The invention generally relates to programmable motion systems and relates in particular to end effectors for programmable motion devices (e.g., robotic systems) for use in object processing such as object sortation.
End effectors for robotic systems may be employed, for example, in certain applications to select and grasp an object, and then move the acquired object very quickly to a new location. Such end effectors should be designed to quickly and easily select and grasp an object from a jumble of similar or dissimilar objects, and should be designed to securely grasp an object during movement. Certain end effectors, when used on different objects of different physical sizes, weights and materials, may have limitations regarding how securely they may grasp an acquired object during rapid movement, particularly rapid acceleration and deceleration (both angular and linear).
Many end effectors employ vacuum pressure for acquiring and securing objects for transport and/or subsequent operations by articulated arms. Other techniques for acquiring and securing objects involve electrostatic attraction, magnetic attraction, needles for penetrating objects such as fabrics, fingers that squeeze an object, hooks that engage and lift a protruding feature of an object, and collets that expand in an opening of an object, among other techniques. Typically, end effectors are designed as a single tool, such as for example, a gripper, a welder, or a paint spray head, and the tool is typically designed for a specific set of needs.
In many applications, it is desirable for the programmable motion device to change tools automatically. For that purpose there are automatic tool changers, such as those offered by ATI Industrial Automation, Inc. of Apex North Carolina and Schunk GmbH & Co. of Germany (each of which uses radially locking bearings). Available tool changers are generally designed to accommodate a wide range of applications, including those where the tools may be complex, bulky, or heavy. Some tools may also require pass-through passages for compressed air, electrical signals, or vacuum. The tool changer might also provide rigid high-precision mounting of the tool on the end effector, so that the robot's load and precision specifications will not be compromised.
Tool changers also generally require tool racks that hold the tools and facilitate the mounting and dismounting of tools from the end effector. The tool changers and tool racks generally assume that dismounting occurs by moving the tool into the rack, engaging the tool by the rack, actuating a latch mechanism to release the tool, and then moving the end effector away from the tool. Mounting a tool reverses this process—the end effector moves to match the two halves of the tool change device, the tool is released by the rack, the latch is actuated, and the end effector then moves the tool out of the rack. These mounting and dismounting motions are generally precise and slow, in accord with the precise tolerances of the tool changer.
A disadvantage of commercially available tool changers is that they are slow. The introduction of long delays can reduce the value of an automated solution, in some cases to the point that the automated solution is not viable. Thus there is a need for tool changing devices that achieve greater speed, and an opportunity to achieve that speed by designing tool changers for those applications with more liberal requirements. There remains a further need therefore, for end effector systems that permit programmable motion systems to quickly and efficiently change end effector tools.
In accordance with an embodiment, the invention is directed to a method of changing a tool on a programmable motion device. The method includes the steps of moving an attachment portion of an end effector of the programmable motion device in a continuous motion; while the attachment portion of the end effector moves in the continuous motion, engaging one of: the attachment portion of the end effector with the tool, or the tool attached to the attachment portion of the end effector with an exchange system, and continuing to move the attachment portion of the end effector in the continuous motion to change a connection status of the attachment portion of the end effector while the attachment portion of the end effector moves in the continuous motion.
In accordance with another embodiment, the invention is directed to a method of exchanging a tool on a programmable motion device. The method includes the steps of moving an attachment portion of the end effector in a continuous motion, removing a first tool from the attachment portion of the end effector while the attachment portion of the end effector moves in the continuous motion, and attaching a second tool to the attachment portion of the end effector while the attachment portion of the end effector device moves in the continuous motion.
In accordance with yet another embodiment, the invention is directed to a method of changing a tool on a programmable motion device. The method includes the steps of moving an attachment portion of an end effector of the programmable motion device in a linear motion, while the attachment portion of the end effector moves in the linear motion, engaging one of: the attachment portion of the end effector with the tool, or the tool attached to the attachment portion of the end effector with an exchange system, and continuing to move the attachment portion of the end effector in the linear motion to change a connection status of the attachment portion of the end effector while the attachment portion of the end effector moves in the linear motion.
