Temperature controlled method to liquefy gas and a production plant using the method

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10571187
  • Patent Number
    10,571,187
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, March 21, 2013
    11 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 25, 2020
    4 years ago
Abstract
A method for liquefying gas involving pre-treating the gas stream in a pre-treater to remove impurities, and then passing the gas stream through a first flow path of a first heat exchanger to lower a temperature of the gas stream. The gas stream is then passed through the gas expansion turbine to lower a pressure of the gas stream and further decrease the temperature of the gas stream. The gas stream is then passed into a primary separator to separate the gas stream into a liquid stream and a cold gas stream. The liquid stream is collected. Selected quantities of the cold gas stream are passed through a second flow path of the first heat exchanger whereby a heat exchange takes place to cool the gas stream flowing through the first flow path to maintain the temperature of the gas stream entering the gas expansion turbine at a temperature which promotes the production of liquids.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to a method to liquefy natural gas from a transmission gas pipeline. The described process was developed to efficiently produce liquid natural gas (LNG).


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

LNG is a natural gas that has been cooled to a cryogenic condition to condense methane, the natural gas main component. A temperature of approximately −161 C is required to produce and keep natural gas in a liquid state at standard atmospheric pressure. Liquefaction reduces the volume by approximately 600 times thus making it more economical to transport over great distances versus traditional pipelines. At present, LNG is primarily transported across continents thus making it available throughout the world. LNG is also produced in small scale liquefaction plants to supply peak saving demands, as well as to make available natural gas to regions that need it but where it is not economical or technically feasible to build pipelines.


There are differences in liquefaction selection processes for large versus small LNG plants. For large plants, the main criteria is minimization of capital cost whereas the minimization of energy consumption is left as a second objective. These two objectives can also go together; thus an optimization of the efficiency of the plant may involve a reduction in the investment of the equipment. On the other hand, a higher efficiency can result in an increase in LNG production, so the efficiency factor has a significant impact on the plant economics. In small to medium LNG plants, it is not the efficiency, but other factors such as simplicity, modularization, ease of maintenance, operation and installation that have an higher criteria when selecting a liquefaction technology. The direct consequence of these different selection criteria is that liquefaction technologies for small to medium scale applications are not the same as the ones that are used in large LNG plants.


The two main groups of liquefaction technologies are the mixed refrigerant technologies and expansion based technologies. The mixed refrigerant technologies are “condensing type” processes, where the refrigerant used for the liquefaction makes use of its latent heat of vaporization to cool the natural gas. The expansion based technologies are processes where the refrigerant is always in gas phase and only makes use of its sensible heat to cool the natural gas.


The following mixed refrigerant technologies are the most representative processes in the industry: PRICO (Poly Refrigerated Integrated Cycle Operation) is licensed by Black and Veatch and it consists of one cycle of mixed refrigerant (a mixture of methane, ethane, propane, butane, nitrogen and sometimes isopentane), the advantages claimed by the licensor are operating flexibility, modular design and reduced refrigerant inventory. The AP-M (Air Products) is licensed by APCI, is a single mixed refrigerant that is vaporized at two different levels of pressure. The dual pressure cycle is more efficient than the single pressure cycle, resulting in smaller heat exchangers and compressor. The LiMuM (Linde Multistage Mixed Refrigerant) is licensed by Linde and consists of a spiral wound heat exchanger and one 3-stage single mixed refrigeration loop for the pre-cooling, liquefaction and sub-cooling of the natural gas. This process allows for high capacity throughput. PCMR (Pre-cooled Mixed Refrigerant) is licensed by Kryopak and consists of a pre-cooling stage (ammonia or propane cycle) followed by a single mixed refrigerant cycle, where the mixed refrigerant is a mixture of nitrogen, methane, ethane, propane and butanes, this process is used primarily in small plants. OSMR (Optimized Single Mixed Refrigerant) is licensed by LNG Limited, the process is a single mixed refrigerant process complemented with a standard package ammonia absorption process. The utilization of an ammonia process improves the efficiency of the process and an increase in LNG output compared to traditional single mixed refrigerant processes. In all of the above mixed refrigerant technologies, the main differences between them are the composition of the mixed refrigerant (although the refrigerants are the same i.e.; nitrogen, methane, ethane, etc.), the metallurgy of the heat exchangers, the orientation of the equipment and the operations set points. In all the mixed refrigerants processes, the objective of innovation is to increase efficiency, reducing capital and operating costs.


