Patent Grant
12146152
The instant application contains a Sequence Listing which has been submitted electronically in XML format and is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. The XML file, created on Jan. 24, 2023, is named 735898_083474-011USCON.xml and is 307,000 bytes in size.
The subject matter disclosed herein is generally related to systems, methods, and compositions for correction frameshift mutations, accurate genome editing and treatment of diseases.
Frameshift mutations are genetic mutations that are caused by insertion or deletion (indels) of nucleotides in a coding region of a nucleic acid sequence that is not divisible by three. The indel results in mutated sequences that, due to the triplet nature of gene expression by codons, changes the reading frame of the codon and therefore change the translation of the nucleic acid sequence.
Frameshift mutations are present in number of diseases, but genetic treatments for these diseases are limited. They often involve removing large section from a genome sequence and lead to undesired side effects.
Therefore, there is need for more efficient tools to correct frameshift mutations.
The present disclosure provides systems, methods, and compositions for correction frameshift mutations, accurate genome editing and treatment of diseases.
The present disclosure provides a composition, which comprises a target specific nuclease, wherein the target comprises a double stranded DNA (dsDNA), and a double strand break (DSB)-end blunting enzyme. The target specificity of the nuclease can be provided by a guide RNA (gRNA). The gRNA can be a single guide RNA (sgRNA). The sgRNA can comprise a nucleic acid sequence at least 75% identical to the nucleic acid sequence of SEQ ID NOs: 54-64. If desired, the composition can further comprise a MS2-binding protein, wherein the sgRNA can comprise one or more MS2 stem loops, and wherein the MS2-binding protein can be linked to the sgRNA by the one or more MS2 stem loops and can bind to the DSB-end blunting enzyme. If desired, the nuclease predominantly can induce staggered ends on the cleaved dsDNA. If desired, the nuclease can be an altered scissile variant. If desired, the altered scissile variant can be AF916, LZ3Cas9 (N690C, T769I, G915M, N980K), G915F, F916P, R918A, R919P or Q920P. If desired, the nuclease can be selected from the group consisting of SpCas9, LbCas12a, AsCas12a and FnCas12a.
In some embodiments, the nuclease can comprise an amino acid sequence at least 85% identical to an amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 95-106.
In some embodiments, the nuclease can comprise an amino acid sequence at least 90% identical to an amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 95-106.
In some embodiments, the nuclease can comprise an amino acid sequence at least 95% identical to an amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 95-106.
In some embodiments, the nuclease can comprise an amino acid sequence at least 99% identical to an amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 95-106.
In some embodiments, the nuclease can comprise an amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 95-106.
In some embodiments, the amino acid sequence can specifically bind to a protospacer-adjacent motif (PAM). The PAM can be selected from the group consisting of NNNNGATT, NNNNGNNN, NNG, NG, NGAN, NGNG, NGAG, NGCG, NAAG, NGN, NRN, NNGRRN, NNNRRT, TTTN, TTTV, TYCV, TATV, TYCV, TATV, TTN, KYTV, TYCV, TATV, and TBN.
In some embodiments, the DSB-end blunting enzyme can be a polymerase. The polymerase can be selected from the group consisting of DNA polymerase λ (POLL), DNA polymerase μ (POLM), DNA polymerase β (POLB), DNA polymerase γ (POLG), DNA polymerase ι (POLI), DNA polymerase η (POLH), TENT4A, DNA polymerase ν (POLN), DNA Ligase 4, DNTT, XRCC4, DNA Polymerase IV, fungi pol IV-like DNA polymerase, DNA polymerase/3′-5′ exonuclease Pol X, and T4 DNA polymerase (T4pol).
In some embodiments, the DSB-end blunting enzyme can be a single-strand DNA specific nuclease. The single-strand DNA specific nuclease can be selected from the group consisting of MGME1, FEN1, DNA2, XRN2, EXOG, EXO5, AP endonuclease, RecJ exonuclease (RecJ), XseA, XseB, S1 nuclease (nucS), P1 nuclease, Artemis, T4 DNA polymerase (T4pol), and Csm1.
In some embodiments, the DSB-end blunting enzyme can be covalently bound to the nuclease by a linker. The linker can be a peptide.
In some embodiments, the dsDNA can be in a cell. The cell can be a eukaryotic cell.
The eukaryotic cell can be a mammalian cell. The mammalian cell can be a human cell.
In some embodiments, the composition can further comprise an inhibitor of the microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ) pathway. The MMEJ pathway inhibitor can be a CtIP or MRN inhibitor. The CtIP inhibitor can be selected from KLHL15 and PIN1. The MRN inhibitor can be selected from E1b55K and E40rf6.
In some embodiments, a first nucleic acid molecule encoding the nuclease is disclosed.
In some embodiments, a second nucleic acid molecule encoding the DSB-end blunting enzyme is disclosed.
In some embodiments, a third nucleic acid molecule encoding the sgRNA is disclosed.
In some embodiments, one or more vectors comprising the nucleic acid molecule are disclosed.
In some embodiments, a cell comprising the composition, the nucleic acid molecule or the one or more vectors is disclosed. If desirable, the cell can be a prokaryotic cell. If desirable, the cell can be a eukaryotic cell. If desired, the eukaryotic cell can be a mammalian cell. If desired, the mammalian cell can be a human cell.
In some embodiments, a method of inserting or deleting one or more single base pairs in a double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) is disclosed, the method comprises cleaving the dsDNA at a target site with a target specific nuclease, wherein the cleavage results in overhangs on both dsDNA ends, inserting a nucleotide complementary to the overhanging nucleotide on both of the dsDNA ends using a double strand break (DSB)-end blunting enzyme, or removing the overhanging nucleotide on both of the dsDNA ends using the DSB-end blunting enzyme, and ligating the dsDNA ends together, thereby inserting or deleting a single base pair in the dsDNA. The target specificity of the nuclease can be provided by a guide RNA (gRNA). The gRNA can be a single guide RNA (sgRNA). The sgRNA can comprise a nucleic acid sequence at least 75% identical to the nucleic acid sequence of SEQ ID NOs: 54-64. The sgRNA can comprise one or more MS2 stem loops that link a MS2-binding protein to the sgRNA, and wherein the MS2-binding protein can bind to the DSB-blunting enzyme. The DSB-end blunting enzyme can be overexpressed. The nuclease can induce staggered ends on the cleaved dsDNA. The nuclease can be an altered scissile variant. The altered scissile variant can be AF916, G915F, F916P, R918A, R919P or Q920P. The nuclease can be selected from the group consisting of SpCas9, LZ3Cas9 (N690C, T769I, G915M, N980K), LbCas12a, AsCas12a and FnCas12a.
In some embodiments, the nuclease of the method can comprise an amino acid sequence at least 85% identical to an amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 95-106.
In some embodiments, the nuclease of the method can comprise an amino acid sequence at least 90% identical to an amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 95-106.
