The systems and methods described herein relate generally to medical instruments, such as elongate steerable instruments for minimally-invasive intervention or diagnosis, and more particularly to methods, systems, and apparatus for controlling, localizing or tracking the location, position, orientation and/ or shape of one or more parts of a medical instrument.
Currently known minimally invasive procedures for diagnosis and treatment of medical conditions use shapeable instruments, such as steerable devices, flexible catheters or more rigid arms or shafts, to approach and address various tissue structures within the body. For various reasons, it is highly valuable to be able to determine the 3-dimensional spatial position of portions of such shapeable instruments relative to other structures, such as the operating table, other instruments, or pertinent anatomical tissue structures.
There remains a need to apply the information gained by the spatial or shape information of a medical instrument and applying this information to produce improved device control or improved modeling when directing a robotic or similar device. There also remains a need to apply such controls to medical procedures and equipment.
In certain variations, a method of controlling a robotically controlled elongate instrument in real time may include one or more of the following steps: displaying an image of an anatomy of a patient; tracking or detecting a localization sensor coupled to the robotically controlled elongate instrument; and registering localization data from the localization sensor to the image to provide a continuously updated location of at least a portion of the elongate instrument in the image of the anatomy of a patient to facilitate robotic navigation of the elongate instrument through the anatomy.
In certain variations, a system for tracking or localizing a robotically controlled elongate instrument may include: an image of an anatomy of a patient; an electromagnetic localization sensor coupled to an elongate instrument; and/or an electromagnetic field generator. The generator may be configured to produce an electromagnetic field in which the electromagnetic localization sensor is detected. The localization sensor may provide localization data for at least a portion of the elongate instrument, where the localization data may be registered to the image to provide a continuously updated location of at least a portion of the elongate instrument in the image. This may facilitate robotic navigation of the elongate instrument through the anatomy.
In certain variations, a system for tracking or localizing a robotically controlled elongate instrument may include: an image of an anatomy of a patient; an electromagnetic localization sensor coupled to an elongate instrument; an electromagnetic field generator; and/or at least one reference sensor, e.g., fixed reference sensor, positioned in a workspace of the electromagnetic field generator. The electromagnetic field generator may be movable relative to the reference sensor thereby expanding the workspace for elongate instrument tracking.
In certain variations, a method of tracking or localizing a robotically controlled elongate instrument in real time may include one or more of the following steps: displaying a single image of an anatomy of a patient; tracking or detecting a localization sensor coupled to the robotically controlled elongate instrument; and/or registering localization data from the localization sensor to the image via a reference sensor to provide a continuously updated location of at least a portion of the elongate instrument in the image of the anatomy of a patient to facilitate robotic navigation of the elongate instrument through the anatomy.
In certain variations, a medical system for controlling an elongate instrument may include a robotically controlled instrument assembly comprising a shapeable elongate instrument. The system may include a localization system coupled to the robotically controlled instrument assembly and configured to track the shapeable elongate instrument, where at least a portion of the localization system is sterilely isolated from the robotically controlled instrument assembly.
In certain variations, a system or robotic system for controlling an elongate instrument with respect to a target space may include an elongate instrument having a localization sensor coupled thereto. The system may include a robotic drive system including at least one actuator, where the robotic drive system is configured to interchangeably couple with the elongate instrument to position the instrument with respect to the target space. The system may also include a controller configured to produce a registration between a localization sensor frame and an image frame or a patient frame. The controller can produce a plurality of signals to direct the robotic drive system or elongate instrument in the image frame using the registration and the image may include an image of the target space or patient.
In certain variations, a robotic system for controlling an elongate instrument with respect to a target space may include an elongate instrument having a localization sensor coupled thereto. The system may include a robotic drive system having at least one actuator. The robotic drive system may be configured to interchangeably couple with the elongate instrument to position the instrument with respect to the target space. The system may include a controller configured to register localization data from the localization sensor to an image of an anatomy or to a patient or target space frame to provide a continuously updated location of at least a portion of the elongate instrument in the image. The controller can produce a plurality of signals to direct robotic navigation of the elongate instrument through the anatomy based on the location of at least a portion of the elongate instrument in the image.
In certain variations, a method of tracking an elongate instrument in real time in an image may include one or more of the following steps: initializing an active contour in the image where the active contour corresponds to at least a portion of the elongate instrument; and updating the active contour as the elongate instrument moves by performing a search based on pixel intensity to track the elongate instrument.
In certain variations, a method of tracking a robotically controlled elongate instrument in real time in an image includes one or more of the following steps: controlling movement of the elongate instrument with a robotic or system command; creating an active contour which corresponds to at least a portion of the elongate instrument; updating the active contour as the elongate instrument moves; performing an image-based or template matching search along the active contour to track features of the elongate instrument; and/or predicting elongate instrument movement based on the commanded elongate instrument motion to increase tracking accuracy.
In certain variations, a system or robotic system for controlling an elongate instrument with respect to a target space is provided. The system may include a robotic drive system having at least one actuator. The robotic drive system may be configured to interchangeably couple with the elongate instrument to position the instrument with respect to the target space. The system may include a controller configured to initialize an active contour in an image, where the active contour corresponds to at least a portion of the elongate instrument. The controller may be configured to update the active contour as the elongate instrument moves by performing a search based on pixel intensity. The controller can produce a plurality of signals to direct the robotic drive system or elongate instrument in the image frame based on tracking of the elongate instrument with the active contour.
In certain variations, systems, methods, and devices described herein may include a robotic medical system for controlling a shapeable elongate instrument within an anatomical region. The systems, methods, and devices described herein may incorporate localization or tracking systems for controlling the shapeable elongate instrument and/or for performing other tasks related to controlling the instrument (e.g., improving a map or a model of the anatomy or region).
Other and further embodiments, objects and advantages of the invention will become apparent from the following detailed description when read in view of the accompanying figures.
Various localization systems and methods for tracking, performing localization of, and/or controlling an elongate instrument, e.g., a robotically controlled elongate instrument, in real time, in a clinical or other environment, are described herein. Various elongate instruments are contemplated for use in the various systems described herein, e.g., a catheter or vascular catheter. The various methods and systems may include integrating or registering a localization system or a localization sensor coupled to an elongate instrument, with an image. A Traxtal electromagnetic tracking or localization system is one example of a system that allows for the tracking of a location, position and/or orientation of a localization sensor placed in a pulsating electromagnetic or magnetic field. Various localization sensors may be utilized, e.g., electromagnetic sensors, fiber optic sensors, and other sensors for detecting or controlling the movement of medical equipment. When the localization sensor is integrated into an image, it enhances the capabilities of an elongate instrument control or tracking system by allowing a user or doctor to easily navigate the elongate instrument through the complex anatomy without exposing the patient to excessive radiation over a prolonged period of time.
The localization data or tracking information of a localization sensor may be registered to the desired image or model in order for navigation of an elongate instrument through the image or model to accurately represent movement of the elongate instrument. The registration process often requires information about the imaging system providing the image, such as its physical dimensions and/or the details about the imaging techniques used to acquire a particular 3D model or other image. Due to the variability in equipment used in a clinical environment, in certain situations there may be no guarantee that such information will be available or easily obtainable to an outside party. As such, various robust techniques to estimate system parameters and various registration techniques may help facilitate the clinical use of localization technology.
In certain variations, a method for tracking, localizing or controlling a robotically controlled elongate instrument in real time may include displaying an image of a patient's anatomy. A localization sensor may be coupled to the robotically controlled elongate instrument. The localization sensor may provide localization data of the sensor and/or elongate instrument. The localization data from the localization sensor may be registered to the image. Registering may include transforming localization data generated by the localization sensor to the coordinate system of the image such that localization data of the elongate instrument, to which the localization sensor is coupled, is overlaid on the image. The coordinate system of the localization sensor may be transformed or translated to the coordinate system of the image through one or more transformations, and optionally through other coordinate systems, to register the localization data to the image. As a result, a continuously or substantially continuously updated location of at least a portion of the elongate instrument is provided in the image of the anatomy of a patient, which allows for or facilitates robotic navigation or control of the elongate instrument through the anatomy e.g., through the vasculature of a patient.
The location, position and/or orientation of the localization sensor may be continuously tracked to allow for accurate manipulation of the elongate instrument in or through the anatomy of a patient. Various types of images may be utilized in the methods and systems described herein. For example, an image may be generated by CT or 2D or 3D fluoroscopy. An image may include a 3D or 2D anatomical model or a 2D or 3D fluoroscopic image or other types of images useful for visualizing an anatomy of a patient to perform various medical procedures.
When using a fluoroscopy image, an image intensifier may be utilized. Localization data from the localization sensor may be registered to a fluoroscopy coordinate system of a fluoroscopy image coupled to the image intensifier. In order to register the localization data from the localization sensor to the fluoroscopy image, various parameters may be ascertained or known. For example, such parameters may include: a distance from an X-ray source to the image intensifier, a distance from the source to a bed, a size of the image intensifier, and/or the axis of rotation of a c-arm of the fluoroscopy system.
In certain variations, the localization sensor may include an electromagnetic localization sensor. The electromagnetic localization sensor may be placed in a pulsating magnetic field generated by an electromagnetic field generator or transmitter to allow for detection or tracking of the localization sensor.
In certain variations, a system for tracking, localizing or controlling a robotically controlled elongate instrument may include an image of an anatomy of a patient, an electromagnetic localization sensor coupled to an elongate instrument, and an electromagnetic field generator. The image may be displayed, generated or otherwise received by the system. The electromagnetic field generator may produce an electromagnetic field in which the electromagnetic localization sensor is detected. The localization sensor may provide localization data for at least a portion of the elongate instrument. The localization data is registered to the image by performing one or more transformations to provide a continuously or substantially continuously updated location of at least a portion of the elongate instrument in the image. This facilitates or allows for robotic navigation or control of the elongate instrument through the anatomy, e.g., through the vasculature of a patient.
Various types of images may be utilized in the methods and systems described herein. For example, an image may be generated by CT or 2D or 3D fluoroscopy. An image may include a 3D or 2D anatomical model or a 2D or 3D fluoroscopic image or other types of images useful for visualizing an anatomy of a patient to perform various medical procedures.
A location, position and/or orientation of the localization sensor is measureable in a coordinate system of the electromagnetic field generator. The location, position and/or orientation measurement of the localization sensor may be registered to the image via one or more transformations.
