This application claims the priority benefit of Italian Application for Patent No. 102020000022813, filed on Sep. 28, 2020, the content of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety to the maximum extent allowable by law.
The present invention relates to a thin-film piezoelectric microelectromechanical structure (of the MEMS—Micro-Electro-Mechanical System—type) having improved electrical characteristics and to a corresponding manufacturing process.
Thin-film piezoelectric (TFP) MEMS structures are known, which, as shown schematically in
The piezoelectric material region 4 has a uniform thickness, for example 2 μm, between the aforesaid bottom-electrode region 2 and top-electrode region 6; in particular, the piezoelectric material region 4 comprises a plurality of PZT sub-layers stacked on top of one another to obtain the desired thickness.
In a known manner, steps for providing each PZT sub-layer by means of sol-gel deposition techniques comprise dispensing a colloidal solution (sol) on the bottom-electrode region 2; subsequent formation of the gel starting from the sol solution via spinning and drying; subsequent pyrolysis for enabling transition from the gel to the amorphous phase; and, lastly, crystallization for enabling transition to the polycrystalline phase.
The piezoelectric stack 1 is arranged over a supporting element 8, for example, made of polysilicon, which may be a membrane, a cantilever element, or some other similar element suspended above an underlying opening or cavity (here not illustrated), from which it is separated by a dielectric region 9, for example, of silicon oxide. The supporting element 8, in the example a membrane, may have a thickness of 4 μm and is able to undergo vertical deformation via the piezoelectric effect.
Piezoelectric MEMS structures can operate as actuators, in this case causing a desired deformation in the supporting element 8 in response to a voltage applied between the bottom and top electrodes 2, 6 and to the consequent deformation of the piezoelectric material region 4; for example, piezoelectric MEMS actuators are used for providing print-heads, sound-wave-generator devices or mirror devices (the so-called micromirrors).
Piezoelectric MEMS structures may moreover operate as detection structures, in this case operating according to the reverse piezoelectric effect, with generation of an electrical detection signal between the bottom and top electrodes 2, 6 in response to the deformation of the piezoelectric material region 4 due to a phenomenon to be detected; for example, piezoelectric MEMS detection structures can be used for measuring the displacement of associated actuators so as to provide a closed control loop, or for detecting sound waves generated by associated generators to obtain information on the time of flight in acoustic transducer devices.
A common requirement in the production of piezoelectric MEMS structures is to improve the corresponding electrical performance, i.e., the degree of displacement given a same voltage applied to the electrodes, in the case of actuators, and the sensitivity to the quantities detected, in the case of piezoelectric detectors.
Known solutions for improving electrical performance of piezoelectric MEMS structures envisage use of doped-PZT solutions, for example, with niobium doping, or a so-called gradient-free approach. In both cases, however, the sol-gel chemical composition is modified; in addition, the doped-PZT solution is more costly, and the gradient-free approach is more complicated to implement in mass production (a wide range of process chemistries being required).
There is a need in the art to solve the problems highlighted previously, and in particular to provide a piezoelectric MEMS structure having improved electrical characteristics, and an associated manufacturing process which is simple and inexpensive to implement.
Embodiments herein concern a piezoelectric microelectromechanical structure and a corresponding manufacturing process.
In an embodiment, a piezoelectric microelectromechanical structure comprises a piezoelectric stack having a main extension in a horizontal plane and a variable section in a plane transverse to said horizontal plane and formed by stacked arrangement of a bottom-electrode region; a piezoelectric material region, constituted by a film of PZT, arranged on the bottom-electrode region; and a top-electrode region arranged on the piezoelectric material region. The piezoelectric material region has, as a result of said variable section, a first thickness along a vertical axis transverse to said horizontal plane at a first area thereof, and a second thickness along the vertical axis at a second area thereof, the second thickness being smaller than the first thickness.
In an embodiment, a process for manufacturing a piezoelectric microelectromechanical structure comprises forming a piezoelectric stack having a main extension in a horizontal plane and variable section in a plane transverse to said horizontal plane. This is accomplished by forming, stacked on one another, a bottom-electrode region; a piezoelectric material region, constituted by a film of PZT, arranged on the bottom-electrode region; and a top-electrode region arranged on the piezoelectric material region. The process comprises forming the piezoelectric material region having, as a result of said variable section, a first thickness along a vertical axis transverse to said horizontal plane at a first area thereof, and a second thickness along said vertical axis (z) at a second area thereof, the second thickness being smaller than the first thickness.
