The present invention relates to systems and methods for polishing microfeature workpieces. In particular, the present invention relates to mechanical and/or chemical-mechanical polishing of microfeature workpieces with workpiece carrier assemblies that include piezoelectric members.
Mechanical and chemical-mechanical planarization processes (collectively, “CMP”) remove material from the surface of microfeature workpieces in the production of microelectronic devices and other products.
The carrier head 30 has a lower surface 32 to which a microfeature workpiece 12 may be attached, or the workpiece 12 may be attached to a resilient pad 34 under the lower surface 32. The carrier head 30 may be a weighted, free-floating wafer carrier, or an actuator assembly 36 may be attached to the carrier head 30 to impart rotational motion to the microfeature workpiece 12 (indicated by arrow J) and/or reciprocate the workpiece 12 back and forth (indicated by arrow I).
The planarizing pad 40 and a planarizing solution 44 define a planarizing medium that mechanically and/or chemically-mechanically removes material from the surface of the microfeature workpiece 12. The planarizing solution 44 may be a conventional CMP slurry with abrasive particles and chemicals that etch and/or oxidize the surface of the microfeature workpiece 12, or the planarizing solution 44 may be a “clean” nonabrasive planarizing solution without abrasive particles. In most CMP applications, abrasive slurries with abrasive particles are used on nonabrasive polishing pads, and clean nonabrasive solutions without abrasive particles are used on fixed-abrasive polishing pads.
To planarize the microfeature workpiece 12 with the CMP machine 10, the carrier head 30 presses the workpiece 12 facedown against the planarizing pad 40. More specifically, the carrier head 30 generally presses the microfeature workpiece 12 against the planarizing solution 44 on a planarizing surface 42 of the planarizing pad 40, and the platen 20 and/or the carrier head 30 moves to rub the workpiece 12 against the planarizing surface 42. As the microfeature workpiece 12 rubs against the planarizing surface 42, the planarizing medium removes material from the face of the workpiece 12.
The CMP process must consistently and accurately produce a uniformly planar surface on the workpiece to enable precise fabrication of circuits and photo-patterns. A nonuniform surface can result, for example, when material from one area of the workpiece is removed more quickly than material from another area during CMP processing. To compensate for the nonuniform removal of material, carrier heads have been developed with expandable interior and exterior bladders that exert downward forces on selected areas of the workpiece. These carrier heads, however, have several drawbacks. For example, the typical bladder has a curved edge that makes it difficult to exert a uniform downward force at the perimeter. Moreover, conventional bladders cover a fairly broad area of the workpiece, thus limiting the ability to localize the downward force on the workpiece. Furthermore, conventional bladders are often filled with compressible air that inhibits precise control of the downward force. In addition, carrier heads with multiple bladders form a complex system that is subject to significant downtime for repair and/or maintenance, causing a concomitant reduction in throughput.
A. Overview
The present invention is directed to methods and systems for mechanical and/or chemical-mechanical polishing of microfeature workpieces. The term “microfeature workpiece” is used throughout to include substrates in or on which microelectronic devices, micro-mechanical devices, data storage elements, and other features are fabricated. For example, microfeature workpieces can be semiconductor wafers, glass substrates, insulated substrates, or many other types of substrates. Furthermore, the terms “planarization” and “planarizing” mean either forming a planar surface and/or forming a smooth surface (e.g., “polishing”). Several specific details of the invention are set forth in the following description and in
One aspect of the invention is directed to a method for polishing a microfeature workpiece having a characteristic. In one embodiment, the method includes determining a status of the characteristic of the microfeature workpiece separate from the polishing cycle and moving a carrier head and/or a polishing pad relative to the other to rub the microfeature workpiece against the polishing pad after determining the status of the characteristic of the microfeature workpiece. The carrier head also carries a plurality of piezoelectric members. The method further includes applying pressure against a back side of the microfeature workpiece in response to the determined status of the characteristic by energizing at least one of the piezoelectric members. Determining the status of the characteristic can include determining a surface contour or a thickness of a layer of the microfeature workpiece, and the status of the characteristic can be determined with a metrology tool. The piezoelectric members can be arranged in a grid, concentrically, or in another pattern in the carrier head.