The expansion based technologies have various processes based on the use of nitrogen as a refrigerant to liquefy natural gas, the N2 expansion cycle. Some of these processes use a single cycle, others use a dual expansion cycle and in other cases a pre-cooling cycle is added to improve efficiency. Several licensors i.e., APCI, Hamworthy, BHP Petroleum Pty, Mustang Engineering and Kanfa Oregon offer the N2 expansion cycles processes, and they differ by proprietary process arrangement. In all these processes, the cooling is provided by an external refrigeration plant using nitrogen expanders. The Niche LNG process is licensed by CB&I Lummus, consists of two cycles: one cycle uses methane as a refrigerant and the other uses nitrogen. The methane provides cooling at moderate and warm levels while the nitrogen cycle provides refrigeration at the lowest temperature level. The OCX process is licensed by Mustang Engineering and is based on the use of the inlet gas as a refrigerant in an open refrigerant cycle with turbo-expanders, there are variations such as OCX-R which adds a closed loop propane refrigerant to the OCX process and OCX-Angle which incorporates LPG recovery.


As demonstrated, presently there are many variations and processes to liquefy LNG. All of the processes operate based on the expansion of low boiling fluids be it through expanders or JT valves, be it closed or open cycle, the difference between them is in the process efficiencies which result in lower capital and operating costs per unit of LNG produced.


What is required is an alternative method to liquefy gas, such as LNG.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

According to one aspect, there is provided a method for liquefying gas where a gas stream is passed through a gas expansion turbine. The method involves pre-treating the gas stream in a pre-treater to remove impurities, and then passing the gas stream through a first flow path of a first heat exchanger to lower a temperature of the gas stream. The gas stream is then passed through the gas expansion turbine to lower a pressure of the gas stream and further decrease the temperature of the gas stream. The gas stream is then passed into a primary separator to separate the gas stream into a liquid stream and a cold gas stream. The liquid stream is collected. Selected quantities of the cold gas stream are passed through a second flow path of the first heat exchanger whereby a heat exchange takes place to cool the gas stream flowing through the first flow path to maintain the temperature of the gas stream entering the gas expansion turbine at a temperature which promotes the production of liquids.


The method will hereinafter, as applied to the natural gas. The impurities removed are carbon dioxide and water. The liquids collected are natural gas liquids.


Although beneficial results may be obtained through the use of the method, as described above, greater efficiencies can be achieved through the use of a recycle stream. The recycle stream already has impurities removed. This involves a step of compressing the cold gas stream in a compressor after the cold gas stream has passed through the first heat exchanger to create a recycled gas stream and directing the recycled gas stream into the gas stream downstream of the pre-treater and upstream of the first heat exchanger.


Passing the recycled gas stream through the compressor will unavoidably raise the temperature of the recycled gas stream. It is, therefore, preferred that a step be included of passing the recycled gas stream through a first flow path of a second heat exchanger downstream of the compressor to lower the temperature of the recycled gas stream prior to the recycled gas stream being directed into the gas stream.


In accordance with the teachings of this method, a steady state will be reached in which a ratio of the recycled gas stream entering the gas stream is maintained constant.


In a variation of the method, where the liquids one wishes to collect are Liquid Natural Gas (LNG), a further step is included of mixing a slip stream of liquid natural gas (LNG) drawn from the primary separator into the gas stream via a mixer positioned downstream of the first heat exchanger and upstream of the gas expansion turbine.


In another variation of the method, a further step may be taken of passing the gas stream through a preliminary separator positioned downstream of the mixer and upstream of the gas expansion turbine to separate natural gas liquids (NGLs) from the gas stream, collecting the NGLs and directing the gas stream to the gas expansion turbine.


An advantage of the above method is that it can operate without external power inputs, resulting in substantial savings in both capital and operating costs. The above described method was developed with a view to collecting natural gas liquids and liquefying natural gas to form Liquid Natural Gas (LNG).





