Systems for ameliorating aqueous hydrocarbon spills

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6344519
  • Patent Number
    6,344,519
  • Date Filed
    Friday, January 9, 1998
    27 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 5, 2002
    22 years ago
Abstract
An oil-sorbent composition of matter has bound combinations of styrene-butadiene-styrene (SBS) and ethylene propylene diene monomer (EPDM). The SBS, or both materials, may be in the form of multitudes of granules. In certain preferred embodiments, the combination is 10-30% by weight and the SBS is about 30% styrene and manufactured without talc. The composition of matter can be formed into a solid, compliant body and utilized in a product for absorbing oil. The body can be formed, in one preferred embodiment, into an extended cylinder having an axial hole.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




This invention is in the field of systems and methods for recovering hydrocarbons from water, including oil spills on open-water surfaces such as the ocean.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




The continuing incidence of oil spillage into both marine and inland waterways due to shipping accidents results in enormous annual costs both financially to the shipping and insurance industries and environmentally. Many spill incidents occur in bad weather or in remote locations. Current systems for ameliorating oil spills require that specialized spill-response ships containing unique heavy equipment reach the site of the spill quickly, which requires relatively calm waters. There is a limited number of units of specialized equipment, and they are not easily transported. Thus, in many cases, response to the spill is delayed for many hours or even days. The impact of a spill is greatly increased by both bad weather and delayed response. Spill damage can be mitigated if response is rapid, even in rough-water conditions.




An additional problem is the high cost of disposal of the recovered material. Current recovery systems create large quantities of waste, which must be disposed of as hazardous waste at high financial cost. This problem can be solved by employing a system that allows for recycling, reclaiming, or low cost disposal.




Known systems for the clean-up of oil spilled on water fall into two categories: (1) absorption or adsorption (sorbing) of the oil, or (2) skimming of the oil, typically in conjunction with containment.




Many materials are known to be oil-absorbent or oil-adsorbent, such as wood chips, activated carbon, wool, cotton balls, corn husks, duck feathers, and various synthetic polymeric materials. A number of polymeric materials (polypropylene, polyester, polyurethane, vinyl polymers, and others) are known to absorb or adsorb crude or refined oil. Systems for applying these materials to oil spills are less developed. Application of materials to oil have been largely limited to two types: (1) spraying particles of the oil-sorbing material on the spill, or (2) placing the material inside booms or other barriers that surround the spill.




Either method creates severe collection problems for sorbent material in particulate form, including sinking of the oil-loaded material, loss of the oil-loaded material due to dispersion by wave or wind action, and dissolution of the oil-sorbent material in the oil spill. These problems are exacerbated when the spill occurs in bad weather or near shorelines. In addition, because 90% of spilled oil is typically located in 10% of the spill area, the dissolution problem can be particularly troublesome inside barriers. Further, the application of oil-sorbing material typically employs spill boats, which rely on availability of the boat and access to the spill. Both of these can be a severe problem in remote locations or bad weather.




Containers for oil-sorbing materials are known. These systems generally employ pillow or bale shaped containers. However, these containers have a tendency to pile up on top of each other, creating an undesirable condition in which a significant amount of the sorbent material is either below the waterline or floating above the oil, in either case out of contact with the oil. In addition, the large cross section of these types of containers tends to result in an “oil lock-out” phenomenon, in which the surface of the material becomes saturated with oil, effectively preventing oil migration to the center of the material. These containers also have a propensity for folding over on themselves in heavy seas, thereby reducing the contact between oil and the sorbent material.




On the other hand, oil-containment systems utilize booms to surround the spill until the oil can be collected. Boom systems have a number of designs, some of which employ oil sorbent materials in their construction. However, oil-sorbent booms are not designed to sorb substantial amounts of oil, but rather are generally used to retrieve a sheen or a small oil spill or to prevent the spill from expanding or reaching a protected area such as a shoreline until it can be collected by mechanical means, typically utilizing skimmers or oil-recovery boats.




Containment systems employing traditional booms have numerous problems. Deployment of some booms requires specialized equipment, which can be slow and difficult. If the spill is large, surrounding the spill may not be possible due to lack of sufficient boom resources. All of these problems can delay response to the spill. Therefore, boom and skimmer systems do not work well in rough water or near obstacles.




Delayed response to a spill results in a number of deleterious changes. A spill spreads uncontrollably and rapidly to a thin layer on water (less than 1 mm in many cases), making containment extremely difficult if not impossible. If close to shore, the oil may wash ashore, causing severe environmental damage. Lighter fractions of the oil (volatile organic compounds) are released into the atmosphere, resulting in hydrocarbon air pollution. The oil will undergo aging and emulsification, which can cause the oil to sink, making cleanup even more difficult. All of these changes cause the cleanup of the spill to become much more difficult, increase the environmental impact, and raise the financial cost of the cleanup.




There has been a need for some time, therefore, for an oil-recovery system that would (1) permit faster response, (2) work better in adverse conditions, such as rough water or near shorelines and obstacles, (3) prevent more of the oil from sinking, (4) contain the extent of the oil spill more quickly, (5) permit easier and more flexible deployment, (6) allow for easier collection, (7) permit economical recycling or disposal of the collected oil, and better protect the environment.




Accordingly, it is a primary object of the present invention to achieve a more effective system for recovering oil from the surface of bodies of water, such as oceans, lakes, or rivers.




It is another object of the invention to provide methods and apparatus for applying oil-absorbent or oil-adsorbent materials to an oil spill quickly and easily, accurately, and with minimal disturbance of the environment.




It is another object of the invention to provide methods and apparatus for effectively containing water-borne oil spills, even under adverse conditions or near shorelines, rocks, and reefs.




It is another object of the invention to provide methods and apparatus for ameliorating oil spills both by containment, such as within a barrier, and by entrapping the oil in an oil-sorbent material.




It is another object of the invention to provide a means of improving the collection of spilled oil.




It is another object of the invention to provide systems for controlling oil spills in areas of a body of water that are remote from collection vessels or in areas where shipping hazards or the oil itself prevent safe vessel operation, for later removal.




It is another object of the invention to provide collection systems that do not need to rely on the presence of specialized boats or vessels but can work with them.




It is another objective of the invention to provide systems for controlling oil spills that provide for the economical recycling of the collected oil as fuel.




It is another objective of the invention to provide systems for controlling oil spills that provide for the disposal of the oil through in-situ burning of the oil.




The present invention achieves the above and other objectives by use of a plurality of water- and oil-porous containers or sacks that are partially filled with a hydrophobic, compliant, oil-absorbent, copolymer material arranged in a number of bodies that (a) are generally cylindrical, (b) are porous, (c) have at least one passageway parallel to the axis of the cylinder, and (d) are dimensioned to float on water with the axis parallel to the surface of the water. The material is formed with a binder in a novel extrusion process. Optionally, a multitude of small flakes of a rigid, inert, smooth material having a surface that is wettable with respect to hydrocarbons are embedded in the bodies. Each sack is sewn in a novel way, with a perimeter stiffening ring, to retain a flat profile, and has a netting that closes to help inhibit outflow of the oil when the sack is retrieved. When deployed from ship or by air onto a spill, the sacks spread into a pancake shape and the copolymer bodies form a relatively thin layer that retains the oil. The inventive sacks will float indefinitely without releasing the oil or allowing it to emulsify, so the oil can remain in place until collection efforts are feasible. The sacks can be burned in situ, or standard fishing boats or specialized collection boats can be used to retrieve the sacks, and the collected material can be burned to capture the energy content of the oil or processed to separate the oil from the copolymer. The inventive sacks can be used in conjunction with other, known containment or retrieval equipment, such as booms or skimmers, if desired.