In some embodiments, the nuclease of the method can comprise an amino acid sequence at least 95% identical to an amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 95-106.
In some embodiments, the nuclease of the method can comprise an amino acid sequence at least 99% identical to an amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 95-106.
In some embodiments, the nuclease of the method can comprise an amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 95-106.
In some embodiments, the amino acid sequence of the method can specifically bind to a protospacer-adjacent motif (PAM). The PAM can be selected from the group consisting of NNNNGATT, NNNNGNNN, NNG, NG, NGAN, NGNG, NGAG, NGCG, NAAG, NGN, NRN, NNGRRN, NNNRRT, TTTN, TTTV, TYCV, TATV, TYCV, TATV, TTN, KYTV, TYCV, TATV, and TBN.
In some embodiments, the DSB-end blunting enzyme of the method can be a polymerase. The polymerase can be selected from the group consisting of DNA polymerase λ (POLL), DNA polymerase μ (POLM), DNA polymerase 3, DNA polymerase γ (POLG), DNA polymerase ι (POLI), DNA polymerase η (POLH), TENT4A, DNA polymerase ν (POLN), DNA Ligase 4, DNTT, XRCC4, DNA Polymerase IV, fungi pol IV-like DNA polymerase, DNA polymerase/3′-5′ exonuclease Pol X, and T4 DNA polymerase (T4pol).
In some embodiments, the DSB-end blunting enzyme of the method can be a single-strand DNA specific nuclease. The single-strand DNA specific nuclease can be selected from the group consisting of MGME1, FEN1, DNA2, XRN2, EXOG, EXO5, AP endonuclease, RecJ exonuclease, XseA, XseB, S1 nuclease (nucS), P1 nuclease, Artemis, T4 DNA polymerase (T4pol), and Csm1. The DSB-end blunting enzyme can be covalently bound to the nuclease by a linker. The linker can be a peptide.
In some embodiments, the dsDNA of the method can be a cell. The cell can be a eukaryotic cell. The eukaryotic cell can be a mammalian cell. The mammalian cell can be a human cell.
In some embodiments, the method can further comprise an inhibitor of the microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ) pathway. The MMEJ pathway inhibitor can be a CtIP or MRN inhibitor. The CtIP inhibitor can be selected from KLHL15 and PIN1. The MRN inhibitor can be selected from E1b55K and E40rf6.
In some embodiments, a method of treating a disease caused by a frameshift mutation in the dsDNA in a subject in need thereof comprising administering to the subject a therapeutically effective amount of the composition, the nucleic acid molecule, the vector or the cell is disclosed.
In some embodiments, a method of treating a disease caused by a frameshift mutation in the dsDNA in a subject in need thereof comprising inserting or deleting a single base pair in the dsDNA with the frameshift mutation according is disclosed.
In some embodiments, a method of enhancing out-frame mutation in the dsDNA in a subject in need thereof comprising administering to the subject a therapeutically effective amount of the composition, the nucleic acid molecule, the vector, or the cell is disclosed.
Aspects, features, benefits, and advantages of the embodiments described herein will be apparent with regard to the following description, appended claims, and accompanying drawings where:
It will be appreciated that for clarity, the following disclosure will describe various aspects of embodiments. It should be noted that the specific embodiments are not intended as an exhaustive description or as a limitation to the broader aspects discussed herein. One aspect described in conjunction with a particular embodiment is not necessarily limited to that embodiment and can be practiced with any other embodiment(s). Reference throughout this specification to “one embodiment”, “an embodiment,” “an example embodiment,” means that a particular feature, structure or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the present invention. Thus, appearances of the phrases “in one embodiment,” “in an embodiment,” or “an example embodiment” in various places throughout this specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment, but may. Furthermore, the particular features, structures or characteristics may be combined in any suitable manner, as would be apparent to a person skilled in the art from this disclosure, in one or more embodiments. Furthermore, while some embodiments described herein include some but not other features included in other embodiments, combinations of features of different embodiments are meant to be within the scope of the invention. For example, in the appended claims, any of the claimed embodiments can be used in any combination.
Unless defined otherwise, technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this disclosure pertains. Definitions of common terms and techniques in molecular biology may be found in Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd edition (1989) (Sambrook, Fritsch, and Maniatis); Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 4th edition (2012) (Green and Sambrook); Current Protocols in Molecular Biology (1987) (F. M. Ausubel et al. eds.); the series Methods in Enzymology (Academic Press, Inc.): PCR 2: A Practical Approach (1995) (M. J. MacPherson, B. D. Hames, and G. R. Taylor eds.): Antibodies, A Laboratory Manual (1988) (Harlow and Lane, eds.): Antibodies A Laboratory Manual, 2nd edition 2013 (E. A. Greenfield ed.); Animal Cell Culture (1987) (R. I. Freshney, ed.); Benjamin Lewin, Genes IX, published by Jones and Bartlet, 2008 (ISBN 0763752223); Kendrew et al. (eds.), The Encyclopedia of Molecular Biology, published by Blackwell Science Ltd., 1994 (ISBN 0632021829); Robert A. Meyers (ed.), Molecular Biology and Biotechnology: a Comprehensive Desk Reference, published by VCH Publishers, Inc., 1995 (ISBN 9780471185710); Singleton et al., Dictionary of Microbiology and Molecular Biology 2nd ed., J. Wiley & Sons (New York, N.Y. 1994), March, Advanced Organic Chemistry Reactions, Mechanisms and Structure 4th ed., John Wiley & Sons (New York, N.Y. 1992); and Marten H. Hofker and Jan van Deursen, Transgenic Mouse Methods and Protocols, 2nd edition (2011).
As used herein, the singular forms “a”, “an,” and “the” include both singular and plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.
The term “optional” or “optionally” means that the subsequent described event, circumstance or substituent may or may not occur, and that the description includes instances where the event or circumstance occurs and instances where it does not.
The recitation of numerical ranges by endpoints includes all numbers and fractions subsumed within the respective ranges, as well as the recited endpoints.
The terms “about” or “approximately” as used herein when referring to a measurable value such as a parameter, an amount, a temporal duration, and the like, are meant to encompass variations of and from the specified value, such as variations of +/−10% or less, +/−5% or less, +/−1% or less, +/−0.5% or less, and +/−0.1% or less of and from the specified value, insofar such variations are appropriate to perform in the disclosed invention. It is to be understood that the value to which the modifier “about” or “approximately” refers is itself also specifically, and preferably, disclosed.
The term “staggered end” when it refers to a double stranded DNA (dsDNA) molecule refers to the 5′ and or 3′ ends of that molecule having at least one nucleotide that is not hybridized to the opposite strand of the dsDNA.
The term “blunt end” when it refers to a dsDNA molecule refers to the 5′ and or 3′ ends of that molecule having nucleotides that hybridize to the opposite strand of the dsDNA.
