This relates generally to superconducting circuits, including but not limited to, tapered connectors for superconducting circuits.
Superconductors are materials capable of operating in a superconducting state with zero electrical resistance under particular conditions. One parameter for operating in a superconducting state is current density. If current density exceeds a superconducting threshold density the superconductor will operate in a non-superconducting state. Geometric shapes such as corners may lead to current crowding effects that result in the current density exceeding the superconducting threshold density at some locations. Moreover, mathematically-optimal tapered connectors can be hard to manufacture.
There is a need for circuits and devices with more efficient and effective methods for reducing or minimizing current crowding in manufactured superconductors. Such circuits, devices, and methods optionally complement or replace conventional systems, devices, and methods for reducing or minimizing current crowding effects.
In one aspect, some embodiments include a superconducting circuit. The superconducting circuit includes: (1) a first component having a first connection point (e.g., a terminal), the first connection point having a first width; (2) a second component having a second connection point, the second connection point having a second width that is larger than the first width; and (3) a connector electrically connecting the first connection point and the second connection point, the connector including: (a) a first taper having a first slope and a non-linear shape; (b) a second taper having a second slope; and (c) a connecting portion connecting the first taper to the second taper, the connecting portion having a third slope that is less than the first slope and less than the second slope.
In another aspect, some embodiments include a superconducting circuit that includes: (1) a first component having a first connection point, the first connection point having a first width; (2) a second component having a second connection point, the second connection point having a second width that is larger than the first width; and (3) a connector electrically connecting the first connection point and the second connection point, the connector including: (a) a first taper positioned adjacent the first connection point and having a non-linear shape; and (b) a second taper positioned adjacent the second connection point and having a linear shape.
In another aspect, some embodiments include a superconducting component that includes: (1) a first portion having a first width; (2) a second portion having a second width; (3) a curved portion coupling the first portion and the second portion, wherein the curved portion has a third width that is at least three times greater than the first width and at least three times greater than the second width; and (4) tapered portions connecting the curved portion to the first portion and the second portion.
In yet another aspect, some embodiments include a superconducting circuit that include: (1) a first component having a first connection point, the first connection point having a first width; (2) a second component having a second connection point, the second connection point having a second width that is larger than the first width; and (3) a connector electrically connecting the first connection point and the second connection point, the connector comprising a tapered portion shaped to minimize current crowding effects, the tapering defined by a taper formula meeting certain current crowding reduction criteria and elongated by a preset factor.
Thus, devices and circuits are provided with methods for reducing or minimizing current crowding by use of tapered connectors, thereby increasing the effectiveness, efficiency, and user satisfaction with such circuits and devices.
For a better understanding of the various described embodiments, reference should be made to the Detailed Description below, in conjunction with the following drawings in which like reference numerals refer to corresponding parts throughout the figures.
Reference will now be made in detail to embodiments, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. In the following detailed description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the various described embodiments. However, it will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art that the various described embodiments may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known methods, procedures, components, circuits, and networks have not been described in detail so as not to unnecessarily obscure aspects of the embodiments.
Many modifications and variations of this disclosure can be made without departing from its spirit and scope, as will be apparent to those skilled in the art. The specific embodiments described herein are offered by way of example only, and the disclosure is to be limited only by the terms of the appended claims, along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled.
A threshold superconducting current for a superconductor component is dependent on current density within the superconductor component. Current crowding effects at corners or curves lead to increased current density, which in turn leads to a lower threshold superconducting current. Therefore, it is important to shape the superconductor component to reduce or minimize current crowding effects (e.g., through the use of tapered connectors).
Mathematically-optimal tapers can minimize current crowding in superconductor devices. However, mathematically-optimal tapers can be difficult to manufacture in some circumstances, such as with superconductor devices having width(s) that are less than 1 micron. For example, drift during an e-beam process leads to stepping of a mathematically-optimal curve, which increases current crowding effects. As another example, a lithography process may over-expose or under-expose parts of a steep curve, which also increase current crowding effects. The present disclosure describes superconducting tapers that both prevent current crowding and are manufacturable.
