This invention relates generally to roofing products, and more particularly to roofing membranes and geomembranes formulated to have enhanced thermal resistance.
Thermoplastic polyolefin (TPO) based roofing membranes are one of many types of roofing membranes available on the market today. TPO may be a melt blend or reactor blend of a polyolefin plastic, such as a polypropylene polymer, with an olefin copolymer elastomer (OCE), such as an ethylene-3Q propylene rubber (EPR) or an ethylene-propylene-diene rubber (EPDR). Examples of commercially available TPO membranes include SURE WELD™ (Carlisle Inc.), GENFLEX™ (Omnova Solutions, Inc), ULTRAPLY™ (Firestone Building Products) and EVERGUARD TPO™ (OAF). Novel stretchable TPO membranes are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,666,491, which is incorporated by reference herein.
TPO based membranes may also be used as geomembranes to cover landfills, storage ponds of water, and the like. Such TPO membranes may have a higher polypropylene content than a similar TPO roofing membrane and sometimes they are referred to as fPP (flexible polypropylene) membranes or sheets.
TPO-based roofing membranes may comprise one or more layers. A TPO membrane may comprise base-(bottom) and cap-(top) layers with a fiber reinforcement scrim (middle) sandwiched between the other two layers. The scrim may be a woven, nonwoven, or knitted fabric composed of continuous strands of material used for reinforcing or strengthening membranes. The scrim is generally the strongest layer in the composite. The fabric can contribute significantly to the tensile strength of the roofing membrane and provide for dimensional stability. In an example, the fabric reinforcement comprises a polyester yarn based scrim. Glass fiber based scrims may also be used for situations where additional weight and/or improved dimensional stability are desired.
An exemplary embodiment of a thermoplastic polyolefin composition may include a thermoplastic polyolefin resin and a UV stabilizer package comprising 0.001 weight percent to 3 weight percent ultrafine titanium dioxide. In an embodiment, the UV stabilizer package may comprise from 0.5 weight percent to 2 weight percent ultrafine titanium dioxide. In an exemplary embodiment, the UV stabilizer package may comprise from 1.5 weight percent to 2 weight percent ultrafine titanium dioxide.
According to an embodiment of the present disclosure, a thermoplastic polyolefin roofing membrane may comprise a cap layer made of a first thermoplastic polyolefin composition, the first thermoplastic polyolefin composition comprising thermoplastic polyolefin resins and a UV stabilizer package. The disclosed roofing membrane may also include a core layer made of a second thermoplastic polyolefin composition and a scrim layer disposed between the cap layer and the core layer. In an embodiment, the UV stabilizer package of the first thermoplastic polyolefin composition comprises from 0.001 weight percent to 3 weight percent ultrafine titanium dioxide.
According to an embodiment of the present disclosure, a method of manufacturing a thermoplastic polyolefin membrane may include providing a first thermoplastic polyolefin mixture comprising a thermoplastic polyolefin resin and a UV stabilizing package comprising 0.001 weight percent to 3 weight percent ultrafine titanium dioxide. The disclose method may further include extruding a first thermoplastic polyolefin layer from the first thermoplastic polyolefin mixture.
A method of preparing TPO membrane 100 may comprise first mixing the additives with TPO to effect a desired formulation and forming a sheet of TPO by extrusion. As such, the additives may be distributed throughout the TPO sheet. To form the TPO membrane 100, scrim 106 may be disposed between the TPO sheets 102 and 104, and the three layers may be laminated together at an elevated temperature such that the two TPO layers 102 and 104 are fused and welded together through the interstices of the scrim 106.