When using a fluoroscopy image, an image intensifier may be utilized. Localization data from the localization sensor may be registered to a fluoroscopy coordinate system of a fluoroscopy image coupled to the image intensifier. In order to register the localization data from the localization sensor to the fluoroscopy image, various parameters may be ascertained or known. For example, such parameters may include: a distance from an X-ray source to the image intensifier, a distance from the source to a bed, a size of the image intensifier, and/or the axis of rotation of a c-arm of the fluoroscopy system.
In another variation, a system for tracking, localizing or controlling a robotically controlled elongate instrument may include an image of an anatomy of a patient, an electromagnetic localization sensor coupled to an elongate instrument, an electromagnetic field generator; and one or more reference sensors, e.g., fixed reference sensors, positioned in a workspace of the electromagnetic field generator. The electromagnetic field generator may be movable relative to the reference sensor thereby extending or expanding the workspace for elongate instrument tracking or in which the elongate instrument may be tracked. The reference sensor provides a reference coordinate system that is independent of the placement of the electromagnetic field generator.
The localization sensor provides localization data for at least a portion of the elongate instrument. The localization data is registered to the image via the reference coordinate system, to provide a continuously or substantially continuously updated location of at least a portion of the elongate instrument in the image. This facilitates or allows robotic navigation of the elongate instrument through the anatomy.
A location, position and/or orientation of the localization sensor may be measured in the reference sensor coordinate system. The location, position and/or orientation measurement of the localization sensor is registered to the image via one or more transformations. In one example, a transformation may be fixed in space and may not require online computation. The electromagnetic field generator may be moved or rotated without distorting a measurement of the localization sensor as the localization sensor is measured in the reference sensor coordinate system.
In certain variations, the reference sensor may include an anatomy patch. The anatomy patch may be positioned on a patient such that the reference sensor appears in the image. As the reference sensor appears in the image, a location, position and/or orientation of the reference sensor can be measured in the coordinate system of the image.
Various types of images may be utilized in the methods and systems described herein. For example, an image may be generated by CT or 2D or 3D fluoroscopy. An image may include a 3D or 2D anatomical model or a 2D or 3D fluoroscopic image or other types of images useful for visualizing an anatomy of a patient to perform various medical procedures.
A location, position and/or orientation of the localization sensor is measureable in a coordinate system of the electromagnetic field generator. The location, position and/or orientation measurement of the localization sensor may be registered to the image via one or more transformations.
When using a fluoroscopy image, an image intensifier may be utilized. Localization data from the localization sensor may be registered to a fluoroscopy coordinate system of a fluoroscopy image coupled to the image intensifier. In order to register the localization data from the localization sensor to the fluoroscopy image, various parameters may be ascertained or known. For example, such parameters may include: a distance from an X-ray source to the image intensifier, a distance from the source to a bed, a size of the image intensifier, and/or the axis of rotation of a c-arm of the fluoroscopy system.
In certain variations, a method of tracking, localizing or controlling a robotically controlled elongate instrument in real time may include: displaying a single image of an anatomy of a patient; tracking a localization sensor coupled to the robotically controlled elongate instrument; and registering localization data from the localization sensor to the image via one or more fixed reference sensors to provide a continuously updated location of at least a portion of the elongate instrument in the image of the anatomy of a patient to facilitate robotic navigation of the elongate instrument through the anatomy. Only a single image may be required to register the localization data. A location, position and/or orientation measurement of the localization sensor may be registered to the image via one or more transformations. A fluoroscope for creating the displayed image may remain fixed and may not be required to rotate or move to complete the registration. In variations where an electromagnetic localization sensor is utilized, the electromagnetic field generator may be movable relative to the fixed reference sensor, thereby expanding the workspace for elongate instrument tracking or in which the elongate instrument may be tracked.
In certain variations, a localization system as described herein may include two subsystems, an imaging subsystem and a tracking subsystem. The imaging subsystem is used to acquire and visualize patient data. For example, a CT scan may provide a 3D model of the patient's anatomy and a fluoroscopy imaging system may provide an X-ray view of the patient's anatomy during an operation. The tracking subsystem continuously tracks the location, position and/or orientation of the sensor, allowing the doctor to manipulate the elongate instrument or tool to which the sensor is coupled, with ease. The two subsystems are put together via a registration process, which transforms the localization or tracking data so that it appears correctly when overlayed on top of the acquired image.
With reference to the exemplary localization system, including the coordinate systems or frames described above, various registration processes or techniques are described herein.
In certain variations, localization data can be registered to a 3D anatomical model or a fluoroscopy image. The techniques used to perform the registration vary depending on the target. Where localization data is registered to a fluoroscopy image, the 2D nature of the fluoroscopy images may require that multiple images be taken at different angles before the registration process is complete. A marker that shows up in both or multiple images may be provided or required. A convenient choice is to embed a fluoro marker in the patient table so that the marker is visible in all fluoro images, effectively using it as the reference sensor. Once the marker is located in multiple images, its 3D position is easily identified via triangulation. Where localization data is registered to a 3D anatomical model, fiducials or detailed knowledge of a specific spot or point in the 3D model, e.g., its location, position and/or orientation, may be required. A patient reference patch may simplify the registration process. Since the 3D model is acquired during a pre-op CT scan, a patient reference patch worn during the scan provides the reference point for future registration. The patch is in essence a location sensor that also shows up in the CT scan. Because the patch provides its current position and orientation, there is enough information to align the 3D anatomical model to the patient during live cases once the patch is identified in the 3D model.
In addition, the patient reference patch may not be needed if the catheter is registered to a particular anatomical feature. The idea is to embed markers in the catheter and drive the catheter to the particular anatomical structure under the guidance of fluoro. A predefined section of the 3D model representing the anatomical structure is then registered to the catheter once the physician clicks through the markers to recognize their 3D location. In another variation of this approach, the 3D model is marked instead with a few easy-to-reach target locations. As before, the physician drives the catheter to those locations in succession under fluoro, and registers the position and orientation of the catheter each time it reaches a target. After collecting a few data points, the 3D model can be registered to the catheter for use in live cases.
Whether registering localization data to a 3D anatomical model or a fluoroscopy image, in certain variations, a reference sensor may be utilized and may greatly simplify the registration process. While a localization sensor may be measured or tracked in the Traxtal or electromagnetic field generator coordinate frame, the Traxtal system may be sensitive to the presence of metal in or nearby its electromagnetic field generator. As such, close proximity of an image intensifier of a fluoroscopy system may have detrimental effects on the workspace of the localization or tracking system. This problem may be alleviated by the introduction of a reference sensor or an extra sensor placed in the workspace of the electromagnetic field generator.
In certain variations, the reference sensor may be used as an anatomy patch 14. As shown in
3D Registration
In certain variations, localization data can be registered to a 3D anatomical model. The 3D registration process aligns the localization sensor measurement or localization data to the 3D model. The required transformations to complete the registration may differ slightly depending on whether a reference sensor is used in the localization sensor measurement or not.
In a variation where the reference sensor doubles as an anatomy patch as described above, transformation M/RT may be computed offline once the model is acquired. The localization sensor location in the model coordinate system may then be calculated from:
MpS=RMTRpS
Where MpS and RpS are position vectors to the localization sensor described in the model coordinate system and in the reference coordinate system.
Fluoro Registration
In certain variations, localization data can be registered to a fluoroscopy image. The fluoro registration process may align the localization sensor measurement or localization data (e.g., from a Traxtal system or electromagnetic sensor) to a 2D fluoroscopy image.
Information about the imaging system may be required to perform the fluoro registration process. The information or parameters of interest may include: the size of the image intensifier; the distance from the x-ray source to the image intensifier; the distance from the x-ray source to the bed; and the axis of rotation if the fluoro imaging system or C-arm is to be rotated. A preliminary calibration step may be necessary to obtain such information unless it is readily provided by the manufacturer of the imaging system.
The physical dimension of the image intensifier helps determine the scale factor, which provides a mapping from pixels to millimeters. It is computed from comparing the size of the image intensifier to that of the window showing the fluoro image so that 1 pixel difference in the fluoro image corresponds to the correct length in millimeters in the real world.
Knowing the distances is important in setting up a correct projection.
which leads to the expression for calculating the unknowns x and y:
In certain variations, the fluoro image may be taken at an oblique angle, which may require the C-arm of the fluoroscopy image to be rotated. However, the x-ray source and the image intensifier are not always perfectly lined up with the axis of rotation, which may remain to be found.
The calibration process starts with locating the object in the AP view and then in the LA view. Basically, this process identifies a direction vector from the source to the object of interest in two different set ups. Angles ψ and ξ are defined from the AP view as:
where x1 are x2 are the x component of the direction vectors toward the object in the AP and LA views. From the geometry, the offset dx and dz are found from the following equations:
dz−dx=d tan(ψ)tan(Φ)=d tan(ξ)i
dz+dx=d tan(ψ)tan(θ)+d
Alternatively, Rodrigues' formula, widely used in kinematics and robotics, may provide a convenient and robust method to locate the axis of rotation.
where Son is the point of interest on the axis of rotation normal to the origin of the global coordinate system, p1 and p2 are the locations of the object in the fluoro coordinate system in LA and AP views, s is the unit vector along the axis of rotation, and α is the degree of rotation. In this case, s is (0, 1, 0)T and α is π/2.
Once all the variables are determined, the mapping to the fluoro coordinate system (F) may be established. A perspective projection mechanism (from a source to an image intensifier) is described in
which projects a 3D point onto the x-y plane of the fluoro coordinate system (F) after perspective divide, i.e., Fx=x′/y′, Fy=y′/w′, and Fz=0; or divide x′, y′ by w′ to obtain new coordinates in the fluoro coordinate system.
In order to use the above perspective projection, the localization data should be represented in the fluoro coordinate system. The transformation F/RT is generated when the reference sensor is located in multiple fluoro images taken at different angles. The AP view, i.e., the top view, and the LA view, i.e., the side view, may be utilized to register the sensor location.