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

These and other features of the invention will become more apparent from the following description in which reference is made to the appended drawings, the drawings are for the purpose of illustration only and are not intended to in any way limit the scope of the invention to the particular embodiment or embodiments shown, wherein:



FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a facility equipped with a gas pre-treatment, an heat exchanger, an expander and a compressor to produce LNG.



FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a facility equipped with an alternate cooling medium for the compression of the recycled vapour fraction.



FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of a facility equipped with the ability to recover natural gas liquids (NGLs).





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

The method will now be described with reference to FIG. 1.


As set forth above, this method was developed with a view to liquefying natural gas to form Liquid Natural Gas (LNG). The description of application of the method to LNG should, therefore, be considered as an example.


Referring to FIG. 1, a pressurized pipeline natural gas stream 1 provides natural gas to users through line 29, valve 30 to flow distribution 37. A natural gas stream 2 is routed through flow control valve 3. The controlled flow enters the gas pre-treatment unit 5 through line 4. Pre-treatment is to remove contaminants and may not be required if the gas used is of sufficient quality. The pre-treated gas exits through line 6 and is mixed with recycled gas stream 25 through valve 26. The mixed gas stream 7 enters heat exchanger 8 where it is pre-cooled. The pressurized pre-cooled gas stream 9 enters expander 10 where the pressure is dropped resulting in a substantial temperature drop. The nearly isentropic expansion also produces torque and therefore shaft power that is converted into electricity through generator 11. The expanded gas stream 12 enters LNG receiver 13 where the liquid and vapour fractions are separated. The vapour stream 17 is routed through heat exchanger 8 to pre-cool inlet gas stream 7. The now warmed gas stream 18 enters compressor 20 through line 19 for re-compression. The compressor 20 shaft power is provided by a gas engine 22 which receives its fuel from gas line 21. The compressed recycled gas stream 23 is cooled in heat exchanger 24 before mixing it with inlet feed gas stream 6 through line 25. To prevent a buildup of nitrogen in the recycle gas stream 25, a bleeding gas stream 27 is routed to gas transmission line 29 through valve 28. The cooling of compressed recycled gas stream 23 is provided by a once through heat exchange from gas transmission line 29. The required gas coolant is routed through valve 31 and line 32 into heat exchanger 24 and the once through flow is returned to gas transmission line 29 through line 34 and valve 33. The LNG receiver 13 accumulates the LNG produced. LNG exits receiver 13 through stream 14 to supply LNG product pump 15, where it is pumped to storage through line 16.


A main feature of this invention is the simplicity of the process which eliminates the use of external refrigeration systems. Another feature of the invention is the flexibility of the process to meet various operating conditions since the ratio of LNG production is proportional to the cold vapour stream generated and recycled. The invention also provides for a significant savings in energy when compared to other processes since it uses its recycled vapour stream as the coolant medium, the process produces its own refrigeration stream. The proposed invention can be used in any LNG production plant size.


Referring to FIG. 2, the main difference from FIG. 1 is in the heat exchanger to cool recycle stream 23. In FIG. 2, the heat exchanger 50 is an air cooling heat exchanger where ambient air is used to cool stream 23. This process orientation provides an alternative method to produce LNG at albeit less efficient than when using heat exchanger 24 as shown in FIG. 1. A pressurized pipeline natural gas stream 1 provides natural gas to users through line 29, valve 30 to flow distribution 37. A natural gas stream 2 is routed through flow control valve 3, and enters the gas pre-treatment unit 5 through line 4. The pre-treated gas exits through line 6 and is mixed with recycle gas stream 25 through valve 26. The mixed gas stream 7 enters heat exchanger 8 where it is pre-cooled. The pressurized pre-cooled gas stream 9 enters expander 10 where the pressure is dropped resulting in a substantial temperature drop. The nearly isentropic expansion also produces torque and therefore shaft power that is converted into electricity through generator 11. The expanded gas stream 12 enters LNG receiver 13 where the liquid and vapour fractions are separated. The vapour stream 17 is routed through heat exchanger 8 to pre-cool inlet gas stream 7. The now warmed gas stream 18 enters compressor 20 through line 19 for re-compression. The compressor 20 shaft power is provided by a gas engine 22 which receives its fuel from gas line 21. The compressed recycled gas stream 23 is cooled in heat exchanger 51 before mixing it with inlet feed gas stream 6 through line 25. To prevent a buildup of nitrogen in the recycle gas stream 25, a bleeding gas stream 27 is routed to gas transmission line 29 through valve 28. The cooling of compressed recycled gas stream 23 is provided by an air cooling heat exchanger 51. The LNG receiver 13 accumulates the LNG produced. LNG exits receiver 13 through stream 14 to supply LNG product pump 15, where it is pumped to storage through line 16.