Due to the rising energy cost, installing solar panels over a commercial roof may provide significant energy saving for the building owner. Solar panels may be rigid solar panels as well as flexible solar panels. Flexible solar panels may be installed on the roof by directly laminating the backside of the solar panels to the top side of roofing membranes. A significant amount of heat may be generated by the solar panels, especially if they have dark colors. The heat in turn may be transferred to the surface of roofing membranes that are underneath of the flexible solar panels. Consequently, the surface temperature of roofing membranes underneath the solar panels can reach over 200 F in hot climates. In a similar manner, geomembranes may have flexible solar panels laminated or otherwise attached to their cap layers.
In embodiments in which the TPO membrane 100 is installed on the roof, a flexible solar panel (not shown) may be laminated to the cap layer 102 of the TPO membrane 100. As such, the cap layer 102 may be subject to the heat generated by the solar panel. Evan without a flexible solar panel installed over the TPO membrane 100, the absorption of intense light during the summer can also subject the TPO membrane 100 to a high temperature.
A disadvantage of conventional TPO roofing membranes is that they are designed to withstanding field temperature below 180 F. If TPO roofing membranes are exposed to a field temperature higher than 180 F for an extended period (such as a couple of years), the TPO membranes may degrade quickly due to UV radiation along with thermal-oxidative degradation caused by high-temperature exposure. Such degradation may lead to surface cracking of the TPO membranes and therefore premature field failure or roof leaking.
The cap layer 102 and core layer 104 of the TPO membrane 100 may be formulated to include TPO resins. Additives may be included in the TPO cap layer 102 to enhance the resistance to degradation. In some embodiments, additives may also be included in the TPO core layer 104. Suitable additives may include a UV stabilizer package. A UV stabilizer package may include any combination of one or more below ingredients: 1) UV stabilizers functioning as free radical scavengers (e.g., Tinuvin XT-850, which is a Hindered Amine Light Stabilizer (“HALS”)); 2) antioxidants functioning as inhibitors of thermo-oxidative degradation at a broad temperature range for long-term thermal stabilizers (e.g., Irganox 1010, which is a sterically hindered phenolic antioxidant); 3) process or thermal stabilizers functioning as inhibitors of thermo-oxidative degradation during extrusion process (e.g., Irgastab FS301, which is a system comprised of a phosphate processing stabilizer Irgafos 168 and a high molecular weight hydroxylamine Irgastab FS042); and/or 4) UV absorber functioning to absorb UV light and dissipate it as thermal energy (e.g., Tinuvin 328, which is 2-(2H-benzotriazol-2-yl)-4,6-ditertpentylphenol).
In addition to a UV stabilizer package, the TPO cap layer 102 and/or core layer 104 may further include other additives. For example, the formulation for TPO cap layer 102 and/or core layer 104 may include rutile titanium dioxide (TiO2) and at least one fire retardant. In an embodiment, the formulation for TPO cap layer 102 may include 1-10 weight percent rutile TiO2. In another embodiment, the formulation for TPO cap layer 102 may include 2-4 weight percent rutile TiO2, The use of TiO2 in a pigment package has been described in U.S. Patent Pub. No. 2008/0050559, which is incorporated by reference herein. TiO2 may also be included in a UV stabilizer/antioxidant package as described in U.S. Patent Pub. No. 2004/0157075, which is incorporated by reference herein.
One of ordinary skill in the art would appreciate the difference in particle size between rutile TiO2 and ultrafine TiO2, such as the DuPont™ Light Stabilizer 210 (“DLS 210”), which in some embodiment may have a mean particle size of 130 nm. By comparison, rutile TiO2 generally has a mean particle size ranging from around 250 nm or more.
