Patent Grant
11481566
The invention generally relates to automated (e.g., programmable motion) and other processing systems, and relates in particular to programmable motion (e.g., robotic) systems intended for use in environments requiring, for example, that a variety of objects (e.g., articles, parcels or packages) be processed (e.g., sorted and/or otherwise distributed) to several output destinations.
Many object distribution systems receive objects in an organized or disorganized stream that may be provided as individual objects or objects aggregated in groups such as in bags, arriving on any of several different conveyances, commonly a conveyor, a truck, a pallet, a Gaylord, or a bin. Each object must then be distributed to the correct destination container, as determined by identification information associated with the object, which is commonly determined by a label printed on the object. The destination container may take many forms, such as a bag or a bin or a tote.
The processing of such objects has traditionally been done by human workers that scan the objects, e.g., with a hand-held barcode scanner, and then place the objects at assigned locations. For example many order fulfillment operations achieve high efficiency by employing a process called wave picking. In wave picking, orders are picked from warehouse shelves and placed at locations (e.g., into bins) containing multiple orders that are sorted downstream. At the processing stage individual objects are identified, and multi-object orders are consolidated, for example into a single bin or shelf location, so that they may be packed and then shipped to customers. The processing (e.g., sorting) of these objects has traditionally been done by hand. A human sorter picks an object from an incoming bin, finds a barcode on the object, scans the barcode with a handheld barcode scanner, determines from the scanned barcode the appropriate bin or shelf location for the article, and then places the article in the so-determined bin or shelf location where all objects for that order have been defined to belong. Automated systems for order fulfillment have also been proposed. See for example, U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0244026, which discloses the use of a robotic arm together with an arcuate structure that is movable to within reach of the robotic arm.
In conventional parcel sortation systems, human workers or automated systems typically retrieve objects in an arrival order, and sort each object into a collection bin based on a set of given heuristics. For instance, all objects of like type might go to a collection bin, or all objects in a single customer order, or all objects destined for the same shipping destination, etc. The human workers or automated systems are required to receive objects and to move each to their assigned collection bin. If the number of different types of input (received) objects is large, a large number of collection bins is required.
Such a system has inherent inefficiencies as well as inflexibilities since the desired goal is to match incoming objects to assigned collection bins. Such systems may require a large number of collection bins (and therefore a large amount of physical space, large capital costs, and large operating costs) in part, because sorting all objects to all destinations at once is not always most efficient.
Certain partially automated sortation systems involve the use of recirculating conveyors and tilt trays, where the tilt trays receive objects by human sortation (human induction), and each tilt tray moves past a scanner. Each object is then scanned and moved to a pre-defined location assigned to the object. The tray then tilts to drop the object into the location. Further, partially automated systems, such as the bomb-bay style recirculating conveyor, involve having trays open doors on the bottom of each tray at the time that the tray is positioned over a predefined chute, and the object is then dropped from the tray into the chute. Again, the objects are scanned while in the tray, which assumes that any identifying code is visible to the scanner.
Such partially automated systems are lacking in key areas. As noted, these conveyors have discrete trays that can be loaded with an object; they then pass through scan tunnels that scan the object and associate it with the tray in which it is riding. When the tray passes the correct bin, a trigger mechanism causes the tray to dump the object into the bin. A drawback with such systems however, is that every divert requires an actuator, which increases the mechanical complexity and the cost per divert can be very high.
An alternative is to use human labor to increase the number of diverts, or collection bins, available in the system. This decreases system installation costs, but increases the operating costs. Multiple cells may then work in parallel, effectively multiplying throughput linearly while keeping the number of expensive automated diverts at a minimum. Such diverts do not ID an object and cannot divert it to a particular spot, but rather they work with beam breaks or other sensors to seek to ensure that indiscriminate bunches of objects get appropriately diverted. The lower cost of such diverts coupled with the low number of diverts keep the overall system divert cost low.
Unfortunately, these systems don't address the limitations to total number of system bins. The system is simply diverting an equal share of the total objects to each parallel manual cell. Thus each parallel sortation cell must have all the same collection bins designations; otherwise an object might be delivered to a cell that does not have a bin to which that object is mapped. There remains a need for a more efficient and more cost effective object sortation system that sorts objects of a variety of sizes and weights into appropriate collection bins or trays of fixed sizes, yet is efficient in handling objects of such varying sizes and weights.
Further, such systems require human personnel to oversee the induction of objects where the processing system may receive objects that it may not be able to efficiently handle or be able to handle at all.
In accordance with an aspect, the invention provides a distribution system for use in an induction system with an object processing system for providing dissimilar objects into one of a plurality of receiving units. The distribution system includes a conveyor section that travels over a vacuum roller, and the plurality of receiving units arranged generally below the vacuum roller such that an object with a mass will fall toward one of the plurality of receiving units based on both the object's mass and a vacuum force applied to the object through the conveyor section.
In accordance with another aspect, the invention provides a distribution system in an induction system for use with an object processing system. The distribution system is for providing dissimilar objects into one of a plurality of receiving units. The distribution system includes a conveyor section that travels over a vacuum roller that is coupled to a vacuum source, said vacuum providing at the conveyor section a vacuum force on an object as the object falls over the vacuum roller toward one of the plurality of receiving units.
In accordance with a further aspect, the invention provides a method of providing distribution of a plurality of dissimilar objects in an induction system for use with an object processing system. The method includes providing a conveyor section that travels over a vacuum roller that is coupled to a vacuum source that provides at the conveyor section a vacuum force on an object having a mass; moving the conveyor section and the object around the vacuum roller; and permitting the object to fall toward one of a plurality of receiving units based on both the object's mass and the vacuum force applied to the object through the conveyor section.
The following description may be further understood with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
The drawings are shown for illustrative purposes only.
In accordance with an embodiment, the invention provides an induction filtering system in which objects (e.g., packages) are screened and limited from entering an object processing system. Only objects that meet defined criteria may be processed by the object processing system in accordance with certain aspects of the invention. The induction filtering system includes at least one evaluation system as well as multiple processing paths, at least one of which leads to the object processing system in accordance with certain aspects of the invention.
