Moorman et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5850425 | Wilkins | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5867264 | Hinnrichs | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5923720 | Barton et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5933277 | Troxell et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5949847 | Terada et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5953161 | Troxell et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5969864 | Chen et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5974211 | Slater | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5987095 | Chapman et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6038285 | Zhong et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6041098 | Touryanski et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6049588 | Cash, Jr. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6086708 | Colgate, Jr. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6088425 | Ono | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6100978 | Naulleau et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6125167 | Morgan | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6163593 | Koller et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6221579 | Everhart et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6226349 | Schuster et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6229870 | Morgan | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6269144 | Dube et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6320648 | Brueck et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6333968 | Whitlock et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6349004 | Fisher et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6353656 | LeVert et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6385289 | Kikuchi | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6399295 | Kaylor et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6411367 | Baker et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6517490 | Garlick | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6525806 | Smith | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6553096 | Zhou et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6573040 | Everhart et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6577708 | Chapman et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6674837 | Taskar et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6685641 | Liu | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6754307 | Brendler et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6757104 | Nakai | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6760399 | Malamud | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6804324 | Martynov et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6836530 | Singer et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6870896 | Protopopov | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6927748 | Hughes et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6947521 | Wernick et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6947522 | Wilson et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6953643 | Bordillon | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6980378 | Lee | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6987616 | Tamada et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6991895 | Yen et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
| 7012989 | Holland et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7062015 | Lewis | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7076025 | Hasnah et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7082182 | Zhou et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7095510 | Fukui | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7120228 | Yokhin et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7183547 | Yun et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7193767 | Peeri | Mar 2007 | B1 |
| 7224528 | Phillips et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7242744 | Brauss | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7245696 | Yun et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7330530 | Chapman | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7352845 | Uda | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7409041 | Grassmann et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7421060 | Zienert et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7431464 | Park | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7443952 | Dosho et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7469037 | Wernick et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7471766 | Dosho | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7535992 | Taguchi et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7542547 | Kogan | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7564947 | Cernik | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7639774 | De Man et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7646849 | Iwasaki et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7711088 | Gibson et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7724871 | Boyden et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7742563 | Edic et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7742564 | Parham et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7809114 | Zou et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7817779 | Ando | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7991114 | Okunuki et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 20030112421 | Smith | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030149357 | Liu | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20040101676 | Phillips et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040121241 | Kodama | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040196957 | Ando | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20050062928 | Yau et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050069696 | King et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050269818 | Forde | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060039532 | Wu et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20070013983 | Kitamura et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070024828 | Liao et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070291896 | Parham et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| WO 0212871 | Feb 2002 | WO |
| WO 2007087328 | Aug 2008 | WO |
| 2010065532 | Jun 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010065532 | Jun 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010141734 | Dec 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010141735 | Dec 2010 | WO |
| PCTUS2010037276 | Dec 2011 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20100310046 A1 | Dec 2010 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61183988 | Jun 2009 | US | |
| 61183989 | Jun 2009 | US |