The term “variant” as used herein means a polypeptide or nucleotide sequence that differs from a given polypeptide or nucleotide sequence in amino acid or nucleic acid sequence by the addition (e.g., insertion), deletion, or conservative substitution of amino acids or nucleotides, but that retains the biological activity of the given polypeptide (e.g., a variant nucleic acid could still encode the same or a similar amino acid sequence). A conservative substitution of an amino acid, i.e., replacing an amino acid with a different amino acid of similar properties (e.g., hydrophilicity and degree and distribution of charged regions) is recognized in the art as typically involving a minor change. These minor changes can be identified, in part, by considering the hydropathic index of amino acids, as understood in the art (see, e.g., Kyte et al., J. Mol. Biol., 157: 105-132 (1982)). The hydropathic index of an amino acid is based on a consideration of its hydrophobicity and charge. It is known in the art that amino acids of similar hydropathic indexes can be substituted and still retain protein function. The present disclosure provides amino acids having hydropathic indexes of ±2 are substituted. The hydrophilicity of amino acids also can be used to reveal substitutions that would result in proteins retaining biological function. A consideration of the hydrophilicity of amino acids in the context of a peptide permits calculation of the greatest local average hydrophilicity of that peptide, a useful measure that has been reported to correlate well with antigenicity and immunogenicity (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 4,554,101). Substitution of amino acids having similar hydrophilicity values can result in peptides retaining biological activity, for example immunogenicity, as is understood in the art. The present disclosure provides substitutions are performed with amino acids having hydrophilicity values within +2 of each other. Both the hydrophobicity index and the hydrophilicity value of amino acids are influenced by the particular side chain of that amino acid. Consistent with that observation, amino acid substitutions that are compatible with biological function are understood to depend on the relative similarity of the amino acids, and particularly the side chains of those amino acids, as revealed by the hydrophobicity, hydrophilicity, charge, size, and other properties. “Variant” also can be used to describe a polypeptide or fragment thereof that has been differentially processed, such as by proteolysis, phosphorylation, or other post-translational modification, yet retains its biological activity or antigen reactivity. Use of “variant” herein is intended to encompass fragments of a variant unless otherwise contradicted by context. The term “protospacer-adjacent motif” as used herein refers to a DNA sequence immediately following a DNA sequence targeted by a nuclease. Examples of protospacer-adjacent motif include, without limitation, NNNNGATT, NNNNGNNN, NNG, NG, NGAN, NGNG, NGAG, NGCG, NAAG, NGN, NRN, NNGRRN, NNNRRT, TTTN, TTTV, TYCV, TATV, TYCV, TATV, TTN, KYTV, TYCV, TATV, and TBN.
The term “MS2 stem loop” as used herein refers to a pattern in a single stranded nucleotide strand originated from a bacterial virus when two regions of the same strand base-pair to form a double helix that ends in an unpaired loop.
Alternatively or additionally, a “variant” is to be understood as a polynucleotide or protein which differs in comparison to the polynucleotide or protein from which it is derived by one or more changes in its length or sequence. The polypeptide or polynucleotide from which a protein or nucleic acid variant is derived is also known as the parent polypeptide or polynucleotide. The term “variant” comprises “fragments” or “derivatives” of the parent molecule. Typically, “fragments” are smaller in length or size than the parent molecule, whilst “derivatives” exhibit one or more differences in their sequence in comparison to the parent molecule. Also encompassed modified molecules such as but not limited to post-translationally modified proteins (e.g. glycosylated, biotinylated, phosphorylated, ubiquitinated, palmitoylated, or proteolytically cleaved proteins) and modified nucleic acids such as methylated DNA. Also, mixtures of different molecules such as but not limited to RNA-DNA hybrids, are encompassed by the term “variant”. Typically, a variant is constructed artificially, preferably by gene-technological means whilst the parent polypeptide or polynucleotide is a wild-type protein or polynucleotide. However, also naturally occurring variants are to be understood to be encompassed by the term “variant” as used herein. Further, the variants usable in the present disclosure may also be derived from homologs, orthologs, or paralogs of the parent molecule or from artificially constructed variant, provided that the variant exhibits at least one biological activity of the parent molecule, i.e. is functionally active.
Alternatively, or additionally, a “variant” as used herein, can be characterized by a certain degree of sequence identity to the parent polypeptide or parent polynucleotide from which it is derived. More precisely, a protein variant in the context of the present disclosure exhibits at least 80% sequence identity to its parent polypeptide. A polynucleotide variant in the context of the present disclosure exhibits at least 70% sequence identity to its parent polynucleotide. The term “at least 70% sequence identity” is used throughout the specification with regard to polypeptide and polynucleotide sequence comparisons. This expression preferably refers to a sequence identity of at least 70%, at least 71%, at least 72%, at least 73%, at least 74%, at least 75%, at least 76%, at least 77%, at least 78%, at least 79%, at least 80%, at least 81%, at least 82%, at least 83%, at least 84%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, or at least 99% to the respective reference polypeptide or to the respective reference polynucleotide.
The similarity of nucleotide and amino acid sequences, i.e. the percentage of sequence identity, can be determined via sequence alignments. Such alignments can be carried out with several art-known algorithms, preferably with the mathematical algorithm of Karlin and Altschul (Karlin & Altschul (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:5873-5877), with hmmalign (HMMER package, hmmer.wustl.edu/) or with the CLUSTAL algorithm (Thompson, J. D., Higgins, D. G. & Gibson, T. J. (1994) Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 4673-80) available e.g. on www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/clustalw/ or on www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/clustalw2/index.html or on npsa-pbil.ibcp.fr/cgi-bin/npsa_automat.pl?page=/NPSA/npsa_clustalw.html. Preferred parameters used are the default parameters as they are set on www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/clustalw/ or www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/clustalw2/index.html. The grade of sequence identity (sequence matching) may be calculated using e.g. BLAST, BLAT or BlastZ (or BlastX). A similar algorithm is incorporated into the BLAS TN and BLASTP programs of Altschul et al. (1990) J. Mol. Biol. 215:403-410. To obtain gapped alignments for comparative purposes, Gapped BLAST is utilized as described in Altschul et al. (1997) Nucleic Acids Res. 25: 3389-3402. When utilizing BLAST and Gapped BLAST programs, the default parameters of the respective programs are used. Sequence matching analysis may be supplemented by established homology mapping techniques like Shuffle-LAGAN (Brudno M., Bioinformatics 2003b, 19 Suppl 1:154-162) or Markov random fields. When percentages of sequence identity are referred to in the present application, these percentages are calculated in relation to the full length of the longer sequence, if not specifically indicated otherwise.
Overview
Some embodiments disclosed herein provide non-naturally occurring or engineered systems, methods, and compositions for target specific nucleases combined with blunting enzymes to correct frameshift mutations for genome editing and treatment of diseases. Frameshift mutations are genetic mutations that are caused by insertion and deletion (indels) of nucleotides in a DNA nucleic acid sequence that is not divisible by three. Due to the triplet nature of gene expression by codons, the indel can change the reading frame of the codon and therefore change the translation of the gene. Different types of frameshift mutations and examples of in-frame corrections of them are shown in
In some embodiments, the systems disclosed herein comprise a target specific nuclease, wherein the target comprises a double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) as well as a blunting enzyme. The systems disclosed herein can also comprise targeting moiety and/or a microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ) inhibitor.
