Because pure virgin PET polymer is more expensive than recycled PET polymer, and because of the environmental benefits associated with using recycled polymer, it would be desirable to be able to produce bulked continuous carpet filament from 100% recycled PET polymer (e.g., PET polymer from post-consumer PET bottles).
A method of manufacturing bulked continuous carpet filament, according to particular embodiments comprises: (A) providing a multi-screw extruder; (B) using a pressure regulation system to reduce a pressure within the multi-screw extruder to below about 1.8 millibars; (C) while maintaining the pressure within the multi-screw extruder below about 1.8 millibars, passing a melt comprising recycled polymer through the multi-screw extruder; and (D) after the step of passing the melt of recycled polymer through the multi-screw extruder, forming the recycled polymer into bulked continuous carpet filament. In various embodiments, the multi-screw extruder comprises: (i) a first satellite screw extruder comprising a first satellite screw that is mounted to rotate about a central axis of the first satellite screw; (ii) a second satellite screw extruder comprising a second satellite screw that is mounted to rotate about a central axis of the second satellite screw; and (iii) the pressure regulation system that is adapted to maintain a pressure within the first and second satellite screw extruders below about 1.8 millibars. In particular embodiments, when passing the melt comprising recycled polymer through the multi-screw extruder: (1) a first portion of the melt passes through the first satellite screw extruder; and (2) a second portion of the melt passes through the second satellite screw extruder.
An extruder for use in extruding a polymer melt, according to particular embodiments, comprises: (1) a first satellite screw extruder comprising a first satellite screw that is mounted to rotate about a central axis of the first satellite screw; (2) a second satellite screw extruder comprising a second satellite screw that is mounted to rotate about a central axis of the second satellite screw; and (3) a pressure regulation system that is adapted to maintain a pressure within the first and second satellite screw extruders below a pressure of about 1.5 millibars as the polymer melt passes through the first and second screw extruders.
A bulked continuous carpet filament, according to various embodiments, consists essentially of a recycled polymer.
A method of manufacturing carpet filament, according to particular embodiments, comprises the steps of: (A) washing a group of polymer flakes to remove at least a portion of one or more contaminants from a surface of the flakes, the group of flakes comprising a first plurality of flakes that consist essentially of PET and a second plurality of flakes that do not consist essentially of PET; (B) after the step of washing the first plurality of flakes: (i) scanning the washed group of flakes to identify the second plurality of flakes, and (ii) separating the second plurality of flakes from the first plurality of flakes; (C) melting the second plurality of flakes to produce a polymer melt; (D) providing an extruder that extrudes material in a plurality of different extrusion streams; (E) reducing a pressure within the extruder to below about 1.5 millibars; (F) while maintaining the pressure within the extruder below about 1.5 millibars, passing the polymer melt through the extruder so that the polymer melt is divided into a plurality of extrusion streams, each having a pressure below about 1.5 millibars; (G) after passing the polymer melt through the extruder, filtering the polymer melt through at least one filter; and (H) after passing the polymer melt through the filter, forming the recycled polymer into bulked continuous carpet filament.
Having described various embodiments in general terms, reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings, which are not necessarily drawn to scale, and wherein:
Various embodiments will now be described in greater detail. It should be understood that the invention may be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein. Rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the scope of the invention to those skilled in the art. Like numbers refer to like elements throughout.
New processes for making fiber from recycled polymer (e.g., recycled PET polymer) are described below. In various embodiments, this new process: (1) is more effective than earlier processes in removing contaminates and water from the recycled polymer; and/or (2) does not require the polymer to be melted and cooled as many times as in earlier processes. In at least one embodiment, the improved process results in a recycled PET polymer having a polymer quality that is high enough that the PET polymer may be used in producing bulked continuous carpet filament from 100% recycled PET content (e.g., 100% from PET obtained from previously used PET bottles). In particular embodiments, the recycled PET polymer has an intrinsic viscosity of at least about 0.79 dL/g (e.g., of between about 0.79 dL/g and about 1.00 dL/g).
A BCF (bulked continuous filament) manufacturing process, according to a particular embodiment, may generally be broken down into three steps: (1) preparing flakes of PET polymer from post-consumer bottles for use in the process; (2) passing the flakes through an extruder that melts the flakes and purifies the resulting PET polymer; and (3) feeding the purified polymer into a spinning machine that turns the polymer into filament for use in manufacturing carpets. These three steps are described in greater detail below.