An automated package sortation system needs to be able to singulate and sort individual packages, in order to route them to specific destinations. Some package sortation systems handle packages using a robotic picking system. The robot acquires a grip on the package, separating it from a pile of other packages, where it can then be scanned and sent to a sorting location. Such automated package handling systems inevitably encounter packages that cannot be processed, because, for example, the packages are outside of the system's package specifications. The robot or the gripper, for example, can only pick items that are within a weight specification. Thus items that it cannot handle might include items that are too light or too heavy, that are too big or too small, or that in some other way cannot be handled by the system.
These incompatible packages can jam up the system. If they are too big, they may get stuck on the conveying systems through the robot package sortation system, and therefore prevent other packages from flowing through. The incompatible packages may also reduce the effective throughput of the sortation system. If they do get through and are presented in a pile to the robot picking system, then the robot may try to pick the incompatible packages. If the package is outside of the system's specification, then the resulting grip on the object might be inadequate to safely transfer the item, and the robot might drop the package and potentially damage the package. Alternatively, if it is able to successfully pick and transfer the package, in doing so it could potentially damage the robotic picking system in some way while straining to move the out-of-specification package.
Compatible package specifications might include: a range of valid package weights, a range of compatible package dimensions, a set of valid labeling types (e.g., whether they employ a printed-on label vs. an adhesive-applied label), exclusion of items marked as fragile, exclusion of items marked as having been insured at high value, and therefore would prefer to be sorted with greater care by hand, exclusion of items marked as containing hazardous materials, such as lithium-ion batteries, and exclusion for any other reason for which the package might be flagged in a database as requiring exception or manual handling. It is desired to provide a system that filters out incompatible packages before they arrive at the package handling system, and/or improves the ability of the package handling system to specifically recognize incompatible packages so that robotic picks are not attempted on objects needing to be handled manually.
In accordance with an embodiment, the invention provides an induction system that limits or manages the induction of objects to an object processing system. In certain aspects, the system provides a variety of approaches to automatically re-route incompatible packages before they arrive at a package sortation system consisting of one or more robotic pickers, or to minimize their impact should they arrive at a robotic picking area.
With reference to
Further, if the roller(s) 32 are rotating at a faster rotational velocity, the system may determine an inertial value for the object 34 as the roller(s) engage and discharge the object from the roller(s). A wide variety of further characteristics may also be determined or estimated, such as for example, center of mass (COM) using the roller(s) in combination with the perception unit(s) as discussed herein and further below. The system may further use the perception units and roller(s) 32 (together with computer processing system 100) to determine whether the object is a collapsible bag, and/or whether the presumed object 34 is actually a multi-pick (includes multiple objects), again, using the perception unit(s) in combination with the roller(s) by observing whether the objects move apart and/or whether the shape of the object changes as it rides over the roller(s) 32. In accordance with further aspects of the invention, the transport rollers 30 may be replaced by conveyor sections that stand below the height of the perturbation rollers 32.
The induction system 10 may further include a multi-purpose perception unit 24 positioned above the conveyor 22 (e.g., higher above than units 20) for viewing an object 27 as shown in
The perception unit 24 also includes scanning and receiving units 80, 82, as well as edge detection units 84 for capturing a variety of characteristics of a selected object on the conveyor 22.
In accordance with further aspects of the invention, the system may additionally employ edge detection sensors 84 that are employed (again together with the processing system 100), to detect edges of any objects in a bin, for example using data regarding any of intensity, shadow detection, or echo detection etc., and may be employed for example, to determine any of size, shape and/or contours as shown in
The volumetric scanning may be done using the scanning unit 80 and receiving unit 82 (together with the processing system 100 shown in
As discussed in more detail below with reference to
With reference again to
In accordance with yet further aspects of the invention, the system may employ optical character recognition (OCR) to read labels and detect, for example, trigger words such as “paint” or “hazardous” or “hazardous?: Y” or “Fragile” as shown at 110 in
In the induction system of
In particular, the conveyor 144 leads to a deformable object induction limiting system 194 that includes a programmable motion device such as an articulated arm 192 having an end effector 193 with a load cell or force torque sensor 195 (shown in
If the object 191 is determined to be insufficiently flexible for processing by the object processing system 12 (again with reference to
The input system may, for example, determine which of the infeed objects are provided as bags by observing the object as it is held by the end effector 118 as discussed further below with reference to
Again, the conveyor 144 leads to a deformable object induction limiting system 194 that includes a programmable motion device such as an articulated arm 192 having an end effector with a load cell or force torque sensor (as discussed above with reference to
If the object is determined to be insufficiently flexible for processing by the object processing system 12, the object may be placed by the articulated arm 192 onto an out-of-specification conveyor 196 (again, that may join with conveyor 134). If the object is determined to be sufficiently flexible for processing by the object processing system (or another system coupled thereto as discussed in more detail below), the object is placed by the articulated arm 192 onto conveyor 198 that leads to a bi-directional conveyor 59. If the object is to be processed by object processing system 12, then the object is directed toward conveyor 51, and if the object is to be processed by a further object processing system (as discussed below for example with reference to
With reference to
Again, when objects are provided as bags, for example, shipping bags made from, e.g., polyethylene, it may be more difficult to determine an object's size and handling parameters. If an object is identified as a bag (or other flexible, malleable object), such objects (again e.g., 146, 148, 151, 153) are diverted to a bag-processing system as discussed further above. The end effector 118 may also include a load cell or force torque sensor 154 (as discussed in more detail below with reference to
In accordance with further aspects, the system may estimate a volume of an object while the object is being held by the end effector. In particular, the system may estimate a volume of picked item while being held by a gripper, and compare the estimated volume with a known volume. One approach is to estimate the volume of the one or more items while the gripper is holding the object 197 (or objects). With reference to
As shown in
The scanning volume may be the volume above the area where the items are picked from; or the scanning volume may be strategically placed in between the picking location and the placing location to minimize travel time. Within the scanning volume, the system takes a snapshot of the volume of items held by the gripper. The volume could be estimated in a variety of ways depending on the sensor type as discussed above.