In some embodiments, the target specific nuclease can be a CRISPR associated protein (Cas). In some embodiments, the targeted nuclease is a Cas9 protein as illustrated in
The target specific nuclease combined with a blunting enzyme can correct frameshift mutations in genes in cells and tissues. In some embodiments, cells include eukaryotic cells, mammalian cells, and human cells. The target specific nuclease combined with a blunting enzyme can induce one or more single-base insertions and deletions (indels). In some embodiments, the targeted nuclease creates staggered ends when it cleaves the target dsDNA. When the staggered ends are created by the target specific nuclease, a blunting enzyme can be used to ether “fill in” the staggered end with a polymerase or “chew back” the staggered end with a nuclease. Filling in followed by ligation creates a one or more bp insertion and chewing back followed by ligation creates one or more bp deletion. (See
Microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ) is one of the pathways for repairing double-strand breaks in DNA. In MMEJ, microhomologous sequences are used to align broken ends often resulting in deletions flanking the original break. In some embodiments, if a target specific nuclease were used to cleave dsDNA, MMEJ could create an unintended deletion.
Non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) is another pathway for repairing double-strand breaks in DNA. In NHEJ, the broken ends are directly ligated together without use of a homologous template. In some embodiments, if a target specific nuclease were used to cleave dsDNA, NHEJ would directly ligate the cleaved dsDNA without deletions and therefore accurately edit the target sequence. (See
In some embodiments, an inhibitor of MMEJ is used to keep cleaved DNA from undergoing MMEJ and being subject to unintended deletion of the sequence of the dsDNA flanking the cleavage.
Target Specific Nucleases
In some embodiments, a target specific nuclease is a nuclease that cleaves a dsDNA and, at least in some cases, leaves a staggered end at the cleavage site. The target specific nuclease disclosed herein can be for example, without limitation, Cas12a, LbCas12a, FnCas12a, AsCas12a, Cas9, SpCas9, SaCas9, LZ3Cas9, Casφ, and the double combinations of Cas9 nickase, zinc finger nuclease (ZFN), and TAL Effector Nuclease (TALEN). The LZ3Cas9 disclosed here can be N690C, T7691, G915M, or N980K. In some embodiments, the target specific nuclease cleaves dsDNA in the genome of a cell providing staggered ends. In some embodiments, the target specific nuclease provides a dsDNA cleavage resulting in staggered ends more than 10% of the time. In some embodiments, the target specific nuclease provides a dsDNA cleavage resulting in staggered ends more than 20% of the time. In other embodiments, the target specific nuclease provides a dsDNA cleavage resulting in staggered ends more than 3, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 95, or 99% of the time.
In some embodiments, the target specific nuclease is a CRISPR associated protein (Cas). In these embodiments, the Cas uses a guide RNA (gRNA) to provide specificity. In some embodiments, the gRNA is a single guide RNA (sgRNA) i.e., a fusion of two noncoding RNAs: a synthetic CRISPR RNA (crRNA) and a trans-activating CRISPR RNA (tracrRNA).
In general, a guide sequence is any polynucleotide sequence having sufficient complementarity with a target polynucleotide sequence to hybridize with the target sequence and direct sequence-specific binding of a Cas protein to the target sequence. In some embodiments, the degree of complementarity between a guide sequence and its corresponding target sequence, when optimally aligned using a suitable alignment algorithm, is about or more than about 50%, 60%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 97.5%, 99%, or more, Optimal alignment may be determined with the use of any suitable algorithm for aligning sequences, non-limiting example of which include the Smith-Waterman algorithm, the Needleman-Wunsch algorithm, algorithms based on the Burrows-Wheeler Transform (e.g., the Burrows Wheeler Aligner), ClustalW, ClustaIX, BLAT, Novoalign (Novocraft Technologies, ELAND (Illumina, San Diego, Calif), SOAP (available at soap.genomics.org.cn), and Maq (available at maq.sourceforge.net). In some embodiments, a guide sequence is about or more than about 5, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 75, or more nucleotides in length. In some embodiments, a guide sequence is less than about 75, 50, 45, 40, 35, 30, 25, 20, 15, 12, or fewer nucleotides in length. The ability of a guide sequence to direct sequence-specific binding of a CRISPR complex to a target sequence may be assessed by any suitable assay.
In some embodiments, the sgRNA comprises a nucleic acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 54-64. For example, the sgRNA can comprise a nucleic acid sequence at least 50%, at least 51%, at least 52%, at least 53%, at least 54%, at least 55%, at least 56%, at least 57%, at least 58%, at least 59%, at least 60%, at least 61%, at least 62%, at least 63%, at least 64%, at least 65%, at least 66%, at least 67%, at least 68%, at least 69%, at least 70%, at least 71%, at least 72%, at least 73%, at least 74%, at least 75%, at least 76%, at least 77%, at least 78%, at least 79%, at least 80%, at least 81%, at least 82%, at least 83%, at least 84%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, or at least 99% identical to a nucleic acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 54-64.
In some embodiments, the target specific nuclease is Cas9. In some embodiments, the target nuclease is a scissile variant. In some embodiments, the Cas9 is a scissile variant of Cas9. In some embodiments, the scissile is for example, without limitation, AF916, LZ3Cas9, G915F, F916P, R918A, R919P, Q920P, N690C, T7691, G915M and N980K. In some embodiments, the LZ3Cas9 is N690C, T7691, G915M, or N980K.
The target specific nuclease can comprise an amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 95-106. For example, the target specific nuclease comprises an amino acid sequence at least 50%, at least 51%, at least 52%, at least 53%, at least 54%, at least 55%, at least 56%, at least 57%, at least 58%, at least 59%, at least 60%, at least 61%, at least 62%, at least 63%, at least 64%, at least 65%, at least 66%, at least 67%, at least 68%, at least 69%, at least 70%, at least 71%, at least 72%, at least 73%, at least 74%, at least 75%, at least 76%, at least 77%, at least 78%, at least 79%, at least 80%, at least 81%, at least 82%, at least 83%, at least 84%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, or at least 99% identical to an amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 95-106.
In some embodiments, the target specific nuclease is a zinc finger nuclease (ZFN). A single zinc finger contains approximately 30 amino acids and the domain functions by binding 3 consecutive base pairs of DNA via interactions of a single amino acid side chain per base pair. The modular structure of the zinc finger motif permits the conjunction of several domains in series, allowing for the recognition and targeting of extended sequences in multiples of 3 nucleotides. These targeted DNA-binding domains can be combined with a nuclease domain, such as FokI, to generate a site-specific nuclease, called a “zinc finger nuclease” (ZFNs) that can be used to introduce site-specific double strand breaks at targeted genomic loci. This DNA cleavage stimulates the natural DNA-repair machinery, leading to one of two possible repair pathways, NHEJ and HDR. For example, the ZFN can target the Rosa26 locus (Perez-Pinera et al. Nucleic Acids Research (2012) 40:3741-3752) or a dystrophin gene.
