Thermally conductive member and method for producing thermally conductive member

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10781312
  • Patent Number
    10,781,312
  • Date Filed
    Friday, January 27, 2017
    7 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 22, 2020
    4 years ago
Abstract
Provided is a thermally conductive member having excellent thermal resistance and insulating properties.The thermally conductive member includes a silicone resin, a thermally conductive filler having a larger particle diameter from 30 um to 100 μm, a thermally conductive filler having a smaller particle diameter of not greater than 10 um, and mica having a particle diameter of not greater than 10 um and an aspect ratio of not greater than 50. The mica is added at a ratio of from 0.9 to 11 parts by mass relative to 100 parts by mass of the silicone resin.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to a thermally conductive member and a method for producing a thermally conductive member.


BACKGROUND ART

A thermally conductive member including a silicone resin filled with silicon carbide as a thermally conductive filler has been known (for example, see Patent Literature 1). Such a thermally conductive member is disposed in contact with a heating element such as an electronic component and used, to promote heat dissipation from the heating element. Specifically, a sheet-shaped thermally conductive member is interposed between a heating element and a heat sink and used.


Meanwhile, in recent years, attention has been paid to a next-generation power semiconductor using silicon carbide (SiC) or the like. Such a power semiconductor can be used at a high temperature at which use of the power semiconductor has not been realized (for example, not lower than 200° C.). Moreover, the maximum heating temperature is expected to be not lower than 250° C. in the future.


CITATION LIST
Patent Literature

Patent Literature 1: Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. 2004-6981A


Technical Problem

A known thermally conductive member has a problem in insulating properties that is not secured when the thermally conductive member is used at the high temperature described above.


SUMMARY OF INVENTION

An object of the present invention is to provide a thermally conductive member having excellent thermal resistance and insulating properties and a method for producing the same.


Solution to Problem

The present inventors have earnestly studied to achieve the object, and as a result, have found that a thermally conductive member including a silicone resin, a thermally conductive filler having a larger particle diameter from 30 μm to 100 μm, a thermally conductive filler having a smaller particle diameter of not greater than 10 μm, and mica having a particle diameter of not greater than 10 μm and an aspect ratio of not greater than 50, wherein the mica is added at a ratio of from 0.9 to 11 parts by mass relative to 100 parts by mass of the silicone resin, has excellent thermal resistance and insulating properties. The present invention has been completed.


In the thermally conductive member, it is preferable that a total filling amount of the thermally conductive filler having a larger particle diameter and the thermally conductive filler having a smaller particle diameter relative to whole volume of the thermally conductive member be from 50 to 60 vol. %, and a filling ratio by volume of the thermally conductive filler having a larger particle diameter to the thermally conductive filler having a smaller particle diameter be from 2:3 to 4:1.


In thermally conductive member, it is preferable that the thermally conductive filler having a smaller particle diameter include silicon carbide.


In the thermally conductive member, it is preferable that the thermally conductive filler having a larger particle diameter include at least one selected from the group consisting of low soda alumina, aluminum nitride, and boron nitride.


In the thermally conductive member, it is preferable that the low soda alumina contain soluble sodium in an amount of not greater than 100 ppm.


Moreover, a method for producing a thermally conductive member of the present invention includes adding and mixing a thermally conductive filler having a larger particle diameter from 30 μm to 100 μm, a thermally conductive filler having a smaller particle diameter of not greater than 10 μm, and mica having a particle diameter of not greater than 10 μm and an aspect ratio of not greater than 50 into an uncured silicone resin, to obtain a mixture, and curing the mixture to obtain a thermally conductive member including a cured product of the mixture.


Advantageous Effects of Invention

The present invention can provide a thermally conductive member having excellent thermal resistance and insulating properties and a method for producing the same.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional view schematically illustrating a configuration of a thermally conductive member according to an embodiment of the present invention.





DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

A thermally conductive member of the present invention includes a silicone resin (silicone rubber) as a base material, a thermally conductive filler having a larger particle diameter from 30 μm to 100 μm, a thermally conductive filler having a smaller particle diameter of not greater than 10 μm, and mica having a particle diameter of not greater than 10 μm and an aspect ratio of not greater than 50.



FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional view schematically illustrating a configuration of a thermally conductive member 1 according to an embodiment of the present invention. The thermally conductive member 1 illustrated in FIG. 1 has a sheet shape. The thermally conductive member 1 includes a silicone resin 2 as a base material, and a thermally conductive filler having a larger particle diameter 3, a thermally conductive filler having a smaller particle diameter 4, and mica 5 dispersed in the silicone resin 2.


As the silicone resin, a silicone resin generally known as a silicone rubber is used. An example of a commercially available silicone resin include trade name “CY52-276A/B” (available from Dow Corning Toray Co., Ltd.) as a two-part curing silicone resin. Note that to the silicone resin, a curing-retarding agent or the like may be added, as necessary.


The thermally conductive filler having a larger particle diameter includes a thermally conductive filler having a particle diameter from 30 μm to 100 μm. The thermally conductive filler having a larger particle diameter has a substantially spherical shape. The particle diameter of the thermally conductive filler having a larger particle diameter is represented by an average particle diameter D50 determined by a laser diffraction process or the like.


Specific examples of the thermally conductive filler having a larger particle diameter include low soda alumina, aluminum nitride, and boron nitride. The thermally conductive filler having a larger particle diameter and including at least one selected from the group consisting of low soda alumina, aluminum nitride, and boron nitride is preferable, and the low soda alumina is particularly preferable.


Note that the low soda alumina contains soluble sodium in an amount of preferably not greater than 100 ppm, more preferably 40 ppm, and further preferably not greater than 20 ppm. Herein, the soluble sodium amount refers to an amount of sodium ions (Na+) dissolved in water when the low soda alumina is brought into contact with water.


Examples of commercially available low soda alumina include trade name “AS-05” (available from Showa Denko K.K., particle diameter: 44 μm, soluble sodium amount: 2 ppm), trade name “CB-40” (available from Showa Denko K.K., particle diameter: 44 μm, soluble sodium amount: 20 ppm), trade name “AZ75-150” (available from NIPPON STEEL & SUMIKIN MATERIALS CO., LTD., particle diameter: 72 μm, soluble sodium amount: 10 ppm), and trade name “AZ35-125” (available from NIPPON STEEL & SUMIKIN MATERIALS CO., LTD., particle diameter: 35 μm, soluble sodium amount: 6 ppm).