Thus, the inventive systems, devices, and methods can be used to permit (1) easy and quick deployment of containment equipment, even if a spill is in an inconvenient or distant location, (2) effective control of the spilled oil during any delays in recovery, and (3) comparatively inexpensive and easy collection of the oil during the clean-up stage. The system is specifically designed for rapid deployment and efficiency in rough water.




Other aspects of the invention will be appreciated by those skilled in the art after a reading of the detailed disclosure of the present invention below.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is an illustration showing various aspects of the inventive system in use, particularly deployment and retrieval techniques.





FIG. 2

is a perspective view of a preferred sack used with the inventive systems and methods, depicted in a state before the sack is deployed.





FIG. 3

is a perspective view of a preferred sack used with the inventive system, as it would appear before deployment.





FIG. 4

is a side, cross-sectional view of the sack of

FIG. 2

, as it would appear after deployment on open water.





FIG. 5

is an isometric assembly diagram showing the elements of the preferred sack of FIG.


2


.





FIG. 6

is a side view of an optional flange used in the preferred sack of FIG.


5


.





FIG. 7

is a cross-sectional view of the perimeter of an embodiment of the preferred sack of FIG.


5


.





FIG. 8

is a view of a preferred way of attaching the webbing and mesh of the preferred sack of FIG.


5


.





FIG. 9

is a partially broken-away perspective view of an alternative preferred sack, modified from the version of FIG.


5


.





FIG. 10

is a perspective view of a preferred form of copolymer body used in the preferred sacks of

FIGS. 2-9

.





FIG. 11

is a detail view of a cross-section of the preferred body, such the one shown in FIG.


10


.





FIG. 12

is a view of a preferred embodiment of apparatus used to collect sacks of

FIGS. 2-9

.





FIG. 13

is a view of an alternative preferred embodiment of the collection system of FIG.


12


.





FIG. 14

is a side view of a paravane assembly used with the embodiments of

FIGS. 12 and 13

.





FIG. 15

is a view of another alternative preferred embodiment of the collection system of FIG.


13


.





FIG. 16

is a view of a subsequent collection operation used in connection with the collection systems of

FIGS. 13

or


15


.











Common numerals are used in the several figures to indicate similar elements.




DETAILED DESCRIPTION




The system includes the application to the oil spill of hundreds or thousands of sacks containing a quantity of appropriately formed bodies comprising copolymer-based materials that are known to absorb and entrap crude or refined hydrocarbon products, including crude oil of any viscosity and gasoline or other refined fuels. For purposes of this application, the term “oil” refers to any hydrocarbon material.




Sack Deployment





FIG. 1

illustrates an oil spill and certain deployment and retrieval activities in accordance with the invention, including a plurality of the inventive containers, referenced as sacks


10


. To simplify the application, a number of different activities are shown in

FIG. 1

, although in practice, many of those activities may take place at different times or in different locations. In

FIG. 1

, a number of sacks


10


are shown being applied to an oil spill. The containers are designed for easy application from floating platforms or ships, as shown at the left of

FIG. 1

, or from air, as shown at the right of FIG.


1


. Although

FIG. 1

illustrates application of sacks


10


from fishing boat


20


, it is also possible to carry a quantity of sacks


10


aboard an oil tanker or other vessel (not shown) from which a spill might conceivably occur, as a precautionary measure.





FIG. 1

also shows a number of sacks


10


being dropped from helicopter


30


on a different part of the spill. The ability to deliver the sacks by air, such as from helicopters or light planes, or in bales from larger cargo planes, permits more rapid response to a spill, even if the spill is in a distant location or in a location that would be hazardous to approach by boat, such as in high seas, near reefs or other obstacles, in shallow water, or in the middle of a large spill. After all, open-ocean spills frequently occur in inconvenient locations or on rough seas. Also, air delivery allows application to a specific area of a large spill, which would be impossible for known sea-borne application methods. One specific area, usually near the center or leading edge of a spill, often contains 90% of the total oil in 10% of the geographic extent of the spill.




The fact that sacks


10


are easy to deploy also permits the most rapid possible form of response, namely delivery from the very tanker that has caused a spill. Known spill-control systems typically require complex, specialized equipment run by well-trained crews, and cannot be readily deployed from tankers. The inventive delivery system, by contrast, is simple enough to be deployed by tanker workers who are not skilled in handling spills, and inexpensive enough to be carried aboard tankers. It is not likely that an on-board tanker-delivery system can cure the entire spill, but prompt application of a quantity of sacks


10


can assist in the initial clean-up by reducing the extent of spreading and quantity of unrecovered oil.




As also shown in

FIG. 1

, at later stages of clean-up, booms


70


, of the sort known in the prior art, can be deployed and used with sacks


10


. However, sacks


10


can ameliorate even non-contained spills before booms


70


are deployed.




Sack Structure





FIGS. 2 through 9

illustrate preferred embodiments of sack


10


.




Before deployment, sacks


10


are suitable for compact storage. As seen in the cross-section of the preferred embodiment of

FIG. 3

, each sack


10


is only partially filled, such that approximately 25-30% of the volume of the sack contains material that can entrap oil. Each sack


10


can be folded (not shown), such as with laces or ties, into a volume much smaller than the volume occupied by the sack when it is fully inflated. Bales of up to thousands of the sacks can be created.




In a preferred embodiment, each sack


10


may measure at least several feet across and contain from a few kilograms of material that can entrap oil to many tens of kilograms. Although larger sizes are also suitable, sacks


10


that measure less than a meter across have been found useful because of the ease of handling and flexibility of application. As shown in

FIG. 1

, a large quantity of sacks


10


can be deployed on an oil spill, as densely as economically possible. However, it is preferred to allow gaps between the sacks, to avoid their coming into contact with each other, which increases the chances that the oil will pass into contact with unused sorbent material. (In an alternative embodiment discussed below, where the sacks are formed into a boom, no gaps would be present, to form a continuous barrier.)





FIG. 3

shows a cross-section of one such sack holding bodies of the oil-encapsulating copolymer. When deployed on open-water surface


50


, however, sack


10


expands to a flat, pancake shape, as shown in the cross-section of FIG.


4


. In that shape, the interior volume of sack


10


becomes smaller than the volume of the same sack in

FIG. 3

, so the material that can entrap oil may comprise approximately 80-85% of the volume, in a layer that is a few inches thick.




It has been found that sacks


10


, when dropped onto open water


50


, will quickly expand into the configuration shown in

FIG. 4

, because of the impact of the sack and subsequent wave action. Thus, sack


10


is designed to permit the material inside to spread out across the area covered by the sack relatively uniformly. It is not necessary, therefore, to take any positive action to ensure that the copolymer extends across the maximum possible extent.




Sacks


10


will float on the surface of the water, and oil coming into contact with the material contained inside sacks


10


will become entrapped by those copolymers. Because the copolymer material is hydrophobic, however, it will not become water-logged. It has been found that sacks


10


containing copolymers will float on the surface of water for at least several weeks, and perhaps indefinitely, without sinking, releasing the oil, or allowing it to emulsify.




The copolymer material in sacks


10


can be of one color, such as white, and change color, such as to black, when oil is entrapped therein. Further details of the copolymer material are specified below.




An optional feature shown in

FIG. 2

is one or more buoyant elements


110


, sewn to the material of sacks


10


at the level of the water-line. That feature assists in ensuring that sacks


10


have high visibility during prolonged periods on the spill. Also if other objects, such as a heavy type of cable, is attached to the sacks


10


, the buoyant elements


110


can assist in helping the sacks remain afloat.




Another optional feature of sack


10


is a small radio transmitter


100


, such as shown schematically in

FIG. 4

, which can emit a constant signal of pre-defined characteristics. Transmitters such as those used in scientific research to tag birds or animals are of one type that may be suitable. Alternatively, numeral


100


can comprise a patch of radar-sensitive material.