Equations (1)-(3) below are examples of curves that meet certain current crowding reduction criteria (e.g., are mathematically-optimal curves). Equation (1) defines a curve along the x-axis and y-axis for a component with a 90-degree turn.
In Equation (1) above, W is the width of the component prior to (e.g., outside, but adjacent to) the turn (e.g., a straight portion of the component). Equation (2) defines a curve along the x-axis and y-axis for a component with a 180-degree turn (e.g., a u-shaped turn).
y180(x)=±(2W/π)cos−1[exp(πx/2W)/2] Equation 2—Curve for 180-degree Turn
In Equation (2) above, W is the width of the component prior to (e.g., outside, but adjacent to) the turn. Equation (3) shows a complex-number function zeta, ζ(c), indicating a curve along the x-axis and y-axis for a tapered component.
In Equation (3) above, W is the width of the narrow end of the tapered portion (e.g., w1 in
As the angle α in Equation (5) is varied from 0 to π, the x and y coordinates for a curved boundary of the tapered portion can be obtained via Equations (6) and (7) below.
x(α)=Re(ζ(α)) Equation 6—X-coordinate of Curved Boundary
y(α)=Im(ζ(α)) Equation 7—Y-coordinate of Curved Boundary
As shown in Equations (6) and (7) above, the x-coordinate is obtained from the real portion of the function zeta and the y-coordinate is obtained from the imaginary portion of the function zeta.
In various embodiments, connector 110 has various tapered shapes to reduce or minimize current crowding effects as current flows between component 102 and component 106. In some embodiments, if the ratio of w2 to w1 is less than a preset factor (e.g., 3, 4, or 5, or more generally a predefined value between 2.5 and 5), connector 110 has a tapered shape meeting one or more current crowding reduction criteria (e.g., mathematically-optimal tapered shape), such as the tapered shape set forth in Equations (3)-(7) above. In some embodiments, if the ratio of w2 to w1 is greater than the preset factor, connector 110 includes a series of tapers (e.g.,
In Equation (8) Δx is a displacement value due to drift during a fabrication process, m is a constant (e.g., a constant in the range of 5 to 10), and L is a length of the mathematically-defined tapered shape.
As discussed previously, reducing a maximum slope of the tapered portions reduces the impact of lithography inaccuracies in some circumstances. Moreover, a vertically-symmetric taper, as shown in
It will also be understood that, although the terms first, second, etc. are, in some instances, used herein to describe various elements, these elements should not be limited by these terms. These terms are only used to distinguish one element from another. For example, a first current could be termed a second current, and, similarly, a second current could be termed a first current, without departing from the scope of the various described embodiments. The first current and the second current are both currents, but they are not the same condition unless explicitly stated as such.
The terminology used in the description of the various described embodiments herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting. As used in the description of the various described embodiments and the appended claims, the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will also be understood that the term “and/or” as used herein refers to and encompasses any and all possible combinations of one or more of the associated listed items. It will be further understood that the terms “includes,” “including,” “comprises,” and/or “comprising,” when used in this specification, specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof.
As used herein, a “superconducting circuit” or “superconductor circuit” is a circuit having one or more superconducting materials. For example, a superconductor switch circuit is a switch circuit that includes one or more superconducting materials. As used herein, a “superconducting” material is a material that is capable of operating in a superconducting state (under particular conditions). For example, a superconducting material is a material that operates as a superconductor (e.g., operates with zero electrical resistance) when cooled below a particular temperature (e.g., a threshold temperature) and having less than a threshold current flowing through it. A superconducting material is also sometimes called herein a superconduction-capable material. In some embodiments, the superconducting materials operate in an “off” state where little or no current is present. In some embodiments, the superconducting materials can operate in a non-superconducting state during which the materials have a non-zero electrical resistance (e.g., a resistance in the range of one thousand to ten thousand ohms). For example, a superconducting material supplied with a current greater than a threshold superconducting current for the superconducting material transitions from a superconducting state having zero electrical resistance to a non-superconducting state having non-zero electrical resistance.