In a particular embodiment, the step of preparing flakes of PET polymer from post-consumer bottles comprises: (A) sorting post-consumer PET bottles and grinding the bottles into flakes; (B) washing the flakes; and (C) identifying and removing any impurities or impure flakes.
In particular embodiments, bales of clear and mixed colored recycled post-consumer (e.g., “curbside”) PET bottles (or other containers) obtained from various recycling facilities make-up the post-consumer PET containers for use in the process. In other embodiments, the source of the post-consumer PET containers may be returned ‘deposit’ bottles (e.g., PET bottles whose price includes a deposit that is returned to a customer when the customer returns the bottle after consuming the bottle's contents). The curbside or returned “post-consumer” or “recycled” containers may contain a small level of non-PET contaminates. The contaminants in the containers may include, for example, non-PET polymeric contaminants (e.g., PVC, PLA, PP, PE, PS, PA, etc.), metal (e.g., ferrous and non-ferrous metal), paper, cardboard, sand, glass or other unwanted materials that may find their way into the collection of recycled PET. The non-PET contaminants may be removed from the desired PET components, for example, through one or more of the various processes described below.
In particular embodiments, smaller components and debris (e.g., components and debris greater than 2 inches in size) are removed from the whole bottles via a rotating trammel. Various metal removal magnets and eddy current systems may be incorporated into the process to remove any metal contaminants. Near Infra-Red optical sorting equipment such as the NRT Multi Sort IR machine from Bulk Handling Systems Company of Eugene, Oreg., or the Spyder IR machine from National Recovery Technologies of Nashville, Tenn., may be utilized to remove any loose polymeric contaminants that may be mixed in with the PET flakes (e.g., PVC, PLA, PP, PE, PS, and PA). Additionally, automated X-ray sorting equipment such as a VINYLCYCLE machine from National Recovery Technologies of Nashville, Tenn. may be utilized to remove remaining PVC contaminants.
In particular embodiments, a binary segregation of the clear materials from the colored materials is achieved using automated color sorting equipment equipped with a camera detection system (e.g., an Multisort ES machine from National Recovery Technologies of Nashville, Tenn.). In various embodiments, manual sorters are stationed at various points on the line to remove contaminants not removed by the sorter and any colored bottles. In particular embodiments, the sorted material is taken through a granulation step (e.g., using a 50B Granulator machine from Cumberland Engineering Corporation of New Berlin, Wis.) to size reduce (e.g., grind) the bottles down to a size of less than one half of an inch. In various embodiments, the bottle labels are removed from the resultant “dirty flake” (e.g., the PET flakes formed during the granulation step) via an air separation system prior to entering the wash process.
In particular embodiments, the “dirty flake” is then mixed into a series of wash tanks. As part of the wash process, in various embodiments, an aqueous density separation is utilized to separate the olefin bottle caps (which may, for example, be present in the “dirty flake” as remnants from recycled PET bottles) from the higher specific gravity PET flakes. In particular embodiments, the flakes are washed in a heated caustic bath to about 190 degrees Fahrenheit. In particular embodiments, the caustic bath is maintained at a concentration of between about 0.6% and about 1.2% sodium hydroxide. In various embodiments, soap surfactants as well as defoaming agents are added to the caustic bath, for example, to further increase the separation and cleaning of the flakes. A double rinse system then washes the caustic from the flakes.
In various embodiments, the flake is centrifugally dewatered and then dried with hot air to at least substantially remove any surface moisture. The resultant “clean flake” is then processed through an electrostatic separation system (e.g., an electrostatic separator from Carpco, Inc. of Jacksonville, Fla.) and a flake metal detection system (e.g., an MSS Metal Sorting System) to further remove any metal contaminants that remain in the flake. In particular embodiments, an air separation step removes any remaining label from the clean flake. In various embodiments, the flake is then taken through a flake color sorting step (e.g., using an OPTIMIX machine from TSM Control Systems of Dundalk, Ireland) to remove any remaining color contaminants remaining in the flake. In various embodiments, an electro-optical flake sorter based at least in part on Raman technology (e.g., a Powersort 200 from Unisensor Sensorsysteme GmbH of Karlsruhe, Germany) performs the final polymer separation to remove any non-PET polymers remaining in the flake. This step may also further remove any remaining metal contaminants and color contaminants.
In various embodiments, the combination of these steps delivers substantially clean (e.g., clean) PET bottle flake comprising less than about 50 parts per million PVC (e.g., 25 ppm PVC) and less than about 15 parts per million metals for use in the downstream extrusion process described below.