Alternatively, fluoro registration may be performed using a single image. A transformation may be generated with a single fluoro image. This would involve use of another sensor, e.g., a sensor 20 being fixed to the bed, which would provide the bed coordinate system (B). A bed sensor and/or reference sensor may be fixed or have a known location. This single image fluoro registration process computes a transformation between the fluoro coordinate system (F) and the bed coordinate system (B), i.e., F/BT and then uses B/RT to get the desired transformation F/RT. B/RT is computed by taking the difference between the two sensor readings, i.e. the relative measurement between the bed 20 and the reference 21 sensors. The idea is to use a sensor instead of a fluoro marker to locate the bed in 3D space. The use of a bed sensor provides a couple of key advantages: frame transformation between the bed and the reference sensor, and robustness to table tilting. As noted before, it is possible to figure out the exact location of the bed sensor in fluoro coordinate system once distances among the source, the bed and the image intensifier are discovered. What is different this time is that the bed sensor provides a relative transformation to the reference sensor because both are measured in the same Traxtal or other sensor coordinate system. This facilitates the computation of reference sensor position and orientation in fluoro coordinate system, which is what is desired. In addition, the bed sensor provides orientation information as well as position data. Bed sensor measurement in the fluoro coordinate system is robust to table tilting because the measurement already reflects the change in table orientation. This allows the physician to reposition or reorient the patient as need arises in the tightly spaced operating room. The process for single image registration is similar to normal fluoro registration that requires fluoro images taken at multiple angles, except that there is no need to rotate the fluoro C-arm and thus saves preparation time and operating room space significantly. In summary, first perform normal fluoro registration process to identify various dimensions of the fluoro machine, such as distances between crucial pieces. Once the variables are known, make sure the bed sensor shows up in the fluoro view. Finally, locate the bed sensor in the fluoro view and click on it or select it to recognize its location on the screen, and the process is completed.
In order to get F/BT, the operator locates the bed sensor 20 in the fluoro image 24 (
In addition or in the alternative, the bed sensor 20 may be installed to have the identical orientation as the fluoro coordinate system to simplify the transformation, i.e., F/BR=I. The resulting transformation is:
RFT=BFRBT
which takes a measurement in the reference coordinate system, RpS, and converts it into the fluoro coordinate system, FpS. Then, applying the perspective projection mentioned above will correctly project the measurement FpS, onto the x-y plane of the fluoro coordinate system.
Sterile Integration of Localization Systems
Various options for integrating an outside localization or tracking system with a surgical system or robotically controlled instrument, surgical system or elongate instrument, e.g., Hansen's VCCS system, are described herein. For example, an electromagnetic localization sensor or Traxtal system may be integrated with a Hansen robotically controlled elongate instrument or catheter. It is contemplated that various localization systems may be integrated with a robotically controlled elongate instrument or surgical system, e.g., electromagnetic sensor based systems, Traxtal systems, and fiber optic based localization systems. Various localization sensors may be used in any of the integrated systems described below, e.g., electromagnetic sensors, fiber optic sensors, etc.
In certain variations, a medical system for controlling an elongate instrument may include a robotically controlled instrument assembly having a shapeable elongate instrument. A localization system may be coupled to the robotically controlled instrument assembly and configured to track the shapeable elongate instrument, wherein at least a portion of the localization system may be sterilely isolated from the robotically controlled instrument assembly.
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
In certain variations, where an electromagnetic field generator of the localization system is positioned in a rack, a small electromagnetic field generator box, which converts an analog signal into a digital signal to drive the sensor coils, may be utilized. Alternatively, an addition to a field generator may be made to avoid analog transfer of information. Optionally, the electromagnetic field generator box may be placed in the RCM or instrument driver.
In any of the variations described herein, the robotically controlled instrument assembly may be disposable. Various localization sensors may be used in any of the systems described herein, including electromagnetic localization sensors or fiber optic sensors. The various methods and system described herein may provide real time visualization of the movement or location of an elongate instrument or other medical instrument while avoiding or minimizing exposing a patient to excessive radiation. Alternatively, any of the medical systems, localization systems or tracking systems described herein may be coupled by wires and/or may be coupled wirelessly.
Exemplary elongate instruments for use in any of the localization or tracking systems described herein are illustrated in
Referring to
Each of the variations of elongate instrument depicted in
In certain variations, a method of controlling a robotically controlled elongate instrument in real time may include one or more of the following steps: displaying an image of an anatomy of a patient; tracking or detecting a localization sensor coupled to the robotically controlled elongate instrument; and registering localization data from the localization sensor to the image to provide a continuously updated location of at least a portion of the elongate instrument in the image of the anatomy of a patient to facilitate robotic navigation of the elongate instrument through the anatomy.
In certain variations, a system for tracking or localizing a robotically controlled elongate instrument may include: an image of an anatomy of a patient; an electromagnetic localization sensor coupled to an elongate instrument; and/or an electromagnetic field generator. The generator may be configured to produce an electromagnetic field in which the electromagnetic localization sensor is detected. The localization sensor may provide localization data for at least a portion of the elongate instrument, where the localization data may be registered to the image to provide a continuously updated location of at least a portion of the elongate instrument in the image. This may facilitate robotic navigation of the elongate instrument through the anatomy.
In certain variations, a system for tracking or localizing a robotically controlled elongate instrument may include: an image of an anatomy of a patient; an electromagnetic localization sensor coupled to an elongate instrument; an electromagnetic field generator; and/or at least one reference sensor, e.g., fixed reference sensor, positioned in a workspace of the electromagnetic field generator. The electromagnetic field generator may be movable relative to the reference sensor thereby expanding the workspace for elongate instrument tracking.
In certain variations, a method of tracking or localizing a robotically controlled elongate instrument in real time may include one or more of the following steps: displaying a single image of an anatomy of a patient; tracking or detecting a localization sensor coupled to the robotically controlled elongate instrument; and/or registering localization data from the localization sensor to the image via a reference sensor to provide a continuously updated location of at least a portion of the elongate instrument in the image of the anatomy of a patient to facilitate robotic navigation of the elongate instrument through the anatomy.
In certain variations, a medical system for controlling an elongate instrument may include a robotically controlled instrument assembly comprising a shapeable elongate instrument. The system may include a localization system coupled to the robotically controlled instrument assembly and configured to track the shapeable elongate instrument, where at least a portion of the localization system is sterilely isolated from the robotically controlled instrument assembly.
In certain variations, a system or robotic system for controlling an elongate instrument with respect to a target space may include an elongate instrument having a localization sensor coupled thereto. The system may include a robotic drive system including at least one actuator, where the robotic drive system is configured to interchangeably couple with the elongate instrument to position the instrument with respect to the target space. The system may also include a controller configured to produce a registration between a localization sensor frame and an image frame or a patient frame. The controller can produce a plurality of signals to direct the robotic drive system or elongate instrument in the image frame using the registration and the image may include an image of the target space or patient.
The localization sensor may be any of various localization sensors, e.g., an electromagnetic localization sensor. An electromagnetic localization sensor may be placed in a pulsating magnetic field generated by an electromagnetic field generator to allow for sensor detection or tracking.
A position and/or orientation of the localization sensor may be continuously tracked to allow for accurate manipulation of the elongate instrument. A variety of images may be utilized, e.g., images generated by CT or 2D or 3D fluoroscopy. For example, the image may be a 3D or 2D anatomical model or a 2D or 3D fluoroscopic image. Registering may include transforming localization data generated by the localization sensor to the coordinate frame of the image such that localization data of the elongate instrument is overlaid on the image.
An image intensifier may be provided, where localization data from the localization sensor may be registered to a fluoroscopy coordinate system of a fluoroscopy image coupled to an image intensifier. Registration to a fluoroscopy image may be produced by knowing: a distance from an X-ray source to the image intensifier, a distance from the source to a bed, a size of the image intensifier, and/or the axis of rotation of a c-arm of a fluoroscopy system. In certain variations, the robotically controlled elongate instrument may be a vascular catheter or other catheter. In certain variations, the registration may be used to facilitate intuitive or instinctive driving of the elongate instrument. A single image or multiple images may be utilized. A master input device may be coupled to the controller, where the master input device uses the registration to permit intuitive or instinctive driving of the elongate instrument using the robotic drive system.
In certain variations, a robotic system for controlling an elongate instrument with respect to a target space may include an elongate instrument having a localization sensor coupled thereto. The system may include a robotic drive system having at least one actuator. The robotic drive system may be configured to interchangeably couple with the elongate instrument to position the instrument with respect to the target space. The system may include a controller configured to register localization data from the localization sensor to an image of an anatomy or to a patient or target space frame to provide a continuously updated location of at least a portion of the elongate instrument in the image. The controller can produce a plurality of signals to direct robotic navigation of the elongate instrument through the anatomy based on the location of at least a portion of the elongate instrument in the image.
The controller may be configured to convert a user input into a plurality of signals based on the registration of a sensor reference frame to the image frame or target space or patient reference frame. A master input device may be coupled to the controller, where the master input device uses the registration to permit intuitive or instinctive driving of the elongate instrument using the robotic drive system.
The various systems and methods described herein may, for example, include or utilize any of the systems or methods illustrated in the figures of the present application.
Tracking an Elongate Instrument with an Active Contour
In certain variations, a system or method for tracking or vision tracking a medical instrument or elongate instrument, e.g., robotically controlled, or at least a portion of the instrument in real time in an image may perform or require one or more of the following steps. One or more of a sequence of points may be identified to initialize an active contour or outline of at least a portion of the elongate instrument. The active contour may correspond to at least a portion of the elongate instrument. The active contour may be updated or modified (e.g., lengthened or shortened) as the elongate instrument moves by performing a pixel intensity or density search, focused pixel intensity or density search, color intensity search or other similar search. For example, the active contour may be updated or modified by searching for a change in pixel density or intensity or a change in brightness in the image, e.g., in a fluoroscopy image or other image. An image-based search, e.g., a template matching search, may be performed along the active contour to track a feature or specific point of interest of the elongate instrument. While the below description refers template matching searches, which are one example of an image-based search, other image-based searches may be performed as an alternative to or in addition to the template matching search. The image-based search may be performed to track the active contour or to track a feature, marker or point of interest of the elongate instrument in order to enhance or confirm the accuracy of the active contour. The image-based search may be performed to track a feature, marker or point of interest of the elongate instrument to ascertain the location of the specific feature, marker or point of interest on the active contour or to track the specific feature, marker or point of interest on the active contour. The image-based search may consist of an image correlation computation.