Such a location device


100


can permit prompt location of sacks


10


that have floated beyond the extent of the spill or otherwise been lost. Also, in cases where sacks


10


are dropped in a remote location by air, location device


100


can provide boats approaching a spill with easy navigational guidance, allowing recovery boats to locate the spill and other boats to avoid inadvertently sailing into the midst of the spill.





FIG. 5

shows more details of the basics of a preferred embodiment of one of the sacks


10


.




The outer material of sack


10


is formed from two layers


200


,


210


sewn together. The copolymer-based material described below is placed inside sack


10


between those two layers. The layers


200


,


210


can be formed of polypropylene, plastic, string or cord such as used in ordinary fishing nets, nylon, or another suitable material. In one suitable embodiment, a woven mesh formed of polypropylene was used. That material floats on water and is a strong material that is highly resistent to tearing, so if a small tear or rip opens, the material will resist its extension.




It is necessary, however, that the sack material have enough porosity to allow passage of the spilled oil to the absorbent material contained therein. Material having gaps of three eighths of an inch has been found most suitable, particularly for use on crude oil.




The necessary porosity of the sacks will depend, however, on the weight of the oil being collected. For example, a tight mesh may work on diesel or gasoline spills but not on heavier crude oil. In one test, a fabric measured as having air permeability of 150 cubic feet per minute at a half inch of water was found suitable for absorbing diesel fuel but not crude oil.




The material of the sack, however, must be sufficiently non-porous to contain the encapsulating copolymer matter. If the copolymer bodies specified below are used, even sack material having high porosity will be able to contain the absorbent material without leakage. Thus, larger bodies have the additional advantage of promoting the desirable goal of using high-porosity sack material, which permits better passage of oil.




Forming the outer material of sack


10


from two layers


200


,


210


sewn together is particularly advantageous in helping sack


10


lay flat on the water, while also reducing the chance that the sack will fold over onto itself, which is undesirable because it limits the extent of sack


10


. The flat configuration further assists in distributing the weight of the sack across its entire lateral extent, which helps in preventing bursting from concentrations of oil-filled copolymer at any particular point. The use of dual layers also promotes the wave action of the water helping to spread out the sack, as opposed to ordinary designs, in which wave action causes problems. Thus, use of the inventive system permits improved collection in actual conditions encountered in real oil spills.




Outside of layers


200


,


210


are two webs


220


,


225


formed of 1.5 inch wide polyester webbing. Material with a yarn count of 1,300 per inch and a breaking point of 4,000 pounds has been found more than sufficient for the loads encountered. For smaller sized sacks (three foot diameter or smaller), polypropylene webbing with a breaking point of 1,200 pounds can be used. Webs


220


,


225


assist in preventing or limiting the extent of rips or tears in layers


200


,


210


.




Webbing rings


240


,


250


are placed around the perimeter of sack


10


outside of webs


220


,


225


. Nylon webbing about 4 cm. wide with a warp yarn count of 1,680 per inch and breaking point of 6,000 pounds has been found suitable. Webbing rings


240


,


250


hold the elements shown in

FIG. 5

together while creating a stiffer edge of sack


10


, which (as discussed above) helps allow sack


10


to lie flat in the water without folding over onto itself, even when dropped from the air from any original configuration. Webbing rings


240


,


250


are narrow, to increase the encounter rate of the copolymer in still-water conditions. For smaller sacks, two-inch polypropylene webbing with a breaking point of 2,400 pounds can be used for webbing rings


240


,


250


.




If desired, during recovery, webbing rings


240


,


250


can be hooked to pick up sacks


10


.




The members of web


220


are sewn so as to leave an opening for the neck of flange


230


, which can be made of hard plastic dip-molded material such as PVC. The base of flange


230


is attached between web


220


and layer


200


, such as by sewing directly through the material of the plastic. Flange


230


is used as a port through which the copolymer material can be inserted into sack


10


. The erect shape of the flange helps during retrieval.




A closer view of flange


230


is shown in FIG.


6


. Flange


230


has a neck


232


and a base


234


, through which the sewing can be done. Cap


236


mates with neck


232


, either with bolts and nuts


238


, as shown, or through internal screw threads, not shown, or a combination of both. Eye


80


is formed, in the depicted embodiment, integrally with cap


236


.




Shown in

FIG. 2

are optional floats


110


, which can also be attached near the ends of the members of webs


220


,


225


of

FIG. 5

to add additional buoyancy.




Internal dividers (not shown) can optionally be used to further assist in preventing accumulation of copolymer material at certain spots. Neon colors can be used on the webbing or rings to facilitate location of sacks


10


during retrieval.




Webbing rings


240


,


250


can also be formed of a single piece of material


245


that is folded over the edge of the perimeter of the assembly and stitched, forming a flat “U” shape in cross-section, as shown in FIG.


7


.




Double and triple stitching, or zigzag stitching, techniques are preferably used to prevent seam rupture or load failures. The connector rings such as snap hooks


260


shown in

FIG. 7

can be added to webbing rings


240


,


250


near the ends of the members of webs


220


,


225


and at the perimeter of webs


220


,


225


, to permit attachment of multiple sacks


10


together. When so attached, sacks


10


can be used as a boom substitute. To supplement the connector rings, ropes or cables can be added to assist in making deployment and retrieval adjustments without undue stress on the sacks


10


.




Although

FIG. 5

shows a circular-shaped sack


10


, other configurations, such as square or rectangular, are also possible. Rectangular sacks are well suited for boom usage. When so used, the boom in accordance with the invention acts as a blanket, having a sizeable width to cover a large surface area. In this form, on the largest spills, the connected sacks can form a boom extending up to half a mile or so in length and holding up to 50,000 pounds of sorbent material. A boom of this sort is particularly useful to deploy in contact with the leading edge of the spill. In addition, double-width or wider booms can be configured easily by hooking additional rectangles together in multiple rows. Natural wave action works with such booms to prevent escape of oil, by spreading the oil across the width of the boom. By contrast, wave action hampers the effectiveness of prior art booms, including most with a “skirt” arrangement.




Also, booms of this sort can be deployed near shorelines, to prevent oil from reaching land, or directly on the shoreline at water's edge, to filter oil moving on shore or as oil returns to the water.




In a preferred embodiment, the members of webs


220


,


225


are attached to the woven mesh of layers


200


,


210


. Specifically, the members are preferably oriented in the same direction as the major axes of the diamond-shaped holes formed by the mesh, which is usually perpendicular to the warp of the woven material of webs


220


,


225


. This preferred configuration is shown in FIG.


8


. When sack


10


is picked up during retrieval with eye


80


, the weight of the oil-filled bodies opposing the tension on the webbing members causes mesh


200


,


210


to close in between those members, as shown in the lower half of FIG.


8


. This facilitates the removal of sacks


10


containing the oil-logged copolymer-based material while also capturing excess oil not entrapped in the copolymer, or fragmented copolymer bodies, that are inside sack


10


at the time of retrieval.




The unique construction of the sort shown in the example of

FIGS. 5-8

allows sacks


10


to expand on the surface of the water such that the formed copolymer bodies spread into a thin layer, creating a pancake shape and giving the sacks


10


minimal cross-sectional height on the spill, such as three inches. The arrangement limits the tendency of a sack


10


to fold onto itself, which can reduce the effectiveness of the system. It also causes the copolymer bodies to disburse uniformly throughout the entire width of the sack


10


, as the sewn layers of the sack prevent the sorbent material from forming into a pile, also improving effectiveness. Known containers tend to have bale-like or pillow-shaped appearances, which permit the sorbent material to form into a pile, creating the possibility of water-logged lower regions and upper regions that are out of the water. As a result, much of the sorbent material is positioned either above or below the oil slick in other known arrangements. Also, when the material becomes concentrated in a pile, the container can sink and interior parts of the material can be hidden, preventing them from encountering the oil.