In particular embodiments, after the flakes are washed, they are fed down a conveyor and scanned with a high-speed laser system 300. In various embodiments, particular lasers that make up the high-speed laser system 300 are configured to detect the presence of particular contaminates (e.g., PVC or Aluminum). Flakes that are identified as not consisting essentially of PET may be blown from the main stream of flakes with air jets. In various embodiments, the resulting level of non-PET flakes is less than 25 ppm.
In various embodiments, the system is adapted to ensure that the PET polymer being processed into filament is substantially free of water (e.g., entirely free of water). In a particular embodiment, the flakes are placed into a pre-conditioner for between about 20 and about 40 minutes (e.g., about 30 minutes) during which the pre-conditioner blows the surface water off of the flakes. In particular embodiments, interstitial water remains within the flakes. In various embodiments, these “wet” flakes (e.g., flakes comprising interstitial water) may then be fed into an extruder (e.g., as described in Step 2 below), which includes a vacuum setup designed to remove—among other things—the interstitial water that remains present in the flakes following the quick-drying process described above.
In particular embodiments, an extruder is used to turn the wet flakes described above into a molten recycled PET polymer and to perform a number of purification processes to prepare the polymer to be turned into BCF for carpet. As noted above, in various embodiments, after Step 1 is complete, the recycled PET polymer flakes are wet (e.g., surface water is substantially removed (e.g., fully removed) from the flakes, but interstitial water remains in the flakes). In particular embodiments, these wet flakes are fed into a Multiple Rotating Screw (“MRS”) extruder 400. In other embodiments, the wet flakes are fed into any other suitable extruder (e.g., a twin screw extruder, a multiple screw extruder, a planetary extruder, or any other suitable extrusion system). An exemplary MRS Extruder 400 is shown in
As may be understood from this figure, in particular embodiments, the MRS extruder includes a first single-screw extruder section 410 for feeding material into an MRS section 420 and a second single-screw extruder section 440 for transporting material away from the MRS section.
In various embodiments, the wet flakes are fed directly into the MRS extruder 400 substantially immediately (e.g., immediately) following the washing step described above (e.g., without drying the flakes or allowing the flakes to dry). In particular embodiments, a system that feeds the wet flakes directly into the MRS Extruder 400 substantially immediately (e.g., immediately) following the washing step described above may consume about 20% less energy than a system that substantially fully pre-dries the flakes before extrusion (e.g., a system that pre-dries the flakes by passing hot air over the wet flakes for a prolonged period of time). In various embodiments, a system that feeds the wet flakes directly into the MRS Extruder 400 substantially immediately (e.g., immediately) following the washing step described above avoids the need to wait a period of time (e.g., up to eight hours) generally required to fully dry the flakes (e.g., remove all of the surface and interstitial water from the flakes).
The resultant polymer melt (e.g., comprising the melted flakes), in various embodiments, is then fed into the extruder's MRS section 420, in which the extruder separates the melt flow into a plurality of different streams (e.g., 4, 6, 8, or more streams) through a plurality of open chambers.
In the MRS section 420, in various embodiments, the satellite screws 425A-H may, for example, rotate faster than (e.g., about four times faster than) in previous systems. As shown in
In various embodiments, as may be understood from
In various embodiments, the MRS extruder's MRS Section 420 is fitted with a Vacuum Pump 430 that is attached to a vacuum attachment portion 422 of the MRS section 420 so that the Vacuum Pump 430 is in communication with the interior of the MRS section via a suitable opening 424 in the MRS section's housing. In still other embodiments, the MRS Section 420 is fitted with a series of Vacuum Pumps. In particular embodiments, the Vacuum Pump 430 is configured to reduce the pressure within the interior of the MRS Section 420 to a pressure that is between about 0.5 millibars and about 5 millibars. In particular embodiments, the Vacuum Pump 430 is configured to reduce the pressure in the MRS Section 420 to less than about 1.5 millibars (e.g., about 1 millibar or less). The low-pressure vacuum created by the Vacuum Pump 430 in the MRS Section 420 may remove, for example: (1) volatile organics present in the melted polymer as the melted polymer passes through the MRS Section 420; and/or (2) at least a portion of any interstitial water that was present in the wet flakes when the wet flakes entered the MRS Extruder 400. In various embodiments, the low-pressure vacuum removes substantially all (e.g., all) of the water and contaminants from the polymer stream.