The active contour may restrict the area in which the image-based search or template matching search will occur and the active contour may provide a seed or initiation for the orientation of a template. Once an active contour is created and the active contour is tracking the elongate instrument in the image, the image-based or template matching search may be performed to track specific features, markers or points of interest on or coupled to the elongate instrument. Features, markers or points of interest may include, e.g., an articulation section, control ring, elongate instrument tip or a sheath. In certain variations, where a template matching search is performed templates may vary based on the type and size of the specific feature, marker or point of interest on the elongate instrument being tracked. The template matching search may be a low computation search that may not take into consideration every single pixel value or all possible locations of the template match.
The active contour tracking and/or the image-based search may facilitate or allow for instinctive driving of the elongate instrument. For example, the active contour tracking and/or the image-based search may allow the user to track or know the heading direction of the elongate instrument or an articulation section of the elongate instrument, or to track or know the direction of articulation of the elongate instrument, which facilitates or allows for instinctive driving of the elongate instrument, e.g., of a robotically controlled elongate instrument or catheter.
Instinctive driving involves the tip of an elongate instrument, e.g., a catheter, moving in the same direction as the command input motion irrespective of the headed direction or orientation of the catheter tip. In order to have instinctive driving for all catheter configurations, the system needs to know the heading direction and rotational orientation of the tip of the instrument at all times or substantially all times, so that it can translate the user input commands accordingly to give the desired output. For example, if a catheter tip is straight inside the body, then a user command to bend left will cause the robotic system to pull the left pull wire or control wire, and the catheter tip will bend left. If the catheter tip has rotated 90° in the clockwise direction inside the body, then when the user commands a left bend, if the robotic system were to pull the left wire, the catheter tip would bend upward. If, however, the robotic system knows the orientation of the tip, then the system will know that it needs to pull on the down wire to get the tip to move left according to the users input.
In certain variations, a low resolution spatial filter or other filter may be used to filter out high frequency texture and/or noise in an image. A particle filter may be used to maintain multiple tracking hypotheses in order to overcome any unnecessary obscuring or blocking of a feature, marker or point of interest of the elongate instrument being tracked in an image. In certain variations, a particle filter may be used to guide template matching. Various images or imaging systems may be utilized to obtain, receive or otherwise display an image. The images may include a fluoroscopy image, 3D image or model or any other image or imaging technology suitable for use in medical procedures.
In certain variations, the active contour may track one or more edges of the elongate instrument in the image. For example, the active contour may specifically track two edges or lines with a darker area between the edges corresponding to the shaft of the elongate instrument. Spacing may be maintained between at least two points in a sequence of points making up the active contour and the spacing may prevent the active contour from mis-tracking, e.g., in areas where the elongate instrument curves rapidly.
In certain variations, the active contour may be updated by using an iterative approach. For example, the active contour may be updated by using one or more iterations or wherein each iteration refines the location of the active contour to the image. Any number of iterations may be used.
The active contour may grow and shrink as a projection of the elongate instrument on the image grows and shrinks, thereby tracking the elongate instrument. Points may be added or removed at a desired distance from an end point of the active contour in the direction that the active contour is traveling to grow or shrink the active contour, in order to track movement of the elongate instrument. Each point along an active contour may produce a fitness value that can guide whether or not that point is on or aligned with the elongate instrument in the image.
In certain variations, an active contour may be initialized by selecting two or more points along a shape or path of the elongate instrument in the image using a pointing device, a touch screen or other selection mechanism. For example, an active contour may be initialized by identifying points on a leader, control ring marker, a sheath marker or other portion of the elongate instrument or sheath. The points may initialize the contour and provide a starting location for tracking a leader, control ring marker, sheath marker or other potion of the elongate instrument or sheath.
In certain variations, a correlation matching search may be performed along the active contour to track features or specific points of the elongate instrument and to enhance or confirm accuracy of the active contour.
In certain variations, one or more secondary active contours for tracking elongate non-instrument objects may be provided. The elongate non-instrument objects may be artificially removed from the image if desired.
In certain variations, a portion of one or more non-elongate non-instrument objects may be tracked within the image using one or more other computer vision technologies such as pattern matching, optical flow, feature matching, or shape matching. The non-elongate non-instrument objects may be artificially removed from the image if desired.
In certain variations, more than one elongate instrument object may be attracted by using more than one active contour. Each active contour may be tracked independently of the other active contours.
In any of the elongate instrument tracking variations described herein, a tracking view may be overlaid on a fluoroscopy image or other image, and a user's view of the image may be augmented or modified to best visualize and track the elongate instrument.
In another variation of a method of tracking a robotically controlled elongate instrument in real time in an image, a first active contour of at least a portion of the elongate instrument or a flexible elongate instrument body may be created, where the active contour tracks the elongate instrument. A template matching search may be performed along the active contour for tracking features of the flexible elongate instrument body. A second active contour for tracking elongate non-instrument objects such as wires, stents, or surgical sutures may also be created. The elongate non-instrument objects may be artificially removed from the image. The image may be a fluoroscopy image or other image as described herein.
In another variation, a method of tracking a robotically controlled elongate instrument in real time in an image may include identifying a sequence of points to initialize an active contour of at least a portion of the elongate instrument. The active contour may be updated as the elongate instrument moves by performing a focused pixel intensity or density search. A template matching search may be performed along the active contour to track features of the elongate instrument and to enhance or confirm accuracy of the active contour. Movement of the elongate instrument may be controlled with one or more robotic commands via a robotic controller and/or robotic instrument driver. Movement of the elongate instrument may be predicted based on previous robotic or system commands, where the robotic or system commands are taken into consideration or are used as factors in predicting the location or movement of the elongate instrument in the image to help with accurately tracking the elongate instrument.
In certain variations, a method of tracking a robotically controlled elongate instrument in real time in an image may include one or more of the following steps: controlling movement of the elongate instrument with a robotic or system command; creating an active contour of the elongate instrument; updating the active contour as the elongate instrument moves; performing a template matching search along the active contour to track features of the elongate instrument; and predicting elongate instrument movement based on the commanded elongate instrument motion to increase tracking accuracy. A command for elongate instrument motion may be utilized to predict where the elongate instrument will be moving in the image. A command for elongate instrument motion may be utilized to predict a location or shape of the active contour in the image. A command for elongate instrument motion may be utilized to focus a pixel density search to update the active contour and/or to focus a template matching search to track features of the elongate instrument in the image. A command for elongate instrument motion may be utilized to eliminate false positives during tracking.
In certain variations, a known distance between a first point and a second point on an elongate instrument may be used to guide or focus a template matching search for the first point based on the position of the second point. A command for elongate instrument motion may be utilized to give guidance on the scale of pixels per millimeter on an image and/or to give guidance on the amount or distance that an elongate instrument is moving out of plane.
Exemplary Systems and Methods for Tracking an Elongate Instrument
In certain variations, elongate instrument tracking may be performed using an active contour (“snake”) that tracks at least a portion of the elongate instrument, e.g., the shaft or articulation section, in an image, e.g., a fluoroscopy image. An active contour is a curvilinear model that attempts to minimize an energy function between the shape and the image. The active contour may delineate an outline of the elongate instrument in an image. Identifying, selecting and/or maintaining a set of points (or nodes) on a curve by minimizing an energy function may create an active contour. Terms of the energy function may maintain the spacing between the points of an active contour, minimize curvature (since elongate medical devices may resist sharp bends and may typically remain straight), and/or maintain proximity to the curve or shape of the elongate instrument in the image. In one example, an energy function or algorithm may be used to maintain the spacing between points or nodes. For example, an energy function may be in the form of a cost function or algorithm, such that when two points or nodes move closer together, the cost or risk increases, and the distance between the points is lengthened, increased or maintained by the cost function or algorithm.
In another example, the energy function may be an arbitrary function that provides a penalty if points or nodes move too close together and the function causes a first point or node to be pushed away or forced apart from a second point or node to improve the accuracy of the tracking of an elongate instrument. The spacing between points or nodes of an active contour may also be maintained or controlled to prevent the active contour from mis-tracking in areas where the elongate instrument curves rapidly. The end result is a sequence of points that tracks the elongate instrument or flexible device and grows or shrinks as a projection of the elongate instrument grows and shrinks.
An active contour may be designed to track one or more edges, e.g., edges of an elongate instrument, in an image, using an energy term or function. The energy term or function may be minimized when the active contour is on an edge or when the active contour is on two edges of an elongate instrument. A darker area may be visible on the image, inside or in between the two edges.
In certain variations, an energy function term that maintains spacing between nodes or points of an active contour may automatically space the nodes out in an optimal or desired manner or degree. In other variations, if a node or point of an active contour moves too close to an adjacent node or point, the nodes or points may be combined to maintain good contour coverage. If two nodes or points get sufficiently far from each other, a new node or point may be created or identified between the two nodes or points. These techniques may help maintain the active contour node or point spacing at an adequate, even or desired distance, and may prevent the active contour from malfunctioning or mis-tracking in areas where the elongate instrument curves rapidly or quickly.
In certain variations, elongate instrument tracking may be carried out on an image that has been normalized with a medium-pass filter. Certain dark or light regions that take up a large portion of the image can be filtered out by subtracting the results of a low pass filter from the original image. For example, referring to
In certain variations, various filters, e.g., such as the second derivative of the Gaussian, may be used to detect the shape of an elongate instrument or a catheter in an image, e.g., a fluoroscopy image. The local ridge-like structure of the catheter in an X-ray image is characterized by the direction of flow of the ridge and the thickness of the catheter ridge structure. The second derivative of the Gaussian may be used to analyze such ridge-like structures via the construction of the Hessian matrix and the spectral analysis of this matrix. Using the accurate form of the second derivative of the Gaussian may require computations that are proportional to the size of the catheter in the image. This computational challenge can be overcome using filters that approximate the second derivative of the Gaussian. The computational load is independent of the size of the catheter in the image. The approximate second order Gaussian derivatives can be approximated using piecewise constant filters. See
As shown in
Initializing the Active Contour
Tracking a robotically controlled elongate instrument using an active contour may include identifying one or more or a sequence of points to initialize or create an active contour of at least a portion of the elongate instrument. There are various approaches for initializing an active contour, or specifying one or more points or nodes that define where to start searching for the active contour. The selection or identification of one or more points or nodes to initialize an active contour to track at least a portion of an elongate instrument or to track the shape of an elongate instrument may be performed manually or automatically.
