The invention relates to a thermal analysis method based on differential type measurement.
The invention also relates to apparatus for performing such a method.
In the field of thermal analysis and calorimetry, there exist various ways of proceeding with differential measurements. The oldest is differential thermal analysis (DTA). In that method, two identical cells, one of which contains a sample under investigation, and the other of which contains a reference substance, are subjected to temperature variation over time, typically a ramp (i.e. a linear increase in temperature), under conditions that are identical. The temperature difference between the two cells is measured continuously by one or more thermometers (thermocouples, thermopiles, resistive probes, etc.). If during the ramp, the sample is subjected to a physicochemical transformation, such as a change of phase, or if it presents a change in its heat capacity, the temperature of the cell containing the sample varies in a manner that is different from the temperature of the reference cell. During a ramp, the temperature difference measurement between the two cells is thus representative of a thermal event due to the sample (physicochemical transformation, variation in heat capacity, etc.).
The method that is presently the most widespread, that of differential scanning enthalpy measurement or differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), is derived from the above longstanding method. There are two main varieties. The first is referred to as power compensated differential scanning calorimetry. During the ramp, the two cells are maintained at the same temperature by using two heater elements, each situated in a respective cell. Under such circumstances, the power difference that needs to be delivered via the heater elements (or to be extracted via cooling elements) in order to keep said temperature difference between the two cells equal to zero is measured directly. This power compensated differential measurement is thus directly representative of the physicochemical transformation (including variation in heat capacity) that occurs in the sample during the ramp. The second is referred to as heat flux differential scanning calorimetry. The heat flux difference associated with the temperature difference between the cells is measured without compensation and by means of a thermal element (thermocouple, thermopile). When operating in this way, and like differential thermal analysis, only the temperature difference (more precisely the heat flux difference through the thermo-element(s)) is representative of the physicochemistry of the sample. For an introduction to such techniques, reference may be made to the following works: S. Randzio, Recent developments in calorimetry, Ann. Rep. Prog. Chem. (The Royal Society of Chemistry) sect. C, 94, pp. 433-504 (1998); C. Eyraud and A. Accary, Analyses thermique et calorimétrique différentielles [Differential thermal and calorimetric analyses], Techniques de l'Ingénieur, traité Analyse et Caractérisations, P1295, pp. 1-15 (1992); M. Brun and P. Claudy, Méthodes Thermiques, Microcalorimétrie [Thermal methods, microcalorimetry], Techniques de l'Ingénieur, traitée Analyse et Caractérisations, P1200, pp. 1-23 (1983); and C. B. Murphy, Differential thermal analysis, Anal. Chem., 30, pp. 867-872, 1958.
In addition to the two above conventional thermal analysis methods, there has been an explosion over the last tens of years in novel methods that provide for the use of temperature variations over time of a “non-trivial” type. In those methods, the temperature variations of the two cells are required to follow well-determined functions of time that are selected by the experimenter (sawteeth, oscillations, oscillations superposed on the usual linear ramp. Examples of such techniques are provided by documents U.S. Pat. No. 5,224,775 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,170,984. Those documents refer to the method known as temperature modulated differential scanning enthalpy measurement or as temperature modulated differential scanning calorimetry (TMDSC), in which temperature oscillation is superposed on a linear ramp. Separating the steady and oscillating components of the difference in temperature (or in heat flux when performing differential measurements in heat flux mode) makes it possible to access data having different physical meanings.
Those differential thermal analysis techniques constitute tools that are very powerful for thermally characterizing substances, and applications are to be found in materials science, earth sciences, physics, chemistry, pharmaceutical engineering, and in the agricultural and food industry, etc. Nevertheless they suffer from certain drawbacks.
A first drawback is associated with the fact that, in practice, the sample and the reference substance do not have exactly the same heat capacity. Often, they also present differences in terms of their contact properties with the walls of the measurement cells, and thus with their interface thermal conductances. Furthermore, depending on how the calorimeters are constructed, the heat transfer coefficients between each cell and the thermal bath are never perfectly identical. This leads to systematic errors.