Referring to FIG. 3, the main difference from FIGS. 1 and 2 is the recovery of natural gas liquids before expansion. This is achieved by circulating a portion of the generated liquid natural gas (LNG), stream 42 and mixing it in 43 with the pre-cooled gas stream 51 to meet the temperature required to condense the heavier fractions present in the natural gas stream such as; butane, propane and ethane. This process orientation provides an alternative method to produce both LNG and NGLs. A pressurized pipeline natural gas stream 1 provides natural gas to users through line 29, valve 30 to gas flow transmission line 37. A natural gas stream 2 is routed through flow control valve 3, and enters the gas pre-treatment unit 5 through line 4. The pre-treated gas exits through line 6 and is mixed with recycle gas stream 25 through valve 26, the mixed gas stream 7 enters heat exchanger 8 where it is pre-cooled. The pressurized pre-cooled gas stream 43 enters mixer 44, a LNG stream 42 is also added to mixer 44. The addition of LNG stream to mixer 44 is controlled by temperature control valve 41. The mixed stream 45, enters separator 46 where the NGLs are separated and accumulated. The NGLs exit separator 46 through line 47 to NGL pump 49 and pumped to storage through line 50. The pressurized, pre-cooled and de-liquified gas stream 9 enters expander 10 where the pressure is dropped resulting in a substantial temperature drop. The nearly isentropic expansion also produces torque and therefore shaft power that is converted into electricity through generator 11. The expanded gas stream 12 enters LNG receiver 13 where the liquid and vapour fractions are separated. The vapour stream 17 is routed through heat exchanger 8 to pre-cool inlet gas stream 7. The now warmed gas stream 18 enters compressor 20 through line 19 for re-compression. The compressor 20 shaft power is provided by a gas engine 22 which receives its fuel from gas line 21. The compressed recycled gas stream 23 is cooled in heat exchanger 24 before mixing it with inlet feed gas stream 6 through line 25 and valve 26. To prevent a buildup of nitrogen in the recycle gas stream 25, a bleeding gas stream 27 is routed to gas transmission line 29 through valve 28.


The cooling of compressed recycled gas stream 23 is provided by a once through heat exchange from gas transmission line 29. The required gas coolant is routed through valve 31 and line 32 into heat exchanger 24 and the once through flow is returned to gas transmission line 29 through line 34 and valve 33.


The LNG receiver 13 accumulates the LNG produced. LNG exits receiver 13 through stream 14 to supply LNG product pump 15, where it is pumped to storage through line 16. A portion of the produced LNG is routed through line 38 to high pressure LNG pump 39. The pressurized LNG liquid stream is controlled by temperature valve 41 to a pre-set temperature through temperature transmitter 47. The controlled LNG stream 42 enters mixer 44 to cool and condense the desired natural gas liquids.


The proposed invention addresses both large and small plants in which process simplicity and ease of operation are the main components. The invention eliminates the need for refrigeration cycle plants and the use of proprietary mixed refrigerants. By simplifying the process, it reduces capital, maintenance, and operations costs.


In the preferred method, natural gas is first pre-cooled with produced cold vapor then expanded through a gas expander. The gas expander produces electricity. The expanded gas produces a vapour and a liquid stream. The vapour stream is recycled by first pre-cooling the feed gas to the expander and then recompressed, cooled and recycled. A portion of the produced LNG provides the cold energy required as a recycle stream to cool and liquefy the pre-treated natural gas stream to recover desired natural gas liquids. The proposed invention eliminates the practice and use of mixed refrigerant cycles resulting in lower capital and operating costs. The process is applicable to any LNG plant size.


VARIATIONS

It should be noted that the motive force for the compressor can be provided by an electric motor versus a gas driven engine as proposed. Moreover, the compressed vapour stream can be discharged into gas transmission line 29 rather than recycled as proposed.


