The invention relates to a tension buffer system for multi-wire pay-off system, which provides a mechanical device to balance the tension difference between multiple wires in the pay-off system to produce a steel cord with constant tension and satisfactory quality.
It is known that the steel cord for the reinforcement of rubber products, for example pneumatic tires and conveyor belts, is made by twisting multiple wires together. In the twist process, each wire must be kept at a constant tensile before entering twist machine. In order to maintain the constant tension, most known devices are provided with an electronic detector to measure the tension of wires at a certain point and send the date to a processor and a motor to control the transport speed and the tension. It is not reliable that the electronic control has a time delay that leads to inaccuracy.
Prior art US2008/092510A1 discloses a mechanical tensile control device of a triple twist pay-off system, wherein wire tension is stabilized by the swing of weight block on the pivoted arm. But this device also has some drawbacks. Firstly, each of this tensile control device can only accommodate one wire, and multiple devices are needed according to the number of wires. Secondly, because of the difference on device manufacturing and assembly, the tension setting on devices can be different. Therefore, there is a need to provide a mechanical device which can not only accommodate multiple wires but also balance the tension difference between multiple wires.
The primary objective of present invention is to provide a tension buffer system for a multi-wire pay-off system to balance the tension difference between the multiple wires.
The second objective of present invention is to provide a simple and reliable tension buffer system which is robust and accurate to balance the tension difference between multiple wires.
According to present invention, a tension buffer system for a multi-wire pay-off system comprises guiding pulleys adapted to guide wires being paid off, and reversing pulleys. Each reversing pulley is adapted to guide a wire from the guiding pulley and back to the guiding pulley. Two reversing pulleys are rotatably mounted on a first support. The first support is pivoted around first support axis lying between the two reversing pulleys so that pivoting brings one of the two reversing pulleys closer to the guiding pulley while the other of the two reversing pulleys more remote from the guiding pulley.
The tension buffer system comprise at least two pairs of guiding pulley and reversing pulley.
Preferably, the tension buffer system further comprises a second support and another reversing pulley. The first support and the another reversing pulley are rotatably mounted on the second support. The second support is pivoted around second support axis lying between the first support and the another reversing pulley so that pivoting brings either one of the reversing pulleys on the first support or the another reversing pulley closer to the guiding pulley while the other reversing pulleys more remote from the guiding pulley.
Preferably, the tension buffer system further comprises a second support and another first support mounted with two reversing pulleys. The two first supports are rotatably mounted on the second support. The second support is pivoted around second support axis lying between the two first supports so that pivoting brings one of the two first supports closer to the guiding pulley while the other of the two first supports more remote from the guiding pulley.
Preferably, the guiding pulleys are con-centric.
Preferably, the angle A between the two lines connecting the centre of reversing pulleys on the first support and the centre of first support axis facing the guiding pulley is less than 180 degree.
Preferably, the angle B between the line connecting the centre of first support axis and the centre of second support axis and the line connecting the centre of another reversing pulley and the centre of the second support axis facing the guiding pulley is less than 180 degree.
Preferably, the angle C between the two lines connecting the centre of first support axis and the centre of second support axis facing the guiding pulley is less than 180 degree.
The invention will now be described into more detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.
Since the tension buffer system 2 comprises two pairs of guiding pulley 4 and reversing pulley 8, there are two wires 6 being paid-off in the system. In operation, each wire 6 exerts a force F on the reversing pulley 8, and the force F exerts a torque to the first support axis 12. If the torques exerted by the two wires 6 are equal, the tension buffer system stays stable. If the tensions of the two wires 6 are different, the higher the tension the higher the force F, the torque difference will drive the pivoting of the first support 10, which brings the reversing pulley 8 with higher tension closer to the guiding pulley 4 while the reversing pulley 8 with lower tension more remote from the guiding pulley 4. With this pivoting, higher tension is reduced because the reversing pulley 8 goes closer to the guiding pulley 4, while the lower tension is increased because the reversing pulley 8 goes more remote to the guiding pulley 4. With above mechanism, the tension difference between wires 6 is balanced by the pivoting of the first support 10. According to physics principle, torque T=distance vector r×force vector F, if the distance vector r is set equal, the torque T will be equal when the force vector F is equal. Therefore, to simplify the tension buffer system, it is better to set the first support 10, the reversing pulleys 8 and guiding pulleys 4 in a symmetric structure against the centre line 18 connecting the centre of first support axis 12 and the center of the guiding pulleys 4. In a symmetric structure, the distance vectors r for the two reversing pulleys 8 are equal, and the equal tension force on the two reversing pulleys 8 will keep the first support 10 in balance.
The angle A between the two lines A1 and A2 connecting the centre of reversing pulleys 8 on the first support 10 and the centre of first support axis 12 facing the guiding pulley 4 is less than 180 degree. This design provides a free swing of the buffer system to balance the tension difference between the two wires 6. The angle A can be set at 180 degree or even more than 180 degree, but stops are needed to limit the swing of the buffer system.
The angle B between the line B1 connecting the centre of first support axis 12 and the centre of second support axis 16 and the line B2 connecting the centre of another reversing pulley 8 and the centre of the second support axis 16 facing the guiding pulley 4 is less than 180 degree. This design provides a free swing of the buffer system to balance the tension difference between the wires 6. The angle B can be set at 180 degree or even more than 180 degree, but stops are needed to limit the swing of the buffer system.
The angle C between the two lines C1 and C2 connecting the centre of first support axis 12 and the centre of second support axis 16 facing the guiding pulley 4 is less than 180 degree. This design provides a free swing of the buffer system to balance the tension difference between the wires 6. The angle C can be set at 180 degree or even more than 180 degree, but stops are needed to limit the swing of the buffer system.
For the similar reasoning, further adding a third support with corresponding second support 14 and first support 10, provides a tension buffer system for 5, 6, 7, 8 wires. Similarly, further adding more supports can provide a tension buffer system for more wires.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/CN2015/072533 | Feb 2015 | WO | international |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2016/052472 | 2/5/2016 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2016/128309 | 8/18/2016 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2159635 | Ranney | May 1939 | A |
2417780 | Parvin | Mar 1947 | A |
2929569 | Detrick | Mar 1960 | A |
2995316 | Burnell | Aug 1961 | A |
3346019 | Brosseit | Oct 1967 | A |
3477653 | Peene | Nov 1969 | A |
3533358 | Leuenberger | Oct 1970 | A |
3565357 | Takashi Noguchi | Feb 1971 | A |
3578795 | Polese | May 1971 | A |
4062504 | Kitazawa | Dec 1977 | A |
4604860 | Matsuura | Aug 1986 | A |
5169479 | Hoddinott | Dec 1992 | A |
5657941 | Simons | Aug 1997 | A |
20010002561 | Shiraga | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20040262444 | Robitaille | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20080092510 | Hsu | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20120018564 | Schmitz | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20190224734 | Nguen | Jul 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
387 512 | Jan 1965 | CH |
650 723 | Oct 1937 | DE |
967 171 | Oct 1957 | DE |
29 49 842 | Sep 1980 | DE |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report dated Apr. 20, 2016 in International (PCT) Application No. PCT/EP2016/052472. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180022568 A1 | Jan 2018 | US |