For example, if the sensors are cameras, then two or more cameras may be placed in a ring around the volume, directed slightly upward towards a backlighting screen (as discussed above) that may be in the shape of sections of a torus, where the gripped volume is held in between all the cameras and the brightly lit white screen. The brightly lit screen backlights the one or more held objects, so that the interior volume is black. Each perception unit and associated illumination source may be activated in a sequence so that no two illumination sources are on at the same time. This allows easy segmentation of the held volume in the image.
The illumination may be provided as a particular wavelength that is not present in the room, or the illumination may be modulated and the detector may demodulate the received perception data so that only illumination from the associated source is provided. The black region once projected back into space, becomes a frustum and the objects are known to lie within a solid frustum. Each camera generates a separate frustum, with the property that the volume of the items is a subset of all of the frustums. The intersection of all the frustums yields an upper bound on the volume of the object(s). The addition of a camera improves the accuracy of the volume estimate. The gripper may be visible within the cameras, and because its position is known, its volume can be subtracted out of the frustum or volume estimate.
In accordance with other aspects, 3D scanners may be used that obtain 3D images of the scanning volume, then the volume estimates are obtained in a similar way by fusing together the point clouds received from each sensor, but without the need for segmenting the images from the background using backlighting. Each 3D scanner returns a 3D image, which for each pixel in the image returns a depth, and again, may use any of light detection and ranging (LIDAR) scanners, pulsed time of flight cameras, continuous wave time of flight cameras, structured light cameras, or passive stereo cameras, etc.
In accordance with further aspects, the system may detect changes in object shape when an object is jostled. This may be done when an object is first lifted (for example at the input station 114 in
Again, the conveyor 144 leads to a deformable object induction limiting system 194. The deformable object induction limiting system 194 includes a programmable motion device such as an articulated arm 192 having an end effector 193 with a load cell or force torque sensor 195 (shown in
The processing system 12, for example, may include an infeed area 201 into which objects may be provided by the processing infeed conveyor (e.g., 46, 19, 51). An infeed conveyor 202 conveys objects from the infeed area 201 to an intermediate conveyor 204 at a processing station 206. The infeed conveyor 202 may include cleats for assisting in lifting the objects from the input area 200 onto the intermediate conveyor 204.
The processing station 206 also includes a grasp perception system 208 that views the objects on the intermediate conveyor 204, and identifies grasp locations on the objects as further shown in
The flow of objects is diagrammatically shown in
With reference to
The programmable motion device 210 may include a robotic arm equipped with sensors and computing, that when combined is assumed herein to exhibit the following capabilities: (a) it is able to pick objects up from a singulated stream of objects using, for example, an end effector; (b) it is able to move the object to arbitrary places within its workspace; and, (c) it is able to generate a map of objects that it is able to pick, represented as a candidate set of grasp points in the workcell, and as a list of polytopes enclosing the object in space. The allowable objects are determined by the capabilities of the robotic system. Their size, weight and geometry are assumed to be such that the robotic system is able to pick, move and place them. These may be any kind of ordered goods, packages, parcels, or other articles that benefit from automated processing.
The correct processing destination is determined from the symbol (e.g., barcode) on the object. It is assumed that the objects are marked in one or more places on their exterior with a visually distinctive mark such as a barcode or radio-frequency identification (RFID) tag so that they may be identified with a scanner. The type of marking depends on the type of scanning system used, but may include 1D or 2D barcode symbologies. Multiple symbologies or labeling approaches may be employed. The types of scanners employed are assumed to be compatible with the marking approach. The marking, either by barcode, RFID tag, or other means, encodes a symbol string, which is typically a string of letters and numbers, which identify the object.
Once grasped, the object may be moved by the programmable motion device 210 to a primary perception system 212 (such as a drop scanner). The object may even be dropped into the perception system 212. In further aspects, if a sufficiently singulated stream of objects is provided on the intermediate conveyor 204, the programmable motion device may be provided as a diverter (e.g., a push or pull bar) that diverts object off of the intermediate conveyor into the drop scanner. Additionally, the movement speed and direction of the intermediate conveyor 204 (as well as the movement and speed of infeed conveyor 202) may be controlled to further facilitate providing a singulated stream of objects on the intermediate conveyor 204 adjacent the drop scanner.
As further shown in
In accordance with certain aspects, the invention provides the ability to identify via barcode or other visual markings of objects by employing a perception system into which objects may be dropped. Automated scanning systems would be unable to see barcodes on objects that are presented in a way that their barcodes are not exposed or visible. The system 212 therefore is designed to view an object from a large number of different views very quickly, reducing or eliminating the possibility of the system 212 not being able to view identifying indicia on an object.
Following detection by the perception unit 212, the object is now positively identified and drops onto the primary transport system 214 (e.g., a conveyor). With reference again to
With reference to
Systems of various embodiments provide numerous advantages because of the inherent dynamic flexibility. The flexible correspondence between sorter outputs and destinations provides that there may be fewer sorter outputs than destinations, so the entire system may require less space. The flexible correspondence between sorter outputs and destinations also provides that the system may choose the most efficient order in which to handle objects, in a way that varies with the particular mix of objects and downstream demand. The system is also easily scalable, by adding sorters, and more robust since the failure of a single sorter might be handled dynamically without even stopping the system. It should be possible for sorters to exercise discretion in the order of objects, favoring objects that need to be handled quickly, or favoring objects for which the given sorter may have a specialized gripper.