In this patent document, the word “comprising” is used in its non-limiting sense to mean that items following the word are included, but items not specifically mentioned are not excluded. A reference to an element by the indefinite article “a” does not exclude the possibility that more than one of the element is present, unless the context clearly requires that there be one and only one of the elements.


The scope of the claims should not be limited by the preferred embodiments set forth in the examples, but should be given a broad purposive interpretation consistent with the description as a whole.

Claims
  • 1. A method for liquefying gas, comprising: obtaining a gas stream from a transmission pipeline at a pipeline pressure;pre-treating the gas stream in a pre-treater to remove impurities and produce a pre-treated gas stream;passing the pre-treated gas stream through a first flow path of a first heat exchanger to lower a temperature of the pre-treated gas stream to produce a cooled gas stream;passing the cooled gas stream from the first heat exchanger through a gas expansion turbine to produce an expanded gas stream by lowering a pressure of the cooled gas stream to about atmospheric pressure and further decrease the temperature of the cooled gas stream;passing the expanded gas stream into a primary separator to separate the expanded gas stream into Liquid Natural Gas (LNG) and a cold gas stream;collecting the LNG;passing selective quantities of the cold gas stream through a second flow path of the first heat exchanger whereby a heat exchange takes place in the first heat exchanger to cool the pre-treated gas stream flowing through the first flow path to maintain the temperature of the cooled gas stream entering the gas expansion turbine at a temperature which promotes the production of liquids;mixing a slip stream of the collected LNG into the cold gas stream via a mixer that is positioned downstream of the first heat exchanger and upstream of the gas expansion turbine, the slip stream causing natural gas liquids (NGLs) in the cold gas stream to condense to produce a mixed phase stream;passing the mixed phase stream through a preliminary separator positioned downstream of the mixer and upstream of the gas expansion turbine to separate the condensed NGLs from the mixed phase stream; anddirecting the remaining mixed phase stream to the gas expansion turbine.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of compressing a portion of the cold gas stream to the pipeline pressure and returning the compressed cold gas stream to the transmission pipeline downstream.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
2772479 Mar 2012 CA national
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/CA2013/050232 3/21/2013 WO 00
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2013/138940 9/26/2013 WO A
US Referenced Citations (92)
Number Name Date Kind
2168438 Carrier Aug 1939 A
3002362 Morrison Oct 1961 A
3152194 Pohl et al. Oct 1964 A
3184926 Blake May 1965 A
3280575 Drake Oct 1966 A
3312073 Jackson et al. Apr 1967 A
3367122 Tutton Feb 1968 A
3653220 Foster et al. Apr 1972 A
3735600 Dowdell et al. May 1973 A
3747359 Streich Jul 1973 A
3754405 Rosen Aug 1973 A
3792590 Lofredo et al. Feb 1974 A
3846993 Bates Nov 1974 A
3859811 Duncan Jan 1975 A
3919853 Rojey Nov 1975 A
3962881 Muska Jun 1976 A
4033735 Swenson Jul 1977 A
4279130 Finch et al. Jul 1981 A
4418530 Bodrov et al. Dec 1983 A
4424680 Rothchild Jan 1984 A
4430103 Gray et al. Feb 1984 A
4444577 Perez Apr 1984 A
4617039 Buck Oct 1986 A
4681612 O'Brien et al. Jul 1987 A
4710214 Sharma et al. Dec 1987 A
4751151 Healy et al. Jun 1988 A
4869740 Campbell et al. Sep 1989 A
4907405 Polizzotto Mar 1990 A
4936888 DeLong Jun 1990 A
5137558 Agrawal Aug 1992 A
5295350 Child et al. Mar 1994 A