To remedy that drawback, at least in part, it is common practice to subtract a reference curve, known as a “base line”, from the differential measurement, which base line is obtained during an independent measurement performed using the same reference substance in both measurement cells. In theory, that subtraction makes it possible to overcome the effects of the thermal asymmetry of the equipment, which effects ought in practice to occur identically in both measurements and ought therefore to be completely eliminated by subtraction. Nevertheless, in practice, it is impossible for the instantaneous thermal conditions (interference, temperature drifts, electronic drifts, sensor drifts, etc.) to be exactly the same during both of those two different measurements. Consequently, errors remain.
A second drawback is that when the calorimeter system is well designed and its noise level concerning temperature measurement is due solely to the noise of the sensor, the principle of differential measurement does not make it possible to improve measurement resolution, since that is determined by the signal-to-noise ratio of the sensor.
A third drawback is encountered when the physical magnitude of interest is not the magnitude that is provided “directly” by the measurement (e.g. the heat capacity of the sample), but is its derivative relative to temperature. This derivative may be obtained by numerical calculation: however it is well known that any such operation has the effect of amplifying any high frequency noise to which the measurement is subject.
The invention seeks to mitigate, at least in part, at least one of the above-mentioned drawbacks of the prior art.
The principle on which the invention is based consists, during differential measurement, in using two samples that are substantially identical, and that present a known temperature difference, instead of using a sample and a reference. Thus, the interface thermal conditions are identical in both cells and no longer give rise to systematic errors.
In addition, the method acts directly to provide the derivative of the physical magnitude of interest (typically the heat capacity) relative to temperature. There is therefore no longer any need to have recourse to a numerical differentiation operation. If it is heat capacity that is desired, then it is possible to obtain it by numerical integration: this results in a reduction in noise level compared with known techniques of the prior art.
In addition, the initial temperature difference between the two samples provides an additional degree of freedom that enables the user to optimize the measurement method as a function of the physical or physicochemical phenomena that are to be revealed. The signal-to-noise ratio increases with an increase in this temperature difference; however the temperature resolution of the measurement is improved for small temperature differences. Similarly, a fast variation in temperature during the ramp gives rise to a good signal-to-noise ratio but to poor temperature resolution. Thus, a method of the invention provides its user with the possibility of acting on two parameters (initial temperature difference and rate of temperature variation) in order to find an optimum between the contradictory requirements concerning signal-to-noise ratio and temperature resolution, instead of having only one parameter available (rate of temperature variation), as in the prior art.
More precisely, the invention provides a thermal analysis method, the method comprising differential measurement of a physical parameter between two samples that are subjected to temperature variation under equivalent conditions, said method being characterized in that said samples are substantially identical as to their composition and as to their thermal properties, and, at the beginning of measurement, they present an initial temperature difference of known magnitude.
The exact meaning of the term “equivalent conditions” depends on the particular implementation, and in particular on the technique actually used for imposing said temperature variation. Thus, in certain circumstances, the samples follow the same temperature variation, which means that (slightly) different heat powers need to be delivered thereto; in contrast, in other circumstances, they are subjected to the same heat power, and as a result their temperature variations are not necessarily identical; in yet other circumstances, they are coupled in the same manner to a common thermal bath of variable temperature. Under all circumstances, useful information can be extracted specifically because the temperature variation of the two samples is produced under conditions that are as similar as possible, except for the initial temperature difference.
In particular, the differential measurement may serve to determine a thermal property of a sample selected from: the heat capacity of the samples, its derivative relative to temperature, or a latent heat.
In particular implementations of the invention:
The invention also provides a thermal analysis apparatus for determining a thermal property of a sample, the apparatus comprising a differential calorimeter measurement head and being characterized in that it further comprises control means for controlling said measurement head and for analyzing data obtained by the measurement, the control means being adapted to implement a method as described above.
In particular:
Other characteristics, details, and advantages of the invention appear on reading the following description made with reference to the accompanying drawings given by way of example and in which:
In the figures, elements that are identical or analogous are identified by the same reference numerals.