The thermally conductive filler having a smaller particle diameter includes a thermally conductive filler having a particle diameter of not greater than 10 μm. The thermally conductive filler having a smaller particle diameter has a substantially spherical shape. The particle diameter of the thermally conductive filler having a smaller particle diameter is represented by an average particle diameter D50 determined by a laser diffraction process or the like. A specific example of the thermally conductive filler having a smaller particle diameter includes silicon carbide.


Examples of commercially available silicon carbide include trade name “GC #2500” (particle diameter: 5.5 μm), trade name “GC #1000” (particle diameter: 10 μm), trade name “GC #3000” (particle diameter: 4 μm), trade name “GC #6000” (particle diameter: 2 μm), and trade name “GCF180” (particle diameter: 63 μm) (all available from Showa Denko K.K.).


A total filling amount of the thermally conductive filler having a larger particle diameter and the thermally conductive filler having a smaller particle diameter relative to the whole volume of the thermally conductive member is from 50 to 60 vol. %.


For example, a content (mass %) of the thermally conductive filler having a larger particle diameter relative to the whole mass of the thermally conductive member is preferably from 31 to 75%, and more preferably from 38 to 72%. Moreover, a content (mass %) of the thermally conductive filler having a smaller particle diameter relative to the whole mass of the thermally conductive member is preferably from 10 to 39%, and more preferably from 10 to 38%.


Moreover, a filling ratio by volume of the thermally conductive filler having a larger particle diameter to the thermally conductive filler having a smaller particle diameter is preferably from 2:3 to 4:1.


As the mica, mica having a particle diameter of not greater than 10 μm and an aspect ratio of not greater than 50 is used. The mica is added to the silicone resin as an additive other than the thermally conductive filler having a larger particle diameter and the thermally conductive filler having a smaller particle diameter.


The mica has a flat shape. The “particle diameter” of the mica is represented by a volume average particle diameter Dv determined by a laser diffraction process or the like. Note that the particle diameter of the mica is preferably not greater than 8 μm. Moreover, the aspect ratio of the mica is preferably not greater than 30.


The mica is added at a ratio from 0.9 to 11 parts by mass, and preferably from 0.9 to 6 parts by mass relative to 100 parts by mass of the silicone resin.


Note that for example, a content (mass %) of the mica relative to the whole mass of the thermally conductive member is preferably from 0.13 to 1.76 mass %, and more preferably from 0.13 to 3.23 mass %.


Examples of commercially available silicon carbide include trade name “SJ-005” (particle diameter: 5 μm, aspect ratio: 20), trade name “SJ-010” (particle diameter: 5 μm, aspect ratio: 20), and trade name “A-11” (particle diameter: 3 μm) (all available from YAMAGUCHI MICA CO., LTD.), and trade name “MK-100” (particle diameter: 4.5 μm, aspect ratio: 40, available from Katakura & Co-op Agri Corporation).


A method for producing a thermally conductive member includes a mixture preparing step of adding and mixing a thermally conductive filler having a larger particle diameter from 30 μm to 100 μm, a thermally conductive filler having a smaller particle diameter of not greater than 10 μm, and mica having a particle diameter of not greater than 10 μm and an aspect ratio of not greater than 50 into an uncured silicone resin, to obtain a mixture, and a curing step of curing the mixture to obtain a thermally conductive member including a cured product of the mixture.


In the mixture preparing step, an additive other than the thermally conductive filler having a larger particle diameter, the thermally conductive filler having a smaller particle diameter, and the mica may be added, as necessary.


When the silicone resin is a thermosetting silicone resin, the mixture is heated in the curing step. When the silicone resin is a photocuring silicone resin, the mixture is irradiated with an active energy ray such as ultraviolet light in the curing step.


Note that between the mixture preparing step and the curing step, the method may include a molding step of molding the mixture in a predetermined shape. The molding step is a step of filling a predetermined mold with the mixture or using a coater or the like to mold the mixture in a predetermined shape (for example, a layer shape (sheet shape)). In the molding step, a known molding method such as a molding method using a coating device such as a coater, and a molding method using a molding mold can be applied.


Note that from a viewpoint of ease of production of a thin sheet, favorable productivity (in particular, mass productivity), high thickness precision of a sheet, and the like, the molding step is preferably a molding step using a coater.


The thermally conductive member has excellent dielectric breakdown strength even under a high-temperature condition. Specifically, the dielectric breakdown strength obtained after a high-temperature acceleration test in which the thermally conductive member is left under a temperature condition of 275° C. for 100 hours is not less than 5 kV/mm.


Note that volume resistivity (Ω·cm) of the thermally conductive member is approximately 5.9×1012 Ω·cm before heating, and approximately 5.4×1013 Ω·cm after the high-temperature acceleration test.


The thermally conductive member of the present invention has excellent thermal resistance. The thermally conductive member can be applied to a high-temperature heating element such as a SiC power semiconductor, and the like.


Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in detail based on Examples. Note that the present invention is not limited to these Examples in any manner.


Investigation of Various Kinds of Fillers
Example 1

As a silicone resin, a two-part curing silicone resin (trade name “CY52-276A/B” available from Dow Corning Toray Co., Ltd., viscosity: 1 Pa·s (before curing)) was prepared. Moreover, as a thermally conductive filler having a larger particle diameter, low soda alumina (trade name “AZ75-150” available from NIPPON STEEL & SUMIKIN MATERIALS CO., LTD., particle diameter: 72 μm, soluble sodium amount: 10 ppm) was prepared. As a thermally conductive filler having a smaller particle diameter, silicon carbide (trade name “GC #2500” available from Showa Denko K.K., particle diameter: 5.5 μm) was prepared. Moreover, as an additive other than the aforementioned additives, mica (trade name “SJ-005” available from YAMAGUCHI MICA CO., LTD., particle diameter: 5 μm, aspect ratio: 20) was prepared.


Then, to a liquid silicone resin uncured, the low soda alumina, the silicon carbide, and the mica were each added under the following addition conditions.


The thermally conductive filler having a larger particle diameter (low soda alumina) and the thermally conductive filler having a smaller particle diameter (silicon carbide) were added to the liquid silicone resin to result in a total filling amount of the thermally conductive filler having a larger particle diameter and the thermally conductive filler having a smaller particle diameter of 55 vol. % and a filling ratio by volume of the thermally conductive filler having a larger particle diameter to the thermally conductive filler having a smaller particle diameter of 3:2.