A surprising benefit of including ultrafine TiO2 in a TPO formulation is an unexpected improvement in heat resistance. Disclosed in the present disclosure are surprising heat resistance data observed in TPO formulations comprising ultra fine TiO2 together with other UV stabilizer package components. According to an embodiment of the present disclosure, an exemplary heat-resistant TPO formulation comprises TPO resins and a UV stabilizer package that includes 0.001 to 3 weight percent ultrafine TiO2. The exemplary heat-resistant TPO formulation may further comprise rutile TiO2 and a fire retardant. In addition to the ultrafine TiO2, the UV stabilizer package in the heat resistant formulation may include any suitable components described in the present disclosure. In an embodiment, the UV stabilizer package may include Tinuvin XT-850, Tinuvin 328, Irgastab FS301. In another embodiment, UV stabilizer package may include Tinuvin XT-850, Tinuvin 328, Uvasorb HA88FD (a HALS), Irgastab FS301, and Irganox 1010. It is to be appreciated that various combinations of UV stabilizer packages components in various amounts may be used together with ultrafine TiO2 to provide various heat-resistant TPO formulations in accordance with the principles of the present disclosure.
An exemplary heat-resistant formulation according to the present disclosure is provided in Table 1 below, and the heat resistance of such a formulation is compared to that of comparative examples A, B, and C. Based on these four different TPO formulations for the cap layer 102, four different test TPO membranes were prepared. Each test TPO membrane has a thickness of 80 mm. All four illustrative formulations include TPO resins and 3% rutile TiO2. The heat-resistant formulation 1 includes a UV stabilizer package comprising 2% DLS 210, along with 1.7% Tinuvin XT-850, 0.5% Tinuvin 328, and 0.5% Irgastab FS301. The UV stabilizer package in comparative example A includes only 2% DLS 210 without additional additives. Compared to the novel UV stabilizer package in the heat-resistant formulation 1, the UV stabilizer package in comparative example B does not include any ultrafine TiO2 but is otherwise the same. Compared to the novel UV stabilizer package in the heat-resistant formulation 1, the UV stabilizer package in comparative example C does not include any ultrafine TiO2 but includes an additional 0.25% of Irganox 1010.
The test TPO membranes were tested according to the 280 F oven test method, which comprises the following steps: 1) set the oven temperature to 280 F for a forced air oven which is well calibrated; 2) put 1 by 2.75 inch piece of the test TPO membrane into the oven; 3) after oven aging for a time period, take the sample out of the oven to cool it down to room temperature; 4) wrap the sample around 3 inch mandrel to examine the TPO cap layer side to see if there are visible cracks under 10× magnification; and 5) if there is visible cracks under 10× magnification, record numbers of days the TPO sample being aged inside of 280 F oven.
Comparing heat-resistant formulation 1 to comparative example A, which includes only ultrafine TiO2 in its UV stabilizer package, the data in Table 1 shows that heat-resistant formulation 1 improves the heat resistance by 636%. The heat-resistance data for comparative examples B and C shows that while a conventional UV stabilizer package comprising three or four different components may provide some heat resistance, the addition of ultrafine TiO2 synergistically allows for at least a 39% improvement in heat resistance.
According to an embodiment of the present disclosure, an exemplary heat-resistant formulation comprises TPO resins and a UV stabilizer package that includes 0.25-2 weight percent ultrafine TiO2. According to another embodiment of the present disclosure, an exemplary heat-resistant formulation comprises TPO resins and a UV stabilizer package that includes 0.5-2 weight percent ultrafine TiO2. According to yet another embodiment of the present disclosure, an exemplary heat-resistant formulation comprises TPO resins and a UV stabilizer package that includes 1.5-2 weight percent ultrafine TiO2.
Shown in Table 2 is the correlation between the amount of ultrafine TiO2 and the corresponding effectiveness in resisting heat-induced degradation. Exemplary heat-resistant formulations 2-5 are identical except the amount of ultrafine TiO2 (DLS210) is increased from 0.5% to 2%. The days it took for cracks to develop did not increase linearly with increases in the concentration of ultrafine TiO2. While each formulation still provides improved heat resistance over comparative examples D and E, there appears to be an optimal heat resistance at around 1.5% to 2% ultrafine TiO2.