The construction produces the flat profile in part for the following reasons: Webbing rings


240


,


250


help flatten the profile of sack


10


by providing a stiff perimeter member. Also, in the circular arrangement, each segment of rings


240


,


250


form a kind of an arch, creating tension that resists any tendency of webs


220


,


225


to pull the perimeter radially inward.




The flat profile of sacks


10


therefore spreads the oil-absorbent copolymer material into an optimal position for encountering the oil; that is, in a flat layer on the surface of the water. The encounter rate of the sorbent material with the oil is vastly improved with the arrangement shown, as opposed to known containers.




The arrangement of the sacks


10


combines with the natural buoyancy of the copolymer bodies to allow sacks


10


to remain afloat on the surface of the water for long periods of time, such as weeks or months or more. In one test, sacks remained afloat and effective for 16 weeks. Even over such extended time periods, the sacks


10


will hold the material in a flat sheet fashion, whether or not the material has sorbed oil.




A modified sack


10


is shown in FIG.


9


. The

FIG. 9

version is particularly useful in waterway applications. The overwhelming majority of aqueous spills (such as 95%) occur in waterways other than open ocean, including harbors, rivers, and lakes. Although many waterway spills are much smaller than open-sea spills, the waterway spills are very frequent and collectively environmentally significant.




The configuration shown in

FIG. 9

is particularly useful with smaller-sized sacks, such as sacks with diameters of about two-thirds of a meter, which might have a carrying weight of about 20 kg. of oil-soaked copolymer bodies.




Like the sack of

FIG. 5

, the sack of

FIG. 9

includes two mesh layers


200


,


210


(only


200


is clearly shown in

FIG. 9

) and a stiffening ring


245


. Instead of heavy nylon rings


240


,


250


(see FIG.


5


), the sack of

FIG. 9

uses a ring


245


made of a single piece of material (as in ring


245


of FIG.


7


), formed from a mesh, such as a tape made of 14×12 count per inch mesh vinyl-encapsulated polyester.




In place of webs


220


,


225


consisting of diametric straps (see FIG.


5


), sack


10


of

FIG. 9

includes ropes


222


,


224


positioned across non-diametric chords. Ropes


222


cross sack


10


on top of layer


200


, while ropes


224


cross sack


10


in an opposing direction below layer


210


. The ends of ropes


222


,


224


are attached to ring


245


.




In sack


10


of

FIG. 9

, ring


80


and fill tube


230


(see

FIG. 6

) have been replaced by a less expensive cloth collar


250


, such as made of a 200-Denier nylon duck fabric. One end of collar


250


is sewn to the top mesh layer


200


, while the other end is folded over itself and sewn, forming a passageway through which a drawstring


255


passes.




Cloth collar


250


can also be used to replace ring


80


and fill tube


230


in the embodiment of sack


10


shown in

FIGS. 5 and 6

. If it is desired to have a pick-up ring, such as ring


80


in that embodiment, a metal ring (not shown) can be affixed to the point where the radial members of web


220


meet at the center of mesh layer


200


, and cloth collar


250


can be located at any other convenient place in mesh layer


200


. Alternatively, the radial members of web


220


can be attached to the sack


10


except at the very center of layer


200


. The central ends of those radial members can be gathered together and attached to a metal ring, and cloth collar


250


can be affixed to the center of mesh layer


200


, just below the ring.




Copolymer Bodies





FIG. 10

shows an example of a suitably formed copolymer body


300


, for use inside sack


10


.




The principal ingredient of bodies


300


is a copolymeric material that is known to sorb oil but not water. Preferably, the material is compliant or flexible. A possible alternative to copolymers is natural or synthetic rubber, such as polyisoprene.




Particularly suitable types of copolymers fall within the class of thermoplastic elastomers, such as styrene-butadiene-styrene (“SBS”), which is a styrenic block copolymer. Styrenic block copolymers were developed for applications that require impact resistance, and this is still their primary use. SBS is highly sorbent, non-toxic, and remains coherent after it is oil saturated. An alternative styrenic block copolymer is styrene-isoprene-styrene (“SIS”).




In a preferred embodiment formed in accordance with the preferred process described below, SBS material formed into granules is mixed with granulated binder material. In that embodiment, granular porous SBS with about 30% styrene has been found suitable, when sifted to retain particles in the range of sizes between 4 and 20 mesh. Preferably, the SBS product is manufactured without talc, contrary to the standard manufacturing process, to enhance inter-granular bonding in the formed body.




The binder material is a compliant or flexible, hydrophobic, olefinic polymer material in a granular form and having a melting point lower than that of the oil-absorbent copolymer. Polyolefin thermoplastic elastomers, such as ethylene propylene (“EP”) rubber or ethylene propylene diene monomer (“EPDM”) have been found suitable. The binder prevents formed bodies


300


from crumbling while being handled in dry form, yet also absorbs a certain quantity of oil, although perhaps not as fast as SBS.




An optionally third component of bodies


300


is a rigid, inert, smooth, thin flake of a material that has a surface that is wettable with respect to hydrocarbons. Any such material can be used, including mica, metal, or polymers, but polymethylpentene (“PMP”) is a primary example. Alternative examples include polyethylene-terephthalate (“PET”), metallized polycarbonate, and polyvinylchloride. The flakes should be relatively thin, such as less than a millimeter thick. The shapes of the flakes is not particularly important, and good results have been achieved with randomly chopped material a few millimeters across. In some embodiments, the flakes enhance the flow of oil into the center of the formed copolymer body


300


, apparently by providing a channel or surface along which the oil can flow. In other embodiments, including those formed in accordance with the preferred process described below, the flakes are not essential but can optionally be added.




In the preferred embodiment, 70-90% by weight of the material of bodies


300


consists of SBS and the remainder of EPDM binder. As explained below, the SBS and EPDM granules are mixed and formed into bodies


300


in a way that results in SBS granules in an EPDM matrix. If flakes are included, they might make up about 5% of the total weight.




Because of the desire, as noted above, to allow the copolymer material to remain in a flat layer, it is desirable to create a relatively large body


300


, so that the material does not pile on top of itself. However, large bodies result in a greater distance between outer surface


310


and center surface


320


, which is disadvantageous because oil would require a much longer time of exposure to soak into the center. Because in real oil spills, a particular quantity of oil may encounter body


300


only sporadically, in a large body, the center material largely remains unused.




A preferred embodiment that solves this dilemma uses a generally tube shape for bodies


300


. For example, a cylinder with an outer diameter from about two to five centimeters has an hole about one to two centimeters in diameter along the longitudinal axis, resulting in a body


300


that has all of its material less than about a centimeter or two from the nearest surface.




The relatively large inner hole allows water and oil to pass through and between the bodies


300


easily, thereby improving the chances of oil encountering a copolymer surface. Also, removal of material from the center of body


300


reduces the amount of material in each body, without significantly reducing the quantity of oil absorbed, which further improves the quantity of oil entrapped per unit quantity of copolymer.




Multiple holes parallel to the cylinder's axis can be used in addition to the axial hole or instead of it. For example, in one arrangement (not shown) three holes are arranged on radial planes separated by 120° angles, the holes being equidistant from the axis of the cylinder. This arrangement permits enhanced flow-through of oil even if the oil layer does not intersect the cylinder along the axis, for example if some of the bodies


300


are partly submerged.




Bodies


300


should be formed with a length exceeding the outer diameter of the cylinder. This restriction is important, because it ensures that bodies


300


will float on the water with the axial hole parallel to the surface of the water, permitting better pass-through of oil. This is particularly important for bodies


300


used with the inventive sacks


10


, because sacks


10


are designed to permit bodies


300


to float in a single layer, as discussed above. When afloat amidst oil, bodies


300


near the circumference of sack


10


tends to physically block oil from flowing to other bodies


300


closer to the center. The inclusion of axial holes, and their orientation parallel to the surface of the water, counteracts this tendency. In addition, in some circumstances, the preferred hole orientation permits more oil to remain inside the axial passageway, permitting more time to complete the absorption process.