In some embodiments, the target specific nuclease is a TAL effector nuclease (TALEN). The TALEN can be used to introduce site-specific double strand breaks at targeted genomic loci. Site-specific double-strand breaks are created when two independent TALENs bind to nearby DNA sequences, thereby permitting dimerization of FokI and cleavage of the target DNA. TALENs have advanced genome editing due to their high rate of successful and efficient genetic modification. This DNA cleavage can stimulate the natural DNA-repair machinery, leading to one of two possible repair pathways: homology-directed repair (HDR) or the non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) pathway. The TALENs can be designed to target any gene involved in a genetic disease.
The TALENs can include a nuclease and a TALE DNA-binding domain that binds to the target gene in a TALEN target region. The target gene can have a mutation such as a frameshift mutation or a nonsense mutation. If the target gene has a mutation that causes a premature stop codon, the TALEN can be designed to recognize and bind a nucleotide sequence upstream or downstream from the premature stop codon. A “TALEN target region” includes the binding regions for two TALENs and the spacer region, which occurs between the binding regions. The two TALENs bind to different binding regions within the TALEN target region, after which the TALEN target region is cleaved. Examples of TALENs are described in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/038536, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.
In some embodiments, the target specific nucleases include tags including for example, without limitation, 3×Flag, nuclear localization sequence (NLS), and the combination of 3×Flag and NLS.
Blunting Enzymes
In some embodiments, the blunting enzyme or double strand break-end blunting enzyme (both terms are used interchangeably herein), is an enzyme that is able either to remove or add nucleotides to a staggered end of a double stranded DNA molecule to produce a blunt end. In some embodiments, the blunting enzyme disclosed herein is a polymerase or a nuclease. In some embodiments, the DSB-blunting enzyme is a single-strand DNA specific nuclease.
In some embodiments, the blunting enzyme is a polymerase selected from polymerase κ (POLL), polymerase μ (POLM), polymerase ν (POLN), polymerase η (POLH), polymerase β (POLB), DNA polymerase θ (POLQ), DNA polymerase κ (POLK), DNA polymerase IV (Saccharomyces cerevisiae), DNA polymerase γ (POLG), DNA polymerase ι (POLI), DNA polymerase ξ, DNA polymerase ν (POLN), DNA nucleotidylexotransferase (DNTT), TENT4A, DNA ligase 4, fungi pol IV-like DNA polymerase (Neurospora crassa), DNA polymerase/3′-5′ exonuclease PolX (Bacillus subtilis), Family X DNA Polymerase (Deinococcus radiodurans), and T4 DNA polymerase (Scherichia virus T4). In some embodiments, the blunting enzyme is a nuclease. In some embodiments, the nuclease is a single-strand DNA specific nuclease. In some embodiments, the nuclease is selected from MGME1, EXOG, APEX1, APEX2, FEN1, DNA2, APE1, XRN1, XRN2, EXOG, EXO5, AP endonuclease, RecJ Exonuclease (RecJ), XseA, XseB, S1 nuclease (nucS), P1 nuclease, XRCC4, Ligase IV, Artemis, and Csm1.
Except as specified above, the blunting enzymes can be from any organism. In some embodiments, the organism is a mammal. In other embodiments, the mammal is a human.
Optimal enzymes can be selected that will enable the precision indel alleles to be stably increased in various cells and target sequences. In some embodiments, the blunting enzymes can be selected from variants such as mutants, truncations or chimeric variants of DNA polymerases and single-base specific DNA nucleases. Representative variants of DNA polymerases and single-base specific DNA nucleases, including but not limited to human POLM (H329G), human POLM (H329G, R389K), human BRCT(POLM)_POLL1, human BRCT(POLM) POLL2, T4 DNA polymerase(Y320A), T4 DNA polymerase(A737V). Other variants include the family X polymerases ScPolk, HsPolk, HsPolp, HsTdt and HsPolp, shown schematically in
In some embodiments, the blunting enzyme is covalently bound to the target specific nuclease by a linker. In some embodiments, the linker is an amino acid, a peptide, or a polypeptide.
Microhomology-Mediated End Joining (MMEJ) Inhibitor
The target specific nuclease and blunting enzyme disclosed herein can be combined with a microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ) inhibitor. In some embodiments, the MMEJ inhibitor is a CtIP inhibitor (e.g., KLHL15, PIN1). In some embodiments, the MMEJ inhibitor is an MRN inhibitor (e.g., E1b55K+E40rf6).
Pathogenic Frameshift Mutations
The non-naturally occurring or engineered systems, methods, and compositions disclosed herein can be used to repair pathogenic genes in human cells and tissues, and can be used to correct the underlying genetic basis of many diseases, especially those conditions caused by a frameshift mutation. Pathogenic frameshifts can cause a wide variety of illnesses. One particular condition caused by a frameshift mutation is Parkinson's disease, caused by the frameshift mutation depicted in
Other conditions caused by frameshift mutations include, inter alia, the following: various cancers, Parkinson's disease, muscular dystrophy, cardiomyopathy, anemia, Crohn's disease, cystic fibrosis, tuberous sclerosis, Xia-Gibbs syndrome, dermatitis, atopic, ichthyosis vulgaris, Usher syndrome, hypothyroidism, ventricular tachycardia, hemochromatosis, retinitis pigmentosa, arthrogryposis, Robinow syndrome, peroxisome biogenesis disorders, Zellweger syndrome spectrum, cortisone reductase deficiency, deficiency of pyrroline-5-carboxylate reductase, Van der Woude syndrome, Neonatal hypotonia, MYH-associated polyposis, neutropenia, methylmalonic acidemia with homocystinuria, hypobetalipoproteinemia, medium-chain acyl-coenzyme A dehydrogenase deficiency, Sezary syndrome, Stargardt disease, glycogen storage disease, maple syrup urine disease, fibrochondrogenesis, Chudley-McCullough syndrome, spastic paraplegia, frontonasal dysplasia, monocarboxylate transporter 1 deficiency, urofacial syndrome, Hajdu-Cheney syndrome, radial aplasia-thrombocytopenia syndrome, Nager syndrome, White-Sutton syndrome, ichthyosis vulgaris, FLG-Related Disorders, Grange syndrome, Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, achromatopsia, amelogenesis imperfecta, adult junctional epidermolysis bullosa, fumarase deficiency, and Senior-Loken syndrome.
The systems, methods, and compositions described herein can also be used to enhance out-frame mutations by avoiding indel in multiples of three by a predictable mutation. Out-frame mutation occurs when the reading frame of the target dsDNA is completely disrupted. Therefore, the systems, methods, and compositions described herein can produce knockout cell lines and organisms.