The movable carriage is therefore reciprocally movable between the destination bins, and the/each carriage moves along a track, and may be actuated to drop an object (e.g., 252) into a desired destination bin. In certain aspects, the carriage (e.g., 220) may include sensors (e.g., transmitter and receiver pairs 260 and/or 262 that may be used to confirm that an object has been received by the carriage or confirming that an object has been discharged by the carriage. In still further aspects, the carriage may be mounted onto a rail chassis via load cells 264 such that the weight within the carriage may be determined from load cell output sensor data as discussed further below with reference to
In accordance with an aspect, the invention provides an automated material handling system that is tasked, in part, with routing objects carried in bins to stations where objects are transferred from one bin to another with one or more programmable motion devices (such as articulated arms) at automated stations, and may further include manual stations. The objects may be provided in bins, which may be containers, totes, or boxes etc. An overall objective of the system may be to sort and ship goods, to perform order fulfillment, to replenish store stock, or to provide any general-purpose system requiring the transfer of individual objects from one bin to a processing system.
The objects may be packages, boxes, flats or polybags etc. in a shipping center, or consumer products in an e-commerce order fulfillment center, or products and warehouse packs in a retail distribution center (DC). The conveyance of objects or bins of objects could take many forms, including belt or roller conveyors, chutes, mobile robots, or human workers. The picking stations, where items are transferred, might be automated systems including robotic systems, or a station manned by a human being.
Systems of the invention may be employed in a wide variety of routing system applications. For example, induction limiting systems of the invention may be employed with multiple routing and processing system.
As an example,
The objects to be processed (e.g., objects 40, 42) are each assigned an object processing station (e.g., 12, 25, 26) toward which they are routed. In particular, the objects to be processed (again, e.g., 40, 42) may be routed to an appropriate processing station based on any of a variety of parameters, such as size, weight, packaging material (boxes, bags, odd shaped objects etc.), and even shipping location, and each object processing station may, for example, include components that are particularly suited for certain sizes, weights, packaging materials etc. Certain objects may be routed by multidirectional conveyor 44 along conveyor 46 to object processing station 12, while others (e.g., objects 49, 52, 54) are directed along conveyor 48 toward further processing stations. Certain of those objects may be routed by multidirectional conveyor 56 along conveyor 58 toward object processing station 25, while others (e.g., objects 61, 62, 63) are directed along conveyor 60 toward further processing stations. Certain of these objects may be routed by multidirectional conveyor 64 along conveyor 65 toward processing station 26, while others (e.g., 67) are directed along conveyor 66 toward further object processing stations. The operation of the systems may be controlled by one or more computer processing systems (e.g., 100, 68 and 69).
As another example,
Again, the objects to be processed are each assigned an object processing station (e.g., 12, 25, 26) toward which they are routed. In particular, the objects to be processed (e.g., 43, 52, 54) may be routed to an appropriate processing station based on any of a variety of parameters, such as size, weight, packaging material (boxes, bags, odd-shaped objects etc.), and even shipping location, and each object processing station may, for example, include components that are particularly suited for certain sizes, weights, packaging materials etc. Certain objects may be routed by multidirectional conveyor 45 along conveyor 19 to object processing station 12, while others (e.g., objects 43, 52, 54) are directed along conveyor 47 toward further processing stations. As discussed above with reference to
Again, the objects to be processed are each assigned an object processing station (e.g., 12, 25, 26) toward which they are routed. In particular, the objects to be processed may be routed to an appropriate processing station based on any of a variety of parameters, such as size, weight, packaging material (boxes, bags, odd-shaped objects etc.), and even shipping location, and each object processing station may, for example, include components that are particularly suited for certain sizes, weights, packaging materials etc. Certain objects may be routed by multidirectional conveyor 59 along conveyor 51 to object processing station 12, while others (e.g., objects 52, 53, 54) are directed along conveyor 47 toward further processing stations. As discussed above with reference to
In particular, conveyor 22 also includes an additional inspection station 86 with a multipurpose perception unit 85, a weight sensing conveyor section 87 and a multidirectional conveyor 88 for evaluating objects (e.g., 81), and for optionally directing objects (e.g., 83, 89) along conveyor 31 toward a multidirectional conveyor 90. Multidirectional conveyor 90 leads to conveyor 91 for providing objects to object processing system 17 as well as to any additional object processing systems (e.g., object 93) along conveyor 92 in series with the object processing system 17.
Conveyor 22 further includes an additional inspection station 96 with a multipurpose perception unit 95, a weight sensing conveyor section 97 and a multidirectional conveyor 99 for evaluating objects (e.g., 98), and for optionally directing objects (e.g., 111, 113) along conveyor 151 toward a multidirectional conveyor 115. Multidirectional conveyor 115 leads to conveyor 117 for providing objects to object processing system 21 as well as to any additional object processing systems (e.g., object 121) along conveyor 119 in series with the object processing system 21.
Conveyor 22 further includes an additional inspection station 127 with a multipurpose perception unit 125, a weight sensing conveyor section 129 and a multidirectional conveyor 131 for evaluating objects (e.g., 137), and for optionally directing objects (e.g., 139, 141) along conveyor 153 toward a multidirectional conveyor 145. Multidirectional conveyor 145 leads to conveyor 147 for providing objects to object processing system 23 as well as to any additional object processing systems (e.g., object 155) along conveyor 149 in series with the object processing system 21. Objects (e.g., 28, 36, 81, 94, 98, 123, 137) may therefore be routed along conveyor 22 to any of a plurality of processing stations, and then directed along a transverse conveyor (e.g., 41, 31, 151, 153) to any of a plurality of processing stations in series along the transverse conveyor. Non-processable objects (e.g., object 157) may be provided to an exception bin 159 at the end of the conveyor 22. Operation of the system may be controlled by one or more computer processing systems 100, 161, 163, 165. Again, the objects to be processed may be routed to an appropriate processing station based on any of a variety of parameters, such as size, weight, packaging material (boxes, bags, odd-shaped objects etc.), and even shipping location, and each object processing station may, for example, include components that are particularly suited for certain sizes, weights, packaging materials etc.