Bodies


300


can be supplemented with different-shaped bodies in sacks


10


. Using such a mixture of bodies


300


is advantageous over the use of a uniform type of body, because regular-shaped bodies can become arranged in a more fitted-together fashion, reducing the quantity of interstitial space, which thereby lowers the encounter rate.




The generally cylindrical exterior


310


of bodies


300


is preferred, as it reduces the area of contact between adjacent bodies


300


. The pressure from many bodies


300


in sack


10


and the softness of the constituent materials tends to meld bodies


300


together, with the consequential tendency to lower the encounter rate. A reduced contact area counters this undesired effect.




Another undesired effect is called “matting” or “gel blocking,” in which the first quantity of absorbed oil combines with an outer layer of grains in body


300


to form a barrier, preventing unabsorbed oil from continuing into the part to reach inner layers of grains and be absorbed thereby.




To increase the surface area of the bodies


300


, consequently permitting faster oil absorption and less gel blocking, without increasing the distance from surface to center, it is desirable to have inner and outer surfaces


310


and


320


roughened somewhat. The same is true of end surfaces


350


and


360


. The preferred process of formation discussed below promotes this goal. Alternatively, cutting or stamping bodies


300


from sheets of molded material has been found to roughen surfaces


310


,


320


, while first cutting the sheets from blocks roughens surfaces


350


,


360


. Also, the sheets or parts can be molded in a rough-sided dimple mold.




Also to reduce gel blocking, bodies


300


preferably have numerous fissures


370


extending into bodies


300


from some or all exterior surfaces and passing between the grains of SBS. Again, the preferred formation process discussed below promotes this goal.




In one example, a body


300


measuring about 3.5 cm. across and about 7.5 cm. long, with a 1 cm. diameter axial hole, was found suitable. That body


300


has a bulk density of about 0.62 g/cc and weighed, therefore, just over 40 grams. A sack


10


of 1.8 meters diameter can carry about 15 kg. of copolymer material, which represents nearly 400 units of the exemplary bodies


300


. A sack


10


of two-thirds of a meter diameter can carry about 2 kg. of copolymer material, which represents about 50 units. The weight of the sacks after bodies


300


absorb oil is about an order of magnitude greater.




The bulk density of the resulting body is controlled, also to reduce gel blocking. With the preferred bulk density, the SBS granules in bodies


300


are also less likely to clump to each other when soaked with oil, which also improves sorbency. Similarly, the SBS grain sizes identified above are selected to avoid gel blocking from either overly large chunks or agglomerated small-diameter, powdery particles.




With the preferred materials discussed above, bulk density greater than 0.75 g/cc tend to prevent the oil from entering the bodies, while bulk density smaller than 0.45 g/cc cause the bodies to fragment, either when dry or after absorbing oil. For example, copolymer bodies with a bulk density in the preferred range have enough inter-granular voids to permit oil to penetrate substantially throughout the thickness of bodies


300


without causing them to fall apart.




Bodies


300


formed in accordance with

FIGS. 10 and 11

can alternatively be used as oil-absorbent filters, such as in a cartridge or around a pipe or shaft. In this usage, because bodies


300


are physically held in position rather than floating, the length relative to the outer diameter is not critical and may be altered as needed. Similarly, the central hole may not be necessary.




In another extension of the inventive form, a structure (not shown) is formed of a number of bodies


300


arranged side-by-side, with longitudinal axes parallel to each other. To form such a structure, multiple bodies


300


can be affixed together, or the structure can be manufactured as a unitary sheet having opposing top and bottom scalloped surfaces, with the holes located between the surfaces at the thicker regions.




Forming the Copolymer Bodies




One method of forming bodies


300


shown in

FIG. 10

is to use low-pressure compression molding in the presence of elevated temperature. For example, pressures about 8-20 psi and temperatures about 150-200° F. have been found suitable to manufacture a product originally consisting of SBS and EPDM granules with high absorbency and high retained coherency after absorbing oil. The heat melts the EPDM, without melting the SBS granules, to agglomerate the material into a coherent assembly without damaging the physical structure of the SBS, thereby degrading that material's absorbency. A mold having a number of circular cavities can be used to form a number of bodies


300


at once.




Another, preferred method of forming bodies


300


applies a modified extrusion process. SBS and EPDM granules are placed in the hopper of an extruder of conventional design, for example, a two-inch Bonnot lab extruder with a hot-water external barrel heater. The extruder heats the granular material to a temperature not exceeding 120° F., far below normal extrusion temperatures for plastic products, and preferably not exceeding 105° F.




In the barrel of the extruder, the EPDM quickly become plasticized, as a result of heat, pressure, and mechanical agitation by the screw and barrel in combination. The extruder's screw mixes the plasticized EPDM and the unmelted SBS, forming a matrix of EPDM surrounding SBS granules. Because the SBS is not melted, some air bubbles remain in the mixture. The softening process occurs quite rapidly in the extruder, permitting very short dwell times (such as less than one minute), which permits rapid manufacturing.




The partially plasticized composite material is pressed through a circular die with a central rod or mandrel, to form the cylindrical structure with the axial hole shown in FIG.


10


. In one example, a four-inch long die was used.




Upon passing through the die, the SBS granules, which have been compressed somewhat by being forced through the die, reexpand, “fluffing” the extruded material while it cools and hardens. The expansion is further assisted by air remaining in the mixture. The extruded material is cut into suitable lengths to form the final bodies


300


.




When cooled and resolidified outside the extruder, the EPDM matrix


390


(see

FIG. 11

) forms a durable but permeable structure for the SBS granules


380


and provides mechanical integrity to the resulting bodies


300


. Thus, bodies


300


formed in accordance with the preferred method do not break or crack absent extreme elastic deformation, despite the presence of fissures


370


. Also, fragments of such bodies do not detach easily from bodies


300


in the form of flakes, crumbles, or dust, even with rough handling.




The fluffing effect (typically undesired in extrusion processes) is beneficial because it forms inter-granular fissures


370


in the EPDM matrix, throughout the structure. However, the fissuring is not so great as to cause loss of structural integrity. As noted above, fissures are preferred to facilitate rapid passage of oil into bodies


300


and to reduce the incidence of gel blocking, permitting continued absorption.




In bodies


300


formed according to the preferred method, any reduction in absorbency caused by the binder (compared to a body composed exclusively of higher-absorbent material, such as SBS) is more than offset by the increase rates of contact between oil and SBS caused by the fissuring and rough external texture and the reduced tendency to premature gelation.




Sack Collection





FIG. 1

also shows techniques of recovering sacks


10


after the copolymer bodies have been soaked with oil. Because the sacks float and stabilize the oil in self-contained and self-sustaining sacks, special equipment is not needed to collect the oil. For example,

FIG. 1

shows an ordinary fishing trawler


20


using its net to scoop up quantities of oil-logged sacks


10


. Although it is not required, the use of the inventive system does not preclude the utilization of more sophisticated collection boats, such as scoop boats or high-speed oil response vessels, such as known in the art. For example, if a large spill is contained in the vicinity of a base for such equipment, it may be advantageous to use such boats to collect sacks


10


at the same time as floating oil not yet held by sacks


10


is skimmed from the surface. It is also possible to fish sacks


10


out of the water using a hook.





FIG. 12

shows a collection method in which a specialized high-speed boat


400


, such as a modified version of boats operated presently by Team One of Seattle, Wash., approaches the spill on a rapid-response basis. Specially fitted outrigger paravanes


410


are deployed upon arrival, and sacks


10


are collected in wings


412


of paravanes


410


as boat


400


slowly advances. In rough-water conditions, sacks


10


are dropped onto the spill or in advance of the spill by air. Because sacks


10


retain the oil indefinitely, boat


400


can wait until the rough-water conditions dissipate to arrive on the scene and complete containment and recovery procedures, without risking dissipation of the spill by winds and seas, thus minimizing environmental damage without risk to recovery boats and crews.