In another aspect of this embodiment, the status is a first status and the workpiece is a first workpiece. In this aspect, the method further includes determining a second status of the characteristic of the first microfeature workpiece after applying pressure against the first microfeature workpiece and determining a first status of the characteristic of a second microfeature workpiece. The second microfeature workpiece is different than the first microfeature workpiece. The method further includes moving the carrier head and/or the polishing pad relative to the other to rub the second microfeature workpiece against the polishing pad after determining the first status of the characteristic of the second microfeature workpiece. As the workpiece rubs against the pad, pressure is applied against a back side of the second microfeature workpiece by energizing at least one of the piezoelectric members in response to the determined first status of the characteristic of the second microfeature workpiece and the difference between a desired status and the determined second status of the characteristic of the first microfeature workpiece.
Another aspect of the invention is directed to a system for polishing a microfeature workpiece having a characteristic. In one embodiment, the system includes a workpiece carrier assembly configured to carry the microfeature workpiece, a plurality of piezoelectric members carried by the workpiece carrier assembly, a polishing pad positionable under the workpiece carrier assembly for polishing the microfeature workpiece, a tool for determining a status of the characteristic of the microfeature workpiece, and a controller operably coupled to the workpiece carrier assembly, the piezoelectric members, the polishing pad, and the tool. The controller can have a computer-readable medium containing instructions to perform one of the above-mentioned methods.
B. Polishing Systems
In the embodiment shown in
In one aspect of this embodiment, the workpiece carrier assembly 130 includes a chamber 114 in the head 132 and a plurality of piezoelectric members 150 (identified individually as 150a-c) in the chamber 114.
Referring to
The workpiece carrier assembly 130 further includes a controller 180 operably coupled to the piezoelectric members 150 to selectively energize one or more of the piezoelectric members 150. More specifically, the controller 180 can provide a voltage to the piezoelectric members 150 through an electrical coupler 158. The electrical coupler 158 can include small wires that are attached to the piezoelectric members 150. The controller 180 accordingly controls the position and magnitude of the force F by selecting the piezoelectric member(s) 150 to energize and varying the voltage. In one embodiment, the controller 180 can include an IC controller chip and a telematics controller to receive wireless signals from the controller 160. In other embodiments, the controllers 160 and 180 can communicate through wired, infrared, radio frequency, or other methods. In additional embodiments, the controller 160 can operate the piezoelectric members 150 directly without interfacing with the controller 180.
The workpiece carrier assembly 130 can further include a flexible member 190 that encloses the chamber 114 and separates the lower wall 154 of the piezoelectric members 150 from the workpiece 112. The flexible member 190 can be silicone or any other suitable material that protects the piezoelectric members 150 during polishing and prevents the planarizing solution 42 (
The metrology tool 170 measures the status of a characteristic of the workpiece 112 before polishing so the data can be used to provide a planar surface on the workpiece 112 during polishing. For example, the metrology tool 170 can measure the thickness of a layer of the workpiece 112 at several sites. After determining the status of the characteristic of the workpiece 112, the metrology tool 170 provides the data to the controller 160. The controller 160 can be an automated process controller that uses the data in controlling the polishing cycle. More specifically, the controller 160 can use the data to determine the position and strength of the forces required to provide a generally planar surface on the workpiece 112. For example, if the metrology tool 170 determines that a layer at a perimeter region of the workpiece 112 has a greater thickness than at a center region of the workpiece 112, the controller 180 can energize the first piezoelectric member 150a to exert the force F against the perimeter region of the workpiece 112 during polishing. The metrology tool 170 can determine the status of the characteristic before and/or after the workpiece 112 is attached to the workpiece carrier assembly 130. Suitable devices include metrology tools manufactured by Nova Measuring Instruments Ltd. of Israel and other similar devices. In additional embodiments, tools other than metrology tools can be used to determine the status of a characteristic.
