Test socket and methods

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6593764
  • Patent Number
    6,593,764
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, October 29, 2002
    22 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 15, 2003
    21 years ago
Abstract
A test socket for testing a packaged semiconductor device. The test socket includes a test substrate, at least one support member, and at least one securing member. Terminals of the test substrate are electrically connectable to a testing device. The terminals may by located within recesses that are configured to receive leads. The shapes of each support member and securing member may be complementary to the respective shapes of the bottom and top surfaces of leads extending from the packaged semiconductor device. Upon placement of a packaged semiconductor device on the test substrate, the leads are aligned with and positioned against their corresponding terminals and the support member. The securing elements are then placed against the leads to bias each lead against its corresponding terminal.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Field of the Invention




The present invention relates to test sockets for vertical surface mount packaged semiconductor devices. In particular, the present invention relates to test sockets for vertical surface mount packaged semiconductor devices which include bent leads. More particularly, the test socket of the present invention engages and readily releases the leads of one or more vertical surface mount packages.




2. Background of Related Art




Semiconductor devices are routinely subjected to testing for compliance with certain electrical performance requirements and bum-in testing. Numerous test sockets have been developed for these purposes. Many such test sockets have been designed for use with a particular type of packaged semiconductor device, such as dual in-line packages (DIPs), small outline packages (SOPs), small outline J-leaded packages (SOJs), and quad flat packages (QFPs).




Many test sockets include several electrically conductive terminals for establishing an electrical connection between one or more packaged semiconductor devices and a testing device attached to the test socket. Typically, such test sockets include several small, movable parts. Exemplary devices are found in the following U.S. Pat. Nos.: 3,573,617 (the “'617 patent”), issued to Ellwood A. Randolph, et al. on Apr. 6, 1971; 4,461,525 (the “'525 patent”), issued to Wendell L. Griffin on Jul. 24, 1984; 5,020,998 (the “'998 patent”), issued to Kiyokazu Ikeya and Masanori Yagi on Jun. 4, 1991; 5,208,529 (the “'529 patent”), issued to Kazuyuki Tsurishima and Teruaki Sakurada on May 4, 1993; 5,489,854 (the “'854 patent”), issued to Roy V. Buck and David N. Tesh on Feb. 6, 1996; 5,609,489 (the “'489 patent”), issued to Joel D. Bickford and Julius K. Botka on Mar. 11, 1997; and 5,628,635 (the “'635 patent”), issued to Kiyokazu Ikeya on May 13, 1997.




However, such test sockets are typically compatible with only a single type of packaged semiconductor device. Moreover, the parts of many test sockets in the prior art tend to wear under repeated use. Many test sockets are also problematic from the standpoint that the contacts thereof fail to accurately approximate the electrical connections that connect a packaged semiconductor device with a carrier substrate in actual use.




Many test sockets employ a cover or other device to ensure adequate electrical contact between the tested packaged semiconductor device and the test socket. The '998, '529, '854 and '489 patents each disclose test sockets which require the use of a cover or similar contact-ensuring device.




However, such devices typically exert force on the packaged semiconductor device, which could bend or otherwise damage the typically delicate leads that extend therefrom, as well as other parts of the packaged semiconductor device. Thus, the use of covers and other devices to force a packaged semiconductor device onto a test socket is somewhat undesirable. Moreover, covers and other contact-ensuring devices tend to prevent adequate heat transfer away from the tested package, and may therefore fail to recreate the conditions to which the packaged semiconductor device will be subjected in use. Further, covers and other such devices tend to be complex, increasing the cost of test sockets and the amount of time that is required to test packaged semiconductor devices.




Other test sockets clamp onto or otherwise apply force to a small portion of the leads of the tested packaged semiconductor device to establish an interference fit-type electrical contact between the leads and their corresponding terminals of the test socket. Exemplary devices are disclosed in the '617, '525 and '529 patents.




However, the use of clamps or other devices that unevenly exert force on the leads may bend or otherwise damage the typically delicate leads. Moreover, due to wear from repeated use, some test sockets fail to approximate the ohmic contact that would be made in actual use of the packaged semiconductor device. Thus, such test sockets may contribute to the generation of inaccurate test results.