As used herein, a “wire” is a section of material configured for transferring electrical current. In some embodiments, a wire includes a section of material conditionally capable of transferring electrical current. For example, a wire made of a superconducting material that is capable of transferring electrical current while the wire is maintained at a temperature below a threshold temperature. As another example, a wire made of semiconducting material is capable of transferring electrical current while the wire is maintained at a temperature above a freeze-out temperature. A cross-section of a wire (e.g., a cross-section that is perpendicular to a length of the wire) optionally has a regular (e.g., flat or round) shape or an irregular shape. While some of the figures show wires having rectangular shapes, any shape could be used. In some embodiments, a length of a wire is greater than a width or a thickness of the wire (e.g., the length of a wire is at least 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, or 10 times greater than the width and the thickness of the wire). In some cases, a wire is a section of a superconducting layer.
The foregoing description, for purpose of explanation, has been described with reference to specific embodiments. However, the illustrative discussions above are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the scope of the claims to the precise forms disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in view of the above teachings. The embodiments were chosen in order to best explain the principles underlying the claims and their practical applications, to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best use the embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular uses contemplated.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/575,274, filed Sep. 18, 2019, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application 62/733,553, entitled “Tapered Connectors for Superconductor Circuits,” filed Sep. 19, 2018, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3059196 | Lentz | Oct 1962 | A |
3119076 | Schlig et al. | Jan 1964 | A |
3283282 | Harvey et al. | Nov 1966 | A |
3399396 | Rogers | Aug 1968 | A |
3422529 | Nuding | Jan 1969 | A |
3443021 | Schrader | May 1969 | A |
3523361 | Weissman | Aug 1970 | A |
3906538 | Matisoo | Sep 1975 | A |
4336561 | Murphy | Jun 1982 | A |
4365317 | Gheewala | Dec 1982 | A |
4509146 | Wang et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4647954 | Graf et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4894906 | Huang | Jan 1990 | A |
5026682 | Clark et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5030614 | Hollander et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5030617 | Legge | Jul 1991 | A |
5041880 | Nojima et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5051787 | Hasegawa | Sep 1991 | A |
5173620 | Fujimaki et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5219826 | Kapitulnik | Jun 1993 | A |
5219832 | Zhou | Jun 1993 | A |
5247475 | Hasunuma et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5321004 | Perez et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5358929 | Fujikami | Oct 1994 | A |
5365476 | Mukhanov | Nov 1994 | A |
5376626 | Drehman et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5455519 | Ohori | Oct 1995 | A |
5481119 | Higashino et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5521862 | Frazier | May 1996 | A |
5574290 | You | Nov 1996 | A |
5583319 | Lieurance | Dec 1996 | A |
5719105 | Odagawa et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5825240 | Geis et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5831278 | Berkowitz | Nov 1998 | A |
5892644 | Evans | Apr 1999 | A |
5925892 | Mizuno et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6029075 | Das et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6078517 | Herr | Jun 2000 | A |
6159905 | Buzcek | Dec 2000 | A |
6242939 | Nagasawa | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6433974 | Heismann | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6774463 | Chaudhari et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6919579 | Amin | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7227438 | Song et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7513765 | Liao | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7558030 | Lee et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7724083 | Herring et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7847282 | Sandhu | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7852106 | Herr et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
8330145 | Wakana et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8565844 | Smith | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8577430 | Smith | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8736085 | Sines | May 2014 | B2 |
9293240 | Flex-Cable | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9443576 | Miller | Sep 2016 | B1 |
9500519 | Tang et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9509315 | McCaughan et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9876505 | Dai et al. | Jan 2018 | B1 |
9998122 | Hamilton et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10103736 | Powell et al. | Oct 2018 | B1 |