In a particular example, the Vacuum Pump 430 comprises three mechanical lobe vacuum pumps (e.g., arranged in series) to reduce the pressure in the chamber to a suitable level (e.g., to a pressure of about 1.0 millibar). In other embodiments, rather than the three mechanical lobe vacuum pump arrangement discussed above, the Vacuum Pump 430 includes a jet vacuum pump fit to the MRS extruder. In various embodiments, the jet vacuum pump is configured to achieve about 1 millibar of pressure in the interior of the MRS section 420 and about the same results described above regarding a resulting intrinsic viscosity of the polymer melt. In various embodiments, using a jet vacuum pump can be advantageous because jet vacuum pumps are steam powered and therefore substantially self-cleaning (e.g., self-cleaning), thereby reducing the maintenance required in comparison to mechanical lobe pumps (which may, for example, require repeated cleaning due to volatiles coming off and condensing on the lobes of the pump). In a particular embodiment, the Vacuum Pump 430 is a jet vacuum pump is made by Arpuma GmbH of Bergheim, Germany.
In particular embodiments, after the molten polymer is run the through the multi-stream MRS Section 420, the streams of molten polymer are recombined and flow into the MRS extruder's second single screw section 440. In various embodiments, the single stream of molten polymer is next run through a filtration system 450 that includes at least one filter. In a particular embodiment, the filtration system 450 includes two levels of filtration (e.g., a 40 micron screen filter followed by a 25 micron screen filter). Although, in various embodiments, water and volatile organic impurities are removed during the vacuum process as discussed above, particulate contaminates such as, for example, aluminum particles, sand, dirt, and other contaminants may remain in the polymer melt. Thus, this filtration step may be advantageous in removing particulate contaminates (e.g., particulate contaminates that were not removed in the MRS Section 420).
In particular embodiments, a viscosity sensor 460 (see
In particular embodiments, removing the water and contaminates from the polymer improves the intrinsic viscosity of the recycled PET polymer by allowing polymer chains in the polymer to reconnect and extend the chain length. In particular embodiments, following its passage through the MRS Section 420 with its attached Vacuum Pump 430, the recycled polymer melt has an intrinsic viscosity of at least about 0.79 dL/g (e.g., of between about 0.79 dL/g and about 1.00 dL/g). In particular embodiments, passage through the low pressure MRS Section 420 purifies the recycled polymer melt (e.g., by removing the contaminants and interstitial water) and makes the recycled polymer substantially structurally similar to (e.g., structurally the same as) pure virgin PET polymer. In particular embodiments, the water removed by the vacuum includes both water from the wash water used to clean the recycled PET bottles as described above, as well as from unreacted water generated by the melting of the PET polymer in the single screw heater 410 (e.g., interstitial water). In particular embodiments, the majority of water present in the polymer is wash water, but some percentage may be unreacted water.
In particular embodiments, the resulting polymer is a recycled PET polymer (e.g., obtained 100% from post-consumer PET products, such as PET bottles or containers) having a polymer quality that is suitable for use in producing PET carpet filament using substantially only (e.g., only) PET from recycled PET products.
In particular embodiments, after the recycled PET polymer has been extruded and purified by the above-described extrusion process, the resulting molten recycled PET polymer is fed directly into a BCF (or “spinning”) machine 500 that is configured to turn the molten polymer into bulked continuous filament. For example, in various embodiments, the output of the MRS extruder 400 is connected substantially directly (e.g., directly) to the input of the spinning machine 500 so that molten polymer from the extruder is fed directly into the spinning machine 500. This process may be advantageous because molten polymer may, in certain embodiments, not need to be cooled into pellets after extrusion (as it would need to be if the recycled polymer were being mixed with virgin PET polymer). In particular embodiments, not cooling the recycled molten polymer into pellets serves to avoid potential chain scission in the polymer that might lower the polymer's intrinsic viscosity.
In particular embodiments, the spinning machine 500 extrudes molten polymer through small holes in a spinneret in order to produce carpet yarn filament from the polymer. In particular embodiments, the molten recycled PET polymer cools after leaving the spinneret. The carpet yarn is then taken up by rollers and ultimately turned into filaments that are used to produce carpet. In various embodiments, the carpet yarn produced by the spinning machine 500 may have a tenacity between about 3 gram-force per unit denier (gf/den) and about 9 gf/den. In particular embodiments, the resulting carpet yarn has a tenacity of at least about 3 gf/den.
In particular embodiments, the spinning machine 500 used in the process described above is the Sytec One spinning machine manufactured by Oerlika Neumag of Neumuenster, Germany. The Sytec One machine may be especially adapted for hard-to-run fibers, such as nylon or solution-dyed fibers, where the filaments are prone to breakage during processing. In various embodiments, the Sytec One machine keeps the runs downstream of the spinneret as straight as possible, uses only one threadline, and is designed to be quick to rethread when there are filament breaks.