In accordance with a further embodiment, the invention is directed to a system for changing a tool on a programmable motion device. The system includes an engagement system for moving an attachment portion of an end effector of the programmable motion device in a continuous motion, and while the attachment portion is moving, engaging the tool with one of an attachment portion of the end effector, or an exchange station to thereby change a connection status of the attachment portion of the end effector while the attachment portion of the end effector moves in the continuous motion.
The following description may be further understood with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
The drawings are shown for illustrative purposes only.
Applicants have discovered that there are many applications where tools are considerably simpler and lighter than those used on certain precision manufacturing programmable motion systems, and further, that in such other applications, the requirements on the tool-changer may be relaxed. For example, in some logistics applications, such as processing items for shipping or E-commerce order fulfillment, it may be necessary to change vacuum cups from one size to another. A typical vacuum cup requires no pass-throughs of electrical, pneumatic, or hydraulic passages, other than the vacuum. Further, the precision of the mount need not be high. Even in a manufacturing application, there are cases where the tools to be exchanged are simple and the requirements for the tool changer may be relaxed.
In programmable motion devices it is sometimes desirable to change end effector tools during processing (between moving objects). The process of changing end effector tools may generally involve (with reference to
For example (and with reference to
Such a typical tool change motion, therefore, involves fine vertical in-and-out motions to dismount tool 12, and further fine vertical in-and-out motions to mount tool 16. Each fine motion includes a reversal, and there is a further reversal between the mount and dismount motions, so the process involves multiple reversals and fine motions, leading to a very time consuming operation. The arrangement is typical but not universal. In some cases the approaching motion might be horizontal, and the departing motion vertical, or vice versa. Even though such a motion is not a reversal, it presents the same problems. The path includes a sharp corner, which can only be produced by coming to a stop or a near-stop, which is a time-consuming fine motion.
Not only does the above process described with reference to
The process of changing tools of the effector of the programmable motion device therefore involves many changes in direction of the effector, as well as many complex fine control engagement and disengagement steps of the tools 12, 16 from and to the attachment portion 10 of the effector and the storage area 14.
The exchanging system in accordance with various embodiments of the present invention (and with reference to
The invention generally provides a set of mechanisms and methods to achieve a rapid exchange of tools in various embodiments. Previous tool exchange devices require the programmable motion device to make at least two fine motions, meaning slow and precise motions. The first fine motion approaches the holder and dismounts the present tool. The second fine motion approaches and mounts the desired tool.
The invention eliminates the fine motions of the programmable motion device. Instead, the programmable motion device, including the effector, remains in substantially uniform motion, and the tool-unmounting and tool-mounting motions are accomplished relative to the effector, as it flies by the holder. The term tool refers to the removable part of the system that is to be exchanged. The term effector refers to the distal link of the programmable motion device, on which the tool is mounted. The term holder refers to the mechanism that holds a tool and facilitates the tool exchange process. The term rack refers to several holders arranged as a unit to hold a variety of tools for selection by the programmable motion device.
The multiple tools and the exchanging system of certain embodiments of the invention may be used with a wide variety of programmable motion devices that are employed for a variety of purposes, such as, for example, object order fulfillment, or object sortation for materials handling and shipping.
The tool change systems of the invention may be used with a wide variety of programmable motion systems and applications. The systems and applications disclosed herein, are in no way limiting of the systems and applications that may benefit from the invention. In applications such as order fulfillment for example, objects are collected into heterogeneous sets and need to be processed into appropriate groupings. In particular, individual objects need to be identified (e.g., by perception systems) and then routed to object-specific locations. The described system reliably automates the grasping and movement of such objects by employing both a robotic arm and versatile gripping systems. The perception units (e.g., cameras or scanners) may look for a variety of codes such as indicia, e.g., barcodes, QR codes, radio frequency tags, Stock Keeping Unit (SKU) codes, Universal Parcel Codes (UPC), low wavelength IR (LWIR), as well as invisible barcodes and digital watermarks such as Digimarc DWCode, etc. Sorting for order fulfillment, for example, is one application for automatically identifying objects from a heterogeneous object stream. Barcode scanners have a wide variety of uses including identifying the Stock Keeping Unit of an article, or tracking parcels.