A vacuum airstream conveyance and transfer (VACT) system can be used to collect sacks


10


using airstream induction (as opposed to pure vacuum pressure). An example of such a system already on the market and known to the ordinarily skilled artisan is called the Linductor system, available from Linductor, Inc. of Seattle, Wash. This Linductor device was developed for transferring bulk solids or volumes of liquids, including removing spilled oil from the surface of water. It has been found that a VACT system that is a variant of the Linductor can be used to gather sacks


10


containing spilled oil more expediently in certain sea conditions. The Linductor system as marketed and if mounted on an appropriate vessel, such as a barge, is capable of picking up sacks up to three feet in diameter, but modifications can be made to allow pickup of larger sacks and conveyance on a smaller vessel.




Such a modified VACT system


420


is depicted in

FIG. 12

, including receiving tank


422


, widened intake pipe


424


, turret assembly


426


, power and induction fan unit


426


, and outlet pipe


428


. Turret assembly


426


rotates to permit intake pipe


424


to be moved to any desired location next to the bow of boat


400


. It is possible to configure a VACT system to use two intake pipes, one on either side of the bow (not shown). Outlet pipe


428


is optional, because sacks


10


can be retained in receiving tank or bladder


422


, or an interior connection (not shown) at the bottom of tank


422


can allow sacks


10


to drop into a hold of boat


400


, or an outlet ramp (not shown) on a side of tank


422


can allow sacks


10


to exit tank


422


and accumulate in an adjacent pile. In the configuration depicted in

FIG. 12

, however, sacks


10


are discharged through outlet pipe


428


and hurled through the air into a lightweight sled


430


towed along the side of boat


400


. A powered barge can be used instead of a towed sled.





FIG. 13

shows laborers tying retrieved sacks


10


to lines or cables


440


pulled manually off of spools


450


, to form towed strings of sacks that can be collected later. Those units of sacks


10


that miss intake pipe


424


are carried slowly up ramps


414


of paravanes


410


and attached manually to lines or cables


440


, such as with snap hooks, after which they are slid back down to the water on a slide


415


, such as made of stainless steel.

FIG. 15

shows an alternative embodiment in which the VACT system is deleted, and manual collection and arrangement into strings is done exclusively.





FIG. 14

shows details of a hydraulically powered paravane


410


, as viewed from the far side of boat


400


in

FIGS. 12 and 13

. Ramp


414


can be tilted from an initially horizontal travel position to drop scoop


416


below waterline


418


. Thereafter, the hydraulic system can spread wings


412


from the travel position to the 45-degree angle shown in

FIGS. 12

,


13


, and


15


. Ramp


414


includes a powered conveyor, with a surface that can be made of a lightweight, wide mesh fabric, such as made of a Velcro material, that can grip and feed sacks


10


from scoop


416


up ramp


414


. Although paravanes


410


are depicted as being supported by boat


400


, they can alternatively be mounted on one or a chain of sleds, similar to sled


430


, towed along the side of or behind powered boat


400


.




In the collection methods depicted in

FIGS. 13 and 15

, after a quantity of sacks


10


are tied into a string, the line


440


can be cut and the chain of sacks released to allow it to float in the water. Then, a workboat can assemble a number of strings together and attach an anchor or buoy


480


to the group of strings, preferably by attaching it to the middle of each string, forming a streamer-like arrangement


460


, shown in FIG.


16


. Anchor or buoy


480


can support a radio transmitter-like element or radar-sensitive patch


100


in

FIG. 4

, for ease of later location, instead of that element being on each sack


10


. Streamers


460


can remain afloat until a collection boat or towed sled


470


attaches a line to anchor or buoy


480


and pulls the assembly aboard. Once loaded, sled


470


with its chains of sacks


10


can be towed to shore with barges.




Disposal




The inventive configuration of sacks


10


permits a disposal method that has been considered desirable but which is difficult if not impossible to achieve in actual practice, namely in-situ burning on the water. In-situ burning prevents the need for the boat collection techniques described above.




Sacks


10


, either alone or in assembled chains or “streamers,” can be easily ignited on the water, which creates a wicking or torch effect, thereby burning not only the sacks but also unabsorbed oil surrounding the sacks. Previous attempts to burn oil spills on water have suffered from numerous difficulties, particularly the problems in ignition caused by rough water, thin oil slicks, or high emulsification. Various published articles have described prior attempts at in-situ burning and the problems faced by such attempts.




If sacks


10


are transported to dry land, they can be disposed of as waste with the oil still intact, but this is costly and environmentally not preferred. Alternatively, sacks


10


can be incinerated on land, and the energy content of the oil and copolymer can be recovered and used as power. To allow for such a disposal technique, it is preferred to use materials for the particles, for the outer material of sack


10


, and for all other components of the sacks


10


that can be burned, to reduce the quantity of solid waste or air-borne pollution. The preferred materials specified in this description are so suited. Another recycling use for oil-logged copolymers is in road building.




Also, it is possible to remove the oil from the copolymer using various processes, to allow recycling of the oil with no remaining hazardous material (or possibly reuse of the copolymer product in sacks


10


). For example, a fully automated process for extraction of refined oil from the copolymer bodies has been developed within a reactor unit originally formed to break down scrap tire chips into the resalable commodities of scrap steel, carbon black, and refined oil. The reactor heats the oil-soaked copolymer bodies in a sealed environment to break down the molecular structure of the copolymers. Such a reactor is a modification of a scrap-tire reactor commercially available from Tire Recycling Technologies Corporation of Albuquerque, N.Mex., called the TRTM-60 tire decomposition machine.




Certain modifications to the TRTM-60 can allow it to work on oil-soaked copolymer bodies, at a reasonable cost: (1) because of the salt content, a higher-grade stainless steel is preferred; (2) the discharge system is changed to eliminate the magnetic separator for carbon black and steel scrap, which is produced from scrap tire but not from copolymer bodies; (3) a second, liquid seal is used at the discharge end; (4) the air condenser is replaced with a second water condenser; and (5) two screw conveyor stages are used instead of five.




As thus modified, the reactor works as follows:




The copolymer bodies from sacks


10


are delivered to an inlet hopper of a sealed screw conveyor. Commercially available as a package with the TRTM-60 is information identifying certain additives that permit better breakdown of the scrap tire, and these additives are useful with the copolymer bodies as well.




Two enclosed, horizontally oriented, stainless-steel screw conveyors stages, powered by individual hydraulic drives and a central hydraulic pumping system, move the material including the copolymer bodies through the reactor while chemically breaking down the bodies while they are conveyed through the entire length. The conveyors have top inlets and discharge chutes at each end. The inlet connection to the reactor and the outlet side of the reactor are sealed, for example by liquid seals, to prevent oxygen from entering the process.




The reactor heats the material in a vacuum at 200-300° C. Each reactor conveyor has a perforated top to vent gases produced during the process. A vertical stainless steel plenum welded to each conveyor provides a means to collect these process gases. The gases are “pulled” off the top of the plenum by a turbine pump. The gas is then filtered to remove residue carried over from the reactor unit. The gases, consisting mostly of vaporized fuel oils, are then pumped through two separate condensing stages that are a water-cooled heat exchanger. Cooling is provided via an air-cooled process chiller with a circulating pumping system. Non-condensable gases are collected and recycled as the fuel medium for the burners, which can be used to maintain the temperature in the reactor unit or to power an electric generator, or can be discharged to a flare and burned.




Oil-soaked copolymer material processed in this fashion can yield much of the output as liquid hydrocarbons. Indeed, some of the resulting liquid consists of styrene, which if separated by distillation, is five to ten times more valuable than crude oil, and can improve the recycling economics. An additional portion of the total output consists of gaseous hydrocarbons, which can be further processed to a hydrocarbon mixture that can be used as clean-burning fuel for the recycling reactor. Yet another portion, generated from the ethylene components, consists of a waxy solid residue that has commercial application as a feed stock for chemical refineries. Optimally, virtually no char will remain.