For a better understanding of the present invention, a preferred embodiment thereof is now described, purely by way of non-limiting example and with reference to the attached drawings, wherein:
As will be described in detail in what follows, according to an aspect of the present solution the microelectromechanical structure has a piezoelectric stack having a variable section, in particular with reference to a variable thickness of the corresponding piezoelectric material region.
The piezoelectric stack is formed on an underlying patterned structure, having an appropriate conformation, which corresponds to the aforesaid variable section of the piezoelectric stack.
As will be highlighted, the effect of the variable section is, in general, that of improving the performance and electrical characteristics of the piezoelectric microelectromechanical structure.
In detail, and with initial reference to
The aforesaid piezoelectric stack 11 is arranged on a supporting element 18, which is deformable along a vertical axis z orthogonal to the aforesaid horizontal plane xy. The supporting element 18, for example of polysilicon, may be a membrane suspended above an underlying opening or cavity 30 and is separated from the piezoelectric stack 11 by a dielectric region 19, for example, of silicon oxide, interposed between the supporting element 18 and the bottom-electrode region 12.
In particular, the top-electrode region 16 is substantially flat (in the aforesaid horizontal plane xy), in a resting condition, i.e., in the absence of deformation; the bottom-electrode region 12 is, instead, patterned in a manner corresponding to an underlying patterned structure 17, in this case entirely constituted by the aforesaid dielectric region 19.
Consequently, the piezoelectric stack 11 has a variable section (in a plane transverse to the horizontal plane xy, in the example of
In greater detail, the piezoelectric material region 14 has projections 14a having the first thickness w1, which jointly define the aforesaid first area 14′, and recesses 14b with the second thickness w2 along the same vertical axis z, which jointly define the aforesaid second area 14″, the aforesaid projections 14a being interposed between the recesses 14b along a first horizontal axis x of the horizontal plane xy.
The dielectric region 19 has, in a corresponding manner, respective projections 19a, at the recesses 14b of the overlying piezoelectric material region 14; and respective recesses 19b, at the projections 14a of the overlying piezoelectric material region 14.
As will be discussed in detail hereinafter, the piezoelectric material region 14 is formed by means of sol-gel deposition spin-coating techniques, which enable, thanks to the intrinsic properties of planarization (in particular, with the stacked layers constituting the PZT film that progressively assume a planar conformation starting from the underlying patterned structure 17), the formation of the structure described, with the top-electrode region 16, formed on the piezoelectric material region 14, that is substantially flat (even though the piezoelectric material region 14 is formed on, and shaped like, the underlying patterned structure 17).
In a possible embodiment, the first thickness w1 may, for example, be comprised between 2 μm and 3 μm. The second thickness (which corresponds to the minimum thickness of the PZT film) may be greater than or equal to 0.5 μm, preferably smaller than 1.2 μm (these values allowing to achieve a good uniformity in the deposition and subsequent planarization of the piezoelectric material region 14).
As also illustrated in
The piezoelectric microelectromechanical structure 10 has, in this case, a plurality of elementary units that repeat along the first horizontal axis x, each formed by a respective projection 14a and a respective recess 14b of the piezoelectric material region 14.
In greater detail, again with reference to
During operation, application of a biasing voltage Vb between the top-electrode region 16 and the bottom-electrode region 12 causes deformation of the supporting element 18 in the direction of the vertical axis z.
In particular,
A maximum deformation occurs at the center of the membrane, having a maximum extension of 330 nm (i.e. 300 nm, corresponding to the case of an applied biasing voltage Vb of 40 V, plus 30 nm, corresponding to the case of a zero applied voltage).
Comparing this plot with the example of
A maximum deformation is obtained at the center of the membrane, having in this case a maximum extension of 346 nm (i.e. 280 nm, corresponding to the case of a biasing voltage Vb applied of 40 V, plus 66 nm, corresponding to the case of a zero applied voltage); therefore, in this case, a 15% increase is obtained as compared to the case of constant uniform thickness of the piezoelectric material region (shown in
In general, the presence of the piezoelectric film with variable thickness enables generation, between the top and bottom electrodes, of locally variable electrical fields, and the consequent improvement in the piezoelectric performance. This improvement in performance is moreover due to the contribution of the piezoelectric coefficient d35, which intervenes in the case of PZT with variable thickness, whereas it is not exploited in the case of constant thickness.