In one variation, each node along the active contour may be identified or selected by the user. For example, this may be accomplished by providing a mouse or trackball click or selection using a touch interface, once for each desired node along the active contour. Other identification or selection mechanisms may be utilized as well, e.g. performing gestures using a touch screen or other user interface to trace over a shape of the elongate instrument in an image. This may produce a robust initialization because each selection point may become a node, but this approach requires the necessary user interaction to select or identify each point.
In another variation, a less intensive method to produce a robust initialization of an active contour includes the user making a selection or identification (e.g., clicking) on one or more instrument features or markers (e.g., control ring on a catheter). This may provide two nodes to initialize the active contour and also provides a starting location for tracking those features, i.e., the leader catheter marker and a sheath marker. After these initial selections or clicks, the active contour tracking system may iterate on the same image until the active contour stops lengthening. This automatically locates both extremes of the elongate instrument, e.g., a catheter, at initialization.
It may also be possible to select or click on a single point or node and then search in the area to find the location or orientation of the elongate instrument, e.g., a catheter, by looking at nearby image intensity gradients. This may be less robust than selecting or identifying two points (e.g., by clicking twice), but is often easier to deal with as a user. This may allow for automatic searching methods to be used that find the areas that appear to be catheter markers and then trying to grow the active contour of the catheter from that position, e.g., for a tracking system that does not require user input to initialize. This may also allow automatic recovery if the tracking was interrupted. In this case, finding the markers on the leader and sheath may be carried out with a separate image-based search or template matching search once the catheter path is initialized.
In certain variations, a search algorithm may be used to create an active contour. A user may select a point on an elongate shaft in an image, thereby seeding a search algorithm. The search algorithm may search in the area around the point to update the active contour and the search algorithm may automatically track the elongate instrument once the initial seeding takes place. In certain variations, a Kinematics based state estimation may be utilized. One of the advantages of having a controlled catheter system is that the current state/shape of the catheter may be estimated using kinematic models. The knowledge of the kinematic model and the geometry of the imaging system can be used together to perform a template based matching/verification system. Given that the catheter has been commanded to move to a position in 3D, the registered geometry of the C-Arm may be used to project the 3D shape onto the image. Such a projection can be used to either specify seed points for a segmentation methodology or may be used standalone as a template based matching system. Given some information about the physics of the imaging system, view dependent templates for the catheter can be generated on the fly for use in tracking the catheter. Another use for kinematics assisted segmentation/tracking is to resolve ties when more than one catheter is present in the field of view.
Updating the Active Contour
Tracking a robotically controlled elongate instrument using an active contour may include updating the active contour as the elongate instrument moves by performing a pixel density or intensity search, focused pixel density or intensity search, color intensity search or other search. This may optimize the shape of the active contour. This sampling search involves sampling a number of points based on the previous position and orientation of the node that is being updated. The lower portion of
For each position in the sampling search, a low-computation method may be used to detect a good fit of the position in the image to the active contour. For example, a set of 9 or more points may be measured (9 points are pictured in the upper portion of
In other variations, advanced approaches may be used to match the active contour to the patterns created by the walls of the instrument or catheter.
In certain variations, tracking an elongate instrument (e.g., robotically controlled elongate instrument or catheter) using an active contour may include using an iterative approach to update the active contour, e.g., when presenting a new image frame. In certain variations, a set or maximum number of iterations, e.g., 5 or 10, may be used, but if the contour moves very little between updates, less than the maximum may be needed.
The active contour may grow or shrink as the elongate instrument in the image, on the screen or display, moves, grows, and/or shrinks. Each point or node along the active contour may produce a certain ‘fitness value’ based on the sampled pixels at that location when doing the low computation image-based search or template matching described above. The population for every node along the elongate instrument produces guidance on the best and worst values that correspond to the active contour tracker node positions. When normalized according to the population of points along the active contour, these fitness values can guide whether a point or node is on the elongate instrument or not on the elongate instrument. At each iteration, extra candidate nodes or points may be created at the desired distance from the end nodes or points of the active contour in the direction that the active contour is traveling in that area. If, after optimization, the fitness value of the end nodes or points are too small, the nodes or points may be removed. If the fitness values are not too small, the nodes or points may remain in the active contour and the overall active contour may lengthen.
In certain variations, the nodes on the inside of the active contour (not on the ends) may be in positions that are not along the elongate instrument in the image. When this occurs, if multiple nodes or points within the active contour have a low fitness value, the active contour may be split into two sides and the shorter side of the active contour (or the side of the active contour that does not contain the features of the elongate instrument being tracked) may be deleted from the active contour. This keeps the active contour tracking robustly even when fast motion occurs, such as withdrawing a guide wire. It also helps the active contour to recover from mis-tracking.
Image-Based Search or Template Matching
In certain variations, elongate instrument tracking may also include performing an image-based search, e.g., a template matching search or focused template matching search, along the active contour to track features of the elongate instrument, e.g., to enhance or confirm accuracy of the active contour or to locate a specific feature of the elongate instrument. Various features of or coupled to an elongate instrument, e.g. a catheter, may be tracked. These may include a control ring, articulation section, various catheter markers, a sheath and/or other features.
Once an active contour is tracking the catheter, templates (or masks) may be used to track features on the catheter, e.g., the control rings on the leader and/or the sheath. Referring to
An advantage of using the combined approach of an active contour and an image-bases search, e.g., a template matching search, is that the active contour restricts the area in which template matching needs to occur and gives a seed or initiation for the orientation of the template. This may significantly speed up the algorithm for real-time tracking and provides additional robustness or accuracy. To combine knowledge of the various tracking techniques, a coefficient mask (see the “Coeff” window of
Various fluoroscopy machines or systems may have a different pixel to real world distance ratio, and therefore, it may be important to be able to specify the number of pixels in a fluoroscopy image or scene for each millimeter. Furthermore, if a fluoroscopy system is used to zoom in on certain areas of a detector or active contour tracker, it is important to update the pixels/mm ratio for the tracking system. There are various ways to detect these ratios automatically or maintain multiple template matching or pixel density or intensity searches at different resolutions at the same time, when tracking an elongate instrument or catheter.
Predictive Tracking
In certain variations, predictive tracking of the elongate instrument in an image based on known robotic commands or system commands may be performed. An advantage of tracking a robotically controlled system, e.g., the Hansen VCCS system, is that the commands for the elongate instrument motion may be exploited to increase the accuracy of tracking. For example, if the catheter leader or distal articulation section is commanded to move forward two millimeters between frames, the next elongate instrument tracking update may know to base image-based searching or template matching two more millimeters along the elongate instrument. This may save significant computation time because less area needs to be searched and the overall robustness of the tracking may be increased because fast commanded motions may automatically be compensated for by the elongate instrument tracking. Commanded robotic elongate instrument motion may be incorporated into the tracking methods or used by the tracking systems as an indicator of or to predict where the elongate instrument will be moving in an image, where the active contour may be and/or where to focus a pixel density or intensity or template matching search. The known commanded motion may be used to update the active contour more quickly and more accurately. Utilizing the known commanded motion in elongate instrument tracking may help eliminate false positives.
Predictive tracking may use the elongate instrument insertion or retraction information to guide a pixel density or intensity or image-based or template matching search. The use of system or robotic elongate instrument commands in predictive tracking may also allow for more advanced searching techniques that can exploit the relationship between different parts of an elongate instrument. For example, the robotic system may know the distance between the sheath and leader control rings. This distance may be used to guide or focus the search for one of the control rings (markers) based on the position of the other control ring. Also, the distance between the rings or other parts of an elongate instrument, measured in the image space, can give guidance on the scale of pixels per millimeter and/or the amount or distance that the elongate instrument is moving out of plane. For example, the known distance between two points on an elongate instrument may be used to determine whether an active contour is in or out of plane. If the distance along the contour on the image is less than the known commanded distance between the 2 points, then it is known that the image is not showing the true length of the catheter and so this section of the catheter is not lying in the plane that is perpendicular to the image. The known distance may also be used to confirm the scale of the active contour in the image.
In certain variations, a commanded motion of an elongate instrument and the tracked motion of the elongate instrument may be used to localize the elongate instrument roll in the image in order to provide or allow instinctiveness or instinctive driving of the elongate instrument. Other techniques for enhancing or improving elongate instrument tracking may include using a two dimensional or three dimensional roadmap or CT image to help the elongate instrument tracking system to track reliably. In another variation, algorithms may be utilized which allow a tracking system to automatically find elongate instruments in an image without requiring a point on the elongate instrument to be selected or clicked on.
Many predictive tracking techniques such as the heuristics discussed herein may exploit knowledge of robotic or system commands and commanded elongate instrument motion. In certain variations, probabilistic methods such as particle filters may be utilized which allow multiple, multi-modal hypothesis to be maintained in a high-dimensional space. For example, when tracking the location of the leader and sheath markers (control rings) along an active contour, if there is a known distance between the two markers, there is a group of possible positions that may be plausible. If something in the fluoroscopy or image field obscures one of the markers (such as the bladder), there may be a distribution of possible locations for the marker; however, if the other marker is still being tracked, that may restrict the possibilities for locations for the first marker. In cases of mis-tracking, multiple hypotheses may be tracked simultaneously until more information provides the needed impetus to disqualify one of the hypotheses.
Probabilistic methods such as particle filters may be an effective way to govern the overall elongate instrument or catheter tracking structure. Particle filters could also be used to guide the overall image based search or template matching technique and integrate other, outside information, such as extra markers on a catheter.
In certain variations, methods of tracking and ignoring non-catheter or elongate non-instrument objects that may confuse the system are provided. A method of tracking an elongate instrument, e.g., robotically controlled elongate instrument, in real time in an image may also include creating a second active contour for tracking elongate non-instrument objects. The elongate non-instrument objects may be artificially removed from the image.
Non-catheter objects, e.g., having a linear shape and dark exposure, such as cables or tubes or other monitoring or fluid lines lying on top of the patient may trick the active contour or active contour tracker and/or the template matching into latching onto the wrong object. Therefore, a method for ignoring certain non-catheter objects may be provided. Referring to
Not only curvilinear objects, but any object that has features that may be tracked using computer vision methods may be ignored in this manner. This gives the user of the system control over what is tracked and what is not tracked. It can also prevent failure modes of the tracker. In certain variations, the non-catheter objects may be automatically detected and ignored with minimal user input. In other variations, the user may be required to click or select the specific non-catheter object and the system may find the contour related to that object.