Although the invention has been described with reference to specific embodiments, many modifications and variations of such embodiments can be made without departing from the innovative concepts disclosed. Thus, it is understood by those skilled in the art that alternative forms and embodiments of the invention can be devised without departing from its spirit and scope.



Claims
  • 1. A composition of matter consisting of styrene-butadiene-styrene, predominately in the form of granules, embedded in an ethylene propylene diene monomer matrix.
  • 2. The composition of claim 1 wherein the ethylene propylene diene monomer is in the range of about 10-30% by weight.
  • 3. The composition of claim 1 wherein the styrene-butadiene-styrene is about 30% styrene.
  • 4. A product for absorbing oil comprising a solid, compliant body consisting of styrene-butadiene-styrene, predominately in the form of a multitude of granules, and ethylene propylene diene monomer, predominately in the form of a multitude of granules, bound together.
  • 5. The product of claim 4 wherein the ethylene propylene diene monomer is in the range of about 10-30% by weight.
  • 6. The product of claim 5 wherein the granules of styrene-butadiene-styrene are in the range of about 4-20 mesh and lack talc.
  • 7. The product of claim 4 wherein the styrene-butadiene-styrene is about 30% styrene.
  • 8. The product of claim 4 further comprising a multitude of inert flakes wettable with respect to oil.
  • 9. The product of claim 4 wherein the body is between about two and about five centimeters across its outer diameter.
  • 10. The product of claim 4 wherein the body is formed generally cylindrically.
  • 11. A product for absorbing oil comprising a solid, compliant, cylindrical body comprised of styrene-butadiene-styrene and ethylene propylene diene monomer, wherein the length along the major axis exceeds the outer diameter, and wherein the body is formed around a hole along the major axis of the cylinder.
  • 12. The product of claim 11 wherein the outer diameter is between about two and about five centimeters.
  • 13. The product of claim 11 wherein the diameter of the hole and the outer diameter of the cylinder differ by less than two centimeters.
  • 14. The product of claim 11 wherein the outer diameter is between about two and about five centimeters and the diameter of the hole is between about one and two centimeters.
  • 15. The product of claim 11 wherein the body is formed around a plurality of holes parallel to the major axis of the cylinder.
  • 16. The product of claim 11 wherein the external surfaces of the body contain a multitude of fissures.
  • 17. The product of claim 16 consisting of styrene-butadiene-styrene having about 30% styrene content and ethylene propylene diene monomer in the range of about 10-30% by weight.
CROSS-REFERENCED RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/034,677, filed Jan. 10, 1997.