Moreover, in addition to the low soda alumina and the silicon carbide, the mica was added to the liquid silicone resin at a ratio of 2 mass % relative to the silicone resin.


The low soda alumina, the silicon carbide, the mica, and the silicone resin were kneaded, to obtain a mixture having fluidity. A predetermined mold was filled with the mixture, and the mixture was heated in this state to be cured. Subsequently, the mixture was appropriately cooled, and a cured product of the mixture was removed from the mold, to obtain a sheet-shaped thermally conductive member of Example 1.


Comparative Example 1

A sheet-shaped thermally conductive member was obtained in the same manner as in Example 1 except that as a thermally conductive filler having a larger particle diameter, alumina of a standard grade (trade name “AX75-150” available from NIPPON STEEL & SUMIKIN MATERIALS CO., LTD., particle diameter: 72 μm, soluble sodium amount: 150 ppm) was used instead of low soda alumina as shown in Table 1. Note that in Table 1 and the like, the thermally conductive filler having a larger particle diameter is represented by “larger particle” and the thermally conductive filler having a smaller particle diameter is represented by “smaller particle”.


Comparative Example 2

A sheet-shaped thermally conductive member was obtained in the same manner as in Example 1 except that mica was not added.


Comparative Example 3

A sheet-shaped thermally conductive member was obtained in the same manner as in Comparative Example 1 except that mica was not added.


Comparative Example 4

A sheet-shaped thermally conductive member was obtained in the same manner as in Example 1 except that as a thermally conductive filler having a larger particle diameter, silicon carbide (trade name “GCF180” available from Showa Denko K.K., particle diameter: 63 μm) was used instead of low soda alumina and mica was not added as shown in Table 1.


Comparative Example 5

A sheet-shaped thermally conductive member was obtained in the same manner as in Example 1 except that as a thermally conductive filler having a larger particle diameter, silicon carbide (trade name “GCF180” available from Showa Denko K.K., particle diameter: 63 μm) was used instead of low soda alumina as shown in Table 1.


Comparative Example 6

A sheet-shaped thermally conductive member was obtained in the same manner as in Example 1 except that as a thermally conductive filler having a larger particle diameter, silicon carbide (trade name “GCF180” available from Showa Denko K.K., particle diameter: 63 μm) was used instead of low soda alumina, and as a thermally conductive filler having a smaller particle diameter, low soda alumina (trade name “AZ2-75”, particle diameter: 4 μm, soluble sodium amount: 4 ppm) was used instead of silicon carbide, and that mica was not added.


Comparative Example 7

A sheet-shaped thermally conductive member was obtained in the same manner as in Comparative Example 6 except that mica was not added.


Comparative Example 8

A sheet-shaped thermally conductive member was obtained in the same manner as in Example 1 except that as mica, trade name “MK-300” available from Katakura & Co-op Agri Corporation, particle diameter: 12.4, aspect ratio: 150) was used and an addition amount of the mica was changed to 1 mass %.


Example 2

A sheet-shaped thermally conductive member was obtained in the same manner as in Example 1 except that an addition amount of the mica was changed to 10 mass %.


Comparative Example 9

A sheet-shaped thermally conductive member was obtained in the same manner as in Example 1 except that an addition amount of the mica was changed to 20 mass %.


Comparative Example 10

A sheet-shaped thermally conductive member was obtained in the same manner as in Example 1 except that boron nitride (trade name “UHB-S1” available from Showa Denko K.K., particle diameter: 0.5 μm, shape: flat shape) was used instead of the mica and an addition amount of the boron nitride was changed to 1 mass %.


Comparative Example 11

A sheet-shaped thermally conductive member was obtained in the same manner as in Example 1 except that as a thermally conductive filler having a larger particle diameter, silica (trade name “HS310” available from NIPPON STEEL & SUMIKIN MATERIALS CO., LTD., particle diameter: 75 μm) was used instead of low soda alumina and mica was not added.


Comparative Example 12

A sheet-shaped thermally conductive member was obtained in the same manner as in Example 1 except that as a thermally conductive filler having a larger particle diameter, silica (trade name “HS310” available from NIPPON STEEL & SUMIKIN MATERIALS CO., LTD., particle diameter: 75 μm) was used instead of low soda alumina.


Comparative Example 13

A sheet-shaped thermally conductive member was obtained in the same manner as in Example 1 except that as a thermally conductive filler having a larger particle diameter, aluminum nitride (trade name “HF-50” available from Tokuyama Corporation, particle diameter: 50 μm) was used instead of low soda alumina and mica was not added.


Example 3

A sheet-shaped thermally conductive member was obtained in the same manner as in Example 1 except that as a thermally conductive filler having a larger particle diameter, aluminum nitride (trade name “HF-50” available from Tokuyama Corporation, particle diameter: 50 μm) was used instead of low soda alumina.


Comparative Example 14

A sheet-shaped thermally conductive member was obtained in the same manner as in Example 1 except that as a thermally conductive filler having a larger particle diameter, boron nitride (trade name “PT-110” available from Momentive Performance Materials Japan LLC, particle diameter: 43 μm) was used instead of low soda alumina and mica was not added.


Example 4

A sheet-shaped thermally conductive member was obtained in the same manner as in Example 1 except that as a thermally conductive filler having a larger particle diameter, boron nitride (trade name “PT-110” available from Momentive Performance Materials Japan LLC, particle diameter: 43 μm) was used instead of low soda alumina.


Comparative Example 15

A sheet-shaped thermally conductive member was obtained in the same manner as in Example 1 except that as a thermally conductive filler having a smaller particle diameter, low soda alumina (trade name “AZ2-75”, particle diameter: 4 μm, soluble sodium amount: 4 ppm) was used instead of silicon carbide, and mica was not added.


Comparative Example 16

A sheet-shaped thermally conductive member was obtained in the same manner as in Example 1 except that as a thermally conductive filler having a smaller particle diameter, low soda alumina (trade name “AZ2-75”, particle diameter: 4 μm, soluble sodium amount: 4 ppm) was used instead of silicon carbide.