In certain variations, multiple views may be used either from a biplane fluoroscopy system or from the same fluoroscopy system using different views by rotating the Carm. Multiple fluoroscopy views from different angles acquired using separate fluoroscopy systems or the same system at different times may be used. Multiple views may be used to make it easier to see the different catheters. Multiple fluoroscopy views may be utilized to acquire a third dimension.
In certain variations, multiple view cues may be used to handle the possible distractions to catheter segmentation/tracking algorithms in fluoroscopy images/movies. An example of a distraction is another catheter that crosses the catheter of interest in the image.
In one example, referring to
The scene with the catheter is imaged from position 1 of the C-Arm to yield image 1. The same scene is imaged from C-Arm position 2 to yield image 2. In the case of a biplane fluoroscopy system images 1 and 2 may be captured simultaneously. When using a single plane fluoroscopy system the second image may be obtained by moving the C-Arm. The angle between the two C-Arm positions, A, is known. Thus given A and G, the image point P1 yields a 3D ray, R1, which passes through C1. This ray can be rotated by an angle A and this would provide the ray, R2, along which P2 must lie. The image point P2 can be estimated by projecting the intersection of R1 and R2. Similarly, given a direction D1 in the image, the corresponding direction D2 in image 2 can be found. In certain variations, it may be assumed that a module is provided, that given a seed point, can provide a quantitative “goodness” measure or reward for moving in a particular direction from the seed point to spatially track the catheter in an image. In certain variations, a multi-view approach may be used for robust initialization of a tracking algorithm and may have applications in the initial alignment of robot and C-arm coordinate frames and in biplane tracking.
For example, a second image of a scene captured from a different viewpoint or C-Ann position may be useful. The second image may help exploit the required depth disparity that may exist between two catheters as two distinct catheters may not pass through the same point in space.
In certain variations, this process may be applied temporally to each image pair from a biplane fluoroscopy system, providing a robust 3D catheter shape tracking system. A variation of this temporal process may include applying the technique only when there is an ambiguity in choosing a direction and not at all times or spatial tracking stages. The same two view concept can be extended to multi-view cases as in rotational/sweep based fluoroscopy-like modalities. Some image processing approaches that detect curvilinear structures in the image can be first applied to the image and an initial set of curvilinear structures can be extracted. Then a catheter segmentation process may be formulated as a strand linking/graph linking problem. The above two view consistency method can be applied during the linking stage as well. The segmentation/shape obtained using the above concept in conjunction with any image processing idea may yields an independent measurement of the catheter shape and can thus be used for closed loop shape control and accurate tip/body positioning.
In certain variations, segmentation for alignment/biplane tracking may be performed by starting out in a first image and obtaining the next step direction and then projecting that direction and the start point to the second view/image. Then, determine if this is a good direction to move in the second image as well. If yes, choose the direction or choose the next best direction to move in the first image, and continue. This may help to overcome crossing catheter problems especially when they are at different depths. The cost that will be maximized/minimized to keep the spatial tracking progressing may depend on agreement from both the images and the individual image-path costs.
Overlaid visualization aides may be provided in any of the systems or methods described herein. One advantage of tracking an elongate instrument overlaid in a fluoroscopy view or other image is the ability to augment the user's view of the fluoroscopy system or image. Instead of requiring the doctor or user to interpret the image, certain things may be automatically interpreted (e.g., such as the location of certain markers on the elongate instrument) and made more visible. This may be accomplished by highlighting the elongate instrument and features as shown in
Various types of sensors may be utilized for intra-body localization such as electro-magnetic, sonomicrometric, fiber-optic, impedance based, etc. While some of these sensors can obtain measurements with sufficient precision, some may suffer from drift, scaling errors, and other sources of inaccuracy. However, when combined with fluoro, these sensors may become much more useful since fluoro measurements have very high accuracy. Sampling at a low rate in fluoro of e.g., 1 Hz for a 3-hour procedure is approximately equal to 5-minutues of fluoro radiation at a 30-Hz rate, which is a typical clinical frame rate. Therefore, using low-rate fluoro to re-register a catheter equipped with some other localization technology may provide both high accuracy and high precision localization information or tracking information. In addition to fluoro aiding a secondary technology for accuracy, the secondary technology could aid fluoro in tracking by seeding sequential image segmentation procedures.
In certain variations, a method of tracking an elongate instrument in real time in an image may include one or more of the following steps: initializing an active contour in the image where the active contour corresponds to at least a portion of the elongate instrument; and updating the active contour as the elongate instrument moves by performing a search based on pixel intensity to track the elongate instrument.
In certain variations, a method of tracking a robotically controlled elongate instrument in real time in an image includes one or more of the following steps: controlling movement of the elongate instrument with a robotic or system command; creating an active contour which corresponds to at least a portion of the elongate instrument; updating the active contour as the elongate instrument moves; performing an image-based or template matching search along the active contour to track features of the elongate instrument; and/or predicting elongate instrument movement based on the commanded elongate instrument motion to increase tracking accuracy.
In certain variations, a system or robotic system for controlling and/or tracking an elongate instrument with respect to a target space is provided. The system may include a robotic drive system having at least one actuator. The robotic drive system may be configured to interchangeably couple with the elongate instrument to position the instrument with respect to the target space. The system may include a controller configured to initialize an active contour in an image, where the active contour corresponds to at least a portion of the elongate instrument. The controller may be configured to update the active contour as the elongate instrument moves by performing a search based on pixel intensity. The controller can produce a plurality of signals to direct the robotic drive system or elongate instrument in the image frame based on tracking of the elongate instrument with the active contour. The controller may be configured to perform an image-based search along the active contour to track one or more features of the elongate instrument. The image-based search along the active contour may be performed with a template matching search. The controller may be configured to perform an image-based search or template matching search to track a feature, marker or point of interest of the elongate instrument in order to enhance or confirm accuracy of the active contour. The active contour may restrict the area in which an image-based search or template matching search will occur and may provide a seed for the orientation of a template. Once an active contour is tracking the elongate instrument, an image-based search or template matching search may be performed to track a specific feature, marker or point of interest of the elongate instrument to ascertain a location of the specific feature, marker or point of interest on the active contour. A feature or point of interest may include an articulation section, control ring, marker, or a sheath of the elongate instrument.
The controller may be configured to perform tracking and/or an image-based search or template matching search to facilitate instinctive driving of the elongate instrument. The controller may be configured to perform an image-based search or template matching search to track a heading direction of an articulation section of the elongate instrument to facilitate instinctive driving of the elongate instrument. The image may be a fluoroscopy image. The system may also include a low-pass spatial filter for filtering high frequency texture and noise in the image.
The system may include a master input device coupled to the controller, where the master input device uses the active contour or image based search tracking to permit intuitive or instinctive driving of the tool using the robotic drive system. The image may include an image of the target space or patient.
The various systems and methods described herein may, for example, include or utilize any of the systems or methods illustrated in the figures of the present application.
Each of the individual variations described and illustrated herein has discrete components and features which may be readily separated from or combined with the features of any of the other variations. Modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation, material, composition of matter, process, process act(s) or step(s) to the objective(s), spirit or scope of the present invention.
Methods recited herein may be carried out in any order of the recited events which is logically possible, as well as the recited order of events. Furthermore, where a range of values is provided, every intervening value between the upper and lower limit of that range and any other stated or intervening value in that stated range is encompassed within the invention. Also, any optional feature of the inventive variations described may be set forth and claimed independently, or in combination with any one or more of the features described herein.
All existing subject matter mentioned herein (e.g., publications, patents, patent applications and hardware) is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety except insofar as the subject matter may conflict with that of the present invention (in which case what is present herein shall prevail). The referenced items are provided solely for their disclosure prior to the filing date of the present application. Nothing herein is to be construed as an admission that the present invention is not entitled to antedate such material by virtue of prior invention.
Reference to a singular item, includes the possibility that there are plural of the same items present. More specifically, as used herein and in the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an,” “said” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. It is further noted that the claims may be drafted to exclude any optional element. As such, this statement is intended to serve as antecedent basis for use of such exclusive terminology as “solely,” “only” and the like in connection with the recitation of claim elements, or use of a “negative” limitation. Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs.
This disclosure is not intended to be limited to the scope of the particular forms set forth, but is intended to cover alternatives, modifications, and equivalents of the variations described herein. Further, the scope of the disclosure fully encompasses other variations that may become obvious to those skilled in the art in view of this disclosure. The scope of the present invention is limited only by the appended claims.