US Referenced Citations (172)
Number Name Date Kind
248559 Jackson Oct 1881 A
425641 Van De Walle Apr 1890 A
530816 Wright Dec 1894 A
543740 Kuhns Jul 1895 A
1032700 Pickett Jul 1912 A
1164527 Kelly, Jr. Dec 1915 A
1274227 Woodson Jul 1918 A
1471819 Bauschard Oct 1923 A
1935642 Laughlin Nov 1933 A
1972513 Drehmann Sep 1934 A
2102310 Egan Dec 1937 A
2182795 Day Dec 1939 A
2467021 Fischer Apr 1949 A
2557079 Cutri Jun 1951 A
2813745 Frieder et al. Nov 1957 A
2889928 Sisk Jun 1959 A
3147216 Oemler Sep 1964 A
3221888 Muller Dec 1965 A
3246582 Wade Apr 1966 A
3324630 Teller et al. Jun 1967 A
3415745 Isaacson Dec 1968 A
3494862 Horowitz Feb 1970 A
3518183 Evans Jun 1970 A
3536616 Kondoh et al. Oct 1970 A
3537587 Kain Nov 1970 A
3538020 Heskett et al. Nov 1970 A
3539013 Smith Nov 1970 A
3565257 Cavalieri Feb 1971 A
3567660 Winkler Mar 1971 A
3594335 Schultz et al. Jul 1971 A
3607741 Sohnius Sep 1971 A
3607793 Mahlman Sep 1971 A
3617565 Fahlvik Nov 1971 A
3617566 Oshima et al. Nov 1971 A
3667235 Preus et al. Jun 1972 A
3667608 Burroughs et al. Jun 1972 A
3679058 Smith Jul 1972 A
3681237 Orban Aug 1972 A
3702657 Cunningham et al. Nov 1972 A
3713539 Thompson et al. Jan 1973 A
3739913 Bogosian Jun 1973 A
3756948 Weinberg Sep 1973 A
3783621 Preus et al. Jan 1974 A
3800950 Hess et al. Apr 1974 A
3831760 Economy et al. Aug 1974 A
3837494 Stevenson Sep 1974 A
3868322 Orloff Feb 1975 A
3888766 DeYoung Jun 1975 A
3915859 Sundin et al. Oct 1975 A
3916969 Auerbach et al. Nov 1975 A
3923472 Martinez et al. Dec 1975 A
3929631 Winkler Dec 1975 A
4002177 Rainer et al. Jan 1977 A
4031839 Pedone Jun 1977 A
4039489 Fletcher Aug 1977 A
4052306 Schwartz et al. Oct 1977 A
4060487 Samsel Nov 1977 A
4061807 Shaler et al. Dec 1977 A
4065923 Preus Jan 1978 A
4070287 Wiegand et al Jan 1978 A
4084380 Hallhagen Apr 1978 A
4099619 Hudler et al. Jul 1978 A
4102783 Zenno et al. Jul 1978 A
4111813 Preus Sep 1978 A
RE29996 Jordan et al. May 1979 E
4206080 Sato et al. Jun 1980 A
4207378 Klein Jun 1980 A
4248758 Wright Feb 1981 A
4261823 Gallagher et al. Apr 1981 A
4264444 Bronnec Apr 1981 A
4332854 Parker Jun 1982 A
4366067 Golding et al. Dec 1982 A
4401475 Eriksson et al. Aug 1983 A
4419232 Arntyr et al. Dec 1983 A
4420400 Weitzen Dec 1983 A
4427157 Klein Jan 1984 A
4429065 Gancy Jan 1984 A
4439324 Crotti Mar 1984 A
4454039 McCoy Jun 1984 A
4497663 Fisher et al. Feb 1985 A
4497712 Crowling Feb 1985 A
4519431 Yoshimura et al. May 1985 A
4519918 Ericsson et al. May 1985 A
4560718 Rittchey Dec 1985 A
4592690 Busch Jun 1986 A
4594157 McGowan Jun 1986 A
4640730 Streets et al. Feb 1987 A
4672781 Pichon Jun 1987 A
4737394 Zafiroglu Apr 1988 A
4740435 Markin et al. Apr 1988 A
4776722 Gaudin Oct 1988 A
4801386 Sugimori et al. Jan 1989 A
4919820 Lafay et al. Apr 1990 A
4929349 Beckman May 1990 A
4941978 Gabrick Jul 1990 A
4965129 Bair et al. Oct 1990 A
4980229 Park et al. Dec 1990 A
5009790 Bustamante et al. Apr 1991 A
5032640 Fachini Jul 1991 A
5037541 Ruey-Jang et al. Aug 1991 A
5071564 Stein et al. Dec 1991 A
5075014 Sullivan Dec 1991 A
5104548 Gabrick Apr 1992 A
5133619 Murfae et al. Jul 1992 A
5135578 Billings Aug 1992 A
5135660 Chromecek et al. Aug 1992 A
5159016 Inoue et al. Oct 1992 A
5165821 Fischer et al. Nov 1992 A
5173182 Debellian Dec 1992 A
5179611 Umeda et al. Jan 1993 A
5181802 Thengs et al. Jan 1993 A
5186831 DePetris Feb 1993 A
5207901 Ravagnan May 1993 A
5211858 Dovan et al. May 1993 A
5223154 MacPherson, Jr. et al. Jun 1993 A
5227072 Brinkley Jul 1993 A
5232587 Hegemier et al. Aug 1993 A
5248729 Inoue et al. Sep 1993 A
5252215 McFarlane et al. Oct 1993 A
5256226 Marzola et al. Oct 1993 A
5278217 Umeda et al. Jan 1994 A
5281463 Cotton Jan 1994 A
5284580 Shyh Feb 1994 A
5297367 Sainz Mar 1994 A
5304311 Codiglia Apr 1994 A
5324429 Holland Jun 1994 A
5330651 Robertson Jul 1994 A
5360548 Stein et al. Nov 1994 A
5364535 Buckalew Nov 1994 A
5374600 Hozumi et al. Dec 1994 A
5391295 Wilcox et al. Feb 1995 A
5403474 Emery Apr 1995 A
5405539 Schneider Apr 1995 A
5407575 Vinsonhaler Apr 1995 A
5414029 Lemoine et al. May 1995 A
5423985 Addeo et al. Jun 1995 A
5428085 Burel et al. Jun 1995 A
5432000 Young, Sr. et al. Jul 1995 A
5439590 Steffan Aug 1995 A
5468539 Crivelli Nov 1995 A
5480254 Autry etal. Jan 1996 A
5496865 Heese et al. Mar 1996 A
5511904 Van Egmond Apr 1996 A
5516845 Heese et al. May 1996 A
5573349 Paoluccio Nov 1996 A
5575925 Logue, Jr. Nov 1996 A
5624576 Lenhart et al. Apr 1997 A
5632889 Tharp May 1997 A
5641847 Hozumi et al. Jun 1997 A
5679246 Wilcox et al. Oct 1997 A
5707527 Knutson et al. Jan 1998 A
5712358 Sojka Jan 1998 A
5720574 Barella Feb 1998 A
5725782 Chinn et al. Mar 1998 A
5733445 Fanelli Mar 1998 A
5744048 Stetler Apr 1998 A
5762790 Zoeller Jun 1998 A
5767060 Hanrahan Jun 1998 A
5788849 Hutter, Jr. et al. Aug 1998 A
5820762 Bamer et al. Oct 1998 A
5830967 Sojka Nov 1998 A
5834577 Sojka Nov 1998 A
5849198 Sharpless Dec 1998 A
5863440 Rink et al. Jan 1999 A
5869555 Simmons et al. Feb 1999 A
5925241 Aldridge et al. Jul 1999 A
5955552 Sojka Sep 1999 A
5958226 Fleischmann Sep 1999 A
6080307 Morris et al. Jun 2000 A
6099723 Morris et al. Aug 2000 A
6106707 Morris et al. Aug 2000 A
6143172 Rink et al. Nov 2000 A
Foreign Referenced Citations (10)
Number Date Country
613245 Sep 1979 CH
136162 Jun 1979 DE
2904428 Aug 1980 DE
3122219 Jun 1981 DE
3634289 Apr 1988 DE
0484061 May 1992 EP
0518336 Dec 1992 EP
7109 Jan 1905 GB
13514 Jul 1983 GB
4-371203 Dec 1992 JP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (41)
Entry
Translation of DE3122219 (Ochiai et al.) Mar. 1982.*
Translation of DE4136647 (Engst) Dec. 1992.*
Fam, Sami, Michael K. Stenstron, and Gary Silverman, “Hydrocarbons in Urban Runoff,” Journal of Environmental Engineering, vol. 113, No. 5, Oct. 1987, pp. 1032-1046.
Shepp, David L., “Petroleum Hydrocarbon Concentrations Observed in Runoff from Discrete, Urbanized Automotive-Intensive Land Uses,” Watershed '96 Conference Proceedings, pp. 220-223.
Materials re: King County Evaluation of Commercially Available Catch Basin Inserts for Treatment of Stormwater Runoff from Developed Sites, 10/95.
Imtech-Imbitive Technologies Corporation product literature re “Imbiber Beads,” 1993, 1996, 1997.
“HydroCartridges/Rubberizer” product literature, 1994-1997.
Aqua Treatment Systems, Inc./“Absorbent W” product literature, 1996-1997.
“Innovative Stormwater Treatment Products & Services Guide,” prepared for the Stormwater Technologies Trade Shows, Nov. 17 & 19, 1997 (discussing several products, some of which were commercially available before Sep. 1997).
Suntree Isles, Inc. “Curb Inlet Basket” product literature, 1995-1996 (and see item A above).
Inventive Resources, Inc. “Water Decontaminator” product literature.
PCT Int'l Prelim. Exam. Report, S.No. PCT/US98/00385 (May 20, 1999).
Kristar Enterprises, Fossil Filter, brochure (9/96).
“Block Copolymers,” Polymer Handbook, p. 34 (Wiley, 3rd Edition 1989).
“Selection Criteria and Laboratory Evaluation of Oilspill Sorbents,” Environmental Protection Series, Report EPS 3/SP/3, pp. 1-73 (Jun. 1991).
“Environmental Spill Encapsulant Polymers,” JRM Chemical Form 550 product brochure (Aug. 1993).
Rushefsky, “Old Tires Now Can Be Retired,” Saten Island Advance (Oct. 22, 1993).
“Titan Tech Attacks Tire Recycling Mess,” American Metal Market (Oct. 26, 1993).
Alexander, “Bradley is Center of World Attention this Week” Chickasha Daily Express (Nov. 4, 1993).
“Business & Technology,” Solid Waste Report, vol. 24, No. 43, p. 346 (Nov. 4, 1993).
“A Cooler Way to Melt Junked Tires,” Business Week (Nov. 8, 1993).
Schulman, “A New Spin on Old Tires,” Newsweek (Nov. 15, 1993).
“Titan Develops Tyre & Plastics Recycling,” HazNews (Dec. 1993).
Kokish, “Titan Opens Pyrolysis Plants in South Korea,” Tire Business (Dec. 13, 1993).
Metz, “N.M. Firm is Ready to Roll into the Tire Recycling Industry,” The Boston Globe (Dec. 28, 1993).
“High-Tech Breakthroughs,” Boardroom Reports (Jan. 1, 1994).
Kansas, “Catalysts and Beams Take Aim at Wastes,” The Wall Street Journal (Jan. 21, 1994).
“Recycling News,” Green Alternative, vol. 4, No. 1 (Feb./Mar. 1994).
“Titan Technologies, Inc.,” Conservative Speculator (Jun. 1994).
“Titan Technologies, Inc.,” Investor's NewsWire, p. All (Sep. 9, 1994).
DiChristina, “Mired in Tires,” Popular Science (Oct. 1994).
McDonagh, et al., “Handling and Disposal of Oil Waste from Oil Spills at Sea,” paper presented at Long Beach Oil Spill Conference (Feb. 27, 1995).
Cassidy, “Titan Potential,” MoneyWorld (Apr. 1995), pp. 18-21.
Titan Technologies, Inc. Investor's Booklet.
“Petrosorb HGPPL-1 Petroleum Product Spill Encapsulant,” Petrosorb product brochure (source and date unknown).
“First in Thirst,” Matasorb Industrial Sorbents product brochure (sourch and date unknown).
Pacific Fluid System, Corp. “Linductor Oil Recovery and Bulk Transfer System Booklet.”.
“Fact Sheets,” Team One USA Challenger Product Information.
Fingas, Mervis F., et al. “The Newfoundland Offshore Burn Experiment-Nobe.”
Buist, Ian A., et al. “In-Situ Burning of Alaska North Slope Emulsions,”
Guenette, Chantal, et al. “Studies of In-Situ Burning of Emulsions in Norway.”
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60/034677 Jan 1997 US