The measurement head TM has two measurement cells 50 and 51 that are thermally connected to a thermal bath 52 of heat capacity that may be considered as being infinite compared with that of each of the two cells 50 and 51. The thermal connection 53 between cell and the bath 52 is represented by a heat transfer coefficient K that is identical for both cells. This thermal connection takes place in different ways depending on the various calorimeter appliances that might be used (heat transfer gas, thermal conductance of a determined material, etc.). The two cells 50 and 51 are thermally isolated from each other, and they are substantially identical from a thermal point of view. Each cell includes a thermometer element 54 or 55 and a heater element 56 or 57 (in theory, a cooling element could equally well be used, but that is unusual). The thermometer element may operate on a variety of measurement principles: resistive thermometry, thermocouple thermometry, thermopile, etc. All of these techniques are commonly used in calorimetry. These thermometer elements 54 and 55 are connected in differential mode, e.g. using a Wheatstone bridge, so as to give the temperature difference between the two cells 50 and 51. This temperature difference is amplified by an amplifier 58, converted into a digital signal by an analog-to-digital converter 66, and then transferred to the control and data processor unit 60 for processing in real or deferred time.
The “absolute” temperature of one or both of the cells 50 and 51 may itself be measured, amplified, converted into digital format, and transferred to the control and processor unit 60 (not shown). This may be necessary for performing certain implementations of the invention, as explained below.
The heater (or cooling) elements 56 and 57 are controlled by the control and processor unit 60 via the digital-to-analog converter 67 and the current source 61, so as to deliver predetermined heat power to the two cells 50 and 51 (which power may be negative, should cooling elements be in use).
Establishing an initial temperature difference between the two cells (and also establishing power compensation, if any, if the apparatus is used in power compensated DSC mode), requires additional power to be delivered, which additional power may be provided by an independent current source 64, connected to one of the heater elements (the element 56 in this example).
The thermal bath 52 is also provided with a thermometer 62 (and an associated amplifier 65) and with a heater or cooling element (63), likewise under the control of the control and processor unit 60 via the digital-to-analog converter 67 and another current source 70. Generally, it is by means of this set of thermometer elements 62 and heater elements 63 that the temperature ramps or any other temperature variation are produced in the cells 50 and 51. Under such circumstances, the elements 56 and 57 act solely as differential heater or cooling means for establishing the initial temperature difference (and where applicable they also act as power compensation means).
In a variant, the heater elements 56 and 57 may be used directly for producing the temperature variations desired for the cells 50 and 51.
The measurement head TM may be subdivided into three different links. The acquisition link or differential measurement link comprises the two thermometers 54 and 55, the differential temperature measurement amplifier 58, and one or more acquisition cards included in the converter 66, or being connected to the control and processor unit 60. The temperature regulation link is servo-controlled to the differential measurement link, e.g. by a proportional integral differential (PID) control loop; it comprises the two heater elements 56 and 57, the current sources 61 and 64, and the digital-to-analog converter 67, together with the control and processor unit 60. The third link comprises a thermometer 62 with its own measurement system (amplifier 65, analog-to-digital converter 66, unit 60), and the heater element 63 with its control system connecting it to the unit 60 so as to control the temperature of the thermal bath 52.
The measurement head of the
While performing the measurement, the temperature of the set S and the temperature of the set R both follow a temperature ramp that is imposed either by means of the bath 52 or directly by the two heater elements 56 and 57. The temperature difference between the sets S and R, written ΔT in
In power compensated differential scanning enthalpy analysis, the heat power difference absorbed by the reference 85 and by the sample 84, in particular as a result of the physicochemical changes to which the sample is subjected, is compensated instantaneously by means of the two heaters 56 and 57. This compensation differential heat power is measured directly by a system that is not shown in
Unlike the method of
In addition, a determined temperature difference, written ΔT and represented diagrammatically by an arrow 81, is imposed between the two sets S, S′ and is servo-controlled to a constant value that is not zero by the heater elements 56 and 57. In a manner analogous to that which occurs in the method of
Unlike that which occurs in the prior art method, it is important to observe that the substances contained in both measurement cells 50 and 51 are subjected during the temperature ramp to physicochemical transformations that are the same, but at instants that are different.