Although the example described above describes using the Sytec One spinning machine to produce carpet yarn filament from the polymer, it should be understood that any other suitable spinning machine may be used. Such spinning machines may include, for example, any suitable one-threadline or three-threadline spinning machine made by Oerlika Neumag of Neumuenster, Germany or any other company.
In various embodiments, the improved strength of the recycled PET polymer generated using the process above allows it to be run at higher speeds through the spinning machine 500 than would be possible using pure virgin PET polymer. This may allow for higher processing speeds than are possible when using virgin PET polymer.
Next, at Step 608, the group of flakes is passed through an MRS extruder while maintaining the pressure within an MRS portion of the extruder below about 1.5 millibars. At Step 610, the resulting polymer melt is passed through at least one filter having a micron rating of less than about 50 microns. Finally, at Step 612, the recycled polymer is formed into bulked continuous carpet filament, which may be used in producing carpet. The method then ends at Step 614.
In particular embodiments, the system may comprise alternative components or perform alternative processes in order to produce substantially continuous BCF from 100% recycled PET, or other recycled polymer. Exemplary alternatives are discussed below.
In particular embodiments, the process may utilize a polymer flow extrusion system other than the MRS Extruder described above. The alternative extrusion system may include for example, a twin screw extruder, a multiple screw extruder, a planetary extruder, or any other suitable extrusion system. In a particular embodiment, the process may include a plurality of any combination of any suitable conical screw extruders (e.g., four twin screw extruders, three multiple screw extruders, etc.).
In particular embodiments, the process described above may be adapted for processing and preparing old carpet (or any other suitable post-consumer product) to produce new carpet yarn comprising 100% recycled carpet. In such embodiments, the process would begin by grinding and washing recycled carpet rather than recycled PET bottles. In various embodiments where old carpet is converted into new carpet yarn comprising 100% recycled carpet, the process may comprise additional steps to remove additional materials or impurities that may be present in recycled carpet that may not be present in recycled PET bottles (e.g., carpet backing, adhesive, etc.).
In various embodiments, the process described above is adapted for processing recycled PET from any suitable source (e.g., sources other than recycled bottles or carpet) to produce new carpet yarn comprising 100% recycled PET.
Many modifications and other embodiments of the invention will come to mind to one skilled in the art to which this invention pertains having the benefit of the teachings presented in the foregoing descriptions and the associated drawings. For example, although the vacuum system discussed above is described as being configured to maintain the pressure in the open chambers of the MRS extruder to about 1 mbar, in other embodiments, the vacuum system may be adapted to maintain the pressure in the open chambers of the MRS extruder at pressures greater than, or less than, 1 mbar. For example, the vacuum system may be adapted to maintain this pressure at between about 0.5 mbar and about 1.2 mbar.
Similarly, although various embodiments of the systems described above may be adapted to produce carpet filament from substantially only recycled PET (so the resulting carpet filament would comprise, consist of, and/or consist essentially of recycled PET), in other embodiments, the system may be adapted to produce carpet filament from a combination of recycled PET and virgin PET. The resulting carpet filament may, for example, comprise, consist of, and/or consist essentially of between about 80% and about 100% recycled PET, and between about 0% and about 20% virgin PET.
Also, while various embodiments are discussed above in regard to producing carpet filament from PET, similar techniques may be used to produce carpet filament from other polymers. Similarly, while various embodiments are discussed above in regard to producing carpet filament from PET, similar techniques may be used to produce other products from PET or other polymers.
In addition, it should be understood that various embodiments may omit any of the steps described above or add additional steps.