TABLE 1









Larger





particle:




Total
smaller
Larger particle












filling
particle

Particle



amount
(Ratio by

diameter



(vol. %)
volume)
Kind
(μm)





Example 1
55
3:2
Low soda
72





alumina






(10 ppm)



Comparative
55
3:2
Standard
72


Example 1


alumina






(150 ppm)



Comparative
55
3:2
Low soda
72


Example 2


alumina






(10 ppm)



Comparative
55
3:2
Standard
72


Example 3


alumina






(150 ppm)



Comparative
55
3:2
Silicon
63


Example 4


carbide



Comparative
55
3:2
Silicon
63


Example 5


carbide



Comparative
55
3:2
Silicon
63


Example 6


carbide



Comparative
55
3:2
Silicon
63


Example 7


carbide



Comparative
55
3:2
Low soda
72


Example 8


alumina






(10 ppm)



Example 2
55
3:2
Low soda
72





alumina






(10 ppm)



Comparative
55
3:2
Low soda
72


Example 9


alumina






(10 ppm)













Smaller particle
Additive















Particle

Particle

Addition




diameter

diameter
Aspect
amount



Kind
(μm)
Kind
(μm)
ratio
(mass %)





Example 1
Silicon
5.5
Mica
5
20
2



carbide







Comparative
Silicon
5.5
Mica
5
20
2


Example 1
carbide







Comparative
Silicon
5.5
None





Example 2
carbide







Comparative
Silicon
5.5
None





Example 3
carbide







Comparative
Silicon
5.5
None





Example 4
carbide







Comparative
Silicon
5.5
Mica
5
20
2


Example 5
carbide







Comparative
Low soda
4
None





Example 6
alumina








(4 ppm)







Comparative
Low soda
4
Mica
5
20
2


Example 7
alumina








(4 ppm)







Comparative
Silicon
5.5
Mica
12.4
150
1


Example 8
carbide







Example 2
Silicon
5.5
Mica
5
20
10



carbide







Comparative
Silicon
5.5
Mica
5
20
20


Example 9
carbide



















TABLE 2









Larger





particle:




Total
smaller
Larger particle












filling
particle

Particle



amount
(Ratio by

diameter



(vol. %)
volume)
Kind
(μm)





Comparative
55
3:2
Low soda
72


Example 10


alumina






(10 ppm)



Comparative
55
3:2
Silica
75


Example 11






Comparative
55
3:2
Silica
75


Example 12






Comparative
55
3:2
Aluminum
50


Example 13


nitride



Example 3
55
3:2
Aluminum
50





nitride



Comparative
55
3:2
Boron
43


Example 14


nitride



Example 4
55
3:2
Boron
43





nitride



Comparative
55
3:2
Low soda
72


Example 15


alumina






(10 ppm)



Comparative
55
3:2
Low soda
72


Example 16


alumina






(10 ppm)













Smaller particle
Additive















Particle

Particle

Addition




diameter

diameter
Aspect
amount



Kind
(μm)
Kind
(μm)
ratio
(mass %)





Comparative
Silicon
5.5
Boron
0.5

1


Example 10
carbide

nitride





Comparative
Silicon
5.5
None





Example 11
carbide







Comparative
Silicon
5.5
Mica
5
20
2


Example 12
carbide







Comparative
Silicon
5.5
None





Example 13
carbide







Example 3
Silicon
5.5
Mica
5
20
2



carbide







Comparative
Silicon
5.5
None





Example 14
carbide







Example 4
Silicon
5.5
Mica
5
20
2



carbide







Comparative
Low
4
None





Example 15
soda








alumina








(4 ppm)







Comparative
Low
4
Mica
5
20
2


Example 16
soda








alumina








(4 ppm)















Measurement and Evaluation of Initial Physical Properties


Measurement of Thermal Conductivity


Each of the thermally conductive members of Examples and Comparative Examples was subjected to processing such as cutting, to prepare a measurement sample (50 mm in length×70 mm in width×7 m in thickness). Thermal conductivity (W/m·k) of each of these measurement samples was measured in accordance with ISO 22007-2 by a hot disk method with use of a measurement device (product name “TPS-500” available from Kyoto Electronics Manufacturing Co., Ltd.).


Moreover, thermal conduction was evaluated in accordance with the following criteria from the measurement results of each measurement sample. The results are shown in Tables 3 and 4.


Evaluation Criteria of Thermal Conduction


“Excellent”: The thermal conductivity is not less than 2 W/m·k, and the thermal conduction is particularly excellent.


“Good”: The thermal conductivity is not less than 1.5 W/m·k, and the thermal conduction is excellent.


“Marginal”: The thermal conductivity is not less than 1.0 W/m·k, and the thermal conduction is mostly excellent.


“Fail”: The thermal conductivity is less than 1.0 W/m·k, and the thermal conduction is poor.


Measurement of Hardness


Each of the thermally conductive members of Examples and Comparative Examples was subjected to processing such as cutting, to prepare a measurement sample (50 mm in length×70 mm in width×7 m in thickness). Hardness of each of these measurement samples was measured in accordance with JISK7312 with use of a rubber hardness meter (durometer, ASKER C available from KOBUNSHI KEIKI CO., LTD.). The results are shown in Tables 3 and 4.


Measurement of Dielectric Breakdown Strength


Each of the thermally conductive members of Examples and Comparative Examples was subjected to processing such as cutting, to prepare a measurement sample (50 mm in length×50 mm in width×1 m in thickness). Dielectric breakdown strength (kV/mm) of each of these measurement samples was measured in accordance with JISC2110-1 with use of a voltage resistance measurement device (product name “TOS5101” available from KIKUSUI ELECTRONICS CORPORATION).


Moreover, the dielectric breakdown strength was evaluated in accordance with the following criteria from the measurement results of each measurement sample. The results are shown in Tables 3 and 4.


Evaluation Criteria of Dielectric Breakdown Strength


“Good”: The dielectric breakdown strength is not less than 5 kV/mm, and the insulating properties are excellent.


“Fail”: The dielectric breakdown strength is less than 5 kV/mm, and the insulating properties are poor.