Delivery
In some embodiments, the target specific nuclease and blunting enzyme are introduced into a cell as a nucleic acid encoding each protein. The nucleic acid introduced into the eukaryotic cell is a plasmid DNA or viral vector. In some embodiments, the target specific nuclease and blunting enzyme are introduced into a cell via a ribonucleoprotein (RNP).
Preferably, delivery is in the form of a vector which may be a viral vector, such as a lenti- or baculo- or adeno-viral/adeno-associated viral vectors, but other means of delivery are known (such as yeast systems, microvesicles, gene guns/means of attaching vectors to gold nanoparticles) and are provided. The viral vector may be selected from a variety of families/genera of viruses, including, but not limited to Myoviridae, Siphoviridae, Podoviridae, Corticoviridae, Lipothrixviridae, Poxviridae, Iridoviridae, Adenoviridae, Polyomaviridae, Papiliomaviridae, Mimiviridae, Pandoravirusa, Salterprovirusa, Inoviridae, Microviridae, Parvoviridae, Circoviridae, Hepadnaviridae, Caulimoviridae, Retroviridae, Cystoviridae, Reoviridae, Birnaviridae, Totiviridae, Parlitiviridae, Filoviridae, Orthomyxoviridae, Deltavirusa, Leviviridae, Picornaviridae, Marnaviridae, Secoviridae, Potyviridae, Caliciviridae, Hepeviridae, Astroviridae, Nodaviridae, Tetraviridae, Luteoviridae, Tombusviridae, Coronaviridae, Arteriviridae, Flaviviridae, Togaviridae, Virgaviridae, Bromoviridae, Tymoviridae, Alphaflexiviridae, Sobemovirusa, or Idaeovirusa.
A vector may mean not only a viral or yeast system (for instance, where the nucleic acids of interest may be operably linked to and under the control of (in terms of expression, such as to ultimately provide a processed RNA) a promoter), but also direct delivery of nucleic acids into a host cell. For example, baculoviruses may be used for expression in insect cells. These insect cells may, in turn be useful for producing large quantities of further vectors, such as AAV or lentivirus adapted for delivery of the present invention. Also envisaged is a method of delivering the target specific nuclease and blunting enzyme comprising delivering to a cell mRNAs encoding each.
In some embodiments, expression of a nucleic acid sequence encoding the target specific nuclease and/or the blunting enzyme may be driven by a promoter. In some embodiments, the target specific nuclease is a Cas. In some embodiments, a single promoter drives expression of a nucleic acid sequence encoding a Cas and one or more of the guide sequences. In some embodiments, the Cas and guide sequence(s) are operably linked to and expressed from the same promoter. In some embodiments, the CRISPR enzyme and guide sequence(s) are expressed from different promoters. For example, the promoter(s) can be, but are not limited to, a UBC promoter, a PGK promoter, an EFIA promoter, a CMV promoter, an EFS promoter, a SV40 promoter, and a TRE promoter. The promoter may be a weak or a strong promoter. The promoter may be a constitutive promoter or an inducible promoter. In some embodiments, the promoter can also be an AAV ITR, and can be advantageous for eliminating the need for an additional promoter element, which can take up space in the vector. The additional space freed up by use of an AAV ITR can be used to drive the expression of additional elements, such as guide sequences. In some embodiments, the promoter may be a tissue specific promoter.
In some embodiments, an enzyme coding sequence encoding a target specific nuclease and/or a blunting enzyme is codon-optimized for expression in particular cells, such as eukarvotic cells. The eukarvotic cells may be those of or derived from a particular organism, such as a mammal, including but not limited to human, mouse, rat, rabbit, dog, or non-human primate. In general, codon optimization refers to a process of modifying a nucleic acid sequence for enhanced expression in the host cells of interest by replacing at least one codon (e.g., about or more than about 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 50, or more codons) of the native sequence with codons that are more frequently or most frequently used in the genes of that host cell while maintaining the native amino acid sequence. Various species exhibit particular bias for certain codons of a particular amino acid. Codon bias (differences in codon usage between organisms) often correlates with the efficiency of translation of messenger RNA (mRNA), which is in turn believed to be dependent on, among other things, the properties of the codons being translated and the availability of particular transfer RNA (tRNA) molecules. The predominance of selected tRNAs in a cell is generally a reflection of the codons used most frequently in peptide synthesis. Accordingly, genes can be tailored for optimal gene expression in a given organism based on codon optimization. Codon usage tables are readily available, for example, at the “Codon Usage Database”, and these tables can be adapted in a number of ways. See Nakamura, Y., et al. “codon usage tabulated from the international DNA sequence databases: status for the year 2000” Nucl. Acids Res. 28:292 (2000). Computer algorithms for codon optimizing a particular sequence for expression in a particular host cell are also available, such as Gene Forge (Aptagen; Jacobus, Pa.), are also available. In some embodiments, one or more codons (e.g., 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 50, or more, or all codons) in a sequence encoding a Cas protein correspond to the most frequently used codon for a particular amino acid.
In some embodiments, a vector encodes a target specific nuclease and/or a blunting enzyme comprising one or more nuclear localization sequences (NLSs), such as about or more than about 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, or more NLSs. In some embodiments, the Cas protein comprises about or more than 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, or more NLSs at or near the amino-terminus, about or more than about 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, or more NLSs at or near the carboxy-terminus, or a combination of these (e.g., one or more NLS at the amino-terminus and one or more NLS at the carboxy terminus). When more than one NLS is present, each may be selected independently of the others, such that a single NLS may be present in more than one copy and/or in combination with one or more other NLSs present in one or more copies. In some embodiments, an NLS is considered near the N- or C-terminus when the nearest amino acid of the NLS is within about 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 1, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, 50, or more amino acids along the polypeptide chain from the N- or C-terminus. Typically, an NLS consists of one or more short sequences of positively charged lysines or arginines exposed on the protein surface, bur other types of NLS are known. In some embodiments, the NLS is between two domains, for example between the Cas13 protein and the viral protein. The NLS may also be between two functional domains separated or flanked by a glycine-serine linker.
In general, the one or more NLSs are of sufficient strength to drive accumulation of the target specific nuclease and/or the blunting enzyme in a detectable amount in the nucleus of a eukaryotic cell. In general, strength of nuclear localization activity may derive from the number of NLSs in the target specific nuclease and/or blunting enzyme, the particular NLS used, or a combination of these factors. Detection of accumulation in the nucleus may be performed by any suitable technique. For example, a detectable marker may be fused to the target specific nuclease and/or the blunting enzyme, such that location within a cell may be visualized, such as in combination with a means for detecting the location of the nucleus (e.g., a stain specific for the nucleus such as DAPI). Examples of detectable markers include fluorescent proteins (such as green fluorescent proteins, or GFP; RFP; CFP), and epitope tags (HA tag, FLAG tag, SNAP tag). Cell nuclei may also be isolated from cells, the contents of which may then be analyzed by any suitable process for detecting protein, such as immunohistochemistry, Western blot, or enzyme activity assay. Accumulation in the nucleus may also be determined indirectly.