In particular, conveyor 181 leads to an induction system 14 that includes the response evaluation section 16, the multipurpose perception unit 24, the weight sensing conveyor section, multidirectional conveyor 132 and deformable object induction limiting system 194 and articulated arm 192 as discussed above with reference to
Conveyor 183 leads to a further induction system 14 including the response evaluation section 16, the multipurpose perception unit 24, the weight sensing conveyor section, multidirectional conveyor 132 and deformable object induction limiting system 194 and articulated arm 192 as discussed above with reference to
Again, the objects to be processed are each assigned an object processing station (e.g., 12, 177, 179) toward which they are routed. In particular, the objects to be processed may be routed to an appropriate processing station based on any of a variety of parameters, such as size, weight, packaging material (boxes, bags, odd-shaped objects etc.), and even shipping location, and each object processing station may, for example, include components that are particularly suited for certain sizes, weights, packaging materials etc. Operation of the system may be controlled by one or more computer processing systems 100, 200, 301.
Any of a wide variety of detection systems may also be employed in the above disclosed and further aspects of the present invention. For example, as discussed above with regard to the weight sensing conveyors discussed above, such a weight sensing conveyor may be provided in a wide variety of systems. For example, and with reference to
With reference to
With reference to
Such systems therefore, that provide weight sensing in the presentation conveyor may include one or more load cells or weight sensitive mechanisms embedded into the surface on which objects are presented to a programmable motion device such as an articulated arm. Each object's weight and/or observed density (weight/volume) as may be estimated using the programmable motion system's cameras or range sensors that can perceive volume. Objects may be diverted or otherwise pass by the processing system when these values exceed specifications. To better localize incompatible objects (e.g., packages), there may be a grid of such weight sensitive mechanisms that are able to sense which region of the picking area contains the one or more incompatible objects, and then allow picking from any area except where the incompatible object(s) has been detected. Further, the systems may detect flow readings while gripping an object. If a flow of air (F1) is too high (as compared to an expected flow (F2) for a particular object, then the system may permit the object to be diverted from or move past an object processing system.
In further aspects therefore, the end effector of the programmable motion device (and as discussed herein with reference to
In accordance with further aspects, the system may limit the initial grip force. For example, the system may employ a partially open gripper valve to limit the maximum grip force (V1) in a vacuum gripper 450 until an object is lifted. Once the object is lifted, the gripper valve may be fully closed, bringing the vacuum force to a greater vacuum (V2) to execute a secure and reliable transfer of the object. Such a process ensures that objects will not be dropped during transfer, and limits the induction of objects to the processing system that are potentially at risk of being dropped or not processed properly.
With reference to
Many further filter systems, diverter systems, testing systems, routing systems and processing systems may be used in the above aspects and further below aspects of the invention. For example, certain embodiments may involve approaches to filtering packages that are too heavy, and doing so before they reach one of the robot pickers. Such systems may include a passive bomb-bay drop system. Such a system may involve routing incoming packages over a chute with a bomb-bay door or doors. The bomb-bay door is held closed by a spring whose stiffness is tuned so that packages that are too-heavy fall through the bomb-bay door. Packages whose weight is less than the limit, do not exert enough force to open the passive bomb-bay door(s). The passive bomb-bay door is mounted to a chute, so that packages fall naturally or slide over the bomb-bay without dropping.
In accordance with further aspects therefore, filtering systems of the invention may include an actuatable bomb-bay drop system (e.g., motor actuated or spring loaded). A sensor measures the weight of packages as they travel over the bomb-bay door(s), and a controller opens the bomb-bay door(s), either by a motor to open the bomb-bay, or by a mechanism that unlocks the bomb-bay door(s), and then a motor that closes it again in accordance with an aspect of the invention.
The induction system 489 of
With further reference to
Again, the receiving stations may be any of automated carriers, chutes or conveyors.
In accordance with further aspects of the invention for example, induction systems may be used that may discriminate between objects by passing objects by an air blower that pushes lighter packages from a stream of packages, leaving the heavier packages. The heavier packages' larger inertia overcomes the air resistance arising from the blown air. For lighter packages, the air resistance exceeds the lighter packages' lower inertia. The air flow are tuned to so that for common package types, the stream blown away contains to the greatest extent those packages meeting the weight specifications.
Additionally, and as shown in
With reference to
In accordance with further aspects, the system may further provide bulk picking by such vacuum systems. Objects may pass by an area in which a large vacuum surface is suspended upside down over the objects. The system may grip objects in bulk—many at a time—but is only able to achieve a lift for light objects, while heavy objects are not lifted out of the object stream. The balance of vacuum lifting force verses weight and packaging material may be adjusted such that either all objects that remain have a minimum weight, or that all objects that are lifted are below a maximum weight.
Induction systems in accordance with a further embodiment of the invention may include system 530 that includes a blower source 532 and a vacuum source 534 that are positioned on either side of an air-permeable conveyor 536 as shown in
With reference to
In applications where objects may be light enough to be moved off of a non-perforated conveyor (and/or the blower and vacuum source is high), a system 550 may be provided that includes a blower source 552 and a vacuum source 554 that are positioned on either side of a conveyor 556 as shown in
As noted above, objects may be routed to any of chutes, conveyors, mobile carriers etc.
With further reference to the side view shown in
The object processing system may include a plurality of stations as discussed above, and the induction filtering may direct different objects to the different stations based on a variety of object characteristics and end effector characteristics (e.g., knowing which end effectors are better suited for handling which objects). The ability to provide objects from infeed conveyors to a wide variety of processing systems provides significant flexibility, and the ability to provide objects to automated carriers provides further flexibility in object processing.
Object processing systems for use with induction filtering systems and methods of various embodiments of the invention may be any of a wide variety of object processing systems such as sortation systems, automated storage and retrieval systems, and distribution and redistribution systems. For example, in accordance with further embodiments, the invention provides systems that are capable of automating the outbound process of a processing system. The system may include one or more automated picking stations 700 (as shown in
In accordance with an embodiment of the system includes an automated picking station that picks eaches from inventory totes and loads them into outbound containers. The system involves together machine vision, task and motion planning, control, error detection and recovery, and artificial intelligence grounded in a sensor-enabled, hardware platform to enable a real-time and robust solution for singulating items out of cluttered containers.