Measurement and Evaluation of Physical Properties Obtained After Thermal Resistance Test


Measurement of Dielectric Breakdown Strength


Each of the thermally conductive members of Examples and Comparative Examples was subjected to processing such as cutting, to prepare a measurement sample (50 mm in length×50 mm in width×1 m in thickness). Each of these measurement samples was placed in a heating device, and left under a temperature condition of 275° C. for 100 hours. Thus, a thermal resistance test was carried out. Subsequently, each measurement sample was removed from the heating device, and appropriately cooled. The dielectric breakdown strength (kV/mm) of each measurement sample heat-treated as described above was measured in the same manner as in the case of the measurement of the initial physical properties. Moreover, the dielectric breakdown strength of each measurement sample subjected to the thermal resistance test was evaluated in the same manner as in the case of the evaluation of the initial physical properties. The results are shown in Tables 3 and 4.


Measurement of Weight Reduction Ratio


Each of the thermally conductive members of Examples and Comparative Examples was subjected to processing such as cutting, to prepare a measurement sample (50 mm in length×70 mm in width×7 m in thickness). Mass of each of these measurement samples was measured with used of a meter in advance. A value thus obtained was assumed to be mass obtained before the thermal resistance test. Subsequently, in the same manner as in the thermal resistance test described above, each measurement sample was subjected to heating treatment in which each measurement sample was left under a temperature condition of 275° C. for 100 hours. Subsequently, each measurement sample was appropriately cooled to room temperature, and mass of each measurement sample was measured with use of the same meter. A value thus obtained was assumed to be mass obtained after the thermal resistance test. Then, a weight reduction ratio (mass %) of weights obtained before and after the thermal resistance test of each measurement sample was determined by Equation 1 described below. The results are shown in Tables 3 and 4.

Weight reduction ratio (%)=(mass obtained before thermal resistance test (g)−mass obtained after thermal resistance test (g))/mass obtained before thermal resistance test (g)×100  (Equation 1)


Moreover, heat stability was evaluated in accordance with the following criteria from the results of the weight reduction ratio of each measurement sample. The results are shown in Tables 3 and 4.


“Good”: The weight reduction ratio is not greater than 1 mass %, and the heat stability is excellent.


“Fail”: The weight reduction ratio is greater than 1 mass %, and the heat stability is poor.


Evaluation of Appearance Obtained After Thermal Resistance Test


Appearance of each measurement sample subjected to the thermal resistance test and used in the measurement of the weight reduction ratio was visually evaluated in accordance with the following criteria. The results are shown in Tables 3 and 4.


Evaluation Criteria of Appearance


“Good”: Cracking or foaming does not occur, and an increase in hardness of a surface is not confirmed.


“Marginal”: A slight impression of foaming is confirmed, but the appearance is generally maintained.


“Fail”: Cracking and foaming occur, or the hardness of a surface is increased.


Measurement of Hardness Obtained After Thermal Resistance Test


Hardness of each measurement sample subjected to the thermal resistance test and used in the measurement of the weight reduction ratio was measured in the same manner as in the case of the measurement of the initial physical properties. The results are shown in Tables 3 and 4.


Processability


Ease of production (processability) of each of the thermally conductive members of Examples and Comparative Examples was evaluated in accordance with the following criteria. The results are shown in Tables 3 and 4.


“Good”: Molding can be achieved without problems.


“Fail”: Viscosity of a silicone resin composition is too high, and molding cannot be achieved.


Comprehensive Evaluation


Each of the thermally conductive members of Examples and Comparative Examples was comprehensively evaluated in accordance with the following criteria. The results are shown in Tables 3 and 4.


Comprehensive Evaluation Criteria


“Excellent”: All the evaluation results are “good” or “excellent”.


“Good”: There no “poor” evaluation result and there is not less than one “marginal” evaluation result.


“Fail”: There is not less than one “poor” evaluation result.











TABLE 3









Initial physical properties













Thermal
Dielectric





conductivity
breakdown strength

















Value

Value
Hardness




Evaluation
(W/m · K)
Evaluation
(kV/mm)
ASKER C















Example 1
Good
1.8
Good
7.68
42


Comparative Example 1
Good
1.8
Good
6.50
40


Comparative Example 2
Good
1.9
Good
6.95
44


Comparative Example 3
Good
1.9
Good
5.18
40


Comparative Example 4
Excellent
2.2
Fail
0.69
48


Comparative Example 5
Excellent
2.2
Fail
0.75
48


Comparative Example 6
Good
1.9
Fail
1.41
30


Comparative Example 7
Good
1.9
Fail
1.60
30


Comparative Example 8
Good
1.8
Good
5.77
50


Example 2
Good
1.8
Good
7.81
46


Comparative Example 9
Good
1.7
Good
8.00
45












Physical properties obtained after thermal resistance test



(at 275° C. for 100 hours)












Dielectric breakdown
Weight reduction





strength
ratio

















Value

Value
Appearance
Hardness



Evaluation
(kV/mm)
Evaluation
(mass %)
Evaluation
ASKER C





Example 1
Good
6.74
Good
0.70
Good
50


Comparative
Good
5.60
Fail
1.42
Good
52


Example 1








Comparative
Fail
4.77
Good
0.87
Good
62


Example 2








Comparative
Fail
3.41
Fail
1.77
Good
58


Example 3








Comparative
Fail
0.63
Good
0.59
Good
50


Example 4








Comparative
Fail
0.72
Good
0.60
Good
50


Example 5








Comparative
Fail
1.00
Fail
3.03
Fail
75


Example 6








Comparative
Fail
1.30
Fail
3.00
Fail
75


Example 7








Comparative
Fail
4.36
Good
0.83
Good
70


Example 8








Example 2
Good
7.77
Good
0.92
Marginal
45


Comparative
Good
7.80
Good
0.95
Marginal
45


Example 9













Processability
Comprehensive evaluation





Example 1
Good
Excellent


Comparative Example 1
Good
Fail


Comparative Example 2
Good
Fail


Comparative Example 3
Good
Fail


Comparative Example 4
Good
Fail


Comparative Example 5
Good
Fail


Comparative Example 6
Good
Fail


Comparative Example 7
Good
Fail


Comparative Example 8
Good
Fail


Example 2
Good
Good


Comparative Example 9
Fail
Fail


















TABLE 4









Initial physical properties













Thermal
Dielectric





conductivity
breakdown strength

















Value

Value
Hardness




Evaluation
(W/m · K)
Evaluation
(kV/mm)
ASKER C















Comparative Example 10
Good
1.8
Good
6.68
43


Comparative Example 11
Fail
0.9
Good
5.50
45


Comparative Example 12
Fail
0.9
Good
6.90
45


Comparative Example 13
Excellent
2.2
Good
6.90
41


Example 3
Excellent
2.2
Good
7.68
45


Comparative Example 14
Excellent
2.1
Good
6.90
41


Example 4
Excellent
2.1
Good
7.68
45


Comparative Example 15
Good
1.6
Good
not less
37






than 10



Comparative Example 16
Good
1.6
Good
not less
35






than 10












Physical properties obtained after thermal resistance test



(at 275° C. for 100 hours)