5329774 Tanguay et al. Jul 1994 A
5425230 Shpak Jun 1995 A
5440894 Schaeffer et al. Aug 1995 A
5669234 Houser Sep 1997 A
5678411 Matsumura et al. Oct 1997 A
5685170 Sorensen Nov 1997 A
5782958 Rojey et al. Jul 1998 A
5799505 Bonaquist et al. Sep 1998 A
5953935 Sorensen Sep 1999 A
6023942 Thomas Feb 2000 A
6089022 Zednik et al. Jul 2000 A
6089028 Bowen et al. Jul 2000 A
6131407 Wissolik Oct 2000 A
6138473 Boyer-Vidal Oct 2000 A
6182469 Campbell et al. Feb 2001 B1
6196021 Wissolik Mar 2001 B1
6266968 Redlich Jul 2001 B1
6286315 Staehle Sep 2001 B1
6378330 Minta et al. Apr 2002 B1
6432565 Haines Aug 2002 B1
6517286 Latchem Feb 2003 B1
6526777 Campbell et al. Mar 2003 B1
6581409 Wilding et al. Jun 2003 B2
6606860 McFarland Aug 2003 B2
6640555 Cashin Nov 2003 B2
6662589 Roberts et al. Dec 2003 B1
6694774 Rashad et al. Feb 2004 B1
6739140 Bishop et al. May 2004 B2
6751985 Kimble Jun 2004 B2
6889523 Wilkinson May 2005 B2
6932121 Shivers, III Aug 2005 B1
6945049 Madsen Sep 2005 B2
7051553 Mak et al. May 2006 B2
7107788 Patel et al. Sep 2006 B2
7155917 Baudat Jan 2007 B2
7219502 Nierenberg May 2007 B2
7257966 Lee et al. Aug 2007 B2
7377127 Mak May 2008 B2
8899074 Wilding Dec 2014 B2
20020170297 Quine et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030008605 Hartford, Jr. et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030019219 Viegas et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030051875 Wilson Mar 2003 A1
20030182947 Kimble et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030196452 Wilding et al. Oct 2003 A1
20040065085 Madsen Apr 2004 A1
20050086974 Steinbach et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050244277 Hurst, Jr. et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060213222 Whitesell Sep 2006 A1
20060213223 Wilding et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060242970 Yang et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070062216 Mak et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070107465 Turner et al. May 2007 A1
20080016910 Brostow et al. Jan 2008 A1
20090113928 Vandor et al. May 2009 A1
20090249829 Lourenco et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090282865 Martinez et al. Nov 2009 A1
20110094263 Wilding et al. Apr 2011 A1
20120060554 Schmidt Mar 2012 A1
20120169049 Oxner et al. Jul 2012 A1
20130333416 Lourenco et al. Dec 2013 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (40)
Number Date Country
1048876 Feb 1979 CA
2 422 893 Feb 2002 CA
2 467 338 Jul 2003 CA
2 516 785 Sep 2004 CA
2 552 366 Jul 2005 CA
2 299 695 Jul 2007 CA
2 318 802 Feb 2008 CA
2 777 760 May 2011 CA
2 728 716 Jul 2012 CA
2 515 999 Dec 2012 CA
1615415 May 2005 CN
1019448706 Jan 2011 CN
44 16 359 Oct 1998 DE
0 482 222 Apr 1992 EP
0 566 285 Oct 1993 EP
0 635 673 Jan 1995 EP
0 780 649 Jun 1997 EP
2 420 081 Oct 1979 FR
1011453 Dec 1965 GB
2 103 354 Feb 1983 GB
3-236589 Oct 1991 JP
5-263998 Oct 1993 JP
2002-295799 Oct 2002 JP
2 180 420 Mar 2002 RU
2 232 342 Jul 2004 RU
9411626 May 1994 WO
9701069 Jan 1997 WO
9859205 Dec 1998 WO
0052403 Sep 2000 WO
03081038 Oct 2003 WO
03095913 Nov 2003 WO
03095914 Nov 2003 WO
2004010480 Jan 2004 WO
2004109180 Dec 2004 WO
2004109206 Dec 2004 WO
2005045337 May 2005 WO
2006004723 Jan 2006 WO
2006019900 Feb 2006 WO
2006036441 Apr 2006 WO
2009061777 May 2009 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (2)
Entry
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 1, 2013, issued in corresponding International Application No. PCT/CA2013/050232, filed Mar. 21, 2013, 13 pages.
Hudson, H.M., et al., “Reducing Treating Requirements for Cryogenic NGL Recovery Plants,” Proceedings of the 80th Annual Convention of the Gas Processors Association, Mar. 12, 2001, San Antonio, Texas, 15 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20150107297 A1 Apr 2015 US