According to the operating principle described with reference to
There follows a mathematical description of the measurement principle in a non-limiting implementation of the invention.
Let TS and CS be the temperature and the heat capacity of the set S, let TS′ and CS′ be the temperature and the heat capacity of the set S′, let TB be the temperature of the thermal bath, so ΔT=TS−TS′, and let K be the thermal coupling coefficient between each of the two sets S, S′ and the bath.
The temperatures of the two cells obey the general energy conservation law, which is described by a system of first-order linear differential equations that is written as follows:
in which PS and PS′ are the powers delivered to the sets S and S′ by the heater elements 56 and 57, respectively.
By writing TS=TS′+ΔT, the following is obtained:
By taking the difference between these two equations, and by writing ΔP=PS−PS′ and ΔC=CS−CS′, the following is obtained:
It is now assumed that the heater element 57 is controlled so as to give rise to a linear increase (a ramp) in the temperature of the set S′ with
constant, and that the temperature TS is servo-controlled to track the same ramp by using the heater element 56, so as to maintain ΔT=ΔT0 constant (and thus
).
This gives:
ΔP−K·ΔT( )=ΔCβ (4)
Another simplification is obtained by subdividing the power difference ΔP into two terms: a constant term ΔP0 that serves to establish the initial temperature difference ΔT0, and that is exactly equal to KΔT0, and a compensation term ΔPC that enables ΔT=ΔT0 to be maintained during the temperature ramp. This gives:
ΔPC=ΔCβ (5)
At this point, it must be considered that the sets S and S′ are identical, except for their temperatures. The heat capacity difference ΔC is due entirely to this temperature difference and it may be written:
ΔC=CS−CS′=CS(TS+ΔT)−CS(TS′) (6)
By substituting (6) into (5) and dividing the right-hand and left-hand members by βΔT, the following is obtained:
where the temperature index “S′” has been omitted and, where:
Equation (7) shows that measuring the compensation differential heat power, for the constant temperature difference between the two sets and for the given rate of temperature variation makes it possible to determine the derivative of the capacities of the samples relative to temperature. During the ramp, TS (and thus
to be calculated over the full extent of said range. The value of the heat capacity of the samples as a function of temperature CS(T) can thus be obtained merely by numerical integration; the integration constant may be determined, if necessary, by an independent calorimetry measurement.
Equation (7) enables
to be determined only approximately. In principle, the approximation (and thus temperature resolution) improves with decreasing ΔT; however the ratio of the signal (ΔPC) to the measurement noise improves with increasing ΔT. It is therefore necessary to find the best compromise between these two contradictory requirements. Equation (7) shows that the measured signal (ΔPC) increases with increasing rate of temperature rise (i.e. with increasing β); however a ramp that is too fast also has effects that are adverse in terms of the temperature resolution of the measurement, since the thermal time constant of the calorimeter then needs to be taken into account; it would then be necessary to deconvolve the signal so as to take this time constant into account. It is therefore necessary to optimize the parameters ΔT and β as a function of the properties of the sample to be studied.
By way of example, consideration may be given to a material that presents two sudden variations of heat capacity at temperatures that are close together, being associated with two phase transitions. These variations are revealed by two close-together peaks of the derivative
and thus of the compensation differential thermal heat power ΔPC. Under such conditions, and in principle, there will be a signal that is of relatively large magnitude, but it is necessary to take a measurement with good temperature resolution in order to be able to separate the two peaks. It is thus preferable to use relatively small values of ΔT and β for the measurement. For example, it is preferable for ΔT not to exceed one-tenth of the separation between the peaks, or of the width of each peak. In contrast, for a sample that presents variation in its heat capacity that is slow and regular, it is possible to sacrifice temperature resolution in order to improve the signal-to-noise ratio.
In general, an indicative criterion is that ΔT should generally not exceed one-tenth or one-hundredth of the amplitude of the range of temperature values in which the measurement is performed (i.e. the range of temperature values that are scanned by the ramp).