In light of the above, it is to be understood that the invention is not to be limited to the specific embodiments disclosed and that modifications and other embodiments are intended to be included within the scope of the appended claims. Although specific terms are employed herein, they are used in a generic and descriptive sense only and not for the purposes of limitation.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/892,713, entitled “Systems and Methods for Manufacturing Bulked Continuous Filament”, filed May 13, 2013, which is a divisional application of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/721,955, entitled “Systems and Methods for Manufacturing Bulked Continuous Filament”, filed Dec. 20, 2012, which claimed priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/654,016, filed May 31, 2012, entitled “Systems and Methods for Manufacturing Bulked Continuous Fiber,” which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1490918 | Gaede | Apr 1924 | A |
3217783 | Wolf | Nov 1965 | A |
3310837 | Wittrock | Mar 1967 | A |
3357049 | Wolfgang | Dec 1967 | A |
3608001 | Kowalski et al. | Sep 1971 | A |
3825236 | Hussmann | Jul 1974 | A |
3865528 | Roess | Feb 1975 | A |
3938924 | Abella et al. | Feb 1976 | A |
4057376 | Berger | Nov 1977 | A |
4057607 | Soehngen et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
4172477 | Reich | Oct 1979 | A |
4192617 | Spielhoff | Mar 1980 | A |
4268176 | Muller | May 1981 | A |
4289409 | Brand | Sep 1981 | A |
4370302 | Suzuoka et al. | Jan 1983 | A |
4564349 | Brown | Jan 1986 | A |
4591487 | Fritsch | May 1986 | A |
4919872 | Fintel | Apr 1990 | A |
5102594 | Burlet | Apr 1992 | A |
5108711 | Chszaniecki | Apr 1992 | A |
5143308 | Hally et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5224383 | Pinto et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5225130 | Deiringer | Jul 1993 | A |
5266601 | Kyber | Nov 1993 | A |
5306803 | Arlt | Apr 1994 | A |
5393140 | Blach | Feb 1995 | A |
5424013 | Lieberman | Jun 1995 | A |
5427881 | Sacripante et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5459168 | Nasr | Oct 1995 | A |
5497562 | Pikus | Mar 1996 | A |
5503788 | Lazareck et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5510073 | Kaegi | Apr 1996 | A |
5532035 | Corbin et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5549957 | Negola et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5554657 | Brownscombe et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5613285 | Chester et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5623012 | Hwo | Apr 1997 | A |
5715584 | Coons, III et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5804115 | Burton et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5836682 | Blach | Nov 1998 | A |
5886058 | Van Erden et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5893702 | Conrad et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5932691 | Khanin et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5945215 | Bersted et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5951159 | Schobert-Csongor et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5958548 | Negola et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5961054 | Nishibori | Oct 1999 | A |
6074084 | Kolossow | Jun 2000 | A |
6113825 | Chuah | Sep 2000 | A |
6265533 | Regel et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6394644 | Streiff | May 2002 | B1 |
6492485 | Gohr et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6620354 | Bessemer et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6627127 | Piovoso et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6722117 | Belcher, Jr. et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6773718 | Seth et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6784214 | Bacher | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6852256 | Borer et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6984694 | Blasius, Jr. et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7025491 | Blach | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7192545 | Ekart et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7198400 | Unterlander et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7204945 | Bonner | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7262380 | Ulrichsen et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7320589 | Babin et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7354988 | Charati et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7380973 | Goedicke et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7485685 | Mihan et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7513677 | Gneuss | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7594453 | Blach | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7654725 | Sturm et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7744788 | Portier et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7799835 | Smith et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7828538 | Fellinger | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7980834 | Maguire | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8080190 | Ichikawa et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8147738 | Boczon et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8187512 | Eloo et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8398752 | Brownstein et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8404755 | Sequeira | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8471972 | Tsubata | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8557155 | Deiss et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8597553 | Clark | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8735457 | Booth et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8741972 | Booth et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
9061442 | Gneuss et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9168718 | Westwood et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9409363 | Clark | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9550338 | Clark | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9630353 | Clark | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9630354 | Clark | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9636860 | Clark | May 2017 | B2 |
9908263 | Pichler et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
20020086077 | Noller et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20040053047 | Jackson et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040072920 | Goedicke | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040082672 | Zeng et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040140248 | Dauzvardis et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040155374 | Hutchinson et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050047267 | Gneuss | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050105382 | Sturm | May 2005 | A1 |