A possible process for manufacturing the previously described piezoelectric microelectromechanical structure 10 is now discussed.
As shown in
The process initially envisages growth of a thermal-oxide layer 24 on the top surface 23a of the active layer 23.
Then, in
As shown in
A conductive layer is then deposited so as to form, on the dielectric region 19, the bottom-electrode region 12.
Next, as shown in
In particular, as mentioned previously, thanks to the intrinsic capacity of planarization of the PZT thin film thus formed, the resulting piezoelectric material region 14 has a variable section with the projections 14a having the first thickness w1 and the recesses 14b having the second thickness w2 along the same vertical axis z.
On the piezoelectric material region 14, in particular on the corresponding planar top surface (in the horizontal plane xy), a further conductive layer is then deposited to form, on the dielectric region 19, the top-electrode region 16.
Next, as shown in
Next, as shown in
As shown in
As shown in
A further embodiment of the present solution is now described, with the piezoelectric microelectromechanical structure 10 operating jointly as a piezoelectric actuator and as a piezoelectric detector. This solution may be advantageously used for providing an ultrasonic transducer, which is able to transmit ultrasound waves, at a frequency higher than 20 kHz, and moreover receive the echo of the waves reflected by an obstacle, for example to obtain time of flight (ToF) information from processing of the reflected signal.
As shown in
Consequently, in this embodiment, the first area 14′ and the second area 14″ of the piezoelectric material region 14 are separate and distinct (instead of being continuous and uniform, as in the first embodiment discussed previously with reference to
In general, the presence of the piezoelectric stack 11 with variable section enables optimization of the detection performance, without penalizing the actuation performance. In fact, the greater thickness of the piezoelectric material region 14 at the first area 14′ dedicated to detection allows to have a greater distance between the top and bottom electrodes 12, 16 and, consequently, a smaller capacitance to be charged during operation as detector (in a known manner, the capacitance being inversely proportional to the distance between the electrodes) and a greater detection voltage acquired at output between the same electrodes.
Simulations and experimental tests for the disclosed structure have shown the possibility of obtaining an output voltage Vout that is substantially doubled, by exploiting the aforesaid variable section of the piezoelectric stack 11, as compared to a traditional solution with uniform thickness that is constant throughout the piezoelectric material region 14.
As will be evident, a same bottom electrode could alternatively be used for the piezoelectric actuator and the piezoelectric detector, the common bottom electrode constituting in this case a same ground reference.
In this regard,
Furthermore, in this embodiment, the aforesaid projections 14a of the piezoelectric material region 14 are obtained only in part in the underlying dielectric region 19 (as in the embodiments discussed previously), given that they extend also through a surface portion of the underlying supporting element 18; in other words, in this embodiment, the patterned structure 17 underneath the piezoelectric stack 11, which determines the variable section thereof, is jointly defined by the aforesaid dielectric region 19 and by the aforesaid top portion of the supporting element 18.
As schematically shown also in
The position of the projections 14a, dedicated, as discussed, to piezoelectric detection, in this case corresponds to the area of greater stress of the membrane, so as to maximize the detection sensitivity.
It will be noted that the value of the distance D between the first and second areas 14′, 14″ of the piezoelectric material region 14 along the first horizontal axis x (i.e., in the direction of separation in the horizontal plane xy between the first and second areas 14′, 14″) is a further factor that affects the degree of piezoelectric response and the value of the output voltage Vout provided by the piezoelectric microelectromechanical structure 10.