10171086 | McCaughan et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10177298 | Taylor et al. | Jan 2019 | B1 |
10186858 | Klaus et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10197440 | Na'afi | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10262776 | Choi et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10361703 | Najafi | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10386229 | Najafi et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10396733 | Najafi et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10454014 | Najafi et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10566516 | Najafi | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10573800 | Najafi | Feb 2020 | B1 |
10586910 | Najafi | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10620044 | Thompson et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10651325 | Najafi et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
20010026426 | Heismann | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020149453 | Snitchler et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030087503 | Sakaguchi et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20050153843 | Kubota | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050197254 | Stasiak et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060073979 | Thieme et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060183327 | Moon | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060270224 | Song et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070217098 | Kruger | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080026234 | Sambasivan et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20100026447 | Keefe et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100171098 | Suzuki | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110108803 | Deligianni et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110254053 | Goupil et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120267604 | Tian | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130012392 | Tanaka et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130090244 | Shinzato et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130143744 | Marsili et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130150245 | Smith | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130341594 | Mohseni et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140113828 | Gilbert et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140299751 | Tang et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150018218 | Lakrimi et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150080225 | Nomura | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150179916 | Pramanik et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150200041 | Mitsuhashi | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150348681 | Huh | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160028402 | Mccaughan et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160028403 | McCaughan | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160322145 | Daibo | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170133127 | Yamaguchi | May 2017 | A1 |
20170186933 | Sunter et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20180012682 | Ichiki | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180033944 | Ladizinsky et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180090661 | McCaughan | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180145664 | Herr et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180269373 | Weidlich | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180294401 | Tuckerman | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180337323 | Yamaguchi | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180364097 | Najafi | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180374979 | Nozawa | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190027672 | Megrant | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190035904 | Najafi | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190035999 | Najafi | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190044051 | Caudillo et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190109595 | Najafi | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190228893 | Betz | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190288132 | Wang et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190378874 | Rosenblatt et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200027502 | Berggren | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200066962 | Najafi | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200080890 | Najafi et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200111944 | Moodera et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200176662 | Dayton et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200194656 | Najafi | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200194909 | Brittles | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200265334 | Haider | Aug 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
106289515 | Jan 2017 | CN |
106549099 | Mar 2017 | CN |
2440576 | Jan 1976 | DE |