Such an order fulfillment system automates part of the sorting process in conjunction with a robotic pick and place system, and in particular, the step of grasping and carrying objects. A programmable motion device such as a robotic arm, for example, picks an object from a bin, places the object in front of (or drops an object into) a scanner, and then, having obtained identification information for the object (such as a barcode, QR codes, UPC codes, other identification codes, information read from a label on the object, or size, weight and/or shape information), routes the object toward the appropriate bin or shelf location by either moving the object itself, or placing the object in or on a conveyance system. Since certain scanners employ cameras or lasers to scan 1D or 2D symbologies printed on labels affixed to objects, the barcodes must be visible to the scanner's sensors for successful scanning in order to automatically identify items in a heterogeneous stream of arbitrary objects, as in a jumbled set of objects found in a bin. Further applications for grasping systems of the invention include sortation for a wide variety of applications, including order fulfillment, collection of objects for shipping, and collection of objects for inventory purposes, etc.
An important aspect is the ability to identify identification or mailing information for the object (such as a barcode, QR codes, UPC codes, other identification codes, information read from a label on the object, or size, weight and/or shape information) of objects by employing a programmable motion device such as a robot arm, to pick up individual objects and place them in front of one or more scanners or to drop or place the object into a scanner. In accordance with other embodiments, the programmable motion device may include a parallel arm robot (Delta-type arm) or a linear indexing pick and place system. Certain convention scanning systems, for example, may be unable to see labels or barcodes on objects that are presented in a way that this information is not exposed or visible. Tool changing systems of the invention may be used with programmable motion devices such as articulated arms, parallel arm robots (Delta-type arms), or linear indexing pick and place systems.
Important components of an automated processing system that includes a tool changing system of the invention are shown in
Generally, the articulated arm 62 selects objects from an input area such as a conveyor 22 that are either in a bin on the conveyor 22, or are on the conveyor itself. A stand 24 includes an attached perception unit 26 that is directed toward the conveyor from above the conveyor 22. The perception unit 26 may include, for example, a 2D or 3D camera, or a scanner such as a laser reflectivity scanner or other type of bar-code reader, or a radio frequency ID scanner. The perception unit 26 is positioned to acquire perception data regarding objects that are provided on a conveyor 22 or in a bin that is on the conveyor 22. Based on the perception data, the system 60 determines one or more grasp locations in an object, and directs the end effector 64 on the articulated arm 62 to grasp the object.
Images taken by the perception unit 26 may be displayed on a touch input screen 28 so that persons in the environment may interact with the system 60, e.g., by confirming, rejecting or proposing, possible grasp locations on objects, based on which the system 60 may undergo machine learning (e.g., in processor 34) with regard to the objects.
The system 60 provides that when an object has been grasped by the end effector 64 of the articulated arm 62, the end effector 64 may present the object to a perception station 29. As further shown in
Having identified a code or indicia, the processing system 34 then pulls routing information regarding the object, and the articulated arm 62 then moves the object using the end effector 64 to an appropriate location 32 of a bank of sortation locations 30. The end effector 64 further includes an acquisition unit tool 72 (such as a vacuum unit, e.g., a vacuum cup) for contacting and grasping the objects. In an embodiment, the acquisition unit tool 72 may be in the form of a flexible bellows, and may include a vacuum line 80 attached to the end effector 64 for providing a vacuum source at the mouth of the flexible bellows.
As further shown in
The system 60 may therefor further provide a plurality of end effector tools in addition to end effector tool 72 that are suited for grasping different objects. In certain embodiments, the end effector tools are vacuum cups that provide passage of a vacuum therethrough. As an example, the different end effectors may each be a different size, and be suited for grasping different objects having differently sized flat areas (for grasping).
In accordance with certain embodiments, therefore, the invention provides a programmable motion system including a dynamic end effector system. The dynamic end effector system includes a plurality of acquisition units and coupling means. The plurality of acquisition tools are provided at an exchange station within an area accessible by the programmable motion device. The coupling means is for coupling any of the plurality of acquisition tools to an end effector of the programmable motion device such that any of the acquisition tools may be automatically selected from the exchange station and used by the programmable motion device without requiring any activation or actuation by the exchange station and without requiring any intervention by a human. While a human may place a new actuation tool into the exchange system, and may then inform the system as to which actuation unit is placed in the system and where it is placed, this is not required. The system may originally be set up such that the system is programmed to know which actuation tools began in which positions (and thereafter track any movement via exchanges). In other embodiments, the vacuum cup tools may have unique physical or magnetic features that may be detected by the exchange station or by the end effector. The programmable motion system may therefore process the objects, and between moving an object, the system may quickly and efficiently exchange a current end effector tool with a new end effector tool as needed.