In some aspects, the invention provides methods comprising delivering one or more polynucleotides, such as one or more vectors as described herein, one or more transcripts thereof, and/or one or proteins transcribed therefrom, to a host cell. In some aspects, the invention further provides cells produced by such methods, and organisms (such as animals, plants, or fungi) comprising or produced from such cells. In some embodiments, a Cas protein in combination with (and optionally complexed) with a guide sequence is delivered to a cell. Conventional viral and non-viral based gene transfer methods can be used to introduce nucleic acids in mammalian cells or target tissues. Such methods can be used to administer nucleic acids encoding a target specific nuclease and/or a blunting enzyme to cells in culture, or in a host organism. Non-viral vector delivery systems include DNA plasmids, RNA (e.g., a transcript of a vector described herein), naked nucleic acid, nucleic acid complexed with a delivery vehicle, such as a liposome, and ribonucleoprotein. Viral vector delivery systems include DNA and RNA viruses, which have either episomal or integrated genomes after delivery to the cell. For a review of gene therapy procedures, see Anderson, Science 256:808-8313 (1992); Navel and Felgner, TIBTECH 11:211-217 (1993): Mitani and Caskey, TIBTECH 11:162-166 (1993); Dillon, TIBTECH 11:167-175 (1993); Miller, Nature 357:455-460 (1992); Van Brunt, Biotechnology 6(10).1149-1154 (1988); Vigne, Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 8:35-36 (1995); Kremer and Perricaudet, British Medical Bulletin 51(1):31-44 (1995); Haddada et al., in Current Topics in Microbiology and immunology. Doerfler and Bohm (eds) (1995); and Yu et al., Gene Therapy 1:13-26 (1994).
The target specific nuclease and/or the blunting enzyme can be delivered using adeno-associated virus (AAV), lentivirus, adenovirus, or other viral vector types, or combinations thereof. In some embodiments, Cas protein(s) and one or more guide RNAs can be packaged into one or more viral vectors. In some embodiments, the targeted trans-splicing system is delivered via AAV as a split intein system, similar to Levy et al. (Nature Biomedical Engineering, 2020, DOT: doi.org/10.1038/s41551-019-0501-5) in other embodiments, the target specific nuclease and/or the blunting enzyme can be delivered via AAV as a trans-splicing system, similar to Lai et al. (Nature Biotechnology, 2005, DOI: 10.1038/nbt1153). In some embodiments, the viral vector is delivered to the tissue of interest by, for example, an intramuscular injection, while other times the viral delivery is via intravenous, transdermal, intranasal, oral, mucosal, intrathecal, intracranial or other delivery methods. Such delivery may be either via a single dose, or multiple doses. One skilled in the art understands that the actual dosage to be delivered herein may vary greatly depending upon a variety of factors, such as the vector chosen, the target cell organism, or tissue, the general condition of the subject to be treated, the degree of transformation/modification sought, the administration route, the administration mode, the type of transformation/modification sought, etc.
The use of RNA or DNA viral based systems for the delivery of nucleic acids takes advantage of highly evolved processes for targeting a virus to specific cells in the body and trafficking the viral payload to the nucleus. Viral vectors can be administered directly to patients (in vivo) or they can be used to treat cells in vitro, and the modified cells may optionally be administered to patients (ex vivo). Conventional viral based systems could include retroviral, lentivirus, adenoviral, adeno-associated and herpes simplex virus vectors for gene transfer. Integration in the host genome is possible with the retrovirus, lentivirus, and adeno-associated virus gene transfer methods, often resulting in long term expression of the inserted transgene. Additionally, high transduction efficiencies have been observed in many different cell types and target tissues. Viral-mediated in vivo delivery of Cas13 and guide RNA provides a rapid and powerful technology for achieving precise mRNA perturbations within cells, especially in post-mitotic cells and tissues.
In certain embodiments, delivery of the target specific nuclease and/or the blunting enzyme to a cell is non-viral. In certain embodiments, the non-viral delivery system is selected from a ribonucleoprotein, cationic lipid vehicle, electroporation, nucleofection, calcium phosphate transfection, transfection through membrane disruption using mechanical shear forces, mechanical transfection, and nanoparticle delivery.
In some embodiments, a host cell is transiently or non-transiently transfected with one or more vectors described herein. In some embodiments, a cell is transfected as it naturally occurs in a subject. In some embodiments, a cell that is transfected is taken from a subject. In some embodiments, the cell is derived from cells taken from a subject, such as a cell line. Cell lines are available from a variety of sources known to those with skill in the art (see, e.g. the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) (Manassas, VA)). In some embodiments, a cell transfected with one or more vectors described herein is used to establish a new cell line comprising one or more vector-derived sequences.
Kits
The present disclosure provides kits for carrying out a method. The present disclosure provides the invention provides kits containing any one or more of the elements disclosed in the above methods and compositions. In some embodiments, the kit comprises a vector system and instructions for using the kit. In some embodiments, the kit comprises a vector system comprising regulatory elements and polynucleotides encoding the target specific nuclease and/or the blunting enzyme. In some embodiments, the kit comprises a viral delivery system of the target specific nuclease and/or the blunting enzyme. In some embodiments, the kit comprises a non-viral delivery system of the target specific nuclease and/or the blunting enzyme. Elements may be provided individually or in combinations, and may be provided in any suitable container, such as a vial, a bottle, or a tube. In some embodiments, the kit includes instruction in one or more languages, for examples, in more than one language.
In some embodiments, a kit comprises one or more reagents for use in a process utilizing one or more of the elements described herein. Reagents may be provided in any suitable container. For example, a kit may provide one or more reaction or storage buffers. Reagents may be provided in a form that is usable in a particular assay, or in a form that requires addition of one or more other components before use (e.g. in concentrate or lyophilized form). A buffer can be any buffer, including but not limited to a sodium carbonate buffer, a sodium bicarbonate buffer, a borate buffer, a Tris buffer, a MOPS buffer, a HEPES buffer, and combinations thereof. In some embodiments, the buffer is alkaline. In some embodiments, the buffer has a pH from about 7 to about 10. In some embodiments, the kit comprises one or more oligonucleotides corresponding to a guide sequence for insertion into a vector so as to operably link the guide sequence and a regulatory element.
Sequences
Sequences of nucleases, enzymes, guides, and linkers can be found in Table 1 below.