19714191 | Jul 1998 | DE |
19827225 | Dec 1999 | DE |
10131967 | Jan 2003 | DE |
0299879 | Jan 1989 | EP |
2424058 | Feb 2012 | EP |
2530500 | Mar 2016 | GB |
S63299282 | Dec 1988 | JP |
H05-55647 | Mar 1993 | JP |
WO9014715 | Nov 1990 | WO |
WO9409566 | Apr 1994 | WO |
WO 2012052628 | Apr 2012 | WO |
WO-2013179690 | Dec 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Clem et al., “Predicted field-dependent increase of critical currents in asymmetric superconducting nanocircuits”, Physical Review B 85, 144511 (2012), 16 pages. (Year: 2012). |
Via et al., “Magnetic and transport currents in thin film superconductors of arbitrary shape within the London approximation”, J. Appl. Phys. 113, 093905 (2013), 11 pages. (Year: 2013). |
Eftekharian et al., “Plasmonic superconducting nanowire single photon detector”, Optical Society of America, Optics Express, vol. 21, No. 3 (2013), 12 pages. (Year: 2013). |
Nawaz et al., “Microwave response of superconducting YBa2Cu3O7-δ nanowire bridges sustaining the critical depairing current: evidence of Josephson-like behavior”, Physical Review Letters 110, 167004 (2013), 5 pages. (Year: 2013). |
Kuroiwa et al., “Short-slot hybrid coupler using linear taper in W-band”, J Infrared Milli Terahz Waves, 34:815-823 (2013), 9 pages. (Year: 2013). |
Akhlaghi et al., “Gated Mode Superconducting Nanowire Single Photon Detectors,” Optics Express, vol. 20, No. 2, Jan. 16, 2012, 9 pgs. |
Atikian, Haig A. et al., “Superconducting Nanowire Single Photon Detector on Diamond,” arXiv:1401.4490v1, physics.optics, Jan. 17, 2014, 5 pgs. |
Chen, Risheng et al., “Photon-Number-Resolving Detector Based on Superconducting Serial Nanowires,” IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, vol. 23, No: 1, Feb. 2013, 9 pgs. |
Clem, John R. et al., “Geometry-dependent critical currents in superconducting nanocircuits,” arXiv:1109.4881v1 [cond-mat.supr-con] Sep. 22, 2011, 29 pgs. |
Dai, Daoxin et al., “Mode conversion in tapered submicron silicon ridge optical waveguides,” Optics Express, vol. 20, No. 12, Jun. 4, 2012, 15 pgs. |
Henrich, D. et al., “Geometry-inducted reduction of the critical current in superconducting nanowires,” arXiv:1204.0616v2 [cond-mat-supr-con] Aug. 22, 2012, 6 pgs. |
Hortensius, H.L. et al., “Critical-Current Reduction in Thin Superconducting Wires Due to Current Crowding,” arXiv:1203.4253v3, [cond-mat-supr-con], May 6, 2012, 5 pgs. |
Korzh, B.A. et al., “Demonstrating sub-3 ps temporal resolution in a superconducting nanowire single-photon detector,” Apr. 18, 2018, 26 pgs. |
Lee, S.-B. et al., “Fabrication of a self-aligned superconducting nanotransistor based NOR logic gate,” Microelectronic Engineering 57-58, 2001, 7 pgs., downloaded from https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienceiarticle/abs/pii/S0167931701004269). |
Marsili, F., “Single-photon detectors based on ultra-narrow superconducting nanowires,” Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Dec. 19, 2010, 31 pgs. |
Mattioli, Francesco et al., “Photon-number-resolving superconducting nanowire detectors,” Superconductor Science and Technology, Aug. 24, 2015, 16 pgs. |
McGaughan, “Superconducting thin film nanoelectronics,” Sep. 2015, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, submitted to the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosopy in Electrical Engineering, 22 pgs. |
Murphy et al., “Nanoscale superconducting memory based on the kinetic inductance of asymmetric nanowire loops,” Departmwent of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, arXiv:1701.08715v2 [cond-mat.supr-con] Jun. 29, 2017, 19 pgs. |
Natarajan et al., “Superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors: physics and applications”, 2012, Superconduc. Sci. Technology vol. 25, p. 063001. |
Quaranta et al., Superconductive Three-Terminal Amplifier/Discriminator, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, vol. 19, No. 3, Jun. 2, 2009, 4 pgs. |
Schmidt, E. et al., AIN-Buffered Superconducting NbN Nanowire Single-Photon Detector on GaAs, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, vol. 27, No. 4, Jun. 2017, 5 pgs. |
Shiino, Tatsuya et al., “Improvement of Critical Temperature of Superconducting NbTiN and NbN Thin Films Using the AIN Buffer Layer,” Superconductor Science and Technology, Mar. 2010, 11 pgs. |
Zhao, Qing-Yuan et al., “A compact superconducting nanowire memory element operated by nanowire cryotrons,” Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Nov. 22, 2017, 20 pgs. |
PsiQuantum Corp., International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2018/033042, dated Aug. 28, 2018, 13 pgs. |
PsiQuantum Corp., International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2018/033041, dated Jul. 27, 2018, 16 pgs. |
PsiQuantum Corp., International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2018/044091, dated Nov. 7, 2018, 13 pgs. |
PsiQuantum Corp., Invitation to Pay Additional Fees/Partial Search Report, PCT/US2018/037892, dated Aug. 20, 2018, 16 pgs. |
PsiQuantum Corp., Invitation to Pay Additional Fees/Partial Search Report, PCT/US2018/037892, dated Aug. 20, 2018, 18 pgs. |
PsiQuantum Corp., Invitation to Pay Additional Fees/Partial Search Report, PCT/US2018/054414, dated Jan. 24, 2019, 21 pgs. |