In one aspect of this embodiment, the metrology tool 170 also determines the status of the characteristic of the workpiece 112 after polishing. Measuring the status of the characteristic after polishing allows the controller 160 to determine if the post-polishing status of the characteristic is the desired status. For example, the controller 160 can determine if the surface of the workpiece 112 is sufficiently planar and/or if a layer of the workpiece 112 has a desired thickness. Moreover, measuring the status of the characteristic after polishing allows the controller 160 to track the wear of the retaining ring 136, the planarizing pad 140, a conditioning stone (not shown), and/or other components of the CMP machine 110. For example, the controller 160 can track the wear of the CMP machine 110 by determining the difference between a projected status of the characteristic and the determined status of the characteristic of a workpiece at the end of the polishing cycle. The wear of the CMP machine 110 affects the polishing of the workpiece and consequently there can be a difference between the projected and determined statuses of the characteristic of the workpiece at the end of the polishing cycle. Accordingly, tracking the difference between the projected and determined statuses over a series of workpieces allows the controller 160 to determine wear in the CMP machine 110.
The controller 160 can adjust the polishing parameters, including the applied forces, when polishing subsequent workpieces, based on the difference between the projected status and the determined status of the characteristic of the previous workpiece to compensate for wear in the CMP machine 110 or other factors. For example, if after polishing the thickness of a layer of a workpiece is greater than the projected thickness, the controller 160 can adjust the applied forces, the dwell time, or other polishing parameters to increase the material removed from subsequent workpieces. In additional embodiments, the system 100 may not include a metrology tool 170 and the controller 160 can adjust the polishing parameters, including the applied forces, based upon an expected status of the characteristic of the workpiece 112. In other embodiments, the system 100 can include a sensor to monitor the planarity of the workpiece surface during polishing. In such embodiments, the controller 160 can adjust the polishing parameters, including the applied forces, based upon the monitored planarity of the workpiece.
C. Other Configurations of Piezoelectric Members
One advantage of the polishing systems of the illustrated embodiments is the ability to apply highly localized forces to a workpiece in response to a predetermined characteristic of the workpiece. This highly localized force control enables the CMP process to consistently and accurately produce a uniformly planar surface on the workpiece. Moreover, the system can also adjust the applied forces and polishing parameters to account for wear of the CMP machine. Another advantage of the illustrated workpiece carrier assemblies is that they are simpler than existing systems and, consequently, reduce downtime for maintenance and/or repair and create greater throughput.
From the foregoing, it will be appreciated that specific embodiments of the invention have been described herein for purposes of illustration, but that various modifications may be made without deviating from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the invention is not limited except as by the appended claims.
This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/425,252, filed Apr. 28, 2003 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,131,891, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4498345 | Dyer et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4501258 | Dyer et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4502459 | Dyer | Mar 1985 | A |
4894579 | Higuchi et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4971021 | Kubotera et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5036015 | Sandhu et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5069002 | Sandhu et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5081796 | Schultz | Jan 1992 | A |
5163334 | Li et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5222329 | Yu | Jun 1993 | A |
5232875 | Tuttle et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5234867 | Schultz et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5240552 | Yu et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5244534 | Yu et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5245790 | Jerbic | Sep 1993 | A |
5245796 | Miller et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
RE34425 | Schultz | Nov 1993 | E |
5314843 | Yu et al. | May 1994 | A |
5413941 | Koos et al. | May 1995 | A |
5421769 | Schultz et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5433649 | Nishida et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5433651 | Lustig et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5439551 | Meikle et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5449314 | Meikle et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5486129 | Sandhu et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5514245 | Doan et al. | May 1996 | A |
5533924 | Stroupe et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5540810 | Sandhu et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5573442 | Morita et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5609718 | Meikle | Mar 1997 | A |
5618381 | Doan et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5618447 | Sandhu | Apr 1997 | A |
5632666 | Peratello et al. | May 1997 | A |
5643048 | Iyer | Jul 1997 | A |
5643060 | Sandhu et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5658183 | Sandhu et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5658190 | Wright et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5663797 | Sandhu | Sep 1997 | A |
5664988 | Stroupe et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5668061 | Herko et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5679065 | Henderson | Oct 1997 | A |
5681204 | Kawaguchi et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5681423 | Sandhu et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5700180 | Sandhu et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5702292 | Brunelli et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5720845 | Liu | Feb 1998 | A |
5730642 | Sandhu et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5738562 | Doan et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5747386 | Moore | May 1998 | A |
5777739 | Sandhu et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5792709 | Robinson et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5795495 | Meikle | Aug 1998 | A |
5798302 | Hudson et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5807165 | Uzoh et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5830806 | Hudson et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5842909 | Sandhu et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5851135 | Sandhu et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5855804 | Walker | Jan 1999 | A |
5868896 | Robinson et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5882248 | Wright et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5893754 | Robinson et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5895550 | Andreas | Apr 1999 | A |
5910846 | Sandhu | Jun 1999 | A |
5934973 | Boucher et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5934980 | Koos et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5936733 | Sandhu et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5945347 | Wright | Aug 1999 | A |