Dielectric breakdown
Weight reduction





strength
ratio

















Value

Value
Appearance
Hardness



Evaluation
(kV/mm)
Evaluation
(mass %)
Evaluation
ASKER C





Comparative
Fail
4.48
Good
0.96
Good
68


Example 10








Comparative
Fail
4.30
Good
0.85
Good
63


Example 11








Comparative
Good
6.50
Good
0.85
Good
63


Example 12








Comparative
Fail
4.70
Good
0.75
Good
55


Example 13








Example 3
Good
6.74
Good
0.75
Good
63


Comparative
Fail
4.70
Good
0.80
Good
55


Example 14








Example 4
Good
6.74
Good
0.80
Good
63


Comparative
Good
not less
Fail
2.06
Fail
84


Example 15

than 10






Comparative
Good
not less
Fail
2.00
Fail
82


Example 16

than 10













Processability
Comprehensive evaluation





Comparative Example 10
Good
Fail


Comparative Example 11
Good
Fail


Comparative Example 12
Good
Fail


Comparative Example 13
Good
Fail


Example 3
Good
Excellent


Comparative Example 14
Good
Fail


Example 4
Good
Excellent


Comparative Example 15
Good
Fail


Comparative Example 16
Good
Fail









As shown in Tables 3 and 4, the thermally conductive members of Examples 1 to 4 were confirmed to have excellent thermal resistance.


Investigation of Total Filling Amount and Filling Ratio of Fillers Having Larger and Smaller Particle Diameters
Examples 5 to 14 and Comparative Examples 17 to 31

Sheet-shaped thermally conductive members according to Examples 5 to 14 and Comparative Examples 17 to 31 were each produced in the same manner as in Example 1 with use of the same silicone resin (trade name “CY52-276A/B” available from Dow Corning Toray Co., Ltd., viscosity: 1 Pa·s (before curing)) as in Example 1 under respective conditions of “thermally conductive filler having a larger particle diameter (larger particle)”, “thermally conductive filler having a smaller particle diameter (smaller particle)”, “total filling amount (of larger and smaller particles) (vol. %)”, “larger particle:smaller particle (ratio by volume)”, “additive (kind, particle diameter, aspect ratio, addition amount”, as shown in Tables 5 to 7.


Note that in Tables 5 to 7, a part of Examples and Comparative Examples described above is shown together for the sake of convenience of description.


Measurement, Evaluation, and the Like of Initial Physical Properties and Physical Properties Obtained After Thermal Resistance Test


Measurement and evaluation of initial physical properties (thermal conductivity, dielectric breakdown strength, and hardness), measurement and evaluation of physical properties obtained after a thermal resistance test (dielectric breakdown strength, weight reduction ratio (heat stability), and appearance), processability, and comprehensive evaluation were carried out for the thermally conductive members of Examples 5 to 14 and Comparative Examples 17 to 31. The results are shown in Tables 8 to 10.












TABLE 5








Total filling
Larger particle:
Larger particle












amount
smaller particle

Particle diameter



(vol. %)
(Ratio by volume)
Kind
(μm)





Comparative
55
1:2
Low soda alumina
72


Example 17


(10 ppm)



Comparative
55
2:3
Low soda alumina
72


Example 18


(10 ppm)



Comparative
55
1:1
Low soda alumina
72


Example 19


(10 ppm)



Comparative
55
4:3
Low soda alumina
72


Example 20


(10 ppm)



Comparative
55
3:2
Low soda alumina
72


Example 2


(10 ppm)



Comparative
55
2:1
Low soda alumina
72


Example 21


(10 ppm)



Comparative
55
4:1
Low soda alumina
72


Example 22


(10 ppm)



Comparative
55
8:1
Low soda alumina
72


Example 23


(10 ppm)



Comparative
50
3:2
Low soda alumina
72


Example 24


(10 ppm)



Comparative
40
3:2
Low soda alumina
72


Example 25


(10 ppm)



Comparative
60
3:2
Low soda alumina
72


Example 26


(10 ppm)



Comparative
60
2:1
Low soda alumina
72


Example 27


(10 ppm)













Smaller particle
Additive















Particle

Particle

Addition




diameter

diameter
Aspect
amount



Kind
(μm)
Kind
(μm)
ratio
(mass %)





Comparative
Silicon
5.5
None





Example 17
carbide







Comparative
Silicon
5.5
None





Example 18
carbide







Comparative
Silicon
5.5
None





Example 19
carbide







Comparative
Silicon
5.5
None





Example 20
carbide







Comparative
Silicon
5.5
None





Example 2
carbide







Comparative
Silicon
5.5
None





Example 21
carbide







Comparative
Silicon
5.5
None





Example 22
carbide







Comparative
Silicon
5.5
None





Example 23
carbide







Comparative
Silicon
5.5
None





Example 24
carbide







Comparative
Silicon
5.5
None





Example 25
carbide







Comparative
Silicon
5.5
None





Example 26
carbide







Comparative
Silicon
5.5
None





Example 27
carbide



















TABLE 6








Total
Larger particle:
Larger particle












filling
smaller particle

Particle



amount
(Ratio

diameter



(vol. %)
by volume)
Kind
(μm)





Comparative
55
1:2
Low
72












Example 28



soda alumina







(10 ppm)












Example 5
55
2:3
Low
72
















soda alumina







(10 ppm)












Example 6
55
1:1
Low
72
















soda alumina







(10 ppm)












Example 7
55
4:3
Low
72
















soda alumina







(10 ppm)












Example 1
55
3:2
Low
72
















soda alumina







(10 ppm)












Example 8
55
2:1
Low
72
















soda alumina







(10 ppm)












Example 9
55
4:1
Low
72
















soda alumina







(10 ppm)












Comparative
55
8:1
Low
72












Example 29



soda alumina







(10 ppm)












Example 10
50
3:2
Low
72
















soda alumina







(10 ppm)