With reference to
In particular, the system 700 includes an array 702 of track elements 704 as discussed above, as well as automated carriers 706 that ride on the track elements 704 as discussed above. One or more overhead perception units 708 (e.g., cameras or scanners) acquire perception data regarding objects in bins or totes 710, as well as perception data regarding locations of destination boxes 712. A programmable motion device such as a robotic system 714 picks an object from the bin or tote 710, and places it in the adjacent box 712. One or both of the units 710, 712 are then moved automatically back into the grid, and one or two new such units are moved into position adjacent the robotic system. Meanwhile, the robotic system is employed to process another pair of adjacent units (again, a bin or tote 710 and a box 712) on the other side of the robotic system 714. The robotic system therefore processes a pair of processing units on one side, then switches sides while the first side is being replenished. This way, the system 700 need not wait for a new pair of object processing units to be presented to the robotic system. The array 702 of track elements 704 may also include shelf stations 716 at which mobile units 706 may park or pick up either bins/totes 710 and boxes 712. The system operates under the control, for example, of a computer processor 720.
The manual pick station system is a goods-to-person pick station supplied by mobile automated movement carriers on track systems as discussed above. The system has the same form and function as the automated picking station in that both are supplied by the same carriers, both are connected to the same track system grid, and both transfer eaches from an inventory tote to an outbound container. The manual system 800 (as shown in
Also, the manual system raises carriers to an ergonomic height (e.g. via ramps), ensures safe access to containers on the carriers, and includes a monitor interface (HMI) to direct the team member's activities. The identity of the SKU and the quantity of items to pick are displayed on an HMI. The team member must scan each unit's UPC to verify the pick is complete using a presentation scanner or handheld barcode scanner. Once all picks between a pair of containers are complete, the team member presses a button to mark completion.
In accordance with this embodiment (and/or in conjunction with a system that includes an AutoPick system as discussed above), a system 800 of
While the bulk of the overall system's picking throughput is expected to be handled by automated picking systems, manual picking systems provide the carrier and track system the ability to (a) rapidly scale to meet an unplanned increase in demand; (b) handle goods that are not yet amenable to automation; and (c) serve as a QA, problem solving, or inventory consolidation station within the overall distribution system. The system therefore, provides significant scaling and trouble-shooting capabilities in that a human sorted may be easily added to an otherwise fully automated system. As soon as a manual picking system is enabled (occupied by a sorter), the system will begin to send totes or bins 810 and boxes 812 to the manual picking station. Automated picking stations and manual picking stations are designed to occupy the same footprint, so a manual picking station may later be replaced with an automated picking station with minimal modifications to the rest of the system.
Again, a carrier is a small mobile robot that can interchangeably carry an inventory tote, outbound container, or a vendor case pack. These carriers can remove or replace a container from or onto a storage fixture using a simple linkage mechanism. Since a carrier only carries one container at a time, it can be smaller, lighter, and draw less power than a larger robot, while being much faster. Since the carriers drive on a smart tile flooring, they have lessened sensing, computation, and precision requirements than mobile robots operating on bare floor. These features improve cost to performance metrics.
All carriers run on the same shared roadway of track sections as independent container-delivery agents. The carriers can move forward, backward, left or right to drive around each other and reach any location in the system. This flexibility allows the carriers to serve multiple roles in the system by transporting (a) inventory totes to picking stations, (b) outbound containers to picking stations, (c) inventory totes to and from bulk storage, (d) full outbound containers to discharge lanes, and (e) empty outbound containers into the system. Additionally, the carriers may be added incrementally as needed to scale with facility growth.
The track floor modules are standard-sized, modular, and connectable floor sections. These tiles provide navigation and a standard driving surface for the carriers and may act as a storage area for containers. The modules are connected to robotic pick cells, induction stations from bulk storage, and discharge stations near loading docks. The modules eliminate the need of other forms of automation, e.g. conveyors, for the transportation of containers within the system.
As shown at 900 in
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that numerous modifications and variations may be made to the above disclosed embodiments without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention.
The present application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/737,208 filed Jan. 8, 2020, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/789,775 filed Jan. 8, 2019; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/737,208 is a continuation-in-part application of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/661,820 filed Oct. 23, 2019; which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/884,351 filed Aug. 8, 2019 and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/749,509 filed Oct. 23, 2018; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/737,208 filed Jan. 8, 2020, further is a continuation-in-part application of claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/543,105 filed Aug. 16, 2019, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,796,116, issued Oct. 6, 2020, which is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/956,442 filed Apr. 18, 2018, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,438,034, issued Oct. 8, 2019, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/486,783 filed Apr. 18, 2017, the disclosures of all of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3592326 | Zimmerle et al. | Jul 1971 | A |
| 3595407 | Muller-Kuhn et al. | Jul 1971 | A |
| 3734286 | Simjian | May 1973 | A |
| 4136780 | Hunter et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
| 4186836 | Wassmer et al. | Feb 1980 | A |
| 4360098 | Nordstrom | Nov 1982 | A |
| 4622875 | Emery et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
| 4722653 | Williams et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
| 4759439 | Hartlepp | Jul 1988 | A |
| 4819784 | Sticht | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4846335 | Hartlepp | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4895242 | Michel | Jan 1990 | A |
| 5190162 | Hartlepp | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5419457 | Ross et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5460271 | Kenny et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5672039 | Perry et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5713473 | Satake et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5794788 | Massen | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5794789 | Payson et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5839566 | Bonnet | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5875434 | Matsuoka et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5990437 | Coutant et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6060677 | Ulrichsen et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6124560 | Roos et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6246023 | Kugle | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6323452 | Bonnet | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6401936 | Isaacs et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6688459 | Bonham et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6762382 | Danelski | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6897395 | Shiibashi et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 8560406 | Antony | Oct 2013 | B1 |