Homo sapiens
Homo sapiens
Homo sapiens
Homo sapiens
Homo sapiens
Homo sapiens
Homo sapiens
oryzae
Penicillium
citrinum
Homo sapiens
Escherichia
coli
Homo sapiens
Homo sapiens
Homo sapiens
Homo sapiens
Homo sapiens
Homo sapiens
Homo sapiens
Homo sapiens
Homo sapiens
Homo sapiens
Homo sapiens
Homo sapiens
Homo sapiens
Escherichia
coli
Escherichia
coli
Escherichia
coli
Streptococcus
pyogenes
Streptococcus
pyogenes
Streptococcus
pyogenes
Streptococcus
pyogenes
Streptococcus
pyogenes
Streptococcus
pyogenes
Streptococcus
pyogenes
Streptococcus
pyogenes
Staphylococcus
aureus
Francisella
novicida
Acidaminococcus
Lachnospiraceae
bacterium
The skilled person in the art would appreciate that the amino acid sequences, peptides, polypeptides, nucleases, polymerases, blunting enzymes, guide RNAs, and single guide RNAs disclosed herein can be encoded by nucleic acid molecules. The skilled person in the art would also appreciate that vectors comprising these nucleic acid molecules could be used as vehicles to carry the genetic materials into cells. The vector can be a plasmid and is generally made of a DNA sequence that consists of an insert and a larger sequence that serves as the “backbone” of the vector.
While several experimental Examples are contemplated, these Examples are intended non-limiting.
Indels Editing in PCSK9 Gene Using Cas9 and Blunting Enzymes
To test for the efficiency of inducing indels in a target gene using Cas9 and blunting enzymes, Cas9 and PCSK9 exon 12 targeting sgRNA were co-transferred into cultured mammalian cells in combination with DNA polymerase μ (POLM), EXOG, T4 DNA polymerase (T4pol), DNA polymerase λ (POLL), MGME1, RecJ exonuclease (RecJ) or Nuclease S1 (nucS). Cas9 and sgRNA alone served as the negative control. The occurrence of indels for the control and each of the combinations was measured. HEK293T cells were used.
Results for each of the combinations are presented in
POLM (
POLL (
Indels Editing in GYPB Gene Using Cas9 and Blunting Enzymes
To test for the efficiency of inducing indels in a target gene using Cas9 and blunting enzymes, Cas9 and GYPB targeting sgRNA were co-transferred into cultured mammalian cells in combination with DNA polymerase μ (POLM), EXOG, T4 DNA polymerase (T4pol), DNA polymerase λ (POLL), MGME1, RecJ exonuclease (RecJ) or Nuclease S1 (nucS). Cas9 and sgRNA alone served as the negative control. The occurrence of indels for the control and each of the combinations was measured. Results for each of the combinations are presented in
POLM (
To test for the efficiency of inducing indels in a target gene using Cas9 and blunting enzymes, Cas9 and TPH2 targeting sgRNA were co-transferred into cultured mammalian cells in combination with POLM, EXOG, T4 polymerase, DNA polymerase λ (POLL), MGME1, RecJ exonuclease (RecJ) or Nuclease S1 (nucS). Cas9 and sgRNA alone served as the negative control. The occurrence of indels for the control and each of the combinations was measured. Results for each of the combinations are presented in
DNA polymerase μ (POLM) (
One skilled in the art will appreciate further features and advantages of the invention based on the above-described embodiments. Accordingly, the invention is not to be limited by what has been particularly shown and described, except as indicated by the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 17/067,379, filed on Oct. 9, 2020, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/913,048 filed on Oct. 9, 2019 and U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/984,422, filed on Mar. 3, 2020, the entire disclosures of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
The invention was made with government support under Grant No. U01CA250554 awarded by the U.S. National Institute of Health (NIT)/National Cancer Institute (NCI) Next Generation of Cancer Model (NGCM) program. The government has certain rights in the invention.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4554101 | Hopp | Nov 1985 | A |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| WO 2012118717 | Sep 2012 | WO |
| WO 2013163628 | Oct 2013 | WO |
| WO 2017147056 | Aug 2017 | WO |
| WO 2018165629 | Sep 2018 | WO |
| WO 2019099943 | May 2019 | WO |
| WO 2019118949 | Jun 2019 | WO |
| WO 2019123014 | Jun 2019 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Anderson, “Human Gene Therapy”, Science 256:808-813 (1992). |
| Chakrabarti et al., “Target-Specific Precision of CRISPR-Mediated Genome Editing”, Molecular Cell 73(4):699-713 (2018). |
| Chu et al., “Increasing the efficiency of homology-directed repair for CRISPR-Cas9-induced precise gene editing in mammalian cells”, Nature Biotechnology 33(5):543-548 (2015). |
| Dillon, “Regulating gene expression in gene therapy”, Tibtech 11:167-173 (1993). |
| Haddada et al., “Gene Therapy Using Adenovirus Vectors”, The Molecular Repertoire of Adenoviruses III, Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology, pp. 297-306 (1995). |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2020/055131 dated Jan. 25, 2021. |
| Kremer et al., “Adenovirus and adeno-associated virus mediated gene transfer”, British Medical Bulletin 51(1):31-44 (1995). |
| Kyte et al., “A Simple Method for Displaying the Hydropathic Character of a Protein”, Journal of Molecular Biology 157:105-132 (1982). |
| Lai et al., “Efficient in vivo gene expression by trans-splicing adeno-associated viral vectors”, Nature Biotechnology 23(11):1435-1439 (2005), doi: 10.1038/nbt1153. |
| Levy et al., “Cytosine and adenine base editing of the brain, liver, retina, heart and skeletal muscle of mice via adeno-associated viruses”, Nature Biomedical Engineering 4:97-110 (2020). |
| Miller, “Human gene therapy comes of age”, Nature 357:455-460 (1992). |
| Mitani et al., “Delivering therapeutic genes—matching approach and application”, Tibtech 11:162-166 (1993). |
| Nabel et al., “Direct gene transfer for immunotherapy and immunization”, Tibtech 11:211-217 (1993). |
| Nakamura et al., “Codon usage tabulated from the international DNA sequence databases: status for the year 2000”, Nucleic Acids Research 28(1):292 (2000). |
| Perez-Pinera et al., “Gene targeting to the ROSA26 locus directed by engineered zinc finger nucleases”, Nucleic Acids Research 40(8):3741-3752 (2012). |
| Shou et al., Precise and Predictable CRISPR Chromosomal Rearrangements Reveal Principles of Cas9-Mediated Nucleotide Insertion, Molecular Cell 71(4):498-509 (2018). |
| Taher-Ghahfarokhi et al., Decoding non-random mutational signatures at Cas9 targeted sites, Nucleic Acids Research 46(16):8417-8434 (2018). |
| Van Brunt, “Molecular Farming: Transgenic Animals as Bioreactors”, Biotechnology 6(10):1149-1153 (1988). |
| Vigne et al., “Third-generation adenovectors for gene therapy”, Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 8:35-36 (1995). |
| Yu et al., “Progress towards gene therapy for HIV infection”, Gene Therapy 1(1):13-26 (1994). |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20230183754 A1 | Jun 2023 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62984422 | Mar 2020 | US | |
| 62913048 | Oct 2019 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 17067379 | Oct 2020 | US |
| Child | 18055718 | US |