20050263941 | Reutter et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060004114 | Kern | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060012074 | Booth et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060069199 | Charati | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060076705 | Fowler et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060284334 | Christel | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070052131 | Fujimaki et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070054106 | Armstrong | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070261777 | Steckelberg et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070275242 | Gopal | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080035079 | Fini | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080069916 | Regalia | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080139700 | Roden et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080157425 | Rodgers et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080214701 | Wilms | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080272508 | Culbert | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080292831 | Juriga et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090004325 | Bacher et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090039542 | Morton-Finger | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090270564 | Gorlier | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090286919 | Moller | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100009189 | Herve | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100102475 | Moon et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100113626 | Liu | May 2010 | A1 |
20110177283 | Juriga | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110257345 | Hoover, Jr. et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120070615 | Shi et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120279023 | Burout et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20140004301 | Cloutier | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20150069652 | Clark | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150069655 | Clark | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150076725 | Clark | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150076744 | Clark | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20170136761 | Sieradzki et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170152611 | Clark | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170275785 | Williams | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20180126595 | Clark | May 2018 | A1 |
20180362723 | Gneuss et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2013267847 | Mar 2014 | AU |
2014215998 | Sep 2014 | AU |
101444954 | Jun 2009 | CN |
101778705 | Jul 2010 | CN |
201872322 | Jun 2011 | CN |
202072825 | Dec 2011 | CN |
102990903 | Mar 2013 | CN |
104040040 | Sep 2014 | CN |
204265905 | Apr 2015 | CN |
4433593 | Jun 1995 | DE |
19722278 | Dec 1998 | DE |
102006033089 | Oct 2007 | DE |
102008018686 | Oct 2009 | DE |
102011082769 | Mar 2013 | DE |
102013000316 | Jul 2014 | DE |
102017111275 | Nov 2018 | DE |
0881054 | Dec 1998 | EP |
1400332 | Mar 2004 | EP |
2748358 | Jul 2014 | EP |
3375916 | Sep 2018 | EP |
2141844 | Jan 1985 | GB |
63191823 | Aug 1988 | JP |
2003530478 | Oct 2003 | JP |
2001021373 | Mar 2001 | WO |
2002038276 | May 2002 | WO |
2003033240 | Apr 2003 | WO |
2004026557 | Apr 2004 | WO |
2008017843 | Feb 2008 | WO |
2008083820 | Jul 2008 | WO |
2010133531 | Nov 2010 | WO |
2011088437 | Jul 2011 | WO |
2011095361 | Aug 2011 | WO |
2016081495 | May 2016 | WO |
2018089346 | May 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Specification portion of U.S. Appl. No. 61/654,016, filed May 31, 2012, total 7 pages (Year: 2012). |
Office Action, dated Apr. 9, 2018, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/204,645. |
International Search Report, dated Apr. 12, 2018, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2018/015751. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Apr. 12, 2018, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2018/015751. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jul. 5, 2018, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/204,645. |
Invitation to Pay Additional Search Fees, dated Jan. 5, 2018, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2017/060359. |
International Search Report, dated Mar. 1, 2018, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2017/060359. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Mar. 1, 2018, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2017/060359. |
Jaecker M: “The Conceptual Concept of the Future // Advantages of the Negative-Conical Gangti EFE on Double-Screw Extruders”, Kunststoffe, Carl Hanser Verlag, Munchen, DE, vol. 99, No. 12, Dec. 1, 2000 (2000-12-91), p. 64,66, XP990976191, ISSN: 9923-5563, figure 1. |
Schiefer,Process Engineering, Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag GmbH, Aug. 1972. |
Wikipedia, Polyethylene terephthalate, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Polyethylene_terephthalate&oldid=491494734. |
Final Office Action from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/546,796 dated Oct. 20, 2016. |
Final Office Action from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/546,819 dated Oct. 19, 2016. |
Final Office Action from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/546,837 dated Oct. 19, 2016. |
Final Office from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/546,847 dated Oct. 19, 2016. |
Restriction Requirement, dated Feb. 5, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/220,733. |
Office Action, dated Oct. 9, 2018, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/419,955. |
International Search Report, dated Nov. 19, 2018, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2018/051043. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Nov. 19, 2018, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2018/051043. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Dec. 13, 2018, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/473,385. |
Hannemann, Innovative Aufbereitungslösung für PET mit uneingeschränkter FDA—Lebensmittelzulassung, Presentation, Mar. 15, 2012, 37 pages total, Gneuss Kunststofftechnik GmbH, Germany. |
Ex Parte Quayle Action, dated Mar. 11, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/220,733. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Apr. 17, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/220,733. |
Notice of Allowance, dated May 1, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/419,955. |
Office Action, dated May 6, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/348,591. |
Office Action, dated Aug. 27, 2018, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/473,385. |