Systems of certain embodiments of the present invention provide that an acquisition tool, such as a vacuum cup (e.g., a flexible bellows type vacuum cup), through which a high vacuum may be designed to flow, may be exchanged for another vacuum cup during use, by the programmable vacuum device. In particular, and with reference to
The coupling of the different vacuum cups to an end effector via the magnets also presents fewer limitations on the lifting dynamics. In particular, and with reference to
In accordance with further embodiments of the invention, it may be desirable to design the vacuum cup such that any seal between the cup and an object will become compromised in the event that too large a weight is attempted to be lifted (protecting the magnetic coupling from being breached or protecting the articulated arm from overload). Such vacuum cups may, for example, permit some portions of the cup to open or otherwise break the seal between the cup and the object, thereby releasing the object from the vacuum cup.
In accordance with an embodiment, the present invention provides a linear dismount motion involving the use of an electromagnet or other actuator, which provides the motive force, allowing other mechanical elements in the effector or the holder to constrain the tool motion. A further embodiment is shown in
In particular,
In further embodiments, the tool 126 may be held firmly against the effector 122 without the electromagnet being energized (by virtue of the metal in the electromagnet engaging the permanent magnet 128). Further, the releasing of the tool 126 may be accomplished by actively reversing the polarity of the electromagnet to push the permanent magnet 128 and the tool 126 away from the effector 122.
The use of a magnetic attachment between the tool and the end effector may be employed with a wide variety of tool exchange systems. Further, there are several possible mechanisms to produce the desired relative motions, such as mechanical constraint, magnetic fields, and various combinations. The best combination varies with the nature of the tool, the application, and the mechanism by which the tool is retained on the effector, whether it be magnetic, a bayonet mount, or some other type.
For example, the tool may include protrusions such as two sets of wheels for engaging a fixed exchange holder.
Many schemes have been identified to arrange the desired motion of the tool relative to the effector.
In particular, and as shown in
The effector 142 then continues to move in the direction as shown at G, and when the effector 142 is positioned above a new tool 164, the electromagnet is then again energized, and the tool 164 is drawn toward the effector 142 and drawn along the direction of travel G of the effector 142. In particular, since the underside of the slot 136 is ramped in the direction of travel G, the leading edge of the upper portion of the tool 144 becomes raised (as shown in
Again, the tool has two pairs of guide wheels that engage a curving slot on the holder. The holder is fixed. As the effector moves through the holder, the curving slot forces the tool to tilt downward, releasing it from the effector. The motion to mount the tool would be the reverse. Additional mechanisms may be provided to ensure that the tool completes its travel and releases cleanly from the effector. This embodiment is shown in further detail in
In particular,
While certain tool and effector attachments may be provided by mechanical coupling (as discussed below with reference to
The mounting of a tool onto an effector may be achieved by moving the effector in the reverse direction. In particular, and with reference to
For example
The use of the separate units 132, 152, 172, 192 permits different tools (and units) to be assembled adjacent one another dynamically during processing. This permits new tools (and units) to be made available by a human, such that the programmable motion system may be able to select a newly made available unit. The units may also be releasably securable in their respective locations, e.g., by locks 188, which may be used in any of the above and below disclosed systems. Systems may also be employed to track and identify which units (and tools) are located in which of a variety of exchanging locations.
In sum, the embodiments discussed herein illustrate several schemes: the first scheme, where the holder is fixed, but still engages the tool mechanically, the second scheme, where the tool is forced from the effector by a magnetic field, and the third scheme (discussed below), where a mobile element of the holder engages the tool mechanically. Combinations of these schemes are also possible. For example, a magnetic field might be employed to facilitate or actuate the motions of scheme one or scheme two, and exchange devices may employ any combination of tool loading and unloading schemes. The effectiveness of systems of the invention depend, in part, on how the holders are combined into a rack, and how the rack is placed in the workspace, to minimize the delays associated with changing tools.