What is needed is a test socket for vertical surface mount packaged semiconductor devices which approximates the actual use conditions to which the semiconductor device will be subjected, which facilitates the testing of several packaged semiconductor devices and is capable of frequently repeating the testing process on new sets of packaged semiconductor devices, and which protects and maintains the shape of the leads.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The angular compression test socket of the present invention includes a test substrate which includes a support member thereon and one or more clamps that are positionable against a substantial portion of the leads of a tested vertical surface mount packaged semiconductor device. The support member conforms to the shape of leads which extend from the packaged semiconductor device that is to be tested. Upon placement of a packaged semiconductor device on the test socket, the support member supports a bottom side of the packaged semiconductor device's leads. The clamps are shaped complementary to the opposite, upper surface of the leads.




In use of the test socket, a vertical surface mount packaged semiconductor device is oriented on the test socket such that the leads which extend from the package are aligned with their corresponding terminals on the test substrate. The clamps are then biased against the leads and exert a substantially equal amount of force along a substantial portion of the length of each lead. In combination with the opposite reactive force of the support member on the leads, the clamps establish an interference-fit type contact between each lead and its corresponding terminal on the test socket, electrically connecting the leads to their corresponding terminal.











Other advantages of the test socket of the present invention will become apparent to those of skill in the relevant art through careful consideration of the appended drawings and the ensuing description.




BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1



a


is a frontal perspective view of a first embodiment of the angular compression test socket according to the present invention, depicting the attachment of a vertical surface mount packaged semiconductor device with two sets of bent leads thereto;





FIG. 1



b


is a frontal perspective view of the vertical surface mount packaged semiconductor device upon the test socket, without the clamps disposed over the vertical surface mount packaged semiconductor device's leads;





FIG. 2

is a cross-section taken along line


2





2


of

FIG. 1



a;







FIGS. 3



a


through


3




c


are perspective views which illustrate variations of the support member;





FIG. 4

is a perspective view of a second embodiment of the angular compression test socket of the present invention;





FIG. 5

is a perspective view of a third embodiment of the angular compression test socket of the present invention;





FIGS. 6 through 8

depict various biasing devices which are useful in the test socket of the present invention;





FIG. 9

is a schematic representation of a system including the test socket of the present invention;





FIG. 10

is a perspective view of an embodiment of a biasing device that is useful with the test socket of the present invention;





FIG. 11

is a perspective view of another embodiment of a biasing device that is useful with the test socket of the present invention, illustrating a biasing position; and





FIG. 12

is a perspective view of the biasing device of

FIG. 11

, illustrating an insertion/removal position.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION





FIGS. 1



a


and


1




b


show a first embodiment of the angular compression test socket


10


of the present invention, which includes a test substrate


40


, a support member


41


carried on the test substrate and extending upwardly therefrom, and clamps


20


and


30


, which are attachable to the test substrate.





FIG. 2

shows a vertical surface mount packaged semiconductor device, which is also referred to as packaged semiconductor device


110


, and which includes two sets of bent leads


112


and


113


extending downward from the bottom edge


114


thereof. Packaged semiconductor device


110


is oriented over test substrate


40


such that a horizontal extension


116


,


117


of each of leads


112


,


113


, respectively, is aligned over its corresponding, electrically conductive terminal


42


,


43


of the test substrate. Horizontal extensions


116


extend in a different general direction than horizontal extensions


117


. The bent section


118


,


119


of each of leads


112


,


113


rests upon support surfaces


46


,


47


, respectively, of support member


41


, which are shaped complementary to the lower, inner surfaces of leads


112


,


113


.




Support member


41


may be formed integrally with test substrate


40


. Alternatively, as shown in

FIG. 3



a


, support member


41


′ may be removable from test substrate


40


′, facilitating the replacement of the same with support members of different shapes and/or sizes.

FIGS. 3



b


and


3




c


illustrate exemplary variations of removable support members


41


″ and


141


, respectively, which are useful in association with test socket


10


′. Such an interchangeable support member accommodates other packaged semiconductor devices having leads of different lengths and/or shapes.





FIG. 4

illustrates yet another variation of support member


141


′, wherein the support member is adapted to support the substantially perpendicularly bent leads


112


′,


113


′ of a vertical surface mount packaged semiconductor device


110


′.