While multiple embodiments and variations of the many aspects of the invention have been disclosed and described herein, such disclosure is provided for purposes of illustration only. Many combinations and permutations of the disclosed system are useful in minimally invasive medical intervention and diagnosis, and the system is configured to be flexible. The foregoing illustrated and described embodiments of the invention are susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, and it should be understood that the invention generally, as well as the specific embodiments described herein, are not limited to the particular forms or methods disclosed, but also cover all modifications, equivalents and alternatives falling within the scope of the appended claims. Further, the various features and aspects of the illustrated embodiments may be incorporated into other embodiments, even if no so described herein, as will be apparent to those skilled in the art.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/832,586, entitled “SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR LOCALIZING, TRACKING AND/OR CONTROLLING MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS,” filed on Mar. 15, 2013, and published as U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0275985, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,629,565 on Apr. 25, 2017. The disclosure of the above-referenced patent application is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4745908 | Wardle | May 1988 | A |
5273025 | Sakiyam et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5398691 | Martin et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5408409 | Glassman et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5524180 | Wang et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5526812 | Dumoulin et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5550953 | Seraji | Aug 1996 | A |
5631973 | Green | May 1997 | A |
5713946 | Ben-Haim | Feb 1998 | A |
5749362 | Funda et al. | May 1998 | A |
5831614 | Tognazzini et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5859934 | Green | Jan 1999 | A |
5876325 | Mizuno et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5935075 | Casscells | Aug 1999 | A |
5951475 | Gueziec et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6038467 | De Bliek et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6047080 | Chen | Apr 2000 | A |
6059718 | Taniguchi et al. | May 2000 | A |
6063095 | Wang et al. | May 2000 | A |
6167292 | Badano | Dec 2000 | A |
6203493 | Ben-Haim | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6226543 | Gilboa et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6246784 | Summers | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6246898 | Vesely | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6259806 | Green | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272371 | Shlomo | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6332089 | Acker | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6424885 | Niemeyer et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6425865 | Salcudean et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6466198 | Feinstein | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6490467 | Bucholz | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6553251 | Lahdesmaki | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6665554 | Charles | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6690963 | Ben-Haim | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6690964 | Beiger et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6726675 | Beyar | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6812842 | Dimmer | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6899672 | Chin | May 2005 | B2 |
6926709 | Beiger et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7155315 | Niemeyer et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7180976 | Wink | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7206627 | Abovitz | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7233820 | Gilboa | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7386339 | Strommer et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7756563 | Higgins | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7850642 | Moll et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7901348 | Soper | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7974681 | Wallace et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8041413 | Barbagli et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8052621 | Wallace et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8073528 | Zhao et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8092397 | Wallace et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8155403 | Tschirren | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8190238 | Moll et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8285364 | Barbagli et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8298135 | Ito et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8317746 | Sewell et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8388556 | Wallace et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8391957 | Carlson et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8394054 | Wallace et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8409172 | Moll et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8460236 | Roelle et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8498691 | Moll et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8657781 | Sewell | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8672837 | Roelle et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8821376 | Tolkowsky | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8858424 | Hasegawa | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8929631 | Pfister et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9014851 | Wong et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9057600 | Walker et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9066740 | Carlson et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9125639 | Mathis | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9138129 | Diolaiti | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9173713 | Hart et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9183354 | Baker et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9186046 | Ramamurthy et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9271663 | Walker et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9272416 | Hourtash et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9283046 | Walker et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9289578 | Walker et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9459087 | Dunbar | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9498291 | Balaji et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9504604 | Alvarez | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9532840 | Wong et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9561083 | Yu et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9566414 | Wong et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9603668 | Weingarten et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9622827 | Yu et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9629595 | Walker et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9629682 | Wallace et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9636184 | Lee et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9710921 | Wong et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9713509 | Schuh et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9717563 | Tognaccini | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9727963 | Mintz et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9737371 | Romo et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9737373 | Schuh | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9744335 | Jiang | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9763741 | Alvarez et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9788910 | Schuh | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9818681 | Machida et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9827061 | Balaji et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9844353 | Walker et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9844412 | Bogusky et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9867635 | Alvarez et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9918681 | Wallace et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9931025 | Graetzel et al. | Apr 2018 | B1 |
9949749 | Noonan et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9955986 | Shah | May 2018 | B2 |
9962228 | Schuh et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
9980785 | Schuh | May 2018 | B2 |
9993313 | Schuh et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10016900 | Meyer et al. | Jul 2018 | B1 |
10022192 | Ummalaneni | Jul 2018 | B1 |
10046140 | Kokish et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10080576 | Romo et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10136950 | Schoenefeld | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10145747 | Lin et al. | Dec 2018 | B1 |
10159532 | Ummalaneni et al. | Dec 2018 | B1 |
10278778 | State | May 2019 | B2 |
10299870 | Connolly et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10426559 | Graetzel et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10434660 | Meyer | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10492741 | Walker et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10464209 | Ho et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10470830 | Hill | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10482599 | Mintz et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10517692 | Eyre et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10524866 | Srinivasan | Jan 2020 | B2 |
20010021843 | Bosselmann et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010039421 | Heilbrun | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020065455 | Ben-Haim et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020077533 | Bieger et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020120188 | Brock et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030105603 | Hardesty | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030125622 | Schweikard | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030181809 | Hall et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030195664 | Nowlin et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040047044 | Dalton | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040072066 | Cho et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040186349 | Ewers | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040249267 | Gilboa | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040263535 | Birkenbach et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050027397 | Niemeyer | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050060006 | Pflueger | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050085714 | Foley et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050107679 | Geiger | May 2005 | A1 |
20050143649 | Minai et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050143655 | Satoh | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050182295 | Soper et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050193451 | Quistgaard et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050256398 | Hastings | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050272975 | McWeeney et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060004286 | Chang | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060015096 | Hauck et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060025668 | Peterson | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060025676 | Viswanathan et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060058643 | Florent et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060084860 | Geiger | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060095066 | Chang | May 2006 | A1 |
20060098851 | Shoham et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060100610 | Wallace et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060149134 | Soper et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060173290 | Lavallee et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060184016 | Glossop | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060200026 | Wallace et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060209019 | Hu | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060258935 | Pile-Spellman et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060258938 | Hoffman et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070032826 | Schwartz | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070055128 | Glossop | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070055144 | Neustadter | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073136 | Metzger | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070083193 | Werneth | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070123748 | Meglan | May 2007 | A1 |
20070135886 | Maschke | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070156019 | Larkin et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070167743 | Honda | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070167801 | Webler et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070208252 | Makower | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070253599 | White et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070269001 | Maschke | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070293721 | Gilboa | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070299353 | Harlev et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080027464 | Moll et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080071140 | Gattani | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080079421 | Jensen | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080082109 | Moll et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080103389 | Begelman et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080118118 | Berger | May 2008 | A1 |
20080118135 | Averbach | May 2008 | A1 |
20080123921 | Gielen et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080140087 | Barbagli et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080147089 | Loh | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080161681 | Hauck | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183064 | Chandonnet | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183068 | Carls et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183073 | Higgins et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183188 | Carls et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080201016 | Finlay | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080207997 | Higgins et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080212082 | Froggatt et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080218770 | Moll et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080243142 | Gildenberg | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080255505 | Carlson et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080262297 | Gilboa | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080275349 | Halperin | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080287963 | Rogers et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080306490 | Lakin et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080312501 | Hasegawa et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090030307 | Govari | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090054729 | Mori | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090076476 | Barbagii et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090149867 | Glozman | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090221871 | Peh | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090227861 | Ganatra | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090248036 | Hoffman et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090259230 | Khadem | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090262109 | Markowitz et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090262979 | Markowitz | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090292166 | Ito | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090295797 | Sakaguchi | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100008555 | Trumer | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100039506 | Sarvestani | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100041949 | Tolkowsky | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100054536 | Huang et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100113852 | Sydora | May 2010 | A1 |
20100121139 | OuYang | May 2010 | A1 |
20100121181 | Wang | May 2010 | A1 |
20100160733 | Gilboa | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100161022 | Tolkowsky | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100161129 | Costa et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100210938 | Verard | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100225209 | Goldberg | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100240989 | Stoianovici | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100290530 | Huang et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100292565 | Meyer | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100298641 | Tanaka | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100328455 | Nam et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331856 | Carlson et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110015648 | Alvarez et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110054303 | Barrick | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110092808 | Shachar | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110184238 | Higgins | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110234780 | Ito | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110238082 | Wenderow | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110245665 | Nentwick | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110248987 | Mitchell | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110249016 | Zhang | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110270273 | Moll et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110276179 | Banks et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110295247 | Schlesinger et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110295248 | Wallace et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110295267 | Tanner et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110295268 | Roelle et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110319910 | Roelle et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120046521 | Hunter et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120056986 | Popovic | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120062714 | Liu | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120065481 | Hunter | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120069167 | Liu et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120071782 | Patil et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120082351 | Higgins | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120116253 | Wallace et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120120305 | Takahashi | May 2012 | A1 |
20120165656 | Montag | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120191079 | Moll et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120209069 | Popovic | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120209293 | Carlson | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120215094 | Rahimian et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120219185 | Hu | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120289777 | Chopra | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120289783 | Duindam et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120302869 | Koyrakh | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130060146 | Yang et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130144116 | Cooper et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130165945 | Roelle | Jun 2013 | A9 |
20130190741 | Moll et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130204124 | Duindam | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130225942 | Holsing | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130243153 | Sra | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130246334 | Ahuja | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130259315 | Angot et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130303892 | Zhao | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130345718 | Crawford | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140058406 | Tsekos | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140107390 | Brown | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140114180 | Jain | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140148808 | Inkpen et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140142591 | Alvarez et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140148673 | Bogusky | May 2014 | A1 |