Again, in certain applications, the effector might need to return to its original pose after a tool change, so that a reversal of motion is required anyway. In that case, the two holders can be mounted in parallel, with the reversal occurring between the dismount and the mount, as shown in
The zero-reversal embodiments discussed above are well suited to a task where successive tool changes occur in opposite directions, which might be described as a reciprocal task motion. For example, if the robot moves between work area A and work area B, requiring tool A for work area A, and tool B for work area B, then the rack could be placed between the two work areas, and every tool change would be a straight motion.
In other applications, however, one may wish to have every tool change occur in the same direction, e.g., always when passing from work area A to work area B. Certain of the embodiments discussed above may not support that. Half of the tool changes would require a pair of reversals in order for the effector to fly through the rack in the correct direction. In certain applications, the exchange devices 202 of
For example,
Systems in accordance with various embodiments of the present invention may include magnetic coupling of the tool to the end effector as discussed above and below, or mechanical coupling of the tool to the end effector.
The process of attaching a different effector 261 to the tool 262 (or attaching the effector 260 to a different tool) may generally be provided by reversing the direction. In particular,
An important component of certain embodiments of the invention is the mechanism of the holder that engages the tool and mounts or dismounts the tool. A further embodiment shown in
During the tool-dismounting process, the bracket's motion is constrained to force the phases, as shown in
The tool-mounting process simply reverses the motion. For example,
It is generally important that the contact forces between the tool and the effector be small to facilitate a smooth uninterrupted motion of the effector. In some embodiments, including the embodiment shown in
Many of the embodiments discussed above assume a shallow insertion depth of the effector in the tool.
In the system 400 of
If an object is identified by the perception unit 29 that requires a different vacuum cup than is currently attached to the end effector, the end effector may place the object back into the bin so that the object may be again grasped, but by a newly attached acquisition device. In certain embodiments, the perception unit 26 may sufficiently identify a next object, and if the vacuum cup on the end effector needs to be changed, the system may exchange a current vacuum cup to a desired one that is known to be a better acquisition unit for grasping the identified object in bin 56.
The system may further seek to identify all objects in a bin 56, may associate each with an optimal vacuum cup, and may then seek to grasp, one at a time, each of the objects associated with a common vacuum cup prior to changing the vacuum cup on the end effector. In each of these embodiments, the system itself identifies the need to change acquisition units, and then changes acquisition units by itself in the normal course of operation.
Other variants, include a suspension mechanism to allow for smooth mechanical interactions in the presence of small variations in position. Further variations would address possible latching mechanisms or detent mechanisms between the tool and effector, such as ball detents and bayonet mounts.
The above embodiments have employed the use of a straight line motion of the effector, but the invention may be adapted to other desired motions.
In particular, the waist 510 of the tool will become engaged by the arm sections 508, and the continuous movement of the effector (as shown at 7) will cause the effector 502 to be pulled away from the tool 504 in much the same way as the tool was pulled from an effector or previously disclosed embodiments. Such a motion might be appropriate for a programmable motion device with few joints, incapable of making a straight line, or in a case where a rotating motion is faster than a straight line. This embodiment is shown in schematic form. As the effector pivots about a horizontal pivot shown at the top of the figure, the tool engages the tool holder and is constrained to move horizontally along the tangent. There are a variety of ways of engaging and constraining the tool's motion, as illustrated in previous embodiments.
In accordance with various embodiments, the invention provides a tool exchange mechanism comprising an effector interface, a tool interface, and a holder mechanism, where the interaction of the effector, tool, and holder produce the tool mounting and dismounting motions relative to the continuously moving effector. The coupling of the tool interface to the effector interface may be magnetic. The coupling of the tool interface to the effector interface may be mechanical, such as by ball detents or a bayonet mount. The holder may include a mobile piece called the bracket that attaches to the tool. The bracket's connection may be mechanical or magnetic. The bracket's motion may be constrained to produce a mounting or dismounting motion of the tool. The holder may include fixed mechanical features that engage the tool, and the mechanical features may constrain the tool's motion to produce a mounting or dismounting motion. The holder may include a permanent magnetic field to mount or dismount a tool, and may include a switched magnetic field, employing some combination of magnetic shunt, permanent magnet, and/or electromagnet. The system may include an additional mobile piece that mechanically engages the effector, while bracing the effector against the forces used to dismount the tool.