A measurement in accordance with the invention may also be performed in heat flux mode, without power compensation. When performing such a measurement, the temperature of the sample 84′ may be servo-controlled to track a linear increase (a ramp) resulting from variation in the temperature of the thermal bath. Under such conditions, the temperature difference between the two samples does not remain constant. It is possible to write ΔT(t)=ΔT0+δT(t). Measuring this temperature difference makes it possible to determine the derivative of the heat capacity of the sample relative to temperature.
To understand that, it is possible to start from above equation (3). Unlike power compensation mode, the power difference ΔP is kept constant and equal to KΔT0:
i.e.:
If the temperature rise is not too fast, and if the temperature difference δT(t) varies relatively slowly compared with the time constant of the calorimeter, it is possible to simplify equation (9) by ignoring the term
By dividing the left-hand and right-hand members by ΔT=ΔT0+δT and by replacing ΔC with CS(T+ΔT)−CS(T), the following is obtained:
The remarks made above concerning the optimum values for the parameters β and ΔT in the power compensation method apply likewise in this implementation of the invention.
Since in the method of the invention the measurement cells 50 and 51 contain substances that are substantially identical, it can be expected that the thermal asymmetries associated with interface problems will be eliminated compared with prior art methods. Nevertheless, other thermal asymmetries arising from the way in which calorimeters are made are never completely absent: that is why it can be appropriate to determine a “base line”, as in prior art methods, which base line is to be subtracted from the measurement results. The base line is determined by performing a measurement in accordance with the invention; put simply, the “sample” used is a “neutral substance” that does not present any change of state in the measurement temperature range and that has heat capacity that is relatively constant throughout the range.
Nevertheless, it should be observed that this step of determining and subtracting the base line is much less important than in the prior art. The error that results from the asymmetry generally does not exceed a few percent (10−2) of the value of
When CS(T) is calculated by integrating its derivative as obtained by performing a measurement in accordance with the invention,
the integration constant CS0 is clearly preponderant, and the integral contributes only a few percent or a few parts per thousand (10−2, 10−3). The error due to asymmetry affecting the measurement of
therefore represents, in all, only 10−4 to 10−5 of the heat capacity. In contrast, in the prior art, the asymmetry error affects the heat capacity measurement directly and is of the order of several percent thereof.
The theory on which the invention is based is described above in detail in the context of a temperature ramp that is linear, in which
for constant β. In reality, it is possible to use non-linear time variation of temperature, providing it is possible to approximate it with piecewise linear variation so as to be able to define the value of β locally. In particular, it is entirely possible to implement the method of the invention with “alternating” calorimetry, in which sinusoidal temperature variation is superposed on a ramp that is linear or quasi-linear.
The notion of piecewise linear variation also covers the situation in which, for a certain period, the temperature of one of the samples or both of them remains constant in spite of heat power being delivered thereto. This situation occurs, for example, in the presence of a first-order phase transition. Under such conditions, the notion of heat capacity temporarily ceases to have meaning, and needs to be replaced by the concept of latent heat, however the method of the invention nevertheless enables a “thermal event” to be revealed that provides information about the physical properties of the samples. The same situation also occurs in known techniques of the prior art.
On comparing magnifications of the curves C1 and C2, as shown in
In the description above, it is assumed that the samples are located inside closed cells. That is not always necessary: commercially-available calorimeters that are suitable for being adapted to implementing the invention only have supports that are similar to the trays of a balance, incorporating thermometer and heater elements and on which the samples are merely placed, possibly enclosed in capsules. More generally, any kind of receptacle can be suitable for providing measurement cells for performing the invention.
The implementation of the invention based on the power compensation principle is described above on the basis of an example in which the variation in the temperature of the samples is obtained directly by means of individual heater or cooling elements associated with each cell. Conversely, the implementation without power compensation is described with reference to an example in which the temperature of the samples is varied by means of a thermal bath. It should be understood that these examples are not limiting: whatever the measurement technique used, the variation in temperature may be controlled either directly, or by means of a thermal bath, or by a combination of both methods. This is already known in the prior art.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0708660 | Dec 2007 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/FR2008/001700 | 12/5/2008 | WO | 00 | 9/30/2010 |