Considering a width of the projections 14a along the first axis x approximately equal to 24 μm and a width of the recess 14b along the same first axis x approximately equal to 1232 μm, a value of the first thickness w1 equal to 2 μm, a value of the second thickness w2 equal to 1 μm, a thickness along the vertical axis z of the dielectric region 19 of 0.5 μm, and a thickness of the supporting element 18 of 4 μm, the following values are found for maximum displacement T_max along the vertical axis z of the piezoelectric detector (i.e., in the first area 14′ of the piezoelectric material region 14) and of maximum output voltage Vout_max as the distance D varies, applying a biasing voltage of 5 Vdc+50 mVpp at 68 kHz to the piezoelectric actuator (i.e., at the second area 14″ of the same piezoelectric material region 14): D=100 μm, T_max=2.5 μm, Vout_max=0.05 V; D=150 μm, T_max=2.8 μm, Vout_max=0.12 V; D=200 μm, T_max=2.8 μm, Vout_max=0.175 V; D=250 μm, T_max=2.2 μm, Vout_max=0.08 V; and D=300 μm, T_max=2.2 μm, Vout_max=0.0055 V.
In the configuration described, it is therefore advantageous to have a distance D between the first and second areas 14′, 14″ of the piezoelectric material region 14 along the first horizontal axis x approximately equal to 200 μm. In the same configuration, but on the hypothesis (as in known solutions) of using a uniform thickness for the piezoelectric material region 14 (equal to 1 μm), a maximum output voltage Vout_max of 0.09 V, which is equal to approximately half the value that can be obtained with the solution described previously, is achieved with the piezoelectric material region 14 having a variable section.
With reference once again to the embodiment of
As shown in
The process initially envisages growth of a thermal-oxide layer 24, on the top surface 23a of the active layer 23, also having, for example, a thickness of 0.5 μm.
Then,
As shown in
As shown in
This step is followed by spin coating sol-gel deposition, for the formation of the piezoelectric material region 14 on the bottom-electrode region 12.
In particular, as previously mentioned, thanks to the intrinsic capacity of planarization of the PZT thin film thus formed, the resulting piezoelectric material region 14 has a variable section with the first thickness w1 at the openings 25 previously formed, and the second thickness w2 elsewhere.
A further conductive layer is then deposited on the piezoelectric material region 14, in particular on the corresponding planar top surface (in the horizontal plane xy), so as to form, above the dielectric region 19, the top-electrode region 16.
Next, as shown in
Next, as shown in
With reference once again to what is shown in
The advantages of the described solution emerge clearly from the foregoing discussion.
In any case, it is again underlined that formation of the piezoelectric stack 11 with the piezoelectric material region 14 having a variable thickness enables an improvement in the piezoelectric performance, both as regards piezoelectric actuation (in terms of displacement that can be obtained) and as regards piezoelectric detection (in terms of sensitivity).
Advantageously, the manufacturing process does not envisage substantial modifications as compared to known solutions, therefore not entailing a substantial increase in terms of time and costs; in fact, as described in detail, the intrinsic capacity of planarization of sol-gel deposition of the PZT material is exploited in order to provide the aforesaid piezoelectric stack 11 having a variable section, on the underlying patterned structure 17.
Finally, it is clear that modifications and variations may be made to what has been described and illustrated herein, without thereby departing from the scope of the present invention, as defined in the appended claims.
In particular, as on the other hand already highlighted previously, the aforesaid patterned structure 17 may be obtained just in the dielectric region 19 underlying the piezoelectric stack 11, or may also extend through the surface portion of the underlying layer of material in which the supporting element 18 of the piezoelectric stack 11 is defined.
In addition, different shapes and configurations may be envisaged for the aforesaid patterned structure 17 and for the piezoelectric material region 14, different from the strip-like or ring-like configurations represented previously.
For instance, the projections 14a of the piezoelectric material region 14 could have an elliptical shape in plan view, be arranged in the form of a grating or as concentric rings, either continuous or interrupted but connected in series through a metallization, with the aim once again of improving the performance (for example, of reducing the capacitance and increasing the voltage generated in the piezoelectric detector case).
The supporting element 18 could moreover have different shapes or configurations, for example being made by cantilever elements or the like.
It is also highlighted that the solution described may possibly be used in combination with other known solutions to improve piezoelectric performance, such as envisaging use of a doped-PZT solution or a so-called gradient-free approach in order to obtain a further improvement of performance.
Finally, it is clear that the solution described may be advantageously applied to all MEMS devices in which piezoelectric actuation and/or detection are used, for example in print-heads, micromirrors, ultrasound generators, linear actuators, micro-tweezers, nano-positioners for hard disks, etc.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
102020000022813 | Sep 2020 | IT | national |