Example 11
40
3:2
Low
72
















soda alumina







(10 ppm)












Example 12
60
3:2
Low
72
















soda alumina







(10 ppm)












Example 13
60
2:1
Low
72
















soda alumina







(10 ppm)













Smaller particle
Additive















Particle

Particle

Addition




diameter

diameter
Aspect
amount



Kind
(μm)
Kind
(μm)
ratio
(mass %)





Comparative
Silicon
5.5
Mica
5
20
2


Example 28
carbide







Example 5
Silicon
5.5
Mica
5
20
2



carbide







Example 6
Silicon
5.5
Mica
5
20
2



carbide







Example 7
Silicon
5.5
Mica
5
20
2



carbide







Example 1
Silicon
5.5
Mica
5
20
2



carbide







Example 8
Silicon
5.5
Mica
5
20
2



carbide







Example 9
Silicon
5.5
Mica
5
20
2



carbide







Comparative
Silicon
5.5
Mica
5
20
2


Example 29
carbide







Example 10
Silicon
5.5
Mica
5
20
2



carbide







Example 11
Silicon
5.5
Mica
5
20
2



carbide







Example 12
Silicon
5.5
Mica
5
20
2



carbide







Example 13
Silicon
5.5
Mica
5
20
2



carbide




















TABLE 7








Total
Larger particle:
Larger particle














filling
smaller particle

Particle




amount
(Ratio

diameter




(vol. %)
by volume)
Kind
(μm)





Example 14
55
3:2
Low soda
72






alumina







(10 ppm)




Comparative
55
3:2
Low soda
72



Example 30


alumina







(10 ppm)




Comparative
55
3:2
Low soda
72



Example 31


alumina







(10 ppm)




Example 2
55
3:2
Low soda
72






alumina







(10 ppm)




Comparative
55
3:2
Low soda
72



Example 8


alumina







(10 ppm)













Smaller particle
Additive















Particle

Particle

Addition




diameter

diameter
Aspect
amount



Kind
(μm)
Kind
(μm)
ratio
(mass %)





Example 14
Silicon
5.5
Mica
5
20
1



carbide







Comparative
Silicon
5.5
Mica
5
20
0.2


Example 30
carbide







Comparative
Silicon
5.5
Mica
5
20
0.8


Example 31
carbide







Example 2
Silicon
5.5
Mica
5
20
10



carbide







Comparative
Silicon
5.5
Mica
12.4
150
1


Example 8
carbide






















TABLE 8








Initial physical properties












Dielectric breakdown




Thermal conductivity
strength
Hardness














Value

Value
ASKER



Evaluation
(W/m · K)
Evaluation
(kV/mm)
C











Comparative Example 17
Not evaluated












Comparative Example 18
Good
1.9
Fail
4.85
52


Comparative Example 19
Excellent
2.0
Fail
4.47
53


Comparative Example 20
Good
1.9
Good
5.43
49


Comparative Example 2
Good
1.9
Good
6.95
44


Comparative Example 21
Good
1.9
Good
5.30
50


Comparative Example 22
Good
1.7
Good
5.66
49


Comparative Example 23
Good
1.6
Good
5.50
45


Comparative Example 24
Good
1.5
Good
5.29
43


Comparative Example 25
Marginal
1.0
Good
5.80
35


Comparative Example 26
Excellent
2.3
Fail
4.16
60


Comparative Example 27
Excellent
2.2
Fail
4.86
62












Physical properties obtained after thermal resistance test (at



275° C. for 100 hours)












Dielectric breakdown
Weight reduction





strength
ratio

















Value

Value
Appearance
Hardness



Evaluation
(kV/mm)
Evaluation
(mass %)
Evaluation
ASKER C











Comparative
Not evaluated













Example 17








Comparative
Fail
4.14
Good
0.72
Good
65


Example 18








Comparative
Fail
4.40
Good
0.82
Good
67


Example 19








Comparative
Fail
4.63
Good
0.81
Good
69


Example 20








Comparative
Fail
4.77
Good
0.87
Good
62


Example 2








Comparative
Fail
4.41
Good
0.71
Good
58


Example 21








Comparative
Fail
4.90
Good
0.86
Good
65


Example 22








Comparative
Good
5.10
Fail
1.01
Fail
75


Example 23








Comparative
Fail
4.55
Good
0.85
Good
65


Example 24








Comparative
Fail
4.90
Good
1.00
Good
60


Example 25








Comparative
Fail
4.00
Good
0.76
Good
78


Example 26








Comparative
Fail
4.54
Good
0.74
Good
75


Example 27













Processability
Comprehensive evaluation





Comparative Example 17
Fail
Fail


Comparative Example 18
Good
Fail


Comparative Example 19
Good
Fail


Comparative Example 20
Good
Fail


Comparative Example 2
Good
Fail


Comparative Example 21
Good
Fail


Comparative Example 22
Good
Fail


Comparative Example 23
Good
Fail


Comparative Example 24
Good
Fail


Comparative Example 25
Good
Fail


Comparative Example 26
Good
Fail


Comparative Example 27
Good
Fail

















TABLE 9








Initial physical properties














Dielectric breakdown












Thermal conductivity
strength
Hardness














Value

Value
ASKER



Evaluation
(W/m · K)
Evaluation
(kV/mm)
C











Comparative Example 28
Not evaluated












Example 5
Good
1.9
Good
5.60
48


Example 6
Good
1.9
Good
5.60
50


Example 7
Good
1.8
Good
6.50
47


Example 1
Good
1.8
Good
7.68
42


Example 8
Good
1.8
Good
6.40
48


Example 9
Good
1.7
Good
6.20
45


Comparative Example 29
Good
1.5
Good
6.50
45


Example 10
Good
1.5
Good
6.50
40


Example 11
Marginal
1.0
Good
7.20
35


Example 12
Excellent
2.2
Good
5.43
59


Example 13
Excellent
2.1
Good
5.89
53












Physical properties obtained after thermal resistance test



(at 275° C. for 100 hours)