It is to be appreciated that the optimal range of concentration of ultrafine TiO2 may vary as the composition of the UV stabilizer package varies. It is to be further appreciated that the optimal concentration of ultrafine TiO2 may vary as the mean particle size of the ultrafine TiO2 varies. Ultrafine TiO2 suitable for the formulations of the present disclosure may have a mean particle size of 165 nm or less. In an embodiment, ultrafine TiO2 having a mean particle size between 125 to 150 nm may be used. In another embodiment, ultrafine TiO2 having a mean particle size between 110 to 165 nm may be used. It is to be appreciated that the embodiments provide herein are merely exemplary, and may be adjusted in accordance with the principles of the present disclosure.
Turning back to
While various embodiments in accordance with the disclosed principles have been described above, it should be understood that they have been presented by way of example only, and are not limiting. Thus, the breadth and scope of the invention(s) should not be limited by any of the above-described exemplary embodiments, but should be defined only in accordance with the claims and their equivalents issuing from this disclosure. Furthermore, the above advantages and features are provided in described embodiments, but shall not limit the application of such issued claims to processes and structures accomplishing any or all of the above advantages.
Additionally, the section headings herein are provided for consistency with the suggestions under 37 C.F.R. 1.77 or otherwise to provide organizational cues. These headings shall not limit or characterize the invention(s) set out in any claims that may issue from this disclosure. Specifically and by way of example, although the headings refer to a “Technical Field,” such claims should not be limited by the language chosen under this heading to describe the so-called technical field. Further, a description of a technology in the “Background” is not to be construed as an admission that technology is prior art to any invention(s) in this disclosure. Neither is the “Summary” to be considered as a characterization of the invention(s) set forth in issued claims. Furthermore, any reference in this disclosure to “invention” in the singular should not be used to argue that there is only a single point of novelty in this disclosure. Multiple inventions may be set forth according to the limitations of the multiple claims issuing from this disclosure, and such claims accordingly define the invention(s), and their equivalents, that are protected thereby. In all instances, the scope of such claims shall be considered on their own merits in light of this disclosure, but should not be constrained by the headings herein.
The present application is a 35 U.S.C. 371 application and claims priority to co-pending International Application No. PCT/US2011/047039, filed Aug. 9, 2011 entitled “Thermoplastic polyolefin membrane with enhanced thermal resistance” which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Nos. 61/372,066, filed Aug. 9, 2010 and 61/429,293, filed Jan. 3, 2011 entitled “Thermoplastic polyolefin membrane with enhanced thermal resistance,” all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety as if set forth in full.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2011/047039 | 8/9/2011 | WO | 00 | 1/14/2013 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2012/021489 | 2/16/2012 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4209430 | Weber | Jun 1980 | A |
4368228 | Gorgati | Jan 1983 | A |
4937274 | Arima | Jun 1990 | A |
5468550 | Davis et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5523357 | Peterson | Jun 1996 | A |
6632509 | Davis et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6750284 | Dharmarajan et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
20040033741 | Peng | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040053067 | Dharmarajan et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040157075 | Yang | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20070193167 | Bruce et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080008858 | Hong et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080050559 | Khan | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080179574 | Yana | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20110151244 | Wu et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20130065021 | Edison et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2796974 | Feb 2002 | FR |
1172167 | Nov 1969 | GB |
Entry |
---|
International search report of published PCT WO/2012/021489A1 (parent application) dated Dec. 20, 2011. |
European search report from European patent application EP11816905 dated Apr. 4, 2014. |
Xing, Linlin and Taylor, Thomas J. “Correlating Accelerated Laboratory, Field, and Thermal Aging TPO Membranes”, Journal of ASTM International vol. 8, No. 8, Paper JAI103743, Jul. 2011. |
Examination Report issued by European Patent Office in European application No. 11816905.1, dated Dec. 9, 2016. |
Office Action dated Oct. 31, 2017 in connection with Canadian Application No. 2,806,240, 4 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130130581 A1 | May 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61372066 | Aug 2010 | US |