| 8776694 | Rosenwinkel et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8997438 | Fallas | Apr 2015 | B1 |
| 9020632 | Naylor | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9102336 | Rosenwinkel | Aug 2015 | B2 |
| 9364865 | Kim | Jun 2016 | B2 |
| 9650214 | Hoganson | May 2017 | B2 |
| 9751693 | Battles et al. | Sep 2017 | B1 |
| 9878349 | Crest et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
| 9926138 | Brazeau et al. | Mar 2018 | B1 |
| 9931673 | Nice et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
| 9962743 | Bombaugh et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
| 9975148 | Zhu et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
| 10029865 | McCalib, Jr. et al. | Jul 2018 | B1 |
| 10198710 | Hahn et al. | Feb 2019 | B1 |
| 10206519 | Gyori et al. | Feb 2019 | B1 |
| 10438034 | Wagner et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
| 10538394 | Wagner et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
| 10576621 | Wagner et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
| 10577180 | Mehta et al. | Mar 2020 | B1 |
| 10611021 | Wagner et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
| 10809122 | Danenberg et al. | Oct 2020 | B1 |
| 10810715 | Chamberlin | Oct 2020 | B2 |
| 10853757 | Hill et al. | Dec 2020 | B1 |
| 11055504 | Wagner | Jul 2021 | B2 |
| 11080496 | Wagner et al. | Aug 2021 | B2 |
| 11205059 | Wagner et al. | Dec 2021 | B2 |
| 20020092801 | Dominguez | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020134056 | Dimario et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020157919 | Sherwin | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020170850 | Bonham et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020179502 | Cerutti et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030034281 | Kumar | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030038065 | Pippin et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030075051 | Watanabe et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20040065597 | Hanson | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040194428 | Close et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040195320 | Ramsager | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040215480 | Kadaba | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040261366 | Gillet et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050002772 | Stone | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050149226 | Stevens et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050220600 | Baker et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20060021858 | Sherwood | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060070929 | Fry et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20070209976 | Worth et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20080046116 | Khan et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080181753 | Bastian et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20090026017 | Freudelsperger | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20100122942 | Harres et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100318216 | Faivre et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110084003 | Benjamins | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110130868 | Baumann | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110144798 | Freudelsperger | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110238207 | Bastian, II et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110243707 | Dumas et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110320036 | Freudelsperger | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120118699 | Buchman et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20130051696 | Garrett et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130110280 | Folk | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130202195 | Perez Cortes et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20140244026 | Neiser | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140249666 | Radwallner et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140277693 | Naylor | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140291112 | Lyon et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20150098775 | Razumov | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150114799 | Hansl et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20160083196 | Dugat | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160221762 | Schroader | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20160221766 | Schroader et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20160228921 | Doublet et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20170057756 | Dugat et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170197233 | Bombaugh et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| 20170225330 | Wagner et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170312789 | Schroader | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20170330135 | Taylor et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20170349385 | Moroni et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
| 20170369244 | Battles et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
| 20180044120 | Mäder | Feb 2018 | A1 |
| 20180085788 | Engel et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180105363 | Lisso et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
| 20180127219 | Wagner et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
| 20180186572 | Issing | Jul 2018 | A1 |
| 20180224837 | Enssie | Aug 2018 | A1 |
| 20180265291 | Wagner et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
| 20180265298 | Wagner et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
| 20180265311 | Wagner et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
| 20180273295 | Wagner et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
| 20180273296 | Wagner et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
| 20180273297 | Wagner et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
| 20180273298 | Wagner et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
| 20180282065 | Wagner et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
| 20180282066 | Wagner et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
| 20180312336 | Wagner et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
| 20180327198 | Wagner et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
| 20180330134 | Wagner et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
| 20190022702 | Vegh et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
| 20190091730 | Torang | Mar 2019 | A1 |
| 20190337723 | Wagner et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
| 20200023410 | Tamura et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
| 20200143127 | Wagner et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2006204622 | Mar 2007 | AU |
| 1033604 | Jul 1989 | CN |
| 1671489 | Sep 2005 | CN |
| 1809428 | Jul 2006 | CN |
| 103129783 | Jun 2013 | CN |
| 103842270 | Jun 2014 | CN |
| 104507814 | Apr 2015 | CN |
| 104858150 | Aug 2015 | CN |
| 105383906 | Mar 2016 | CN |
| 105668255 | Jun 2016 | CN |
| 105873838 | Aug 2016 | CN |
| 205500186 | Aug 2016 | CN |
| 108602630 | Sep 2018 | CN |
| 19510392 | Sep 1996 | DE |
| 102004001181 | Aug 2005 | DE |
| 102007023909 | Nov 2008 | DE |
| 102007038834 | Feb 2009 | DE |
| 102008039764 | May 2010 | DE |
| 0235488 | Sep 1987 | EP |
| 0613841 | Sep 1994 | EP |
| 0648695 | Apr 1995 | EP |
| 1695927 | Aug 2006 | EP |
| 1995192 | Nov 2008 | EP |
| 2233400 | Sep 2010 | EP |