Referring now to

FIG. 5

, test substrate


240


may also define a lead alignment notch


244


,


245


around each of terminals


242


,


243


, respectively. Lead alignment notch


244


,


245


functions as a guide to ensure the proper alignment of leads


112


,


113


(see

FIG. 2

) respective of their corresponding terminals


242


,


243


. Accordingly, the horizontal dimensions of lead alignment notch


244


,


245


are at least slightly larger than those of horizontal extension


116


,


117


(see

FIG. 2

) in order to facilitate the ready insertion of the horizontal extensions therein and ready removal of the same therefrom. The depth of lead alignment notch


244


,


245


may be smaller than the thickness of horizontal extension


116


,


117


in order to facilitate the biasing of the leads against their corresponding terminals


242


,


243


by clamps


20


,


30


(see FIG.


2


). Alternatively, clamps


220


,


230


may include downward extensions thereon, which are referred to as nodules


224


,


234


(clamp


230


and nodules


234


are not shown). Each nodule


224


,


234


is smaller than horizontal extension


116


,


117


and lead alignment notch


244


,


245


, and, in use, biases a lead


112


,


113


against its respective terminal.




Test substrate


40


and support member


41


are formed from a material which withstands the high temperatures that are typically generated by semiconductor devices during operation, resists expansion and deformation when exposed to such temperatures, has good thermal conductivity, is an electrical insulator, is formable into thin layers, and upon which metallic traces and terminals may be carried. Materials which are useful for manufacturing test substrate


40


and/or support member


41


include, without limitation, ceramics, FR


4


board, BT resins, borophosphosilicate glass (BPSG), phosphosilicate glass (PSG) and borosilicate glass (BSG). Test substrate


40


and support member


41


may be manufactured by known methods for fabricating carrier substrates.




Test substrate


40


may be adapted to accommodate one or several packaged semiconductor devices


110


. Preferably, test substrate


40


accommodates several packaged semiconductor devices


110


that are disposed in an end-to-end, in-line fashion (see FIG.


9


).




Referring back to

FIG. 2

, terminals


42


,


43


are positioned upon test substrate


40


such that they align with their corresponding leads


112


,


113


of the tested packaged semiconductor device(s)


110


. Although illustrated as including only a single set of terminals


42


,


43


, test socket


10


may include several sets of terminals to accommodate various types of packaged semiconductor devices, which have leads of different sizes, different numbers of leads, different lead shapes and/or different lead patterns.




As

FIG. 9

illustrates, terminals


42


,


43


are in electrical communication with a testing device


200


of the type known in the industry, such as an electrical property tester or a burn-in tester.




Referring again to

FIGS. 1



a


and


2


, a packaged semiconductor device


110


is secured to test substrate


40


with clamps


20


and


30


. The lower, inner surface of each of clamps


20


and


30


, which is referred to as a securing edge.


22


,


32


, is shaped complementary to the upper, outer surface of leads


112


,


113


, respectively. Thus, as clamps


20


,


30


are biased against leads


112


,


113


, they bias the leads against terminals


42


,


43


and support member


41


, securing packaged semiconductor device


110


to test substrate


40


and establishing an electrical communication between each of the leads and its corresponding terminal.




In order to place an adequate load on leads


112


,


113


to establish an electrical connection with terminals


42


,


43


, clamps


20


,


30


may engage test substrate


40


. As shown in

FIGS. 6 and 7

, mechanisms by which clamps


20


,


30


engage test substrate


40


include clamping elements


60


which extend upwardly from the test substrate and engage the clamps (see

FIG. 6

) or clamping elements


60


′ that extend downwardly from the clamps and engage the test substrate or securing receptacles


62


′ defined thereby (see FIG.


7


). Such mechanisms are referred to as biasing devices. Alternatively, with reference to

FIG. 8

, a mechanically actuated biasing device


80


which positions clamps


20


,


30


over leads


112


,


113


and places a sustained load thereon may also be used to secure a tested packaged semiconductor device to test substrate


40


and establish an electrical connection between leads and their corresponding terminals


42


,


43


.