5954912 | Moore | Sep 1999 | A |
5967030 | Blalock | Oct 1999 | A |
5972792 | Hudson | Oct 1999 | A |
5975990 | Malcok et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5980363 | Meikle et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5981396 | Robinson et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5994224 | Sandhu et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5997384 | Blalock | Dec 1999 | A |
6006739 | Akram et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6007408 | Sandhu | Dec 1999 | A |
6039633 | Chopra | Mar 2000 | A |
6040245 | Sandhu et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6046111 | Robinson | Apr 2000 | A |
6054015 | Brunelli et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6057602 | Hudson et al. | May 2000 | A |
6066030 | Uzoh | May 2000 | A |
6074286 | Ball | Jun 2000 | A |
6080050 | Chen et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6083085 | Lankford | Jul 2000 | A |
6102777 | Duescher et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6106351 | Raina et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108092 | Sandhu | Aug 2000 | A |
6110820 | Sandhu et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6116988 | Ball | Sep 2000 | A |
6120354 | Koos et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6135856 | Tjaden et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6139402 | Moore | Oct 2000 | A |
6143123 | Robinson et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6143155 | Adams et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6152803 | Boucher et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6152808 | Moore | Nov 2000 | A |
6171174 | Campbell et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6176992 | Talieh | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6180525 | Morgan | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6184571 | Moore | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6187681 | Moore | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6190494 | Dow | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6191037 | Robinson et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6191864 | Sandhu | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6193588 | Carlson et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6200901 | Hudson et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6203404 | Joslyn et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6203407 | Robinson | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6203413 | Skrovan | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206754 | Moore | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206756 | Chopra et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206769 | Walker | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208425 | Sandhu et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6210257 | Carlson | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6213845 | Elledge | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6218316 | Marsh | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6224466 | Walker et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6227939 | Monroe | May 2001 | B1 |
6227955 | Custer et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6234874 | Ball | May 2001 | B1 |
6234877 | Koos et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6234878 | Moore | May 2001 | B1 |
6237483 | Blalock | May 2001 | B1 |
6241593 | Chen et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6250994 | Chopra et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251785 | Wright | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6261151 | Sandhu et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6261163 | Walker et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6267650 | Hembree | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6273786 | Chopra et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6273796 | Moore | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6276996 | Chopra | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6277009 | Chen et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6287879 | Gonzales et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6290572 | Hofmann | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6301006 | Doan | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6303507 | Wang et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6306012 | Sabde | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6306014 | Walker et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6306768 | Klein | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6312558 | Moore | Nov 2001 | B2 |
6313038 | Chopra et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6319420 | Dow | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6323046 | Agarwal | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6325696 | Boggs et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6328632 | Chopra | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6331488 | Doan et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6338667 | Sandhu et al. | Jan 2002 | B2 |
6350180 | Southwick | Feb 2002 | B2 |
6350691 | Lankford | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6352466 | Moore | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6354923 | Lankford | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6354930 | Moore | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6358122 | Sabde et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6358127 | Carlson et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6358129 | Dow | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6361417 | Walker et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6362105 | Moore | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6364746 | Moore | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6364757 | Moore | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6368190 | Easter et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6368193 | Carlson et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6368194 | Sharples et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6368197 | Elledge | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6376381 | Sabde | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6387289 | Wright | May 2002 | B1 |
6402884 | Robinson et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6447369 | Moore | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6458015 | Robinson et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6537133 | Birang et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6579799 | Chopra et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6609947 | Moore | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6769970 | Taylor et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6799136 | Patel et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
20020049029 | Large et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020102917 | Lee et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020164924 | Korovin | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020197745 | Shanmugasundram et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030027424 | Paik | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030199112 | Shanmugasundram et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040214509 | Elledge | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050032459 | Surana et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO-2004067228 | Aug 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070004321 A1 | Jan 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10425252 | Apr 2003 | US |
Child | 11518013 | US |