| 2477914 | Apr 2013 | EP |
| 3112295 | Jan 2017 | EP |
| 2832654 | May 2003 | FR |
| 2084531 | Apr 1982 | GB |
| 200228577 | Jan 2002 | JP |
| 2007182286 | Jul 2007 | JP |
| 2008037567 | Feb 2008 | JP |
| 2010202291 | Sep 2010 | JP |
| 9731843 | Sep 1997 | WO |
| 03095339 | Nov 2003 | WO |
| 2005118436 | Dec 2005 | WO |
| 2007009136 | Jan 2007 | WO |
| 2008091733 | Jul 2008 | WO |
| 2010017872 | Feb 2010 | WO |
| 2011038442 | Apr 2011 | WO |
| 2014130937 | Aug 2014 | WO |
| 2015118171 | Aug 2015 | WO |
| 2017036780 | Mar 2017 | WO |
| 2017044747 | Mar 2017 | WO |
| 2018175466 | Sep 2018 | WO |
| 2018176033 | Sep 2018 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Communication pursuant to Rules 161(1) and 162EPC issued by the European Patent Office in related European Patent Application No. 20704961.0 dated Aug. 17, 2021, 3 pages. |
| Communication pursuant to Rules 161(1) and 162EPC issued by the European Patent Office in related European Patent Application No. 20703621.1 dated Aug. 17, 2021, 3 pages. |
| Communication pursuant to Rules 161(1) and 162EPC issued by the European Patent Office in related European Patent Application No. 20704119.5 dated Aug. 17, 2021, 3 pages. |
| Communication pursuant to Rules 161(1) and 162EPC issued by the European Patent Office in related European Patent Application No. 20704962.8 dated Aug. 17, 2021, 3 pages. |
| Communication pursuant to Rules 161(1) and 162EPC issued by the European Patent Office in related European Patent Application No. 20704645.9 dated Aug. 17, 2021, 3 pages. |
| Communication pursuant to Rules 161(1) and 162EPC issued by the European Patent Office in related European Patent Application No. 20703866.2 dated Aug. 17, 2021, 3 pages. |
| Communication pursuant to Rules 161(1) and 162 EPC issued by the European Patent Office in related European Patent Application No. 18723144.4 dated Nov. 26, 2019, 3 pages. |
| Examiner's Report issued by the Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada in related Canadian Patent Application No. 3,060,257 dated Dec. 9, 2020, 3 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued by the International Bureau of WIPO dated Oct. 22, 2019, in related International Application No. PCT/US2018/028164, 11 pages. |
| International Preliminary Reporton Patentability issued by the International Bureau of WIPO in related International Application No. PCT/US2019/057710 dated Apr. 27, 2021, 8 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion issued by the International Searching Authority dated Aug. 9, 2018, in related International Application No. PCT/US2018/028164, 15 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion issued by the International Searching Authority dated Mar. 25, 2020, in related International Application No. PCT/US2020/012695, 14 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion issued by the International Searching Authority dated Mar. 25, 2020, in related International Application No. PCT/US2020/012704, 15 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion issued by the International Searching Authority dated Mar. 25, 2020, in related International Application No. PCT/US2020/012713, 14 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion issued by the International Searching Authority dated Mar. 25, 2020, in related International Application No. PCT/US2020/012720, 14 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion issued by the International Searching Authority dated Mar. 25, 2020, in related International Application No. PCT/US2020/012744, 14 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion issued by the International Searching Authority dated Mar. 25, 2020, in related International Application No. PCT/US2020/012754, 14 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion issued by the International Searching Authority dated Feb. 6, 2020 in related International Application No. PCT/US2019/057710, 12 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in related U.S. Appl. No. 15/956,442 dated Mar. 15, 2019, 8 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in related U.S. Appl. No. 16/737,213 dated Jun. 4, 2020, 6 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in related U.S. Appl. No. 16/737,211 dated Nov. 23, 2020, 11 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in related U.S. Appl. No. 16/737,213 dated Feb. 24, 2021, 8 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in related U.S. Appl. No. 16/737,218 dated Mar. 26, 2021, 13 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in related U.S. Appl. No. 16/737,215 dated Mar. 26, 2021, 13 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in related U.S. Appl. No. 16/737,202 dated Apr. 13, 2021, 9 pages. |
| Notice on the First Office Action and First Office Action, along with its English Translation, issued by the China National Intellectual Property Administration in related Chinese Patent Application No. 201880038892.0 dated Sep. 2, 2020, 23 pages. |
| Notice on the Second Office Action and Second Office Action, along with its English Translation, issued by the China National Intellectual Property Administration in related Chinese Patent Application No. 201880038892.0 dated Apr. 14, 2021, 8 pages. |
| Communication pursuant to Rules 161(1) and 162 EPC issued by the European Patent Office in related European Application No. 19805436.3 dated Jun. 1, 2021, 3 pages. |
| Final Office Action issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in related U.S. Appl. No. 16/737,213 dated Jul. 23, 2021, 10 pages. |
| International Preliminary Reporton Patentability issued by the International Bureau of WIPO in related International Application No. PCT/US2020/012744 dated Jun. 16, 2021, 8 pages. |
| International Preliminary Reporton Patentability issued by the International Bureau of WIPO in related International Application No. PCT/US2020/012720 dated Jun. 16, 2021, 8 pages. |
| International Preliminary Reporton Patentability issued by the International Bureau of WIPO in related International Application No. PCT/US2020/012695 dated Jun. 16, 2021, 8 pages. |
| International Preliminary Reporton Patentability issued by the International Bureau of WIPO in related International Application No. PCT/US2020/012713 dated Jun. 16, 2021, 8 pages. |
| International Preliminary Reporton Patentability issued by the International Bureau of WIPO in related International Application No. PCT/US2020/012754 dated Jun. 16, 2021, 8 pages. |
| International Preliminary Reporton Patentability issued by the International Bureau of WIPO in related International Application No. PCT/US2020/012704 dated Jun. 16, 2021, 9 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in related U.S. Appl. No. 16/737,218 dated Oct. 26, 2021, 7 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in related U.S. Appl. No. 16/661,820 dated Oct. 27, 2021, 18 pages. |
| Examiner's Report issued by the Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada (Canadian Intellectual Property Office) in related Canadian Patent Application No. 3,060,257 dated Oct. 28, 2021, 6 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in related U.S. Appl. No. 17/349,064 dated Mar. 8, 2022, 14 pages. |
| Examiner's Report issued by the Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada (Canadian Intellectual Property Office) in related Canadian Patent Application No. 3,126,766 dated Apr. 13, 2022, 5 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in related U.S. Appl. No. 17/516,862 dated Jul. 19, 2022, 10 pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20210271835 A1 | Sep 2021 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62884351 | Aug 2019 | US | |
| 62789775 | Jan 2019 | US | |
| 62749509 | Oct 2018 | US | |
| 62486783 | Apr 2017 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 16737208 | Jan 2020 | US |
| Child | 17324588 | US | |
| Parent | 15956783 | Apr 2018 | US |
| Child | 16543105 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 16661820 | Oct 2019 | US |
| Child | 16737208 | US | |
| Parent | 16543105 | Aug 2019 | US |
| Child | 16661820 | US |