Dielectric
Weight reduction





breakdown strength
ratio

















Value

Value
Appearance
Hardness



Evaluation
(kV/mm)
Evaluation
(mass %)
Evaluation
ASKER C











Comparative
Not evaluated













Example 28








Example 5
Good
5.00
Good
0.72
Good
61


Example 6
Good
5.00
Good
0.82
Good
62


Example 7
Good
5.60
Good
0.82
Good
65


Example 1
Good
6.74
Good
0.70
Good
50


Example 8
Good
5.40
Good
0.73
Good
56


Example 9
Good
5.50
Good
0.85
Good
63


Comparative
Good
6.00
Fail
1.01
Fail
74


Example 29








Example 10
Good
6.20
Good
0.88
Good
62


Example 11
Good
7.00
Good
1.00
Good
60


Example 12
Good
5.10
Good
0.76
Good
75


Example 13
Good
5.40
Good
0.76
Good
70















Processability
Comprehensive evaluation












Comparative Example 28
Fail
Fail


Example 5
Good
Excellent


Example 6
Good
Excellent


Example 7
Good
Excellent


Example 1
Good
Excellent


Example 8
Good
Excellent


Example 9
Good
Excellent


Comparative Example 29
Good
Fail


Example 10
Good
Excellent


Example 11
Good
Good


Example 12
Good
Excellent


Example 13
Good
Excellent


















TABLE 10









Initial physical properties













Thermal
Dielectric





conductivity
breakdown strength

















Value

Value
Hardness




Evaluation
(W/m · K)
Evaluation
(kV/mm)
ASKER C















Example 14
Good
1.8
Good
7.58
46


Comparative Example 30
Good
1.8
Good
5.20
48


Comparative Example 31
Good
1.8
Good
5.36
47


Example 2
Good
1.8
Good
7.81
46


Comparative Example 8
Good
1.7
Good
5.77
50












Physical properties obtained after thermal resistance test



(at 275° C. for 100 hours)












Dielectric breakdown
Weight reduction





strength
ratio

















Value

Value
Appearance
Hardness



Evaluation
(kV/mm)
Evaluation
(mass %)
Evaluation
ASKER C





Example 14
Good
6.11
Good
0.78
Good
59


Comparative
Fail
4.28
Good
0.61
Good
55


Example 30








Comparative
Fail
4.92
Good
0.67
Good
58


Example 31








Example 2
Good
7.77
Good
0.92
Marginal
45


Comparative
Fail
4.86
Good
0.83
Good
70


Example 8















Processability
Comprehensive evaluation












Example 14
Good
Excellent


Comparative Example 30
Good
Fail


Comparative Example 31
Good
Fail


Example 2
Good
Good


Comparative Example 8
Good
Fail









As shown in Tables 8 to 10, the thermally conductive members of Examples 5 to 14 were confirmed to have excellent thermal resistance.


REFERENCE SIGNS LIST




  • 1 Thermally conductive member


  • 2 Silicone resin


  • 3 Thermally conductive filler having a larger particle diameter


  • 4 Thermally conductive filler having a smaller particle diameter


  • 5 Mica


Claims
  • 1. A thermally conductive member comprising: a silicone resin;a thermally conductive filler having a larger particle diameter from 30 μm to 100 μm;a thermally conductive filler having a smaller particle diameter of not greater than 10 μm; anda mica having a particle diameter of not greater than 10 μm and an aspect ratio of not greater than 50,wherein the mica is added at a ratio of from 0.9 to 11 parts by mass relative to 100 parts by mass of the silicone resin.
  • 2. The thermally conductive member according to claim 1, wherein a total filling amount of the thermally conductive filler having a larger particle diameter and the thermally conductive filler having a smaller particle diameter relative to whole volume of the thermally conductive member is from 50 to 60 vol. %, anda filling ratio by volume of the thermally conductive filler having a larger particle diameter to the thermally conductive filler having a smaller particle diameter is from 2:3 to 4:1.
  • 3. The thermally conductive member according to claim 1, wherein the thermally conductive filler having a smaller particle diameter includes silicon carbide.
  • 4. The thermally conductive member according to claim 1, wherein the thermally conductive filler having a larger particle diameter includes at least one selected from the group consisting of low soda alumina, aluminum nitride, and boron nitride.
  • 5. The thermally conductive member according to claim 4, wherein the low soda alumina contains soluble sodium in an amount of not greater than 100 ppm.
  • 6. A method for producing a thermally conductive member comprising: adding and mixing a thermally conductive filler having a larger particle diameter from 30 μm to 100 μm, a thermally conductive filler having a smaller particle diameter of not greater than 10 μm, and a mica having a particle diameter of not greater than 10 μm and an aspect ratio of not greater than 50 into an uncured silicone resin, to obtain a mixture; andcuring the mixture to obtain a thermally conductive member including a cured product of the mixture.
  • 7. The thermally conductive member according to claim 2, wherein the thermally conductive filler having a smaller particle diameter includes silicon carbide.
  • 8. The thermally conductive member according to claim 2, wherein the thermally conductive filler having a larger particle diameter includes at least one selected from the group consisting of low soda alumina, aluminum nitride, and boron nitride.
  • 9. The thermally conductive member according to claim 8, wherein the low soda alumina contains soluble sodium in an amount of not greater than 100 ppm.
  • 10. The thermally conductive member according to claim 3, wherein the thermally conductive filler having a larger particle diameter includes at least one selected from the group consisting of low soda alumina, aluminum nitride, and boron nitride.
  • 11. The thermally conductive member according to claim 10, wherein the low soda alumina contains soluble sodium in an amount of not greater than 100 ppm.
  • 12. The thermally conductive member according to claim 7, wherein the thermally conductive filler having a larger particle diameter includes at least one selected from the group consisting of low soda alumina, aluminum nitride, and boron nitride.
  • 13. The thermally conductive member according to claim 12, wherein the low soda alumina contains soluble sodium in an amount of not greater than 100 ppm.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
2016-020828 Feb 2016 JP national
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/JP2017/002865 1/27/2017 WO 00
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2017/135158 8/10/2017 WO A
US Referenced Citations (1)
Number Name Date Kind
20110163460 Kato et al. Jul 2011 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (8)
Number Date Country
103849356 Jun 2014 CN
2001-139733 May 2001 JP
2003-183498 Jul 2003 JP
2003-197833 Jul 2003 JP
2004-6981 Jan 2004 JP
2004-210856 Jul 2004 JP
2010-13521 Jan 2010 JP
2010-59237 Mar 2010 JP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)
Entry
International Search Report dated Feb. 21, 2017 in International Application No. PCT/JP2017/002865.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20200165453 A1 May 2020 US