PsiQuantum Corp., International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2018/054414, dated Mar. 20, 2019, 21 pgs. |
Najafi, Office Action dated Dec. 12, 2018, U.S. Appl. No. 16/028,288, 6 pgs. |
Najafi, Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 5, 2019, U.S. Appl. No. 16/028,288, 10 pgs. |
Najafi, Office Action dated Sep. 21, 2018, U.S. Appl. No. 16/028,293, 8 pgs. |
Najafi, Final Office Action dated Mar. 1, 2019 U.S. Appl. No. 16/028,293, 5 pgs. |
Najafi, Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 21, 2018, U.S. Appl. No. 16/012,520, 9 pgs. |
Najafi, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 16/136,124, dated Apr. 4, 2019, 9 pgs. |
Najafi, Quayle Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 16/151,180, dated Jan. 31, 2019, 5pgs. |
Najafi, Notice of Allowace, U.S. Appl. No. 16/151,180, dated Mar. 14, 2019, 5 pgs. |
Najafi, Notice of Allowance U.S. Appl. No. 16/151,190, dated Feb. 6, 2019, 11 pgs. |
Najafi, Notice of Allowance U.S. Appl. No. 16/151,190, dated Mar. 28, 2019, 5 pgs. |
Najafi, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 16/046,815, dated Feb. 4, 2019, 9 pgs. |
Najafi, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 16/046,807, dated Mar. 18, 2019, 10 pgs. |
Najafi, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 16/107,143, dated Mar. 19, 2019, 11 pgs. |
PsiQuantum Corp., International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2019/017687, dated Apr. 30, 2019, 8 pgs. |
Stanfield, CMOS-Compatible, Piezo-Optomechanically Tunable Photonics for Visible Wavelengths and Cryogenic, Temperatures, vol. 27, Issue 20, pp. 28588-28605, 2019. |
PsiQuantum Corp., International Search Report, PCT/US2019/017691, dated Apr. 23, 2019, 7 pgs. |
PsiQuantum Corp., International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2019/030019, dated Jul. 17, 2019, 8 pgs. |
PsiQuantum Corp., PCT/US2018/044091, International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Jan. 28, 2020, 6 pgs. |
Najafi, Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 16/664,716, dated Apr. 1, 2020, 14 pgs. |
PsiQuantum, International Search Report / Written Opinion, PCT/US2019/051853, dated. Jan. 27, 2020, 13 pgs. |
PsiQuantum, International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT/US12018/033041, dated Nov. 26, 2019, 8 pgs. |
PsiQuantum, International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT/US2018/054414, dated Apr. 8, 2020, 15 pgs. |
Psiquantum, International Search Report / Written Opinion, PCT/US2018/037892, dated Oct. 17, 2018, 18 pgs. |
PsiQuantum, International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT/US2018/037892, dated Dec. 17, 2019, 12 pgs. |
Najafi, Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 16/553,068, dated Apr. 1, 2020, 11 pgs. |
Najafi, Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 16/544,718, dated Aug. 17, 2020, 6 pgs. |
Najafi, Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 16/656,506, dated Aug. 13, 2020, 18 pgs. |
Najafi, Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 16/553,068, dated Sep. 18, 2020, 8 pgs. |
Najafi, Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 16/473,550, dated Sep. 24, 2020, 8 pgs. |
Najafi, Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 16/473,550, dated Nov. 3, 2020, 2 pgs. |
Najafi, Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 16/553,068, dated Nov. 12, 2020, 2 pgs. |
Najafi, Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 16/656,506, dated Nov. 3, 2020, 12 pgs. |
Najafi, Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 16/664,716, dated Oct. 16, 2020, 14 pgs. |
Najafi, Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 16/473,547, dated Dec. 9, 2020, 8 pgs. |
Najafi, Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 16/543,256, dated Dec. 9, 2020, 12 pgs. |
Chung, Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 16/849,829, dated Aug. 21, 2020, 5 pgs. |
Chung, Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 16/849,829, dated Dec. 8, 2020, 5 pgs. |
PsiQuantum Corp., International Search Report / Written Opinion, PCT/US20/28519, dated Jan. 12, 2021, 9 pgs. |
PsiQuantum Corp., Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 16/849,829, dated Mar. 1, 2021, 8 pgs. |
PsiQuantum Corp., Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 16/544,718, dated Feb. 5, 2021, 6 pgs. |
PsiQuantum Corp., Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 16/664,716, dated Jan. 28, 2021, 8 pgs. |
PsiQuantum Corp., Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 16/473,547, dated Jan. 27, 2021, 2 pgs. |
PsiQuantum Corp., Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 16/543,256, dated Feb. 4, 2021, 2 pgs. |
PsiQuantum Corp., Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 16/544,718, dated Mar. 12, 2021, 2 pgs. |
PsiQuantum Corp., Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 16/544,718, dated Mar. 24, 2021, 2 pgs. |
PsiQuantum Corp., Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 16/849,829, dated Apr. 5, 2021, 2 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210384126 A1 | Dec 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62733553 | Sep 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16575274 | Sep 2019 | US |
Child | 17408309 | US |