FIG. 10

illustrates an embodiment of a biasing device


80


, wherein clamps


20


and


30


are biased against the leads of a semiconductor device (not shown), which are in turn biased against the corresponding terminals of a test substrate


40


, by vertical movement of the biasing device relative to the test substrate. As depicted, biasing device


80


is in a biasing position. The upward pointing arrows illustrate the direction in which biasing device


80


may be moved to place each of clamps


20


and


30


into an insertion/removal position. Biasing device


80


may also include two downwardly extending elements


85


and


86


that define a semiconductor device receptacle


87


. Upon downward movement of biasing device


80


relative to test substrate


40


, in order to secure a semiconductor device to the latter and test the semiconductor device, receptacle


87


may receive the semiconductor device.




Another embodiment of a biasing device


80


′, which is also referred to as an angular biasing device, is shown in

FIGS. 11 and 12

, wherein clamps


20


′ and


30


′ are biased against the leads of a semiconductor device (not shown), which are in turn biased against the corresponding terminals (not shown) of a test substrate


40


, by pivotal movement of components


82


′ and


83


′. As illustrated, components


82


′ and


83


′ are configured to facilitate the movement of clamps


20


′ and


30


′ between a biasing position (FIG.


11


), wherein they bias the leads against their corresponding terminals, and an insertion/removal position (FIG.


12


), wherein clamps


20


′ and


30


′ are moved away from the semiconductor device and the test substrate. Components


82


′ and


83


′ each include a pivot component


84


′ and


85


′, respectively, which secures and pivotally maintains the position of components


82


′ and


83


′ relative to test substrate


40


.




Preferably, each of the above-described biasing devices places a load on leads


112


,


113


which is directed orthogonally downward and inward relative to test substrate


40


and to the tested packaged semiconductor device


110


. Thus, a substantially equalized load is placed on leads


112


,


113


by clamps


20


,


30


.




The shapes of clamps


20


,


30


and support member


41


facilitate equalization of the load placed on leads


112


,


113


by clamps


20


,


30


. Additionally, the shapes of clamps


20


,


30


and support member


41


preferably prevent damage to the leads during testing.




Clamps


20


,


30


are preferably rigid in order to establish and maintain an adequate electrical connection between leads


112


,


113


and their corresponding terminals


42


,


43


; durable so that they will withstand frequent, repeated use; electrically non-conductive so that they do not diminish the accuracy of the test data; withstand the high temperatures that are typically generated by semiconductor devices during operation; and resist expansion and deformation when exposed to such temperatures. Materials which are useful for manufacturing clamps


20


,


30


include, but are not limited to, fiber reinforced plastics, ceramics, and electrical insulator-coated metals.




Referring again to

FIG. 2

, in use, one or more packaged semiconductor devices


110


are oriented over test substrate


40


such that leads


112


,


113


align with their corresponding terminals


42


,


43


and support member


41


is positioned beneath and between leads


112


and


113


. Clamps


20


,


30


are positioned over leads


112


,


113


, respectively, and biased thereagainst. Testing device


200


(see

FIG. 9

) then conveys electrical impulses through selected ones of terminals


42


,


43


to their corresponding leads in order to test packaged semiconductor devices


110


.




Advantageously, clamps


20


,


30


support vertically mountable packaged semiconductor devices


110


substantially perpendicularly relative to test substrate


40


, approximating the orientation of such packaged semiconductor devices during the actual use thereof. Additionally, the shapes of securing edges


22


,


32


of clamps


20


,


30


and support member


41


, which are complementary to the shape of leads


112


,


113


, maintain the shape of the leads during testing. Further, clamps


20


,


30


bias leads


112


,


113


against their corresponding terminals


42


,


43


and support member


41


, providing a zero insertion force test socket. Consequently, the likelihood that test socket


10


will bend or otherwise damage leads


112


,


113


is relatively small when compared with many test sockets in the prior art. Moreover, the direct electrical connection between leads


112


,


113


and terminals


42


,


43


better approximates an actual use electrical connection by substantially reducing the inductance and impedance created by the contacts of many prior art test sockets. Thus, test socket


10


also provides test data which more accurately represents actual in-use characteristics of the tested packaged semiconductor device


110


than many test sockets in the prior art.




Although the foregoing description contains many specificities, these should not be construed as limiting the scope of the present invention, but merely as providing illustrations of some of the presently preferred embodiments. Similarly, other embodiments of the invention may be devised which do not depart from the spirit or scope of the present invention indicated by the appended claims and their equivalents. All additions, deletions and modifications which fall within the meaning and scope of the claims are embraced within their scope.