20140180063 | Zhao | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140235943 | Paris | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140243849 | Saglam | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140257334 | Wong et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140257746 | Dunbar et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140264081 | Walker et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140275988 | Walker et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276033 | Brannan | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276392 | Wong et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276394 | Wong et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276646 | Wong et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276934 | Balaji et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276937 | Wong et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276938 | Hsu et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140277747 | Walker et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140296655 | Akhbardeh et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140309527 | Namati et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140309649 | Alvarez et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140343416 | Panescu | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140350391 | Prisco et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140357953 | Roelle et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140357984 | Wallace et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140364739 | Liu | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140364870 | Alvarez et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150051482 | Liu et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150051592 | Kintz | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150054929 | Ito et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150057498 | Akimoto | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150073266 | Brannan | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150101442 | Romo | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150119638 | Yu et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150133963 | Barbagli | May 2015 | A1 |
20150141808 | Elhawary | May 2015 | A1 |
20150141858 | Razavi | May 2015 | A1 |
20150142013 | Tanner et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150164594 | Romo et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150164596 | Romo | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150223725 | Engel | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150223897 | Kostrzewski et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150223902 | Walker et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150255782 | Kim et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150265087 | Park | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150265359 | Camarillo | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150265368 | Chopra | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150265807 | Park et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150275986 | Cooper | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150287192 | Sasaki | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150297133 | Jouanique-Dubuis et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150305650 | Hunter | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150313503 | Seibel et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150314110 | Park | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150335480 | Alvarez et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150374956 | Bogusky | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150375399 | Chiu et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160000302 | Brown | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160000414 | Brown | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160000520 | Lachmanovich | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160001038 | Romo et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160008033 | Hawkins et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160111192 | Suzara | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160128992 | Hudson | May 2016 | A1 |
20160175059 | Walker et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160183841 | Duindam et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160199134 | Brown et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160202053 | Walker et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160206389 | Miller | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160213432 | Flexman | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160213884 | Park | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160228032 | Walker et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160270865 | Landey et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160287279 | Bovay et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160287346 | Hyodo et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160296294 | Moll et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160314710 | Jarc | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160331469 | Hall et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160360947 | Iida | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160372743 | Cho et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160374541 | Agrawal et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170007337 | Dan | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170055851 | Al-Ali | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170065356 | Balaji et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170079725 | Hoffman | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170079726 | Hoffman | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170100084 | Walker et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170100199 | Yu et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170105803 | Wong et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170113019 | Wong et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170119413 | Romo | May 2017 | A1 |
20170119481 | Romo et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170151027 | Walker et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170165011 | Bovay et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170172673 | Yu et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170189118 | Chopra | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170202627 | Sramek et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170209073 | Sramek et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170215808 | Shimol et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170215969 | Zhai et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170238807 | Veritkov et al. | Aug 2017 | A9 |
20170258366 | Tupin | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170290631 | Lee et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170296032 | Li | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170296202 | Brown | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170325896 | Donhowe | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170333679 | Jiang | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170340241 | Yamada | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170340396 | Romo et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170348067 | Krimsky | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20170360418 | Wong et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20170360508 | Germain et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20170365055 | Mintz et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20170367782 | Schuh et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180025666 | Ho et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180055582 | Krimsky | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180056044 | Choi et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180098690 | Iwaki | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180177383 | Noonan et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180177556 | Noonan et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180177561 | Mintz et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180184988 | Walker et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180214011 | Graetzel et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180217734 | Koenig et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180221038 | Noonan et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180221039 | Shah | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180240237 | Donhowe et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180250083 | Schuh et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180271616 | Schuh et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180279852 | Rafii-Tari et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180280660 | Landey et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180286108 | Hirakawa | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180289243 | Landey et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180289431 | Draper et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180308247 | Gupta | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180325499 | Landey et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180333044 | Jenkins | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180360435 | Romo | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180368920 | Ummalaneni | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190000559 | Berman et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190000560 | Berman et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190000576 | Mintz et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190046814 | Senden et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190066314 | Abhari | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190083183 | Moll et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190086349 | Nelson | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190105776 | Ho et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190107454 | Lin | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190110839 | Rafii-Tari et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190110843 | Ummalaneni et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190117176 | Walker et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190117203 | Wong et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190151148 | Alvarez et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190125164 | Roelle et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190167366 | Ummalaneni | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190175009 | Mintz | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190175062 | Rafii-Tari et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190175287 | Hill | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190175799 | Hsu | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190183585 | Rafii-Tari et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190183587 | Rafii-Tari et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190216548 | Ummalaneni | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190216550 | Eyre | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190216576 | Eyre | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190223974 | Romo | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190228525 | Mintz et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190228528 | Mintz et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190246882 | Graetzel et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190262086 | Connolly et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190269468 | Hsu et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190274764 | Romo | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190287673 | Michihata | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190290109 | Agrawal et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190298160 | Ummalaneni et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190298458 | Srinivasan | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190298460 | Al-Jadda | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190298465 | Chin | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190328213 | Landey et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190336238 | Yu | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190365209 | Ye et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190365479 | Rafii-Tari | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190365486 | Srinivasan et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190374297 | Wallace et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190375383 | Alvarez | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190380787 | Ye | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190380797 | Yu | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200000530 | DeFonzo | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200000533 | Schuh | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200022767 | Hill | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200039086 | Meyer | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200046434 | Graetzel | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200054405 | Schuh | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200054408 | Schuh et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200060516 | Baez | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200078103 | Duindam | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200093549 | Chin | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200093554 | Schuh | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200100845 | Julian | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200100853 | Ho | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200100855 | Leparmentier | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200101264 | Jiang | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200107894 | Wallace | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200121502 | Kintz | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200146769 | Eyre | May 2020 | A1 |
20200155084 | Walker | May 2020 | A1 |
20200170630 | Wong | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200170720 | Ummalaneni | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200188043 | Yu | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200197112 | Chin | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200206472 | Ma | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200217733 | Lin | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200222134 | Schuh | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200237458 | DeFonzo | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200261172 | Romo | Aug 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101147676 | Mar 2008 | CN |
101222882 | Jul 2008 | CN |
102316817 | Jan 2012 | CN |
102458295 | May 2012 | CN |
102973317 | Mar 2013 | CN |
103735313 | Apr 2014 | CN |
105559850 | May 2016 | CN |
105559886 | May 2016 | CN |
105611881 | May 2016 | CN |
106821498 | Jun 2017 | CN |
104931059 | Sep 2018 | CN |
3 025 630 | Jun 2016 | EP |
10-2014-0009359 | Jan 2014 | KR |
2569699 | Nov 2015 | RU |
WO 03086190 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO 05087128 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO 09097461 | Jun 2007 | WO |
WO 15089013 | Jun 2015 | WO |
WO 17048194 | Mar 2017 | WO |
WO 17066108 | Apr 2017 | WO |
WO 17167754 | Oct 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Gutierrez et al., A practical global distortion correction method for an image intensifier based x-ray fluoroscopy system, Med Phys. Mar. 2008 ; 35(3): 997-1007. |
Konen et al., 1998, The VN-project: endoscopic image processing for neurosurgery, Computer Aided Surgery, 3:1-6. |
Mayo Clinic, Robotic Surgery, https://www.mayoclinic.org/tests-procedures/robotic-surgery/about/pac-20394974?p=1, downloaded from the internet on Jul. 12, 2018, 2 pp. |
Shi et al., Sep. 14-18, 2014, Simultaneous catheter and environment modeling for trans-catheter aortic valve implantation, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 2024-2029. |
Vemuri et al., Dec. 2015, Inter-operative biopsy site relocations in endoluminal surgery, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, <10.1109/TBME.2015.2503981>. <hal-01230752>. |
Wilson et al., 2008, a buyer's guide to electromagnetic tracking systems for clinical applications, Proc. of SPCI, 6918:691826-1 p. 6918B-11. |
Ciuti et al., 2012, Intra-operative monocular 30 reconstruction for image-guided navigation in active locomotion capsule endoscopy. Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (Biorob), 4th IEEE Ras & Embs International Conference on IEEE. |
Fallavollita et al., 2010, Acquiring multiview C-arm images to assist cardiac ablation procedures, EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing, vol. 2010, Article ID 871408, pp. 1-10. |
Haigron et al., 2004, Depth-map-based scene analysis for activew navigation in virtual angioscopy, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 23(11):1380-1390. |
Kumar et al., 2014, Stereoscopic visualization of laparoscope image using depth information from 3D model, Computer methods and programs in biomedicine 113(3):862-868. |
Livatino et al., 2015, Stereoscopic visualization and 3-D technologies in medical endoscopic teleoperation, IEEE. |
Luo et al., 2010, Modified hybrid bronchoscope tracking based on sequential monte carlo sampler: Dynamic phantom validation, Asian Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. |
Mourgues et al., 2002, Flexible calibration of actuated stereoscopic endoscope for overlay inrobot assisted surgery, International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. |
Nadeem et al., 2016, Depth Reconstruction and Computer-Aided Polyp Detection in Optical Colonoscopy Video Frames, arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.01329. |
Point Cloud, Sep. 10, 2010, Wikipedia, 2 pp. |
Racadio et al., Dec. 2007, Live 3D Guidance in the interventional radioloay suite. AJR, 189:W357-W364. |
Sato et al., 2016, Techniques of stapler-based navigational thoracoscopic segmentectomy using virtual assisted lung mapping (VAL-MAP), Journal of Thoracic Disease, 8(Suppl 9):S716. |
Shen et al., 2015, Robust camera localisation with depth reconstruction for bronchoscopic navigation. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 10(6):801-813. |
Solheim et al., May 14, 2009, Navigated resection of giant intracranial meningiomas based on intraoperative 3D ultrasound, Acta Neurochir, 151:1143-1151. |
Song et al., 2012, Autonomous and stable tracking of endoscope instrument tools with monocular camera, Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM), 2012 IEEE-ASME International Conference on. IEEE. |
Verdaasdonk et al., Jan. 23, 2012, Effect of microsecond pulse length and tip shape on explosive bubble formation of 2.78 μm Er,Cr;YSGG and 2.94 μm Er:YAG laser, Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 8221, 12. |
Yip et al., 2012, Tissue tracking and registration for image-guided surgery, IEEE transactions on medical imaging 31 (11):2169-2182. |
Zhou et al., 2010, Synthesis of stereoscopic views from monocular endoscopic videos, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW), 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on IEEE. |
Kiraly et al, 2002, Three-dimensional Human Airway Segmentation Methods for Clinical Virtual Bronchoscopy, Acad Radiol, 9:1153-1168. |
Kiraly et al., Sep. 2004, Three-dimensional path planning for virtual bronchoscopy, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 23(9):1365-1379. |
Solomon et al., Dec. 2000, Three-dimensional CT-Guided Bronchoscopy With a Real-Time Electromagnetic Position Sensor A Comparison of Two image Registration Methods, Chest, 118(6):1783-1787. |
Al-Ahmad et al., dated 2005, Early experience with a computerized robotically controlled catheter system, Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 12:199-202. |
Hansen Medical, Inc. 2005, System Overview, product brochure, 2 pp., dated as available at http://hansenmedical.com/system.aspx on Jul. 14, 2006 (accessed Jun. 25, 2019 using the internet archive way back machine). |
Hansen Medical, Inc. Bibliography, product brochure, 1 p., dated as available at http://hansenmedical.com/bibliography.aspx on Jul. 14, 2006 (accessed Jun. 25, 2019 using the internet archive way back machine). |
Hansen Medical, Inc. dated 2007, Introducing the Sensei Robotic Catheter System, product brochure, 10 pp. |
Hansen Medical, Inc. dated 2009, Sensei X Robotic Catheter System, product brochure, 5 pp. |
Hansen Medical, Inc. Technology Advantages, product brochure, 1 p., dated as available at http://hansenmedical.com/advantages.aspx on Jul. 13, 2006 (accessed Jun. 25, 2019 using the internet archive way back machine). |
Marrouche et al., dated May 6, 2005, AB32-1, Preliminary human experience using a novel robotic catheter remote control, Heart Rhythm, 2(5):S63. |
Oh et al., dated May 2005, P5-75, Novel robotic catheter remote control system: safety and accuracy in delivering RF Lesions in all 4 cardiac chambers, Heart Rhythm, 2(5):S277-S278. |
Reddy et al., May 2005, P1-53. Porcine pulmonary vein ablation using a novel robotic catheter control system and real-time integration of CT imaging with electoanatomical mapping, Hearth Rhythm, 2(5):S121. |
Slepian, dated 2010, Robotic Catheter Intervention: the Hansen Medical Sensei Robot Catheter System, PowerPoint presentation, 28 pp. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170209224 A1 | Jul 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13832586 | Mar 2013 | US |
Child | 15466565 | US |