Office Action, dated Aug. 27, 2018, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/473,402. |
Extended European Search Report, dated Jul. 24, 2018, from corresponding European Patent Application No. 18170112.9. |
Office Action, dated Jul. 23, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/041,442. |
Australian Office Action, dated Dec. 5, 2016, from corresponding Australian Patent Application No. 2016234917. |
“MRS extrusion technology offers new options in PET”, Plastics Additives and Compounding, Elsevier Science, Oxofrd, GB, vol. 11, No. 2, Mar. 1, 2009 (Mar. 1, 2009), pp. 24-26, XP026067788, ISSN: 1464-391X. DOI:10.1016/S1464-391X(09)70050-9 [retrieved on Mar. 1, 2009] the whole document. |
Gneuss M: “Multi Rotation System Extruder Leads to Breakthrough in Polymer Evacuation”, International Fiber Journal, International Media Group, Charlotte, NC, US, vol. 23, No. 1, Feb. 1, 2008 (Feb. 1, 2008), pp. 40-41, XP001514827, ISSN: 1049-801X the whole document. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Dec. 11, 2014, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2013/040753. |
International Search Report, dated Feb. 2, 2016, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2015/061116. |
International Search Report, dated Feb. 2, 2016, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2015/061145. |
International Search Report, dated Jan. 20, 2016, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2015/061288. |
International Search Report, dated Sep. 2, 2013, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2013/040753. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Feb. 2, 2016, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2015/061116. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Feb. 2, 2016, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2015/061145. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Jan. 20, 2016, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2015/061288. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Sep. 2, 2013, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2013/040753. |
Australian Office Action, dated May 9, 2014, from corresponding Australian Patent Application No. 2013267847. |
Australian Office Action, dated Aug. 26, 2015, from corresponding Australian Patent Application No. 2014215998. |
Chinese Office Action, dated Sep. 14, 2015, from corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 201380003461.8. |
Chinese Office Action, dated May 12, 2016, from corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 201380003461.8. |
European Office Action, dated Dec. 12, 2016, from corresponding European Patent Application No. 15158377.0. |
Extended European Search Report, dated Aug. 26, 2015, from corresponding European Application No. 15158377.0. |
Korean Office Action, dated Aug. 18, 2014, from corresponding Korean Patent Application No. 10-2014-7016621. |
Decision of Patent Grant, dated Dec. 12, 2014, from corresponding Korean Patent Application No. 10-2014-7016621. |
Vietnamese Office Action, dated Jul. 13, 2016, from corresponding Vietnamese Patent Application No. 1-2014-01079. |
Notice of Opposition, dated Dec. 17, 2015, from corresponding European Application No. 13728264.6. |
Final Office Action, dated Dec. 24, 2015, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/256,261. |
Office Action, dated Aug. 21, 2015, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/256,261. |
International Search Report, dated Feb. 5, 2016, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2015/061174. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Feb. 5, 2016, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2015/061174. |
Office Action, dated May 26, 2016, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/546,819. |
Office Action, dated Jun. 1, 2016, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/546,837. |
Office Action, dated Jun. 30, 2016, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/892,740. |
Office Action, dated Jun. 13, 2016, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/546,847. |
Office Action, dated Jun. 22, 2016, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/546,796. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Apr. 13, 2016, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/256,261. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Feb. 2, 2017, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/546,819. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Feb. 3, 2017, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/546,796. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Feb. 2, 2017, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/546,837. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Feb. 2, 2017, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/546,847. |
Notice of Acceptance, dated Jun. 21, 2016, from corresponding Australian Patent Application No. 2014215998. |
Notice of Acceptance, dated Nov. 10, 2014, from corresponding Australian Patent Application No. 2013267847. |
“Processing Technology: Processing of Polymer Melts,” Oct. 31, 2007, Gneuss Kunststofftechnik GmbH, Dusseldorf, Germany. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jan. 24, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/473,402. |
Office Action, dated Jun. 18, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/402,583. |
Restriction Requirement, dated Jul. 15, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/432,579. |
Office Action, dated Aug. 8, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/409,599. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Aug. 8, 2019, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2018/015751. |
Office Action, dated Aug. 13, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/213,694. |
Botos, J., et al., “Color Measurement of Plastics—from Compounding via Pelletizing, up to Injection Molding and Extrusion,” AIP Conference Proceedings 1593, 16 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4873725, Feb. 17, 2015. |
Machado, Almir De Souza, “Fundamentals of Cast Film Extrusion Technology,” https://www.slideshare.net/ASMachado/fundamentals-of-cast-film-extrusion-technology, Dec. 2, 2013. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Aug. 19, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/402,583. |
Office Action, dated Aug. 26, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/220,905. |
Office Action, dated Sep. 12, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/432,579. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Oct. 10, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/432,579. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170106566 A1 | Apr 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61654016 | May 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13721955 | Dec 2012 | US |
Child | 13892713 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13892713 | May 2013 | US |
Child | 15396143 | US |