In accordance with an embodiment, the invention may provide a pair of tool holder mechanisms, arranged in series, so that a single smooth motion of the effector will pass through both mechanisms, dismounting one tool and mounting another. In further embodiments, two or more tool holder mechanisms, are arranged next to one another, so that the effector may selectively pass through one holder to dismount the tool, then turn and pass through another holder to mount a different tool. In accordance with further embodiments one or more tool holder mechanisms, may be actuated to rotate so as to accommodate the desired motion of the effector, or one or more tool holder mechanisms, actuated to present the desired tool or tool holder to the effector. In accordance with a further embodiment, the system may include an additional mechanism that advances a tool from one holder to the other holder. In accordance with a further embodiment, the tool and effector may be designed so that when mounted, one piece is inserted into the other, at a depth and with a profile such that the tool can be dismounted by pivoting about one of the contact points, without producing a collision.
In certain embodiments, a tool and effector may be designed so that when mounted, one piece is inserted into the other, at a depth and with such a profile that the tool cannot be dismounted by pivoting about one of the contact points, but must be pulled substantially straight.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that numerous modifications and variations may be made to the above disclosed embodiments without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention.
The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/523,245, filed Jul. 26, 2019, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,865,700, issued Jan. 9, 2024, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/739,562, filed Oct. 1, 2018, as well as to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/711,087, filed Jul. 27, 2018, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3637249 | Kuhl et al. | Jan 1972 | A |
3656794 | McCord | Apr 1972 | A |
3720433 | Rosfelder | Mar 1973 | A |
4266905 | Birk | May 1981 | A |
4389064 | Laverriere | Jun 1983 | A |
4561686 | Atchley | Dec 1985 | A |
4578013 | Barillec et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4600229 | Oten | Jul 1986 | A |
4604787 | Sievers, Jr. | Aug 1986 | A |
4621398 | Kleiman | Nov 1986 | A |
4635985 | Rooke | Jan 1987 | A |
4653793 | Guinot et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4677778 | Sorimachi et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4828304 | No et al. | May 1989 | A |
4850627 | Franklin | Jul 1989 | A |
4858974 | Stannek | Aug 1989 | A |
4913617 | Nicholson | Apr 1990 | A |
5044063 | Voellmer | Sep 1991 | A |
5190332 | Nagai et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5207465 | Rich | May 1993 | A |
5219318 | Vranish | Jun 1993 | A |
5253858 | Grieve | Oct 1993 | A |
5860900 | Dunning et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5993365 | Stagnitto et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6015174 | Raes et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6135522 | Su et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6193291 | Morroney | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6213528 | Hufken et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6244640 | Le Bricquer et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6382692 | Schmalz et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6454333 | Portal | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6554337 | Kazerooni et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6817639 | Schmalz et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
8132835 | Ban et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8267386 | Schaaf et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
9266237 | Nomura | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9486926 | Kawano | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9623570 | Krahn et al. | Apr 2017 | B1 |
9656813 | Dunkmann et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9687983 | Prats | Jun 2017 | B1 |
9757863 | Suzuki | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9981379 | Youmans et al. | May 2018 | B1 |
9999977 | Wagner et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10011020 | Wagner et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10086519 | Wagner et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10118300 | Wagner et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10300612 | Wagner et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10335956 | Wagner et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10357883 | O'Connor et al. | Jul 2019 | B1 |
10500735 | Menon et al. | Dec 2019 | B1 |
10576641 | Wagner et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10618177 | Wagner et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10647005 | Wagner et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
10723019 | Wagner et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10850402 | Wagner et al. | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10857682 | Wagner et al. | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10913159 | Wagner et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
11185996 | Wagner et al. | Nov 2021 | B2 |
11426882 | Takahashi et al. | Aug 2022 | B2 |
11633864 | Poteet | Apr 2023 | B2 |
11772281 | Wieckowski | Oct 2023 | B1 |