Claims
  • 1. A test socket for use in testing a semiconductor device package, comprising:a substrate comprising at least one terminal to be contacted by at least one lead of the semiconductor device package; a support member on said substrate for supporting at least a portion of said at least one lead; and a biasing element for removably securing said at least one lead to said at least one terminal without substantially deforming said at least one lead.
  • 2. The test socket of claim 1, wherein said support member includes a surface shaped complementary to at least a portion of a bottom surface of said at least one lead.
  • 3. The test socket of claim 1, wherein said biasing element is shaped complementary to at least a portion of a top surface of said at least one lead.
  • 4. The test socket of claim 1, wherein said at least one terminal is recessed relative to a surface of said substrate.
  • 5. The test socket of claim 4, wherein a recessed area of said substrate is configured to at least partially receive said at least one lead.
  • 6. The test socket of claim 1, wherein said biasing element comprises at least one protrusion.
  • 7. The test socket of claim 6, wherein, upon placement of said biasing element over said at least one lead, said at least one protrusion is biased against said at least one lead.
  • 8. The test socket of claim 1, wherein said support member is removable from said substrate.
  • 9. The test socket of claim 1, further comprising a biasing component for forcing said biasing element toward said support member.
  • 10. The test socket of claim 1, wherein said support member is configured to support a plurality of leads of the semiconductor device package that extend in different directions from one another.
  • 11. The test socket of claim 10, further comprising at least one additional biasing element.
  • 12. A system for testing a packaged semiconductor device, comprising:a testing device; and a test socket operatively connected with said testing device and comprising: a substrate; at least one terminal on said substrate; at least one support member on said substrate for supporting at least a portion of at least one lead of the packaged semiconductor device; and at least one biasing element for reversibly securing the at least one lead to said at least one terminal so as to establish an electrical connection between the packaged semiconductor device and said testing device without substantially deforming the at least one lead.
  • 13. The system of claim 12, wherein said at least one support member comprises at least one support surface shaped complementary to said at least a portion of said at least one lead to be placed thereagainst.
  • 14. The system of claim 12, wherein said at least one biasing element comprises a securing surface shaped complementary to at least a portion of a top surface of the at least one lead against which said securing surface is to be positioned.
  • 15. The system of claim 12, wherein said at least one terminal is recessed relative to a surface of said substrate.
  • 16. The system of claim 15, wherein a recessed area of said substrate is configured to receive at least a portion of the at least one lead.
  • 17. The system of claim 15, wherein said at least one biasing element comprises at least one protrusion.
  • 18. The system of claim 17, wherein, upon placement of said at least one biasing element over the at least one lead, said at least one protrusion biases the at least one lead against said at least one terminal.
  • 19. The system of claim 12, wherein said at least one support member and said at least one biasing element are interchangeable with at least one other support member and at least one other biasing element.
Parent Case Info

This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 10/034,713, filed Dec. 28, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,472,893, issued Oct. 29, 2002, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 09/887,764, filed Jun. 22, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,340,896, issued Jan. 22, 2002, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 09/472,406, filed Dec. 27, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,262,583, issued Jul. 17, 2001, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 09/007,947, filed Jan. 16, 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,118,291, issued Sep. 12, 2000.

US Referenced Citations (16)
Number Name Date Kind
3184699 Spera May 1965 A
3335227 Damon et al. Aug 1967 A
3354394 James Nov 1967 A
3366914 McManus et al. Jan 1968 A
3391383 Antes Jul 1968 A
3573617 Randolph et al. Apr 1971 A
3719917 Fischer et al. Mar 1973 A
4426689 Henle et al. Jan 1984 A
4461525 Griffin Jul 1984 A
5020998 Ikeya et al. Jun 1991 A
5208529 Tsurishima et al. May 1993 A
5489854 Buck et al. Feb 1996 A
5609489 Bickford et al. Mar 1997 A
5628635 Ikeya May 1997 A
5779488 Cluff Jul 1998 A
6472893 Martin et al. Oct 2002 B2
Continuations (4)
Number Date Country
Parent 10/034713 Dec 2001 US
Child 10/283005 US
Parent 09/887764 Jun 2001 US
Child 10/034713 US
Parent 09/472406 Dec 1999 US
Child 09/887764 US
Parent 09/007947 Jan 1998 US
Child 09/472406 US