20010013434 | Hopkins | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020011735 | Nagai et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020185575 | Kalb | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030038491 | Schmalz et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20060131905 | Mazzucchelli | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060267360 | Kiaie et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070006940 | Perlman et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070287884 | Schena | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20100040450 | Parnell | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100078953 | Ban et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100109360 | Meisho | May 2010 | A1 |
20120025053 | Tell | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20130129464 | Regan et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130147101 | Cho | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20150306770 | Mittal et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150328779 | Bowman et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150375401 | Dunkmann et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160096278 | Cho | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160207202 | Lee et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160214143 | Nagatsuka | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160221196 | Suzuki | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160271805 | Kuolt et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20170050315 | Henry et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170062263 | Kesil et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170076251 | Simske et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170080571 | Wagner et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170080579 | Wagner et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170106532 | Wellman et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170120454 | Ferguson et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170120455 | Wagner et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170197316 | Wagner et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170197318 | Takebayashi et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170225341 | Kerestes et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170276472 | Becker et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20180117773 | Odhner et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180250811 | Wagner et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180281202 | Brudniok et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20190039240 | Wagner et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190054634 | Haddadin | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190255713 | Churchill | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20200017317 | Yap et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200070361 | Menon et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200189105 | Wen et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20210016454 | Jeong et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210053216 | Diankov et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210053230 | Mizoguchi et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210129354 | Wilson, II et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
20210260775 | Mizoguchi | Aug 2021 | A1 |
20210308874 | Gealy et al. | Oct 2021 | A1 |
20210308875 | Gealy et al. | Oct 2021 | A1 |
20210323144 | Jeremiah | Oct 2021 | A1 |
20210339403 | Menon et al. | Nov 2021 | A1 |
20220072719 | Stuckey et al. | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220118629 | Payton et al. | Apr 2022 | A1 |
20220135346 | Matsuoka et al. | May 2022 | A1 |
20220219318 | Jeong et al. | Jul 2022 | A1 |
20220241962 | Nguyen et al. | Aug 2022 | A1 |
20220266458 | Fofonoff et al. | Aug 2022 | A1 |
20220314460 | Sun et al. | Oct 2022 | A1 |
20230089400 | Jeremiah | Mar 2023 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1367729 | Sep 2002 | CN |
101925959 | Dec 2010 | CN |
203680306 | Jul 2014 | CN |
103987637 | Aug 2014 | CN |
104057460 | Sep 2014 | CN |
104415868 | Mar 2015 | CN |
3810989 | Aug 1989 | DE |
10121344 | Nov 2002 | DE |
102011115951 | Apr 2013 | DE |
102016004087 | Aug 2017 | DE |
2708335 | Mar 2014 | EP |
3520973 | Aug 2019 | EP |
H01220636 | Sep 1989 | JP |
2010201536 | Sep 2010 | JP |
2008005060 | Jan 2008 | WO |
2014040843 | Mar 2014 | WO |
2017025076 | Feb 2017 | WO |
2017035466 | Mar 2017 | WO |
2017044632 | Mar 2017 | WO |
2018034978 | Feb 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC issued by the European Patent Office in related European Patent Application No. 19752776.5 on Jan. 25, 2023, 7 pages. |
Communication pursuant to Rules 161(1) and 162 EPC issued by the European Patent Office in related European Patent Application No. 19752776.5 on Mar. 10, 2021, 3 pages. |
Examiner's Report issued by the Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada (Canadian Intellectual Property Office) in related Canadian Patent Application No. 3,107,825 on Mar. 18, 2022, 4 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued in related International Application No. PCT/US2019/043637 on Nov. 13, 2019, 14 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in related U.S. Appl. No. 16/523,245 on Mar. 29, 2023, 12 pages. |
Notice on the First Office Action, along with its English translation, issued by the China National Intellectual Property Administration in related Chinese Patent Application No. 201980049469.5 on Mar. 31, 2023, 31 pages. |
Notice on the Second Office Action, along with its English translation, issued by the China National Intellectual Property Administration in related Chinese Patent Application No. 201980049469.5 on Oct. 20, 2023, 7 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20240173872 A1 | May 2024 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62739562 | Oct 2018 | US | |
62711087 | Jul 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16523245 | Jul 2019 | US |
Child | 18384923 | US |